RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Problem...
Here my two cents: Or just set up a minutes retry delivery if you need to have the email in your spool to give you enough time to setup your exchange box. Then type new shorter times and reset entries in order to have mails delivery to your exchange To reset entries: Enter as admin, go to the spool and in the drop down menu (actions) click on Reset All Entries. Luis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: lunes, 06 de noviembre de 2006 10:22 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Problem... Hi Karl- Sorry about your drives. What a mess! Log on to Smarter Mail as the system admin, and access Settings | General Settings | Spool They only try four times, but you can set the delays there. I have mine set to 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes, for a total of 3:15, but I don't use this server for caching. You might wan to use something more like 15, 60, 120, 240 for 7:15, or maybe even more depending on yur needs. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 508-425-7176 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:49 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Problem... Wow ! FUN weekend ! Internal Exchange server lost two drives simultaneously on a RAID 5 stripe early Friday... Then on rebuild started dropping random drives. Needless to say, Dell backplanes are a little hard to come by on a weekend. Anyway, after we get the Exchange box back Saturday, it turns out SmarterMail only mailbags for 2 hours.. anyone know how to fix this before I attempt a call to smartertools ? I haven't been impressed with their support line in the past. Karl Drugge --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New Engine
Forthose using sniffer (like me) there is a new engine that you can download. It claims to be twice as fast. That should be very useful theses days where spam traffice have increased a lot. -Luis Arango ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Processes Directive ver 4.0.8 question
Does the "Processes" directive still works under 4.0.8 version? It is a directive set in the declude.cfg where you can control how many declude processes to run simultaneously. Also is the "Threads" directive working in version 4.0.8 as well? I don't see PROCESSES in the online manual. Not in 4.0.8 version.(Release notes say that 2.0.6 version uses it). And I don't see THREADS in the online manual. It started in version 3.0.5.3 according to the release notes. If procceses directive doesn't exist. What is the directive that replaces it? The thing is that I am receiving huge amount of emails per day and from time to time my proc directory is backlogging email. I find my self with over 10K emails in the proc directory. I haven't seen that in a while and I used to increase the processes to empty the proc directory fast. But it doesn't seem to work. I thank you in advance for the answers about the directives. Regards -Luis Arango ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New Engine
Direct Link http://www.armresearch.com/message-sniffer/download/sniffer-2-3.5.zip the following is taken from their site How do I upgrade to the latest version of Sniffer? You can download the latest Sniffer engine from this page (see the Current Distribution file at the top of this page). Open the .zip file, and rename the executable to match your license ID and copy it over your current executable. regards From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig EdmondsSent: lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006 9:21To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New EngineImportance: High whats the link? I cant find it here http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Main_Page Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123 Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto ArangoSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:10 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New Engine Forthose using sniffer (like me) there is a new engine that you can download. It claims to be twice as fast. That should be very useful theses days where spam traffice have increased a lot. -Luis Arango---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time
From time to time our PROC directoryis backlogging emails.. We process about 60K to 80 K every day. And from time to time I found between 8K to 10K in our PROC. It seems to be an spammer flood, but my server is not able to manage it fast enough to empty the directory. We use Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest engine, inv-urbland f-prot When checking at the task manager I see quite a few (8 or 10) sniffer processes running at the same time as well as f-prot and inv-urbl processes, but not fast enough to empty the proc directory. The PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I don't know how to speed up the processes unless I remove sniffer, inv-urbland f-prot. I run a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and 2.00GB of RAM running Windows 2003 server. I am running Smartermail 3.3.2439 Any suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent backlogging in the PROC directory? Luis Arango ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Processes Directive ver 4.0.8 question
Darrel: Thank you for your answer.
By the way the THREADS directive is not mentioned in the
4.0.8 online manual. Could Declude update the informationof the manual and
tell us (or just me) please, how it works, default values, etc,
etc.
regards
-Luis
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])Sent: lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006
11:51To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Processes Directive ver 4.0.8 question
The replacement for the PROCESSES directive in
the newer ("service") builds of Declude is THREADS (declude.cfg file).
Once you adjust your THREADS count you will need to restart your decludeproc
service as that file is only read on service start.
Darrell
Check
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue
Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From:
Panda
Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:10
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Processes
Directive ver 4.0.8 question
Does the "Processes" directive still works under
4.0.8 version? It is a directive set in the declude.cfg where you can
control how many declude processes to run simultaneously.
Also is the "Threads" directive working in
version 4.0.8 as well?
I don't see PROCESSES in the online manual. Not
in 4.0.8 version.(Release notes say that 2.0.6 version uses it).
And I don't see THREADS in the online manual. It
started in version 3.0.5.3 according to the release notes.
If procceses directive doesn't exist. What is the
directive that replaces it?
The thing is that I am receiving huge amount of
emails per day and from time to time my proc directory is backlogging email.
I find my self with over 10K emails in the proc directory. I haven't seen
that in a while and I used to increase the processes to empty the proc
directory fast. But it doesn't seem to work.
I thank you in advance for the answers about the
directives.
Regards
-Luis
Arango---This E-mail came from
the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The
archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time
I will try the THREADS directive to see how it goes. Luis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto ArangoSent: lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006 12:06To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time From time to time our PROC directoryis backlogging emails.. We process about 60K to 80 K every day. And from time to time I found between 8K to 10K in our PROC. It seems to be an spammer flood, but my server is not able to manage it fast enough to empty the directory. We use Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest engine, inv-urbland f-prot When checking at the task manager I see quite a few (8 or 10) sniffer processes running at the same time as well as f-prot and inv-urbl processes, but not fast enough to empty the proc directory. The PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I don't know how to speed up the processes unless I remove sniffer, inv-urbland f-prot. I run a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and 2.00GB of RAM running Windows 2003 server. I am running Smartermail 3.3.2439 Any suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent backlogging in the PROC directory? Luis Arango---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time
Thank you both for your help and comments. Yes I am running snifferin a persistent mode. It is a relief to hear that you are handling 180K with same setup.. I have found some strange issues within the server and they don't seem to be related to Declude, smartermail, etc. Mostly something related with folders, files and memory. Before I jump into conclusions I am just testing some things and report back to the forum. So far after a fresh restart of the box Proc directory went back to normal and so far so good. Meanwhile I will accept Darrell's offer and email him off the list. Thank you very muchh Darrel. Regards Luis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herb GuentherSent: lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006 16:22To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time Are you running sniffer in the persistent mode? That will lighten the load quite a bit, we are doing 180K a day w the exact same setup you are.HerbDarrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Luis, Email me offlist at support [at] invariantsystems.com and I will help you tweak up invURIBL and your declude configuration to help with this situation. You have a fast enough machine that should easily handle 150K+ messages a day easy. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:05 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time From time to time our PROC directoryis backlogging emails.. We process about 60K to 80 K every day. And from time to time I found between 8K to 10K in our PROC. It seems to be an spammer flood, but my server is not able to manage it fast enough to empty the directory. We use Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest engine, inv-urbland f-prot When checking at the task manager I see quite a few (8 or 10) sniffer processes running at the same time as well as f-prot and inv-urbl processes, but not fast enough to empty the proc directory. The PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I don't know how to speed up the processes unless I remove sniffer, inv-urbland f-prot. I run a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and 2.00GB of RAM running Windows 2003 server. I am running Smartermail 3.3.2439 Any suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent backlogging in the PROC directory? Luis Arango---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. -- Herb Guenther Lanex, LLC www.lanex.com (262)789-0966x102 Office (262)780-0424 Direct This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intended recipient(s)only. If you are not an intended recipient please advise us of our error by return e-mail then delete this e-mail and any attached files. You may not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way.---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcop blocked message but not blocked
