Re: problem opening older Word 6 doc with 4.0

2013-06-08 Thread Shenfeng Liu 
Kay,
  Could you please share the bug ID when you reported it?
  It sounds like a ship stopper candidate if can be confirmed.
  Thanks!

- Shenfeng (Simon)



2013/6/7 Max Merbald 

> Thank you! Since there still are quite a few older files around AOo 4
> should be able to open them.
>
>
> Am 06.06.2013 18:25, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>  4.0 is giving me this message when trying to open an older Word 6 version
>> document...
>>
>> "Read-Error .
>> This is not a WinWord 97 file."
>>
>> This is an old document I downloaded from a public server quite some time
>> ago.
>>
>> it was readable in 3.4.1, but not now.
>>
>> I will file a bug and upload it.
>>
>>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Marcus (OOo) wrote:

I've updated the test area in staging:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html


There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest
looks very good:
* Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline


Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?


* Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to
extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.


Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak 
about "Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries" and delete the 
link in the nav sidebar.


I've concentrated on the DL links. Thanks for looking right and left. ;-)
Updated.


1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries//
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/


Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place
there. But it is just a matter of preference.


Yes, me too. However, we had this discussion last year and some wanted 
to have SDK on the same level as the languages.


Because we save one complexity level I can live with this very well.

We shouldn't forget that this is just the structure on the mirrors. 
Nearly nobody will see or take care about this. ;-)



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2


Since this is our most "official" package, I would name it
apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
or
Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I
would prefer to see both "Apache" and "OpenOffice" present in full in
the package name.


Good idea.

@Juergen:
As you are producing the source packages, please can you take this into 
account?


Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Logo next steps

2013-06-08 Thread Rob Weir 
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Samer Mansour  wrote:
> Congrats Chris!
>
> Ok girls and guys, I've already made a dent in documenting where the logo
> appears in the different sections:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO4+-+Application+And+Launcher
> I don't have sizes, but I want to review those sections and document new
> sizes with some wireframes what it would look like.
> Some of the layout could use some polishing which I could help with.
>
> I could generate the smaller images, fav icons, etc. once we have the SVG.
> I could check out and in changes, both code and resource files like images.
>

A quick thought on the workflow.  Abstractly we'll probably want a
"master" image SVG file and then a set of defined steps (a "recipe")
that gets us from the master SVG to each of bitmap images we'll need.
This is probably not something that can be entirely automated, but we
could have steps in a text file stored parallel to the source, or on
the wiki.

For example, to produce the website logo from the master:

1) Remove the version number from the master logo

2) Crop to specified aspect ratio, with specified centering of the logo

3) Export to PNG, with alpha transparency, with specified dimensions

Something like that (with the details specified, obviously)

That way, if we ever need to tweak the logo master SVG we can
consistently generate the derived versions.

-Rob



> Samer
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
>
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> Now that the core decision making process is over, what are the next
>>> steps?
>>>
>>
>> Good, congratulations to Chris and it's good to see that the outcome was
>> basically the ratification of the preferences 5000+ people had expressed in
>> the survey.
>>
>>
>>  1) I've sent Chris a note requesting the latest SVG.  Once I receive
>>> it I'll check it in.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, and I assume you will also take care of all licensing and
>> paperwork. At a certain point in future we will claim this new logo as our
>> trademark and I trust all appropriate steps are being taken in this respect
>> too.
>>
>>
>>  2) We should make an inventory of places where this logo should go.
>>> What sizes are needed, formats, background color (or alpha
>>> transparency), border requirements, location in SVN, etc.
>>>
>>
>> I would just add to your list: a square 100x100 icon for social media.
>> Ideally, we should have it in place when OpenOffice 4 is released.
>>
>>
>>  Note:  Previously it was mentioned that the number "4" had unlucky
>>> connotations in some cultures.  So we need to include the version
>>> number as part of the logo in the splash screen and about box?
>>>
>>
>> We'd need to hear from them, but I would find it quite odd if we didn't
>> include a "4" in the about box (and in the splash screen too). If this was
>> version 13 (which is unlucky in other cultures), I would find equally odd
>> to omit the "13" from the about box.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Andrea.
>>
>>
>> --**--**-
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on aoo-win7

2013-06-08 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile 
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:35 AM,   wrote:
> Hi! , The aoo-win7 builder has just completed a run
>
> STATUS: Failure
>
>  Build revision 1490123 on branch openoffice/trunk
>
>  Snapshot results at: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>
>  Build using the ASF buildslave: bb-win7
>
>  Build results at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/642
>
>  Build reason was: The Nightly scheduler named 'aoo-win7-nightly' triggered 
> this build

C:/Progra~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/include\../../VC/include/unordered_set(64) :
error C2065: '_Hash_compare' : undeclared identifier

the bot might be suffering from the issue described here:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vcgeneral/thread/eaf24519-84e3-442e-ac7d-adab82a81ede

"If you're using the original Feature Pack, you may want to install
the Feature Pack Refresh instead. If you installed the Windows SDK
after installing the Feature Pack, it overwrites a few headers and you
need to repair VS to get the Feature Pack headers back (this is
documented in the Feature Pack release notes)."

If repairing does not work, install Visual C++ 2008 Feature Pack Release from
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=6922

Regards

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Draft blog post: When will OpenOffice version X be released?

2013-06-08 Thread Kay Schenk 
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Dave Fisher  wrote:

>
> On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> > On 06/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=when_will_openoffice_version_x
> >> Since we get this question frequently, I thought it would be good to
> >> have a canonical response we can point people to.
> >
> > It's good but I'd add pointers so that people who want to get involved
> can do so.
> >
> > It is time to give more visibility to development snapshots, for
> example: a link to
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsetswould
>  help in getting more feedback. Or a link to any QA resource leading
> to it. We don't want to make them too visible since they are unofficial,
> but hiding them too much does not help either, especially when the release
> comes closer.
>
> We can discuss developer snapshots on list, but I think it is outside of
> ASF policy to publish URLs elsewhere - like in Blog posts.
>

yes...I think we have told this a few times...no public announcements of
"development" products



>
> We should point those interested in development to the dev ML and then on
> the ML point them to development resources ad hoc.
>
> >
> > Same for translations. It would be good to include a link to
> > http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html
>
> Definitely.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >  Andrea.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 

MzK

"You can't believe one thing and do another.
 What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
 -- Leonard Peltier

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Kay Schenk 
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:

> I've updated the test area in staging:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.html
>
> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB, de
> languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it might be
> just a missing language. ;-)
> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>
> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**analyze.html
>
> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marcus
>

Good for me! :) Got everything right!


thanks for all your work!


>
>
>
> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>
>  I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
>> new directory + filename structure).
>>
>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
>> as the time is running.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries//
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>
>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_**Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.**gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.**gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.**gz
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_install_en-US.dmg
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_install_en-US.exe
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.
>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|**binaries]/.
>> ..
>>
>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
>> the following:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> binaries/
>> en-US/
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>> gz/download
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> binaries/
>> en-US/
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**gz.md5
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-**closer.cgi/
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> source/
>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2
>>
>>
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 

MzK

"You can't believe one thing and do another.
 What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
 -- Leonard Peltier

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

Marcus (OOo) wrote:

I've updated the test area in staging:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html


There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest 
looks very good:

* Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline
* Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently 
consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd 
recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to 
extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries//
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/


Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place 
there. But it is just a matter of preference.



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2


Since this is our most "official" package, I would name it
apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
or
Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I 
would prefer to see both "Apache" and "OpenOffice" present in full in 
the package name.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 
Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror 
to do some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:


http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries//

You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...

PS:
Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to start 
the download?


Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
might be just a missing language. ;-)
And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries//
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Location for logo source?

2013-06-08 Thread Dave Fisher 


Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
 
 http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/art/galleries/logos/
>>> 
>>> I like this area more.  Maybe the images/AOO_logos is better for the
>>> concrete website PNG image, and the marketing/art/galleries area could
>>> be for the source, etc.?  We can then set expectations/permissible
>>> uses, etc., on the existing web pages.
>> 
>> 
>> Seems good. Actually, we could even shorten it to
>> http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/logos/
>> for better reachability in SVN ("art" would still be meaningful, but
>> "galleries" seems misleading). This is just a minor preference of course.
> 
> I checked it in earlier just so those who are interested in helping
> with it can access it:
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/marketing/art/galleries/logos/aoo-working/
> 
> I'd like to clean up the /marketing tree in general, to move the old
> logo(s) to a history page, etc.  This whole area of the website is in
> need of a cleanup.   Or maybe migration into the wiki?  Most of the
> project-facing marketing work is probably better done on the wiki than
> in static pages.  In the end I'd only want things like logos, where we
> do not want to give public write-access, to be in SVN.
> 
> Make sense?

