Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

RGB ES wrote on 2011-02-26 14.58:

I get a certification error with konqueror, but not with firefox for
https://www.libreoffice.org/. Same forhttps://bugs.freedesktop.org/


might be because Konqueror does not know about the StartSSL Root CA 
which we use - it should work at least in Firefox, IE, Chrome, SeaMonkey 
and Safari. :-)


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

:: LibreOffice needs your support for setting up its Foundation!
:: Join our fundraising at http://challenge.documentfoundation.org

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



[tdf-discuss] Example: Strange OpenOffice Email from a new universe

2011-02-27 Thread Joe Rotello

On the subject of an example of the Email received...

Here's my initially-received copy. I include the header info for ones 
perusal.
Note that I only x'ed out the 32 character password that they sent for 
privacy, otherwise it is pristine in what I received.


Although I find it of interest to note that it originated from  
nob...@openoffice.org, I suspect this is the first of many that will 
be sent by this now splinter(?) group.


Joe
WindowGroup /Knoxville , TN / USA
Skype: joerotello

==

Return-Path:nob...@openoffice.org

Delivery-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:36:14 -0500
Received-SPF: neutral (mxus1: 192.9.171.175 is neither permitted nor denied by 
domain of openoffice.org) client-ip=192.9.171.175; 
envelope-from=nob...@openoffice.org; helo=mailout02.kenai.com;
Received: from mailout02.kenai.com (mailout02.kenai.com [192.9.171.175])
by mx.perfora.net (node=mxus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
id 0MV7Yb-1PWFqV0S8T-00YHkB for i...@windowgroup.com; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 
21:36:14 -0500
Received: from mail01.openoffice.org (ooxmlm01z1.network.org [192.9.171.118])
by mailout02.kenai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680FB14DC66
fori...@windowgroup.com; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:36:13 + (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail01.openoffice.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5C08C09A
fori...@windowgroup.com; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:36:13 + (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at network.org
Received: from mail01.openoffice.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (ooxmlm01z1.network.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 
10025)
with ESMTP id aWw7U04V-sbY fori...@windowgroup.com;
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:36:12 + (GMT)
Received: from openoffice.org (ooxmgt01z1.network.org [192.9.171.128])
by mail01.openoffice.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73D18C094
fori...@windowgroup.com; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:36:12 + (GMT)
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:36:12 +
From: nob...@openoffice.org
Reply-To: nob...@openoffice.org
To: i...@windowgroup.com
Message-Id:4d68671ca50a0_27de81272252f4@ooxmgt01z1.tmail
Subject: Welcome to openoffice.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-UI-Junk: AutoMaybeJunk +0 ();
  V01:0NJ5Ll2O:RdzZWWUpMNUkYxTGG9cm28H/sLM9D2rxIetxLxOsSh9I7hdKcxc
  y/KwzRvCZB/37RAARz7x8smwf0fDhviPAZ9L3TQnMAyi512QQActVgd05XYSyHf4
  aragbl7hiOWlwgnlPgFNbXh+5Uvuyd5CrNHCMMzXpIOM1HT1h+5Z3usl8ZnO77gu
  QzAnfWzxrs2R7v8yhGlnaOLhVylrcc/iUnw==
Envelope-To: i...@windowgroup.com

Your account has been migrated to the new OpenOffice.org infrastructure.

Here are your new account credentials:

Username: josephrot
Password: 

You will be asked to change your password when you login for the first time.

Welcome to the new OpenOffice.org website!
http://www.openoffice.org/news/#move

The OpenOffice.org Team

==



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [tdf-discuss] Example: Strange OpenOffice Email from a new universe

2011-02-27 Thread C
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 15:27, Joe Rotello wrote:
 On the subject of an example of the Email received...

 Here's my initially-received copy. I include the header info for ones
 perusal.
 Note that I only x'ed out the 32 character password that they sent for
 privacy, otherwise it is pristine in what I received.

 Although I find it of interest to note that it originated from
  nob...@openoffice.org, I suspect this is the first of many that will be
 sent by this now splinter(?) group.

