Re: ROTF Libertarian Joke

[Mirimir]

On 01/08/2017 08:39 PM, Razer wrote:
> Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan walk into a bar. The bartender serves
> them tainted alcohol because there are no regulations. They die.
> 
> https://twitter.com/missokistic/status/466416327666974722

For sure. But after their friends figure it out, they slowly impale the
bartender on a red-hot copper bar, and burn the bar to the ground ;)

So hey, all's well that ends well.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:01:22 -0800
Razer  wrote:
 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 08:54 PM, "juan" Kill-listed at the server.
> 

mommy mommy. I'm being treated like the despicable piece of shit
that I am and I DON"T LIKE IT. Too bad I can't actually KILL
people who disrespect my authority! But at least I can 'kill
list' them.  Which is the equivalen of a two year old retard
covering his ears. 

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:03:28 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 08:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >
> > What about that holocaust? What was the number of Jews holocausted
> > in all the newspapers after WWI?
> 
> Jews fought in the German army in WWI stupid.


and why shouldn't they - they are poster children for fascism

Re: ROTF Libertarian Joke

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:39:51 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan walk into a bar. The bartender
> serves them tainted alcohol because there are no regulations. They
> die.


More stupid trolling.

However, that piece of trolling illustrates that the rayzer's
credentials to anarchism are as good as that of hillary clinton
or any other statist american psycho from the 'left'.

Then again, the rayzers credentials to True Real
Anarchism were firmly established with this little nugget 

"Let it be known..Castro was a true hero." 


Nothing says True Anarchist like cheering for commie tyrants.

Or cheering for  joo-kkkristian theocracy.


Get this : joo-kkkristianity is "an ostensibly spiritual
religion" according to this sick motherfucker. 

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 08:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> What about that holocaust? What was the number of Jews holocausted in
> all the newspapers after WWI?

Jews fought in the German army in WWI stupid.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 08:54 PM, "juan" Kill-listed at the server.

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:27:43PM -0800, Razer wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 07:34 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > To learn who controls you, look only at those you may not criticize.
> 
> 
> If you live in a Nazi nation they'll kill you for criticizing them.
> 
> Any questions stupid?

What about that holocaust? What was the number of Jews holocausted in
all the newspapers after WWI?

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:49:25 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> I predict it will be the year of the renegades... of funk...


Why is a trolling shitbag like you subscribed tho this list? 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[grarpamp]

# Secret World of Mohamed Atta
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LULV1gicJs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJIqtwW1kR0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V01Ol2Nk-Tk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Danger
https://fas.org/sgp/news/2010/09/dark-contrast.pdf
https://fas.org/sgp/jud/dark-contrast2.pdf
https://fas.org/sgp/news/2010/09/dark-index.pdf

# Zero: An Investigation Into 9/11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWiusdy1miI

# Bring the Power Back - Public Enemy Vs Rage Against the Machine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsqF6urwj3A

# Fahrenheit 9/11 - Michael Moore
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg-be2r7ouc

# America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hRPpva1ujE

https://www.youtube.com/results?sp=CAM%253D=9%2F11+truth
https://www.youtube.com/results?sp=CAM%253D=9%2F11+conspiracy
https://reddit.com/r/911/


You could spend months clicking around all the related sidebars
and stuff out there, some full of shit, some real.

Re: The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 07:34 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> To learn who controls you, look only at those you may not criticize.


If you live in a Nazi nation they'll kill you for criticizing them.

Any questions stupid?

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:04:32 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> This entirely lost me. Convo over.


What convo. This was just me wasting time with an absolute
shitbag like you. 


11
> 
> >
> >> If there are they didn't all show up last week you know? The guy I
> >> share camp space with is from El Salvador and has been in the US
> >> for more than forty fucking years.
> > And he's the youngest illegal immigrant there is. The
> > majority of them entered the US in the 19th century and they are
> > still mowing your lawn. Capitalism keeps them alive.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> That paragraph made no sense whatsoever 


for fucking retards who don't realize that they are being
thoroughly mocked and  laughed at.

Hey, you should try to polish your english. Here's a new word
for you : 


http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sarcasm?s=t

The (Western) Empire: free speech, holocaust denial, jail in 14 countries

[Zenaan Harkness]

What a swell empire it is - not.

For the free speech crime of holocaust denial today, in the EU,
jail is the punishment in 14 EU countries.

To learn who controls you, look only at those you may not criticize.

Free speech?

Freedom to publicly communicate/ publish conentious conspiracies such
as "the holocaust never happened"?


David Dees - page 98 is missing:
http://ddees.com/index.php/2016/11/17/page-98/

ROTF Libertarian Joke

[Razer]

Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan walk into a bar. The bartender serves
them tainted alcohol because there are no regulations. They die.

https://twitter.com/missokistic/status/466416327666974722

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:43:21 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 06:37 PM, juan wrote:
> > The ~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants who
> > can't cross the border
> 
> DUDE! There MIGHT BE "~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants" in the country.

This is how stupid your trolling is 

"the only 'illegals' that make it into the US over
the southern border are the ones who pay well-connected coyotes" 

That's something  a bunch of cheap mexican mafiosos can do and
at the same time it's well beyond the abilities of "sand
niggers".  Puzzling eh.



> If there are they didn't all show up last week you know? The guy I
> share camp space with is from El Salvador and has been in the US for
> more than forty fucking years.

And he's the youngest illegal immigrant there is. The majority
of them entered the US in the 19th century and they are still
mowing your lawn. Capitalism keeps them alive.



> 
> 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 06:40 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:49 -0800
> Razer  wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01/08/2017 06:17 PM, juan wrote:
>>> By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that
>>
>> I know that. You're a functional illiterate.
>
>   Tell me rayzer, like a good american fascist, how many
>   languages do you understand, apart from Imperial English? 
>
>
>   Three languages? Trilingual. Two? Bilingual. One? amerikunt.
>

In my life I've learned four. English, Spanish, Hebrew, and Yiddish.
Five if you count morse code. Six if you consider computer language.
Multiple varieties of Basic. From V 1.1 to BasicA and the variety used
on the tandy color computer which I can't recall the name of. I was also
pretty good with OS9 v.1 and II for the coco, and I know enough jscript
to get into trouble with.

