RE: VOTE: release 3.6.2
Hi, +1 from me to release these artifacts as 3.6.2: - I did *not* run smoke tester as already lots of people have done this. - I just tested drop in replacement of the JAR file for my projects with 3.6 (including PANGAEA) - works fine, no checkindex bugs and similar stuff. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:37 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 3.6.2 Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix release with the fix. Tom (the reporter of the bug) confirmed his checkindex passed successfully last night, and besides that we have a few other nice bugfixes there. Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr362rc0 If you want to use the smoketester, of course you must run it from the lucene_solr_3_6 branch. This passes for me on linux. I'm not sure it works on other platforms. Thanks, Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
This vote passes. Thanks everyone for testing. Will load the artifacts into santa's sleigh later today. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix release with the fix. Tom (the reporter of the bug) confirmed his checkindex passed successfully last night, and besides that we have a few other nice bugfixes there. Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr362rc0 If you want to use the smoketester, of course you must run it from the lucene_solr_3_6 branch. This passes for me on linux. I'm not sure it works on other platforms. Thanks, Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
+1 Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. On 21 December 2012 01:07, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7 javadocs run after it failed for me.) I first had to install Java 5 using the manual instructions here (the linked script didn't work for me): http://www.s-seven.net/java_15_mountain_lion Steve On Dec 19, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: I don't think these javadocs warnings require a re-spin so +1 to release current artifacts. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of java7 have different levels of pickiness. This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as many tools unfortunately. I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really careful about this stuff. OK I committed that fix and a couple other javadocs warnings. Thanks for spinning 3.6.2 Robert! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
same here +1 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
+1 Tommaso 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com same here +1 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
+1 tested the Maven artifacts with the testsuites from Infinispan and Hibernate Search On 21 December 2012 13:22, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Tommaso 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com same here +1 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
+1 On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7 javadocs run after it failed for me.) I first had to install Java 5 using the manual instructions here (the linked script didn't work for me): http://www.s-seven.net/java_15_mountain_lion Steve On Dec 19, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: I don't think these javadocs warnings require a re-spin so +1 to release current artifacts. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of java7 have different levels of pickiness. This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as many tools unfortunately. I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really careful about this stuff. OK I committed that fix and a couple other javadocs warnings. Thanks for spinning 3.6.2 Robert! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix release with the fix. Tom (the reporter of the bug) confirmed his checkindex passed successfully last night, and besides that we have a few other nice bugfixes there. Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr362rc0 If you want to use the smoketester, of course you must run it from the lucene_solr_3_6 branch. This passes for me on linux. I'm not sure it works on other platforms. Thanks, Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of java7 have different levels of pickiness. This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as many tools unfortunately. I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really careful about this stuff. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of java7 have different levels of pickiness. This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as many tools unfortunately. I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really careful about this stuff. OK I committed that fix and a couple other javadocs warnings. Thanks for spinning 3.6.2 Robert! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
Hi Robert, Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch. Tom On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of java7 have different levels of pickiness. This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as many tools unfortunately. I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really careful about this stuff. OK I committed that fix and a couple other javadocs warnings. Thanks for spinning 3.6.2 Robert! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote: Hi Robert, Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch. I think i would prefer not to: even though its just a new option/feature, 3.6.x is basically in bugfix mode. I know this isn't great for people that want the feature, but i feel we should be really careful with these bugfix releases myself. Terms index bug is a whole different story though! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
Thanks Robert, Ok, I can see that logic. People who want the new feature can just apply the patch. Tom On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote: Hi Robert, Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch. I think i would prefer not to: even though its just a new option/feature, 3.6.x is basically in bugfix mode. I know this isn't great for people that want the feature, but i feel we should be really careful with these bugfix releases myself. Terms index bug is a whole different story though! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
I don't think these javadocs warnings require a re-spin so +1 to release current artifacts. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of java7 have different levels of pickiness. This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as many tools unfortunately. I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really careful about this stuff. OK I committed that fix and a couple other javadocs warnings. Thanks for spinning 3.6.2 Robert! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2
+1 I prepared a PyLucene 3.6.2 release from the tip of the lucene_solr_3_6 branch and all tests passed. Andi.. On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Robert Muir wrote: Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix release with the fix. Tom (the reporter of the bug) confirmed his checkindex passed successfully last night, and besides that we have a few other nice bugfixes there. Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr362rc0 If you want to use the smoketester, of course you must run it from the lucene_solr_3_6 branch. This passes for me on linux. I'm not sure it works on other platforms. Thanks, Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
