RE: [Elecraft] restrictive CQs? SKCC, Fists etc. - protocol on who we can play with

2007-10-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
David wrote:
I can't speak for others, but in my case, a rag chew is more difficult that
a FISTS QSO.  FISTS QSOs, in my experience have been pretty straight
forward; name, greetings, rst, qth, rig, power, ant, and maybe wx info.  Not
exciting, on invigorating for most folks, but it is a lot for those of us
struggling with the code. 

---

You are not alone. Working with some new Hams who are dedicated brass
pounders, I was reminded of that in recent years. Back when I was struggling
along with my first QSO's back in the 50's we had the Novice bands, and they
were *busy* bands populated by slow, shaky fists whose thrill was getting
through a name-qth-RST-wx-73 QSO. At least we all knew we were beginners
together (Back then no Novice license ran over 1 year. It was upgrade of be
off the air). 

It takes practice to learn to think about what to say while sending CW, just
as speaking in a new language takes practice to think of what and how to say
something while finding and pronouncing the words. It's not a trivial task
and it is why I was thrilled when I was nominated for the Rag Chewer's Club.


FISTS and similar groups do a wonderful job providing a surrogate Novice
band for operators of all classes who are getting into CW. I applaud them
wholeheartedly. They are filling a real need to encourage and promote CW.
Some of those members will never go on to using CW as a language. Instead
they may focus on those simple, rote exchanges to become top gun
DX-chasers or contesters, developing the skill to hammer out multiple QSOs
per minute using computers and all the other stuff involved in that sort of
operating. That takes experience and skill too. 

Some will move on to chewing the rag and developing the ability to use CW as
a language to hold an easy-going conversation with others. 

Many will do some of both. 

Ron AC7AC

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Departing list ......

2007-10-05 Thread Dohn
Without having seen the K3 in action, has anyone got any idea what the
differences would be if you stood an IC-7000 next to a K3 and compared their
performances?

Dohn  N8EWY
K2  5815
K1
Fists 12820   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred (FL)
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:00 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Departing list ..

I've decided to not order the K3, and
am leaving this list today.  Being a
1-rig ham, I really need to be practical
and go with a 1-rig HF/60/VHF/UHF rig,
ala IC-7000.  Perhaps in late 2008 spring,
when K3 dust settles - I'll be back.  But the
1-rig, HF/VHF/UHF and mobile rig - will have to
suit me for a while.  And I don't know what
mobiling with a K3 would mean.

I'm a snowbird, in cars, 2 residences, boat
in summer, golf cart in winter.  Lots of
shacks.

I will not miss the Reflector.  I stopped
doing email administration back in 89. 

My K3 order was a 2nd Production Run
order.   So long.

73's Fred, de N3CSY
3 Oct 07


   


Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail,
news, photos  more. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] RE: [QRP-L] ARCI Membership Dues

2007-10-05 Thread
Andy:

Go to:
http://www.qrparci.org

Bill - K4AHK


 [Original Message]
 From: Andy - GM0NWI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Elecraft Discussion List elecraft@mailman.qth.net; QRP-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 10/4/2007 7:00:50 PM
 Subject: [QRP-L] ARCI Membership Dues

 Guy's...

 Can someone possibly tell me WHO I send my ARCI Membership dues for
 2007/2008 to in the US..?

 The shack here is in somewhat of an upheaval at the present time, and I
 can't lay my hands on the last
 QRP Quarterly that I received and I think my current membership is
shortly
 due to expire..
 (hope I'm not too late for the next edition)..

 TIA

 72's 73's   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Andy
 GM0NWI 

 Elecraft K2 Fully Loaded QRP S/n 01432
 Elecraft K2 Fully Loaded QRO S/n 05469




 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.0/1048 - Release Date:
03/10/2007
 20:22
  

 __
 QRP-L mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.0/1049 - Release Date:
10/4/2007 8:59 AM


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[QRP-L] ARCI Membership Dues MANY THANKS

2007-10-05 Thread Andy - GM0NWI
Guy's...

What A Response..!  The Flood Gates Opened BIG TIME..!

I might have forgot to mention in my first post that I am ALREADY a member
of the ARCI at present, ...
But have mislayed my last copy of QQ here in the shack somewhere, so my
original plea was for information
On WHO and WHERE to send my present dues..

Glad to say that I know have the info and will be sending my payment soon in
the coming days..

Many Thanks to all who replied..

72's 73's[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Andy
GM0NWI 

Elecraft K2 Fully Loaded QRP S/n 01432
Elecraft K2 Fully Loaded QRO S/n 05469




No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.1/1050 - Release Date: 04/10/2007
17:03
 

__
QRP-L mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [Elecraft] Hakko 936-12

2007-10-05 Thread Greg Beat

Ian -

For a variable temperature soldering station -- and using 60/40 (Sn/Pb) 
solder -- stay within the range of 650 to 750 degrees F (345 - 400 degrees 
C).


Personally, I always set one to 700 F degrees (370 C) --- since I learned my 
techniques in 1970s with the Weller TCP series with 700 degree tips.


I do NOT recommend 800 F degree tips or temperature settings, burns up tips 
faster.
Really only useful for SOME lead-free solders -- and you must have excellent 
soldering techniques (be quick) -- not to lift traces, etc.


Get the proper MASS and PROFILE for your solder tip -- that matches the 
solder joint -- these are far more important to proper heating of the joint 
for solder flow -- than dialing up a higher temperature (which is the 
common mistake for the beginner).


Greg
w9gb

- Original Message - 
From: Ian Stirling [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 12:34 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] Hakko 936?



Hi guys,

 My Hakko 936 with several T-1 for surface mounted tiny
components arrived today.  It is not warm yet.
I have been using an Antex 15 Watt iron since 1971, and
I built my K2 #4962 with it.   Now, variable temperature is,
well, a variable that I have never had to consider.
So,  my questions:
What temperature do you set with 60/40 solder on such as
a K2, and perhaps a different temperature when soldering
an AD9851?

73,
Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962, LP-100 #278
--





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] n3csy,s memborable Farewell

2007-10-05 Thread n4dsp


Hey Fred who cares! I will not miss you either!
Arrogance seems your best quality so put the 
lowly IC7000 in one of your many shacks

Mr. Snowbird and while your at it read something
about Receiver Specifications like BDR or IMD.

john-n4dsp



Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred (FL) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Elecraft] Departing list ..
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I've decided to not order the K3, and
am leaving this list today.  Being a
1-rig ham, I really need to be practical
and go with a 1-rig HF/60/VHF/UHF rig,
ala IC-7000.  Perhaps in late 2008 spring,
when K3 dust settles - I'll be back.  But the
1-rig, HF/VHF/UHF and mobile rig - will have to
suit me for a while.  And I don't know what
mobiling with a K3 would mean.

I'm a snowbird, in cars, 2 residences, boat
in summer, golf cart in winter.  Lots of
shacks.

I will not miss the Reflector.  I stopped
doing email administration back in 89. 


My K3 order was a 2nd Production Run
order.   So long.

73's Fred, de N3CSY
3 Oct 07


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] re:Restrictive CQ's

2007-10-05 Thread n4dsp

Are you kidding Ron? That would hurt sales!!
We must not offend anyone on this list even if
the topic turns to non elecraft. We must be
politically correct.

