RE: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-11-14 Thread Savoia Computer Support
You do not have to file the trademark in the US. You can even use the ™
symbol with out paying to file. Of course, you receive more protection by
filing but as long as you claim the trademark first you own it.

Rick Savoia
Savoia Computer


-Original Message-
From: Sean W. O'Quin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:05 PM
To: dev@marketing.openoffice.org
Subject: RE: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

Although not a lawyer I am pretty sure that in most of the g8 countries, you
can protect a trademark just by using the ™(trademark) symbol.

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Ian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:30 PM
To: dev@marketing.openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

 

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 22:17 +, jonathon wrote:

> Ian wrote:

> 

> > > I realize that trademark registration is expensive.

> > Not that expensive. IIRC it was about £250 ($500) to trademark the

> 

> For one country about £250. Multiply that by 244 and you are looking

> at roughly 61,000 pounds. Not as much as I thought it would be.  (I'm

> quoting Wikipedia for the number of countries, so that figure is

> probably wrong.)

 

So just register it in the G8 countries to start with. That would make

it very difficult for anyone to do much and it would only cost £2k.

 

> > So in the whole scheme of things trademarking OOo in the G8

> countries is a negligible cost compared to the salaries of the

> developers, community manager and

> 

> Assuming that other countries charge roughly the same amount, you're

> looking at the cost of three or four employees, for trademark

> protection in every country of the world.

 

But we don't really need to do it in every country to have a big effect.

What we want is maximum effect for minimum cost. Even just registering

in the USA would make a big difference.

 

> [Note to self:  construct list of countries, with amount to register

> trademark, and process by which that can be done.]

> 

> > Interesting idea. What name would be suitable? Freedom office, perhaps?

> > or the People's Office?

> 

> In the US, "People's Office" sounds like a communist plot.   "Freedom

> Office" might work, but suffers from association with "freedom fries"

> 

> I'd like to retain the OOo designation, but not sure how.   "Oooh"

> might be a little too out of place for a corporate environment.  I was

> thinking of something in Esperanto, Interlingua, or one of the other

> conlangs would be a good choice.

> Perhaps "toko tomo pali".

> (Wondering how Sonja Kisa would react if that were to be the name of

> the project.)

> 

> >It would also counter MS and its OOXML piracy of the name.

> 

> That is part of the idea of worldwide trademark protection.

 

Just the USA would have stopped MS if someone had had the foresight to

do it. Quite amazing given all the paranoia with Sun legal in dealing

with the OOo web site for example.

 

Ian

-- 

New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications

www.theINGOTs.org

 

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning

Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79

8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. 

 

 

-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-30 Thread jonathon
Ian wrote:

> Just the USA would have stopped MS if someone had had the foresight to do it.

Sun owned the trademark;
Sun failed to retain ownership of the trademark;
Microsoft got to confuse people about OOo;

xan

jonathon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-30 Thread Sean W. O'Quin
Although not a lawyer I am pretty sure that in most of the g8 countries, you
can protect a trademark just by using the ™(trademark) symbol.

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Ian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:30 PM
To: dev@marketing.openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

 

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 22:17 +, jonathon wrote:

> Ian wrote:

> 

> > > I realize that trademark registration is expensive.

> > Not that expensive. IIRC it was about £250 ($500) to trademark the

> 

> For one country about £250. Multiply that by 244 and you are looking

> at roughly 61,000 pounds. Not as much as I thought it would be.  (I'm

> quoting Wikipedia for the number of countries, so that figure is

> probably wrong.)

 

So just register it in the G8 countries to start with. That would make

it very difficult for anyone to do much and it would only cost £2k.

 

> > So in the whole scheme of things trademarking OOo in the G8

> countries is a negligible cost compared to the salaries of the

> developers, community manager and

> 

> Assuming that other countries charge roughly the same amount, you're

> looking at the cost of three or four employees, for trademark

> protection in every country of the world.

 

But we don't really need to do it in every country to have a big effect.

What we want is maximum effect for minimum cost. Even just registering

in the USA would make a big difference.

 

> [Note to self:  construct list of countries, with amount to register

> trademark, and process by which that can be done.]

> 

> > Interesting idea. What name would be suitable? Freedom office, perhaps?

> > or the People's Office?

> 

> In the US, "People's Office" sounds like a communist plot.   "Freedom

> Office" might work, but suffers from association with "freedom fries"

> 

> I'd like to retain the OOo designation, but not sure how.   "Oooh"

> might be a little too out of place for a corporate environment.  I was

> thinking of something in Esperanto, Interlingua, or one of the other

> conlangs would be a good choice.

