[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY On Air Sensitivity

2009-02-07 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hi Tony,

i would like to learn more about HF path simulator.
Is there any material on the web i can study?

BR
Norbert


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony d...@... wrote:

 All,
 
 Had another opportunity to test MFTTY on air today. As expected, 
sensitivity 
 goes hand-in-hand with character speed and the slower 1/8 mode is 
probably 
 close to what you might expect from say PSK31.
 
 Path simulations seem to indicate that the mode is probably more 
stable than 
 PSK31 when HF path distortion becomes an issue.
 
 I'd appreciate any thoughts / experiences with MFTTY performance; 
slow vs. 
 fast mode etc.
 
 Tony - K2MO





Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY On Air Sensitivity

2009-02-07 Thread Jose A. Amador
Norbert,

I am taking the license of answering before Tony does, so look for the 
Pathsim docs (AE4JY). There is another german program, IONOS, which is 
another HF path simulator.

I have just played with them, but actually done nothing serious enough.

73,

Jose, CO2JA

---

Norbert Pieper wrote:

 i would like to learn more about HF path simulator.
 Is there any material on the web i can study?
 
 BR
 Norbert


VI Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y 
Educación Energética
9 - 12 de Junio 2009, Palacio de las Convenciones
...Por una cultura energética sustentable
www.ciercuba.com 


Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY On Air Sensitivity

2009-02-07 Thread Tony
Norbert,

See the link below for the PathSim user guide / download page. 

http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/pathsim.htm

Input wavs should have the same amplitude when comparing modes. I use a sound 
editor to normalize the the digital mode sound clips when testing. Let me know 
if you need any assistance. 

Tony - K2MO



- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper polar_elect...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:40 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY On Air Sensitivity


 Hi Tony,
 
 i would like to learn more about HF path simulator.
 Is there any material on the web i can study?
 
 BR
 Norbert
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony d...@... wrote:

 All,
 
 Had another opportunity to test MFTTY on air today. As expected, 
 sensitivity 
 goes hand-in-hand with character speed and the slower 1/8 mode is 
 probably 
 close to what you might expect from say PSK31.
 
 Path simulations seem to indicate that the mode is probably more 
 stable than 
 PSK31 when HF path distortion becomes an issue.
 
 I'd appreciate any thoughts / experiences with MFTTY performance; 
 slow vs. 
 fast mode etc.
 
 Tony - K2MO

 
 



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread W6IDS

I understand, Norbert, now.

Hthe information I read leads me to believe (and it's stated as 
such)
that the greater frequency of Pilot tones provides an aid to tuning.  IMHO,
it seems to me that the pause time that you stated is a bit too long to 
provide
benefit.  I don't know where I'd pause for an equivalent of 20 characters.

Right now, I am seeing a Pilot tone only at the beginning of the CQ
in which I included my callsign, City/State and Locator.  I think it could 
be
inserted by the operator at the end of each line of CQ for tuning.  I also
noticed that without looking at the screen, I instantly recognized the
signal by WB4MWD by virtue of the inclusion of the Pilot tones.  First
time I've been able to identify an exotic mode by ear per se, so the tones
have an additional value.

I think we just need to adopt a reasonable protocol for the tone use and
also allow for manual insertion as needed.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper polar_elect...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:55 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out


 Hello Howard and all,

 In fact the V3.0143 !!DOES!!- send out pilot tone by SEND button
 or Send By Enter Key

 The thing is that the pilot is sent out ONLY if there was a
 reasonable pause between the transmissions. I did set the pause time
 to a value that is equivalent to the transmission time of 4 Words
 (20 characters)

 This was done to avoid an un-needed flood of bothering pilots.

 My question to the group is:
 In Pratice:
 Is that pause time and the effective number of pilots sufficent or
 is there higher or lower occurrence of pilots needed?
 


Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread kh6ty


 I think we just need to adopt a reasonable protocol for the tone use and
 also allow for manual insertion as needed.

 Howard W6IDS
 Richmond, IN



Howard, for manual Pilot insertion, just configure a macro as only Pilot 
and click that to insert a Pilot whenever you want.

What I think FMTTY needs more than anything is the ability to double-click 
on a callsign and use it for the macros, such as CALL (for the other 
station's callsign). I cannot seem to get the TxMacro boxes to work. When I 
configure a macro with Box1 and put a callsign in for Box 1, I still get 
Box1 transmitting instead of the callsign. The macros also need to be 
linked to function keys for ease of keyboarding use. There really is not 
enough time to fill in the TxMacro box for every QSO. You have to capture a 
callsign as quickly as possible in order to keep from losing a contact. A 
double-click has proven to be the fastest way to do that.

For example, the significant default DigiPan macros which many are familiar 
with are:

F2 CQ
F3 Call 3 (transmit, 3x3, 3x3, 3x3, receive)
F4 Call (transmit, 1x1)
F5 BTU (1x1, receive)
F6 Signoff (73, 1x1, SK, receive)

This way, the new user only has to press F2 to call CQ, F3 to answer a CQ, 
and then just alternate between F4 and F5 for the QSO. When finished, he 
just goes to the next function key in line to signoff.

Of course preferences of others may vary!

73, Skip KH6TY



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
the macro-name for box1 is Name ... for box2 it is Call
that should solve the problem
greetz
dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: kh6ty 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out




   I think we just need to adopt a reasonable protocol for the tone use and
   also allow for manual insertion as needed.
  
   Howard W6IDS
   Richmond, IN
  

  Howard, for manual Pilot insertion, just configure a macro as only Pilot 
  and click that to insert a Pilot whenever you want.

  What I think FMTTY needs more than anything is the ability to double-click 
  on a callsign and use it for the macros, such as CALL (for the other 
  station's callsign). I cannot seem to get the TxMacro boxes to work. When I 
  configure a macro with Box1 and put a callsign in for Box 1, I still get 
  Box1 transmitting instead of the callsign. The macros also need to be 
  linked to function keys for ease of keyboarding use. There really is not 
  enough time to fill in the TxMacro box for every QSO. You have to capture a 
  callsign as quickly as possible in order to keep from losing a contact. A 
  double-click has proven to be the fastest way to do that.

  For example, the significant default DigiPan macros which many are familiar 
  with are:

  F2 CQ
  F3 Call 3 (transmit, 3x3, 3x3, 3x3, receive)
  F4 Call (transmit, 1x1)
  F5 BTU (1x1, receive)
  F6 Signoff (73, 1x1, SK, receive)

  This way, the new user only has to press F2 to call CQ, F3 to answer a CQ, 
  and then just alternate between F4 and F5 for the QSO. When finished, he 
  just goes to the next function key in line to signoff.

  Of course preferences of others may vary!

  73, Skip KH6TY



   

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread W6IDS

Hey, Skip!  Long time no.

Yes, I think you're touching on some things that could go well toward
enhancing the operation.  I, too, am having a little difficulty with the
TX Macro box as well.  However, I suspect that if we keep the
cards 'n letters coming in, there'll be some attention given to the
ideas for sure.

HI had not thought about using a marco for the Pilot
thingie.  DUH!  I've been trying it by manually typing it in.   I wasn't
thinking macro in that instance.

Trying to capture the callsign, QTH, etc does take time and causes
dead time too, not to mention creating a cumbersome process.
But, then again, this is new as we are awareand interesting.

So far, I'm one up on the receiver side.  Still working to get my first
transmit check out moment.

Regards,

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: kh6ty kh...@comcast.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out




 I think we just need to adopt a reasonable protocol for the tone use and
 also allow for manual insertion as needed.

 Howard W6IDS
 Richmond, IN



 Howard, for manual Pilot insertion, just configure a macro as only Pilot
 and click that to insert a Pilot whenever you want.

 What I think FMTTY needs more than anything is the ability to double-click
 on a callsign and use it for the macros, such as CALL (for the other
 station's callsign). I cannot seem to get the TxMacro boxes to work. When 
 I
 configure a macro with Box1 and put a callsign in for Box 1, I still get
 Box1 transmitting instead of the callsign. The macros also need to be
 linked to function keys for ease of keyboarding use. There really is not
 enough time to fill in the TxMacro box for every QSO. You have to capture 
 a
 callsign as quickly as possible in order to keep from losing a contact. A
 double-click has proven to be the fastest way to do that.

 For example, the significant default DigiPan macros which many are 
 familiar
 with are:

 F2 CQ
 F3 Call 3 (transmit, 3x3, 3x3, 3x3, receive)
 F4 Call (transmit, 1x1)
 F5 BTU (1x1, receive)
 F6 Signoff (73, 1x1, SK, receive)

 This way, the new user only has to press F2 to call CQ, F3 to answer a CQ,
 and then just alternate between F4 and F5 for the QSO. When finished, he
 just goes to the next function key in line to signoff.

 Of course preferences of others may vary!

 73, Skip KH6TY


 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



 Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread kh6ty
Thanks Seigfried! That works now. I could not find where that was in the 
Help.

Now, if Norbert can only code a double-click to enter the call in Box2, that 
would be great. I know that it is possible under VB6 as I always code it 
that way in my own VB PSK31 programs. For example, I code according to the 
following double-click rules (double-clicking in Windows usually 
automatically selects a word, as I remember.):

1. If the word contains three consecutive numbers, it goes into the RST 
field.

2. If the word contains one or two numbers, it goes into the callsign 
field.

3. If the word has no numbers, it goes into the operator name field.

4. For QTH, I select all the words and use a right-click context menu to 
enter the text into the QTH field.

I do not attempt to distinguish between something like PSK31 and a 
callsign, but rely on the human brain to make the distinction by where the 
operator makes the double-click selection.

73, Skip KH6TY



- Original Message - 
From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out


the macro-name for box1 is Name ... for box2 it is Call
that should solve the problem
greetz
dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: kh6ty
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out




   I think we just need to adopt a reasonable protocol for the tone use and
   also allow for manual insertion as needed.
  
   Howard W6IDS
   Richmond, IN
  

  Howard, for manual Pilot insertion, just configure a macro as only Pilot
  and click that to insert a Pilot whenever you want.

  What I think FMTTY needs more than anything is the ability to double-click
  on a callsign and use it for the macros, such as CALL (for the other
  station's callsign). I cannot seem to get the TxMacro boxes to work. When 
I
  configure a macro with Box1 and put a callsign in for Box 1, I still get
  Box1 transmitting instead of the callsign. The macros also need to be
  linked to function keys for ease of keyboarding use. There really is not
  enough time to fill in the TxMacro box for every QSO. You have to capture 
a
  callsign as quickly as possible in order to keep from losing a contact. A
  double-click has proven to be the fastest way to do that.

  For example, the significant default DigiPan macros which many are 
familiar
  with are:

  F2 CQ
  F3 Call 3 (transmit, 3x3, 3x3, 3x3, receive)
  F4 Call (transmit, 1x1)
  F5 BTU (1x1, receive)
  F6 Signoff (73, 1x1, SK, receive)

  This way, the new user only has to press F2 to call CQ, F3 to answer a CQ,
  and then just alternate between F4 and F5 for the QSO. When finished, he
  just goes to the next function key in line to signoff.

  Of course preferences of others may vary!

  73, Skip KH6TY





Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1785 - Release Date: 11/13/2008 
9:12 AM




Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
that was easy to find out how this thing works  just right click on the 
button makro
ther you find a predefined text that contains the maros use by the programm
glad that i could help
dg9bfc
siegfried or in short form ... sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: kh6ty 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Cc: d...@polar-electric.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:53 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out


  Thanks Seigfried! That works now. I could not find where that was in the 
  Help.

  Now, if Norbert can only code a double-click to enter the call in Box2, that 
  would be great. I know that it is possible under VB6 as I always code it 
  that way in my own VB PSK31 programs. For example, I code according to the 
  following double-click rules (double-clicking in Windows usually 
  automatically selects a word, as I remember.):

  1. If the word contains three consecutive numbers, it goes into the RST 
  field.

  2. If the word contains one or two numbers, it goes into the callsign 
  field.

  3. If the word has no numbers, it goes into the operator name field.

  4. For QTH, I select all the words and use a right-click context menu to 
  enter the text into the QTH field.

  I do not attempt to distinguish between something like PSK31 and a 
  callsign, but rely on the human brain to make the distinction by where the 
  operator makes the double-click selection.

  73, Skip KH6TY

  - Original Message - 
  From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

  the macro-name for box1 is Name ... for box2 it is Call
  that should solve the problem
  greetz
  dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: kh6ty
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

   I think we just need to adopt a reasonable protocol for the tone use and
   also allow for manual insertion as needed.
  
   Howard W6IDS
   Richmond, IN
  

  Howard, for manual Pilot insertion, just configure a macro as only Pilot
  and click that to insert a Pilot whenever you want.

  What I think FMTTY needs more than anything is the ability to double-click
  on a callsign and use it for the macros, such as CALL (for the other
  station's callsign). I cannot seem to get the TxMacro boxes to work. When 
  I
  configure a macro with Box1 and put a callsign in for Box 1, I still get
  Box1 transmitting instead of the callsign. The macros also need to be
  linked to function keys for ease of keyboarding use. There really is not
  enough time to fill in the TxMacro box for every QSO. You have to capture 
  a
  callsign as quickly as possible in order to keep from losing a contact. A
  double-click has proven to be the fastest way to do that.

  For example, the significant default DigiPan macros which many are 
  familiar
  with are:

  F2 CQ
  F3 Call 3 (transmit, 3x3, 3x3, 3x3, receive)
  F4 Call (transmit, 1x1)
  F5 BTU (1x1, receive)
  F6 Signoff (73, 1x1, SK, receive)

  This way, the new user only has to press F2 to call CQ, F3 to answer a CQ,
  and then just alternate between F4 and F5 for the QSO. When finished, he
  just goes to the next function key in line to signoff.

  Of course preferences of others may vary!

  73, Skip KH6TY

  Internal Virus Database is out of date.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
  Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1785 - Release Date: 11/13/2008 
  9:12 AM



   

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-12 Thread W6IDS
It seems to be an interesting piece of software, Norbert.
I was susrprised at how I was able to copy my first
CQ from WB4MWD while that station was basically
covered by a PACTOR MBO.  I don't know if that
was a fluke or not but will be curious to see if it can
be replicated in the future.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper polar_elect...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:54 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Tuning information


 Hi Steinar,
 
 no problem just click options and enter new Tx Center Frequency
 ( in the upper right corner ) click apply.
 
 MFTT can handle any Tx Frequency from near zero up to near half of 
 TX sample rate of soundcard.
 
 BR
 Norbert

  SNIP SNIP


[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-11 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hi Steinar,

no problem just click options and enter new Tx Center Frequency
( in the upper right corner ) click apply.

MFTT can handle any Tx Frequency from near zero up to near half of 
TX sample rate of soundcard.

BR
Norbert

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 
wrote:

 Hi Norbert
 
 Thanks for giving us this very interesting and easy to use 
software.  I
 have question; what about
 using 1500Hz as a default infrequency  in instead of 1000Hz ? All my
 transceivers (icom's) have their
 sweet point's  at 1500Hz. i USB/LSB
 
 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
 
 
 
 
 Norbert Pieper wrote:
  There is an update of MFTTY Help file available now.
  In the chapter General i have added a page named 
  Tuning into MFTTY Station
  Feel free to download and study
  http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/MFTTHelp.chm
 
  Problems with opening the Help file?
  Then read this Instructions from Microsoft
  http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/HelpInstructions.html
 
  73
  55
  de
  Norbert
 
 

  --
--
 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1886 - Release Date: 
10.01.2009 18:01
 
 





Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-11 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Great !  Thanks again :)

73 de LA5VNA Steinar





Norbert Pieper wrote:
 Hi Steinar,

 no problem just click options and enter new Tx Center Frequency
 ( in the upper right corner ) click apply.

 MFTT can handle any Tx Frequency from near zero up to near half of 
 TX sample rate of soundcard.

 BR
 Norbert

 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 
 wrote:
   
 Hi Norbert

 Thanks for giving us this very interesting and easy to use 
 
 software.  I
   
 have question; what about
 using 1500Hz as a default infrequency  in instead of 1000Hz ? All my
 transceivers (icom's) have their
 sweet point's  at 1500Hz. i USB/LSB

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar




 Norbert Pieper wrote:
 
 There is an update of MFTTY Help file available now.
 In the chapter General i have added a page named 
 Tuning into MFTTY Station
 Feel free to download and study
 http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/MFTTHelp.chm

 Problems with opening the Help file?
 Then read this Instructions from Microsoft
 http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/HelpInstructions.html

 73
 55
 de
 Norbert


   
 --
   
 --
   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1886 - Release Date: 
   
 10.01.2009 18:01
   
   



   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1886 - Release Date: 10.01.2009 
 18:01

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-11 Thread Matti Niemelä
Heard HB9TLK, LA5VNA and F1ABL with half speed on 14068 kHz.

73 de Matti OH2ZT


Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-11 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear howard
the pilot is a macro that sends a pilot-tone and the beginning of your 
transmitted text
it is explained on the homepage how this work but i will try to explain it
the other sees the pilottone on his waterfall
he makes a rectangle with his mousecursor around this line
the programm now is tunet for this frequency and starts decoding text
so normally you only need to send the pilottone at the first transmission
that is the reason why the pilottone is in the cq-button
you can send it also during the other macros but you don´t need to do
for the macros name qth etc ... just click on txtmacro near the upper left edge 
of the waterfall
a new window opens where you can put in the name qth etc of the other station
now when you click on the button macro under the waterfall a text will be send 
with the 
name qth etc of the other station  a counter is counted upwards so in a 
contest
it is the qso number . hope all is understood well
if you want to play with the soft off-air just put your pc mic in front of your 
pc speaker
now you can send text to yourself ... yes the soft can sent and receice 
fullduplex
now when you have some practise with the soft
it is time to bring it on the air
there are several people trying out the soft in this group and so the chance to 
find somebody
is not to bad ..
if you have comments about the soft or maybe a whish for a function just drop a 
mail to norbert or ask here in the group if this whish is possible to ad in 
the programm
hope i could help
best 73´s de dg9bfc
sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: W6IDS 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:27 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m



  Yessir, the new version works now.

  I've found I cannot PTT through the COM1 - it looks
  like I'll be using the VOX option instead (which does work).

  I am still going through this material and trying to get a
  handle on my learning curve.

  I am not quite sure what to do next other than look for a
  MFTTY signal to copy. While I can key the transmitter
  VOX and can hear my tones, I don't know if my transmit status
  is fully operational. 

  I see that I do not have access to audio controls like I would
  have with Windows XP. So, I manually turned up my mike
  gain to get reasonable RF output.

  It's not quite clear to me just how I would get city, name, etc
  into the program for use in a MACRO like you have set up
  in the program.

  Where does the word PILOT fit into all of this, that I've seen
  in the CQ button, etc?

  Still plugging along here... thanks for the help thus far!

  Howard W6IDS 
  Richmond, IN

  - Original Message - 
  From: Norbert Pieper polar_elect...@yahoo.com
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:35 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m

   Hello Howard,
   
   The issue is solved:
   Cause of Problem: the file c:\Window\system32\dx8vb.dll is not 
   registered.
   
   Solution: Download and install new version of MFTT it will fix the 
   Problem automatically.

  SNIP SNIP


   

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-11 Thread Russell Blair
Thier is gruop on K3UK SKED website http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ 
we'er testing and talking about the program. MFTTY and looking for others on 
MFTTY.

Russell

 
= 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Sun, 1/11/09, Matti Niemelä mattis.niem...@kolumbus.fi wrote:

From: Matti Niemelä mattis.niem...@kolumbus.fi
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Tuning information
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 8:04 AM







Heard HB9TLK, LA5VNA and F1ABL with half speed on 14068 kHz.
 
73 de Matti OH2ZT
  














  


Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-11 Thread W6IDS
Many thanks, Seigfried.  I'll digest this and when I get home from work, I'll 
begin
to seriously play with the program.  I do recall the info regarding the pilot,
however, after successfully finding myself with the program installed now, I did
not make the connection mentally at first since it's new for me.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
  - Original Message - 
  From: Siegfried Jackstien 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 8:37 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m


  dear howard
  the pilot is a macro that sends a pilot-tone and the beginning of your 
transmitted text
  it is explained on the homepage how this work but i will try to explain it
  the other sees the pilottone on his waterfall

SNIP SNIP

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-11 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear russel
look on the skedpage
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ 
digital
there you will find others to test with
greetz
sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: W6IDS 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 3:54 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m



  Many thanks, Seigfried.  I'll digest this and when I get home from work, I'll 
begin
  to seriously play with the program.  I do recall the info regarding the 
pilot,
  however, after successfully finding myself with the program installed now, I 
did
  not make the connection mentally at first since it's new for me.

  Howard W6IDS
  Richmond, IN
- Original Message - 
From: Siegfried Jackstien 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m


dear howard
the pilot is a macro that sends a pilot-tone and the beginning of your 
transmitted text
it is explained on the homepage how this work but i will try to explain it
the other sees the pilottone on his waterfall

  SNIP SNIP

   

[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hello Howard,

The issue is solved:
Cause of Problem: the file c:\Window\system32\dx8vb.dll is not 
registered.
 
Solution: Download and install new version of MFTT it will fix the 
Problem automatically.
 
BR Norbert

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, W6IDS w6...@... wrote:

 Forgot to mention, if it matters, that I'm running VISTA.
 
 Howard W6IDS
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: W6IDS w6...@...
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m
 
 
  
  Hey, Steinar!
  
  Tried to bring up MFTTY but encountered a problem.
  
  I get this flag:
  
  Run Time Error '429':
  
  ActiveX component can't create object.
  
  Howard W6IDS
  Richmond, IN
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@...
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:35 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m
  
  
  Hi all,
  
  I am monitoring dial 3588 USB (1000Hz) now 
  
  
  
  Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
  http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
  
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
 





[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.140 is out

2009-01-10 Thread Norbert Pieper
Attention V3.0.140 is compatible with V3.0.139 !!!

