Re: [discuss] Open Office development issue

2010-03-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi Kapil,

first of all please use the appropriate mailing list. In your case it is 
d...@api.openoffice.org or d...@extensions.openoffice.org and please 
ensure that you are subscribed correctly.


It doesn't make sense to post on n different mailing lists. Please don't 
do that!!!


Now related to your question, you can for example implement a Calc 
add-in function and in the implementation you can do whatever you want 
to get data from somewhere and return it... See for example the 
OpenOffice.org SDK which contains an exmaple implementing a simply counter.


sdk/examples/DevelopersGuide/Spreadsheet/ExampleAddin.java

And read the docu
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Spreadsheets/Spreadsheet_Add-Ins

Regards

Juergen


On 3/10/10 11:43 AM, KAPIL KUMAR LALWANI wrote:

Sir/Mam,
 I am Kapil, wroking as a software engineer in a IT company. presently i am 
wroking for OpenOffice integration with our product. I had done all very well. Now 
i wish to build RTD(Real Time Data ) like in excel, but as per my RD i cant 
find RTD for openoffice, so i am moving towards DDE(Dynamic Data Exchange). For DDE 
i wish to build the DDE Application server for dynamic data updation from our data 
server. can you please help me out for this because i can't find any help on the 
forums and please give me one more answer is RTD is possible in OpenOffice?
if yes please help to build this through your basic guidelines
  Thanks  Regards,
Kapil Kumar Lalwani
Trainee, TickerPlant Infovending Ltd.,

“Enjoy the WORK you do, Do the BEST you can.”


   The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. 
http://in.yahoo.com/




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Incubator vote request - OpenOfficeMouse

2009-11-13 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

first of all i want to make clear that i don't want to be the person who 
blocks any new project. But i want to raise a little bit more awareness 
and that we should analyze the project ideas a little bit more before we 
accept it. The potential, the outlook and further plans etc.



OOmouse wrote:

Dear OpenOffice.org Community

First, I would like to apologize for any annoyance, irritation, or 
embarrassment the recent media attention to the OpenOfficeMouse has 
caused.  It was never my intention to mislead anyone or imply that the 
OpenOffice.org Community was producing hardware.  In the game industry, 
from which I hail, it is quite common for mice to be branded with 
specific game software, so it simply never occurred to me that any such 
confusion was possible.  Second, I would like to express my appreciation 
for the professional and sensitive way in which John McCreesh, Florian 
Effenberger, and especially Louis Suarez-Potts, dealt with what could 
have easily been an unpleasant problem and quickly defused it in a 
positive and effective manner.  Third, I would like to ask for your 
support for establishing the OpenOfficeMouse Software Project as an 
OpenOffice.org Incubator project.


If the software was nothing more than a basic mouse utility, I would not 
make this request.  Juergen Schmidt is correct in concluding that a 
piece of hardware with flexible configuration options is of very little 
utility to the project.  However, I suggest that the *software* we have 
written to allow for maximum flexibility in customizing the mouse 
buttons should not necessarily be dismissed as a mere marketing 
strategy, because its keybinding capabilities can be readily put to use 
in a wide variety of input devices that are not limited to mice, let 
alone our mouse.  For example, it could be combined with voice 
recognition software to permit the same flexible configuration options 
enjoyed by the mouse users to people who cannot use mice or keyboards 
due to physical handicaps.  Alternatively, it should not be difficult to 
modify it in order to attach sounds to specific OpenOffice.org functions 
for those who cannot see the screen since we already have built-in sound 
alerts that are triggered by switches between one profile and another.


All the things you have described here are probably correct and of 
course useful. But i still don't see any specifics for OpenOffice.org. 
Everything you have described is valid for any application and if you 
want to make it open source feel free to create a SourceForge or Google 
Code project. I am still not convinced.


Juergen

Furthermore, the high level of interest we have seen from people 
volunteering to produce a variety of application-specific profiles, many 
of which were proposed for applications we had never heard of, suggests 
that such a *software* project might have the potential of expanding 
into a trans-application, device-agnostic interface under the aegis of 
OpenOffice.org.

Thank you,
Theo aka OOmouse

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Incubator project proposal - OpenOfficeMouse

2009-11-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Wunna Ko wrote:

+1 for incubator project.

Nice to see a hardware with OpenOffice.org labelled on it.
this is not really a good argument for a project and we should take it a 
little bit more serious.


If you vote a project please think about the consequences it might have. 
We are a software project and no hardware project.


Let them pay 2 per year and they can maybe use the logo, i don't 
know if that would be possible at all. It's just an idea.


But please not in the way to accept a project where we will probably see 
no real progress or work and give them the opportunity to use the logo 
for free.


I would of course kill or remove projects where no activity is going on. 
Or better i would consolidate the number of projects generally.


Juergen



On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:

Unless other information makes me change my mind, I support Juergens point
of view,

Cor

Juergen Schmidt wrote (9-11-2009 13:29)

for new incubator projects the main question for me is, if there is any
real relation and benefit for our project. In case of this mouse i am not
sure and i don't really see it. It is a piece of hardware with very flexible
configuration options. Not more and not less. Ok one of the pre-configured
profiles was created based on some OOo user tracking information but that's
it. It is not OOo specific and can be used with many other applications.

For me it is no incubator project. For me it is a clever marketing
strategy and nothing more. Probably there are other ways to support such
things and it can be evaluated in a different context if necessary and
wanted.

We should simply ask us what we would expect from a new incubator project.
In which direction would it develop further? I personally don't see there
huge opportunities.

It is more natural that we will support modern and new hardware like the
new generation of touch pads which will also allow nice features ...

Sorry but it doesn't really convince me and from my point of view a no for
this new project.

Just my 2 cents


--
Cor Nouws
 - nl.OpenOffice.org marketing contact
 - Community Contributor Representative in the Community Council
Gevoel niet vrij te zijn? Zie www.nieuwsteversie.nl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org









-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Incubator project proposal - OpenOfficeMouse

2009-11-09 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

for new incubator projects the main question for me is, if there is any 
real relation and benefit for our project. In case of this mouse i am 
not sure and i don't really see it. It is a piece of hardware with very 
flexible configuration options. Not more and not less. Ok one of the 
pre-configured profiles was created based on some OOo user tracking 
information but that's it. It is not OOo specific and can be used with 
many other applications.


For me it is no incubator project. For me it is a clever marketing 
strategy and nothing more. Probably there are other ways to support such 
things and it can be evaluated in a different context if necessary and 
wanted.


We should simply ask us what we would expect from a new incubator 
project. In which direction would it develop further? I personally don't 
see there huge opportunities.


It is more natural that we will support modern and new hardware like the 
new generation of touch pads which will also allow nice features ...


Sorry but it doesn't really convince me and from my point of view a no 
for this new project.


Just my 2 cents

Juergen



OOmouse wrote:
I am the designer of the OpenOfficeMouse and a long-time user of 
OpenOffice.org, particularly Writer and Impress.  It is my belief that 
application interface efficiency can be pursued in other ways than new 
variations on hotkeys, pull-down menus, and icon toolbars.  We are 
planning to release the source code for the mouse software we have 
written and would like to do so as an OpenOffice.org project rather than 
as an independent OSS project as a means of contributing to the 
community.  This is a request for review of the proposal to establish 
the setup and customization software for the OpenOfficeMouse as an 
OpenOffice.org open source development project.
The OpenOfficeMouse mouse is designed specifically for use with 
OpenOffice and incorporates OOo 3.1 usage data for its default button 
assignments.  The software presently allows complete customization of 
the mouse's 18 buttons, scroll wheel, and analog joystick.  Additional 
functionality includes double-click assignments for all 18 buttons as 
well as the ability to use the joystick as a keyboard with 4, 8, or 16 
assignable key commands.  Version 1.0 of the software is already 
functional for Windows operating systems and the code will be released 
under the Gnu Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3).  The mouse 
possesses 512k flash memory, supports 64 on-mouse application profiles, 
and 1024-character macros.  The software is written in C++ using Qt 
library  and uses .svg format for all graphics.  The most pressing need 
is for a library for sending and receiving commands according to the HID 
standard in order to provide full Linux and OS/X support.


More information about the OpenOfficeMouse can be found at 
www.openofficemouse.com.  The OpenOfficeMouse will be publicly 
introduced at OOoCon next month.


Thank you,
Theo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Incubator project proposal - OpenOfficeMouse

2009-11-09 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi Bruce,

i think you misunderstand me. First of all openofficemouse is not my 
project and i have no interest in it. It might be helpful for people and 
maybe especially for people with diabilities. But that is and was not my 
point.


We talk here about an incubator project for OpenOffice.org the software 
project. And in fact of this i don't see a real benefit for this mouse 
project. There is nothing special that is worth to keep it as a sub 
project under the OpenOffice.org umbrella.


It is simply a commercial product where the company want to use the 
OpenOffice.org brand to promote it.


It might be cool and fancy, yes. But i look on the benefit for our 
project and i don't see one.


But hey it's just my personal opinion

Juergen


Bruce Martin wrote:

Dear Juergen:

I just received your message in [discuss] about the open office mouse. As
well as that of another person who didn't see it as particularly
OpenOfficeMouse germane.

I have also seen your first page of the OpenOfficeMouse website.

IMHO:

The idea of a mouse that does more is good, but what it does and its
potential field of applicability are where the controversy surely will
arise.

I remember myself having uploaded somewhere the idea of a mouse that was
hardware versatile, but the objectives for it were quite different. It was
not for gamers, nor was it any more dedicated to any operating system that
the most basic mouse that could be found. All the variations were purely
hardware.

The reason for this was that I wanted the speed to be hardware controlled so
that it could be controlled, and slowed down during use in a BIOS session or
during the initial loading of an operating system. Also this would make it
totally independent of both the operating system and all software running on
any platform that would work with the most basic, standard mouse around.

Such a device also would have significant potential to help handicapped
users.

Hence it would use standard, basic software that comes with the operating
system, and appear identical to that basic mouse to the machine.

Thinking further, this idea would not really need to be a mouse itself, but
an adapter box that would plug between the actual mouse or trackball and the
mouse port, which could be PS-2, USB or RS-232.

I am an electronic technician with an overall background of almost 50 years.

I have an old trackball here that is a bit like that. In the days of 16 bit
windows, I purchased this for $CDN 129.95 plus tax. It is known as the
roller mouse and was made in California. However this device only connects
RS-232, typical for that time.

I am currently using it on an old 16 bit machine I have that I still use
occasionally when working with/recuperating data that comes from the DOS
era, such as stuff done in Generic CADD or Ashton-Tate's Framework IV.

On another occasion, I remember hardware modifying a mouse to make the
buttons operate with foot pedals. The prototype worked, but I found the foot
pedals did not marry with physical coordination as well as I would have
liked.

About that critic:

I got the impression that the critic would have preferred a project that had
no potential for use outside of Open Office. He was being very marketing
conscious and proprietary-oriented in the interest of using the idea as an
open office selling tool. (I say selling even though Open Office is
free, because his object is to sell potential users to commit their time
to downloading and learning to use Open Office.)

The other problem:

18 buttons on a mouse sound very versatile, but they would cause a huge
physical coordination problem for many. Fancy keyboards have a plethora of
programmable buttons, and they abound in the marketplace at low prices
because of their market penetration. Personally, since I often have to work
on other peoples' computers, I focus on making the best use of whatever is
there at the time, and making my own templates, etc that I carry with me on
the road in an external hard drive that will run either USB or FireWire. (I
prefer Firewire when it is available since it demands less of the processor
and runs more stably.)

When Microsoft in its early days went for a 2 button mouse as opposed to the
MAC's
1-button, there were those people then who saw this as a bad idea. The
argument was that it was not natural or intuitive to the human body.

Personally, I find 2 buttons OK, but what software people try and do with
the use of the mouse is often too much.

In either case the limitation is neither hardware nor software, but the
human body.

As an older person (close to 65 years old), I find physical coordination is
more of a challenge than it was when I was younger. Also in the majority of
cases eyesight, after the age of 40 or so, starts to gradually degrade.
These physical limitations also need to be respected.

When I buy a cellphone, I look for the (physically) biggest one, and abhor
the market placing too much attention on smallness to suit the young
people's mad 

Re: [discuss] Besides XML input/output, will there be an effort to have JSON input/output which is much simpler than XML?

2009-10-27 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi Casey,


if you would ask a little more precise and detailed you may get an answer.

If you talk about ODF manipulation from Java without an office please 
take a look on the ODFToolkit project (www.odftoolkit.org)



Juergen

Casey Hawthorne wrote:

--
Regards,
Casey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Is there an effort to add a PIM to Open Office that is Microsoft Outlook compatible?

2009-10-27 Thread Juergen Schmidt

no

Casey Hawthorne wrote:

--
Regards,
Casey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Re: [project leads] Re: [discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election

2009-10-26 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi Cor,

sure i will add some more points.

- time factor
a clear yes, otherwise i wouldn't have accepted the nomination. Thinking 
about the time factor was a bigger part of my considerations.


- ideas by the work/tasks of the council
I think it will be natural when i concentrate my efforts on the 
development aspects of the project. This will include the SDK, the API, 
examples, documentation, tutorials, tooling and everything else that can 
help to lower the entrance barrier for new developers as well as for 
ISV's and users who simply want to automate some tasks.


I would also like to improve the presence of OO.org in the public and 
here especially on conferences, that means i would like to motivate 
local groups to present OO.org. It works quite well in some countries 
but i think it can be improved in others. I have some kind of conference 
toolkit/toolbox in mind that helps people to present OO.org in a common 
way.


And finally i will try to raise awareness that any kind of fragmentation 
of the project will damage the project. I think it is important that we 
keep all activities under the umbrella of the main OO.org project. Any 
kind of fork or splintering should be avoided and it's important to 
bundle the resources we have.


Many other ideas come into my mind where the realization doesn't depend 
necessarily on the council. But driven by the council can help to 
improve the overall acceptance of the council.


The council can grow to an accepted instance to steer the project in a 
way that is acceptable by individuals as well as company contributors. 
From my point of view (no idealistic but realistic view) company 
contributors are essential to the long term success of the project. I 
think it is important to keep this in mind.


Maybe this sounds strange to some people and please don't misunderstand 
 me. Every single contribution in whatever area is important and makes 
this project so interesting. But as i mentioned before the heart of the 
project is the product and that is today mainly developed by full time 
developers paid by a company. So we can't ignore it but we can try to 
improve the situation by attracting new developers.


Juergen


Cor Nouws wrote:

Hi Juergen

Thanks for accepting your nomination.
I asked the others the following questions. You already wrote about the 
items, but if you have something to add, pls feel free to do so.


- why do you think that you have enough spare time for the work in the 
Community Council?
- what is your idea by the work/tasks of the council? Do you have any 
special areas of interest/ideas?


Thanks a lot for your answers,
best wishes,

Cor

Juergen Schmidt wrote (22-10-2009 22:00)

Hi,

first of all thank you Cor for your trust in me that i would be an
eligible candidate.

I needed some days to think about the nomination to be sure that i am
motivated, have the time and that i have the open and global view on 
the project that is necessary. And what is more important from my 
point of view that i have a realistic view because the work in all the 
different areas have to be done. Talking only is not enough. And the 
heart is still the product itself. A good product that we can promote, 
where we can do marketing for, that we can localize to reach even more 
people, that we can customize to reach other user groups like 
OOo4Kids, and that we can always improve to make it the best office 
suite of choice.


I know the project very well because i know it before it was born ;-)
And the reason why i still work full time on the project is the 
project  self. Ok Sun as a good employer is a further very important 
point here as well.


My the potential CC work would i do in my spare time because it
wouldn't be part of my normal work. You see there is no real difference
to any other candidate ;-)

I am not looking for a further position or so, i am already the 
project lead of the API and Extensions project (but project lead 
positions are

not really important from my point of view). But i am always motivated
to improve things where i have the impression that things can be
improved. And that is the reason why i accept the nomination.






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: [project leads] Re: [discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election

2009-10-22 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

first of all thank you Cor for your trust in me that i would be an
eligible candidate.

I needed some days to think about the nomination to be sure that i am
motivated, have the time and that i have the open and global view on the 
project that is necessary. And what is more important from my point of 
view that i have a realistic view because the work in all the different 
areas have to be done. Talking only is not enough. And the heart is 
still the product itself. A good product that we can promote, where we 
can do marketing for, that we can localize to reach even more people, 
that we can customize to reach other user groups like OOo4Kids, and that 
we can always improve to make it the best office suite of choice.


I know the project very well because i know it before it was born ;-)
And the reason why i still work full time on the project is the project 
 self. Ok Sun as a good employer is a further very important point here 
as well.


My the potential CC work would i do in my spare time because it
wouldn't be part of my normal work. You see there is no real difference
to any other candidate ;-)

I am not looking for a further position or so, i am already the project 
lead of the API and Extensions project (but project lead positions are

not really important from my point of view). But i am always motivated
to improve things where i have the impression that things can be
improved. And that is the reason why i accept the nomination.

It's up to others now to vote for me or not. I am at least willing to do 
my best.


Thank you

Juergen



Cor Nouws wrote:

Hi all,

Louis Suarez-Potts wrote (13-10-2009 16:47)

**Call for Nominations**


I would like to nominate Juergen Schmidt as candidate for the Community 
Council.
Juergen is well known as lead of the API project (and co-lead before) 
and in that position promoting the importance of more intuitive and 
better APIs among the developers. He worked on the UNO, SDK and DevGuide.
He also is co-lead of the extensions project from the beginning. This 
project is an important bridge to many, often non-corporate, developers 
and contributors for the project.
Juergen also makes valuable contributions to the marketing project, for 
example with organising the OpenOffice.org contribution for the FOSDEM 
and promotional goods... T-shirts :-)
He is active at various levels in the project and whenever time allows, 
with an open mind to reach out. I consider this very useful for a 
position in the council, therefore I hope Juergen that will accept this 
nomination.


Looking at his background, the Code Contributor as well as the Product 
Development seat could be his place in the Community Council for the 
next years.


Best regards,
Cor






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] REGARDING ADDON IN OPEN OFFICE

2009-08-24 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

it is probably not a good idea in general to connect to the database 
during the extension installation. I don't know the reasons for doing it 
during the installation but i would think about it. Keep the 
registration short and easy.


Anyway that wouldn't solve your problem and would only postpone it on 
later during the runtime of the office.


I am not sure if it really helps in this case but often it is a problem 
with the context classloader.


Before you call in any external library it is good practice (and i 
highly recommend it) to set the context class loader accordingly. Many 
external libs rely on a well prepared default class loader (including 
the whole classpath etc.). In case of UNO components we prepare private 
class loaders for every extension and you have to ensure that 
everything you need is configured in the manifest.


Try the following before you call in the external lib

ClassLoader cl = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(); 
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(this.getClass().getClassLoader());

...
// external code
...
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(cl);

Juergen


Manoj Chauhan wrote:

Dear Sir/madam

I'm a java programmer in company and developing a extension for open office
thru java code. I'm developing transliteration tool
and trying to transliterate current document. We are using my sql jar and
already included in Library folder. But error is occuring.  I need your
help. Please give me some solution. if possible, so please send code
snnipet. It's your greate obliged at me. I' m waiting for your reply.

Thanx  Regards
Manoj Chauhan



setting up UNO environment ...
build UNO idl files finished
uno-idl-compile:
init:
deps-jar:
Compiling 1 source file to F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\build\classes
compile:
Building jar: F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\dist\AkWriterAddOn.jar
Updating property file:
F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\build\regclass.properties
Updating property file:
F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\build\regclass.properties
jar:
Building jar: F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\dist\AkWriterAddOn.jar
images:
registry:
Deleting: F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\dist\AkWriterAddOn.oxt
creating UNO extension package ...
Building zip: F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\dist\AkWriterAddOn.oxt
uno-package:
C:\Program Files\OpenOffice.org 3/program\unopkg gui -f
F:\_Piyali_Tests\AkWriterAddOn\dist\AkWriterAddOn.oxt
C:\Program Files\OpenOffice.org 3/program\soffice
java.sql.SQLException: Server connection failure during transaction. Due to
underlying exception: 'java.net.SocketException: java.net.SocketException:
Invalid argument: connect'.
** BEGIN NESTED EXCEPTION **
java.net.SocketException
MESSAGE: java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument: connect
STACKTRACE:
java.net.SocketException: java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument:
connect
at
com.mysql.jdbc.StandardSocketFactory.connect(StandardSocketFactory.java:156)
at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.init(MysqlIO.java:284)
at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.createNewIO(Connection.java:2680)
at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.init(Connection.java:1485)
at
com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:266)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:582)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:185)
at com.example.AkDataPicker.connectToMySql(AkDataPicker.java:29)
Aug 21, 2009 2:59:07 PM com.example.AkWriterAddOn dispatch
SEVERE: null
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.example.AkWriterAddOn.dispatch(AkWriterAddOn.java:150)
at com.example.AkWriterAddOn.dispatch(AkWriterAddOn.java:149)

** END NESTED EXCEPTION **

Attempted reconnect 3 times. Giving up.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] OOo project proposal: Security Project

2009-05-27 Thread Juergen Schmidt

+1

Malte Timmermann wrote:

Hi,

security is a really important topic, and it should get better
visibility/attention on OOo.

And it's currently in focus, as you can see on
http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/comments_on_the_black_hat

I thought it would be a good idea to start a security project, which
could take care for security and privacy related things long term.

I would like to ask all of you to support and to vote for this new
project, as proposed below.

Best,
Malte.


--


MISSION STATEMENT

The goal of the security project is to work on security and privacy
related improvements and features in OpenOffice.org.

Solutions need to be analyzed and discussed in a wider audience, before
implementations in OpenOffice.org start.


PROJECT PROPOSAL

Members of the security project will help improving OpenOffice.org
security and privacy by identifying possible security and privacy issues
and by elaborating solutions.

This includes general topics like encryption, password handling, digital
signatures and certificate handling.

The solution won't necessarily be implemented by members of the security
team. Members of the project have some skills in the area of security
and privacy, but don't necessarily need to be very familiar with the
OpenOffice.org code base.

The Security Project should also work on security and privacy issues
with regard to the OpenOffice.org web site.

This project supplements the efforts of the OpenOffice.org security team
and will not supersede it. Undisclosed security vulnerabilities will
still be handled by the security team alone, as well as the security
bulletins and alerts, because such information can not be disclosed in
advance to members of a project where everybody can join.

As a long term goal, the security project could do some deeper security
investigations in the existing code base, or elaborate some security
related guidelines for developers.

We invite the OpenOffice.org community to join the project and help
us ensure that OpenOffice.org remains safe and reliable for all users.


PROJECT LEAD:

Malte Timmermann, Technical Architect Software Engineering, Sun
Microsystems.

Co-Leads:
tbd.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] OO.org Quiz - we are looking for hardware or financial sponsors

2009-01-26 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

if you do business with OO.org, you are interested in marketing and if 
you are interested in advertising your company, this might be of 
interest for you.


In 2 weeks the FOSDEM open source developer conference will take place 
in Brussels, Belgium. We had the idea to organize a technical focused 
Quiz around OO.org and OO.org source code. For this Quiz we are looking 
for sponsors. We are looking for laptops, netbooks or mp3 players like a 
iPod nano or touch. Monetary donations are also welcome.


If you are interested to help us, please send me an email asap. 
Potential sponsors will be named publicly at the event.


Thanks in advance

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: [OOoCon] Re: [dev] FOSDEM 2009: Call for Papers for our OpenOffice.org DevRoom

2009-01-12 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi Leo,

Leo Moons wrote:

Juergen Schmidt schreef:

REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER
I was asking myself when I should launch my 'Call for restaurant 
visitors in Brussels', and then Juergen comes up with a hint ;-) . You 
can all be assured that I will try and find another nice restaurant in 
the capital of Europe. Please let me know, if you want to be there on 
6th February, so I can search for a nice appropriate place.
on the 6th there is the informal come together or FOSDEM Beer Event 
in the Delirium Cafe (http://www.anaesthesic.be/delirium/home/?lang=en) 
If possible and if you have time you can look for a nice restaurant for 
Saturday 7th. There is no official event on Saturday and we should plan 
an OO.org dinner with 1,2,3 or maybe more beer ;-)


I am looking forward to see you in Brussels

Juergen



CU then and there



just a friendly reminder that you should send me your proposals until 
tomorrow. I promise some fun in Brussels and Leo will probably guide 
us into a small nice restaurant as last year. Did i mentioned that the 
Belgium beer is excellent ;-)


Juergen




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Doc. Templates under File, New.

2009-01-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

i think it is a nice feature even though very specialized. This kind of 
feature could be realized as a wizard. It don't have to be a copy of the 
MS feature but it can be similar or even better ;-).


I would suggest that you start to collect requirements for such a 
feature. Talk with other lawers and discuss what would be really useful 
and necessary. Maybe there is database with law texts that can be used 
directly. There are many ways to include such thinks directly from a 
wizard. At the end the wizard will create an initial document based on 
the input from the wizard.


After this you should come back to the list. Maybe there are already 
some interested developer or ISV's who are interested to help with the 
development.


I can't promise that this will work or that somebody will do the 
development. But you should simply start to work with the community to 
define this kind of new feature. I think we need exactly this features 
for the future. Nice and useful thinks that help to simplify our daily 
work. For lawers and for other occupational groups as well.


Don't wait that others do the work. Start yourself. You don't have to 
implement it yourself but you can start to work on the idea. Convince 
others to join the project ...


Juergen

law...@pacific.net wrote:

Hello,

I've been trying out the Open Office's word processing application for
our county law library's public computers. I am, over all, very
impressed and satisfied.

One MSWord feature that we use here and I regret not seeing on the
Open Office app is Word's legal pleading paper and Pleading Wizard
features. By clicking on Word's File, then New, a box on screen
offers a Legal tab that includes a pleading-paper template and also
a wizard feature that permits answering basic questions about the
legal venue, the court, the parties, and the pleading's name. Then it
drafts the difficult caption portion on a numbered and lined document
template.

I realize that there are probably enormous copyright hindrances to
adding such a feature to Open Office's writing app, but is there some
after-market add-on or macro that will emulate or substitute for this
MSWord feature?

We get a lot of people who can't afford a lawyer in here and they
would be sunk without some foolproof way to draft documents that the
clerks downstairs will accept.

Thanks for your kind attention and for some pretty terrific
applications. What do users who finally acquire them normally
contribute?

Tom Anderson
Mendocino County Law Library
Ukiah, CA



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org




--
Sun Microsystems GmbHJuergen Schmidt
Nagelsweg 55 Technical Lead Programmability
20097 Hamburg, Germany

Registered Office: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 
Kirchheim-Heimstetten

Commercial register of the Local Court of Munich: HRB 161028
Managing Directors: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Martin Haering

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: [dev] FOSDEM 2009: Call for Papers for our OpenOffice.org DevRoom

2009-01-09 Thread Juergen Schmidt

REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER

just a friendly reminder that you should send me your proposals until 
tomorrow. I promise some fun in Brussels and Leo will probably guide us 
into a small nice restaurant as last year. Did i mentioned that the 
Belgium beer is excellent ;-)


Juergen

Juergen Schmidt wrote:
FOSDEM - the Free and Open Source Developer's European Meeting - is 
nearly upon us. FOSDEM is the most developer-focused FOSS conference, 
and will take place in Brussels, Belgium on 6th/7th February (not 
forgetting the FOSDEM beer event on the Friday night  :) . Geeks from 
all the major FOSS projects are expected to be there - including 
OpenOffice.org.


If you are an experienced OpenOffice.org developer, we need your help!

OpenOffice.org will have again a DevRoom at FOSDEM. The main goal of the 
DevRoom is to attract developers to work on and with OpenOffice.org. We 
want to show developers that there is nothing magic about OpenOffice.org 
development, and that our active and enthusiastic developer community is 
keen to help newcomers.


We want to help developers get started on the code - by explaining how 
the source code is structured and how our build environment works. We're 
also keen to show developers how to integrate OpenOffice.org in their 
own applications, using interfaces, APIs, components, etc. We want to 
encourage developers to produce exciting new extensions for OpenOffice.org.


If you are able to share your in-depth technical knowledge and 
enthusiasm then please get in touch without delay. We are looking for 
people who can:


- give a 45 minute talk; or
- run 90 or 120 minute workshops

Please send your proposals (see below) to juergen.schmidt (at) sun.com 
as soon as possible - by the end of this week (latest Saturday 10th).


Make it your New Year's Resolution to recruit a new developer in 2009 - 
and help us start the ball rolling at FOSDEM in February.


Proposals
=
Your proposal should include
- a title
- a short abstract
- your full name
- a short bio of you and ideally your role in the OpenOffice.org project
- request for sponsorship (travel, lodging)

We know that we are again a little bit late this year and that it is 
short-time. But we promise to improve it next year ;-)



Thanks in advance

Juergen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] FOSDEM 2009: Call for Papers for our OpenOffice.org DevRoom

2009-01-06 Thread Juergen Schmidt
FOSDEM - the Free and Open Source Developer's European Meeting - is 
nearly upon us. FOSDEM is the most developer-focused FOSS conference, 
and will take place in Brussels, Belgium on 6th/7th February (not 
forgetting the FOSDEM beer event on the Friday night  :) . Geeks from 
all the major FOSS projects are expected to be there - including 
OpenOffice.org.


If you are an experienced OpenOffice.org developer, we need your help!

OpenOffice.org will have again a DevRoom at FOSDEM. The main goal of the 
DevRoom is to attract developers to work on and with OpenOffice.org. We 
want to show developers that there is nothing magic about OpenOffice.org 
development, and that our active and enthusiastic developer community is 
keen to help newcomers.


We want to help developers get started on the code - by explaining how 
the source code is structured and how our build environment works. We're 
also keen to show developers how to integrate OpenOffice.org in their 
own applications, using interfaces, APIs, components, etc. We want to 
encourage developers to produce exciting new extensions for OpenOffice.org.


If you are able to share your in-depth technical knowledge and 
enthusiasm then please get in touch without delay. We are looking for 
people who can:


- give a 45 minute talk; or
- run 90 or 120 minute workshops

Please send your proposals (see below) to juergen.schmidt (at) sun.com 
as soon as possible - by the end of this week (latest Saturday 10th).


Make it your New Year's Resolution to recruit a new developer in 2009 - 
and help us start the ball rolling at FOSDEM in February.


Proposals
=
Your proposal should include
- a title
- a short abstract
- your full name
- a short bio of you and ideally your role in the OpenOffice.org project
- request for sponsorship (travel, lodging)

We know that we are again a little bit late this year and that it is 
short-time. But we promise to improve it next year ;-)



Thanks in advance

Juergen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Re: [project leads] Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-08 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

not that i am not interested or that the idea isn't interesting 
generally but can you please continue the discussion on one mailing list 
only.


Or better on an appropriate mailing list for the new incubator project.

Thanks

Juergen


Kay Ramme wrote:

Hi Martin,

Martin Hollmichel wrote:

all,

Let me do some additional comments regarding our current project setup 
since this is a project which not necessarily has to do with 
OpenOffice.org core technology or native lang projects.

I tend to disagree here ... but lets see ...



Currently the Incubator category has been set up to provide some space 
to test new ideas (see: 
http://projects.openoffice.org/incubator.html The Incubator 
category exists to provide a space for community members to test 
ideas. These ideas can be coding or not.

OK


It seems to be the expectation that the projects in Incubator should 
find their final destination either in Accepted Projects 
(http://projects.openoffice.org/accepted.html) or in Native-Lang 
Projects (http://projects.openoffice.org/native-lang.html) or find 
their end sooner or later in /dev/null. Since the [EMAIL PROTECTED] project 
does not meet the criteria for being an accepted project (... 
projects that include core technical projects as well as key user 
information projects.) nor the criteria of a native lang project it 
seems not be that easy for me to just vote +1 without this lengthy 
comment.

That means, that you do in principal vote with a +1, doesn't it?

In my daydreams, I see the [EMAIL PROTECTED] becoming the OOo suites complement on 
the server. Thus I hope it to certainly become a core technical project.


I think we need to revisit these guidelines and may invent a new 
category like OOo related projects. Candidates for this project 
might be the [EMAIL PROTECTED] but also the Extensions or the Education project. 
To encourage the creation of such projects I would like to see the 
conditions for those project at a low level. At the same time this 
also would mean that these project are also not in the scope of the 
Community Council Charter 
(http://council.openoffice.org/CouncilProposal.html).
Ah, I may understand what you are talking about now ... it is about the 
CCs relationship e.g. with [EMAIL PROTECTED] right? For example, if the CC needs 
to coordinate releases of [EMAIL PROTECTED] or extensions etc. right?




At this time many OpenOffice.org related projects are hosted anywhere 
(e.g. more than 100 on sourceforge) but not within the OpenOffice.org 
domain. I think it would help the overall OpenOffice.org project if we 
would introduce such new category for these projects.
I agree that we should encourage any OOo related project to be hosted on 
OOo. So, I am not sure yet if we really need a new category, I have to 
admit, that I am even not sure we need any categories at all ... yes I 
know, I am slow ;-)




The current infrastructure on collab.net has some limitations (single 
database Issuetracker instance for all project) which makes the 
introduction of an independent category difficult but I guess this is 
just a technical problem and should be solvable in the one or other way.


but under the current guidelines of the project I'm fine with voting 
for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] project becoming a regular incubator project of 
OpenOffice.org,

Ahhh, I hoped so :-) thanks!


Martin


 Kay




Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] Good Idea - Introduce Kannada

2008-07-11 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi Kishore,

of course it is possible, it's up to you to organize a team of 
volunteers to localize all necessary resources to Kannada. Localization 
projects works great all over the world and i ma sure you will get the 
necessary help and support you will need.


That the power of open source you don't have to wait that somebody does 
it, you do it on your own and can start immediately. For localization no 
programming skills are necessary. Well it would be good to have one who 
can build the office with the new locale for testing ;-) But that should 
be the smallest problem.


Juergen

Kishore wrote:

Hi,

Kannadigas are slowly but steadily turning to Openoffice from Microsoft's
word and excel.  Hence, I could see openoffice in Telugu, Tamil but why not
in Kannada.  We are 6 crore strong population and bangalore is the IT hub of
the world.  So think about it and let me know if possible.

We can disucuss about any techincal intricacies required and I  few friends
of mine can contribute.

Best Regards,
Kishore.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] Extending the File - Open in OpenOffice

2008-05-08 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

well i think ftp is one solution. But from my point of view a WebDAV 
access to some kind of web storage is much smoother and of course 
already supported out of the box.


Mounting a web storage via WebDAV as a web folder however you want to 
name it, enables the usage of the storage from all other applications as 
well. That offers much more flexibility.


Juergen


Ib Erik Söderblom wrote:

Hi'

I'm a user with the need of having access to specific files on a server on
the internet.
It works like this:
The files are placed on a server, and I access them via FTP and download
them, work with them and then upload them again. Finaly erasing the
downloaded files.

I'm using the system with 3 different pc's ( and a PDA via a pc ) and so
having no sync problem.
And it also provides some extended security from a pc-crash or the pc
getting stolen.

My idea' is, that an ftp-option should exist in OpenOffice, via File - Open
(Save).

More and more people are using the internet as a mean of storage, and I
think a feature of this kind would be a perfect tool for many people.
And you would be the first to have it !

I hope you can use my idea' to something.

Kind regards

Ib Erik Söderblom
Mathildeparken 21. 1 th.
3400 Hillerod
Denmark

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.soderblom.dk




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [interface-discuss] [RFC] RDF metadata API draft

2008-03-19 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Stephan Bergmann wrote:

Some more input:


Hi Michael,


so i would be especially interested in input from people who would
like to use ODF metadata: does this API do what you need?


I don't know :), but have some other feedback (always IMO)

- Pair T, U  clearly belongs into css.beans
  (yes, that's nasty, since you need to add udkapi to your CWS then :)


Agreed, beans might be suitable.

- Not sure if the modifying methods of XRDFNamedGraph are necessary (or 
if they are only added to allow implementing XRDFRepository together 
with an alien XRDFNamedGraph implementation; in which case some 
private protocol between an XRDFRepository and the XRDFNamedGraph 
objects it creates might be better)---but I am absolutely not a domain 
expert with RDF.


- I vaguely remember I had some reason to consider UNOIDL constants, 
esp. complex ones like strings or (not even implemented) structs, as 
not useful, but unfortunately cannot remember the reason any longer...
as far as i remember they should be avoided especially string constants. 
In C++ they become static strings and i remember a performance issue 
with the static constructor.


Juergen



- Minor stylistic stuff:
-- XRDFURI vs. XRdfUri etc. (I personally prefer the latter, but the 
former is also widely used).
-- If you are in module rdf, the RDF in exception, interface, and 
service names might be unnecessary.


-Stephan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Sun Microsystems GmbHJuergen Schmidt
Nagelsweg 55 Technical Lead Programmability
20097 Hamburg, Germany

Registered Office: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 
Kirchheim-Heimstetten

Commercial register of the Local Court of Munich: HRB 161028
Managing Directors: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Martin Haering

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] how dialog import

2008-03-14 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Hi,

it's currently not possible but on our todo list and even suggested as a 
GSOC project. You can only workaround it by creating a new dialog, move 
in the user directory and overwrite the new created xdl file with the 
old one.



Juergen

ΤΟΠΙΚΗ ΛΑ.Ο.Σ ΑΙΓΙΟΥ wrote:

Hello.
How i can import a dialog?

I have the file.xdl and i can't import

Thak's

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] Re: Re: .doc compatibility

2008-02-25 Thread Juergen Schmidt

andreas moroder wrote:

M. Fioretti wrote:


On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 17:49:42 PM +, jonathon wrote:

(four times)

Styles are not being correctly used.

since this, even outside of this thread, is one of the most frequent
issues, then maybe OOo/ODF styles are very poorly advertised and
documented, but this is a side topic.

The OP clearly said that this is a problem of interoperability with MS
Office users and/or documents. So maybe this is not really a case
where OOo/ODF styles aren't correctly used: this is a case where such
styles have never been used, because they didn't exist where those
documents were created; and maybe a case where such styles simply
_cannot_ be used, because such information is lost every time a file
goes in .doc format back and forth between OOo and MS Office
users. Are we sure this isn't the case here?

That's right. The old documents were .doc and they have to remain .doc
because of interoperability with other entities.


 No politics in this case, simply a office with to much power.

It is an office that does not know how to use their tools correctly.

Maybe OOo is not _their_ chosen tool: from the initial message it is
not to be excluded that IT tried to switch users without them asking
for it or even knowing when the switch would happen. There are cases
where migration was indeed done this way, nobody noticed or complained
and a few people where even really happy that the last version of MS
Office finally doesn't crash and runs quite faster!

They did know, they even got short courses but they did not really
understand that there are incompatibilities.


But of course, it all depends on how complex the existing MS Office
files are and on how much the users have to interact, editing files
together, with external MS Office users.

They are not that complex. There are even very simple documents that look
different on ooo.  
Maybe you can prepare some example docs containing the same formats that 
cause the problems and i am sure the writer team will take a closer look 
on it. Submit an issue with the docs attached.


Juergen



Bye
Andreas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] .doc compatibility

2008-02-22 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Andreas wrote:

Hello,

now that microsoft has partially opened the documentation of the .doc 
format, is there a chance that better doc compatibility will become a 
primary objective  ?
mmh, as far as i know it provides not realy any new info. But of course 
i am no file format expert.




