Re: continuum-webapp models
Wasn't sure how certain we were about deleting these, so just raised an issue (CONTINUUM-1063). On 14/12/2006, at 10:34 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff thats all On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jesse, Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the domain entities directly in the view? I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only exposes that required stuff for view preparation. Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and project group and projects bits like name, group, etc.. so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume jesse On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for preparing views for the webapp? Cheers, Rahul Brett Porter wrote: anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuum-webapp models
I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for preparing views for the webapp? Cheers, Rahul Brett Porter wrote: anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett
Re: continuum-webapp models
yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and project group and projects bits like name, group, etc.. so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume jesse On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for preparing views for the webapp? Cheers, Rahul Brett Porter wrote: anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuum-webapp models
Hi Jesse, Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the domain entities directly in the view? I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only exposes that required stuff for view preparation. Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and project group and projects bits like name, group, etc.. so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume jesse On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for preparing views for the webapp? Cheers, Rahul Brett Porter wrote: anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett
Re: continuum-webapp models
no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff thats all On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jesse, Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the domain entities directly in the view? I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only exposes that required stuff for view preparation. Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and project group and projects bits like name, group, etc.. so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume jesse On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for preparing views for the webapp? Cheers, Rahul Brett Porter wrote: anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuum-webapp models
We can clean them. I don't think session-models is used. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett
Re: continuum-webapp models
I think I added a couple of models since there had been precendent in there being other models in use and as a way to present data into the extreme components which needed objects presented in a certain fashion if we can do away with them without issues then I am for that :) jesse On 12/6/06, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We can clean them. I don't think session-models is used. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: continuum-webapp models
anyone? On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote: I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more? What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid? - Brett