Yes +1. Thanks for your leadership on this.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Rob
> 
>> Regards,
>>  Andrea.
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB, 
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it 
might be just a missing language. ;-)

And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries//
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: changes to the README file for 4.0

2013-06-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

On 01/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:

Crazy idea. What if we just made a sub domain for each release?  Or
equivalently a path under  ooo-site.  Then we could have hard-coded
standard paths in the code and other systems like:
www.openoffice.org/release//README
Could also do LICENSE, release notes, even the update notification XML files


Sounds like a very good idea. I'm not sure we will be able to implement 
it in time for OpenOffice 4 (translations get in the way), but it could 
be setup with some basic information already for version 4 (and, if the 
hard-coded URLs in version 4 are different and cannot be changed at this 
stage, we could redirect them appropriately).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[AOO 4.0] [DEVTOOLS] setting toolbar name in Addons.xcu

2013-06-08 Thread Carl Marcum 

Hi All,

I have committed a change to Netbeans plugin trunk for AOO 4.0 for 
setting toolbar name in Addons.xcu and setting to AOO 4.0.


https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122055

I have attached to the issue an example Addons.xcu created with the 
plugin and a older developer snapshot

AOO350m1(Build:9611)  -  Rev. 1400866

I've been really busy with work and will be away from email a few weeks 
so I wanted to get this in.


If anyone can look at the Addons.xcu file and let me know if there is 
any issues I'd appreciate it.
Also If there is a schema I can validate against, I can work on it when 
I get back.


Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Need QA (test) volunteers on Ubuntu 64bit

2013-06-08 Thread Annapoornima Koppad 
Hi Yu,

I am generally free next week. I can spare two to three hours everyday next
week.

I have ubuntu installation on virtual, and my own windows 7 home. Please
let me know if I can contribute.

Thanks and regards,

Anna


On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have achieved the exeution target on full regression testing, as every
> QA assignee continues to do their assignments or retest for failed test
> cases when related defects have been resolved, We now have another work
> with more higher priority, that is to do a quick go through with latest dev
> snapshot build(contains stlport change) by end of next week (*June 14*).
>
> We're looking for people who can spend a few time over next week to run
> pre-defined checklist on their Ubuntu 64bit, and to enter Bugzilla issues
> for any failed test functions, as well as to highlighter the critical bugs
> in the report.
>
> If you have interest on it, please let me know as soon as possible, I will
> send you the general testing list. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

[DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 
I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to 
apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version, 
new directory + filename structure).


If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast 
as the time is running.




1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries//
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like 
the following:


http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Build AOO in Win7 Troubles

2013-06-08 Thread Ivan Fuentes 
I remove the new lines and I wrote it in just one line.

sh ./configure --with-cl-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft
Visual Studio 11.0/VC/" --with-mspdb-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files
(x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0/Common7/IDE"
--with-asm-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio
11.0/VC/bin" --with-csc-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft
Visual Studio 11.0/SDK/v3.5" --with-frame-home="/cygdrive/c/Program
Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1" --with-psdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program
Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1" --with-midl-path="/cygdrive/c/Program
Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1/bin" --with-jdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program
Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02"
--with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1" --with-dmake-url="
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2";
--with-epm-url="http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz";
--enable-pch --disable-atl --disable-binfilter --without-junit

and i got this error:

checking the Microsoft C/C++ Compiler... found
(/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~2/MICROS~3.0/VC/bin/cl.exe)
checking the Version of Microsoft C/C++ Compiler... found Compiler version
in "/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~2/MICROS~3.0/VC/bin/cl.exe: error while loading
shared libraries: mspdb110.dll: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory"
./configure: line 8138: test: : integer expression expected
configure: error: Compiler too old. Use Microsoft C/C++ .NET 2008.

I'm using MSVC 2012, (i don't want to install MSVC 2008 :() What do i have
to do?


