Need quarterly board report for this month
We missed last month’s report. Would someone like to take a crack at this month’s? Regards, Alan
Board report time 2015-12
Here's the report that I sent to the board: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-12+-+December <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-12+-+December> If I missed something please let me know. Thanks! Regards, Alan
Re: Board report time 2015-11
Some time ago, I was trying to download the source code of Geronimo, in order to start playing with it and see if something can be done on it. Unfortunatelly, there is no enough updated documentation at website about how to do that. I tried with svn, and using "mvn install" it keeps showing errors due some repositories not found. If you have any updated doc to do this, I will appreciate having it. I would like to work in creating a good documentation about how to download it step by step and compiling code smoothly. This is the begining to bring more devs to the project. I'm using Geronimo with OSGi in some projects with Aries and OpenJPA. Using also MyFaces and Trinidad (or PrimeFaces). I like how easy you can develop OSGi applications with Geronimo, and if there is a chance to colaborate in any way, I would like to do it. Regards, Eduardo García On 11/18/2015 08:33 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Here's the report that I sent to the board: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-18+-+November If I missed something please let me know directly. I’m sorry about being so tardy with the report. Regards, Alan
Board report time 2015-11
Here's the report that I sent to the board: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-18+-+November <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-18+-+November> If I missed something please let me know directly. I’m sorry about being so tardy with the report. Regards, Alan
Re: Board report time 2015-07
looks fine. LieGrue, strub Am 09.07.2015 um 07:11 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: Here's the report that I sent to the board: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July If I missed something please let me know directly. I’m sorry about being so tardy with the report. Regards, Alan
Board report time 2015-07
Here's the report that I sent to the board: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July If I missed something please let me know directly. I’m sorry about being so tardy with the report. Regards, Alan
Re: Board report time 2015-04
Looking at this from an angle of enterprise management, I always liked the following features about Geronimo: 1) I can load any service as a gbean on top of Geronimo, and run it. This includes: Tomcat, Jetty, or even Apache JAMES. In fact, I could run Apache JAMES by itself inside Geronimo without Tomcat or Jetty. When the first example JAMES gbean was discussed, I was happy to see it. I wished it had gone somewhere. I think this feature points at the OSGi - being able to load and manage services on top of the kernel. 2) With Geronimo, I don't have to run tomcat on top of the tanuki wrapper (http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/). Tomcat is shipped without any kind of watchdog. Running it in the enterprise requires some kind of active monitoring to make sure it keeps running. Geronimo meets this need. 3) Geronimo was working towards being friendly in Web Server Farm management. It was having a model that allowed configuration to be pushed out from a central maven-like repository. 4) Geronimo works with a maven-like repository. For building, installing, distributing, and maintaining components and applications in Geronimo, its adherence to a maven model makes that really structured and more understandable as we integrate other things into Geronimo. 5) Geronimo instances. At one time Geronimo allowed multiple instances, then later in version 3 it did not, then I contributed to get multiple instance working again, then the project team started discussing changes that would not allow that again. Okay, with today's docker/component standard, perhaps multiple instance support is not as necessary. However, I still think it is a good feature to have. One should be able to install Geronimo one time, after which they should be able to create and destroy multiple instances at will without a lot of heavy lifting. In the enterprise, we want to run different services in their own JVM, but we do not necessarily want to have to install and configure the entire Geronimo package every time. We want to install Geronimo only once on a server - especially when we are talking about web farm management, we want one admin node on one server to proxy-manage all local instances. -RG - Original Message - From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: geronimo-dev dev@geronimo.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 2:25:54 AM Subject: Re: Board report time 2015-04 It’s not only the spec-api stuff. There are also many other things like xbean, geronimo-jta, javamail, etc. It’s basically a commons-EE atm. If you talk about a reboot then I wonder what you had in mind. There is TomEE which takes the really lightweight approach. And having two implementations providing the same doesn’t make sense. At least not if there are exactly the same people involved… Should the Geronimo-Server focus on OSGi? That is what made the big difference so far. No clue otherwise. LieGrue, strub Am 07.04.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: I agree, we should start moving our focus. When you speak of #2, what bits do you speak of? The glue that assembles the various JSR implementations of the JEE spec? I wonder if we should start a total re-write. We’ve learned a thing or two since this project started and the current Zeitgeist for server software has moved on. I think it’s an exciting time to take a fresh look at Geronimo and to “re-imagine” it. If you all agree, what to keep and what to re-write? Regards, Alan On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Txs Alan! I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project basically consists of 2 different things. 1.) the Geronimo EE server 2.) all the rest ;) 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people interested in continueing with 1? Should we reflect this in the report? LieGrue, strub Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Regards, Alan
Re: Board report time 2015-04
It’s not only the spec-api stuff. There are also many other things like xbean, geronimo-jta, javamail, etc. It’s basically a commons-EE atm. If you talk about a reboot then I wonder what you had in mind. There is TomEE which takes the really lightweight approach. And having two implementations providing the same doesn’t make sense. At least not if there are exactly the same people involved… Should the Geronimo-Server focus on OSGi? That is what made the big difference so far. No clue otherwise. LieGrue, strub Am 07.04.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: I agree, we should start moving our focus. When you speak of #2, what bits do you speak of? The glue that assembles the various JSR implementations of the JEE spec? I wonder if we should start a total re-write. We’ve learned a thing or two since this project started and the current Zeitgeist for server software has moved on. I think it’s an exciting time to take a fresh look at Geronimo and to “re-imagine” it. If you all agree, what to keep and what to re-write? Regards, Alan On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Txs Alan! I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project basically consists of 2 different things. 1.) the Geronimo EE server 2.) all the rest ;) 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people interested in continueing with 1? Should we reflect this in the report? LieGrue, strub Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Regards, Alan
Re: Board report time 2015-04
I agree, we should start moving our focus. When you speak of #2, what bits do you speak of? The glue that assembles the various JSR implementations of the JEE spec? I wonder if we should start a total re-write. We’ve learned a thing or two since this project started and the current Zeitgeist for server software has moved on. I think it’s an exciting time to take a fresh look at Geronimo and to “re-imagine” it. If you all agree, what to keep and what to re-write? Regards, Alan On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Txs Alan! I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project basically consists of 2 different things. 1.) the Geronimo EE server 2.) all the rest ;) 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people interested in continueing with 1? Should we reflect this in the report? LieGrue, strub Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Regards, Alan
Re: Board report time 2015-04
Hi, For 1, it will be nice to be able to build geronimo server with more packaging/assembly options. For example, it will be very useful to be able to have an assembly that supports tomcat war without ejb, rar, ear. Also, it will be very useful as well to be able to customize assembly options at the framework level to fine services to be bundled in. Regards Jack On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Txs Alan! I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project basically consists of 2 different things. 1.) the Geronimo EE server 2.) all the rest ;) 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people interested in continueing with 1? Should we reflect this in the report? LieGrue, strub Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Regards, Alan
Re: Board report time 2015-04
Txs Alan! I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project basically consists of 2 different things. 1.) the Geronimo EE server 2.) all the rest ;) 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people interested in continueing with 1? Should we reflect this in the report? LieGrue, strub Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Regards, Alan
Board report time 2015-04
Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Regards, Alan
ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2015
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 April 2015, 10:30 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is 1 full week prior to that (Wed, Apr 8th)! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is 1 full week (7days) prior to the board meeting (Wed, Apr 8th). If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. As always, PMC chairs are welcome to attend the board meeting. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt [3] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates [4] - https://reporter.apache.org/ https://reporter.apache.org/ Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. The report should be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository, trying to keep a similar format to the others. This can be found at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board Your report should also be sent in plain-text format to bo...@apache.org mailto:bo...@apache.org with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. Chairs may use the Apache Reporter Service [4] to help them compile and submit a board report. Resolutions --- There are several templates for use for various Board resolutions. They can be found in [3] and you are encouraged to use them. It is strongly recommended that if you have a resolution before the board, you are encouraged to attend that board meeting. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Re: Board report time
Yep. I updated the board report submitted it. Thanks! On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Jarek, we can say we released some spec jars + javamail as well Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-16 6:34 GMT+01:00 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com: I'll submit this tomorrow. Any last minute updates? Jarek On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide one for February. Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board report time
I'll submit this tomorrow. Any last minute updates? Jarek On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide one for February. Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board report time
Hello Jarek, we can say we released some spec jars + javamail as well Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-16 6:34 GMT+01:00 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com: I'll submit this tomorrow. Any last minute updates? Jarek On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide one for February. Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Thanks, Jarek
Board report time
Hi all, Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide one for February. Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board report time
Looks good. Thanks Jarek. --kevan On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Thanks, Jarek
Board report time
Hi all, This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board report time
LGTM, thanks! Regards, Alan On Oct 11, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board report time
+1 for the report. looks good. Are we loosing steam as a community? Well, geronimo contains quite a few interesting pieces. It's kind of an 'EE-commons' project now. But to be honest I'm not sure about the future of Geronimo as EE server. All the OSGi stuff is way too complex and I personally never liked it much to have tons of different projects with highly different constellations on one JVM. This is just too complicated to maintain, too difficult to search errors (e.g. how to do javaagent or classreload with different openjpa versions?), freaking difficult to read logs, rule out deadlocks between different apps on the same app server, etc. This is actually not a Geronimo issue. I do see all these problems with big WebLogic and WebSphere installations as well (I'm doing quite a few huge customers). Most times it's easier to have 5 smaller servers which only serve a single 'application' Of course such an app could consist of multiple WARs, etc but they all work nicely together, use the same shared libs, etc. And in such a case all the complexity of OSGi is just unecessary overhead and heavy lifting. LieGrue, strub On Tuesday, 8 July 2014, 20:20, Sandip Ghayal sgha...@yahoo.com wrote: Are we loosing steam as a community? Thanks, Sandip Ghayal Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone Kevan Miller wrote Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek. --kevan On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Thanks, Jarek
Board report time
Hi all, Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board report time
Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek. --kevan On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board report time
Are we loosing steam as a community? Thanks, Sandip Ghayal Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone Kevan Miller wrote Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek. --kevan On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Thanks, Jarek
Board Report Time
Hi all, I created a draft board report for April: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek. --kevan On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I created a draft board report for April: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Thanks, Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
+1 LieGrue, strub From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Developers dev@geronimo.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 22:22 Subject: Re: Board Report Time +1 Thanks! Regards, Alan On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek! --kevan On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today. Thanks, Jarek On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday). Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today. Thanks, Jarek On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday). Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek! --kevan On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today. Thanks, Jarek On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday). Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
+1 Thanks! Regards, Alan On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek! --kevan On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today. Thanks, Jarek On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday). Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
+1 Thanks! Regards, Alan On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek! --kevan On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today. Thanks, Jarek On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday). Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
+1 Thanks! Regards, Alan On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek! --kevan On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today. Thanks, Jarek On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday). Jarek
Board Report Time
Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page directly. The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday). Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
+1 Regards, Alan On Oct 4, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October If I missed something please let me know of update the page. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Jarek
Board Report Time
I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October If I missed something please let me know of update the page. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Jarek
Re: Board Report Time
Thanks Jarek. Looks good to me. --kevan On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October If I missed something please let me know of update the page. The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday). Jarek
july board report
All, We have a board report due this month. If anyone would like to start pulling information together on our wiki, that would be great. --kevan
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2012
I've updated https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2012-04-april.html --kevan On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: FYI Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board bo...@apache.org Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2012 Date: April 1, 2012 8:24:21 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller ke...@apache.org This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 April 2012, 10:00:00 PST and the deadline for submitting your report is 1 full week prior to that (Wed, Apr 11th)! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is 1 full week (7days) prior to the board meeting (Wed, Apr 11th). If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. As always, PMC chairs are welcome to attend the board meeting. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt [3] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. The report should be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository, trying to keep a similar format to the others. This can be found at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board Your report should also be sent in plain-text format to bo...@apache.org with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. Resolutions --- There are several templates for use for various Board resolutions. They can be found in [3] and you are encouraged to use them. It is strongly recommended that if you have a resolution before the board, you are encouraged to attend that board meeting. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2012
FYI Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board bo...@apache.org Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2012 Date: April 1, 2012 8:24:21 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller ke...@apache.org This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 April 2012, 10:00:00 PST and the deadline for submitting your report is 1 full week prior to that (Wed, Apr 11th)! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is 1 full week (7days) prior to the board meeting (Wed, Apr 11th). If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. As always, PMC chairs are welcome to attend the board meeting. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt [3] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. The report should be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository, trying to keep a similar format to the others. This can be found at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board Your report should also be sent in plain-text format to bo...@apache.org with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. Resolutions --- There are several templates for use for various Board resolutions. They can be found in [3] and you are encouraged to use them. It is strongly recommended that if you have a resolution before the board, you are encouraged to attend that board meeting. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
board report
Our board report is due next week. I've added a template to our Wiki -- https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2011-07+-+July Will plan on updating during the next few days. Contributions welcome! --kevan
Re: board report
If we value documentation as much as we value code, then how about this modification? -RG - current - Community There are x subscribers to the user@ mailing list and y subscribers to the dev@ mailing list. Although the makeup of the project is diverse, most of the current development activities are coming from IBM employees. - - change - Community There are x subscribers to the user@ mailing list and y subscribers to the dev@ mailing list. Although the makeup of the project is diverse, most of the current development activities are coming from IBM employees. Yet, during this past period, there have been several non-IBM employees working as contributors to provide documentation through the project's Wiki. - On 07/15/2011 10:11 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: Our board report is due next week. I've added a template to our Wiki -- https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2011-07+-+July Will plan on updating during the next few days. Contributions welcome! --kevan
Re: board report
Background information on our branding requirements: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html --kevan
Re: board report
On Jul 15, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote: If we value documentation as much as we value code, then how about this modification? Great. Thanks! It wasn't actually my intent to include that diversity statement. That was a one time statement from a past report, motivated by external events. Inclusion in the draft was a copy-paste carryover and poor editing on my part. The documentation contributions are definitely worth noting (and well desired, too!) I've updated the wiki. I've also added the project branding checklist that is required for our board report. --kevan
Re: board report
And probably most relevant to the task at hand: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs --kevan
Re: board report
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: And probably most relevant to the task at hand: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs We have some low-hanging fruit, here. Can definitely have some of these requirements resolved for our report. It's ok to have some items pending. However, we need to be making forward progress. As always, help welcome... --kevan
Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2011
FYI Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board bo...@apache.org Date: April 1, 2011 11:29:47 AM EDT To: Kevan Miller ke...@apache.org Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2011 This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 April 2011, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt [3] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to bo...@apache.org with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. Resolutions --- There are several templates for use for various Board resolutions. They can be found in [3] and you are encouraged to use them. It is strongly recommended that if you have a resolution before the board, you are encouraged to attend that board meeting. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Board Report
All, I submitted the following report to the ASF Board -- https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2011-01+-+January --kevan
Re: October Board report
