[digitalradio] CRT MONITOR...off topic
i have a nice KDS vs-190i monitor for the station. i am familiar with the term native resolution, and run the monitor in that mode (1280/1024 in true color). the monitor and video card will run many different sync rates. how does one determine the best sync freq david/wd4kpd
[digitalradio] LINUX PROGRAMS INSTALLS
YES YES YESTRYING TO INSTALL SOMETHING NEW IS A BOOGER ! IS ALSO MY REASON FOR NOT SWITCHING. DAVID/WD4KPD
[digitalradio] New multimode program for Linux
I would like to announce that I have posted fldigi, release 1.01. This release consists of GPL source code written in C++ and uses the Fast Light Toolkit gui support libraries. There is also a pre-compiled binary that is known to operate on several Linux distros including the Ubuntu derivatives. You can find the posting at http://www.w1hkj.com 73, Dave, W1HKJ
Re: [digitalradio] pactor via sound card?
Sound card software will not work very well with Pactor because of the timing requirements with the burst mode Dave WB2FTX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Does anyone know of a way to both copy and transmit on pactor? I need to put together a small digital station with just the xcvr and laptop. I don't need another box!!! Get a SCS P3 box.. If you're doing anything beyond pure recreation with it that's the way to go. It's a small box. Will be using it to send E-mail back from the wilds of Peru this summer if all goes well. With a little luck I'll be consuming Inca Kola at the in-laws in Lima this summer.. 73 Bill - WA7NWP
[digitalradio] NEWEST RULES....
PERHAPS IF WHAT IS TRANSMITTED IS NOT FOR DIRECT HUMAN CONSUMPTION AND GRATIFICATION, THEN IT IS NOT DATA. JUST GONNA HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE AFTER ALL THE SHOUTING IS OVER. DAVID/WD4KPD
Re: [digitalradio] Many FCC Errors: Voice/Phone/Digi 3600-3700kHz Re: What is mode?
FYI Dave WB2FTX Dave Bernstein wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio" expeditionradio@... wrote: snip As for the supposed "loss" or "disappearance" of the automatic band at 3620kHz to 3635kHz, I do not believe this FCC error should be allowed to stand for very long. Perhaps the FCC's interim correction to the rulemaking will be one of these options: 1. Simply move the automatic band to 3575kHz-3600kHz, although this is incompatible with bandplans of other IARU regions. 2. Drop all band restrictions for automatically controlled stations on 80 meters. Some form of automatic control will be working its way into many of the different systems we use, anyway. So the definition of what is automation, and what is operator-helping computer programs is becoming as blurred as the antique definition of mode itself. With the widespread opposition to the relaxation of constraints on unattended (semi-automatic) operation in RM-11306, as expressed by hundreds of comments filed with the FCC, one hopes the FCC would not casually decide to let automatically controlled stations run wild on 80m or any other band. Clearly, the FCC has been sloppy in its rollout of this rulemaking. Compounding this with an even sloppier correction would be a disaster. 73, Dave, AA6YQ __._,_.___ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Ham radio antenna Ham radio store Digital voice Digital voice recorder mp3 Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___
Re: [digitalradio] FCC: lost exclusivity of quite a bandwidth
Danny Douglas wrote: Hmm tried to initiate a messge with my present email address, which I have used over a year this month, and suddenly Yahoo doesnt know me? I have rejoined. The following is of great interest in the US and affect hams world wide, in particular digital ops, who have lost exclusivity of quite a bandwidth here in the states, as soon as this goes thru. It may not be as bad as you may think. In the UK, and across much of Europe, bandplans are voluntary. However, you don't usually get vast numbers of stations using the 'wrong' mode in the various subsections. Well, not unless there is a CQWW contest on anyway... Most people keep to the suggested segments and everyone gets along quite well most of the time. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Kantronics KAM
