[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1433) Missing not-like condition in Simple Methods
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550345 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1433: You are right Chris, I will do it when I will update the site for marketing stuffes, should be soon... Missing not-like condition in Simple Methods -- Key: OFBIZ-1433 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1433 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Reporter: Chris Howe Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Attachments: SM.patch not-like condition is missing from the enumeration in the simple-methods.xsd -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1509) Allow for more status values for a task in the project.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550347 ] Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-1509: I looked at the workeffort status possibilities and would like to use the existing structure however I see the following possibilities for the CALENDAR_STATUS: Needs Action, Sent, Declined, Delegated, Cancelled I was more looking for a status series like: created, implemented, confirmed, approved, canceled, onhold or: created, completed, tested, delivered, canceled, onhold Is there some against if i create a new status for a PROJECT_TASK using one of the 2 series? this can still have tha TASK_STATUS as its child and the WORK_EFFORT_STATUS as its parent Allow for more status values for a task in the project. --- Key: OFBIZ-1509 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1509 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: ProjectMgr Reporter: Hans Bakker Currently the status values of a task in the workeffort manager only allow for : 'accepted' and 'completed' For a project Task this is not enough, we need to have an indication not only that the task is completed but for example is tested with another person. I would like to add another status called 'confirmed' to indicate that another authority has confirmed the task is really completed. The question is do we add this status to the workeffort manager or we create a new workEffortType only used in the project manager application? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1505) New screen to manage the default glAccountId for the PaymentMethodType entity.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-1505: - Description: This is *not* an organization specific screen, and so it will be accessible from the top menu of the accounting component. In the new screen, it will only be possible to update the glAccountId field of the existing records; adding/removing new records is not allowed, nor updating the other fields of the PaymentMethodType entity. Also, the name of the top menu should reflect the specialized scope of this screen. was:This is *not* an organization specific screen, and so it will be accessible from the top menu of the accounting component. Summary: New screen to manage the default glAccountId for the PaymentMethodType entity. (was: New screen to manage the PaymentMethodType entity.) New screen to manage the default glAccountId for the PaymentMethodType entity. -- Key: OFBIZ-1505 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1505 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato This is *not* an organization specific screen, and so it will be accessible from the top menu of the accounting component. In the new screen, it will only be possible to update the glAccountId field of the existing records; adding/removing new records is not allowed, nor updating the other fields of the PaymentMethodType entity. Also, the name of the top menu should reflect the specialized scope of this screen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1510) Review and improve the demo GL settings in accounting/data/DemoGlSetup.xml file
Review and improve the demo GL settings in accounting/data/DemoGlSetup.xml file --- Key: OFBIZ-1510 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1510 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Choose more meaningful glAccountId etc... Persons with a good knowledge of GL accounting setup may help with this task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1511) Create a project scheduler
Create a project scheduler -- Key: OFBIZ-1511 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1511 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: ProjectMgr Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Hans Bakker Fix For: SVN trunk A project scheduler is needed to create and revise planned dates of tasks in a project taking into account the available resources, required sequence of tasks and priorities and actual dates of already started tasks. This could also be used for the scheduling of a manufacturing run. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1512) Be able to process incoming requests and insert these as tasks into existing projects
Be able to process incoming requests and insert these as tasks into existing projects - Key: OFBIZ-1512 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1512 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: ProjectMgr Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Hans Bakker Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Incoming requests from customers affecting current projects need to be inserted as tasks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1513) add a resource manager
add a resource manager -- Key: OFBIZ-1513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1513 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: ProjectMgr Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Hans Bakker Fix For: SVN trunk Add a resource tab on the highest level in the project manager which will enable the administrator to add and remove existing partyId's to the projectmanager resource list. In this list are all parties which have the roleTypes of which the parentId = PROJECT_TEAM. All screens in the project manager need to be changed so only parties with the specified parentRoleType of 'PROJECT_TEAM' can be selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-1513) add a resource manager
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1513: -- Assignee: Hans Bakker add a resource manager -- Key: OFBIZ-1513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1513 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: ProjectMgr Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Hans Bakker Assignee: Hans Bakker Fix For: SVN trunk Add a resource tab on the highest level in the project manager which will enable the administrator to add and remove existing partyId's to the projectmanager resource list. In this list are all parties which have the roleTypes of which the parentId = PROJECT_TEAM. All screens in the project manager need to be changed so only parties with the specified parentRoleType of 'PROJECT_TEAM' can be selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-1438) Add Find menu with Find Project, Find Tasks, Find Timesheet as sub menu items
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1438: -- Assignee: Anil K Patel Add Find menu with Find Project, Find Tasks, Find Timesheet as sub menu items -- Key: OFBIZ-1438 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1438 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: ProjectMgr Reporter: Anil K Patel Assignee: Anil K Patel Priority: Minor Attachments: findMenu1438.patch Add Find menu in Application menu under project component. On click on Find, A screen should come that has a sub menu with Find Project, Find Tasks, Find Timesheet as sub menu items. Find Project will be the default selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1423) Missing ReturnItemTypeMap for AGGREGATED prodcuts
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550378 ] Bilgin Ibryam commented on OFBIZ-1423: -- Committed in trunk rev. 603189 Missing ReturnItemTypeMap for AGGREGATED prodcuts - Key: OFBIZ-1423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1423 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Reporter: Bilgin Ibryam Assignee: Bilgin Ibryam Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Hi, Returning AGGREGATED products (PC001) currently is not possible due to missing entry in ReturnItemTypeMap enity. Is there a reason for it or just missed ? Bilgin Index: applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml === --- applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml (revision 597751) +++ applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml (working copy) @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=FINISHED_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=MARKETING_PKG_AUTO returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=MARKETING_PKG_PICK returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ +ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=AGGREGATED returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=DIGITAL_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_DPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=FINDIG_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_FDPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=PROMOTION_ADJUSTMENT returnItemTypeId=RET_PROMOTION_ADJ/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1438) Add Find menu with Find Project, Find Tasks, Find Timesheet as sub menu items
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550379 ] Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-1438: Hi Jyotsna, this looks pretty good and ready for inclusion in SVN, a few comments however: 1. Your 'find timesheets' should replace the current timesheet option 2. Your 'find project' should replace the current 'project' option. 3. and i think we should add a new 'tasks' option after the 'project' option which is showing your find task. 4 your task list does not show any planned and actual hours.(did you use the 'getTask' service?) 5. remember the priority is optional, will give an error on line 151 and line 117 in FindWorkEfforts.bsh regards Hans Add Find menu with Find Project, Find Tasks, Find Timesheet as sub menu items -- Key: OFBIZ-1438 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1438 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: ProjectMgr Reporter: Anil K Patel Assignee: Anil K Patel Priority: Minor Attachments: findMenu1438.patch Add Find menu in Application menu under project component. On click on Find, A screen should come that has a sub menu with Find Project, Find Tasks, Find Timesheet as sub menu items. Find Project will be the default selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1423) Missing ReturnItemTypeMap for AGGREGATED prodcuts
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bilgin Ibryam closed OFBIZ-1423. Resolution: Fixed Missing ReturnItemTypeMap for AGGREGATED prodcuts - Key: OFBIZ-1423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1423 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Reporter: Bilgin Ibryam Assignee: Bilgin Ibryam Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Hi, Returning AGGREGATED products (PC001) currently is not possible due to missing entry in ReturnItemTypeMap enity. Is there a reason for it or just missed ? Bilgin Index: applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml === --- applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml (revision 597751) +++ applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml (working copy) @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=FINISHED_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=MARKETING_PKG_AUTO returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=MARKETING_PKG_PICK returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ +ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=AGGREGATED returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=DIGITAL_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_DPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=FINDIG_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_FDPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=PROMOTION_ADJUSTMENT returnItemTypeId=RET_PROMOTION_ADJ/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1506) Add a column with the default account id to the list form in the setup screen for payment method types mappings.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] JyotsnaRathore updated OFBIZ-1506: -- Attachment: (was: costComponent.patch) Add a column with the default account id to the list form in the setup screen for payment method types mappings. Key: OFBIZ-1506 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Add a column to the list form in the following screen: https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/accounting/control/GlAccountNrPaymentMethod?organizationPartyId=Company to display the default gl account id for the payment method type (from PaymentMethodType.glAccountId): display both the id and description of the account. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1506) Add a column with the default account id to the list form in the setup screen for payment method types mappings.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] JyotsnaRathore updated OFBIZ-1506: -- Attachment: costComponent.patch Can we implement use-when in list forms..? Add a column with the default account id to the list form in the setup screen for payment method types mappings. Key: OFBIZ-1506 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Add a column to the list form in the following screen: https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/accounting/control/GlAccountNrPaymentMethod?organizationPartyId=Company to display the default gl account id for the payment method type (from PaymentMethodType.glAccountId): display both the id and description of the account. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1503) New screen for the CostComponentCalc entity
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] JyotsnaRathore updated OFBIZ-1503: -- Attachment: costComponent.patch Can we implement use-when in list form ? New screen for the CostComponentCalc entity --- Key: OFBIZ-1503 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1503 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting, manufacturing Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Attachments: costComponent.patch This is *not* an organization specific screen, and so it will be accessible from the top menu of the accounting component. The screen can be copied from the existing screen in the manufacturing component: https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/manufacturing/control/EditCostCalcs However, the only editable fields in the new screen will be: Cost Gl Account Type Id and Offsetting Gl Account Type Id; on the other hand, hide the two fields (both in the edit and list form) in the screen of the manufacturing applocation. Also, the name of the top menu should reflect the specialized scope of this screen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1506) Add a column with the default account id to the list form in the setup screen for payment method types mappings.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] JyotsnaRathore updated OFBIZ-1506: -- Comment: was deleted Add a column with the default account id to the list form in the setup screen for payment method types mappings. Key: OFBIZ-1506 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Add a column to the list form in the following screen: https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/accounting/control/GlAccountNrPaymentMethod?organizationPartyId=Company to display the default gl account id for the payment method type (from PaymentMethodType.glAccountId): display both the id and description of the account. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1504) New screen to manage the default glAccountId for the InvoiceItemType entity.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alok Agnihotri updated OFBIZ-1504: -- Attachment: jira-issue-1504 Here is the patch for jira-issue-1504 Created UI for InvoiceItemType New screen to manage the default glAccountId for the InvoiceItemType entity. Key: OFBIZ-1504 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1504 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Attachments: jira-issue-1504 This is *not* an organization specific screen, and so it will be accessible from the top menu of the accounting component. In the new screen, it will only be possible to update the glAccountId field of the existing records; adding/removing new records is not allowed, nor updating the other fields of the InvoiceItemType entity. Also, the name of the top menu should reflect the specialized scope of this screen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1505) New screen to manage the default glAccountId for the PaymentMethodType entity.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brajesh Patel updated OFBIZ-1505: - Attachment: Jira_issue_1505.patch Created UI to manage the default glAccountId for the PaymentMethodType entity. New screen to manage the default glAccountId for the PaymentMethodType entity. -- Key: OFBIZ-1505 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1505 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Attachments: Jira_issue_1505.patch This is *not* an organization specific screen, and so it will be accessible from the top menu of the accounting component. In the new screen, it will only be possible to update the glAccountId field of the existing records; adding/removing new records is not allowed, nor updating the other fields of the PaymentMethodType entity. Also, the name of the top menu should reflect the specialized scope of this screen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Transaction related error in log when the
The following error is logged (even if the service works as expected) when the service getInventoryAvailableByFacility is called: == 2007-12-11 15:54:57,906 (default-invoker-Thread-6) [ GenericDelegator.java:2031:ERROR] exception report -- ERROR: Cannot do a find that returns an EntityListIterator with no transaction in place. Wrap this call in a transaction. Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: Stack Trace stack trace --- java.lang.Exception: Stack Trace org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.find(GenericDelegator.java:2030) org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.findListIteratorByCondition(GenericDelegator.java:2008) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.entityops.FindByAnd.exec(FindByAnd.java:88) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:931) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.ifops.IfCompare.exec(IfCompare.java:121) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:931) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:568) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleMethod(SimpleMethod.java:105) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleService(SimpleMethod.java:87) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:76) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.runSync(SimpleServiceEngine.java:51) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:375) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:208) org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java:136) == I think this is caused by the service definition that has: use-transaction=false I've noticed that this flag has been set by Si in rev. r438286: Turned off transactions for all the getInventory_ services -- they do not store anything and should not require them. Also added marketing package ATP/QOH to the getProductInventorySummaryForItems service which searches across all facilities Is there a reason for setting this flag? Should we remove it? Or is the error a fake error that should be fixed instead? Jacopo
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Jacopo, Thank you very much for the info! I will get to that today. -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Re: RFC: Properties Idea
David, Thank you very much for your comments. I agree with the idea of data model extensions designed around a particular configuration option. I was thinking more along the lines of having some of the system-level configuration options stored in an entity - so we could have a basic system configuration UI. Of course some things could be left out - like the cache settings you mentioned previously. I'll put the idea on the shelf for now. -Adrian David E Jones wrote: This is an interesting approach, but very different from what I had imagined and what has been discussed (though not in a lot of detail). Rather than creating a generic structure I'd rather continue with the existing pattern of designing data model extensions according to the nature of the configuration option. That approach is certainly more work, but ultimately more valuable and easier to use and maintain going forward. All options are basically listed out and can be restricted more using enums as needed, and structured relative to whatever makes sense like a product store or organization party or whatever. This also helps clarify which options should or should not go in the database. IMO only the business level configuration options should go in the database and not the technical, or perhaps better labeled system, level ones. If it relates to something in the current data model, like payment settings for example, then it makes sense to create a structure for and put it in the database. That particular example would also allow us to get rid of some hackish things like specifying the properties file name in an entity field. -David On Dec 7, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: Now that OFBiz supports XML properties files, I've started thinking about David's comment that configuration settings and such should be kept in the database - and how to add that capability to the UtilProperties class bag of tricks. Just like the XML properties file idea, I'd like to make it transparent to the developer. I'm thinking we would need only one entity, and a little more work on the UtilProperties class. The entity would be something like: ResourceProperties -- ResourceName, id-long PropertyKey, id-long PropertyValue, very-long So, if you called UtilProperties.getPropertyValue(MyResource, MyProperty) the usual properties files would be checked first, and if that failed, the ResourceProperties entity would be searched. UtilProperties would keep the entity version of Properties objects in the same cache as regular file-based Properties objects. What do you think? The only thing I haven't figured out is how to get a delegator instance. In the example above, there are two String parameters - no delegator. I know I can call GenericDelegator.getGenericDelegator(String delegatorName) but what delegator name do I use? Any ideas on how that would/should work? -Adrian
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Adrian, you have to download an ssh client... let me check the one (free software) I have in my laptop... just give me 5 minutes (time to switch it on) Jacopo Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Use Putty. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Raj Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
This one is a good one: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Jacopo Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, you have to download an ssh client... let me check the one (free software) I have in my laptop... just give me 5 minutes (time to switch it on) Jacopo Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Thank you Raj and Jacopo! Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This one is a good one: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Jacopo Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, you have to download an ssh client... let me check the one (free software) I have in my laptop... just give me 5 minutes (time to switch it on) Jacopo Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
ah ah... quicker than me :-) Raj Saini wrote: Use Putty. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Raj Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1423) Missing ReturnItemTypeMap for AGGREGATED prodcuts
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550564 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1423: Back ported in release4.0 603294 Missing ReturnItemTypeMap for AGGREGATED prodcuts - Key: OFBIZ-1423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1423 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Reporter: Bilgin Ibryam Assignee: Bilgin Ibryam Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 Hi, Returning AGGREGATED products (PC001) currently is not possible due to missing entry in ReturnItemTypeMap enity. Is there a reason for it or just missed ? Bilgin Index: applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml === --- applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml (revision 597751) +++ applications/order/data/OrderTypeData.xml (working copy) @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=FINISHED_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=MARKETING_PKG_AUTO returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=MARKETING_PKG_PICK returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ +ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=AGGREGATED returnItemTypeId=RET_FPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=DIGITAL_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_DPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=FINDIG_GOOD returnItemTypeId=RET_FDPROD_ITEM/ ReturnItemTypeMap returnHeaderTypeId=CUSTOMER_RETURN returnItemMapKey=PROMOTION_ADJUSTMENT returnItemTypeId=RET_PROMOTION_ADJ/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Jacopo, I'm getting access denied messages while entering my password in ssh. -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This one is a good one: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Jacopo Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, you have to download an ssh client... let me check the one (free software) I have in my laptop... just give me 5 minutes (time to switch it on) Jacopo Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Re: RFC: Properties Idea
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: I was thinking more along the lines of having some of the system- level configuration options stored in an entity - so we could have a basic system configuration UI. Of course some things could be left out - like the cache settings you mentioned previously. I'll put the idea on the shelf for now. I'm pretty against having configuration like this in the database... it makes it really difficult to manage overall, largely because revision control is either not there, or done in the database separate from the code revision control, making deployments very error prone because you have to manually keep an eye on these settings in the database and make sure they are up to date. If you have a config UI it makes it even more difficult to manage because if someone changes something in the UI and someone else writing code makes a corresponding configuration in the file system, when the data is reloaded you might end up with a change loss problem... and that's only one scenario. -David smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1441) Enhance the integration with eBay
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550654 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1441: -- Looks good Marco, I'd say you can commit this work. Enhance the integration with eBay - Key: OFBIZ-1441 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1441 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: order, product Affects Versions: SVN trunk Environment: mac os Reporter: Marco Risaliti Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: ebay.patch, ebay.zip Move the eBay export (auctions creation), currently in the product component, and import (of orders) stuff, currently in the order component, into a new specialpurpose component. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Transaction related error in log when the
This is an important error message. The problem is that the Entity Engine can't just create a transaction for these because it can't commit or rollback the transaction because the connection and ResultSet stay open until the EntityListIterator is closed, which is done by the code calling the EE and so the transaction must be managed outside the EE. It is not correct that read only operations don't need a transaction. Part of the definition of transaction isolation definitely involves reading as well as writing. -David On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: The following error is logged (even if the service works as expected) when the service getInventoryAvailableByFacility is called: == 2007-12-11 15:54:57,906 (default-invoker-Thread-6) [ GenericDelegator.java:2031:ERROR] exception report -- ERROR: Cannot do a find that returns an EntityListIterator with no transaction in place. Wrap this call in a transaction. Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: Stack Trace stack trace --- java.lang.Exception: Stack Trace org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.find(GenericDelegator.java:2030) org .ofbiz .entity .GenericDelegator.findListIteratorByCondition(GenericDelegator.java: 2008) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.entityops.FindByAnd.exec(FindByAnd.java: 88) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:931) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.ifops.IfCompare.exec(IfCompare.java:121) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:931) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:568) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleMethod(SimpleMethod.java: 105) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleService(SimpleMethod.java: 87) org .ofbiz .minilang .SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:76) org .ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.runSync(SimpleServiceEngine.java: 51) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java: 375) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java: 208) org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java: 136) == I think this is caused by the service definition that has: use-transaction=false I've noticed that this flag has been set by Si in rev. r438286: Turned off transactions for all the getInventory_ services -- they do not store anything and should not require them. Also added marketing package ATP/QOH to the getProductInventorySummaryForItems service which searches across all facilities Is there a reason for setting this flag? Should we remove it? Or is the error a fake error that should be fixed instead? Jacopo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Transaction related error in log when the
David, thanks for the explanation. So I guess that it is ok to remove the use-transaction=false for these services, right? Jacopo David E Jones wrote: This is an important error message. The problem is that the Entity Engine can't just create a transaction for these because it can't commit or rollback the transaction because the connection and ResultSet stay open until the EntityListIterator is closed, which is done by the code calling the EE and so the transaction must be managed outside the EE. It is not correct that read only operations don't need a transaction. Part of the definition of transaction isolation definitely involves reading as well as writing. -David On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: The following error is logged (even if the service works as expected) when the service getInventoryAvailableByFacility is called: == 2007-12-11 15:54:57,906 (default-invoker-Thread-6) [ GenericDelegator.java:2031:ERROR] exception report -- ERROR: Cannot do a find that returns an EntityListIterator with no transaction in place. Wrap this call in a transaction. Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: Stack Trace stack trace --- java.lang.Exception: Stack Trace org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.find(GenericDelegator.java:2030) org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.findListIteratorByCondition(GenericDelegator.java:2008) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.entityops.FindByAnd.exec(FindByAnd.java:88) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:931) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.ifops.IfCompare.exec(IfCompare.java:121) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java:931) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:568) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleMethod(SimpleMethod.java:105) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleService(SimpleMethod.java:87) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:76) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.runSync(SimpleServiceEngine.java:51) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:375) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java:208) org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java:136) == I think this is caused by the service definition that has: use-transaction=false I've noticed that this flag has been set by Si in rev. r438286: Turned off transactions for all the getInventory_ services -- they do not store anything and should not require them. Also added marketing package ATP/QOH to the getProductInventorySummaryForItems service which searches across all facilities Is there a reason for setting this flag? Should we remove it? Or is the error a fake error that should be fixed instead? Jacopo
Re: Transaction related error in log when the
It would be good to hear Si's comment on that, but my vote is definitely for removing it. A service should only really have use-transaction set to false if it is doing it's own transaction management internally, like manually or in sub-services only. -David On Dec 11, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: David, thanks for the explanation. So I guess that it is ok to remove the use-transaction=false for these services, right? Jacopo David E Jones wrote: This is an important error message. The problem is that the Entity Engine can't just create a transaction for these because it can't commit or rollback the transaction because the connection and ResultSet stay open until the EntityListIterator is closed, which is done by the code calling the EE and so the transaction must be managed outside the EE. It is not correct that read only operations don't need a transaction. Part of the definition of transaction isolation definitely involves reading as well as writing. -David On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: The following error is logged (even if the service works as expected) when the service getInventoryAvailableByFacility is called: = = 2007-12-11 15:54:57,906 (default-invoker-Thread-6) [ GenericDelegator.java:2031:ERROR] exception report -- ERROR: Cannot do a find that returns an EntityListIterator with no transaction in place. Wrap this call in a transaction. Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: Stack Trace stack trace --- java.lang.Exception: Stack Trace org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator.find(GenericDelegator.java:2030) org .ofbiz .entity .GenericDelegator .findListIteratorByCondition(GenericDelegator.java:2008) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.entityops.FindByAnd.exec(FindByAnd.java: 88) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java: 931) org.ofbiz.minilang.method.ifops.IfCompare.exec(IfCompare.java: 121) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSubOps(SimpleMethod.java: 931) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.exec(SimpleMethod.java:568) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleMethod(SimpleMethod.java: 105) org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleMethod.runSimpleService(SimpleMethod.java: 87) org .ofbiz .minilang .SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:76) org .ofbiz .minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.runSync(SimpleServiceEngine.java:51) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java: 375) org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher.runSync(ServiceDispatcher.java: 208) org.ofbiz.service.GenericDispatcher.runSync(GenericDispatcher.java: 136) = = I think this is caused by the service definition that has: use-transaction=false I've noticed that this flag has been set by Si in rev. r438286: Turned off transactions for all the getInventory_ services -- they do not store anything and should not require them. Also added marketing package ATP/QOH to the getProductInventorySummaryForItems service which searches across all facilities Is there a reason for setting this flag? Should we remove it? Or is the error a fake error that should be fixed instead? Jacopo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Transaction related error in log when the
Of course, I'd love too to get Si's opinion... but I have the feeling he doesn't like to participate in ML discussions. In the last months I don't remember a message from Si, apart from the comments on Jira and the commit logs. Hopefully he will find a moment to jump in this discussion, if not, I can try to open a Jira issue to capture Si's attention (I'm joking, Si) Jacopo David E Jones wrote: It would be good to hear Si's comment on that, but my vote is definitely for removing it. A service should only really have use-transaction set to false if it is doing it's own transaction management internally, like manually or in sub-services only. -David
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1441) Enhance the integration with eBay
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Risaliti closed OFBIZ-1441. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in rev. 603323, 603325, 603326, 603327, 603345, 603349, 603351, 603353. Please let me know if something wrong this is my first commits in OFBiz. Thanks Marco Enhance the integration with eBay - Key: OFBIZ-1441 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1441 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: order, product Affects Versions: SVN trunk Environment: mac os Reporter: Marco Risaliti Assignee: Marco Risaliti Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: ebay.patch, ebay.zip Move the eBay export (auctions creation), currently in the product component, and import (of orders) stuff, currently in the order component, into a new specialpurpose component. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1514) Duplicates in Search Results
Duplicates in Search Results Key: OFBIZ-1514 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: product Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Joe Eckard Priority: Minor If a product has multiple keywords with identical roots and different relevancy weights and the product is within a set of search results that span multiple pages, then it will be duplicated in the results display. This is because ProductSearch is doing a distinct on productId, relevancyWeight(s) instead of grouping by the productId. I'm attaching a small proof-of-concept patch to make grouping by productId the default - it appears to work well with various combinations of search criteria (multiple keywords, features, feature cats, categories, etc.) but I haven't done a tremendous amount of testing. (Only using PostgreSQL and Derby) From the comments in the ProductSearch code it looks like it was done this way once, but it may have caused problems with Oracle. Does anyone know what that problem was, or can anyone check this patch against oracle? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1514) Duplicates in Search Results
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550726 ] Joe Eckard commented on OFBIZ-1514: --- To reproduce this from a clean checkout: Load demo data, create keywords for all products. In the catalog manager, do a keyword search for gizmos with a VIEW_SIZE parameter of 10. You should see 1-10 of 19. Then manually add the keyword gizmotron to Big Gizmo (GZ-8544). Do the same search again and you should see 1-10 of 20. Duplicates in Search Results Key: OFBIZ-1514 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: product Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Joe Eckard Priority: Minor If a product has multiple keywords with identical roots and different relevancy weights and the product is within a set of search results that span multiple pages, then it will be duplicated in the results display. This is because ProductSearch is doing a distinct on productId, relevancyWeight(s) instead of grouping by the productId. I'm attaching a small proof-of-concept patch to make grouping by productId the default - it appears to work well with various combinations of search criteria (multiple keywords, features, feature cats, categories, etc.) but I haven't done a tremendous amount of testing. (Only using PostgreSQL and Derby) From the comments in the ProductSearch code it looks like it was done this way once, but it may have caused problems with Oracle. Does anyone know what that problem was, or can anyone check this patch against oracle? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1514) Duplicates in Search Results
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Eckard updated OFBIZ-1514: -- Attachment: patch.txt Duplicates in Search Results Key: OFBIZ-1514 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: product Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Joe Eckard Priority: Minor Attachments: patch.txt If a product has multiple keywords with identical roots and different relevancy weights and the product is within a set of search results that span multiple pages, then it will be duplicated in the results display. This is because ProductSearch is doing a distinct on productId, relevancyWeight(s) instead of grouping by the productId. I'm attaching a small proof-of-concept patch to make grouping by productId the default - it appears to work well with various combinations of search criteria (multiple keywords, features, feature cats, categories, etc.) but I haven't done a tremendous amount of testing. (Only using PostgreSQL and Derby) From the comments in the ProductSearch code it looks like it was done this way once, but it may have caused problems with Oracle. Does anyone know what that problem was, or can anyone check this patch against oracle? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1514) Duplicates in Search Results
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Eckard updated OFBIZ-1514: -- Description: If a product has multiple keywords with identical roots and different relevancy weights and the product is within a set of search results that span multiple pages, then it will be duplicated in the results display. This is because ProductSearch is doing a distinct on productId, relevancyWeight(s) instead of grouping by the productId. (And the attempt at duplicate removal only happens on a page-by-page basis.) I'm attaching a small proof-of-concept patch to make grouping by productId the default - it appears to work well with various combinations of search criteria (multiple keywords, features, feature cats, categories, etc.) but I haven't done a tremendous amount of testing. (Only using PostgreSQL and Derby) From the comments in the ProductSearch code it looks like it was done this way once, but it may have caused problems with Oracle. Does anyone know what that problem was, or can anyone check this patch against oracle? was: If a product has multiple keywords with identical roots and different relevancy weights and the product is within a set of search results that span multiple pages, then it will be duplicated in the results display. This is because ProductSearch is doing a distinct on productId, relevancyWeight(s) instead of grouping by the productId. I'm attaching a small proof-of-concept patch to make grouping by productId the default - it appears to work well with various combinations of search criteria (multiple keywords, features, feature cats, categories, etc.) but I haven't done a tremendous amount of testing. (Only using PostgreSQL and Derby) From the comments in the ProductSearch code it looks like it was done this way once, but it may have caused problems with Oracle. Does anyone know what that problem was, or can anyone check this patch against oracle? Duplicates in Search Results Key: OFBIZ-1514 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: product Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Joe Eckard Priority: Minor Attachments: patch.txt If a product has multiple keywords with identical roots and different relevancy weights and the product is within a set of search results that span multiple pages, then it will be duplicated in the results display. This is because ProductSearch is doing a distinct on productId, relevancyWeight(s) instead of grouping by the productId. (And the attempt at duplicate removal only happens on a page-by-page basis.) I'm attaching a small proof-of-concept patch to make grouping by productId the default - it appears to work well with various combinations of search criteria (multiple keywords, features, feature cats, categories, etc.) but I haven't done a tremendous amount of testing. (Only using PostgreSQL and Derby) From the comments in the ProductSearch code it looks like it was done this way once, but it may have caused problems with Oracle. Does anyone know what that problem was, or can anyone check this patch against oracle? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r603353 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product: config/ servicedef/ src/org/ofbiz/product/product/ webapp/catalog/WEB-INF/ webapp/catalog/find/ widget/catalog/
Cool, good work Marco !