Last chance everyone, The board report needs to be sent in by Monday. So, if there is anything notable that was missed - please add it! Thanks, Jay Jay D. McHugh wrote: Hello again everyone, I have made a couple of additional changes to the report. Please take a look (especially to the sections on the sandbox and specifications) to make sure I haven't said anything that isn't correct. And remember - the changes should really be made before the 16th. So make your changes/additions soon. Thanks, Jay Jay D. McHugh wrote: Hello all, Every three months I resolve that I should keep a running tally of the important events in Geronimo so that it will be easier to make the quarterly reports. I'm still making the same resolution. But, here is a start to the report for October. There are a few items that are not yet resolved: Will there be a 2.2 release this quarter? Will the Blueprint sandbox get contributed to Aries? etc... So not everything can be nailed down now. But if there are any areas that are completely missing, please add them. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-10+-+October Thanks, Jay
Re: October Board report
Hello again everyone, I have made a couple of additional changes to the report. Please take a look (especially to the sections on the sandbox and specifications) to make sure I haven't said anything that isn't correct. And remember - the changes should really be made before the 16th. So make your changes/additions soon. Thanks, Jay Jay D. McHugh wrote: Hello all, Every three months I resolve that I should keep a running tally of the important events in Geronimo so that it will be easier to make the quarterly reports. I'm still making the same resolution. But, here is a start to the report for October. There are a few items that are not yet resolved: Will there be a 2.2 release this quarter? Will the Blueprint sandbox get contributed to Aries? etc... So not everything can be nailed down now. But if there are any areas that are completely missing, please add them. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-10+-+October Thanks, Jay
October Board report
Hello all, Every three months I resolve that I should keep a running tally of the important events in Geronimo so that it will be easier to make the quarterly reports. I'm still making the same resolution. But, here is a start to the report for October. There are a few items that are not yet resolved: Will there be a 2.2 release this quarter? Will the Blueprint sandbox get contributed to Aries? etc... So not everything can be nailed down now. But if there are any areas that are completely missing, please add them. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-10+-+October Thanks, Jay
Re: October Board report
Thanks Jay! --kevan
Quarterly Board Report
Many thanks to Jay McHugh for generating this Quarter's Board report -- http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-07+-+July I've made some editorial updates. Any updates need to be in by Monday morning. --kevan
Re: Quarterly Board Report
On Jul 12, 2009, at 11:19 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Many thanks to Jay McHugh for generating this Quarter's Board report -- http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-07+-+July I've made some editorial updates. Any updates need to be in by Monday morning. Oops. That should have said Many thanks to Jay McHugh and David Jencks. --kevan
April board report
All, I've updated our Wiki with information for our April board report. It's due Monday. Sorry for just getting to it -- I had a good holiday, though... ;-) Please update with anything I may have missed. Thanks. --kevan
Re: April board report
On Apr 13, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've updated our Wiki with information for our April board report. It's due Monday. Sorry for just getting to it -- I had a good holiday, though... ;-) Please update with anything I may have missed. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-04+-+April Thanks. --kevan
ASF Board Report
All, I've updated http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-01+-+January with information for our quarterly board report. Please review and update with any changes or additions. Final input needs to be made by Monday. So, I'll finalize over the weekend. Thanks! --kevan
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Oct 2008
All, I've made additional updates to our board report. Will submit to the board on Monday morning. --kevan On Oct 3, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, Our quarterly board report is due on October 13. Donald has already made some updates -- thanks Donald! Please take a look at http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2008-10-october.html and update as you see fit... --kevan Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: September 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Oct 2008 This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 October 2008, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Oct 2008
All, Our quarterly board report is due on October 13. Donald has already made some updates -- thanks Donald! Please take a look at http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2008-10-october.html and update as you see fit... --kevan Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: September 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Oct 2008 This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 October 2008, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Re: Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
I added a couple of javamail bullets. Rick Kevan Miller wrote: All, We have a Geronimo Board report due by July 14th. I created a skeleton file at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2008-07+-+July Will start filling it out over the weekend/early next week. Feel free to update with relevant information. --kevan Begin forwarded message: *From: *ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Date: *June 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT *To: *Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject: **ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008* This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2008, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
I updated the new Board Report on the Wiki earlier in the week. Have a look at it please. I'll be submitting on Monday morning (will plan on removing empty sections before then). --kevan On Jul 3, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, We have a Geronimo Board report due by July 14th. I created a skeleton file at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2008-07+-+July Will start filling it out over the weekend/early next week. Feel free to update with relevant information. --kevan Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: June 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008 This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2008, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
Kevan Miller wrote: I updated the new Board Report on the Wiki earlier in the week. Have a look at it please. I'll be submitting on Monday morning (will plan on removing empty sections before then). Looks good to me. I didn't notice anything missing. Joe --kevan On Jul 3, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, We have a Geronimo Board report due by July 14th. I created a skeleton file at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2008-07+-+July Will start filling it out over the weekend/early next week. Feel free to update with relevant information. --kevan Begin forwarded message: *From: *ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Date: *June 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT *To: *Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject: **ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008* This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2008, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
Can I edit this a little, want to add some context to the gshell bits? --jason On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: I updated the new Board Report on the Wiki earlier in the week. Have a look at it please. I'll be submitting on Monday morning (will plan on removing empty sections before then). --kevan On Jul 3, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, We have a Geronimo Board report due by July 14th. I created a skeleton file at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2008-07+-+July Will start filling it out over the weekend/early next week. Feel free to update with relevant information. --kevan Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: June 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008 This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2008, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Can I edit this a little, want to add some context to the gshell bits? Go for it... --kevan
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
Kay, updated a wee bit... :-) --jason On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Can I edit this a little, want to add some context to the gshell bits? Go for it... --kevan
Fwd: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008
All, We have a Geronimo Board report due by July 14th. I created a skeleton file at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2008-07+-+July Will start filling it out over the weekend/early next week. Feel free to update with relevant information. --kevan Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: June 30, 2008 8:50:04 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Jul 2008 This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2008, 10 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is two full days prior to that! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is two full days (48h) prior to the board meeting. The exact date of the board meeting can be found in the calendar.txt file in the board directory of the committers repository [2]. If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. Your report should be sent in plain-text format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. The content should also be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
Board Report for January 2008
Please accept this report from the Geronimo PMC for January 2008. Apache Geronimo Board Report The Apache Geronimo Project has released Geronimo 2.0.2 in October. Currently we are working on the 2.1 release for January 2008 (or so). Geronimo voted to accept project Yoko as a sub-project in Geronimo from Incubator. There are no community issues for the Board's attention. Details follow. Releases - Geronimo 2.0.2 was released in October - Release Manager - Kevan Miller. 2.1 is in process Subprojects *Components* - Transaction manager and connector framework 2.0.2 including bug fixes was released in October. *Javamail* - 1.2 with IMAP client support and rewritten POP3 cllient was released on December. - The javamail provider jars 1.3 were released in December with new IMAP functionality, improved POP3 functionality, OSGI packaging, and bug fixes. *DayTrader* - Draft performance report for Apache Geronimo 2.0.2 was made available in early December. Final version is pending. *Genesis* - Genesis 1.3 was released in December suppporting some legal files generation. *GShell* - The first GShell release, 1.0-alpha-1, was in December. *XBean* - XBean 3.2 incorporating bug fixes and some new functionality was released in October. *Specs* - Several specs were released including bug fixes and OSGI packaging info, including Activation, Javamail, Servlet-2.5 and stax-api. *JUGs and Conferences* * Ireland Java Users Group was attended by Jeff Genender * EclipseWorld 2007 was attended by Tim McConnell, where he presented two courses related to the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *New Committers* - Erik Craig - Alexey Petrenko - Lars Kuhne *PMC Additions / Changes* - Jay McHugh - Voted Kevan Miller as new PMC chair as a recommendation to the Board
Re: Board Report Due in January
Just a few short days left. Please take a few minutes and update the Wiki. I'll take what we have on Monday at 0800 ET and submit it for our report for January. On Dec 31, 2007, at 8:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Its that time again. I have created the template and would ask everyone to take a few minutes to post their updates / input. The report is due on the 16th. I'll send a reminder and close the report out on the 13th for submission to the board so we'll be on time. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2008-01+-+January Thanks!
Board Report Due in January
Its that time again. I have created the template and would ask everyone to take a few minutes to post their updates / input. The report is due on the 16th. I'll send a reminder and close the report out on the 13th for submission to the board so we'll be on time. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2008-01+-+January Thanks!
Re: ASF Board Report for Nov 2007 is now due
Here is a draft: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/2007-11-14 If I missed something, please edit it asap. On Nov 12, 2007 11:30 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, we need one as a TLP, not as an incubator project ;-) On Nov 12, 2007 11:22 PM, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/12/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The meeting will take place this week at ApacheCon. I will work on a draft asap. I already submitted a quick note in the ServiceMix report stating that ServiceMix has graduated from the Incubator. However, the MoinMoin wiki config seems to be goofed up somehow. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );' Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/ Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/ Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/ Castor - http://castor.org/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: ASF Board Report for Nov 2007 is now due
On 11/12/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The meeting will take place this week at ApacheCon. I will work on a draft asap. I already submitted a quick note in the ServiceMix report stating that ServiceMix has graduated from the Incubator. However, the MoinMoin wiki config seems to be goofed up somehow. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );' Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/ Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/ Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/ Castor - http://castor.org/
Re: ASF Board Report for Nov 2007 is now due
Well, we need one as a TLP, not as an incubator project ;-) On Nov 12, 2007 11:22 PM, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/12/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The meeting will take place this week at ApacheCon. I will work on a draft asap. I already submitted a quick note in the ServiceMix report stating that ServiceMix has graduated from the Incubator. However, the MoinMoin wiki config seems to be goofed up somehow. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );' Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/ Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/ Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/ Castor - http://castor.org/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
ServiceMix board report - oct 2007
This report for October is the first report since ServiceMix graduation last month. ServiceMix resources have not been moved yet. Hopefully everything will be sorted out soon. We have released our first non incubating version of ServiceMix, the 3.1.2 version, on September 25th. We are currently preparing for our next big release, ServiceMix 3.2, which is planned for the end of October. Work has started on the next major version 4.0 which will be based on OSGi. On the community side, both developer and user community are very active. A new committer has been voted in. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
October board report
The report has to be submitted asap. I've written it at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/2007-10-17. Please review and add anything missing asap. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: October board report
Guillaume, Looks fine to me... Gert Guillaume Nodet wrote: The report has to be submitted asap. I've written it at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/2007-10-17. Please review and add anything missing asap.