73 and good dxing to you.
john-n4dsp



Message: 3
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:49:27 -0400
From: RonSpencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Elecraft] Restrictive CQs
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250

Just waded through the digest version and seems like 1/3 of the posts were
on the restrictive CQs subject.
What did that have to do with Elecraft?? How about for this forum we
restrict our postings to topics relating to Elecraft and Elecraft only?
That's why I subscribe.

73
Ron  N4XD


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Elecraft Digest, Vol 42, Issue 7

2007-10-05 Thread Dixontribe
Surely the whole idea of cw is to chat to another person local or in  another 
country albeit numbers or whatever,cw is after all a gentlemans  mode and 
most cw operators will find time to stop and chat. Im on cw  through choice and 
have enjoyed it very much for the past 20 years, i have  microphones there in 
the shack drawers somewhere!.This is just my own  personal opinion guys so dont 
fall on me from a great height please.Regards and  hope to hear you at some 
stage.Incidentally my k2 (qrp version)going great guns  and working now to 
finding out whats going to come out the speaker when i call  cq next..
If anyone wants a natter send me time,freq,date and ill be there band condx  
prevailing..
Dave G0AYD..



   
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Hakko 936?

2007-10-05 Thread R. Kevin Stover
Ian Stirling wrote:
 Hi guys,
 
   My Hakko 936 with several T-1 for surface mounted tiny
 components arrived today.  It is not warm yet.
  I have been using an Antex 15 Watt iron since 1971, and
 I built my K2 #4962 with it.   Now, variable temperature is,
 well, a variable that I have never had to consider.
 So,  my questions:
  What temperature do you set with 60/40 solder on such as
 a K2, and perhaps a different temperature when soldering
 an AD9851?
 
 73,
 Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962, LP-100 #278

When I built K2/100 #4684 I had my 936 set at 700 most of the time.
I'd bump it up to 750, maybe 800 on rare occasions but I did 90% of the
radio at 700.


-- 
R. Kevin Stover
AC0H
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Departing list ......

2007-10-05 Thread R. Kevin Stover
Dohn wrote:
 Without having seen the K3 in action, has anyone got any idea what the
 differences would be if you stood an IC-7000 next to a K3 and compared their
 performances?
 
 Dohn  N8EWY
 K2  5815
 K1
 Fists 12820   

Not even worth bothering to do a comparison.
The K2 blows the doors off anything Icom makes below a 756 ProIII level.
The IC-7000 is nothing more than a prettified 706MkII-G which has the
same HF receiver as the IC-718.

Some people want performance, some people want convenience.

-- 
R. Kevin Stover
AC0H
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Departing list ......

2007-10-05 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
In defence of ICOM the IC-7000 is 100% different to the IC-706MkII. 
Performance is another issue...


Simon Brown, HB9DRV

- Original Message - 
From: R. Kevin Stover [EMAIL PROTECTED]



The IC-7000 is nothing more than a prettified 706MkII-G which has the
same HF receiver as the IC-718.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Hakko 936?

2007-10-05 Thread Don Wilhelm

Ian,

You have already received some starting point temperatures.
There are no really hard and fast rules - watch the solder connections 
for a while, especially watch to see how long it takes for the solder to 
flow out smoothly onto the solder pad.  If that time is longer than 3 
seconds, increase the heat a bit, but if it is less than 2 seconds, 
reduce the heat.
Different boards will require different temperatures - those with small 
traces will need less heat, but those with large traces and an extensive 
ground plane (like the KPA100) require more.


When working with thru-plated boards, strive to produce a tiny fillet of 
solder that has a concave surface.  If the solder surface is convex, all 
the solder may be stuck to the component lead and the solder pad did not 
receive enough heat (besides that, too much solder is already applied).


The soldering tutorial on the Builder's Resource page at the Elecraft 
website has a lot of good information that you may want to review.


SMD soldering usually does not require as much heat as lead thru hole 
construction, but the principle is the same - watch for the solder to 
flow and keep that time short. 


73,
Don W3FPR

Ian Stirling wrote:

Hi guys,

  My Hakko 936 with several T-1 for surface mounted tiny
components arrived today.  It is not warm yet.
 I have been using an Antex 15 Watt iron since 1971, and
I built my K2 #4962 with it.   Now, variable temperature is,
well, a variable that I have never had to consider.
So,  my questions:
 What temperature do you set with 60/40 solder on such as
a K2, and perhaps a different temperature when soldering
an AD9851?

73,
Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962, LP-100 #278
--
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Departing list ......

2007-10-05 Thread Brett gazdzinski
 
From what I have heard, the 7000 will be very poor compared to the K3.

The 756 pro was much worse than the K2, and all the 756 pro series
are at least twice the price of the 7000!

1.6 MHz to 440 in a very small box, how good could it really be?

As a mobile rig, it would likely be neat, but has no antenna tuner,
you have to add that...
Just like those really little handhelds that do 500 KHz to UHF, 
they do it allpoorly


Brett
N2DTS 


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dohn
 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 5:23 AM
 To: 'Fred (FL)'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Departing list ..
 
 Without having seen the K3 in action, has anyone got any idea what the
 differences would be if you stood an IC-7000 next to a K3 and 
 compared their
 performances?
 
 Dohn  N8EWY
 K2  5815
 K1
 Fists 12820   
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred (FL)
 Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:00 PM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] Departing list ..
 
 I've decided to not order the K3, and
 am leaving this list today.  Being a
 1-rig ham, I really need to be practical
 and go with a 1-rig HF/60/VHF/UHF rig,
 ala IC-7000.  Perhaps in late 2008 spring,
 when K3 dust settles - I'll be back.  But the
 1-rig, HF/VHF/UHF and mobile rig - will have to
 suit me for a while.  And I don't know what
 mobiling with a K3 would mean.
 
 I'm a snowbird, in cars, 2 residences, boat
 in summer, golf cart in winter.  Lots of
 shacks.
 
 I will not miss the Reflector.  I stopped
 doing email administration back in 89. 
 
 My K3 order was a 2nd Production Run
 order.   So long.
 
 73's Fred, de N3CSY
 3 Oct 07
 
 

 __
 __
 
 Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your 
 pocket: mail,
 news, photos  more. 
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC

2007-10-05 Thread Paul Webb
Hi All 

Sorry to add to the noise level, I took over from Geo , the founder of FISTS 
just before he past away and produce the newsletter and fulfil other roles in 
FISTS too. Yes we do have many members that will call CQ FISTS, we have a 
number of challenges (rather than number exchanging contests that normally fill 
the bands), we encourage all our members to make the exchange of numbers (if 
they are working another member that wants theirs) almost incidental to the 
QSO, and ask them NOT to exclude anyone , member or not that returns to their 
call. we are all about getting people to use CW and we certainly do not want to 
push people away. I use a straight key myself but have no problem if my QSO 
partner wants to use paddles,keyboard, or what ever as long as it CW its good 
for me!, If you hear me call CQ FISTS please come back to me member or not, 
paddles or straight key, its the QSO that counts not the equipment or numbers. 
best 73's 
Paul M0BMN


  ___ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC

2007-10-05 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Paul Webb wrote:


Hi All

Sorry to add to the noise level, I took over from Geo , the founder of FISTS 
just before he past away and produce the newsletter and fulfil other roles in 
FISTS too. Yes we do have many members that will call CQ FISTS, we have a 
number of challenges (rather than number exchanging contests that normally fill 
the bands), we encourage all our members to make the exchange of numbers (if 
they are working another member that wants theirs) almost incidental to the 
QSO, and ask them NOT to exclude anyone , member or not that returns to their 
call. we are all about getting people to use CW and we certainly do not want to 
push people away. I use a straight key myself but have no problem if my QSO 
partner wants to use paddles,keyboard, or what ever as long as it CW its good 
for me!,


If you hear me call CQ FISTS please come back to me member or not, paddles or 
straight key, its the QSO that counts not the equipment or numbers.