BR
Norbert



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY 3.0.140 is out

2009-01-10 Thread Steinar Aanesland


ok, then I must have done something wrong.

73 de LA5VNA Steinar


 

Norbert Pieper wrote:
 Attention V3.0.140 is compatible with V3.0.139 !!!

 BR
 Norbert


   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1885 - Release Date: 09.01.2009 
 19:59

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread W6IDS

Yessir, the new version works now.

I've found I cannot PTT through the COM1 - it looks
like I'll be using the VOX option instead (which does work).


I am still going through this material and trying to get a
handle on my learning curve.

I am not quite sure what to do next other than look for a
MFTTY signal to copy.  While I can key the transmitter
VOX and can hear my tones, I don't know if my transmit status
is fully operational.  

I see that I do not have access to audio controls like I would
have with Windows XP.  So, I manually turned up my mike
gain to get reasonable RF output.

It's not quite clear to me just how I would get city, name, etc
into the program for use in a MACRO like you have set up
in the program.

Where does the word PILOT fit into all of this, that I've seen
in the CQ button, etc?

Still plugging along here... thanks for the help thus far!

Howard   W6IDS 
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper polar_elect...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:35 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m


 Hello Howard,
 
 The issue is solved:
 Cause of Problem: the file c:\Window\system32\dx8vb.dll is not 
 registered.
 
 Solution: Download and install new version of MFTT it will fix the 
 Problem automatically.

  SNIP SNIP


Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-09 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Siegfried

We are now testing the latest version 3.0.139 on 3591 usb
I have some wishes ; is it possible for Norbert to have the
version number printed on the web side ?  Now you have to download
the software and look at the about to see if you have the latest one.

73 de LA5VNA Steinar





Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
 which version do you have?? date of the file??
 norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center 
 frequence of the filter
 he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
 simply download it again and delete the older one version number is still 
 3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
 do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert 
 explained it to me in a mail
 the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 
 with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
 if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round the 
 tone
 hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
 the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the 
 pilottone is
 decoding should start very easy after that
 hope i could help a bit
 good luck with the new mode
 best 73´s de dg9bfc
 sigi 

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-09 Thread Russell Blair
Last night about four of us here in the U.S. tried to get .139 to work and we 
just was not able to, we get togeather over on the K3UK 30M digital Skid site 
to talk about it .
 
Russell 


 
= 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Fri, 1/9/09, Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no wrote:

From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, January 9, 2009, 2:55 PM






Hi Siegfried

We are now testing the latest version 3.0.139 on 3591 usb
I have some wishes ; is it possible for Norbert to have the
version number printed on the web side ? Now you have to download
the software and look at the about to see if you have the latest one.

73 de LA5VNA Steinar

Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
 which version do you have?? date of the file??
 norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center 
 frequence of the filter
 he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
 simply download it again and delete the older one version number is still 
 3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
 do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert 
 explained it to me in a mail
 the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 
 with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
 if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round the 
 tone
 hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
 the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the 
 pilottone is
 decoding should start very easy after that
 hope i could help a bit
 good luck with the new mode
 best 73´s de dg9bfc
 sigi 

 

 














  

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-09 Thread F.R. Ashley
Listening 3.591 USB for MFTTY now.

WB4M Budyd
- Original Message - 
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m


 Hi Siegfried

 We are now testing the latest version 3.0.139 on 3591 usb
 I have some wishes ; is it possible for Norbert to have the
 version number printed on the web side ?  Now you have to download
 the software and look at the about to see if you have the latest one.

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar





 Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
 which version do you have?? date of the file??
 norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center 
 frequence of the filter
 he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
 simply download it again and delete the older one version number is 
 still 3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
 do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert 
 explained it to me in a mail
 the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 
 
 with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
 if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round 
 the tone
 hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle
 the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the 
 pilottone is
 decoding should start very easy after that
 hope i could help a bit
 good luck with the new mode
 best 73´s de dg9bfc
 sigi




 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



 Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-09 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear steinar
i dropped him a mail about this
greetz
dg9bfc
sigi


Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-07 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
which version do you have?? date of the file??
norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center 
frequence of the filter
he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
simply download it again and delete the older one version number is still 
3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert 
explained it to me in a mail
the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 
with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round the 
tone
hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the pilottone 
is
decoding should start very easy after that
hope i could help a bit
good luck with the new mode
best 73´s de dg9bfc
sigi 

  - Original Message - 
  From: Steinar Aanesland 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:42 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m



  Hi all,

  I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz.
  My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and intuitive
  to use. The mode
  works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;)

  la5vna Steinar

  Steinar Aanesland wrote:
   OK qsy 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
   la5vna Steinar
  
  
  
  
  
   Graham wrote:
   
   Try 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz ?
  
   596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 
  
  
   --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 
  
  
   wrote:
   
   
   Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz (3596 usb dial)
   and calling CQ
  
   la5vna Steinar
  
  
  
  
  
   Graham wrote:
   
   
   No signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
   
   
   night .. 
   
   
   would be better on 80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??
  
   G .. 
  
  
   --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
   wrote:
   
   
   
   Hi Graham,
  
   I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?
  
   LA5VNA Steinar
  
  
  
  
   Graham wrote:
   
   
   
   --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
   
   
   
   
   Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
   
   
   6 
   
   
   
   
   
   Jan.
   
   
   
   Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?
  
   de Rich/N2JR
  
   
   
   
   
   Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
   
   
   
   noticed, 
   
   
   
   it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to stall ?
  
   looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do you mean dial frequency ? 
   
   
   
   just 
   
   
   
   noise 
  
   G .. 
  
  
   
   --
   
   
   --
   
   
   
   
   
   --
   
   
   
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
   Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
   
   
   Date: 
   
   
   
   
   
   06.01.2009 07:56
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   --
   
   
   --
   
   
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
   Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
   
   
   06.01.2009 07:56
   
   
   
   
  
   
   --
  
  
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
   Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
06.01.2009 07:56
  
   
   
  
  
   
   --
  
  
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
   Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
07:56
  
   



   

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-07 Thread Russell Blair
The older version was 3.0.125 the newer one is 3.0.131 if you look at the about 
tab at the top.
 
Russell


 
= 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de wrote:

From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 11:16 PM







which version do you have?? date of the file??
norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center 
frequence of the filter
he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
simply download it again and delete the older one version number is still 
3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert 
explained it to me in a mail
the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 
with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round the 
tone
hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the pilottone 
is
decoding should start very easy after that
hope i could help a bit
good luck with the new mode
best 73´s de dg9bfc
sigi 
 

- Original Message - 
From: Steinar Aanesland 
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m




Hi all,

I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz.
My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and intuitive
to use. The mode
works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;)

la5vna Steinar

Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 OK qsy 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 Try 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


 wrote:
 
 
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 
 No signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
 
 
 night .. 
 
 
 would be better on 80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
 
 
 
 
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
 
 
 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jan.
 
 
 
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 
 
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
 
 
 
 noticed, 
 
 
 
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do you mean dial frequency ? 
 
 
 
 just 
 
 
 
 noise 

 G .. 


 
  - - - - - -
 
 
 --
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
 
 
 Date: 
 
 
 
 
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  - - - - - -
 
 
 --
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
 
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
 
 
 
 

 
  - - - - - -


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

 
 


 
  - - - - - -


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

 

 














  

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-07 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Ups.. I thought I had the newest one but it was 3.0.123 . I will upgrade
to 3.0.131 .