2013/6/8 Regina Henschel 

> Hi,
>
> Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
>
>  On 07/06/2013 Ivan Fuentes wrote:
>>
>>>  --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/**Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02\
>>>  --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/**apache-ant-1.9.1\
>>>  --with-dmake-url=
>>> http://dmake.apache-extras.**org.codespot.com/files/dmake-**4.12.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> --with-epm-url=http://ftp.**easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.**
>>> 7-source.tar.gz\
>>>
>>>  --enable-pch \
>>>  --disable-atl \
>>>
>>
>> Whatever shell/interpreter you are using, it seems that, as Juergen
>> wrote, you are not passing the dmake URL properly.
>>
>> E-mail breaks it, but it seems that: you don't have a \ to terminate the
>> dmake configuration option and tell the interpreter that the command
>> continues on the next line; the dmake URL is on another line; the EPM
>> URL is outdated.
>>
>> If you copied the EPM URL from a wiki page, please fix it on the wiki
>> page. Or at least give us the link so that we can fix it.
>>
>> And try changing that section as follows (unless someone else with more
>> experience than me in enjoying Windows builds steps in):
>> ...
>> --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/**apache-ant-1.9.1 \
>> --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.**apache-extras.org.codespot.**
>> com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
>> \
>> --with-epm-url=http://www.**msweet.org/files/project2/epm-**
>> 3.7-source.tar.gz\
>>
>
> I have no line --with-epm-url at all.
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
>
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
P.D. Por fa confirma de recibido ;)


"... and to make the darkness bright
paint the sky with stars"
[Iván Fuentes]

Re: Location for logo source?

2013-06-08 Thread Kay Schenk 
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Chris R. sent me the logo source, including additional application
>> >> notes, links to the font, etc.
>> >>
>> >> Where should this go?
>> >>
>> >> On the one hand we store the live version of the logo bitmaps on the
>> >> website here:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/
>> >>
>> >> But there are also other copies in other location, in the product
>> >> tree, in the site tree, and outside of SVN on forums, wiki, etc.
>> >>
>> >> So I think we want a more central location where we can store this
>> >> material, since it cuts across product, website and externally.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe a new root SVN folder, /openoffice/artwork ?   That could grow
>> >> to contain things like CD labels, etc.
>> >>
>> >> I'm sure someone will suggest the MWiki.  That allows some kinds of
>> >> attachments, yes?  But does it version attachments?  I think we want
>> >> full version control on logo source changes.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> -Rob
>> >>
>> >
>> > There is a subarea in images that had been set up for this --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/
>> >
>> > with svg directory for source, and renderings in the main logos area.
>> >
>> > Could we continue to use this area?
>> >
>>
>> Possibly.  The side effect would be that the logo source gets
>> published to the website.  What would that mean to visitors?  My
>> preference would be to make it clear that the logo is not something
>> that we just want people grabbing and reusing for any purpose.
>>
>>
>> > I would suggest all other items -- notes, a rendering -- be placed in
>> >
>> > http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/art/galleries/logos/
>> >
>>
>> I like this area more.  Maybe the images/AOO_logos is better for the
>> concrete website PNG image, and the marketing/art/galleries area could
>> be for the source, etc.?  We can then set expectations/permissible
>> uses, etc., on the existing web pages.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>
> Yes, this makes sense. And, I didn't realize there was already some
> appropriate links to SVG there. This is a good choice.
>

a ps.

I can use these to work on new logo use for web sites soonish -- Monday,
PDT? -- and supply mockup pages.


>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> 
>> > MzK
>> >
>> > "You can't believe one thing and do another.
>> >  What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
>> >  -- Leonard Peltier
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> 
> MzK
>
> "You can't believe one thing and do another.
>  What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
>  -- Leonard Peltier
>



-- 

MzK

"You can't believe one thing and do another.
 What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
 -- Leonard Peltier

Re: New Volunteer

2013-06-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

mehdi soleimani nasab wrote:

Here's a little info about my past experiences; I was part of a team
in my university who developed a Rule-Based machine translation system
for English to Persian text translation. This team has previously
developed a Persian spell checker extension


Welcome! The easiest way to help immediately is to contribute to the 
Persian translation, due in about 10 days. Please add a comment to

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122287
stating that you are available to help, so that you can coordinate with 
other volunteers vie private e-mail or directly on the issue page.



I have attached my CV (in case u're interested to know more about me!) :)


Attachments are removed, but we don't need a CV, we will hopefully learn 
more about you from your contributions!


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Handlers Drawing - Desing of the nodes.

2013-06-08 Thread Alan Eduardo Puc Pech 
Hi Regina

Thanks I found, but now I am building the module packimages, but I have
this error:

packimages: parsing '/home/alan/aoo/main/solver/400/
unxlngi6.pro/res/img/wzien-US.ilst' ...
packimages: parsing '/home/alan/aoo/main/solver/400/
unxlngi6.pro/res/img/xsltdlgen-US.ilst' ...
packimages: parsing '../unxlngi6.pro/res/img/commandimagelist.ilst' ...
packimages: assemble image list ...
packimages: creating image archive ...
packimages: sorting from ../unxlngi6.pro/res/img/sorted.lst ...
packimages: done sort ...
*Can't call method "desiredCompressionLevel" on an undefined value at
/usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm line 249.*
*dmake:  Error code 2, while making '../unxlngi6.pro/bin/images.zip'*
*ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/home/alan/aoo/main/packimages/pack*
*
*
I think it's related to my version of perl. but I would like to know your
opinion.

regards.



2013/6/8 Regina Henschel 

> Hi Alan,
>
> Alan Eduardo Puc Pech schrieb:
>
>> Hi Armin
>>
>> Where I find that folder ---> wntmsci12?
>> because you told me to copy the following link:
>>
>> - copy these (from
>> main\solver\400\wntmsci12\workdir\ResTarget\svxen-US.res)
>>
>> to your office installation (search there). But I don't find wntmsci12
>>
>> I use ubuntu 12.04.
>>
>
> If you use a Linux, then it will not be wnt... but likely unx...
> Simple open solver\400\ and you will find it.
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Build AOO in Win7 Troubles

2013-06-08 Thread Regina Henschel 

Hi,

Andrea Pescetti schrieb:

On 07/06/2013 Ivan Fuentes wrote:

 --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02\
 --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1\
 --with-dmake-url=
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2

--with-epm-url=http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz\

 --enable-pch \
 --disable-atl \


Whatever shell/interpreter you are using, it seems that, as Juergen
wrote, you are not passing the dmake URL properly.

E-mail breaks it, but it seems that: you don't have a \ to terminate the
dmake configuration option and tell the interpreter that the command
continues on the next line; the dmake URL is on another line; the EPM
URL is outdated.

If you copied the EPM URL from a wiki page, please fix it on the wiki
page. Or at least give us the link so that we can fix it.

And try changing that section as follows (unless someone else with more
experience than me in enjoying Windows builds steps in):
...
--with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1 \
--with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
\
--with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \


I have no line --with-epm-url at all.

Kind regards
Regina



Kind regards
Regina

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Apache licence and derivated work

2013-06-08 Thread Rob Weir 
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Guy Waterval  wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> 2013/6/8 Rob Weir 
>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Guy Waterval 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I would know what has to be written on a derivated *documentation* work
>> > (modified or translated) based on an original work published with an
>> Apache
>> > licence.
>> >
>>
>> Is the original work a work published by an Apache project?  Or is it
>> a 3rd party work from outside Apache that you are modifying?
>>
>> And is the destination of the modified work for publication by this
>> project?  Or is it for independent publication outside of the project.
>>
>> (In other words, where is it coming from and where is it going?)
>>
>> Although the license is the same in these cases, there are differences
>> in Apache policy.  If you can give more details we can give a more
>> specific answer.
>>
> Many thanks for your answer. Here are some clarifications.
> It concerns my own docs,  published with an ALV2 license. I could have the
> opportunity to work on it with a  group, a little as ODFAuthors do. So, the
> different chapters would be released with a list of authors/contributors
> and the copyright name would be the name of the group. The licence is still
> ALv2.0.
> I would insert a notice in the files, with clear instructions for third
> parties (companies, schools, administrations, editors, etc.) which would
> reuse and modify the work, so that they know exactly how  to do,  if they
> modify the work  to fit it to their own specific needs and distribute it on
> their own Intranet or in a printed version. I would avoid to receive too
> much questions, and would try to solve this issue in a clear notice
> explaining the procedure.
> It's also important for people who will join to this effort of
> documentation. I think they have the right to understand clearly how the
> work they will produce could be reused to decide whether they participate
> or not.
>

OK.  So this is entirely 3rd party and Apache policy does not apply.

Section 4 of the ALv2 explains what is required by someone who
modifies and redistributes a work under Apache license:

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html

That is the official requirement.   But let's look at your specific
questions now and see how this applies:

#1. The title of the derivated document has to be different.

Section 4b of the license says: "You must cause any modified files to
carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files".

Changing the title could be part of that.  But the license does not
specify the exact way in which you indicate that you changed the
files.

#2. The author of the modified version has to add its own copyright notice.

This is also not required.  The only requirement is to preserve any
copyright notices that are already there.

Section 4c of  the license: "You must retain, in the Source form of
any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent,
trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the
Derivative Works; "


#3. The licence of the derivated work has to be obligatory the Apache
licence or not ?

I'd encourage using the Apache license for derived works, but it is
not required.  Section 4 of the license says (with my emphasis):

"You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
***may provide additional or different license terms*** and conditions
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for
any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided ***Your use,
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the
conditions stated in this License***. "

So you may apply a different license provided it is compatible with
the Apache License.  But in most cases it is simplest just to use the
Apache License.

#4. If yes in #3, the APPENDIX: "How to apply the Apache License to your
work" has to be added to the derivated work.

Section 4a of the license says that you must include a copy of the
license, so that would include the Appendix as well.

#5. Has the author of the derivated work to write a notice giving credit to
the author(s) and contributor(s) of the original version on which he has
based his work ? Is a link to the original work obligatory or not ?

If the original work had a copyright statement, then that must be
preserved.  If the original version had a NOTICE text file (see
section 4d of the license) then that must be preserved.

You can see the NOTICE file for AOO itself here, to get an idea of
what kinds of things are in it:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/NOTICE

In any case, you should probably decide whether you are looking for
"hard" legal constraints on what people do with the documentation, or
"soft" social norming that guides them to reasonable behavior.  For
example, if you had a page in the documentation that listed the
contributors and invited authors of derived vers

Re: [Discuss][Wiki]"Synchronizing" (or not) localized wiki sites [was: Fwd: [UserGuide]My "roadmap"]

2013-06-08 Thread RGB ES 
(top posting, because I'm not answering any particular post)

At this point, I think we all agree that we have a bit of a license mess
that needs to be fixed in order to clarify the documentation project. So
here is one possible idea:

1- Move the current /Documentation page to /Documentation-OLD or
/Documentation-LEGACY(1), indicating at the begining that the content is
outdated
2- Create a new "portal" page on the old url with the characteristic
described bellow

Characteristics for the new portal

* Introduction to the project, how to contact the group and participate,
pending tasks lists, etc.
* Links to the new, Apache licensed documentation (user guide, building
guide, etcetera) indicating that it's a work in progress and that new
contributors are welcomed.
* Add a section that points to the legacy page. Something like "Apache
OpenOffice inherited not only the code from former OpenOffice.org project,
but also a huge amount of documentation. Some of those documents are still
valid, some don't, but you can find all of them here".

Once this new structure is in place for the main EN site, propagate it to
other languages will be easier than fixing current PDL licensed pages.

What do you think?

(1) Maybe it's better to first create the new portal on /Documentation-AOO,
when that new page is ready move /Documentation to /Documentation-Legacy,
then move /Documentation-AOO to /Documentation

Regards
Ricardo



2013/6/5 Dennis E. Hamilton 

> I don't believe the ASF iCLA I filed stipulates anything about ALv2,
> although it certainly stipulates what my contributions grant to the ASF and
> to anyone who receives my contribution via the ASF.  (Note that the grant
> to recipients is directly from me, via the iCLA, no matter what the ALv2
> says.)
>
> My comment is mainly with respect to pages on the wiki that are covered by
> licenses other than the ALv2 and what contributing any modifications to
> them entails, no matter what the ASF gets from me under the terms of my
> iCLA.
>
> Of course, a click-through registration that asserts ALv2 for
> contributions is fine, although the ASF and recipients still have more
> rights than that for any contribution I make.  The current statement about
> treating materials not under the default license still applies and I
> suspect a form of that has to remain in any click-through on registration.
>  The iCLA doesn't (and can't) alter that situation.
>
>  - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 01:24 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: l...@openoffice.apache.org; d...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss][Wiki]"Synchronizing" (or not) localized wiki sites
> [was: Fwd: [UserGuide]My "roadmap"]
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton 
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > I prepared my response before I saw this one.
> >
> > There is still need to be careful around this:
> >
> >  However, when we create new material, including enhancements
> >  Of existing material, then we need to respect the ICLA which
> >  says our contributions are made under ALv2.  This might mean
> >  that going forward that modified content is covered by multiple
> >  licenses.
> >
> >  1. When enhancing existing materials, the existing license must be
> > honored.  How additional licensing works depends on the specific
> > Conditions.  It should not be automatically assumed possible.
> >
> >  2. Since our having accounts on the wiki are subject to the rules for
> > The wiki, I'm not sure the ICLA governs (1).  As committers, we
> > certainly shouldn't be asserting any other license, but the current
> > license on the work is going to determine whether and how the ALv2
> > can be introduced.
> >
>
> The ICLA says:
>
>  "Contribution" shall mean any original work of authorship,
>including any modifications or additions to an existing work, that
>is intentionally submitted by You to the Foundation for inclusion
>in, or documentation of, any of the products owned or managed by
>the Foundation (the "Work"). For the purposes of this definition,
>"submitted" means any form of electronic, verbal, or written
>communication sent to the Foundation or its representatives,
>including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing
>lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that
>are managed by, or on behalf of, the Foundation for the purpose of
>discussing and improving the Work, but excluding communication that
>is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by You
>as "Not a Contribution."
>
> So I think that covers wiki contributions as well since that is
> "documentation of", yes?
>
> -Rob
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:28 AM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Cc: l...@openoffice.apache.org; d...@open

Service com.sun.star.sdbc.ResultSet

2013-06-08 Thread Rajath Shashidhara 
Hello,

I was trying to implement the "open" command for my ucp.
I was reading through the implementation of this service.

My question is:
Is there a standard way to store the properties of the folder children?
As in, is there any data structure defined in the api to store the property
values in a tabulated form or is it upto me to store it and return it when
queried by getXXX() methods?



-- 
Rajath S,
M.Sc(Hons.) Physics,
Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani,
Pilani

New Volunteer

2013-06-08 Thread mehdi soleimani nasab 
Hi, Sup?!

I have added my info to the directory of volunteers. I will finish my
B.Sc. in a month. This summer before starting my master studies I am
thinking of doing sth useful. I hope it can be a starting point to get
me involved with open source. :)

Here's a little info about my past experiences; I was part of a team
in my university who developed a Rule-Based machine translation system
for English to Persian text translation. This team has previously
developed a Persian spell checker extension for Microsoft Word.
I am also familiar with machine learning techniques and their
application in natural language processing.

I have attached my CV (in case u're interested to know more about me!) :)

Bests,

-- 
Mahdi Soleimani


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Draft blog post: When will OpenOffice version X be released?

2013-06-08 Thread Dave Fisher 

On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

> On 06/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=when_will_openoffice_version_x
>> Since we get this question frequently, I thought it would be good to
>> have a canonical response we can point people to.
> 
> It's good but I'd add pointers so that people who want to get involved can do 
> so.
> 
> It is time to give more visibility to development snapshots, for example: a 
> link to 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets
>  would help in getting more feedback. Or a link to any QA resource leading to 
> it. We don't want to make them too visible since they are unofficial, but 
> hiding them too much does not help either, especially when the release comes 
> closer.

We can discuss developer snapshots on list, but I think it is outside of ASF 
policy to publish URLs elsewhere - like in Blog posts.

We should point those interested in development to the dev ML and then on the 
ML point them to development resources ad hoc.

> 
> Same for translations. It would be good to include a link to
> http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html

Definitely.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Regards,
>  Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Draft blog post: When will OpenOffice version X be released?

2013-06-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

On 06/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:

https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=when_will_openoffice_version_x
Since we get this question frequently, I thought it would be good to
have a canonical response we can point people to.


It's good but I'd add pointers so that people who want to get involved 
can do so.


It is time to give more visibility to development snapshots, for 
example: a link to 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets 
would help in getting more feedback. Or a link to any QA resource 
leading to it. We don't want to make them too visible since they are 
unofficial, but hiding them too much does not help either, especially 
when the release comes closer.


Same for translations. It would be good to include a link to
http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html

Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Need QA (test) volunteers on Ubuntu 64bit

2013-06-08 Thread Yuzhen Fan 
Hi,

We have achieved the exeution target on full regression testing, as every
QA assignee continues to do their assignments or retest for failed test
cases when related defects have been resolved, We now have another work
with more higher priority, that is to do a quick go through with latest dev
snapshot build(contains stlport change) by end of next week (*June 14*).

We're looking for people who can spend a few time over next week to run
pre-defined checklist on their Ubuntu 64bit, and to enter Bugzilla issues
for any failed test functions, as well as to highlighter the critical bugs
in the report.

If you have interest on it, please let me know as soon as possible, I will
send you the general testing list. Thanks!

Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer

2013-06-08 Thread Armin Le Grand 
Hi Y Chan,

you may export as PDF and print from PDF viewer

--
ALG (iPad)

Am 08.06.2013 um 10:42 schrieb Y Chan :

> When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often
> disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there are
> redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc.
> because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have
> openoffice.
> 
> Looking forward to improvements :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Yuk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Build AOO in Win7 Troubles

2013-06-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

On 07/06/2013 Ivan Fuentes wrote:

 --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02\
 --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1\
 --with-dmake-url=
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
 --with-epm-url=http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz\

 --enable-pch \
 --disable-atl \


Whatever shell/interpreter you are using, it seems that, as Juergen 
wrote, you are not passing the dmake URL properly.


E-mail breaks it, but it seems that: you don't have a \ to terminate the 
dmake configuration option and tell the interpreter that the command 
continues on the next line; the dmake URL is on another line; the EPM 
URL is outdated.


If you copied the EPM URL from a wiki page, please fix it on the wiki 
page. Or at least give us the link so that we can fix it.


And try changing that section as follows (unless someone else with more 
experience than me in enjoying Windows builds steps in):

...
--with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1 \
--with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 
\

--with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \
--enable-pch \
...

(the mailing list may break it, but it's 4 lines, each beginning with 
"--" and ending in "\"; of course, "..." means that you should leave the 
remaining lines unchanged).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Handlers Drawing - Desing of the nodes.

2013-06-08 Thread Regina Henschel 

Hi Alan,

Alan Eduardo Puc Pech schrieb:

Hi Armin

Where I find that folder ---> wntmsci12?
because you told me to copy the following link:

- copy these (from
main\solver\400\wntmsci12\**workdir\ResTarget\svxen-US.**res)
to your office installation (search there). But I don't find wntmsci12

I use ubuntu 12.04.


If you use a Linux, then it will not be wnt... but likely unx...
Simple open solver\400\ and you will find it.

Kind regards
Regina


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer

2013-06-08 Thread Guy Waterval 
Hi all,

2013/6/8 Rory O'Farrell 

> On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 16:42:04 +0800
> Y Chan  wrote:
>
> > When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often
> > disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there
> are
> > redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc.
> > because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have
> > openoffice.
> >
> > Looking forward to improvements :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Yuk
>
> There is no immediate fix for this.  It is best to use the defined styles
> for footnotes, the styles modified if necessary to suit your need, rather
> than to individually (directly) format each footnote to suit your
> requirements.
>
> You can use a portable version of OpenOffice which will run off a USB key.
>  I'm sorry, I haven't an up-to-date link for this version.
>
http://www.winpenpack.com/en/download.php?view.1341

A+
-- 
gw

>
>

Re: concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer

2013-06-08 Thread Rory O'Farrell 
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 16:42:04 +0800
Y Chan  wrote:

> When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often
> disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there are
> redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc.
> because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have
> openoffice.
> 
> Looking forward to improvements :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Yuk

There is no immediate fix for this.  It is best to use the defined styles for 
footnotes, the styles modified if necessary to suit your need, rather than to 
individually (directly) format each footnote to suit your requirements.

You can use a portable version of OpenOffice which will run off a USB key.  I'm 
sorry, I haven't an up-to-date link for this version.


-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer

2013-06-08 Thread Y Chan 
When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often
disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there are
redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc.
because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have
openoffice.

Looking forward to improvements :)

Cheers,
Yuk

Re: Proofing Tool GUI V1.0 - Released

2013-06-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

On 01/06/2013 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:

I have created and uploaded a Web page containing the manual, source and
downloads for Proofing Tool GUI V1.0. ...
Site: http://marcoagpinto.cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui.html


Good! I still have the same issues as before (but I now receive a 
warning saying that ISO-8859-1 encoding is unsupported in your tool):

- The file takes 39 minutes to open with your binary Linux version
- The output is quite corrupted, see http://imagebin.org/260609

You already explained that you cannot reproduce the problems so I'll 
stop here, considering that my file is using an unsupported charset. 
This mailing list is not the place for discussing bugs in your tool: if 
you make an issue queue available on GitHub, SourceForge, Google Code or 
your own server I might consider posting bugs there.



If you like the tool, maybe you could place it in the official AOO page
of tools.


What page are you referring to? If it's on a wiki, feel free to update 
it yourself; if it is somewhere else, please give the precise URL of the 
page to be modified and I'll list your tool there: even though I prefer 
manual editing, I'm sure that several community members will appreciate 
that a tool like yours exists.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org