Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-09-01 Thread drago01
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III  wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 17:20:23 -0400,
>  Al Dunsmuir  wrote:
>>
>> Please  do  not  ignore that the browser is there for the user to use,
>> not for Fedora to stream information in spite of the user's wishes.
>
> Nor for Mozilla to track its users. There shouldn't be a start page at
> all as it opens a connection back to the start page server before you
> (easily) have a chance to disable it. It is especially annoying that
> that after updates you still get some Mozilla update page (that at
> fisrt glance appears to be from a remote server, though maybe there is
> some trickery going on) even though the start page is disabled.
>
> I would think respecting the privacy of our users would be a good reason
> for having no start page the default.

I actually don't use any start page and haven't done so for years.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Chris Jones
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:20 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> Please  do  not  ignore that the browser is there for the user to use,
> not for Fedora to stream information in spite of the user's wishes.
> 
> This is Linux, not some Microsoft (or Apple) "we know what is best for
> you" system.
> Al
> 
> 

I couldn't have summed it up better myself.

That's exactly right. The browser is there for the user sitting at his
desk and staring at the screen. The user.
And Fedora considering forcing and flooding the home page with their own
informational crap, 90% of it probably useless, makes us just as bad as
Google. Don't you think it's kind of hypocritical?

I can see the many valid points that have been made with this
discussion, but to me it seems a bit tacky to even be discussing the
issue to this degree.
And I revert from using the term "issue" because I sincerely don't
believe there is one.

I think many here are forgetting that Google is our friend. And Google
Inc. as a company not only support free and open source software but
they are also part of that very community and have done their fair share
for the FOSS community over the years.
And when you think about it, sure Google Search is proprietary code and
all, but it's pretty amazing what Google let you do with their tools and
apps, all for free! I'm sure an exception can be made for such a small
thing. Google Inc. seems to be treated as an enemy of FOSS here, but
they're not. And I think it's disgraceful that's how you're all painting
a unsubstantiated target on them.

My solution to a problem that never was; amend the policy guidelines and
move on to some more serious issues.

Regards


-- 
Chris Jones 

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 17:46:53 -0400,
  Matt McCutchen  wrote:
> 
> The update page is remote.  If you want to disable it, set
> "startup.homepage_override_url" to the empty string.  There is also
> "startup.homepage_welcome_url" for the first run of the browser.

Thanks!
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:30 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 17:20:23 -0400,
>   Al Dunsmuir  wrote:
> > 
> > Please  do  not  ignore that the browser is there for the user to use,
> > not for Fedora to stream information in spite of the user's wishes.
> 
> Nor for Mozilla to track its users. There shouldn't be a start page at
> all as it opens a connection back to the start page server before you
> (easily) have a chance to disable it. It is especially annoying that
> that after updates you still get some Mozilla update page (that at
> fisrt glance appears to be from a remote server, though maybe there is
> some trickery going on) even though the start page is disabled.

The update page is remote.  If you want to disable it, set
"startup.homepage_override_url" to the empty string.  There is also
"startup.homepage_welcome_url" for the first run of the browser.

I'm not commenting on what the default should be.

-- 
Matt

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 17:20:23 -0400,
  Al Dunsmuir  wrote:
> 
> Please  do  not  ignore that the browser is there for the user to use,
> not for Fedora to stream information in spite of the user's wishes.

Nor for Mozilla to track its users. There shouldn't be a start page at
all as it opens a connection back to the start page server before you
(easily) have a chance to disable it. It is especially annoying that
that after updates you still get some Mozilla update page (that at
fisrt glance appears to be from a remote server, though maybe there is
some trickery going on) even though the start page is disabled.

I would think respecting the privacy of our users would be a good reason
for having no start page the default.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, 4:59:27 PM, Matt wrote:

> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> It doesn't seem to be an unavoidable requirement, it says:
>> 
>> "If you proposed Start/Home Page is not similar to the existing Firefox
>> Start Page, please be prepared to provide a rationale for the change,
>> and how it would benefit the end-user. "
>> 
>> I think we could manage such a rationale.

> We can definitely make a rationale for having a bunch of Fedora
> resources on the start page, but our rationale for omitting a Google
> search box, "it's redundant and promotes a proprietary service", is not
> a line of reasoning I would expect Mozilla to accept.  Then again, they
> may calculate that they are better off compromising on this issue in
> order to keep Fedora using their trademarks.
> --
> Matt

Personally, I _DO_ want to have something close to the standard Google
search  pages  as  my  home page. On my XP systems, I use the standard
Mozilla start page.

Put  too  much  crap on there (and yes, if I do not want to look for a
Fedora  resource,  too  much  additional  information  WILL  fit  that
classification), and I will change the Fedora start page to either the
standard   Mozilla   page  or  just  www.google.ca  with  just  a  few
keystrokes.  At  that point, you have lost me as an audience, unless I
specifically decide to use the handy Fedora bookmarks provided.

Shocking?  No. I want to use my computer, and most of the time I bring
up  a browser session to do searches, or use a bookmark on my toolbar.
Stupid  UI  "innovations"  like hiding my toolbar in the FF 4 beta are
quickly reverted to the way _I_ want my browser.

Please  do  not  ignore that the browser is there for the user to use,
not for Fedora to stream information in spite of the user's wishes.

This is Linux, not some Microsoft (or Apple) "we know what is best for
you" system.
Al


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:59 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It doesn't seem to be an unavoidable requirement, it says:
> > 
> > "If you proposed Start/Home Page is not similar to the existing Firefox
> > Start Page, please be prepared to provide a rationale for the change,
> > and how it would benefit the end-user. "
> > 
> > I think we could manage such a rationale.
> 
> We can definitely make a rationale for having a bunch of Fedora
> resources on the start page, but our rationale for omitting a Google
> search box, "it's redundant and promotes a proprietary service", is not
> a line of reasoning I would expect Mozilla to accept.  Then again, they
> may calculate that they are better off compromising on this issue in
> order to keep Fedora using their trademarks.

'It's redundant' seems fairly reasonable to me. IIRC, the presence of a
search box on the start page is a hangover from when there *wasn't* one
in the browser chrome by default.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It doesn't seem to be an unavoidable requirement, it says:
> 
> "If you proposed Start/Home Page is not similar to the existing Firefox
> Start Page, please be prepared to provide a rationale for the change,
> and how it would benefit the end-user. "
> 
> I think we could manage such a rationale.

We can definitely make a rationale for having a bunch of Fedora
resources on the start page, but our rationale for omitting a Google
search box, "it's redundant and promotes a proprietary service", is not
a line of reasoning I would expect Mozilla to accept.  Then again, they
may calculate that they are better off compromising on this issue in
order to keep Fedora using their trademarks.

-- 
Matt

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:27:59AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It doesn't seem to be an unavoidable requirement, it says:
> 
> "If you proposed Start/Home Page is not similar to the existing Firefox
> Start Page, please be prepared to provide a rationale for the change,
> and how it would benefit the end-user. "
> 
> I think we could manage such a rationale.

It's worth a shot. The results would be instructive either way.


-- 
Matthew Miller 
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:39 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:19 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Fedora gets to build and ship a slightly-modified version of Firefox while
> > retaining the Firefox name due to a distribution partner agreement with
> > Mozilla. Mozilla gets their money from Google. I don't think we *can* make
> > it something else -- it's part of the price we are paying in order to use
> > the non-Free name.
> > 
> > See: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox_Rebranding:Worksheet#Start_page
> 
> Good catch.  More fallout of the Mozilla trademarks...  (Am I starting
> to sound like Kevin?)

It doesn't seem to be an unavoidable requirement, it says:

"If you proposed Start/Home Page is not similar to the existing Firefox
Start Page, please be prepared to provide a rationale for the change,
and how it would benefit the end-user. "

I think we could manage such a rationale.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:19 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Fedora gets to build and ship a slightly-modified version of Firefox while
> retaining the Firefox name due to a distribution partner agreement with
> Mozilla. Mozilla gets their money from Google. I don't think we *can* make
> it something else -- it's part of the price we are paying in order to use
> the non-Free name.
> 
> See: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox_Rebranding:Worksheet#Start_page

Good catch.  More fallout of the Mozilla trademarks...  (Am I starting
to sound like Kevin?)

-- 
Matt

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-31 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:52:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yeah, there really doesn't seem any particular reason for the search box
> to be there, unless Google was paying us for it to be there or
> something.

Fedora gets to build and ship a slightly-modified version of Firefox while
retaining the Firefox name due to a distribution partner agreement with
Mozilla. Mozilla gets their money from Google. I don't think we *can* make
it something else -- it's part of the price we are paying in order to use
the non-Free name.

See: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox_Rebranding:Worksheet#Start_page



-- 
Matthew Miller 
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 02:05 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 01:52 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> >
> > So why would the policy apply to the search box on
> > http://start.fedoraproject.org , which is just meant for users and is
> > not really a piece of infrastructure?
> >
> > --
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > Because some people are rather overzealous about stuff like that?
> >
> 
> Why should we use a search engine in "start.fedoraproject.org", we can 
> just put a nice page with useful information like: how users get help, 
> notification, etc ...;
> BTW firefox has search "built-in" (in the top right corner), Epiphany 
> too (address bar can be used as search box), I don't know about Konqueror.

