Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround). On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.__com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:WRodrigues@__schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi all, I've been trying to fix few issues, the localstorage seems to work now among other things. I've identified few more issues that I'll fix today, after that and fixing such issues (kvmclock) etc let's request David to spin up another RC. On Friday 06 February 2015 12:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: Sounds reasonable to me. Would you be willing to put those changes in for 4.5 before we spin up another RC, Marcus? On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: OK - thanks, Andrei Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a plan of attack soon. Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and 4.6), I believe. Thanks! On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Thanks for the feedback, Andrei. I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is, so it's great to have your comments. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are still tons of 12.04 installs. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks, Marcus I responded to Rohit's e-mail and then later read yours. :) On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: No, it won't help. It won't remove the kvmclock xml, just generate xml that explicitly disables kvmclock. See my email above. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for me. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround). On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.__com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this?
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
No, it won't help. It won't remove the kvmclock xml, just generate xml that explicitly disables kvmclock. See my email above. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for me. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround). On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.__com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for me. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround). On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.__com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care. Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear complains about clock performance in VMs. Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Sure, I agree. It just makes it tough to detect features when we're targeting multiple platforms. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Roger that. Well, backports without version change is one of the main reasons I use (RH)EL, so depends you look at it. Anyway, it does not seem like a big thing affecting users, so good job on finding a fix. Thanks. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 16:22:15 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 CentOS *6* users, that is... On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute, regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support. Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm. Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both. So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to explicitly disable it if there are issues. I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features without changing versions). On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care. Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear complains about clock performance in VMs. Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute, regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support. Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm. Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both. So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to explicitly disable it if there are issues. I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features without changing versions). On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care. Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear complains about clock performance in VMs. Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
CentOS *6* users, that is... On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute, regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support. Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm. Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both. So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to explicitly disable it if there are issues. I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features without changing versions). On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care. Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear complains about clock performance in VMs. Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Roger that. Well, backports without version change is one of the main reasons I use (RH)EL, so depends you look at it. Anyway, it does not seem like a big thing affecting users, so good job on finding a fix. Thanks. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 16:22:15 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 CentOS *6* users, that is... On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute, regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support. Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm. Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both. So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to explicitly disable it if there are issues. I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features without changing versions). On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care. Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear complains about clock performance in VMs. Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: OK - thanks, Andrei Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a plan of attack soon. Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and 4.6), I believe. Thanks! On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Thanks for the feedback, Andrei. I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is, so it's great to have your comments. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are still tons of 12.04 installs. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Sounds reasonable to me. Would you be willing to put those changes in for 4.5 before we spin up another RC, Marcus? On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: OK - thanks, Andrei Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a plan of attack soon. Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and 4.6), I believe. Thanks! On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Thanks for the feedback, Andrei. I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is, so it's great to have your comments. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are still tons of 12.04 installs. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are still tons of 12.04 installs. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks for the feedback, Andrei. I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is, so it's great to have your comments. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are still tons of 12.04 installs. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
OK - thanks, Andrei Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a plan of attack soon. Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and 4.6), I believe. Thanks! On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Thanks for the feedback, Andrei. I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is, so it's great to have your comments. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are still tons of 12.04 installs. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Thanks for the feedback, Andrei. I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is, so it's great to have your comments. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are still tons of 12.04 installs. Andrei - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud int-cl...@schubergphilis.com Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi everyone, So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5 (due to this kvmclock issue). How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with regards to KVM on CS 4.5? Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well. I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty smooth with fewer rough edges. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Cheers, Wilder On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter |
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock, even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though. I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then backed out because of the Ubuntu 12.04 incompatibility. I think it was around that time that the minimum versions were adopted, but it's not until now in 4.5 that kvmclock is back and will require Ubuntu 12.04 users to either upgrade to a newer Ubuntu or run non-distro packages. I'm game to back out kvmclock yet again, but I'd prefer to see us update our recommended platforms. Maybe we should ask people what they've been running. Is anyone still testing against 12.04? On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working due to that exception when I try to run a VM). Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/ I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING! On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Marcus Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how they resolved the issue, though. This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1): cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING! On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Marcus Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how they resolved the issue, though. This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1): cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working due to that exception when I try to run a VM). Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/ I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING! On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Marcus Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how they resolved the issue, though. This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1): cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I just happen to be using 12.04.1, but I'm personally fine with upgrading. I know that upgrading is sometimes easier said than done in production environments, though, so it would be interesting to get feedback from users on this. On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock, even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though. I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then backed out because of the Ubuntu 12.04 incompatibility. I think it was around that time that the minimum versions were adopted, but it's not until now in 4.5 that kvmclock is back and will require Ubuntu 12.04 users to either upgrade to a newer Ubuntu or run non-distro packages. I'm game to back out kvmclock yet again, but I'd prefer to see us update our recommended platforms. Maybe we should ask people what they've been running. Is anyone still testing against 12.04? On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working due to that exception when I try to run a VM). Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/ I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING! On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Marcus Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how they resolved the issue, though. This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1): cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case). As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a supported platform for CS 4.5. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks, Rohit As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which is what I'm running). On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc. On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 816.707s OK (SKIP=1) test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 85.883s OK Test to create service offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to update existing service offering ... ===
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock thing fixed. When will the next RC be cut? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 31 January, 2015 13:57:33 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock thing fixed. When will the next RC be cut? Lucian I've already cut RC2 that should include the kvmclock fixes. --David
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Actually, there are two sections in that doc that specify different Libvirt versions (depending on what you need to do): * 0.9.4 * 0.9.11 (maybe this version has to be compiled from source?) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment ::
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks, Marcus Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how they resolved the issue, though. This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1): cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I am able to manually create a VM on KVM using an ISO. I just can't create a VM via CloudStack due to that exception. On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs on that. At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros. On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt). I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it says I'm at the latest. What am I missing there? :) On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the following: 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source) at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811) at com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503) at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808) at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I think the below commits from marcus addresses them. https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce ~Rajani On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I should point out that I'm on master. On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone ::
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi everyone, Any news on this? I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties). I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Okay, thanks for the clarification. I will test it over the weekend. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 816.707s OK (SKIP=1) test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 85.883s OK Test to create service offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to delete service offering ... === TestName:
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
kvmclock has been fixed, some changes were made to LibvirtComputingResource in 4.5 and master. it doesn't apply to 4.4. On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote: -1 quite simple issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8176 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8175 2015-01-13 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi Marcus, On 23-Jan-2015, at 3:17 pm, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: kvmclock has been fixed, some changes were made to LibvirtComputingResource in 4.5 and master. it doesn't apply to 4.4. Just saw your changes on commit@, thanks for fixing it. I’ll test it and see if it works in my setup. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 816.707s OK (SKIP=1) test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 85.883s OK Test to create service offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 3 tests in 196.733s OK Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to check router services Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 816.707s OK (SKIP=1) test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 85.883s OK Test to create service offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 3 tests in 196.733s OK Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to check router services Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 7 tests in 413.426s OK (SKIP=1) Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS === ok
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi Wilder, If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks. On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it. Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :) Cheers, Wilder On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Wilder, Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks. Regards. On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 816.707s OK (SKIP=1) test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 85.883s OK Test to create service offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 3 tests in 196.733s OK Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to check router services Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status :
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi all, Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work. Remarks: * I will test Basic Zone later today * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests results. :) There go my results: :: Environment :: Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra Management Server: MacBook Pro Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro :: Advanced Zone :: === Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s OK Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 217.296s OK Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 816.707s OK (SKIP=1) test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 85.883s OK Test to create service offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 3 tests in 196.733s OK Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to check router services Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 7 tests in 413.426s OK (SKIP=1) Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 2 tests in 481.417s OK Test create VPC offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_vpc_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC offering without load balancing service ... === TestName: test_03_vpc_off_without_lb | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC offering without static NAT service ... === TestName: test_04_vpc_off_without_static_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
-1 quite simple issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8176 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8175 2015-01-13 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi Marcus, Thanks for replying. I checked the code, we read the config value from agent.properties to see if kvmclock.disabled param is true or false. Based on that only we general suitable xml. I think codewise it looks alright, what other improvements do you think we can do? The libvirt version on my host (Ubuntu 14.04 based) was 1.2.2. I couldn't find after which version of libvirt it should work so as to put a if-else check for that. On Monday 19 January 2015 09:55 PM, Marcus wrote: Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled (though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere. On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com: Hi, Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues. Due to this, I've to vote -1. Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for key cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock related exceptions. 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug? Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying systemvms: 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable( GenericDaoBase.java:1045) While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why this was happening. What worked on KVM: - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix) - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and networking. Regards. On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi, On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Yes please let'd do that. Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5. Travis seems to be happy about it: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745 I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for few issues it looks promising: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in xenserver, kvm setups) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be environment based) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043 -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
-1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found a regression in comparison to 4.4! On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Yes please let'd do that. Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5. Travis seems to be happy about it: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745 I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for few issues it looks promising: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in xenserver, kvm setups) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be environment based) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043 -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
I'd suggest in LibvirtComputingResource we wrap the call to clock.setTimer for kvmclock in a libvirt version check and change the parameters passed based on that (see variable _hypervisorLibvirtVersion). I haven't tracked down exactly which version shipped it, but it seems like someone was 'cleaning up' libvirt and perhaps enforced that kvmclock doesn't take options: http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=bbd392ff86249434ca63bb5977d2b1bd2d72a538 - kvmclock: no extra attributes are supported In general, we want kvmclock, and it should only be disabled if there's an issue (e.g. it has broken live migration in the past with certain qemu and kernel versions). I am confused about one thing, you mention this only shows up when you add volumes, correct? Is that attaching a volume to a VM with these settings? Is the clock XML somehow getting added to the volume? On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Marcus, Thanks for replying. I checked the code, we read the config value from agent.properties to see if kvmclock.disabled param is true or false. Based on that only we general suitable xml. I think codewise it looks alright, what other improvements do you think we can do? The libvirt version on my host (Ubuntu 14.04 based) was 1.2.2. I couldn't find after which version of libvirt it should work so as to put a if-else check for that. On Monday 19 January 2015 09:55 PM, Marcus wrote: Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled (though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere. On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com: Hi, Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues. Due to this, I've to vote -1. Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for key cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock related exceptions. 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug? Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying systemvms: 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable( GenericDaoBase.java:1045) While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why this was happening. What worked on KVM: - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix) - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and networking. Regards. On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
So we likely will cancel this, but there's good discussion and problem solving going on in this, I don't want people to ignore this because I cancelled it. --David On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: -1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found a regression in comparison to 4.4! On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Yes please let'd do that. Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5. Travis seems to be happy about it: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745 I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for few issues it looks promising: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in xenserver, kvm setups) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be environment based) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043 -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
...or I guess we can just disable extra attributes altogether for kvmclock, if we can confirm that it never should have had extra options On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'd suggest in LibvirtComputingResource we wrap the call to clock.setTimer for kvmclock in a libvirt version check and change the parameters passed based on that (see variable _hypervisorLibvirtVersion). I haven't tracked down exactly which version shipped it, but it seems like someone was 'cleaning up' libvirt and perhaps enforced that kvmclock doesn't take options: http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=bbd392ff86249434ca63bb5977d2b1bd2d72a538 - kvmclock: no extra attributes are supported In general, we want kvmclock, and it should only be disabled if there's an issue (e.g. it has broken live migration in the past with certain qemu and kernel versions). I am confused about one thing, you mention this only shows up when you add volumes, correct? Is that attaching a volume to a VM with these settings? Is the clock XML somehow getting added to the volume? On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Marcus, Thanks for replying. I checked the code, we read the config value from agent.properties to see if kvmclock.disabled param is true or false. Based on that only we general suitable xml. I think codewise it looks alright, what other improvements do you think we can do? The libvirt version on my host (Ubuntu 14.04 based) was 1.2.2. I couldn't find after which version of libvirt it should work so as to put a if-else check for that. On Monday 19 January 2015 09:55 PM, Marcus wrote: Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled (though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere. On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com: Hi, Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues. Due to this, I've to vote -1. Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for key cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock related exceptions. 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug? Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying systemvms: 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable( GenericDaoBase.java:1045) While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why this was happening. What worked on KVM: - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix) - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and networking. Regards. On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
by any chance, I wanted to test VPC load-balancing without netscaler. on 4.3.x I have a dropdown list for Algorithm on the Load-Balancing features of a Public IP. in 4.5.0 I don't see the list and it fail to create LB. Thanks, On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: -1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found a regression in comparison to 4.4! On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Yes please let'd do that. Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5. Travis seems to be happy about it: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745 I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for few issues it looks promising: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in xenserver, kvm setups) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be environment based) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043 -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Adrian, On Wednesday 14 January 2015 10:52 PM, Adrian Lewis wrote: Rohit, I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you? FYI, the infra to build EL7 packages is in place now. The latest 4.5 (SNAPSHOT) EL7 packages are here - http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos7/4.5 You may test that and let me know if they work/fail for you. Regards. Adrian -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com: Hi, Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues. Due to this, I've to vote -1. Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for key cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock related exceptions. 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug? Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying systemvms: 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable( GenericDaoBase.java:1045) While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why this was happening. What worked on KVM: - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix) - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and networking. Regards. On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled (though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere. On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc. mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com: Hi, Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues. Due to this, I've to vote -1. Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for key cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock related exceptions. 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug? Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying systemvms: 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable( GenericDaoBase.java:1045) While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why this was happening. What worked on KVM: - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix) - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and networking. Regards. On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi, Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues. Due to this, I've to vote -1. Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for key cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock related exceptions. 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source) This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug? Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying systemvms: 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260 ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397) ---at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable(GenericDaoBase.java:1045) While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why this was happening. What worked on KVM: - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix) - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and networking. Regards. On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi Adrian, I'll be creating CentOS7 packages soon, for that I need to procure and setup a RHEL/CentOS7 machine. I'll try to do that this weekend and will share them next week. On Wednesday 14 January 2015 10:52 PM, Adrian Lewis wrote: Rohit, I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you? Adrian -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks! -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 15 January 2015 09:33 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi Adrian, I'll be creating CentOS7 packages soon, for that I need to procure and setup a RHEL/CentOS7 machine. I'll try to do that this weekend and will share them next week. On Wednesday 14 January 2015 10:52 PM, Adrian Lewis wrote: Rohit, I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you? Adrian -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=ref s /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
+1 (binding) Brought up a basic zone using devcloud4(Centos 6and XenServer 6.2.0-70446c), everything worked without issue system vms came up and their agent connected. Added Nux's macchinina distribution as a template. Added Ubuntu as a template. (Loved the HVM checkbox addition to the UI). Successfully brought up a VM both based on both the templates. Password retrieval worked, root resize worked. Brought up a web server on one of the VMs and opened a security group rule. The rule applied successfully. Brought up an advanced zone again using devcloud4 so centos 6 and XenServer 6.2.0-70446c. Just like with the 4.4 release marvin fails to set the traffic tags for the public/management/storage/guest networks. I skipped over this small detail and set them manually. After this everything was fine, added a machine based on Nux's macchinina template, password retrieval worked. Brought up a web server on it, did nat forwarding. All worked without issue. Great work on this release folks! On 14 January 2015 at 18:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Daan: I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the vote period will be longer. --David On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: David, Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other votes going on as well. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Rohit, I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you? Adrian -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Daan: I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the vote period will be longer. --David On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: David, Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other votes going on as well. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
David, Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other votes going on as well. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
+1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
OSS RPMs http://tmp.nux.ro/acs45/ I'm currently testing 443, but will test 45 as soon as that one is out the door. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: David Nalley da...@gnsa.us To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 23:16:55 Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Thanks Lucian! On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: OSS RPMs http://tmp.nux.ro/acs45/ I'm currently testing 443, but will test 45 as soon as that one is out the door. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: David Nalley da...@gnsa.us To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 23:16:55 Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1 Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
(+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.