Did you do ANY reading at all about this?  It's not a splinter
group... From the main OOo website, you get a link to
http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Home  This is a project
that has been on the go for a long time (almost 2 years since its
start).  The OOo site was moved off the old hosting infrastructure to
a new one.  The email you and everyone else who had an OOo account
received was to let you know your account was moved and reset
nothing more.  No splinter group.  No funny marketing attempts.
Nothing more than the simple fact that the OOo user accounts were
moved to the new server and letting everyone know so each user could
assign a new password.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread M Henri Day
2011/2/27 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org

 Hi,

 RGB ES wrote on 2011-02-26 14.58:

  I get a certification error with konqueror, but not with firefox for
 https://www.libreoffice.org/. Same forhttps://bugs.freedesktop.org/


 might be because Konqueror does not know about the StartSSL Root CA which
 we use - it should work at least in Firefox, IE, Chrome, SeaMonkey and
 Safari. :-)


 Florian


Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first
glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature
that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and
under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the
Swedish) :
*
This web site is not secure.*

The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be used to
transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security
functions but failed.

The above notice is followed by a so-called «certificate summary», as
follows :

Owner : *.libreoffice.org, Florian Effenberger
Issuer : StartCom Class2 Primary Intermediate Server, CA StartCom Ltd.
Expires : 2012-12-27 01.37.00 GMT

Encryption protocol : TLS v1.0 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA)

Henri

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [tdf-discuss] Example: Strange OpenOffice Email from a new universe

2011-02-27 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Joe Rotello wrote:
 On the subject of an example of the Email received...
 Here's my initially-received copy. I include the header info for ones 
 perusal.

OK, then I confirm what I wrote in
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg05281.html
and others confirmed in the meantime: it just announces the completion
of the big openoffice.org infrastructure renewal, that has been in the
talks for at least 5 years and in the works since at least 2009.

And of course it cannot be confused at all with an announcement about
LibreOffice, or with anything else than what it is, i.e., a plain
service announcement. It even contains links to the official pages
describing the move: http://www.openoffice.org/news/#move

Regards,
  Andrea.


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



[tdf-discuss] Basic Macro Snippets collection

2011-02-27 Thread Rainer Bielefeld

Hi,

may be there is some interest to create something similar to
http://www.ooowiki.de/ÜbersichtMakros?
That would be collection with
- source code texts
- short description of function and installation
- Extension file to install in a simple way.

It would be great to have some users who would help authors to integrate 
those snippets, test them, improve documentation, improve the macros, ...


May be someone can create a WIKI page
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BasicSnippets
(like http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA), Create a Team page,...
There some further goal-oriented discussion could happen.

I would observe that interested, but I can't contribute because I will 
continue my bug confirmation activita.


Here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34786
for example we have a candidate with a workaroundfor an old OOo bug what 
deserves to help more users than only the author.


Best regards

Rainer Bielefeld

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

M Henri Day wrote on 2011-02-27 16.10:


Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first
glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature
that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and
under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the
Swedish) :
*
This web site is not secure.*

The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be used to
transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security
functions but failed.


do you see the same message if you open https://www.libreoffice.org/admin/ ?

Thanks,
Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

:: LibreOffice needs your support for setting up its Foundation!
:: Join our fundraising at http://challenge.documentfoundation.org

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread M Henri Day
2011/2/27 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org

 Hi,

 M Henri Day wrote on 2011-02-27 16.10:


  Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first
 glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a
 feature
 that allows one to check security information with respect to a website,
 and
 under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the
 Swedish) :
 *
 This web site is not secure.*

 The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be used
 to
 transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security
 functions but failed.


 do you see the same message if you open https://www.libreoffice.org/admin/?

 Thanks,
 Florian


No, Florian, when I type that sequence into the address bar, I'm redirected
to «https://www.libreoffice.org/Security/login?BackURL=%2Fadmin%2F» and a
padlock symbol is shown to the left. When I click on the latter, I'm
informed both that the connexion is secure and that the website has an
«impeccable» security history - a description I much appreciated. In order
to log onto the above page, I was instructed to «[p]lease choose an
authentication method and enter your credentials to access the CMS» ; when I
then attempted to do so using my email address and my registration password
for the LibreOffice forum, I was rejected, which is, I presume, precisely as
it should be, given that I am not an LO adminstrator

Henri

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


[tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread NoOp
On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
 
 Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first
 glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature
 that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and
 under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the
 Swedish) :
 *
 This web site is not secure.*
 
 The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be used to
 transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security
 functions but failed.
 
 The above notice is followed by a so-called «certificate summary», as
 follows :
 
 Owner : *.libreoffice.org, Florian Effenberger
 Issuer : StartCom Class2 Primary Intermediate Server, CA StartCom Ltd.
 Expires : 2012-12-27 01.37.00 GMT
 
 Encryption protocol : TLS v1.0 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA)
 
 Henri
 

That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:
http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png
In other words, its mixed  only 'partially' secure.

If you try https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ that page should show
the security lock. And if you check the security (Tools|Advanced|Page
Security Info) you should see:
The connection to www.libreoffice.org is secure.

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01

The issue, at this point, is with SeaMonkey (linux)  Konquer. If I try
on SeaMonkey Windows 2.1b2 it's fine:
http://img402.imageshack.us/f/seamonkeycertwindows1.png/

I've posted on the SeaMonkey dev group to see I someone there can figure
out the issue.

Gary



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Setup Advice

2011-02-27 Thread Barbara Duprey

On 2/26/2011 4:27 PM, Mark Preston wrote:

Thanks very much for this. I have the downloaded set-up files now and
will think hard on whether to install it or not - it has to depend on
how heavily we need the system working over the next weeks.

If this remains an issue, I can see it being a major stumbling block
for places - such as mine - where there may be several users and a
need for continual document operations. Unfortunately that will mean
our primary target audience (to offices that currently use either
Microsoft Office or Open Office on Windows systems or networks).

On 26/02/2011 03:18, NoOp wrote:

On 02/21/2011 02:16 PM, Mark Preston wrote:

I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
but have really one simple question before I do. Background is I will
be running it on Windows Vista, currently run OpenOffice and will be
using it near daily including with MS Office documents and presentations.

So the question is: can I load LibO side-by-side with OpenOffice and
if not what is the procedure to load LibO and - should there be
probelms - to reload OpenOffice? Most importantly, this is a
multi-user system so it needs to be loaded for at least three users.
Any advice much appreciated.


It's an issue:
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/
quote
For Windows users that have OpenOffice.org installed, we advise
uninstalling that beforehand, because it registers the same file type
associations.
/quote

The issue is that LO uses the same executables as OOo (swriter, etc) and
hasn't yet cleaned up the code to use something else (lowriter, etc).
This can cause *considerable* issues with OOo and LO coexisting on the
same Windows system. If you want to have both installed (on Windows -
it's no issue on linux) at the same time, then I'd suggest installing
'in parallel', see:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Run_OOo_versions_parallel#Windows

So at this point (on Windows) you are better off with either/or: OOo or
LO, but not both at the same time.


I've been running with both on Win7 for several months, primarily using LibO but occasionally OOo. 
I've had no problem at all with resetting file associations, it's just a matter of browsing to the 
soffice.exe that's in the desired directory. I didn't do anything special at all for installation, 
and I've had no issues of any conflicts with files created on one fork and used on the other. YMMV, 
but you probably needn't be paranoid about this.


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread M Henri Day
2011/2/27 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net

 On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
 ...
 
  Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first
  glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a
 feature
  that allows one to check security information with respect to a website,
 and
  under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the
  Swedish) :
  *
  This web site is not secure.*
 
  The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be
 used to
  transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security
  functions but failed.
 
  The above notice is followed by a so-called «certificate summary», as
  follows :
 
  Owner : *.libreoffice.org, Florian Effenberger
  Issuer : StartCom Class2 Primary Intermediate Server, CA StartCom Ltd.
  Expires : 2012-12-27 01.37.00 GMT
 
  Encryption protocol : TLS v1.0 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA)
 
  Henri
 

 That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:

 http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png
 In other words, its mixed  only 'partially' secure.


Not quite sure what you mean by «pulling the images from an http vs http»
here, Gary, as the address for which the anomalous security ratings is shown
is, in fact, «https://www.libreoffice.org/», i e, a https address. In any
event, I still get the above messages for «https://www.libreoffice.org/» on
Opera


 If you try https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ that page should show
 the security lock. And if you check the security (Tools|Advanced|Page
 Security Info) you should see:
 The connection to www.libreoffice.org is secure.

 Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01


That was indeed the case on Opera 11.01 on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 setup


 The issue, at this point, is with SeaMonkey (linux)  Konquer. If I try
 on SeaMonkey Windows 2.1b2 it's fine:
 http://img402.imageshack.us/f/seamonkeycertwindows1.png/

 I've posted on the SeaMonkey dev group to see I someone there can figure
 out the issue.

 Gary



 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Archived for eternity ! Not bad - I'd settle for half of that !

Henri

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Setup Advice

2011-02-27 Thread Mark Preston
I can understand that Barbara and generally agree - there should be no
issues running the two together. This, in fact, is what I shall be
trying first.

The issue, as I see it anyway, is not so much that there *will* be
problems running the two together as that there is the very clear
*impression* that there will. It is made all the worse by even we
doing the LibreOffice work and testing are reporting that there can be
problems (as NoOp did below).

What we need, in my opinion, is not necessarily changes to the code or
the installation method as to the clarity of information about doing
it in our own documentation and on the site.

On 27/02/2011 19:29, Barbara Duprey wrote:
 On 2/26/2011 4:27 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
 Thanks very much for this. I have the downloaded set-up files now and
 will think hard on whether to install it or not - it has to depend on
 how heavily we need the system working over the next weeks.

 If this remains an issue, I can see it being a major stumbling block
 for places - such as mine - where there may be several users and a
 need for continual document operations. Unfortunately that will mean
 our primary target audience (to offices that currently use either
 Microsoft Office or Open Office on Windows systems or networks).

 On 26/02/2011 03:18, NoOp wrote:
 On 02/21/2011 02:16 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
 I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
 but have really one simple question before I do. Background is I will
 be running it on Windows Vista, currently run OpenOffice and will be
 using it near daily including with MS Office documents and
 presentations.

 So the question is: can I load LibO side-by-side with OpenOffice and
 if not what is the procedure to load LibO and - should there be
 probelms - to reload OpenOffice? Most importantly, this is a
 multi-user system so it needs to be loaded for at least three users.
 Any advice much appreciated.

 It's an issue:
 http://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/
 quote
 For Windows users that have OpenOffice.org installed, we advise
 uninstalling that beforehand, because it registers the same file type
 associations.
 /quote

 The issue is that LO uses the same executables as OOo (swriter,
 etc) and
 hasn't yet cleaned up the code to use something else (lowriter, etc).
 This can cause *considerable* issues with OOo and LO coexisting on the
 same Windows system. If you want to have both installed (on Windows -
 it's no issue on linux) at the same time, then I'd suggest installing
 'in parallel', see:
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Run_OOo_versions_parallel#Windows


 So at this point (on Windows) you are better off with either/or:
 OOo or
 LO, but not both at the same time.
 
 I've been running with both on Win7 for several months, primarily
 using LibO but occasionally OOo. I've had no problem at all with
 resetting file associations, it's just a matter of browsing to the
 soffice.exe that's in the desired directory. I didn't do anything
 special at all for installation, and I've had no issues of any
 conflicts with files created on one fork and used on the other. YMMV,
 but you probably needn't be paranoid about this.
 

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


[tdf-discuss] [Solved] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread NoOp
On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
 2011/2/27 NoOp snipped
 
 On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
 That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:

 http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png
 In other words, its mixed  only 'partially' secure.

 
 Not quite sure what you mean by «pulling the images from an http vs http»
 here, Gary, as the address for which the anomalous security ratings is shown
 is, in fact, «https://www.libreoffice.org/», i e, a https address. In any
 event, I still get the above messages for «https://www.libreoffice.org/» on
 Opera

What that means is that the rotating images that you see on the page
showing LO screenshots are obtained from
http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/. That's a
non-encrypted link  so Opera is telling you that there are unencrypted
objects on the page  therefore isn't completely secure. In other
browsers (Firefox for instance) you will see a 'broken lock' on that
page to indicate that it has mixed objects (unencrypted/encrypted).

 
 
 If you try https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ that page should show
 the security lock. And if you check the security (Tools|Advanced|Page
 Security Info) you should see:
 The connection to www.libreoffice.org is secure.

 Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01

 
 That was indeed the case on Opera 11.01 on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 setup
 

 The issue, at this point, is with SeaMonkey (linux)  Konquer. If I try
 on SeaMonkey Windows 2.1b2 it's fine:
 http://img402.imageshack.us/f/seamonkeycertwindows1.png/

 I've posted on the SeaMonkey dev group to see I someone there can figure
 out the issue.

Looks like a SeaMonkey profile issue. Just tried on a different machine
 the regular profile gets the errors. Switched to a clean 'test'
profile and https://www.libreoffice.org/download works fine (linux). Now
I just have to find the correct mozilla sqlite file that apparently is
still stuck on *.documentfoundation.org and not picking up
*.libreoffice.org.

Apologies for for the false alarm  noise.


 Gary
...


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [tdf-discuss] Thank you for using OpenOffice.org

2011-02-27 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol

Am 25.02.2011 12:02, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:

Hi Rainer, Cor,
Am 25.02.2011 06:13, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld:

Cor Nouws schrieb:


I have never seen that effect.


Hi,

I also can't remember.

Did anyone check whether that message also shows up when you repair the
installation?


Now I done two things:
I repaired the installation first and second I changed it by installling
the testtools.
Neither by repairing nor by changing there is the website displayed.
After that I deinstalled LibreOffice and installed it. And I got the
message again.
As I see the intialization will be before the installation of the AddOns.



I believe in the custom installation somewhere is a selection to
deactivate check for updates.


I didn't see any of such a selection.


Did someone check whether that has an
influence?
May be someone can attach a screenshot to a new Bug report?


I hope I can do the bug report on the weekend. If someone else can do
it, I have a screenshot and can add it.


There is a reopened bug report. I added my comment and a screenshot.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31023

--
Grüße
k-j

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [tdf-discuss] [Solved] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread M Henri Day
2011/2/27 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net

 On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
  2011/2/27 NoOp snipped
 
  On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
 ...
  That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:
 
 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png
  In other words, its mixed  only 'partially' secure.
 
 
  Not quite sure what you mean by «pulling the images from an http vs http»
  here, Gary, as the address for which the anomalous security ratings is
 shown
  is, in fact, «https://www.libreoffice.org/», i e, a https address. In
 any
  event, I still get the above messages for «https://www.libreoffice.org/»
 on
  Opera

 What that means is that the rotating images that you see on the page
 showing LO screenshots are obtained from
 http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/. That's a
 non-encrypted link  so Opera is telling you that there are unencrypted
 objects on the page  therefore isn't completely secure. In other
 browsers (Firefox for instance) you will see a 'broken lock' on that
 page to indicate that it has mixed objects (unencrypted/encrypted).


Gary, I can't access the
http://www.libreoffice.org/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/
assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/page
; when I try I'm informed that I don't have the requisite permissions.
However, precisely as you said - which, of course, I should have noted
previously - in Firefox, when I access the
http://www.libreoffice.org/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/page,
a note to the effect that the website has not provided any information
on the owner is displayed and in addition, under technical details, a
message to the effect that the website is partially encrypted and that
certain portions of the page were not encrypted before being sent over the
internet

Henri


 
 
  If you try https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ that page should show
  the security lock. And if you check the security (Tools|Advanced|Page
  Security Info) you should see:
  The connection to www.libreoffice.org is secure.
 
  Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01
 
 
  That was indeed the case on Opera 11.01 on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10
 setup
 
 
  The issue, at this point, is with SeaMonkey (linux)  Konquer. If I try
  on SeaMonkey Windows 2.1b2 it's fine:
  http://img402.imageshack.us/f/seamonkeycertwindows1.png/
 
  I've posted on the SeaMonkey dev group to see I someone there can figure
  out the issue.

 Looks like a SeaMonkey profile issue. Just tried on a different machine
  the regular profile gets the errors. Switched to a clean 'test'
 profile and https://www.libreoffice.org/download works fine (linux). Now
 I just have to find the correct mozilla sqlite file that apparently is
 still stuck on *.documentfoundation.org and not picking up
 *.libreoffice.org.

 Apologies for for the false alarm  noise.

 
  Gary
 ...


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***




-- 
























*老朽
頓首

M Henri Day, PhD, MD
Stadshagsvägen 22, 5tr
S-112 50 Stockholm
SUÈDE

Tel : +46 8 6183098
Email : mhenri...@gmail.com
Skype/Google Talk : mhenriday
http://mhenriday.googlepages.com
http://mhenriday.blogspot.com/
http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/mhenriday/*

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


[tdf-discuss] Re: [Solved] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread NoOp
On 02/27/2011 01:09 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
 2011/2/27 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net
 
 On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
  2011/2/27 NoOp snipped
 
  On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
 ...
  That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:
 
 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png
  In other words, its mixed  only 'partially' secure.
 
 
  Not quite sure what you mean by «pulling the images from an http vs http»
  here, Gary, as the address for which the anomalous security ratings is
 shown
  is, in fact, «https://www.libreoffice.org/», i e, a https address. In
 any
  event, I still get the above messages for «https://www.libreoffice.org/»
 on
  Opera

 What that means is that the rotating images that you see on the page
 showing LO screenshots are obtained from
 http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/. That's a
 non-encrypted link  so Opera is telling you that there are unencrypted
 objects on the page  therefore isn't completely secure. In other
 browsers (Firefox for instance) you will see a 'broken lock' on that
 page to indicate that it has mixed objects (unencrypted/encrypted).

 
 Gary, I can't access the
 http://www.libreoffice.org/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/
 assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/page
 ; when I try I'm informed that I don't have the requisite permissions.

That's correct - you don't have permission. I was only pointing out that
the .png's for the screenshots on the web page pull the files from
there. You will of course be able to access these:

http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png

http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-11.png

http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-10.png

etc. I was just pointing out that those are the reason why you are
getting a mixed (encrypted/unencrypted) page notice.

If those links used https:
https://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-10.png
Then the entire page would show as secure when you use https to access it.
...


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


[tdf-discuss] [Resolved] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread NoOp
On 02/27/2011 12:15 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
 
 Looks like a SeaMonkey profile issue. Just tried on a different machine
  the regular profile gets the errors. Switched to a clean 'test'
 profile and https://www.libreoffice.org/download works fine (linux). Now
 I just have to find the correct mozilla sqlite file that apparently is
 still stuck on *.documentfoundation.org and not picking up
 *.libreoffice.org.
 
 Apologies for for the false alarm  noise.


Found it.
security.enable.ssl2 was set to true. Reset it to false  the page now
loads fine.


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Re: [tdf-discuss] [Resolved] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs

2011-02-27 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

NoOp wrote on 2011-02-27 22.52:

Found it.
security.enable.ssl2 was set to true. Reset it to false  the page now
loads fine.


thanks for sharing! There are quite some other reports of issues with 
the SSL certificate, so if anyone else experiences problems, let me know.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

:: LibreOffice needs your support for setting up its Foundation!
:: Join our fundraising at http://challenge.documentfoundation.org

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***