ian parkinson wrote: I think the Kam etc are great, I had thought of hooking a couple up on 466 Mhz and leave messages in a neighbours M.box for playing chess. Do you mean PMR446? If so, don't let the authorities catch you, as it's not legal to use anything other than voice on PMR446... (See http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/licensing/classes/business_radio/information/ofw57/#content where it says PMR 446 is a handportable, short-range, voice-only communication system. It provides a basic but effective radio service for both business and non-business users, and is ideal for providing communication over short distances (e.g. within office buildings, factories and building sites). Please note that it is for speech transmissions *only*.) There's discussion of 'Digital' PMR446, but that seems to be about digital audio, not AX.25. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Virtual Audio Cable?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave, One of the problems with the SDR1K documents is that they use VAC version 3 and I have version 4. See the note at the bottom of page 146 of the latest SDR1K (1.6.2) Operating Manual. Trevor G0KTN Thanks Trevor, I wish I had seen that before I paid $39 for V4.03 !! There was I thinking No, get the newer version, for the extra $10 it will be worth it in the long run. Oh dear. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Virtual Audio Cable?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave, One of the problems with the SDR1K documents is that they use VAC version 3 and I have version 4. See the note at the bottom of page 146 of the latest SDR1K (1.6.2) Operating Manual. Trevor G0KTN Mind you, that doesn't explain why PSK31 can't be properly decoded when connecting the speaker output from the SDR1000/D44 set up through an MP3+ sound card to either PSK31 Deluxe or W1SQLPSK ... Just emailed the Flex-Radio technical support guy to see if V4.03 is the problem. He didn't mention it in the past, and I know that there's a document on setting up V4.03 with PowerSDR. All I have to do is remember where it was. LOL I've read, and reread, that many documents on PowerSDR/SDR1000/VAC etc that I'm not sure where they all are kept now! Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Virtual Audio Cable?
I knew I had seen it somewhere... http://kb.flex-radio.com/article.aspx?id=10218 Dave (G0DJA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave, One of the problems with the SDR1K documents is that they use VAC version 3 and I have version 4. See the note at the bottom of page 146 of the latest SDR1K (1.6.2) Operating Manual. Trevor G0KTN Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Digital Voice: Some thoughts after one week.
Andrew O'Brien wrote: I have been QRV on digital voice ,using WinDRM, and thought I would offer some rookie/newbie random thoughts. I think that you may be looking at this from the wrong angle, Andrew, DRM is intended as a very high quality mode, capable of very high quality reproduction and, just like in FM broadcast terms, this has its limitations. You need high s/n+n ratios and the associated bandwidth to go with it. If Amateur Radio were just about being able to work ultra-DX then many modes and bands would never have been developed. SSTV, especially Digital SSTV, also requires good signals and wide (in comparison to CW/SSB or even WSJT modes) bandwidth. Fast Scan TV on 23cm requires even more bandwidth. However, people do use wideband modes and enjoy the challenge that these modes bring. If you use some of the very high microwave bands a few miles is an achievement. That doesn't mean that quite long distances are not able to be worked, given the right conditions and a good deal of application, but you are not going to get DXCC of 10GHz, unless you go to using moon bounce, which is possible, but not easy... If you want to work the world, quickly, then DRM, Fast Scan TV and other specialist modes are not going to be the way to go. However, if you enjoy a challenge and find that every contact completed, whether that contact is over a distance of 1 mile or 1000 miles, is an enjoyable proof that it can be done, then stick with it. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Virtual Audio Cable?
Andrew O'Brien wrote: Anyone figure out how useful this might be for digital radio modes ? Andy K3UK Just found another program that I can't find a way to get it to work with VAC, this one is MMSSTV. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Virtual Audio Cable?
Andrew O'Brien wrote: Anyone figure out how useful this might be for digital radio modes ? Andy K3UK I bought it (it costs $39) and cannot get it to work with some digital programs. They do not recognise the virtual connections as being soundcards and I have not yet managed to set them up. The ones that I have found that *will* work, so far, include PSK31 Deluxe, W1SQLPSK, Spectrum Laboratory, WinDRM and HamPAL. However, I have not yet managed to get Multipsk or DIGTRX to recognise that audio is available on a virtual 'cable' from VAC yet. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Virtual Audio Cable?
Alan Biddle wrote: Dave, Go to http://www.flex-radio.com/Expert_Setups/expert_setups.htm and download the first article, VAC Setup With PowerSDR. While much is specific to the SDR-1000, there is a good general discussion of how to set up several programs, including MMTTY. There should at least be a few good tips there. 73s, Alan WA4SCA Yes, I have an SDR1K as well. However, I'm having problems with the audio output of it, in that using an FT817 gives perfect copy on PSK31, however, using the SDR1K gives one or two characters that are OK, the occasional 'CQ' or part of, and sometimes nearly a whole a callsign and then a lot of corrupted characters. So, I'm well used to going round and round the SDR1K expert set ups and the VAC installation system. LOL Still can't get MMSSTV to work with VAC, even after reading through the expert setup several times. MMSSTV just doesn't detect any audio on any of the streams that it offers in Device Set Up in (O)ptions, MISC. One of the problems with the SDR1K documents is that they use VAC version 3 and I have version 4. There are differences, like the fact that, in Version 3, the control panel shows if the cable is in async mode, but version 4 doesn't and doesn't seem to allow you to set it. Or, rather, I can't find any reference to async in any setup page and it doesn't seem to be mentioned in the Help file with VAC version 4 either. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Virtual Audio Cable?
Alan Biddle wrote: Dave, Go to http://www.flex-radio.com/Expert_Setups/expert_setups.htm and download the first article, VAC Setup With PowerSDR. I've found the problem with no received audio in MMSSTV! In Control PanelSounds Multimedia I had VAC Cable 2 in 'Playback' and Cable 1 in 'Sound Recording'. Swapping them round made MMSSTV able to detect the audio. I'm hoping that might cure some of my other problems now... Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Virtual Audio Cable?
David Ackrill wrote: I'm hoping that might cure some of my other problems now... Unfortunately not. :-( The characters are still coming through distorted. I see the occasional couple of correct characters and the rest are corrupted. This is the same with whatever program I use. Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] pskmail
which live cd has this program ? david/wd4kpd Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] but which rig ?????
DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote: David, Look seriously at the SDR-1000 (http://www.flex-radio.com). Walt/K5YFW I've just bought another SDR1000 (finger trouble on my early one meant that I decided to start from scratch with a ready built unit) and I'm just setting it up again. hen I'll be looking to get it going on digital modes as well. Anyone else using the SDR1000? If so, any advice on getting it all set up would be useful. Thanks - Dave (G0DJA) Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] but which rig ?????
following this modem/bw thread thru many rigs so i don't think anyone has offered their ideas on which of the current rigs will pass audio the best. am in market for one that will pass a digisstv signal using hamdream/hampal and digitrx (rdft) this afternoon i was messing with my ft920 and the digital sstv programs, i monitored on a completely diffirent system, and low and behold, the digital input on the rear apron drops all the low frequencies especially using rdft modulation. the cutoff point dropped 1 1/2 blocks ! i tried running the modes thru the mic input, and now got full bw thruput (slight rolloff low with EQ to off/flat), but level input is touchy to the mic. would like a rig that doesnt require me to run anything thru the mike if possible, makes switching cables etc a pain. so which rig ??? (not opposed to SDR if it can work) david/wd4kpd Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Can You Call Another Ham On The Air? Right Now?
Please excuse top post - Still resetting options. Well, for a start, you are assuming that the other person is in and listening. ALE wont help in that case. Just like calling someone on their mobile phone and they have it switched off, or don't answer. Plus, who's going to keep and distribute the codes for each person? I bet the non-Amateur visitor wont know the callsign of their Amateur Radio friend, nor what they might have as an identifier. So, just ask them if they can call a friend of yours, but you don't have their number and are not sure if they are in... It's a bit of a silly arguement to say we should be able to call up someone who we probably have never spoken to before and have not got any idea whether they use the same bands and modes as we do... de Dave (G0DJA) expeditionradio wrote: Have you ever had a visitor to your ham shack... and they ask if you can call up another ham who they know? Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] HAMPAL PROBLEM
HELP NEEDED... JUST INSTALLED HAMPAL ON THIS NEW MACHINE, AND THIS ERROR COMES UP EVERY TIME, HOWEVER THE PROGRAM SEEMS TO WORK OTHERWISE. ONLY WHEN I OK THE ERROR BOX, PROGRAM CLOSES. C:\WD4KPD\HAMPAL01JAN06\HAMPAL.EXE HAD THE FOLLOOWING UNRECOVERABLE ERROR: COULDN'T FIND LIBRARY MSVCP80.DLL(REQUIRED BY C:\PROGRA~1\WIFD1F~1\MPSHHOOK.DLL) ENSURE THAT IT IS INSTALLED. I HAVE DOWNLOADED THE MSVCP80.DLL AND PUT IT INTO THE WINDOWS\SYSTEM DIR. MACHINE IS XP. DAVID/WD4KPD Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] VOLUME SETTINGS
FOR THOSE OF YOU USING MANY PROGRAMS THRU YOUR SOUND CARD..THIS PROGRAM SAVES YOUR SETTINGS BETWEEN PROGRAMS. VOLSET AND QUICKMIX. I CAN SEND YOU EITHER ONE IF NEEDED. DAVID/WD4KPD Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] multimode beacon
sorry for late replies to you all that responded, been gone for week. should be back in groove monday. what i had done with the wav file was to create each modes audio stacked in frequency. i put cw down around 300hz, then added the others on up to around 2.5kc with a little guardband. all of them play at the same, in a loop and it is up to the receiver to seperate the modes. would really guess that the real question is what freq to run such an animal on the bands david/wd4kpd Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Station for Sale
Now I know why I didn't mind giving up ham radio for a career and raising a family back in the seventies... The pettiness and slander and arguments among hams that I use to hear on SSB are now on this media, and to no one's benefit except maybe the hams making the comments.. Why do a few hams feel the need to use this media for subjects in which the majority of digital radio hams have no interest. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: NTS and traffic handling and digital
Again, I emphazise that NTS exclusively operates in the auto control band plan the actual scenario of QRM from an autocontrolled NTS station is remote. I have seen my station delay tranmitting due to RTTY, Pactor, and CW stations on frequency Dave WB2FTX Dave Bernstein wrote: Yes, lots of talk, but no description of an actual scenario that substantiates that talk. The explanation, I believe, is that there is no such scenario. If you disagree, describe the scenario. 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has been talked about by many Me for one. At 05:32 PM 2/20/06, you wrote: I have never seen you or any one else here describe a scenario in which someone already in QSO on a frequency is QRM'd by an automatic station, and the fault doesn't lie with the automatic station. If you can describe such a scenario, please do so. 73, Dave, AA6YQ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] Re: NTS and traffic handling and digital
I think the title of this string should be changed. Most of the comments have really no idea of the difference between NTSD running "Classic Winlink" in the auto control subbands and Winlink 2000. I operate within the auto control subbands in automatic mode connecting to other NTSD stations Although no one "owns" a frequency, I would not operate outside of these subbands and possibly interfere with another QSO in a another digital mode. you have plenty of space to operate. It would appear that operation of other modes in the autocontrol subands is deliberately inviting a confrontation. Dave WB2FTX Eastern Area Digital Coordinator NTSD doc wrote: This has been raised many times during this and other debates in the Ham fraternity about the latest cause of avoidable QRM. It is one of the examples people unhappy point to as an illustration of ARRL arrogance "do as I say, not as I do". OTOH, it is kind of silly if not looking for conflict to start a QSO on a freq one knows has been used to the benefit of thousands of Hams for 40 years at certain times of day. It remains the responsibility of the operators of W1AW to be certain the freq is clear *prior* to transmitting. Perhaps an Official Observer should cite them to make the point that no one is above the law, regs, nor common courtesy. ;-) doc Hmmm. I have sent them a note or two in the past over exactly that. I or someone else was using a freq and they fired up. I let them no in unequivocal terms, that is not suppose to happen. They are no different than anyone else on that matter, and should check every frequency they are about to fire up, and slightly change if someone else is there. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] Digest Number 1820 alternative to quickmix
