Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Thanks Alex, I've merged the changes for SOLR-16852 On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:51 AM Houston Putman wrote: > Yeah that was moved without fixing the script. So fixing the script is the > way to go. > > - Houston > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:44 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure > due > > to the fact that SolrVersion class moved: > > > > Q: Shall I run 'python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/addVersion.py 9.5.0' in > folder > > '/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr' (y/n): y > > . > > changing version to 9.5.0... > > File > > > > > "/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr/dev-tools/scripts/scriptutil.py", > > line 91, in update_file > > infile = open(filename, 'r') > > ^^^ > > FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > > 'solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrVersion.java' > > > > it looks like this class moved > > to org.apache.solr.client.api.util.SolrVersion. > > any thoughts? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alex Deparvu > wrote: > > > > > Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze > > > branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in > some > > > setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions > > and > > > so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. > > > > > > Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script > > to > > > guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it > > > sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got > me > > > stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while > > > waiting for others. > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the > > >> feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release > branch. > > >> Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built > > >> (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... > but > > >> just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. > > >> ~ David > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > > >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm > planning > > >> on > > >> > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < > > >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > >> > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and > > >> eyeballs, > > >> > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Another quick update. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be > a > > >> > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this > > needs > > >> to > > >> > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the > priority. > > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks > > >> close > > >> > to > > >> > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he > > wants > > >> > this > > >> > > > in 9.4 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > best, > > >> > > > alex > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl < > > jan@cominvent.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. > Please > > >> > check. > > >> > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next > > few > > >> > days. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Jan Høydahl > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > > >> > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > >> > > >>> : > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends > > up > > >> > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into > 9.4…. > > >> > > Since we > > >> > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu < > > stilla...@apache.org> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > > > >> > > Just a quick status update > > >> > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not > > >> sure if > > >> > > >> there > > >> > > is more work pending > > >> > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > > >> > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are > no > > >> more > > >> > > failures (still running one single te
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Yeah that was moved without fixing the script. So fixing the script is the way to go. - Houston On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:44 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure due > to the fact that SolrVersion class moved: > > Q: Shall I run 'python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/addVersion.py 9.5.0' in folder > '/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr' (y/n): y > . > changing version to 9.5.0... > File > > "/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr/dev-tools/scripts/scriptutil.py", > line 91, in update_file > infile = open(filename, 'r') > ^^^ > FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > 'solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrVersion.java' > > it looks like this class moved > to org.apache.solr.client.api.util.SolrVersion. > any thoughts? > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze > > branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in some > > setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions > and > > so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. > > > > Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script > to > > guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it > > sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got me > > stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while > > waiting for others. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley > > wrote: > > > >> Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the > >> feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. > >> Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built > >> (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but > >> just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. > >> ~ David > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning > >> on > >> > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < > >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com > >> > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and > >> eyeballs, > >> > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Another quick update. > >> > > > > >> > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > >> > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this > needs > >> to > >> > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks > >> close > >> > to > >> > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he > wants > >> > this > >> > > > in 9.4 > >> > > > > >> > > > best, > >> > > > alex > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please > >> > check. > >> > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next > few > >> > days. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Jan Høydahl > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > >> > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > >> > > >>> : > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends > up > >> > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. > >> > > Since we > >> > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > Just a quick status update > >> > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not > >> sure if > >> > > >> there > >> > > is more work pending > >> > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > >> > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no > >> more > >> > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just > to > >> > make > >> > > >> sure > >> > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade > in > >> the > >> > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If > >> anyone > >> > > else > >> > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > >> > > > >> > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > >> > > I
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure due to the fact that SolrVersion class moved: Q: Shall I run 'python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/addVersion.py 9.5.0' in folder '/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr' (y/n): y . changing version to 9.5.0... File "/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr/dev-tools/scripts/scriptutil.py", line 91, in update_file infile = open(filename, 'r') ^^^ FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/SolrVersion.java' it looks like this class moved to org.apache.solr.client.api.util.SolrVersion. any thoughts? On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze > branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in some > setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions and > so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. > > Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script to > guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it > sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got me > stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while > waiting for others. > > best, > alex > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley > wrote: > >> Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the >> feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. >> Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built >> (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but >> just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. >> ~ David >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning >> on >> > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com >> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and >> eyeballs, >> > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Another quick update. >> > > > >> > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a >> > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs >> to >> > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. >> > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks >> close >> > to >> > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants >> > this >> > > > in 9.4 >> > > > >> > > > best, >> > > > alex >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please >> > check. >> > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few >> > days. >> > > >> >> > > >> Jan Høydahl >> > > >> >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < >> > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com >> > > >>> : >> > > >>> >> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up >> > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. >> > > Since we >> > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Just a quick status update >> > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not >> sure if >> > > >> there >> > > is more work pending >> > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported >> > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no >> more >> > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to >> > make >> > > >> sure >> > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in >> the >> > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If >> anyone >> > > else >> > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. >> > > >> > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! >> > > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see >> what I >> > > >> need to >> > > do Monday morning. >> > > >> > > best, >> > > alex >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < >> > > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no >> > > >> necessity >> > > > to ask permission. >> > > > >> > > > ~ David >> >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in some setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions and so on) and jump straight to the branch creation. Is this all documented anywhere? I get the feeling that having a script to guide you helps simplify the process a lot once you have done it sufficiently enough times to trust it. having almost zero context got me stuck in a step where I could have done other things in parallel while waiting for others. best, alex On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:52 AM David Smiley wrote: > Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the > feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. > Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built > (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but > just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. > ~ David > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning on > > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh < > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and > eyeballs, > > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu > wrote: > > > > > > > > Another quick update. > > > > > > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs > to > > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks > close > > to > > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants > > this > > > > in 9.4 > > > > > > > > best, > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please > > check. > > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few > > days. > > > >> > > > >> Jan Høydahl > > > >> > > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > > >>> : > > > >>> > > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up > > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. > > > Since we > > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just a quick status update > > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure > if > > > >> there > > > is more work pending > > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no > more > > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to > > make > > > >> sure > > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in > the > > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone > > > else > > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > > > > > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > > > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what > I > > > >> need to > > > do Monday morning. > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < > > > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no > > > >> necessity > > > > to ask permission. > > > > > > > > ~ David > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, > > since > > > it > > > >> affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy > > > warning > > > >> is > > > >> generated. > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the > > > Lucene > > > >>> release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not > > > work > > > >> out, I > > > >>> will go ahead with the release. > > > >>> > > > >>> best, > > > >>> alex > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch. Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built (multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but just telling you and anyone else who wants to be an RM in the future. ~ David On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:02 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning on > merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh > > wrote: > > > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and eyeballs, > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > > > > Another quick update. > > > > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs to > > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks close > to > > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants > this > > > in 9.4 > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl > > wrote: > > > > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please > check. > > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few > days. > > >> > > >> Jan Høydahl > > >> > > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > > >>> : > > >>> > > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up > > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. > > Since we > > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Just a quick status update > > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if > > >> there > > is more work pending > > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more > > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to > make > > >> sure > > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the > > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone > > else > > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > > > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I > > >> need to > > do Monday morning. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < > > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no > > >> necessity > > > to ask permission. > > > > > > ~ David > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, > since > > it > > >> affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy > > warning > > >> is > > >> generated. > > >> > > >> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the > > Lucene > > >>> release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not > > work > > >> out, I > > >>> will go ahead with the release. > > >>> > > >>> best, > > >>> alex > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene > 9.8 > > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be > > >> low-ish. > > > > Jan > > > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta < > > ans...@anshumgupta.net > > >> : > > > > > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too > > > many > > > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the > > >> Lucene > > > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and > > moving > > forward > > > with the older version of Lucene. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl < > > jan@cominvent.com > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning on merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections. On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh wrote: > So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and eyeballs, > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > > > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > > Another quick update. > > > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs to > > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks close to > > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants this > > in 9.4 > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please check. > >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few days. > >> > >> Jan Høydahl > >> > >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh < > ep...@opensourceconnections.com > >>> : > >>> > >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up > >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. > Since we > >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu > wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a quick status update > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if > >> there > is more work pending > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to make > >> sure > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone > else > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I > >> need to > do Monday morning. > > best, > alex > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no > >> necessity > > to ask permission. > > > > ~ David > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since > it > >> affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy > warning > >> is > >> generated. > >> > >> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu > > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the > Lucene > >>> release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not > work > >> out, I > >>> will go ahead with the release. > >>> > >>> best, > >>> alex > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl > > >> wrote: > >>> > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be > >> low-ish. > > Jan > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta < > ans...@anshumgupta.net > >> : > > > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too > > many > > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the > >> Lucene > > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and > moving > forward > > with the older version of Lucene. > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com > >> > wrote: > > > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too > > fresh) > Lucene > >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new > >>> Lucene > >> version. > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org > >> : > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Some updates to share on the upgrade. > >>> I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a > >> fix. > this > >>> comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a > >> look > >>> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > >>> I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and eyeballs, so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it! > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: > > Another quick update. > > There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a > regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs to > block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks close to > being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants this > in 9.4 > > best, > alex > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please check. >> Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few days. >> >> Jan Høydahl >> >>> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh >> : >>> >>> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up >> getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. Since we >> have basic auth added to prometheus as well! >>> >>> >>> On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: Hi, Just a quick status update - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if >> there is more work pending - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more failures (still running one single test a few more times just to make >> sure if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone else wants to review, now would be a very good time. Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I >> need to do Monday morning. best, alex > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no >> necessity > to ask permission. > > ~ David > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it >> affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning >> is >> generated. >> >> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu > wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene >>> release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work >> out, I >>> will go ahead with the release. >>> >>> best, >>> alex >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl >> wrote: >>> I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be >> low-ish. Jan > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta > : > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too > many > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the >> Lucene > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving forward > with the older version of Lucene. > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too > fresh) Lucene >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new >>> Lucene >> version. >> >> Jan >> >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu > : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Some updates to share on the upgrade. >>> I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a >> fix. this >>> comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a >> look >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 >>> I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my > findings >>> and >>> validate with them some of the observations I had >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x >>> >>> There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area > I >>> will >>> look at next. >>> >>> best, >>> alex >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org >>> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Another quick update. There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs to block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority. - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14496 - this looks close to being merged and I think Eric mentioned in this thread that he wants this in 9.4 best, alex On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please check. > Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few days. > > Jan Høydahl > > > 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh >: > > > > If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up > getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. Since we > have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > > > > > > >> On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Just a quick status update > >> - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if > there > >> is more work pending > >> - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > >> - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more > >> failures (still running one single test a few more times just to make > sure > >> if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the > >> release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone else > >> wants to review, now would be a very good time. > >> > >> Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > >> I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I > need to > >> do Monday morning. > >> > >> best, > >> alex > >> > >> > >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no > necessity > >>> to ask permission. > >>> > >>> ~ David > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it > affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning > is > generated. > > On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu > >>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene > > release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work > out, I > > will go ahead with the release. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > > >> I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 > >> integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be > low-ish. > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta : > >>> > >>> I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too > >>> many > >>> releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the > Lucene > >>> upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving > >> forward > >>> with the older version of Lucene. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl > >> wrote: > >>> > Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too > >>> fresh) > >> Lucene > 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new > > Lucene > version. > > Jan > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > > > Hi, > > > > Some updates to share on the upgrade. > > I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a > fix. > >> this > > comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a > look > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > > I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my > >>> findings > > and > > validate with them some of the observations I had > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > > > There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area > >>> I > > will > > look at next. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu < > >>> stilla...@apache.org > > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > >> the CollapsingQParser ( > >> > > >> > > > > >>> > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > >> ). > >> If anyone
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please check. Good luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few days. Jan Høydahl > 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh : > > If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up getting > reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. Since we have > basic auth added to prometheus as well! > > > >> On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just a quick status update >> - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if there >> is more work pending >> - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported >> - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more >> failures (still running one single test a few more times just to make sure >> if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the >> release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone else >> wants to review, now would be a very good time. >> >> Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! >> I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I need to >> do Monday morning. >> >> best, >> alex >> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley >>> wrote: >>> >>> There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no necessity >>> to ask permission. >>> >>> ~ David >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning is generated. On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu >>> wrote: > Hi, > > It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene > release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work out, I > will go ahead with the release. > > best, > alex > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 >> integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be low-ish. >> >> Jan >> >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta >>> : >>> >>> I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too >>> many >>> releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the Lucene >>> upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving >> forward >>> with the older version of Lucene. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl >>> >> wrote: >>> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too >>> fresh) >> Lucene 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new > Lucene version. Jan > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu >>> : > > Hi, > > Some updates to share on the upgrade. > I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. >> this > comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my >>> findings > and > validate with them some of the observations I had > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area >>> I > will > look at next. > > best, > alex > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu < >>> stilla...@apache.org > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to >> the CollapsingQParser ( >> >> > >>> https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html >> ). >> If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look >>> at > the PR, >> maybe something pops up. >> >> best >> alex >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu < stilla...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade >> PR >>> for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some >>> time I would appreciate a hand. >>> Tracking failures here >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 >>> >>> >>> best, >>> alex >>> >>>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up getting reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. Since we have basic auth added to prometheus as well! > On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a quick status update > - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if there > is more work pending > - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported > - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more > failures (still running one single test a few more times just to make sure > if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the > release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone else > wants to review, now would be a very good time. > > Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! > I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I need to > do Monday morning. > > best, > alex > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley > wrote: > >> There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no necessity >> to ask permission. >> >> ~ David >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it >>> affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning is >>> generated. >>> >>> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu >> wrote: >>> Hi, It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work >>> out, I will go ahead with the release. best, alex On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl >>> wrote: > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be >>> low-ish. > > Jan > >> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta >> : >> >> I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too >> many >> releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the >>> Lucene >> upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving > forward >> with the older version of Lucene. >> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl >> > wrote: >> >>> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too >> fresh) > Lucene >>> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene >>> version. >>> >>> Jan >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu >> : Hi, Some updates to share on the upgrade. I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a >>> fix. > this comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a >>> look https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my >> findings and validate with them some of the observations I had https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area >> I will look at next. best, alex On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu < >> stilla...@apache.org >>> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > the CollapsingQParser ( > >>> > >>> >> https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > ). > If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look >> at the >>> PR, > maybe something pops up. > > best > alex > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu < >>> stilla...@apache.org> >>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 >>> upgrade > PR >> for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone >>> has >>> some >> time I would appreciate a hand. >> Tracking failures here >> >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 >> >> >> best, >> alex >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu < >>> stilla...@apache.org > >> wrote: >> >>> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade >>> and >>> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 >>> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no on
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Hi, Just a quick status update - SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if there is more work pending - SOLR-16644 was merged and backported - SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more failures (still running one single test a few more times just to make sure if there is any flakiness here I will not include the upgrade in the release). Thank you Christine Poerschke for helping out! If anyone else wants to review, now would be a very good time. Looks to me like we are in good shape for a release very soon! I volunteered for this one, so I will dig up the docs to see what I need to do Monday morning. best, alex On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:23 AM David Smiley wrote: > There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no necessity > to ask permission. > > ~ David > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it > > affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning is > > generated. > > > > On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene > > > release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work > > out, I > > > will go ahead with the release. > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl > > wrote: > > > > > > > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 > > > > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be > > low-ish. > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta >: > > > > > > > > > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too > many > > > > > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the > > Lucene > > > > > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving > > > > forward > > > > > with the older version of Lucene. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too > fresh) > > > > Lucene > > > > >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new > > > Lucene > > > > >> version. > > > > >> > > > > >> Jan > > > > >> > > > > >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu >: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Hi, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Some updates to share on the upgrade. > > > > >>> I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a > > fix. > > > > this > > > > >>> comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a > > look > > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > > > > >>> I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my > findings > > > and > > > > >>> validate with them some of the observations I had > > > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > > > >>> > > > > >>> There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area > I > > > will > > > > >>> look at next. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> best, > > > > >>> alex > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > > > > the CollapsingQParser ( > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > > > > ). > > > > If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look > at > > > the > > > > >> PR, > > > > maybe something pops up. > > > > > > > > best > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu < > > stilla...@apache.org> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 > > upgrade > > > > PR > > > > > for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone > > has > > > > >> some > > > > > time I would appreciate a hand. > > > > > Tracking failures here > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best, > > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu < > > stilla...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 > > > upgrade > > > > >> and > > > > >> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 > > > > >> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one > > else > > > > >> picks > > > > >> it up first. > > > > >>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no necessity to ask permission. ~ David On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it > affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning is > generated. > > On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene > > release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work > out, I > > will go ahead with the release. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > > > > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 > > > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be > low-ish. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta : > > > > > > > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too many > > > > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the > Lucene > > > > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving > > > forward > > > > with the older version of Lucene. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) > > > Lucene > > > >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new > > Lucene > > > >> version. > > > >> > > > >> Jan > > > >> > > > >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> Some updates to share on the upgrade. > > > >>> I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a > fix. > > > this > > > >>> comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a > look > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > > > >>> I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings > > and > > > >>> validate with them some of the observations I had > > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > > >>> > > > >>> There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I > > will > > > >>> look at next. > > > >>> > > > >>> best, > > > >>> alex > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu > > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > Hi, > > > > > > It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > > > the CollapsingQParser ( > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > > > ). > > > If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at > > the > > > >> PR, > > > maybe something pops up. > > > > > > best > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 > upgrade > > > PR > > > > for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone > has > > > >> some > > > > time I would appreciate a hand. > > > > Tracking failures here > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 > > > > > > > > > > > > best, > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 > > upgrade > > > >> and > > > >> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 > > > >> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one > else > > > >> picks > > > >> it up first. > > > >> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 > > > >> > > > >> best > > > >> alex > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman < > > hous...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, > so > > we > > > >> may > > > >>> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for > the > > > >>> vector/memory map stuff. > > > >>> > > > >>> - Houston > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> > > > Thanks Alex and Jan! > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, < > > > jan@cominvent.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > Sure, it's all yours.. > > > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run > this > > > >>> script to > > > > get going. > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning is generated. On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu wrote: > Hi, > > It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene > release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work out, I > will go ahead with the release. > > best, > alex > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 > > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be low-ish. > > > > Jan > > > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta : > > > > > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too many > > > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the Lucene > > > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving > > forward > > > with the older version of Lucene. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl > > wrote: > > > > > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) > > Lucene > > >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new > Lucene > > >> version. > > >> > > >> Jan > > >> > > >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > >>> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> Some updates to share on the upgrade. > > >>> I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. > > this > > >>> comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look > > >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > > >>> I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings > and > > >>> validate with them some of the observations I had > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > >>> > > >>> There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I > will > > >>> look at next. > > >>> > > >>> best, > > >>> alex > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > Hi, > > > > It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > > the CollapsingQParser ( > > > > >> > > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > > ). > > If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at > the > > >> PR, > > maybe something pops up. > > > > best > > alex > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu > > >> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade > > PR > > > for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has > > >> some > > > time I would appreciate a hand. > > > Tracking failures here > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 > > > > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 > upgrade > > >> and > > >> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 > > >> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else > > >> picks > > >> it up first. > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 > > >> > > >> best > > >> alex > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman < > hous...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so > we > > >> may > > >>> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the > > >>> vector/memory map stuff. > > >>> > > >>> - Houston > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > Thanks Alex and Jan! > > > > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, < > > jan@cominvent.com> > > >>> wrote: > > > > > Sure, it's all yours.. > > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this > > >>> script to > > > get going. > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > > > > > > Jan > > > > > >> 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu < > > stilla...@apache.org > > : > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand > > >>> holding). > > >> > > >> > > >> best, > > >> alex > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl < > > >>> jan@cominvent.com> > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Hi, It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work out, I will go ahead with the release. best, alex On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 > integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be low-ish. > > Jan > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta : > > > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too many > > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the Lucene > > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving > forward > > with the older version of Lucene. > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) > Lucene > >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene > >> version. > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Some updates to share on the upgrade. > >>> I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. > this > >>> comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look > >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > >>> I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings and > >>> validate with them some of the observations I had > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > >>> > >>> There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I will > >>> look at next. > >>> > >>> best, > >>> alex > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu > >> wrote: > >>> > Hi, > > It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > the CollapsingQParser ( > > >> > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > ). > If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the > >> PR, > maybe something pops up. > > best > alex > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu > >> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade > PR > > for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has > >> some > > time I would appreciate a hand. > > Tracking failures here > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 > > > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu > > wrote: > > > >> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade > >> and > >> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 > >> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else > >> picks > >> it up first. > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 > >> > >> best > >> alex > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman > >> wrote: > >> > >>> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we > >> may > >>> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the > >>> vector/memory map stuff. > >>> > >>> - Houston > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > Thanks Alex and Jan! > > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, < > jan@cominvent.com> > >>> wrote: > > > Sure, it's all yours.. > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this > >>> script to > > get going. > > > > >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > > > > Jan > > > >> 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu < > stilla...@apache.org > : > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand > >>> holding). > >> > >> > >> best, > >> alex > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl < > >>> jan@cominvent.com> > > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 > optimizations, > > 21 > >>> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's > >>> been > > almost 2 > >>> months since 9.3. > >>> > >>> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday > >>> Sept > > 26th, > >>> twelve days from today. > >>> > >>> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers > >>>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 integration, so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be low-ish. Jan > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta : > > I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too many > releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the Lucene > upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving forward > with the older version of Lucene. > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) Lucene >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene >> version. >> >> Jan >> >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Some updates to share on the upgrade. >>> I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. this >>> comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 >>> I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings and >>> validate with them some of the observations I had >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x >>> >>> There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I will >>> look at next. >>> >>> best, >>> alex >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu >> wrote: >>> Hi, It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to the CollapsingQParser ( >> https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html ). If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the >> PR, maybe something pops up. best alex On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu >> wrote: > Hi, > > To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR > for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has >> some > time I would appreciate a hand. > Tracking failures here > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 > > > best, > alex > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu > wrote: > >> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade >> and >> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 >> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else >> picks >> it up first. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 >> >> best >> alex >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we >> may >>> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the >>> vector/memory map stuff. >>> >>> - Houston >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks Alex and Jan! On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, >>> wrote: > Sure, it's all yours.. > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this >>> script to > get going. > >>> >> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > > Jan > >> 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu >>> : >> >> Hi, >> >> I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand >>> holding). >> >> >> best, >> alex >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl < >>> jan@cominvent.com> > wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 optimizations, > 21 >>> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's >>> been > almost 2 >>> months since 9.3. >>> >>> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday >>> Sept > 26th, >>> twelve days from today. >>> >>> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers >>> wants to >>> try the Release Manager role! >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>> >>> > > >>> >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Re: Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
By default, Solr returns all metrics, of which there are a ton of them!
That's great for looking at metrics if you are exploring them for the first
time. But as you'll see in the ref guide, there are many filtering options
which I would consider to be mandatory if you are going to use metrics "for
real" (in production).
I know I sidestepped your question; you may have a point about indentation
defaults. I'm somewhat surprised the Prometheus Exporter insists on JSON
(vs Solr native "javabin"); I can see the code for that and it seems it's
because it's going to do some Json specific "jq" processing. Okay.
See org.apache.solr.prometheus.scraper.SolrScraper#request where you could
clone the params from MetricsQuery in order to set indent=false. Or be a
little fancy and use SolrParams.wrapDefaults(params, new
MapSolrParams(Map.of("indent","false"))) or similar. I wish there was a
convenience method for that on SolrParams.
Feel free to create a JIRA issue & PR and I'll review.
~ David
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:38 PM Chris Schomaker
wrote:
> I'd like to raise an issue that I'm having with Solr 9.3 that might make a
> good case for getting another release (9.3.1 or 9.4) out soon.
>
> I've had a 9.3 cluster of 180 nodes up and running for about a week. After
> the weekend, I noticed that metrics from the cluster were failing to ship.
> Upon investigation, I found that the payload coming back from
> `/solr/admin/metrics` was over a GB in size. I also saw query responses had
> ballooned in size to tens of MB and the UI was slow. I captured query
> responses in the browser, with curl and in a packet capture. In all cases,
> there were a large amount of space characters. This can be seen in the
> brower's network inspector when clicking around the UI, as well (make sure
> to disable pretty print).
>
> This all lead me to SOLR-16925. I have a fix in place for query results but
> the admin endpoints like `/solr/admin/metrics` are still experiencing the
> issue. You can simply pass `&indent=off` to the endpoints and the
> whitespace issue goes away. However, I can't figure out a way to configure
> Solr to use this default param with the CoreAdminHandler. The Solr Prom
> Exporter could be reconfigured to include this param but that's a lot of
> configuration to add. There's no way to reconfigure the UI.
>
> Here's a good illustration of the issue:
>
> ```
> ❯ curl --user 'foo:bar' "http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/metrics"; >
> /tmp/metrics_indented.json
>
> ❯ curl --user 'foo:bar' "
> http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/metrics?indent=off";
> > /tmp/metrics_not_indented.json
>
> ❯ ls -lh /tmp | grep metrics
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 foo bar 1.4G Sep 28 08:57 metrics_indented.json
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 foo bar 177K Sep 28 08:59 metrics_not_indented.json
>
> ❯ grep -o ' ' /tmp/metrics_indented.json | wc -l
> 1449499825
> ```
>
> In my opinion, Solr 9.3 can't be monitored and is therefore unfit to run.
>
> I'll be AFK for the next few days but am happy to lend a hand with a new
> release next week. I'd need a lot of help, though.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too many releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the Lucene upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving forward with the older version of Lucene. On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) Lucene > 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene > version. > > Jan > > > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > > > Hi, > > > > Some updates to share on the upgrade. > > I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. this > > comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > > I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings and > > validate with them some of the observations I had > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > > > There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I will > > look at next. > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > >> the CollapsingQParser ( > >> > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > >> ). > >> If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the > PR, > >> maybe something pops up. > >> > >> best > >> alex > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR > >>> for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has > some > >>> time I would appreciate a hand. > >>> Tracking failures here > >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 > >>> > >>> > >>> best, > >>> alex > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu > >>> wrote: > >>> > Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade > and > marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 > I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else > picks > it up first. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 > > best > alex > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman > wrote: > > > It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we > may > > want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the > > vector/memory map stuff. > > > > - Houston > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thanks Alex and Jan! > >> > >> On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, > > wrote: > >> > >>> Sure, it's all yours.. > >>> You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this > > script to > >>> get going. > >>> > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > >>> > >>> Jan > >>> > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu >> : > > Hi, > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand > > holding). > > > best, > alex > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl < > > jan@cominvent.com> > >>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 > >> optimizations, > >>> 21 > > bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's > > been > >>> almost 2 > > months since 9.3. > > > > I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday > > Sept > >>> 26th, > > twelve days from today. > > > > I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers > > wants > >> to > > try the Release Manager role! > > > > Jan > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > -- Anshum Gupta
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Hello, I have no strong views on Lucene 9.7 or Lucene 9.8 for Solr 9.4 but if it's not too late to ask, I'd love to see the (small) https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1950 change for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16994 considered for being in the 9.4 release. Thanks, Christine From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 09/28/23 14:05:25 UTC+1:00To: dev@solr.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) Lucene 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene version. Jan > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > Hi, > > Some updates to share on the upgrade. > I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. this > comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings and > validate with them some of the observations I had > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I will > look at next. > > best, > alex > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to >> the CollapsingQParser ( >> https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-result s.html >> ). >> If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the PR, >> maybe something pops up. >> >> best >> alex >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR >>> for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some >>> time I would appreciate a hand. >>> Tracking failures here >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 >>> >>> >>> best, >>> alex >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and >>>> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 >>>> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks >>>> it up first. >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 >>>> >>>> best >>>> alex >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may >>>>> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the >>>>> vector/memory map stuff. >>>>> >>>>> - Houston >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Alex and Jan! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, it's all yours.. >>>>>>> You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this >>>>> script to >>>>>>> get going. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu >>>>> : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand >>>>> holding). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> best, >>>>>>>> alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl < >>>>> jan@cominvent.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 >>>>>> optimizations, >>>>>>> 21 >>>>>>>>> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's >>>>> been >>>>>>> almost 2 >>>>>>>>> months since 9.3. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday >>>>> Sept >>>>>>> 26th, >>>>>>>>> twelve days from today. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers >>>>> wants >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> try the Release Manager role! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>>> >>>>> - >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
RE: Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
I'd like to raise an issue that I'm having with Solr 9.3 that might make a good case for getting another release (9.3.1 or 9.4) out soon. I've had a 9.3 cluster of 180 nodes up and running for about a week. After the weekend, I noticed that metrics from the cluster were failing to ship. Upon investigation, I found that the payload coming back from `/solr/admin/metrics` was over a GB in size. I also saw query responses had ballooned in size to tens of MB and the UI was slow. I captured query responses in the browser, with curl and in a packet capture. In all cases, there were a large amount of space characters. This can be seen in the brower's network inspector when clicking around the UI, as well (make sure to disable pretty print). This all lead me to SOLR-16925. I have a fix in place for query results but the admin endpoints like `/solr/admin/metrics` are still experiencing the issue. You can simply pass `&indent=off` to the endpoints and the whitespace issue goes away. However, I can't figure out a way to configure Solr to use this default param with the CoreAdminHandler. The Solr Prom Exporter could be reconfigured to include this param but that's a lot of configuration to add. There's no way to reconfigure the UI. Here's a good illustration of the issue: ``` ❯ curl --user 'foo:bar' "http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/metrics"; > /tmp/metrics_indented.json ❯ curl --user 'foo:bar' "http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/metrics?indent=off"; > /tmp/metrics_not_indented.json ❯ ls -lh /tmp | grep metrics -rw-rw-r-- 1 foo bar 1.4G Sep 28 08:57 metrics_indented.json -rw-rw-r-- 1 foo bar 177K Sep 28 08:59 metrics_not_indented.json ❯ grep -o ' ' /tmp/metrics_indented.json | wc -l 1449499825 ``` In my opinion, Solr 9.3 can't be monitored and is therefore unfit to run. I'll be AFK for the next few days but am happy to lend a hand with a new release next week. I'd need a lot of help, though. Thanks, Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) Lucene 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene version. Jan > 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > Hi, > > Some updates to share on the upgrade. > I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. this > comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 > I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings and > validate with them some of the observations I had > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x > > There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I will > look at next. > > best, > alex > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to >> the CollapsingQParser ( >> https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html >> ). >> If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the PR, >> maybe something pops up. >> >> best >> alex >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR >>> for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some >>> time I would appreciate a hand. >>> Tracking failures here >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 >>> >>> >>> best, >>> alex >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu >>> wrote: >>> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks it up first. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 best alex On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman wrote: > It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may > want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the > vector/memory map stuff. > > - Houston > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Alex and Jan! >> >> On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, > wrote: >> >>> Sure, it's all yours.. >>> You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this > script to >>> get going. >>> >> > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py >>> >>> Jan >>> 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu > : Hi, I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand > holding). best, alex On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan@cominvent.com> >>> wrote: > Hi, > > Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 >> optimizations, >>> 21 > bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's > been >>> almost 2 > months since 9.3. > > I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday > Sept >>> 26th, > twelve days from today. > > I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers > wants >> to > try the Release Manager role! > > Jan > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >>> >>> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Hi, Some updates to share on the upgrade. I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. this comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176 I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to explain my findings and validate with them some of the observations I had https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I will look at next. best, alex On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu wrote: > Hi, > > It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to > the CollapsingQParser ( > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html > ). > If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the PR, > maybe something pops up. > > best > alex > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR >> for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some >> time I would appreciate a hand. >> Tracking failures here >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 >> >> >> best, >> alex >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu >> wrote: >> >>> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and >>> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 >>> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks >>> it up first. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 >>> >>> best >>> alex >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman >>> wrote: >>> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the vector/memory map stuff. - Houston On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Alex and Jan! > > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, wrote: > > > Sure, it's all yours.. > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script to > > get going. > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > > > > Jan > > > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu >>> >: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding). > > > > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl < jan@cominvent.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 > optimizations, > > 21 > > >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been > > almost 2 > > >> months since 9.3. > > >> > > >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept > > 26th, > > >> twelve days from today. > > >> > > >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers wants > to > > >> try the Release Manager role! > > >> > > >> Jan > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Hi, It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to the CollapsingQParser ( https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html ). If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the PR, maybe something pops up. best alex On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > Hi, > > To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR for > review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some time I > would appreciate a hand. > Tracking failures here > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 > > > best, > alex > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > >> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and >> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 >> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks >> it up first. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 >> >> best >> alex >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may >>> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the >>> vector/memory map stuff. >>> >>> - Houston >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks Alex and Jan! >>> > >>> > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Sure, it's all yours.. >>> > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this >>> script to >>> > > get going. >>> > > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py >>> > > >>> > > Jan >>> > > >>> > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu : >>> > > > >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand >>> holding). >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > best, >>> > > > alex >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl >> > >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> Hi, >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 >>> > optimizations, >>> > > 21 >>> > > >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been >>> > > almost 2 >>> > > >> months since 9.3. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday >>> Sept >>> > > 26th, >>> > > >> twelve days from today. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers >>> wants >>> > to >>> > > >> try the Release Manager role! >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Jan >>> > > >> >>> - >>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Hi, To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR for review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some time I would appreciate a hand. Tracking failures here https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783 best, alex On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu wrote: > Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and > marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 > I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks it > up first. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 > > best > alex > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman wrote: > >> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may >> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the >> vector/memory map stuff. >> >> - Houston >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks Alex and Jan! >> > >> > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, >> wrote: >> > >> > > Sure, it's all yours.. >> > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script >> to >> > > get going. >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py >> > > >> > > Jan >> > > >> > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu : >> > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding). >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > best, >> > > > alex >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Hi, >> > > >> >> > > >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 >> > optimizations, >> > > 21 >> > > >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been >> > > almost 2 >> > > >> months since 9.3. >> > > >> >> > > >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept >> > > 26th, >> > > >> twelve days from today. >> > > >> >> > > >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers >> wants >> > to >> > > >> try the Release Manager role! >> > > >> >> > > >> Jan >> > > >> >> - >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4 I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks it up first. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985 best alex On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman wrote: > It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may > want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the > vector/memory map stuff. > > - Houston > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Alex and Jan! > > > > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, > wrote: > > > > > Sure, it's all yours.. > > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script > to > > > get going. > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding). > > > > > > > > > > > > best, > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 > > optimizations, > > > 21 > > > >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been > > > almost 2 > > > >> months since 9.3. > > > >> > > > >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept > > > 26th, > > > >> twelve days from today. > > > >> > > > >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers wants > > to > > > >> try the Release Manager role! > > > >> > > > >> Jan > > > >> > - > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the vector/memory map stuff. - Houston On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Alex and Jan! > > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, wrote: > > > Sure, it's all yours.. > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script to > > get going. > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > > > > Jan > > > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding). > > > > > > > > > best, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 > optimizations, > > 21 > > >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been > > almost 2 > > >> months since 9.3. > > >> > > >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept > > 26th, > > >> twelve days from today. > > >> > > >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers wants > to > > >> try the Release Manager role! > > >> > > >> Jan > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Thanks Alex and Jan! On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, wrote: > Sure, it's all yours.. > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script to > get going. > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py > > Jan > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > > > Hi, > > > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding). > > > > > > best, > > alex > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 optimizations, > 21 > >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been > almost 2 > >> months since 9.3. > >> > >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept > 26th, > >> twelve days from today. > >> > >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers wants to > >> try the Release Manager role! > >> > >> Jan > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >> > >> > >
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Sure, it's all yours.. You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script to get going. https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py Jan > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu : > > Hi, > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding). > > > best, > alex > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 optimizations, 21 >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been almost 2 >> months since 9.3. >> >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept 26th, >> twelve days from today. >> >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers wants to >> try the Release Manager role! >> >> Jan >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> >>
Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Hi, I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding). best, alex On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Hi, > > Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 optimizations, 21 > bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been almost 2 > months since 9.3. > > I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept 26th, > twelve days from today. > > I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers wants to > try the Release Manager role! > > Jan > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >
