Re: [SOLUTION] CloudStack 4.3.1 some VMs would get stopped continuously
This is a great workaround, but can we make sure a bug gets filed for this issue? It'd be nice if we could get it fixed. --David On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:14 PM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: I've seen an issue where cloudstack would stop some VMs after they have been started. Posting the solution for whoever comes across this problem. I've noticed following pattern: VM was trying to be migrated to another host while another thread would stop the VM within 10 minutes of the start time. The solution was to look for a message in the log that has (981,VmWorkJobQueue, 2371) is reaching concurrency limit 1 continuously. Delete the reference id of 2371 from cloud.sync_queue_item Delete the reference id of 981 from cloud.sync_queue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
+1 (binding) Brought up a basic zone using devcloud4(Centos 6and XenServer 6.2.0-70446c), everything worked without issue system vms came up and their agent connected. Added Nux's macchinina distribution as a template. Added Ubuntu as a template. (Loved the HVM checkbox addition to the UI). Successfully brought up a VM both based on both the templates. Password retrieval worked, root resize worked. Brought up a web server on one of the VMs and opened a security group rule. The rule applied successfully. Brought up an advanced zone again using devcloud4 so centos 6 and XenServer 6.2.0-70446c. Just like with the 4.4 release marvin fails to set the traffic tags for the public/management/storage/guest networks. I skipped over this small detail and set them manually. After this everything was fine, added a machine based on Nux's macchinina template, password retrieval worked. Brought up a web server on it, did nat forwarding. All worked without issue. Great work on this release folks! On 14 January 2015 at 18:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Daan: I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the vote period will be longer. --David On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: David, Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other votes going on as well. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
[SOLUTION] CloudStack 4.3.1 some VMs would get stopped continuously
I've seen an issue where cloudstack would stop some VMs after they have been started. Posting the solution for whoever comes across this problem. I've noticed following pattern: VM was trying to be migrated to another host while another thread would stop the VM within 10 minutes of the start time. The solution was to look for a message in the log that has (981,VmWorkJobQueue, 2371) is reaching concurrency limit 1 continuously. Delete the reference id of 2371 from cloud.sync_queue_item Delete the reference id of 981 from cloud.sync_queue
Re: CloudStack Quality Process meeting 14 jan 2014
Recording of the meeting is here: https://citrix.sharefile.com/d/s0b016d158bb41c3b --David On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, A little report on this afternoons meeting: We mainly spoke on the minimal functionality that should not be touched by new commits. A list was made at [1]. Next we agreed to finalize this list next week by working through maven projects (and possibly documetation chapters) and to start grinding down on the gate specification and ipossibly implementation.[2]. It was a small committee. Hopefully this is indicative of people doing real work and not of the spin this initiative has ;) [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+basic+functionalities [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Gate+requirements -- Daan
CloudStack Quality Process meeting 14 jan 2014
H, A little report on this afternoons meeting: We mainly spoke on the minimal functionality that should not be touched by new commits. A list was made at [1]. Next we agreed to finalize this list next week by working through maven projects (and possibly documetation chapters) and to start grinding down on the gate specification and ipossibly implementation.[2]. It was a small committee. Hopefully this is indicative of people doing real work and not of the spin this initiative has ;) [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+basic+functionalities [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Gate+requirements -- Daan
StaticNat does not get disassociated from tier when plugin fails to enable the static NAT
Hi Jayapal, In NuageVsp integration, we found that when NuageVsp plugin fails to enable a StaticNat in VPC, StaticNat does not get disassociated from tier. When I looked in to the code, I found that there is a field performedIpAssoc in enableStaticNat() method. This field is initialized to false and not set to true after calling ipAddress = _ipAddrMgr.associateIPToGuestNetwork(ipId, networkId, false); So, this is value always false and when plugin fails _vpcMgr.unassignIPFromVpcNetwork(ip.getId(), networkId); is never called. But, in case of createPortForwardingRule(), similar variable is initialized but it is set to true after calling _ipAddrMgr.associateIPToGuestNetwork(). So, I tried the fix to set the flag to true after calling associateIPTOGuestNetwork() for staticNat and things are working as expected. When plugin fails, StaticNat gets disassociated from tier. Please let me know if I am missing something. Thanks, Suresh
pnfs support?
Somebody in the silicon valley meetup just asked about pNFS [1] - I’d never heard of it, but sounds interesting and in theory would negate a lot of the ugliness of NFS. Curious if anybody else is familiar with it, or if there’s a general interest in having support in ACS? John 1: http://www.pnfs.com/
Secondary Storage Behavior
Hi All, I'm working on a plugin to list all the data saved on a given secondary storage. I've experienced some unexpected behavior in the process. *Setup:* CS - 4.4.0 Hypervisor - KVM Storage - 2 secondary storage NFS mount points (/mnt/secondary, and /mnt/secondary2) All installed on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS, on their own node in the same zone. *Expected Behavior:* *System VM Templates* - When additional secondary storage's are added, System Templates are copied to the new secondary storages in the same zone. *Iso's and Templates* - If public, loaded on ALL secondary storages in the zone. If private, a secondary storage is chosen at random. *Snapshots* - A secondary storage is chosen at random and all subsequent snapshots will be on the secondary storage originally selected. *Actual Behavior:* *System VM Templates* - When additional secondary storage's are added, System Templates are reflected in the data base as being on both mount points however when exploring the directories the system templates are NOT on the newly added secondary storage. Investigating the 'template_store_ref' tables in the DB there are, in fact, two template_store_ref entries for each secondary storage both of which reference the same 'vm_template'. I've given CS overnight to maybe complete the copy or kick off any tasks to perform the copy but nothing came of it. (causing my plugin to return UUID's of system templates that don't actually reside on the given secondary storage) *Iso's* (*Working as expected*)- If public, loaded on ALL secondary storages in the zone. If private, a secondary storage is chosen at random. *Templates* - Regardless of being Featured, Public, and/or Private a secondary storage is chosen at random. *Snapshots* - It appears a secondary storage is chosen at random. Maybe I have a misunderstanding how secondary storage should work or maybe I found a bug? Any thoughts, suggestions or direction would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Kevin McGill
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...
Github user cloudtrends commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#discussion_r22991914
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java ---
@@ -894,6 +894,13 @@ protected void
injectSshKeysIntoSystemVmIsoPatch(String publicKeyPath, String pr
} else {
command = new Script(/bin/bash, s_logger);
}
+String osname = System.getProperty(os.name);
--- End diff --
Hi karuturi ,
thanks for your kindly help , yes , I should use the isOnWindows function .
ChunFeng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...
Github user cloudtrends commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#issuecomment-70043494 My test environment is on Windows 2008 cygwin 64 bits version . I can reoccur the error's by below python scripts: --- cygwin_python_test.py --- import os.path import sys file_name = sys.argv[1] if os.path.exists(file_name): print file_name else: print can not find end -- test it by , touch a file : F:/sourcecode/python/a-exist.txt First test with Backslash : $ python cygwin_python_test.py F:\sourcecode\python\a-exist.txt can not find Then with slash : $ python cygwin_python_test.py F:/sourcecode/python/a-exist.txt F:/sourcecode/python/a-exist.txt So , I thinks we should change the backslash to slash in windows environment . --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...
Github user cloudtrends commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#issuecomment-70043778 Hi karuturi , thanks for point out that I should use isOnWindows function , very appreciation. ChunFeng --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: 4.3 build issue
I think this is only on jenkins.b.o, I’m able to build it locally. On 14-Jan-2015, at 8:20 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: is there a temporary build issue with 4.3: [INFO] Scanning for projects... Downloading: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.3.2/cloudstack-4.3.2.pom [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] The project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:4.3.2 (/opt/cloudstack/pom.xml) has 1 error [ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not find artifact org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack:pom:4.3.2 in central (http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2) and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM @ line 24, column 11 - [Help 2] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException [ERROR] [Help 2] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/UnresolvableModelException INFO[0019] The command [/bin/sh -c cd /opt/cloudstack; mvn -Pdeveloper -Dsimulator -DskipTests clean install] returned a non-zero code: 1 Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
4.3 build issue
is there a temporary build issue with 4.3: [INFO] Scanning for projects... Downloading: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.3.2/cloudstack-4.3.2.pom [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] The project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:4.3.2 (/opt/cloudstack/pom.xml) has 1 error [ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not find artifact org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack:pom:4.3.2 in central (http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2) and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM @ line 24, column 11 - [Help 2] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException [ERROR] [Help 2] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/UnresolvableModelException INFO[0019] The command [/bin/sh -c cd /opt/cloudstack; mvn -Pdeveloper -Dsimulator -DskipTests clean install] returned a non-zero code: 1
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69927724 Fair point, merging it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#issuecomment-69926558 Tested locally on master, works for me. Thanks for your contribution @pyr --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69927499 Yes, that would also work. I considered it, but since the file works with both cloud and cloud_usage I wasn --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: weird db setup issue
Sebastien, Can you try again with latest 4.3/4.4/4.5/master and see if it works after Erik’s fix? Keep us posted. On 14-Jan-2015, at 7:29 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue: Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management server node IP[ OK ] Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql We apologize for below error: *** Encountering an error when executing mysql script -- table: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql Error: ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created successfully and not create-schema-premium ? I solved the issue and it seems related to MySQL What mysql version are/were you running? I just confirmed that the SQL query is accepted on MySQL 5.1, but not on MySQL 5.6. I guess they became a bit more strict somewhere in between. Adding absolute references solves it. See PR #67 for a fix -- Erik Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #548
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/548/changes Changes: [Rohit Yadav] Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better -- [...truncated 1207 lines...] T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DatabaseAccessObjectTest Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.862 sec Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DbUpgradeUtilsTest Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.425 sec Results : Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs 4.4.3-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Compiling 33 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 4 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Compiling 4 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API 4.4.3-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Compiling 31 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69926942 LGTM. Maybe we could be to put USE cloud; (or cloud_usage as applicable) in this file at the beginning, will that help? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
Github user pyr commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#issuecomment-69926943 thanks @bhaisaab --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69928504 Thanks for fixing this Erik @terbolous ! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: weird db setup issue
Sebastien, Can you check your MySQL version ? Is it 5.6.22 or above ? There was an issue with MySQL 5.6.22 - where in the SQL file mentioned returns an error, runs fine on MySQL 5.6.21 and below. You can downgrade/install the MySQL that is packaged with 4.5.0 OR update the SQL to include the use cloud before the SQL command. Raja -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:53 PM To: dev Subject: Re: weird db setup issue This happens on a new installation of Citrix CloudPlatform 4.5.0 as well. If anyone has time, we should check if this happens on ACS 4.5 and fix it -- Erik On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Sebastien, Which build/version of CloudStack are you using? this is 4.3.1 from packages, ubuntu 14.04 but I think it's an issue with my setup. that schema file has not changed in more than a year and is the same in all branches. I will keep investigating. adding use cloud (like Erik mentioned) solved the issue. On 05-Dec-2014, at 7:22 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue: Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management server node IP[ OK ] Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql We apologize for below error: *** Encountering an error when executing mysql script -- table: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql Error: ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created successfully and not create-schema-premium ? - the create-database* scripts doesn't need a selected database - the create-schema.sql script starts by selecting the database (use cloud;) create-schema-premium.sql doesn't have the same selection at start, and I'm no sql guru but it could be a foreign key or something else without an explicit schema that fails. you should probably be able to workaround it by adding a use cloud; early in the create-schema-premium.sql file that's my two cent. -- Erik Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: weird db setup issue
I can't answer for Sebastien, but in my case it was 5.6.22 (installed from mysql-community repo on centos7). Do you have a link to the mysql bug? -- Erik On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Raja Pullela raja.pull...@citrix.com wrote: Sebastien, Can you check your MySQL version ? Is it 5.6.22 or above ? There was an issue with MySQL 5.6.22 - where in the SQL file mentioned returns an error, runs fine on MySQL 5.6.21 and below. You can downgrade/install the MySQL that is packaged with 4.5.0 OR update the SQL to include the use cloud before the SQL command. Raja -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:53 PM To: dev Subject: Re: weird db setup issue This happens on a new installation of Citrix CloudPlatform 4.5.0 as well. If anyone has time, we should check if this happens on ACS 4.5 and fix it -- Erik On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Sebastien, Which build/version of CloudStack are you using? this is 4.3.1 from packages, ubuntu 14.04 but I think it's an issue with my setup. that schema file has not changed in more than a year and is the same in all branches. I will keep investigating. adding use cloud (like Erik mentioned) solved the issue. On 05-Dec-2014, at 7:22 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue: Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management server node IP[ OK ] Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql We apologize for below error: *** Encountering an error when executing mysql script -- table: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql Error: ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created successfully and not create-schema-premium ? - the create-database* scripts doesn't need a selected database - the create-schema.sql script starts by selecting the database (use cloud;) create-schema-premium.sql doesn't have the same selection at start, and I'm no sql guru but it could be a foreign key or something else without an explicit schema that fails. you should probably be able to workaround it by adding a use cloud; early in the create-schema-premium.sql file that's my two cent. -- Erik Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: pnfs support?
Isn't that just a version of NFS 4.x? I believe it would just work, at least as a shared mount point with KVM. On Jan 14, 2015 7:39 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote: Somebody in the silicon valley meetup just asked about pNFS [1] - I’d never heard of it, but sounds interesting and in theory would negate a lot of the ugliness of NFS. Curious if anybody else is familiar with it, or if there’s a general interest in having support in ACS? John 1: http://www.pnfs.com/
Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #549
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/549/changes
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #893
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist #437
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/437/changes Changes: [Daan Hoogland] logging in clustering code, to find faulty vif plug on xenserver from clustered ms on nic orchestration for start command [Daan Hoogland] serialization issue in json/gson [Daan Hoogland] upgrade path [Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-6652 CLONE - [Automation] Vmware- System's StartCommand failed with NumberFormatException while using VMware DVS [Rohit Yadav] Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better [Rohit Yadav] Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures [Rohit Yadav] move ConstantTimeComparator to utils -- [...truncated 2542 lines...] [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/engine/components-api/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/engine/components-api/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.4:jar (default-jar) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Building jar: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/engine/components-api/target/cloud-engine-components-api-4.4.3-SNAPSHOT.jar [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/engine/components-api/target/cloud-engine-components-api-4.4.3-SNAPSHOT.jar to /home/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-engine-components-api/4.4.3-SNAPSHOT/cloud-engine-components-api-4.4.3-SNAPSHOT.jar [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/engine/components-api/pom.xml to /home/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-engine-components-api/4.4.3-SNAPSHOT/cloud-engine-components-api-4.4.3-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Server 4.4.3-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-server --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/server (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-server --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-server --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (generate-resource) @ cloud-server --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [copy] Copying 3 files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/server/target/conf [copy] Copying 1 file to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/server/target/conf [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-server --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 30 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-server --- [INFO] Compiling 360 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/server/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-server --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 33 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-server --- [INFO] Compiling 83 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/server/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-server --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/ws/server/target/surefire-reports
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #894
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Rohit, I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you? Adrian -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[CROSSPOST] [ovsdb-dev] CloudStack OVSDB?
-Original Message- From: ovsdb-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.orgmailto:ovsdb-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:ovsdb-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:03 PM To: ovsdb-...@lists.opendaylight.orgmailto:ovsdb-...@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: [ovsdb-dev] CloudStack OVSDB? Hi all, I saw Hugo Trippaers' presentation from last year's FOSDEM about using OVSDB and CloudStack. As some of you may have noticed, I was looking for someone to document using OpenDaylight with CloudStack for the new Using OpenDaylight section of the wiki: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CloudStack_and_OpenDaylight Is there anyone here who's familiar with this who can help document Helium with CloudStack 4.4, please? Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://secure-web.cisco.com/1dDDhuQflPzd19tLV5kjckvanMMnd62cqqA-4LBPmf4LYnM7d72a73uz4zzIjskvgu9VA1tB69c0BNKJoGwVu-P8RS6kuLNJA048jvJNq7u1ryaYXO8zdDm56fj92K91KFxKw5zU-76QMYZhT7su0OXf35sS1wJeey0hn2iR4bDE/http%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 ___ ovsdb-dev mailing list ovsdb-...@lists.opendaylight.orgmailto:ovsdb-...@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/ovsdb-dev
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Daan: I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the vote period will be longer. --David On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: David, Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other votes going on as well. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
David, Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other votes going on as well. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: xenserver 6.5
Adrian, I think your questions/considerations are right and I have been wondering about the same things. On one side it should be allowed unless instead of only allowed if. On the other hand therre are sure to be some features extra or some that might have a slightly different semantics that might hinder or impair cloudstack. Not sure what the right answer is. Hope that someone with a view on the architectural decisions behind it can shed some light. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: With XS 6.5 released, is anyone able to comment on: 1. Does the 4.5 branch need updating to support it? 2. If the changes are so minor, will we see support in 4.3.x or 4.4.x as well? Do we consider this to be a feature or bug? If the code for the resource class stays exactly the same and the only thing blocking the use of XS 6.5 is the checks that CS does when adding a new host, would this not be considered as a bug? Technically the validation is broken as its intent is to determine whether or not the current resource class can handle the hypervisor. If the current resource class can in fact handle XS6.5 but the validation code says it can't, isn’t this is a bug? Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 October 2014 20:10 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5 Correct on both counts On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: thanks Tim, from this I take that hypervisor versions are hardcoded still, and xenserver 6.5 is supported since 4.5. correct? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Daan, Here are the relevant commits: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2b e02d1f515d8d089b6596127614fe6b8030d723 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=b7 f5e95c8f17cf42d35705872b4210db8c2def72 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=67 4af6e47313fa18c18536a2daed90d13b9a9a59 Mike, Here's an example of the type of DB changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f= setup/db/db/schema-441to450.sql;h=e6aae8e3d624744af9f19b132fa8f53b5a4c ddb5;hp=34d5f8842005f8a2da4df8a9a838d919cc648831;hb=2be02d1f515d8d089b 6596127614fe6b8030d723;hpb=f212aa57c32eb05d6a69730e37ac50bdb1f0a268 On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah, Tim, I'm a little unclear of what you mean by requiring a DB update. Can you clarify that? Thanks! On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Tim, these changes are needed? so 4.4.1 will not work with db changes... Do you have a commit id? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: I know that master had a bunch of cleanup work to make things work better (commits were a month ago), but baring any significant issues, being able to support a newer XenServer should be as simple as a database update. So net of this master *today* should work fine with 6.5 (and the various pre-release builds since beta.2). On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Someone correct me if I'm wrong but, if a previous XenServer resource class can handle the newer version of XenServer, then I don't think you need to make any changes to CloudStack files to use that newer version. If you do see some incompatibility with that version of XenServer, then someone would need to create a new resource class to handle the discrepancies. On Monday, October 20, 2014, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Out of interest, on the assumption that there are no issues with using 6.5 when it's released and there are no backwards-compatibility problems, will it then work with 4.4.1 or does CS need to be *explicitly* told that newer, effectively unknown versions are 'acceptable' as a valid hypervisor? Basically, If we deploy CS 4.4.1 and we like the look of XS 6.5 when it comes out, will we need to make any changes to CS to start using it? If so, are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it require rebuilding? -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com javascript:;] Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5 I think it should be minimal, because although there are large internal changes
Re: CloudStack Quality Process
Stephen, I already considdered myself out, and the Californians are asleep at the moment. I'm alright with early start but cannot host a GTM. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is that we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out this week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't do 16:00). -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 12:50 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks. On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
I¹m not sure what bearing Redhat has on this discussion, but you are correct in noting the Citrix did release CloudPlatform 4.5 today ‹ and it is largely based on ACS 4.5 code. Collectively, Citrix engineers continue to contribute the lion¹s share of ACS code and we carefully follow all rules established by the community. That being said, today was the start of our Citrix Summit event. It is the Sales Kick Off and and Partner gathering for Citrix to start 2015. It was a great opportunity to publicize what we¹re doing with CloudPlatform (and thus ACS by extension) and we chose today as our launch date. The reception by our sales personnel and channel partners at the show has been very positive so far. We expect good reaction from customers as well as we believe this is our highest quality release to date. Thanks for your interest. -Steve Steve Wilson VP Product Unit Manager Cloud Software Citrix @virtualsteve On 1/13/15, 3:14 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
Well, I sent it yesterday so the Californians would have been awake and may now be expecting a meeting at 8 AM their time. Let's do it at 16:00 GMT. Hopefully David will be able to start the GTM he's already sent out: he indicated that he could do the earlier time if he knew the day before. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 January 2015 08:19 To: dev Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Stephen, I already considdered myself out, and the Californians are asleep at the moment. I'm alright with early start but cannot host a GTM. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is that we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out this week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't do 16:00). -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 12:50 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks. On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design
Re: what's the status of Bare Metal component?
Frank, Interesting. Care to detail a bit? How would hosting the kickstarts on the public network help? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 20:02:14 Subject: RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component? Yeah that's kind of annoying. If users don't mind to put the HTTP/NFS server storing kickstart file and ISOs on the public network, it's possible to use other hypervisors' system VM -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 11:39 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: what's the status of Bare Metal component? Thanks Frank, that sounds promising. The VMware requirement kind of sucks, though. No way around it, perhaps via some helping sys VM? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 19:29:56 Subject: RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component? CloudStack offers baremetal for basic zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickS tart) and advanced zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+Advance d+Networking+Support). Basic zone support has been there for years, advanced zone is new feature in 4.5; development work has been done, though there may be some small enhancements and bug fixes. BTW: competitorstack, funny! -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: what's the status of Bare Metal component? Hi, What is the status of the Bare Metal deployment component? I'm just being asked to install the competitorstack because of this feature and was wondering where Cloudstack is at the moment? Any docs about it and how can we help with it? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2
+1 (binding) based on the minimalistic testing to install, start/stop/destroy a VM ~Rajani On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150112T2202 Commit: 2d9a42e833b576aba016f0d73660da0c5b7b7174 List of changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8070?filter=12330007 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3/ PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster 11.0' If I wanted. I did not even know it was coming. But I agree with Marcus, citrix clouplatform could be at 11.0 right now, it would not mean anything in terms of semantic versioning vs cloudstack releases. I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something. It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4 more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet and can't let their own releases be slowed by us. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger cgei...@it1solutions.com wrote: Don't take it back. I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has today's date on it. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say release highlights, not that it was released: https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/ I take it back! :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie To: CloudStack Dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2
+1 Tested basic zone deployment with KVM and basic VM lifecycle operations. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150112T2202 Commit: 2d9a42e833b576aba016f0d73660da0c5b7b7174 List of changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8070?filter=12330007 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3/ PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
Yes, mea culpa for making a big deal out of it. For some reason it suck in my head that ACS is for CP what Fedora is for RHEL so it seemed odd. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 14 January, 2015 09:07:36 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster 11.0' If I wanted. I did not even know it was coming. But I agree with Marcus, citrix clouplatform could be at 11.0 right now, it would not mean anything in terms of semantic versioning vs cloudstack releases. I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something. It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4 more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet and can't let their own releases be slowed by us. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger cgei...@it1solutions.com wrote: Don't take it back. I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has today's date on it. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say release highlights, not that it was released: https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/ I take it back! :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie To: CloudStack Dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
On Jan 14, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Yes, mea culpa for making a big deal out of it. For some reason it suck in my head that ACS is for CP what Fedora is for RHEL so it seemed odd. Nux no need for a mea culpa, that's also in my head. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 14 January, 2015 09:07:36 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster 11.0' If I wanted. I did not even know it was coming. But I agree with Marcus, citrix clouplatform could be at 11.0 right now, it would not mean anything in terms of semantic versioning vs cloudstack releases. I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something. It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4 more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet and can't let their own releases be slowed by us. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger cgei...@it1solutions.com wrote: Don't take it back. I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has today's date on it. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say release highlights, not that it was released: https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/ I take it back! :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie To: CloudStack Dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [MERGE] Support Granular SCSI disk controllers in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor
Hi Sateesh, Can can send a Github PR for review (if you want to get a code review) and share code coverage wrt unit (and integration) tests. I think if the code coverage is well above 80% I think everyone should be okay with the merge. Let me know if you need any help. On Wednesday 14 January 2015 09:06 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: Hi, I would like merge the branch 'vmware-disk-controllers' into master branch. This branch contains implementation to support Granular SCSI disk controllers in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor. This is specific to VMware hypervisor only. The code changes are in area of vmware resource. All changes are being tracked using JIRA ticket [3] with code in ACS branch 'vmware-disk-controllers'. Please see [2[ for Functional specification which was discussed in proposal thread [1] below and talk [4] held at CCC EU 2014, Budapest. Currently CloudStack supports following combinations only. * DATA volumes - SCSI controller (LSI Logic Parallel) - Hard coded in source code, no option for user to edit/choose the controller type * ROOT volumes - IDE or SCSI (LSI Logic Parallel) - Baed on value of global configuration parameter vmware.root.disk.controller For some guest operating systems like Windows 2012 R2, deploying instances with LSI Parallel controller might result in failure to boot as guest OS vendor is not shipping the OS with LSI Logic parallel drivers. OS Vendor is supporting/shipping LSI SAS controller as preferred. CloudStack should provide administrator the means to choose the type of disk controller (including sub types listed in introduction section above) for an instance. The controller to be used by VM to access virtual disk (volume) can decided for various reasons. Some of them are listed here, * Some controllers are optimized for best performance over specific backend infrastructure like SAN. Ex: VMware Paravirtual SCSI *Compatibility of some controllers with VM's virtual hardware version or guest operating system. *Operating system vendor recommendation and default set of drivers distributed as part of operating system image. Ex: Windows 8.1 ISO doesn't have Lsi Logic Parallel SCSI drivers by default. Hence a virtual disk attached to this controller won't accessible during installation of OS using the ISO. Now CloudStack provides administrator options to specify disk controllers to use for user instances at various ways. 1) Global configuration settings 2) Template settings (during registration of template) 3) Option to enable auto detection of the recommended disk controller for the instance's guest operating system by vendor and applicable virtual hardware version. Please let me know your comments. Regards, Sateesh [1] http://markmail.org/thread/en4skoqu4mbitacs [2] Functional specification document - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/vI5cAg [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787 [4] http://ccceu2014.sched.org/event/5d24aad67443542c72b5fc51c25c090b From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 12:06 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Server 2012 R2 Bug on CS 4.4.0 with vmware hypervisor -Original Message- From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] Sent: 15 November 2014 14:06 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Michael Phillips Subject: RE: Server 2012 R2 Bug on CS 4.4.0 with vmware hypervisor Hi Michael, further clarification; CS adds the data disk to the VM but since it's listed as SCSI device 0:0, the vm is unable to find it when you do a disk rescan. Yes, due to absence of LSI Logic Parallel driver in the guest, the virtual disk goes undetected. Currently for all data volumes, of user instance deployed by CloudStack, are attached to LSI Logic Parallel controller. And this is not configurable, which is be a blocker for most recent versions of Windows OS like Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 8.1 which does not ship/pack LSI Logic Parallel driver by default, which means all virtual disks attached to this controller would not detected. Support for choice of controllers is in progress and expected to be available in CloudStack 4.6 release. I am going to talk about proposal to address this and implementation details in CloudStack Collaboration Conference scheduled next week at Budapest, Hungary. Link to the entry in conference schedule is [1] and JIRA ticket for this feature is [2] [1] http://ccceu2014.sched.org/event/5d24aad67443542c72b5fc51c25c090b?iframe=yesw=sidebar=yesbg=no [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787 Hi, I am working on implementation of this feature based on functional specification [2] and followed by proposal thread [1] below. All changes are being tracked using JIRA ticket [3] using ACS branch 'vmware-disk-controllers' [1] http://markmail.org/thread/en4skoqu4mbitacs [2] Short link for functional specification document -
Re: API response change command=deleteIso
Hi, I think we have had such fixes before and it won't break anyone's client's unless they rely on hardcoded response keys. Most clients such as CloudMonkey or Marvin would look for returned response under a key that has a response substring so this change should not break them. I'm not sure about the UI though. Brian, Jessica may comment on that. On Tuesday 13 January 2015 09:22 PM, Rene Moser wrote: Hi dev I found an inconsistency, call it a typo, in the API response and would like to make an API change [1]. I saw there has been a similar change in the past [2]. Thanks for your response. Regards René [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63 [2] https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack/commit/e7134b82f90cfa9482cd08c3cf4633c64d621117 -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CloudStack Quality Process
so that's an appointment, everybody! ;) On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: Well, I sent it yesterday so the Californians would have been awake and may now be expecting a meeting at 8 AM their time. Let's do it at 16:00 GMT. Hopefully David will be able to start the GTM he's already sent out: he indicated that he could do the earlier time if he knew the day before. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 January 2015 08:19 To: dev Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Stephen, I already considdered myself out, and the Californians are asleep at the moment. I'm alright with early start but cannot host a GTM. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is that we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out this week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't do 16:00). -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 12:50 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks. On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org |
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6900: Fixed if we download a v...
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images
Are there anyone help me ? Thanks a lot :). Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me] 发送时间: 2015年1月13日 15:28 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images Dear All, I find some images in ui/images about CloudStack UI. Could I get the PSD (Photoshop) format or XCF (GIMP) format? I want to change the UI color for different Regions, then easy for acknowledge . Thanks a lot :) Best Regards, Star Guo
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #892
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...
GitHub user terbolous opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67 CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better This should fix the problem some people are seeing with cloudstack-setup-databases complaining about 'No database selected' You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/terbolous/cloudstack mysql56-schema-fix Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #67 commit 396936ea5e84d079394664fd1d0596a94e159855 Author: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com Date: 2015-01-14T13:52:47Z Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: weird db setup issue
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue: Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management server node IP[ OK ] Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql We apologize for below error: *** Encountering an error when executing mysql script -- table: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql Error: ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created successfully and not create-schema-premium ? I solved the issue and it seems related to MySQL What mysql version are/were you running? I just confirmed that the SQL query is accepted on MySQL 5.1, but not on MySQL 5.6. I guess they became a bit more strict somewhere in between. Adding absolute references solves it. See PR #67 for a fix -- Erik
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...
GitHub user cloudtrends opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66 under windows environment the publicKeyPath and privateKeyPath should replace from \... Under windows environment the publicKeyPath and privateKeyPath should replace from \ to / when send them into injectkeys.py You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/cloudtrends/cloudstack master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #66 commit 13d65691358946feebd80c9e905a4f374459a39d Author: cloudtrends 2306434...@qq.com Date: 2015-01-14T11:51:18Z under windows the publicKeyPath and privateKeyPath should replace from \ to / when send them into injectkeys.py --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
I'll note here that this can be applied to 4.4 and 4.3 as well, modulo some simple changes. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:32 AM, pyr g...@git.apache.org wrote: GitHub user pyr opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65 Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API. See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the full rationale. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack feature/constant-time Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #65 commit 9b4e39e837af498599859c4a6687eb8bf9f8ad89 Author: Pierre-Yves Ritschard p...@spootnik.org Date: 2015-01-14T10:27:35Z Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API. See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the full rationale. Conflicts: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServer.java server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#issuecomment-69899701 LGTM, let me test it. I can help backport it to 4.3/4.4, it's a good fix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #277
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/277/changes Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response name string: there is an extra 's' [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8154: fix UI for API change -- [...truncated 1276 lines...] [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] Compiling 7 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/target/classes [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Compiling 107 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-security --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Compiling 2 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.ScopeTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.28 sec Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.type.VolumeTypeHelperTest Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.05 sec Results : Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Core 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/schema/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/core/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/schema (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/core (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] [INFO] ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#discussion_r22929307
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ConstantTimeComparator.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// License); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+package com.cloud.api;
+
+public class ConstantTimeComparator {
+
+public static boolean compareBytes(byte[] b1, byte[] b2) {
+if (b1.length != b2.length) {
+return false;
+}
+
+int result = 0;
+for (int i = 0; i b1.length; i++) {
+result |= b1[i] ^ b2[i];
--- End diff --
Neat. +1
I would suggest moving this to utils instead of api. The api directory or
artifact should hold only contracts, commands and interfaces, if this is in
utils it could be re-usable (or maybe not) in future.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69900395
Tested with CloudMonkey/Marvin, most sane clients should not break who
search for objects in a xyzresponse key. This also fixes the UI so we're good.
Google search resulted 8 places where deleteisosresponse was used. Such
fixes have been done in the past. The impact is low, also because it's an async
api.
Response before;
{ deleteisosresponse : {jobid:aef086a9-ceb6-4af1-9b01-44a130dc6a16} }
Response after the fix;
{ deleteisoresponse : {jobid:0fd02b7f-0a14-4ef2-8dc5-932a9ee30004} }
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
Github user pyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#discussion_r22930247
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ConstantTimeComparator.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// License); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+package com.cloud.api;
+
+public class ConstantTimeComparator {
+
+public static boolean compareBytes(byte[] b1, byte[] b2) {
+if (b1.length != b2.length) {
+return false;
+}
+
+int result = 0;
+for (int i = 0; i b1.length; i++) {
+result |= b1[i] ^ b2[i];
--- End diff --
Agreed, updated accordingly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
Re: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images
Hi Star, Our major UI contributors Jessica or Brian may have some idea. I think you can also use existing images for dimensions etc and create your own? On Wednesday 14 January 2015 03:13 PM, Star Guo wrote: Are there anyone help me ? Thanks a lot :). Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me] 发送时间: 2015年1月13日 15:28 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images Dear All, I find some images in ui/images about CloudStack UI. Could I get the PSD (Photoshop) format or XCF (GIMP) format? I want to change the UI color for different Regions, then easy for acknowledge . Thanks a lot :) Best Regards, Star Guo -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Adding Dockerfile and instructions
Github user runseb closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/61 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...
GitHub user pyr opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65 Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API. See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the full rationale. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack feature/constant-time Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #65 commit 9b4e39e837af498599859c4a6687eb8bf9f8ad89 Author: Pierre-Yves Ritschard p...@spootnik.org Date: 2015-01-14T10:27:35Z Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API. See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the full rationale. Conflicts: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServer.java server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: weird db setup issue
This happens on a new installation of Citrix CloudPlatform 4.5.0 as well. If anyone has time, we should check if this happens on ACS 4.5 and fix it -- Erik On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Sebastien, Which build/version of CloudStack are you using? this is 4.3.1 from packages, ubuntu 14.04 but I think it's an issue with my setup. that schema file has not changed in more than a year and is the same in all branches. I will keep investigating. adding use cloud (like Erik mentioned) solved the issue. On 05-Dec-2014, at 7:22 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue: Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management server node IP[ OK ] Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql [ OK ] Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql We apologize for below error: *** Encountering an error when executing mysql script -- table: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql Error: ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created successfully and not create-schema-premium ? - the create-database* scripts doesn't need a selected database - the create-schema.sql script starts by selecting the database (use cloud;) create-schema-premium.sql doesn't have the same selection at start, and I'm no sql guru but it could be a foreign key or something else without an explicit schema that fails. you should probably be able to workaround it by adding a use cloud; early in the create-schema-premium.sql file that's my two cent. -- Erik Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #891
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#discussion_r22932788
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java ---
@@ -894,6 +894,13 @@ protected void
injectSshKeysIntoSystemVmIsoPatch(String publicKeyPath, String pr
} else {
command = new Script(/bin/bash, s_logger);
}
+String osname = System.getProperty(os.name);
+if (osname.startsWith(Windows)) {
+scriptPath = scriptPath.replaceAll( ,/ );
--- End diff --
testWindowsScript#ConfigurationServerImplTest TestCase might break with
this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#issuecomment-69908275 In case of windows, python scripts are executed and I think it runs fine from cygwin. Is this change targeted to make it work from cmd? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#discussion_r22932649
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java ---
@@ -894,6 +894,13 @@ protected void
injectSshKeysIntoSystemVmIsoPatch(String publicKeyPath, String pr
} else {
command = new Script(/bin/bash, s_logger);
}
+String osname = System.getProperty(os.name);
--- End diff --
There is an isOnWindows() function in this class which can be reused
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
Re: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images
Hi, Rohit Thanks. I try to change the color style of UI on png. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月14日 17:59 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: Re: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images Hi Star, Our major UI contributors Jessica or Brian may have some idea. I think you can also use existing images for dimensions etc and create your own? On Wednesday 14 January 2015 03:13 PM, Star Guo wrote: Are there anyone help me ? Thanks a lot :). Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me] 发送时间: 2015年1月13日 15:28 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images Dear All, I find some images in ui/images about CloudStack UI. Could I get the PSD (Photoshop) format or XCF (GIMP) format? I want to change the UI color for different Regions, then easy for acknowledge . Thanks a lot :) Best Regards, Star Guo -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