have been using VOLSET for long time if you need it...pse email. it is 465kb zip file. david/wd4kpd Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital
John, You are grossly misinformed. The Winlink stations on the frequecies you list are Winlink 2000 stations handling e mail messages. NTSD operates almost exclusively in the small automatic control band segments. Dave WB2FTX John Bradley wrote: I would like to point out that Dave Struebel andthe Winlink Group are responsible for most of the QRM we enjoy on HF from unattended Winlink stations, especially around 14105 to 14110. If Winlink, rather than spreading themselves out all over the band, were to confine their operations to a narrower segment, ie 14072 to 14080, and below 14105, leaving the OLIVIA and other similar modes some operating room, then it might be worthwhile getting involved with NTSD. This doesn't have to be done by regulation, just a gentlemen's agreement would suffice. Like many hams, I have a pactor 1 TNC sitting doing nothing, but don't want to make a bad situation worse . Until Winlink cleans up it's act, I don't want to be any part of more QRM John VE5MU - Original Message - Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital Winlink 2000 has solutions to many of the requirements that you list. However in all cases until the computer calls and delivers the message with an automated voice it still requires trained operator at the delivery end. There is an active NTS digital network but lacking in stations willing to either draw the traffic off manaully or pass it on to other means of delivery. If anyone is interested in joining NTSD either as a digital HF station or as a keyboarder to remove traffic drop me an email and I can point you in the right direction. Dave Struebel WB2FTX Eastern Area Digital Cordinator- NTSD Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital
There is an active digital system in NTS called NTSD employing Winlink software and coverage from area to area. Many NTS operators keyboard into these NTSD stations but the main problem as always is getting the trafic delivered locally. It makes no sense to be able to relay trafic via HF digital but end up having to take it to the manual nets. We are always looking for additional stations to join us either locally or as NTSD stations. All it takes is an HF rig, a computer and a TNC capable of at least Pactor I ( the later versions of the AEA PK-232 will work. If interested please respond via e mail. Dave Struebel WB2FTX Eastern Area Digital Cooridinator NTSD Tim Gorman wrote: The ARRL folks should not be shocked at what has happened. When they negotiate agreements with other agencies (e.g. the American Red Cross) that prevent amateurs from collecting outgoing message traffic at emergency shelters, what do they expect? The ARRL admitted in one of the latest QST's (Nov I think) that they AGREED with the Red Cross decision during Katrina to not let hams collect traffic in Red Cross shelters destined for loved ones from evacuees. As for routine traffic, there are lots of messages that have a reasonable delivery time that can be handled by the NTS. The ARRL needs to get off their duff and start being cheerleaders for this type of operation instead of being only cheerleaders for handling emergency agency operational and logistical traffic. I disagree that the only way this will work for digital is if it can be done on a store-and-forward basis. Your prediction is probably true as long as the ARRL and others continue to cast routine traffic as being unnecessary and a waste of time to handle. Especially in emergency situations, it is being able to get the message delivered that is important, not that it be done within 10 minutes. People waited days to find out about relatives in Katrina. Outgoing welfare traffic from that area could have been sent and delivered by hams much quicker than that. Even routine birthday notices, christmas greetings, and just plain hello's don't require delivery within 10 minutes. And for someone that doesn't remember an email address or even a telephone number, amateur radio still provides a reasonable alternative. psk nets can operate at least as efficiently as the old RTTY nets used to. I suspect they can operate better since it is easier to manage frequencies and to dispatch sender/receiver pairs off-frequency than during the old RTTY nets. The real kicker will be the number of people that are willing to dedicate the time and effort to make such a system work. Even when traffic nets were valid alternatives to the telephone system (e.g. late 50's to early 70's), the percentage of hams that were dedicated to traffic handling, even on a part-time basis, was small. Since digital operation is only about 10% of the total operations today, my guess is that the number of hams willing to make a digital system work will be insignificant. I suspect that if you did a survey on this list you would get no more than 1 or 2 people interested in doing routine traffic handling no matter how important the traffic is. Tim ab0wr On Monday 09 January 2006 15:17, williams wrote: (excerpts follow:) Because the need for NTS traffic became less and less about 20 years ago, I finally decided that it was not worth the effort required and only occasionally participated. Today the NTS traffic handles even less traffic and we have seen that even during severe emergencies in recent time, has almost no traffic flowing anymore. I know that even the ARRL folks are shocked at what has happened. The public now expects messages to be delivered in a reasonable time. I think 24 hours is about the maximum and really that is longer