[RESULT][VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

And here is my +1

Therefore vote passed with:
* +1 (non-binding) from Vicente Rossello, Juan Llado
* +1 (binding) from Mark, JL and me
* no -1

Will follow with the release process likely beginning of next week.

Thanks for all the ones who votes!



Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-05-27 18:30 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro :

> Reviewed quickly the tentacle report.
> Downloaded the sources from the staging repo and ran a build.
>
> Got some failures with timings and the multicast module failing.
> Looks like it does not work under mac. I have seen a system property to
> skip them. Might appear as blocker but they aren't cause I don't think they
> are useful (system out instead of asserts for most of the cases). They have
> been always failing with anyone complaining.
>
> I might drop them at some point fix them when I have a bit of time.
>
> So here is my +1
>
> Thanks Romain
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jgallim...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Romain, I'll take a look tonight.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > for the one using tentacle to check notice/license files: i uploaded it
> > > there http://home.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapachetomee-1097/
> (skipped
> > > binaries/exploded folders cause my network connection doesn't allow
> that
> > > ATM)
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> > >  | JavaEE Factory
> > > 
> > >
> > > 2016-05-24 12:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> > >
> > > > @Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > > >  | Github
> > > >  | LinkedIn
> > > >  | Tomitriber
> > > >  | JavaEE Factory
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg  >:
> > > >
> > > >> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> So here is my
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> LieGrue,
> > > >> strub
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"
> > > >> >  a
> > > >> > écrit :
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Nothing patrticular.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still
> > > >> pending
> > > >> >>  tasks to do.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear
> regarding
> > > the
> > > >> >>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7
> > > >> certified).
> > > >> >>  Could we have that download page to be split into something
> like 2
> > > >> parts:
> > > >> >>  1.x and 7.x
> > > >> >>  With the information on the policy at the top.
> > > >> >>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
> > > >> >>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in
> > the
> > > >> TomEE
> > > >> >>  7.x
> > > >> >>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a
> bit
> > > >> messy
> > > >> > and
> > > >> >>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in
> my
> > > >> > opinion.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained
> > releases +
> > > >> link
> > > >> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That
> is
> > > my
> > > >> > second task once vote passed.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has
> been
> > > >> done
> > > >> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we
> > can
> > > >> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker -
> > compared
> > > >> to
> > > >> > the lack of votes ;).
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to
> > > >> compile
> > > >> >>  without success.
> > > >> >>  XAPoolT

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

Reviewed quickly the tentacle report.
Downloaded the sources from the staging repo and ran a build.

Got some failures with timings and the multicast module failing.
Looks like it does not work under mac. I have seen a system property to
skip them. Might appear as blocker but they aren't cause I don't think they
are useful (system out instead of asserts for most of the cases). They have
been always failing with anyone complaining.

I might drop them at some point fix them when I have a bit of time.

So here is my +1

Thanks Romain




--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jgallim...@tomitribe.com> wrote:

> Thanks Romain, I'll take a look tonight.
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  >
> wrote:
>
> > for the one using tentacle to check notice/license files: i uploaded it
> > there http://home.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapachetomee-1097/ (skipped
> > binaries/exploded folders cause my network connection doesn't allow that
> > ATM)
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
> > 2016-05-24 12:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> >
> > > @Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Github
> > >  | LinkedIn
> > >  | Tomitriber
> > >  | JavaEE Factory
> > > 
> > >
> > > 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> > >
> > >> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So here is my
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"
> > >> >  a
> > >> > écrit :
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
> > >> >
> > >> > Nothing patrticular.
> > >> >
> > >> >>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still
> > >> pending
> > >> >>  tasks to do.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding
> > the
> > >> >>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7
> > >> certified).
> > >> >>  Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2
> > >> parts:
> > >> >>  1.x and 7.x
> > >> >>  With the information on the policy at the top.
> > >> >>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
> > >> >>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in
> the
> > >> TomEE
> > >> >>  7.x
> > >> >>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit
> > >> messy
> > >> > and
> > >> >>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my
> > >> > opinion.
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained
> releases +
> > >> link
> > >> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is
> > my
> > >> > second task once vote passed.
> > >> >
> > >> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been
> > >> done
> > >> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we
> can
> > >> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker -
> compared
> > >> to
> > >> > the lack of votes ;).
> > >> >
> > >> >>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to
> > >> compile
> > >> >>  without success.
> > >> >>  XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can
> likely
> > be
> > >> > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.
> > >> >
> > >> >>  Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test
> > >> > fixed
> > >> >>  and more reliable (if possible).
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for taking time to have a look.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  --
> > >> >>  Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > >> >>  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > >> >>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament
> > >> > 
> > >> >>  wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins
> > >> > 
> > >> >>  > wrote:
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> >>  > rmannibu...@gm

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Thanks Romain, I'll take a look tonight.

