Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Henry,

Thank you very much for the clarification, It's my bad to misunderstand the
meanings of regression and feature.

We have not yet tried to compile the project with Java9 before, the issue
found by Patrick make me realize that the JDK9 has been GA released.

So we are fine with this release candidate, right? Thanks!

Hi Patrick,

I'm really sorry for the confusion.

Best.
Gary









On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> I would argue this is not a blocker since the pom.xml define the target
> JVM:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/blob/master/pom.xml#L104
>
> Gary, when you said regression, did you mean it was working with Java9
> before and now it was not?
> If it has not been working with Java9 from beginning this should not be
> release blocker.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Johnu  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> > Thanks for the reply. Currently,Mnemonic doesn't support
> > Java 9 due to incompatible interface changes. We verified the release
> with
> > Java8. (Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-401)  If
> it
> > is a blocker, I will cancel the rc vote. Else, we will fix it in the next
> > release.  Please let us know.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2017 11:38 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Patrick,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for the guidance and we will try to figure out how
> to
> > > fix this issue you found.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Gary.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Patrick Hunt 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote,
> fix
> > > it,
> > > > and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't
> > believe
> > > > there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for
> folks
> > > > using it certainly.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Gary.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is this a feature or a regression?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> > > > > > >   Can you please vote for the release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Johnu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate
> this
> > > > issue
> > > > > > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we
> fix
> > it
> > > > for
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could
> be a
> > > > > blocker
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt <
> ph...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> $java -version
> > > > > > > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > > > > > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > > > > > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed
> mode)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > > ga...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Amit and Atri,

The invitations have been sent to your mailbox, please accept to join our
channel #storage-class-memory. thanks.

Best,
Gary.


On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Atri Sharma  wrote:

> I would like to participate as well
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
> > Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and
> > join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks!
> >
> > Best
> > Gary.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre 
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to participate in this as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Avinash
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please
> register on
> >> > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel
> >> #storage-class-memory,
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> >> > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to
> post
> >> > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our
> workgroup.
> >> > the
> >> > >> > progress is
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> >> > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this
> >> > Slack
> >> > >> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> >> > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> >> > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory
> >> > resource
> >> > >> -
> >> > >> > trying but not guaranteed
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can
> have a
> >> > >> > > discussion...
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <
> hit...@apache.org>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > > > Hello Gary,
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this
> workgroup
> >> (I
> >> > am
> >> > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling
> for
> >> > >> this)
> >> > >> > > where
> >> > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > thanks
> >> > >> > > > -- Hitesh
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> >> > ga...@apache.org
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and
> APIs
> >> > for
> >> > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> >> > >> please go
> >> > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup.
> Thanks!
> >> > >> > > >>
> >> > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> >> &

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and
join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks!

Best
Gary.

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre  wrote:

> I'd like to participate in this as well.
>
> Thanks
> Avinash
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on
> > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel
> #storage-class-memory,
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
> > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup.
> > the
> > >> > progress is
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this
> > Slack
> > >> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory
> > resource
> > >> -
> > >> > trying but not guaranteed
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > >> > > discussion...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah 
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > Hello Gary,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup
> (I
> > am
> > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for
> > >> this)
> > >> > > where
> > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > thanks
> > >> > > > -- Hitesh
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs
> > for
> > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> > >> please go
> > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> > ddu...@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> > >> common
> > >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Debo
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > >> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > >> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory applica

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Patrick,

Thank you very much for the guidance and we will try to figure out how to
fix this issue you found.

Best,
Gary.




On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote, fix it,
> and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't believe
> there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for folks
> using it certainly.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
> >
> > Best,
> > Gary.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> > > Is this a feature or a regression?
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> > > >   Can you please vote for the release?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Johnu
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this
> issue
> > > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix it
> for
> > > new
> > > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a
> > blocker
> > > > for
> > > > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> $java -version
> > > > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > $java -version
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Best,
> > > > >> > Gary.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> > > > >> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation
> failure:
> > > > >> > > Compilation failure:
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > >> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <
> jo...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > > >> > > >
> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gary Wong]

Hi Patrick,

I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.

Best,
Gary.


On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Is this a feature or a regression?
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> >   Can you please vote for the release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this issue
> > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix it for
> new
> > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a blocker
> > for
> > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> > >
> > >> $java -version
> > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
> > >> >
> > >> > $java -version
> > >> >
> > >> > Best,
> > >> > Gary.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt 
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> > >> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> > >> > > Compilation failure:
> > >> > > [ERROR]
> > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > >> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > >> > > [ERROR]
> > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > >> > > [ERROR]
> > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > >> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > >> > > [ERROR]
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George 
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi all,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > >> > > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > >> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > found
> > >> > at:
> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > >> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > >> > > > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > >> > > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d
> 794690f71b
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > KEYS file available:
> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > >> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > >> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> > >> items
> > >> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and
> > test.
> > >> > The
> > >> > > > please vote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> incubating
> > >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this issue
further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix it for new
JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a blocker for
this release candidate? Thanks!.

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> $java -version
> java version "9.0.1"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
> >
> > $java -version
> >
> > Best,
> > Gary.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> > > Compilation failure:
> > > [ERROR]
> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > > [ERROR]
> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > > [ERROR]
> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > > [ERROR]
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> items
> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> > The
> > > > please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?

$java -version

Best,
Gary.


On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> Compilation failure:
> [ERROR]
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> error: cannot find symbol
> [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> [ERROR]
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> error: cannot find symbol
> [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> [ERROR]
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> error: cannot find symbol
> [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> > please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Henry

Our project has not yet graduated since Mnemonic was not on the agenda of
Oct. board meeting for some reasons,
but fortunately, our project would be evaluated in next board meeting.
Thanks!

Best,
Gary.


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> I think Apache Mnemonic has gotten board approval to be top level project
> (TLP), right?
>
> This should be the first release as TLP instead.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> > please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

+1, Thanks!

Best
Gary


On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on
https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel #storage-class-memory,
Thanks!



On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
> major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
>> > progress is
>> >
>> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
>> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
>> > channel -  not yet but soon later
>> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
>> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource
>> -
>> > trying but not guaranteed
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
>> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
>> > > discussion...
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah 
>> wrote:
>> > > > Hello Gary,
>> > > >
>> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
>> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for
>> this)
>> > > where
>> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
>> > > >
>> > > > thanks
>> > > > -- Hitesh
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
>> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
>> please go
>> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
>> common
>> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Debo
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
>> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
>> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
>> > > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
>> > > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
>> > > >> > >   - Integrating one another
>> > > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
>> > ga...@apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >> Add ORC
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
>> > > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
>> > > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
>> > > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
>> > > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
>> > > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
>> oriented
>> > > >> > *Distributed
>> > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
major findings and summary on Apache mail list...

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic  wrote:

> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
> > progress is
> >
> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource -
> > trying but not guaranteed
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > > discussion...
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah 
> wrote:
> > > > Hello Gary,
> > > >
> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for this)
> > > where
> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > -- Hitesh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please
> go
> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards common
> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Debo
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >> > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Add ORC
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> oriented
> > > >> > *Distributed
> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> Data
> > > >> Store,
> > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model*
> > > for
> > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> querying,
> > > >> > >> processing, and analytics.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> > > >> owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Good Apache program name for storage-class memory oriented projects, so
let's propose this program to Apache board if appropriate, Thanks!

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) 
wrote:

> BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”?
>
> debo
>
> On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)"  wrote:
>
> Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a
> DISCUSS thread.
>
>     debo
>
> On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
>
> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> please go
> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> wrote:
>
> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> common
> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> >
> > Debo
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > >
> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > >   - Integrating one another
> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Add ORC
> > >>
> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > >>
> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> oriented
> > *Distributed
> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> Data Store,
> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> Model* for
> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> querying,
> > >> processing, and analytics.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > >>>
> > >>> .. Owen
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge
> potential
> > >>>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> analytics
> > >>>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> > non-volatile
> > >>>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> fundamentally
> > >>> change
> > >>>> the way to construct high performance applications similar
> to what
> > >>> happened
> > >>>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s.
> so if
> > >>> possible, I
> > >>>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> > >>> collaboration
> > >>>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class
> memory
> > >>>> technology-oriented projects.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best.
> > >>>> Gary.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > 
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.
> org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Add *ActiveMQ and Geode*

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *RocketMQ  *represented by *Von Gosling*
   - *ActiveMQ *represented by *Clebert Suconic*
   - *Geode *represented by *Swapnil Bawaskar*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and
Streaming, High Performance Data Management, **Durable Object Model,
Durable Computing Model* for new generation high-performance applications,
e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <
swapnil.bawas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would be happy to represent Apache Geode.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) 
> wrote:
>
> > BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”?
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)"  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a
> > DISCUSS thread.
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
> >
> > It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs
> for
> > storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> > please go
> > ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> ddu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> > common
> > > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >
> > > Debo
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >
> > > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Add ORC
> > > >>
> > > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >>
> > > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> > oriented
> > > *Distributed
> > > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> > Data Store,
> > > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model* for
> > > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> > querying,
> > > >> processing, and analytics.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> > owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> .. Owen
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi all,
> > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Add *Hive/LLAP and RocketMQ*

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan*
   - *RocketMQ  *represented by *Von Gosling*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and
Streaming, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new
generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing,
and analytics.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Von Gosling  wrote:

> I'm happy to represent Apache RocketMQ on this  storage collaboration
> effort. This is a very key in low latency messaging.
>
> Best Regards,
> Von Gosling
>
>
>
> > 在 2017年10月20日，02:55，Gang(Gary) Wang  写道：
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> > technology-oriented projects.
> >
> > Best.
> > Gary.
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup

   - Sharing idea and good practice
   - Identifying common opportunities
   - Promoting storage-class memory application
   - Delivering solid solution
   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
   - Integrating one another
   - Coordinating the progress


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Add ORC
>
>- *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
>- *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
>- *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
>- *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
>- *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
>- *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
>
> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for
> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying,
> processing, and analytics.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley 
> wrote:
>
>> I can represent ORC within the group.
>>
>> .. Owen
>>
>> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
>> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
>> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
>> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
>> change
>> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
>> happened
>> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
>> possible, I
>> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
>> collaboration
>> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
>> > technology-oriented projects.
>> >
>> > Best.
>> > Gary.
>>
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Add ORC

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new
generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing,
and analytics.


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley 
wrote:

> I can represent ORC within the group.
>
> .. Owen
>
> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> > technology-oriented projects.
> >
> > Best.
> > Gary.
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

It is wonderful, as of now, we have the following projects and their
communities.

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we can cover Storage-class memory oriented Database,
KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Durable Object Model, Durable
Computing Model for new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
querying, processing, and analytics.


On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Atri Sharma  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Anoop John 
> wrote:
> > +1..Am there to represent Apache HBase.
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Wes McKinney 
> wrote:
> >> I'm happy to represent Apache Arrow on this. This is very much in line
> >> with our focus on zero-copy / memory-mapped data access of structured
> >> data sets and cache-efficient memory layout.
> >>
> >> - Wes
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> wrote:
> >>> This is a great idea. Storage class memory will have a big impact on
> many of the Apache projects.
> >>>
> >>> Debo
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> >>>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> >>>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> non-volatile
> >>>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> >>>> the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> >>>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> >>>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> >>>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> >>>> technology-oriented projects.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best.
> >>>> Gary.
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> l'apprenant
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change
the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened
when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I
advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration
and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
technology-oriented projects.

Best.
Gary.

Our graduation approval has been postponed

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

For some reason, our resolution was not added to the agenda of this board
meeting, fortunately, one of our mentor Andrew Purtell, he will help us to
make sure our resolution become one of agenda of next board meeting held on 15
November 2017, Thanks.

Best.
Gary

Fwd: Crail project looking for mentors

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

I forward this email thread for discussion if any. Thanks!


-- Forwarded message --
From: Gang(Gary) Wang 
Date: Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: Crail project looking for mentors
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org


I'm a PPMC at Mnemonic project,  we got interested in this project because
our project is working on Ceph memory service for our Durable object model
(DOM) and Durable computing model (DCM). Crail could be a promising and
more efficient solution for us to take fully advantage of the RDMA
capabilities for durable object exchange across nodes in a cluster. I'm
looking forward to integrating Crail soon...



On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, patrick stuedi  wrote:

> Efficient asynchronous I/O is one key aspect in Crail, because we're
> directly leveraging the asynchronous hardware interfaces of NVMe,
> RDMA, etc and export them at the distributed systems level. If you
> have experience with libaio and similar interfaces then that's
> definitely related.. Crail is a distributed storage system designed
> for high-performance storage and networking hardware, tailored to
> support data processing in new data center deployments. If you're
> interested in becoming a mentor please let us know...
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Clebert Suconic
>  wrote:
> > I have written a libaio wrapper in java.  For artemis and high
> performance
> > sync IOs.
> >
> >
> > Would that work be related sim any form ?
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:37 PM Luciano Resende 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:58 PM, patrick stuedi 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > The Crail project (www.crail.io) is looking for additional mentors
> >> > helping with the Apache incubator process. A draft of the Crail
> >> > incubator proposal is available here:
> >> >
> >> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrailProposal
> >> >
> >> > If you're interested and you're eligible to be a mentor please let us
> >> know!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> We are still looking for one more mentor before starting the formal vote
> >> for Crail.
> >>
> >> Any volunteers ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Luciano Resende
> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[ANNOUNCE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi, everyone,

Our project has passed the recommendation vote in general@incubator list.
and the resolution has been submitted to Apache board for final approval.
that will happen in next board meeting on 18 October 2017

I appreciate all you've done for our community and this project!

Cheers!
Gary


-- Forwarded message --
From: Gang Wang 
Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:50 PM
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org


Hi, PPMC and everyone,

This vote to graduate Apache Mnemonic to a top-level project has passed with
7 binding +1s and no -1s:

Binding Votes:
==
Uma Maheswara Rao G
Luke Han
James R. Taylor
Julian Hyde
Henry Saputra
Patrick D. Hunt
P. Taylor Goetz

Non-Binding Votes:
==
Johnu George
Debojyoti Dutta
Yanhui Zhao
Pierre Smits
Gang Wang
Devaraj K
Liang Chen
Rakesh Radhakrishnan
Ganhua Zhang
Wen Tong
Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Paley Shen

Thank you, everyone, for voting! We will submit the resolution to the board.

With appreciation,
Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community

[ANNOUNCE] Get Started Page Added

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

We have prepared the Get Started page for our project, please visit the
following link to check it out

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/getstarted.html

In this page, we will add more code snippets to guide the user to learn how
to make use of Mnemonic.

To contribute your guide code snippets, you can submit yours with tooltips
markup e.g.

In Java,

m_act = new NonVolatileMemAllocator(
*/*tooltip,a memory service instance*/*
Utils.getNonVolatileMemoryAllocatorService("pmalloc")*/*tooltip*/*,
*/*tooltip,the capacity*/*1024 * 1024 * 1024L*/*tooltip*/*,
*/*tooltip,an uri associated with memory service*/"*
./pobj_hashmaps.dat"*/*tooltip*/,*
*/*tooltip,open a new memory space*/*true*/*tooltip*/*);


The effect on this markup can be found in Get Started page, thanks!

Cheers

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating released

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Thank you for releasing the mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating.


On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Johnu George  wrote:

> The Apache Mnemonic community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating.
>
> Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, it's
> proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and
> durable computing model that bring several advantages to significantly
> improve the performance of massive real-time data processing/analytic.
> developers are able to use this library to design their cache-less and
> SerDe-less high performance applications.
>
> The release is available for download at:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/
> mnemonic/0.9.0-incubating
>
> The full changelog is available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/
> mnemonic/0.9.0-incubating/CHANGES.txt
>
> We would like to thank all contributors who made this release possible!
>

Re: Learn from Equifax breach

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Sure and please also point out which need to be fixed if possible, Thanks!

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:

> Thanks Gary for the insightful thread. Maybe run our code base against a
> threat ID tool?
>
> Debo
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 13, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
> >
> > One of our contributors told me that this breach is related to a
> > serialized object that Mnemonic has tried to avoid as below
> >
> > "However, “for either vulnerability, the process is basically the same.
> The
> > attacker sends a specific HTTP request containing some special syntax.
> In
> > one case, an OGNL expression.  In the other, a serialized object,” he
> said
> > in comments emailed to SC Media. “The Equifax Struts application would
> > receive this request, and get tricked into executing operating system
> > commands.”
> >
> > The attacker can then “use these to take over the entire box – do
> anything
> > the application can do,” Williams said. “So, they probably stole the
> > database credentials out of the application, ran some queries, and then
> > exfiltrated the data to some server they control on the internet.”"
> >
> > https://www.scmagazine.com/apache-struts-vulnerability-
> likely-behind-equifax-breach-congress-launches-probes/article/687955/
> >
> > IMHO, from the technical view point, Mnemonic has nothing about how to
> > interact with UI layer. Theoretically, Mnemonic's linked durable objects
> > could be transferred between different layers to avoid SerDe, user code
> > makes use of those durable object for their own business logics.
> >
> > Regarding the Durable Query Model (DQM), it has not yet been fully
> > implemented, we need to consider any possible injection and provide the
> > proper measure to prevent potential breaches.
> >
> > Thanks!
>

Learn from Equifax breach

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

One of our contributors told me that this breach is related to a
serialized object that Mnemonic has tried to avoid as below

"However, “for either vulnerability, the process is basically the same. The
attacker sends a specific HTTP request containing some special syntax.  In
one case, an OGNL expression.  In the other, a serialized object,” he said
in comments emailed to SC Media. “The Equifax Struts application would
receive this request, and get tricked into executing operating system
commands.”

The attacker can then “use these to take over the entire box – do anything
the application can do,” Williams said. “So, they probably stole the
database credentials out of the application, ran some queries, and then
exfiltrated the data to some server they control on the internet.”"

https://www.scmagazine.com/apache-struts-vulnerability-likely-behind-equifax-breach-congress-launches-probes/article/687955/

IMHO, from the technical view point, Mnemonic has nothing about how to
interact with UI layer. Theoretically, Mnemonic's linked durable objects
could be transferred between different layers to avoid SerDe, user code
makes use of those durable object for their own business logics.

Regarding the Durable Query Model (DQM), it has not yet been fully
implemented, we need to consider any possible injection and provide the
proper measure to prevent potential breaches.

Thanks!

[DISCUSS] Avoiding Merge Commits in Git

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

As of now, we are using the Github PRs to merge changes, we try to keep the
Git history clean and avoid merge commit to pollute our code history while
upstreaming new commits to Apache repo. the blog states why and how to
avoid merge commits very clearly.

http://www.kerrybuckley.org/2008/06/18/avoiding-merge-commits-in-git/

The problem is if we received multiple pending PRs, we have to notify
all owners of remaining PRs to rebase their commits every time when a PR
commit got upstreamed.

Any idea about how to avoid merge commits while not bother PR owners to
rebase their changes once their PR get submitted?

Thanks!

Vote Process for Graduate Mnemonic to TLP expired on dev@list here

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Wei and Wen,

Please vote on general@incubator instead of dev@list here, because the
voting process for graduation on dev@list has been concluded.

if you have not yet subscribed the general@incubator list, please send
email to the following email address to subscribe it first.
general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
and then waiting for the Mnemonic graduation vote thread send to your
mailbox.

Please note that the email subject in question is "[VOTE] Graduate Apache
Mnemonic project from Incubator" on general@incubator list. Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary.


On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Wei HE  wrote:
> > +1 (:))
> >
> > Wei HE
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Henry Saputra 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:04 PM James Taylor 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1. Nice work, everyone!
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Gangumalla, Uma <
> >> > uma.ganguma...@intel.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Uma
> >> > >
> >> > > On 9/7/17, 3:00 PM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP
> for
> >> > > >Mnemonic.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> >> > least
> >> > > >three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >[ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
> >> > > >[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> >> > > >[ ] -1 Do not proceed yet becauseŠ
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Vote for graduation on general list.

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

Just as a heads up, please don't forget to forward your vote to the
general@incubator list.

By the way, if you have not yet subscribed the general@incubator list,
please send email to the following email address to apply it, Thanks!
general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org

Very truly yours
Gary.

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

As 72 hours have elapsed, the voting period has concluded, a majority of
PPMCs have voted +1s, and no -1s, so the vote PASSES.
The voting tally can be seen below:

4  +1 (binding) votes:

* Patrick Hunt
* Uma Maheswara Rao G
* James Taylor
* Henry Saputra


10 +1 (non-binding) votes:

* Johnu George
* Gang Wang
* Yanhui Zhao
* Debojyoti Dutta
* Wen Tong
* Peili Shen
* Rakesh Radhakrishnan Potty
* Ganhua Zhang
* Hao Cheng
* Helin Cao

As soon as this result shows up in the mail archive, we will start the
corresponding vote on the incubator general list.

Cheers
Gary

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

This issue has been resolved with Uma, Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi Uma,
>
> Thank you very much for proposing me as Chair for Apache Mnemonic project.
>
> Hi Mentors and PPMCs
>
> Looks I have no enough permission to update the content of
> https://whimsy4.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mnemonic
> <http://whimsy.apache.org/roster> , Could you please help and guide us to
> correct those issues pointed out by Uma? Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Gangumalla, Uma  > wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mnemonic has draft resolution
>> option.
>> Need to choose a chair. I propose you(Gary Wong) as Chair for Apache
>> Mnemonic project if no other objections. (Do we need vote for this)
>>
>> Also it says, resolution can be reviewed in private list.
>>
>>
>> From that whimsy.apache.org/roster
>> Below things needs to be corrected.
>> 1.
>> Licensing
>> * No Software Grant and No IP Clearance Filed
>> * No Release Yet/Missing ASF Copyright Headers on Source Code
>> * No Release Yet/Binary has licensing issues
>>
>> 2. PPMC/Committers in this project are not listed there
>>
>> 3. Prior board report is not linked to June month report.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Uma
>>
>>
>> On 9/7/17, 11:16 AM, "Gary Wong"  wrote:
>>
>> >Got it, Thanks for the guidance, We are going to start the official vote.
>> >we have also prepared a draft of Graduation resolution for your review,
>> >Thanks!
>> >
>> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/Gradua
>> tion+Resolution
>> >
>> >On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Henry Saputra 
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> To do official VOTE thread we need to have proposed board resolution
>> for
>> >> the TLP.
>> >>
>> >> - Henry
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Patrick and Mentors
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for the input and guidance.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have visited the following page that you mentioned, it looks there
>> >>are
>> >> > some broken links.
>> >> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#
>> >> graduation_check_list
>> >> >
>> >> > I paste two key sections here as a checklist for verification
>> >> >
>> >> >-
>> >> >
>> >> >Preparations
>> >> >-
>> >> >
>> >> >   Complete (and sign off) tasks documented in the status file
>> >> >
>> >><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-status>
>> >> >   Yes, it is up-to-date
>> >> >   -
>> >> >
>> >> >   Ensure suitable names
>> >> >
>> >><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-names>
>> >> > for
>> >> >   project name and product names
>> >> >   Approved,
>> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-
>> >> 95
>> >> >   -
>> >> >
>> >> >   Demonstrate ability to create Apache releases
>> >> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#releases>
>> >> >   Release 8 versions and another one is WIP, involved 3 release
>> >> > managers
>> >> >   -
>> >> >
>> >> >   Demonstrate community readiness
>> >> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
>> >
>> >> >   Our contributors come from different companies and show the
>> >> diversity
>> >> >   and working on different components, all changes have been
>> >>reviewed
>> >> > and
>> >> >   trackable. we have an open, positive and inclusive atmosphere
>> >>for
>> >> the
>> >> >   discussion
>> >> >   -
>> >> >
>> >> >   Ensure Mentors
>> >> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_
>> >> > Responsibilities.html#Mentor>
>> >> >   and IPMC
>> >> >   &

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the technical documentation

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Great!, Thank you very much for the support, could you please also help to
list some work items in order so we can create JIRA ticket accordingly to
make it done.

>From Niall's feedback, I think there are at least 3 following items need to
be resolved.

1) add detailed description to sample code snippets shown in web page

2) simplify the sample codes shown in front page

3) use descriptive names for sample codes

please add more to this list, thanks!

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Yanhui ZHAO 
wrote:

> Hi Gary
>
> I think it is a great point. I can work with you and other devs who are
> interested to draft the documentation.
>
> A well written document will help devs like me to have a clear picture on
> roadmap, design, and technical details of our project. It also helps to
> attract other devs like Niall from the community to contribute to our
> project.
>
> Thanks
>
> Yanhui
> 
> From: Gang(Gary) Wang 
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 10:10 AM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Improve the technical documentation
>
> As Niall mentioned suggestion and issues on MNEMONIC-360
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-360>, I think we need put
> more efforts on technical documentation after the release of
> 0.9.0-incubating. so I create this DISCUSS thread for discussion about
> where and how to improve it. please join us and help us to prioritize the
> next work items. Thanks!
>

[DISCUSS] Improve the technical documentation

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

As Niall mentioned suggestion and issues on MNEMONIC-360
, I think we need put
more efforts on technical documentation after the release of
0.9.0-incubating. so I create this DISCUSS thread for discussion about
where and how to improve it. please join us and help us to prioritize the
next work items. Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP

[Gary Wong]

I vote +1 for graduation.

The community has grown and continues to make progress, many features have
been contributed to Mnemonic, we have already released 8 versions of
Mnemonic according to Apache guidelines since becoming Apache podling.


On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP for
> > Mnemonic.
> >
> > This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> > three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> > [ ] -1 Do not proceed yet because…
> >
>

[VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP for
Mnemonic.

This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not proceed yet because…

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Uma,

Thank you very much for proposing me as Chair for Apache Mnemonic project.