Thanks
Jacques
PS : Heu... did not tried ;o)
Author: mrisaliti
Date: Tue Dec 11 12:41:37 2007
New Revision: 603353
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603353view=rev
Log:
eBay features are now moved to a specialpurpose application and it can be
removed from the product application (Part of issue
OFBIZ-1441)
Removed:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/productsExport.properties
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/product/ProductsExportToEbay.java
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/find/ExportForms.xml
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.properties
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels_it.properties
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/servicedef/services.xml
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/WEB-INF/controller.xml
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/find/keywordsearch.ftl
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/find/keywordsearchactions.ftl
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/widget/catalog/FindScreens.xml
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.properties
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.properties?rev=603353r1=603352r2=603353view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.properties
(original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels.properties Tue
Dec 11 12:41:37 2007
@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@
PageTitlePickListOptions=Pick List Options
PageTitlePickingMoveStock=Picking : Move Stock
PageTitlePickingViewStartedPicks=Picking : View Started Picks
-PageTitleProductsExportToEbay=Products Export on eBay
PageTitleQuickAddProductVariants=Quick Add Product Variants
PageTitleSearchInventoryItems=Search Inventory Items
PageTitleSearchResults=Search Results
@@ -574,7 +573,6 @@
ProductExpireDate=Expire Date
ProductExpireResultsFrom=Expire Results From
ProductExplodeOrderItems=Explode Order Items
-ProductExportToeBay=Export To eBay
ProductFacilities=Facilities
ProductFacilitiesList=Facilities List
ProductFacility=Facility
@@ -1512,10 +1510,6 @@
productevents.specified_update_mode_not_supported=Specified update mode:
${updateMode} is not supported.
productevents.thru_date_not_formatted_correctly=Thru Date not formatted
correctly.
productevents.updatemode_not_specified=Update Mode was not specified, but is
required.
-productsExportToEbay.errorDuringAuthenticationToEbay=Error during
authentication to eBay
-productsExportToEbay.exceptionDuringBuildingDataItemsToEbay=Exception
occurred during building data items to eBay
-productsExportToEbay.exceptionInExportToEbay=Exception in exportToEbay
-productsExportToEbay.productItemsSentCorrecltyToEbay=Product items sent
correclty to eBay
productsearchevents.added_x_product_category_members=Added ${numAdded}
product category members.
productsearchevents.error_getting_search_results=Error getting search
results: ${errSearchResult}.
productsearchevents.expired_x_items=Expired ${numExpired} items.
@@ -1896,22 +1890,4 @@
FormFieldTitle_carrierServiceCode=Carrier Service Code
FormFieldTitle_editLink=Edit Link
FormFieldTitle_monthsInPastLimit=Months In Past Limit
-FormFieldTitle_picklistBinId=Picklist Bin
-FormFieldTitle_geoCode=Country
-FormFieldTitle_location=Location
-FormFieldTitle_ebayCategory=eBay Category
-FormFieldTitle_paymentMethodsAccepted=Payment Methods Accepted
-FormFieldTitle_paymentPayPal=PayPal
-FormFieldTitle_paymentVisaMC=Visa/Mastercard
-FormFieldTitle_paymentAmEx=American Express
-FormFieldTitle_paymentDiscover=Discover card
-FormFieldTitle_paymentCCAccepted=Credit card
-FormFieldTitle_paymentCashInPerson=Cash-in-person
-FormFieldTitle_paymentCashOnPickup=Payment on delivery
-FormFieldTitle_paymentCOD=Cash on delivery
-FormFieldTitle_paymentCODPrePayDelivery=Cash On Delivery After Paid
-FormFieldTitle_paymentMOCC=Money order/cashiers check
-FormFieldTitle_paymentMoneyXferAccepted=Direct transfer of money
-FormFieldTitle_paymentPersonalCheck=Personal check
-FormFieldTitle_listingDuration=Listing Duration
-FormFieldTitle_startPrice=Start Price
+FormFieldTitle_picklistBinId=Picklist Bin
\ No newline at end of file
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels_it.properties
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels_it.properties?rev=603353r1=603352r2=603353view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels_it.properties
(original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/config/ProductUiLabels_it.properties Tue
Dec 11 12:41:37 2007
@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@
PageTitlePickListOptions=Opzioni Lista di Prelievo
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
An even one easier that supersede Putty (actually the best is to have both) is WinSCP, really easy to use (UI). Pageant is also a must have when you use only Putty (but like I said, WinSCP rules) Jacques De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] ah ah... quicker than me :-) Raj Saini wrote: Use Putty. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Raj Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1442) Add ability to use XML property files for locale-specific properties
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550748 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-1442: Jeroen, The objective of getting XML file support into OFBiz was to move away from using *.properties files - which required special translation tools. It is my understanding that there is no translation tool needed when working with UTF-8 XML files. The latest revision supports both the OFBiz custom XML file format and and standard java XML file format. While having multiple translations in the same file seems odd at first, when you look at one you can see the advantage - missing property translations become obvious. Add ability to use XML property files for locale-specific properties Key: OFBIZ-1442 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1442 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Reporter: Adrian Crum Priority: Minor Attachments: xml_props.patch, xml_props.patch, xml_props_demo.patch As per discussion on the dev mailing list, implement XML property files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-1442) Add ability to use XML property files for locale-specific properties
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550748 ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on OFBIZ-1442 at 12/11/07 3:40 PM: -- Jeroen, The objective of getting XML file support into OFBiz was to move away from using *.properties files - which required special translation tools. It is my understanding that there is no translation tool needed when working with UTF-8 XML files. The latest revision supports both the OFBiz custom XML file format and the standard java XML file format. While having multiple translations in the same file seems odd at first, when you look at one you can see the advantage - missing property translations become obvious. was (Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jeroen, The objective of getting XML file support into OFBiz was to move away from using *.properties files - which required special translation tools. It is my understanding that there is no translation tool needed when working with UTF-8 XML files. The latest revision supports both the OFBiz custom XML file format and and standard java XML file format. While having multiple translations in the same file seems odd at first, when you look at one you can see the advantage - missing property translations become obvious. Add ability to use XML property files for locale-specific properties Key: OFBIZ-1442 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1442 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Reporter: Adrian Crum Priority: Minor Attachments: xml_props.patch, xml_props.patch, xml_props_demo.patch As per discussion on the dev mailing list, implement XML property files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-574) Simplify the home page and reorganize according to more common ASF project patterns
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550749 ] Jeroen van der Wal commented on OFBIZ-574: -- The content of the site is outdated (ie the JavaOne presentation was seven months ago!), links are not working and this gives Ofbiz an inactive image. Can I support? Simplify the home page and reorganize according to more common ASF project patterns --- Key: OFBIZ-574 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-574 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: site Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato simplify the home page and reorganize according to more common ASF project patterns; some of the stuff on the home page we may even want to move to docs.ofbiz.org, but much of it will move to other (new) pages following ASF project patterns -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Transaction related error in log when the
Hi Jacopo, Just chiming in. David is absolutely right. Transactions are always needed. For database reads, transactions are needed to prevent dirty reads, for example. It should be obvious why update, delete, insert need transactions. The use-transaction=false should only be off when the service does it's own transaction management. Especially when a separate transaction outside of current transaction is needed -- such as when wanting to update a log regardless of how current transaction proceeds. But be careful of forking transactions like that. Must make sure the forked transaction only handles data that is not related to the data handled by the main transaction. I had a recent project where we went into a fork frenzy, forking more and more transactions to escape deadlocks. Check that particular service to see if it does any transaction management of its own. I'll check too, and report. Jonathon Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Of course, I'd love too to get Si's opinion... but I have the feeling he doesn't like to participate in ML discussions. In the last months I don't remember a message from Si, apart from the comments on Jira and the commit logs. Hopefully he will find a moment to jump in this discussion, if not, I can try to open a Jira issue to capture Si's attention (I'm joking, Si) Jacopo David E Jones wrote: It would be good to hear Si's comment on that, but my vote is definitely for removing it. A service should only really have use-transaction set to false if it is doing it's own transaction management internally, like manually or in sub-services only. -David
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-574) Simplify the home page and reorganize according to more common ASF project patterns
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550823 ] Raj Saini commented on OFBIZ-574: - I like how OpenEJB site is done. All the site contents are pulled up from Confluence (Wiki). IIRC, Confluence has a plugin which can help its contents with site. I remember, I wrote some example for OpenEJB and code was pulled out from SVN with the help of confluence plugin to show the examples on website. I think we can work on similar lines here. Creating site in wiki will more maintainable. I can explore this further if we agree on it. Simplify the home page and reorganize according to more common ASF project patterns --- Key: OFBIZ-574 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-574 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: site Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato simplify the home page and reorganize according to more common ASF project patterns; some of the stuff on the home page we may even want to move to docs.ofbiz.org, but much of it will move to other (new) pages following ASF project patterns -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
AFAIK WinSCP is for scp (secury remote copy). Can you run the commands from WinSCP for example svn up? I never tried it as I use Linux. Raj Jacques Le Roux wrote: An even one easier that supersede Putty (actually the best is to have both) is WinSCP, really easy to use (UI). Pageant is also a must have when you use only Putty (but like I said, WinSCP rules) Jacques De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] ah ah... quicker than me :-) Raj Saini wrote: Use Putty. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Raj Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
Regarding RMI connnection
hi, I want to know how many RMI connections are supported by Ofbiz. I need to increase the number of rmi connections accepted by Ofbiz. Thanks, Mukul Saxena
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Putty worked fine for me, I had no idea to use any of it but found some good walkthroughs on apache.org Regards Scott On 12/12/2007, Raj Saini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AFAIK WinSCP is for scp (secury remote copy). Can you run the commands from WinSCP for example svn up? I never tried it as I use Linux. Raj Jacques Le Roux wrote: An even one easier that supersede Putty (actually the best is to have both) is WinSCP, really easy to use (UI). Pageant is also a must have when you use only Putty (but like I said, WinSCP rules) Jacques De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] ah ah... quicker than me :-) Raj Saini wrote: Use Putty. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Raj Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, How does someone using Windows do the 3.1 ssh step? -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Adrian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adrianc Date: Mon Dec 10 12:04:01 2007 New Revision: 603024 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603024view=rev Log: UtilProperties bug fix and enhancements. This commit fixes the bug reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1488 and it includes a few of the improvements mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1485. This commit also lays the groundwork for improved properties file support in the future. This commit contains a new xsd file - it needs to be included on the apache ofbiz website. XML properties files will generate console error messages until it is. You can add the xsd file to the site yourself, it is a useful task, here are the details: 1) check out the site files from svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/ 2) add the new xsd files and commit 3) publish the updates: 3.1) ssh to people.apache.org using your committer's account and password 3.2) cd /www/ofbiz.apache.org/ 3.3) svn up The mods will go live approx after 30 minutes. Jacopo
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1440) Review/Improve/Cleanup the /accounting/control/EditAcctgTrans screen
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550844 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1440: -- I think it is time to prevent the ability to modify an accounting transaction that is posted. Instead of adding a bunch of use-when in the form definition's fields, I'd suggest that we create two new forms and we add a sectioncondition... area to the screen definition to include the editable or not editable ones according to the isPosted flag. Review/Improve/Cleanup the /accounting/control/EditAcctgTrans screen Key: OFBIZ-1440 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1440 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Assignee: Anil K Patel Attachments: CreateAcctgTrans.patch Review/Improve/Cleanup the /accounting/control/EditAcctgTrans screen: you can reach it from AccountingGeneral LedgerAccountingAccounting Transactionsthen perform a search and click one of the accctgTransId - add more fields (from the AcctgTrans entity) to the form at the top of the screen - the form at the top of the screen, and the underlying updateAcctgTrans service, always allows to edit the fields of the AcctgTrans entity (even if the transactions are posted): should we limit this (both at the ui and service level)? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r603423 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz: product/price/PriceServices.java shipment/thirdparty/usps/UspsServices.java
Bilgin,
this is a good catch, thanks.
Jacopo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bibryam
Date: Tue Dec 11 16:21:27 2007
New Revision: 603423
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603423view=rev
Log:
Fixed a bug in calculateProductPrice service when called for products with
agreement.
Removed non UTF character causing warnings.
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/price/PriceServices.java
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/shipment/thirdparty/usps/UspsServices.java
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/price/PriceServices.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/price/PriceServices.java?rev=603423r1=603422r2=603423view=diff
==
---
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/price/PriceServices.java
(original)
+++
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/price/PriceServices.java
Tue Dec 11 16:21:27 2007
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
List orderItemPriceInfos = FastList.newInstance();
if (defaultPriceValue != null) {
// If a price calc formula (service) is specified, then use it to
get the unit price
-if
(UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(defaultPriceValue.getString(customPriceCalcService)))
{
+if (ProductPrice.equals(defaultPriceValue.getEntityName())
UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(defaultPriceValue.getString(customPriceCalcService))) {
GenericValue customMethod = null;
try {
customMethod =
defaultPriceValue.getRelatedOne(CustomMethod);
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1414) Refactor FOP Java code
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-1414. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed, rev 603483. Refactor FOP Java code -- Key: OFBIZ-1414 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1414 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Reporter: Adrian Crum Priority: Minor Attachments: fop_refactor.patch As per the discussion on the dev mailing list, refactor the FOP Java code so that it is contained in a single worker class. This will make it easier to keep OFBiz source code updated against FOP API changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1494) Implement new screens and Java event to manage account reconciliations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] JyotsnaRathore updated OFBIZ-1494: -- Attachment: glreconcilation.patch I think submit button Create Account Reconciliation should be disabled if none of the AcctgTransEntry records associated to the selected account is selected(checked) . Implement new screens and Java event to manage account reconciliations -- Key: OFBIZ-1494 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1494 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato Attachments: glreconcilation.patch, glreconcilation.patch, Glreconciliation.patch Implement new screen and Java event to create an account reconciliation (for example a bank reconciliation). For a general description about the process: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_reconciliation Task details: 1) add a new menu item Account Reconciliation to the AccountingGeneral LedgerAccounting menu; the menu item will open the screen described at point #2 2) implement a new screen composed by a search form at the top and a multi form at the bottom 2.1) the (single) search form is composed by: 2.1.1) a drop down (allow-empty= false) with all the GL accounts associated to the organization 2.1.2) a search button 2.2) the multi form will only be visible when the first form has been submitted; the list will show all the AcctgTransEntry records associated to the selected account (sorted by ascending date) with reconcileStatusId field set to not reconciled; each row will have a checkbox; at the end of the list a submit button Create Account Reconciliation 2.3) (OPTIONAL) it would be cool to add some Javascript (or Ajax?) magic to display, at the bottom of the page the total of all the selected records (use the amount field where D counts as + and C as -) 3) create a Java event (not necessarily a service, a controller event is probably easier) and that will receive data from the multi form at point 2.2 and: 3.1) for each row selected it will retrieve the corresponding AcctgTransEntry and add it to a List (NOTE/HINTS: there are some utils methods to easily retrieve/parse fields submitted by a multi form... let me know if you don't find them) 3.2) compute the total of all the AcctgTransEntry.amount of the entries in the list (where D counts as + and C as -) 3.3) call the service createGlReconciliation with the following input fields: glReconciliationName=the 'now' timestamp, glAccountId, organizationPartyId, reconciledDate=now, reconciledBalance=the number computed in #3.2; save the output parameter glReconciliationId 3.4) iterate the list of entries created in #3.1 and for each one call the service createGlReconciliationEntry with the following input fields: glReconciliationId= the value returned at #3.3, acctgTransId, acctgTransEntrySeqId, reconciledAmount=AcctgTransEntry.amount 3.5) put in the context/parameters the glReconciliationId 4) set the controller entries so that, after the event described at #3 is successfully executed, redirect to a new screen Edit GL Reconciliation (described in #5); on error return at the screen described in #2 5) implement a new screen Edit GL Reconciliation that takes as input a glReconciliationId and is composed by: 5.1) an editable form that display the content of the GlReconciliation entry; the only editable fields will be: glReconciliationName, description, reconciledDate; all the other fields will be visible only; once submitted, the three fields will be updated (updateGlReconciliation) 5.2) a list (non editable) of all the GlReconciliationEntry records associated with the glReconciliationId 6) add a new menu item Account Reconciliations to the AccountingGeneral LedgerAccounting menu; the menu item will open the screen described at point #7 7) implement a new screen composed by a search form at the top and a multi form at the bottom 7.1) the (single) search form is composed by: 7.1.1) a drop down (allow-empty= false) with all the GL accounts associated to the organization 7.1.2) from/thru dates 7.1.3) a search button 7.2) a list form (visible when the first form has been submitted) that lists all the GlReconciliation records that match the search parameters; the glReconciliationId field will be an hyperlink to open the Edit Gl Reconciliation screen (implemented in #5; the highlighted menu should not change) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-1361) Mark UtilDateTime.java deprecated methods as deprecated
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-1361. -- Resolution: Later Due to differences in opinion and no clear consensus, I'm closing this. We can look at it again later. Mark UtilDateTime.java deprecated methods as deprecated --- Key: OFBIZ-1361 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1361 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Reporter: Adrian Crum Priority: Minor Attachments: UtilDateTime.patch Now that user-selected locale and time support has been added to the framework, it's time to start weeding out date/time code that doesn't use the Locale and TimeZone objects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r603024 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: base/dtd/ofbiz-properties.xsd base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java example/config/ExampleXmlUiLabels.xml webtools/src/org/ofbiz/we
Adrian, is it still an outstanding issue? Jacopo Adrian Crum wrote: Jacopo, I'm getting access denied messages while entering my password in ssh. -Adrian
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-84) Shortcut for all Unpaid Invoices on a BillingAccount
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pankaj Savita updated OFBIZ-84: --- Attachment: Invoice_OrderBillingAccount.patch Updated patch with fix, related to view-map(BillingAccountOrders) missed that needs to checked into svn. Shortcut for all Unpaid Invoices on a BillingAccount Key: OFBIZ-84 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-84 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: accounting Reporter: Anil K Patel Assignee: Anil K Patel Priority: Minor Attachments: Invoice_OrderBillingAccount.patch, Invoice_OrderBillingAccount.patch, Invoice_OrderBillingAccount.patch A Shortcut to Listing Unpaid Invoices on a BillingAccount should be provided. If somebody can help me figure out few cosmetic things like, Link Name and Location, I'll do the coding and provide the patch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