Jon

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> for the one using tentacle to check notice/license files: i uploaded it
> there http://home.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapachetomee-1097/ (skipped
> binaries/exploded folders cause my network connection doesn't allow that
> ATM)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2016-05-24 12:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > @Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github
> >  | LinkedIn
> >  | Tomitriber
> >  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
> > 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >
> >> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
> >>
> >>
> >> So here is my
> >>
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"
> >> >  a
> >> > écrit :
> >> >>
> >> >>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
> >> >
> >> > Nothing patrticular.
> >> >
> >> >>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still
> >> pending
> >> >>  tasks to do.
> >> >>
> >> >>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding
> the
> >> >>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7
> >> certified).
> >> >>  Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2
> >> parts:
> >> >>  1.x and 7.x
> >> >>  With the information on the policy at the top.
> >> >>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
> >> >>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the
> >> TomEE
> >> >>  7.x
> >> >>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit
> >> messy
> >> > and
> >> >>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my
> >> > opinion.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases +
> >> link
> >> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is
> my
> >> > second task once vote passed.
> >> >
> >> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been
> >> done
> >> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can
> >> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared
> >> to
> >> > the lack of votes ;).
> >> >
> >> >>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
> >> >>
> >> >>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to
> >> compile
> >> >>  without success.
> >> >>  XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely
> be
> >> > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.
> >> >
> >> >>  Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test
> >> > fixed
> >> >>  and more reliable (if possible).
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for taking time to have a look.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>  --
> >> >>  Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> >>  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> >>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >>
> >> >>  On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament
> >> > 
> >> >>  wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>  > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins
> >> > 
> >> >>  > wrote:
> >> >>  >
> >> >>  > >
> >> >>  > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> >>  > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> >>  > > wrote:
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins
> >> > :
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance
> >> > of an
> >> > official
> >> >>  > > vote
> >> >>  > > >> for major releases:
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
> >> >>  > > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
> >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
> >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
> >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help
> >> > with LICENSE
> >> > and
> >> >>  > > >> NOTICE file updates

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

Thanks Romain for that.

I'll review today and should vote during the day.


--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> for the one using tentacle to check notice/license files: i uploaded it
> there http://home.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapachetomee-1097/ (skipped
> binaries/exploded folders cause my network connection doesn't allow that
> ATM)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2016-05-24 12:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > @Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github
> >  | LinkedIn
> >  | Tomitriber
> >  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
> > 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >
> >> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
> >>
> >>
> >> So here is my
> >>
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"
> >> >  a
> >> > écrit :
> >> >>
> >> >>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
> >> >
> >> > Nothing patrticular.
> >> >
> >> >>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still
> >> pending
> >> >>  tasks to do.
> >> >>
> >> >>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding
> the
> >> >>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7
> >> certified).
> >> >>  Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2
> >> parts:
> >> >>  1.x and 7.x
> >> >>  With the information on the policy at the top.
> >> >>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
> >> >>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the
> >> TomEE
> >> >>  7.x
> >> >>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit
> >> messy
> >> > and
> >> >>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my
> >> > opinion.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases +
> >> link
> >> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is
> my
> >> > second task once vote passed.
> >> >
> >> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been
> >> done
> >> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can
> >> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared
> >> to
> >> > the lack of votes ;).
> >> >
> >> >>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
> >> >>
> >> >>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to
> >> compile
> >> >>  without success.
> >> >>  XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely
> be
> >> > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.
> >> >
> >> >>  Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test
> >> > fixed
> >> >>  and more reliable (if possible).
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for taking time to have a look.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>  --
> >> >>  Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> >>  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> >>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >>
> >> >>  On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament
> >> > 
> >> >>  wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>  > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins
> >> > 
> >> >>  > wrote:
> >> >>  >
> >> >>  > >
> >> >>  > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> >>  > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> >>  > > wrote:
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins
> >> > :
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance
> >> > of an
> >> > official
> >> >>  > > vote
> >> >>  > > >> for major releases:
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
> >> >>  > > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
> >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
> >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
> >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
> >> >>  > > >>
> >> >>  > > >> Binary 

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

for the one using tentacle to check notice/license files: i uploaded it
there http://home.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapachetomee-1097/ (skipped
binaries/exploded folders cause my network connection doesn't allow that
ATM)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-05-24 12:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> @Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>
>> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
>>
>>
>> So here is my
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"
>> >  a
>> > écrit :
>> >>
>> >>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
>> >
>> > Nothing patrticular.
>> >
>> >>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still
>> pending
>> >>  tasks to do.
>> >>
>> >>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the
>> >>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7
>> certified).
>> >>  Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2
>> parts:
>> >>  1.x and 7.x
>> >>  With the information on the policy at the top.
>> >>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
>> >>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the
>> TomEE
>> >>  7.x
>> >>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit
>> messy
>> > and
>> >>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my
>> > opinion.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases +
>> link
>> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is my
>> > second task once vote passed.
>> >
>> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been
>> done
>> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can
>> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared
>> to
>> > the lack of votes ;).
>> >
>> >>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
>> >>
>> >>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to
>> compile
>> >>  without success.
>> >>  XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
>> >>
>> >
>> > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely be
>> > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.
>> >
>> >>  Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test
>> > fixed
>> >>  and more reliable (if possible).
>> >>
>> >
>> > Thanks for taking time to have a look.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >>  --
>> >>  Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> >>  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> >>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >>
>> >>  On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament
>> > 
>> >>  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>  > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins
>> > 
>> >>  > wrote:
>> >>  >
>> >>  > >
>> >>  > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> >>  > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> >>  > > wrote:
>> >>  > > >
>> >>  > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins
>> > :
>> >>  > > >
>> >>  > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance
>> > of an
>> > official
>> >>  > > vote
>> >>  > > >> for major releases:
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
>> >>  > > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
>> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
>> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
>> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help
>> > with LICENSE
>> > and
>> >>  > > >> NOTICE file updates:
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0
>> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1
>> > http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0
>> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >> And RAT scan:
>> >>  > > >>
>> >>  > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

@Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :

> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
>
>
> So here is my
>
>
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"
> >  a
> > écrit :
> >>
> >>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
> >
> > Nothing patrticular.
> >
> >>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still pending
> >>  tasks to do.
> >>
> >>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the
> >>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7
> certified).
> >>  Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2
> parts:
> >>  1.x and 7.x
> >>  With the information on the policy at the top.
> >>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
> >>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the
> TomEE
> >>  7.x
> >>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit messy
> > and
> >>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my
> > opinion.
> >>
> >
> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases +
> link
> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is my
> > second task once vote passed.
> >
> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been done
> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can
> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared to
> > the lack of votes ;).
> >
> >>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
> >>
> >>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to compile
> >>  without success.
> >>  XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
> >>
> >
> > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely be
> > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.
> >
> >>  Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test
> > fixed
> >>  and more reliable (if possible).
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for taking time to have a look.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>  --
> >>  Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >>  On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament
> > 
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >>  > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins
> > 
> >>  > wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  > >
> >>  > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >>  > > wrote:
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins
> > :
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance
> > of an
> > official
> >>  > > vote
> >>  > > >> for major releases:
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
> >>  > > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help
> > with LICENSE
> > and
> >>  > > >> NOTICE file updates:
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0
> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1
> > http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0
> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >> And RAT scan:
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <
> >>  > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been
> > in all the
> > vote
> >>  > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure
> > everyone has
> >>  > > time to
> >>  > > >> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you
> > have 72
> > hours
> >>  > to
> >>  > > do
> >>  > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release
> > manager.
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the
> > diffs, rat
> >>  > > reports
> >>  > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?
> > Or at the
> >>  > very
> >>  > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > >>
> >>  > > > 6 m

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Mark Struberg]

I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything. 


So here is my 


+1

LieGrue,
strub





> On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau  
> wrote:
> > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" 
>  a
> écrit :
>> 
>>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
> 
> Nothing patrticular.
> 
>>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still pending
>>  tasks to do.
>> 
>>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the
>>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7 certified).
>>  Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2 parts:
>>  1.x and 7.x
>>  With the information on the policy at the top.
>>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
>>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the TomEE
>>  7.x
>>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit messy
> and
>>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my
> opinion.
>> 
> 
> Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases + link
> the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is my
> second task once vote passed.
> 
> This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been done
> and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can
> enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared to
> the lack of votes ;).
> 
>>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
>> 
>>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to compile
>>  without success.
>>  XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
>> 
> 
> The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely be
> something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.
> 
>>  Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test 
> fixed
>>  and more reliable (if possible).
>> 
> 
> Thanks for taking time to have a look.
> 
> 
>> 
>>  --
>>  Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>> 
>>  On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament 
> 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>  > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins 
> 
>>  > wrote:
>>  >
>>  > >
>>  > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>  > > wrote:
>>  > > >
>>  > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins 
> :
>>  > > >
>>  > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance 
> of an
> official
>>  > > vote
>>  > > >> for major releases:
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
>>  > > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
>>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
>>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
>>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help 
> with LICENSE
> and
>>  > > >> NOTICE file updates:
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0  
> http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1  
> http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0  
> http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >> And RAT scan:
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <
>>  > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been 
> in all the
> vote
>>  > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure 
> everyone has
>>  > > time to
>>  > > >> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you 
> have 72
> hours
>>  > to
>>  > > do
>>  > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release 
> manager.
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the 
> diffs, rat
>>  > > reports
>>  > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?  
> Or at the
>>  > very
>>  > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
>>  > > >>
>>  > > >>
>>  > > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 
> year old
> think
>>  > we
>>  > > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if 
> not done
> in 1
>>  > > > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't 
> accept any
>>  > > excuse
>>  > > > anymore to delay a release.
>>  > >
>>  > > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a 
> showstopper
> for
>>  > > any release and not subject to majority vote.
>>  > >
>>  >
>>  > For a TLP, it definitely is.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > >
>>  > > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, 
> hence
>>  > > putting effort into those practices.
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > -David

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"  a
écrit :
>
> So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?

Nothing patrticular.

> Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still pending
> tasks to do.
>
> We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the
> status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7 certified).
> Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2 parts:
> 1.x and 7.x
> With the information on the policy at the top.
> Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
> implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the TomEE
> 7.x
> The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit messy
and
> the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my
opinion.
>

Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases + link
the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is my
second task once vote passed.

This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been done
and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can
enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared to
the lack of votes ;).

> That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
>
> That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to compile
> without success.
> XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
>

The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely be
something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.

> Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test fixed
> and more reliable (if possible).
>

Thanks for taking time to have a look.

>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins 
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
> > > >
> > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an
official
> > > vote
> > > >> for major releases:
> > > >>
> > > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
> > > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
> > > >>
> > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
> > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
> > > >>
> > > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
> > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
> > > >>
> > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
> > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
> > > >>
> > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help with LICENSE
and
> > > >> NOTICE file updates:
> > > >>
> > > >>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
> > > >>
> > > >>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1  http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
> > > >>
> > > >>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
> > > >>
> > > >> And RAT scan:
> > > >>
> > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <
> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
> > > >>
> > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been in all the
vote
> > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure everyone has
> > > time to
> > > >> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you have 72
hours
> > to
> > > do
> > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release manager.
> > > >>
> > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat
> > > reports
> > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?  Or at the
> > very
> > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 year old
think
> > we
> > > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if not done
in 1
> > > > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't accept any
> > > excuse
> > > > anymore to delay a release.
> > >
> > > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a showstopper
for
> > > any release and not subject to majority vote.
> > >
> >
> > For a TLP, it definitely is.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, hence
> > > putting effort into those practices.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> David Blevins
> > > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >>
> > > >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins <
david.blev...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give
> > feedback
> > > >> on how it should be updated.  Let’s start another thread.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time
and
> > > wo

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Have you run tentacles to generate a legal report?

Jon

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> Hi
>
> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0 vote.
>
> Here are the release notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
>
> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
>
> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
>
> New staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
>
> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0
>
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
>
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we are talking
> about
> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X}
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>



-- 
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still pending
tasks to do.

We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the
status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7 certified).
Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2 parts:
1.x and 7.x
With the information on the policy at the top.
Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we
implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the TomEE
7.x
The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit messy and
the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my opinion.

That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.

That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to compile
without success.
XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core

Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test fixed
and more reliable (if possible).


--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
> > >
> > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an official
> > vote
> > >> for major releases:
> > >>
> > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
> > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
> > >>
> > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
> > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
> > >>
> > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
> > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
> > >>
> > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
> > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
> > >>
> > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help with LICENSE and
> > >> NOTICE file updates:
> > >>
> > >>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
> > >>
> > >>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1  http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
> > >>
> > >>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
> > >>
> > >> And RAT scan:
> > >>
> > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <
> > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
> > >>
> > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been in all the vote
> > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure everyone has
> > time to
> > >> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you have 72 hours
> to
> > do
> > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release manager.
> > >>
> > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat
> > reports
> > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?  Or at the
> very
> > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 year old think
> we
> > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if not done in 1
> > > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't accept any
> > excuse
> > > anymore to delay a release.
> >
> > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a showstopper for
> > any release and not subject to majority vote.
> >
>
> For a TLP, it definitely is.
>
>
> >
> > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, hence
> > putting effort into those practices.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> David Blevins
> > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>
> > >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins  >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give
> feedback
> > >> on how it should be updated.  Let’s start another thread.
> > >>>
> > >>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and
> > work
> > >> openly on it.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> David Blevins
> > >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> > >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>>
> >  On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >> > wrote:
> > 
> >  @David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html <
> > >> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, just added a
> >  link on the download page
> > http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think
> > >>  the
> >  information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the
> >  website until you are fully happy with it.
> > 
> > 
> >  Romain Manni-Bucau
> >  @rmannibucau  > >> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> |  Blog
> >   http://rma

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[John D. Ament]

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins 
wrote:

>
> > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
> >
> > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
> >
> >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an official
> vote
> >> for major releases:
> >>
> >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
> >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
> >>
> >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
> >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
> >>
> >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
> >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
> >>
> >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
> >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
> >>
> >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help with LICENSE and
> >> NOTICE file updates:
> >>
> >>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
> >>
> >>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1  http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
> >>
> >>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
> >>
> >> And RAT scan:
> >>
> >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <
> >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
> >>
> >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been in all the vote
> >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure everyone has
> time to
> >> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you have 72 hours to
> do
> >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release manager.
> >>
> >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat
> reports
> >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?  Or at the very
> >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
> >>
> >>
> > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 year old think we
> > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if not done in 1
> > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't accept any
> excuse
> > anymore to delay a release.
>
> Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a showstopper for
> any release and not subject to majority vote.
>

For a TLP, it definitely is.


>
> I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, hence
> putting effort into those practices.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> David Blevins
> >> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give feedback
> >> on how it should be updated.  Let’s start another thread.
> >>>
> >>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and
> work
> >> openly on it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> David Blevins
> >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>
>  On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> 
>  @David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html <
> >> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, just added a
>  link on the download page
> http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think
> >>  the
>  information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the
>  website until you are fully happy with it.
> 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>  @rmannibucau  >> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> |  Blog
>   >>
> >> | Github  https://github.com/rmannibucau>>
> >> |
>  LinkedIn  >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Tomitriber
>  > | JavaEE
> Factory
>   >> https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>>
> 
>  2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins  >> >:
> 
> > Also the download page would need to be updated.  It currently says
> >> “Java
> > EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with
> >> “NOT
> > Java EE 7 compliant”.  That text should be a link to an explanation
> of
> >> why
> > and an explanation of the version number.
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Blevins
> > http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins <
> david.blev...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Where is the documentation page again?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> David Blevins
> >> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > 

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[David Blevins]

> On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
> wrote:
> 
> 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
> 
>> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an official vote
>> for major releases:
>> 
>>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
>>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
>> 
>>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
>>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
>> 
>>  1.0.0 preview binaries
>>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
>> 
>>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
>>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
>> 
>> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help with LICENSE and
>> NOTICE file updates:
>> 
>>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
>> 
>>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1  http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
>> 
>>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
>> 
>> And RAT scan:
>> 
>> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <
>> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
>> 
>> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been in all the vote
>> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure everyone has time to
>> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you have 72 hours to do
>> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release manager.
>> 
>> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat reports
>> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?  Or at the very
>> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
>> 
>> 
> 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 year old think we
> got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if not done in 1
> year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't accept any excuse
> anymore to delay a release.

Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a showstopper for any 
release and not subject to majority vote.

I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, hence putting 
effort into those practices.


-David


> 
> 
>> 
>> --
>> David Blevins
>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> 
>>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give feedback
>> on how it should be updated.  Let’s start another thread.
>>> 
>>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and work
>> openly on it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> David Blevins
>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> 
 On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote:
 
 @David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html <
>> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, just added a
 link on the download page http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think
>>  the
 information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the
 website until you are fully happy with it.
 
 
 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau > https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> |  Blog
 >
>> | Github >
>> |
 LinkedIn > https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Tomitriber
 > | JavaEE Factory
 > https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>>
 
 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > >:
 
> Also the download page would need to be updated.  It currently says
>> “Java
> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with
>> “NOT
> Java EE 7 compliant”.  That text should be a link to an explanation of
>> why
> and an explanation of the version number.
> 
> 
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> 
>> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins 
> wrote:
>> 
>> Where is the documentation page again?
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> David Blevins
>> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> 
>>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0
> vote.
>>> 
>>> Here are the release notes:
>>> 
> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> <
> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :

> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an official vote
> for major releases:
>
>   [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
>   http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
>
>   [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
>   http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
>
>   1.0.0 preview binaries
>   http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
>
>   [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
>   http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
>
> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help with LICENSE and
> NOTICE file updates:
>
>   1.0.0 - 1.5.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
>
>   1.5.0 - 1.5.1  http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
>
>   1.5.1 - 1.6.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
>
> And RAT scan:
>
>  - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d <
> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
>
> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been in all the vote
> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure everyone has time to
> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you have 72 hours to do
> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release manager.
>
> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat reports
> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?  Or at the very
> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
>
>
6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 year old think we
got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if not done in 1
year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't accept any excuse
anymore to delay a release.


>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> > On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins 
> wrote:
> >
> > Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give feedback
> on how it should be updated.  Let’s start another thread.
> >
> > I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and work
> openly on it.
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Blevins
> > http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  > wrote:
> >>
> >> @David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html <
> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, just added a
> >> link on the download page http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think
>  the
> >> information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the
> >> website until you are fully happy with it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau  https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> |  Blog
> >> >
> | Github >
> |
> >> LinkedIn  https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Tomitriber
> >> > | JavaEE Factory
> >>  https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>>
> >>
> >> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins  >:
> >>
> >>> Also the download page would need to be updated.  It currently says
> “Java
> >>> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with
> “NOT
> >>> Java EE 7 compliant”.  That text should be a link to an explanation of
> why
> >>> and an explanation of the version number.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> David Blevins
> >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>
>  On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins 
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Where is the documentation page again?
> 
> 
>  --
>  David Blevins
>  http://twitter.com/dblevins 
>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> 
> > On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >>> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0
> >>> vote.
> >
> > Here are the release notes:
> >
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> >>> <
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> 
> >
> > Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >
> > As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
> >
> > New staging repository is
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
> >
> > Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tome

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[David Blevins]

Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an official vote for 
major releases:

  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
  
  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
  
  1.0.0 preview binaries
  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
  
  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65

Binary comparison of this release to previous to help with LICENSE and NOTICE 
file updates:

  1.0.0 - 1.5.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
  
  1.5.0 - 1.5.1  http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
  
  1.5.1 - 1.6.0  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs

And RAT scan:

 - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d 


Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been in all the vote threads, 
we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure everyone has time to give 
feedback.  So I’m hoping the response is not “you have 72 hours to do this” as 
they’ve historically been done by the release manager.

Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat reports and 
ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date?  Or at the very least pause 
this vote till that stuff is done.


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins  wrote:
> 
> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give feedback on 
> how it should be updated.  Let’s start another thread.
> 
> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and work 
> openly on it.
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> 
>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote:
>> 
>> @David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html 
>> , just added a
>> link on the download page http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think 
>>  the
>> information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the
>> website until you are fully happy with it.
>> 
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau > > |  Blog
>> > | 
>> Github > |
>> LinkedIn > > | Tomitriber
>> > | JavaEE Factory
>> > >
>> 
>> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > >:
>> 
>>> Also the download page would need to be updated.  It currently says “Java
>>> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with “NOT
>>> Java EE 7 compliant”.  That text should be a link to an explanation of why
>>> and an explanation of the version number.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> David Blevins
>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> 
 On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins 
>>> wrote:
 
 Where is the documentation page again?
 
 
 --
 David Blevins
 http://twitter.com/dblevins 
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 
> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> > wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0
>>> vote.
> 
> Here are the release notes:
> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
>>> <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
 
> 
> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> 
> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
> 
> New staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
> 
> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0
> 
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> 
> 
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we are
>>> talking
> about
> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X}
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github <
>>> https://github.c

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[David Blevins]

Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give feedback on how 
it should be updated.  Let’s start another thread.

I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and work openly 
on it.


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
> wrote:
> 
> @David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html, just added a
> link on the download page http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think the
> information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the
> website until you are fully happy with it.
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
> 
> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :
> 
>> Also the download page would need to be updated.  It currently says “Java
>> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with “NOT
>> Java EE 7 compliant”.  That text should be a link to an explanation of why
>> and an explanation of the version number.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> David Blevins
>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> 
>>> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Where is the documentation page again?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> David Blevins
>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> 
 On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0
>> vote.
 
 Here are the release notes:
 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
>> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
>>> 
 
 Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
 
 As discussed pushed the tag on github:
 https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
 
 New staging repository is
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
 
 Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0
 
 Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
 everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
 
 
 Please vote:
 [ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
 [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we are
>> talking
 about
 [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X}
 
 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau  |  Blog
  | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
 LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
  | JavaEE Factory
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

@David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html, just added a
link on the download page http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think the
information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the
website until you are fully happy with it.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins :

> Also the download page would need to be updated.  It currently says “Java
> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with “NOT
> Java EE 7 compliant”.  That text should be a link to an explanation of why
> and an explanation of the version number.
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> > On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins 
> wrote:
> >
> > Where is the documentation page again?
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Blevins
> > http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0
> vote.
> >>
> >> Here are the release notes:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> >
> >>
> >> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >>
> >> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
> >>
> >> New staging repository is
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
> >>
> >> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> >> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote:
> >> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
> >> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we are
> talking
> >> about
> >> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X}
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >>  | JavaEE Factory
> >> 
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[David Blevins]

Also the download page would need to be updated.  It currently says “Java EE 6 
compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it with “NOT Java EE 7 
compliant”.  That text should be a link to an explanation of why and an 
explanation of the version number.


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins  wrote:
> 
> Where is the documentation page again?
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins 
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> 
>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0 vote.
>> 
>> Here are the release notes:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
>> 
>> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
>> 
>> New staging repository is
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
>> 
>> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0
>> 
>> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
>> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
>> 
>> 
>> Please vote:
>> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
>> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we are talking
>> about
>> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X}
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Github  
>> |
>> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>>  | JavaEE Factory
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[David Blevins]

Where is the documentation page again?


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0 vote.
> 
> Here are the release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> 
> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> 
> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
> 
> New staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
> 
> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0
> 
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> 
> 
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we are talking
> about
> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X}
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Just to clarify after Andy's mail: tempted to say the opposite: this is not
an important release since we can release whenever we want and versioning
is just a number and as a side note out of topic there. Doc has been
updated some time ago but feel free to adjust it if you or anyone else feel
the need. About the rubber stamped same thing, this is if you think but we
stated there was no stamped contract between EE and TomEE versions on
multiple threads so with the additional doc I think it is clear enough now.
That's just binaries we can use from end to end - and that's the only goal
of this release as stated in the version vote.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-05-18 15:32 GMT+02:00 jllado :

> +1 ^^
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-TomEE-7-0-0-tp4678479p4678508.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[jllado]

+1 ^^



--
View this message in context: 
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-TomEE-7-0-0-tp4678479p4678508.html
Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Andy Gumbrecht]

Please give everyone a really good chance to test this one and not rush
through on a 3 +1 binding. Most are also not going to be able to fully test
until the weekend.

The docs need to be in place to explain this is *not *EE7 out of the box,
and should be a part of this review/vote.

There needs to be a definitive statement of what is and what is not
available in this release.

This is more than just a regular binary release. It is a rubber stamped
TomEE statement of the current state of the project, and should be treated
as such.

The world is our customer and we cannot afford bad press on this.

Andy.

On 18 May 2016 at 12:45, cocorossello  wrote:

> Tested, works fine in my side.  +1
>
> (you said everyone is welcome so here is my vote  )
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-TomEE-7-0-0-tp4678479p4678488.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
  Andy Gumbrecht
  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
  http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[cocorossello]

Tested, works fine in my side.  +1 

(you said everyone is welcome so here is my vote  )



--
View this message in context: 
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-TomEE-7-0-0-tp4678479p4678488.html
Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi

As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the 7.0.0 vote.

Here are the release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051

Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS

As discussed pushed the tag on github:
https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0

New staging repository is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097

Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0

Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.


Please vote:
[ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
[ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we are talking
about
[ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X}

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M3

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

Late but here is my +1
Le 6 mars 2016 18:36, "Romain Manni-Bucau"  a écrit :

> And with my +1 it makes the vote passing with 3 +1 bindings. I'll continue
> the release.
>
> Thanks Mark and Andy.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> 
>
> 2016-03-06 14:52 GMT+01:00 Andy :
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 03/03/2016 18:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> This release is mainly to fix bval binaries used in M2. Added the few
> >> fixes
> >> we did since M2 release (NPE for @WebService in ear lib part and
> >> application/*+json support for our default json provider).
> >>
> >> Here are the release notes:
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.0.0-M3%20and%20status%20!%3D%20OPEN
> >>
> >> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >>
> >> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0-M3
> >>
> >> New staging repository is
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1085/
> >>
> >> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M3/
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> >> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote:
> >> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks even more than M2
> >> [ ] +0 dont' know this Tom so not sure
> >> [ ] -1 no cause 
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >> 
> >>
> >>
> > --
> >   Andy Gumbrecht
> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M3

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

And with my +1 it makes the vote passing with 3 +1 bindings. I'll continue
the release.

Thanks Mark and Andy.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber


2016-03-06 14:52 GMT+01:00 Andy :

> +1
>
> On 03/03/2016 18:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> This release is mainly to fix bval binaries used in M2. Added the few
>> fixes
>> we did since M2 release (NPE for @WebService in ear lib part and
>> application/*+json support for our default json provider).
>>
>> Here are the release notes:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.0.0-M3%20and%20status%20!%3D%20OPEN
>>
>> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
>>
>> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0-M3
>>
>> New staging repository is
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1085/
>>
>> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M3/
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
>> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
>>
>>
>> Please vote:
>> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks even more than M2
>> [ ] +0 dont' know this Tom so not sure
>> [ ] -1 no cause 
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>> 
>>
>>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M3

[Andy]

+1

On 03/03/2016 18:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

Hi

This release is mainly to fix bval binaries used in M2. Added the few fixes
we did since M2 release (NPE for @WebService in ear lib part and
application/*+json support for our default json provider).

Here are the release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.0.0-M3%20and%20status%20!%3D%20OPEN

Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS

As discussed pushed the tag on github:
https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0-M3

New staging repository is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1085/

Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M3/

Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.


Please vote:
[ ] +1 yeah it rocks even more than M2
[ ] +0 dont' know this Tom so not sure
[ ] -1 no cause 

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber




--
  Andy Gumbrecht
  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M3

[Andy Gumbrecht]

I'll try to test tomorrow morning.

http://www.tomitribe.com - @AndyGeeDe - On a small screen device.
On 4 Mar 2016 09:16, "Mark Struberg"  wrote:

> +1 yeah it rocks of course ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 03.03.2016 um 18:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > This release is mainly to fix bval binaries used in M2. Added the few
> fixes
> > we did since M2 release (NPE for @WebService in ear lib part and
> > application/*+json support for our default json provider).
> >
> > Here are the release notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.0.0-M3%20and%20status%20!%3D%20OPEN
> >
> > Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >
> > As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0-M3
> >
> > New staging repository is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1085/
> >
> > Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M3/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> > everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> >
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 yeah it rocks even more than M2
> > [ ] +0 dont' know this Tom so not sure
> > [ ] -1 no cause 
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> > 
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M3

[Mark Struberg]

+1 yeah it rocks of course ;)

LieGrue,
strub



> Am 03.03.2016 um 18:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Hi
> 
> This release is mainly to fix bval binaries used in M2. Added the few fixes
> we did since M2 release (NPE for @WebService in ear lib part and
> application/*+json support for our default json provider).
> 
> Here are the release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.0.0-M3%20and%20status%20!%3D%20OPEN
> 
> Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> 
> As discussed pushed the tag on github:
> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0-M3
> 
> New staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1085/
> 
> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M3/
> 
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> 
> 
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks even more than M2
> [ ] +0 dont' know this Tom so not sure
> [ ] -1 no cause 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> 

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M3

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi

This release is mainly to fix bval binaries used in M2. Added the few fixes
we did since M2 release (NPE for @WebService in ear lib part and
application/*+json support for our default json provider).

Here are the release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.0.0-M3%20and%20status%20!%3D%20OPEN

Keys file is still the same: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS

As discussed pushed the tag on github:
https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0-M3

New staging repository is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1085/

Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M3/

Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.


Please vote:
[ ] +1 yeah it rocks even more than M2
[ ] +0 dont' know this Tom so not sure
[ ] -1 no cause 

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2 (take 2)

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

(just changing subject to get it captured by apache tools)

and here is my +1 which makes 3 +1 bindings so the vote passed.

Thanks guys.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber


2016-02-28 18:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg :

> +1
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 23.02.2016 um 11:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Fixed the header issue so back to another vote:
> >
> > Here are the release notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
> >
> > Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >
> > Recreated the tag - it is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
> >
> > New staging repository is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1083
> >
> > Dev dist (updated) is
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> > however very welcomed to test and vote.
> >
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> > [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> > [ ] -1 no cause 
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> > 
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2 (take 2)

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

and here is my +1 which makes 3 +1 bindings so the vote passed.

Thanks guys.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber


2016-02-28 18:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg :

> +1
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 23.02.2016 um 11:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Fixed the header issue so back to another vote:
> >
> > Here are the release notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
> >
> > Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >
> > Recreated the tag - it is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
> >
> > New staging repository is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1083
> >
> > Dev dist (updated) is
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> > however very welcomed to test and vote.
> >
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> > [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> > [ ] -1 no cause 
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> > 
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2 (take 2)

[Mark Struberg]

+1

txs and LieGrue,
strub



> Am 23.02.2016 um 11:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Hi
> 
> Fixed the header issue so back to another vote:
> 
> Here are the release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
> 
> Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> 
> Recreated the tag - it is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
> 
> New staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1083
> 
> Dev dist (updated) is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/
> 
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> however very welcomed to test and vote.
> 
> 
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> [ ] -1 no cause 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2 (take 2)

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

I found one test failing in the build but passing alone (-Dtest=XAPoolTest)

It passes on the CI as part of the build so it might be a timing issue.
I'll investigate but it's not a blocker

Everything else looks good.
Thanks Romain for putting this together

Here is my +1

JLouis

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Thiago Veronezi 
wrote:

> Hi Romain,
> I'm way behind schedule. I'm checking it out now. Sorry about that.
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > up?
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> > 
> >
> > 2016-02-23 11:13 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Fixed the header issue so back to another vote:
> > >
> > > Here are the release notes:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
> > >
> > > Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> > >
> > > Recreated the tag - it is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
> > >
> > > New staging repository is
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1083
> > >
> > > Dev dist (updated) is
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-
> > > M2/
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> > > however very welcomed to test and vote.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > > [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> > > [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> > > [ ] -1 no cause 
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Github
> > >  | LinkedIn
> > >  | Tomitriber
> > > 
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2 (take 2)

[Thiago Veronezi]

Hi Romain,
I'm way behind schedule. I'm checking it out now. Sorry about that.
[]s,
Thiago.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> up?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> 
>
> 2016-02-23 11:13 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Fixed the header issue so back to another vote:
> >
> > Here are the release notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
> >
> > Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >
> > Recreated the tag - it is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
> >
> > New staging repository is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1083
> >
> > Dev dist (updated) is
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-
> > M2/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> > however very welcomed to test and vote.
> >
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> > [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> > [ ] -1 no cause 
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github
> >  | LinkedIn
> >  | Tomitriber
> > 
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2 (take 2)

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

up?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber


2016-02-23 11:13 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> Hi
>
> Fixed the header issue so back to another vote:
>
> Here are the release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
>
> Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
>
> Recreated the tag - it is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
>
> New staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1083
>
> Dev dist (updated) is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-
> M2/
>
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> however very welcomed to test and vote.
>
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> [ ] -1 no cause 
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Tomitriber
> 
>

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2 (take 2)

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi

Fixed the header issue so back to another vote:

Here are the release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828

Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS

Recreated the tag - it is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2

New staging repository is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1083

Dev dist (updated) is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/

Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
however very welcomed to test and vote.


Please vote:
[ ] +1 yeah it rocks
[ ] +0 not sure what it is about
[ ] -1 no cause 

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Andy spotted few missing headers, will re-roll tomorrow or in the week


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber


2016-02-22 14:31 GMT+01:00 Jeff Genender :

> +1
>
> Jeff
>
> > On Feb 22, 2016, at 2:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > As mentionned on the list few weeks ago I'd like to release tomee
> 7.0.0-M2.
> >
> > Here are the release notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
> >
> > Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> >
> > Tag is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
> >
> > Staging repository is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1081/
> >
> > Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> > however very welcomed to test and vote.
> >
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> > [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> > [ ] -1 no cause 
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> > 
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2

[Jeff Genender]

+1

Jeff

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 2:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> As mentionned on the list few weeks ago I'd like to release tomee 7.0.0-M2.
> 
> Here are the release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
> 
> Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> 
> Tag is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
> 
> Staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1081/
> 
> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/
> 
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> however very welcomed to test and vote.
> 
> 
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> [ ] -1 no cause 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

Awesome Romain.
I'll review today.
Le 22 févr. 2016 10:47, "Romain Manni-Bucau"  a
écrit :

> Hi
>
> As mentionned on the list few weeks ago I'd like to release tomee 7.0.0-M2.
>
> Here are the release notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828
>
> Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
>
> Tag is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2
>
> Staging repository is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1081/
>
> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/
>
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
> however very welcomed to test and vote.
>
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks
> [ ] +0 not sure what it is about
> [ ] -1 no cause 
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> 
>

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0-M2

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi

As mentionned on the list few weeks ago I'd like to release tomee 7.0.0-M2.

Here are the release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12332828

Here is my key: https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS

Tag is pushed on tomee repo and named tomee-7.0.0-M2

Staging repository is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1081/

Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0-M2/

Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Everyone is
however very welcomed to test and vote.


Please vote:
[ ] +1 yeah it rocks
[ ] +0 not sure what it is about
[ ] -1 no cause 

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber