[tdf-discuss] Re: [libreoffice-users] How to get the height of the text context
Den tors 27 apr. 2023 kl 10:55 skrev Rose Gale : > Hello: >I don't know if anyone has encountered this problem, but I haven't > been able to find the right solution. I hope I can get some helpful > suggestions here. >I'd like to start by stating that I can only do this in c# for a > variety of reasons >I need to get the height of the content on the last page of the > document. I have drawn a sketch below for your understanding. > Only text is accepted in this mailing list, so everything else is stripped away. Upload it somewhere and give us the link instead. > >I have found some classes on the official website, but I do not know > whether they are useful or how to use them. > [image: image.png] > > Actually, to achieve functions similar to Word : var height = > objrage.get_Information(WdInformation.wdVerticalPositionRelativeToPage); > > > Best Regards > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Re: [tdf-discuss] Returning to OpenOffice
2015-01-06 7:25 GMT+01:00 Ivan Stephen : > First of all - I'm no developer, but I've been using word processing and > spreadsheets for just about twenty-five years. Over that time, I've seen > some really ill-conceived software (some of which was more focused on glitz > than functionality). > > Over the last five years or so, since the demise of AppleWorks, I've tried > NeoOffice, Lotus Symphony, OpenOffice and LibreOffice. At times I've > switched just to see if there's an improvement. Other times, I've made the > change due to outright frustration. That's the case this time. After > using > LibreOffice for two years or more, I've gone back to OpenOffice. > > Why, you ask? > No, I don't. I did the same switch. Twice… (but I still have LibreOffice installed so I can try it out now and then, when I don't have anything better to do…) > > I'm working with one fairly large spreadsheet of 126 KB (well, it isn't > really THAT large). No, not large at all. > It contains no formulas or macros, just about 24 > columns and 2500 rows, plus six more small spreadsheets. Many cells have > nothing in them. I did a direct comparison of OpenOffice and LibreOffice, > and found that the latest Mac versions vary substantially. I turned off > everything I could (such as Java runtime) in both. OpenOffice opened the > file quite a bit more slowly (3 mins., 45 secs.) compared with > LibreOffice's > 2 mins. > I have several spreadsheets way bigger than yours, with formulas, conditional formatting and macros, opening in less than a minute. With Apache OpenOffice. 3:45 sounds way too much to me. And I bought this computer in 2007… > > However, I realized that I don't care that much that it's slow to open in > OpenOffice, as the file gets used all day. But I find that OpenOffice > seems > MUCH more stable, I find that too. > and doesn't tie up my RAM nearly as much as LibreOffice > for the same file. I didn't test that, but I believe you. > (That's really why I dropped LibreOffice.) Could it be > related to the constantly increasing size of LibreOffice? > > I also realized that I don't really care that OpenOffice doesn't yet save > files as docx or xlsx. I just want stability from the software. > I didn't know it could, but I don't use those formats anyway, and if someone sends me such a file I just delete it. Problem solved. > > Of course, OpenOffice is also lagging behind Microsoft Office. With what? I didn't use MS Office since at least 2007 (that's the year I stopped using Windows), but I certainly don't miss any features in either LibreOffice or Apache OpenOffice. > I'm also > aware that Munich and Freiburg recently returned to Microsoft after having > made a real commitment to open-source software. > > As I'm planning to move into the publishing field, I may yet need to use > Microsoft Office. But as long as possible, I will use OpenOffice, and > perhaps it will catch up to Microsoft, especially now that IBM is throwing > its support to Apache OO. > > Also - it may seem like a little thing, but I reported a bug some time > ago. > It was related to your "find" field not allowing anything to be copied into > it. LibreOffice didn't seem able to fix it, and OpenOffice's find field > works much better - and that's another reason to return to it. > I also reported bugs a while ago, but in the end I just found too many so I went back to my life. In fact there are a couple of bugs in Apache OpenOffice as well, but I just don't have time to report them anymore, and most of them are just looks anyway. And I never got along very well with this mailing list; I always forget to ”reply to all”, which I don't need to do with most of the mailing lists I'm subscribed to, including those for Apache OpenOffice… Kind regards Johnny Rosenberg ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Returning-to-OpenOffice-tp4135219.html > Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] About.com "Readers' Choice Awards 2013 for Office Software"