than most expectations. Digital could have had a really huge impact on traffic handling, but the interest is just not there. The only possible way that digital traffic can succeed is if it can work for most hams with easy to use access and be accessible at all times so you don't have to show up for a net. I realize that the downside of all this is the loss of camaraderie which I believe is one of the main glues holding the current CW and voice systems together for now. And traffic that comes in with an e-mail address needs to be dispatched immediately. Ideally, we would also have better ways to insure delivery. Will this ever happen? I used to think so, but have increasing doubts. We may see a different type of activity though with the newer digital technologies such as JNOS2, Winlink 2000, and now PSKmail where messages can be delivered via the net ... if you have an e-mail address for the recipient. 73, Rick, KV9U Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol:
Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital
Winlink 2000 has solutions to many of the requirements that you list. However in all cases until the computer calls and delivers the message with an automated voice it still requires trained operator at the delivery end. There is an active NTS digital network but lacking in stations willing to either draw the traffic off manaully or pass it on to other means of delivery. If anyone is interested in joining NTSD either as a digital HF station or as a keyboarder to remove traffic drop me an email and I can point you in the right direction. Dave Struebel WB2FTX Eastern Area Digital Cordinator- NTSD kd4e wrote: It seems to me that if the E-mail system is involved at all then Ham Radio is mostly irrelevant. Such messages would likely to be rare except out of devastated areas and even then folks are already deploying digital relay stations to quick-up critical Internet access. The need also presumes the absence of cellphone and landline communications. It seems to me that Ham Radio needs to offer a system parallel to the Internet that delivers messages to people without access to E-mail or where significant Internet outages make quick restoration improbable (what that means in terms of a threshold of downtime and of geographical distribution is a future discussion). We need a digital message forwarding system, that preferably includes the capacity to optionally imbed small images, and that has built in tracking and redundancy so that we always know where the message is and if a station or a group of stations are down there is always a way around. It needs to be frequency and mode diversified so that the best and fastest frequency and mode are automatically selected (which may require the dropping of an attached image to use a more simple digital mode in favor of getting at least the text message through). It needs to be operating system independent (MS Windows, Linux, or Apple Mac) and require no costly and/or proprietary hardware or software. We have an example of cooperative distributed computing here: http://folding.stanford.edu/ so citizens (Hams) may be expected to figure out a way to do this! Just some thoughts ... 73, doc kd4e The public now expects messages to be delivered in a reasonable time. I think 24 hours is about the maximum and really that is longer than most expectations. Digital could have had a really huge impact on traffic handling, but the interest is just not there. The only possible way that digital traffic can succeed is if it can work for most hams with easy to use access and be accessible at all times so you don't have to show up for a net. I realize that the downside of all this is the loss of camaraderie which I believe is one of the main glues holding the current CW and voice systems together for now. And traffic that comes in with an e-mail address needs to be dispatched immediately. Ideally, we would also have better ways to insure delivery. Will this ever happen? I used to think so, but have increasing doubts. We may see a different type of activity though with the newer digital technologies such as JNOS2, Winlink 2000, and now PSKmail where messages can be delivered via the net ... if you have an e-mail address for the recipient. 73, Rick, KV9U Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to 66.24.209.78 Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] need cluster testers
Andy, I can connect BUT... (paste of results follows) [EMAIL PROTECTED] kb3efs]$ telnet telnet open cluster.dynalias.org Trying 66.24.209.78... Connected to cluster.dynalias.org. Escape character is '^]'. K3UK WinCluster Lite - Version 2.3.8 - Telnet Port 1 Hello 97-82-syr-ny.dialin.a-315.westelcom.com Please enter your call: kb3efs Invalid Callsign. Please Try Again. Please enter your call: Connection closed by foreign host. [EMAIL PROTECTED] kb3efs]$ (end of Paste) At least it is getting through now. 73 Dave KB3EFS --- obrienaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you have a chance to try connecting to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org I would appreciate it. I am not sure I fixed the problem but I have at least got outgoing things such as Echolink working whereas earlier it was not successfully port forwarded. Andy. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] A Mea Culpa Re: NTS and traffic handling and digital
I am sorry I brought the subject up and created such a firestorm. Should the group owner desire it I well leave the group. Dave - KB3EFS __ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Mine Survivor is a Ham!
Um Folks... If WE are Ham Radio Operators then why are not using NTS to send RADIOGRAMS? There are 35 hams in Philippi WV including KC8VKZ. I believe the best message to send (per the ARRL at http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/forms/fsd3.html ) would be: ARRL SIXTY EIGHT via NTS. Just another option. 73 Dave KB3EFS PS Per an AP news item KC8VKZ has been moved back to a hospital in WV that is closer to his home. --- John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From ARRL: Mine Survivor Moved to Pittsburgh (Jan 6, 2006) -- Randal McCloy Jr, KC8VKZ, the only miner to survive Monday's explosion at the Sago Mine in Tallmansville, West Virginia, has been transferred to Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh for specialized treatment. He remains in critical condition. Hams may wish to send a note of support on a QSL card to Randal McCloy Jr, KC8VKZ, PO Box 223, Philippi, WV 26435. __ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] RTTYM/CONTESTIA
will these two modes be available as stand alones or will they be only for users of mix ? it would not be good to have another mode on the air that is pay only like pactor III. david/wd4kpd Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] conttestia/rttym
just wondering if contestia/rttym will limited to mix users ? if not, could use some links. david/wd4kpd Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/u8TY5A/tzNLAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] olivia/chirp beacon
a non legal thought its not gonna be much of a mode test, if you are on a dead band...6/10 if you are in attendance, then why not just call cq a bunch. text: cq cq cq (mode) test transmission. please qrx or send e-mail to ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AR don't think this will break any laws, and you don't have to use qrp if you don't want to. and of course any mode u run will be no wider than ssb. somewhere around 1804/3582/7089 would probably acceptable. david/wd4kpd looking to reply. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] bad cd/download v.05
downloaded from the dublin site, and burned on another machine. same results. couldnt do the chksums. cluecd runs, and all the ham programs i tried do work. what didnt work was the browser...Konqueror...which i guess is the equiv of explorer. when called up, it just didnt show up and the call went thru a timeout and stopped. no errors were given. david/wd4kpd The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Knoppix
tks jerryi have dl it already, but not made cd as yet. the AFU version with Knoppix has many ham programs built in. david/wd4kpd Jerry Weihrauch wrote: David, Try: http://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/knoppix/KNOPPIX_V3.7-2004-12-08-EN.iso If the iso has EN in the title then that is the English version. Had problems with Knoppix 3.7 and prior versions, it can not find my sound card. However Simply Mepis with a newer kernel found my sound card. Simply Mepis is also a Live CD has the very same ham programs that Knoppix has and is based on Debian like Knoppix. www.mepis.org http://ftp.wustl.edu/pub/linux/distributions/mepis/ProMEPIS-2005.b03.iso 73, Jerry K0HZI The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img src=http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif; height=67 width=200 style=border:0 alt=Digital Spotter//a Yahoo! Groups Links The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img src=http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif; height=67 width=200 style=border:0 alt=Digital Spotter//a Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] linux
I DID ! said it couldnt find the needed module. i have another standard knoppix live cd, and it works ok in english. it was a problem only with the AFU version. david/wd4kpd Chuck Mayfield wrote: At 12:25 PM 2/21/2005, you wrote: anyone have a link for download of the Knoppix live cd with the ham programs built in that is in English ? have the German version, but no fun to play with. david/wd4kpd Try starting it with knoppix lang=en Regards, Chuck - AA5J The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img src=http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif; height=67 width=200 style=border:0 alt=Digital Spotter//a Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
