Re: Google CSE for community website
+1. Go ahead! On 17.04.2013 04:26, Suresh Marru wrote: Hi All, Kudos to Uli, the new com-dev site is awesome and easily navigable. But given the wealth of information but one needs to know how to navigate to it. Can we add a google search engine to the site? If its ok, I can commit it for review. Suresh
Re: Consent to translate your web page at http://community.apache.org/
Dear Maria, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Maria Ramos mar...@webhostinghub.com wrote: ...I've emailed you a week ago regarding your web page which I found interesting and wanted to translate it into Spanish language We love translations...but you'll first have to convince us that you're not a bot, and that this is not just a scam to get link love for your website. The latter sounds especially hard ;-) -Bertrand
Re: Call for moderators
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? you can add me if I'm not already one. -Bertrand
Re: Consent to translate your web page at http://community.apache.org/
On 17 April 2013 09:19, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Dear Maria, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Maria Ramos mar...@webhostinghub.com wrote: ...I've emailed you a week ago regarding your web page which I found interesting and wanted to translate it into Spanish language We love translations...but you'll first have to convince us that you're not a bot, and that this is not just a scam to get link love for your website. The latter sounds especially hard ;-) I don't think Maria is subscribed to this list. Of course the linkbait issue crossed my mind too, but at no point has Maria asked for a link from us. We can't stop her translating the newbie FAQ and posting it somewhere, so that's why I told her she doesn't need our permission. Of course, I didn't say we would link to her translation, I merely said she doesn't need our permission. If it turns out to be genuine then we can use the content here, otherwise the links will be inbound not outbound. Ross
Spam on Women's Wiki
The main reason I have called for more moderators on the mailing list is that we are getting an increasing amount of spam on the Women's Wiki (around 5 a week at present) and I need some help killing it, the notifications are coming through to the moderation list and, naturally I don't want to allow them through. Do we want to set up some spam control on the wiki? Anyone know how? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Consent to translate your web page at http://community.apache.org/
This is another similar question. I'm serving as a member of a S.Korea government agency (National IT Industry Promotion Agency)'s advisory committee, and recently there's a move to support open source software and foster global open source committers. May I encourage them to get involved in ASF web translate project as their first step? On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Dear Maria, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Maria Ramos mar...@webhostinghub.com wrote: ...I've emailed you a week ago regarding your web page which I found interesting and wanted to translate it into Spanish language We love translations...but you'll first have to convince us that you're not a bot, and that this is not just a scam to get link love for your website. The latter sounds especially hard ;-) -Bertrand -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
Re: Consent to translate your web page at http://community.apache.org/
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: ...Of course the linkbait issue crossed my mind too, but at no point has Maria asked for a link from us. We can't stop her translating the newbie FAQ and posting it somewhere, so that's why I told her she doesn't need our permission. Of course, I didn't say we would link to her translation, I merely said she doesn't need our permission That's fine of course, but this looks so much like an SEO scam that we saw on the Felix list recently that I had to ask. Search Google for I've emailed you a week ago regarding your web page which I found interesting and wanted to translate it into Spanish language. to see what I mean. If Maria is indeed not a bot, let's hear from her ;-) -Bertrand
Re: Spam on Women's Wiki
On 2013/04/17 16:33, Ross Gardler said: The main reason I have called for more moderators on the mailing list is that we are getting an increasing amount of spam on the Women's Wiki (around 5 a week at present) and I need some help killing it, the notifications are coming through to the moderation list and, naturally I don't want to allow them through. Do we want to set up some spam control on the wiki? Anyone know how? Sorry, where is that wiki? -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Consent to translate your web page at http://community.apache.org/
That's really nice to hear! I guess, translate project will be very helpful for people who don't know what to try first. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Absolutely! We, the ComDev PMC ought to be seeking to have our whole site translated. Whilst English is the default language for our developer lists and therefore those wishing to participate will typically need to be able to read/write English there is no reason why we shouldn't be providing our sign-posting documentation in as many native languages as possible. Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 17 April 2013 09:55, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: This is another similar question. I'm serving as a member of a S.Korea government agency (National IT Industry Promotion Agency)'s advisory committee, and recently there's a move to support open source software and foster global open source committers. May I encourage them to get involved in ASF web translate project as their first step? On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Dear Maria, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Maria Ramos mar...@webhostinghub.com wrote: ...I've emailed you a week ago regarding your web page which I found interesting and wanted to translate it into Spanish language We love translations...but you'll first have to convince us that you're not a bot, and that this is not just a scam to get link love for your website. The latter sounds especially hard ;-) -Bertrand -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