Hi Mentors and PPMCs

Looks I have no enough permission to update the content of
https://whimsy4.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mnemonic
<http://whimsy.apache.org/roster> , Could you please help and guide us to
correct those issues pointed out by Uma? Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary



On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Gangumalla, Uma 
wrote:

> Hi Gary,
>
> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mnemonic has draft resolution
> option.
> Need to choose a chair. I propose you(Gary Wong) as Chair for Apache
> Mnemonic project if no other objections. (Do we need vote for this)
>
> Also it says, resolution can be reviewed in private list.
>
>
> From that whimsy.apache.org/roster
> Below things needs to be corrected.
> 1.
> Licensing
> * No Software Grant and No IP Clearance Filed
> * No Release Yet/Missing ASF Copyright Headers on Source Code
> * No Release Yet/Binary has licensing issues
>
> 2. PPMC/Committers in this project are not listed there
>
> 3. Prior board report is not linked to June month report.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
>
> On 9/7/17, 11:16 AM, "Gary Wong"  wrote:
>
> >Got it, Thanks for the guidance, We are going to start the official vote.
> >we have also prepared a draft of Graduation resolution for your review,
> >Thanks!
> >
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/
> Graduation+Resolution
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Henry Saputra 
> >wrote:
> >
> >> To do official VOTE thread we need to have proposed board resolution for
> >> the TLP.
> >>
> >> - Henry
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Patrick and Mentors
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for the input and guidance.
> >> >
> >> > I have visited the following page that you mentioned, it looks there
> >>are
> >> > some broken links.
> >> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#
> >> graduation_check_list
> >> >
> >> > I paste two key sections here as a checklist for verification
> >> >
> >> >-
> >> >
> >> >Preparations
> >> >-
> >> >
> >> >   Complete (and sign off) tasks documented in the status file
> >> >
> >><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-status>
> >> >   Yes, it is up-to-date
> >> >   -
> >> >
> >> >   Ensure suitable names
> >> >
> >><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-names>
> >> > for
> >> >   project name and product names
> >> >   Approved,
> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-
> >> 95
> >> >   -
> >> >
> >> >   Demonstrate ability to create Apache releases
> >> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#releases>
> >> >   Release 8 versions and another one is WIP, involved 3 release
> >> > managers
> >> >   -
> >> >
> >> >   Demonstrate community readiness
> >> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community>
> >> >   Our contributors come from different companies and show the
> >> diversity
> >> >   and working on different components, all changes have been
> >>reviewed
> >> > and
> >> >   trackable. we have an open, positive and inclusive atmosphere
> >>for
> >> the
> >> >   discussion
> >> >   -
> >> >
> >> >   Ensure Mentors
> >> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_
> >> > Responsibilities.html#Mentor>
> >> >   and IPMC
> >> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_
> >> >
> >>Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29>
> >> >   have no remaining issues
> >> >
> >><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-issues>
> >> >   We have taken actions on issues from the discussion of
> >>graduation
> >> and
> >> >   fulfilled the Apache maturity assessment
> >> >
> >> >
> >>https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg7jLFp
> >> > -ec-TmW96mZbX

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gary Wong]

Got it, Thanks for the guidance, We are going to start the official vote.
we have also prepared a draft of Graduation resolution for your review,
Thanks!

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/Graduation+Resolution

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> To do official VOTE thread we need to have proposed board resolution for
> the TLP.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick and Mentors
> >
> > Thank you for the input and guidance.
> >
> > I have visited the following page that you mentioned, it looks there are
> > some broken links.
> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#
> graduation_check_list
> >
> > I paste two key sections here as a checklist for verification
> >
> >-
> >
> >Preparations
> >-
> >
> >   Complete (and sign off) tasks documented in the status file
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-status>
> >   Yes, it is up-to-date
> >   -
> >
> >   Ensure suitable names
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-names>
> > for
> >   project name and product names
> >   Approved, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-
> 95
> >   -
> >
> >   Demonstrate ability to create Apache releases
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#releases>
> >   Release 8 versions and another one is WIP, involved 3 release
> > managers
> >   -
> >
> >   Demonstrate community readiness
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community>
> >   Our contributors come from different companies and show the
> diversity
> >   and working on different components, all changes have been reviewed
> > and
> >   trackable. we have an open, positive and inclusive atmosphere for
> the
> >   discussion
> >   -
> >
> >   Ensure Mentors
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_
> > Responsibilities.html#Mentor>
> >   and IPMC
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_
> > Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29>
> >   have no remaining issues
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-issues>
> >   We have taken actions on issues from the discussion of graduation
> and
> >   fulfilled the Apache maturity assessment
> >
> >   https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg7jLFp
> > -ec-TmW96mZbXM/edit?usp=sharing
> >   -
> >
> >Decide upon destination
> ><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#
> > subproject-or-top-level>
> >Would be Top-Level Project
> >-
> >
> >Prepare a resolution
> ><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution>
> > *(top
> >level candidates only)*.
> >We will prepare our resolution according to
> >
> >https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#
> > submission_of_the_resolution_to_the_board
> >template
> >
> >https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/
> > templates/podling-tlp-resolution.txt
> >and some samples
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CRUNCH/
> > Graduation+Resolution
> >
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> > Graduation+Resolution
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DATAFU/
> > Graduation+Resolution
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/
> > Graduation+Resolution
> >The resolution should be proposed on the general incubator list
> > before a *VOTE
> ><http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>* is started to allow
> >feedback
> >-
> >
> >Subproject acceptance *VOTE*
> ><https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#
> > subproject-acceptance>
> >by destination Project *(*subproject* candidates only)*
> >NA
> >-
> >
> >Incubator PMC (IPMC)
> ><https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_
> > Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29>
> >:
> >-
> >
> >   For top level candidates, this is a recommendation *VOTE*
> >   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#i

Fwd: Apache Arrow at JupyterCon

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

I forward this discussion thread here for your information, please join if
you are also interested in this topic.


-- Forwarded message --
From: Jacques Nadeau 
Date: Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: Apache Arrow at JupyterCon
To: d...@arrow.apache.org


This is a interesting problem but also pretty complex. Arrow's Java memory
management model is complex on purpose (see
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/java/memory/
src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/memory/README.md
for more info). It is designed to reserve and share memory in multiple
hierarchical domains (with reservations and limits) while providing
transfer semantics across those domains with minimal contention and
locking. An opaque (and potentially easy starting point would be to
optionally allow AllocationManager to use something other than the
PooledByteBufAllocatorL and UnsafeDirectLittleEndian for memory allocation.
This wouldn't expose movement between different memory tiers but that could
be managed underneath the Arrow system. At the end of the day, the whole
hierarchy is basically a collection of memory addresses, accounting and
reference counting.

A phase two could be a proposal which allows movement between memory
domains and could be generified across systems like Mnemonic as well
GPU/Device memory domains.


On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Wes McKinney  wrote:

> Thanks Gary, that is helpful context. In light if this, it might be
> worth writing some kind of a proposal for how to enable the Java
> vector classes to be backed by some other kind of byte buffers. It
> might be that an alternative version of portions of the Arrow Java
> library (i.e. decoupled from Netty) might need to be created.
>
> If it cannot be reconciled with the Netty AbstractByteBuf class then
> this would be useful to know so that Arrow developers can plan
> accordingly for the future.
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
> > The ArrowBuf is inherited from AbstractByteBuf, the AbstractByteBuf is
> > defined in the Netty library, it does more like a memory pool not a pure
> > buffer so that's why ArrowBuf is not backed by ByteBuffer as now.
> >
> > I have ever tried to make ArrowBuf build on top of DurableBuffer of
> > Mnemonic, but looks it is not very easy to decouple the refcount from
> other
> > parts because the lifecycle of DurableBuffer could also be managed by
> > JVM automatically instead of using refcount.
> >
> > I still want to figure out how gracefully to migrate the backend of
> > ArrowBuf from Netty to Mnemonic. In addition, DurableBuffer could bring
> > other benefits for Arrow e.g. persistent on any kind of memory service
> that
> > could make use of SSD, NVMe, Memory and NAS and more. in this way, Arrow
> is
> > able to break through the capacity limitation of system memory, avoid
the
> > SerDe for storage and link other durable objects with ease and etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Wes McKinney 
> wrote:
> >
> >> It should be possible to have an ArrowBuf backed by a
> >> MappedByteBuffer. Anyone reading is welcome to dig in and write a
> >> patch for this.
> >>
> >> Semantically this is what we have done in C++ -- a memory map inherits
> >> from arrow::Buffer, so we can slice and dice a memory map as we would
> >> any other Buffer object
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/
> arrow/io/file.cc#L501
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Gonzalo Ortiz Jaureguizar
> >>  wrote:
> >> > This is a very interesting feature. It's very surprising that there
> is no
> >> > ByteBuffer implementation backed on a MappedByteBuffer. As far as I
> >> > understand, it should be trivial to implement (maybe not to pool) as
> >> > usually ByteBuf is backed on a ByteBuffer and MappedByteBuffer
extends
> >> > that. But I didn't find implementations when I goggled for it.
> >> >
> >> > 2017-09-03 16:12 GMT+02:00 Wes McKinney :
> >> >
> >> >> I think ideally we would have a Java interface that would support
all
> >> of:
> >> >>
> >> >> - Memory mapped files
> >> >> - Anonymous shared memory segments (e.g. POSIX shm)
> >> >> - NVM / Mnemonic
> >> >>
> >> >> We already have the ability to do zero-copy reads from buffer-like
> >> >> objects in C++ and IO interfaces that support zero copy (like memory
> >> >> mapped files). We can do zero-copy reads from ArrowBuf in Java but
we
> >> >> are missing the interf

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gary Wong]

Hi Patrick and Mentors

Thank you for the input and guidance.

I have visited the following page that you mentioned, it looks there are
some broken links.
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#graduation_check_list

I paste two key sections here as a checklist for verification

   -

   Preparations
   -

  Complete (and sign off) tasks documented in the status file
  <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-status>
  Yes, it is up-to-date
  -

  Ensure suitable names
  <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-names> for
  project name and product names
  Approved, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95
  -

  Demonstrate ability to create Apache releases
  <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#releases>
  Release 8 versions and another one is WIP, involved 3 release managers
  -

  Demonstrate community readiness
  <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community>
  Our contributors come from different companies and show the diversity
  and working on different components, all changes have been reviewed and
  trackable. we have an open, positive and inclusive atmosphere for the
  discussion
  -

  Ensure Mentors
  
<https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor>
  and IPMC
  
<https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29>
  have no remaining issues
  <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-issues>
  We have taken actions on issues from the discussion of graduation and
  fulfilled the Apache maturity assessment

  
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg7jLFp-ec-TmW96mZbXM/edit?usp=sharing
  -

   Decide upon destination
   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject-or-top-level>
   Would be Top-Level Project
   -

   Prepare a resolution
   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution> *(top
   level candidates only)*.
   We will prepare our resolution according to

   
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#submission_of_the_resolution_to_the_board
   template

   
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/podling-tlp-resolution.txt
   and some samples
   https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CRUNCH/Graduation+Resolution

   https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Graduation+Resolution
   https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DATAFU/Graduation+Resolution
   https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Graduation+Resolution
   The resolution should be proposed on the general incubator list
before a *VOTE
   <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>* is started to allow
   feedback
   -

   Subproject acceptance *VOTE*
   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject-acceptance>
   by destination Project *(*subproject* candidates only)*
   NA
   -

   Incubator PMC (IPMC)
   
<https://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29>
   :
   -

  For top level candidates, this is a recommendation *VOTE*
  
<https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#ipmc-top-level-recommendation>
  See below.

  -

  For subproject candidates, this is a graduation approval *VOTE*
  
<https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject-graduation>
  NA
  -

   Final hand-over
   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#notes-on-hand-over>
   -

   Consider post graduation tasks
   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#project-first-steps>


Graduation to a top level project requires:

   -

   a charter for your project
   https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#preparing_a_charter
   -

   a positive community graduation VOTE
   <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>

   https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community_graduation_vote
   -

   a positive IPMC recommendation VOTE
   <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>
   I have not found a template for this vote, but we can refer to other
   project's vote.
   Samples

   
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201709.mbox/%3CCAOqetn_+Oub4Gtr4=hOv=cLeMYB0i=xeewkoxibpg1v+cwa...@mail.gmail.com%3E
   -

   the acceptance of the resolution
   <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution> by
   the Board


so our next step would be to prepare a resolution, please help to verify it
and guide us to complete those steps for graduation, Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary.


On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> ps.
>
> &

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Let me summarize the discussion on graduation, Please refer to this email
thread for details.

1) We have completed the website of Mnemonic that is required before
graduation
http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/

2) We have filled the Apache project maturity assessment for Mnemonic and
fixed all gaps that would be helpful for graduation
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg7jLFp-ec-TmW96mZbXM/edit?usp=sharing

3) Many contributed have voted +1s for this graduation

Please add yours if any before we are starting graduation votes, Thanks!

Cheers
Gary



On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>
> Looks no new issues crop up for a few days, and many contributors are
> positive and voted +1s for graduation, no negative from our community, so I
> think this discussion could be settled down today and proceed to collect
> votes from our community and IPMCs for graduation, please guide us if any
> missing, misunderstanding and suggestion, Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>>
>> Looks we have resolved all the issues that you have pointed out for
>> graduation, meanwhile, there are more contributors +1 for our project's
>> graduation so, could we start the community graduation vote and IPMC
>> graduation vote according to the following chart extracted from
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community ? Thanks!
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:
>>
>>> +1 support for graduation.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Wei HE  wrote:
>>> > +1 support for graduation.
>>> >
>>> > Wei HE
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the
>>> readiness
>>> >> for the graduation.
>>> >>
>>> >> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
>>> >> comments for your review, Thanks!
>>> >>
>>> >> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me
>>> to
>>> >> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're
>>> on
>>> >> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
>>> >>
>>> >> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of
>>> website. we
>>> >> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link from
>>> >> navigator menu on website.
>>> >>
>>> >> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item,
>>> from
>>> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
>>> which
>>> >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed) and
>>> >> MNEMONIC-356(WIP)
>>> >>
>>> >> *CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
>>> committers
>>> >> or from contributors.  If I take
>>> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
>>> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an
>>> example, the
>>> >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.*
>>> >>
>>> >> We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit messages
>>> must
>>> >> contain Apache JIRA number and title.
>>> >>
>>> >> *LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
>>> >> *most*)*
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source
>>> repository
>>> >> have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that generated by
>>> mvn
>>> >> building process would be excluded and all other project files have
>>> been
>>> >> properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.
>>> >>
>>> >> *RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/
>>> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/> b

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs

Looks no new issues crop up for a few days, and many contributors are
positive and voted +1s for graduation, no negative from our community, so I
think this discussion could be settled down today and proceed to collect
votes from our community and IPMCs for graduation, please guide us if any
missing, misunderstanding and suggestion, Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>
> Looks we have resolved all the issues that you have pointed out for
> graduation, meanwhile, there are more contributors +1 for our project's
> graduation so, could we start the community graduation vote and IPMC
> graduation vote according to the following chart extracted from
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community ? Thanks!
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:
>
>> +1 support for graduation.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Wei HE  wrote:
>> > +1 support for graduation.
>> >
>> > Wei HE
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the
>> readiness
>> >> for the graduation.
>> >>
>> >> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
>> >> comments for your review, Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
>> >> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
>> >> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
>> >>
>> >> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of website.
>> we
>> >> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link from
>> >> navigator menu on website.
>> >>
>> >> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item,
>> from
>> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
>> which
>> >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*
>> >>
>> >> Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed) and
>> >> MNEMONIC-356(WIP)
>> >>
>> >> *CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
>> committers
>> >> or from contributors.  If I take
>> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
>> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an example,
>> the
>> >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.*
>> >>
>> >> We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit messages
>> must
>> >> contain Apache JIRA number and title.
>> >>
>> >> *LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
>> >> *most*)*
>> >>
>> >> Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source repository
>> >> have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that generated by
>> mvn
>> >> building process would be excluded and all other project files have
>> been
>> >> properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.
>> >>
>> >> *RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/
>> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/> but that doesn't include
>> any
>> >> download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
>> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/> does include
>> download
>> >> links to the proper release mirrors.*
>> >>
>> >> That has been corrected by replacing it with the link
>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
>> >>
>> >> *RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).*
>> >>
>> >> Yes, we started with the community vote for releasing and the result
>> >> explicitly shows binding and non-binding votes.
>> >>
>> >> *RE30 - Again, not using mirror.*
>> >>
>> >> Looks no mirror link in this field.
>> >>
>> >> *RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary
>> >> releases."*
>> >>
>> >> Yes it is and corrected
>> >&g

Re: Mnemonic board report is due.

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

We have submitted the board report as below for your review and approval,
Thanks!

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2017

Very truly yours,
Gary.


On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> Thank you for reminding us, we will get it done today.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>
>> Hi folks, the board report is due tomorrow. Please get it submitted asap.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>
>

Re: Mnemonic board report is due.

[Gary Wong]

Hi Patrick,

Thank you for reminding us, we will get it done today.

Very truly yours,
Gary


On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Hi folks, the board report is due tomorrow. Please get it submitted asap.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

+1 build pass, all test cases pass, no major bugs pending.

Very truly yours
Gary


On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.9.0-incubating, release candidate rc2. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic
> .git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.9.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
> 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs

Looks we have resolved all the issues that you have pointed out for
graduation, meanwhile, there are more contributors +1 for our project's
graduation so, could we start the community graduation vote and IPMC
graduation vote according to the following chart extracted from
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community ? Thanks!

[image: Inline image 1]

Very truly yours
Gary

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:

> +1 support for graduation.
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Wei HE  wrote:
> > +1 support for graduation.
> >
> > Wei HE
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the
> readiness
> >> for the graduation.
> >>
> >> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
> >> comments for your review, Thanks!
> >>
> >> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
> >> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
> >> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
> >>
> >> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of website.
> we
> >> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link from
> >> navigator menu on website.
> >>
> >> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item,
> from
> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
> which
> >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*
> >>
> >> Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed) and
> >> MNEMONIC-356(WIP)
> >>
> >> *CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
> committers
> >> or from contributors.  If I take
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an example,
> the
> >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.*
> >>
> >> We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit messages
> must
> >> contain Apache JIRA number and title.
> >>
> >> *LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
> >> *most*)*
> >>
> >> Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source repository
> >> have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that generated by mvn
> >> building process would be excluded and all other project files have been
> >> properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.
> >>
> >> *RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/
> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/> but that doesn't include
> any
> >> download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/> does include download
> >> links to the proper release mirrors.*
> >>
> >> That has been corrected by replacing it with the link
> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
> >>
> >> *RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).*
> >>
> >> Yes, we started with the community vote for releasing and the result
> >> explicitly shows binding and non-binding votes.
> >>
> >> *RE30 - Again, not using mirror.*
> >>
> >> Looks no mirror link in this field.
> >>
> >> *RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary
> >> releases."*
> >>
> >> Yes it is and corrected
> >>
> >> *RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.*
> >>
> >> Sorry I forgot it and corrected it by the Apache Jira ticket
> MNEMONIC-357
> >> (resolved) as well as MNEMONIC-358 (resolved)
> >>
> >> *QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use
> >> linters, sonar, etc.*
> >>
> >> Yes, we will investigate this plugin and apply them to project later, as
> >> for now, the QU10 has been replaced with "YES. The project records all
> bugs
> >> in the Apache’s JIRA issue tracker. Developer also uses Eclipse or
> Intellij
> >> IDEA to improve their code quality."
> >>
> >> *QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
> >> reported.  If you haven&#

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the readiness
for the graduation.

For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
comments for your review, Thanks!

*CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*

The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of website. we
also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link from
navigator menu on website.

*CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item, from
my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest" which
today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*

Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed) and
MNEMONIC-356(WIP)

*CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from committers
or from contributors.  If I take
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an example, the
commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.*

We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit messages must
contain Apache JIRA number and title.

*LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
*most*)*

Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source repository
have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that generated by mvn
building process would be excluded and all other project files have been
properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.

*RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/
<http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/> but that doesn't include any
download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
<http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/> does include download
links to the proper release mirrors.*

That has been corrected by replacing it with the link
http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/

*RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).*

Yes, we started with the community vote for releasing and the result
explicitly shows binding and non-binding votes.

*RE30 - Again, not using mirror.*

Looks no mirror link in this field.

*RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary releases."*

Yes it is and corrected

*RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.*

Sorry I forgot it and corrected it by the Apache Jira ticket MNEMONIC-357
(resolved) as well as MNEMONIC-358 (resolved)

*QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use
linters, sonar, etc.*

Yes, we will investigate this plugin and apply them to project later, as
for now, the QU10 has been replaced with "YES. The project records all bugs
in the Apache’s JIRA issue tracker. Developer also uses Eclipse or Intellij
IDEA to improve their code quality."

*QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
reported.  If you haven't had one reported, there's no way to confirm this.*

The QU20 has been replaced with "YES. Security issues would be treated with
the highest priority, computing service and memory service are separated
from other modules and defined by interfaces, so security concerns could be
largely mitigated by introduced this design at first place.", that this
emphasize we consider the security aspect from design viewpoint as well.

*QU50 - I see that MNEMONIC-203/217 have been open for around 6 months.*

We have asked owners to properly handle those tickets

*CO10 - Github shows two pull requests open without any commentary or
questions from the project's committers.  Why is that?*

They are stalled PRs, we have asked the owner to properly revoke them.

*The full checklist as follows for you to add comments*
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg7jLFp-ec-TmW96mZbXM/edit?usp=sharing

Very truly yours
Gary





On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 2:25 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> Huge +1 to that.
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:18 PM Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
>
> > The "checklist" suppose to just provide guide for readiness our
> > graduation. It was NOT mandatory checklist.
> >
> > This should be used primarily for self check to make sure we are ready
> for
> > graduation.
> >
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:50 PM, John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> So first, I'll say its always great to see a podling aim to graduate.
> Its
> >> not up to me to measure whether the podling has been successful or not,
> >> but
> >> instead the IPMC as a whole.  I can give you some feedback on the APMM
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

Thank you very much for the careful review and guidance, it is very helpful
and informative, we will follow up and fix all of the issues that you
pointed out for us, Thanks again!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:50 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> So first, I'll say its always great to see a podling aim to graduate.  Its
> not up to me to measure whether the podling has been successful or not, but
> instead the IPMC as a whole.  I can give you some feedback on the APMM
> assessment, but I'll point out that I'm not a fan of this form and
> completing this form is not a requirement for graduation.
>
> So please, when reviewing the below list, understand that completing this
> is not a requirement for graduation.  Even then, podlings who think they
> pass it may be missing things.
>
> CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.
>
> CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item, from
> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest" which
> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.
>
> CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from committers
> or from contributors.  If I take https://github.com/
> apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60 as an example, the commit message says
> nothing about provenance of the source code.
>
> LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
> *most*)
>
> RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/ but that
> doesn't include any download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.
> apache.org/downloads/ does include download links to the proper release
> mirrors.
>
> RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).
>
> RE30 - Again, not using mirror.
>
> RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary releases."
>
> RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.
>
> QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use
> linters, sonar, etc.
>
> QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
> reported.  If you haven't had one reported, there's no way to confirm this.
>
> QU50 - I see that MNEMONIC-203/217 have been open for around 6 months.
>
> CO10 - Github shows two pull requests open without any commentary or
> questions from the project's committers.  Why is that?
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
>> Hi John, Our Mentors and PPMCs
>>
>> We have prepared Apache Maturity checklist for your evaluation, please
>> guide us to graduate our project, thanks.
>>
>> All comments and suggestions are welcome!
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John
>>>
>>> Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please take a look at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
>>>> mnemonic/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John
>>>>>
>>>>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review
>>>>> it, Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we
>>>>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament >>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you
>>>>>>> should be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John, Our Mentors and PPMCs

We have prepared Apache Maturity checklist for your evaluation, please
guide us to graduate our project, thanks.

All comments and suggestions are welcome!

Cheers!
Gary


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi John
>
> Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
>> Please take a look at https://dist.apache.org/rep
>> os/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John
>>>
>>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review
>>> it, Thanks!
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi John
>>>>
>>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we
>>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Very truly yours
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>>>>
>>>>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you
>>>>> should be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
>>>>> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases should
>>>>> be archived.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find anything
>>>>> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
>>>>> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want
>>>>> to grab your specific version from there.
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page,
>>>>>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the
>>>>>> suggestion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
>>>>>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
>>>>>>> downloading the latest one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament <
>>>>>>> johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Uma
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review,
>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for the guidance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>>>>>>>> uma.ga

Re: MNEMONIC-349 do we need to show previous release manage in the website?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Wen Tong

How about showing all release manager in order and mark the current release
manager with an asterisk suffix? Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary



On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:

> HI Developers:
>   To make corrections, Johnu is our new release manager, but still
> want your options whether we should mention the ex-release manager's
> name on the updated page?
>   Thanks!
> Wen
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:
> > HI Developers:
> >   Ohnu has become our new release manager, we will update the website
> > to reflect this change, do you want to mention the previous release
> > manager's name on the website? please let me know
> >   Thanks!
> > Wen
>

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop/Spark Integration pages published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi, there are two pages about Apache Hadoop and Spark that has been
published on our project website as follows for your reference. Thanks!

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/sparkusecases.html
http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/hadoopusecases.html

Very truly yours,
Gary.

[DISCUSS] Continuous Integration

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi, our project has right now supported the Travis and CircleCI, but both
of them cannot run all of the test cases on their platforms because our
test cases consume too much storage space and time that is limited by the
free plan, I also tried the codefresh they also limit 30 mins for testing.
please let me know if you can recommend more powerful and open-source
friendly service for Mnemonic CI.

Thanks!
Gary.

Re: Afs-site link not working on the mnemonic website

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Yes, it is a bug, please fire up a JIRA ticket for follow-up.  Thanks!

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Yanhui ZHAO  wrote:

> Dear Gary and devs
>
>
> I found the afs-site source link on mnemonic website not working. The link
> directs to: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/tree/asf-site,
> and the request returned a 404 error. Please review.
>
>
> Issue path: https://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ -> Source Code
> -> asf-site
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Yanhui
>
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me

Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> Please take a look at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
> mnemonic/
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
>> Hi John
>>
>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review it,
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John
>>>
>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we
>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>>>
>>>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you should
>>>> be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
>>>> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases should
>>>> be archived.
>>>>
>>>> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find anything
>>>> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
>>>> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want to
>>>> grab your specific version from there.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page,
>>>>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the
>>>>> suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
>>>>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
>>>>>> downloading the latest one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament >>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Uma
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank
>>>>>>>> you very much for the guidance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>>>>>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>>>>>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to
>>>>>>>>> check where
>>>>>>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> assess better?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Uma
>>>>>>>>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review it,
Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi John
>
> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we will
> correct this according to your guidance.
>
> Thanks!
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>
>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you should
>> be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
>> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases should be
>> archived.
>>
>> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find anything
>> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
>> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want to
>> grab your specific version from there.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page,
>>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the
>>> suggestion.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi John,
>>>>
>>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
>>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>
>>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>
>>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
>>>> downloading the latest one.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Uma
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank
>>>>>> you very much for the guidance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>>>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>>>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check
>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
>>>>>>> assess better?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Uma
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George"  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a
>>>>>>> stable
>>>>>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance
>>>>>>> of our
>>>>>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
>>>>>>> >>Mnemonic
>>>>>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server
>>>>>>> hosted
>>>>>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated
>>>>>>> community
>&

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we will
correct this according to your guidance.

Thanks!
Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>
> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you should be
> linking to your mirrored artifacts.
> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases should be
> archived.
>
> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find anything
> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want to
> grab your specific version from there.
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page,
>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the
>> suggestion.
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>
>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>
>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
>>> downloading the latest one.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Uma
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank
>>>>> you very much for the guidance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check
>>>>>> where
>>>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
>>>>>> assess better?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Uma
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George"  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a
>>>>>> stable
>>>>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
>>>>>> >>Mnemonic
>>>>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server
>>>>>> hosted
>>>>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated
>>>>>> community
>>>>>> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our
>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project
>>>>>> README.md
>>>>>> >> file. Please review it as follows.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website,
>>>>>> >>please
>>>>>> >> clear brow

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John,

The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page, Please
refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the suggestion.

Very truly yours
Gary


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> You can download all versions of the package from Apache distribution site
> that is linked from the following web page
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>
> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>
> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
> downloading the latest one.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Uma
>>>
>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank you
>>> very much for the guidance.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>>
>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check
>>>> where
>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
>>>> assess better?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Uma
>>>>
>>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George"  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a
>>>> stable
>>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of
>>>> our
>>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
>>>> >>Mnemonic
>>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server
>>>> hosted
>>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated community
>>>> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our
>>>> Apache
>>>> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project
>>>> README.md
>>>> >> file. Please review it as follows.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website,
>>>> >>please
>>>> >> clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Very truly yours.
>>>> >> Gary
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament <
>>>> johndam...@apache.org>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > Hi patrick,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I recently raised an issue with the website to the team.  I
>>>> personally
>>>> >> > would like to see that fixed before a graduation.  Specifically
>>>> saying
>>>> >> that
>>>> >> > you need to learn it from github.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > John
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase
>>>> >> community
>>>> >> > > involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I
>>>> >>feel
>>>> >> > that
>>>> >> > > my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is
>>>> >>interest
>>>> >> in
>>>> >> > > the community I would now be in favor, but up to you - do you
>>>> feel
>>>> >> you&

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John,

You can download all versions of the package from Apache distribution site
that is linked from the following web page
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases

Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases

We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
downloading the latest one.

Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>
> John
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong  wrote:
>
>> Hi Uma
>>
>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank you
>> very much for the guidance.
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>
>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check where
>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
>>> assess better?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Uma
>>>
>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George"  wrote:
>>>
>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a stable
>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of our
>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
>>> >>Mnemonic
>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server hosted
>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated community
>>> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our
>>> Apache
>>> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project README.md
>>> >> file. Please review it as follows.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>> >>
>>> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website,
>>> >>please
>>> >> clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.
>>> >>
>>> >> Very truly yours.
>>> >> Gary
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament >> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi patrick,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I recently raised an issue with the website to the team.  I
>>> personally
>>> >> > would like to see that fixed before a graduation.  Specifically
>>> saying
>>> >> that
>>> >> > you need to learn it from github.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > John
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt 
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase
>>> >> community
>>> >> > > involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I
>>> >>feel
>>> >> > that
>>> >> > > my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is
>>> >>interest
>>> >> in
>>> >> > > the community I would now be in favor, but up to you - do you feel
>>> >> you're
>>> >> > > ready to graduate at this point?
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Regards,
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Patrick
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
>>> ddu...@apache.org>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >> On the diversity issue, we are trying to solve that with new
>>> >> committers
>>> >> > >> from different organizations. We have had contributions from
>>> other
>>> >> > >> companies like Cisco recently.
>>> >> > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gary Wong]

Hi Uma

Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank you
very much for the guidance.

Very truly yours
Gary


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma 
wrote:

> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
> What is the mentors call on this?
>
> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check where
> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
> assess better?
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George"  wrote:
>
> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a stable
> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of our
> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear John and Patrick,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
> >>Mnemonic
> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server hosted
> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated community
> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our Apache
> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project README.md
> >> file. Please review it as follows.
> >>
> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
> >>
> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website,
> >>please
> >> clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.
> >>
> >> Very truly yours.
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi patrick,
> >> >
> >> > I recently raised an issue with the website to the team.  I personally
> >> > would like to see that fixed before a graduation.  Specifically saying
> >> that
> >> > you need to learn it from github.
> >> >
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase
> >> community
> >> > > involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I
> >>feel
> >> > that
> >> > > my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is
> >>interest
> >> in
> >> > > the community I would now be in favor, but up to you - do you feel
> >> you're
> >> > > ready to graduate at this point?
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > > Patrick
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> On the diversity issue, we are trying to solve that with new
> >> committers
> >> > >> from different organizations. We have had contributions from other
> >> > >> companies like Cisco recently.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> This space is about to heat up soon and we will see more
> >>committers.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> cheers
> >> > >> debo
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Patrick Hunt 
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > I've mentored a number of podlings over the years and this one if
> >> very
> >> > >> well
> >> > >> > run and is on a good trajectory. As noted my main concern is
> >>about
> >> > >> > diversity - in particular "self-sustaining and self-governing
> >> > >> communities".
> >> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
> >> > >> > That's pretty clear and concise statements from the Apache
> >>community
> >> > as
> >> > >> a
> >> > >> > whole as to what it takes. The podling is following "the apache
> >>way"
> >> > >> quite
> >> > >> > well, so it's really the sustaining part for me. Ensuring that
> >> > >> community is
> >> > >> > being built and the community as a whole is owning the process.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Hope this helps, regards,
&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Dear John and Patrick,

Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of Mnemonic
Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server hosted
website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated community
members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our Apache
server hosted website by providing a forward link in project README.md
file. Please review it as follows.

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/

Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website, please
clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.

Very truly yours.
Gary


On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> Hi patrick,
>
> I recently raised an issue with the website to the team.  I personally
> would like to see that fixed before a graduation.  Specifically saying that
> you need to learn it from github.
>
> John
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>
> > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase community
> > involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I feel
> that
> > my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is interest in
> > the community I would now be in favor, but up to you - do you feel you're
> > ready to graduate at this point?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> wrote:
> >
> >> On the diversity issue, we are trying to solve that with new committers
> >> from different organizations. We have had contributions from other
> >> companies like Cisco recently.
> >>
> >> This space is about to heat up soon and we will see more committers.
> >>
> >> cheers
> >> debo
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >>
> >> > I've mentored a number of podlings over the years and this one if very
> >> well
> >> > run and is on a good trajectory. As noted my main concern is about
> >> > diversity - in particular "self-sustaining and self-governing
> >> communities".
> >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
> >> > That's pretty clear and concise statements from the Apache community
> as
> >> a
> >> > whole as to what it takes. The podling is following "the apache way"
> >> quite
> >> > well, so it's really the sustaining part for me. Ensuring that
> >> community is
> >> > being built and the community as a whole is owning the process.
> >> >
> >> > Hope this helps, regards,
> >> >
> >> > Patrick
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > For me the best test if a podling is ready for graduation is they do
> >> it
> >> > > (mostly) for themselves. So, Mnemonic, I'd encourage you to search
> >> > through
> >> > > the incubator mailing list archives for examples of other podlings
> >> > running
> >> > > a graduation vote and submitting the result to the IPMC. Then, do
> it.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm glad to see the recent move to bring in more RMs in response to
> >> the
> >> > > earlier feedback, now that everyone is aware of it. Sorry, I didn't
> >> think
> >> > > that the incubator report might not be read back.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Patrick,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I read it.  I'm curious, did you or Andrew share your feedback with
> >> > >> Mnemonic directly?  I've noticed that podlings sometimes don't see
> >> the
> >> > >> input, and don't receive responses the way TLPs do.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> For the podling's information, we do also maintain a whimsy page of
> >> all
> >> > >> approved board reports per project, Mnemonic can see that
> information
> >> > >> here:
> >> > >> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Mnemonic
> >> > >>
> >> > >> When I see a podling receiving 5 +1's on a dev list release vote,
> >> > that's a
> >> > >> great sign.
> >> > >&

Fwd: [DISCUSS][UPDATE] Durable Query Model Proposal

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Devs.

The following ticket has been resolved, it defined the interface for
durable memory service based query engine, the user could use this low
level engine to query their durable objects in very efficient way, i.e.
using native code to filter out business durable objects from large
capacity of durable memory service. it also is flexible for the underlying
implementation of query engine since it does not assume how the query
engine works. so for example, memory service provider could simply make use
of SQLite as query engine or use customized one to avoid copying from
durable objects.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-326

Best Regards.
Gary.



-- Forwarded message --
Hi Devs.

Mnemonic has been evolved to be able to support more sophistical features,
so I propose to design and implement another new model for Mnemonic that is
Durable Query Model (DQM).

DQM would build on top of durable collection and memory services. DQM is
also able to take fully advantages of Durable Object Model (DOM) and
Durable Computing Model (DCM) for high performance querying and updating on
Massive Linked Business Object Sets (MLBOS).

DQM should allows to distribute and sharing all or part of MLBOS across
nodes even data centers without heavily depending on frameworks to burden
developers.

The following diagram shows the concept architecture of this new model


​
​
The applications could use 3 querying forms with hints to query their
MLBOS. the model should provide enough flexibility to accommodate best
Query Engines working on durable collections and durable memory services.

The Collection Query Engine is inspired by CQEngine
https://github.com/npgall/cqengine
Thanks Niall Gallagher for join us and help me to learn his project

There are lot we can create for DQM around durable models with various
platforms/technologies e.g. cloud, container, hpc.

The DQM would be next big feature for Mnemonic, Please review arch. any
idea, suggestion and feedback are warmly welcome, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> Hi Gary,
> I think, there is some error in the attachment. I am not able
> to view it.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been evolved to be able to support more sophistical
> features,
> > so I propose to design and implement another new model for Mnemonic that
> is
> > Durable Query Model (DQM).
> >
> > DQM would build on top of durable collection and memory services. DQM is
> > also able to take fully advantages of Durable Object Model (DOM) and
> > Durable Computing Model (DCM) for high performance querying and updating
> on
> > Massive Linked Business Object Sets (MLBOS).
> >
> > DQM should allows to distribute and sharing all or part of MLBOS across
> > nodes even data centers without heavily depending on frameworks to burden
> > developers.
> >
> > The following diagram shows the concept architecture of this new model
> >
> >
> > ​
> > The applications could use 3 querying forms with hints to query their
> > MLBOS. the model should provide enough flexibility to accommodate best
> > Query Engines working on durable collections and durable memory services.
> >
> > The Collection Query Engine is inspired by CQEngine
> > https://github.com/npgall/cqengine
> > Thanks Niall Gallagher for join us and help me to learn his project
> >
> > There are lot we can create for DQM around durable models with various
> > platforms/technologies e.g. cloud, container, hpc.
> >
> > The DQM would be next big feature for Mnemonic, Please review arch. any
> > idea, suggestion and feedback are warmly welcome, Thanks!
> >
> > Very truly yours.
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
>

[ANNOUNCE] Use case diagrams of DCM and MS published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Devs.

The diagrams about the use cases of durable computing model and memory
service that have been added to our official project website for your
review and reference, Thanks!

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/dcmusecases.html

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/msusecases.html

Very truly yours
Gary.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Use case diagrams of durable object model published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Thanks.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Paley Shen  wrote:

> Hi Gary,
>
> MNEMONIC-314 is created.
>
> Thanks,
> Peili
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Peili,
> >
> > Please create a JIRA ticket for this issue so we can follow up, Thanks!
> >
> > Very truly yours.
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Paley Shen 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Gary for the diagrams.
> > >
> > > Could you help to remove the dead link (
> > > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/usage.html) after
> > > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/build.html.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Peili
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Devs.
> > > >
> > > > The diagrams about the use cases of durable model have been added to
> > our
> > > > official project website for your review and reference, Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/domusecases.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Very truly yours
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Use case diagrams of durable object model published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Peili,

Please create a JIRA ticket for this issue so we can follow up, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary


On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Paley Shen  wrote:

> Thanks Gary for the diagrams.
>
> Could you help to remove the dead link (
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/usage.html) after
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/build.html.
>
> Thanks,
> Peili
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs.
> >
> > The diagrams about the use cases of durable model have been added to our
> > official project website for your review and reference, Thanks!
> >
> > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/domusecases.html
> >
> >
> > Very truly yours
> > Gary
> >
>

[ANNOUNCE] Use case diagrams of durable object model published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Devs.

The diagrams about the use cases of durable model have been added to our
official project website for your review and reference, Thanks!

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/domusecases.html


Very truly yours
Gary

Re: [DISCUSS] Durable Query Model Proposal

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Johnu, Thanks for pointing it out, looks the Apache mail system removes
embedded picture from mail body, Let me attach it here for your reference,
Thank!


​


On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> Hi Gary,
> I think, there is some error in the attachment. I am not able
> to view it.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been evolved to be able to support more sophistical
> features,
> > so I propose to design and implement another new model for Mnemonic that
> is
> > Durable Query Model (DQM).
> >
> > DQM would build on top of durable collection and memory services. DQM is
> > also able to take fully advantages of Durable Object Model (DOM) and
> > Durable Computing Model (DCM) for high performance querying and updating
> on
> > Massive Linked Business Object Sets (MLBOS).
> >
> > DQM should allows to distribute and sharing all or part of MLBOS across
> > nodes even data centers without heavily depending on frameworks to burden
> > developers.
> >
> > The following diagram shows the concept architecture of this new model
> >
> >
> > ​
> > The applications could use 3 querying forms with hints to query their
> > MLBOS. the model should provide enough flexibility to accommodate best
> > Query Engines working on durable collections and durable memory services.
> >
> > The Collection Query Engine is inspired by CQEngine
> > https://github.com/npgall/cqengine
> > Thanks Niall Gallagher for join us and help me to learn his project
> >
> > There are lot we can create for DQM around durable models with various
> > platforms/technologies e.g. cloud, container, hpc.
> >
> > The DQM would be next big feature for Mnemonic, Please review arch. any
> > idea, suggestion and feedback are warmly welcome, Thanks!
> >
> > Very truly yours.
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
>

[DISCUSS] Durable Query Model Proposal

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Devs.

Mnemonic has been evolved to be able to support more sophistical features,
so I propose to design and implement another new model for Mnemonic that is
Durable Query Model (DQM).

DQM would build on top of durable collection and memory services. DQM is
also able to take fully advantages of Durable Object Model (DOM) and
Durable Computing Model (DCM) for high performance querying and updating on
Massive Linked Business Object Sets (MLBOS).

DQM should allows to distribute and sharing all or part of MLBOS across
nodes even data centers without heavily depending on frameworks to burden
developers.

The following diagram shows the concept architecture of this new model


​
The applications could use 3 querying forms with hints to query their
MLBOS. the model should provide enough flexibility to accommodate best
Query Engines working on durable collections and durable memory services.

The Collection Query Engine is inspired by CQEngine
https://github.com/npgall/cqengine
Thanks Niall Gallagher for join us and help me to learn his project

There are lot we can create for DQM around durable models with various
platforms/technologies e.g. cloud, container, hpc.

The DQM would be next big feature for Mnemonic, Please review arch. any
idea, suggestion and feedback are warmly welcome, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary

Re: Status of website?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John,

Thank you very much for the review and mentoring, Yes, as Johnu mentioned,
we are going to update the website and to complete it as soon as possible,
you also remind us to use the new ASF branding that will be our priority
task, Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Johnu George (johnugeo) <
johnu...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>  Thanks for reaching out. We have recently opened two Jiras to
> track the same issues. We are updating the website content now.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On 6/23/17, 8:11 AM, "John D. Ament"  wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Congratulations on your recent release.
>
> I wanted to reach out to you because your website has a couple of
> issues.
>
> 1. You're using the old incubator logo/feather.  When do you plan to
> update
> your ASF branding?
>
> 2. You include some text "This site is under construction... Please
> learn
> it from Github instead." when do you plan to update the website?
>
> John
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gary Wong]

Hi Patrick, Debo,

It is my bad, I suggest to use the "[CANCEL]", as afterthought, for this
case, we should use "[UPDATE]", that indicates only the content of vote has
been changed nothing else. Thanks

Very truly yours
Gary


On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> I'm confused, I thought this rc (rc1) voting was cancelled:
>
> "[CANCEL] Cancelling the vote due to Formatting woes ..."
>
> in such cases a new vote should be started, with a new rc number, in order
> to remove any ambiguity/confusion.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Chunyong He  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chunyong
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Gary Wong  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > License is okay, all tests pass, keys are correct
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > > 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > > 8.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.8.0-incubating:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > mnemonic.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.8.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is 2941b87:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=2941b87f7e28c898cbecb35c845e5b4cd90bc197
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > > 8.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> items
> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> > The
> > > > please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Debo~ Dutta, on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gary Wong]

+1 (non-binding)
License is okay, all tests pass, keys are correct

Thanks
Gary


On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 8.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.8.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.8.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 2941b87:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=2941b87f7e28c898cbecb35c845e5b4cd90bc197
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 8.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Debo~ Dutta, on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Gary Wong]

Hi Debo,

Thank you for the review and sorry for some missing steps, I will add them
up soon, Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:

> Thanks ... I am following the process (pretty well written) and have an
> issue with GPG versions ... hoping to solve it soon and send out email
>
> Will add some more details after I am done
>
> debo
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>
>> Hi Patrick, Debo and folks
>>
>> We have updated the "How to release" page according to your feedback,
>> Please review it again, Thanks!
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+release
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Patrick and Johnu for the review and guiding, as Johnu mentioned,
>>> we will update the wiki and website according to your feedback, also add
>>> Johnu's slides to web page.  Thanks!
>>>
>>> Very truly yours.
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Johnu George (johnugeo) <
>>> johnu...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Patrick for the suggestions. We had a talk recently in Apache
>>>> BigData Conference 2017  held at FL.  (Slides in
>>>> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/
>>>> Mnemonic.pdf ) We will soon update the website.
>>>>
>>>> On 6/5/17, 11:12 AM, "Patrick Hunt"  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You might add the "how to contrib" to your web site.
>>>> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ Any other updates
>>>> that are
>>>> pending for the web site? (docs seem empty? perhaps just update to
>>>> point t
>>>> content available elsewhere)
>>>>
>>>> Are any new http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/talks/ available?
>>>>
>>>> This would also be a good time to review the incubator status page,
>>>> I
>>>> notice you've probably completed a number of the "work items" (mark
>>>> the
>>>> ones that are not applicable as "NA"?)
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
>>>>
>>>> feedback on how to release:
>>>> * very impressive :-)
>>>> * link the "dockerfile" to the actual dockerfile?
>>>> * for things like 1.1.3.1 (checkout) I'd recommend listing the
>>>> actual
>>>> command. It makes it foolproof for anyone trying to cut a release to
>>>> copy/paste. In my experience the more you can cut out potential for
>>>> error
>>>> the better off you'll be long term.
>>>> * for things like "send XXX email" i've found it helpful to include
>>>> the
>>>> template in the instructions. It's pretty boilerplate with a number
>>>> of
>>>> required bits of data, easier to just include this than expect the
>>>> RM to
>>>> figure it out. Again, smooths the release mechanics and ensures
>>>> anyone can
>>>> pick it up at any time.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Gary Wong 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Patrick, Debo, Uma and Folks.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have written the initial version of "How to release" page for
>>>> your
>>>> > review.
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+
>>>> release
>>>> >
>>>> > @Uma, Thank you very much for constructing our project Wiki
>>>> portal and
>>>> > already added "How to Contribute to Mnemonic" page for us.
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/
>>>> > How+to+Contribute+to+Mnemonic
>>>> >
>>>> > Very truly yours.
>>>> > Gary
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Gary Wong 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Great! Thanks Debo :)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Very truly yours
>>>> >> Gary
>>>> >>
>&

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Gary Wong]

Hi Patrick, Debo and folks

We have updated the "How to release" page according to your feedback,
Please review it again, Thanks!
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+release

Very truly yours
Gary


On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Gary Wong  wrote:

> Thanks Patrick and Johnu for the review and guiding, as Johnu mentioned,
> we will update the wiki and website according to your feedback, also add
> Johnu's slides to web page.  Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours.
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Johnu George (johnugeo) <
> johnu...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Patrick for the suggestions. We had a talk recently in Apache
>> BigData Conference 2017  held at FL.  (Slides in
>> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Mnemonic.pdf
>> ) We will soon update the website.
>>
>> On 6/5/17, 11:12 AM, "Patrick Hunt"  wrote:
>>
>> You might add the "how to contrib" to your web site.
>> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ Any other updates that
>> are
>> pending for the web site? (docs seem empty? perhaps just update to
>> point t
>> content available elsewhere)
>>
>> Are any new http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/talks/ available?
>>
>> This would also be a good time to review the incubator status page, I
>> notice you've probably completed a number of the "work items" (mark
>> the
>> ones that are not applicable as "NA"?)
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
>>
>> feedback on how to release:
>> * very impressive :-)
>> * link the "dockerfile" to the actual dockerfile?
>> * for things like 1.1.3.1 (checkout) I'd recommend listing the actual
>> command. It makes it foolproof for anyone trying to cut a release to
>> copy/paste. In my experience the more you can cut out potential for
>> error
>> the better off you'll be long term.
>> * for things like "send XXX email" i've found it helpful to include
>> the
>> template in the instructions. It's pretty boilerplate with a number of
>> required bits of data, easier to just include this than expect the RM
>> to
>> figure it out. Again, smooths the release mechanics and ensures
>> anyone can
>> pick it up at any time.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Patrick, Debo, Uma and Folks.
>> >
>> > I have written the initial version of "How to release" page for your
>> > review.
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+release
>> >
>> > @Uma, Thank you very much for constructing our project Wiki portal
>> and
>> > already added "How to Contribute to Mnemonic" page for us.
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/
>> > How+to+Contribute+to+Mnemonic
>> >
>> > Very truly yours.
>> > Gary
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Gary Wong 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Great! Thanks Debo :)
>> >>
>> >> Very truly yours
>> >> Gary
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Debojyoti Dutta > >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Gary
>> >>>
>> >>> Thx for the 1st version  happy to help and will add to the
>> notes as
>> >>> I do the release :)
>> >>>
>> >>> debo
>>     >>>
>> >>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Gary Wong 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Got it, Thanks, Let me submit initial version of "how to
>> release" to
>> >>>> wiki page.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Very truly yours.
>> >>>> Gary
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Patrick Hunt 
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Having a "how to release" wiki page (or any kind of living
>> document)
>> >>>>> for
>> >>>>> the project ensures that anyone in the community can release the
>> >>>>> product.
>> >>

Update the dates of work items in project status page

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Mentors and PPMCs

As Patrick advised, we have added the missing dates for work items in
project status page,
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html

Please review those updates that marked as blue font under "incubation work
items" category.

The blue font mark would be removed next week after correction if any.
Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Gary Wong]

Thanks Patrick and Johnu for the review and guiding, as Johnu mentioned, we
will update the wiki and website according to your feedback, also add
Johnu's slides to web page.  Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Johnu George (johnugeo)  wrote:

> Thanks Patrick for the suggestions. We had a talk recently in Apache
> BigData Conference 2017  held at FL.  (Slides in
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Mnemonic.pdf
> ) We will soon update the website.
>
> On 6/5/17, 11:12 AM, "Patrick Hunt"  wrote:
>
> You might add the "how to contrib" to your web site.
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ Any other updates that
> are
> pending for the web site? (docs seem empty? perhaps just update to
> point t
> content available elsewhere)
>
> Are any new http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/talks/ available?
>
> This would also be a good time to review the incubator status page, I
> notice you've probably completed a number of the "work items" (mark the
> ones that are not applicable as "NA"?)
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
>
> feedback on how to release:
> * very impressive :-)
> * link the "dockerfile" to the actual dockerfile?
> * for things like 1.1.3.1 (checkout) I'd recommend listing the actual
> command. It makes it foolproof for anyone trying to cut a release to
> copy/paste. In my experience the more you can cut out potential for
> error
> the better off you'll be long term.
> * for things like "send XXX email" i've found it helpful to include the
> template in the instructions. It's pretty boilerplate with a number of
> required bits of data, easier to just include this than expect the RM
> to
> figure it out. Again, smooths the release mechanics and ensures anyone
> can
> pick it up at any time.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick, Debo, Uma and Folks.
> >
> > I have written the initial version of "How to release" page for your
> > review.
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+release
> >
> > @Uma, Thank you very much for constructing our project Wiki portal
> and
>     > already added "How to Contribute to Mnemonic" page for us.
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/
> > How+to+Contribute+to+Mnemonic
> >
> > Very truly yours.
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Gary Wong 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Great! Thanks Debo :)
> >>
>     >> Very truly yours
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Gary
> >>>
> >>> Thx for the 1st version  happy to help and will add to the
> notes as
> >>> I do the release :)
> >>>
> >>> debo
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Gary Wong 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Got it, Thanks, Let me submit initial version of "how to release"
> to
> >>>> wiki page.
>     >>>>
> >>>> Very truly yours.
> >>>> Gary
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Patrick Hunt 
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Having a "how to release" wiki page (or any kind of living
> document)
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> the project ensures that anyone in the community can release the
> >>>>> product.
> >>>>> This is great for onboarding new RMs, etc...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> ddu...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Thx a lot Gary and Patrick for the tips on release management.
> It
> >>>>> would be
> >>>>> > my 1st so I am going to seamlessly ask for forgiveness :)
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > debo
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Gary Wong]

Hi Patrick, Debo, Uma and Folks.

I have written the initial version of "How to release" page for your review.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+release

@Uma, Thank you very much for constructing our project Wiki portal and
already added "How to Contribute to Mnemonic" page for us.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+Contribute+to+Mnemonic

Very truly yours.
Gary


On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:

> Great! Thanks Debo :)
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary
>>
>> Thx for the 1st version  happy to help and will add to the notes as I
>> do the release :)
>>
>> debo
>>
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>>
>>> Got it, Thanks, Let me submit initial version of "how to release" to
>>> wiki page.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours.
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Having a "how to release" wiki page (or any kind of living document) for
>>>> the project ensures that anyone in the community can release the
>>>> product.
>>>> This is great for onboarding new RMs, etc...
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Debojyoti Dutta 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Thx a lot Gary and Patrick for the tips on release management. It
>>>> would be
>>>> > my 1st so I am going to seamlessly ask for forgiveness :)
>>>> >
>>>> > debo
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Patrick Hunt 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> fyi many projects capture this, some even capture the exact email
>>>> formats
>>>> >> etc..., on their wiki. Typically as a "how to release" page, e.g.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease
>>>> >> http://htrace.incubator.apache.org/building.html
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You might compare to what you've created, however each project
>>>> typically
>>>> >> has it's own special cases.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> For things like "Commit the whole new release candidate folder in the
>>>> >> staged trunk
>>>> >> using the SVN client to commit it all" (and similar) you probably
>>>> should
>>>> >> just give the command to run to simplify things and reduce the
>>>> chances for
>>>> >> error. The more you can make each operation "copy/paste" the more
>>>> likely
>>>> >> you'll have a successful release and easier for the RM. That said
>>>> the more
>>>> >> you can automate the better (typically by adding it to mvn).
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Patrick
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hi Debo
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks you Debo for becoming our new releasing manager, I'm trying
>>>> to
>>>> >>> detail the steps below from my previous releases, hope it can help.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi PPMCs
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Please correct me if any missing or incorrect items below and
>>>> welcome to
>>>> >>> optimize & improve the following steps, Thanks!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 1) Prepare a Linux box (one time setup)
>>>> >>> The commands are running on Linux OS, so please have a Linux box or
>>>> a
>>>> >>> Virtual Machine for releasing
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 2) Prepare your release key if not yet or expired (one time setup)
>>>> >>> https://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generate-key
>>>> >>> Please also put your key fingerprint into your account,
>>>> >>> https://id.apache.org
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 3) Start a GPG agent on your Linux box using the following command
>>>> >>> (before
>>>> >>> releasing)
>>>> >>> $eval 'gpg-agent --da

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Gary Wong]

Great! Thanks Debo :)

Very truly yours
Gary


On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:

> Hi Gary
>
> Thx for the 1st version  happy to help and will add to the notes as I
> do the release :)
>
> debo
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>
>> Got it, Thanks, Let me submit initial version of "how to release" to wiki
>> page.
>>
>> Very truly yours.
>> Gary
>>
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>>
>>> Having a "how to release" wiki page (or any kind of living document) for
>>> the project ensures that anyone in the community can release the product.
>>> This is great for onboarding new RMs, etc...
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Debojyoti Dutta 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thx a lot Gary and Patrick for the tips on release management. It
>>> would be
>>> > my 1st so I am going to seamlessly ask for forgiveness :)
>>> >
>>> > debo
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Patrick Hunt 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> fyi many projects capture this, some even capture the exact email
>>> formats
>>> >> etc..., on their wiki. Typically as a "how to release" page, e.g.
>>> >>
>>> >> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease
>>> >> http://htrace.incubator.apache.org/building.html
>>> >>
>>> >> You might compare to what you've created, however each project
>>> typically
>>> >> has it's own special cases.
>>> >>
>>> >> For things like "Commit the whole new release candidate folder in the
>>> >> staged trunk
>>> >> using the SVN client to commit it all" (and similar) you probably
>>> should
>>> >> just give the command to run to simplify things and reduce the
>>> chances for
>>> >> error. The more you can make each operation "copy/paste" the more
>>> likely
>>> >> you'll have a successful release and easier for the RM. That said the
>>> more
>>> >> you can automate the better (typically by adding it to mvn).
>>> >>
>>> >> Patrick
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Debo
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks you Debo for becoming our new releasing manager, I'm trying to
>>> >>> detail the steps below from my previous releases, hope it can help.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi PPMCs
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please correct me if any missing or incorrect items below and
>>> welcome to
>>> >>> optimize & improve the following steps, Thanks!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 1) Prepare a Linux box (one time setup)
>>> >>> The commands are running on Linux OS, so please have a Linux box or a
>>> >>> Virtual Machine for releasing
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2) Prepare your release key if not yet or expired (one time setup)
>>> >>> https://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generate-key
>>> >>> Please also put your key fingerprint into your account,
>>> >>> https://id.apache.org
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 3) Start a GPG agent on your Linux box using the following command
>>> >>> (before
>>> >>> releasing)
>>> >>> $eval 'gpg-agent --daemon --use-standard-socket'
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 4) Install SVN client on your laptop to upload staged/released
>>> artifacts
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 5) Using SVN client to check out the staged trunk (One time and
>>> Update
>>> >>> before voting)
>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic
>>> >>> This trunk is used to upload the release candidates before voting on
>>> >>> dev@list
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 6) Using SVN client to check out the release trunk (One time and
>>> Update
>>> >>> after voting)
>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic
>>> >>> This trunk is used to upload the releases after voting on
>>> 

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Gary Wong]

Got it, Thanks, Let me submit initial version of "how to release" to wiki
page.

Very truly yours.
Gary

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Having a "how to release" wiki page (or any kind of living document) for
> the project ensures that anyone in the community can release the product.
> This is great for onboarding new RMs, etc...
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:
>
> > Thx a lot Gary and Patrick for the tips on release management. It would
> be
> > my 1st so I am going to seamlessly ask for forgiveness :)
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
> >
> >> fyi many projects capture this, some even capture the exact email
> formats
> >> etc..., on their wiki. Typically as a "how to release" page, e.g.
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease
> >> http://htrace.incubator.apache.org/building.html
> >>
> >> You might compare to what you've created, however each project typically
> >> has it's own special cases.
> >>
> >> For things like "Commit the whole new release candidate folder in the
> >> staged trunk
> >> using the SVN client to commit it all" (and similar) you probably should
> >> just give the command to run to simplify things and reduce the chances
> for
> >> error. The more you can make each operation "copy/paste" the more likely
> >> you'll have a successful release and easier for the RM. That said the
> more
> >> you can automate the better (typically by adding it to mvn).
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Debo
> >>>
> >>> Thanks you Debo for becoming our new releasing manager, I'm trying to
> >>> detail the steps below from my previous releases, hope it can help.
> >>>
> >>> Hi PPMCs
> >>>
> >>> Please correct me if any missing or incorrect items below and welcome
> to
> >>> optimize & improve the following steps, Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> 1) Prepare a Linux box (one time setup)
> >>> The commands are running on Linux OS, so please have a Linux box or a
> >>> Virtual Machine for releasing
> >>>
> >>> 2) Prepare your release key if not yet or expired (one time setup)
> >>> https://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generate-key
> >>> Please also put your key fingerprint into your account,
> >>> https://id.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> 3) Start a GPG agent on your Linux box using the following command
> >>> (before
> >>> releasing)
> >>> $eval 'gpg-agent --daemon --use-standard-socket'
> >>>
> >>> 4) Install SVN client on your laptop to upload staged/released
> artifacts
> >>>
> >>> 5) Using SVN client to check out the staged trunk (One time and Update
> >>> before voting)
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic
> >>> This trunk is used to upload the release candidates before voting on
> >>> dev@list
> >>>
> >>> 6) Using SVN client to check out the release trunk (One time and Update
> >>> after voting)
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic
> >>> This trunk is used to upload the releases after voting on general@list
> >>>
> >>> 7) Using SVN client to checkout the project status file (One time and
> >>> Update after releasing)
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/cont
> >>> ent/projects/mnemonic.xml
> >>>
> >>> 8) Replace the KEYS file contents with yours in both trunk of stage and
> >>> release and then commit the changes using SVN client
> >>>
> >>> 9) run the following command for auto release packaging on project
> >>> directory
> >>> $./build-tools/release.sh   >>> version>
> >>> 
> >>> for example
> >>> $./build-tools/release.sh 0.8.0 0.8.0 rc1
> >>> Note that usually we use the same current version in above command as
> we
> >>> cannot predict whether or not have a new candidate for this release
> >>> before
> >>> voting
> >>> In this step, you may have to input your GPG password to allow gpg to
> >>> sign

[DISCUSSION] Durable Streaming Model

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi folks,

After the study of current streaming frameworks e.g. Spark, Storm,
Gearpump, I think it might be feasible to take the advantage of Mnemonic
durable models to construct a lightwight streaming modules as a durable
near real-time massive object graph based analytics library.

Very truly yours.
Gary

[DISCUSSION] Mnemonic Python Binding

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Folks.

As the Python is one of hottest programming language nowadays, so why not
to have a Python binding for Mnemonic ?

The basic idea is to make Java durable objects available to Python code.
thus Python developer is able to take benefits from durable object model,
even durable computing model.

On top of Mnemonic python binding, we could further construct
Numpy/Pandas/Scipy-like data structures and functionality for vectoring
algorithms with durable features in-place.

Very truly yours.
Gary

Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Debo

Thanks you Debo for becoming our new releasing manager, I'm trying to
detail the steps below from my previous releases, hope it can help.

Hi PPMCs

Please correct me if any missing or incorrect items below and welcome to
optimize & improve the following steps, Thanks!

1) Prepare a Linux box (one time setup)
The commands are running on Linux OS, so please have a Linux box or a
Virtual Machine for releasing

2) Prepare your release key if not yet or expired (one time setup)
https://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generate-key
Please also put your key fingerprint into your account,
https://id.apache.org

3) Start a GPG agent on your Linux box using the following command (before
releasing)
$eval 'gpg-agent --daemon --use-standard-socket'

4) Install SVN client on your laptop to upload staged/released artifacts

5) Using SVN client to check out the staged trunk (One time and Update
before voting)
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic
This trunk is used to upload the release candidates before voting on
dev@list

6) Using SVN client to check out the release trunk (One time and Update
after voting)
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/mnemonic
This trunk is used to upload the releases after voting on general@list

7) Using SVN client to checkout the project status file (One time and
Update after releasing)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/mnemonic.xml

8) Replace the KEYS file contents with yours in both trunk of stage and
release and then commit the changes using SVN client

9) run the following command for auto release packaging on project directory
$./build-tools/release.sh  

for example
$./build-tools/release.sh 0.8.0 0.8.0 rc1
Note that usually we use the same current version in above command as we
cannot predict whether or not have a new candidate for this release before
voting
In this step, you may have to input your GPG password to allow gpg to sign
off artifacts using your private key

10) Prepare the new release candidate folder on stage trunk
please duplicate a folder from latest release candidate on stage trunk and
rename it as current release candidate.
for example: 0.8.0-incubating-rc1
and then empty the src folder

11) Update the CHANGES.txt for current release candidate on stage trunk
a) open the JIRA for Mnemonic project
b) in the overview, click the "Versions"
c) click the latest version that needs to be release, for example
"0.8.0-incubating"
d) click the button "Release Notes" on top-right
e) copy the Text between "Configure Release Notes" and "Edit/Copy Release
Notes"
f) open CHANGES.txt and replace all contents with the one just copied

12) Upload packaged artifacts from Linux box
Please use tools e.g. SCP to download all artifacts suffixed with *.tar.gz
under target/ folder into the src folder of staged trunk

13) Commit the whole new release candidate folder in the staged trunk
using the SVN client to commit it all

14) Prepare a voting mail for dev@list voting
Please refer to the latest vote mail in dev@list

15) Report the voting results on dev@list
if not pass, please prepare next release candidate after issues fixed

16) Prepare a voting mail for general@list voting
Please refer to the latest vote mail in general@list

17) Report the voting results on general@list
if not pass, please prepare next release candidate after issues fixed

18) Submit the voted release candidate to release trunk
a) Please copy the release candidate from staged trunk to release trunk
b) and then remove the rc[x] suffix of the folder, for example,
0.8.0-incubating-rc1 to 0.8.0-incubating
c) commit your new folder into SVN repos using SVN client

19) Update the project status file for the new releasing
Insert a new xml element to mnemonic.xml for new release
for example: "2017-xx-xx the eighth official release."
and then commit it using SVN client

Please also improve it or correct it if any issue, Thanks!

Very truly yours
+Gary

Re: Columnar layout for Mnemonic objects

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Johnu I appreciate that you share the feedback of ApacheCon with us and
your conceptual design.

Yes, in some sense, the runtime layout is in favor of arranging a set of
same type data on a continuous memory space because this way could bring
many benefits from the cache line, SIMD, transferring, space saving.

As you mentioned, the better solution could be of embedding the columnar
layout mechanism to the infrastructure of durable object model with added
annotations, it could take most of benefits from columnar data as well as
providing the same view as object graphs.

The concerns are about the operation cost of columnar data deleting,
continuous memory space extension to accommodate more items and sync. if
index changed. but I believe that could be possible to resolve them all
very well, Thanks!

+1 from me.

Very truly yours.
Gary


On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Johnu George  wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>   I had a great opportunity to talk to many Apache developers during
> the Apache conference held in FL.  Regarding the Mnemonic project, some
> were concerned with the cache efficiency of the generic object model
> supported in Mnemonic.  Most of the applications prefer columnar layout for
> cache efficiency and bulk load operations.  It can be currently supported
> in Mnemonic by generating the layout on demand before the real computing.
> However, the better solution is to move this logic to the storage layer
> where data layout is provided by the user.( We can provide one extra
> annotation field for every durable object?)
>
> Any comments?
>
> Regards,
> Johnu
>

[NEXTFEATURES] Apache Mnemonic (incubating)

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Folks

I believe that the Mnemonic are not only used to make objects just durable
with in-place computing to improve the performance but also to propose a
larger ecosystem for a set of brand new concept and model about how to
manage customer's business data in full life-cycle on top of existing
big-data ecosystem.

My $0.02, the next concept/model would be based on DOM &DCM and towards the
binding with distribution, high reliability, messaging, cloud service and
etc.

Very welcome you can join to propose your ideas, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
+Gary.

Re: [MILESTONE] Apache Mnemonic (incubating) development

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Yes I agree with you, a quick start guide with some example code snippets
would be very helpful for user/developer to get into it, the website of
mnemonic also need re-organized to accommodate it.

For the benchmark, I'm looking forward to carrying out with you
collaboratively for publishing some more unbiased performance results.

Regarding more features, we could create a new thread to discuss about it,
there might be more potential values to our audience. Thanks!

Very truly yours.
+Gary



On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Johnu George (johnugeo)  wrote:

> Great! We should have a quick start guide with usage examples of sessions
> and durable structures.  For Spark and Hadoop, we can publish few benchmark
> results on real workloads.
>
> Looking forward to more feature suggestions
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On 5/10/17, 4:39 PM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>   With the support and contribution from you and our community,
> Mnemonic
> has evolved to integrate with Apache Hadoop© and Apache Spark©. it
> makes
> those two popular computing engines possible to get benefits from
> Durable
> Object Model and Durable Computing Model.
>
>   We continue to enrich features of Mnemonic and add new concept/model
> to
> Mnemonic. we also encourage you to propose ideas, suggestion for
> Mnemonic
> development and introduce more contributors to our community, Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours.
> +Gary.
>
>
>

Re: [MILESTONE] Apache Mnemonic (incubating) development

[Gary Wong]

Yes sure, looks It seems a good timing for us to consider about press to
reach broader audience. please guide us to create one if desired. Thanks!

Very truly yours.
+Gary


On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Wow, that sounds great, kudos!
>
> Have you considered putting out some press with Sally? (Apache Public
> Relations Committee) Seems like a great thing to publicise and use to build
> interest/community.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> >   With the support and contribution from you and our community, Mnemonic
> > has evolved to integrate with Apache Hadoop© and Apache Spark©. it makes
> > those two popular computing engines possible to get benefits from Durable
> > Object Model and Durable Computing Model.
> >
> >   We continue to enrich features of Mnemonic and add new concept/model to
> > Mnemonic. we also encourage you to propose ideas, suggestion for Mnemonic
> > development and introduce more contributors to our community, Thanks!
> >
> > Very truly yours.
> > +Gary.
> >
>

[MILESTONE] Apache Mnemonic (incubating) development

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Folks,

  With the support and contribution from you and our community, Mnemonic
has evolved to integrate with Apache Hadoop© and Apache Spark©. it makes
those two popular computing engines possible to get benefits from Durable
Object Model and Durable Computing Model.

  We continue to enrich features of Mnemonic and add new concept/model to
Mnemonic. we also encourage you to propose ideas, suggestion for Mnemonic
development and introduce more contributors to our community, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
+Gary.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John and PPMCs

As John advised, our community and project mnemonic might be ready to get
graduated, I'd like to start the following votes according to the processes
of http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html with your mentoring
and guidance if no objection today

   - Community graduation vote
   - IPMC recommendation vote

Mnemonic Project Incubation Status
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
Very truly yours
+Gary


On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi John
>
> Thank you for starting this discussion.
>
> Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more people to join
> our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and already get
> interested as i known.
>
> Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business so I think
> that it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in time if
> qualified.
>
> My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic, I'm also
> looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.
>
> Thanks!
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament  wrote:
> > Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
> >
> > After looking at your recent release, your current growth and well
> functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to graduate?
> >
> > John
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

Thank you for starting this discussion.

Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more people to join
our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and already get
interested as i known.

Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business so I think that
it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in time if qualified.

My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic, I'm also
looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.

Thanks!
Very truly yours
Gary


On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament  wrote:
> Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
>
> After looking at your recent release, your current growth and well
functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to graduate?
>
> John
>

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache
Mnemonic 0.7.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 2 non-binding +1s and
no 0 or -1.

* *Binding votes +1s: **
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)
Patrick Hunt (phunt)


** non-binding votes +1s: **Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)

*Project Members Role Info*http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/

**Thanks all**
Cheers
Gary

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

+1 Verified and Tested, Thanks

Gary


On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.7.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 7.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic
> .git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.7.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic
> .git;a=commit;h=73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 7.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
>

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
0.7.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/
dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/src/

The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.7.0-incubating

The release hash is 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/
dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt

The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
please vote:

[ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Very truly yours,
Gary

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache
Mnemonic 0.6.0-incubating passed with 2 binding +1s, 2 non-binding +1s and
no 0 or -1.

* *Binding votes +1s: **
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)


** non-binding votes +1s: * *Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)

*Project Members Role Info*http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/
**Thanks all**
Cheers
Gary


On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.6.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

+1 Building and Testing Pass on servers

Very truly yours.
+Gary


On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.6.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
0.6.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/src/

The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating

The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt

The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
please vote:

[ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Very truly yours,
Gary

[Release] Preparing next release v0.6.0

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Folks,

We are preparing Mnemonic v0.6.0 RC1, Please let me know if any blocker to
this release, Thanks.

Very truly yours.
+Gary.

Re: [DISCUSS] new features

[Gary]

Yes, I agree, but the performance improvement could be one of the values 
Mnemonic could deliver, as you mentioned the durable object model (DOM) could 
establishes a new infrastructure for large set of object graph (e.g. IoT data, 
business models, machine learning/deep learning parameters).

Regarding the durable structures, it would be great useful for user to take 
fully advantages of Mnemonic for their business and research. as Johnu also 
mentioned, Mnemonic might provide the data process/analytics  capabilities 
without need developer to be aware of the computing engines and distribute 
system existing like Hadoop/Spark does.

For the performance, by using the existed frameworks to integrated with 
Mnemonic might not fully exhibit Mnemonic's capabilities, but It could still 
show some extent of benefits if using Mnemonic in some places (e.g.  cache, 
input/output, checkpoint, internal data persist)

In addition, I'd like to add one item to the list you provided. that is the 
durable native computing, because it breaks the barriers to access object 
graphs in the same viewpoint from native code and managed code avoid 
introducing marshal/un-marshal operations.

Very truly yours.
+Gary.

On 3/7/2017 10:10 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
> Johnu: like the durable data structure collection idea. Maybe do solid
> benchmarking along the way too.
>
> Gary?
>
> thx
> debo
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Johnu George (johnugeo) 
> wrote:
>
>> I would like to see the durable form of major datastructures.  Once
>> durable Arrays, Lists, Maps, Sets, Trees(->Graphs) are completely
>> performance tested, we should build the distributed layer (which would be
>> transparent to the user). That way, mnemonic can handle the growing
>> processing/storage needs of the big data applications.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Johnu
>>
>> On 3/7/17, 9:06 PM, "Debojyoti Dutta"  wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Mnemonic has a lot of directions for potential impact  here are
>> some
>> 1) distributed durable key-val
>> 2) durable graph
>> 3) integration with other apache projects
>>
>> Any thoughts on the priority (based on participation)?
>> --
>> -Debo~
>>
>>
>>
>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Opportunity to become Apache Mnemonic Sponsor

[Gary]

Hi Folks

Please join to become our community's sponsor at any amount. see the following 
official website.

_/http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/sponsors/community-sponsor/_

*SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS *

1) RECOGNITION ON EVENT SIGNAGE Logo/listing on conference signage and at 
respective Apache Community booth

2) RECOGNITION IN PRECONFERENCE EMAIL MARKETING Logo/listing under Apache 
Project Community sponsors.

3) KEYNOTE STAGE BRANDING Logo/listing prominently displayed on stage screens.

4) 10X10 EXHIBIT BOOTH IN TECHNOLOGY SHOWCASE Providing excellent mindshare for 
sponsors.

5) (6) CONFERENCE ATTENDEE PASSES Full access conference passes to be 
distributed among pooled sponsors as group decides. 20% discount on additional 
passes.

6) RECOGNITION ON EVENT WEBSITE Prominent listing on website pages.

7) ONSITE RECOGNITION During opening keynote.

Please fill in the project name as Apache Mnemonic (incubating) in the form and 
donate any amount you want, I have been a sponsor of our community and hope you 
too, Thanks!

Very truly yours
+Gary.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.5.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gary]

Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache
Mnemonic 0.5.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 2 non-binding +1s and no 0 
or -1.

*Binding votes +1s:*
Patrick Hunt (phunt)
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)

*non-binding votes +1s:
*Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)

*Thanks all,*
Cheers
Gary


On 3/1/2017 2:45 PM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.5.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.5.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.5.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.5.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gary]

Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache
Mnemonic 0.5.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 2 non-binding +1s and no 0 
or -1.

*Binding votes +1s:*
Patrick Hunt (phunt)
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)

*non-binding votes +1s:
*Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)

*Thanks all,*
Cheers
Gary


On 3/1/2017 2:45 PM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.5.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.5.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.5.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature Roadmap, regular meetings etc

[Gary]

Hi Debo,

We have not yet a JIRA item about the road map for coming release.

For the IRC, I really love the IRC but I found the Slack could be a attractive 
alternative for us to discuss anything about Mnemonic project with the 
following add-on features.

* The ability to directly send files and images to channels is an objective 
benefit Slack has over IRC, which has even less ability to do that than MIME 
email (at least MIME lets you post the base64'd file contents of your image, 
rather than just a clickable link).

* The ability to send long messages or whole source files is an objective 
benefit Slack has over IRC.

* The ability to, by default and without running a secondary service that can 
crash or lose connectivity, log and search channels is an objective Benefit 
Slack has over IRC, which can support that feature only by using bots, and only 
by tunneling results through privmsgs or forcing users to leave the IRC 
protocol itself and visit ancillary web sites.

* The ability to edit and delete messages is an objective benefit Slack has 
over IRC.

[https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10486541] Author: tptacek

The downsides are :
* Slack belongs to a company
* Slack is not totally free, the free plan has

  * Searchable message archives, up to 10k of your team’s most recent messages
  * 10 apps or service integrations
  * Native apps for iOS, Android, Mac & Windows Desktop
  * Two-person voice and video calls
  * 5GB total file storage for the team
  * Two-factor authentication

so if those downsides are not acceptable or favorable, there is a alternative 
choice that is Rocket.chat.
https://rocket.chat
It is totally free and an open source Slack alternative with additional features

  * Audio and Video Conference
  * Built-in Live-chat for Websites
  * Federation
  * Screen-Sharing
  * Self-Registration
  * Theming and Branding

  * No limitation for searching, file storage and so on if self-host it.

Regarding the summary of meetings, My 2 cents, we could post it on dev@list 
instead. because I think JIRA looks more friendly to discuss something specific 
to the ticket.

Thanks.
Very truly yours.


On 3/6/2017 7:28 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> Is there a document or a JIRA item on the roadmap for the upcoming releases?
>
> Would it make sense to have a regular meeting on IRC and then have the
> summary on JIRA?
>
> thx
> -Debo~
>



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Do we use the IRC chatrooms?

[Gary]

I totally agree with you, we must talk to each others to make Mnemonic better.

Thanks.
+Gary.


On 3/3/2017 4:16 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
> We should try to do regular meetings to discuss roadmaps and blockers 
> this will help to grow the community!
>
> debo
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Gary  wrote:
>
>> Hi Debo,
>>
>> Thank you for creating the channels on IRC for use, hope the IRC could
>> help Mnemonic growing.
>>
>> B.R,
>> +Gary
>>
>> On 3/3/2017 3:10 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
>>> Sorry  its #apache-mnemonic-dev  sent the chatrooms in a separate
>>> email ...
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FWIW I had setup the chatroom incubator-mnemonic chatroom on freenode.
>>>> Would love to meet up with fellow mnemonic developers.
>>>>
>>>> debo
>>>>
>>>> From: "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" 
>>>> Date: Friday, March 3, 2017 at 2:59 PM
>>>> To: "dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org" > apache.org
>>>> Subject: Do we use the IRC chatrooms?
>>>>
>>>> Would be good for the devs to be on the chatrooms!
>>>>
>>>> debo
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Hello!

[Gary]

Hi Johnu,

Welcome you to join our community, I'm also looking forward to working on 
Mnemonic with you closely. Thanks.

B.R,
+Gary.

On 3/3/2017 3:56 PM, Johnu George (johnugeo) wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>  Excited to be part of this group. Coming from a background of 
> distributed systems and processing, I feel this project to have huge 
> potential for future computing needs.  Looking forward to actively contribute 
> and learn more stuff!
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Do we use the IRC chatrooms?

[Gary]

Hi Debo,

Thank you for creating the channels on IRC for use, hope the IRC could help 
Mnemonic growing.

B.R,
+Gary

On 3/3/2017 3:10 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
> Sorry  its #apache-mnemonic-dev  sent the chatrooms in a separate
> email ...
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) 
> wrote:
>
>> FWIW I had setup the chatroom incubator-mnemonic chatroom on freenode.
>> Would love to meet up with fellow mnemonic developers.
>>
>> debo
>>
>> From: "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" 
>> Date: Friday, March 3, 2017 at 2:59 PM
>> To: "dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org" > Subject: Do we use the IRC chatrooms?
>>
>> Would be good for the devs to be on the chatrooms!
>>
>> debo
>>
>
>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature