Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Nux!]

OSS RPMs http://tmp.nux.ro/acs45/

I'm currently testing 443, but will test 45 as soon as that one is out the door.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "David Nalley" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 23:16:55
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

> Hi folks,
> 
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[David Nalley]

Thanks Lucian!

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Nux!  wrote:
> OSS RPMs http://tmp.nux.ro/acs45/
>
> I'm currently testing 443, but will test 45 as soon as that one is out the 
> door.
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "David Nalley" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 23:16:55
>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

(+ users)

Hi everyone,

David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this 
candidate.
In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository 
built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:

DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0

> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

+1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
vpc, and several storage types.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> (+ users)
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test 
> this candidate.
> In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository 
> built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
>
> DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
> RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
> SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0
>
>> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Daan Hoogland]

David,

Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
votes going on as well.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
> vpc, and several storage types.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav  
> wrote:
>> (+ users)
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test 
>> this candidate.
>> In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository 
>> built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
>>
>> DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
>> RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
>> SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0
>>
>>> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>>> up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>
>>
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software 
>> Engineering
>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>> Support
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>> Courses
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a 
>> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



-- 
Daan

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Adrian Lewis]

Rohit,

I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?

Adrian

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

(+ users)

Hi everyone,

David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test
this candidate.
In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository
built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:

DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0

> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs
> /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a
company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[David Nalley]

Daan:

I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the
vote period will be longer.

--David

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> David,
>
> Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
> think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
> votes going on as well.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>> +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
>> vpc, and several storage types.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav  
>> wrote:
>>> (+ users)
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test 
>>> this candidate.
>>> In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following 
>>> repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
>>>
>>> DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
>>> RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
>>> SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0
>>>
 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:

 Hi folks,

 I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
 up for a vote:

 Git Branch and Commit SH:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
 location):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/

 PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

 Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

 For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
 indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohit Yadav
>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design & 
>>> Build
>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>>> CloudStack Consulting
>>> CloudStack Software 
>>> Engineering
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>>> Support
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>>> Courses
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is 
>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Ian Duffy]

+1 (binding)

Brought up a basic zone using devcloud4(Centos 6and XenServer
6.2.0-70446c), everything worked without issue system vms came up and
their agent connected.

Added Nux's macchinina distribution as a template.
Added Ubuntu as a template. (Loved the HVM checkbox addition to the UI).

Successfully brought up a VM both based on both the templates.
Password retrieval worked, root resize worked.

Brought up a web server on one of the VMs and opened a security group
rule. The rule applied successfully.

Brought up an advanced zone again using devcloud4 so centos 6 and
XenServer 6.2.0-70446c. Just like with the 4.4 release marvin fails to
set the traffic tags for the public/management/storage/guest networks.
I skipped over this small detail and set them manually.

After this everything was fine, added a machine based on Nux's
macchinina template, password retrieval worked. Brought up a web
server on it, did nat forwarding. All worked without issue.

Great work on this release folks!

On 14 January 2015 at 18:40, David Nalley  wrote:
> Daan:
>
> I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the
> vote period will be longer.
>
> --David
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland  
> wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
>> think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
>> votes going on as well.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>>> +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
>>> vpc, and several storage types.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav  
>>> wrote:
 (+ users)

 Hi everyone,

 David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test 
 this candidate.
 In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following 
 repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:

 DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
 RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
 SystemVM Templates: 
 http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0

> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design & 
 Build
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
 CloudStack Consulting
 CloudStack Software 
 Engineering
 CloudStack Infrastructure 
 Support
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
 Courses

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the 
 sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue 
 Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India 
 LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from 
 Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
 incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
 ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South 
 Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
 registered trademark.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Adrian,

I'll be creating CentOS7 packages soon, for that I need to procure and
setup a RHEL/CentOS7 machine. I'll try to do that this weekend and will
share them next week.

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 10:52 PM, Adrian Lewis wrote:

Rohit,

I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?

Adrian

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

(+ users)

Hi everyone,

David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test
this candidate.
In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository
built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:

DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0


On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:

Hi folks,

I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs
/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a
company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under lic

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Adrian Lewis]

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 15 January 2015 09:33
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Hi Adrian,

I'll be creating CentOS7 packages soon, for that I need to procure and setup
a RHEL/CentOS7 machine. I'll try to do that this weekend and will share them
next week.

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 10:52 PM, Adrian Lewis wrote:
> Rohit,
>
> I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?
>
> Adrian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>
> (+ users)
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help
> test this candidate.
> In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following
> repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
>
> DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
> RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
> SystemVM Templates:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0
>
>> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=ref
>> s
>> /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design &
> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
> Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is
> traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
> trademark.
>

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I
did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack
related services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/&

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
(after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues.

Due to this, I've to vote -1.

Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already
been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed
it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though
it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but
configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for
key "cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"

On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock
related exceptions.
2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock
doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy
at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)

This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in
/etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this
workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug?

Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in
basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception
CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying
systemvms:

2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
(Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable
to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock
for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
>---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274)

>---at
com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397)
>---at
com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable(GenericDaoBase.java:1045)

While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why
this was happening.

What worked on KVM:

- Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and
with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix)
- Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy
- Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix

I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and
networking.

Regards.

On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote:

Hi folks,

I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Adrian,

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 10:52 PM, Adrian Lewis wrote:

Rohit,

I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?


FYI, the infra to build EL7 packages is in place now. The latest 4.5
(SNAPSHOT) EL7 packages are here -
http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos7/4.5

You may test that and let me know if they work/fail for you.

Regards.



Adrian

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

(+ users)

Hi everyone,

David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test
this candidate.
In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository
built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:

DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0


On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:

Hi folks,

I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs
/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a
company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP i

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Daan Hoogland]

Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.

mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef "Rohit Yadav" :

> Hi,
>
> Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
> (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues.
>
> Due to this, I've to vote -1.
>
> Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already
> been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed
> it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though
> it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but
> configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for
> key "cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"
>
> On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock
> related exceptions.
> 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException
> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock
> doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy
> at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>
> This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in
> /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this
> workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug?
>
> Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in
> basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception
> CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying
> systemvms:
>
> 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
> (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable
> to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock
> for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
> >---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274)
>
> >---at
> com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397)
> >---at
> com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable(
> GenericDaoBase.java:1045)
>
> While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why
> this was happening.
>
> What worked on KVM:
>
> - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and
> with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix)
> - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy
> - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix
>
> I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and
> networking.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
>> tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature
of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or
libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled
(though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick
code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere.

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
>
> mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
> Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef "Rohit Yadav" :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
>> (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues.
>>
>> Due to this, I've to vote -1.
>>
>> Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already
>> been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed
>> it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though
>> it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but
>> configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for
>> key "cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"
>>
>> On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock
>> related exceptions.
>> 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException
>> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock
>> doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy
>> at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>>
>> This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in
>> /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this
>> workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug?
>>
>> Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in
>> basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception
>> CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying
>> systemvms:
>>
>> 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
>> (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable
>> to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock
>> for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
>> >---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274)
>>
>> >---at
>> com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397)
>> >---at
>> com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable(
>> GenericDaoBase.java:1045)
>>
>> While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why
>> this was happening.
>>
>> What worked on KVM:
>>
>> - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and
>> with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix)
>> - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy
>> - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix
>>
>> I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and
>> networking.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>>> up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
>>> tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build> iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software Engineering> engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support> cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses> cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expr

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Marcus,

Thanks for replying. I checked the code, we read the config value from
agent.properties to see if kvmclock.disabled param is true or false.
Based on that only we general suitable xml. I think codewise it looks
alright, what other improvements do you think we can do?

The libvirt version on my host (Ubuntu 14.04 based) was 1.2.2. I
couldn't find after which version of libvirt it should work so as to put
a if-else check for that.

On Monday 19 January 2015 09:55 PM, Marcus wrote:

Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature
of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or
libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled
(though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick
code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere.

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.

mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef "Rohit Yadav" :


Hi,

Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
(after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues.

Due to this, I've to vote -1.

Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already
been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed
it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though
it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but
configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for
key "cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"

On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock
related exceptions.
2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock
doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy
 at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)

This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in
/etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this
workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug?

Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in
basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception
CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying
systemvms:

2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
(Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable
to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock
for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260

---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274)



---at

com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397)

---at

com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable(
GenericDaoBase.java:1045)

While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why
this was happening.

What worked on KVM:

- Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and
with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix)
- Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy
- Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix

I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and
networking.

Regards.

On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote:


Hi folks,

I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.

mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)


Yes please let'd do that.

Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked
bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5.
Travis seems to be happy about it:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745

I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for
few issues it looks promising:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in
xenserver, kvm setups)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be
environment based)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Daan Hoogland]

-1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found a regression in
comparison to 4.4!

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>
>> Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
>>
>> mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
>
>
> Yes please let'd do that.
>
> Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked
> bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5.
> Travis seems to be happy about it:
> https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745
>
> I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for
> few issues it looks promising:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in
> xenserver, kvm setups)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be
> environment based)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design &
> Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
> Courses
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a
> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



-- 
Daan

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

by any chance,  I wanted to test VPC load-balancing without netscaler. on
4.3.x  I have a dropdown list for Algorithm on the Load-Balancing features
of a Public IP. in 4.5.0 I don't see the list and it fail to create LB.

Thanks,



On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> -1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found a regression in
> comparison to 4.4!
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> >>
> >> Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
> >>
> >> mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
> >
> >
> > Yes please let'd do that.
> >
> > Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked
> > bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5.
> > Travis seems to be happy about it:
> > https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745
> >
> > I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for
> > few issues it looks promising:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in
> > xenserver, kvm setups)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be
> > environment based)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Rohit Yadav
> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> > M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> > PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
> >
> > IaaS Cloud Design &
> > Build
> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> > CloudStack Consulting
> > CloudStack Software
> > Engineering
> > CloudStack Infrastructure
> > Support
> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training
> > Courses
> >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> or
> > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> sender
> > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
> a
> > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue
> > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil
> > and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd
> is a
> > company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> > license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

I'd suggest in LibvirtComputingResource we wrap the call to
clock.setTimer for kvmclock in a libvirt version check and change the
parameters passed based on that (see  variable
_hypervisorLibvirtVersion). I haven't tracked down exactly which
version shipped it, but it seems like someone was 'cleaning up'
libvirt and perhaps enforced that kvmclock doesn't take options:

http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=bbd392ff86249434ca63bb5977d2b1bd2d72a538

"- kvmclock: no extra attributes are supported"

In general, we want kvmclock, and it should only be disabled if
there's an issue (e.g. it has broken live migration in the past with
certain qemu and kernel versions).

I am confused about one thing, you mention this only shows up when you
add volumes, correct? Is that attaching a volume to a VM with these
settings? Is the clock XML somehow getting added to the volume?

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Thanks for replying. I checked the code, we read the config value from
> agent.properties to see if kvmclock.disabled param is true or false.
> Based on that only we general suitable xml. I think codewise it looks
> alright, what other improvements do you think we can do?
>
> The libvirt version on my host (Ubuntu 14.04 based) was 1.2.2. I
> couldn't find after which version of libvirt it should work so as to put
> a if-else check for that.
>
>
> On Monday 19 January 2015 09:55 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature
>> of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or
>> libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled
>> (though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick
>> code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
>>>
>>> mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
>>> Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef "Rohit Yadav" :
>>>
 Hi,

 Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
 (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues.

 Due to this, I've to vote -1.

 Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already
 been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed
 it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though
 it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but
 configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for
 key "cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"

 On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock
 related exceptions.
 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
 (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException
 org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock
 doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy
  at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)

 This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in
 /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this
 workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug?

 Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in
 basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception
 CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying
 systemvms:

 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
 (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable
 to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock
 for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
>
> ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274)


> ---at

 com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397)
>
> ---at

 com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable(
 GenericDaoBase.java:1045)

 While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why
 this was happening.

 What worked on KVM:

 - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and
 with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix)
 - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy
 - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix

 I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt advance zone, vpc and
 networking.

 Regards.

 On Tuesday 13 January 2015 04:46 AM, David Nalley wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

...or I guess we can just disable extra attributes altogether for
kvmclock, if we can confirm that it never should have had extra
options

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> I'd suggest in LibvirtComputingResource we wrap the call to
> clock.setTimer for kvmclock in a libvirt version check and change the
> parameters passed based on that (see  variable
> _hypervisorLibvirtVersion). I haven't tracked down exactly which
> version shipped it, but it seems like someone was 'cleaning up'
> libvirt and perhaps enforced that kvmclock doesn't take options:
>
> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=bbd392ff86249434ca63bb5977d2b1bd2d72a538
>
> "- kvmclock: no extra attributes are supported"
>
> In general, we want kvmclock, and it should only be disabled if
> there's an issue (e.g. it has broken live migration in the past with
> certain qemu and kernel versions).
>
> I am confused about one thing, you mention this only shows up when you
> add volumes, correct? Is that attaching a volume to a VM with these
> settings? Is the clock XML somehow getting added to the volume?
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Rohit Yadav  
> wrote:
>> Hi Marcus,
>>
>> Thanks for replying. I checked the code, we read the config value from
>> agent.properties to see if kvmclock.disabled param is true or false.
>> Based on that only we general suitable xml. I think codewise it looks
>> alright, what other improvements do you think we can do?
>>
>> The libvirt version on my host (Ubuntu 14.04 based) was 1.2.2. I
>> couldn't find after which version of libvirt it should work so as to put
>> a if-else check for that.
>>
>>
>> On Monday 19 January 2015 09:55 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>>
>>> Rohit, the kvmclock error might be that we are trying to use a feature
>>> of kvmclock that is missing in your particular version of qemu or
>>> libvirt. We probably don't want to require kvmclock to be disabled
>>> (though it is an option), so we can perhaps wrap the offending tick
>>> code xml generation in a version check as done elsewhere.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Daan Hoogland 
>>> wrote:

 Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.

 mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
 Op 15 jan. 2015 15:42 schreef "Rohit Yadav" :

> Hi,
>
> Tested using KVM: While it was working for most cases it failed for me
> (after upgrades from 4.3.2) for few minor issues.
>
> Due to this, I've to vote -1.
>
> Browsing cluster level settings produced NPE. This issue has already
> been fixed in 4.4 but somehow did not make in to 4.5/master. I've fixed
> it on 4.5/master (CLOUDSTACK-7219). No NPE seen after this fix, though
> it would hide errors in log in case a configuration is found but
> configDepot return null we get NPE. I'm not sure why this happened for
> key "cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"
>
> On fresh deployment with KVM, creation of volumes failed with kvmclock
> related exceptions.
> 2015-01-15 11:53:01,500 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) LibvirtException
> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: unsupported configuration: timer kvmclock
> doesn't support setting of timer tickpolicy
>  at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>
> This was fixed after setting 'kvmclock.disable=true' in
> /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties While this worked after this
> workaround, I want to discuss if this should be treated like a bug?
>
> Whenever ssvms were launching some warning and exceptions were seen (in
> basic zone with or without localstorage) and after this exception
> CloudStack kept trying to launch them and finally succeeded in deploying
> systemvms:
>
> 2015-01-15 19:32:02,829 WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
> (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-0a56dc80 job-10/job-12 ctx-8e851b7a) Was unable
> to find lock for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Was unable to find lock
> for the key template_spool_ref1 and thread id 258565260
>>
>> ---at com.cloud.utils.db.Merovingian2.release(Merovingian2.java:274)
>
>
>> ---at
>
> com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy.release(TransactionLegacy.java:397)
>>
>> ---at
>
> com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.releaseFromLockTable(
> GenericDaoBase.java:1045)
>
> While the above seems something which can be ignored, I don't know why
> this was happening.
>
> What worked on KVM:
>
> - Basic zone deployment without and without local storage and
> with/without security groups (after kvmclock disable fix)
> - Basic vm lifecycle: create, start, stop, restart, destroy
> - Upgrade from 4.3.2 after NPE fix
>
> I'll test other components in detail tomorrow wrt adv

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[David Nalley]

So we likely will cancel this, but there's good discussion and problem
solving going on in this, I don't want people to ignore this because I
cancelled it.

--David

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> -1 (binding), just to be formal. As said, Rohit found a regression in
> comparison to 4.4!
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav  
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Monday 19 January 2015 06:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>>
>>> Rohit is mentioning regression here. I suggest we drop this rc.
>>>
>>> mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk)
>>
>>
>> Yes please let'd do that.
>>
>> Since yesterday, I've scanned over 400 issues on JIRA and cherry-picked
>> bugfixes which were fixed on master or older branches but not on 4.5.
>> Travis seems to be happy about it:
>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/47628745
>>
>> I've been testing 4.5 branch since today morning with KVM and except for
>> few issues it looks promising:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8171 (seen in
>> xenserver, kvm setups)
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8172 (could be
>> environment based)
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8150 (build related)
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8043
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design &
>> Build
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software
>> Engineering
>> CloudStack Infrastructure
>> Support
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
>> Courses
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a
>> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Hi all,

Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has 
been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.

Remarks:

* I will test Basic Zone later today
* For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests 
results. :)

There go my results:

:: Environment ::

Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud 
infra
Management Server: MacBook Pro
Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro


:: Advanced Zone ::

===
Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is created ... 
=== TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s

OK


Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: 
test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 217.296s

OK


Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for 
migration
Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 10 tests in 816.707s

OK (SKIP=1)


test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) 
... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 85.883s

OK


Test to create service offering ... === TestName: 
test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: 
test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: 
test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 3 tests in 196.733s

OK


Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host 
credentials to check router services
Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok

--
Ran 7 tests in 413.426s

OK (SKIP=1)


Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 2 tests in 481.417s

OK

Test create VPC offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_vpc_offering | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test VPC offering without load balancing service ... === TestName: 
test_03_vpc_off_without_lb | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test VPC offering without static NAT service ... === TestName: 
test_04_vpc_off_without_static_nat | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test VPC offer

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Wilder,

Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 
branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.

Regards.

> On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues  
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has 
> been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
>
> Remarks:
>
> * I will test Basic Zone later today
> * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests 
> results. :)
>
> There go my results:
>
> :: Environment ::
>
> Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud 
> infra
> Management Server: MacBook Pro
> Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
>
>
> :: Advanced Zone ::
>
> ===
> Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
> test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is created ... 
> === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | 
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain 
> | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status 
> : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
> test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
>
> --
> Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
>
> OK
>
>
> Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: 
> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
>
> --
> Ran 1 test in 217.296s
>
> OK
>
>
> Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter 
> | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: 
> test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone 
> for migration
> Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | 
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
>
> --
> Ran 10 tests in 816.707s
>
> OK (SKIP=1)
>
>
> test_privategw_acl 
> (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName: 
> test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
>
> --
> Ran 1 test in 85.883s
>
> OK
>
>
> Test to create service offering ... === TestName: 
> test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: 
> test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: 
> test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
>
> --
> Ran 3 tests in 196.733s
>
> OK
>
>
> Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host 
> credentials to check router services
> Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | 
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status 
> : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS 
> ===
> ok
> Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS 
> ===
> ok
>
> --
> Ran 7 tests in 413.426s
>
> OK (SKIP=1)
>
>
> Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test VPN in VPC .

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Hi Rohit,

Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 
8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it.

Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :)

Cheers,
Wilder

On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Wilder,

Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 
branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.

Regards.

On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:

Hi all,

Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC has 
been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.

Remarks:

* I will test Basic Zone later today
* For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests 
results. :)

There go my results:

:: Environment ::

Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud 
infra
Management Server: MacBook Pro
Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro


:: Advanced Zone ::

===
Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is created ... 
=== TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s

OK


Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: 
test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 217.296s

OK


Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for 
migration
Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 10 tests in 816.707s

OK (SKIP=1)


test_privategw_acl (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) 
... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 85.883s

OK


Test to create service offering ... === TestName: 
test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: 
test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: 
test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 3 tests in 196.733s

OK


Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host 
credentials to check router services
Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok

--
Ran 7 tests in 413.426s

OK (SKIP=1)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Wilder,

If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next RC. 
At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. 
Thanks.

> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues  
> wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 
> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>
> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it.
>
> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
>> Hi Wilder,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 
>> branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>> On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC 
>>> has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
>>>
>>> Remarks:
>>>
>>> * I will test Basic Zone later today
>>> * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests 
>>> results. :)
>>>
>>> There go my results:
>>>
>>> :: Environment ::
>>>
>>> Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS Beta-Cloud 
>>> infra
>>> Management Server: MacBook Pro
>>> Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
>>>
>>>
>>> :: Advanced Zone ::
>>>
>>> ===
>>> Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
>>> test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is created 
>>> ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain 
>>> | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: 
>>> test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | 
>>> Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
>>> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
>>> SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : 
>>> SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
>>> test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>>
>>> Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: 
>>> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ran 1 test in 217.296s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>>
>>> Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: 
>>> test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : 
>>> SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: 
>>> test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : 
>>> SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : 
>>> SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : 
>>> SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status 
>>> : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status 
>>> : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone 
>>> for migration
>>> Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm 
>>> | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ran 10 tests in 816.707s
>>>
>>> OK (SKIP=1)
>>>
>>>
>>> test_privategw_acl 
>>> (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === 
>>> TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ran 1 test in 85.883s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>>
>>> Test to create service offering ... === TestName: 
>>> test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: 
>>> test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>> Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: 
>>> test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>> ok
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ran 3 tests in 196.733s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>>
>>> Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Tomasz Zięba]

-1
quite simple issues:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8176
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8175

2015-01-13 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Nalley :

> Hi folks,
>
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>



-- 
Regards,
Tomasz Zięba
Twitter: @TZieba
LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

kvmclock has been fixed, some changes were made to
LibvirtComputingResource in 4.5 and master. it doesn't apply to 4.4.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Tomasz Zięba  wrote:
> -1
> quite simple issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8176
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8175
>
> 2015-01-13 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Nalley :
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Tomasz Zięba
> Twitter: @TZieba
> LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Marcus,

> On 23-Jan-2015, at 3:17 pm, Marcus  wrote:
>
> kvmclock has been fixed, some changes were made to
> LibvirtComputingResource in 4.5 and master. it doesn't apply to 4.4.

Just saw your changes on commit@, thanks for fixing it. I’ll test it and see if 
it works in my setup.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

I will test it over the weekend.

Cheers,
Wilder

On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi Wilder,
> 
> If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next 
> RC. At the moment the latest is SHA d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. 
> Thanks.
> 
>> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Rohit,
>> 
>> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 
>> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>> 
>> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test it.
>> 
>> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. :)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Wilder
>> 
>> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Wilder,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 4.5 
>>> branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>>> 
 On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC 
 has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
 
 Remarks:
 
 * I will test Basic Zone later today
 * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the tests 
 results. :)
 
 There go my results:
 
 :: Environment ::
 
 Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS 
 Beta-Cloud infra
 Management Server: MacBook Pro
 Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
 
 
 :: Advanced Zone ::
 
 ===
 Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
 test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is created 
 ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: 
 test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: 
 test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | 
 Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
 test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
 SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status 
 : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
 test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 
 --
 Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
 
 OK
 
 
 Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: 
 test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 
 --
 Ran 1 test in 217.296s
 
 OK
 
 
 Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: 
 test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : 
 SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: 
 test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : 
 SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : 
 SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : 
 SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status 
 : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status 
 : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone 
 for migration
 Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm 
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 
 --
 Ran 10 tests in 816.707s
 
 OK (SKIP=1)
 
 
 test_privategw_acl 
 (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === 
 TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 
 --
 Ran 1 test in 85.883s
 
 OK
 
 
 Test to create service offering ... === TestName: 
 test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: 
 test_02_edit_service_offeri

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Hi everyone,

Any news on this?

I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).

I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

Thanks!
Mike

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:

> Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>
> I will test it over the weekend.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
> On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> > Hi Wilder,
> >
> > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
> next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> >
> >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rohit,
> >>
> >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> >>
> >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
> test it.
> >>
> >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
> list. :)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Wilder
> >>
> >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Wilder,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
> latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
> 4.5). Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Regards.
> >>>
>  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> 
>  Hi all,
> 
>  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the
> RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
> 
>  Remarks:
> 
>  * I will test Basic Zone later today
>  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
> tests results. :)
> 
>  There go my results:
> 
>  :: Environment ::
> 
>  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
> Beta-Cloud infra
>  Management Server: MacBook Pro
>  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
> 
> 
>  :: Advanced Zone ::
> 
> 
> ===
>  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
> test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
> created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
> test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
> test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
> test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
> 
>  --
>  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
> 
>  OK
> 
> 
>  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
> 
>  --
>  Ran 1 test in 217.296s
> 
>  OK
> 
> 
>  Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
> test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status
> : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
> test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status
> : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the
> zone for migration
>  Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
> test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
> 
>  --
>  Ran 10 tests in 816.707s
> 
>  OK (SKIP=1)
> 
> 
>  test_privategw_acl
> (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

I should point out that I'm on master.

On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Any news on this?
>
> I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
> without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
>
> I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>
> I will test it over the weekend.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
> On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> > Hi Wilder,
> >
> > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
> next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> >
> >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rohit,
> >>
> >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> >>
> >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
> test it.
> >>
> >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
> list. :)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Wilder
> >>
> >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Wilder,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
> latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
> 4.5). Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Regards.
> >>>
>  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> 
>  Hi all,
> 
>  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the
> RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
> 
>  Remarks:
> 
>  * I will test Basic Zone later today
>  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
> tests results. :)
> 
>  There go my results:
> 
>  :: Environment ::
> 
>  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
> Beta-Cloud infra
>  Management Server: MacBook Pro
>  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
> 
> 
>  :: Advanced Zone ::
> 
> 
> ===
>  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
> test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
> created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
> test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
> test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
> test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
> 
>  --
>  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
> 
>  OK
> 
> 
>  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
> 
>  --
>  Ran 1 test in 217.296s
> 
>  OK
> 
> 
>  Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
> test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status
> : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
> test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status
> : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the
> zone for migration
>  Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
> test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
> 
>  --
>  Ran 10 tests 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rajani Karuturi]

I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce

~Rajani

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> I should point out that I'm on master.
>
> On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Any news on this?
> >
> > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
> > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
> >
> > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mike
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > I will test it over the weekend.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Wilder
> >
> > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Wilder,
> > >
> > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
> > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> > >
> > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Rohit,
> > >>
> > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
> > 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
> > test it.
> > >>
> > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
> > list. :)
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Wilder
> > >>
> > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Wilder,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
> > latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
> > 4.5). Thanks.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards.
> > >>>
> >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > 
> >  Hi all,
> > 
> >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
> the
> > RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
> work.
> > 
> >  Remarks:
> > 
> >  * I will test Basic Zone later today
> >  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
> > tests results. :)
> > 
> >  There go my results:
> > 
> >  :: Environment ::
> > 
> >  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
> > Beta-Cloud infra
> >  Management Server: MacBook Pro
> >  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
> > 
> > 
> >  :: Advanced Zone ::
> > 
> > 
> >
> ===
> >  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
> > test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
> > created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS
> ===
> >  ok
> >  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
> > test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
> > test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails
> |
> > Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
> > test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
> > Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
> > Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
> > test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> > 
> > 
> --
> >  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
> > 
> >  OK
> > 
> > 
> >  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
> > test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> > 
> > 
> --
> >  Ran 1 test in 217.296s
> > 
> >  OK
> > 
> > 
> >  Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
> > test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm |
> Status
> > : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
> > test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status
> > : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
> > Status : SUCCESS =

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Nux!]

I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock thing 
fixed.
When will the next RC be cut?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rajani Karuturi" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, 31 January, 2015 13:57:33
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

> I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
> 
> ~Rajani
> 
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> 
>> I should point out that I'm on master.
>>
>> On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > Any news on this?
>> >
>> > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
>> > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
>> >
>> > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Mike
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>> >
>> > I will test it over the weekend.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Wilder
>> >
>> > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Wilder,
>> > >
>> > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
>> > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
>> > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
>> > >
>> > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Rohit,
>> > >>
>> > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
>> > 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>> > >>
>> > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
>> > test it.
>> > >>
>> > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
>> > list. :)
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Wilder
>> > >>
>> > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi Wilder,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
>> > latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
>> > 4.5). Thanks.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Hi all,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
>> the
>> > RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
>> work.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Remarks:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * I will test Basic Zone later today
>> > >>>> * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
>> > tests results. :)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> There go my results:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> :: Environment ::
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
>> > Beta-Cloud infra
>> > >>>> Management Server: MacBook Pro
>> > >>>> Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> :: Advanced Zone ::
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> >
>> ===
>> > >>>> Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
>> > test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> > >>>> ok
>> > >>>> Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
>> > created ... === TestNa

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[David Nalley]

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Nux!  wrote:
> I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock 
> thing fixed.
> When will the next RC be cut?
>
> Lucian
>

I've already cut RC2 that should include the kvmclock fixes.

--David

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
following:

2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock'
at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
>
> ~Rajani
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > I should point out that I'm on master.
> >
> > On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Any news on this?
> > >
> > > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
> or
> > > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
> > >
> > > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
> > >
> > > I will test it over the weekend.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Wilder
> > >
> > > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Wilder,
> > > >
> > > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
> the
> > > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> > > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Rohit,
> > > >>
> > > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
> > > 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> > > >>
> > > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
> > > test it.
> > > >>
> > > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
> > > list. :)
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Wilder
> > > >>
> > > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Wilder,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
> > > latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
> > > 4.5). Thanks.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards.
> > > >>>
> > >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Hi all,
> > > 
> > >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
> > the
> > > RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
> > work.
> > > 
> > >  Remarks:
> > > 
> > >  * I will test Basic Zone later today
> > >  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
> the
> > > tests results. :)
> > > 
> > >  There go my results:
> > > 
> > >  :: Environment ::
> > > 
> > >  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
> > > Beta-Cloud infra
> > >  Management Server: MacBook Pro
> > >  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  :: Advanced Zone ::
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> >
> ===
> > >  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
> > > test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
> > >  ok
> > >  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
> > > created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status :
> SUCCESS
> > ===
> > >  ok
> > >  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
> > > test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
> > >  ok
> > >  Test delet

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

I am able to manually create a VM on KVM using an ISO. I just can't create
a VM via CloudStack due to that exception.

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
> following:
>
> 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
> b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
> b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
> 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock'
> at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
> at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
> at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
> at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
> at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
> wrote:
>
>> I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
>>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
>>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
>>
>> ~Rajani
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I should point out that I'm on master.
>> >
>> > On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Any news on this?
>> > >
>> > > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
>> or
>> > > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
>> > >
>> > > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > > Mike
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>> > >
>> > > I will test it over the weekend.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Wilder
>> > >
>> > > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Wilder,
>> > > >
>> > > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
>> the
>> > > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
>> > > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
>> > > >
>> > > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Hi Rohit,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
>> > > 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I
>> will
>> > > test it.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
>> > > list. :)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Cheers,
>> > > >> Wilder
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Hi Wilder,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
>> > > latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
>> > > 4.5). Thanks.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Regards.
>> > > >>>
>> > >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >  Hi all,
>> > > 
>> > >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
>> > the
>> > > RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
>> > work.
>> > > 
>> > >  Remarks:
>> > > 
>> > >  * I will test Basic Zone later today
>> > >  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
>> the
>> > > tests results. :)
>> > > 
>> > >  There go my results:
>> > > 
>> > >  :: Environment ::
>> > > 
>> > >  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
>> > > Beta-Cloud infra
>> > >  Management Server: MacBook Pro
>> > >  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >  :: Advanced Zone ::
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >
>> >
>> ===
>> > >  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
>> > > test_0

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see
the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:

http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" 
wrote:

> Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
> following:
>
> 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
> b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
> b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
> 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock'
> at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
> at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
> at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
> at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
> at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
> wrote:
>
> > I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
> >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
> >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I should point out that I'm on master.
> > >
> > > On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Any news on this?
> > > >
> > > > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
> > or
> > > > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
> > > >
> > > > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
> > > >
> > > > I will test it over the weekend.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Wilder
> > > >
> > > > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Wilder,
> > > > >
> > > > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
> > the
> > > > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> > > > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Rohit,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
> > > > 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I
> will
> > > > test it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from
> the
> > > > list. :)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >> Wilder
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi Wilder,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
> > > > latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on
> latest
> > > > 4.5). Thanks.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Regards.
> > > > >>>
> > > >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >  Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only
> after
> > > the
> > > > RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
> > > work.
> > > > 
> > > >  Remarks:
> > > > 
> > > >  * I will test Basic Zone later today
> > > >  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
> > the
> > > > tests results. :)
> > > > 
> > > >  There go my results:
> > > > 
> > > >  :: Environment ::
> > > > 
> > > >  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
> > > > Beta-Cloud infra
> > > >  Management Server: MacBook Pro
> > > >  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  :: Advanced Zone ::
> > > > 
> > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of libvirt).

I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
says I'm at the latest.

What am I missing there? :)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus  wrote:

> That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see
> the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
>
>
> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
> On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" 
> wrote:
>
> > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
> > following:
> >
> > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
> > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
> > b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
> > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> > (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
> > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
> 'kvmclock'
> > at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
> > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> > at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
> > at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
> > at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
> > at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
> > at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
> > at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
> > at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> > at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
> > >
> > > ~Rajani
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I should point out that I'm on master.
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > Any news on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
> (with
> > > or
> > > > > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will test it over the weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Wilder
> > > > >
> > > > > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Wilder,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should
> become
> > > the
> > > > > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> > > > > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi Rohit,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
> > > > > 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I
> > will
> > > > > test it.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from
> > the
> > > > > list. :)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > >> Wilder
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hi Wilder,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
> against
> > > > > latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on
> > latest
> > > > > 4.5). Thanks.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Regards.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Hi all,
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only
> > after
> > > > the
> > > > > RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant
> VPC
> > > > work.
> > > > > 
> > 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Actually, there are two sections in that doc that specify different Libvirt
versions (depending on what you need to do):

* 0.9.4
* 0.9.11 (maybe this version has to be compiled from source?)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
> libvirt).
>
> I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
> says I'm at the latest.
>
> What am I missing there? :)
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>
>> That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see
>> the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
>>
>>
>> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
>> On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
>> > following:
>> >
>> > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
>> > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
>> > b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
>> > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
>> > (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
>> > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
>> 'kvmclock'
>> > at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>> > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>> > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>> > at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
>> > at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
>> > at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
>> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
>> > >
>> > > ~Rajani
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I should point out that I'm on master.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Any news on this?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
>> (with
>> > > or
>> > > > > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > Mike
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I will test it over the weekend.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > Wilder
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Wilder,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should
>> become
>> > > the
>> > > > > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
>> > > > > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> > > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Hi Rohit,
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
>> > > > > 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I
>> > will
>> > > > > test it.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from
>> > the
>> > > > > list. :)
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Cheers,
>> > > > > >> Wilder
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav <
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>> Hi Wilder,
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
>> against
>> > > > > latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on
>> > latest
>> > > > > 4.5).

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a
thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that
most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to
dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs
on that.

At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place
for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our
XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum
version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" 
wrote:

> It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
> libvirt).
>
> I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
> says I'm at the latest.
>
> What am I missing there? :)
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>
> > That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please
> see
> > the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
> >
> >
> >
> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
> > On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
> > > following:
> > >
> > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> > > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
> > > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
> > > b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
> > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> > > (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
> > > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
> > 'kvmclock'
> > > at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
> > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> > > at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
> > > at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
> > > at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
> > > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
> > > >
> > > > ~Rajani
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I should point out that I'm on master.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any news on this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
> > (with
> > > > or
> > > > > > without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
> > > > > > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will test it over the weekend.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Wilder
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Wilder,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should
> > become
> > > > the
> > > > > > next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> > > > > > d08369

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Thanks, Marcus

Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
they resolved the issue, though.

This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):

cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
Bellard

cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
--version
libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus  wrote:

> The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a
> thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
> target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
> changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
> Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
> functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that
> most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to
> dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs
> on that.
>
> At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place
> for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
> was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our
> XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
> any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
> updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum
> version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
> On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" 
> wrote:
>
> > It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
> > libvirt).
> >
> > I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
> > says I'm at the latest.
> >
> > What am I missing there? :)
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> >
> > > That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please
> > see
> > > the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
> > > On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
> > > > following:
> > > >
> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
> > > > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
> > > > b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
> > > > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
> > > 'kvmclock'
> > > > at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
> > > > at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
> > > > at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
> > > > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
> > > > >
> > > > > ~Rajani
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I should point out that I'm on master.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any news on this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> Thanks, Marcus
>
> Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
> they resolved the issue, though.
>
> This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):
>
> cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
> QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
> Bellard
>
> cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
> --version
> libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>
>> The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a
>> thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
>> target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
>> changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
>> Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
>> functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that
>> most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to
>> dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs
>> on that.
>>
>> At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place
>> for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
>> was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our
>> XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
>> any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
>> updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum
>> version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
>> On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
>> > libvirt).
>> >
>> > I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
>> > says I'm at the latest.
>> >
>> > What am I missing there? :)
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>> >
>> > > That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please
>> > see
>> > > the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
>> > > On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
>> > > > following:
>> > > >
>> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
>> > > > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
>> > > > b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
>> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
>> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
>> > > > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
>> > > 'kvmclock'
>> > > > at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
>> > > > at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
>> > > > at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
>> > > > at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
>> > > > at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
>> > > > at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
>> > > > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
>> > > > at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>> > > > at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>> > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ~Rajani
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I should point out that I'm on maste

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has
never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working
due to that exception when I try to run a VM).

Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:

https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/

I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your
dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus  wrote:

> Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
> feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>  wrote:
> > Thanks, Marcus
> >
> > Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
> > they resolved the issue, though.
> >
> > This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):
> >
> > cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
> > QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
> > Bellard
> >
> > cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
> > --version
> > libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> >
> >> The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's
> a
> >> thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
> >> target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
> >> changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
> >> Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
> >> functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos
> that
> >> most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit
> trickier to
> >> dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the
> docs
> >> on that.
> >>
> >> At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in
> place
> >> for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
> >> was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like
> our
> >> XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
> >> any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
> >> updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a
> minimum
> >> version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
> >> On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
> >> > libvirt).
> >> >
> >> > I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin,
> it
> >> > says I'm at the latest.
> >> >
> >> > What am I missing there? :)
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock.
> Please
> >> > see
> >> > > the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
> >> > > On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >> > >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see
> the
> >> > > > following:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> >> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
> >> > > > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
> >> > > > b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
> >> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN
> [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> >> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
> >> > > > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
> >> > > 'kvmclock'
> >> > > > at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
> >> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> >> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
> >> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
> >> > > > at
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
> >> > > > at
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
> >> > > > at
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
> >> > > > at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
> >> > > > at
> com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
> >> > > > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
> >> > > > at
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> >> > > > at
> >> > > >
> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock,
even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport
things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though.
I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then
backed out because of the Ubuntu 12.04 incompatibility. I think it was
around that time that the minimum versions were adopted, but it's not
until now in 4.5 that kvmclock is back and will require Ubuntu 12.04
users to either upgrade to a newer Ubuntu or run non-distro packages.
I'm game to back out kvmclock yet again, but I'd prefer to see us
update our recommended platforms.

Maybe we should ask people what they've been running. Is anyone still
testing against 12.04?

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has
> never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working
> due to that exception when I try to run a VM).
>
> Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/
>
> I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your
> dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent.
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>
>> Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
>> feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>>  wrote:
>> > Thanks, Marcus
>> >
>> > Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
>> > they resolved the issue, though.
>> >
>> > This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):
>> >
>> > cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
>> > QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
>> > Bellard
>> >
>> > cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
>> > --version
>> > libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>> >
>> >> The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's
>> a
>> >> thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
>> >> target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
>> >> changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
>> >> Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
>> >> functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos
>> that
>> >> most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit
>> trickier to
>> >> dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the
>> docs
>> >> on that.
>> >>
>> >> At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in
>> place
>> >> for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
>> >> was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like
>> our
>> >> XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
>> >> any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
>> >> updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a
>> minimum
>> >> version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
>> >> On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
>> >> > libvirt).
>> >> >
>> >> > I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin,
>> it
>> >> > says I'm at the latest.
>> >> >
>> >> > What am I missing there? :)
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock.
>> Please
>> >> > see
>> >> > > the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
>> >> > > On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> >> > >
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see
>> the
>> >> > > > following:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> >> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
>> >> > > > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
>> >> > > > b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
>> >> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN
>> [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
>> >> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
>> >> > > > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
>> >> > > 'kvmclock'
>> >> > > > at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>> >> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>> >> > > > at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>> >> > > > at org

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

I just happen to be using 12.04.1, but I'm personally fine with upgrading.

I know that upgrading is sometimes easier said than done in production
environments, though, so it would be interesting to get feedback from users
on this.

On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Marcus  wrote:

> Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock,
> even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport
> things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though.
> I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then
> backed out because of the Ubuntu 12.04 incompatibility. I think it was
> around that time that the minimum versions were adopted, but it's not
> until now in 4.5 that kvmclock is back and will require Ubuntu 12.04
> users to either upgrade to a newer Ubuntu or run non-distro packages.
> I'm game to back out kvmclock yet again, but I'd prefer to see us
> update our recommended platforms.
>
> Maybe we should ask people what they've been running. Is anyone still
> testing against 12.04?
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>  wrote:
> > If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It
> has
> > never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it
> working
> > due to that exception when I try to run a VM).
> >
> > Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:
> >
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/
> >
> > I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your
> > dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> >
> >> Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
> >> feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> >>  wrote:
> >> > Thanks, Marcus
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see
> how
> >> > they resolved the issue, though.
> >> >
> >> > This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):
> >> >
> >> > cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm
> --version
> >> > QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008
> Fabrice
> >> > Bellard
> >> >
> >> > cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
> >> > --version
> >> > libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS.
> There's
> >> a
> >> >> thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
> >> >> target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
> >> >> changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos
> and
> >> >> Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
> >> >> functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos
> >> that
> >> >> most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit
> >> trickier to
> >> >> dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the
> >> docs
> >> >> on that.
> >> >>
> >> >> At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in
> >> place
> >> >> for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced
> fix
> >> >> was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like
> >> our
> >> >> XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have
> seen
> >> >> any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
> >> >> updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a
> >> minimum
> >> >> version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
> >> >> On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
> >> >> > libvirt).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install
> libvirt-bin,
> >> it
> >> >> > says I'm at the latest.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What am I missing there? :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus 
> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock.
> >> Please
> >> >> > see
> >> >> > > the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
> >> >> > > On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> >> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still
> see
> >> the
> >> >> > > > following:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO
> [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> >> >> > > > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
> >> >> > > > b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in poo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Thanks, Rohit

As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04
(which is what I'm running).

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to
> work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration,
> attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.
>
> > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Any news on this?
> >
> > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
> without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
> >
> > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mike
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > I will test it over the weekend.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Wilder
> >
> > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Wilder,
> > >
> > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
> next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
> d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> > >
> > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Rohit,
> > >>
> > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
> test it.
> > >>
> > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
> list. :)
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Wilder
> > >>
> > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Wilder,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
> latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
> 4.5). Thanks.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards.
> > >>>
> >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> > 
> >  Hi all,
> > 
> >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
> the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
> work.
> > 
> >  Remarks:
> > 
> >  * I will test Basic Zone later today
> >  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
> tests results. :)
> > 
> >  There go my results:
> > 
> >  :: Environment ::
> > 
> >  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
> Beta-Cloud infra
> >  Management Server: MacBook Pro
> >  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
> > 
> > 
> >  :: Advanced Zone ::
> > 
> > 
> ===
> >  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
> test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
> created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
> test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
> test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails
> | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
> test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> > 
> > 
> --
> >  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
> > 
> >  OK
> > 
> > 
> >  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> > 
> > 
> --
> >  Ran 1 test in 217.296s
> > 
> >  OK
> > 
> > 
> >  Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
> test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
> test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> >  ok
> >  Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was
able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).

As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a
supported platform for CS 4.5.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski  wrote:

> Thanks, Rohit
>
> As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04
> (which is what I'm running).
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to
>> work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration,
>> attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.
>>
>> > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > Any news on this?
>> >
>> > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
>> or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
>> >
>> > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Mike
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>> >
>> > I will test it over the weekend.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Wilder
>> >
>> > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Wilder,
>> > >
>> > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
>> the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
>> d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
>> > >
>> > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Rohit,
>> > >>
>> > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
>> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>> > >>
>> > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
>> test it.
>> > >>
>> > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
>> list. :)
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Wilder
>> > >>
>> > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi Wilder,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
>> latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
>> 4.5). Thanks.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards.
>> > >>>
>> >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
>> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> >  Hi all,
>> > 
>> >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
>> the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
>> work.
>> > 
>> >  Remarks:
>> > 
>> >  * I will test Basic Zone later today
>> >  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
>> the tests results. :)
>> > 
>> >  There go my results:
>> > 
>> >  :: Environment ::
>> > 
>> >  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
>> Beta-Cloud infra
>> >  Management Server: MacBook Pro
>> >  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  :: Advanced Zone ::
>> > 
>> > 
>> ===
>> >  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
>> test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
>> created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
>> test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
>> test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test update admin details ... === TestName:
>> test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
>> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
>> Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
>> Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
>> test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> > 
>> > 
>> --
>> >  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
>> > 
>> >  OK
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
>> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> > 
>> > 
>> --
>> >  Ran 1 test in 217.296s
>> > 
>> >  OK
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
>> test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
>> >  ok
>> >  Test Deploy Vi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Hi there,

We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 
12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04.

Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not 
being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool.

Cheers,
Wilder


On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski 
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:

Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able 
to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).

As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a 
supported platform for CS 4.5.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
Thanks, Rohit

As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which 
is what I'm running).

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Hi Mike,

I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work 
for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach 
localstorage disks etc.

> On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski 
> mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Any news on this?
>
> I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or 
> without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
>
> I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
> mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
> Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>
> I will test it over the weekend.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
> On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
>
> > Hi Wilder,
> >
> > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next 
> > RC. At the moment the latest is SHA 
> > d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
> >
> >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
> >> mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rohit,
> >>
> >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 
> >> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
> >>
> >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test 
> >> it.
> >>
> >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. 
> >> :)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Wilder
> >>
> >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
> >> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Wilder,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 
> >>> 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). 
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Regards.
> >>>
>  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
>  mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> 
>  wrote:
> 
>  Hi all,
> 
>  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC 
>  has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
> 
>  Remarks:
> 
>  * I will test Basic Zone later today
>  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the 
>  tests results. :)
> 
>  There go my results:
> 
>  :: Environment ::
> 
>  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS 
>  Beta-Cloud infra
>  Management Server: MacBook Pro
>  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
> 
> 
>  :: Advanced Zone ::
> 
>  ===
>  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
>  test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is 
>  created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS 
>  ===
>  ok
>  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: 
>  test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: 
>  test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | 
>  Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
>  test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
>  SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | 
>  Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
>  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
>  test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
>  ok
> 
>  --
>  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
> 
>  OK
> 
> 
>  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: 
>  test_01_reset_vm_on_rebo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu
12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would
be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Hi Wilder,
>
> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think
> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2
> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
>
> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade
> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty
> smooth with fewer rough edges.
>
> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have
>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04.
>>
>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to
>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wilder
>>
>>
>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski > > wrote:
>>
>>  Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I
>>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).
>>>
>>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should
>>> be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>> mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, Rohit
>>>
>>> As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu
>>> 12.04 (which is what I'm running).
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
>>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
>>> seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
>>> like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.
>>>
>>> > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > Any news on this?
>>> >
>>> > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on
>>> KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
>>> >
>>> > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> > Mike
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>>> >
>>> > I will test it over the weekend.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Wilder
>>> >
>>> > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
>>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Wilder,
>>> > >
>>> > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which
>>> should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
>>> d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
>>> > >
>>> > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi Rohit,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
>>> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used
>>> and I will test it.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit
>>> away from the list. :)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Wilder
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav
>>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> Hi Wilder,
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
>>> against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your
>>> tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Regards.
>>> > >>>
>>> >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> > 
>>> >  Hi all,
>>> > 
>>> >  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it
>>> only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy
>>> with the redundant VPC work.
>>> > 
>>> >  Remarks:
>>> > 
>>> >  * I will test Basic Zone later today
>>> >  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events
>>> log after the tests results. :)
>>> > 
>>> >  Ther

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Hi everyone,

So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5
(due to this kvmclock issue).

How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine if
we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

Thanks,
Mike

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu
> 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would
> be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Wilder,
>>
>> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think
>> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2
>> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
>>
>> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade
>> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty
>> smooth with fewer rough edges.
>>
>> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have
>>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu
>>> 12.04.
>>>
>>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to
>>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Wilder
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski >> > wrote:
>>>
>>>  Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I
 was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).

 As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should
 be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
 wrote:

 Thanks, Rohit

 As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu
 12.04 (which is what I'm running).

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
 wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
 seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
 like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.

 > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
 >>> > wrote:
 >
 > Hi everyone,
 >
 > Any news on this?
 >
 > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on
 KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
 >
 > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 >
 > Thanks!
 > Mike
 >
 > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
 >>> > wrote:
 > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
 >
 > I will test it over the weekend.
 >
 > Cheers,
 > Wilder
 >
 > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
 wrote:
 >
 > > Hi Wilder,
 > >
 > > If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which
 should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
 d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
 > >
 > >> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
 >>> > wrote:
 > >>
 > >> Hi Rohit,
 > >>
 > >> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
 > >>
 > >> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used
 and I will test it.
 > >>
 > >> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit
 away from the list. :)
 > >>
 > >> Cheers,
 > >> Wilder
 > >>
 > >> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
 wrote:
 > >>
 > >>> Hi Wilder,
 > >>>
 > >>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
 against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your
 tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.
 > >>>
 > >>> Regards.
 > >>>
 >  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
 >>> > wrote:
  

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. 
I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are 
still tons of 12.04 installs. 

Andrei 

- Original Message -

> From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> To: "Rohit Yadav" 
> Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" ,
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
> , "int-cloud"
> 
> Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

> Hi everyone,

> So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS
> 4.5
> (due to this kvmclock issue).

> How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
> determine if
> we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
> regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

> Thanks,
> Mike

> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> > FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
> > Ubuntu
> > 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
> > issue would
> > be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Wilder,
> >>
> >> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
> >> think
> >> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test
> >> 4.4.2
> >> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
> >>
> >> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
> >> upgrade
> >> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is
> >> pretty
> >> smooth with fewer rough edges.
> >>
> >> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we
> >>> have
> >>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
> >>> Ubuntu
> >>> 12.04.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help
> >>> to
> >>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
> >>> cool.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Wilder
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>  >>> <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
> >>> 14.04, I
> >>>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be
> >>>> the case).
> >>>>
> >>>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04
> >>>> should
> >>>> be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>>  >>>> <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks, Rohit
> >>>>
> >>>> As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
> >>>> Ubuntu
> >>>> 12.04 (which is what I'm running).
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >>>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Mike,
> >>>>
> >>>> I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
> >>>> seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
> >>>> like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>>  >>>> <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Hi everyone,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Any news on this?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on
> >>>> KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks!
> >>>> > Mike
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.

I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is,
so it's great to have your comments.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky 
wrote:

> Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
> community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already,
> but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
>
> Andrei
>
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> > To: "Rohit Yadav" 
> > Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" ,
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
> > , "int-cloud"
> > 
> > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>
> > Hi everyone,
>
> > So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS
> > 4.5
> > (due to this kvmclock issue).
>
> > How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
> > determine if
> > we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
> > regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
>
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
>
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > > FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
> > > Ubuntu
> > > 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
> > > issue would
> > > be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Wilder,
> > >>
> > >> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
> > >> think
> > >> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test
> > >> 4.4.2
> > >> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
> > >>
> > >> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
> > >> upgrade
> > >> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is
> > >> pretty
> > >> smooth with fewer rough edges.
> > >>
> > >> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi there,
> > >>>
> > >>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we
> > >>> have
> > >>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
> > >>> Ubuntu
> > >>> 12.04.
> > >>>
> > >>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help
> > >>> to
> > >>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
> > >>> cool.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Wilder
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
> > >>>  > >>> <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
> > >>> 14.04, I
> > >>>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be
> > >>>> the case).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04
> > >>>> should
> > >>>> be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> > >>>>  > >>>> <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks, Rohit
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
> > >>>> Ubuntu
> > >>>> 12.04 (which is what I'm running).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
> > >>>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi Mike,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
> > >>>> seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
> > >>>> like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms of 
it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see Windows 2012 
servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as Ubuntu 14.04 and 
12.04. 

Andrei 
- Original Message -

> From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

> Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.

> I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
> is,
> so it's great to have your comments.

> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
> 
> wrote:

> > Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
> > community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
> > already,
> > but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
> >
> > Andrei
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >
> > > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> > > To: "Rohit Yadav" 
> > > Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" ,
> > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
> > > , "int-cloud"
> > > 
> > > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> >
> > > So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
> > > CS
> > > 4.5
> > > (due to this kvmclock issue).
> >
> > > How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
> > > determine if
> > > we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
> > > with
> > > regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mike
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
> > > > on
> > > > Ubuntu
> > > > 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
> > > > issue would
> > > > be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Wilder,
> > > >>
> > > >> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
> > > >> I
> > > >> think
> > > >> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
> > > >> test
> > > >> 4.4.2
> > > >> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
> > > >>
> > > >> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
> > > >> and
> > > >> upgrade
> > > >> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
> > > >> is
> > > >> pretty
> > > >> smooth with fewer rough edges.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi there,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
> > > >>> and we
> > > >>> have
> > > >>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
> > > >>> Ubuntu
> > > >>> 12.04.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
> > > >>> help
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
> > > >>> cool.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Cheers,
> > > >>> Wilder
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
> > > >>>  > > >>> <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
> > > >>> 14.04, I
> > > >>>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would
> > > >>>> be
> > > >>>> the case).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu
> > > >>>&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

OK - thanks, Andrei

Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
plan of attack soon.

Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
4.6), I believe.

Thanks!

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky 
wrote:

> I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms
> of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
> Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
> Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.
>
> Andrei
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>
> > Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
>
> > I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
> > is,
> > so it's great to have your comments.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
> > 
> > wrote:
>
> > > Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
> > > community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
> > > already,
> > > but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
> > >
> > > Andrei
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > >
> > > > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> > > > To: "Rohit Yadav" 
> > > > Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" ,
> > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
> > > > , "int-cloud"
> > > > 
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > > So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
> > > > CS
> > > > 4.5
> > > > (due to this kvmclock issue).
> > >
> > > > How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
> > > > determine if
> > > > we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
> > > > with
> > > > regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mike
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
> > > > > on
> > > > > Ubuntu
> > > > > 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
> > > > > issue would
> > > > > be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
> > > > > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Wilder,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
> > > > >> I
> > > > >> think
> > > > >> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
> > > > >> test
> > > > >> 4.4.2
> > > > >> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> upgrade
> > > > >> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> pretty
> > > > >> smooth with fewer rough edges.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi there,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
> > > > >>> and we
> > > > >>> have
> > > > >>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
> > > > >>> Ubuntu
> > > > >>> 12.04.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
> > > > >>> help
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> fix? Not being able to upgrade

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.


On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> OK - thanks, Andrei
>
> Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
> Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
> plan of attack soon.
>
> Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
> 4.6), I believe.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky 
> wrote:
>
>> I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms
>> of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
>> Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
>> Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.
>>
>> Andrei
>> - Original Message -
>>
>> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>>
>> > Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
>>
>> > I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
>> > is,
>> > so it's great to have your comments.
>>
>> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
>> > 
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
>> > > community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
>> > > already,
>> > > but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
>> > >
>> > > Andrei
>> > >
>> > > - Original Message -
>> > >
>> > > > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
>> > > > To: "Rohit Yadav" 
>> > > > Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" ,
>> > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
>> > > > , "int-cloud"
>> > > > 
>> > > > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
>> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>> > >
>> > > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > > So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
>> > > > CS
>> > > > 4.5
>> > > > (due to this kvmclock issue).
>> > >
>> > > > How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
>> > > > determine if
>> > > > we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
>> > > > with
>> > > > regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Mike
>> > >
>> > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > > FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
>> > > > > on
>> > > > > Ubuntu
>> > > > > 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
>> > > > > issue would
>> > > > > be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Hi Wilder,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
>> > > > >> I
>> > > > >> think
>> > > > >> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
>> > > > >> test
>> > > > >> 4.4.2
>> > > > >> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
>> > > > >> and
>> > > > >> upgrade
>> > > > >> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
>&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Sounds reasonable to me.

Would you be willing to put those changes in for 4.5 before we spin up
another RC, Marcus?

On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Marcus  wrote:

> I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
> things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
> packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
> do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
> targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
> of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
> support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
> the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>  wrote:
> > OK - thanks, Andrei
> >
> > Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
> > Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
> > plan of attack soon.
> >
> > Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
> > 4.6), I believe.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in
> terms
> >> of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
> >> Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
> >> Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.
> >>
> >> Andrei
> >> ----- Original Message -
> >>
> >> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
> >>
> >> > Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
> >>
> >> > I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
> >> > is,
> >> > so it's great to have your comments.
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
> >> > 
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > > Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
> >> > > community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
> >> > > already,
> >> > > but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
> >> > >
> >> > > Andrei
> >> > >
> >> > > - Original Message -
> >> > >
> >> > > > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> >> > > > To: "Rohit Yadav" 
> >> > > > Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" ,
> >> > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
> >> > > > , "int-cloud"
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
> >> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi everyone,
> >> > >
> >> > > > So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
> >> > > > CS
> >> > > > 4.5
> >> > > > (due to this kvmclock issue).
> >> > >
> >> > > > How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
> >> > > > determine if
> >> > > > we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
> >> > > > with
> >> > > > regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
> >> > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Mike
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> >> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > > FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
> >> > > > > on
> >> > > > > Ubuntu
> >> > > > > 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
> >> > > > > issue would
> >> > > > > be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Hi Wilder,
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> The iss

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your
agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround).

On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:

Hi everyone,

So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5
(due to this kvmclock issue).

How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine
if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

Thanks,
Mike

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:

FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the
same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Wilder,

The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
think
as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
test 4.4.2
to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
upgrade
scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
is pretty
smooth with fewer rough edges.

On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:

Hi there,

We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
and we have
Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
Ubuntu 12.04.

Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
help to
fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
cool.

Cheers,
Wilder


On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> wrote:

Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04
to 14.04, I
was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected
would be the case).

As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if
Ubuntu 12.04 should
be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>
wrote:

 Thanks, Rohit

 As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility
issue with Ubuntu
 12.04 (which is what I'm running).

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>> wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04
and local storage
 seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it
thoroughly things
 like migration, attaching/detach localstorage
disks etc.

 > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
 >> wrote:
 >
 > Hi everyone,
 >
 > Any news on this?
 >
 > I am still having trouble creating a VM on
local storage on
 KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in
agent.properties).
 >
 > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 >
 > Thanks!
 > Mike
 >
 > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
 mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>
 >> wrote:
 > Okay, thanks for the clarification.
 >
 > I will test it over the weekend.
 >
 > Cheers,
 > Wilder
 >
 > On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi all,

I've been trying to fix few issues, the localstorage seems to work now
among other things. I've identified few more issues that I'll fix today,
after that and fixing such issues (kvmclock) etc let's request David to
spin up another RC.

On Friday 06 February 2015 12:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:

Sounds reasonable to me.

Would you be willing to put those changes in for 4.5 before we spin up
another RC, Marcus?

On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Marcus  wrote:


I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.


On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:

OK - thanks, Andrei

Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
plan of attack soon.

Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
4.6), I believe.

Thanks!

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky 
wrote:


I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in

terms

of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.

Andrei
- Original Message -


From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1



Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.



I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
is,
so it's great to have your comments.



On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky

wrote:



Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
already,
but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.

Andrei

- Original Message -


From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
To: "Rohit Yadav" 
Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" ,
dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
, "int-cloud"

Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1



Hi everyone,



So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
CS
4.5
(due to this kvmclock issue).



How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
determine if
we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
with
regards to KVM on CS 4.5?



Thanks,
Mike



On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:



FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
on
Ubuntu
12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
issue would
be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav

wrote:


Hi Wilder,

The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
I
think
as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
test
4.4.2
to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
and
upgrade
scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
is
pretty
smooth with fewer rough edges.

On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrote:


Hi there,

We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
and we
have
Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
Ubuntu
12.04.

Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
help
to
fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
cool.

Cheers,
Wilder


On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:

Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
14.04, I

was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would
be
the case).

As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu
12.04
should
be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
wrote:

Thanks, Rohit

As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
Ubuntu
12.04 (which is what I'm running).

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
wrote:

Hi Mike,

I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local
storage
seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.


On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski

mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote:


Hi everyone,

Any

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Nux!]

That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.

Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear complains 
about clock performance in VMs.

Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties if 
desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Marcus" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

> I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
> things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
> packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
> do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
> targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
> of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
> support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
> the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
thinking "why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
explicitly disable it to make it go away?"... this is again due to
variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.

Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.

So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
explicitly disable it if there are issues.

I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
without changing versions).




On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux!  wrote:
> That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.
>
> Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
> complains about clock performance in VMs.
>
> Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties 
> if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -----
>> From: "Marcus" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>
>> I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
>> things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
>> packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
>> do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
>> targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
>> of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
>> support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
>> the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

CentOS *6* users, that is...


On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
> regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
> disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
> thinking "why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
> explicitly disable it to make it go away?"... this is again due to
> variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
> kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
> issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
> live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
> runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
> xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.
>
> Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
> issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
> were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
> system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
> back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
> without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
> would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
> Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
> there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
> ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.
>
> So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
> the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
> explicitly disable it if there are issues.
>
> I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
> fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
> is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
> Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
> the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
> though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
> without changing versions).
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux!  wrote:
>> That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.
>>
>> Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
>> complains about clock performance in VMs.
>>
>> Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties 
>> if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?
>>
>> Lucian
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Marcus" 
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>>
>>> I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
>>> things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
>>> packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
>>> do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
>>> targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
>>> of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
>>> support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
>>> the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Nux!]

Roger that.
Well, backports without version change is one of the main reasons I use (RH)EL, 
so depends you look at it.
Anyway, it does not seem like a big thing affecting users, so good job on 
finding a fix. Thanks.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Marcus" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 16:22:15
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

> CentOS *6* users, that is...
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>> If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
>> regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
>> disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
>> thinking "why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
>> explicitly disable it to make it go away?"... this is again due to
>> variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
>> kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
>> issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
>> live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
>> runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
>> xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.
>>
>> Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
>> issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
>> were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
>> system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
>> back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
>> without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
>> would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
>> Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
>> there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
>> ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.
>>
>> So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
>> the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
>> explicitly disable it if there are issues.
>>
>> I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
>> fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
>> is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
>> Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
>> the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
>> though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
>> without changing versions).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux!  wrote:
>>> That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.
>>>
>>> Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
>>> complains
>>> about clock performance in VMs.
>>>
>>> Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties 
>>> if
>>> desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?
>>>
>>> Lucian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Marcus" 
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>>>
>>>> I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
>>>> things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
>>>> packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
>>>> do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
>>>> targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
>>>> of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
>>>> support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
> >>> the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

Sure, I agree. It just makes it tough to detect features when we're
targeting multiple platforms.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Nux!  wrote:
> Roger that.
> Well, backports without version change is one of the main reasons I use 
> (RH)EL, so depends you look at it.
> Anyway, it does not seem like a big thing affecting users, so good job on 
> finding a fix. Thanks.
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Marcus" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 16:22:15
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>
>> CentOS *6* users, that is...
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>>> If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
>>> regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
>>> disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
>>> thinking "why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
>>> explicitly disable it to make it go away?"... this is again due to
>>> variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
>>> kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
>>> issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
>>> live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
>>> runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
>>> xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.
>>>
>>> Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
>>> issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
>>> were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
>>> system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
>>> back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
>>> without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
>>> would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
>>> Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
>>> there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
>>> ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.
>>>
>>> So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
>>> the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
>>> explicitly disable it if there are issues.
>>>
>>> I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
>>> fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
>>> is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
>>> Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
>>> the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
>>> though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
>>> without changing versions).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux!  wrote:
>>>> That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.
>>>>
>>>> Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
>>>> complains
>>>> about clock performance in VMs.
>>>>
>>>> Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through 
>>>> agent.properties if
>>>> desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?
>>>>
>>>> Lucian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>> From: "Marcus" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>>>>
>>>>> I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
>>>>> things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
>>>>> packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
>>>>> do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
>>>>> targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
>>>>> of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
>>>>> support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
>> >>> the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in
already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or
made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for
me.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your
> agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround).
>
> On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5
>> (due to this kvmclock issue).
>>
>> How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine
>> if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
>> regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>> mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
>> Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the
>> same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Wilder,
>>
>> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
>> think
>> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
>> test 4.4.2
>> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
>>
>> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
>> upgrade
>> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
>> is pretty
>> smooth with fewer rough edges.
>>
>> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
>> and we have
>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
>> Ubuntu 12.04.
>>
>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
>> help to
>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
>> cool.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wilder
>>
>>
>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
>> > 
>> > >> wrote:
>>
>> Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04
>> to 14.04, I
>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected
>> would be the case).
>>
>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if
>> Ubuntu 12.04 should
>> be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>> > 
>> > >>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Thanks, Rohit
>>
>>  As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility
>> issue with Ubuntu
>>  12.04 (which is what I'm running).
>>
>>  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
>>  > 
>> > >> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Mike,
>>
>>  I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04
>> and local storage
>>  seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it
>> thoroughly things
>>  like migration, attaching/detach localstorage
>> disks etc.
>>
>>  > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
>>  > 
>>  > >> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Hi everyone,
>>  >
>>  > Any news on this?
>>  >
>>  > I am still having trouble creating a VM on
>> local storage on
>>  KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in
>> agent.properties).
>>  >
>>  > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>>  >
>>  > Thanks!
>>  > Mike
>>  >
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Marcus]

No, it won't help. It won't remove the kvmclock xml, just generate xml
that explicitly disables kvmclock. See my email above.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in
> already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or
> made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for
> me.
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
>
>> Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your
>> agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround).
>>
>> On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5
>>> (due to this kvmclock issue).
>>>
>>> How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine
>>> if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
>>> regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>>> mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
>>> Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the
>>> same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
>>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Wilder,
>>>
>>> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
>>> think
>>> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
>>> test 4.4.2
>>> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
>>>
>>> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
>>> upgrade
>>> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
>>> is pretty
>>> smooth with fewer rough edges.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
>>> and we have
>>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
>>> Ubuntu 12.04.
>>>
>>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
>>> help to
>>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
>>> cool.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Wilder
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
>>> >> 
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04
>>> to 14.04, I
>>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected
>>> would be the case).
>>>
>>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if
>>> Ubuntu 12.04 should
>>> be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>> >> 
>>> >> >>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Thanks, Rohit
>>>
>>>  As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility
>>> issue with Ubuntu
>>>  12.04 (which is what I'm running).
>>>
>>>  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
>>>  >> 
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Mike,
>>>
>>>  I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04
>>> and local storage
>>>  seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it
>>> thoroughly things
>>>  like migration, attaching/detach localstorage
>>> disks etc.
>>>
>>>  > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
>>>  >> 
>>>  >> >> wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  > Hi everyone,
>>>  >
>>>  > Any news on this?
>>>  >
>>>  > I am still having trouble creating a VM on
>>> local storage on
>>>  KVM (with or 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

[Mike Tutkowski]

Thanks, Marcus

I responded to Rohit's e-mail and then later read yours. :)

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Marcus  wrote:

> No, it won't help. It won't remove the kvmclock xml, just generate xml
> that explicitly disables kvmclock. See my email above.
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>  wrote:
> > Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in
> > already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or
> > made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working
> for
> > me.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your
> >> agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround).
> >>
> >> On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS
> 4.5
> >>> (due to this kvmclock issue).
> >>>
> >>> How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine
> >>> if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
> with
> >>> regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> >>> mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
> >>> Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the
> >>> same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu
> 12.04.1.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
> >>> mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Wilder,
> >>>
> >>> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
> I
> >>> think
> >>> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
> >>> test 4.4.2
> >>> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
> >>>
> >>> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
> and
> >>> upgrade
> >>> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
> >>> is pretty
> >>> smooth with fewer rough edges.
> >>>
> >>> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
> >>> and we have
> >>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support
> to
> >>> Ubuntu 12.04.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look
> and
> >>> help to
> >>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t
> be
> >>> cool.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Wilder
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>  >>> 
> >>>  >>> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from
> 12.04
> >>> to 14.04, I
> >>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected
> >>> would be the case).
> >>>
> >>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if
> >>> Ubuntu 12.04 should
> >>> be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>  >>> 
> >>>  >>> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Thanks, Rohit
> >>>
> >>>  As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility
> >>> issue with Ubuntu
> >>>  12.04 (which is what I'm running).
> >>>
> >>>  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >>>   >>> 
> >>>  >>> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Hi Mike,
> >>>
> >>>  I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04
> >>> and local storage
> >>>  seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it
> >>> thoroughly things
> >>>  like migration, attaching/detach localstorage
> >>> disks etc.
> >>>
> >>>  > On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>   >>> 
> >>>   >>>