Re: Spam on Women's Wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/Women/ Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 17 April 2013 10:12, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote: On 2013/04/17 16:33, Ross Gardler said: The main reason I have called for more moderators on the mailing list is that we are getting an increasing amount of spam on the Women's Wiki (around 5 a week at present) and I need some help killing it, the notifications are coming through to the moderation list and, naturally I don't want to allow them through. Do we want to set up some spam control on the wiki? Anyone know how? Sorry, where is that wiki? -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
Re: Spam on Women's Wiki
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Ross Gardler wrote: Do we want to set up some spam control on the wiki? Anyone know how? I'd suggest we do set it up - most of the other wikis have now enabled it, and while it has probably put a few new people off, generally most people accept it as long as requests to be added are turned around fast. (Doesn't have to be incubator fast!) The main thing we need to do is come up with a list of the initial admins, who will grant karma as required. I'm happy to do it (NickBurch), I guess Ross is happy to do so (RossGardler), can we have a third person? (I'll need your wiki username) When we have that, I can email infra and ask them to enable the config and setup the initial groups Nick
Call for New Moderation Technology was Re: Call for moderators
I don't know if this is the right list or not (infra?), but I saw the topic here (and it is the 4th or 5th such request I've seen in the past 3-4 months) and in my mind it relates to improving the community, so I figured I'd discuss here first and then maybe we can take a proposal to infra@. It really is time for the ASF to modernize moderation and our mailing lists. The current approach is very antiquated compared to other lists/groups I moderate (LinkedIn, Google Groups, Wordpress, etc.) and it is no doubt a drain on what is already a fairly constrained resource (i.e. committers, PMC members and heavy contributors). Things that I think we need in order to make moderation easier: 1. Web interface where you can bulk process requests, either accepting in bulk or rejecting in bulk. The mail by mail approach is horribly tedious and is so often overwhelmed by spam that it takes too long to find the ones that aren't spam. 2. Figure out a way for official ASF communications to PMCs, etc. to NOT have to be moderated. I find it ridiculous after all this time that I have to moderate in messages from board members, or others, etc. to PMC and/or other lists. There should be official communication channels that authorized people can use when they sign in w/ their ASF credentials. 3. Better spam detection such that any email that is NOT spam, after sitting in the queue is automatically sent back to the user w/ instructions on how to subscribe to and properly send mail to the desired list. Anything that is spam is put into a separate folder automatically and left to die after X days like the current approach. Other mailing list nice to haves: 1. For user (as opposed to dev) mailing lists, when someone sends an email to the list, automatically do a search in the archives first that replies back w/ potential answers and FAQs, thus offloading the I can't bother to perform a search first questioners. 2. Web interface. Web Interface. Web Interface. Don't get me wrong, I want a good old fashioned email, but a web interface would bring in a lot more people in my opinion b/c now I can pull instead of being pushed too. For some lists that I participate in less frequently, this would save a lot of work for my email server while still allowing me to participate in the list. 3. The ability for moderators to pin topics to the top for all users (i.e. FAQs, etc.) 4. Search In other words, real forum software. -Grant On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Call for New Moderation Technology was Re: Call for moderators
On 17.04.2013 12:53, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I don't know if this is the right list or not (infra?), but I saw the topic here (and it is the 4th or 5th such request I've seen in the past 3-4 months) and in my mind it relates to improving the community, so I figured I'd discuss here first and then maybe we can take a proposal to infra@. Infra for sure. It really is time for the ASF to modernize moderation and our mailing lists. The current approach is very antiquated compared to other lists/groups I moderate (LinkedIn, Google Groups, Wordpress, etc.) and it is no doubt a drain on what is already a fairly constrained resource (i.e. committers, PMC members and heavy contributors). Things that I think we need in order to make moderation easier: 1. Web interface where you can bulk process requests, either accepting in bulk or rejecting in bulk. The mail by mail approach is horribly tedious and is so often overwhelmed by spam that it takes too long to find the ones that aren't spam. +1 2. Figure out a way for official ASF communications to PMCs, etc. to NOT have to be moderated. I find it ridiculous after all this time that I have to moderate in messages from board members, or others, etc. to PMC and/or other lists. There should be official communication channels that authorized people can use when they sign in w/ their ASF credentials. Ask infra to subscribe your email to all private-allow lists. It's a one-liner on the command line and they'll do it if asked. 3. Better spam detection such that any email that is NOT spam, after sitting in the queue is automatically sent back to the user w/ instructions on how to subscribe to and properly send mail to the desired list. Anything that is spam is put into a separate folder automatically and left to die after X days like the current approach. +1 Other mailing list nice to haves: 1. For user (as opposed to dev) mailing lists, when someone sends an email to the list, automatically do a search in the archives first that replies back w/ potential answers and FAQs, thus offloading the I can't bother to perform a search first questioners. I don't believe this will change anything. They won't bother reading, the same way they didn't bother doing a search in the first place. 2. Web interface. Web Interface. Web Interface. Don't get me wrong, I want a good old fashioned email, but a web interface would bring in a lot more people in my opinion b/c now I can pull instead of being pushed too. For some lists that I participate in less frequently, this would save a lot of work for my email server while still allowing me to participate in the list. Nabble. The integration with our mailing lists sucks though. Users still have to subscribe and when they don't (90% of the cases) their emails show up at Nabble but possibly not on our lists. 3. The ability for moderators to pin topics to the top for all users (i.e. FAQs, etc.) The Welcome message when subscribing can be modified to include an URL to such a resource, as can the footer on messages. 4. Search Google: site:mail-archives.apache.org your term here markmail.org Nabble In other words, real forum software. -1. I want it pushed to me and not having to go poll dozens of websites. Uli -Grant On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Google CSE for community website
On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: +1. Go ahead! I committed the search box addition (r1468843), please review it in staging and publish if it is ok - http://community.staging.apache.org/ Note that, the search points to the published site and not staging. Suresh On 17.04.2013 04:26, Suresh Marru wrote: Hi All, Kudos to Uli, the new com-dev site is awesome and easily navigable. But given the wealth of information but one needs to know how to navigate to it. Can we add a google search engine to the site? If its ok, I can commit it for review. Suresh
Re: Spam on Women's Wiki
Also, multiple ways to request access. See the header at the top of every page on http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/ On 17 April 2013 10:48, Nick Burch n...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Ross Gardler wrote: Do we want to set up some spam control on the wiki? Anyone know how? I'd suggest we do set it up - most of the other wikis have now enabled it, and while it has probably put a few new people off, generally most people accept it as long as requests to be added are turned around fast. (Doesn't have to be incubator fast!) The main thing we need to do is come up with a list of the initial admins, who will grant karma as required. I'm happy to do it (NickBurch), I guess Ross is happy to do so (RossGardler), can we have a third person? (I'll need your wiki username) When we have that, I can email infra and ask them to enable the config and setup the initial groups Nick -- NS
Re: Call for moderators
Me too. On 17 April 2013 00:09, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com -- NS
Re: svn commit: r1468843 - /comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html
On 17.04.2013 13:30, sma...@apache.org wrote: Author: smarru Date: Wed Apr 17 11:30:20 2013 New Revision: 1468843 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1468843 Log: adding a google custom search box Modified: comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html Modified: comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html?rev=1468843r1=1468842r2=1468843view=diff == --- comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html (original) +++ comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html Wed Apr 17 11:30:20 2013 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd; +!DOCTYPE html !-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ META name=description content=Apache Community Development/ META name=keywords content=apache, apache community, community development, opensource/ - META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 !-- LINK rel=stylesheet href=/style/compressed.css type=text/css media=screen, projection LINK rel=stylesheet href=/style/style.css type=text/css media=screen, projection -- @@ -135,20 +134,42 @@ /div div class=container -h3 class=mutedThe Apache Software Foundation/h3 -h4 class=mutedMeritocracy in Action./h4 +section id=content class=row + div class=span9 +h3 class=mutedThe Apache Software Foundation/h3 + /div + div class=span3 class=pull-rightgcse:search/gcse:search/div You meant class=span3 pull-right. Also, can you please make it HTML5-compliant [1]? In addition, it looks a bit odd in the layout, you could try tweaking it. Bootstrap has a special class for search boxes, we should use it. Uli [1] https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/element#html5
Re: svn commit: r1468843 - /comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html
Thanks Uli, this is great feedback. I will get these changes as soon I get online. Thanks, Suresh Sent from my iPhone On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: On 17.04.2013 13:30, sma...@apache.org wrote: Author: smarru Date: Wed Apr 17 11:30:20 2013 New Revision: 1468843 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1468843 Log: adding a google custom search box Modified: comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html Modified: comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html?rev=1468843r1=1468842r2=1468843view=diff == --- comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html (original) +++ comdev/site/trunk/templates/standard.html Wed Apr 17 11:30:20 2013 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd; +!DOCTYPE html !-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ META name=description content=Apache Community Development/ META name=keywords content=apache, apache community, community development, opensource/ - META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 !-- LINK rel=stylesheet href=/style/compressed.css type=text/css media=screen, projection LINK rel=stylesheet href=/style/style.css type=text/css media=screen, projection -- @@ -135,20 +134,42 @@ /div div class=container -h3 class=mutedThe Apache Software Foundation/h3 -h4 class=mutedMeritocracy in Action./h4 +section id=content class=row + div class=span9 +h3 class=mutedThe Apache Software Foundation/h3 + /div + div class=span3 class=pull-rightgcse:search/gcse:search/div You meant class=span3 pull-right. Also, can you please make it HTML5-compliant [1]? In addition, it looks a bit odd in the layout, you could try tweaking it. Bootstrap has a special class for search boxes, we should use it. Uli [1] https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/element#html5
Re: Call for New Moderation Technology was Re: Call for moderators
On Apr 17, 2013, at 7:04 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote: On 17.04.2013 12:53, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I don't know if this is the right list or not (infra?), but I saw the topic here (and it is the 4th or 5th such request I've seen in the past 3-4 months) and in my mind it relates to improving the community, so I figured I'd discuss here first and then maybe we can take a proposal to infra@. Infra for sure. I'll move it over there. It really is time for the ASF to modernize moderation and our mailing lists. The current approach is very antiquated compared to other lists/groups I moderate (LinkedIn, Google Groups, Wordpress, etc.) and it is no doubt a drain on what is already a fairly constrained resource (i.e. committers, PMC members and heavy contributors). Things that I think we need in order to make moderation easier: 1. Web interface where you can bulk process requests, either accepting in bulk or rejecting in bulk. The mail by mail approach is horribly tedious and is so often overwhelmed by spam that it takes too long to find the ones that aren't spam. +1 2. Figure out a way for official ASF communications to PMCs, etc. to NOT have to be moderated. I find it ridiculous after all this time that I have to moderate in messages from board members, or others, etc. to PMC and/or other lists. There should be official communication channels that authorized people can use when they sign in w/ their ASF credentials. Ask infra to subscribe your email to all private-allow lists. It's a one-liner on the command line and they'll do it if asked. 3. Better spam detection such that any email that is NOT spam, after sitting in the queue is automatically sent back to the user w/ instructions on how to subscribe to and properly send mail to the desired list. Anything that is spam is put into a separate folder automatically and left to die after X days like the current approach. +1 Other mailing list nice to haves: 1. For user (as opposed to dev) mailing lists, when someone sends an email to the list, automatically do a search in the archives first that replies back w/ potential answers and FAQs, thus offloading the I can't bother to perform a search first questioners. I don't believe this will change anything. They won't bother reading, the same way they didn't bother doing a search in the first place. Sigh. I agree, but it would be nice to try... 2. Web interface. Web Interface. Web Interface. Don't get me wrong, I want a good old fashioned email, but a web interface would bring in a lot more people in my opinion b/c now I can pull instead of being pushed too. For some lists that I participate in less frequently, this would save a lot of work for my email server while still allowing me to participate in the list. Nabble. The integration with our mailing lists sucks though. Users still have to subscribe and when they don't (90% of the cases) their emails show up at Nabble but possibly not on our lists. 3. The ability for moderators to pin topics to the top for all users (i.e. FAQs, etc.) The Welcome message when subscribing can be modified to include an URL to such a resource, as can the footer on messages. I was thinking beyond just the initial subscription. For instance, you could pin release notices to the top, or FAQs, etc. Just like in other forums. 4. Search Google: site:mail-archives.apache.org your term here markmail.org Nabble In other words, real forum software. -1. I want it pushed to me and not having to go poll dozens of websites. With real forum software, you get both. It's not an either/or thing. People who want email, get email. People who want web, get web. And I don't think it requires dozens of websites. Uli -Grant On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers http://www.lucidworks.com
Re: Spam on Women's Wiki
On 17 April 2013 14:19, Katherine Marsden kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 4/17/2013 2:34 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/Women/ Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com I don't know how useful the content of the women's wiki is. I think probably the Women's wiki could/should be shutdown as the women@ list was and any helpful content for women and other's contributed to the comdev website. +1 for moving useful content to ComDev site. Any volunteers? Ross
Re: Google CSE for community website
It looks great. Published. Thanks. Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 17 April 2013 13:03, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote: On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: +1. Go ahead! I committed the search box addition (r1468843), please review it in staging and publish if it is ok - http://community.staging.apache.org/ Note that, the search points to the published site and not staging. Suresh On 17.04.2013 04:26, Suresh Marru wrote: Hi All, Kudos to Uli, the new com-dev site is awesome and easily navigable. But given the wealth of information but one needs to know how to navigate to it. Can we add a google search engine to the site? If its ok, I can commit it for review. Suresh
Re: Google CSE for community website
It is faulty, that's why I didn't publish it. Look at my comment on the commit diff. It's not that bad but still should be fixed. Uli On 17.04.2013 16:17, Ross Gardler wrote: It looks great. Published. Thanks. Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 17 April 2013 13:03, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote: On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: +1. Go ahead! I committed the search box addition (r1468843), please review it in staging and publish if it is ok - http://community.staging.apache.org/ Note that, the search points to the published site and not staging. Suresh On 17.04.2013 04:26, Suresh Marru wrote: Hi All, Kudos to Uli, the new com-dev site is awesome and easily navigable. But given the wealth of information but one needs to know how to navigate to it. Can we add a google search engine to the site? If its ok, I can commit it for review. Suresh
Re: Call for moderators
Thanks, that's three new moderators, so I've made the request. Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 17 April 2013 13:52, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Me too. On 17 April 2013 00:09, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com -- NS
Re: Spam on Women's Wiki
On 4/17/2013 6:47 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: On 17 April 2013 14:19, Katherine Marsden kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 4/17/2013 2:34 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/Women/ Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com I don't know how useful the content of the women's wiki is. I think probably the Women's wiki could/should be shutdown as the women@ list was and any helpful content for women and other's contributed to the comdev website. +1 for moving useful content to ComDev site. Looking at the Wiki, unless I am missing something I think there is not anything relevant to Apache community there, just a few links off to other projects women's groups and instructions on what not to do. I think it would be safe to just shut down. Looking at the history Jean Anderson and Noirin Plunkett added most of the content and I think they are on this list. Jean, Noirin, do you think it is ok to shutdown the women's wiki without migrating content or should we move those links somewhere? Thanks Kathey
Re: Google CSE for community website
My apologies, I missed your comment on the commit.I guess you are more of a perfectionist than I (which is certainly not a bad thing). I'll not roll back as we know Suresh is looking at it. Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 17 April 2013 15:32, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: It is faulty, that's why I didn't publish it. Look at my comment on the commit diff. It's not that bad but still should be fixed. Uli On 17.04.2013 16:17, Ross Gardler wrote: It looks great. Published. Thanks. Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 17 April 2013 13:03, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote: On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: +1. Go ahead! I committed the search box addition (r1468843), please review it in staging and publish if it is ok - http://community.staging.apache.org/ Note that, the search points to the published site and not staging. Suresh On 17.04.2013 04:26, Suresh Marru wrote: Hi All, Kudos to Uli, the new com-dev site is awesome and easily navigable. But given the wealth of information but one needs to know how to navigate to it. Can we add a google search engine to the site? If its ok, I can commit it for review. Suresh
Re: Call for New Moderation Technology was Re: Call for moderators
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: With real forum software, you get both. It's not an either/or thing. People who want email, get email. People who want web, get web. That's what I hear about JIRA, but it's email notifications are such crap that I ultimately stopped reading the Lucene dev list, even though I'm strongly motivated to do so. Marvin Humphrey
Re: Call for moderators
I'd be glad to do this if we still need any. On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen rbo...@apache.org
Re: Call for moderators
Well it turns out I'm the only moderator on private - never noticed since its such low traffic. I'll add you and Luciano in that role, Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity On 17 Apr 2013 20:55, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: I'd be glad to do this if we still need any. On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: It seems that we need another moderator or two for this list - any volunteers? Ross Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen rbo...@apache.org
Re: Call for moderators
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote: Well it turns out I'm the only moderator on private - never noticed since its such low traffic. I'll add you and Luciano in that role, Ok. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
