[RESULT] [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Thanks for voting everyone. The following votes have been cast:

+1s (* = PMC / binding vote)

Vicente Rossello
Cesar Hernandez
Richard Zowalla
Jean-Louis Monteiro (*)
Daniel Dias Dos Santos
Martin Wiesner
Alexandre Vermeerbergen
Mark Struberg (*)
David Blevins (*)
Jonathan Gallimore (*)

With 10 +1s and no other votes, this vote has passed. I'll promote these
artifacts and continue with the release.

Thanks for all the reviews and votes.

Jon

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
> TomEE 8.0.4.
>
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>
> Binaries & Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>
> Source code:
> TomEE 8.0.4:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>
> Tags:
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>
> Release notes:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] Yes, release it
> [+0] Not fussed
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> showstopper is)
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[David Blevins]

+1.  Thank you, Jon!


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:12 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
> 
> +1 binding
> 
> LieGrue and thanks Jon!
> strub
> 
> 
>> Am 22.07.2020 um 16:34 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore 
>> :
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache TomEE
>> 8.0.4.
>> 
>> 
>> Maven Repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>> 
>> Binaries & Source:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>> 
>> Source code:
>> TomEE 8.0.4:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
>> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>> 
>> Tags:
>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>> 
>> Release notes:
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
>> 
>> Please VOTE:
>> 
>> [+1] Yes, release it
>> [+0] Not fussed
>> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
>> showstopper is)
>> 
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> Here is my +1.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Jon
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Mark Struberg]

+1 binding

LieGrue and thanks Jon!
strub


> Am 22.07.2020 um 16:34 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore 
> :
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache TomEE
> 8.0.4.
> 
> 
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> 
> Binaries & Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> 
> Source code:
> TomEE 8.0.4:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> 
> Tags:
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
> 
> Release notes:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] Yes, release it
> [+0] Not fussed
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> showstopper is)
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> Here is my +1.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jon

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Just want to bump this up... I think we need 1 more PMC +1. Can anyone take
a look?

Thanks

Jon

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
> TomEE 8.0.4.
>
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>
> Binaries & Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>
> Source code:
> TomEE 8.0.4:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>
> Tags:
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>
> Release notes:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] Yes, release it
> [+0] Not fussed
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> showstopper is)
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Alex The Rocker]

Hello,

Here is my +1  (non-binding)

Tested this Apache TomEE+ 8.0.4 candidate with various Java
(AdoptOpenJDK 11 OpenJ9 / 11 HotSpot / 8 Open J9) on CentOS 7, with
various web applications relying on  JAX RS, JAX WS, JMS, Servlets and
JSPs.

Found no regression vs. our previous runtime based on TomEE+ 8.0.2

Kind regards,
Alexandre

Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 16:59, Jonathan Gallimore
 a écrit :
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache TomEE
> 8.0.4.
>
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>
> Binaries & Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>
> Source code:
> TomEE 8.0.4:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>
> Tags:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>
> Release notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] Yes, release it
> [+0] Not fussed
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> showstopper is)
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Wiesner, Martin]

Hi all,

here’s my 

+1 (non-binding)

Tested with several projects (primarily web services, JAXB, REST…), 
both on Linux & Mac OS, each under AdoptOpenJDK 11 (latest). 
=> no show stoppers found.

Best
Martin
—
https://twitter.com/mawiesne 

> Am 23.07.2020 um 17:02 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro :
> 
> Hey Jon.
> 
> Did some quick tests and ran TCK. No regression, we even fixed some good
> chunk of tests for better TCK coverage.
> 
> +1
> 
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:29 PM Vicente Rossello 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I've checked the artifacts and played a bit with the plus server.
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:58 PM Zowalla, Richard <
>> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for the exaplantion, Jon. I will take a look at the transformer
>>> and apply it to our application after I have returned from vacation.
>>> 
>>> For now:
>>> 
>>> Take my +1 (although I've only tested 8.0.4 as stated in my original
>>> mail).
>>> 
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 12:41 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>>> 
>>> Hi Richard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The artifacts are here:
>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/org/apache/tomee/jakarta/apache-tomee/9.0.0-M2/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (note the org.apache.tomee.jakarta group ID).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The transformation tool currently only works on zips, which is why we don't
>>> 
>>> (yet) have tar.gzs there.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Its worth taking a look at the Eclipse Transformer to transform your
>>> 
>>> applications. This is another case where I'd expect issues, and encourage
>>> 
>>> you to report them. I'm also a committer on that project and would be keen
>>> 
>>> to help with any improvements. Here's how we do it on Moviefun:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/examples/moviefun/pom.xml#L111-L126
>>> 
>>> .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We're not able to translate javax -> jakarta "on the fly". I have looked at
>>> 
>>> this, and theoretically its possible to create a java agent to do this, but
>>> 
>>> it comes unstuck where various libraries inspect classes for annotations,
>>> 
>>> and none of them actually *load* the class to do that (so it doesn't get
>>> 
>>> translated, and subsequently fails). Unfortunately, the renaming means
>>> 
>>> we'll all need to make changes to our applications at some point.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jon
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04 PM Zowalla, Richard <
>>> 
>>> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Jon,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> thanks for the explanation.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging
>>> 
>>> repository? Is this known/planned in this way?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with
>>> 
>>> the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Richard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>>> 
>>> Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi folks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
>>> 
>>> briefly address.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
>>> 
>>> can't
>>> 
>>> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can
>>> 
>>> cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
>>> 
>>> wish.
>>> 
>>> I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary
>>> 
>>> that
>>> 
>>> uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version
>>> 
>>> that
>>> 
>>> uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can
>>> 
>>> report
>>> 
>>> issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I
>>> 
>>> totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta
>>> 
>>> namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If
>>> 
>>> you can
>>> 
>>> check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal
>>> 
>>> issues,
>>> 
>>> bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try,
>>> 
>>> do try
>>> 
>>> building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples)
>>> 
>>> produces
>>> 
>>> both javax and jakarta .war files.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic.
>>> 
>>> A
>>> 
>>> couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full
>>> 
>>> pass,
>>> 
>>> but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't
>>> 
>>> block
>>> 
>>> the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry
>>> 
>>> -
>>> 
>>> there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still
>>> 
>>> won't
>>> 
>>> pass.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hope that all makes sense, but 

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

Hey Jon.

Did some quick tests and ran TCK. No regression, we even fixed some good
chunk of tests for better TCK coverage.

+1

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:29 PM Vicente Rossello 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've checked the artifacts and played a bit with the plus server.
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:58 PM Zowalla, Richard <
> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the exaplantion, Jon. I will take a look at the transformer
>> and apply it to our application after I have returned from vacation.
>>
>> For now:
>>
>> Take my +1 (although I've only tested 8.0.4 as stated in my original
>> mail).
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 12:41 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>>
>> Hi Richard
>>
>>
>> The artifacts are here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/org/apache/tomee/jakarta/apache-tomee/9.0.0-M2/
>>
>>
>> (note the org.apache.tomee.jakarta group ID).
>>
>>
>> The transformation tool currently only works on zips, which is why we don't
>>
>> (yet) have tar.gzs there.
>>
>>
>> Its worth taking a look at the Eclipse Transformer to transform your
>>
>> applications. This is another case where I'd expect issues, and encourage
>>
>> you to report them. I'm also a committer on that project and would be keen
>>
>> to help with any improvements. Here's how we do it on Moviefun:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/examples/moviefun/pom.xml#L111-L126
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> We're not able to translate javax -> jakarta "on the fly". I have looked at
>>
>> this, and theoretically its possible to create a java agent to do this, but
>>
>> it comes unstuck where various libraries inspect classes for annotations,
>>
>> and none of them actually *load* the class to do that (so it doesn't get
>>
>> translated, and subsequently fails). Unfortunately, the renaming means
>>
>> we'll all need to make changes to our applications at some point.
>>
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04 PM Zowalla, Richard <
>>
>> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>>
>> thanks for the explanation.
>>
>>
>> The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging
>>
>> repository? Is this known/planned in this way?
>>
>>
>> I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with
>>
>> the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>>
>> Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>>
>>
>> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
>>
>> briefly address.
>>
>>
>> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
>>
>> can't
>>
>> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can
>>
>> cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
>>
>> wish.
>>
>> I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary
>>
>> that
>>
>> uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version
>>
>> that
>>
>> uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward.
>>
>>
>> We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can
>>
>> report
>>
>> issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I
>>
>> totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta
>>
>> namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If
>>
>> you can
>>
>> check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal
>>
>> issues,
>>
>> bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try,
>>
>> do try
>>
>> building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples)
>>
>> produces
>>
>> both javax and jakarta .war files.
>>
>>
>> Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic.
>>
>> A
>>
>> couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full
>>
>> pass,
>>
>> but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't
>>
>> block
>>
>> the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry
>>
>> -
>>
>> there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still
>>
>> won't
>>
>> pass.
>>
>>
>> Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have.
>>
>> Many
>>
>> thanks again for your reviews.
>>
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>
>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>>
>>
>> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
>>
>> briefly address.
>>
>>
>> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
>>
>> can't
>>
>> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I
>>
>> can close
>>
>> this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
>>
>> wish.
>>
>>
>> I 

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Vicente Rossello]

Hi,

I've checked the artifacts and played a bit with the plus server.

+1

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:58 PM Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:

> Thanks for the exaplantion, Jon. I will take a look at the transformer and
> apply it to our application after I have returned from vacation.
>
> For now:
>
> Take my +1 (although I've only tested 8.0.4 as stated in my original mail).
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 12:41 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>
> Hi Richard
>
>
> The artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/org/apache/tomee/jakarta/apache-tomee/9.0.0-M2/
>
>
> (note the org.apache.tomee.jakarta group ID).
>
>
> The transformation tool currently only works on zips, which is why we don't
>
> (yet) have tar.gzs there.
>
>
> Its worth taking a look at the Eclipse Transformer to transform your
>
> applications. This is another case where I'd expect issues, and encourage
>
> you to report them. I'm also a committer on that project and would be keen
>
> to help with any improvements. Here's how we do it on Moviefun:
>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/examples/moviefun/pom.xml#L111-L126
>
> .
>
>
> We're not able to translate javax -> jakarta "on the fly". I have looked at
>
> this, and theoretically its possible to create a java agent to do this, but
>
> it comes unstuck where various libraries inspect classes for annotations,
>
> and none of them actually *load* the class to do that (so it doesn't get
>
> translated, and subsequently fails). Unfortunately, the renaming means
>
> we'll all need to make changes to our applications at some point.
>
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04 PM Zowalla, Richard <
>
> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jon,
>
>
> thanks for the explanation.
>
>
> The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging
>
> repository? Is this known/planned in this way?
>
>
> I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with
>
> the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>
> Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
>
>
>
> Hi folks
>
>
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>
>
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
>
> briefly address.
>
>
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
>
> can't
>
> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can
>
> cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
>
> wish.
>
> I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary
>
> that
>
> uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version
>
> that
>
> uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward.
>
>
> We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can
>
> report
>
> issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I
>
> totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta
>
> namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If
>
> you can
>
> check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal
>
> issues,
>
> bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try,
>
> do try
>
> building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples)
>
> produces
>
> both javax and jakarta .war files.
>
>
> Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic.
>
> A
>
> couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full
>
> pass,
>
> but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't
>
> block
>
> the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry
>
> -
>
> there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still
>
> won't
>
> pass.
>
>
> Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have.
>
> Many
>
> thanks again for your reviews.
>
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks
>
>
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>
>
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
>
> briefly address.
>
>
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
>
> can't
>
> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I
>
> can close
>
> this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
>
> wish.
>
>
> I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax
>
> (8.0.4) and
>
> then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta
>
> (9.0.0-M2).
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and
>
> Apache
>
> TomEE 8.0.4.
>
>
>
> Maven Repo:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>
>
> Binaries & Source:
>
>
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Zowalla, Richard]

Thanks for the exaplantion, Jon. I will take a look at the transformer
and apply it to our application after I have returned from vacation.
For now: 
Take my +1 (although I've only tested 8.0.4 as stated in my original
mail).
Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 12:41 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> Hi Richard
> The artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/org/apache/tomee/jakarta/apache-tomee/9.0.0-M2/
> (note the org.apache.tomee.jakarta group ID).
> The transformation tool currently only works on zips, which is why we
> don't(yet) have tar.gzs there.
> Its worth taking a look at the Eclipse Transformer to transform
> yourapplications. This is another case where I'd expect issues, and
> encourageyou to report them. I'm also a committer on that project and
> would be keento help with any improvements. Here's how we do it on
> Moviefun:
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/examples/moviefun/pom.xml#L111-L126
> .
> We're not able to translate javax -> jakarta "on the fly". I have
> looked atthis, and theoretically its possible to create a java agent
> to do this, butit comes unstuck where various libraries inspect
> classes for annotations,and none of them actually *load* the class to
> do that (so it doesn't gettranslated, and subsequently fails).
> Unfortunately, the renaming meanswe'll all need to make changes to
> our applications at some point.
> Jon
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04 PM Zowalla, Richard <
> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> thanks for the explanation.
> The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven
> stagingrepository? Is this known/planned in this way?
> I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4)
> withthe 9.0.0-M2 artifacts.
> Thanks,Richard
> 
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan
> Gallimore:
> Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
> 
> Hi folks
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted tobriefly
> address.
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both.
> Youcan'tvote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for
> example. I cancancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote
> for the 2, if wewish.I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're
> producing the binarythatuses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it
> to produce the versionthatuses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so
> going forward.
> We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you
> canreportissues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the
> release. Itotally understand that migrating your own projects to the
> jakartanamespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a
> vote. Ifyou cancheck you can download it and boot it up, and check
> for any legalissues,bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an
> example app to try,do trybuilding the moviefun example. That (like
> many of the examples)producesboth javax and jakarta .war files.
> Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is
> fantastic.Acouple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not
> expecting a fullpass,but I'm also not expecting regressions, so
> passing the TCK shouldn'tblockthe release. I did have to comment out
> the new security module (sorry-there were some JAX-RS test failures
> with it), so those tests stillwon'tpass.
> Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may
> have.Manythanks again for your reviews.
> Jon
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted tobriefly
> address.
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both.
> Youcan'tvote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for
> example. Ican closethis vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for
> the 2, if wewish.
> I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax(8.0.4)
> andthen transforming it to produce the version that uses
> jakarta(9.0.0-M2).
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2
> andApacheTomEE 8.0.4.
> 
> Maven Repo:
> 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> 
> Binaries & Source:
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> 
> Source code:TomEE 8.0.4:
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> 
> Tags:
> 
> 
> 
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Hi Richard

The artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/org/apache/tomee/jakarta/apache-tomee/9.0.0-M2/

(note the org.apache.tomee.jakarta group ID).

The transformation tool currently only works on zips, which is why we don't
(yet) have tar.gzs there.

Its worth taking a look at the Eclipse Transformer to transform your
applications. This is another case where I'd expect issues, and encourage
you to report them. I'm also a committer on that project and would be keen
to help with any improvements. Here's how we do it on Moviefun:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/examples/moviefun/pom.xml#L111-L126
.

We're not able to translate javax -> jakarta "on the fly". I have looked at
this, and theoretically its possible to create a java agent to do this, but
it comes unstuck where various libraries inspect classes for annotations,
and none of them actually *load* the class to do that (so it doesn't get
translated, and subsequently fails). Unfortunately, the renaming means
we'll all need to make changes to our applications at some point.

Jon

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04 PM Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> thanks for the explanation.
>
> The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging
> repository? Is this known/planned in this way?
>
> I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with
> the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> > Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
> >
> >
> > Hi folks
> >
> > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
> >
> > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
> > briefly address.
> >
> > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
> > can't
> > vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can
> > cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
> > wish.
> > I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary
> > that
> > uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version
> > that
> > uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward.
> >
> > We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can
> > report
> > issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I
> > totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta
> > namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If
> > you can
> > check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal
> > issues,
> > bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try,
> > do try
> > building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples)
> > produces
> > both javax and jakarta .war files.
> >
> > Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic.
> > A
> > couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full
> > pass,
> > but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't
> > block
> > the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry
> > -
> > there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still
> > won't
> > pass.
> >
> > Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have.
> > Many
> > thanks again for your reviews.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
> > >
> > > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
> > > briefly address.
> > >
> > > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
> > > can't
> > > vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I
> > > can close
> > > this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
> > > wish.
> > >
> > > I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax
> > > (8.0.4) and
> > > then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta
> > > (9.0.0-M2).
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and
> > > > Apache
> > > > TomEE 8.0.4.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maven Repo:
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> > > >
> > > > Binaries & Source:
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> > > >
> > > > Source code:
> > > > TomEE 8.0.4:
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> > > > TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> > > >
> > > > Tags:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Zowalla, Richard]

Hi Jon,

thanks for the explanation.

The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging
repository? Is this known/planned in this way?

I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with
the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts.

Thanks,
Richard


Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
> 
> 
> Hi folks
> 
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
> 
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
> briefly address.
> 
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
> can't
> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can
> cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
> wish.
> I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary
> that
> uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version
> that
> uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward.
> 
> We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can
> report
> issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I
> totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta
> namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If
> you can
> check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal
> issues,
> bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try,
> do try
> building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples)
> produces
> both javax and jakarta .war files.
> 
> Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic.
> A
> couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full
> pass,
> but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't
> block
> the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry
> -
> there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still
> won't
> pass.
> 
> Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have.
> Many
> thanks again for your reviews.
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi folks
> > 
> > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
> > 
> > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
> > briefly address.
> > 
> > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
> > can't
> > vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I
> > can close
> > this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
> > wish.
> > 
> > I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax
> > (8.0.4) and
> > then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta
> > (9.0.0-M2).
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and
> > > Apache
> > > TomEE 8.0.4.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Maven Repo:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> > > 
> > > Binaries & Source:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> > > 
> > > Source code:
> > > TomEE 8.0.4:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> > > TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> > > 
> > > Tags:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> > > 
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
> > > 
> > > Release notes:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
> > > 
> > > Please VOTE:
> > > 
> > > [+1] Yes, release it
> > > [+0] Not fussed
> > > [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what
> > > the
> > > showstopper is)
> > > 
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > 
> > > Here is my +1.
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > Jon
> > > 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:


Hi folks

Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.

I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
briefly address.

The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You can't
vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can
cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we wish.
I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary that
uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version that
uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward.

We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can report
issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I
totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta
namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If you can
check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal issues,
bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try, do try
building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples) produces
both javax and jakarta .war files.

Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic. A
couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full pass,
but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't block
the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry -
there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still won't
pass.

Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have. Many
thanks again for your reviews.

Jon

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks
>
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
> briefly address.
>
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You can't
> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can close
> this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we wish.
>
> I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax (8.0.4) and
> then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2).
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
>> TomEE 8.0.4.
>>
>>
>> Maven Repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>>
>> Binaries & Source:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>>
>> Source code:
>> TomEE 8.0.4:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
>> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>>
>> Tags:
>>
>>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
>>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>>
>> Release notes:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
>>
>> Please VOTE:
>>
>> [+1] Yes, release it
>> [+0] Not fussed
>> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
>> showstopper is)
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jon
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Hi folks

Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.

I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
briefly address.

The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You can't
vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can close
this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we wish.

I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax (8.0.4) and
then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2).

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
> TomEE 8.0.4.
>
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>
> Binaries & Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>
> Source code:
> TomEE 8.0.4:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>
> Tags:
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>
> Release notes:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] Yes, release it
> [+0] Not fussed
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> showstopper is)
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hello,

+1  : )
--

*Daniel Dias dos Santos*
Java Developer
SouJava & JCP Member
GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos
Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava
Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava


Em qua., 22 de jul. de 2020 às 14:17, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> escreveu:

> I'll try to run the TCK tonight
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:58 PM Zowalla, Richard <
> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > tested it with my (EAR) applications (primarily web services, JSF) on
> > Linux with OpenJDK 11.
> >
> > +1 (8.0.4)
> >
> > Best,
> > Richard
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2020, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
> > > TomEE
> > > 8.0.4.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maven Repo:
> > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> > >
> > > Binaries & Source:
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> > >
> > > Source code:
> > > TomEE 8.0.4:
> > >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> > > TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> > >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> > >
> > > Tags:
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> > >
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
> > >
> > > Please VOTE:
> > >
> > > [+1] Yes, release it
> > > [+0] Not fussed
> > > [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> > > showstopper is)
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Here is my +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jon
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

I'll try to run the TCK tonight

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:58 PM Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> tested it with my (EAR) applications (primarily web services, JSF) on
> Linux with OpenJDK 11.
>
> +1 (8.0.4)
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2020, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
> > TomEE
> > 8.0.4.
> >
> >
> > Maven Repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> >
> > Binaries & Source:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> >
> > Source code:
> > TomEE 8.0.4:
> >
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> > TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> >
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> >
> > Tags:
> >
> >
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> >
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> >
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] Yes, release it
> > [+0] Not fussed
> > [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> > showstopper is)
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Here is my +1.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jon
>

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Zowalla, Richard]

Hi,

tested it with my (EAR) applications (primarily web services, JSF) on
Linux with OpenJDK 11.

+1 (8.0.4)

Best,
Richard

Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2020, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
> TomEE
> 8.0.4.
> 
> 
> Maven Repo:
> 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> 
> Binaries & Source:
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> 
> Source code:
> TomEE 8.0.4:
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> 
> Tags:
> 
> 
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> 
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
> 
> Release notes:
> 
> 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] Yes, release it
> [+0] Not fussed
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> showstopper is)
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> Here is my +1.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jon

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Cesar Hernandez]

+1 thank you!.

El mié., 22 jul. 2020 a las 9:24, Vicente Rossello ()
escribió:

> +1 for tomee 8.0.4  Tested in our project
>
> I can't vote 9.0.0-M2 since I haven't tested it.
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:57 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache
> TomEE
> > 8.0.4.
> >
> >
> > Maven Repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
> >
> > Binaries & Source:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
> >
> > Source code:
> > TomEE 8.0.4:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> > TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
> >
> > Tags:
> >
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] Yes, release it
> > [+0] Not fussed
> > [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> > showstopper is)
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Here is my +1.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jon
> >
>


-- 
Atentamente:
César Hernández.

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Vicente Rossello]

+1 for tomee 8.0.4  Tested in our project

I can't vote 9.0.0-M2 since I haven't tested it.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:57 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache TomEE
> 8.0.4.
>
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>
> Binaries & Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>
> Source code:
> TomEE 8.0.4:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>
> Tags:
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>
> Release notes:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] Yes, release it
> [+0] Not fussed
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> showstopper is)
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>

[VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

[Jonathan Gallimore]

Hi All,

I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache TomEE
8.0.4.


Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/

Binaries & Source:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/

Source code:
TomEE 8.0.4:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip

Tags:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2

Release notes:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320=12348414

Please VOTE:

[+1] Yes, release it
[+0] Not fussed
[-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
showstopper is)

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

Here is my +1.

Thanks

Jon