Yeah, there really doesn't seem any particular reason for the search box
to be there, unless Google was paying us for it to be there or
something.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-29 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 08/30/2010 01:52 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> So why would the policy apply to the search box on
> http://start.fedoraproject.org , which is just meant for users and is
> not really a piece of infrastructure?
>
> --
> Matt
>
>
> Because some people are rather overzealous about stuff like that?
>

Why should we use a search engine in "start.fedoraproject.org", we can 
just put a nice page with useful information like: how users get help, 
notification, etc ...;
BTW firefox has search "built-in" (in the top right corner), Epiphany 
too (address bar can be used as search box), I don't know about Konqueror.

Best regards.

-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-29 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 02:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 08/30/2010 01:01 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > >
> > > Interesting.  I can understand not wanting to promote a proprietary
> > > search engine on the Fedora start page, but if the idea is that Fedora
> > > users and contributors should be able to avoid using them altogether, I
> > > think that's currently pretty unrealistic.
> >
> > I don't think there is any expectation for users.  This is just a Fedora
> > infrastructure policy so that we don't end up relying on things that we
> > can't build upon or fork if necessary.
>
> So why would the policy apply to the search box on
> http://start.fedoraproject.org , which is just meant for users and is
> not really a piece of infrastructure?
>
> --
> Matt
>
>
Because some people are rather overzealous about stuff like that?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-29 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 02:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 01:01 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> >
> > Interesting.  I can understand not wanting to promote a proprietary
> > search engine on the Fedora start page, but if the idea is that Fedora
> > users and contributors should be able to avoid using them altogether, I
> > think that's currently pretty unrealistic.  
> 
> I don't think there is any expectation for users.  This is just a Fedora
> infrastructure policy so that we don't end up relying on things that we
> can't build upon or fork if necessary.

So why would the policy apply to the search box on
http://start.fedoraproject.org , which is just meant for users and is
not really a piece of infrastructure?

-- 
Matt

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines

2010-08-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
 On 08/30/2010 01:01 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> Interesting.  I can understand not wanting to promote a proprietary
> search engine on the Fedora start page, but if the idea is that Fedora
> users and contributors should be able to avoid using them altogether, I
> think that's currently pretty unrealistic.  

I don't think there is any expectation for users.  This is just a Fedora
infrastructure policy so that we don't end up relying on things that we
can't build upon or fork if necessary.

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Proprietary search engines (was: Fedora Notifications System.)

2010-08-29 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/8/29 Matt McCutchen 

> On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > > 3) We're already using a GOOGLE SEARCH BOX!! in
> http://start.fedoraproject.org/ ¿Do you have the code for this one?
> > > NO. And Fedora Project is using it. I'm sharing a "Fedora Solution" an
> applied search engine for the community. and I can
> > > add as many collaborators as I want, I can share my code, I can Modify
> it, it's more "opensource" that the one that we're already using...
> > >
> >
> > Just to make this clear on 3).  We grandfathered that in, meaning it is
> > now against policy to do more of it but we didn't remove it because it
> > had historical significance.  Though I believe we're in the works to
> > replace the start page with something else.
>
> Interesting.  I can understand not wanting to promote a proprietary
> search engine on the Fedora start page, but if the idea is that Fedora
> users and contributors should be able to avoid using them altogether, I
> think that's currently pretty unrealistic.  People have questions all
> the time, and being able to search the whole web for an answer at once
> is great.  Without a web search, one has to do a separate search of each
> data source (wiki, bug database, mailing lists) of each relevant
> project, assuming those search features even exist and that it is
> possible to identify all the relevant projects in advance (harder when
> searching for work to reuse).
>
> --
> Matt
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN... With "Fedora's engine" I'm giving you the
chance of having something more "opensource" and also more specific and
useful for the fedora users who want to search things all around the web.

-- 
<-Manuel Escudero->
Linux User #509052
@GWave: jmlev...@googlewave.com
@Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31  1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Proprietary search engines (was: Fedora Notifications System.)

2010-08-29 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > 3) We're already using a GOOGLE SEARCH BOX!! in 
> > http://start.fedoraproject.org/ ¿Do you have the code for this one?
> > NO. And Fedora Project is using it. I'm sharing a "Fedora Solution" an 
> > applied search engine for the community. and I can
> > add as many collaborators as I want, I can share my code, I can Modify it, 
> > it's more "opensource" that the one that we're already using...
> >
> 
> Just to make this clear on 3).  We grandfathered that in, meaning it is
> now against policy to do more of it but we didn't remove it because it
> had historical significance.  Though I believe we're in the works to
> replace the start page with something else.

Interesting.  I can understand not wanting to promote a proprietary
search engine on the Fedora start page, but if the idea is that Fedora
users and contributors should be able to avoid using them altogether, I
think that's currently pretty unrealistic.  People have questions all
the time, and being able to search the whole web for an answer at once
is great.  Without a web search, one has to do a separate search of each
data source (wiki, bug database, mailing lists) of each relevant
project, assuming those search features even exist and that it is
possible to identify all the relevant projects in advance (harder when
searching for work to reuse).

-- 
Matt

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel