Processed: Re: Bug#300672: vim-doc: fails to install because of /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 300672 + pending
Bug#300672: vim-doc: fails to install because of /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 300692 important
Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency

[Steve Langasek]

severity 300692 important
thanks

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:41:42PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> I knew only one DD for help uploading package is not enought, and I
> am very appreciate that he has done so much for scim package.

> I hope more DD will stand up for helping on pkg-ime project. :-)

> The scim-chewing is listed in Suggests, but doesn't exist in Debian 
> pool yet.

> The scim-chewing is an intelligent ZhuYin(bopomofo) input method for
> SCIM which people mostly used in Taiwan.

> So it is very an very important package for our Debian users.

> It depends on libchewing package which the new version of im-sdk 
> package depends on it too.

> Now, the libchewing and scim-chewing are both available on:
> svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-ime/

> Please consider to make this as a RC bug, otherwise it will be 
> impossible to see chewing included in Sarge.

That doesn't sound like an RC bug in the scim package.  Packages are allowed
to Suggest: packages not present in the archive.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#299931: libgstreamer0.8: amarok/gstreamer huge memory hole

[Loïc Minier]

reassign 299931 amarok
thanks

Hi,

On lun, mar 21, 2005, Christian Henz wrote:
> 
> Okay, gst-launch also behaves nicely, so indeed the problem seems to be 
> with amarok. I was 'blaming' gst because I first noticed the problem after
> upgrading gst lib/plugins... 

 Ok, reassigning to amarok.

 Regards,

-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other."

Bug#299807: marked as done (omniORB potentially vulnerable against DoS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:17:53 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299807: fixed in omniorb4 4.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 17:38:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 09:38:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBcTQ-0002hT-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:38:25 -0800
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id 
j2GHcHti015164
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:38:17 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) id j2GHcDAL015137
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:38:13 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: einhorn.in-berlin.de: www-data set sender to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from port-213-148-143-146.static.qsc.de 
(port-213-148-143-146.static.qsc.de [213.148.143.146]) 
by webmail.in-berlin.de (IMP) with HTTP 
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:38:12 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:38:12 +0100
From: "W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: omniORB potentially vulnerable against DoS
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6
X-Spam-Score: (-2.398) ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libomniorb4
Version: 4.0.5-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch

In case of setting serverCallTimeOutPeriod in /etc/omniORB4.cfg
or by command line, omniORB does not honour the timeout which
leads to inaccessibility of any server application, if too many
client connections are not closed by the client side.

The patch is by Duncan Grisby (omniORB upstream) and will
be included in CVS and upcoming 4.0.6, I hope.

diff -u -r1.1.4.21 giopStrand.cc
--- src/lib/omniORB/orbcore/giopStrand.cc 17 Oct 2004 21:48:40 - 1.1.4.21
+++ src/lib/omniORB/orbcore/giopStrand.cc 16 Mar 2005 09:15:29 -
@@ -540,10 +540,12 @@
 giop_s->giopStreamList::insert(servers);
   }

-  if (remove && giop_s->state() != IOP_S::WaitingForReply)
-delete giop_s;
-  else
-restart_idle = 0;
+  if (remove) {
+if (giop_s->state() != IOP_S::WaitingForReply)
+  delete giop_s;
+else
+  restart_idle = 0;
+  }

   if (restart_idle && !biDir) {
 CORBA::Boolean success = startIdleCounter();

---
Received: (at 299807-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 08:24:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 00:24:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDICz-0006UH-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:24:21 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDI6j-0005uR-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:17:53 -0500
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#299807: fixed in omniorb4 4.0.5-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:17:53 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: omniorb4
Source-Version: 4.0.5-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
omniorb4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libcos4-dev_4.0.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/omniorb4/libcos4-dev_4.0.5-2_i386.deb
libcos4_4.0.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/omniorb

Processed: tagging 300395

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 300395 unreproducible
Bug#300395: po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300703: autofs: Upgrade fails

[Anders Boström]

Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-3
Severity: grave

Upgrade from 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-2 fails:

Preparing to replace autofs 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-2 (using 
.../autofs_4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-3_amd64.deb) ...
Stopping automounter:dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit 
status 2
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
Stopping automounter:dpkg: ... it looks like that went OK.
Unpacking replacement autofs ...
...
Setting up autofs (4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-3) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/autofs ...
Stopping automounter:dpkg: error processing autofs (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 autofs
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Some errors occurred while unpacking. I'm going to configure the
packages that were installed. This may result in duplicate errors
or errors caused by missing dependencies. This is OK, only the errors
above this message are important. Please fix them and run [I]nstall again
Press enter to continue.

Setting up autofs (4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-3) ...
Stopping automounter:dpkg: error processing autofs (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 autofs

installation script returned error exit status 100.
Press  to continue.

This seems to fail also:

sid:~# /etc/init.d/autofs stop
Stopping automounter:sid:~# 

sid:~# sh -x /etc/init.d/autofs stop
+ FLAGS='defaults 21'
+ DAEMON=/usr/sbin/automount
++ basename /usr/sbin/automount
+ prog=automount
+ initdir=/etc/init.d
+ test -e /usr/sbin/automount
+ system=unknown
+ '[' -f /etc/debian_version ']'
+ system=debian
+ '[' debian = redhat ']'
+ '[' debian = debian ']'
+ thisscript=/etc/init.d/autofs
+ '[' '!' -f /etc/init.d/autofs ']'
+ PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
+ export PATH
+ localoptions=
+ daemonoptions=
+ '[' debian = redhat ']'
+ '[' debian = debian ']'
+ TIMEOUT=300
+ DISABLE_DIRECT=1
+ DAEMON_EXIT_WAIT=20
+ '[' -f /etc/default/autofs ']'
+ . /etc/default/autofs
++ TIMEOUT=300
++ DISABLE_DIRECT=1
+ daemonoptions=' --timeout=300'
+ RETVAL=0
+ '[' debian = debian ']'
+ debian stop
+ set -e
+ case "$1" in
+ echo -n 'Stopping automounter:'
Stopping automounter:+ umount_loopback
++ LC_ALL=C
++ awk '!/^#/ && $1 ~ /^\/dev\/loop/ && $2 != "/" {print $2}' /proc/mounts
+ loops=
++ LC_ALL=C
++ awk '!/^#/ && $1 ~ /^automount/ {print $2}' /proc/mounts
+ automounts='/var/autofs/misc
/var/autofs/net
/mnt/linux32/home
/mnt/linux32/nfs2
/home
/neti
/nfs2'
++ LC_ALL=C
++ awk '!/^#/ && $1 ~ /^\/dev\/loop/ && $2 != "/" {print $1}' /proc/mounts
+ loopmnts=
+ any=0
++ ls /var/run/autofs/_home.pid /var/run/autofs/_mnt_linux32_home.pid 
/var/run/autofs/_mnt_linux32_nfs2.pid /var/run/autofs/_neti.pid 
/var/run/autofs/_nfs2.pid /var/run/autofs/_var_autofs_misc.pid 
/var/run/autofs/_var_autofs_net.pid
+ for file in '`ls /var/run/autofs/*.pid 2>/dev/null`'
+ '[' -e /var/run/autofs/_home.pid ']'
+ any=1
++ head -n 1 /var/run/autofs/_home.pid
+ pid=902
++ ps -wwo cmd= 902
++ sed -e 's,.* --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/\([^ ]*\)\.pid.*,\1,; s,_,/,g'
+ mnt=/home
+ start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --retry USR2/20 --pidfile 
/var/run/autofs/_home.pid --exec /usr/sbin/automount
sid:~# 

sid:~# start-stop-daemon --stop --retry USR2/20 --pidfile 
/var/run/autofs/_home.pid --exec /usr/sbin/automount
No /usr/sbin/automount found running; none killed.
sid:~# 

sid:~# ps aux | grep automount
root   651  0.0  0.0  11748   944 ?SMar18   0:00 
/usr/sbin/automount --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/_var_autofs_misc.pid 
--timeout=300 /var/autofs/misc file /etc/auto.misc
root   720  0.0  0.0  11736   932 ?SMar18   0:00 
/usr/sbin/automount --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/_var_autofs_net.pid 
--timeout=300 /var/autofs/net program /etc/auto.net
root   793  0.0  0.0  12860  1064 ?SMar18   0:00 
/usr/sbin/automount --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/_mnt_linux32_home.pid 
--timeout=300 /mnt/linux32/home yp auto_home
root   807  0.0  0.0  12860  1048 ?SMar18   0:00 
/usr/sbin/automount --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/_mnt_linux32_nfs2.pid 
--timeout=300 /mnt/linux32/nfs2 yp auto_nfs2
root   902  0.0  0.0  12860  1064 ?SMar18   0:00 
/usr/sbin/automount --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/_home.pid --timeout=300 /home yp 
auto.home -proto=udp,intr,vers=3
root  1030  0.0  0.0  12860  1048 ?SMar18   0:00 
/usr/sbin/automount --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/_neti.pid --timeout=300 /neti yp 
auto_neti -intr,vers=3
root  1125  0.0  0.0  12860  1048 ?SMar18   0:00 
/usr/sbin/automount --pid-file=/var/run/autofs/_nfs2.pid --timeout=300 /nfs2 yp 
auto_nfs2 -proto=udp,intr,vers=2
root  5148  0.0  0.0   2700   540 pts/3R+   09:28   0:00 grep automount
sid:~# 


sid:~# killall automount

killall automount worked! start-stop-daemon --stop don't seem to work...

sid:~# which start-stop-daemon 
/sbin/s

Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)

[Martin Pitt]

Hi!

Hilmar, where did you see patches like

+if (pagesSize*(int)sizeof(Page *)/sizeof(Page *) != pagesSize ||
+pagesSize*(int)sizeof(Ref)/sizeof(Ref) != pagesSize) {

in the current tetex-bin package? debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888
already has correct patches. Also, "advanced static code analysis"
shows that the wrong approach is not used:

~/tex/tetex-bin-2.0.2 $ grep -r 'pagesSize.*sizeof' .
./libs/xpdf/xpdf/Catalog.cc:  pages = (Page **)gmalloc(pagesSize * sizeof(Page 
*));
./libs/xpdf/xpdf/Catalog.cc:  pageRefs = (Ref *)gmalloc(pagesSize * 
sizeof(Ref));
./libs/xpdf/xpdf/Catalog.cc:pages = (Page **)grealloc(pages, pagesSize * 
sizeof(Page *));
./libs/xpdf/xpdf/Catalog.cc:pageRefs = (Ref *)grealloc(pageRefs, pagesSize 
* sizeof(Ref));
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:+  if (pagesSize >= INT_MAX/sizeof(Page *) 
||
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:+  pagesSize >= INT_MAX/sizeof(Ref)) {
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:   pages = (Page **)gmalloc(pagesSize * 
sizeof(Page *));
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:   pageRefs = (Ref *)gmalloc(pagesSize * 
sizeof(Ref));
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:+if (pagesSize >= 
INT_MAX/sizeof(Page *) ||
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:+pagesSize >= 
INT_MAX/sizeof(Ref)) {
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:   pages = (Page **)grealloc(pages, 
pagesSize * sizeof(Page *));
./debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888:   pageRefs = (Ref *)grealloc(pageRefs, 
pagesSize * sizeof(Ref));

At the time the patch was fixed, the new CAN number was not yet
assigned, so it does not appear in the changelog. So it would be nice
to add the CAN to the changelog.

This was the relevant upload (I think):

tetex-bin (2.0.2-24) unstable; urgency=high

  * SECURITY UPDATE: more buffer overflows in xpdf library, thanks to
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the tetex-bin-specific patch, which
fixes more integer overflows discovered by Markus Meissner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, thanks to him for discovering this.
  * Added debian/patches/patch-CAN-2004-0888. This patch contains the
first fix included in the last upload, as well as the additional fixes
from this upload, which are:
  [...]

Please close this bug.

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt   http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer   http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory...

[Marc Schiffbauer]

Package: udev
Version: 0.054-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Hi,

after the last udev update my system did not come up anymore because
udev failed to start and then no partitions but / had been found...

The Problem: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory on startup. On my
System /tmp is only a symlink to /var/tmp which made udev not start.

Suggested solution:

Do not use /tmp for temporary mounts on system start or test it to be a
real directory. Maybe it would be better to create a temporary dir for
startup:

TMP="$(mktemp -d /udev-startup-XX)"

and then use $TMP to mount temp things instead of /tmp


-Marc



-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
insgesamt 0
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 19 2004-12-05 11:05 cd-aliases.rules -> 
../cd-aliases.rules
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 13 2004-10-20 11:39 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 12 2005-03-17 13:05 z_hal-plugdev.rules -> ../hal.rules

-- /sys/:
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda10/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda11/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda12/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda2/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda5/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda6/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda7/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda8/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda9/dev
/sys/block/hdc/dev
/sys/block/hdd/dev
/sys/block/sda/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda1/dev
/sys/class/graphics/fb0/dev
/sys/class/input/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev
/sys/class/misc/nvram/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/misc/vmmon/dev
/sys/class/misc/watchdog/dev
/sys/class/printer/lp0/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp1/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp2/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio1/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio2/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC1/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC2/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC3/dev
/sys/class/sound/dmmidi/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp1/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp2/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/hwC0D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/midiC0D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/midi/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer1/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer2/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D2c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D2p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC1D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC1D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC1D1c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC1D1p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC2D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC2D1c/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev
/sys/class/usb/hiddev0/dev
/sys/class/video4linux/radio0/dev
/sys/class/video4linux/vbi0/dev
/sys/class/video4linux/video0/dev

-- Kernel configuration:
 isapnp_init not present.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=en_US, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii  hotplug  0.0.20040329-19 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii  initscripts  2.86.ds1-1  Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  makedev  2.3.1-77creates device files in /dev
ii  sed  4.1.4-2 The GNU sed stream editor

-- debconf information:
  udev/devfs-warning:
  udev/reboot-warning:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 300395

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 300395 - unreproducible
Bug#300395: po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300395: po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build

[Martin Quinson]

Hello,

I cannot reproduce this bug on my machine, and I'm thus embarrassed to fix
it. I mean that a clean pbuild does not trigger the fix on my box. Does it
come from the fact that I call pbuilder from the command line while you have
a robot (cronjob?) calling it for you?

Anyway, I would really appreciate if you could test the attached patch. I
plan to upload a package with this change tomorow or so, but I'd prefer to
make sure it's the right fix before loading the servers.

Thanks for your time,
Mt.

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 02:11:12PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Package: po4a
> Version: 0.20-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
> building the package po4a in a clean build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
> 
[...] 
> 
> --
> DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
> http://darts.alioth.debian.org/
> 
> Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically.
> DARTS just helped finding the problem.
> 
> 
diff -ruN po4a-0.20.orig/debian/changelog po4a-0.20/debian/changelog
--- po4a-0.20.orig/debian/changelog 2005-03-21 10:14:41.0 +0100
+++ po4a-0.20/debian/changelog  2005-03-21 10:17:30.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+po4a (0.20-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  Release critical bug fix.
+
+  [Martin Quinson]
+  * Set the COLUMNS during the build to prevent issues arising when
+building without a terminal (Closes: #300395).
+
+ -- Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:04:59 +0100
+
 po4a (0.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [Nicolas François]
diff -ruN po4a-0.20.orig/debian/rules po4a-0.20/debian/rules
--- po4a-0.20.orig/debian/rules 2005-03-21 10:14:41.0 +0100
+++ po4a-0.20/debian/rules  2005-03-21 10:12:38.0 +0100
@@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
 
 package = po4a
 
+# Attempt to close #300395: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build
+COLUMNS?=76
+LINES?=24
+# (end of close attempt)
+
 # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
 #export DH_VERBOSE=1
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 268944, closing 268944

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 268944 - sarge
Bug#268944: sh: wrong errexit with eval
Tags were: sarge patch
Bug#276964: set -e; if eval ...; then ...; else ...; fi exits if false, rather 
than executing 'else'
Tags removed: sarge

> close 268944
Bug#268944: sh: wrong errexit with eval
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#276964: set -e; if eval ...; then ...; else ...; fi exits if false, rather 
than executing 'else'
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300117: revelation: Don't start

[Stefan Voelkel]

Hello,

> Hello,
>
> I found the problem.

Please append the commands to the bug you used to solve the problem, that
way we have the solution documented in the bts. I'll close the bug
afterwards.

regards
  Stefan
-- 
Stefan Völkel[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Millenux GmbH  mobile: +49.170.79177.17
Lilienthalstraße 2  phone: +49.711.88770.300
70825 Stuttgart-Korntal   fax: +49.711.88770.349
 -= linux without limits -=- http://linux.zSeries.org/ =-

Bug#300395: Ok, found a way to reproduce it

[Martin Quinson]

Hello,

I found a way to reproduce it (playing with at(1) and friends). The fix I
proposed was not enough. I'm on it, hold your breath... ;)


Thanks, Mt.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package revelation
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: revelation

> tags 300117 + pending
Bug#300117: revelation: Don't start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300395: marked as done (po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:17:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300395: fixed in po4a 0.20-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 13:11:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 05:11:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCdjb-0003Rg-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:11:19 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C416856;
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:11:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-2-178.mnet-online.de [82.135.2.178])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8DB5F9ED;
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:11:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115D7100B81B0;
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:11:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: po4a: FTBFS: tries to get Terminal Size on build
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:11:12 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: po4a
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

building the package po4a in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=
[...]
lib/Locale/Po4a/Chooser.pm -> blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Chooser.pm
Manifying blib/script/po4a-translate -> blib/bindoc/po4a-translate.1p
Manifying blib/script/po4a-normalize -> blib/bindoc/po4a-normalize.1p
Manifying blib/script/po4a -> blib/bindoc/po4a.1p
Manifying blib/script/po4a-updatepo -> blib/bindoc/po4a-updatepo.1p
Manifying blib/script/po4a-gettextize -> blib/bindoc/po4a-gettextize.1p
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Pod.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Pod.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/LaTeX.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::LaTeX.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/TransTractor.pm -> 
blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::TransTractor.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Po.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Po.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Sgml.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Sgml.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Common.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Common.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/KernelHelp.pm -> 
blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::KernelHelp.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Guide.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Guide.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Xml.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Xml.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Man.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Man.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Dia.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Dia.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Docbook.pm -> 
blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Docbook.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/Chooser.pm -> 
blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::Chooser.3pm
Manifying blib/lib/Locale/Po4a/TeX.pm -> blib/libdoc/Locale::Po4a::TeX.3pm
Deleting META.yml
XX Update documentation pot files: 

 done.
XX Update documentation fr.po: 

 done.
XX Update documentation es.po: 

 done.
XX Update documentation ca.po: 

 done.
XX Update documentation it.po: 

 done.
X Translate binary manpages to it
Unable to get Terminal Size. The TIOCGWINSZ ioctl didn't work. The COLUMNS and 
LINES environment variables didn't work. The resize program didn't work. at 
/usr/lib/perl5/Term/ReadKey.pm line 343.
Died at /tmp/buildd/po4a-0.20/_build/lib/My/Builder.pm line 151.
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
=

This happens if the build output is detached from a terminal (redirected to a
build log file).

Thanks for considering.


--
DAR

Processed: Re: Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 300705 important
Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory...
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300705: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory...

[Steve Langasek]

severity 300705 important
thanks

Marc,

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:13:15AM +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> after the last udev update my system did not come up anymore because
> udev failed to start and then no partitions but / had been found...

> The Problem: udev relies on /tmp to be a directory on startup. On my
> System /tmp is only a symlink to /var/tmp which made udev not start.

> Suggested solution:

> Do not use /tmp for temporary mounts on system start or test it to be a
> real directory. Maybe it would be better to create a temporary dir for
> startup:

> TMP="$(mktemp -d /udev-startup-XX)"

> and then use $TMP to mount temp things instead of /tmp

This can be trivially worked around by creating a /var/tmp directory on the
root filesystem, or by making /tmp a bind mount to /var/tmp instead of a
symlink.  There's no justification for making this a release-critical bug in
udev, as you've made changes to the base system that are not guaranteed to
be supported.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 299013, closing 299013

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 299013 - sarge
Bug#299013: libdevmapper1.01 initscript should be in rcS.d, not rc2.d
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge

> close 299013
Bug#299013: libdevmapper1.01 initscript should be in rcS.d, not rc2.d
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andre Tomt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296662: marked as done (security hole in LDAP login code (CAN-2005-0505))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:20:24 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line New upstream version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 20:53:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 12:53:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D43VS-0004y0-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:53:14 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B909181A8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:53:13 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CA1FF6F031; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:55:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:55:38 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: security hole in LDAP login code (CAN-2005-0505)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: irm
Version: 1.5.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
CVE: CAN-2005-0505

According to
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=3D306629 :

  IRM 1.5.2.1 fixes a potential security flaw in the LDAP login code.  All
  users (especially those running on LDAP) are urged to upgrade.

http://secunia.com/advisories/14342 has a bit more info:

   Fulvio Civitareale has reported a vulnerability in IRM, which can be
   exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions.

   The vulnerability is caused due to an error in the LDAP login code where=
 a
   user with a non-existent username can login.

Please mention CAN-2005-0505 in any changelog entries.

--=20
see shy jo

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCHO3Jd8HHehbQuO8RAjv0AJ4x58qQfeQ2g2823h/3pDbrpBvtuQCffUxA
YEUhlP9FyG5r7vleLSZJxoo=
=UCpf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--

---
Received: (at 296662-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 11:21:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 03:21:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from eth1859.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (gryphon.hezmatt.org) 
[150.101.200.66] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDKyP-0002Yg-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:21:29 -0800
Received: from mpalmer by gryphon.hezmatt.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 1DDKxM-0001yZ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:20:24 +1100
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:20:24 +1100
From: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New upstream version
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

As much as this bug ever existed, it should now be fixed.

--WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

i

Bug#300449: marked as done (cacti: Update from previous version delete custom scripts without warning !!!!)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:32:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300449: fixed in cacti 0.8.6c-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 20:57:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 12:57:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCl0a-0006m4-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:57:20 -0800
Received: from orage (unknown [82.249.115.55])
by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B2A2BA61B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:57:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gege by orage with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DCl0W-0002dn-Qn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:57:16 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?G=E9rald_GARCIA?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cacti: Update from previous version delete custom scripts without 
warning
 
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:57:16 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
PLING_PLING autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6c-4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes serious data loss

During a apt-get upgrade, my custom sensor scripts located in
/usr/share/cacti/scripts/local/.sh has been deleted by the
installer during the set-up of the new directory structure...
This should not append and the install script should be able to detect
files not part of the package and should not delete directory if it
found these kinds of file...

I completely lost all my custom scripts !!!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1+athlon
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages cacti depends on:
ii  apache1.3.33-3   versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  debconf   1.4.30.11  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libphp-adodb  4.52-1 The 'adodb' database abstraction l
ii  logrotate 3.7-2  Log rotation utility
ii  mysql-client  4.0.23-7   mysql database client binaries
ii  php4  4:4.3.10-2 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cli  4:4.3.10-2 command-line interpreter for the p
ii  php4-mysql4:4.3.10-2 MySQL module for php4
ii  php4-snmp 4:4.3.10-2 SNMP module for php4
ii  rrdtool   1.0.49-1   Time-series data storage and displ
ii  snmp  5.1.2-6NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii  ucf   1.14   Update Configuration File: preserv
ii  wwwconfig-common  0.0.42 Debian web auto configuration

-- debconf information:
* cacti/username: cacti
  cacti/poller_name: /usr/share/cacti/cmd.php
* cacti/mysql_server: localhost
* cacti/webserver: None
* cacti/save_rootpw: true
* cacti/dump_location: /var/cache/cacti/dumps
  cacti/default-poller: cacti
  cacti/upgrade_warning:
* cacti/root_mysql: root
* cacti/no_automagic:
  cacti/no_mysql: false
* cacti/purge_db: true
  cacti/no_mysql_message:
* cacti/database: cacti
  cacti/mismatch:

---
Received: (at 300449-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 11:39:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 03:39:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDLFf-0005Z7-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:39:19 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDL8w-0001ha-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:32:22 -0500
From: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#300449: fixed in cacti 0.8.6c-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:32:22 -0500
Delivered-T

Bug#292258: marked as done (libgtksourceview-cil: Will have file clash with upcoming libgtksourceview-common (1.1.2))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:47:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292258: fixed in gtksourceview-sharp 0.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 22:41:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 14:41:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.188] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtZN4-0008O6-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:41:14 -0800
Received: from espresso.caffeine (c211-30-49-101.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au 
[211.30.49.101])
by mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id 
j0PMfAfo020448
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:12 +1100
Received: from netsnipe by espresso.caffeine with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1CtZMz-0005ZW-9r
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:09 +1100
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:09 +1100
From: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtksourceview-cil: Will have file clash with upcoming 
libgtksourceview-common (1.1.2)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.6
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x2E8B68BD
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1 9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD
X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.dtype.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2E8B68BD
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libgtksourceview-cil
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: minor

Hi guys,

According to:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-devtools/2005-January/msg00010.html
a final GtkSourceView 1.1.2 tarball will be released for GNOME 2.8.x in
the next few days.

GtkSourceView 1.1.2 will clash with libgtksourceview-cil due to
/usr/share/gtksourceview-1.0/language-specs/nemerle.lang being in both.

When I release libgtksourceview-1.1.2 it will:
Conflicts: libgtksourceview-cil (<=3D 0.5-2)
So as to avoid any delays getting GtkSourceView 1.1.2 into Sarge, could
you please upload a libgtksourceview-cil 0.5-3 package that will depend
upon libgtksourceview-common (>=3D 1.1.2) into unstable now?

Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

--=20
---
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau   
 Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & UNSW Computing Students' Society President
 -
  "Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
 Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB9ssEmyTAfS6LaL0RAhcbAKCLBJBXBpT/Y4pzqkbPHNXQHZQm9wCfURd6
ZUlIVJHLmJaziYDJ5ZOo/5g=
=qEb9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--

---
Received: (at 292258-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 11:56:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 03:56:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDLWB-li-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:56:23 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDLNH-0001xw-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:47:11 -0500
From: Debian Mono Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
S

Bug#297149: compile with 0.60

[Ognyan Kulev]

Hi,
I've successfully build this package by using 0.60 definitions. Here is 
what I did:

* Download ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/aspell6-bn-0.01.1-1.tar.bz2
* Unpack and rename directory to aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1
* apt-get source aspell-bn
* cp -R aspell-bn-0.50.1/debian aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1
* cd aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1
* dch -i and add new version aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1-1
* dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -uc
BTW the following errors occur while building package:
dh_gencontrol
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${misc:Depends}
dh_md5sums
Regards,
ogi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental

[Martin Pitt]

Hi!

Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]:
> Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 1.170.5
> /usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory

I really don't understand this. This seems to happen at random,
affects the Sarge/Sid version as well and seems to affect only some
architectures.

Xlib.h is in libx11-dev, tk8.4-dev needs it and depends on it. The
build log shows that the package is installed:

Selecting previously deselected package libx11-dev.
Unpacking libx11-dev (from .../libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-12_powerpc.deb) ...
[...]
Setting up libx11-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12) ...
[...]

Previous psotgresql versions have built fine with exactly the same
build dependencies. Maybe tk8.4-dev or XFree86 introduced a change
which could explain this weirdness?

Thanks for any idea,

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt   http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer   http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#300722: FTBFS in experimental

[Andreas Barth]

Package: pilot-link
Version: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,
please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=pilot-link
for the full build log

Cheers,
Andi

Automatic build of pilot-link_0.11.8-0.12.0-pre2-2 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 
1.170.5
Build started at 20050321-0906
**
[...]
dh_strip -p python-pisock
dh_compress -p python-pisock
dh_fixperms -p python-pisock
dh_makeshlibs -p python-pisock
dh_python -p python-pisock
dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend 
on python.)
make: *** [python-pisock] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20050321-0911
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]:
> > Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 
> > 1.170.5
> > /usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
> 
> I really don't understand this. This seems to happen at random,
> affects the Sarge/Sid version as well and seems to affect only some
> architectures.
> 
> Xlib.h is in libx11-dev, tk8.4-dev needs it and depends on it. The
> build log shows that the package is installed:
> 
> Selecting previously deselected package libx11-dev.
> Unpacking libx11-dev (from .../libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-12_powerpc.deb) ...
> [...]
> Setting up libx11-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12) ...
> [...]
> 
> Previous psotgresql versions have built fine with exactly the same
> build dependencies. Maybe tk8.4-dev or XFree86 introduced a change
> which could explain this weirdness?

/usr/include/X11 could be missing in the chroot; -I/usr/X11R6/include
should be there in any case, but maybe it isn't?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: patches for libtheora's debian bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package libtheora
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libtheora

> tags 300422 patch
Bug#300422: libtheora: FTBFS: tries to install to /usr during packaging.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

> tags 290465 patch
Bug#290465: debian/rules script broken for for libtheora
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 297816 patch
Bug#297816: libtheora should contain watch file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental

[Kenshi Muto]

At Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:37:43 +1100,
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]:
> > > Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 
> > > 1.170.5
> > > /usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
> > 
> > I really don't understand this. This seems to happen at random,
> > affects the Sarge/Sid version as well and seems to affect only some
> > architectures.

I experienced same case on my arm experimental buildd.
The problem of my case was caused by broken xfree86-common
(uninstallation failed). Andreas, did you check it?

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300681: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

[Geiger Guenter]

Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:06:01AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Package: realtime-lsm
> Severity: serious
> 
> The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build
> system to something that works with just dpkg-buildpackage.

Hi, 

I just followed the instructions from modules-assistant. If this is
not acceptable anymore, can you give me a hint how I should build
the package.

Thanks

Guenter


> 
> --Jeroen
> 
> - Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> 
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:41:43 +0100
> From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Explanation
> 
> Michael Banck:
> 
>   The package builds fine like that, it's just the additional kernel
>   modules which need to be built by a different script, AIUI
> 
> Steve Langasek:
> 
>   well, here's the thing.  the source package does build if you run
>   the normal debian/rules commands; but those binary packages that are
>   built do *not* include the kernel-specific modules packages.  So you
>   have to go through an additional step to build the per-kernel module
>   packages, which are not listed in debian/control but are present in
>   the archive.
> 
> me:
> 
>   We cannot support this security-wise.
> 
>   Apart from that the package apparently fails to build from source
>   (FTBFS) if
> 
> make -f debian/rules build
> sudo make -f debian/rules binary
> 
>   doesn't produce all required binary packages that should end up in
>   the archive.
> 
> 
>   This is surely release-critical.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   Joey
> 
> - End forwarded message -
> 
> -- 
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental

[Andreas Barth]

* Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 14:30]:
> At Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:37:43 +1100,
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]:
> > > > Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 
> > > > 1.170.5
> > > > /usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
> > > 
> > > I really don't understand this. This seems to happen at random,
> > > affects the Sarge/Sid version as well and seems to affect only some
> > > architectures.

> I experienced same case on my arm experimental buildd.
> The problem of my case was caused by broken xfree86-common
> (uninstallation failed). Andreas, did you check it?

I'll check the chroot and re-queue the package and see if it fails
again.


Thanks,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300681: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:20:28AM -0600, Geiger Guenter wrote:
> Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:06:01AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Package: realtime-lsm
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> > The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build
> > system to something that works with just dpkg-buildpackage.
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I just followed the instructions from modules-assistant. If this is
> not acceptable anymore, can you give me a hint how I should build
> the package.

Please ask on -devel, I think there's enough information in the
bugreport to point out what exactly the problem is. Basically, your
package should just build with dpkg-buildpackage, and you should make
your package have a correct debian/control (NOT generated at build time,
never!), and invoke module-assistant or whatever needed in debian/rules.
Alternatively, let the user build the modules they want. Just do not do
it the 'user' way, and consequently upload that.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Nut will not work with nut-usb >= 2.0.1-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 300115 important
Bug#300115: Nut will not work with nut-usb >= 2.0.1-1
Severity set to `important'.

> #as per http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities, as newhidups and
> energizerups (from nut-usb too) are still usable. This bug seems due to a
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> change in 2.0.1-pre2 (call to HIDIOCINITREPORT for some other APC models),
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> and we can't satisfy both at the same time, at least with hidups...
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300115: Nut will not work with nut-usb >= 2.0.1-1

[arnaud . quette]

severity 300115 important
#as per http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities, as newhidups and 
energizerups (from nut-usb too) are still usable. This bug seems due to a 
change in 2.0.1-pre2 (call to HIDIOCINITREPORT for some other APC models), 
and we can't satisfy both at the same time, at least with hidups...
thanks

...But I'm also preparing the final switch to newhidups...
Please, launch newhidups (from 2.0.1) and report back the data tree 
dumped.
I'm currently preparing a patch to add apc support to newhidups (check
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/nut/) and will keep you informed for 
testing...

Arnaud
---
Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt
OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/
... and much more ...



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300115: Nut will not work with nut-usb >= 2.0.1-1

[Ralf Hildebrandt]

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> ...But I'm also preparing the final switch to newhidups...
> Please, launch newhidups (from 2.0.1) and report back the data tree 
> dumped.

Ah!

# /lib/nut/newhidups -D -D -D -D -a myups
Network UPS Tools: New HID UPS driver 0.12 (2.0.1)

Warning: This is an experimental driver.
Some features may not function correctly.

debug level is '4'
Looking up UPS
hid_lookup_usage: found 840004

Opening new device
Found 0, not matching VendorID

Opening new device
Found 43d, not matching VendorID

Opening new device
Found 51d, not matching VendorID

Opening new device
Found 0, not matching VendorID

Opening new device
Found 0, not matching VendorID
found 0 (-1)
No USB/HID UPS found



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300748: fop: don't update without libbatik-java 1.5.1-1

[Arnaud Vandyck]

Package: fop
Version: 1:0.20.5-5
Severity: critical

The new fop package (1:0.20.5-5) will only work with libbatik-java
1.5.1-1 (and more), but not with previous releases of the libbatik-java
package.

Every one can close this bug as soon as libbatik-java 1.5.1-1 will be in
the archive.

Thanks.

-- 
  .''`. 
 : :' :rnaud
 `. `'  
   `-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#299500: Bug#300636: lincvs: fails to start when locale set to 'fr'

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Hi David and Mathieu (submitter of #299500),

On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:05:24PM +0100, David Morel wrote:
> starting lincvs hangs; starting it with -d shows an endless list of:
> "Debug: Type: 2 seems to have duplicate MenuItems: Annoter (chercher la
> ligne)"
> starting the app whith 'LANG="en" lincvs' works fine

Many thanks for reporting this. Especially that it depends on the locale.
This will probably explain why I wasn't able to reproduce #299500.
Mathieu, can you confirm that lincvs starts fine for you as well if you
start it with `LANG=en lincvs' ?
I can reproduce the error here and will forward this to upstream.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#288009: marked as done ([CAN-2005-0508] libbatik-java: new upstream release fixes a security issue and lots of bugs/conformance/performance issues)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:17:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288009: fixed in batik 1.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2004 17:11:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 31 09:11:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.132] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CkQJA-00076l-00; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:11:24 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF2CC059
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  1 Jan 2005 01:10:51 +0800 (WST)
Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (vscan02.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 24247-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sat,  1 Jan 2005 01:10:51 +0800 (WST)
Received: from dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au 
(dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.168.241])
by vscan02.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2E9C07A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  1 Jan 2005 01:10:49 +0800 (WST)
Subject: libbatik-java: new upstream release fixes a security issue and
lots of bugs/conformance/performance issues
From: pabs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.5
X-Mutt-Fcc: 
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dlzOKtNNb/3FMr9Yxpxs"
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 01:11:03 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-dlzOKtNNb/3FMr9Yxpxs
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libbatik-java
Version: 1.5final-3
Severity: wishlist

New upstream release 1.5.1 is available. Change Log reproduced below. I
was unable to find a CVE for the security issue.

Change Log
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

The following log records some of the most important changes.
Bug fixing is an on-going task, so it is implied in all sub-releases.

1.5 -> 1.5.1

1. Security:

   A script security issue was reported in the Batik Squiggle
   browser. Squiggle uses the Rhino scripting engine and some features
   of that engine can be leveraged by malicious scripts to gain access
   to otherwise protected resources (like the file system).

   The Batik team has worked with the Rhino team to fix the isssue
   that was reported and the Batik 1.5.1 patch release addresses the=20
   issue.

2. Features:

   Rhino JavaScript Debugger now integrated with Squiggle.
   Better line numbers in error messages.
   Zachary DelProposto's Scroll pane class is added.  Allows for
  scrollbars on SVG documents.
   Cool solitaire examples in SVG.

3. Performance fixes:

   Parents who have children added/removed no longer invalidate
  their entire area.
   When a element is removed or CSS properties changed all next
  siblings are not repainted unless CSS rules change them.
   First event dispatch is much quicker than the past.
   Switched to Xerces 2.5.0 to improve performance of data protocol.
   Changes to paint properties on text is now _much_ faster.
   When using many objects from an external file the file will only
 be loaded/parsed once.
   Modifying x/y and some viewBox changes on SVG elements is now much
 faster.
   Better JPEG embedding in PDF.

4. Conformance:
   Batik now passes all non SMIL-Animation tests from the SVG Working
 Group beSuite.

   @font-face CSS property and font-face elements are now compliant
 with SVG specification.

   Changes to the 'class' attribute now update rendering tree
 correctly.

   selectSubString now implemented.

   Dynamic modification of display, and marker properties supported.
   SVG 'a' element respects 'preventDefault' on event object.
   Pattern element no longer applies object bounding box transform
  if viewBox is specified.

5. Bugs:

   Fullscreen mode (F11) works again.
   getExtentOfChar() returns bbox in text elements coordinate system.
   SVGPoint now supports matrixTransform in more cases
   clientX/Y now correct wh

Bug#298922: mesa: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL

[Lars Wirzenius]

Kurt:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL

This would seem to be because mesa is missing a Build-Depends on 
xlibmesa-gl-dev. If I give the following command, pbuilder will 
successfully build packages:

  pbuilder build --extrapackages "build-essential xlibmesa-gl-dev" *.dsc

Marcelo, adding that and uploading a new package should fix it, 
therefore. If you don't have time, please indicate, someone will be
happy to do an NMU.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298922: mesa: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL

[Marcelo E. Magallon]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:

 > This would seem to be because mesa is missing a Build-Depends on
 > xlibmesa-gl-dev. If I give the following command, pbuilder will
 > successfully build packages:

 Argh!  No...

 The mesa package does not require mesa to build itself and much less
 mesa from the X tree...

 The fix should be on its way to the archive soon, I just have to sort a
 little bandwidth problem out (13 kB of .diff.gz produces 13 MB of
 packages :-\ which is no fun behind a modem line)

-- 
Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300302: foobillard: FTBFS: GL/gl.h missing

[Marcelo E. Magallon]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:07:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

 > This repackaging of mesa needs some serious re-thinking; perhaps the
 > above fix, together with fixing mesa so it doesn't require itself for
 > bootstrapping, is the best choice.

 Those are big words Steve.  Unless I'm missing something rather
 obvious, the fix ammounts to removing one "#" and adding a couple of
 lines to debian/rules, which I've done and I'm just waiting for the
 package to build.

 It was rather unfortunate that the packages percollated thru NEW during
 the exact same week that I got rather loaded with stuff from the
 RL-side and not after some reasonable time after the packages where
 first uploaded, which was the time when I had plently of time to fix
 any trouble arising from the repackaging in a speedy manner.

-- 
Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300430: gtkglext: FTBFS: GL/glx.h missing

[Marcelo E. Magallon]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:05:03PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:

 > (mesag-dev is installed and contains /usr/include/GL/glx.h)

 It does?

 Do you have a configure.log handy?

-- 
Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300302: foobillard: FTBFS: GL/gl.h missing

[Marcelo E. Magallon]

Just in case someone gets trigger happy with an NMU:

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:25:01PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:

 > Adding the lines:
 > 
 > ==
 > include/GL/gl.h usr/include/GL
 > include/GL/glext.h  usr/include/GL
 > include/GL/gl_mangle.h  usr/include/GL
 > ==
 > 
 > to debian/mesag-dev.install fixes this problem.

 That's the wrong fix.

-- 
Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300703: maybe the init.s script is broken?

[Francesco Potorti`]

This one "fixed" the problem.

cd /etc/init.d/
diff -pu /etc/init.d/autofs\~ /etc/init.d/autofs
--- /etc/init.d/autofs~ 2005-02-21 12:37:43.0 +0100
+++ /etc/init.d/autofs  2005-03-21 17:25:54.0 +0100
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ start)
 stop)
echo -n 'Stopping automounter:'

-   umount_loopback
+   umount_loopback || true

any=0
for file in `ls /var/run/autofs/*.pid 2>/dev/null`

Diff finished at Mon Mar 21 17:26:46

-- 
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore)Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR  Fax:   +39 050 313 8091
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/   Key:   fly.isti.cnr.it/public.key


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: bug 299500 is forwarded to lincvs-users@sunsite.dk

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> forwarded 299500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299500: lincvs failed to start
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 299500, severity of 299500 is grave, severity of 300636 is grave, merging 299500 300636

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 299500 - unreproducible
Bug#299500: lincvs failed to start
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible

> severity 299500 grave
Bug#299500: lincvs failed to start
Severity set to `grave'.

> severity 300636 grave
Bug#300636: lincvs: fails to start when locale set to 'fr'
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 299500 300636
Bug#299500: lincvs failed to start
Bug#300636: lincvs: fails to start when locale set to 'fr'
Merged 299500 300636.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reopening 247542

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> reopen 247542
Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300764: missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks install/removal and hoses buildds

[James Troup]

Package: musixlyr, pmx, musixtex
Version: 2.1c-1, 2.5.4-1, 0.112.1-3
Severity: grave

The postrm failure is particularly bad because it wedged the buildd
chroots in a broken state causing all subsequent builds to fail.
Please fix ASAP.

| Setting up musixlyr (2.1c-1) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixlyr.postinst: line 13: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such 
file or directory
| dpkg: error processing musixlyr (--configure):
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Setting up musixtex (0.112.1-3) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postinst: line 24: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such 
file or directory
| dpkg: error processing musixtex (--configure):
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Setting up p2c (1.21alpha2-2) ...
| Setting up pmx (2.5.4-1) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/pmx.postinst: line 13: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file or 
directory
| dpkg: error processing pmx (--configure):
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  musixlyr
|  musixtex
|  pmx
| E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
| apt-get failed.
| Package installation failed
| Trying to reinstall removed packages:
| Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
|   /usr/bin/sudo dpkg --root=/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable --remove 
debconf-utils debhelper gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libg2c0 
musixlyr musixtex p2c pmx po-debconf
| (Reading database ... 15628 files and directories currently installed.)
| Removing debhelper ...
| Removing html2text ...
| Removing libg2c0 ...
| Removing musixlyr ...
| Removing musixtex ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postrm: line 16: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file 
or directory
| dpkg: error processing musixtex (--remove):
|  subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postinst: line 24: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such 
file or directory
| dpkg: error while cleaning up:
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Removing p2c ...
| Removing pmx ...
| Removing po-debconf ...
| Removing debconf-utils ...
| Removing intltool-debian ...
| Removing gettext ...
| Removing gettext-base ...
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  musixtex
| dpkg run to remove packages (debconf-utils debhelper gettext gettext-base 
html2text intltool-debian libg2c0 musixlyr musixtex p2c pmx po-debconf) failed!

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=m-tx&ver=0.55c-1

-- 
James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#247542: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory

[Samuel Mimram]

Hi,
The bug mentionned in the BR does not seem to be solved :
% make
*** Building HTML ***
test -d ./html || mkdir ./html
cd ./html && gtkdoc-mkhtml mediastreamer ../mediastreamer-docs.sgml
/usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkhtml: line 42: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or 
directory
make: *** [html-build.stamp] Error 127

Am I missing something?
I have the 1.3-3 version of gtk-doc-tools.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Samuel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 300440 to dhelp

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 300440 dhelp
Bug#300440: post-installation returns error code 21 if /usr/share/doc/menu/html 
does not exist
Bug reassigned from package `menu' to `dhelp'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300185: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:56:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 09:29:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 01:29:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCDnL-000462-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:29:27 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6635575DE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-4-70.mnet-online.de [82.135.4.70])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A24E5E63A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) 
[+prerelease])
id 1DCDnC-000337-GT
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:18 +0100
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:18 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: postgresql-7.4
Version: 1:7.4.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,
please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=postgresql-7.4
for the full build log

Cheers,
Andi

Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 1.170.5
Build started at 20050318-0210
**
[...]
Checking correctness of source dependencies...
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 
linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-6 
binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-6 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-6
--
dpkg-source: extracting postgresql-7.4 in postgresql-7.4-7.4.7
[...]
make -C ../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl all
make[5]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpgtcl'
make -C ../../../src/interfaces/libpq all
make[6]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpq'
make[6]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[6]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpq'
make[5]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpgtcl'
cc -g -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -I../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4  -c -o pgtclAppInit.o pgtclAppInit.c
cc -g -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations pgtclAppInit.o -L../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl 
-lpgtcl -L../../../src/interfaces/libpq -lpq -L/usr/lib -ltcl8.4 -ldl -lpthread 
-lieee -lm -L../../../src/port  -lpam -lssl -lcrypto -lkrb5 -lz -lreadline 
-lcrypt -lresolv -lnsl -ldl -lm  -lpgport -o pgtclsh
cc -g -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -I../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4  -c -o pgtkAppInit.o pgtkAppInit.c
In file included from pgtkAppInit.c:15:
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
In file included from pgtkAppInit.c:15:
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: error: syntax error before "Window"
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`Window'
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: error: `Window' declared as function returning a 
function
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: warning: parameter names (without types) in 
function declaration
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:575: error: syntax error before "XEvent"

Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib

[Pierre THIERRY]

Package: r-doc-html
Version: 2.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS chapter 4

/usr/lib : Libraries for programming and packages
/usr/share : Architecture-independent data

The documents should be somewhere in /usr/share

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 247542

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 247542 - fixed
Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency
Tags were: fixed
Tags removed: fixed

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks

[Pierre THIERRY]

Package: r-doc-html
Version: 2.0.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/R/doc/manual$ ll *.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-admin.html -> 
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-admin.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-data.html -> 
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-data.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-exts.html -> 
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-exts.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 39 2005-03-21 18:29 R-FAQ.html -> 
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-FAQ.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-intro.html -> 
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-intro.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-lang.html -> 
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-lang.html

I reinstalled the package to be sure it wasn't a modification made by
another one.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#300422: new patch for libtheora, fixing the wishlist bug too

[RISKO Gergely]

package libtheora
tags 294457 patch
thanks

Here is an updated patch for libtheora, can be applied to version
0.0.0.alpha4-1

I will NMU it on April 1st, if you don't upload it sooner.

Thanks,
Gergely

diff -urN /home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/changelog 
libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/changelog
--- /home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/changelog  
2005-03-21 19:20:45.0 +0100
+++ libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/changelog 2005-03-21 19:14:47.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libtheora (0.0.0.alpha4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU, because an FTBFS keeps it out from testing
+  * fixed the build things (closes: #300422, #290465, #297816)
+  * created libtheora-bin package (closes: #294457)
+
+ -- RISKO Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:14:12 +0100
+
 libtheora (0.0.0.alpha4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream.
@@ -16,6 +24,3 @@
 
  -- Christopher L Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:00:00 -0500
 
-Local variables:
-mode: debian-changelog
-End:
diff -urN /home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/control 
libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/control
--- /home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/control
2005-03-21 19:20:45.0 +0100
+++ libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/control   2005-03-21 18:27:00.0 
+0100
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Christopher L Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Build-Depends: autotools-dev, cdbs, debhelper (>> 4.0.0), devscripts, doxygen, 
graphviz, libogg-dev (>= 1.1.0), libsdl1.2-dev, libvorbis-dev, python
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
+Standards-Version: 3.6.1.1
 
 Package: libtheora0
 Architecture: any
@@ -16,9 +16,20 @@
 Architecture: any
 Section: libdevel
 Depends: libtheora0 (= ${Source-Version}), libogg-dev
-Description: The Theora Compression Codec (development files)
+Description: The Theora Video Compression Codec (development files)
  Theora is a fully open, non-proprietary, patent-and-royalty-free,
  general-purpose compressed video format.
  .
  This package contains the header files and documentation needed to develop
  applications with libtheora.
+
+Package: libtheora-bin
+Architecture: any
+Section: utils
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Description: The Theora Video Compression Codec (example encoder, decoder)
+ Theora is a fully open, non-proprietary, patent-and-royalty-free,
+ general-purpose compressed video format.
+ .
+ This package contains a reference implementation of an encoder and a
+ decoder.
diff -urN 
/home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/libtheora-bin.install 
libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/libtheora-bin.install
--- 
/home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/libtheora-bin.install  
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/libtheora-bin.install 2005-03-21 
18:40:04.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+examples/.libs/dump_video usr/bin
+examples/.libs/encoder_example usr/bin
+examples/.libs/player_example usr/bin
diff -urN 
/home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/00list 
libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/00list
--- /home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/00list 
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/00list2005-03-21 
13:32:06.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+01autotools
diff -urN 
/home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/01autotools.dpatch
 libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/01autotools.dpatch
--- 
/home/risko/work/debian/rc/libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/01autotools.dpatch
 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libtheora-0.0.0.alpha4/debian/patches/01autotools.dpatch2005-03-21 
13:41:56.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## 01_autotools.dpatch by  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: Autotools build fixes
+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
+
+--- ./autogen.sh
 ./autogen.sh
+@@ -113,4 +113,4 @@
+ autoconf || exit 1
+
+ cd $olddir
+-$srcdir/configure "$@" && echo
++#$srcdir/configure "$@" && echo
+--- ./doc/Makefile.am
 ./doc/Makefile.am
+@@ -44,21 +44,21 @@
+ 
+ 
+ install-data-local: doxygen-build.stamp
+-  $(mkinstalldirs) $(docdir)
++  $(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)$(docdir)
+   if test -d libtheora; then \
+ for dir in libtheora/*; do \
+   if test -d $$dir; then \
+ b=`basename $$dir`; \
+-$(mkinstalldirs) $(docdir)/$$b; \
++$(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)$(docdir)/$$b; \
+ for f in $$dir/*; do \
+-  $(INSTALL_DATA) $$f $(docdir)/$$b; \
++  $(INSTALL_DATA) $$f $(DESTDIR)$(docdir)/$$b; \
+ done \
+   fi \
+ done \
+   fi
+ 
+ uninstall-local:
+-  rm -rf $(docdir)
++  rm -rf $(DESTDIR)$(docdir)
+ 
+ clean-local:
+   if test -d libtheora; then rm -rf libtheora; fi
diff -urN /home

Bug#299602: error from cron job after Sarge upgrade

[Lars Wirzenius]

> After upgrading (Mon 14 at 20:13 UTC) a Sarge installation, this
> rss2email crontab:
> */10 * * * * if [ -x /usr/bin/r2e ]; then /usr/bin/r2e run; fi
> report the following output.
> --
> === SEND THE FOLLOWING TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
> E: nonnumeric port: ' ' http://www.osvdb.org/backend/rss.php

For what it's worth: I can't replicate this. I ran r2e in my sarge
qemu image, with the version 1:2.54-1 mentioned in the bug report,
against the lwn.net feed, and there was no problem.

I have had a couple of instances of the same in January, but they were 
temporary problems and were fixed by the next time r2e ran from my 
crontab. I suspect it may be that rss2email barfs on bad rss, but
since the feeds have been fixed by the time I look at them, I haven't
been able to debug it.

Lorenzo, does this happen every time for you, or only that one time?
If it happens every time, then I think some further information on
how to reproduce it would be good. If it only happened that one time,
I think we can lower the severity of the bug report.

The next time it happens (for me or any other user), immediately 
downloading a copy of the rss feed in question to a file and sending
it as an attachment to this bug report would probably be wise.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297149: compile with 0.60

[Soumyadip Modak]

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:55 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've successfully build this package by using 0.60 definitions. Here is 
> what I did:
> 
> * Download ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/aspell6-bn-0.01.1-1.tar.bz2
> * Unpack and rename directory to aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1
> * apt-get source aspell-bn
> * cp -R aspell-bn-0.50.1/debian aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1
> * cd aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1
> * dch -i and add new version aspell-bn-0.60.0.01.1.1-1
> * dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -uc
> 
> BTW the following errors occur while building package:
> 
> dh_gencontrol
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${misc:Depends}
> dh_md5sums
> 
> Regards,
> ogi
> 

Ok, thanks a lot for the info. Internet access in India is a bit spotty
at the moment, because of union troubles, at the telcos. I hope to get
the upstream developers to confirm whether the gnu.org wordlist is
identical to the original, in a couple of days. If any emergency
situation arises, then feel free to do an NMU, with the gnu.org
wordlist.
-- 
Soumyadip Modak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://soumyadip.blogspot.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of opustex 0.84-5.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 280266 + fixed
Bug#280266: opustex: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: patch for compilation with libgtk-2.6

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 300456 patch
Bug#300456: oregano: FTBFS: compile error in file.c
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300456: oregano: FTBFS: compile error in file.c

[Maximiliano Curia]

Roland Stigge wrote:
building the package oregano in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
...
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\" 		-I/usr/include 		  -DOREGANO_GLADEDIR=\""/usr/share/oregano/glade"\"	  -DOREGANO_LIBRARYDIR=\""/usr/share/oregano/libraries"\" 	-DOREGANO_MODELDIR=\""/usr/share/oregano/models"\" 	-DDATADIR=\""/usr/share"\" 	-DXTHREADS -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprint-2.2 -I/usr/include/gtksourceview-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/
li
 bpng12 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprintui-2.2  	  -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1   -DGLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1   -DGNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1-g -Wall -O2 -c file.c
...
=
Thanks for considering.
Mmmh, must be due to a gnome libraries upgrade. Letting the 
*_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1 was very bad idea. I'll try fix it. Thanks for 
the report.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300775: Pam: newer upstream version (0.78) available fixing security bugs

[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]

Package: libpam-runtime
Version: 0.76-22
Priority: serious
Tags: security

It seems we are missing some of upstream releases (0.77 was released in 
September 2002 and 0.78 was released in November 2004). Please package this 
new release:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/pre/library/

The 0.78 release includes two important security bugs as well as some of 
the patches from Debian and other releases. The relevant security bugs are:

- Severe denial of service possible in pam_unix
- Pam_wheel with the trust module can be spoofed

Some other fixes in the PAM modules might be security-related, see below.

The full changelog entries are:

0.78: Do Nov 18 14:48:36 CET 2004

* pam_unix: change the order of trying password changes - local first,
  NIS second (t8m)
* pam_wheel: add option only_root to make it affect authentication
  to root account only
* pam_unix: test return values on renaming files and report error to
  syslog and to user
* pam_unix: forced password change shouldn't trump account expiration
* pam_unix: remove the use of openlog (from debian - toady)
* pam_unix: NIS cleanup (patch from Philippe Troin)
* pam_access: you can now authenticate an explicit user on an explicit
  tty (from debian - toady)
* pam_limits, pam_rhosts, pam_unix: fixed hurd portability issues
  (patch from Igor Khavkine)
* pam_env: added comments in the configuration file to avoid errors
  (from debian - toady)
* pam_mail: check PAM_NO_ENV to know if we can delete the environment
  variable (from debian - toady)
* pam_filter: s/termio/termios/g (from debian - toady)
* pam_mkhomedir: no maxpathlen required (from debian - toady)
* pam_limits: applied patch to allow explicit limits for root
  and remove limits on su. (from debian - toady)
* pam_unix: severe denial of service possible with this module since
  it locked too aggressively. Bug report and testing help from Sascha
  Loetz. (Bug 664290 - agmorgan)
* getlogin was spoofable: "/tmp/" and "/dev/" have the same number of
  characters, so 'ln /dev/tty /tmp/tty1 ; bash < /tmp/tty1 ; logname'
  attacks could potentially spoof pam_wheel with the 'trust' module
  argument into granting access to a luser. Also, pam_unix gave
  odd error messages in such a situation (logname != uid). This
  problem was found by David Endler of iDefense.com (Bug 667584 -
  agmorgan).
* added my new DSA public key to the pgp.keys.asc file. Also included
  a signed copy of my new public key (1024D/D41A6DF2) made with my old
  key (1024/2A398175).
* added "include" directive to config file syntax.
  The whole idea is to create few "systemwide" pam configs and include
  parts of them in application pam configs.
  (patch by "Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) (Bug 812567 - baggins).
* doc/modules/pam_mkhomedir.sgml: Remove wrong debug options
  (Bug 591605 - kukuk)
* pam_unix: Call password checking helper whenever the password field
  contains only one character (Bug 1027903 - kukuk)
* libpam/pam_start.c: All service names should be files below /etc/pam.d
  and nothing else. Forbid paths. (Bug 1027912 - kukuk)
* pam_cracklib: Fix error in distance algorithm in the 0.9 pam_cracklib
  module (Bug 1010142 - toady)
* pam_userdb: applied patch from Paul Walmsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  it now indicates whether encrypted or plaintext passwords are stored
  in the database needed for pam_userdb (BerliOS - toady)
* pam_group: The module should also ignore PAM_REINITIALIZE_CRED to
  avoid spurious errors (from Linux distributors - kukuk)
* pam_cracklib: Clear the entire options structure (from Linux
  distributors - kukuk)
* pam_issue: We write a NUL to prompt_tmp[tot_size] later, so make sure
  that the destination is part of the allocated block, make do_prompt
  static (from Linux distributors - kukuk)
* ldconfig: Only run full ldconfig, if we don't install into a FAKEROOT
  environment, else let ldconfig only create the symlinks correct
  (from Linux distributors - kukuk)
* pam_unix/pam_pwdb: Use SIG_DFL instead of SIG_IGN for SIGCHLD
  (from Linux distributors - kukuk)
* Add most of Steve Grubb's resource leak and other fixes (from
  Linux distributors - kukuk)
* doc/Makefile: Don't include .cvsignore files in tar ball (kukuk)
* libpam_misc/misc_conv.c: Differentiate between Ctrl-D and
   (Bug 1032604 - kukuk)
* Make.Rules.in: Add targets for installing man pages for modules
  (from Linux distributors - kukuk)
* Add pam_xauth module (Bug 436440 - kukuk)
* Add pam_localuser module (Bug 436444 - kukuk)
* Add pam_succeed_if module (from Linux distributors - kukuk)
* configure.in: Fix check for libcrypt (Bug 417704 - kukuk)
* Add the "broken_shadow" argument to pam_unix, for ignoring errors
  reading shadow information (from Linux distributors - kukuk)
* Add patches to make PAM modules reentrant (Bug 440107 - kukuk)
* Merge patches from Red Hat (Bug 477000 and other - kukuk)
* Fix pam_rhosts option parsing (Bug 922648 - kukuk)
* Add $ISA support in config files (from Red Hat - kukuk)

0.77: Mon Sep 23 1

Bug#300636: lincvs: fails to start when locale set to 'fr'

[David Morel]

Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
Hi David and Mathieu (submitter of #299500),
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:05:24PM +0100, David Morel wrote:
starting lincvs hangs; starting it with -d shows an endless list of:
"Debug: Type: 2 seems to have duplicate MenuItems: Annoter (chercher la
ligne)"
starting the app whith 'LANG="en" lincvs' works fine

Many thanks for reporting this. Especially that it depends on the locale.
This will probably explain why I wasn't able to reproduce #299500.
Mathieu, can you confirm that lincvs starts fine for you as well if you
start it with `LANG=en lincvs' ?
I can reproduce the error here and will forward this to upstream.
Gruesse,
this might fix it
--- ts/fr.ts.orig   2005-03-21 20:11:31.705995784 +0100
+++ ts/fr.ts2005-03-21 20:11:50.991064008 +0100
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
 
 
 Annotate (search lines)
-Annoter (chercher la
ligne)
+Annoter (chercher les
lignes)
 
 
 Watch on



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: new upstream version fixes this

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 297149 +patch
Bug#297149: aspell-bn: FTBFS: Cannot find is13194-bn.cset
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297149: compile with 0.60

[Ognyan Kulev]

Soumyadip Modak wrote:
Ok, thanks a lot for the info. Internet access in India is a bit spotty
at the moment, because of union troubles, at the telcos. I hope to get
the upstream developers to confirm whether the gnu.org wordlist is
identical to the original, in a couple of days. If any emergency
situation arises, then feel free to do an NMU, with the gnu.org
wordlist.
Let compare beginning of both README's:
0.50:
GNU Aspell Bengali Word List Package
Copyright  2002 Dr Abhijit Das
Copyright  2002 Taneem Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Source URL: http://www.bengalinux.org/downloads
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=43331
0.60:
GNU Aspell 0.60 Bengali (ÐÂÂÐÂÑÐÂâÐÂÐÐÂÑ) Dictionary Package
Version 0.01.1-1
2004-08-24
Original Word List By:
  Taneem Ahmed 
  . 
  Dr Abhijit Das
Copyright Terms: GPL (see the file Copyright for the exact terms)
Wordlist URL: http://www.bengalinux.org/downloads
Source Verson: 0.50-1
I consider this enough proof that 0.60 dictionary is based on 0.50
dictionary.
Regards,
ogi

Processed: update-alternatives conflict causing dangling symlinks.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 291510 serious
Bug#291510: dangling symlink
Severity set to `serious'.

> retitle 291510 kaffe: update-alternatives order causing dangling symlinks.
Bug#291510: dangling symlink
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: More info on non-free fonts

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 298962 + patch
Bug#298962: enlightenment: contains non-free fonts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300764: missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks install/removal and hoses buildds

[Roland Stigge]

Hi James,

thanks for reporting.

pmx already Depends on tetex-bin, so I don't know why this:

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 17:40 +, James Troup wrote:
> | Setting up pmx (2.5.4-1) ...
> | /var/lib/dpkg/info/pmx.postinst: line 13: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file 
> or directory

could happen (with pbuilder, everything went fine; but I don't wanna
be ridiculous ;)), considering the definition of Depends (depended-on
packages are configured before the depending package).

I fear that adding tetex-bin to Depends to the other two wouldn't
improve the situation.

Any idea?

Thanks in advance!

bye,
  Roland




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

[Al Stone]

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 05:06 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Package: oprofile-source
> Severity: serious
> 
> The way this package is built is not accepteble. Please fix the build
> system to something that works with just dpkg-buildpackage.

I'm a little puzzled.  The package 'oprofile-source' does build
from source using dpkg-buildpackage.  I just now built a brand new
sid chroot for i386, and ran 'dpkg-buildpackage' without a problem
(after adding build-essential and the build-deps).

Perhaps it is not clear from the description, but this package is
only supposed to provide the _source_ needed to build an oprofile
kernel module for 2.4.x kernels.  It is not supposed to provide
the modules themselves.  Hence, I build the module packages personally
and upload them as a convenience for using, using the source provided
in 'oprofile-source.'  Is it this module building part that you're
suggesting I automate?  If it is, that's fine -- I just want to make
sure I understand what part is unacceptable.

If there's a better way to do this, let me know.  This is the method
that my AM and I settled on when I applied to become a DD.  The
problem is that the oprofile module was not accepted into the upstream
Linux kernel source until 2.6.

Note that this is not an issue for 2.6.x kernels where the kernel
image packages contain an oprofile module by default.

> --Jeroen
> 
> - Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> 
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:41:43 +0100
> From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Explanation
> 
> Michael Banck:
> 
>   The package builds fine like that, it's just the additional kernel
>   modules which need to be built by a different script, AIUI
> 
> Steve Langasek:
> 
>   well, here's the thing.  the source package does build if you run
>   the normal debian/rules commands; but those binary packages that are
>   built do *not* include the kernel-specific modules packages.  So you
>   have to go through an additional step to build the per-kernel module
>   packages, which are not listed in debian/control but are present in
>   the archive.
> 
> me:
> 
>   We cannot support this security-wise.
> 
>   Apart from that the package apparently fails to build from source
>   (FTBFS) if
> 
> make -f debian/rules build
> sudo make -f debian/rules binary
> 
>   doesn't produce all required binary packages that should end up in
>   the archive.
> 
> 
>   This is surely release-critical.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   Joey
> 
> - End forwarded message -
> 
-- 
Ciao,
al
--
Al Stone  Alter Ego:
Linux & Open Source Lab   Debian Developer
Hewlett-Packard Company   http://www.debian.org
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
--



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300780: File conflict with liblucene-java-doc on unpacking

[debian]

Package: liblucene-java
Version: 1.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.5.1

Upon upgrading all installed packages, installation halted with the
unpacking of the new version of liblucene-java because one of the files
in the new version conflicted with a file in the old version of
liblucene-java-doc. When I ran the upgrade command again, it ran to
completion.

It seems like this should simply require the appropriate versioned
Conflicts/Replaces relationships to be declared.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7+phil1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages liblucene-java depends on:
ii  j2sdk [java2-runtime]  1.4.2-1   J2SE Development Kit
ii  kaffe-pthreads [java1- 2:1.1.4.PRECVS8-2 A POSIX threads enabled version of

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#299602: error from cron job after Sarge upgrade

[Lorenzo Iannuzzi]

Il giorno lun, 21-03-2005 alle 20:18 +0200, Lars Wirzenius ha scritto:
> > After upgrading (Mon 14 at 20:13 UTC) a Sarge installation, this
> > rss2email crontab:
> > */10 * * * * if [ -x /usr/bin/r2e ]; then /usr/bin/r2e run; fi
> > report the following output.
> > --
> > === SEND THE FOLLOWING TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
> > E: nonnumeric port: ' ' http://www.osvdb.org/backend/rss.php

> I have had a couple of instances of the same in January, but they were 
> temporary problems and were fixed by the next time r2e ran from my 
> crontab. I suspect it may be that rss2email barfs on bad rss, but
> since the feeds have been fixed by the time I look at them, I haven't
> been able to debug it.

It happened for a while (some days) so I disabled rss2email. Now I've
restarted it, and it works.
For what I know, nothing changed in his configs.
-- 

Lorenzo Iannuzzi


pgpiQesGi5YVo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#300787: impossible to upgrade makedev

[Alessandro Pagnin]

Package: makedev
Version: 2.3.1-77
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Trying to upgrade to this version of makedev, when system go to
configure the package it reboots immediately

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages makedev depends on:
ii  base-passwd   3.5.9  Debian base system master password

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300113: Bug#297137 / Bug#300113: bash 2.05-0beta1 not recent enough

[Jan Echternach]

The version of bash that failed for me in Bug#297137 was 2.05a-11.
The version in the Depends field in hotplug-0.0.20040329-20 is 2.05-0beta1
which is OLDER than 2.05a-11.  The comment in Bug#300113 speaks of version
2.05b-beta1 which doesn't exist.  The changelog entry for version 2.05b-1
suggests that this is the version that has the 'unset' bug fixed, and
2.05b-1 is newer than 2.05a-11.

-- 
Jan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libsem 0.0.1-3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 298815 + fixed
Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which 
is also in package libc6-dev
There were no tags set.
Bug#300492: libsem should FTBFS on irrelevant architectures
Tags added: fixed

> tag 298856 + fixed
Bug#298856: RFA: libsem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300787: impossible to upgrade makedev

[Justin Pryzby]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:13:05PM +0100, Alessandro Pagnin wrote:
> Package: makedev
> Version: 2.3.1-77
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> 
> Trying to upgrade to this version of makedev, when system go to
> configure the package it reboots immediately
This didn't happen for me.  I'm running udev; are you?

Justin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300780: File conflict with liblucene-java-doc on unpacking

[Barry Hawkins]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
| Upon upgrading all installed packages, installation halted with the
| unpacking of the new version of liblucene-java because one of the files
| in the new version conflicted with a file in the old version of
| liblucene-java-doc. When I ran the upgrade command again, it ran to
| completion.
[...]
Thank you for the report.  The issue is under review and a fix should be
forthcoming.  This bug report will be merged with the original report of
the condition, Bug Report #300653.
Regards,
- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCP0Et7bZ6kUftWZwRAirMAKCu0p7Rxf0atsbT6Si+tBODxBAvoQCfUesH
amsk2T6HTAMiY7nXh88hQas=
=QuvL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300456: [oregano] patch for compilation with gtk26

[RISKO Gergely]

this should be dropped in as debian/patches/gtk26-compilefix.patch
diff -urN oregano-0.40.0/src/file.c oregano-0.40.0-gtk26/src/file.c
--- oregano-0.40.0/src/file.c   2004-11-22 07:19:08.0 +0100
+++ oregano-0.40.0-gtk26/src/file.c 2005-03-21 19:43:32.0 +0100
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 #include "dialogs.h"
 #include "save-schematic.h"
 
-#if (GTK_MINOR_VERSION==4)
+#if (GTK_MINOR_VERSION>=4)
 
 char *
 dialog_open_file (SchematicView *sv)



-=-
Gergely


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300422: Fwd: problems compiling

[RISKO Gergely]

> Hello.  I am interested in your patch, but am having trouble with compilation.
> (I am not the maintainer or a DD).
>
> If I run "debuild", it tries to first run "debian/rules clean", but fails at:
>
> mv config.guess.cdbs-orig config.guess
> mv: cannot stat `config.guess.cdbs-orig': No such file or directory
> make: *** [clean] Error 1
> debuild: fatal error at line 764:
> dpkg-buildpackage failed!
>
> If I run "fakeroot debian/rules binary", I get:
>
> dpatch apply-all
> applying patch 01autotools to ./ ... failed.
> make: *** [apply-dpatches] Error 1
>
> Am I doing something wrong?

Sorry, the patch was wrong, now it is fixed, so it is my second try.

The patch only works with cdbs >=0.4.27-3, since there was changes
around config.{guess,sub} handling, but it will migrate to testing
tonight.  So we will have it tomorrow in testing too!

Gergely



theora-2ndtry
Description: Binary data

Bug#298467: marked as done (gaim.postinst doesn't work if directory doesn't already exist)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:17:29 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298467: fixed in gaim 1:1.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 18:00:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 10:00:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171] (mailnull)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8MX1-0001o8-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:00:39 -0800
Received: from 67-138-255-9.nrp4fair.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([67.138.255.9] 
helo=norbert.strandboge.com)
by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.44)
id 1D8MX0-000Ctf-Au
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:00:38 -0500
Received: from sirius.strandboge.com (sirius.strandboge.com [192.168.2.3])
by norbert.strandboge.com (smtp server) with ESMTP id j27I0YP1010907
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:00:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from james by sirius.strandboge.com with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D8MWm-0007ZU-MT
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:00:24 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gaim.postinst doesn't work if directory doesn't already exist
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:00:24 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS.org
X-Originating-IP: 67.138.255.9
X-Report-Abuse-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see 
http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: jstrand1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gaim
Version: 1:1.1.4-2
Severity: normal

The statement:
if [ ! -h /usr/share/doc/gaim ]; then
rmdir /usr/share/doc/gaim
...

evauluates to TRUE when /usr/share/doc/gaim doesn't exist.  Therefore
'rmdir' is called and fails, and dpkg gives errors and the install
stops.

I think you can do what you intended with:
if [ -d /usr/share/doc/gaim ]; then
rmdir /usr/share/doc/gaim
fi

if [ ! -e /usr/share/doc/gaim ]; then
ln -s gaim-data /usr/share/doc/gaim
fi


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gaim depends on:
ii  gaim-data  1:1.1.4-2 multi-protocol instant messaging c
ii  libao2 0.8.5-1   Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libaspell150.60.2+20050121-1 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti
ii  libatk1.0-01.8.0-4   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile0  0.2.6-5   Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-20  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcrypt111.2.0-4   LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.6.2-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnutls111.0.16-9  GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgtk2.0-02.6.2-3   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libgtkspell0   2.0.8-1   a spell-checking addon for GTK's T
ii  libice64.3.0.dfsg.1-10   Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.8.0-3   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10   X Window System Session Management
ii  libstartup-notificatio 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac
ii  libx11-6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10   X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10   X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10   X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 298467-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 22:23:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 14:23:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff

Processed: tagging 300780

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 300780 sid
Bug#300780: File conflict with liblucene-java-doc on unpacking
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295008: marked as done (aspell-nl: Support for pending Aspell 0.60)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:47:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295008: fixed in dutch 1:0.1e-33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 23:01:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 15:01:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D06G4-0003lZ-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:01:00 -0800
Received: (qmail 27997 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2005 23:01:00 -
Received: from dsl254-022-219.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO 
sirius.bignachos.com) ([216.254.22.219])
  (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
  by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 12 Feb 2005 23:00:59 -
Received: from rubeus (unknown [192.168.1.20])
by sirius.bignachos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B639A52E12
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:00:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rubeus (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5C08D33BF2; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:59:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aspell-nl: Support for pending Aspell 0.60
X-URL: http://bignachos.com
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:59:51 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: aspell-nl
Severity: wishlist

I'm planning to upload Aspell 0.60 Real Soon Now.  Since the binary
format of the dictionaries has changed in 0.60, this dictionary must be
rebuilt.  The general approach to transition a dictionary is:

* Use the Aspell packages available at
  http://people.debian.org/~pyro/pending/

* Build-depend on aspell (>> 0.60)

* Change "Provides: aspell-dictionary" to "Provides: aspell6-dictionary"

* Note that the dictionary files previously located in /usr/share/aspell
  and /usr/lib/aspell are now all located in /usr/lib/aspell-0.60, and
  adjust the package accordingly.

I'm currently building a staging area to make the transition as smooth
as possible.  Please contact me once you've prepared the new package and
I'll add it to the staging area.  I plan to make the aspell 0.60 upload
in a couple days (tentatively sometime Monday).  If you have not
prepared a package by then, I'll elevate this bug to RC and NMU shortly
thereafter.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-ac12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---
Received: (at 295008-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 22:53:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 14:53:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDVmF-0002Y3-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:53:39 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDVfu-lK-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:47:06 -0500
From: Ivo Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#295008: fixed in dutch 1:0.1e-33
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:47:06 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: dutch
Source-Version: 1:0.1e-33

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dutch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

aspell-nl_0.1e-33_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dutch/aspell-nl_0.1e-33_i386.deb
dutch_0.1e-33.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dutch/dutch_0.1e-33.diff.gz
dutch_0.1e-33.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dutch/dutch_0.1e-33.dsc
idutch_0.1e-33_i386.deb
  to pool/m

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Al,

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> I'm a little puzzled.  The package 'oprofile-source' does build
> from source using dpkg-buildpackage.  I just now built a brand new
> sid chroot for i386, and ran 'dpkg-buildpackage' without a problem
> (after adding build-essential and the build-deps).

> Perhaps it is not clear from the description, but this package is
> only supposed to provide the _source_ needed to build an oprofile
> kernel module for 2.4.x kernels.  It is not supposed to provide
> the modules themselves.  Hence, I build the module packages personally
> and upload them as a convenience for using, using the source provided
> in 'oprofile-source.'  Is it this module building part that you're
> suggesting I automate?  If it is, that's fine -- I just want to make
> sure I understand what part is unacceptable.

Yes, the problem is this second part, which results in binary packages in
the archive that are not built as a result of ./debian/rules binary.  This
is non-standard, and in particular complicates the matter of security
support post-release.

If these are merely convenience packages that nothing depends on, it may be
best to remove them from the archive and just ship the oprofile-source
package.  If so, please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#300703: autofs: Upgrade fails

[Adam Conrad]

If you want to solve this bug once and for all, just replace "--exec
$DAEMON" in your stop target with "--name automount" instead.  This way,
it will match pidfile and process name, which is about as reliable for
getting the "right process", but won't fail on inode removal.

I'm making this change to the Ubuntu packages for now (as we're on an
older version without the attempted upgrade magic), but you could save
yourself a lot of headaches if you do the same in the Debian package, and
scrap a bunch of the other magic used to work around the disappearing
inode.

... Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#247542: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 247542 patch
Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300764: marked as done (missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks install/removal and hoses buildds)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:41:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300764: missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks 
install/removal and hoses buildds
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 17:41:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 09:41:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 83-216-141-215.jamest298.adsl.metronet.co.uk 
(shiri.gloaming.local) [83.216.141.215] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDQtp-0005NB-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:41:09 -0800
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian))
id 1DDQtJ-0004TF-RX
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:40:37 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: missing depends (at least) on tetex-bin breaks install/removal and
 hoses buildds
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:40:37 +
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: musixlyr, pmx, musixtex
Version: 2.1c-1, 2.5.4-1, 0.112.1-3
Severity: grave

The postrm failure is particularly bad because it wedged the buildd
chroots in a broken state causing all subsequent builds to fail.
Please fix ASAP.

| Setting up musixlyr (2.1c-1) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixlyr.postinst: line 13: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such 
file or directory
| dpkg: error processing musixlyr (--configure):
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Setting up musixtex (0.112.1-3) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postinst: line 24: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such 
file or directory
| dpkg: error processing musixtex (--configure):
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Setting up p2c (1.21alpha2-2) ...
| Setting up pmx (2.5.4-1) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/pmx.postinst: line 13: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file or 
directory
| dpkg: error processing pmx (--configure):
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  musixlyr
|  musixtex
|  pmx
| E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
| apt-get failed.
| Package installation failed
| Trying to reinstall removed packages:
| Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
|   /usr/bin/sudo dpkg --root=/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable --remove 
debconf-utils debhelper gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libg2c0 
musixlyr musixtex p2c pmx po-debconf
| (Reading database ... 15628 files and directories currently installed.)
| Removing debhelper ...
| Removing html2text ...
| Removing libg2c0 ...
| Removing musixlyr ...
| Removing musixtex ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postrm: line 16: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file 
or directory
| dpkg: error processing musixtex (--remove):
|  subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postinst: line 24: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such 
file or directory
| dpkg: error while cleaning up:
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Removing p2c ...
| Removing pmx ...
| Removing po-debconf ...
| Removing debconf-utils ...
| Removing intltool-debian ...
| Removing gettext ...
| Removing gettext-base ...
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  musixtex
| dpkg run to remove packages (debconf-utils debhelper gettext gettext-base 
html2text intltool-debian libg2c0 musixlyr musixtex p2c pmx po-debconf) failed!

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=m-tx&ver=0.55c-1

-- 
James

---
Received: (at 300764-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 23:41:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 15:41:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 83-216-141-215.jamest298.adsl.metronet.co.uk 
(shiri.gloaming.local) [83.216.141.215] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDWWn-00064a-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:41:45 -0800
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian))
id 1DDWWI-0006v2-3W
  

Bug#247542: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory

[Steve Langasek]

tags 247542 patch
thanks

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:41:40PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> The bug mentionned in the BR does not seem to be solved :

> % make
> *** Building HTML ***
> test -d ./html || mkdir ./html
> cd ./html && gtkdoc-mkhtml mediastreamer ../mediastreamer-docs.sgml
> /usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkhtml: line 42: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or 
> directory
> make: *** [html-build.stamp] Error 127

> Am I missing something?

> I have the 1.3-3 version of gtk-doc-tools.

> Thanks for your help.

My fault; I had openjade1.3 installed in the build env on this sponsored
upload, and gtk-doc does not build-conflict with openjade1.3 which provides
an alternative for /usr/bin/openjade.

The attached patch adds the missing build-conflict.  Loïc, given the impact
of this (and the previous) bug, I'm going to go ahead and fix my botched
sponsor upload with an NMU; catch me on IRC or by mail if you have any
concerns with this.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control
--- gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control
+++ gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 Uploaders: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian GNOME Maintainers 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Akira TAGOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlos Perellà MarÃn <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Ed Boraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
Emil Soleyman-Zomalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Drew <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josselin Mouette 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, OndÅej Surà 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert McQueen <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 Build-Depends-Indep: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), docbook-dsssl, xsltproc, jade 
(>= 1.2.1-35), libxml2-utils, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, gnome-pkg-tools
-Build-Conflicts-Indep: openjade
+Build-Conflicts-Indep: openjade, openjade1.3
 
 Package: gtk-doc-tools
 Architecture: all
diff -u gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control.in gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control.in
--- gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control.in
+++ gtk-doc-1.3/debian/control.in
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 Uploaders: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, @GNOME_TEAM@
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 Build-Depends-Indep: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), docbook-dsssl, xsltproc, jade 
(>= 1.2.1-35), libxml2-utils, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, gnome-pkg-tools
-Build-Conflicts-Indep: openjade
+Build-Conflicts-Indep: openjade, openjade1.3
 
 Package: gtk-doc-tools
 Architecture: all
diff -u gtk-doc-1.3/debian/changelog gtk-doc-1.3/debian/changelog
--- gtk-doc-1.3/debian/changelog
+++ gtk-doc-1.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+gtk-doc (1.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Build-conflict with openjade1.3 as well as with openjade, since
+/usr/bin/openjade is an alternative (and we want /usr/bin/jade to be
+picked up instead).  Closes: #247542
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:48:21 -0800
+
 gtk-doc (1.3-3) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Urgency high because of FTBFS caused by this package


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#300587: lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6

[Amaya]

Lirc 0.7 will be entering testing in a couple of days.
Can you test it then?

Thanks!

-- 
 .''`.   sleep: command not found
: :' :   
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3)  
  `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297116: marked as done (kaffe - FTBFS on s390)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:48:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297116: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.4.PRECVS9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 07:25:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 23:25:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D5Inn-0008S8-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:25:19 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 193793C017; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:25:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:25:17 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kaffe - FTBFS on s390
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: kaffe
Version: 2:1.1.4.PRECVS8-2
Severity: serious

kaffe fails to build from source on s390.

| In file included from /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-=
1.1.4.PRECVS8/config/s390/linux/md.h:19,
|  from ../../../config/md.h:1,
|  from /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-=
1.1.4.PRECVS8/kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-jthreads/jthread.h:41,
|  from /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-=
1.1.4.PRECVS8/kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-jthreads/thread-impl.h:16,
|  from /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-=
1.1.4.PRECVS8/kaffe/kaffevm/intrp/../locks.h:16,
|  from /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-=
1.1.4.PRECVS8/kaffe/kaffevm/intrp/methodcalls.c:21:
| /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/config/s=
390/sysdepCallMethod.h: In function `sysdepCallMethod':
| /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/config/s=
390/sysdepCallMethod.h:156: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will=
 break strict-aliasing rules
| /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/config/s=
390/sysdepCallMethod.h:156: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will=
 break strict-aliasing rules
| /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/config/s=
390/sysdepCallMethod.h:162: error: parse error before "switch"
| /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/kaffe/ka=
ffevm/intrp/methodcalls.c: In function `engine_callMethod':
| /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/kaffe/ka=
ffevm/intrp/methodcalls.c:100: warning: assignment from incompatible pointe=
r type
| make[3]: *** [methodcalls.lo] Error 1

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=3Dkaffe&ver=3D2%3A1.1.4.PRECVS8-2&a=
rch=3Ds390&stamp=3D1108673204&file=3Dlog&as=3Draw

Bastian

--=20
Another Armenia, Belgium ... the weak innocents who always seem to be
located on a natural invasion route.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.4

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkIhddwACgkQnw66O/MvCNHdpwCfcb6E5HVksHRn7vScGm17Vy1e
WrgAmwXWd+tbdEnyYtIYsI+4kG0I6Wvx
=bbL0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--

---
Received: (at 297116-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 23:53:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 15:53:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDWi9-0006uy-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:53:29 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDWcx-0004zz-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:48:07 -0500
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PRO

Bug#291510: marked as done (kaffe: update-alternatives order causing dangling symlinks.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:48:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291510: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.4.PRECVS9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2005 08:09:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 00:09:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrtrC-0001B4-00; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:09:27 -0800
Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local
(return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1CrtrB-0007KN-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:09:25 +
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:09:25 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dangling symlink
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Chris Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kaffe
Version: 2:1.1.4.PRECVS6-1


I get the following output from cron.daily:

/etc/cron.daily/man-db:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/javah.1.gz is a dangling symlink


It seems your package is at fault, and the man page has gone away:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/share/man/man1/javah.1.gz
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 28 2005-01-13 17:05 /usr/share/man/man1/javah.1.gz -> 
/etc/alternatives/javah.1.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/javah.1.gz
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 36 2005-01-13 17:05 /etc/alternatives/javah.1.gz -> 
/usr/share/man/man1/javah.kaffe.1.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/share/man/man1/javah.kaffe.1.gz
ls: /usr/share/man/man1/javah.kaffe.1.gz: No such file or directory









---
Received: (at 291510-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 23:57:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 15:57:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDWlo-00077l-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:57:16 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDWcx-0004zx-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:48:07 -0500
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#291510: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.4.PRECVS9-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:48:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: kaffe
Source-Version: 2:1.1.4.PRECVS9-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kaffe, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jikes-kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/jikes-kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
kaffe-common_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-common_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
kaffe-dev_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-dev_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
kaffe-doc_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-doc_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
kaffe-jthreads_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-jthreads_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_powerpc.deb
kaffe-pthreads_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-pthreads_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_powerpc.deb
kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1.diff.gz
kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1.dsc
kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9-1_all.deb
kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe_1.1.4.PRECVS9.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug 

Processed: 300587 pending

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 300587 pending
Bug#300587: lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gtk-doc 1.3-3.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 247542 + fixed
Bug#247542: Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298967: NMU to fix non-free font RC bug

[Micah Anderson]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Gerrit Pape wrote:

> clone 298967 -1
> reassign -1 bglibs
> retitle -1 bglibs: NMU is not for sarge
> close 298967
> quit
> 
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:18:17AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > > Hi Micah, while I appreciate your efforts, this NMU unfortunately was
> > > unnecessary, the current bglibs packages in sarge are fine.
> > I should've noted in the NMU that I did this because of the BSP this
> > weekend, we are trying to resolve as many RC bugs as possible. I
> > suspected that since you hadn't replied yet, that this report was most
> > probably true. But I see now that it is not!
> 
> Ok, as I said I appreciate your efforts.  From a maintainer's point of
> view though, I think a two days old bug on an actively maintained
> package doesn't warrant a zero-day NMU that replaces the upstream
> source.

I understand that from a maintainer's point of view, in many cases the
bugs we were targetting at the BSP were 5 days old, it is impossible
for me to acertain at this late of date why bglibs was identified as a
target when it was only a couple days old. 

However, from the release manager's point of view, the current policy
is that 0-day NMUs to fix RC bugs are allowed and encouraged until
release. Every day the release manager is deciding not to allow
certain packages into testing because of RC bugs, so the quicker that
these bugs are dealt with, the better. If we waited for every
maintainer to get around to fixing their RC bugs, then there would
never be a release. 

So, I agree with you -- this should'nt have been a target, although it
would have been a couple days later, but this is only a special case
scenario due to the ramp-up towards freeze for release.

> > > Peter, the file /usr/share/doc/bglibs-doc/latex/Helvetica.ttf in the
> > > bglibs-doc package is from the GPL upstream tarball.  The font actually
> > > is generated by the doxygen package, which Debian also distributes under
> > > the GPL.
> > 
> > If this is true, then my NMU should be knocked out and this bug should
> > be closed, no?
> 
> Shouldn't you know when doing the upload?  Please first check whether a

Shouldn't I know what? 

> bug report actually reports a real bug.  Unfortunately ``knowcking out''

To the best of my knowledge, the bug report did represent a genuine
bug, and as I have indicated a number of times, I apologize for being
wrong about that.

> the NMU isn't possibly AFAIK, you replaced the package source in the

You can replace the package source with another upload, replacing the
NMU with the new one.

> Debian archive.  IMO you should either have contacted me before, or
> used an urgency medium, and upload the NMU to a some-day delay queue;
> it's the same effect to the package, but gives the maintainer some time
> to re-act.  Now I have to deal with the broken upstream source in Debian
> sid.

I asked during the BSP if a delay queue was protocol and was told that
normally yes this is the procedure, but right now this is not.
Obviously this is the right way to do it and due to the improper
nature of the bug, this situation was incurred, and I apologize for
the problems it has caused.

micah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

[Al Stone]

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 15:02 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > Perhaps it is not clear from the description, but this package is
> > only supposed to provide the _source_ needed to build an oprofile
> > kernel module for 2.4.x kernels.  It is not supposed to provide
> > the modules themselves.  Hence, I build the module packages personally
> > and upload them as a convenience for using, using the source provided
> > in 'oprofile-source.'  Is it this module building part that you're
> > suggesting I automate?  If it is, that's fine -- I just want to make
> > sure I understand what part is unacceptable.
> 
> Yes, the problem is this second part, which results in binary packages in
> the archive that are not built as a result of ./debian/rules binary.  This
> is non-standard, and in particular complicates the matter of security
> support post-release.

Okay, that makes sense.  Thanks.

> If these are merely convenience packages that nothing depends on, it may be
> best to remove them from the archive and just ship the oprofile-source
> package.  If so, please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org.

Hmmm.  "Convenience" is an interesting term.  Without a kernel module
produced from the source contained in 'oprofile-source', systems
with 2.[24].x kernels will not be able to run the user-space tools
in the package 'oprofile' (2.6 kernels will not have this problem).
However, because 'oprofile' cannot determine which kernel will be
in use when it is run, we decided not to force a "Depends:" on a
'kernel-oprofile-module' in the package so the user has greater
flexibility.

So, I need an opinion, I guess: is it reasonable to make the user
create their own kernel modules in those cases?  If they are using
something like 'oprofile,' they had better know what they're doing,
so that's not unreasonable, but it might be inconvenient, and it
affects a (possibly large) subset of all possible users.  If it's
not reasonable, I'll leave this bug as is and put together the proper
packaging to build all the various modules from source.

-- 
Ciao,
al
--
Al Stone  Alter Ego:
Linux & Open Source Lab   Debian Developer
Hewlett-Packard Company   http://www.debian.org
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
--



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300816: Broken dependencies means interchange should not be in testing

[Karl Schmidt]

Package: interchange
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5

The upstream author emphatically states that Interchange only works with 
unthreaded Perl.  I've run siege tests on the sample data base and confirmed 
that interchange fails with multiple threads. The package states via debconfig
 that it requires unthreaded perl, yet there the dependency is for 
 perl >= 5.6.0-16 which is threaded. This is really a broken dependency as no 
 such package exists.

There are indications from the mailing list that interchange requires apache1
 (probably due to the threaded mod-perl issues). There is no dependency, 
 suggests, recommends  for < apache 2 yet a configuration script looks for an 
 apache1 config file. 

The original issue of unthreaded perl goes back almost 2 years (see bug 199718)

Compounding this issue is the fact that there are dependencies in the debian 
core packages for the threaded perl package. 

Given that to create a workable system in testing requires running apache1, 
creating a second unthreaded perl and mod-perl, and extensive editing of the 
main program to point at these non existent packages, interchange should not 
be in testing, but only unstable at this time. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages interchange depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.30.11  Debian configuration management sy
pn  libdigest-md5-perl   Not found.
ii  libhtml-parser-perl   3.45-1 A collection of modules that parse
pn  libmime-base64-perl  Not found.
ii  libsafe-hole-perl 0.08-3.1   Perl module which makes a "hole" i
ii  liburi-perl   1.30-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii  libwww-perl   5.803-4WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  logrotate 3.7-2  Log rotation utility
ii  perl [libstorable-perl]   5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300780: Swatting a very visible bug - # 300780

[Jeff Breidenbach]

Now that I think about it, lucene-demo-1.4.3.jar  has some very useful
programs. It's arguably in a better place now than before. How about
we leave it in the liblucene-java package, and follow the reporter's
suggestion?

"It seems like this should simply require the appropriate versioned
Conflicts/Replaces relationships to be declared."

This is just adding a dependency to make sure liblucene-java-doc <= 1.4.3-2 is
not installed at the same time as the current liblucene-java package. I think
that would solve the problem.

Cheers,
Jeff

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:51:33 -0500, Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jeff,
> ~From what I can tell so far, it looks like 300780 is related to my
> commenting out dh_movefiles.  That's what I get for trusting lintian
> blindly; bad, _bad_ new maintainer.  Working on a fix without
> reintroducing the lintian error; will ping you as soon as I have something.
> 
> Thanks,
> - --
> Barry Hawkins
> All Things Computed
> site: www.alltc.com
> weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
> 
> Registered Linux User #368650
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFCP2wU7bZ6kUftWZwRAgyhAKCh9X/mzxhXEUrAHapPbHwg/d1/2QCgwisL
> BENjCayeQuvR4W54TiILfq8=
> =leU9
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm

[emperor]

Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

When I start the system, everything looks fine. But when I try to login I can't 
type anything. Only the mouse works. Starting the login manager takes a long 
time and XFree86.0.log indicates that vt2 is used. If I restart kdmand then 
lookinto XFree86.0.log it now shows that vt7 is used (which is correctI can 
type andlogin again). I found a bug report in the xserver-section and an answer 
was thatit had something to do with kdm or kdelibs. So I post this error here.

System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages kdm depends on:
ii  debconf  1.4.30.11   Debian configuration management sy
ii  kdebase-bin  4:3.3.2-1   KDE Base (binaries)
ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-4.0.2   KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c102  2.7.0-6 client library to control the FAM 
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-6   GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11 0.5.13-1.0  GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libpam-runtime   0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8   Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-8   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System event recording an
ii  xbase-clients4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 miscellaneous X clients
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-3   compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
  kdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false
  shared/default-x-display-manager: kdm
  kdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/kdm


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # * emperor [Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:00:22 +0100]:
> #> Package: kdm
> #> Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> #> Severity: grave
> #> Justification: renders package unusable
> severity 300820 normal
Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm
Severity set to `normal'.

> tag 300820 pending
Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks ^^^
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300820: No keyboard inputs after system boot in kdm

[Adeodato Simó]

# * emperor [Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:00:22 +0100]:

#> Package: kdm
#> Version: 4:3.3.2-1
#> Severity: grave
#> Justification: renders package unusable

severity 300820 normal
tag 300820 pending
thanks ^^^
   pending someone sends The Emperor a nice mail clueing him in

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best night and
day to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle
any human being can fight and never stop fighting.
-- e.e. cummings



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300767: marked as done (r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:49:46 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in 
/usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 18:04:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 10:04:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pthierry.net1.nerim.net (imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org) 
[213.41.153.205] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDRGW-0007Ci-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:04:36 -0800
Received: from bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org (bateleur.arcanes [192.168.1.1])
by imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EACD8E096
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:10:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 02FB9DC111; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:04:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:04:34 +0100
From: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: r-doc-html
Version: 2.0.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/R/doc/manual$ ll *.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-admin.html -> ../../../../lib=
/R/doc/manual/R-admin.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-data.html -> ../../../../lib/=
R/doc/manual/R-data.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-exts.html -> ../../../../lib/=
R/doc/manual/R-exts.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 39 2005-03-21 18:29 R-FAQ.html -> ../../../../lib/R=
/doc/manual/R-FAQ.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-intro.html -> ../../../../lib=
/R/doc/manual/R-intro.html
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-lang.html -> ../../../../lib/=
R/doc/manual/R-lang.html

I reinstalled the package to be sure it wasn't a modification made by
another one.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

--=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCPwyyxe13INnVDYoRAogZAKC/lCFOp80Hj56YHlgfI0C3s++PXQCg3z2M
VYtXOEaxB440QcecLllD5ow=
=Gufj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--

---
Received: (at 300767-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 02:50:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 18:50:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDZTH-0002P2-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:50:19 -0800
Received: from basebud.nulle.part 
(c-24-14-51-226.client.comcast.net[24.14.51.226])
  by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
  id <20050322024947014004ucs5e>; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:49:48 +
Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDZSk-0007ka-9W; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:49:46 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:49:46 -0600
To: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual 
are loop symlinks
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Refer

Processed: Re: Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 300765 wishlist
Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> tags 300765 + upstream
Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> tags 300765 + wontfix
Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: wontfix

> On 21 March 2005 at 18:50, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> | Package: r-doc-html
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> | Version: 2.0.1-4
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> | Severity: serious
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> | Justification: FHS chapter 4
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Too many unknown commands, stopping here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300765: r-doc-html: Documents have nothing to do in /usr/lib

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

severity 300765 wishlist
tags 300765 + upstream
tags 300765 + wontfix

On 21 March 2005 at 18:50, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
| Package: r-doc-html
| Version: 2.0.1-4
| Severity: serious
| Justification: FHS chapter 4
| 
| /usr/lib : Libraries for programming and packages
| /usr/share : Architecture-independent data
| 
| The documents should be somewhere in /usr/share

1)  R is a rather large system -- the upstream sources come in at around 10.6
mb for the compressed 2.0.1 release, and 12.4 for the current sources of
the upcoming 2.1.0 release. R is also fairly popular and used by
thousands of people across many different operating systems.

2)  On all platforms, R installs all its files below a given directory.
On Unix systems this defaults to /usr/local/lib/R. On Debian, we 
use /usr/lib/R for the obvious reasons. It is similar for OS X etc pp.

3)  The R Core development team is aware of the issue; I had privately raised
this before. Linux is used as a development platform by a large number
of the R Core developers (and yes, some even use Debian). They know about
the FHS.

4)  As I said above, this is a large codebase and satisfying the FHS is a
nice goal in and by itself. Unfortunately, it is without any upside for
the other platforms. Still. I presume that a well-designed patch would
find the consideration of the R developers. But someone needs to write
and test the patch. So far, other priorities were more important. If
you care deeply about this, consider submitting a patch.

5)  This is an upstream issue. I do suggest we close it here, and I invite
you to raise and file the issue in the upstream bug archive at
http://bugs.r-project.org

6)  I disagree with your assessment of the bug severity. 

Dirk


| -- System Information:
| Debian Release: 3.1
|   APT prefers testing
|   APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
| Architecture: i386 (i686)
| Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
| Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
| 
| -- no debconf information
| 
| -- 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

-- 
Better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a precise 
answer to the wrong question.  --  John Tukey as quoted by John Chambers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300683: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:02:25PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, the problem is this second part, which results in binary packages in
> the archive that are not built as a result of ./debian/rules binary.  This
> is non-standard, and in particular complicates the matter of security
> support post-release.
>
> If these are merely convenience packages that nothing depends on, it may be
> best to remove them from the archive and just ship the oprofile-source
> package.  If so, please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org.

Just for the record, I rejected all oprofile-source-built kernel module
packages from NEW, so if it stays this way, and the -source package is
useful as is (without those module packages uploaded into the archive),
it's fine as far as I'm concerned.

If you want them in the archive though, yeah, you need to fix the build
system.
 
--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl