Comparing ofBiz Hashed Passwords in .NET
I am working on an application that wants to leverage the ofBiz user logins to allow ofBiz users to automatically logon to another application developed in .NET ASP.NET. The ASP.NET application gets a login from the user and then accesses a copy of the ofBiz user login table to compare passwords for login validation. I have the .NET code creating a SHA-1 password hash but it does not compare properly to the encrypted passwords in ofBiz. I wrote some test Java code and determined that it's version of SHA-1 is the same as the .NET version hash. So it looks like a salt is being used but none of the ofBiz developers where I work can point out how to find the salt value or help me with this. I have looked through the login code and it looks like a straight SHA-1 hash using MessageDigest. But then the hashed passwords should match but they don't. Can someone tell me what (and where) the salt value is that is being used? Or if I'm missing something here what it is? And possibly point me to where in the documentation this is covered (if it is)? Thanks! - Grant -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Comparing-ofBiz-Hashed-Passwords-in-NET-tp2280296p2280296.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Comparing ofBiz Hashed Passwords in .NET
I am working on an application that wants to leverage the ofBiz user logins to allow ofBiz users to automatically logon to another application developed in .NET ASP.NET. The ASP.NET application gets a login from the user and then accesses a copy of the ofBiz user login table to compare passwords for login validation. I have the .NET code creating a SHA-1 password hash but it does not compare properly to the encrypted passwords in ofBiz. I wrote some test Java code and determined that it's version of SHA-1 is the same as the .NET version hash. So it looks like a salt is being used but none of the ofBiz developers where I work can point out how to find the salt value or help me with this. I have looked through the login code and it looks like a straight SHA-1 hash using MessageDigest. But then the hashed passwords should match but they don't. Can someone tell me what (and where) the salt value is that is being used? Or if I'm missing something here what it is? And possibly point me to where in the documentation this is covered (if it is)? Thanks! - Grant
Re: Comparing ofBiz Hashed Passwords in .NET
CGrantAnderson wrote: I am working on an application that wants to leverage the ofBiz user logins to allow ofBiz users to automatically logon to another application developed in .NET ASP.NET. The ASP.NET application gets a login from the user and then accesses a copy of the ofBiz user login table to compare passwords for login validation. I have the .NET code creating a SHA-1 password hash but it does not compare properly to the encrypted passwords in ofBiz. I wrote some test Java code and determined that it's version of SHA-1 is the same as the .NET version hash. So it looks like a salt is being used but none of the ofBiz developers where I work can point out how to find the salt value or help me with this. I have looked through the login code and it looks like a straight SHA-1 hash using MessageDigest. But then the hashed passwords should match but they don't. Can someone tell me what (and where) the salt value is that is being used? Or if I'm missing something here what it is? And possibly point me to where in the documentation this is covered (if it is)? There is no salt in ofbiz passwords. I have a patch that adds support for it, that is compatible with unix crypt(3).
Re: Comparing ofBiz Hashed Passwords in .NET
How old is the OFBiz instance? The hex encoding was messy a few years back which resulted in unexpected results but that's been fixed for a while now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 7/07/2010, at 10:55 AM, CGrantAnderson wrote: I am working on an application that wants to leverage the ofBiz user logins to allow ofBiz users to automatically logon to another application developed in .NET ASP.NET. The ASP.NET application gets a login from the user and then accesses a copy of the ofBiz user login table to compare passwords for login validation. I have the .NET code creating a SHA-1 password hash but it does not compare properly to the encrypted passwords in ofBiz. I wrote some test Java code and determined that it's version of SHA-1 is the same as the .NET version hash. So it looks like a salt is being used but none of the ofBiz developers where I work can point out how to find the salt value or help me with this. I have looked through the login code and it looks like a straight SHA-1 hash using MessageDigest. But then the hashed passwords should match but they don't. Can someone tell me what (and where) the salt value is that is being used? Or if I'm missing something here what it is? And possibly point me to where in the documentation this is covered (if it is)? Thanks! - Grant -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Comparing-ofBiz-Hashed-Passwords-in-NET-tp2280296p2280296.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3845) Multiple lookups target problem
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12885880#action_12885880 ] Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3845: Hi Shubham, i could reproduce the error. In my instance it's not the problems with the generated IDs (every lookup have a unique ID). The problem is the Request. I don't now why but the last Request which is used on the site for the last lookup will be used for every other lookup before. Freemarker renders the right Tag but the behavior of the .load method seems to be mysterious. I will have a look at this issue :-) Multiple lookups target problem --- Key: OFBIZ-3845 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3845 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: ALL COMPONENTS Affects Versions: jQuery Reporter: Shubham Dubey Fix For: jQuery Steps: (1) Go to any page having more than one lookup. (2) Click on any lookup and find the corrosponding information and click on tab to select the information. Any lookup we select, lookup for same lookupId is created, which is for the last lookup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3830) jQuery Calendar Implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12885883#action_12885883 ] Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3830: OK Jacques good hint, i will keep it in mind, thanks. I wish you a good holiday, take you're time to relaxe a few days :-) Have a good day Sascha jQuery Calendar Implementation -- Key: OFBIZ-3830 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: ALL APPLICATIONS Affects Versions: jQuery Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES Fix For: jQuery Attachments: cal.gif, images.zip, jquery.zip, OFBIZ-3814_calendar_fix.patch, OFBIZ-3830_calendar_update.patch, OFBIZ-3830_CalendarLanguageFix.patch Hey, good morning, here a few changes from the WE. I try to implement a new jQuery calendar. It's not totally done, yet. I didn't touch the FTLs were the calenar is called. But all calendar calls over the Macro renderer work. I used the jQuery User Interface [http://jqueryui.com/] Calendar (so no licence problems) furthermore i added a plugin for the data pickin (GLP/MIT Licence too :-) [http://trentrichardson.com/examples/timepicker/]). The jQuery UI have some interessting widgets!! For commit please copy the folder from the jquery.zip in the images/jquery folder. You should have images/jquery/ui and images/jquery/plugins. Furthermore there are themes for the jQuery UI widgets. Which i have copied in the Theme CSS of ofbiz. The images.zip contains images which are needed by the jQuery widegts, i placed them in the image folder of each ofbiz Theme. I think we have to decide if this is the right way to deal with th jQuery UI. Cheers, hava good day Sascha -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: PicklistOptions processing time
Hi Albert, When you say better prepared SQL statements do you mean that you have not used the Entity Engine? Jacques From: mayo albertmay...@hotmail.com Has anyone else noticed the amount of time it could take to load the PicklistOptions view for larger batches of orders and a larger database history? I am noticing as our OFBiz database grows larger, it is taking the PicklistOptions longer to load. Even for a batch as small as 50 orders it can take up to a couple minutes to load. 300 orders can take upwards of 5-10 minutes. My development system with much lesser hardware can get through a hundred orders in seconds, so I have a feeling it has to do with the process/code inefficiency. I am using OFBiz 4.0. Has this already been fixed in the trunk version? If not, I have developed a faster picklist process for my copmany that makes minimal hits to the database and utilizes better prepared SQL statements to get the same result. It may be a nice foundation to a substantially improved picklist process for the trunk version. Would anyone be interested in this code? If so, should I create a Jira ticket and attach the code? -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PicklistOptions-processing-time-tp2280129p2280129.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3830) jQuery Calendar Implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12885892#action_12885892 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3830: Thanks Sascha, I will follow your advice ;) jQuery Calendar Implementation -- Key: OFBIZ-3830 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: ALL APPLICATIONS Affects Versions: jQuery Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES Fix For: jQuery Attachments: cal.gif, images.zip, jquery.zip, OFBIZ-3814_calendar_fix.patch, OFBIZ-3830_calendar_update.patch, OFBIZ-3830_CalendarLanguageFix.patch Hey, good morning, here a few changes from the WE. I try to implement a new jQuery calendar. It's not totally done, yet. I didn't touch the FTLs were the calenar is called. But all calendar calls over the Macro renderer work. I used the jQuery User Interface [http://jqueryui.com/] Calendar (so no licence problems) furthermore i added a plugin for the data pickin (GLP/MIT Licence too :-) [http://trentrichardson.com/examples/timepicker/]). The jQuery UI have some interessting widgets!! For commit please copy the folder from the jquery.zip in the images/jquery folder. You should have images/jquery/ui and images/jquery/plugins. Furthermore there are themes for the jQuery UI widgets. Which i have copied in the Theme CSS of ofbiz. The images.zip contains images which are needed by the jQuery widegts, i placed them in the image folder of each ofbiz Theme. I think we have to decide if this is the right way to deal with th jQuery UI. Cheers, hava good day Sascha -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3845) Multiple lookups target problem
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12885901#action_12885901 ] Shubham Dubey commented on OFBIZ-3845: -- Hi Sascha Yes there is a problem, and i did't said that lookUpId's are same for all the lookup's infact i mentioned Any lookup we select, lookup for same lookupId is created, which is for the last lookup. If it is confusing,then i would like to clarify it. Please see the associated lookupId on title bar of the lookup, that targets to the last one. Also i see a problem that sometimes lookup's are not displayed, that might be a instantaneous problem on my local instance,that i will look. Thanks for reviewing it, i will also try to have closer look at this mysterious behaviour :) Multiple lookups target problem --- Key: OFBIZ-3845 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3845 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: ALL COMPONENTS Affects Versions: jQuery Reporter: Shubham Dubey Fix For: jQuery Steps: (1) Go to any page having more than one lookup. (2) Click on any lookup and find the corrosponding information and click on tab to select the information. Any lookup we select, lookup for same lookupId is created, which is for the last lookup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods
What about removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods methods and use instead the public boolean shippingApplies() ? (We will also need a new shippingApplies method that takes as input the shipgroup). In fact the logic in shippingApplies is the one used in several other places to determine the shipping charges. Kind regards, Jacopo
Re: Removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods
+ 1 Bilgin On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: What about removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods methods and use instead the public boolean shippingApplies() ? (We will also need a new shippingApplies method that takes as input the shipgroup). In fact the logic in shippingApplies is the one used in several other places to determine the shipping charges. Kind regards, Jacopo
Re: Removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods
+1. Rishi Solanki Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Bilgin Ibryam bibr...@gmail.com wrote: + 1 Bilgin On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: What about removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods methods and use instead the public boolean shippingApplies() ? (We will also need a new shippingApplies method that takes as input the shipgroup). In fact the logic in shippingApplies is the one used in several other places to determine the shipping charges. Kind regards, Jacopo
Re: Removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods
+1 -- Thanks Regards, Mridul Pathak Senior Manager HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: What about removing the ShoppingCart.containOnlyDigitalGoods methods and use instead the public boolean shippingApplies() ? (We will also need a new shippingApplies method that takes as input the shipgroup). In fact the logic in shippingApplies is the one used in several other places to determine the shipping charges. Kind regards, Jacopo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Adding agreementId to OrderHeader
Thanks Scott, the link was indeed useful. I like the plan of creating the AgreementOrderAppl entity, because it will be definitely very flexible. However the existing order code (ui and business logic) is based on the assumption that one agreement is associated to a cart/order, and I would like to fix this process asap before enhancing the data model with the AgreementOrderAppl entity. So, what if I add the new field to the OrderHeader but instead of naming it agreementId we use primaryAgreementId? Kind regards, Jacopo On Jul 3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacopo, Not sure if this is of any use to you: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394 Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: yes, I will do. Jacopo On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it? Thanks Jacques From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book. since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed them. Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the OOTB as a basis. I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/2/2010 10:26 AM: Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right? Jacques From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net I used the model on page 146 and the example agreementID 10002 since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the product agreement productID and updates the orderitem orderterms(page 128) and table 4.9(page 129) . an SECA checks that the order terms can be accepted based on the order, like a promo may be disqualified based on the order terms. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/2/2010 3:26 AM: When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from AgreementTerms, if the agreement has a price list then the agreement prices are used in place of ProductPrice); however the agreementId is only added to the cart but it is lost when the order is saved. This causes issues if the order is edited: the agreement is lost and the system is unable to apply the agreement prices to the edited order. The solution I am proposing is to add the agreementId field to OrderHeader entity. What do you think? Jacopo
Re: PicklistOptions processing time
No, I used DynamicViewEntity to make more complex SQL to more quickly filter
out any orders that should not be picked. For instance in OFBiz 4.0 (and
maybe the trunk version), the picklistoptions function will (abbreviated)
select * from OrderHeader
for each orderHeader {
select * from OrderItemShipGroup where orderId = orderHeader.orderId
for each orderItemShipGroup in orderItemShipGroupList {
select * from OrderItemShipGrpInvRes where orderId =
orderItemShipGroup.orderId;
for each orderItemShipGrpInvRes in orderItemShipGrpInvResList {
etc
}
}
}
These kind of loops can create many hits to the database and greatly slow
down the process, especially if the database tables have many records. Our
database is now almost 8 gigs. The PicklistOptions process yesterday took
~4 minutes for 40 pickable orders.