Board Report for October -- Input Needed
All, Geronimo is scheduled to give a Board report on October 17th. Here is a wiki page to gather status -- http://cwiki.apache.org/ confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2007-10+- +October Please have your updates in by Sunday October 14th. This allows the status to be finalized and sent to the board prior to the meeting. Thanks, --kevan
August Incubator Board Report
I've written a report for this month (due for August 8th) at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2007 Please review and correct if I missed anything. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
Board report for July 2007
I have something that came up that I need to attend to. In order to ensure that we have our report in on time I'm going to send the following to the Board @ rather than later this evening. If someone has something that they really want in there I'll be happy to amend the report. Apache Geronimo Board Report for July 2007 The Apache Geronimo Project has completed a certified Java EE 5.0 compliant stack in release 2.0-M6-rc1. This is not the official 2.0 release but demonstrates that we have an implementation that passes the grueling demands of the Java EE 5.0 platform TCK. Sun has placed Apache Geronimo on their certification page: http://java.sun.com/ javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp Collaboration with several other projects at Apache is going on which include ActiveMQ, Axis 2, CXF, MyFaces, OpenEJB, OpenJPA, Tomcat and Yoko. Releases * Geronimo 2.0-M5 and 2.0-M6 were released in April and June respectively. * Geronimo Javamail geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0, geronimo- javamail_1.4_mail-1.0, and geronimo-javamail_1.4_proverider-1.0 were released in June. * Geronimo Specs geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0, geronimo- activation_1.1_spec-1.0, geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1, geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0 Devtools * Work continues on the JBoss to Geronimo (J2G) conversion tool currently in sandbox Xbean 3.0 and 3.0.1 (a minor build configuration bugfix) were released in April and June respectively JUGs and Conferences * Following sessions were presented at ApacheCon Europe 2007, May 1-4, Amsterdam: o Apache Geronimo 2.0 - Java EE 5.0 Status and Positioning o J2EE Application Development on Apache Geronimo Simplified using Eclipse Policy Changes * TCK Access Access to the Geronimo TCK was given to the following non- Geronimo committers: Bruno Aranda, Dan Diephouse, Dan Kulp, Darren Middlehouse. Subprojects * DayTrader Using the benchmark to flush out oddities and bugs. 2.0 will be updated and released soon after Geronimo 2.0 is made available. * DevTools * XBean We've fixed a number of bugs found during geronimo tck work and extended the xbean-spring functionality slightly. * Samples Contains a gallery of small samples that show how Geronimo's plan can be written and used. They can be created from a template to give a consistent look and feel. Community New Committers: * Jay McHugh * Lin Sun * Tim McConnell PMC Additions: Other Issues * TCK Issues We have encountered significant delays in obtaining TCKs and related materials such as exclusion lists. Delays have been taking between 2 and 3 weeks from request to obtaining product. Direct emails and instant messages are ignored or not responded to from the Apache representative. These issues are on the Apache side and not Sun as Sun has been very responsive in our requests. We need to improve our access to the TCKs and exclusion lists. There are several people on Apache Geronimo that are interested in helping out in this area if needed. In addition, we need a better way to coordinate TCK activities by multiple projects it might be prudent to have a place for various projects to coordinate their TCK test activities. During the Geronimo testing it was discovered that CXF (that helped with the testing) was unaware of some challenges that had already been raised by Geronimo testers. We're not sure if there is sufficient overlap to justify more central coordination but wanted to note the issue.
Apache Geronimo Board Report for July 2007
Apache Geronimo Board Report for July 2007 The Apache Geronimo Project has completed a certified Java EE 5.0 compliant stack in release 2.0-M6-rc1. This is not the official 2.0 release but demonstrates that we have an implementation that passes the grueling demands of the Java EE 5.0 platform TCK. Sun has placed Apache Geronimo on their certification page: http://java.sun.com/ javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp Collaboration with several other projects at Apache is going on which include ActiveMQ, Axis 2, CXF, MyFaces, OpenEJB, OpenJPA, Tomcat and Yoko. Releases * Geronimo 2.0-M5 and 2.0-M6 were released in April and June respectively. * Geronimo Javamail geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0, geronimo- javamail_1.4_mail-1.0, and geronimo-javamail_1.4_proverider-1.0 were released in June. * Geronimo Specs geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0, geronimo- activation_1.1_spec-1.0, geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1, geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0 Devtools * Work continues on the JBoss to Geronimo (J2G) conversion tool currently in sandbox Xbean 3.0 and 3.0.1 (a minor build configuration bugfix) were released in April and June respectively JUGs and Conferences * Following sessions were presented at ApacheCon Europe 2007, May 1-4, Amsterdam: o Apache Geronimo 2.0 - Java EE 5.0 Status and Positioning o J2EE Application Development on Apache Geronimo Simplified using Eclipse Policy Changes * TCK Access Access to the Geronimo TCK was given to the following non- Geronimo committers: Bruno Aranda, Dan Diephouse, Dan Kulp, Darren Middlehouse. Subprojects * DayTrader Using the benchmark to flush out oddities and bugs. 2.0 will be updated and released soon after Geronimo 2.0 is made available. * DevTools * XBean We've fixed a number of bugs found during geronimo tck work and extended the xbean-spring functionality slightly. * Samples Contains a gallery of small samples that show how Geronimo's plan can be written and used. They can be created from a template to give a consistent look and feel. Community New Committers: * Jay McHugh * Lin Sun * Tim McConnell PMC Additions: Other Issues * TCK Issues We have encountered significant delays in obtaining TCKs and related materials such as exclusion lists. Delays have been taking between 2 and 3 weeks from request to obtaining product. These issues are on the Apache side and not Sun as Sun has been very responsive in our requests. We need to improve our access to the TCKs and exclusion lists. There are several people on Apache Geronimo that are interested in helping out in this area if needed. In addition, we need a better way to coordinate TCK activities by multiple projects it might be prudent to have a place for various projects to coordinate their TCK test activities. During the Geronimo testing it was discovered that CXF (that helped with the testing) was unaware of some challenges that had already been raised by Geronimo testers. We're not sure if there is sufficient overlap to justify more central coordination but wanted to note the issue.
Reminder - Board Report Updates
Please take a few minutes to visit the Wiki and fill in board report which is due next week. I'll take the contents and finalize it on Monday around 1700 ET and send it to the board. Thanks for your help http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-07- july.html
Geronimo Board Report for 1Q 2007
Here is a link to our Wiki with the report: http://cwiki.apache.org/ GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-04-april.html For posterity the text is included below: Apache Geronimo Board Report for 1Q 2007 The Apache Geronimo Project has been mostly focusing on achieving Java EE 5 functionality for its 2.0 release. We have been refining our release procedures and as a result have been fairly consistent at releasing monthly Milestones to make our work in progress available to users. Version 1.2 is nearing its readiness to release but has been delayed due to external dependencies that have not been fulfilled. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. Releases * Geronimo 2.0-M2 and 2.0-M3 were released in January and February respectively. Continuing the Drive to 5 and hope to have a developer release by May. * Geronimo Javamail New release of the javamail jars were released. The new versions are geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_mail-1.1, geronimo- javamail_1.3.1_provider-1.1, and geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3. Devtools Xbean Website Migrated the authoring of the website to Confluence. GMOxSITE space can be updated by Geronimo committers only and uses autoexport plugin to create the HTML version that is served from minotaur. Some content on the website such as plugin repo lists, schemas, images are still maintained via the original svn repo. JUGs and Conferences * Apache Geronimo v2 - a Java EE 5 application server by Jacek Laskowski at Studencki Festiwal Informatyczny (SFI) - Krakow, Poland March 8-10, 2007 * More, faster, easier with Java EE 5 and Apache Geronimo v2 by Jacek Laskowski at Software Development GigaCon 2007 - Warszawa, Poland, March 22-23, 2007 Policy Changes * TCK Access The PMC approved a policy allowing read access to our TCK framework for any Apache committer that has signed the NDA for access to the Sun TCK. There is a 72-hour waiting period for non-Geronimo committers so the PMC membership can comment. Non-committers are granted read-only access (and can earn karma) while Geronimo committers are granted Read / Write access. Subprojects * DayTrader Currently working on development to provide an EJB 3.0 version of this benchmark * DevTools * XBean Community New Committers: * Jarek Gawor * Rakesh Midha * Donald Woods PMC Additions: * Prasad Kashyap * Dain Sundstrom
Final nag on the Board Report for April
Alrighty then, please take one last peek, make your final updates. I'll take what's in the Wiki this Friday at 1700 ET and send it to the board. Thanks all for the updates already received. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-04- april.html
Board Report Nudge
Just a gentle nudge...please review: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-04- april.html
Re: Board Report Nudge
Looks good to me. The only other possible addition I thought of was to be more specific with our TCK status on both 1.2 2.0. Of course, that would mean that we would have to remove the report from the wiki. I'm not sure if that's worth it and I'm not even sure that all of the board has signed the NDA ... so it's probably best to leave it out. Thanks, Joe Matt Hogstrom wrote: Just a gentle nudge...please review: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-04-april.html
Re: Board Report Nudge
Don't worry about the board / NDA :) The actual problem is that the board minutes are public information: http://apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html So we should not add TCK status. We could add a line saying working through issues on how to speed up communication with SUN regarding TCK challenges (with better wording of course), since it is a pain point for us. thanks, dims On 4/4/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks good to me. The only other possible addition I thought of was to be more specific with our TCK status on both 1.2 2.0. Of course, that would mean that we would have to remove the report from the wiki. I'm not sure if that's worth it and I'm not even sure that all of the board has signed the NDA ... so it's probably best to leave it out. Thanks, Joe Matt Hogstrom wrote: Just a gentle nudge...please review: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-04-april.html -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
Re: Board Report Nudge
Matt Hogstrom wrote: Just a gentle nudge...please review: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-04-april.html Should we be mentioning the smaller things we released, such as the updates to the javamail spec and provider jars? Rick
Re: Board Report Nudge
Sure, please add them ... everyone should be able to edit the Wiki ... thanks On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: Matt Hogstrom wrote: Just a gentle nudge...please review: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board- report-2007-04-april.html Should we be mentioning the smaller things we released, such as the updates to the javamail spec and provider jars? Rick
Re: Board Report Nudge
Thanks for pulling this together, Matt. Looks good to me. With Rick's additions, I can't think of anything else to add... --kevan On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Sure, please add them ... everyone should be able to edit the Wiki ... thanks On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: Matt Hogstrom wrote: Just a gentle nudge...please review: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board- report-2007-04-april.html Should we be mentioning the smaller things we released, such as the updates to the javamail spec and provider jars? Rick
Board report due for April - Input Requested
I created a new page on the Wiki for the April Board report. Please take a few minutes to review and update as necessary. I'll put out a final reminder and then grab that text for the report. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo +Board+Report+-+2007-04+-+April Thanks. Matt
Re: 回复： Geronimo Board Report for January 2007
I think Dims would be able to provide a more accurate estimate. On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:38 PM, falom wrote: Hi Matt, Is there any estimate when the first axis2 enabled geronimo relese will come. Particularly i'm interested at using the axis2 jms listener with geronimo activemq broker. Thanks! falom Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote： Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences JUGs Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Boulder and Dallas in November Javapolis in December Open Source Conference in Tokyo in December - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1- PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools 1.2.0 was released in November. This included the ability to fully edit Geronimo.xml plans. * XBean Version 2.8 was released in early January * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions Anita Kulshreshtha Vamsavardhana Reddy Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件 Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
回复： Geronimo Board Report for January 2007
Hi Matt, Is there any estimate when the first axis2 enabled geronimo relese will come. Particularly i'm interested at using the axis2 jms listener with geronimo activemq broker. Thanks! falom Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote： Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences JUGs Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Boulder and Dallas in November Javapolis in December Open Source Conference in Tokyo in December - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1- PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools 1.2.0 was released in November. This included the ability to fully edit Geronimo.xml plans. * XBean Version 2.8 was released in early January * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions Anita Kulshreshtha Vamsavardhana Reddy Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
Geronimo presentation at the Open Source Conference (OSC) in Tokyo. Will have to check the last board report. But seems like we added several committers in early October. I'll take a look... --kevan On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at the end of Monday. Thanks! Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences None - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1- PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools * XBean * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions None Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
On 1/12/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - JUGs and Conferences None Geronimo presentation at the Java Metroplex UG in Dallas on 12/13. Best wishes, Paul
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
Thanks for everyone's input...I'm compiling and sending the report./ On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at the end of Monday. Thanks! Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences None - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1- PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools * XBean * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions None Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Thanks for everyone's input...I'm compiling and sending the report./ Good. Thanks... FYI. Looks like the new committers made it into the October report... --kevan
Geronimo Board Report for January 2007
Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences JUGs Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Boulder and Dallas in November Javapolis in December Open Source Conference in Tokyo in December - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1- PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools 1.2.0 was released in November. This included the ability to fully edit Geronimo.xml plans. * XBean Version 2.8 was released in early January * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions Anita Kulshreshtha Vamsavardhana Reddy Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
Hi Matt, there was a JUG in Las Vegas in November Matt Hogstrom wrote: Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at the end of Monday. Thanks! Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences None - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1-PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools * XBean * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions None Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
And one in Boulder, CO in Nov too. Tim McConnell wrote: Hi Matt, there was a JUG in Las Vegas in November Matt Hogstrom wrote: Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at the end of Monday. Thanks! Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences None - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1-PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools * XBean * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions None Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
Eclipse Tooling v1.2.0 was released in November. On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at the end of Monday. Thanks! Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences None - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1- PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools * XBean * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions None Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -sachin
Re: Board Report for November / December / January
Hi Matt, The Geronimo Deployment Plan Editor in Eclipse has been enhanced and now supports full fledged editing of geronimo-web.xml. - Shiva On 1/15/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eclipse Tooling v1.2.0 was released in November. On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at the end of Monday. Thanks! Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences None - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1-PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools * XBean * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions None Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -sachin
Board Report for November / December / January
Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at the end of Monday. Thanks! Geronimo Project - Board Report Summary - All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project team has been focusing on two releases. 1.2-beta was released that includes integration of three projects from the incubator (OpenEJB, Yoko and OpenJPA). 2.0-M1 was released that includes many of the new Java EE 5.0 technologies. The project is working towards a goal of completing a certified server in time for Java One. 2.0-M1 also pulled in CXF from the Incubator. Collaboration with several other projects in Apache is going on which includes Axis 2, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, CXF and Yoko. There has been some mention about OSGi which would include Felix but that work hasn't really taken off yet. Here are the details. - Releases 1.2-beta was released in December 2.0-M1 was released in December 2.0-M2 is targetted for release at the end of January of this year - JUGs and Conferences None - Certifications None at this time - Subprojects * DayTrader Released a performance report on Geronimo in October. DayTrader was the benchmark sample used for comparisons. The report can be found at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1- PerformanceReport.pdf * DevTools * XBean * Specifications Specifications were reorganized after several months of debate. Rather than having a single version for the specifications each one is packaged separately. Dain Sundstrom volunteered to help keep the releases and organization going. * Other Work WADI clustering has been moving forward GCache has continued development but there has not been a lot of activity on the list. New JMX console was added to Geronimo 1.2 JNDI / Classloader viewer was added by a new community member. Really neat stuff. - Community * New committers None * PMC additions None Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