LA5VNA Steinar





Russell Blair wrote:
 The older version was 3.0.125 the newer one is 3.0.131 if you look at the 
 about tab at the top.
  
 Russell


  
 = 
 IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
 = 
 Russell Blair (NC5O)
 Skype-Russell.Blair
 Hell Field #300
 DRCC #55
 30m Dig-group #693

 --- On Tue, 1/6/09, Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de 
 wrote:

 From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 11:16 PM







 which version do you have?? date of the file??
 norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center 
 frequence of the filter
 he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
 simply download it again and delete the older one version number is still 
 3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
 do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert 
 explained it to me in a mail
 the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 
 with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
 if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round the 
 tone
 hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
 the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the 
 pilottone is
 decoding should start very easy after that
 hope i could help a bit
 good luck with the new mode
 best 73´s de dg9bfc
 sigi 
  

 - Original Message - 
 From: Steinar Aanesland 
 To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m




 Hi all,

 I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz.
 My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and intuitive
 to use. The mode
 works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;)

 la5vna Steinar

 Steinar Aanesland wrote:
   
 OK qsy 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:

 
 Try 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


 wrote:


   
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:


 
 No signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 


   
 night .. 


   
 would be better on 80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
 wrote:



   
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:



 
 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:




   
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 


 
 6 


   

 
 Jan.



   
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR





 
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 



   
 noticed, 



   
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do you mean dial frequency ? 



   
 just 



   
 noise 

 G .. 



  - - - - - -


   
 --


   

   
 --



   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 


   
 Date: 


   

   
 06.01.2009 07:56



   

   
  - - - - - -


   
 --


   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 


   
 06.01.2009 07:56


   
   
  - - - - - -


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56



   

  - - - - - -


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56


 

  














   
   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1879 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 17:16

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-07 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
mine says 3.0.126 . where did you get the 3.0.131 version
  - Original Message - 
  From: Russell Blair 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 2:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m


The older version was 3.0.125 the newer one is 3.0.131 if you look at 
the about tab at the top.

Russell



= 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693


--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Siegfried Jackstien 
siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de wrote:

  From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 11:16 PM


  which version do you have?? date of the file??
  norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with 
center frequence of the filter
  he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
  simply download it again and delete the older one version number 
is still 3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
  do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... 
norbert explained it to me in a mail
  the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 

  with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
  if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor 
round the tone
  hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
  the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the 
pilottone is
  decoding should start very easy after that
  hope i could help a bit
  good luck with the new mode
  best 73´s de dg9bfc
  sigi 

- Original Message - 
From: Steinar Aanesland 
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m



Hi all,

I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz.
My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and 
intuitive
to use. The mode
works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;)

la5vna Steinar

Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 OK qsy 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 Try 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland 
saa...@... 


 wrote:
 
 
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 
 No signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
 
 
 night .. 
 
 
 would be better on 80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland 
saanes@ 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, rich3x rh3x@ 
wrote:
 
 
 
 
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during 
day 
 
 
 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jan.
 
 
 
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant 
attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 
 
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. 
just 
 
 
 
 noticed, 
 
 
 
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do you mean dial frequency 
? 
 
 
 
 just 
 
 
 
 noise

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-07 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Here http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
73 LA5VNA Steinar




Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
 mine says 3.0.126 . where did you get the 3.0.131 version
   - Original Message - 
   From: Russell Blair 
   To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 2:25 PM
   Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m


 The older version was 3.0.125 the newer one is 3.0.131 if you look at 
 the about tab at the top.

 Russell



 = 
 IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
 = 
 Russell Blair (NC5O)
 Skype-Russell.Blair
 Hell Field #300
 DRCC #55
 30m Dig-group #693


 --- On Tue, 1/6/09, Siegfried Jackstien 
 siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de wrote:

   From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
   Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
   To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 11:16 PM


   which version do you have?? date of the file??
   norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with 
 center frequence of the filter
   he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
   simply download it again and delete the older one version 
 number is still 3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
   do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... 
 norbert explained it to me in a mail
   the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right 
 mode/speed 
   with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
   if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor 
 round the tone
   hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
   the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence 
 the pilottone is
   decoding should start very easy after that
   hope i could help a bit
   good luck with the new mode
   best 73´s de dg9bfc
   sigi 

 - Original Message - 
 From: Steinar Aanesland 
 To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m



 Hi all,

 I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz.
 My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and 
 intuitive
 to use. The mode
 works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;)

 la5vna Steinar

 Steinar Aanesland wrote:
  OK qsy 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
  la5vna Steinar
 
 
 
 
 
  Graham wrote:
  
  Try 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz ?
 
  596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 
 
 
  --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland 
 saa...@... 
 
 
  wrote:
  
  
  Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz (3596 usb dial)
  and calling CQ
 
  la5vna Steinar
 
 
 
 
 
  Graham wrote:
  
  
  No signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
  
  
  night .. 
  
  
  would be better on 80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??
 
  G .. 
 
 
  --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland 
 saanes@ 
  wrote:
  
  
  
  Hi Graham,
 
  I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?
 
  LA5VNA Steinar
 
 
 
 
  Graham wrote:
  
  
  
  --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, rich3x rh3x@ 
 wrote:
  
  
  
  
  Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during 
 day 
  
  
  6 
  
  
  
  
  
  Jan.
  
  
  
  Does this mode work well/attracted any significant 
 attention?
 
  de Rich/N2JR
 
  
  
  
  
  Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. 
 just 
  
  
  
  noticed, 
  
  
  
  it 'has

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-07 Thread Russell Blair
I see you did get the newest version of the last e-mail.
 
Russell


 
= 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Wed, 1/7/09, Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de wrote:

From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 9:50 AM







mine says 3.0.126 . where did you get the 3.0.131 version

- Original Message - 
From: Russell Blair 
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com 
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m








The older version was 3.0.125 the newer one is 3.0.131 if you look at the about 
tab at the top.
 
Russell


 
 = 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
 = 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell. Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackstien @freenet. de 
wrote:

From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackstien @freenet. de
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 11:16 PM





which version do you have?? date of the file??
norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center 
frequence of the filter
he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage
simply download it again and delete the older one version number is still 
3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version
do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert 
explained it to me in a mail
the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed 
with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal
if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round the 
tone
hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle 
the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the pilottone 
is
decoding should start very easy after that
hope i could help a bit
good luck with the new mode
best 73´s de dg9bfc
sigi 
 

- Original Message - 
From: Steinar Aanesland 
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m




Hi all,

I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz.
My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and intuitive
to use. The mode
works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;)

la5vna Steinar

Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 OK qsy 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 Try 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


 wrote:
 
 
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 
 No signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
 
 
 night .. 
 
 
 would be better on 80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
 
 
 
 
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
 
 
 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jan.
 
 
 
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 
 
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
 
 
 
 noticed, 
 
 
 
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do you mean dial frequency ? 
 
 
 
 just 
 
 
 
 noise 

 G .. 


 
  - - - - - -
 
 
 --
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
 
 
 Date: 
 
 
 
 
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  - - - - - -
 
 
 --
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
 
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
 
 
 
 

 
  - - - - - -


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

 
 


 
  - - - - - -


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

 


 














  

[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Graham
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x r...@... wrote:

 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.
 
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?
 
 de Rich/N2JR


Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just noticed, 
it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?

looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? just 
noise 

G .. 



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Graham,

I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

LA5VNA Steinar




Graham wrote:
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x r...@... wrote:
   
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.

 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 

 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just noticed, 
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? just 
 noise 

 G .. 


   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread rich3x
OK Steinar:  will try 7035.
de Rich/N2Jr

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... wrote:

 hummm , it is possible to try a freq around 7035 ? There is there is
 heavy ssb qrm on
 
 7068 in Europa 
 
 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
 
 
 
 
 
 
 rich3x wrote:
  Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.
 
  Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?
 
  de Rich/N2JR
 
 
 

 

 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date:
06.01.2009 07:56
 
 





Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Great ! I will qsy 7035 usb dial

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




rich3x wrote:
 OK Steinar:  will try 7035.
 de Rich/N2Jr

 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... wrote:
   
 hummm , it is possible to try a freq around 7035 ? There is there is
 heavy ssb qrm on

 7068 in Europa 

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar






 rich3x wrote:
 
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.

 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR



   

   
 
   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date:
   
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   



   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
ups, heavy psk31 qrm on 7035 but 7039 seems clean

la5vna Steinar







Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 Great ! I will qsy 7035 usb dial

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar




 rich3x wrote:
   
 OK Steinar:  will try 7035.
 de Rich/N2Jr

 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... wrote:
   
 
 hummm , it is possible to try a freq around 7035 ? There is there is
 heavy ssb qrm on

 7068 in Europa 

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar






 rich3x wrote:
 
   
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.

 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR



   

   
 
 
   
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date:
   
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
 
   
 

   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   
 


   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Graham
No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the night .. 
would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

G .. 


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 
wrote:

 Hi Graham,
 
 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?
 
 LA5VNA Steinar
 
 
 
 
 Graham wrote:
  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:

  Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 
Jan.
 
  Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?
 
  de Rich/N2JR
 
  
 
  Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
noticed, 
  it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?
 
  looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 
just 
  noise 
 
  G .. 
 
 

  --
--
 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
06.01.2009 07:56
 
 





Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz  (3596 usb dial)
and calling CQ

la5vna Steinar





Graham wrote:
 No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the night .. 
 would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 
 wrote:
   
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
   
   
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 
 
 Jan.
   
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
   
 noticed, 
   
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 
   
 just 
   
 noise 

 G .. 


   
 --
   
 --
   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
   
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   



   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Graham
Try   3.583 Khz dial  usb + 1000 hz ?

596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


wrote:

 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz  (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ
 
 la5vna Steinar
 
 
 
 
 
 Graham wrote:
  No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
night .. 
  would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??
 
  G .. 
 
 
  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
  wrote:

  Hi Graham,
 
  I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?
 
  LA5VNA Steinar
 
 
 
 
  Graham wrote:
  
  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:


  Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
6 
  
  Jan.

  Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?
 
  de Rich/N2JR
 
  
  
  Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 

  noticed, 

  it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?
 
  looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 

  just 

  noise 
 
  G .. 
 
 

  
--

  --

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
Date: 

  06.01.2009 07:56


 
 
 

  --
--
 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
06.01.2009 07:56
 
 





[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Graham
Try   3.583 Khz dial  usb + 1000 hz ?

596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


wrote:

 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz  (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ
 
 la5vna Steinar
 
 
 
 
 
 Graham wrote:
  No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
night .. 
  would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??
 
  G .. 
 
 
  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
  wrote:

  Hi Graham,
 
  I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?
 
  LA5VNA Steinar
 
 
 
 
  Graham wrote:
  
  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:


  Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
6 
  
  Jan.

  Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?
 
  de Rich/N2JR
 
  
  
  Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 

  noticed, 

  it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?
 
  looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 

  just 

  noise 
 
  G .. 
 
 

  
--

  --

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
Date: 

  06.01.2009 07:56


 
 
 

  --
--
 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
06.01.2009 07:56
 
 





Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
OK qsy  3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
la5vna Steinar





Graham wrote:
 Try   3.583 Khz dial  usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


 wrote:
   
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz  (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
   
 night .. 
   
 would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
 wrote:
   
   
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
   
   
   
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
 
 6 
   
 
 
 Jan.
   
   
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
   
   
 noticed, 
   
   
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 
   
   
 just 
   
   
 noise 

 G .. 


   
 
   
 --
   
   
   
 --
   
   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
   
 Date: 
   
   
   
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   
   
   

   
 --
   
 --
   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
   
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   



   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Hi all,

I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz.
My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and intuitive
to use. The mode
works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;)

la5vna Steinar





Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 OK qsy  3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz
 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
   
 Try   3.583 Khz dial  usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


 wrote:
   
 
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz  (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
   
 No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
   
 
 night .. 
   
 
 would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
 wrote:
   
   
 
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 
   
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
   
   
   
 
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
 
   
 6 
   
 
 
 
   
 Jan.
   
   
 
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 
   
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
   
   
 
 noticed, 
   
   
 
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 
   
   
 
 just 
   
   
 
 noise 

 G .. 


   
 
   
 
 --
   
 
   
   
 
 --
   
   
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
   
 
 Date: 
   
 
   
   
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   
 
   
   
 
   
 --
   
 
 --
   
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
   
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
 
   
 

   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   
 


   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Graham

I have a beacon on 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz . Do you see me ?

la5vna Steinar






Graham wrote:
 Try   3.583 Khz dial  usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


 wrote:
   
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz  (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
 No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
   
 night .. 
   
 would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
 wrote:
   
   
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
   
   
   
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
 
 6 
   
 
 
 Jan.
   
   
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
   
   
 noticed, 
   
   
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 
   
   
 just 
   
   
 noise 

 G .. 


   
 
   
 --
   
   
   
 --
   
   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
   
 Date: 
   
   
   
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   
   
   

   
 --
   
 --
   
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
   
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   



   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
qrt now

73 de la5vna


Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 Graham

 I have a beacon on 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz . Do you see me ?

 la5vna Steinar






 Graham wrote:
   
 Try   3.583 Khz dial  usb + 1000 hz ?

 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... 


 wrote:
   
 
 Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz  (3596 usb dial)
 and calling CQ

 la5vna Steinar





 Graham wrote:
 
   
 No  signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the 
   
 
 night .. 
   
 
 would be better on  80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ??

 G .. 


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saanes@ 
 wrote:
   
   
 
 Hi Graham,

 I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ?

 LA5VNA Steinar




 Graham wrote:
 
 
   
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x rh3x@ wrote:
   
   
   
 
 Will qsx  send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 
 
   
 6 
   
 
 
 
   
 Jan.
   
   
 
 Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

 de Rich/N2JR

 
 
 
   
 Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just 
   
   
 
 noticed, 
   
   
 
 it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to  stall ?

 looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do  you mean dial frequency ? 
   
   
 
 just 
   
   
 
 noise 

 G .. 


   
 
   
 
 --
   
 
   
   
 
 --
   
   
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release 
   
 
 Date: 
   
 
   
   
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
   
 
   
   
 
   
 --
   
 
 --
   
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 
   
 
 06.01.2009 07:56
   
 
   
 

   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   
 


   
 


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
 07:56

   



[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY: Run-time Error 429

2008-12-16 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hi Rich,

that looks very much like the dx8vb.dll in your system directory is
not registered in the registry.

do this:
- find the dx8vb.dll on your PC and remember the folder (path) name
- click Start -run
- type in box
regsvr32 C:\WINDOWS\system32\dx8vb.dll
!!!that is an example!!! you have to enter your individual correct
folder name

BR Norbert

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich3x r...@... wrote:

 ActiveX component can't create object
 
 program won't load/run -- vb6 installed -- solution?
 
 de Rich/N2JR






[digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-14 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hello Siggi and Group,

i'm very glad to see that you were able to use MFTTy with some 
success. 
So far i have learned that tune finder is needed.
And a Hlepfile in a more readable format?

I will add a graphical, FFT-Based, tune finder This might take a 
week or two. I will let you know when done.

Please send me your additional suggestions, i will collect and 
considder them as my little available time allows... step by step.

73
55
de
Norbert



--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien 
siegfried.jackst...@... wrote:

 dear norbert
 thanks for the second edition of your software
 i will try it out on my system and can send you my comments about
 best 73´s de dg9bfc
 sigi
   - Original Message - 
   From: Norbert Pieper 
   To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:15 PM
   Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty
 
 
   Hello to the Group!!
 
   I'm new here and have some goddies...
 
   I freshly released an update of MF Tele Type V 2.0.088
   http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/
 
   And yes it is possible to run MFTT under Vista 
   Instructions: 
   Launch program directly from it's Program folder location for 
   example 
   c:\Program Files\HamRadioSoftware\MFTeleType\MFteletype.exe
 
   In the properties table one must set:
 
   XP Servicepack2 ( right click on the MFteletype.exe file to 
access 
   the properties tab and select XP Service pack 2) this step need 
be 
   done only one time. 
 
   Execute as Administrator (each time one runs the program, it is 
   necessary to right click the .exe file and select to run it as 
   Administrator. )
 
   Whish you lots of fun with MFTT!
   Any feedback is welcome.
 
   73
   55
   de
   Norbert





[digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-14 Thread Vojtech Bubnik
Hi Norbert.

I do not want to discourage you from your experiments, but I would
like to point out, that there are already two tone chat modes designed
for amateur use on HF, namely Throb and ThrobX. DTMF as well as ThrobX
encode each single character into two simultaneous tones. Throb has a
single exception, idle character is encoded as single tone. DTMF does
not shape amplitude, Throb/ThrobX does. DTMF is much wider than Throb
or ThrobX.

I believe DTMF was designed for cheap inexact tone decoders and not
fully harmonic encoders and transmission paths, the tones are picked
so their third intermix product is not exactly aligned with other DTMF
tones. If used on HF, one does not want the IMD product fall outside
of the useful signal. On telephone line it does not matter and some
nonlinearity may be even useful to boost SNR.

On HF I don't believe big tone spacing will bring much benefit when
compared with ThrobX.

73, Vojtech OK1IAK


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Norbert Pieper
polar_elect...@... wrote:

 Hello Siggi and Group,
 
 i'm very glad to see that you were able to use MFTTy with some 
 success. 
 So far i have learned that tune finder is needed.
 And a Hlepfile in a more readable format?
 
 I will add a graphical, FFT-Based, tune finder This might take a 
 week or two. I will let you know when done.
 
 Please send me your additional suggestions, i will collect and 
 considder them as my little available time allows... step by step.
 
 73
 55
 de
 Norbert
 
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien 
 siegfried.jackstien@ wrote:
 
  dear norbert
  thanks for the second edition of your software
  i will try it out on my system and can send you my comments about
  best 73´s de dg9bfc
  sigi
- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty
  
  
Hello to the Group!!
  
I'm new here and have some goddies...
  
I freshly released an update of MF Tele Type V 2.0.088
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/
  
And yes it is possible to run MFTT under Vista 
Instructions: 
Launch program directly from it's Program folder location for 
example 
c:\Program Files\HamRadioSoftware\MFTeleType\MFteletype.exe
  
In the properties table one must set:
  
XP Servicepack2 ( right click on the MFteletype.exe file to 
 access 
the properties tab and select XP Service pack 2) this step need 
 be 
done only one time. 
  
Execute as Administrator (each time one runs the program, it is 
necessary to right click the .exe file and select to run it as 
Administrator. )
  
Whish you lots of fun with MFTT!
Any feedback is welcome.
  
73
55
de
Norbert
 





[digitalradio] Re: MFTTY Download

2008-12-14 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hi Lew,

that looks very much like the dx8vb.dll in your system directory is 
not registered in the registry.

do this:
- find the dx8vb.dll on your PC and remember the folder (path) name
- click Start run 
- type in box 
regsvr32 C:\WINDOWS\system32\dx8vb.dll
!!!that is an example!!! you have to enter your individual correct 
folder name

BR Norbert


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Lew Cason lew_j...@... 
wrote:

 Thank you for the information
 
 I installed it on a Panasonic laptop with Win 98 and received a 
error 
 RUN-TIME ERROR 429 ACTIVEX COMPOMENT CAN'T CREAT OBLECT
 
 
 Lew
 N4HRA
   - Original Message - 
   From: Toby Burnett 
   To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 9:39 AM
   Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download
 
 
 

 http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/
 
 That is where I got it from. 
 
 Good luck
 
 ---Original Message---
 
 From: n4hra
 Date: 14/12/2008 12:43:48
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download
 
 Were do I fine the MFTTY site to download 
 
 Lew





[digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-14 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hi Voitech,

many thanks for the hint!
I guess i have to learn more about Throb and ThrobX
Particular about the single exception an why it was implemented.

BR
Norbert

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Vojtech Bubnik bubn...@... 
wrote:

 Hi Norbert.
 
 I do not want to discourage you from your experiments, but I would
 like to point out, that there are already two tone chat modes 
designed
 for amateur use on HF, namely Throb and ThrobX. DTMF as well as 
ThrobX
 encode each single character into two simultaneous tones. Throb 
has a
 single exception, idle character is encoded as single tone. DTMF 
does
 not shape amplitude, Throb/ThrobX does. DTMF is much wider than 
Throb
 or ThrobX.
 
 I believe DTMF was designed for cheap inexact tone decoders and not
 fully harmonic encoders and transmission paths, the tones are 
picked
 so their third intermix product is not exactly aligned with other 
DTMF
 tones. If used on HF, one does not want the IMD product fall 
outside
 of the useful signal. On telephone line it does not matter and some
 nonlinearity may be even useful to boost SNR.
 
 On HF I don't believe big tone spacing will bring much benefit when
 compared with ThrobX.
 
 73, Vojtech OK1IAK
 




Re: [digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-14 Thread Rick W
I admit that I am in the extreme minority of hams who are interested in 
group connectivity under the worst possible conditions, such as needed 
for public service, emergency, and even casual use. Any advance in 
higher speed/robust modes is welcome since there is always the 
possibility that they could eventually be a component in new technology.
One of the concerns that I have is the proliferation of new modes that 
basically don't improve the state of the art. I don't know anything 
about mftty so after testing this mode, perhaps some of you can tell us 
about the advantages over the other digital modes?

73,

Rick, KV9U


Re: [digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-14 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Votjech and all,

Yes in Throb, it can be used one or two carriers when in Throbx it is always 
two.

It's why Throbx is better that Throb for the reason that you have not to 
decide if it is one or two carriers (in Throb, you must evaluate through a 
threshold if the second carrier must be taken into account or not).

However in Throbx, the choice to use the Space character as idle character 
is not the best in my opinion.

73
Patrick


- Original Message - 
From: Vojtech Bubnik bubn...@seznam.cz
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty


Hi Norbert.

I do not want to discourage you from your experiments, but I would
like to point out, that there are already two tone chat modes designed
for amateur use on HF, namely Throb and ThrobX. DTMF as well as ThrobX
encode each single character into two simultaneous tones. Throb has a
single exception, idle character is encoded as single tone. DTMF does
not shape amplitude, Throb/ThrobX does. DTMF is much wider than Throb
or ThrobX.

I believe DTMF was designed for cheap inexact tone decoders and not
fully harmonic encoders and transmission paths, the tones are picked
so their third intermix product is not exactly aligned with other DTMF
tones. If used on HF, one does not want the IMD product fall outside
of the useful signal. On telephone line it does not matter and some
nonlinearity may be even useful to boost SNR.

On HF I don't believe big tone spacing will bring much benefit when
compared with ThrobX.

73, Vojtech OK1IAK


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Norbert Pieper
polar_elect...@... wrote:

 Hello Siggi and Group,

 i'm very glad to see that you were able to use MFTTy with some
 success.
 So far i have learned that tune finder is needed.
 And a Hlepfile in a more readable format?

 I will add a graphical, FFT-Based, tune finder This might take a
 week or two. I will let you know when done.

 Please send me your additional suggestions, i will collect and
 considder them as my little available time allows... step by step.

 73
 55
 de
 Norbert



 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien
 siegfried.jackstien@ wrote:
 
  dear norbert
  thanks for the second edition of your software
  i will try it out on my system and can send you my comments about
  best 73´s de dg9bfc
  sigi
- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty
 
 
Hello to the Group!!
 
I'm new here and have some goddies...
 
I freshly released an update of MF Tele Type V 2.0.088
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/
 
And yes it is possible to run MFTT under Vista
Instructions:
Launch program directly from it's Program folder location for
example
c:\Program Files\HamRadioSoftware\MFTeleType\MFteletype.exe
 
In the properties table one must set:
 
XP Servicepack2 ( right click on the MFteletype.exe file to
 access
the properties tab and select XP Service pack 2) this step need
 be
done only one time.
 
Execute as Administrator (each time one runs the program, it is
necessary to right click the .exe file and select to run it as
Administrator. )
 
Whish you lots of fun with MFTT!
Any feedback is welcome.
 
73
55
de
Norbert
 






Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



Yahoo! Groups Links







Re: [digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-14 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
you can use smaller spacing when using slower mode
it should work very well for weak signal but you have to take a lot of time for 
a qso
best 73´s de dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: Vojtech Bubnik 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:17 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty


  Hi Norbert.

  I do not want to discourage you from your experiments, but I would
  like to point out, that there are already two tone chat modes designed
  for amateur use on HF, namely Throb and ThrobX. DTMF as well as ThrobX
  encode each single character into two simultaneous tones. Throb has a
  single exception, idle character is encoded as single tone. DTMF does
  not shape amplitude, Throb/ThrobX does. DTMF is much wider than Throb
  or ThrobX.

  I believe DTMF was designed for cheap inexact tone decoders and not
  fully harmonic encoders and transmission paths, the tones are picked
  so their third intermix product is not exactly aligned with other DTMF
  tones. If used on HF, one does not want the IMD product fall outside
  of the useful signal. On telephone line it does not matter and some
  nonlinearity may be even useful to boost SNR.

  On HF I don't believe big tone spacing will bring much benefit when
  compared with ThrobX.

  73, Vojtech OK1IAK

  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Norbert Pieper
  polar_elect...@... wrote:
  
   Hello Siggi and Group,
   
   i'm very glad to see that you were able to use MFTTy with some 
   success. 
   So far i have learned that tune finder is needed.
   And a Hlepfile in a more readable format?
   
   I will add a graphical, FFT-Based, tune finder This might take a 
   week or two. I will let you know when done.
   
   Please send me your additional suggestions, i will collect and 
   considder them as my little available time allows... step by step.
   
   73
   55
   de
   Norbert
   
   
   
   --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien 
   siegfried.jackstien@ wrote:
   
dear norbert
thanks for the second edition of your software
i will try it out on my system and can send you my comments about
best 73´s de dg9bfc
sigi
- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty


Hello to the Group!!

I'm new here and have some goddies...

I freshly released an update of MF Tele Type V 2.0.088
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/

And yes it is possible to run MFTT under Vista 
Instructions: 
Launch program directly from it's Program folder location for 
example 
c:\Program Files\HamRadioSoftware\MFTeleType\MFteletype.exe

In the properties table one must set:

XP Servicepack2 ( right click on the MFteletype.exe file to 
   access 
the properties tab and select XP Service pack 2) this step need 
   be 
done only one time. 

Execute as Administrator (each time one runs the program, it is 
necessary to right click the .exe file and select to run it as 
Administrator. )

Whish you lots of fun with MFTT!
Any feedback is welcome.

73
55
de
Norbert
   
  



   

[digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-13 Thread Norbert Pieper
Hello to the Group!!

I'm new here and have some goddies...

I freshly released an update of MF Tele Type V 2.0.088
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/

And yes it is possible to run MFTT under Vista 
Instructions: 
Launch program directly from it's Program folder location  for 
example 
„c:\Program Files\HamRadioSoftware\MFTeleType\MFteletype.exe

In the properties table one must set:

XP Servicepack2 ( right click on the MFteletype.exe file to access 
the properties tab and select XP Service pack 2) this step need be 
done only one time. 

Execute as  Administrator (each time one runs the program, it is 
necessary to right click the .exe file and select to run it as 
Administrator. )

Whish you lots of fun with MFTT!
Any feedback is welcome.

73
55
de
Norbert



Re: [digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-13 Thread Bob/Chris
Hello Norbert,

After following your instructions for a Vista machine, when I start MFTT I 
get the Run-time error '429', ActiveX component can't create object. I don't 
know what to do about this.

Thanks---

Bob C (WU9Q)


- Original Message - 
From: Norbert Pieper polar_elect...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:15 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty


Hello to the Group!!

I'm new here and have some goddies...

I freshly released an update of MF Tele Type V 2.0.088
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/

And yes it is possible to run MFTT under Vista
Instructions:
Launch program directly from it's Program folder location  for
example
c:\Program Files\HamRadioSoftware\MFTeleType\MFteletype.exe

In the properties table one must set:

XP Servicepack2 ( right click on the MFteletype.exe file to access
the properties tab and select XP Service pack 2) this step need be
done only one time.

Execute as  Administrator (each time one runs the program, it is
necessary to right click the .exe file and select to run it as
Administrator. )

Whish you lots of fun with MFTT!
Any feedback is welcome.

73
55
de
Norbert




Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



Yahoo! Groups Links







Re: [digitalradio] Re: mftty

2008-12-13 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear norbert
thanks for the second edition of your software
i will try it out on my system and can send you my comments about
best 73´s de dg9bfc
sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: Norbert Pieper 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:15 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: mftty


  Hello to the Group!!

  I'm new here and have some goddies...

  I freshly released an update of MF Tele Type V 2.0.088
  http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/

  And yes it is possible to run MFTT under Vista 
  Instructions: 
  Launch program directly from it's Program folder location for 
  example 
  c:\Program Files\HamRadioSoftware\MFTeleType\MFteletype.exe

  In the properties table one must set:

  XP Servicepack2 ( right click on the MFteletype.exe file to access 
  the properties tab and select XP Service pack 2) this step need be 
  done only one time. 

  Execute as Administrator (each time one runs the program, it is 
  necessary to right click the .exe file and select to run it as 
  Administrator. )

  Whish you lots of fun with MFTT!
  Any feedback is welcome.

  73
  55
  de
  Norbert