Thanks
Andreas

A frustrated IT director that got the order to reinstall word 2000 
because of not so good .doc compatibility
more interesting is the question what you mean with not so god .doc 
compatibility. Did you mean real conversion errors, missing data, bad 
formats or missing VBA features. For the latter one VBA i would say that 
we will never reach a really good compatibility.
We are no simple clone althoug it looks so. We provide a good platform 
independent office suite with an open standardized document format that 
becomes adopted by more and more goverments and public offices all over 
the world.


If especially companies are willing to pay a lot of money for licences 
and will stay with an closed format or a pseudo open format it is hard 
to argue against that or to convince them. I think the migration to ODF 
is possible if really wanted and already demonstrated.


Don't be frustrated! There is often a lot of politics involved behind 
the scenes ;-)


But the good thing is that we always work on better compatibility.

Juergen





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] OO funcionalities

2007-09-06 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Lionking-Cyan wrote:

Hi. I wanted to ask you if with open office it's possible to remove the spaces 
between the lines (pratically, the ones you get pressing enter twice) for a 
selected part of the text, in an automatic way. And also, is it possible to 
fill the lines? I mean, when i copy a text on open office, it often only fills 
let's say 2/3 of the lines. In order to fill them, and thus require less pages 
to print it, i need to press delete at the start of each line manually. Is 
there a funcionality to do it automatically for a selected part of the document?
If they aren't in open office, could you implement these 2 funcionalities in 
future releases please? I believe it's very important to print documents copied 
from the web, in fewer pages.
Thx.
i don't know if there exists such a feature right now in OO.org but you 
can do it on your own with a macro.


For example:
#
Sub RemoveEmptyLines
  Dim oCcursor As Variant
  Dim oText As Variant

  oText = ThisComponent.getText()
  oCursor = oText.CreateTextCursor()
  oCursor.GoToStart(False)
  Do
If NOT oCursor.gotoEndOfParagraph(true) Then Exit Do
  If  oCursor.getString() =  Then
oCursor.gotoNextWord(true)
oText.insertString(oCursor, , true)
endif
  Loop Until NOT oCursor.gotoNextParagraph(false)
End Sub
#

Maybe there exists an easier way but it works ;-)

Juergen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [interface-discuss] com.sun.star.smarttags

2007-01-25 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Frank Meies wrote:

Hi Stephan,

On 01/25/07 13:13, Stephan Bergmann wrote:

http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/successful_community_project_smart_tags 
made me aware of new UNOIDL content at offapi/com/sun/star/smarttags 
(at least available in SRC680m200).  Some notes:


- XSmartTagAction.idl:1.2 contains both interface XSmartTagAction and 
service SmartTagAction, similar for XSmartTagRecognizer.idl:1.2.  I 
think it is better to only have one entity definition per .idl file 
(named after the entity).


- XSmartTagRecognizer.Recognize is capitalized, which is odd.

- Both XSmartTagAction and XSmartTagRecognizer have a method 
initialize, apparently following the semantics of 
com.sun.star.lang.XIntialization.  Why not just inherit that 
interface?  Or, if applicable, use service constructors for 
initialization (and hiding XInitialization from UNOIDL as an 
implementation detail).


- Both SmartTagAction and SmartTagRecognizer are old style services. 
Are they needed at all?  How are instances of 
XSmartTagAction/Recognizer found/instantiated at runtime?


thank you for your comments. These new interfaces/services are community 
contributions and still work in progress, they will be reviewed, 
discussed and changed accordingly soon.


That makes no difference. I assume that somebody has mentored the 
community member and we should follow our own guidelines for new types 
always. Why starting with old style type definitions which have to be 
changed later anyway.

I totally agree to Stefan and we should fix this asap.

At this point i would like to remember that we won't use old style type 
definitions for new types. That it includes no inheritance from 
XInterface (obsolete), use multiple inheritance interfaces instead of 
old style services. And use new style services when you want to 
instantiate your services globally.


If it is unclear how to design new types feel free to ask.

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [interface-discuss] com.sun.star.smarttags

2007-01-25 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:

Hi Jürgen, Frank,

thank you for your comments. These new interfaces/services are community 
contributions and still work in progress, they will be reviewed, 
discussed and changed accordingly soon.
That makes no difference. I assume that somebody has mentored the 
community member and we should follow our own guidelines for new types 
always. Why starting with old style type definitions which have to be 
changed later anyway.

I totally agree to Stefan and we should fix this asap.


I'd voite for asap being before release of 2.2. Releasing a version
with types we know we will change soon is Not Good (TM), it will only
burden us with compatibility issues later (even if they're not
published, yet).


+1 from me

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] Proposing a new User Experience project on OOo

2007-01-17 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Lutz Hoeger wrote:

Hi,

This message is cross-posted to discuss@, users@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED], in order to 
reach a broad audience. However, I would be happy if most of the 
comments / discussion / etc. could be sent to discuss@ only (not sure if 
the reply-to header works here).


WHAT

I would like to propose an OpenOffice.org User Experience (UX) project.


+1 from me.

I think user experience is such an important topic that a separate 
project covering this is a great idea.


Innovative new ideas and a lot from experience from our real users who 
work with the product every day and who are willing to help here can 
only improve the overall usability of our great product.


So i am looking forward to this new project and hope the invention of 
new own ideas will be become more important than simply copy things from 
other competitive programs ;-)


Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [discuss] Project Proposal : ODF Toolkit

2007-01-17 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Niklas Nebel wrote:

Alexandro Colorado wrote:

I wonder if this shouldn't be part of XML or Extensions project?


There will of course be overlap with existing projects - especially if 
we're serious about componentization (to get to the appropriate subset 
from Dieter's mail). But from a user's point of view, it will be 
something new: The place to look at if you're dealing with ODF files, 
even if you don't need (or want) the whole office suite.




yes exactly and we won't reinvent the wheel again. The modularization 
should and hopefully will take place in the appropriate existing 
projects. See the new ODF Toolkit project more as an umbrella project to 
provide a centralized entry point.


Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]