John and Darrel. Thank you for your answers. I will be extremely careful then with Spamcop, the revdns is a very good suggestion. Regards Luis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 07:45 a.m. To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcop blocked message but not blocked Yes, servers can be removed from Spamcop pretty quick depending on various factors. FWIW IMO Spamcop tends to list known legit mailservers fairly often (gmail, aol, earthlink, etc). I use it, but I also counter weight revdns for some of those big providers mailservers to counter spamcop hits. Darrell -- -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:20 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcop blocked message but not blocked Today I found this in a message (declude logs) Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.9.248.51; I verified why was this address blocked and found out that Spamcop site says 216.9.248.51 not listed in bl.spamcop.net Verification was done 5 hours after the blocked message was received. IP belongs to one of the Blackberry's smtp servers. Any ideas? Could an address be removed within few hours?. Any ideas? Is Spamcop failing or this is common? Luis --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] iMail Sys Log Files are growing out of control
Under your domain name (based on your email), I performed several tests to make sure you are not an open relay, and it seems you aren't . with that said, only thing I can think of is that you are suffering a huge dictionary attack and that infor is -of course- beinglogged. Probably "Verbose Logging" is on and for sure that increases the amount of logs. but to grow from 4 Mb to 1.5 gig is amazing.. if this is growing by the minute, rename de log file and wait for the log to create it self again for the current day.. wait a few minutes and open de log to see the log and study it.. It will sure give you hints about what is causing such growth. Another possibility is that you have users with viruses and they are using your smtp server -big time- probably the virus is not going any where if you have an internal antivirus (Imail) but the information is logged anywayh . just my two cents. -Luis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolf TombeSent: Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 06:35 p.m.To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] iMail Sys Log Files are growing out of control I apologize if this is OT; but this is the best support group I know of for emergency situations, and I have one. Starting one week ago today (slept 13th), my iMail Sysxxx.txt log files began to grow out of control. Files, that for several years have averaged around 4Mb in size, suddenly jumped to about 1.5 Gig per day and have remained there. I found out about this when my server reported running out of Volume space on the log file partition (which has 15Gig assigned to it) this morning! These files are so large that I cant even open them! Nothing has changed on the server that I am aware of. Has anyone seen this behavior before or have any suggestion? Thanks in advance for any help anyone might be able to provide. Wolf---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Spamcop blocked message but not blocked
Today I found this in a message (declude logs) Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.9.248.51; I verified why was this address blocked and found out that Spamcop site says 216.9.248.51 not listed in bl.spamcop.net Verification was done 5 hours after the blocked message was received. IP belongs to one of the Blackberry's smtp servers. Any ideas? Could an address be removed within few hours?. Any ideas? Is Spamcop failing or this is common? Luis --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Spamcop listing google's IPs
Check http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheckip=66.249.82.224 So.. Be careful if you are giving spamcop high scores. Luis Arango --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Flooded with spam
thanks. I will Luis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chris asaroSent: Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 08:50 a.m.To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Flooded with spam Louis enable the abuse detection settings in SM. That should allow you to cut off the connection and not have to process that extra mail. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto ArangoSent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 6:52 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Flooded with spam Just checking with the list if they have seen an increase in the amount of spam messages caught. Last monday and tuesday my mail servers are flooded with spam. My smartermail server that usually process 30 to 40 K per day, processed on monday 120K and 94K of them where caught as spam. On tuesday processed aprox 110K, and 85K where spam. My spool and forward server processed over 140K yesterday. Reviewing the spool I would say that almost all spam, a lot of them trying to relayon my backup server Do you guys saw this spam increase?. btw. message sniffer, INVURIBL and declude worked fine.. I am happy I have them. regards Luis Arango---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Flooded with spam
Just checking with the list if they have seen an increase in the amount of spam messages caught. Last monday and tuesday my mail servers are flooded with spam. My smartermail server that usually process 30 to 40 K per day, processed on monday 120K and 94K of them where caught as spam. On tuesday processed aprox 110K, and 85K where spam. My spool and forward server processed over 140K yesterday. Reviewing the spool I would say that almost all spam, a lot of them trying to relayon my backup server Do you guys saw this spam increase?. btw. message sniffer, INVURIBL and declude worked fine.. I am happy I have them. regards Luis Arango ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] How to configure per-domain file for gateway domains
I am testing Declude acting as a gateway for domain on other server. The junkmail manual 4.0.8 says that global.cfg is the file used to configure the actions for outgoing email. But it also says To get around this, you can set up per-domain configuration files for the gateway domains.. I want to create a per-domain configuration file of actions for the outgoing e-mail. So I figured that creating a folder using the domain I am forwarding and a file global.cfg within that folder it will work. But it doesn't. Looking at at the debugged log file, Declude looks for the junkmail file at a per-user and per-domain basis (that is only use for incoming mail), but it doesn't look for for a global.cfg under a folder (domain) or user (global.cfg is used for outgoing e-mail) Bottom line: I don't know how to configure the outgoing actions as a per domain, per user. How does the configuration work? Could you please update the manual with that information? Thanks -Luis Arango --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How to configure per-domain file for gateway domains
David, thank you very much. I tested it and now I understand how DOSENDRACTIONS work -I believe-. Finally I just used the default junkmail in the domain, something I thought it wasn't going to work, but it worked since I am using the box to domain forwarding (SM), so there is incoming email and declude looks for the default junmail file anyway., Definitely Declude has too many directives. I hope one day I can learn and fully use at least 20% of them. Problem solved. Declude is great. bye -Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Viernes, 21 de Julio de 2006 02:57 p.m. To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How to configure per-domain file for gateway domains Add the following line to your global.cfg DOSENDERACTIONS ON Take the copy of your $default$.junkmail and rename it to $default$.sender (DOSENDERACTIONS ON uses the $default$.sender actions for OUTBOUND email rather than the OUTBOUND actions in the global.cfg) Likewise for per domain settings or per user setting ie. Alberti.sender David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 3:52 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How to configure per-domain file for gateway domains I am testing Declude acting as a gateway for domain on other server. The junkmail manual 4.0.8 says that global.cfg is the file used to configure the actions for outgoing email. But it also says To get around this, you can set up per-domain configuration files for the gateway domains.. I want to create a per-domain configuration file of actions for the outgoing e-mail. So I figured that creating a folder using the domain I am forwarding and a file global.cfg within that folder it will work. But it doesn't. Looking at at the debugged log file, Declude looks for the junkmail file at a per-user and per-domain basis (that is only use for incoming mail), but it doesn't look for for a global.cfg under a folder (domain) or user (global.cfg is used for outgoing e-mail) Bottom line: I don't know how to configure the outgoing actions as a per domain, per user. How does the configuration work? Could you please update the manual with that information? Thanks -Luis Arango --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How to configure per-domain file for gateway domains
Matt, thank you very much for your answer and your suggestions regarding how to prevent dictionary attacks. They will be very useful. Btw: I used the default.junkmail file under the domain folder and it worked, just like you just wrote. -Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Viernes, 21 de Julio de 2006 03:50 p.m. To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How to configure per-domain file for gateway domains I'm not sure why this would be the recommended method. I have always done this differently. If you create a folder under your Declude folder for the domain in question, and place a $Default$.junkmail file in it, that will handle the gatewayed domain's E-mail. So if this was example.com, you could create a file as C:\IMail\Declude\example.com\$Default$.junkmail Something did change somewhere in one of the versions where gatewayed E-mail stopped using the master $Default$.junkmail file and started using Global.cfg actions for gatewayed E-mail, but if you specify it with a per-domain config it will work. BTW, watch out for dictionary attacks. Those of us that have been doing this for more than a handful of domains have found that address validation is an absolute necessity. I'm sure that Sandy would recommend his free Exchange to Aliases scripting, but I would recommend either ORF, or Alligate Gateway for this, and Alligate Gateway is the easiest of all to configure to do validation since it can resolve in real-time off of the destination server and/or from an address flat file. Matt David Barker wrote: Add the following line to your global.cfg DOSENDERACTIONS ON Take the copy of your $default$.junkmail and rename it to $default$.sender (DOSENDERACTIONS ON uses the $default$.sender actions for OUTBOUND email rather than the OUTBOUND actions in the global.cfg) Likewise for per domain settings or per user setting ie. Alberti.sender David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 3:52 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How to configure per-domain file for gateway domains I am testing Declude acting as a gateway for domain on other server. The junkmail manual 4.0.8 says that global.cfg is the file used to configure the actions for outgoing email. But it also says To get around this, you can set up per-domain configuration files for the gateway domains.. I want to create a per-domain configuration file of actions for the outgoing e-mail. So I figured that creating a folder using the domain I am forwarding and a file global.cfg within that folder it will work. But it doesn't. Looking at at the debugged log file, Declude looks for the junkmail file at a per-user and per-domain basis (that is only use for incoming mail), but it doesn't look for for a global.cfg under a folder (domain) or user (global.cfg is used for outgoing e-mail) Bottom line: I don't know how to configure the outgoing actions as a per domain, per user. How does the configuration work? Could you please update the manual with that information? Thanks -Luis Arango --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackberry Issues - blank bodies
Thank you Sandy. I will test it. Too bad Declude hasn't address this issue. Would it work with Smartermail/Declude as well? Luis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Domingo, 02 de Julio de 2006 09:00 p.m. To: Kevin Bilbee Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackberry Issues - blank bodies The problem is with Declude adding plain text to the end of the Base64 section of the email so it decodes incorrectly. FOOTER32 shouldn't have this problem. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/do wnload/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2a liases/download/release/ http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2alias es/download/release/ --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackberry Issues - blank bodies
If you use Declude footer, turn it off. My guess (I am not an expert) is that some emails sent by Blackberrys are sent using transfer code Base64. That transfer code has a problem with Declude footer. I am not sure if the problem is at Declude end or at the Bas64 encode using an invalid character. This also happens with some emails sent by Lotus Notes. You can see these related links for more information http://vowe.net/archives/006415.html http://www.archivesat.com/IMail_Server_Discussion/thread436323.htm Also you can see this interesting discussion about blank messages when sent by Lotus Notes. However Declude is not involved in this issue. A mcafee tech support guy says that Lotus Notes does not in fact comply with RFC2045 because they use and invalid end of line character inside the email instead of wrapping. http://forums.mcafeehelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=78912sid=f6bc5730c5586fdd523f4 c7e956013bd As today I haven't seen any Declude statement about this issue in order to confirm what the problem is. Is it a Declude problem or a Lotus Notes / Blackberry problem using invaid end of line characters I just disabled Declude footer and no more blank emails from Lotus Notes or Blackberries. Regards -Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Viernes, 30 de Junio de 2006 08:47 a.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackberry Issues - blank bodies Folks - Once in awhile, we (really,me) get e-mails from folks using Blackberrys. The body is blank. I'm trying to track down the cause. We're using Imail 8.22 all patches applied. Latest version of Declude. The same e-mail, going through a different e-mail server (not Imail / Declude) goes through just fine. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance, Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question
Unfortunately it is not in the manual. Too bad.. but it is in the release notes http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 1.69 [Beta, 16 Apr 2003] ADDED ALLOWADDR option, to allow up to 20 E-mail addresses to send unlimited E-mail. Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango E. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean LawrenceSent: Miércoles, 05 de Abril de 2006 12:57 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Hi Nick, Thanks for your input. I didn't see anything related to ALLOWADDR in the manual, are there other commands available? Thanks, Dean On 4/5/06, Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dean -Dean Lawrence wrote: First, what thresholds are most of you using, that causes minimal screaming phone calls from client? 8-)RELAYTHRESHOLD11020RELAYTHRESHOLD23040 Secondly, how are you handling non-fixed IP users that may send large (over the thresholds), but not absorbent amounts of mail? ALLOWADDR[EMAIL PROTECTED]-Nick---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381http://www.idatatech.com/ Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question
Release notes don't show any other commands Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango Sent: Miércoles, 05 de Abril de 2006 04:48 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Unfortunately it is not in the manual. Too bad.. but it is in the release notes http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122 1.69 [Beta, 16 Apr 2003] ADDED ALLOWADDR option, to allow up to 20 E-mail addresses to send unlimited E-mail. Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango E. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence Sent: Miércoles, 05 de Abril de 2006 12:57 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question Hi Nick, Thanks for your input. I didn't see anything related to ALLOWADDR in the manual, are there other commands available? Thanks, Dean On 4/5/06, Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dean - Dean Lawrence wrote: First, what thresholds are most of you using, that causes minimal screaming phone calls from client? 8-) RELAYTHRESHOLD11020 RELAYTHRESHOLD23040 Secondly, how are you handling non-fixed IP users that may send large (over the thresholds), but not absorbent amounts of mail? ALLOWADDR[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Nick --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- __ Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner Internet Data Technology 888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381 http://www.idatatech.com/ Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.1Questions
The new interface looks nice. Very intuitive Have some questions: 1. Where do I config the VIRDIR directive (EVA) in the new GUI interface? 2. How do I setup de default.junkmail configuration for all domains? Not a per domain configuration? Should I add the domain default? -Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Smarter Mail Installation
Here my two cents: 15 Min: Agree and make sure on where to install (d or c), where the domains info and emails are going to held at (d: c:, network), where the spool and logs are going to be held etc 15 Min (optional): coordinating everything in your mind and on paper to make sure all steps are clear before starting setup 5 Minutes: Run setup (smartermail) 5-10 Minutes: Setup IIS to run smartermail webmail, check if it works, etc, and activate license 30 - 60 Minutes: to make tests using MX of a real domain and make sure everything is working -inbound and outbound- 30 to 120 minutes aprox: installing external components if needed. 30 Minutes: migrating or adding the domains. If it is a migration with migrating tools provided by smartertools that should be an easy task. 30 to 90 minutes (optional): adding by hand 64 POP mail boxes if you are not using a migration tool and setting up Autoresponders. Another 30 to 60 minutes double checking everything in the production environment and making adjustments if needed. Total Minimum 2 hours and 30 minutes, probably less. Maximum (reasonable) 6 hours Plus the time RTFM and learning curve regards Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2006 12:42 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Smarter Mail Installation We've been asked to estimate/quote an installation of SmarterMail, which we've not actually installed before. There are 4 domains with fixed IP addresses, 64 POP boxes WebMail and 5 two-three sentence auto-responders. For those of you who have been through it before, could you give me an idea of how much time you feel is reasonable, not including our own RTFM and learning curve time. Thanks, Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailbox Action in smartermail questions
Thank you Dave, that helps me clarify the action smartermail takes when the mailbox doesn't exist (using plus addressing), but I am not sure what the declude does when mailbox action is enabled. Probably if mailbox action is actually taking advantage of plus addressing, probably the only option left is what you just mentioned. Use Move To Folder instead of Move to folder (if it exists), to make sure the folder is created if it doesn't exist. Thanks a lot again for your time answering my post.. I hope Declude can answer the first two questions Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Miércoles, 22 de Marzo de 2006 08:17 a.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailbox Action in smartermail questions Hi Luis- I am using the same versions. I have enabled plus addressing in SM. By default, SM does not create the folder. You need to change the option in Plus Addressing from Move to folder (if it exists) to Move to folder. You can do this on the domain level under Default User Settings. I have not tried the mailbox action with Plus Addressing turned off, so I cannot answer the first two questions. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original Message - From: Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:03 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailbox Action in smartermail questions Version 3.06.4 and 4.0.94 according to the release notes added the support for MAILBOX action in Smartermail. My questions are: 1. Does the mailbox account in smartermail need to have plus addressing enabled in order for the Mailbox Action to work properly. It seems to me that it does. I just want to confirm this. 2. If plus addressing is disabled does the mailbox action work at all? 3. Also, if the mailbox doesn't exist, is it created automatically? In my tests it is not created automatically if it doesn't exist, but I am not sure if I am doing something wrong. Could you confirm. regards Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Mailbox Action in smartermail questions
Version 3.06.4 and 4.0.94 according to the release notes added the support for MAILBOX action in Smartermail. My questions are: 1. Does the mailbox account in smartermail need to have plus addressing enabled in order for the Mailbox Action to work properly. It seems to me that it does. I just want to confirm this. 2. If plus addressing is disabled does the mailbox action work at all? 3. Also, if the mailbox doesn't exist, is it created automatically? In my tests it is not created automatically if it doesn't exist, but I am not sure if I am doing something wrong. Could you confirm. regards Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway
check your declude logs.. post them here, they would be able to give us more info Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry VanderzandSent: Sábado, 18 de Marzo de 2006 11:18 a.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway have an addres that I have whitelisted WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg Yet somehow it got marked as spam There was a matchin a filter file How is this possible? Should whitelisting not take precedence? See headers below Received: from mailface.roving.com [63.251.135.75] by intown.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A17A068C; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:54 -0500Received: from ws06 (unknown [10.200.200.61])by mailface.roving.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8224448C003for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:42:37 -0500 (EST)Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:43:53 -0500 (EST)From: Ken Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: We Need Your InputMIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_Part_13064663_1921543487.1142624633764"X-Roving-Queued: 20060317 02:43:53.764X-Mailer: Roving Constant Contact 0 (http://www.constantcontact.com)X-Return-Path-Hint: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Roving-ID: 1101247029557X-Lumos-SenderID: 1011230829116X-Roving-CampaignId: 1101247029557X-Roving-StreamId: 0X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [63.251.135.75]X-Declude-Spoolname: D11790199df6a.smdX-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 22.X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: FIVETEN-BULK [3], MYFILTER [19], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT11 [11], WEIGHT12 [12], WEIGHT15 [15], WEIGHT19 [19]X-Note: REMOTEIP: 63.251.135.75X-Note: REVDNS: mailface.roving.comX-Note: FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Note: TO: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: FIVETEN-BULK, MYFILTER, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT11, WEIGHT12, WEIGHT15, WEIGHT19 [22]X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: UX-UIDL: 428964605X-IMail-ThreadID: 11790199df6a Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] imail to smartermail migration
I moved some of the domains I host in Imail to Smartermail. I run 17 domains and 230 users in Smartermail running Declude Antivirus and Junkmail. I took me half day to figure out how the migration tool works and how to migrate domains from time to time and not all at once. The migration worked almost fine. I don't use IMAP. I don't recall exactly but I remember having problems with some alias since I did rename a couple of domains prior to the migration and then rename them back in smartermail. Nothing to worry about.. But I don't recall what it was exactly. I followed instructions to install declude under smartermail and it was pretty easy to setup. I used same configuration I used in Imail (copy paste files), making sure I changed paths to reflect new smartermail paths in the declude necessary config files. Some Declude actions doesn't work in Smartermail. Declude can give you details about it, or you can read their product manuals. They will tell you what features or actions don't work in smartermail. My opinion. 1. I am very happy with the webmail interface and webmail administration. My users are more than happy with it. 2. Domain administrators have said that they feel they have a powerful administration tool (webmail interface) 3. To understand how it works is not that hard. But it nees time and dedication to get hold of all the important details within the server in order to administer Smartermail properly. 4. I am not exactly thrill about their logs. They use 3 logs (POP, SMTP and Delivery -probably they have Imap log, but I don't use it-). In my personal opinion, Imail delivered far better and deeper information in their logs. Declude logs are fully compatible with smartermail logs in order to track down a message. Very useful. 5. Smartermail version 3 has now more new and innovative features than Imail. Obviously there are some that only Imail has, but for me Smartermail now does the job. 6. Smartermail support team is very open to suggestions and to help you out with problems. I am still hesitating on moving the remaining base of users and domains, primaraly because of some administration features I require to better administer my domains and userbase, something I am asking Smartermail to consider. Secondly because I am afraid Smartermail cannot handle the load I require, which seems to be pretty small, but I haven't had the chance to read or talk to any one using Smartermail with the load I use to confirm how stable it is. Imail has been very trustable and stable since the time I first installed it 4 years ago, I process 40K messages per day (About 4000 users and 300 plus domains). If you have specific questions just shoot. I will be more than happy to answer them. Regards -Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy C. Bohen Sent: Lunes, 20 de Febrero de 2006 11:46 a.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] imail to smartermail migration I figure this is one of the better places to get real 3rd party opinions on this topic. I'm getting more and more fedup with Imail, I was hoping 2006 would improve things but from the sounds of it, it may be worse then 8.x. Who has made the move from imail/declude to smartermail/declude? How did it go? Whats your opinion post move? I can go into my problems with imail, but I have so many I'm not sure where to start. But here are some of the big ones. - Slow performance - Real bad webmail performance -Weird behavior, SMTP stops randomly, queue pileups occur randomly - Bugginess of new versions is scary.. Thanks --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0 is out - has anyone tried it yet?
I just upgraded my production/testing server from professional 2.6 (unlimited) to 3.0 unlimited (I am running in that box 220 users in 15 sites). Plan to work with over 300 domains and 4500 usersfrom my current Imail installation. so far I like the product very, very much. Ithas some things only available in Imail until now. For example the ability to send an email directly to a subfolder in the mailbox account or read from an specific folder via POP3. It is called Plus Addressing The SMTP port uses also an alternate port. "Users will be able to access their mail through either the SMTP port and the alternate SMTP port, as both will be available simultaneously. I haven't tested yet." It has also: Message archiving per domain seems to be working fine. It is organized by date. Outlook integration is only one way. From your Outlook you can see your calendar, contacts, tasks. It is very easy to setup, and works perfectly. Calendar, Tasks and Contacts intregration within the domain works great, but have't tested deeeply yet. You can import and export contacts easily. Message preview is a fantastic Speed is great if you have a good internet connection of course. more here http://www.smartertools.com/Products/SmarterMail/ReleaseNotes.aspx I am using declude and sniffer (persistent mode) and so far no problem. I will upgrade to version 4.08 there are a lot.. lot.. lot of new features. Not all tested yet.. but so far I am extremely pleased with it. give me a few days and I will keep posting what I found with it. Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert E. SpivackSent: Jueves, 09 de Febrero de 2006 02:37 a.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0 is out - has anyone tried it yet? According to SmarterTools site, version 3 is finally out. Im anxious to hear if the port 587 stuff is working right, among all the other new things this one is important catch-up feature with Imail. It also looks like they added subfolder handling to smtp and pop just like Imail.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0 is out - has anyone tried it yet?
Title: Message In both servers (the one running Imail and the one running smartermail) Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition DualXeon D2.8 2 GB Ram 2 x 120 MB (Hard Drives Raid 1) 2 NICs Intel PRO 1000 MT (external and internal) Messages Smartermail about 5K per day Imail between 30 and 40K per day -Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ErikSent: Jueves, 09 de Febrero de 2006 02:24 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0 is out - has anyone tried it yet? Hi Luis, What is your average count of inbound/outbound email messages on your server and what type of server specs/speed? -Erik -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto ArangoSent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:10 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0 is out - has anyone tried it yet? I just upgraded my production/testing server from professional 2.6 (unlimited) to 3.0 unlimited (I am running in that box 220 users in 15 sites). Plan to work with over 300 domains and 4500 usersfrom my current Imail installation. so far I like the product very, very much. Ithas some things only available in Imail until now. For example the ability to send an email directly to a subfolder in the mailbox account or read from an specific folder via POP3. It is called Plus Addressing The SMTP port uses also an alternate port. "Users will be able to access their mail through either the SMTP port and the alternate SMTP port, as both will be available simultaneously. I haven't tested yet." It has also: Message archiving per domain seems to be working fine. It is organized by date. Outlook integration is only one way. From your Outlook you can see your calendar, contacts, tasks. It is very easy to setup, and works perfectly. Calendar, Tasks and Contacts intregration within the domain works great, but have't tested deeeply yet. You can import and export contacts easily. Message preview is a fantastic Speed is great if you have a good internet connection of course. more here http://www.smartertools.com/Products/SmarterMail/ReleaseNotes.aspx I am using declude and sniffer (persistent mode) and so far no problem. I will upgrade to version 4.08 there are a lot.. lot.. lot of new features. Not all tested yet.. but so far I am extremely pleased with it. give me a few days and I will keep posting what I found with it. Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert E. SpivackSent: Jueves, 09 de Febrero de 2006 02:37 a.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0 is out - has anyone tried it yet? According to SmarterTools site, version 3 is finally out. Im anxious to hear if the port 587 stuff is working right, among all the other new things this one is important catch-up feature with Imail. It also looks like they added subfolder handling to smtp and pop just like Imail.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x
Doesn't have that option as far I as have seen. Regarding your other question. I believe that support from declude will have the answer Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Jueves, 09 de Febrero de 2006 03:19 p.m. To: JunkMail Declude Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x Does anyone know if SmarterMail has Program aliases. I have checked the docs and am going back and forth with SmarterTools sales, but not to be found. It is the only missing feature I would need to move away from Imail. So now here is my declude question. Could I use smartermail/declude, with an external test, to identify a message form a specific account then process and move the message/delete a message to where I would like. What would happen when declude gets control back and the message no longer exists? We currently use program aliases to process EDI orders from customers. Kevin Bilbee Network Administrator Standard Abrasives, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (805) 520-5800 x7332 Changing the way industry works. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x
Regarding the preview of messages for spamming review. You can use the preview option of version 3.0. You can preview every message without opening it. First time the page is heavy to load but it saves a lot of time. There are two preview options, small and large preview. Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Jueves, 09 de Febrero de 2006 04:42 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x Kevin,I don't believe they introduced this, though they closed many gaps that they had in IMail equivalent functionality in this release, and changed a few other things that concerned me. For instance, they introduced sub-mailbox functionality, and they also gave us the ability to turn off autoresponders and catch-all's.My greatest concerns about SmarterMail's Web interface are these three things: 1) Virtually no control of content outside of skinning, so you can't tweak things that they don't expressly allow you to tweak (such as removing a link to a piece of functionality).2) Webmail uses a separate page for viewing a message list and viewing a message, so you have to click back and forth, and this is completely impractical for doing any form of spam review. It doesn't matter that much for occasional end-use, but it is certainly not lingua franca for Webmail clients.3) Integration of SmarterMail spam blocking functionality in the interface can be confusing to end users if you handle spam outside of that system. I'm not sure if Declude has a tie in to that functionality, but I'm guessing not at this momentand also one big non-interface thing that also concerns me a great deal: 4) Proprietary mailbox format, which makes them pretty much uneditable (or at least I can't figure out how to do it without a hex editor). I really wish they would abandon this and go to simple text files.I host E-mail on SmarterMail, and I am generally happy with that, but I won't move my Declude setup there until they change these things because my hands are tied by the needs of my system. Program aliases are real nice to have, but I'm not currently tied down by that need.There are plenty of good points, so don't let me make it sound bad. They have things like archiving of E-mail for SOX compliance, shared calendaring, Outlook integration with calendaring, tasks, content filtering, great performance and stability, and a nicer interface than IMail 8.x- (but I prefer IMail's wide flexibility in the new Webmail a great, great deal more, but that isn't a universal need). Naturally, people should do due-diligence before upgrading or migrating, especially on a brand new major release.MattKevin Bilbee wrote: Does anyone know if SmarterMail has Program aliases. I have checked the docs and am going back and forth with SmarterTools sales, but not to be found. It is the only missing feature I would need to move away from Imail. So now here is my declude question. Could I use smartermail/declude, with an external test, to identify a message form a specific account then process and move the message/delete a message to where I would like. What would happen when declude gets control back and the message no longer exists? We currently use program aliases to process EDI orders from customers. Kevin Bilbee Network Administrator Standard Abrasives, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (805) 520-5800 x7332 Changing the way industry works. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up
let's see. if your files are filling up in your spool, seems to me that declude doesn't have anything to do with it. the operating theory of declude is as follows (copied from declude web site) Email-IN - Mail Server - declude.exe - Proc - decludeproc.exe -work- spool - Mail Server - Email-OUT ||Review-- ||Error-- The files you see in the spool are already processed by declude. So the problem is the mail Server it self (imail in your case). Of course there are a lot of variables. Is the proc directory full as well? or it is empty -the load is not as high whe you take a look at it-=. Probably if declude has something to do with it, it is because it is consuming a lot of resources and that doesn't let Imail server process the messages in the spool efficiently. With that said, take a look at your task manager and see what processes are eating your resources. Are you running sniffer by any chance? and if you do, are you running it in persistent mode? Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. ClausenSent: Viernes, 20 de Enero de 2006 06:18 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango wrote: Have you seen any of the files in the spool to see if there are real mails and not bouncing ones. Or perhaps to make sure your mailserver wasn't hikacked? Are those emails for or from your users? Make sure nobody is using your server to relay on and is sending large amounts of spam from there. That will explain why you have 37K messages in your spool what is you daily volumen of emails? Have you checked declude logs to see if they offer valuable information to determine what is going on. Do you run Imail or Smartermail? I'm running IMail. I haven't noticed anything unusual in the logs, and I'm running two Postfix boxes in front of the IMail server to ward off distributed dictionary attacks, and their config has not changed.-- A. Clausen
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up
Have you seen any of the files in the spool to see if there are real mails and not bouncing ones. Or perhaps to make sure your mailserver wasn't hikacked? Are those emails for or from your users? Make sure nobody is using your server to relay on and is sending large amounts of spam from there. That will explain why you have 37K messages in your spool what is you daily volumen of emails? Have you checked declude logs to see if they offer valuable information to determine what is going on. Do you run Imail or Smartermail? -Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. ClausenSent: Viernes, 20 de Enero de 2006 12:44 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool Directory Backed Up We upgraded to 3.0.5.23 a couple of weeks ago, and since then I've noticed a steady expansion in the number of files in the spool directory. It's now up to about 37000 files. I'm fairly certain that Declude has something to do with this. Any hints? -- A. Clausen
[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer in Persistent Mode using Windows Resource Kit Tools
Here is another method to install sniffer in persistent mode. I just want to share it with you and others out there. I hope it is useful. I am not sure if there is information about how to install persistent mode using the windows resource kit tools in this list. So I decided to post it just in case. I have tested for a week and it works fine for me under Windows 2003 I switched to it, since RunSvcExe started to show some errors in my event viewer ==Sniffer in Persistent Mode Using Windows Resource Kit Tools== 1. Create a directory in C: called for example reskit c:\reskit 2. Place the following windows NT/2000/2003 windows resource kit files (they are free). Download the kit from microsoft.com instsrv.exe srvany.exe 3. Run the following command line c:\reskit\instsrv.exe Declude Sniffer c:\reskit\Srvany.exe that will set a service under the name Declude Sniffer 4. Open your registry and look for the key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Declude Sniffer 5. Then add a key and name it Parameters 6. Next Add a Value and type this information Value Name:Application Data Type: REG_SZ (String) String: [full path of your sniffer installation]\snfrv2r3.exe xnk05x5vmipeaof7 persistent Note for licensed users: replace snfrv2re.exe with your licenced sniffer application name and xnk05x5vmipeaof7 with the licenced code. 7. In your Services Manager locate the service named Declude Sniffer and start it. 8. Set the Startup Type to Automatic. You are set to go. TO REMOVE THE SERVICE--- if you want to remove the service just type the following command line c:\reskit\instsrv.exe Declude Sniffer REMOVE -Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer in Persistent Mode using Windows Resource Kit Tools
The Value Name of Step 6 is: Application -Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Miércoles, 18 de Enero de 2006 01:13 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer in Persistent Mode using Windows Resource Kit Tools I am confused with step 6 6. Next Add a Value and type this information Value Name:Application Data Type: REG_SZ (String) String: [full path of your sniffer installation]\snfrv2r3.exe xnk05x5vmipeaof7 persistent What is the Value name??? Thank you Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet Computer Services 519-741-1222 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:15 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer in Persistent Mode using Windows Resource Kit Tools Here is another method to install sniffer in persistent mode. I just want to share it with you and others out there. I hope it is useful. I am not sure if there is information about how to install persistent mode using the windows resource kit tools in this list. So I decided to post it just in case. I have tested for a week and it works fine for me under Windows 2003 I switched to it, since RunSvcExe started to show some errors in my event viewer ==Sniffer in Persistent Mode Using Windows Resource Kit Tools== 1. Create a directory in C: called for example reskit c:\reskit 2. Place the following windows NT/2000/2003 windows resource kit files (they are free). Download the kit from microsoft.com instsrv.exe srvany.exe 3. Run the following command line c:\reskit\instsrv.exe Declude Sniffer c:\reskit\Srvany.exe that will set a service under the name Declude Sniffer 4. Open your registry and look for the key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Declude Sniffer 5. Then add a key and name it Parameters 6. Next Add a Value and type this information Value Name:Application Data Type: REG_SZ (String) String: [full path of your sniffer installation]\snfrv2r3.exe xnk05x5vmipeaof7 persistent Note for licensed users: replace snfrv2re.exe with your licenced sniffer application name and xnk05x5vmipeaof7 with the licenced code. 7. In your Services Manager locate the service named Declude Sniffer and start it. 8. Set the Startup Type to Automatic. You are set to go. TO REMOVE THE SERVICE--- if you want to remove the service just type the following command line c:\reskit\instsrv.exe Declude Sniffer REMOVE -Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Issues with Windows 2003 FTP service
Thanks a lot for the follow up and answer to your own post. It may help us in the future. You are very kind. I am glad you were able to solve the problem. regards Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Miércoles, 04 de Enero de 2006 08:37 a.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Issues with Windows 2003 FTP service Good morning all, I figured that I might save those that might respond some time...I found and fixed the issue. Turns out that the MS SMTP part of the metabase was still corrupt in some way...not sure exactly how...and this was causing FTP of all things to behave very, very slowly (while MS SMTP was operating normally). After a lot of playing around with things I figured out that it was the MS SMTP segment of the metabase that when enabled as it was originally would cause FTP to drag, and I also found that stopping the MS SMTP service would cause FTP to return to normal. Why??? Who really knows, but when my metabase was corrupted, it was a corruption in the MS SMTP portion of the file and somehow it is still bad (I'm thinking that my backup copy that I restored had the error that eventually caused the corruption). Thanks, Matt Matt wrote: I'm at wits end with this and I figured that I would put a feeler out here to see if anyone has a clue as to what the source of my issue might be. My MSFTPSVC on one server suddenly has slowed to a crawl, i.e. 15 to 60 seconds from issuing a command to receiving a response. This even happens with the FTP client on the same server going to 127.0.0.1. I have also tested by installing a third-party FTP server on the same box and that worked fine. There is nothing else that is remarkable going on with that server, and I am unsure as to what precipitated the issue, though one possibility is the last MS security rollout that caused my metabase to become corrupted following the reboot back on 12/22. I fixed that with a copy from a backup and all seemed normal. The corrupted metabase showed a block of random characters in the middle of the XML file, and it occurred in the SMTP segment. The current working metabase looks just fine, but I'm thinking that whatever caused the corruption might have also corrupted some other stuff that is affecting FTP. The release notes on those patches didn't suggest anything related to the FTP service or TCP/IP. I have tried many different things from uninstalling and reinstalling the FTP service, removing the last two MS patches (and reinstalling them), and a host of smaller tasks. I have run a rootkit detector and I have real-time virus protection on the server, but that was just to eliminate the very small possibility as the server is well firewalled, completely patched, has only one regular RD user (myself), unnecessary services are disabled, and I even stay away from often exploited software such as Perl and PHP. There is nothing else abnormal on the server that would suggest a bug or otherwise. Curiously this isn't affecting the Web server or SMTP services that are also part of IIS along with FTP. One clue to the problem is that when I reset my router, FTP works at full speed for maybe up to a minute. Although this makes no sense in the purest sense, the same thing happens when using a client on the same box FTPing to 127.0.0.1...the FTP will work at normal speed for a short while when FTPing to 127.0.0.1 immediately following a router reload. I am 99.9% positive that my network has nothing to do with causing the issue, but this one thing suggests that there is some interaction with TCP/IP and the FTP service that is contributing to the issue. This makes me think that it is a bug with the IIS rate limiting which requires QOS to be bound to the NIC, and maybe the router resets are resetting the QOS/rate limiting, allowing it to operate at full speed until it adjusts back to almost no throughput. I have rate limiting turned on for both Web and FTP, but this is only affecting FTP. I have tried turning off QOS and rebooting, but that had no affect on the issue, yet the way that rate limiting works, it seems to explain why a router reload causes things to work well for a few moments before degrading again. At this point my next try will probably be to uninstall and reinstall all of IIS, but I was hoping that maybe someone around here has seen this or a similar issue, or if there were any ideas about the possible interaction with QOS and rate limiting gone bad, and how to reinstall that part of Windows if possible. I would like to avoid rebuilding this box, but I won't keep it running in the present state with an unknown issue even though I could
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0
what questions do you have regarding smartermail? or what is your username in the forum to look for them. I try to be actively involved in the forum -that is my way to learn about smartermail- and I will be glad to try to help. regards -Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael GraveenSent: Miércoles, 21 de Diciembre de 2005 08:51 a.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0 I've also posted question to their forum with little or no response (I didn't think the questions were that obscure). There definitely seems to be more "experts" in the IMail camp, or at least experts that are willing to share.As with new versions of IMail, I'll take the "wait and see attitude" with Smartermail 3.0MIchael GraveenAt 03:42 AM 12/21/2005, you wrote: The community support for SmarterMail is much smaller (or at least quieter).We are running one SM server for a client and Ive posted several questions on the SM support forums and have not received any responses at all.Similar posts to Imail or Declude discussion lists have always resulted in lots of replies with useful help.Obviously the products are different and the questions are different, but so far Im not impressed with the size/responsiveness of the community. Thats an important factor we will consider seriously before migrating any other servers from Imail to SM saving a few hundred dollars in license costs is insignificant if we cant get help one way or another as quickly.(Needless to say, the SM questions were on issues that SM tech support provided courteous but not helpful replies when first submitted privately as an email support case, so I was hoping for help from the community) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Evans MartinSent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:48 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0Its such a breath of fresh air having been in the IMail camp for the last several years. LOL!Evans MartinEVANS MARTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]HOSTING: http://www.martek.netPROGRAMMING: http://www.martekware.comiPlus Info Browser IPBs IMail Migration Tool, password browser, reporting suite make IPlus Info Browser something no IMail administrator should be without. http://www.martek.net/Default.aspx?tabid=96 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary SteinerSent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 6:48 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0The following was posted today on SmarterTools web forums: Q: When will we expect to see v. 3? A: The release date depends on the results of final QA. The product is essentially done, just making sure that all the bugs are out of it. Since mail servers are so critical to people's infrastructure, we work extremely hard to make a stable release with no issues that are going to bite you. We don't sacrifice stability for a quick release. Assuming everything is in good order (which to this point it appears to be), release will be middle of January.You can view the original post at http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/2/11125/ShowPost.aspx#11125
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent?
Routeto routes to an email address.. Not a subfolder Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems Sent: Sábado, 05 de Noviembre de 2005 09:26 a.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent? - Original Message - From: Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 5:27 PM As far as I know there is no support for Mailbox Action. The equivalent is Routeto for Smartermail, but still far from the nice functionality of the Mailbox action. I hope some day we have Mailbox action available for smartermail as well. Is an action I miss a lot. Is Routeto for SmarterMail equivalent in that you can route a given user's spam to a subfolder in their individual mailbox, or does it only route to an email address like RouteTo for IMail? Bill Green --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent?
As far as I understand, such feature doesn't exist in SmarterMail Read this post http://forum.smartertools.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=7296 It is a list of features that we (imail) users would like to see in SmarterMail. Read my reply of May 20, where I address the [EMAIL PROTECTED] issue I would love that feature in SmarterMail as weel as the full compatibility of the Mailbox (declude). Specifically for the Mailbox action to work in smartermail I don't know who has to make changes. Smartermail or Declude? So I don't know who to suggest to look at that feature in order to make it work in smartermail Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Sábado, 05 de Noviembre de 2005 12:00 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent? In IMail an email address like [EMAIL PROTECTED] acts as both an address and a mailbox. Anything like it in SmarterMail? Darin. - Original Message - From: Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 11:32 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent? Routeto routes to an email address.. Not a subfolder Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems Sent: Sábado, 05 de Noviembre de 2005 09:26 a.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent? - Original Message - From: Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 5:27 PM As far as I know there is no support for Mailbox Action. The equivalent is Routeto for Smartermail, but still far from the nice functionality of the Mailbox action. I hope some day we have Mailbox action available for smartermail as well. Is an action I miss a lot. Is Routeto for SmarterMail equivalent in that you can route a given user's spam to a subfolder in their individual mailbox, or does it only route to an email address like RouteTo for IMail? Bill Green --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent?
As far as I know there is no support for Mailbox Action. The equivalent is Routeto for Smartermail, but still far from the nice functionality of the Mailbox action. I hope some day we have Mailbox action available for smartermail as well. Is an action I miss a lot. Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems Sent: Martes, 01 de Noviembre de 2005 12:25 p.m. To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent? I've been following SmarterMail's growth with interest on this mailing list since IMail's price debacle last year (or was it 2 yrs ago?). The dealbreaker for us then was the lack of an equivalent to the IMail/Declude Mailbox Action where I could route mail of a certain weight range to a user's subfolder accessable by the user via WebMail. This has been extremely popular with our customers and was actually the feature which drew us to Declude in the first place. Now, from what I'm seeing on the IMail list, it looks as if IpSwitch is again engaging in Sticker Shock on the IMail Annual Maintenance. I'm looking at SmarterMail with renewed interest as, I'm sure, are others. Have I missed news of a SmarterMail equivalent to the Mailbox Action, or is one coming soon? Bill --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wondering about Declude 3.x
How does the autoreview directory option works? Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Miércoles, 19 de Octubre de 2005 02:38 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wondering about Declude 3.x Planning to post 3.0.5.9 tomorrow. Fixes include COUNTRY and MAILFROM, improved installer, autoreview directory option, error directory for files not able to be moved, smartermail forward issue resolved etc. In general we have been pleased with the results - of the outstanding issues these seem to be isolated to a specific customer environments, and we are currently working to try replicate these. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:25 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wondering about Declude 3.x I appreciate the others sharing their experiences, but I was also hoping that someone from Declude could comment on the current state, any known issues, and what the plans are related to bugs and/or tweaks to the newly introduced code. Thanks, Matt Matt wrote: Since things have been quite for some time, I just wanted to check up on what is happening with 3.x. The last that I heard, there were several people having issues with multi-processor systems. The thread settings also concern me in the way that they are being implemented. It appears from reports that these can greatly affect the performance of a system (and therefore it's stability/ability), and knowing how variable E-mail can be, I'm not sure that this is something that I would want to have hard coded on my system. I would hope that there would be another way to go about this. Right now I'm on 2.0.6.16 and have been for some time, but as bugs arise, and bug fixes are released, I would like to have the peace of mind to upgrade to the latest code, but I'm not sure that I have that yet. I know that the folks at Declude have been working long and hard at this for sometime now, and I don't want to disrespect that hard work, but I would appreciate an update on where things are, and where they are going as far as the service issues go. Thanks, Matt --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] T*.SMD files sitting in the spool for a few hours
Imail 8.15 Declude 3.0.5.5 PRO junk and virus I have seen in my Imail installation that some T*.SMD and their corresponding D*.SMD files are sitting in my spool for about 3 hours Today we have processed over 8 or 10K messages and we have 50 or 60 T*.SMD files sitting in the spool since 10 am (ET) If I manually rename the T*.SMD files to Q*.smd and move them to the proc directory they are processed correctly. The spool log shows that the message was received a few hours ago. And that is all, no other log line until I manually move them to the proc directory changing the T*.SMD to Q*.smd (I make sure I use a lowercase smd extension, since in the proc directory I just see lowercase extensions). Also is the SMD extension treated diferently than the lower case smd extension? Any ideas why is that happening? Why it takes so long for a T*.SMD file to be renamed to Q*.SMD or Q*.smd. Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Running at 100%
If your problem is sniffer eating your CPU, solution is to run sniffer in a persistent mode. Same happened to me a few weeks ago, and answer from Sniffer was that. I suggest to run it as a service. What it does, as far as I understand, is make sure the rulebase is not loaded everytime a message is scan, but instead every 10 minutes or any x time (variable you can configure in the sniffer configuration file). The right link to start reading about it is the following http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/PersistentHelp.html Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango E. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris Sent: Jueves, 08 de Septiembre de 2005 11:15 a.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Running at 100% It looks like sniffer and fprot...when I turn off sniffer things look normal but then a lot of spam comes thru too...so I can not afford to do thatI think it is just the shear volume of spam hitting my server constantly and the server can't keep caught up.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail
1) Declude leaves directories with names such as 6432144091.vir in the SPOOL/PROC overflow directory and it NEVER goes back and removes these directories or cleans them up. I have to manually delete the .vir directories. I haven´t seen that in my system smartermail/declude installation yet. I have seen it in my Imail/Declude installation. I manually delete those. I just don't bother. 2) Orphaned files. I have found files in the SPOOL/PROC directory where the .EML extension has been renamed to .EM$ and there is no matching .HDR file. These stay until I delete the orphans. I currently have a file in my SPOOL directory called X6432144091.EML with no matching .HDR file - which means its an orphan file too. 3) The PROC overflow directory is being populated with files even when the server is under very low utilization. This, in my opinion, portends major performance problems ahead of us when the server is under a high load. I don't see any tuning parameters available which allow me to tweak under what circumstances the PROC directory is utilized. I have a dual processor server with 2 gig of RAM on it and I should not be forced to the same limitations as someone with a single processor server. This process needs to be tunable. 4) This morning I had about 100 files in the SPOOL/PROC directory. I had to manually copy them to the SPOOL directory for processing. Once I moved them, the new files being placed into the PROC directory would automatically move back to the SPOOL directory for processing. So it appears that there is some situation where Declude forgets about some files in the SPOOL/PROC directory and never goes back and moves them back to the SPOOL. I can set up a script to do this (and delete the .vir folders too) every 15 minutes but I shouldn't have to do that. Before doing that check your logs to see what happened with those files. I only find a couple of emails once in that directory and looking at the declude logs and smartermails logs the files were delivered correctly. I didn't know why they stayed in the proc directory, but any way they were delivered fine. I just erased them. 5) This morning I had 45 spam emails in my in-box that had no header records indicating that they were ever processed by Declude. Apparently there is some situation where Declude doesn't process messages. I haven't yet figured out how or why this may be happening. I'll do more research to see what I can find. I am hoping that support will get with me ASAP and that together we can identify the cause of these problems and make some enhancements to Declude which will make it more smartemail friendly. That is strange. Reading your entire email, seems like there is a problem with your configuration files. Setting log debugging to high and working with support will help you find the problem. The file not found error you mentioned in another post seems to be the key to solve the strange declude behavior. Code:[3] Error String: [The system cannot find the path specified.]. That is strange, I had some errors like that when trying to manually indicate Declude config files where exactly to hold the spam I was receiving. I gave up and decided to try again later with that configuration. I just left it as the default configuration like this WEIGHT15HOLD %DATE% And it works without problems. It creates a date folder under my D:\SmarterMail\Spool\Spam\ directory and works just fine holding spam catched the corresponding day Declude support pretty sure will help you debug and solved the problem. I am confident that declude is working fine and doesn't have a bug as big as the one you point out... Or at least I hope so. It works for me. Regards Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail vs iMail
I am currently in your same scenario.. But one step forward perhaps. I am currently starting to test smartermail in a production enviroment (Xeon dual 2.8 Ghz/2Gb Ram). I have studied it for a long time. I run 350 domains with around 4500 users (25K messsages per day). Declude junkmail, antivirus (f-prot) and sniffer (test license) Smartermail lacks of some features compared to Imail but is has a few interesting ones that Imail doesn't have. Major hit is the webmail interface and administration capabilities for each domain. I am runinng Imail and smartermail now. Some domains in smartermail in a production environment. I will let you know how it goes next week. If things goes right I will migrate everything this incoming weekend. I understand from a declude email that the largest smartermail installation they are aware of handles 4 millions messager per day running declude antivirus. -Luis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spaminator Sent: Lunes, 08 de Agosto de 2005 12:25 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail vs iMail I've long been evaluating both SmarterMail and iMail. While offended at the iMail price increases, I am generally pleased with the maturity of the product (trying to track down the cause of mail routing failures, etc. would seem more difficult in SmarterMail). However, I have not used SmarterMail in any production capacity under load. Does anyone have an opinion regarding whether SmarterMail will easily handle 800 users / 50,000 emails daily on the same dual 2.8 gHz/4gb RAM hardware that our iMail install currently runs on? Declude, invURIbl, and Message Sniffer would be running on both platforms. Thanks... --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Woes
My two Cents First cent: (configure DNSOVERRIDE in Declude. It will speed it up) In may 18, 2005 declude posted to this list the following. It worked for me. We have had reports from some customers that their spool and overflow folders have been slowly backing up using Declude 2.0.6 If you are experiencing this kind of problem, type Declude -diag at the command prompt. SmarterMail If you see 'Using [sm.decludekey.us]' more than once, follow steps 1-5 Imail If you see 'Using [im.decludekey.us]' more than once, follow steps 1-5 1. Create a new txt file in your Declude folder and rename it to declude.cfg. If you already have a declude.cfg skip to step 2 2. Open the declude.cfg in notepad 3. Add DNSOVERRIDE xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is your DNS server IP address (use the IP defined in your Smartermail or IMail administrator DNS field) 4. Save the declude.cfg file 5. Return to the command prompt and type Declude -diag you should see the 'Using' text being displayed only once. 6. Monitor the spool and the overflow to see if the situation has improved. Second Cent: While testing bitdefender as a second scanner, my spool folder started growing big time. Reason bitdefender wasn't fast enough. Once bitdefender was disable as a second scanner, f-prot my first one handled everything quite well. Maybe your mcafee scanner is not fast enough. F-prot handle my load very well and I understand it is one of the fastest commandscanners around.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto
Check this archived message. I believe It has the answer you are looking for http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24505.html it the solution has a small error than is later fixed in the posts. Instead of warn, the test should use COPYTO Hope it helps Luis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher Sent: Viernes, 20 de Mayo de 2005 03:42 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto I would like to use copyto to receive a copy of all email sent/receive from a particular user. I am already using the Imail copy all mail, but I have that setup for another customer to monitor and I now have another customer that wants a user monitored. Is there anyway in Junkmail to monitor all email from a user and to setup multiple sessions? Kyle Imail 8.20 Junkmail 2.0.6 Pro
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)
I totally agree. Here is a link with some of the features missing http://forums.smartertools.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=8767 However its webmail is very nice. I hope we have that in IMAIL. Luis Arango -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Jueves, 19 de Mayo de 2005 01:09 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?) So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few months ... everyone in here seems to rant and rave about it, wishing they had switched sooner. However, when I really dig into it, it seems like it's missing a lot of common functionality. Here's a couple examples that I confirmed with their tech support: - There's no way to have an alias launch an EXE (or do anything but go to another email address) - There's no global filters, and no way to create filters automatically with web services. Editing the XML directly would require a service restart. So it'd need to be entirely manual, or find a way to hook their DLLs I guess. - No way to change the connection banner for IMAP (or smtp or pop3) - No way to create an address or alias that would allow a user to unsubscribe the mailing list by just sending a message there, it *needs* to have unsubscribe in the subject. I assume this could somehow be rigged with some title-rewriting content filter .. ick. I've seen a few other things that concern me .. some of this stuff is on the list, or has been put on the list for the next release, but they're shooting for December. So, I guess we should realistically assume 2006. Any thoughts? Jonathan --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. __ [Email scanned for viruses by Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-] [Email escaneado contra virus por Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-] __ [Email scanned for viruses by Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-] [Email escaneado contra virus por Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders...
Thanks.. I tested it.. im.decludekey.us showed up 3 times. I configured the dnsoverride and the the using text was displayed only once. No more im.decludekey.us texts. Is that OK? Besides one more setting I have to keep in mind when changing DNSs or when switching servers (in case de DNS changes), could you please tell us how often Declude phones home? Or what is all this about? It would be great to further understand the whole issue. For the record. 2 weeks ago we were bombarded with thousands of emails with viruses. Our overflow folder increased tremendously (over 2K to 3K in the overflow). Delays of 2 to 4 hours to deliver emails to the mailboxes. Declude seemed very slowed analyzing messages. Perhaps the DNS resolve time was taking too much time and this override solved the problem. Great news, I hope this new dnsoverride setting solves it all PD: it is just me that doesnt find it or there is no indication of the dnsoverride setting in the declude site? Luis Arango From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Krausse Sent: Miércoles, 18 de Mayo de 2005 03:42 p.m. To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spool and Overflow Folders... We have had reports from some customers that their spool and overflow folders have been slowly backing up using Declude 2.0.6 If you are experiencing this kind of problem, type Declude -diag at the command prompt. SmarterMail If you see 'Using [sm.decludekey.us]' more than once, follow steps 1-5 Imail If you see 'Using [im.decludekey.us]' more than once, follow steps 1-5 1. Create a new txt file in your Declude folder and rename it to declude.cfg. If you already have a declude.cfg skip to step 2 2. Open the declude.cfg in notepad 3. Add DNSOVERRIDE xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is your DNS server IP address (use the IP defined in your Smartermail or IMail administrator DNS field) 4. Save the declude.cfg file 5. Return to the command prompt and type Declude -diag you should see the 'Using' text being displayed only once. 6. Monitor the spool and the overflow to see if the situation has improved. Declude Engineering
[Declude.JunkMail] MailFrom issues
Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango E. Hi. Yesterday (Wednesday)afternoon, I had some false positives from users that I usually receive mail from, after failing mainly the MailFrom test Reason: Domain name of the domain here has no MX or A records Domains are working fine and they have MXs. Even one of the domains is in my Imail Server (where declude runs). How does Declude perform the MailFrom test? What DNS does it use? Is it a problem with the DNS's configured in the IMAIL box? Thanks in advance for your comments. -Luis Arango __ [Email scanned for viruses by Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-] [Email escaneado contra virus por Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