My code uses DynamicViewEntity to create join statements and make minimal
hits to the database--I think a total of 4 hits. For the same 40 pickable
orders, the process ran in 2-3 seconds. My code is missing some of the
bells and whistles that you have, but it gives a good foundation and
structure. You will be able to add all the bells and whistles very quickly.
My company is using my code in production right now. The user has verified
it is working correctly to this point. Let me know if anyone is interested
in seeing the code. I would like to contribute to the community is some
way, since I do not have time to properly develop on the trunk.
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PicklistOptions-processing-time-tp2280129p2280947.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: PicklistOptions processing time
We've done the same thing here, but using a view entity instead of a
dynamic entity. Ours uses 3 queries, 1 to find orders ready to pick, 1
to find those already on a picklist (subtracted from the first list)
and 1 to find those that need stock moves (also subtracted from the
original list).
I would be interested to see your approach.
-Joe
On Jul 7, 2010, at 9:59 AM, mayo wrote:
No, I used DynamicViewEntity to make more complex SQL to more
quickly filter
out any orders that should not be picked. For instance in OFBiz 4.0
(and
maybe the trunk version), the picklistoptions function will
(abbreviated)
select * from OrderHeader
for each orderHeader {
select * from OrderItemShipGroup where orderId =
orderHeader.orderId
for each orderItemShipGroup in orderItemShipGroupList {
select * from OrderItemShipGrpInvRes where orderId =
orderItemShipGroup.orderId;
for each orderItemShipGrpInvRes in orderItemShipGrpInvResList {
etc
}
}
}
These kind of loops can create many hits to the database and greatly
slow
down the process, especially if the database tables have many
records. Our
database is now almost 8 gigs. The PicklistOptions process
yesterday took
~4 minutes for 40 pickable orders.
My code uses DynamicViewEntity to create join statements and make
minimal
hits to the database--I think a total of 4 hits. For the same 40
pickable
orders, the process ran in 2-3 seconds. My code is missing some of
the
bells and whistles that you have, but it gives a good foundation and
structure. You will be able to add all the bells and whistles very
quickly.
My company is using my code in production right now. The user has
verified
it is working correctly to this point. Let me know if anyone is
interested
in seeing the code. I would like to contribute to the community is
some
way, since I do not have time to properly develop on the trunk.
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PicklistOptions-processing-time-tp2280129p2280947.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
birt and System.err
I have discovered that something in birt is closing System.err during startup. This was discovered when Exception.printStackTrace() stopped showing output(it goes to System.err by default). If I remove the birt component, then err is not closed. Has anyone else seen this? Hans, do you have any clues as to what is going on here?
Re: PicklistOptions processing time
We've done the same thing here, but using a view entity instead of a
dynamic entity. Ours uses 3 queries, 1 to find orders ready to pick, 1
to find those already on a picklist (subtracted from the first list)
and 1 to find those that need stock moves (also subtracted from the
original list).
I would be interested to see your approach.
-Joe
On Jul 7, 2010, at 9:59 AM, mayo wrote:
No, I used DynamicViewEntity to make more complex SQL to more
quickly filter
out any orders that should not be picked. For instance in OFBiz 4.0
(and
maybe the trunk version), the picklistoptions function will
(abbreviated)
select * from OrderHeader
for each orderHeader {
select * from OrderItemShipGroup where orderId =
orderHeader.orderId
for each orderItemShipGroup in orderItemShipGroupList {
select * from OrderItemShipGrpInvRes where orderId =
orderItemShipGroup.orderId;
for each orderItemShipGrpInvRes in orderItemShipGrpInvResList {
etc
}
}
}
These kind of loops can create many hits to the database and greatly
slow
down the process, especially if the database tables have many
records. Our
database is now almost 8 gigs. The PicklistOptions process
yesterday took
~4 minutes for 40 pickable orders.
My code uses DynamicViewEntity to create join statements and make
minimal
hits to the database--I think a total of 4 hits. For the same 40
pickable
orders, the process ran in 2-3 seconds. My code is missing some of
the
bells and whistles that you have, but it gives a good foundation and
structure. You will be able to add all the bells and whistles very
quickly.
My company is using my code in production right now. The user has
verified
it is working correctly to this point. Let me know if anyone is
interested
in seeing the code. I would like to contribute to the community is
some
way, since I do not have time to properly develop on the trunk.
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PicklistOptions-processing-time-tp2280129p2280947.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: PicklistOptions processing time
Ok cool. I did something similar. What is the best way for me to get the code to you? -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PicklistOptions-processing-time-tp2280129p2281080.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Adding agreementId to OrderHeader
I have the implementation that uses the Sales agreement and a productaggreemt for retail, wholesale, custom. so as you think though the changes you might want to consider hooks to allow this in future. also the agreements are based on partyID role of customeras a relationship with the company so I don't see how just AgreementOrderAppl tied to the order header will accomplish this. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/7/2010 6:07 AM: Thanks Scott, the link was indeed useful. I like the plan of creating the AgreementOrderAppl entity, because it will be definitely very flexible. However the existing order code (ui and business logic) is based on the assumption that one agreement is associated to a cart/order, and I would like to fix this process asap before enhancing the data model with the AgreementOrderAppl entity. So, what if I add the new field to the OrderHeader but instead of naming it agreementId we use primaryAgreementId? Kind regards, Jacopo On Jul 3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacopo, Not sure if this is of any use to you: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394 Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: yes, I will do. Jacopo On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it? Thanks Jacques From: BJ Freemanbjf...@free-man.net never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book. since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed them. Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the OOTB as a basis. I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automationhttp://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedinhttp://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/2/2010 10:26 AM: Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right? Jacques From: BJ Freemanbjf...@free-man.net I used the model on page 146 and the example agreementID 10002 since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the product agreement productID and updates the orderitem orderterms(page 128) and table 4.9(page 129) . an SECA checks that the order terms can be accepted based on the order, like a promo may be disqualified based on the order terms. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/2/2010 3:26 AM: When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from AgreementTerms, if the agreement has a price list then the agreement prices are used in place of ProductPrice); however the agreementId is only added to the cart but it is lost when the order is saved. This causes issues if the order is edited: the agreement is lost and the system is unable to apply the agreement prices to the edited order. The solution I am proposing is to add the agreementId field to OrderHeader entity. What do you think? Jacopo
Re: Adding agreementId to OrderHeader
Hi Jacopo, I have to admit to not being a big fan of the primary* pattern, for example in the Shipment entity I really feel it has done nothing except cause us to take shortcuts when writing shipping logic. In terms of an Agreement or even a Shipment, what does it actually mean to be the primary? I understand its usage in Product.primaryProductCategoryId, where it can be used in cases where you need to be able to inspect a hierarchy rather than a graph e.g. for reporting purposes, but it makes less sense to me for those other entities. Could we not for now just limit the UI and logic to only handle a single agreement, but allow for the many-to-many in the data model? Regards Scott On 8/07/2010, at 1:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Thanks Scott, the link was indeed useful. I like the plan of creating the AgreementOrderAppl entity, because it will be definitely very flexible. However the existing order code (ui and business logic) is based on the assumption that one agreement is associated to a cart/order, and I would like to fix this process asap before enhancing the data model with the AgreementOrderAppl entity. So, what if I add the new field to the OrderHeader but instead of naming it agreementId we use primaryAgreementId? Kind regards, Jacopo On Jul 3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacopo, Not sure if this is of any use to you: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394 Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: yes, I will do. Jacopo On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it? Thanks Jacques From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book. since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed them. Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the OOTB as a basis. I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/2/2010 10:26 AM: Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right? Jacques From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net I used the model on page 146 and the example agreementID 10002 since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the product agreement productID and updates the orderitem orderterms(page 128) and table 4.9(page 129) . an SECA checks that the order terms can be accepted based on the order, like a promo may be disqualified based on the order terms. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/2/2010 3:26 AM: When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from AgreementTerms, if the agreement has a price list then the agreement prices are used in place of ProductPrice); however the agreementId is only added to the cart but it is lost when the order is saved. This causes issues if the order is edited: the agreement is lost and the system is unable to apply the agreement prices to the edited order. The solution I am proposing is to add the agreementId field to OrderHeader entity. What do you think? Jacopo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Adding agreementId to OrderHeader
Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacopo, I have to admit to not being a big fan of the primary* pattern, for example in the Shipment entity I really feel it has done nothing except cause us to take shortcuts when writing shipping logic. In terms of an Agreement or even a Shipment, what does it actually mean to be the primary? I understand its usage in Product.primaryProductCategoryId, where it can be used in cases where you need to be able to inspect a hierarchy rather than a graph e.g. for reporting purposes, but it makes less sense to me for those other entities. Could we not for now just limit the UI and logic to only handle a single agreement, but allow for the many-to-many in the data model? My vote is to not add a primaryFoo field, but use a joined entity, with an appropriate Purpose attached. Once you have code that can look up the joined entity with a purpose, adding more logic to handle other purposes is easy. But having a primaryFoo in the base entity means you have duplicate code for dealing with the same info. Regards Scott On 8/07/2010, at 1:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Thanks Scott, the link was indeed useful. I like the plan of creating the AgreementOrderAppl entity, because it will be definitely very flexible. However the existing order code (ui and business logic) is based on the assumption that one agreement is associated to a cart/order, and I would like to fix this process asap before enhancing the data model with the AgreementOrderAppl entity. So, what if I add the new field to the OrderHeader but instead of naming it agreementId we use primaryAgreementId? Kind regards, Jacopo On Jul 3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacopo, Not sure if this is of any use to you: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394 Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: yes, I will do. Jacopo On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it? Thanks Jacques From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book. since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed them. Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the OOTB as a basis. I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/2/2010 10:26 AM: Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right? Jacques From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net I used the model on page 146 and the example agreementID 10002 since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the product agreement productID and updates the orderitem orderterms(page 128) and table 4.9(page 129) . an SECA checks that the order terms can be accepted based on the order, like a promo may be disqualified based on the order terms. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/2/2010 3:26 AM: When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from AgreementTerms, if the agreement has a price list then the agreement prices are used in place of ProductPrice); however the agreementId is only added to the cart but it is lost when the order is saved. This causes issues if the order is edited: the agreement is lost and the system is unable to apply the agreement prices to the edited order. The solution I am proposing is to add the agreementId field to OrderHeader entity. What do you think? Jacopo
Re: Adding agreementId to OrderHeader
how will you get all the companies role of agreements for a particular party that has a partyrelationship of customer? how will you get all the Sales agreements for a partyrelationship of customer with the company under the role of agreements? BJ Freeman sent the following on 7/7/2010 10:19 AM: = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man I have the implementation that uses the Sales agreement and a productaggreemt for retail, wholesale, custom. so as you think though the changes you might want to consider hooks to allow this in future. also the agreements are based on partyID role of customeras a relationship with the company so I don't see how just AgreementOrderAppl tied to the order header will accomplish this. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/7/2010 6:07 AM: Thanks Scott, the link was indeed useful. I like the plan of creating the AgreementOrderAppl entity, because it will be definitely very flexible. However the existing order code (ui and business logic) is based on the assumption that one agreement is associated to a cart/order, and I would like to fix this process asap before enhancing the data model with the AgreementOrderAppl entity. So, what if I add the new field to the OrderHeader but instead of naming it agreementId we use primaryAgreementId? Kind regards, Jacopo On Jul 3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Scott Gray wrote: Hi Jacopo, Not sure if this is of any use to you: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394 Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: yes, I will do. Jacopo On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it? Thanks Jacques From: BJ Freemanbjf...@free-man.net never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book. since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed them. Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the OOTB as a basis. I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automationhttp://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedinhttp://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/2/2010 10:26 AM: Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right? Jacques From: BJ Freemanbjf...@free-man.net I used the model on page 146 and the example agreementID 10002 since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the product agreement productID and updates the orderitem orderterms(page 128) and table 4.9(page 129) . an SECA checks that the order terms can be accepted based on the order, like a promo may be disqualified based on the order terms. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.comhttp://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/2/2010 3:26 AM: When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from AgreementTerms, if the agreement has a price list then the agreement prices are used in place of ProductPrice); however the agreementId is only added to the cart but it is lost when the order is saved. This causes issues if the order is edited: the agreement is lost and the system is unable to apply the agreement prices to the edited order. The solution I am proposing is to add the agreementId field to OrderHeader entity. What do you think? Jacopo
discussion Agreements, ERP and/or MRP
Many companies have agreements about when orders will be place and when shipping will happen, before any order is placed. Ofbiz advertises it is MRP software, yet all I have been able to see is Just-in-time-MRP. Without the Data Model on page 146 vol I, rea,l efficient MRP can not happen. For those that argue the current model works, do an evaluation of the amount of passes it takes to marshal the data, compared to the Data Model I refer to. I have a customer that has a big contract to manufacture concrete parts for a project two years off. Yet they need to know ERP to build the manufacture plant to accommodate the orders that will be coming in. I have another customer that to get good deals and deliver from suppliers has yearly contracts. This feeds back to the Budget Scenarios as to what type of cash flow against order flow they must have to make these agreement worthwhile. Again no ordered have been placed. Now I am not proposing that the complete Data model be filled in with data, only the models structure be, as in the data model books, adhered to. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52 Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/ Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Re: Hippo CMS
Any progress now? -- Regards, Michael Xu (xudong) On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote: That makes far too much sense Adrian. I'm AFK for the next few days so I'll do it next week unless someone else wants to sooner. Regards Scott On 24/06/2010, at 5:38 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote: It might be worthwhile to post a message on the Jackrabbit user mailing list. Let them know what we have in mind, and see if they have any suggestions. Previous experience has shown that Apache sister projects are very helpful in integration efforts. -Adrian --- On Wed, 6/23/10, Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx.de@ googlemail.com wrote: From: Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Hippo CMS To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 2:04 AM Hi Scott, jep that's sounds like a plan. In my opinion concentrating on Jackrabbit will be the best point to start. We should make some Jira Tasks and schedule them that we can start implementing ASAP :-). Did we need a separate Brunch? Cheers Sascha 2010/6/23 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Sascha, Any help would of course be very much appreciated. I think regardless of what approach we take, everyone is mostly in agreement that we will be integrating with Jackrabbit or more importantly we will be making use of the JCR interface (in theory the actual JCR implementation should be irrelevant). One thing I'm fairly sure we will need is a JAAS authentication module (and probably authorization) that we can plug in to the jackrabbit repository so that it can authenticate users via OFBiz. That should be fairly straightforward I think, I'm less certain about what an authorization mechanism would look like. I guess we're also going to need to some sort of session provider interface that allows OFBiz to retrieve sessions from either an embedded repo or remote server repo and once again, it needs to be able to work with any JCR implementation. I'm not entirely sure what that would look like at this stage but any thoughts on the topic would be useful. Most of the other questions come back to the content model and who controls it, will it be OFBiz or a random CMS or perhaps they will have separate models with some sort of jackrabbit internal synchronization between the two? We need to look at these options and understand the pros and cons of each before we can move forward with any sort of certainty. Regards Scott On 22/06/2010, at 6:26 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: +1 i like the idea integrating a full featured CMS in ofbiz, a few weeks ago we started working with JCR but i think the Hippo way is a good one too :-) So Scott i would volunteer to help you :-) ... Have a good day Sascha 2010/6/19 Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com Anybody using or considered using Hippo CMS (onehippo.org) in conjunction with OFBiz? - Apache Licensed - Uses Jackrabbit as its repository - Supports Versioning, Internationalization, Publishing Workflows and more We could start out by using Hippo's UI to manage content and retrieve it for display within OFBiz using the JCR API. As the various document types needed by the OFBiz base applications begin to take shape we could look at ways to allow the content to be modified directly from within OFBiz (once again using the JCR API). Any thoughts, alternatives, ideas or whatever would be appreciated. I'm considering working on a POC in my spare time, not sure how long that might take at this stage. I already have a copy of Hippo running inside OFBiz but that was just a matter of expanding their WAR distribution and wrapping it in a component, next step would be gaining access to the repo from OFBiz code. Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com -- Sascha Rodekamp Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de -- Sascha Rodekamp Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de
Re: Hippo CMS
Scott, I like the idea of integrating with existing CMS applications. When we are talking about hippo what of their various products are we considering here: Hippo CMS7 Hippo Repository 2 Hippo Site Toolkit 2 or Hippo Portal 2.0 from www.onehippo.org Brett On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote: Anybody using or considered using Hippo CMS (onehippo.org) in conjunction with OFBiz? - Apache Licensed - Uses Jackrabbit as its repository - Supports Versioning, Internationalization, Publishing Workflows and more We could start out by using Hippo's UI to manage content and retrieve it for display within OFBiz using the JCR API. As the various document types needed by the OFBiz base applications begin to take shape we could look at ways to allow the content to be modified directly from within OFBiz (once again using the JCR API). Any thoughts, alternatives, ideas or whatever would be appreciated. I'm considering working on a POC in my spare time, not sure how long that might take at this stage. I already have a copy of Hippo running inside OFBiz but that was just a matter of expanding their WAR distribution and wrapping it in a component, next step would be gaining access to the repo from OFBiz code. Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
Re: Comparing ofBiz Hashed Passwords in .NET
Solution found - Yes, the ofBiz version we are using is old and the password hash hex encoding is indeed the older one with, ah, custom, hex encoding. As an example for anyone who may in the future encounter this problem, the password ofbiz looks like this with the old encoding: 47ca69ebb4bdc9ae0adec130880165d2cc05db1a And this with standard SHA-1 encoding: 47B56994CBC2B6D10AA1BE30F70165ADB305A41A The old code is in the HashCrypt.java file and the old version of the function is called getDigestHashOldFunnyHexEncode. Thank you Scott! And thank you Adam for answering the question about salting. - Grant
Re: Hippo CMS
Integrating here means to put Hippo as a ofbiz component or let it as a standalone application but integrating over data/service layer? -- Regards, Michael Xu (xudong) www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 0135 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096 On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Brett Palmer brettgpal...@gmail.comwrote: Scott, I like the idea of integrating with existing CMS applications. When we are talking about hippo what of their various products are we considering here: Hippo CMS7 Hippo Repository 2 Hippo Site Toolkit 2 or Hippo Portal 2.0 from www.onehippo.org Brett On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: Anybody using or considered using Hippo CMS (onehippo.org) in conjunction with OFBiz? - Apache Licensed - Uses Jackrabbit as its repository - Supports Versioning, Internationalization, Publishing Workflows and more We could start out by using Hippo's UI to manage content and retrieve it for display within OFBiz using the JCR API. As the various document types needed by the OFBiz base applications begin to take shape we could look at ways to allow the content to be modified directly from within OFBiz (once again using the JCR API). Any thoughts, alternatives, ideas or whatever would be appreciated. I'm considering working on a POC in my spare time, not sure how long that might take at this stage. I already have a copy of Hippo running inside OFBiz but that was just a matter of expanding their WAR distribution and wrapping it in a component, next step would be gaining access to the repo from OFBiz code. Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
Re: Hippo CMS
Hi Brett, I was looking at CMS 7 (which overlays Repository 2). I didn't really look too closely at their other stuff since CMS 7 was really all I was interested in. Regards Scott On 8/07/2010, at 4:27 PM, Brett Palmer wrote: Scott, I like the idea of integrating with existing CMS applications. When we are talking about hippo what of their various products are we considering here: Hippo CMS7 Hippo Repository 2 Hippo Site Toolkit 2 or Hippo Portal 2.0 from www.onehippo.org Brett On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote: Anybody using or considered using Hippo CMS (onehippo.org) in conjunction with OFBiz? - Apache Licensed - Uses Jackrabbit as its repository - Supports Versioning, Internationalization, Publishing Workflows and more We could start out by using Hippo's UI to manage content and retrieve it for display within OFBiz using the JCR API. As the various document types needed by the OFBiz base applications begin to take shape we could look at ways to allow the content to be modified directly from within OFBiz (once again using the JCR API). Any thoughts, alternatives, ideas or whatever would be appreciated. I'm considering working on a POC in my spare time, not sure how long that might take at this stage. I already have a copy of Hippo running inside OFBiz but that was just a matter of expanding their WAR distribution and wrapping it in a component, next step would be gaining access to the repo from OFBiz code. Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Hippo CMS
Hi Michael, The idea was to add hippo as a component and use their webapp as an interim CMS while we build out similar functionality in OFBiz. OFBiz would use the JCR API to interact with the underlying repository. In terms of progress... none. In my spare time I'll be playing around with a jackrabbit integration for OFBiz and reading all the articles I can find. I feel like I need to better understand the JCR and content models in general before doing anything concrete. Regards Scott On 8/07/2010, at 5:27 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: Integrating here means to put Hippo as a ofbiz component or let it as a standalone application but integrating over data/service layer? -- Regards, Michael Xu (xudong) www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 0135 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096 On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Brett Palmer brettgpal...@gmail.comwrote: Scott, I like the idea of integrating with existing CMS applications. When we are talking about hippo what of their various products are we considering here: Hippo CMS7 Hippo Repository 2 Hippo Site Toolkit 2 or Hippo Portal 2.0 from www.onehippo.org Brett On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: Anybody using or considered using Hippo CMS (onehippo.org) in conjunction with OFBiz? - Apache Licensed - Uses Jackrabbit as its repository - Supports Versioning, Internationalization, Publishing Workflows and more We could start out by using Hippo's UI to manage content and retrieve it for display within OFBiz using the JCR API. As the various document types needed by the OFBiz base applications begin to take shape we could look at ways to allow the content to be modified directly from within OFBiz (once again using the JCR API). Any thoughts, alternatives, ideas or whatever would be appreciated. I'm considering working on a POC in my spare time, not sure how long that might take at this stage. I already have a copy of Hippo running inside OFBiz but that was just a matter of expanding their WAR distribution and wrapping it in a component, next step would be gaining access to the repo from OFBiz code. Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