Only one spoken language is still with me. Mostly due to disuse.
Spanish. Taxi Spanish.

Comprede piojo?

Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 06:37 PM, juan wrote:
> The ~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants who
>   can't cross the border

DUDE! There MIGHT BE "~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants" in the country.
If there are they didn't all show up last week you know? The guy I share
camp space with is from El Salvador and has been in the US for more than
forty fucking years.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:49 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 06:17 PM, juan wrote:
> > By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that
> 
> 
> I know that. You're a functional illiterate.


Tell me rayzer, like a good american fascist, how many
languages do you understand, apart from Imperial English? 


Three languages? Trilingual. Two? Bilingual. One? amerikunt.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:30:11 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 06:27 PM, juan wrote:
> > More truly crazy, fact-free commentary.
> That's because you aren't looking out the window of the cafe I sit in
> at the moment or you could see them. 


What would I see? The ~15 million 'ilegal' immigrants who
can't cross the border, but they do anyway? 

Did I mention that tne only thing you do here is parrot
propaganda from your nazi government? 

But the gov't you love so much rayzer is lying to you, It
wasn't the arab terrists and their box cutters. 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 06:16 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Here's the photographic proof of the post-liquified rock layers at
> ground zero:

That's schist. It's a lot like what's called "Chert" in California.
Looks A LOT like rock doesn't it?

It isn't. It crumbles when you touch it, and Schist is mica-based. It
does melt under heat and pressure and liquefy, and it's layered into the
mud.

There is no bedrock below 14th st. It was Peter Stuyvesant's sheep graze
and oyster mud flats.

This is what I mean about the total ignorance and twisting of facts to
match their non-reality by 'truthers'

Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 06:27 PM, juan wrote:
> More truly crazy, fact-free commentary.
That's because you aren't looking out the window of the cafe I sit in at
the moment or you could see them. Better look like you have money
though. They're the 'shopping police' and if you aren't shopping they'll
harass you until you move.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 05:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Ground zero showed no building submersion:
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/HolyYeshua/solving-the-radioactive-riddle-of-9-11-a-simple-explanation-of-ground-zero

Didn't need to be 'submerged' just undermined. And We were discussing
WTC 7. Not the towers.

>
> Along with numerous reports of explosions by first responders who
> brought out the first survivors from the WTC lobbies.
>
> Thermite flakes in the dust
>

So? Thermite is mostly aluminum, or should I say "metal powder, fuel and
metal oxide". There literally thousands of combinations of dusts that
could fit that description, especially when mixed with jet fuel from a
disintegrated, partly aluminum composited aircraft.

> , explosions heard from the elevators,

The fucking building was creaking, and swaying in the breeze (see the
earlier post with the construction dilemmas posed by the WTC's
construction. High winds was one of the problems), and slowly
collapsing. and the floors pancaking on each other.

What do you suppose that sounds like? Crickets chirping?

> lots more links and info on the above page.

Anyone with a name like "Yeshua" is most likely a White Identity Xtian
and is unlikely to be providing any worthwhile information on the
subject because most of them can't even read no less subject what they
read to anything resembling critical analysis.

Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:10:25 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 05:37 PM, juan wrote:
> > Notice also the if 'terrists' attacks were retaliation for what
> > you joo-amerikunts do all the time, then there would be at
> > least a real, big, terrist attack every week. Yet there are none.
> 
> There are three police agencies patrolling the downtown shopping
> district, and all they really do is keep tabs on the homeless
> population. You can extrapolate on that as to the manpower assigned to
> the 'war on terra' in 'Merica.


More truly crazy, fact-free commentary. 


> 
> The reason there's no terrorist attack every week is because the US
> borders are buttoned down so tight you couldn't get a tube of hair gel
> into the states 

Sure. That's also the reason why there are more than ten
million  'illegal' immigrants in the US.

Ten million ordinary people can cross the US borders, but arab
terrists are too stupid to do it. So who's the anti-arab
("sand niggers") racist here? 



> without spending a day in the 'green room' at the
> airport 

Ah yes. No doubt the only way for 'terrists' to enter the US is
by plane. And they only would travel in first class. Because
terrists like luxury.


> or border and the only 'illegals' that make it into the US
> over the southern border are the ones who pay well-connected coyotes


Something that brain dead arab terrists could never do. They
wouldn't have the money to do it either if they could read this
list and get the idea.


Keep trolling rayzer. 






> to bring them in and a few who try it on their own. Most of them end
> up dead and vulture-picked on Tohono O'Odham land in Arizona with the
> Border Patrol watching them die
> http://censored-news.blogspot.com/2007/09/spy-towers-on-tohono-oodham-land-map.html

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:39:00 -0800
Razer  wrote:


> I have proved
> that (at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking
> the buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is
> mud with wood 

By the way, I didn't even bother fully reading that. Now I did
and it turns our that you are embarrasing yourself in your usual
cosmic way, like when you showed you know fuck about
pharmacology. So, let's see : 

"the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking the
buildings" 

No, a plane or missile striking a building has nothing to do
with a tuning fork. If anything, the object that would
have to resonate like a fork would be the struck building. So
your ramblings are just nonsense from the very start. When you
hit a tuning fork, what resonates is the fork, not your finger,
retard. 

Plus, the analogy between a building with a mass of 500,000
tons and a tuning forks goes only so far. How much energy from
the alleged plane was transmited to the building and caused the
structure to oscillate (and at what frequency?) ? And how much
energy at a specific frequency then magically travelled 
demolished wtc7?

Then you vomit something about "resonance in the ground" -
Too bad the ground is if anything  a sink for mechanical
energy - it doesn't have any specific resonant frequency. 

To sum up : the idea that mechanical energy from a plane could
be transferred to a SMALL AREA, a couple of blocks away,  by
means of waves in the ground, and  affect the 'mud' where a
building rests is so fucking crazy that only a troll like you
would advance it. Not to mention again that you got the
elements of your 'theory' mixed up from the begining.













 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:14PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800
> Razer  wrote:
> 
> > On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote:
> > >
> > >   If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a
> > >   building, then the building would magically sink in a
> > >   pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos
> > >   showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.
> > >
> > >   
> > 
> > Ok class. Here we have a tuning fork (A440) and a glass of water. 
> 
>   I know what resonance is, you motherfucking scumbag. 
> 
>   Now prove that 
> 
>   "the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
>  mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." 
> 
> 
>   Since that is what 'really' happened, it must be documented
>   everywhere. Even in places like wikimierda. So go ahead, post
>   the link  : 
> 
>   
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC7_SUNK_IN_BROWN_SHIT_POOL_RAYZERZZ_SAYZ_ZO
> 
>   Or are you claiming that you are a truther whose TRUE THEORY is
>   BEING SUPPRESSED by a BURGEOIS CONSPIRACY?

Oh oh oh! I know, I know - pick me! Pick me!  That razonance didn't
liquify the mud, IT LIQUIFIED THE ROCK LAYER under the towers, which
sunk through the rock and the rock de-liquified, leaving no trace
(conspiracy theories and documentaries of 3 days of rapid cleanup of
ground zero to the contrary) of the SUNK TOWERS!

Here's the photographic proof of the post-liquified rock layers at
ground zero:
https://www.metabunk.org/claim-picture-shows-rock-formation-under-wtc-caused-by-nuclear-device.t4595/

(Come on! At least this variant of borderline-Razer-therapy includes
 photographic PROOF of the post-liquiefied rock layer...)

Well color me pre-glacial sandstone.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 05:37 PM, juan wrote:
> Notice also the if 'terrists' attacks were retaliation for what
>   you joo-amerikunts do all the time, then there would be at least
>   a real, big, terrist attack every week. Yet there are none.

There are three police agencies patrolling the downtown shopping
district, and all they really do is keep tabs on the homeless
population. You can extrapolate on that as to the manpower assigned to
the 'war on terra' in 'Merica.

The reason there's no terrorist attack every week is because the US
borders are buttoned down so tight you couldn't get a tube of hair gel
into the states without spending a day in the 'green room' at the
airport or border and the only 'illegals' that make it into the US over
the southern border are the ones who pay well-connected coyotes to bring
them in and a few who try it on their own. Most of them end up dead and
vulture-picked on Tohono O'Odham land in Arizona with the Border Patrol
watching them die
http://censored-news.blogspot.com/2007/09/spy-towers-on-tohono-oodham-land-map.html

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Cecilia Tanaka]

Very bizarre
​ ​
and weird, just for fun!  :)

"Nostradamus predictions for 2017: Terrifying forewarnings of 16th century
prophet revealed
​.​
"

http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/740011/nostradamus-predictions-2017-prophecies


Brrr...
​"​
10 Terrifying Predictions For 2017
​!"​  :P

http://listverse.com/2016/12/31/10-terrifying-predictions-for-2017/


​"​
What 2017 will look like
​."​


http://www.quantumrun.com/future-timeline/2017

-- 
​"The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."​

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:35:01PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800
> Razer  wrote:
> 
> 
> > 
> > Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that
> > the subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were
> > undermined by the shock wave of a 255,000 lb aircraft
> 
> 
>   Perhaps a poll would be in order? How many people would think
>   rayzer is a troll making shit up as ge goes? 
> 
>   If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a
>   building, then the building would magically sink in a
>   pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos
>   showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.
> 
>   But then you'd find most of the intact building inside
>   the 'mud'. Not a pile of rubble above ground. 
> 
>   But hey razer, you are either literally deranged or a full time
>   government troll. Or both. But your mud fantasies are waaayyy
>   beyoend stupid. Why don't you go troll other fascists like you
>   in shitter? That's your natural enviroment.

Ground zero showed no building submersion:

http://www.slideshare.net/HolyYeshua/solving-the-radioactive-riddle-of-9-11-a-simple-explanation-of-ground-zero

Along with numerous reports of explosions by first responders who
brought out the first survivors from the WTC lobbies.

Thermite flakes in the dust, explosions heard from the elevators,
lots more links and info on the above page.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:28:45 -0800
Razer  wrote:


> You're probably are racist enough to think "Sand Niggers" (note the
> quotes) aren't smart enough to coordinate an attack like 9-11.

The fact that they can do it doesn't mean that they actually
did it. You joo-amerikunts did it. 

Notice also the if 'terrists' attacks were retaliation for what
you joo-amerikunts do all the time, then there would be at least
a real, big, terrist attack every week. Yet there are none. 

What we see is a false flag attack every some years, to keep
the sheep in line. 



> Did I
> mention that 9-11 truthers are typically also very very white, and
> very very closet racist?

that coming from a theocrayic joo  - did I ever mentioned that
you are your own, sorry, self parody? 





> 
> Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 05:10 PM, juan made some shit up as if he knows how I feel
about Arab people:

> the evil arab terrists did it eh

"Terrorists? Why they're people lacking identity. They're seeking to be
noticed." ~Marshall McLuhan interviewed after the very first airliner
hijacking in the 60s.

He didn't mention, or wasn't aware of the fact that their identity,
culturally, was being intentionally destroyed by the terror tactics of
nation-states. Terrorism is a tactic, and nation-states excel at it.
"Double-tap" drone strikes alone have killed more innocent people in the
years since the first Predator flew than all the independent terrorists
seeking revenge that ever existed on Earth have killed over the
millennial, including 9/11. The combatant:civilian kill ratio according 
to stats Pakistan kept are 50:1. The same as carpet bombing. That
assumes thet nation state engaged in drone strikes doesn't comsider
anyone in an area they deem strategic, a combatant. Afghanistan has it's
version of 'strategic hamlets' Somalia? A free-fire zone.

You're probably are racist enough to think "Sand Niggers" (note the
quotes) aren't smart enough to coordinate an attack like 9-11. Did I
mention that 9-11 truthers are typically also very very white, and very
very closet racist?

Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:04:04 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> On 01/08/2017 04:49 PM, juan wrote:
> 
> > It's funny how you ranted against 'science'
> 
> I don't rant against science. I rant against it's rigidness in the
> face of facts that should be altering it's formulation of facts, in
> the interests of the people who write their grants and paychecks.
> Industrial crapitalism.

Oh, I see that the burgeois conspiracy is really getting at you.


On the other hand you are quite willing to use True Science to
advance american corp-pentagon propaganda like you are doing
here.  (the evil arab terrists did it eh)


I'm waiting for all the papers you and other lunatics like you
wrote about the true cause of WTC7 collapse - JOO MUD MAGICAL
RESONANCE. 


Come on rayser, share your science. Your discoveries are so
amazing, you surely can get a few millions in grants which you
can then send to cuba. 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 04:32 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> excessively reinforced central column

...and floor supports at the corners but NOT in the middle of the spans
on the building's outside edges. So when the buildings had  torsionally
flexed a few times too often as it WAS NOT designed to do, the corner
supports let go and the floors slid down the central support column.

Thanks for pointing out why the two WTC towers collapsed straight down.

Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:39:00 -0800
Razer  wrote:


> 
> Because resonance is a universal physical principle. I have proved
> that (at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking
> the buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is
> mud with wood 


The only thing you've proven so far is tha you are either a
literal lunatic, or a very trolling troll.

It's funny how you ranted against 'science' a while back but
now are vomiting a string of lunatic, pseudo scientific
nonsense. That would suggest that every single word you are
spweing here is...trolling. 

So we have magical joo-kristian resonance generated because a
planet hit a building. 

But, the hit buildings didn't magicall sink in magical joo mud
themselves. Another building a couple of blocks away,
magically sunk after a couple of hours. Is that how magical
joo resonance works eh rayzer? 




> or metal sticks vertically inserted (pilings) and it
> affected the building's (the piece of paper or stir stick) stability,
> and the building we're discussing, already seriously damaged and
> unstable from that shock wave, eventually fell down, sort of like the
> piece of paper or stir stick would eventually bump the side of the
> glass.
> 
> No go fap yourself.
> 
> Rr
> 
> >
> >
> > Since that is what 'really' happened, it must be documented
> > everywhere. Even in places like wikimierda. So go ahead,
> > post the link  : 
> >
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC7_SUNK_IN_BROWN_SHIT_POOL_RAYZERZZ_SAYZ_ZO
> >
> > Or are you claiming that you are a truther whose TRUE
> > THEORY is BEING SUPPRESSED by a BURGEOIS CONSPIRACY?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:39:52PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
...
> # Incontrovertible - New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDQJscd5ba0
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qirWUviaZuo
> http://incontrovertible911evidence.co.uk/
> 
> Were you aware that any steel-framed building is now susceptible
> to sudden and total collapse? Official US findings have concluded
> that normal office fires burning over only a few floors and for
> only 6 hours, can cause total and catastrophic collapse leaving no
> time for evacuation. The building featured in this film fell from
> 47 storeys into just a few piles of rubble within 7 seconds. The
> cause is cited as thermal expansion acting upon connections around
> composite beams. What is more disturbing is the fact very few
> firefighters are aware of this problem. Not only that, hardly
> anything has been changed with building codes and regulations to
> prevent such a catastrophic failure again. Training has not been
> modified for fire crews, engineering has not been corrected. The
> silence has been deafening... How fast can you run?

Come on! Surely you jest? EVERYone knows that a little fire causes total
structural collapse of such buildings - especially those of the design
of the WTC buildings with excessively reinforced central column which
also simultaneously structurally collapses. Because ... pancake theory,
yeah, that's it!

(Great links grarpamp - thanks.)

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 04:30 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800
> Razer  wrote:
>
>> On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote:
>>> If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a
>>> building, then the building would magically sink in a
>>> pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos
>>> showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.
>>>
>>> 
>> Ok class. Here we have a tuning fork (A440) and a glass of water. 
>   I know what resonance is, you motherfucking scumbag. 
>
>   Now prove that 
>
>   "the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
>  mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." 


Because resonance is a universal physical principle. I have proved that
(at least) the shock wave of a 255,000 lb 'tuning fork' striking the
buildings nearby caused a resonance in the ground below which is mud
with wood or metal sticks vertically inserted (pilings) and it affected
the building's (the piece of paper or stir stick) stability, and the
building we're discussing, already seriously damaged and unstable from
that shock wave, eventually fell down, sort of like the piece of paper
or stir stick would eventually bump the side of the glass.

No go fap yourself.

Rr

>
>
>   Since that is what 'really' happened, it must be documented
>   everywhere. Even in places like wikimierda. So go ahead, post
>   the link  : 
>
>   
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC7_SUNK_IN_BROWN_SHIT_POOL_RAYZERZZ_SAYZ_ZO
>
>   Or are you claiming that you are a truther whose TRUE THEORY is
>   BEING SUPPRESSED by a BURGEOIS CONSPIRACY?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a
> > building, then the building would magically sink in a
> > pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos
> > showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.
> >
> > 
> 
> Ok class. Here we have a tuning fork (A440) and a glass of water. 

I know what resonance is, you motherfucking scumbag. 

Now prove that 

"the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
 mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." 


Since that is what 'really' happened, it must be documented
everywhere. Even in places like wikimierda. So go ahead, post
the link  : 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC7_SUNK_IN_BROWN_SHIT_POOL_RAYZERZZ_SAYZ_ZO

Or are you claiming that you are a truther whose TRUE THEORY is
BEING SUPPRESSED by a BURGEOIS CONSPIRACY?

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Cecilia Tanaka]

http://xkcd.com/1013  :P

-- 
​"The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."​

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote:
>
>   If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a
>   building, then the building would magically sink in a
>   pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos
>   showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.
>
>   

Ok class. Here we have a tuning fork (A440) and a glass of water. I will
strike the tuning fork against a hard object ... like Juan's head ...
(Get you hands out of your pants Juan and come here to the front of  the
class... Don't bother to wipe the stain on your trousers. We ALL know
what you were doing back there Juan) and now I will put the end of the
tuning fork I'm holding in a glass of water.

Even with the damping effect of my fingers squeezed tight around it like
you might hold your own cock when ur fapping Juan, (PAY ATTENTION JUAN!)
you will still see ripples in the water. If there's solid material
added, like Juan's teeny load of pubescent jizz, the net effect is a
lowering of the frequency of the ripples due to change of mass, but the
amplitude will approximately remain the same and if you let a piece of
paper or light wood like a chunk of coffee stir stick float in the
water, the objects will move up, down, and sideways, in relation to the
ripples.

That's your physics lesson for today children.

Rr

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:14:52PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:56:35 +1000
> "James A. Donald"  wrote:
> 
> > On 1/8/2017 12:12 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> > > The official excuse for WTC 7's symmetrical collapse is that the
> > > side of the building /not/ shown clearly in photos was "scooped
> > > out" by falling debris.  (The photos I have seen do indicate
> > > substantial damage to the facade from falling debris.)  This is not
> > > consistent with a symmetrical collapse as observed - the support
> > > columns destroyed by the "scoop" provided no vertical support, so
> > > the load was distributed unevenly and the building would have
> > > sagged in that direction when it lost global structural integrity.
> > 
> > 
> > I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame.  It
> > did not collapse symmetrically - it sagged on one side.  Hence no
> > need for any official excuse.
> 
> 
>   Funnily enough, even the government psychos clearly admit the
>   nature of the collapse, whereas James takes the trouble to
>   blatanly lie for them.

That's "James" to you, thank you very much.

Seems the memetic is, if you -really- want to shill for da govt., ya
gotta have a middle name initial to sound more "formal" or something.

And if you're so bold as to actually use your real name, well tough
titties when Juan calls you out on your bullshit :D

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:17:26AM -0800, Razer wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 05:42 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:56:35PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> >> I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame.  It did not
> >> collapse symmetrically - it sagged on one side.  Hence no need for any
> >> official excuse.
> >>
> >> The building looked as if it had been chewed on by giant rats, with great
> >> big holes all over the place, and was on fire, hence its collapse is no
> >> great mystery.
> > No matter what color of the hats of the "terrists" was/is, why the
> > 'mericans celebrate Patriot Day(tm) exactly on this day?
> >
> > Their sickyourity was fucked and the wikipedia page about this is
> > unparseble for me.
> >
> > Is there other conspiracy theory besides "inducing fear in sheeple"?
> >
> 
> The real fear for US society's 'planners' and the people who reap almost
> all the wealth from those plans is that Americans will come to
> understand that their lifestyles, based on extractive resource looting
> and wars that further that looting when an amenable strongman ruler
> can't be installed, is responsible, with few to zero 'degrees of
> separation', for people who have nothing left to live for and given a
> plane ticket/box-cutters, flying airplanes into US skyscrapers as
> revenge. Charismatic figure like Osama entirely optional. Just ask the
> Muslim who drives his truck into a crowd of people if anyone actually
> instructed him or cajoled him to do that.
> 
> BigPharma couldn't pump out enough mood meds to keep US citizens going
> to work everyday like nothing was going on if that little bit of
> personal responsibility-related information spread like a meme in the
> American consciousness.

Indeed.

(Although I don't buy the box-cutter meme, it's clear that millions
of Murricans are sleep walking.)

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:51:52 +1000
"James A. Donald"  wrote:

> On 1/9/2017 5:59 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> > In their position paper Rebuilding America's Defenses, the PNAC
> > folks said that their plan for global domination could not be
> > effectively implemented absent a "galvanizing event" like a new
> > Pearl Harbor.
> 
> The globalists made hay out of 9/11, just as the Nazis made hay out
> of the burning of the Reichstag.
> 
> Nonetheless, Stalin, not Hitler, really did torch the Reichstag.


Yep. And giant rats ate wtc7. 

'We' are waiting for the evidence you are supposed to provide
James. You made a claim, now prove it. 


Meanwhile, even your government acknowledges the fact that they
need to provide an 'excuse' for the way wtc7 'imploded'. And
the exuse is not "eaten by giant rats".








 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800
Razer  wrote:


> 
> Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that
> the subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were
> undermined by the shock wave of a 255,000 lb aircraft


Perhaps a poll would be in order? How many people would think
rayzer is a troll making shit up as ge goes? 

If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a
building, then the building would magically sink in a
pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos
showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.

But then you'd find most of the intact building inside
the 'mud'. Not a pile of rubble above ground. 

But hey razer, you are either literally deranged or a full time
government troll. Or both. But your mud fantasies are waaayyy
beyoend stupid. Why don't you go troll other fascists like you
in shitter? That's your natural enviroment.

US Government Offers $25, 000 Prize For Inventing A Way To Secure IoT Devices

[Razer]

> America's Federal Trade Commission has announced a $25,000 prize for
> whoever creates the best tool for securing consumers' IoT devices.
>
> The so-called "IoT Home Inspector Challenge" asks participants to
> create something that will work on current, already-on-the-market IoT
> devices, with extra points also awarded for scalability ad easy of
> use. "Contestants have the option of adding features, such as those
> that would address hard-coded, factory default, or easy-to-guess
> passwords," according to the official site, but "The tool would, at a
> minimum, help protect consumers from security vulnerabilities caused
> by out-of-date software."
>
> The winning submission can't be just a policy (or legal) solution, and
> will be judged by a panel which includes two computer science
> professors and a vulnerability researcher from Carnegie Mellon
> University's CERT Coordination Center. Computerworld points out that
> "This isn't the first time the FTC has offered cash for software
> tools. In 2015, it awarded $10,500 to developers of an app that could
> block robocalls."

https://news.slashdot.org/story/17/01/07/0745229/us-government-offers-25000-prize-for-inventing-a-way-to-secure-iot-devices

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 03:23 PM, juan wrote:
> FIDEL CASTRO SAYS SO. QOD

He did? Then I'm in good company.

Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:19:15 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> On 01/08/2017 02:56 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800
> > Razer  wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class 
> > that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit
> > their deranged 'theories', then it's all a 'burgeois'
> > 'conspiracy'
> 
> Bourgeoisie denial and rationalization.


Yes, like I said. Anything that doesn't go along with your
mudering commie dogma is burgeois conspiracy. 

FIDEL CASTRO SAYS SO. QOD.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 02:56 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800
> Razer  wrote:
>
>
>> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class 
>   that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit
>   their deranged 'theories', then it's all a 'burgeois'
>   'conspiracy'

Bourgeoisie denial and rationalization.

There's a difference. Idiot.


>
>   And of course they love official conspiracy theories.
>   Whatever the gov't says, it must be right. Especially
>   regarding mud. 
>
>
>

Reality bites (people making shit up ... on the ass). the fact that the
subterranean structures in MUD under the buildings were undermined by
the shock wave of a 255,000 lb aircraft (max takeoff weight) hitting a
tall building 2/3s (or so) of the way up causing a 'tuning fork' effect
in the ground below, or 'shear stress' for that matter, is reality and
can be verified by the simplest of experiments.

Saying there was a planned controlled demolition because it 'looked
like', is speculative and without substance of fact.

Moron.

Rr

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:50:25 -0800
Razer  wrote:


> Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class 

that's how commie shitbags 'think' - if reality doesn't fit
their deranged 'theories', then it's all a 'burgeois'
'conspiracy'

And of course they love official conspiracy theories.
Whatever the gov't says, it must be right. Especially
regarding mud. 

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

Correction: believing there are consequences] go their complicity in
Genocide.


Should read 'believing there are no consequences to their complicity in
Genocide.'


On 01/08/2017 02:39 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> In part regarding flavor of WTC 7 that started this thread...
>
> # 9/11: Decade of Deception / The Toronto Hearings
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiVv8tQdmY
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSJZqMwNoY
> https://pressfortruth.ca/
>
> On the tenth anniversary of the Attacks of September 11th, 2001,
> expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada
> to provide evidence-based research that called into question the
> official story of 9/11. This was known as The Toronto Hearings on
> 9/11. Over a period of four days, these experts in Structural
> Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and History gave researched and
> professional testimony to an international panel of distinguished
> judges. The panel of judges, in conjunction with the steering
> committee would go on to publish their final analysis of the evidence
> provided, which called for a new investigation into the Attacks of
> September 11th, 2001.
>
>
> # Incontrovertible - New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDQJscd5ba0
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qirWUviaZuo
> http://incontrovertible911evidence.co.uk/
>
> Were you aware that any steel-framed building is now susceptible
> to sudden and total collapse? Official US findings have concluded
> that normal office fires burning over only a few floors and for
> only 6 hours, can cause total and catastrophic collapse leaving no
> time for evacuation. The building featured in this film fell from
> 47 storeys into just a few piles of rubble within 7 seconds. The
> cause is cited as thermal expansion acting upon connections around
> composite beams. What is more disturbing is the fact very few
> firefighters are aware of this problem. Not only that, hardly
> anything has been changed with building codes and regulations to
> prevent such a catastrophic failure again. Training has not been
> modified for fire crews, engineering has not been corrected. The
> silence has been deafening... How fast can you run?
>
> # What If the Official 9/11 Story Were True?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGkDQuL-1Gk
>
> Two planes crashed, 3 buildings collapsed on 9/11 according to the
> official story. If true, how would it affect the risks to to public
> and to firefighters from burning buildings if minor fires alone
> could cause a steel building to collapse? Why has there been no
> change in firefighting procedures, no change in building codes, and
> no lawsuits if the official story is true?
>
> # Conspiratus Xendrius Channel 9/11- Irrefutable Evidence for the Demolitons
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3v4QUQpYjc
>
> # Rapid Debris / Evidence Liquidation
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsHZj6MGxRs
>
> # Larry Silverstein - Controlled Demo HE ADMITS THEY PULLED wtc7
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeuQqP-NLnE
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJsEGgc5L2c
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Fhl5h86Qq0
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center#9.2F11_and_collapse
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_(1973-2001)#Design_and_construction
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_and_recovery_effort_after_the_September_11_attacks_on_the_World_Trade_Center#Debris_removal
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_World_Trade_Center
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 02:39 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> expert witnesses

You mean like the Phud  in sheet metal for the computer industry who
speculated on the melting temp of the steel in the buildings? A foundry
worker or machinist knows more about the melting temperature of
construction steel than he does. However foundry workers and machinists
weren't asked about it.

Because all these so-called 'experts' are affluent middle-class and
bought into the American execeptionalist narrative and don't trust the
people who actually know what they're talking about to support their
narrative that allows them the rationale to go on living off the looted
resources of other nations believing there are consequences] go their
complicity in Genocide.

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:41:13 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 02:04 PM, juan wrote:
> > 'We' are all waiting for your proof. 
> >
> 
> When you provide proof of 'controlled demolition'.

It's no doubt the best explanation. The proofs are everywhere
including in your own video. But of course, you don't believe
what you see. You bewlieve what your joo-kristian gov't tells
you to believe. Such a 'progressive' 'anarchist' you are.

Now what about your lunatic vomit regarding "mud"? And why does
a piece of pro-government shit like you troll this list? 

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:38:54 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 02:12 PM, the fed said:
> > You didn't watch your own fucking video.
> > The video is meant to show that the media "magically" knew
> > beforehand that the building would collapse, 
> 
> 
> 
> I watched it. I've seen the footage before and a bunch of it at the
> time in real time. Doesn't matter what the poster meant it to prove.
> The footage speaks for itself. 


Indeed. It clearly shows a building falling on its footprint
exactly as if it had been the target of controlled demolition, 
something that EVEN the government acknowledges.


"The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the façade
was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and
implosion." 


Now die, motherfucker.

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[grarpamp]

In part regarding flavor of WTC 7 that started this thread...

# 9/11: Decade of Deception / The Toronto Hearings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiVv8tQdmY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSJZqMwNoY
https://pressfortruth.ca/

On the tenth anniversary of the Attacks of September 11th, 2001,
expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada
to provide evidence-based research that called into question the
official story of 9/11. This was known as The Toronto Hearings on
9/11. Over a period of four days, these experts in Structural
Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and History gave researched and
professional testimony to an international panel of distinguished
judges. The panel of judges, in conjunction with the steering
committee would go on to publish their final analysis of the evidence
provided, which called for a new investigation into the Attacks of
September 11th, 2001.


# Incontrovertible - New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDQJscd5ba0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qirWUviaZuo
http://incontrovertible911evidence.co.uk/

Were you aware that any steel-framed building is now susceptible
to sudden and total collapse? Official US findings have concluded
that normal office fires burning over only a few floors and for
only 6 hours, can cause total and catastrophic collapse leaving no
time for evacuation. The building featured in this film fell from
47 storeys into just a few piles of rubble within 7 seconds. The
cause is cited as thermal expansion acting upon connections around
composite beams. What is more disturbing is the fact very few
firefighters are aware of this problem. Not only that, hardly
anything has been changed with building codes and regulations to
prevent such a catastrophic failure again. Training has not been
modified for fire crews, engineering has not been corrected. The
silence has been deafening... How fast can you run?

# What If the Official 9/11 Story Were True?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGkDQuL-1Gk

Two planes crashed, 3 buildings collapsed on 9/11 according to the
official story. If true, how would it affect the risks to to public
and to firefighters from burning buildings if minor fires alone
could cause a steel building to collapse? Why has there been no
change in firefighting procedures, no change in building codes, and
no lawsuits if the official story is true?

# Conspiratus Xendrius Channel 9/11- Irrefutable Evidence for the Demolitons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3v4QUQpYjc

# Rapid Debris / Evidence Liquidation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsHZj6MGxRs

# Larry Silverstein - Controlled Demo HE ADMITS THEY PULLED wtc7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeuQqP-NLnE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJsEGgc5L2c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Fhl5h86Qq0


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center#9.2F11_and_collapse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_(1973-2001)#Design_and_construction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_and_recovery_effort_after_the_September_11_attacks_on_the_World_Trade_Center#Debris_removal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_World_Trade_Center
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 02:04 PM, juan wrote:
>   'We' are all waiting for your proof. 
>

When you provide proof of 'controlled demolition'.

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 02:12 PM, the fed said:
> You didn't watch your own fucking video.
>   The video is meant to show that the media "magically" knew
>   beforehand that the building would collapse, 



I watched it. I've seen the footage before and a bunch of it at the time
in real time. Doesn't matter what the poster meant it to prove. The
footage speaks for itself. Only an idiot wouldn't know it was going to
collapse, and as I said you're an idiot so I'll spell it out

It had already internally collapsed which is why the fuel storage tank
IN the building (because the construction was cheapskate like the towers
and the builders didn't want to pay for the permits necessary for an
outdoor tank) fell through a number of floors and burned the fucking
thing out. Until the roof... The thing that keeps torsional forces from
affecting the frame of the building, fell in. That, combined with the
internal structural damage and the undermining off it's substructure,
was the end.

That whole area of downtown Manhattan had to have a few taller buildings
torn down because of the undermining of the building substructures. The
East side of the tip of Manhattan at the time was mostly low-slung
buildings with not so much to damage. You and your idiot friends make it
sound like  the WTC buildings were the only ones affected. Because
you're mental midgets.

> that the collapse
>   looks exactly like controlled demolition,

Looky looky "looks exactly like"

There's damning evidence. Idiot.


>  that a non
>   'controlled' collapse looks different (pic at the end) and that
>   salomon jakobo from wall street was babbling about "pulling" the
>   building. 
>
>
>

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:57:55 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/08/2017 01:46 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:37:32 -0800
> > Razer  wrote:
> >
> >> This page intentionally left blank
> >
> > ""the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
> >  mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." "
> >
> >
> > " 
> 
> 
> That's what I typed Unh hunh, yup.
> 

This is what you typed you worthless piece of dishonest shit 

"""the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
 mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7.""" 

Now type the proof. 


'We' are all waiting for your proof. 

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 01:46 PM, juan wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:37:32 -0800
> Razer  wrote:
>
>> This page intentionally left blank
>
>   ""the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
>  mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." "
>
>
>   " 


That's what I typed Unh hunh, yup.

Just because it would disprove your half-wit truther friends so they
never mention it in their cherry-picked 'analyses', unlike everyone
else, doesn't make it barren-of-fact moron.

It makes you and your half-wit friends disinformation propagators

Rr

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:40:32 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> On 01/08/2017 11:13 AM, the list's federal troll wrote:
> 
> > But feel free to link all the 'evidence' showing the
> > building tiping and falling on its side like a cut tree. I will be
> > waiting.
> 
> At minute 1:30 the commentator say "You see this thing leaning over?"
> about a windows blown out, burning and damaged WTC7
> 
> WTC Building 7 Collapse - 23 angles >
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo


THanks for further making my point, pentagon bot.

The very first seconds of the video show MINIMAL damage to
the building and rather small fires. And then we have all the
MSM bots repeating propaganda. Telling the audience that the
building 'will' collapse...because that's exactly what your
government planned. 

The video doesn't SHOW anything useful, apart from being
a perfect example of how the "media" work as an outlet for
gov't propaganda.


The only 5 seconds worth watching start at ~11:20 and show that
at the end of the fall a part of the building tilts somewhat.
The sequence also show minimal damage prior to the collapse.

Now, even if there's any *slight* deviation in the trajectory of
some small portion of the building from a 100% straight line, AT
THE END, that's something fully compatible with 'controlled
demolition'.

And see just how STUPID your fake character is rayzer. You
pretend to be a 'lefty' 'dissident' and yet what you do is
parrot 100% certified americunt propaganda straight out of the
FUCKING MSM.

And you didn't even watch your own video, I'd say, since it ends
with a picture of a building that wasn't correctly 'demolished'
and with audio from scumbag silverstein (or whatever his name)
babbling about "pulling" something

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:37:32 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> This page intentionally left blank


""the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
 mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." "


" 

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

This page intentionally left blank

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

This page intentionally left blank

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:13:38 -0800
Razer  wrote:

> The fact that the ground in Manhattan below 14th street is mud and
> honeycombed with building substructures as deep as the buildings are
> tall is NOT a "theory".
> 


the pentagon's bot 'asserted' 

"the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the
 mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." 


Either provide proof or admit you are nothing but lying
scumbag. 

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

The fact that the ground in Manhattan below 14th street is mud and
honeycombed with building substructures as deep as the buildings are
tall is NOT a "theory".

Nor is the reason why the Harkins Slough flyway sank into the mud during
the Loma Prieta Earthquake due to liquification a "Theory". My ex drove
the pickup truck through it (the CHP was too busy to have set up
roadblocks yet) on the way to pick me up after securing the kids and
described the roadbed sitting almost at water level with the support
columns NOT visible and sunk in the mud.

I can't speak for the pancaking of the I-880 flyway in the Bay Area not
knowing the geology of the land under it but you'd think an earthquake
rocking it would toss it sideways. Especially considering the contractor
building it had skimped on the reinforcing rebar. However the top deck
collapsed directly on top of the deck below, killing and wounding a
number of people. leading me to believe liquifaction was also involved.
Much of the bay area is built on landfilled marshland.

Rr

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 11:13 AM, juan wrote:
>   But feel free to link all the 'evidence' showing the building
>   tiping and falling on its side like a cut tree. I will be
>   waiting.


Also see: Fracture Simulation Case Study of the WTC7


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSlIFXw3EGg

Which also illustrates the 'lean to the left'

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Razer]

On 01/08/2017 11:13 AM, the list's federal troll wrote:

>   But feel free to link all the 'evidence' showing the building
>   tiping and falling on its side like a cut tree. I will be
>   waiting.

At minute 1:30 the commentator say "You see this thing leaning over?"
about a windows blown out, burning and damaged WTC7

WTC Building 7 Collapse - 23 angles >
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo

Then at 1:46 you see the top left roof collapse dumping what appears to
be the air-handling system into the building structure, then the
building crumples a bit in at the top left middle and fall to the left

I should mention a while back a local 'activist' published footage of a
cop 'smashing someone's face into the pavement' except that you never
actually see it. He makes like a mob jostled him and points the camera
in the air hollering "Oh my god he smashed him onto the sidewalk!"

You know... most of the people viewing the vid claim they actually saw
it even though It wasn't in the footage.

The "lean" IS in this footage.

Rr

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[juan]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:56:35 +1000
"James A. Donald"  wrote:

> On 1/8/2017 12:12 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> > The official excuse for WTC 7's symmetrical collapse is that the
> > side of the building /not/ shown clearly in photos was "scooped
> > out" by falling debris.  (The photos I have seen do indicate
> > substantial damage to the facade from falling debris.)  This is not
> > consistent with a symmetrical collapse as observed - the support
> > columns destroyed by the "scoop" provided no vertical support, so
> > the load was distributed unevenly and the building would have
> > sagged in that direction when it lost global structural integrity.
> 
> 
> I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame.  It
> did not collapse symmetrically - it sagged on one side.  Hence no
> need for any official excuse.


Funnily enough, even the government psychos clearly admit the
nature of the collapse, whereas James takes the trouble to
blatanly lie for them.


"The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the façade
was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and
implosion." 


"If the collapse initiated at these transfer trusses, this
would explain why the building imploded, producing a limited
debris field " 


Oops. So the building imploded eh. But hey, whereas the
government psychos do admit part of the truth so that their
propaganda is more 'beliaveble', 'libertaraisns' like James lie
through their teeth. Cute. 


Oh, here's the source


https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf


But hey, the real explanation is rayzer's "mud theory" and the
evidence that James provided ("I watched it frame by frame"
LMAO).


















> 
> The building looked as if it had been chewed on by giant rats, with 
> great big holes all over the place, and was on fire, hence its
> collapse is no great mystery.
> 

The more one looks at the "Russian Hack" the more it looks like...

[Razer]

The more one looks at the "Russian Hack" the more it looks like (I was
right...) US intel agencies and the State department put their regional
satraps up to it...SOMEONE forgot to clean up the comments in the code!

So far we have traces of Russia's neighbors Georgia, and Ukraine
(Crowdstrike) involved.

Yasha Levine has a screenshot of the git with enough info to hunt the
code down if you were so inclined:
https://twitter.com/yashalevine/status/818105937642786817

Re: WTC [WAS] Do you have predictions about 2017?

[Georgi Guninski]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:56:35PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame.  It did not
> collapse symmetrically - it sagged on one side.  Hence no need for any
> official excuse.
> 
> The building looked as if it had been chewed on by giant rats, with great
> big holes all over the place, and was on fire, hence its collapse is no
> great mystery.

No matter what color of the hats of the "terrists" was/is, why the
'mericans celebrate Patriot Day(tm) exactly on this day?

Their sickyourity was fucked and the wikipedia page about this is
unparseble for me.

Is there other conspiracy theory besides "inducing fear in sheeple"?

Re: Do you have predictions about 2017?

[James A. Donald]

On 1/8/2017 12:12 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:

The official excuse for WTC 7's symmetrical collapse is that the side
of the building /not/ shown clearly in photos was "scooped out" by
falling debris.  (The photos I have seen do indicate substantial
damage to the facade from falling debris.)  This is not consistent
with a symmetrical collapse as observed - the support columns
destroyed by the "scoop" provided no vertical support, so the load was
distributed unevenly and the building would have sagged in that
direction when it lost global structural integrity.



I have watched videos of the collapse of WTC 7 frame by frame.  It did 
not collapse symmetrically - it sagged on one side.  Hence no need for 
any official excuse.


The building looked as if it had been chewed on by giant rats, with 
great big holes all over the place, and was on fire, hence its collapse 
is no great mystery.

Re: Battle of the AI's

[Georgi Guninski]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 04:24:16AM -0500, John Newman wrote:
> 
> > On Jan 8, 2017, at 2:37 AM, grarpamp  wrote:
> > 
> > https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/07/two-google-home-bots-engage-in-a-duel-of-words/
> > http://www.cw6sandiego.com/news-anchor-sets-off-alexa-devices-around-san-diego-ordering-unwanted-dollhouses/
> > 
> > Another fun use for pirate radio and tv gear,
> > drive around in your van broadcasting "Alexa, buy
> > me $1M in BTC and have it sent to ".
> 
> 
> Now that is an interesting idea... ;)
>

If I got it right, if they fix the "issue" additional voice synthesis
will be needed.

Where is this stuff popular? ;)

Re: Battle of the AI's

[John Newman]

> On Jan 8, 2017, at 2:37 AM, grarpamp  wrote:
> 
> https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/07/two-google-home-bots-engage-in-a-duel-of-words/
> http://www.cw6sandiego.com/news-anchor-sets-off-alexa-devices-around-san-diego-ordering-unwanted-dollhouses/
> 
> Another fun use for pirate radio and tv gear,
> drive around in your van broadcasting "Alexa, buy
> me $1M in BTC and have it sent to ".


Now that is an interesting idea... ;)

Could anyone else stand to have an echo in their home, listening fucking 24/7?? 
 I've heard the claim that it isn't "really listening" until it hears its 
keyword "Alexa" or whatever, but of course that seems absurd on the face of it.

Re: Battle of the AI's

[Georgi Guninski]

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 02:37:41AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/07/two-google-home-bots-engage-in-a-duel-of-words/
>

LOL :)

What is the current record on the Turing test?

(Apologies to grarpamp for the spam, hit the wrong key).