Google's Season of Docs now accepting organization applications
Hi all, Google's "Season of Docs" is now accepting organization applications. "Season of Docs was created to bring together technical writers and open source projects to foster collaboration and improve documentation in the open source space." More info in blog post [1] and specific site[2]. I was wondering if we could benefit of this somehow? From the "Project Ideas" [3] page: "Refactor the open source project's existing documentation to provide an improved user experience or a more accessible information architecture." Cheers, Antonio [1] https://opensource.googleblog.com/2019/04/season-of-docs-org-apps.html [2] https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/docs/ [3] https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/docs/project-ideas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Groovy support
Hi, seems different problems, some are just test failures some are implementation bound. @Toni if you need help getting started let me know. -Sven On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:43 PM Sven Reimers wrote: > Hi all, > > just checking the test status at the moment. > > Seems there are a couple of test failures with regards to CC, e.g.running > > ant -Dtest.type=unit -Dcontinue.after.failing.tests=true > > -Dtest.includes=org/netbeans/modules/groovy/editor/api/completion/**/*Test.java > test-single > > results in 9 test failures > > I think those worked when I last checked the tests for NetBeans 10.. > > Will try to figure out what is going on... > > Sven > > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:39 PM Anton Epple wrote: > >> Thanks, I'm in contact with Sven now. He'll get me up to date. Possibly >> the CC Tests are already fixed. >> >> Am 02.04.19, 18:38 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" >> : >> >> Sven is the last who worked on this area, would really be great to >> have >> progress there. >> >> Gj >> >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:29 PM Anton Epple >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > I might be able to do some work on NB Groovy Support for a >> customer. They >> > have issues with code completion, false error marks, and GroovyDoc >> in >> > general. >> > >> > >> > >> > I checked, and most of the code completion tests are failing. I >> > investigated a bit and it seems in Groovy 2.5.2 there are some >> changes in >> > behavior, for example many classes are not resolved in AST >> ClassNodes >> > automatically. As a result you only get the completions for >> > java.lang.Object in most cases. >> > >> > >> > >> > It would be great if anyone who has recently worked on the Groovy >> support >> > could help me with some info on the current state, and which work is >> > planned, so we can coordinate in case somebody works on it (or I >> can at >> > least get some hints). >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > >> > >> > Toni >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> >> >> >> > > -- > Sven Reimers > > * Senior Expert Software Architect > * Java Champion > * Apache NetBeans PPMC: http://netbeans.apache.org > * JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: https://www.meetup.com/JUG-Bodensee > * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009 & 2018 > > * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers > -- Sven Reimers * Senior Expert Software Architect * Java Champion * Apache NetBeans PPMC: http://netbeans.apache.org * JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: https://www.meetup.com/JUG-Bodensee * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009 & 2018 * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers
Re: Groovy support
Hi all, just checking the test status at the moment. Seems there are a couple of test failures with regards to CC, e.g.running ant -Dtest.type=unit -Dcontinue.after.failing.tests=true -Dtest.includes=org/netbeans/modules/groovy/editor/api/completion/**/*Test.java test-single results in 9 test failures I think those worked when I last checked the tests for NetBeans 10.. Will try to figure out what is going on... Sven On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:39 PM Anton Epple wrote: > Thanks, I'm in contact with Sven now. He'll get me up to date. Possibly > the CC Tests are already fixed. > > Am 02.04.19, 18:38 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" > : > > Sven is the last who worked on this area, would really be great to have > progress there. > > Gj > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:29 PM Anton Epple > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I might be able to do some work on NB Groovy Support for a customer. > They > > have issues with code completion, false error marks, and GroovyDoc in > > general. > > > > > > > > I checked, and most of the code completion tests are failing. I > > investigated a bit and it seems in Groovy 2.5.2 there are some > changes in > > behavior, for example many classes are not resolved in AST ClassNodes > > automatically. As a result you only get the completions for > > java.lang.Object in most cases. > > > > > > > > It would be great if anyone who has recently worked on the Groovy > support > > could help me with some info on the current state, and which work is > > planned, so we can coordinate in case somebody works on it (or I can > at > > least get some hints). > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Toni > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > -- Sven Reimers * Senior Expert Software Architect * Java Champion * Apache NetBeans PPMC: http://netbeans.apache.org * JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: https://www.meetup.com/JUG-Bodensee * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009 & 2018 * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers
Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP
Hi all, What about changing: "RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project; " To "RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project subject to the Bylaws of the Foundation; "? I'm somewhat concerned about asking our future Vicepresident to "serve ... subject to ... the Bylaws of the Foundation" and not to ask the PMC to do the same. That looks unfair to me! :-D Cheers, Antonio El 2/4/19 a las 16:54, Bertrand Delacretaz escribió: Hi, the resolution looks mostly good to me, thanks! With one paragraph to remove: On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further... We don't ask for bylaws anymore, projects are welcome to create community guidelines but that's not a requirement, they can also just lean on the standard ASF guidelines. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: ? about development
Hi Brad, Am Freitag, den 29.03.2019, 13:43 -0600 schrieb Brad Walker: > I'm interested in helping w/ development. So I was thinking that I could > fix some of the "low-hanging" issues that would be easy for me to complete. > This would also help me with learning the process. > > There are several places in the code where the following Java code exists. > Class clz = Class.forName(cslLanguageClass, true, myClassLoader); > Object o = clz.newInstance(); > > This causes the following error when compiling. > >[repeat] > /home/bwalker/src/netbeans-10.0-test/ide/csl.api/anttask/src/org/netbeans/modules/csl/CslJar.java:274: > warning: [deprecation] newInstance() in Class has been deprecated >[repeat] Object o = clz.newInstance(); > I think this is a worthwhile effort. Everybody will benefit from a better signal-to-noise ration in compiler warnings. Before going through the whole code-base, a prototype with one or two modules would be good. As you've seen by the reply from Tim there can be immediate feedback. I would appreciate it. Greetings Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP
I think we’re broad enough as it is. The NetBeans umbrella is broad and everything we do is a derivative or an extension of some kind of NetBeans API. Gh On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:40, Jan Lahoda wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:03 PM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:01 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Overall, looks OK to me. Two comments/questions: > > > -would it make sense the make the charter a little bit more general (to > > > include things like netbeans-jackpot/standalone (Java) hints) either: > > > "providing a development environment" => "providing developer tools" > > > or, if that is too general: > > > "providing a development environment" => "providing development > > environment > > > and related tools" > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > I think 'development environment, tooling platform, and application > > framework' is broad enough to cover netbeans-jackpot and anything else we > > do, and there's also the phrase 'projects within the scope of > > responsibility of the Apache NetBeans Project', i.e., we could see what > we > > do quite broadly. E.g., jackpot is an extension or ancillary project to > the > > development environment as well as the tooling platform, the same is true > > for html4j/DukeScript technologies etc. > > > > But if you strongly disagree, we can discuss further. Personally, I think > > we're pretty broad as it is already and if we make it even broader, and > > 'and related tools' is kind of assumed, I believe, anyway, it could > become > > too vague. It's hard enough as it is to explain what exactly NetBeans is, > > let's not make it even harder. :-) > > > > OK, I am not insisting on this much, just trying to ensure that we have > something broad enough to cover our activities. > > I was considering HTML4J, but that fits under the "application framework", > no? > > Jan > > Just my 2c. > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > The section on "bylaws": > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked > > with > > > the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development > > and > > > increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it > further > > > > > > Should probably be removed (I think it has been removed from recent > > > resolutions on other projects). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Apache NetBeans community members: > > > > > > > > Since we have already voted and agreed on becoming a top level Apache > > > > project[1], worked through the maturity model[2], cleaned up our > > > roster[3], > > > > notified the Apache Incubator that we have the intention to > > graduate[4], > > > > voted on a PMC chair[5], and followed our mentors' advice that the > very > > > > next thing to do is to start this discussion thread on the draft > > > > resolution[6], I hereby would like to start a discussion on the draft > > > > resolution for Apache NetBeans to graduate from the Apache Incubator > to > > > > become an Apache top level project. > > > > > > > > Please see the resolution below and provide comments, corrections, > > > > suggestions, and feedback. Be careful to note, again, especially > before > > > > commenting on this, that we have spent a lot of time cleaning up our > > > > roster[3] and hence the length of the roster is simply a reflection > of > > > the > > > > size and scope of the project. The content of the roster originates > > from > > > > the list of initial committers[7], together with several contributors > > > voted > > > > to be committers and PPMC members by the PPMC during incubation. > > > > > > > > Again, this is *NOT* a vote thread because of our mentors having > > pointed > > > > out that we have already voted and that another vote is not needed > and > > > that > > > > simply a discussion thread is the next step[6]. > > > > > > > > The discussion is open for 72 hours. Then the same discussion will > > begin > > > on > > > > general@incubator for graduation, followed by a [VOTE] on graduation > > > > there, > > > > that includes the resolution. > > > > > > > > Please feel free to reach out with any questions. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/72e59c722580fef2cbaa637735691a549756aeaa72c4cbf52265fbe0@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+NetBeans > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster > > > > > > > > 4. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1287b8c8aeb639c8648bd59129bf244c01f3c29c79889a7c8f2b4f0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > 5. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0ecae84ac6e4a097a34ce7b2afe0e987e4
Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:03 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:01 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Overall, looks OK to me. Two comments/questions: > > -would it make sense the make the charter a little bit more general (to > > include things like netbeans-jackpot/standalone (Java) hints) either: > > "providing a development environment" => "providing developer tools" > > or, if that is too general: > > "providing a development environment" => "providing development > environment > > and related tools" > > ? > > > > > > I think 'development environment, tooling platform, and application > framework' is broad enough to cover netbeans-jackpot and anything else we > do, and there's also the phrase 'projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache NetBeans Project', i.e., we could see what we > do quite broadly. E.g., jackpot is an extension or ancillary project to the > development environment as well as the tooling platform, the same is true > for html4j/DukeScript technologies etc. > > But if you strongly disagree, we can discuss further. Personally, I think > we're pretty broad as it is already and if we make it even broader, and > 'and related tools' is kind of assumed, I believe, anyway, it could become > too vague. It's hard enough as it is to explain what exactly NetBeans is, > let's not make it even harder. :-) > OK, I am not insisting on this much, just trying to ensure that we have something broad enough to cover our activities. I was considering HTML4J, but that fits under the "application framework", no? Jan Just my 2c. > > Gj > > > > > The section on "bylaws": > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked > with > > the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development > and > > increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further > > > > Should probably be removed (I think it has been removed from recent > > resolutions on other projects). > > > > Thanks, > > Jan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Apache NetBeans community members: > > > > > > Since we have already voted and agreed on becoming a top level Apache > > > project[1], worked through the maturity model[2], cleaned up our > > roster[3], > > > notified the Apache Incubator that we have the intention to > graduate[4], > > > voted on a PMC chair[5], and followed our mentors' advice that the very > > > next thing to do is to start this discussion thread on the draft > > > resolution[6], I hereby would like to start a discussion on the draft > > > resolution for Apache NetBeans to graduate from the Apache Incubator to > > > become an Apache top level project. > > > > > > Please see the resolution below and provide comments, corrections, > > > suggestions, and feedback. Be careful to note, again, especially before > > > commenting on this, that we have spent a lot of time cleaning up our > > > roster[3] and hence the length of the roster is simply a reflection of > > the > > > size and scope of the project. The content of the roster originates > from > > > the list of initial committers[7], together with several contributors > > voted > > > to be committers and PPMC members by the PPMC during incubation. > > > > > > Again, this is *NOT* a vote thread because of our mentors having > pointed > > > out that we have already voted and that another vote is not needed and > > that > > > simply a discussion thread is the next step[6]. > > > > > > The discussion is open for 72 hours. Then the same discussion will > begin > > on > > > general@incubator for graduation, followed by a [VOTE] on graduation > > > there, > > > that includes the resolution. > > > > > > Please feel free to reach out with any questions. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/72e59c722580fef2cbaa637735691a549756aeaa72c4cbf52265fbe0@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+NetBeans > > > > > > 3. > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster > > > > > > 4. > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1287b8c8aeb639c8648bd59129bf244c01f3c29c79889a7c8f2b4f0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > > > 5. > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0ecae84ac6e4a097a34ce7b2afe0e987e403fe32269fb3903895bbc@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > > > 6. > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e49a123f879c31abad142461c976b2b3446b6c1376ad7baaa1c64220@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > > > 7. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal > > > > > > - > > > > > > Establish the Apache NetBeans Project > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of > > the > > > Foundation and consistent with the Foundation
Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:01 PM Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hi, > > Overall, looks OK to me. Two comments/questions: > -would it make sense the make the charter a little bit more general (to > include things like netbeans-jackpot/standalone (Java) hints) either: > "providing a development environment" => "providing developer tools" > or, if that is too general: > "providing a development environment" => "providing development environment > and related tools" > ? > > I think 'development environment, tooling platform, and application framework' is broad enough to cover netbeans-jackpot and anything else we do, and there's also the phrase 'projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache NetBeans Project', i.e., we could see what we do quite broadly. E.g., jackpot is an extension or ancillary project to the development environment as well as the tooling platform, the same is true for html4j/DukeScript technologies etc. But if you strongly disagree, we can discuss further. Personally, I think we're pretty broad as it is already and if we make it even broader, and 'and related tools' is kind of assumed, I believe, anyway, it could become too vague. It's hard enough as it is to explain what exactly NetBeans is, let's not make it even harder. :-) Just my 2c. Gj > The section on "bylaws": > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked with > the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and > increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further > > Should probably be removed (I think it has been removed from recent > resolutions on other projects). > > Thanks, > Jan > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > Dear Apache NetBeans community members: > > > > Since we have already voted and agreed on becoming a top level Apache > > project[1], worked through the maturity model[2], cleaned up our > roster[3], > > notified the Apache Incubator that we have the intention to graduate[4], > > voted on a PMC chair[5], and followed our mentors' advice that the very > > next thing to do is to start this discussion thread on the draft > > resolution[6], I hereby would like to start a discussion on the draft > > resolution for Apache NetBeans to graduate from the Apache Incubator to > > become an Apache top level project. > > > > Please see the resolution below and provide comments, corrections, > > suggestions, and feedback. Be careful to note, again, especially before > > commenting on this, that we have spent a lot of time cleaning up our > > roster[3] and hence the length of the roster is simply a reflection of > the > > size and scope of the project. The content of the roster originates from > > the list of initial committers[7], together with several contributors > voted > > to be committers and PPMC members by the PPMC during incubation. > > > > Again, this is *NOT* a vote thread because of our mentors having pointed > > out that we have already voted and that another vote is not needed and > that > > simply a discussion thread is the next step[6]. > > > > The discussion is open for 72 hours. Then the same discussion will begin > on > > general@incubator for graduation, followed by a [VOTE] on graduation > > there, > > that includes the resolution. > > > > Please feel free to reach out with any questions. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gj > > > > 1. > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/72e59c722580fef2cbaa637735691a549756aeaa72c4cbf52265fbe0@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > 2. > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+NetBeans > > > > 3. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster > > > > 4. > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1287b8c8aeb639c8648bd59129bf244c01f3c29c79889a7c8f2b4f0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > 5. > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0ecae84ac6e4a097a34ce7b2afe0e987e403fe32269fb3903895bbc@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > 6. > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e49a123f879c31abad142461c976b2b3446b6c1376ad7baaa1c64220@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > 7. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal > > > > - > > > > Establish the Apache NetBeans Project > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of > the > > Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a > > Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, > related > > to providing a development environment, tooling platform, and application > > framework. > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee > (PMC), > > to be known as the "Apache NetBeans Project", be and hereby is > established > > pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache
Re: Groovy support
Thanks, I'm in contact with Sven now. He'll get me up to date. Possibly the CC Tests are already fixed. Am 02.04.19, 18:38 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" : Sven is the last who worked on this area, would really be great to have progress there. Gj On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:29 PM Anton Epple wrote: > Hi, > > > > I might be able to do some work on NB Groovy Support for a customer. They > have issues with code completion, false error marks, and GroovyDoc in > general. > > > > I checked, and most of the code completion tests are failing. I > investigated a bit and it seems in Groovy 2.5.2 there are some changes in > behavior, for example many classes are not resolved in AST ClassNodes > automatically. As a result you only get the completions for > java.lang.Object in most cases. > > > > It would be great if anyone who has recently worked on the Groovy support > could help me with some info on the current state, and which work is > planned, so we can coordinate in case somebody works on it (or I can at > least get some hints). > > > > Thanks > > > > Toni > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Groovy support
Sven is the last who worked on this area, would really be great to have progress there. Gj On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:29 PM Anton Epple wrote: > Hi, > > > > I might be able to do some work on NB Groovy Support for a customer. They > have issues with code completion, false error marks, and GroovyDoc in > general. > > > > I checked, and most of the code completion tests are failing. I > investigated a bit and it seems in Groovy 2.5.2 there are some changes in > behavior, for example many classes are not resolved in AST ClassNodes > automatically. As a result you only get the completions for > java.lang.Object in most cases. > > > > It would be great if anyone who has recently worked on the Groovy support > could help me with some info on the current state, and which work is > planned, so we can coordinate in case somebody works on it (or I can at > least get some hints). > > > > Thanks > > > > Toni > >
Groovy support
Hi, I might be able to do some work on NB Groovy Support for a customer. They have issues with code completion, false error marks, and GroovyDoc in general. I checked, and most of the code completion tests are failing. I investigated a bit and it seems in Groovy 2.5.2 there are some changes in behavior, for example many classes are not resolved in AST ClassNodes automatically. As a result you only get the completions for java.lang.Object in most cases. It would be great if anyone who has recently worked on the Groovy support could help me with some info on the current state, and which work is planned, so we can coordinate in case somebody works on it (or I can at least get some hints). Thanks Toni
Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP
Hi, Overall, looks OK to me. Two comments/questions: -would it make sense the make the charter a little bit more general (to include things like netbeans-jackpot/standalone (Java) hints) either: "providing a development environment" => "providing developer tools" or, if that is too general: "providing a development environment" => "providing development environment and related tools" ? The section on "bylaws": RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further Should probably be removed (I think it has been removed from recent resolutions on other projects). Thanks, Jan On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Dear Apache NetBeans community members: > > Since we have already voted and agreed on becoming a top level Apache > project[1], worked through the maturity model[2], cleaned up our roster[3], > notified the Apache Incubator that we have the intention to graduate[4], > voted on a PMC chair[5], and followed our mentors' advice that the very > next thing to do is to start this discussion thread on the draft > resolution[6], I hereby would like to start a discussion on the draft > resolution for Apache NetBeans to graduate from the Apache Incubator to > become an Apache top level project. > > Please see the resolution below and provide comments, corrections, > suggestions, and feedback. Be careful to note, again, especially before > commenting on this, that we have spent a lot of time cleaning up our > roster[3] and hence the length of the roster is simply a reflection of the > size and scope of the project. The content of the roster originates from > the list of initial committers[7], together with several contributors voted > to be committers and PPMC members by the PPMC during incubation. > > Again, this is *NOT* a vote thread because of our mentors having pointed > out that we have already voted and that another vote is not needed and that > simply a discussion thread is the next step[6]. > > The discussion is open for 72 hours. Then the same discussion will begin on > general@incubator for graduation, followed by a [VOTE] on graduation > there, > that includes the resolution. > > Please feel free to reach out with any questions. > > Thanks, > > Gj > > 1. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/72e59c722580fef2cbaa637735691a549756aeaa72c4cbf52265fbe0@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > 2. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+NetBeans > > 3. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster > > 4. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1287b8c8aeb639c8648bd59129bf244c01f3c29c79889a7c8f2b4f0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > 5. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0ecae84ac6e4a097a34ce7b2afe0e987e403fe32269fb3903895bbc@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > 6. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e49a123f879c31abad142461c976b2b3446b6c1376ad7baaa1c64220@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > 7. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal > > - > > Establish the Apache NetBeans Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the > Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a > Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related > to providing a development environment, tooling platform, and application > framework. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), > to be known as the "Apache NetBeans Project", be and hereby is established > pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache NetBeans Project be and hereby is responsible for > the creation and maintenance of software related to providing a development > environment, tooling platform, and application framework; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache NetBeans" be and > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction > of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache NetBeans Project, and > to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the > scope of responsibility of the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache NetBeans Project: > > * Anton Epple > * Antonio Vieiro > * Aristides Villarreal > * Arunava Sinha > * Ate Douma > * Attila Kelemen > * Bertrand Delacretaz > * Bruno Flávio > * Bruno Souza > * Christian Lenz > * Constantin Drabo > * David Heffelfinger > * Daniel Gruno > * Dusan Balek > * Eirik Bakke > * Emilian Bold > * Emmanuel Hugonnet > * Eric Barboni > * Flo
Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP
Hi, the resolution looks mostly good to me, thanks! With one paragraph to remove: On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NetBeans PMC be and hereby is tasked with > the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and > increased participation in the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further... We don't ask for bylaws anymore, projects are welcome to create community guidelines but that's not a requirement, they can also just lean on the standard ASF guidelines. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Which mentors want to continue on the Apache NetBeans roster?
On 02/04/2019 10.55, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Hi mentors, In: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster You can see that Bertrand Delacratez, Ate Douma, and Daniel Gruno have indicated in one way or another that they would like to continue to be on the Apache NetBeans roster. That's great. Please confirm that in this thread (can't find exactly where I got that info from, would be good to have this single thread wherein mentors confirm their continuation with the project). Reconfirmed: I'm willing to stay on the PMC. Ate That leaves Mark Struberg, would be great to have you too of course, can you confirm/deny interest in continuing, in this thread? Thanks, Gj - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
[DISCUSS] Resolution for Apache NetBeans graduation to TLP
Dear Apache NetBeans community members: Since we have already voted and agreed on becoming a top level Apache project[1], worked through the maturity model[2], cleaned up our roster[3], notified the Apache Incubator that we have the intention to graduate[4], voted on a PMC chair[5], and followed our mentors' advice that the very next thing to do is to start this discussion thread on the draft resolution[6], I hereby would like to start a discussion on the draft resolution for Apache NetBeans to graduate from the Apache Incubator to become an Apache top level project. Please see the resolution below and provide comments, corrections, suggestions, and feedback. Be careful to note, again, especially before commenting on this, that we have spent a lot of time cleaning up our roster[3] and hence the length of the roster is simply a reflection of the size and scope of the project. The content of the roster originates from the list of initial committers[7], together with several contributors voted to be committers and PPMC members by the PPMC during incubation. Again, this is *NOT* a vote thread because of our mentors having pointed out that we have already voted and that another vote is not needed and that simply a discussion thread is the next step[6]. The discussion is open for 72 hours. Then the same discussion will begin on general@incubator for graduation, followed by a [VOTE] on graduation there, that includes the resolution. Please feel free to reach out with any questions. Thanks, Gj 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/72e59c722580fef2cbaa637735691a549756aeaa72c4cbf52265fbe0@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+NetBeans 3. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster 4. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1287b8c8aeb639c8648bd59129bf244c01f3c29c79889a7c8f2b4f0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E 5. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0ecae84ac6e4a097a34ce7b2afe0e987e403fe32269fb3903895bbc@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E 6. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e49a123f879c31abad142461c976b2b3446b6c1376ad7baaa1c64220@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E 7. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal - Establish the Apache NetBeans Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to providing a development environment, tooling platform, and application framework. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache NetBeans Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache NetBeans Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to providing a development environment, tooling platform, and application framework; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache NetBeans" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache NetBeans Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache NetBeans Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache NetBeans Project: * Anton Epple * Antonio Vieiro * Aristides Villarreal * Arunava Sinha * Ate Douma * Attila Kelemen * Bertrand Delacretaz * Bruno Flávio * Bruno Souza * Christian Lenz * Constantin Drabo * David Heffelfinger * Daniel Gruno * Dusan Balek * Eirik Bakke * Emilian Bold * Emmanuel Hugonnet * Eric Barboni * Florian Vogler * Geertjan Wielenga * Glenn Holmer * Ivar Grimstad * James Gosling * Jan Lahoda * Jan Pirek * Jaroslav Tulach * Jean-Marc Borer * Jiří Kovalský * Joerg Michelberger * Johan Vos * John Kostaras * John McDonnell * Josh Juneau * José Pereda * Junichi Yamamoto * Kirk Pepperdine * Lars Bruun-Hansen * Laszlo Kishalmi * Leonardo Zanivan * Mark Stephens * Mark Struberg * Martin Entlicher * Martin Klähn * Matthias Bläsing * Michael Müller * Michael Nascimento * Michel Graciano * Milos Kleint * Neil C Smith * Ralph Benjamin Ruijs * Reema Taneja * Shai Almog * Simon Phipps * Svatopluk Dedic * Sven Reimers * Thilina Ranathunga * Timon Veenstra * Tomas Mysik * Tomas Zezula * Tushar Joshi * Vladimir Voskresensky * Wade Chandler * Zoran Sevarac NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Geertjan Wielenga be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache NetBeans, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and
Re: Which mentors want to continue on the Apache NetBeans roster?
On 02/04/2019 03.55, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Hi mentors, In: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster You can see that Bertrand Delacratez, Ate Douma, and Daniel Gruno have indicated in one way or another that they would like to continue to be on the Apache NetBeans roster. That's great. Please confirm that in this thread (can't find exactly where I got that info from, would be good to have this single thread wherein mentors confirm their continuation with the project). Confirmed, I would like to continue on the PMC :) That leaves Mark Struberg, would be great to have you too of course, can you confirm/deny interest in continuing, in this thread? Thanks, Gj - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Which mentors want to continue on the Apache NetBeans roster?
Hi On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:55 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...You can see that Bertrand Delacratez, Ate Douma, and Daniel Gruno have > indicated in one way or another that they would like to continue to be on > the Apache NetBeans roster... Confirmed, I'm fine with remaining on the PMC to help with community related topics if desired. I'm not planning to get more involved at the code level. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Which mentors want to continue on the Apache NetBeans roster?
Hi mentors, In: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Realistic+PMC+Roster You can see that Bertrand Delacratez, Ate Douma, and Daniel Gruno have indicated in one way or another that they would like to continue to be on the Apache NetBeans roster. That's great. Please confirm that in this thread (can't find exactly where I got that info from, would be good to have this single thread wherein mentors confirm their continuation with the project). That leaves Mark Struberg, would be great to have you too of course, can you confirm/deny interest in continuing, in this thread? Thanks, Gj
