Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
+1 Martijn Op 11-3-2013 15:05, Peter Reilly schreef: +1 Peter On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote: +1 on the release as is too Works perfectly in easyant :) 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org +1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build. Maybe I'm picking nits: you can't veto a release, this is a majority vote. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org -- Jean Louis Boudart Independent consultant Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.9.0 Released
From the release notes: - support for @Ignore annotation and requirement of JUnit 4.11 This isn't quite true: we now support @Ignore in JUnit4 but should be able to support all JUnit versions. The change in JUnit JAR in the optional directory was to allow testing of Assume failures with a specified message so only impacts Ant's unit tests, not tests executed by Ant. I've been using the Nightly Build version of the JUnit task to execute tests running with JUnit 4.2 for the past week without issue. Could we therefore update the homepage key features note to make this clear. I'd suggest just removing the bullet point about JUnit versions. Thanks Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.9.0 Released
Apologies for my mistake. I have just updated the homepage. regards, Antoine On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Michael Clarke wrote: From the release notes: - support for @Ignore annotation and requirement of JUnit 4.11 This isn't quite true: we now support @Ignore in JUnit4 but should be able to support all JUnit versions. The change in JUnit JAR in the optional directory was to allow testing of Assume failures with a specified message so only impacts Ant's unit tests, not tests executed by Ant. I've been using the Nightly Build version of the JUnit task to execute tests running with JUnit 4.2 for the past week without issue. Could we therefore update the homepage key features note to make this clear. I'd suggest just removing the bullet point about JUnit versions. Thanks Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
+1 Peter On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote: +1 on the release as is too Works perfectly in easyant :) 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org +1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build. Maybe I'm picking nits: you can't veto a release, this is a majority vote. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org -- Jean Louis Boudart Independent consultant Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
+1 on the release as is too Works perfectly in easyant :) 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org +1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build. Maybe I'm picking nits: you can't veto a release, this is a majority vote. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org -- Jean Louis Boudart Independent consultant Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.0 [2nd attempt]
Hi, the release vote has passed with 5 +1's and no other votes. Also we need to update the WHATSNEW [on the web site only, none in the release artefacts] to mention the fact that 1.9.0 requires Java 1.5. I am going to start copying the artifacts and updating the web site. Regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.9.0 Released
Hi, I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.9.0. Apache Ant is a Java based build tool. - Version 1.9.0 is the first Ant release which requires at least Java 1.5. - support for @Ignore annotation and requirement of JUnit 4.11 - the zip, bzip2 and tar are improved - removal of the Perforce Ant tasks; users of these tasks can use the tasks supplied by Perforce Inc. instead, which contain more functionality and connect natively to the Perforce servers - numerous bug fixes and improvements as documented in Bugzilla and in the release notes Source and binary distributions are available from the Apache Ant download site: http://ant.apache.org/bindownload.cgi and http://ant.apache.org/srcdownload.cgi Please verify signatures using the KEYS file available at the above location when downloading the release. For complete information on Ant, including instructions on how to submit bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache Ant website: http://ant.apache.org/index.html Antoine Levy-Lambert, on behalf of the Apache Ant community - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
+1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build. Maybe I'm picking nits: you can't veto a release, this is a majority vote. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
“Changes that could break older environments” fails to list the Java 5 requirement! Typo in WHATSNEW: “NullPointerExcpetion” Otherwise, +1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
Good catch, Jesse. I have to admit I find the lack of a mention of requiring Java 5 troubling. That is definitely a difference people are going to care about. Is it possible to sneak that edit in to the WHATSNEW file (in both the bin and src packages) without a whole new revote? On 13-03-08 06:55 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: “Changes that could break older environments” fails to list the Java 5 requirement! Typo in WHATSNEW: “NullPointerExcpetion” Otherwise, +1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
Hello Bruce, the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required. You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build. Otherwise, we can include the mention that the new release requires Java 1.5 in the README.html and in the emails sent to announce the release, as well as on the Ant web site. Regards, Antoine On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: Good catch, Jesse. I have to admit I find the lack of a mention of requiring Java 5 troubling. That is definitely a difference people are going to care about. Is it possible to sneak that edit in to the WHATSNEW file (in both the bin and src packages) without a whole new revote? On 13-03-08 06:55 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: “Changes that could break older environments” fails to list the Java 5 requirement! Typo in WHATSNEW: “NullPointerExcpetion” Otherwise, +1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
Yes, that is what I thought. I think your answer is a good compromise. +1 on the vote. On 08/03/2013 2:10 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hello Bruce, the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required. You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build. Otherwise, we can include the mention that the new release requires Java 1.5 in the README.html and in the emails sent to announce the release, as well as on the Ant web site. Regards, Antoine On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: Good catch, Jesse. I have to admit I find the lack of a mention of requiring Java 5 troubling. That is definitely a difference people are going to care about. Is it possible to sneak that edit in to the WHATSNEW file (in both the bin and src packages) without a whole new revote? On 13-03-08 06:55 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: “Changes that could break older environments” fails to list the Java 5 requirement! Typo in WHATSNEW: “NullPointerExcpetion” Otherwise, +1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
+1 Maarten From: Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:47 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt] Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now uploaded too. On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:16 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hi, I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the patches of Michael Clarke concerning JUnit. Let's vote on releasing Ant 1.9.0 a second time. Let' start with my own +1 Regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now uploaded too. On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:16 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hi, I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the patches of Michael Clarke concerning JUnit. Let's vote on releasing Ant 1.9.0 a second time. Let' start with my own +1 Regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
I did not find the time to make a new build last night, it will be for my NYC evening. Regards, Antoine On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: In fact I found out that I need to add ham crest on the class path, this was probably meant by the patch but I did not notice that. Regards, Antoine On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hello Jesse, in fact the patch is failing one test : testTestMethods in junit-test.xml The test bad in T2.java runs [or at least something is reported as failing ] although only ok is included. /junit /target Regards, Antoine On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: -0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support [1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It could be pushed back to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off. [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
On 03/04/2013 11:25 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: in fact the patch is failing one test : testTestMethods in junit-test.xml Now fixed? Reports: skipping tests since it fails when using JUnit 4 But there is one genuine failure I know about, which predates @Ignore support: https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix/jdk=JDK%201.7%20(latest),label=Ubuntu/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit/XMLResultAggregatorTest/testFrames/ Reproducible locally when running on Java 7. Not yet sure what it means but it looks bad. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
On 03/05/2013 08:45 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: Reproducible locally when running on Java 7. Not yet sure what it means but it looks bad. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
Hi, yes, I also noticed the failure of this XMLResultAggregatorTest and came to the conclusion that the junitreport stylesheet needed to be changed. Regards, Antoine On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: On 03/05/2013 08:45 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: Reproducible locally when running on Java 7. Not yet sure what it means but it looks bad. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
[VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
Hi, I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the patches of Michael Clarke concerning JUnit. Let's vote on releasing Ant 1.9.0 a second time. Let' start with my own +1 Regards, Antoine
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
Nice work Antoine, +1 Conor On 4 March 2013 15:34, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, I have uploaded candidate artefacts for an ant 1.9.0 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ Let's vote on releasing these. Let' start with my own +1 I ran the build on MacOS with JDK 1.6 and there were no errors/failures in the tests. On MacOS with JDK 1.7 two tests are failing : - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLResultAggregatorTest fails with an error (couldn't compile stylesheet), this is similar to a bug present in the eclipse bugzilla [1] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecuteJavaTest has one failure in testNoTimeOutForked process should not have been killed The Windows [3] and Linux [4] build configurations on the Jetbrains server referenced from our Nightly+Continuous Buids page [2] are now successful The Ant JDK build matrix on builds.apache.org is failing with errors which seem to come from the server environment or the setup in Jenkins, particularly going out of memory. I do not think that I have the karma to change the setup of the builds and add some VM args - which usually are not needed anyway. Regards, Antoine [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=384757 [2] http://ant.apache.org/nightlies.html [3] http://teamcity.jetbrains.com/viewLog.html?buildTypeId=bt133buildId=lastFinished [4] http://teamcity.jetbrains.com/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt134 [5] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix/
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
-0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support [1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It could be pushed back to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off. [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
Hello Jesse, I will incorporate the patch for JUnit support and do another build. Regards, Antoine On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: -0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support [1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It could be pushed back to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off. [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
Hello Jesse,
in fact the patch is failing one test :
testTestMethods in junit-test.xml
The test bad in T2.java runs [or at least something is reported as failing ]
although only ok is included.
Regards,
Antoine
echo file=${input}/T1.javapublic class T1 extends
junit.framework.TestCase {
public void testOK() {}
public void testBad() {throw new
RuntimeException(failed);}
}/echo
echo file=${input}/T2.java
import org.junit.Test;
public class T2 {
@Test
public void ok() {}
@Test
public void bad() {
throw new RuntimeException(failed);}
}/echo
javac srcdir=${input} destdir=${output} includes=T1.java,T2.java
source=5 includeantruntime=false
classpath
path refid=junit /
/classpath
/javac
junit fork=true printsummary=true haltonerror=true
classpath
pathelement location=${output} /
path refid=junit /
/classpath
test name=T1 methods=testOK /
test name=T2 methods=ok /
/junit
/target
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
-0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support
[1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It
could be pushed back to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
In fact I found out that I need to add ham crest on the class path, this was probably meant by the patch but I did not notice that. Regards, Antoine On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hello Jesse, in fact the patch is failing one test : testTestMethods in junit-test.xml The test bad in T2.java runs [or at least something is reported as failing ] although only ok is included. /junit /target Regards, Antoine On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: -0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support [1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It could be pushed back to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off. [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
On 2013-02-19, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: I am currently looking at the test failures of Ant under linux with Oracle JDK 1.6 here [1]. These tests are referenced from the Nightly+ Continuous Builds page [2] under Apache Ant - Core Trunk (Linux) I'd rather work with https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix/ which isn't really green (or blue) either. We may want to fix the nightly builds page. I would like to fix this so that we have a set of green lights before doing the release. +1 unless what you see is really due to environmental issues on the server. You shouldn't waste your time debugging a remote system you don't have access to, IMHO. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hello Stefan, I have found out that the root cause of the test failures found is the java vm running with file.encoding set to ASCII. The tests that fail are written in such a way that they assume that Ant is running with file.encoding=UTF-8 which is the default it seems in a lot of Java 1.6 VMs (but not all). Also, by default StringResource instances have a null encoding, which works when the encoding of the VM is UTF-8. I am making a change to change the default encoding of StringResource to UTF-8 which seems to lead to better results when the VM is running under ASCII encoding ( ANSI_X3.4-1968 precisely). Also, I found out that the contains/ selector needs an encoding attribute to have a chance to do its job when the encoding of the files to select is different from the default encoding of the JVM. I am addressing that by adding an encoding attribute on the contains selector. Regards, Antoine On Mar 3, 2013, at 5:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2013-02-19, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: I am currently looking at the test failures of Ant under linux with Oracle JDK 1.6 here [1]. These tests are referenced from the Nightly+ Continuous Builds page [2] under Apache Ant - Core Trunk (Linux) I'd rather work with https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix/ which isn't really green (or blue) either. We may want to fix the nightly builds page. I would like to fix this so that we have a set of green lights before doing the release. +1 unless what you see is really due to environmental issues on the server. You shouldn't waste your time debugging a remote system you don't have access to, IMHO. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
[VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release
Hi, I have uploaded candidate artefacts for an ant 1.9.0 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ Let's vote on releasing these. Let' start with my own +1 I ran the build on MacOS with JDK 1.6 and there were no errors/failures in the tests. On MacOS with JDK 1.7 two tests are failing : - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLResultAggregatorTest fails with an error (couldn't compile stylesheet), this is similar to a bug present in the eclipse bugzilla [1] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecuteJavaTest has one failure in testNoTimeOutForked process should not have been killed The Windows [3] and Linux [4] build configurations on the Jetbrains server referenced from our Nightly+Continuous Buids page [2] are now successful The Ant JDK build matrix on builds.apache.org is failing with errors which seem to come from the server environment or the setup in Jenkins, particularly going out of memory. I do not think that I have the karma to change the setup of the builds and add some VM args - which usually are not needed anyway. Regards, Antoine [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=384757 [2] http://ant.apache.org/nightlies.html [3] http://teamcity.jetbrains.com/viewLog.html?buildTypeId=bt133buildId=lastFinished [4] http://teamcity.jetbrains.com/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt134 [5] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix/
RE: Ant 1.9.0
Late to the thread here, but I just upgraded to 1.8.4 and have an issue with the javac task and package-info.class. We have a number of javac tasks with compilerarg line=-proc:only/ and those are generating package-info.class files. I don't see a task attribute or nested element to directly tell Ant that I only want annotations processing and not actual compilation of class files. I added a destdir attribute to those javac invocations, but it'd be nice if the task checked for that compiler arg or had an native attribute so that it wouldn't create the package-info.class files. -Original Message- From: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 10:17 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Ant 1.9.0 Hello, after a few weeks of very hard work at my day job I have a quiet day to look at these patches. I also need to look at possible test failures running the ant test suite on my MAC with Java 1.7 Regards, Antoine On Feb 5, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: On 01/30/2013 10:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs? Those with PatchAvailable [1] should be checked. (Pity that we cannot just get pull requests; coming from the land of GitHub this feels really primitive.) There were a fair number recently, e.g. the 54298-54305 series. I cannot see myself spending much time on this now unfortunately, but if you are willing to put together a 1.9.0, +1 to the effort (and incidentally a belated +1 for removing proprietary tasks). [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?keywords=PatchAvailable keywords_type=allwordsbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status= REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOproduct=Antlist_id=95004 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org -- This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
On 02/19/2013 10:31 AM, Justin Georgeson wrote: have an issue with the javac task and package-info.class Please use Bugzilla to report things like this. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
RE: Ant 1.9.0
Indeed https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54583 -Original Message- From: Jesse Glick [mailto:jgl...@cloudbees.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:34 PM To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: Ant 1.9.0 On 02/19/2013 10:31 AM, Justin Georgeson wrote: have an issue with the javac task and package-info.class Please use Bugzilla to report things like this. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org -- This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hello, after a few weeks of very hard work at my day job I have a quiet day to look at these patches. I also need to look at possible test failures running the ant test suite on my MAC with Java 1.7 Regards, Antoine On Feb 5, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: On 01/30/2013 10:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs? Those with PatchAvailable [1] should be checked. (Pity that we cannot just get pull requests; coming from the land of GitHub this feels really primitive.) There were a fair number recently, e.g. the 54298–54305 series. I cannot see myself spending much time on this now unfortunately, but if you are willing to put together a 1.9.0, +1 to the effort (and incidentally a belated +1 for removing proprietary tasks). [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?keywords=PatchAvailablekeywords_type=allwordsbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOproduct=Antlist_id=95004 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hi, I am currently looking at the test failures of Ant under linux with Oracle JDK 1.6 here [1]. These tests are referenced from the Nightly+ Continuous Builds page [2] under Apache Ant - Core Trunk (Linux) It looks like the OS/JVM combination does not read properly the XML entities or the non-ascii characters in the build files. I would like to fix this so that we have a set of green lights before doing the release. If someone has some ideas on the root cause of the test failures and the best way to address that I am interested. Also I did not look yet at the FindBugs build configuration which is also failing. Regards, Antoine [1] http://teamcity.jetbrains.com/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt134 [2] http://ant.apache.org/nightlies.html On Feb 18, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hello, after a few weeks of very hard work at my day job I have a quiet day to look at these patches. I also need to look at possible test failures running the ant test suite on my MAC with Java 1.7 Regards, Antoine On Feb 5, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: On 01/30/2013 10:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs? Those with PatchAvailable [1] should be checked. (Pity that we cannot just get pull requests; coming from the land of GitHub this feels really primitive.) There were a fair number recently, e.g. the 54298–54305 series. I cannot see myself spending much time on this now unfortunately, but if you are willing to put together a 1.9.0, +1 to the effort (and incidentally a belated +1 for removing proprietary tasks). [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?keywords=PatchAvailablekeywords_type=allwordsbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOproduct=Antlist_id=95004 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
On 01/30/2013 10:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs? Those with PatchAvailable [1] should be checked. (Pity that we cannot just get pull requests; coming from the land of GitHub this feels really primitive.) There were a fair number recently, e.g. the 54298–54305 series. I cannot see myself spending much time on this now unfortunately, but if you are willing to put together a 1.9.0, +1 to the effort (and incidentally a belated +1 for removing proprietary tasks). [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?keywords=PatchAvailablekeywords_type=allwordsbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOproduct=Antlist_id=95004 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Regarding bugs requested from the community I would definitely like to see https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54408 I submitted this bug with patch, and if someone can review my changes I'd be happy to revise based on suggestions. Thanks, Ben Wing On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:09:33 -0500 From: Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de Reply-To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Ant 1.9.0 Hi, I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs. Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ? Also, Jan Mat?rne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce. Now would be a good time to remove them. Do we need a vote for that ? Best regards, Antoine [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E dic...@freeshell.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://freeshell.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hi On 2013-01-31, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. Obviously I've not been very active here lately, and to be honest, I don't expect this to change anytime soon. Thank you for taking this forward. Matt, do you expect the Java5ification to break existing public APIs? If not, we could as well create a release now with the rather incompletely migration and tak additional steps in later point releases. Cheers Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
I don't think I've affected any APIs as yet. This would be acceptable. Matt On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi On 2013-01-31, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. Obviously I've not been very active here lately, and to be honest, I don't expect this to change anytime soon. Thank you for taking this forward. Matt, do you expect the Java5ification to break existing public APIs? If not, we could as well create a release now with the rather incompletely migration and tak additional steps in later point releases. Cheers Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hi Antoine, I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase some months back. At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump which I wasn't able to understand. It might be nice to figure this out and finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0. br, Matt On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote: Hi, I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs. Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ? Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce. Now would be a good time to remove them. Do we need a vote for that ? Best regards, Antoine [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E
Re: Ant 1.9.0
We've discussed this before[1] and already voted in favour of removing the commercial tasks from Ant some time ago[2]. A complication was that we wanted to create AntLibs for them if we couldn't get the vendors to support them directly so that there was minimal upset for our users, but apart from the VSS tasks that didn't happen. I did contact all the vendors at the time but I got virtually no response. The only company that did respond, as I recall, was Perforce. Perhaps that is why they now provide decent tasks themselves. So this is one instance where what we wanted to happen has happened. +1 to removing the tasks, with a document redirect on where to get the tasks now. [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201005.mbox/browser [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201006.mbox/browser On 30/01/2013 7:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hi, I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs. Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ? Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce. Now would be a good time to remove them. Do we need a vote for that ? Best regards, Antoine [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hello Bruce, I can see myself implementing the removal of the Perforce Ant tasks, this should be pretty straightforward. I will work on this this week-end. Regards, Antoine On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: We've discussed this before[1] and already voted in favour of removing the commercial tasks from Ant some time ago[2]. A complication was that we wanted to create AntLibs for them if we couldn't get the vendors to support them directly so that there was minimal upset for our users, but apart from the VSS tasks that didn't happen. I did contact all the vendors at the time but I got virtually no response. The only company that did respond, as I recall, was Perforce. Perhaps that is why they now provide decent tasks themselves. So this is one instance where what we wanted to happen has happened. +1 to removing the tasks, with a document redirect on where to get the tasks now. [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201005.mbox/browser [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201006.mbox/browser On 30/01/2013 7:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hi, I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs. Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ? Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce. Now would be a good time to remove them. Do we need a vote for that ? Best regards, Antoine [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Hello Matt, I have seen that you started upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase. I do not see myself going systematically in the codebase to do that because I do not have the time to do it. I will look to see whether there are failures in Gump. I also got some failures running the unit tests in Java 1.7 locally on my Mac, I will need to dig into that and see whether the errors are reproduceable … Regards, Antoine On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Matt Benson wrote: Hi Antoine, I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase some months back. At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump which I wasn't able to understand. It might be nice to figure this out and finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0. br, Matt On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote: Hi, I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs. Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ? Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce. Now would be a good time to remove them. Do we need a vote for that ? Best regards, Antoine [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.0
Thanks very much, Antoine. It's appreciated. On 13-01-31 06:11 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hello Bruce, I can see myself implementing the removal of the Perforce Ant tasks, this should be pretty straightforward. I will work on this this week-end. Regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