2013/3/3 Marc Paré : > FYI, the About.com "Readers' Choice Awards 2013 for Office Software" started > on Feb. 19 and will end on March 19. > > You may vote every 24hrs. Let's make our LibreOffice suite the office suite > of choice and it would be nice if we won out on all categories where we > appear! > > To vote, you can log in with your Facebook or About.com accounts or you can > enter your email address in a field on the page. > > Here are the details: > > = > = > > The "Readers' Choice Awards 2013 for Office Software" categories webpage can > be found here: > > http://office.about.com/od/ReaderResponse/tp/About-Com-Readers-Choice-Awards-2013-For-Office-Software-Nominations.htm > > = > = > > > As of today, March 3 2013, LibreOffice ranking in the various "Office > Software Suites" categories is: > > = > Favorite Office Suite for Android: LIBREOFFICE does not have an official > implementation of an Android version. > Favorite Office Suite for Android: Google Docs/Apps 80% -- Quickoffice Pro > HD 20% > = > Favorite Office Software Suite or App for iOS: LIBREOFFICE does not have an > official implementation of an iOS version. > Favorite Office Software Suite or App for iOS: Google Apps 60% -- iWork 20% > -- Documents Free 20% > = > Favorite Office Software for Mac: LibreOffice 75% -- iWork and MSO both 12% > = > Favorite Office Software for Windows: LibreOffice 75% -- MSO 14% -- AOO 10% > = > Favorite Office Software for BlackBerry: LibreOffice 100% > = > Favorite Office Software for Business: LIBREOFFICE IS NOT ON THIS LIST!!! > ITALO IS AWARE OF THIS. > Favorite Office Software for Business: MSO 33% -- Google Docs/Apps 33% -- > AOO 33% ??? -- IMO strange as LibreOffice is most likely used in Business > = > Favorite Academic Software Suite: LIBREOFFICE IS NOT ON THIS LIST!!! ITALO > IS AWARE OF THIS. > Favorite Academic Software Suite: MSO Home and Student 50% -- Google Apps > for Education 50% -- IMO, strange as LibreOffice is most likely used in > education extensively!!! > = > Favorite Site for Office Software Templates: LibreOffice templates 80% -- > MSO templates 20% > = > Favorite Cloud Office Suite: LIBREOFFICE, at present, does not have an > official "Cloud" implementation, but is working on it. > Favorite Cloud Office Suite: Google docs 100% > = > Favorite Office Software Company or Organization Based on Social > Responsibility: TheDocumentFoundation 60% -- TheApacheFoundation 20% -- > Microsoft 20% > = Can't vote since there is no suitable category to vote in, that is ”Favourite office suite for Linux” seems to be left out. Johnny Rosenberg > > Congrats to all who are voting every 24hrs. If you are not voting yet, feel > free to join in. It will make a difference to our brand and show that we are > a very committed community. > > Cheers, > > Marc > > -- > Marc Paré > m...@marcpare.com > http://www.parEntreprise.com > parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) > parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Macro Difficulties
2013/3/7 Tony Pursell : > On 7 March 2013 16:43, Charles Jenkins wrote: > >> This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation >> thereof. And also a plea for help. >> >> I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One (hereafter >> called B1) in order to eliminate the need to pay for expensive licenses for >> Microsoft Excel. >> >> B1 has a toolbar button that's supposed to generate a spreadsheet for data >> viewed as a table onscreen. Unfortunately, instead of really creating a >> spreadsheet, B1 just dumps out a tab-separated text file and then opens a >> spreadsheet called "AutoOpen.xls" that in turn loads the text file into a >> new spreadsheet. >> >> This clunky way of doing things has the advantage that there's no worry >> about file formats. Whatever version of Excel you're running, it can open >> the text file. This method *could* work in LibreOffice too, but >> unfortunately the macro command used in AutoOpen.xls doesn't exist in LO >> BASIC. The command is Workbooks.OpenText >> >> I'm not sure if the problem is that OpenText doesn't exist, or if there is >> no Workbooks object to begin with. The documentation on LO BASIC is so >> sparse that I can't find anything about opening spreadsheets. The LO help >> file promises documentation at OpenOffice.org; but clicking that link takes >> me instead to >> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/BASIC_Guide, which is a >> placeholder page containing only a link to another website--which doesn't >> respond. >> >> (By the way, the help file does document an Open command, but that command >> is used to