I think that part of the confusion is that many people, when hearing CD DX or
CQ DE or CQ TEST or CQ WHATEVER have the impression that the station calling
only wants to have a QSO of the type specified.  CQ DX is probably the best 
exampleI would never answer a CQ DX call from a US station.


While the personal statements of many FISTS members has indicated they are more 
than willing to QSO with non-FISTS members, unless one has read their 
statements, one is back to square one...is CQ FISTS like CQ DX (I only want to 
QSO with a specific type of station) or some other meaning.


73 - k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Departing list ......

2007-10-05 Thread KU4YP
Agreed, 

I have an ft-817 and portability is definitely it's strong suit. The 
receiver is lacking to say the least. But, I can put an entire station in a 
bag. People mix apples and oranges when comparing rigs.

All that says I have not finished the K2...

73 de KU4YP
Michael Prevatt
Ft. Meade, Fl. 
*sent from ipaq*


As a mobile rig, it would likely be neat, but has no antenna tuner,
you have to add that...
Just like those really little handhelds that do 500 KHz to UHF, 
they do it allpoorly



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC

2007-10-05 Thread Dan KB6NU

The answer to that is NO.

While there may be some FISTS members that want to only exchange  
numbers, the vast majority of them are ready and willing to ragchew.  
In fact, I'd bet most of them would rather make a contact, then to  
continually be calling CQ FISTS.


73!

Dan KB6NU
--
CW Geek, FISTS #9342
Get my Tech and General Class study guides at www.kb6nu.com/tech-manual
LET'S GET MORE KIDS INTO HAM RADIO!


On Oct 5, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Thom LaCosta wrote:

I think that part of the confusion is that many people, when  
hearing CD DX or
CQ DE or CQ TEST or CQ WHATEVER have the impression that the  
station calling
only wants to have a QSO of the type specified.  CQ DX is probably  
the best exampleI would never answer a CQ DX call from a US  
station.


While the personal statements of many FISTS members has indicated  
they are more than willing to QSO with non-FISTS members, unless  
one has read their statements, one is back to square one...is CQ  
FISTS like CQ DX (I only want to QSO with a specific type of  
station) or some other meaning.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Restrictive CQs

2007-10-05 Thread Terry Schieler
I agree, Ron.  This entire (lenghty) thread would have been better posted on
eHam.net than here..


Terry, WØFM 



-Original Message-
From: RonSpencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 8:49 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Restrictive CQs

Just waded through the digest version and seems like 1/3 of the posts were
on the restrictive CQs subject. 
What did that have to do with Elecraft?? How about for this forum we
restrict our postings to topics relating to Elecraft and Elecraft only?
That's why I subscribe. 

73
Ron  N4XD

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.0/1048 - Release Date: 10/3/2007
8:22 PM
 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC

2007-10-05 Thread Darwin, Keith
-
 I think that part of the confusion is that many people, when  
 hearing CD DX or
 CQ DE or CQ TEST or CQ WHATEVER have the impression that the  
 station calling
 only wants to have a QSO of the type specified.  CQ DX is probably  
 the best exampleI would never answer a CQ DX call from a US  
 station.
-

There's no question that FISTS and SKCC folks will willingly work
non-members, but that's not really the point.  Why would someone who is
happy to work anyone call CQ FISTS or CQ SKCC?  Why not just call CQ?
It makes no sense for them to use a qualified CQ when they are looking
for just anybody.  So if they are using a directed CQ, then it is only
rational to take it face value and assume they mean what they're saying.
No they do not want to work anybody but only those who qualify.  Most
though are polite enough to overlook the minor rudeness of the
non-qualifier who answers, and will work them anyway.

If an OP sends KN to turn it over to the other op, do you break into the
QSO?

If a DX station says listening up 3 do you call right on their freq?

If an OP sends you RRR (received) do you repeat all your info next time?

Do you answer CQ DX if you're not DX?

If someone sends CQ at 10 wpm but has an Extra call, do you assume they
really want to go 20 and answer them at that speed?

Face value, guys, face value.  Ya gotta take this stuff for what it
means and not second guess the thoughts behind them.  Treating some
qualified CQ's as limited (CQ DX) while others qualified CQ's like
they're not qualified is irrational and adds significant confusion.
Take it at face value and don't answer if you're not what the other
person is calling for.




In fact, I'd bet most of them would rather make a contact, then to
continually be calling CQ FISTS.
-

If they want to work anyone, they'll call CQ.  Until then, they are
saying they are NOT looking for just anyone.  If that is not their
intention, then THEY need to change their call.

IMNSHO (in my not so humble opinion)

Apologies for any offense my direct communication style may have caused.
73 all (yes, I do mean it)

- Keith N1AS -
- K2 5411.ssb.100 -
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC

2007-10-05 Thread Dan KB6NU
Oh, come on. You're really making a mountain out of a molehill here.  
If you don't feel comfortable replying to a CQ FISTS call, Keith,  
then don't do it. The rest of you please feel free to do so, even if  
you're not part of that august group.


73!

Dan KB6NU


On Oct 5, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Darwin, Keith wrote:


-

I think that part of the confusion is that many people, when
hearing CD DX or
CQ DE or CQ TEST or CQ WHATEVER have the impression that the
station calling
only wants to have a QSO of the type specified.  CQ DX is probably
the best exampleI would never answer a CQ DX call from a US
station.

-

There's no question that FISTS and SKCC folks will willingly work
non-members, but that's not really the point.  Why would someone  
who is
happy to work anyone call CQ FISTS or CQ SKCC?  Why not just call  
CQ?

It makes no sense for them to use a qualified CQ when they are looking
for just anybody.  So if they are using a directed CQ, then it is only
rational to take it face value and assume they mean what they're  
saying.
No they do not want to work anybody but only those who qualify.   
Most

though are polite enough to overlook the minor rudeness of the
non-qualifier who answers, and will work them anyway.

If an OP sends KN to turn it over to the other op, do you break  
into the

QSO?

If a DX station says listening up 3 do you call right on their freq?

If an OP sends you RRR (received) do you repeat all your info next  
time?


Do you answer CQ DX if you're not DX?

If someone sends CQ at 10 wpm but has an Extra call, do you assume  
they

really want to go 20 and answer them at that speed?

Face value, guys, face value.  Ya gotta take this stuff for what it
means and not second guess the thoughts behind them.  Treating some
qualified CQ's as limited (CQ DX) while others qualified CQ's like
they're not qualified is irrational and adds significant confusion.
Take it at face value and don't answer if you're not what the other
person is calling for.




In fact, I'd bet most of them would rather make a contact, then to
continually be calling CQ FISTS.
-

If they want to work anyone, they'll call CQ.  Until then, they are
saying they are NOT looking for just anyone.  If that is not their
intention, then THEY need to change their call.

IMNSHO (in my not so humble opinion)

Apologies for any offense my direct communication style may have  
caused.

73 all (yes, I do mean it)

- Keith N1AS -
- K2 5411.ssb.100 -
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft][OT] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC

2007-10-05 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Darwin, Keith wrote:


-

I think that part of the confusion is that many people, when
hearing CD DX or
CQ DE or CQ TEST or CQ WHATEVER have the impression that the
station calling
only wants to have a QSO of the type specified.  CQ DX is probably
the best exampleI would never answer a CQ DX call from a US
station.

-

Face value, guys, face value.  Ya gotta take this stuff for what it
means and not second guess the thoughts behind them.  Treating some
qualified CQ's as limited (CQ DX) while others qualified CQ's like
they're not qualified is irrational and adds significant confusion.
Take it at face value and don't answer if you're not what the other
person is calling for.


Thanks for the examplesI received a few emails correcting my 
mis-comprehension of CQ FISTS means, well means to some FIST members who don't 
think it's a directed call, and to others who believe it is.


To add some topicality, when I use my Elecraft rigs, I will refrain from 
answering a CQ FISTS call, since I don't want to be confused about which 
directed CQs are not what they appear to be, and I can't remember the calls of 
all the people who said that their directed CQs are not what they appear to be.


But, I guess if I called CQ ELECRAFT and someone answered and asked me about ten 
tec gear, I'd be at a loss.


73 k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft][OT] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC [END of Thread]

2007-10-05 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
Let's end this thread for now. It was a good discussion, but is now 
degenerating as many do over time. ;-)


73, Eric  WA6HHQ
Elecraft List Manager
---
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] CQ FISTS ,SKCC ETC

2007-10-05 Thread Joe-aa4nn

Can't we just drop this Fist business, geesh, folks,
enough is enough.  de Joe, aa4nn

Oh, come on. You're really making a mountain out of a molehill here.  
If you don't feel comfortable replying to a CQ FISTS call, Keith,  
then don't do it. The rest of you please feel free to do so, even if  
you're not part of that august group.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Important Elecraft List Notes

2007-10-05 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft

Folks,

Several -strong- reminders from the list guidelines:

1. Please do not -personally- criticize others for their postings or 
opinions. Doing so will result in your automatic placement in moderated 
mode for future postings. Doing so also results in a more negative 
impression of you by list readers, -not- the person you are attacking.


2. Please resist the urge to comment pro/con on a thread if it simply 
duplicates other postings or if the thread is getting excessively long. 
Email the moderator instead.


3. Do not post saying a particular thread is inappropriate. Email the 
moderator (me) instead. Posting only  comments like this unnecessarily 
adds to the level of list noise.


Lastly, please remember that email does not always accurately reflect 
the emotions of a poster. Its easy to mis-read the intent of a poster. 
Commenting negatively about someone only serves to create a problem 
where many times there was none. We're all here to learn and have fun. 
Please remember that before sending the next critical or cynical 
posting. :-)


73, Eric  WA6HHQ
Elecraft  List Moderator
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 shipping on Oct 08

2007-10-05 Thread Joseph Trombino Jr
Wondering if any one has info on how many K3 kits will be shipped in the 
first production run starting on Monday 08 Oct???


I'm in the second run so trying to find out when the shipping date for the 
second run might begin.


   73, Joe W2KJ 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 shipping on Oct 08

2007-10-05 Thread Dave G4AON

I'm hoping mine will ship next week...

Any update on where we are?

Dave, G4AON
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 shipping on Oct 08

2007-10-05 Thread Julian G4ILO
I don't know about you, but I don't know what my position is within
the first batch. So I'm betting on some time between next week and
whenever the second batch starts to ship. :) It'd be nice to know more
exactly, but I guess the team have better things to do than start
giving everyone individual delivery dates. I haven't been contacted
yet, but I did log on to the site a couple of weeks ago to update my
CC details and order items, so perhaps they already have all the info
they need.

-- 
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Ham-Directory: www.ham-directory.com


On 10/5/07, Dave G4AON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm hoping mine will ship next week...

 Any update on where we are?

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 shipping on Oct 08

2007-10-05 Thread Dave G4AON

Julian

I did contact Lisa and confirm my credit card and order details.

I placed a deposit by phone 29th or 30th April, so I would hope those 
who assisted Elecraft with their finances would get some reward, being 
placed near the front of the queue for a start!


73 Dave
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Departing list ......

2007-10-05 Thread Brett gazdzinski
The eham reviews look quite good!
For a mobile rig it seems the trick, you could work 10 meters, 2 meters,
listen (tx?) on CB for hiway conditions, all with one remotely mounted
radio.
I cant believe it works as good as they say though, and a 150MHz 1st if???
 
Surely there is no filter at 150 MHz
 
I hope to try the K3 mobile, and I suppose I can listen to channel 19 on CB
as well.
Any day now I suppose!
 
Brett
N2DTS


  _  

From: johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:49 AM
To: Brett gazdzinski; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Departing list ..


I think we have to compare an apple with an apple.  IC7000 is capable when
you see it as a mobile rig from 500k to UHF.  It can no way be compared with
a contest rig like K2 and K3.
 
When coming to IC756pro3, its DSP manual notch within AGC loop is very
useful when operating the rig under strong QRM condition.  The DSP NR is
better than KDSP2 in SSB mode.  When I operate in SSB mode, I like 756pro3
but K2 works better in CW mode where you don't even need IF shift.
 
K3 should be the all round station rig to combat against the big players.  I
am in the early batch and waiting for it now.
 
73,
 
Johnny Siu VR2XMC

 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 shipping on Oct 08

2007-10-05 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
So, on the basis that I paid the entire cost, including UPS shipping on
2-May AND bought every option available, 2 additional filters, an XV144, a
HexKey, a Proset and some mini-modules too - all of which I said they could
ship in one go to save on shipping costs

mean that Wayne will fly it over personally on Mon 8th !

HiHi


On 5/10/07 16:56, Dave G4AON [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 Julian
 
 I did contact Lisa and confirm my credit card and order details.
 
 I placed a deposit by phone 29th or 30th April, so I would hope those
 who assisted Elecraft with their finances would get some reward, being
 placed near the front of the queue for a start!
 
 73 Dave
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

-- 
There are three truths: my truth, your truth, and the truth.
-Chinese proverb


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] restrictive CQs? SKCC, Fists etc. - protocol on who we can play with

2007-10-05 Thread Russell Ruby

Ron,

I enjoyed your postings on this topic.

I was out of active participation in amateur radio for
about 30 years.

My only amateur radio things which survive from my early days
are the vibroplex original bug my parents gave me when I passed
my general exam, and guess what ?  My ragchewers club certificate !

Also surviving is the TenTec PM3A which was my last serious venture
into amateur radio back in 1970/1971 when I started daydreaming about
trail radio.  

Not hard to guess what got me back into amateur radio.   While
visiting the new downtown Seattle public library at its grand opening
in May 2004, I paused to look through the latest copies of QST and CQ.
I saw a photo of a fella wearing gloves on the trail operating a KX1 !!
I was blown away.  I looked for every scrap I could find about the KX1.
Less than a month later, in one session I passed all the exams to be
relicensed as an amateur extra.  I must say, the exams seem a lot
easier than they were in the old days :)  I'm thinking all the study for
my amateur extra back then - which I never got around to taking - must
have stuck with me !

Up to now, I have been using my bug and PM3A.  But I just finished
building my KX1 and am about to head out on the trail - in the glacier peak
wilderness in Washington.  I know, possible nasty weather and all
that, but it will be fun !

russ  w7au

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 Manual and updated Assembly Manual?

2007-10-05 Thread n2zdb


Wouldn't it be nice if the manuals were posted today?  If the K3 is 
just about ready to ship

then the manuals should be ready also!

Michael
N2ZDB

Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - 
http://mail.aol.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Checking K2 sensitivity...

2007-10-05 Thread Steve Kallal
I am the second owner of K2 #2289. I've built and added a number of options.
But I wonder about its rx sensitivity. I often have to use the preamp on 30
and 20 meters to hear weaker signals. The same is not true of my 756 PRO 2,
at least on the same signals while doing an A/B comparison.

That said, I'd like to know the best way to re-check the rx sensitivity on
my K2. I still prefer it to my PRO 2 for copying CW, especially with narrow
filters kicked in. The PRO 2 has horrible ringing with narrow filters.
Otherwise, it just seems like the PRO 2 has better ears. Some how I don't
think that should be. Maybe my K2 needs tweaking.

73,

Steve N6VL

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Checking K2 sensitivity...

2007-10-05 Thread Darwin, Keith
-Original Message-
I am the second owner of K2 #2289 ... I wonder about its rx sensitivity
... it just seems like the PRO 2 has better ears.
--

One has to be careful about confusing audio output with sensitivity.
The K2 tends to produce less audio output with weak signals than other
rigs and that leads us to conclude it doesn't hear.  What it doesn't do
is reproduce all signal levels at the same audio level.

An S9 signal is just as loud as the band noise in most rigs because
their AGCs are very aggressive  flat.  They turn the gain down for all
signals to match them to the quietest signal, effectively making audio
output constant.

The K2 has some slope to its AGC.  Loud signals produce more audio
output than quiet signals.  Band noise is quieter than signals.  So as
you listen to the K2, you don't hear much unless there is a signal
there.  The K2 is still picking up everything the Pro 2 is, it just
isn't amplifying it as much.

An interesting test would be to turn AGC off on both rigs, set both with
RF gain max and AF gain so they are the same volume, then tune in very
weak signals.  I bet they both pick them up equally well.

- Keith N1AS -
- K2 5411.ssb.100 -
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Checking K2 sensitivity...

2007-10-05 Thread Dave G4AON
There was a problem with transmit power and RX sensitivity on early 
K2s,  my K2 serial #1892 had this problem. Basically the tuning cap(s) 
in the band pass filter needed a fixed capacitor of around 10 pF across 
the variable as it was right at the end of it's tuning range, you might 
want to check back through the list for details.


My K2 gives 0.12 uV sensitivity for 10 dB signal to noise without the 
pre-amp, and 0.1 uV with the pre-amp on.


73 Dave G4AON
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT2 aligned and working but..

2007-10-05 Thread Tom Hammond

JT:

Your external wattmeter is BETWEEN the KAT2 and the antenna...!

The KAT2 is providing a match to the K2, NOT the external meter, which is
AHEAD of the KAT2 and in a place where no matching is being done.

Remember, the KAT2 does NOT TUNE the antenna/coax, it only provides a
conjugate match to the RADIO... so if you have a 3:1 SWR ON THE COAX,
it's still gonna be there AT THE EXT. meter, but at the K2, the KAT2
will have compensated it down to near 1:1.

73,

Tom Hammond   N0SS


At 13:04 10/05/2007, JT Croteau wrote:

So I just finished my KAT2 assembly and alignment.  I even just had a
nice QSO on 20M using my 40M dipole.  However, while the KAT2 reports
a nice 1.2:1 SWR and 5.6W POUT and 0.2 reflected, my external
wattmeter (Elecraft W1) is still showing a horrible match with the SWR
way off the scale.

Any ideas?

Thanks

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT2 aligned and working but..

2007-10-05 Thread JT Croteau
On 10/5/07, Tree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Perfectly expected.  The KAT2 is inside the K2 - and is just matching your
 bad SWR to the finals.  The bad SWR is still there outside the radio.

Yeah, I thought of this just after I posted.  Sometimes I don't get it
til I actually write out the problem.  Heh, thanks Tree.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Checking K2 sensitivity...

2007-10-05 Thread Dave G4AON
The 20m low power/sensitivity bulletin on early K2s is on the Elecraft 
web site is at:


http://www.elecraft.com/Apps/k2_20M_LowPower.htm

73 Dave, G4AON
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT2 aligned and working but..

2007-10-05 Thread Don Wilhelm

JT,

Unless you have somehow placed the W1 between the K2 and the *input* to 
the KAT2 (not an easy feat), you will not see any reduction of SWR on 
the antenna transmission line.


The KAT2 (or any tuner for that matter) does not change the antenna, it 
just adds inductance and capacity to reduce the SWR at *its* input - the 
SWR at its output will remain the same.


So, no problem, what you are seeing is the expected behavior.  If you 
feel you must reduce the SWR between the KAT2 output and the antenna, 
you will have to work on the antenna itself.  If you are feeding with 
coax, that may be a concern, but if you are feeding the antenna with low 
loss parallel transmission line, all should be good.


73,
Don W3FPR

JT Croteau wrote:

So I just finished my KAT2 assembly and alignment.  I even just had a
nice QSO on 20M using my 40M dipole.  However, while the KAT2 reports
a nice 1.2:1 SWR and 5.6W POUT and 0.2 reflected, my external
wattmeter (Elecraft W1) is still showing a horrible match with the SWR
way off the scale.

  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 shipping on Oct 08

2007-10-05 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Dave G4AON wrote:


Julian

I did contact Lisa and confirm my credit card and order details.

I placed a deposit by phone 29th or 30th April, so I would hope those who 
assisted Elecraft with their finances would get some reward, being placed 
near the front of the queue for a start!


I believe the reward would be in getting your K3 before the folks that didn't 
order early and send in a deposit.


73 - thom
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Manual and updated Assembly Manual?

2007-10-05 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Wouldn't it be nice if the manuals were posted today?  If the K3 is just 
about ready to ship

then the manuals should be ready also!


Being in the first batch...I really hope if there is a time crunch, Aptos 
decides to pack and ship mine before they take the time to post manuals.


Yea, I know...I'm self centered...but I paid a deposit to get a rig early, not 
an online manual, which I can't use to contact anyone.


73-k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Checking K2 sensitivity...

2007-10-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Something that Elecraft offers (that you won't find from other major
manufacturers as far as I know) is a way for you to measure the sensitivity
of your receiver using standard measurement techniques easily and
inexpensively even if you don't have much test equipment. 

You know that sensitivity and volume are two different things. Volume is
easy to achieve. The ability to hear signals down in the band noise is
something else. Once you have enough volume to hear the noise, raising it
won't help dig out that signal. For that you need a better signal-to-noise
ratio.

Elecraft has neat, inexpensive little mini-kit calibrated signal
generators that come with instructions on how to measure the sensitivity of
your receiver. They are quick and fun to build with a few simple tools. You
can use one to make accurate measurements of the MDS (minimum discernable
signal) and the Signal-to-Noise-Plus-Noise ratio of your K2 (and any other
receiver) for meaningful side-by-side comparisons as well as a way to check
to see if your rig is still hearing as well as it has in the past. 

Check out the XG1 (40 meter only) or XG2 (80/40/20 meter) signal generators
at
http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_prod_list.htm

Ron (A shameless endorsement) AC7AC



-Original Message-
I am the second owner of K2 #2289. I've built and added a number of options.
But I wonder about its rx sensitivity. I often have to use the preamp on 30
and 20 meters to hear weaker signals. The same is not true of my 756 PRO 2,
at least on the same signals while doing an A/B comparison.

That said, I'd like to know the best way to re-check the rx sensitivity on
my K2. I still prefer it to my PRO 2 for copying CW, especially with narrow
filters kicked in. The PRO 2 has horrible ringing with narrow filters.
Otherwise, it just seems like the PRO 2 has better ears. Some how I don't
think that should be. Maybe my K2 needs tweaking.

73,

Steve N6VL

_

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[qrp-l.org] W3P/SCH in PA QSO Party!

2007-10-05 Thread Edward R. Breneiser
Hello all,

The NT3V Contest Team has been selected to operate a PA QSO Party Bonus
Station this year. We are all very honored to have been selected to
operate as one of five W3P PA QSO Party Bonus Stations.

We will setup our W3P Bonus Station at the Hawk Mountain Scout
Reservation in Schuylkill County. Look for us on ssb, cw and psk31.

The ops for the stations will be NT3V, WR1B, W3UM, WA3WSJ, NZ3G and
KB3GWY. We will be operating from a cabin up on a mountain in Schuylkill
County and it will be a blast!  What a collection of operators and
skills for this station. 

If you hear W3P/SCH, please give us a call and collect your 200 extra
bonus points per band per mode -hi!  

Here's a breakdown of who does want:

Phone: NT3V, NZ3G, WR1B  KB3GWY
CW   : W3UM  WA3WSJ
PSK31: WA3WSJ 

Head Cook: WA3WSJ 
Yes, I will do all the cooking for this motley crew!

Friday night we head over to Tamaqua, PA for a full course Italian
dinner with ALL the extras. We then will drive to the cabin and do some
final checks on the equipment. Saturday morning final checks and then
start the Party.  Saturday night I cook steaks with mushrooms and all
the fix'ns!  Sunday eat eat and eat and oh yes operate the Party hi!

If you hear us, stop by and kick your feet up awhile as this is the
friendly QSO party. It's also the PA QSO Party's 50th Anniversary.

CQ CQ CQ Party de W3P!

73,

Ed, WA3WSJ 
 



___
http://mail.qrp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l_qrp-l.org


[Elecraft] KX1 power on problem

2007-10-05 Thread Mike Scott
My 3-band KX1 does not always come fully on when I hit the power switch.

I am plugged into external 14 VDC power. I also have the same symptoms on
battery power.

Symptoms are as follows:

Log lamp always works

Sometimes power comes on normally with the frequency shown in the display
and band noise and signals in the headphones.

Sometimes when I turn it on I hear noise, but not band noise and the display
remains dark. The noise right now is accompanied with a start up buzz that
fades to white noise with a dark display.

After a lot of power cycling when I am trouble shooting the KX1 starts up
every time and the start up buzz goes away and the display works.

One more symptom that is odd, I just used recall memory to tune to 7.040
MHz. I then cycled the power. The radio came up on 6.0691 MHz, it forgot the
last frequency used. 

No matter what the prior frequency is the radio comes up at the following
frequencies:
40M -  6.0691
30M - 10.1068
20M - 14.0054

The buzzing noise makes me think an electrolytic is going somewhere.

I am not sure where to start, anyone have a pointer?

Mike Scott - AE6WA
Tarzana, CA (DM04 / near LA)
QRP-ARCI #12326/ KX1  #1311/ Swan 350C


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re:FOR SALE: Ten Tec 238 Tuner

2007-10-05 Thread J. W. (Dub) Thornton

Tuner is spoken for.  Thanks!

73 Dub

At 08:15 PM 10/4/2007, you wrote:
Excellent condition, inside and out, with one very small 
exception.  The thin inner web of the antenna selection knob was 
split, probably by over tightening the set screw, which is a fairly 
common occurrence, especially the band-switch knobs on some of the 
older Ten Tec radios.  The knob should be available from Ten Tec, 
however, this knob has been re-enforced by filling the outer ring 
around the split web with epoxy, making it stronger than a new one would be.

Original manual.
Bungee Cord for the dial string has just been replaced.

$325.00 shipped to contl USA.
Postal money order preferred.

73  Dub

--
J. W.  (Dub) Thornton  K5DUB
Minco, OK.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


--
J. W.  (Dub) Thornton  K5DUB
Minco, OK. 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] New Product request ...

2007-10-05 Thread Paul Pollock
Since I have now constructed a K1 and a K2, I can say that setting  
the K2 up for SSB is more involved than it might be for CW. To that  
end, there needs to be another Elecraft test device, to assist people  
to set up the K2. Most of what is needed is already present in  
individual tools Elecraft makes as kits. We need an item that does  
three(3) things:


1). A dummy load to handle at least 20-watts
2). A pad buffer (at the output of the dummy load) to be used to  
filter out/reduce the transmitter RF, and detect/output the audio.  
This is used as the input to a computer soundcard (for use with  
Spectrogram or other spectrum analyzer)) for transmitter bandwidth/ 
BFO analysis.
3). A audio white-noise generator which is fed to a cable terminated  
with a 8-pin mic-plug. This would be used to source the signal which  
would be used by the entire transmission chain, finally outputting  
signal which can be bandwidth and quality analyzed for proper  
transmitter alignment.


Alignment of the receiver IF/BFO is much more straight-forward and  
requires little more than a N-Gen (K2 audio output fed to computer  
soundcard). But getting the transmitter aligned to the same point as  
the receiver, and calibrating the voice response thru the SSB filter  
is nothing less than hunt--peck for most of us (hope the best and  
pray the fellow on the other end is forgiving grin).


This message should be taken as a formal request for Wayne and Gary,  
and not as a huge new source of discussion. We all know this request  
is reasonable and has utility.


-Paul Pollock-K2 #6148
  KD7BWB

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Product request ...

2007-10-05 Thread Don Wilhelm

Paul,

I believe you may be making the situation overly complex.  Certainly 
specialized test equipment can be used to do the task you request, but 
the tools are already available if you are willing to use your computer 
to assist with the task - you apparently are already familiar with 
Spectrogram.


The transmit passband response will be the same as the receive passband 
response set for the SSB FL1 position, so the transmitted audio passband 
can be properly set in receive using Spectrogram.


The SSB FL1 BFO settings are the ones used for transmit as well as 
receive (when the K2 is set to receive on the FL1 filter), and when 
these BFOs (FL1 LSB and USB) are properly set on receive, the same audio 
passband will be transmitted - there is no transmit frequency offset 
involved on SSB.


Unless your voice is unusually low or high pitched, set Spectrogram 
markers at 300 and 2600 (for the 2.4 kHz OP1 filter width) and center 
the receive passband between those two markers.  Do that on both LSB and 
USB for the FL1 filter position and the BFOs should be properly set to 
transmit an audio spectrum containing energy in the 300 to 2600 Hz 
range.  If your voice requires content in the audio range higher or 
lower than that, skew the passband (but not more than 100 Hz on the low 
frequency end) so it covers the audio range that you require.


If you wish to actually look at the transmit passband using Spectrogram, 
I would suggest that you use another relatively wideband receiver to 
listen to the transmitted signal - connect that receiver to the computer 
running Spectrogram, transmit with the K2 into a dummy load and couple 
the other receiver (with a short antenna) so you receive about an S-9 
signal.


For white noise, or pink noise input (or most any other kind of audio 
waveform) to the K2, download the NCH Tone Generator from 
http://www.nch.com.au/tonegen/index.html and use that to provide the 
output from your soundcard.  If you do not have 2 computers available, 
download Audacity to record the output of NCH Tone Generator in WAV 
format and burn that to a CD which you can play on a non-computer CD player.


There are many ways to 'skin the cat' without resorting to specialized 
equipment - computer based tools abound, particularly in the audio 
realm.  If you have a 32 bit soundcard, you can achieve close to a 90 dB 
dynamic range.


Elecraft does produce the 2T-GEN which can be used to produce a 2 tone 
test signal for adjusting your SSB audio for minimum IMD.  The same 
setup using Spectrogram on a separate receiver will give you a good 
picture of the transmitted audio spectrum.


73,
Don W3FPR

Paul Pollock wrote:
Since I have now constructed a K1 and a K2, I can say that setting the 
K2 up for SSB is more involved than it might be for CW. To that end, 
there needs to be another Elecraft test device, to assist people to 
set up the K2. Most of what is needed is already present in individual 
tools Elecraft makes as kits. We need an item that does three(3) things:


1). A dummy load to handle at least 20-watts
2). A pad buffer (at the output of the dummy load) to be used to 
filter out/reduce the transmitter RF, and detect/output the audio. 
This is used as the input to a computer soundcard (for use with 
Spectrogram or other spectrum analyzer)) for transmitter bandwidth/BFO 
analysis.
3). A audio white-noise generator which is fed to a cable terminated 
with a 8-pin mic-plug. This would be used to source the signal which 
would be used by the entire transmission chain, finally outputting 
signal which can be bandwidth and quality analyzed for proper 
transmitter alignment.


Alignment of the receiver IF/BFO is much more straight-forward and 
requires little more than a N-Gen (K2 audio output fed to computer 
soundcard). But getting the transmitter aligned to the same point as 
the receiver, and calibrating the voice response thru the SSB filter 
is nothing less than hunt--peck for most of us (hope the best and 
pray the fellow on the other end is forgiving grin).


This message should be taken as a formal request for Wayne and Gary, 
and not as a huge new source of discussion. We all know this request 
is reasonable and has utility.


-Paul Pollock-K2 #6148
  KD7BWB


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-05 Thread David Wilburn
Since there are CW and Heath enthusiasts in one place, I was curious 
about a set of twins I picked up 4 or 5 years ago.  You are welcome to 
reply off lists if it is not appropriate, as I do not wish to offend.


I picked up a Heathkit HR1680, and HX1681, complete with all manuals and 
power supply / speaker.  I have operated with them a bit.  I picked up 
some matching Heathkit paddles, and manuals, though I haven't tried them 
out.  I have only used the twins with a straight key.


I like the setup, but for now, I do not have the time to devote to going 
back over it and checking it out.  I was just curious about the opinions 
on these rigs from the folks that have experience with them.  I have not 
gotten much out of them, power wise, but assumed they just needed some 
attention.


The ham I got them from, was still using them, was retiring from the 
hobby, as he was up in age, and had to slow down to 35 wpm.  That was 
killing me as I was struggling at about 10wpm at the time.  I got the 
impression he was going to live with his daughter, but he did not say.


It was fun learning how to operate a split system and it was with these 
rigs that I learned, what little I have learned, about zero beat.  In 
one sense, I would like to keep these rigs for the day when I will have 
more time to pay attention to them, and go through and check them out. 
On the other hand, I have a bit of a situation here at home, and I may 
not really get a chance to do those sort of things, and it would be a 
shame for them to sit around when someone else could be enjoying them.


I'm hoping that hearing about the rigs, what they were capable of, and 
how well they worked, will help me tip the balance which way I want to 
go with them.  I really do like how they look on the bench, especially 
powered up with all the red lighting.  They are in my shack pic on QRZ, 
http://www.qrz.com/k4dgw , though they were not powered at the time. 
They do not sell for that much, as most folks are not interested in CW 
only rigs, so they would not do much to help me towards a K3.  Did I 
mention they looked cool? ;^) I sold my other rigs, TS-570, and IC-718, 
to pay for the K2 and all the goodies.  The 706 that is in the picture 
was put in the vehicle with a 20m hamstick, so I can listen to CW while 
I am driving.  Thanks.

--

David Wilburn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K4DGW
K2 #5982

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-05 Thread Brett gazdzinski
The eham reviews are mixed.
I don't think they were great rigs, but likely a lot of fun.

I did a Google search, usually anything heathkit brings up
loads of mods and such, but nothing on these rigs...

Old stuff is fun to play with, but often not real fun to actually
use, although the solid state stuff (no tune?) might be better.

I have really been spoiled by modern transceivers, even the old
KWM2-a was a chore to hop around the band with.

They might be more fun to play with then any amount of money
you might get for them.
I had a few HW101's, extra clean they go for about $100.00
with power supply, ebay sometimes a bit more...

Surely the old stuff is more fun to play with then its worth 
to sell...

Brett
N2DTS 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] OT - Heath CW Twins

2007-10-05 Thread Stephen W. Kercel

David:

In 1977 (Good Heavens! That's 30 years ago.) I built a HR-1680 and 
used it for several years. As a strictly CW guy, and preferring 
separate units, the 1680/81 combination was just what I was looking 
for. The HR-1680 was not a high performance receiver compared to 
modern rigs, but I worked an awful lot of DX with it.


The real beauty of the HR-1680 was that Heath had a scheme that let 
you use the VFO as a signal generator and the S-meter as a tuning 
indicator, and you could align the receiver with no other instruments 
except a VOM. It was easy for a relatively inexperienced person to 
build it and get it running correctly.


I used a Viking Ranger as a transmitter.

As far as I know, Heath never actually sold the HX-1681 at retail. 
After I built the 1680, I really wanted the companion transmitter, 
but it never showed up in the Heath catalog. In 1978, I saw a 
finished HX-1681 on display at a Heath retail store in the Boston 
suburbs, and asked when it would be for sale. The Heath people told 
me they were having trouble getting it type accepted by the FCC. 
Evidently they never did.


Thus, I'm not sure how you managed to acquire a 1681. You must have 
gotten one of the old display units. Given that Heath was having 
trouble meeting FCC requirements I'd be concerned about the spectral 
purity of the HX-1681. I would look at the output on a spectrum 
analyzer before I put the thing on the air.


Anyway, the pair would be fun and simple to use, but the 
HR-1680/HX-1681 is no match for the K2.


73,

Steve Kercel
AA4AK



At 08:19 PM 10/5/2007, David Wilburn wrote:
Since there are CW and Heath enthusiasts in one place, I was curious 
about a set of twins I picked up 4 or 5 years ago.  You are welcome 
to reply off lists if it is not appropriate, as I do not wish to offend.


I picked up a Heathkit HR1680, and HX1681, complete with all manuals 
and power supply / speaker.  I have operated with them a bit.  I 
picked up some matching Heathkit paddles, and manuals, though I 
haven't tried them out.  I have only used the twins with a straight key.


I like the setup, but for now, I do not have the time to devote to 
going back over it and checking it out.  I was just curious about 
the opinions on these rigs from the folks that have experience with 
them.  I have not gotten much out of them, power wise, but assumed 
they just needed some attention.


The ham I got them from, was still using them, was retiring from the 
hobby, as he was up in age, and had to slow down to 35 wpm.  That 
was killing me as I was struggling at about 10wpm at the time.  I 
got the impression he was going to live with his daughter, but he did not say.


It was fun learning how to operate a split system and it was with 
these rigs that I learned, what little I have learned, about zero 
beat.  In one sense, I would like to keep these rigs for the day 
when I will have more time to pay attention to them, and go through 
and check them out. On the other hand, I have a bit of a situation 
here at home, and I may not really get a chance to do those sort of 
things, and it would be a shame for them to sit around when someone 
else could be enjoying them.


I'm hoping that hearing about the rigs, what they were capable of, 
and how well they worked, will help me tip the balance which way I 
want to go with them.  I really do like how they look on the bench, 
especially powered up with all the red lighting.  They are in my 
shack pic on QRZ, http://www.qrz.com/k4dgw , though they were not 
powered at the time. They do not sell for that much, as most folks 
are not interested in CW only rigs, so they would not do much to 
help me towards a K3.  Did I mention they looked cool? ;^) I sold my 
other rigs, TS-570, and IC-718, to pay for the K2 and all the 
goodies.  The 706 that is in the picture was put in the vehicle with 
a 20m hamstick, so I can listen to CW while I am driving.  Thanks.

--

David Wilburn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K4DGW
K2 #5982

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100/KAT100 trouble

2007-10-05 Thread Christopher A. Kantarjiev

Don,

It's taken me several weeks to get to this, but tonight was the night. I had 
tested and determined that the base K2 was fine, but neither the KPA nor KAT 
controlled power correctly. The parts folks had sent me diodes.


Boy, what a nuisance these are to replace! Julius N2WN had suggested putting the 
KPA's diodes on the underside of the board, where they are easier to get at, and 
I followed that advice. For the KAT, there's just no good way to get at the 
backside of the board w/o removing all the connectors. I used a stainless dental 
pick to clean out the holes from the front, and soldered from that side, too.


Power control works great now. Both bridges seem to want to be recalibrated - 
the max output is about 75W, even when I have 100+ dialed in. I didn't do the 
original calibration on these, so I'm not certain of how close they were ... and 
I guess I'm not sure that I measured for full power out when I bought them.


I suspect that it's a calibration issue, because output is low across the entire 
HIGH range. The bargraph is showing about the right number of bars for the POWER 
setting.


Or is there some other problem I should be looking for that might cause this?

Thanks again.

73 de chris K6DBG

Don Wilhelm wrote:

Chris,

As your first step, you need to obtain some 1N5711 diodes - obtain 5 of 
them if you have to order any.


First remove the KPA100 and check the base K2 into a good dummy load.  
Do you have good power control over the entire range?  If yes, the base 
K2 is working, but if no, replace RF Board D9 and re-check.


Once you have verified that the base K2 can control the power output, 
add the KPA100 - operate into a dummy load (no antennas please because 
there are too many variables to deal with).  If the K2 with KPA100 
properly controls power and displays a 1:1 SWR, then you will have 2 
more extra diodes.  OTOH, if the KPA100 produces full power output no 
matter where the power knob is set, then replace D16 and D17 in the 
KPA100.  The K2 with KPA100 should now properly control power output.


Lastly, add the KAT100, but set the ATU menu to CAL and connect the 
dummy load to the KAT100.  If all works well, you have extra diodes, but 
if all is not well, then replace D1 and D2 in the KAT100.


After all is working fine into a dummy load, then you can connect an 
antenna and try it out - you should find normal behavior.


OK, this has been simplistic and considers only that the lightning 
zapped the wattmeter diodes.  This is usually the only consequence, but 
if at any point, normal behavior is not restored after replacing the 
diodes, there is some other problem that must be investigated before 
attempting to proceed any further with the testing.


73,
Don W3FPR

Chris Kantarjiev wrote:


I may be having my first run-in with lightning damage.

A thunderstorm rolled through the SF Bay Area last night. I didn't
disconnect my antennas until I *saw* the first lightning flash.
Oops, I think.

I turned on the radio later in the evening, and was getting very
high SWR indications on the KAT100, and HiCur on the K2. Hitting
TUNE caused a lot of clicking and clacking, and eventual tune to
about 1.5:1, but SWR was still high on transmit - and the indicated
power on the bargraph was lower than dialed in. This is on both
antennas - a vertical and OCF dipole - both more or less resonant.

I turned off the rig and called it a night.

This morning I pulled out my LP200 dummy load/power meter. The ATU
tunes it to 1.1:1. Power out does not change appreciably
in response to the POWER knob - if set for any value less than 10W, 
the power is about 4W; if set for values about 10W (PA on), power out 
is always about 30W. In neither case is the LED indication on

the K2 correct.

I also notice that the SWR LEDs no longer display anything when the
power is set below 10W, but indicate as expected when POWER is
above 10W.

  







___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Product request ...

2007-10-05 Thread Dave G4AON

Paul (and others)

A neat trick with audio spectrum analysis software running on a PC is to 
use a diode ring mixer, such as an SBL-1 or equivalent, feed a signal 
generator into the oscillator port and monitor the IF port on the sound 
card. Pi network attenuators on at least the IF port will reduce 
spurious signals which could result from the mixer not being properly 
terminated with 50 Ohms. While exact details are perhaps a bit much for 
this list, it's neither complex nor expensive to produce and another 
useful item for your shack drawer.


To give a broad resistive termination for feeding a signal to such 
devices, I use Wes Haywards resistive tap from the June 2001 QST (Simple 
RF Power Measurement), this is available from the ARRL members part of 
their web site. For a signal generator I use an old Marconi 2018.


The free software Spectrum Laboratory from DL4YHF 
(http://freenet-homepage.de/dl4yhf/spectra1.html), which also includes a 
two tone test generator, and can be configured for an orange graticule 
and green trace to look like a proper spectrum analyser.


All good fun for less than $10.

73 Dave, G4AON
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com