> Perhaps "toko tomo pali".

> (Wondering how Sonja Kisa would react if that were to be the name of

> the project.)

> 

> >It would also counter MS and its OOXML piracy of the name.

> 

> That is part of the idea of worldwide trademark protection.

 

Just the USA would have stopped MS if someone had had the foresight to

do it. Quite amazing given all the paranoia with Sun legal in dealing

with the OOo web site for example.

 

Ian

-- 

New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications

www.theINGOTs.org

 

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning

Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79

8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. 

 

 

-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-30 Thread Ian Lynch
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 22:17 +, jonathon wrote:
> Ian wrote:
> 
> > > I realize that trademark registration is expensive.
> > Not that expensive. IIRC it was about £250 ($500) to trademark the
> 
> For one country about £250. Multiply that by 244 and you are looking
> at roughly 61,000 pounds. Not as much as I thought it would be.  (I'm
> quoting Wikipedia for the number of countries, so that figure is
> probably wrong.)

So just register it in the G8 countries to start with. That would make
it very difficult for anyone to do much and it would only cost £2k.

> > So in the whole scheme of things trademarking OOo in the G8
> countries is a negligible cost compared to the salaries of the
> developers, community manager and
> 
> Assuming that other countries charge roughly the same amount, you're
> looking at the cost of three or four employees, for trademark
> protection in every country of the world.

But we don't really need to do it in every country to have a big effect.
What we want is maximum effect for minimum cost. Even just registering
in the USA would make a big difference.

> [Note to self:  construct list of countries, with amount to register
> trademark, and process by which that can be done.]
> 
> > Interesting idea. What name would be suitable? Freedom office, perhaps?
> > or the People's Office?
> 
> In the US, "People's Office" sounds like a communist plot.   "Freedom
> Office" might work, but suffers from association with "freedom fries"
> 
> I'd like to retain the OOo designation, but not sure how.   "Oooh"
> might be a little too out of place for a corporate environment.  I was
> thinking of something in Esperanto, Interlingua, or one of the other
> conlangs would be a good choice.
> Perhaps "toko tomo pali".
> (Wondering how Sonja Kisa would react if that were to be the name of
> the project.)
> 
> >It would also counter MS and its OOXML piracy of the name.
> 
> That is part of the idea of worldwide trademark protection.

Just the USA would have stopped MS if someone had had the foresight to
do it. Quite amazing given all the paranoia with Sun legal in dealing
with the OOo web site for example.

Ian
-- 
New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications
www.theINGOTs.org

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-30 Thread jonathon
Ian wrote:

> > I realize that trademark registration is expensive.
> Not that expensive. IIRC it was about £250 ($500) to trademark the

For one country about £250. Multiply that by 244 and you are looking
at roughly 61,000 pounds. Not as much as I thought it would be.  (I'm
quoting Wikipedia for the number of countries, so that figure is
probably wrong.)

> So in the whole scheme of things trademarking OOo in the G8 countries is a 
> negligible cost compared to the salaries of the developers, community manager 
> and

Assuming that other countries charge roughly the same amount, you're
looking at the cost of three or four employees, for trademark
protection in every country of the world.

[Note to self:  construct list of countries, with amount to register
trademark, and process by which that can be done.]

> Interesting idea. What name would be suitable? Freedom office, perhaps?
> or the People's Office?

In the US, "People's Office" sounds like a communist plot.   "Freedom
Office" might work, but suffers from association with "freedom fries"

I'd like to retain the OOo designation, but not sure how.   "Oooh"
might be a little too out of place for a corporate environment.  I was
thinking of something in Esperanto, Interlingua, or one of the other
conlangs would be a good choice.
Perhaps "toko tomo pali".
(Wondering how Sonja Kisa would react if that were to be the name of
the project.)

>It would also counter MS and its OOXML piracy of the name.

That is part of the idea of worldwide trademark protection.

xan

jonathon


Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-28 Thread sharad kukreti
Here, In India it is US $120
  - Sharad Kukreti

Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:22:42 -0500, Ian Lynch wrote:

> On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 20:16 +, jonathon wrote:
>> Sharud wrote:
>>
>> > As it is confusing with name "OpenOffice" , therefore we should raise 
>> this issue.
>>
>> It is too late now, but
>> * "OpenOffice.org" should have been trademarked in at least every
>> major country, prior to being released;
>> * "OpenOffice" should have been trademarked in countries in which it
>> was not already a trademark;
>> * The OOo logos should have been trademarked, prior to release;
>>
>> I realize that trademark registration is expensive.
>
> Not that expensive. IIRC it was about £250 ($500) to trademark the
> INGOTs and The Learning Machine in the UK. So in the whole scheme of
> things trademarking OOo in the G8 countries is a negligible cost
> compared to the salaries of the developers, community manager and web
> site hosting etc.
>
>> Without, there
>> will eventually come a point where OOo will be legally required
>> to/forced to change names, because the usage by OOo is a trademark
>> infringement. (What is the current number of countries where the OOo
>> L10N team has to use a name other than OOo when distributing it,
>> because of the trademark infringement.)
>>
>> The other option is to rename OOo now, and trademark the new name in
>> at least the major countries of the world, prior to the release of the
>> new version with the new name.
>
> Interesting idea. What name would be suitable? Freedom office, perhaps?
> or the People's Office? It would also counter MS and its OOXML piracy of
> the name.
>
> Ian

In mexico cost also 500 dls. I might do a search just in case (80 dls).

-- 
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-27 Thread Alexandro Colorado

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:22:42 -0500, Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 20:16 +, jonathon wrote:

Sharud wrote:

> As it is confusing with name "OpenOffice" , therefore we should raise  
this issue.


It is too late now, but
* "OpenOffice.org" should have been trademarked in at least every
major country, prior to being released;
* "OpenOffice" should have been trademarked in countries in which it
was not already a trademark;
* The OOo logos should have been trademarked, prior to release;

I realize that trademark registration is expensive.


Not that expensive. IIRC it was about £250 ($500) to trademark the
INGOTs and The Learning Machine in the UK. So in the whole scheme of
things trademarking OOo in the G8 countries is a negligible cost
compared to the salaries of the developers, community manager and web
site hosting etc.


Without, there
will eventually come a point where OOo will be legally required
to/forced to change names, because the usage by OOo is a trademark
infringement. (What is the current number of countries where the OOo
L10N team has to use a name other than OOo when distributing it,
because of the trademark infringement.)

The other option is to rename OOo now, and trademark the new name in
at least the major countries of the world, prior to the release of the
new version with the new name.


Interesting idea. What name would be suitable? Freedom office, perhaps?
or the People's Office? It would also counter MS and its OOXML piracy of
the name.

Ian


In mexico cost also 500 dls. I might do a search just in case (80 dls).

--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-27 Thread Ian Lynch
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 20:16 +, jonathon wrote:
> Sharud wrote:
> 
> > As it is confusing with name "OpenOffice" , therefore we should raise this 
> > issue.
> 
> It is too late now, but
> * "OpenOffice.org" should have been trademarked in at least every
> major country, prior to being released;
> * "OpenOffice" should have been trademarked in countries in which it
> was not already a trademark;
> * The OOo logos should have been trademarked, prior to release;
> 
> I realize that trademark registration is expensive. 

Not that expensive. IIRC it was about £250 ($500) to trademark the
INGOTs and The Learning Machine in the UK. So in the whole scheme of
things trademarking OOo in the G8 countries is a negligible cost
compared to the salaries of the developers, community manager and web
site hosting etc.

> Without, there
> will eventually come a point where OOo will be legally required
> to/forced to change names, because the usage by OOo is a trademark
> infringement. (What is the current number of countries where the OOo
> L10N team has to use a name other than OOo when distributing it,
> because of the trademark infringement.)
> 
> The other option is to rename OOo now, and trademark the new name in
> at least the major countries of the world, prior to the release of the
> new version with the new name.

Interesting idea. What name would be suitable? Freedom office, perhaps?
or the People's Office? It would also counter MS and its OOXML piracy of
the name.

Ian
-- 
New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications
www.theINGOTs.org

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-27 Thread jonathon
Sharud wrote:

> As it is confusing with name "OpenOffice" , therefore we should raise this 
> issue.

It is too late now, but
* "OpenOffice.org" should have been trademarked in at least every
major country, prior to being released;
* "OpenOffice" should have been trademarked in countries in which it
was not already a trademark;
* The OOo logos should have been trademarked, prior to release;

I realize that trademark registration is expensive. Without, there
will eventually come a point where OOo will be legally required
to/forced to change names, because the usage by OOo is a trademark
infringement. (What is the current number of countries where the OOo
L10N team has to use a name other than OOo when distributing it,
because of the trademark infringement.)

The other option is to rename OOo now, and trademark the new name in
at least the major countries of the world, prior to the release of the
new version with the new name.

xan

jonathon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-27 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi,

thanks for the pointer! I'm checking that.

Florian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-27 Thread sharad kukreti

I have also gone into the http://enterprise.siemens.com/open and found that is 
not related to open source and open office project, only it is creating 
confusion in open source/free software community as they have used word “open” 
which is not even related to freedom/liberty for their solutions. As it is 
confusing with name “OpenOffice” , therefore we should raise this issue.
   
  Sharad Kukreti
   
  
Alex Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:16:29 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Hi anyone read about Siemens HiPath OpenOffice, I am still having a hard
> time defining what it is and if it at any point has to do with
> OpenOffice.org or not.
>
> www.siemens.co.uk/openoffice
>
> I would really want to get more input from this product that Siemen
> released and if there could be any issues with the branding.

Looking at their site, and remembering Siemens roots (they started out making 
PABX telephone systems), this seems to be a very fancy PIM and communications 
application. It seems to aim to integrate every communication medium that a 
business (specifically an SME) uses into a single desktop interface. 

It does not appear to be a productivity suite in the sense of MSO or OO.o (in 
fact, there appears to be no office suite - word-processor, spreadsheet 
etc. - component there at all.

That would be in keeping with Siemens' traditional business.

As for branding/copyright, that would be a matter for the legal people, 
although the fact they've run the words "open" and "office" together, as do 
we, could be an issue.

-- 
Alex Fisher

Co-Lead, CD-ROM Project

OpenOffice.org Marketing 
Community Contact
Australia/New Zealand


http://distribution.openoffice.org/cdrom/


 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-26 Thread Alex Fisher
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:16:29 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Hi anyone read about Siemens HiPath OpenOffice, I am still having a hard
> time defining what it is and if it at any point has to do with
> OpenOffice.org or not.
>
> www.siemens.co.uk/openoffice
>
> I would really want to get more input from this product that Siemen
> released and if there could be any issues with the branding.

Looking at their site, and remembering Siemens roots (they started out making 
PABX telephone systems), this seems to be a very fancy PIM and communications 
application. It seems to aim to integrate every communication medium that a 
business (specifically an SME) uses into a single desktop interface. 

It does not appear to be a productivity suite in the sense of MSO or OO.o (in 
fact, there appears to be no office suite - word-processor, spreadsheet 
etc. - component there at all.

That would be in keeping with Siemens' traditional business.

As for branding/copyright, that would be a matter for the legal people, 
although the fact they've run the words "open" and "office" together, as do 
we, could be an issue.

-- 
Alex Fisher

Co-Lead, CD-ROM Project

OpenOffice.org Marketing 
Community Contact
Australia/New Zealand


http://distribution.openoffice.org/cdrom/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-26 Thread RJ Gilson
Alexandro,

I Googled it and came up with this from their website:

HiPath OpenOffice joins everything together, creating
a seamless communications system with the programmes
and applications that your staff use every day. It
lets you combine your phone calls, voicemail boxes,
conferencing, fax, and messaging into a single,
unified solution


Hope this helps
Randy


--- Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi anyone read about Siemens HiPath OpenOffice, I am
> still having a hard  
> time defining what it is and if it at any point has
> to do with  
> OpenOffice.org or not.
> 
> www.siemens.co.uk/openoffice
> 
> I would really want to get more input from this
> product that Siemen  
> released and if there could be any issues with the
> branding.
> 
> -- 
> Alexandro Colorado
> CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
> http://es.openoffice.org
> 
>
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-26 Thread Mike Williams
Hi Alexander,

The description suggests it is nothing whatsoever to do with Openoffice.org 
(notice they don't use the .org). 

Are HP the owner of "openoffice"? I know someone else owns it which is why the 
office suite has to have ".org" appended.

Mike

P.S. Have you thought of emailing HP UK?

On Saturday 27 October 2007 10:16, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Hi anyone read about Siemens HiPath OpenOffice, I am still having a hard
> time defining what it is and if it at any point has to do with
> OpenOffice.org or not.
>
> www.siemens.co.uk/openoffice
>
> I would really want to get more input from this product that Siemen
> released and if there could be any issues with the branding.

-- 

Better Access Pty Ltd
Australian Dragon Media Centres
Torquay, Victoria, Australia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.better-access.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Marketing] HiPath OpenOffice

2007-10-26 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Hi anyone read about Siemens HiPath OpenOffice, I am still having a hard  
time defining what it is and if it at any point has to do with  
OpenOffice.org or not.


www.siemens.co.uk/openoffice

I would really want to get more input from this product that Siemen  
released and if there could be any issues with the branding.


--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]