open simple data files to be processed and closed by the script. >> It doesn't cause LO to open a document in the UI.) >> >> After finding nothing documented, I enabled macro recording, began >> recording a macro, and used File > Open to open the text file/spreadsheet >> myself. Obviously, I was hoping to then examine the macro to learn what >> objects and functions LO uses to open files. But opening a new file causes >> macro recording to end without a comment, warning, or error…and without >> saving anything of the macro in progress. >> >> Can anyone give me clues to creating a macro which can open a spreadsheet? >> >> > Try this > > http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php > > Tony Sorry, should have read your post before I posted an identical one (we sent exactly the same link)… Johnny Rosenberg > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Macro Difficulties
2013/3/7 Nino Novak : > Am 07.03.2013 17:43, schrieb Charles Jenkins: > > >> This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation >> thereof. > > > Please keep in mind, that LibreOffice has evolved from OpenOffice.org (now > Apache Open Office), which in turn is derived from StarOffice. > > So you in addition might want to google for ooobasic or even starbasic, if > LO basic does not give the desired results. > > >> Can anyone give me clues to creating a macro which can open a spreadsheet? > > > http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=134164 > or even better, > http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=365860 > > HTH, > Nino http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Reply settings on this list have changed
2012/8/13 Tony Pursell : > Florian, > > On 13 August 2012 02:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > >> >> I was not aware that any list existed that did not use "reply mangling" so >> that the reply (by default) went back to the list Will be interested to >> see what occurs. >> >> >> >> >> On 08/12/2012 12:26 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed >>> (so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled). >>> >>> So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other >>> words, with any e-mail client, replies to e-mails on the list were >>> automatically sent directly to the list. >>> >>> In the past, this lead to two major problems: >>> >>> 1. Several times, people have sent direct replies to the public list, >>> where deleting them is nearly impossible. I remember at least one case >>> where confidential information has been sent out that caused lots of >>> worries for the sender and his employer. This happened because people hit >>> "reply" and thought it would reply to the sender only. >>> >>> 2. I have heard complaints in the past from people, stating that working >>> with the non-developer lists of LibreOffice is a pain for them, because of >>> reply-to mangling, resulting in a lack of communication. This also led to >>> the fact that numerous tasks were done by the same people, who needed to >>> spend more and more time, instead of sharing the work burden with others. >>> While I do not fully believe this argument, there's just one way to find >>> out... >>> >>> Therefore, I have applied a change: >>> >>> Replies to e-mails from the list now only go to the original sender. You >>> either need to use the "reply to all" feature of your e-mail program, or - >>> preferably - the "reply to list"/"reply to group" feature, which will >>> direct replies directly to the list. >>> >>> This is common practice on most mailing lists, and even the default >>> setting for our mailing list software, so we did not re-invent the wheel >>> here. Those seeking for details should have a look at >>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >>> >>> I know we had numerous discussions on this topic in the past, but the >>> outcome was that roughly 50% were for this change, and 50% refused it, so I >>> am really sitting between two chairs here, for which I beg for your >>> understanding. On the one hand, those complaining the lists are unusable >>> with reply-to mangling, on the other hand, those complaining the lists are >>> unusable without reply-to mangling. Unfortunately, combining those two, >>> even on a per-recipient basis, is not possible, so they are mutually >>> exclusive to each other. >>> >>> In order to find out the real impact, I simply changed the setting, and >>> again, I beg for your understanding. >>> >>> Do not worry: The mailing lists are for the community, so it's the >>> community deciding how they should work. What I'd like to ask all of you is >>> to try out for a few days if that change is good for each list or not. >>> Should we find out it is more harmful than it helps, I will immediately >>> switch back to the old behaviour. >>> >>> Sorry for this short notice, and I beg for your understanding that I'm >>> somehow sitting between two chairs here. >>> >>> Florian >>> >>> >> I will find this a real pain. I use Gmail, which seems to only have Reply > and Reply to All. There is no Reply to List. So to send this back to the > list I have to Reply to All, remove Andrew from the To box, and Cut and > Paste the list address from the CC box. If I do not do this, Andrew will > get my message twice. > > Please put it back the way it was, > > Tony > I use Gmail too and it seems like you don't have to cut and paste anything. Seems to be OK to leave the address in ”CC: and to leave ””To:” empty. That's what I'm doing right now, hope it works… So I click ”Reply to all” (which requires a click more than just replying), then I delete everything in ”To:”, write my message and hit ”Send”. Not very quick, though. I want the old behaviour back. There is no way to idiot proof anyway. Kind regards Johnny Rosenberg ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Looking for an easier way to do the following in a spreadsheet
2012/7/23 Johnny Rosenberg : > 2012/7/15 dave_ : >> By saving a spreadsheet as a csv file, I can import the values into another >> program (it creates labels and btw the program is designed for it printer >> only). The labels are "paired numbers" >> >> Let say I have a column labeled A-O (starting at cell a1 >> >> A B C D E F G H and so on (this is row 1) >> >> 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 and so on (this is row a2) >> 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 and so on (this is row a3) >> >> Cell A1 will be the starting input value and the rest will be generated >> >> a1= a1 b2=a2 c2=a2+1d2=a1+2e2=a1+2 f2=a1+3 and so on. >> (1) (1) (2) (3) (3) >> (4) >> >> Since column O makes the total columns number odd (15 colums) I cannot just >> "copy" the cells down. >> >> Any know an easier way of doing this. I am enclosing a sample file >> (hopefully anyway). :) >> >> Thanks ahead to all that helps. >> >> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3995544/Double_Number_Series.ods >> Double_Number_Series.ods > > Here is my try: > B8=1 > C8=1 (why complicate things?) > D8=IF(B8=C8;C8+1;C8) > Fill D8 to R8. Yes, to R8, that is two columns more than the headers. This is only temporary, because the next step takes care of it. Just wanted to make sure this was not misunderstood, since this is ”the trick” in this case… Then, do ↓ > Select Q8:R8, drag them to B9:C9. These cells will then be the first > two cells on the next row. > Fill D8:P8 to D9:P9 to complete the row. > Now you have a complete row (B9:P9) that you can fill down as far as you want. > > Here is my version of your file: > http://ubuntuone.com/0azAbwhwtFk1UEMeG8e6z6 > > > Kind regards > > Johnny Rosenberg > ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Looking for an easier way to do the following in a spreadsheet
2012/7/15 dave_ : > By saving a spreadsheet as a csv file, I can import the values into another > program (it creates labels and btw the program is designed for it printer > only). The labels are "paired numbers" > > Let say I have a column labeled A-O (starting at cell a1 > > A B C D E F G H and so on (this is row 1) > > 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 and so on (this is row a2) > 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 and so on (this is row a3) > > Cell A1 will be the starting input value and the rest will be generated > > a1= a1 b2=a2 c2=a2+1d2=a1+2e2=a1+2 f2=a1+3 and so on. > (1) (1) (2) (3) (3) > (4) > > Since column O makes the total columns number odd (15 colums) I cannot just > "copy" the cells down. > > Any know an easier way of doing this. I am enclosing a sample file > (hopefully anyway). :) > > Thanks ahead to all that helps. > > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3995544/Double_Number_Series.ods > Double_Number_Series.ods Here is my try: B8=1 C8=1 (why complicate things?) D8=IF(B8=C8;C8+1;C8) Fill D8 to R8. Select Q8:R8, drag them to B9:C9. These cells will then be the first two cells on the next row. Fill D8:P8 to D9:P9 to complete the row. Now you have a complete row (B9:P9) that you can fill down as far as you want. Here is my version of your file: http://ubuntuone.com/0azAbwhwtFk1UEMeG8e6z6 Kind regards Johnny Rosenberg ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice for Academic Work -- College/University
2012/5/15 Laurence Jeloudev wrote, among other things: > I hope Microsoft Office support Libreoffice file formats the odf formats in > there next office release, as then it would help more compatibility issues > and problems with files and formatting hopefully being fixed. Dream on. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] A New LibreOffice Bounty!
2012/1/11 Rich Jones : > Hello, DocFound people! I guess you mean DocFound- and Windows people. > > A new bounty came across our system, I'm not sure if it was you who posted > it or not, but if not, I thought you might be interested in checking it out: > > http://gun.io/open/25/better-windows-7-taskbar-integration-for-libreoff > > Thanks! > > -- > Rich Jones > Director, Gun.io > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Email/Calendar program in libre?
2011/10/12 William Mount : > Are there any plans to include an > email/calendar/Personal-Information-Manager style program in future > editions? No. > Is it possible to bundle a pre-existing FOS program (like > Thunderbird)? > > Thunderbird is okay, but it needs a bunch of addons to be functional. It > needs an addon to minimize to the taskbar, another to have a calednar, etc. > A bit annoying, as these should already be part of it. > > -- > William Durai > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] how change macro security level?
2011/8/28 Terrence Enger : > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 13:08 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: >> [snip] >> >> Meanwhile, looking under Tools > Options > LibreOffice > >> Paths, I see that my local builds put things under >> ~/.config/libreoffice, and sure enough there is >> ~/.config/libreoffice/3/user/registrymodifications.xcu. I >> shall go try that. > > That file lacked the entry for MacroSecurityLevel. Adding > it changed the program behaviour, but not for the better. > And then the program wiped out the entry. > > Better news: In the build from aa51fd4-4eb4f62-260b7c1, the > program allows execution for a new module. The build from > c305fc3 is not quite so cooperative: bug 40420 "SIGSEGV, > basicbox.cxx:544" > <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40420>. > > So, I have what I need for my own playing around. Thank > you, Regina, for your pointers. > > The remaining questions are ... Does anybody else share the > problem of the ineffective "MacroSecurity..." button? Does > anybody care? > > Thanks, > Terry, I don't know if it's mentioned already, in that case I just missed it, or if it's even relevant, but what Java are you running? From the LibreOffice home page: ”If you run Linux, the GCJ Java variant has known issues with LibreOffice, we advise to e.g. use OpenJDK instead.” Kind regards Johnny Rosenberg ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Question
2011/5/26 Fernand Vanrie : > Marius , > > You need for that a different page style for every kind of article >> >> Hello! I am Marius Popa again, with a new question for you. Is it possible >> to add headers and footers with a different context depending on the pages >> I >> want to edit? Here, I refer to magazine, which have different headers and >> footers depending on the kind of every article. Thanks in advance. >> Yes, a different page style for every article is the way to go. It would be nice of you if you had a more describing subject than just ”Question”. If you didn't have a question you wouldn't writer here at all, right? If your subject describes your problem or question with a few words, I think it's more likely that ”the right people” read it and give you a good answer. Best regards Johnny Rosenberg ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
