[Drakelist] FS: SPR-4 and MS-4

2011-07-31 Thread Tom Swisher
All;

Thinning the herd a bit here at home and have an SPR-4 and MS-4 for sale. Both 
are in very good condition and work fine. The SPR-4 includes the original 
manual.

$225 plus shipping for both. If interested respond by private e-mail.

Pictures available on request.



Tom
--
Tom Swisher, WA8PYR

 A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their 
own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of 
labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. - Thomas 
Jefferson


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Collins and Drake Compared

2011-06-16 Thread Tom Swisher
On Jun 16, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Garey Barrell wrote:

 Essentially, Drake came along and found less expensive ways to emulate the 
 Collins equipment and circuitry to make it more affordable for the 'average' 
 ham.  Drake was just the reverse of Collins, i.e., the majority of their 
 business was with hams, with a small (if any?) government segment.  Heath did 
 somewhat the same, although they went a little too far, in my opinion, and 
 ended up with a product that felt 'cheap' and flimsy, compared even to the 
 Drake.  Drake was not fancy, but WAS and IS solid in construction.

Well put, Garey. I've personally always considered Collins the gear for the 
rich man while Drake was the gear for everyman.



Tom
--
Tom Swisher, WA8PYR

 A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their 
own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of 
labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. - Thomas 
Jefferson


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] AC4 heat Fan Summary

2010-12-17 Thread Tom Swisher
On Dec 16, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Jim Shorney wrote:

 On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:32:48 -0500, mike bryce wrote:
 
 should it blow in
 
 or suck out?
 
 This would seem to be a question of spot cooling vs. system cooling.

I'll chime in with my $0.02 here...

The suck it out versus blow it in debate (aka negative pressure versus 
positive pressure ventilation) has been raging for years in the fire service. 
When I went through firefighter training 25 years ago, the current wisdom was 
leaning in favor of positive pressure, but this has shifted a couple of times. 
These days both are in favor, but use varies depending on the space you need to 
ventilate.

Generally, positive pressure is going to create a column of pressurized air 
with most of the effort going in one direction and is best for a limited space 
with few entrances and exits, whereas negative pressure will draw air from any 
place air can come from, and what you get is better although lower pressure 
evacuation of many spaces. I prefer negative pressure for my Twins  and TR-4 as 
it can help draw warmer air from many places in the rig, not just the finals, 
although the finals are where most of the benefit will be found. It also limits 
the incoming dust being concentrated heavily in one location, which aids in 
periodic cleaning.

Tom
--
Tom Swisher, WA8PYR

 A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their 
own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of 
labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. - Thomas 
Jefferson

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] The Drake R-4---PERIOD!

2010-10-04 Thread Tom Swisher
On Oct 2, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Edward Swynar wrote:

 All this talk about the R-4A, R-4B,  R-4C receivers has me wondering if I
 might really  truly have the ONLY plain-Jane R-4 (no letters) in
 existance...! Hi Hi
 
 Seriously, I know that's NOT the case, but it sure does seem by times that
 the original R-4 is the poor cousin of the whole family of Drake R
 series of receivers...
 
 Personally, I like my R-4, and I like it a lot. Are there any others out
 there still in use...?


I have one. Given to me by my grandfather (ex-WA8PYR, WD4ANZ, now SK) along 
with an original T-4X, R-4 and AC-4 when I got my ticket in 1980. He was the 
first owner; I'm the second.

Great radios


Tom
--
Tom Swisher, WA8PYR

 A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their 
own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of 
labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. - Thomas 
Jefferson

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Looking for TR-33c stuff

2010-08-08 Thread Tom Swisher
All;

Does anyone have lurking about in the dark recesses of their computers an 
electronic copy of the manual(s) for the Drake TR-33c they might be willing to 
share?

I'm also looking for a few crystals, specifically 145.270, 146.760, 147.060, 
147.210 and 147.240 if anyone has any spares taking up space.

Thanks,


Tom
--
Tom Swisher, WA8PYR

 A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their 
own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of 
labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. - Thomas 
Jefferson

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] R-8 computer protocol available?

2010-03-10 Thread Tom Swisher
All;

Anybody have (or know where I can get) the computer control protocol 
information for the R-8? I love my R-8 (the original) but really would like to 
extend my capabilities, so I'm going to take a stab at programming again and 
try my hand at some code for the Mac.

I've got the Developer suite (xCode, etc) but at a standstill without the 
computer control protocols.

Thanks for any assistance!

Tom
---
Tom Swisher, WA8PYR

Nobody from Columbus has ever made a first-rate wanderer in the Conradean 
tradition. Some of them have been fairly good at disappearing for a few days to 
turn up in a hotel in Louisville with a bad headache and no recollection of how 
they got there, but they always scurry back. - James Thurber


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] List Downtime

2009-06-14 Thread Tom Swisher

On Jun 14, 2009, at 8:37 AM6/14/09, Thom LaCosta wrote:


At 07:32 AM 06/12/09, Thom LaCosta wrote:
Apologies for the recent list downtime.  An automated update to the  
server software did not restore the settings for the mailing lists.


Is anyone here?

Just wondering if I should continue the list, or simply remove it  
from the server?



Still lurking...

Tom WA8PYR


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] t4x case type

2008-12-26 Thread Tom Swisher

On Dec 25, 2008, at 7:57 PM12/25/08, Carey Lockhart wrote:


hi gang and merry christmas

does the t-4x have the splatter paint job or a smooth paint on the  
case?


Mine has smooth paint...

Tom WA8PYR

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [drakelist] DMM recommendation

2008-07-17 Thread Tom Swisher

Tom Swisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:47 PM7/16/08, Garey Barrell wrote:

You might want to keep your eyes open for one of the Heath VTVMs,  
some of which have huge meters. They are abundant at hamfests, easy  
to fix (as long as the meter movement or cover aren't damaged) and  
typically cheap!


The Simpson 260 is an excellent meter, but unless you get one of the  
very latest models they are only 20,000 ohm / volt sensitivity.   
This is usually not a problem, except when it comes time to measure  
a high impedance AVC circuit in a tube receiver.  Then the 11 Megohm  
input impedance of a Heath VTVM is handy!


I concur again... I have one of the Heath VTVMs but don't use it too  
much; sure is handy to have around when you need it, though.


Tom WA8PYR

--
Submissions:drakelist@zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] DMM recommendation

2008-07-16 Thread Tom Swisher

Tom Swisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
On Jul 16, 2008, at 4:06 PM7/16/08, Garey Barrell wrote:

You won't go wrong with a Fluke, any model.  There are LOTS cheaper  
meters, but none much better.  The biggest deficiency in the cheaper  
meters is that lots of them are very low input impedance.  Absolute  
accuracy is really not all that important for 99.9% of what you will  
use it for, but low input impedance can be a problem, especially if  
you are working on tube type gear.  Look for at least 10-11Megohm  
input impedance.


I second the Fluke DMM recommendation, and have another to add...

Look around for a good analog meter to add to your workbench; they're  
very, very useful to have around as well, especially if you're doing  
any kind of fine receiver tuneup. It's much, much easier to detect  
minute swings of a needle as opposed to the often constantly bobbling  
numbers on a DMM display.


I highly recommend the Simpson 260. I picked up a near mint Simpson  
260 Series 6P, complete with the original Bakelite case with roll-up  
door, for $50 at Dayton a couple of years ago, and it has made  
receiver tuneup so much easier. I had almost forgotten how nice it is  
to use a really good analog VOM...


The real bonus is that the Series 6P and later models used one D cell  
and one 9v cell as opposed to one D and four AA cells. Much easier to  
change batteries, although that wouldn't have stopped me from buying  
one of the earlier models.



Tom WA8PYR

--
Submissions:drakelist@zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] Drake Cabinet Screws

2008-07-08 Thread Tom Swisher

Tom Swisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
On Jul 8, 2008, at 7:12 PM7/8/08, Jim Gerke wrote:

Sure enough, the description does say Steel Type 4140 Hardened  
Alloy Steel. Further down, it says Rockwell Hardness Minimum C40.  
These screws are obviously for some special, probably military or  
space, application.


The closest thing they have that is reasonably priced is the  
phillips head version for which I paid $5.28 for a box of 100.


And the Phillips head version wins by quantity 99!!!

Personally, I'll go with the Phillips version. While a straight-head  
screw is original, I'm not too concerned about that for a rig I use  
every day; as long as the cover stays on and the screw looks  
reasonably correct, I'm a happy camper.


Tom WA8PYR

--
Submissions:drakelist@zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--