RE: free/busy info
Yes they are in the same 5.5 site. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: free/busy info Are the Exchange 2000 and Exchange 5.5 server in the same Exchange 5.5 site? I suspect not given that replicas solved your problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Ellis Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: free/busy info Creating a f/b folder replica on the 2000 server seems to have resolved the issue, but I still wonder about the root cause. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: free/busy info Sorry, exchange 5.5 site. Both the 5.5 server and the 2000 server in question are in the same physical and exchange 5.5 site. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: free/busy info Tell us about sites. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Ellis Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: free/busy info I used to have a mailbox on 5.5, then I moved the box to an ex2000 box in the same site. When on 5.5, I could see f/b info for users on both 5.5 and 2000, now I can't see any, and I keep getting popups about the public folder not being available. The f/b public folder is on one of the 5.5 servers. Should there be a replica of it on the 2000 box, or is that not necessary? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ:
4-way exchange 2000 clusters
Anyone got a 4-way exchange 2000 cluster? I'm looking at 2, to support worst case, 15,000 users each. 3 active/1 passive, 3 Virtual servers per cluster, therefore 5000 users per VS. 100Mb mailbox limits. Is this realistic thinking? Am also considering putting in some front end servers at some of our less well connected sites, and also using them for Instant Messenger servers. Any thoughts? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Undelete command
HELP! Recently I deleted the mailbox of one of the resigned employee, after 3 days her replacement comes in and asking about the old mails of her successor, she says that there are some important mails she needs to retrieve on the said mailbox. This user is one of the VP's here. How can I retrieve the deleted mailbox? Is there an Undelete mailbox like command in Exchange? I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4, and have no recovery server ready here. Thanks in advance... Jojo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Question
If your whole Exchange org is ready to go native, then yes you can start to take it out. You'll need to remove the SRS before you can remove the config connection agreement and consequently uninstall the ADC itself. I'd dig around for the Technet articles/whitepapers on this before you do though. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 02:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Question You can take the connection out. Kevinm QWSZC, VRY+Y, NFH, SAD-VF, DERSDESDFG ~~~ More letters after my names makes me Smarter. ~~~ please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert Moore Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Question Once you've upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to 2000, do you leave the ADC in place? Or, once the upgrade is complete, has it outlived its usefulness? Thanks, Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2k migration permissions question
You need to think about using a tool like the ADMT (Active Directory Migration Tool) to bring across the users original NT4 SID into the SidHistory of his AD account which will then give access to the mailbox via the original 55 assoc-nt-account Once you have done this, you can run a repermissioning exercise which will re-ACL all resources (NT4, 55 or 2K) with the new AD SIDs so that you are not relying on the SidHistory mechanism. Read up on the Domain migration cookbook at http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/activedirectory/cook book.asp Which explains these concepts more. Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 20:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2k migration permissions question In our test environment, every time I migrate a users mailbox by right-click method. I then have to manually assign the user permissions to access their own mailbox. Is this right Have I overlooked some obvious setting someplace? Feel free to point me to a technote. If there is one that is relevant, I haven't found it. Thanks, Gordon | | | | ___NOTICE This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Undelete command
Then build one and restore a good backup. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a sp Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Undelete command HELP! Recently I deleted the mailbox of one of the resigned employee, after 3 days her replacement comes in and asking about the old mails of her successor, she says that there are some important mails she needs to retrieve on the said mailbox. This user is one of the VP's here. How can I retrieve the deleted mailbox? Is there an Undelete mailbox like command in Exchange? I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4, and have no recovery server ready here. Thanks in advance... Jojo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns
In the FAQ. (we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this) -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio ns Good morning to some and good afternoon to the others ... I'm assuming of course that you do go to sleep some time. 8-) We recently implemented the IMSEXT.DLL, in order to throw in the disclaimers which our security and legal departments were looking for. However, this is now causing issues on emails which MUST have only specific text in the body as they tend to ignore it or choke on it when they see disclaimer text as well. How are other people handling issues such as sending an unsubscribe message to a list when the unsubscribe message is only supposed to have a specific subject line and absolutely nothing in the message body? Does anyone know of any alternative products or settings I can use on IMSEXT.DLL or Exchange; which would let the clients override the dislaimer text on an email by email basis, or with the ability to override the auto-disclaimer for specific mailboxes? This requirement also extends to emails relayed off of our IMS (from behind our firewall of course). TIA ... Joe This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and If you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, transfert ou autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdite. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns
Hi Joe You could create another Exchange server with an IMS that is dedicated to those domains and addresses that have issues with the disclaimer and not run the disclaimer on those machines. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 13:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns In the FAQ. (we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this) -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio ns Good morning to some and good afternoon to the others ... I'm assuming of course that you do go to sleep some time. 8-) We recently implemented the IMSEXT.DLL, in order to throw in the disclaimers which our security and legal departments were looking for. However, this is now causing issues on emails which MUST have only specific text in the body as they tend to ignore it or choke on it when they see disclaimer text as well. How are other people handling issues such as sending an unsubscribe message to a list when the unsubscribe message is only supposed to have a specific subject line and absolutely nothing in the message body? Does anyone know of any alternative products or settings I can use on IMSEXT.DLL or Exchange; which would let the clients override the dislaimer text on an email by email basis, or with the ability to override the auto-disclaimer for specific mailboxes? This requirement also extends to emails relayed off of our IMS (from behind our firewall of course). TIA ... Joe This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and If you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, transfert ou autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdite. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When addressed to clients of the company from where this e-mail originates (the sending company) any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business or client engagement letter . The sending company does not accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the accessing of any files attached to this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Opening Outlook with only one PST Files
Is she triple- or quadruple-clicking maybe? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Do illiterate people get the full effect of alphabet soup? - -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening Outlook with only one PST Files I have a client with Exchange server 5.5 with sp 4.0 on a NT server. Every time this client opens her Outlook she two outlook files appear. She was only configured to run exchange client and not internet mail. I tried to close one of the PST files (off line one!!!), but I can not?? I just want to open one PST file from the exchange server, when she opens Outlook 2000. Also her inbox (on her off line PST file) is receiving her mail from the exchange server. The Inbox on the exchange PST is not receiving any mail. I want her exchange mail box (exchange PST file) to receive all the mail. Thank You Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Undelete command
and design some procedures for deleting mailboxes (perhaps take a look at the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Inside every older person is a younger person...wondering what the heck happened. - -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command Then build one and restore a good backup. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a sp Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Undelete command HELP! Recently I deleted the mailbox of one of the resigned employee, after 3 days her replacement comes in and asking about the old mails of her successor, she says that there are some important mails she needs to retrieve on the said mailbox. This user is one of the VP's here. How can I retrieve the deleted mailbox? Is there an Undelete mailbox like command in Exchange? I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4, and have no recovery server ready here. Thanks in advance... Jojo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
blocking internet access (OT)
Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC connector setup
I'm in the middle of setting up my first Recipient Connection Agreement, and I'm still a bit confused. On the From Exchange tab, you have to choose a Default destination. Since we have multiple OUs in our AD, do I choose our site, instead of an individual OU? Or is the Default destination just where it creates accounts it doesn't know what else to do with? (In which case I would just choose a convenient OU.) Thanks, Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ASCII messages
Another fun part is that sometimes you get the bounce message and your message still posts on the list. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:49 PM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages And they don't even return the subject of the message so I can figure out which one to resend. This very message happens to be one I created from scratch because it was bounced by internet.com for having an attachment. The message I previously sent was a plain text message. The next message you get from me in this thread will also be one I'm recreating from scratch for the exact same reason. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I don't have a problem with them doing it. I do have a problem with them not supplying a bit more useful error message for debugging. It took me the better part of a week to figure out what the cause was because the error message was useless (your message was rejected because it contained an attachment and I know there was no attachment), and getting any response at all from the listadmin was impossible. A useful error message or a response from the listadmin would easily solve most people's gripes. My $.02. Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
With 5.5 the client needs to resolve the NetBios name. Easy to check, run nbtstat -a Server_Name Note the a must be lower case in this command syntax. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Undelete command
here's what we do: Change the primary NT account used by the mailbox to the supervisor's account. Go to the supervisor's station and from Tools, Services, highlight Microsoft Exchange Server and click Properties. On the Advanced tab, add the mailbox to the Open these additional mailboxes selections. (If the supervisor uses the Outlook Bar, add a shortcut to the mailbox there.) Hide the mailbox from the GAL. Make a notation in the Exchange Admin GAL entry in the Administrative Notes section stating that this mailbox will be deleted on a date 90 days from the date of termination. Make Administrator an Alternate Recipient for the mailbox and DO NOT check the deliver to both box Give Exchange Admins Send As permissions to the mailbox Remove the terminated employee's mailbox from all DLs. Disable their NT account. Archive their G: C: drives to CD. Give the CD to the supervisor. Give the supervisor any mail archive CDs (.pst). After 30 days, remove the mailbox from the supervisor's Additional Mailboxes listing. Ask the supervisor if the CDs are no longer needed. If they are not, ask if MIS should store them or if the supervisor would like to keep them. Delete the user's Home Directory. After 90 days, delete the mailbox the NT account. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - I have yet to hear a man ask for advice on how to combine marriage and a career. -Gloria Steinem - -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command Next time, hide the mailbox, set the max allowable incoming mail size to 0K and then get permission to delete it in writing, after having permission export the mailbox to PST and burn it to a CD.That's how I do it...YMMV For your immediate problem, get busy building that recovery server. Matthew -Original Message- From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Undelete command HELP! Recently I deleted the mailbox of one of the resigned employee, after 3 days her replacement comes in and asking about the old mails of her successor, she says that there are some important mails she needs to retrieve on the said mailbox. This user is one of the VP's here. How can I retrieve the deleted mailbox? Is there an Undelete mailbox like command in Exchange? I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4, and have no recovery server ready here. Thanks in advance... Jojo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
connection failure to exchange server 5.5
Hi everyone. This is a follow-up to my earlier message, at some point after my email, outlook failed to connect to the server for everyone in the site. The only way I could quickly restore the service was to reboot the server, as stopping the services one after the other was taking too long. This problem occurred in the past and the only way to resolve it was a reboot. Please your advise is required to resolve the problem as rebooting server is not a permanent solution. I have checked the event viewer there were no error messages, which other log can I check. Thanks With best regards Sabi Kassim-Momodu User\Network Support Analyst This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you receive this message in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
Nope. DNS. Outlook looks at DNS entries first-- hence when Outlook takes 2 or 3 minutes to start up, the first thing to look at is DNS. Since DNS is the answer, the HOSTS file is more important than the LMHOSTS file. Both of these files can be identical, though, so if you're making one, it's no big deal to make the other. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
Yes. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Hide the modem / wire. JDE -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem?
Ben is correct.one example would be having mail delivered to a PST. The mail leaves the server inbox without ever being placed in the deleted items folder. If I'm not mistaken a rule can also be created to delete items, thus never touching the Deleted items folder. This is why you need the reg hack.YMMV -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Go ahead and do it to make sure, but I as well as others will confirm that you can delete things directly from your Inbox, or other folders for that matter, without it touching the Deleted Items folder, thus it cannot be recovered from the Deleted Items, rather can only be recovered from the folder it was deleted from. That means you need the reg hack. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From:Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:Friday, August 17, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Um, I'll have to try this, but I don't think that is correct. I believe messages are _always_ retained in the IS for the retention period (I don't care how you delete them). The DumsterAlwaysOn entry allows you to see the Recover Deleted Items tool in folders other that Deleted Items. That's why you only need the hack on any machines except the one you recover from. -Walden -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? Correct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? so if i am in my inbox folder, and hold down the shift key the item in the inbox never touches the deleted items folder, it is deleted right from the inbox folder, so to recover this you would have to turn dumpster always on registry edit ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? But if I want to recover other folders I have to go to each clients workstation and do the Dumpsteralways on reg config ?? No just the workstation you plan to use to recover things. But I thought anytime you delete an item it goes to the deleted item folder anyhow?? Not always...delete this message while holding the shiftkey. Delivering items to a PST would also be an instance were the message left the IS without being placed in the deleted items folder. So in which scenario would it be useful to edit this registry setting??? If you plan on recovering things that never resided in the deleted items folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem?
I think you two are saying the same thing. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Go ahead and do it to make sure, but I as well as others will confirm that you can delete things directly from your Inbox, or other folders for that matter, without it touching the Deleted Items folder, thus it cannot be recovered from the Deleted Items, rather can only be recovered from the folder it was deleted from. That means you need the reg hack. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Um, I'll have to try this, but I don't think that is correct. I believe messages are _always_ retained in the IS for the retention period (I don't care how you delete them). The DumsterAlwaysOn entry allows you to see the Recover Deleted Items tool in folders other that Deleted Items. That's why you only need the hack on any machines except the one you recover from. -Walden -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? Correct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? so if i am in my inbox folder, and hold down the shift key the item in the inbox never touches the deleted items folder, it is deleted right from the inbox folder, so to recover this you would have to turn dumpster always on registry edit ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? But if I want to recover other folders I have to go to each clients workstation and do the Dumpsteralways on reg config ?? No just the workstation you plan to use to recover things. But I thought anytime you delete an item it goes to the deleted item folder anyhow?? Not always...delete this message while holding the shiftkey. Delivering items to a PST would also be an instance were the message left the IS without being placed in the deleted items folder. So in which scenario would it be useful to edit this registry setting??? If you plan on recovering things that never resided in the deleted items folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector setup
Robert/phillip There was a whole thread on these subjects which may have some answers for you. Run a search in the archives for the subject line: - Active Directory Connector - Question Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector setup What we decided to do (just now) is create a folder for all the contacts (we have a lot of them--our students who do not have Exchange accounts, but are just Custom Recipients) and groups, and then let it run. It worked perfectly. Thanks for your input. I may have more questions as the day goes by. Rob -Original Message- From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector setup You can't have multiple user accounts with the same ID no matter how many OU's you have and no matter what OU you setup for ADC replication. If you are talking about an E2k upgrade after a Win2k migration then you could definitely make use of the temp OU as a sort of staging area for sorting out where all the id's go. The temp OU just doesn't make much sense for an on going administration type setup. Phil That (the one way connection) seems fine for when the conversion is already done. But what about during the upgrade process (from 5.5 to 2000) when we have to get all the info off the Exchange 5.5 server into AD? When Exchange replicates with AD, does it search all of AD regardless of the default OU for the corresponding user account? And if it does not find a user account, does it then create a new account in the specified default OU? If this is right, then a temporary OU makes a lot of sense. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ScanMail Problem
Why don't you configure it with the scanmail management console? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have internet connection, we definitely don't have a slow connection (t3). I tried downloading the pattern file stopped all the services and placed it in the C:\program files\trend\patterns. Started all the services and it did not recognize the new pattern file. Did I do something wrong? or miss a step? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Slow internet connection, NO internet connection. Munged pattern file.. Can you download the pattern file and manually update your server? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ScanMail Problem The ScanMail that I'm running won't download the latest pattern files, scan engine etc from the internet. It will just timeout. What would stop that function from working? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ScanMail Problem
I have tried to configure it to update from the ScanMail site. But when I hit Update Now it just sits and times out. It use to work...all of a sudden it just stopped updating. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Why don't you configure it with the scanmail management console? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have internet connection, we definitely don't have a slow connection (t3). I tried downloading the pattern file stopped all the services and placed it in the C:\program files\trend\patterns. Started all the services and it did not recognize the new pattern file. Did I do something wrong? or miss a step? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Slow internet connection, NO internet connection. Munged pattern file.. Can you download the pattern file and manually update your server? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ScanMail Problem The ScanMail that I'm running won't download the latest pattern files, scan engine etc from the internet. It will just timeout. What would stop that function from working? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook View Control updates available
For those worried about the security hole in the Outlook View Control, used in Team Folders and digital dashboards, updates are out for both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002. Details at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms01-038.asp. The Outlook 2002 also fixes a vulnerability to file attachments with a CLSID as the file extension. No word yet on when (or if) the Team Folders download will reappear. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ScanMail Problem
You go through a proxy? What account is running scanmail - did the password change? Anything in the application event log? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have tried to configure it to update from the ScanMail site. But when I hit Update Now it just sits and times out. It use to work...all of a sudden it just stopped updating. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Why don't you configure it with the scanmail management console? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have internet connection, we definitely don't have a slow connection (t3). I tried downloading the pattern file stopped all the services and placed it in the C:\program files\trend\patterns. Started all the services and it did not recognize the new pattern file. Did I do something wrong? or miss a step? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Slow internet connection, NO internet connection. Munged pattern file.. Can you download the pattern file and manually update your server? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ScanMail Problem The ScanMail that I'm running won't download the latest pattern files, scan engine etc from the internet. It will just timeout. What would stop that function from working? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ScanMail Problem
I also have exactly similar situation. It used to work before. But now I only see the message generic HTTP failure. I even checked the trend site and there it is suggested to download a test file, server.ini. IF that succeeds, they say there is no problem with the conection. I could download it. But still it is not working. Currently I am downlaoding it manually and updating. Anil -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem You go through a proxy? What account is running scanmail - did the password change? Anything in the application event log? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have tried to configure it to update from the ScanMail site. But when I hit Update Now it just sits and times out. It use to work...all of a sudden it just stopped updating. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Why don't you configure it with the scanmail management console? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have internet connection, we definitely don't have a slow connection (t3). I tried downloading the pattern file stopped all the services and placed it in the C:\program files\trend\patterns. Started all the services and it did not recognize the new pattern file. Did I do something wrong? or miss a step? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Slow internet connection, NO internet connection. Munged pattern file.. Can you download the pattern file and manually update your server? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ScanMail Problem The ScanMail that I'm running won't download the latest pattern files, scan engine etc from the internet. It will just timeout. What would stop that function from working? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any form of disclosure, production, distribution or any action taken or refrained from in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately. The content of the email is not
RE: ScanMail Problem
If you changed the password in user manager but did not also update the password in the services applet on the machine I would expect it to fail. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I did change the password. Would that effect would changing the password have on downloading pattern files? The account that is running scanmail has Act as part of the OS and log on as a service and has admin rights to Exchange. Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem You go through a proxy? What account is running scanmail - did the password change? Anything in the application event log? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have tried to configure it to update from the ScanMail site. But when I hit Update Now it just sits and times out. It use to work...all of a sudden it just stopped updating. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Why don't you configure it with the scanmail management console? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have internet connection, we definitely don't have a slow connection (t3). I tried downloading the pattern file stopped all the services and placed it in the C:\program files\trend\patterns. Started all the services and it did not recognize the new pattern file. Did I do something wrong? or miss a step? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Slow internet connection, NO internet connection. Munged pattern file.. Can you download the pattern file and manually update your server? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ScanMail Problem The ScanMail that I'm running won't download the latest pattern files, scan engine etc from the internet. It will just timeout. What would stop that function from working? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: ScanMail Problem
I updated the passwords on both. Any other suggestions? Changing the password is the only modification. If I updated both the NT Account and the services. What could of possibly changed that wouldn't allow downloading pattern files to work? Thank you, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem If you changed the password in user manager but did not also update the password in the services applet on the machine I would expect it to fail. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I did change the password. Would that effect would changing the password have on downloading pattern files? The account that is running scanmail has Act as part of the OS and log on as a service and has admin rights to Exchange. Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem You go through a proxy? What account is running scanmail - did the password change? Anything in the application event log? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have tried to configure it to update from the ScanMail site. But when I hit Update Now it just sits and times out. It use to work...all of a sudden it just stopped updating. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Why don't you configure it with the scanmail management console? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem I have internet connection, we definitely don't have a slow connection (t3). I tried downloading the pattern file stopped all the services and placed it in the C:\program files\trend\patterns. Started all the services and it did not recognize the new pattern file. Did I do something wrong? or miss a step? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Problem Slow internet connection, NO internet connection. Munged pattern file.. Can you download the pattern file and manually update your server? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ScanMail Problem The ScanMail that I'm running won't download the latest pattern files, scan engine etc from the internet. It will just timeout. What would stop that function from working? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: ASCII messages
I've had that one happen too. I bet someone over there is changing things on purpose to watch threads like this. g I know the ops manager for internet.com. I'll give him a call and see if he's aware of the problem. Tom. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Another fun part is that sometimes you get the bounce message and your message still posts on the list. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:49 PM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages And they don't even return the subject of the message so I can figure out which one to resend. This very message happens to be one I created from scratch because it was bounced by internet.com for having an attachment. The message I previously sent was a plain text message. The next message you get from me in this thread will also be one I'm recreating from scratch for the exact same reason. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I don't have a problem with them doing it. I do have a problem with them not supplying a bit more useful error message for debugging. It took me the better part of a week to figure out what the cause was because the error message was useless (your message was rejected because it contained an attachment and I know there was no attachment), and getting any response at all from the listadmin was impossible. A useful error message or a response from the listadmin would easily solve most people's gripes. My $.02. Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 to 2000
We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
A savvy kid would ftp Opera or Netscape or Mozilla. That also wouldn't keep my kid from using Yahoo Messenger or ICQ or whatever else is keeping him from his homework. -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 09:27 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem?
My bad. I read the original post as to mean that w/o the hack on the machine that did the shift-delete those messages couldn't be deleted. Upon re-reading the post that's not what was said, sorry. I think we can all agree on the following: At an end-user machine the hack doesn't need to be installed. The end user can delete things and recover from deleted items. If they delete them from deleted items they can Recover Deleted Items. If however they shift-delete them from inbox (or another folder) _they_ cannot Recover Deleted Items them. At an admin machine the hack should be installed. This would allow the admin to open the end-users mailbox (provided they had rights) and Recover Deleted Items the mail messages from _any_ folder regardless of a delete or shift-delete. Both of the preceding assume that Deleted Item Retention Time hasn't passed since the delete. Fair? -Walden -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? You know, after reading more closely, it looks like that, yes. It was a little confusing since he disagreed with the previous post, which was correct. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? I think you two are saying the same thing. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Go ahead and do it to make sure, but I as well as others will confirm that you can delete things directly from your Inbox, or other folders for that matter, without it touching the Deleted Items folder, thus it cannot be recovered from the Deleted Items, rather can only be recovered from the folder it was deleted from. That means you need the reg hack. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Um, I'll have to try this, but I don't think that is correct. I believe messages are _always_ retained in the IS for the retention period (I don't care how you delete them). The DumsterAlwaysOn entry allows you to see the Recover Deleted Items tool in folders other that Deleted Items. That's why you only need the hack on any machines except the one you recover from. -Walden -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? Correct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? so if i am in my inbox folder, and hold down the shift key the item in the inbox never touches the deleted items folder, it is deleted right from the inbox folder, so to recover this you would have to turn dumpster always on registry edit ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? But if I want to recover other folders I have to go to each clients workstation and do the Dumpsteralways on reg config ?? No just the workstation you plan to use to recover things. But I thought anytime you delete an item it goes to the deleted item folder anyhow?? Not always...delete this message while holding the shiftkey. Delivering items to a PST would also be an instance were the message left the IS without being placed in the deleted items folder. So in which scenario would it be useful to edit this registry setting??? If you plan on recovering things that never resided in the deleted items folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
No, removed from his will, the familial equivalent g -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) And if he does it again, does he get fired? LJ -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) I second that emotion. In this case a simple No should suffice. If it doesn't, a boot password on the machine should do the trick. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
That's what duct-tape and TheStick were invented for. Just remember the rule of thumb - the stick can't be thicker than your thumb. Tom. -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) And if he does it again, does he get fired? LJ -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) I second that emotion. In this case a simple No should suffice. If it doesn't, a boot password on the machine should do the trick. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: ASCII messages
I just sent a reply to the list stating that maybe the internet.com people had got their act together because I had successfully posted 2 replies directly to the list this morning. That reply bounced. So 2 out of 3 direct replies made it to the list. I'm sending this to my custom recipient. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:19 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages I've had that one happen too. I bet someone over there is changing things on purpose to watch threads like this. g I know the ops manager for internet.com. I'll give him a call and see if he's aware of the problem. Tom. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Another fun part is that sometimes you get the bounce message and your message still posts on the list. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:49 PM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages And they don't even return the subject of the message so I can figure out which one to resend. This very message happens to be one I created from scratch because it was bounced by internet.com for having an attachment. The message I previously sent was a plain text message. The next message you get from me in this thread will also be one I'm recreating from scratch for the exact same reason. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I don't have a problem with them doing it. I do have a problem with them not supplying a bit more useful error message for debugging. It took me the better part of a week to figure out what the cause was because the error message was useless (your message was rejected because it contained an attachment and I know there was no attachment), and getting any response at all from the listadmin was impossible. A useful error message or a response from the listadmin would easily solve most people's gripes. My $.02. Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5
I'm just curious. Are you saying that you were shutting down the services, you didn't get any error messages while the services were stopping; you just didn't want to wait any longer, so you powered the box off? Tom. -Original Message- From: Sabi Kassim-Momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 Hi everyone. This is a follow-up to my earlier message, at some point after my email, outlook failed to connect to the server for everyone in the site. The only way I could quickly restore the service was to reboot the server, as stopping the services one after the other was taking too long. This problem occurred in the past and the only way to resolve it was a reboot. Please your advise is required to resolve the problem as rebooting server is not a permanent solution. I have checked the event viewer there were no error messages, which other log can I check. Thanks With best regards Sabi Kassim-Momodu User\Network Support Analyst This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you receive this message in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ASCII messages
Let me try ... -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I just sent a reply to the list stating that maybe the internet.com people had got their act together because I had successfully posted 2 replies directly to the list this morning. That reply bounced. So 2 out of 3 direct replies made it to the list. I'm sending this to my custom recipient. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:19 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages I've had that one happen too. I bet someone over there is changing things on purpose to watch threads like this. g I know the ops manager for internet.com. I'll give him a call and see if he's aware of the problem. Tom. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Another fun part is that sometimes you get the bounce message and your message still posts on the list. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:49 PM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages And they don't even return the subject of the message so I can figure out which one to resend. This very message happens to be one I created from scratch because it was bounced by internet.com for having an attachment. The message I previously sent was a plain text message. The next message you get from me in this thread will also be one I'm recreating from scratch for the exact same reason. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I don't have a problem with them doing it. I do have a problem with them not supplying a bit more useful error message for debugging. It took me the better part of a week to figure out what the cause was because the error message was useless (your message was rejected because it contained an attachment and I know there was no attachment), and getting any response at all from the listadmin was impossible. A useful error message or a response from the listadmin would easily solve most people's gripes. My $.02. Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ASCII messages
Come on Bill. You know you like it. It keeps you on your toes. It's so much more fun trying to guess which posts are going to make it passed the screeners. Tom. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I just sent a reply to the list stating that maybe the internet.com people had got their act together because I had successfully posted 2 replies directly to the list this morning. That reply bounced. So 2 out of 3 direct replies made it to the list. I'm sending this to my custom recipient. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:19 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages I've had that one happen too. I bet someone over there is changing things on purpose to watch threads like this. g I know the ops manager for internet.com. I'll give him a call and see if he's aware of the problem. Tom. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages Another fun part is that sometimes you get the bounce message and your message still posts on the list. Quality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:49 PM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: ASCII messages And they don't even return the subject of the message so I can figure out which one to resend. This very message happens to be one I created from scratch because it was bounced by internet.com for having an attachment. The message I previously sent was a plain text message. The next message you get from me in this thread will also be one I'm recreating from scratch for the exact same reason. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ASCII messages I don't have a problem with them doing it. I do have a problem with them not supplying a bit more useful error message for debugging. It took me the better part of a week to figure out what the cause was because the error message was useless (your message was rejected because it contained an attachment and I know there was no attachment), and getting any response at all from the listadmin was impossible. A useful error message or a response from the listadmin would easily solve most people's gripes. My $.02. Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem?
For once! (hehe). But it's only this once Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Fair! case closed...We agree to agree -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? My bad. I read the original post as to mean that w/o the hack on the machine that did the shift-delete those messages couldn't be deleted. Upon re-reading the post that's not what was said, sorry. I think we can all agree on the following: At an end-user machine the hack doesn't need to be installed. The end user can delete things and recover from deleted items. If they delete them from deleted items they can Recover Deleted Items. If however they shift-delete them from inbox (or another folder) _they_ cannot Recover Deleted Items them. At an admin machine the hack should be installed. This would allow the admin to open the end-users mailbox (provided they had rights) and Recover Deleted Items the mail messages from _any_ folder regardless of a delete or shift-delete. Both of the preceding assume that Deleted Item Retention Time hasn't passed since the delete. Fair? -Walden -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? You know, after reading more closely, it looks like that, yes. It was a little confusing since he disagreed with the previous post, which was correct. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From:Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:Friday, August 17, 2001 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? I think you two are saying the same thing. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Go ahead and do it to make sure, but I as well as others will confirm that you can delete things directly from your Inbox, or other folders for that matter, without it touching the Deleted Items folder, thus it cannot be recovered from the Deleted Items, rather can only be recovered from the folder it was deleted from. That means you need the reg hack. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From:Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:Friday, August 17, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Um, I'll have to try this, but I don't think that is correct. I believe messages are _always_ retained in the IS for the retention period (I don't care how you delete them). The DumsterAlwaysOn entry allows you to see the Recover Deleted Items tool in folders other that Deleted Items. That's why you only need the hack on any machines except the one you recover from. -Walden -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? Correct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? so if i am in my inbox folder, and hold down the shift key the item in the inbox never touches the deleted items folder, it is deleted right from the inbox folder, so to recover this you would have to turn dumpster always on registry edit ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? But if I want to recover other folders I have to go to each clients workstation and do the Dumpsteralways on reg config ?? No just the workstation you plan to use to recover things. But I thought anytime you delete an item it goes to the deleted item folder anyhow?? Not always...delete
RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5
We see that if we need to do a mid day re boot and lots of users are connected. The services applet hangs while attempting to stop the services (usually the info store) and we usually need to give it the fickle finger of fate (i.e., tap the power button) to get it to cycle. Steve -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 I'm just curious. Are you saying that you were shutting down the services, you didn't get any error messages while the services were stopping; you just didn't want to wait any longer, so you powered the box off? Tom. -Original Message- From: Sabi Kassim-Momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 Hi everyone. This is a follow-up to my earlier message, at some point after my email, outlook failed to connect to the server for everyone in the site. The only way I could quickly restore the service was to reboot the server, as stopping the services one after the other was taking too long. This problem occurred in the past and the only way to resolve it was a reboot. Please your advise is required to resolve the problem as rebooting server is not a permanent solution. I have checked the event viewer there were no error messages, which other log can I check. Thanks With best regards Sabi Kassim-Momodu User\Network Support Analyst This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you receive this message in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GroupWise Migration Question
We've been migrating quite successfully from GropuWise 5.2 to Exchange for about 2 months so far. We've got about 7000 more to go and have hit one issue that is slowing us down a bit. We are trying to find a way to determine the size of the GroupWise users' mailboxes prior to the migration so we can determine how long it will take to migrate the data. Anyone ever heard of a tool that can do this? Thanks Steve * The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Has Returned
It's a day for fun A day for relaxation Wait, that's tomorrow -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Can someone explain to me what Haiku Friday is? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Tinki Winki knows I hear LaLa is his friend TeleTubbies rule! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Has Returned I'm glad it's Friday Now we can play with answers Where is lala land? Bob -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Has Returned
Answer in haiku format is 5, 7, 5 syllables, that is -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Can someone explain to me what Haiku Friday is? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Tinki Winki knows I hear LaLa is his friend TeleTubbies rule! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Has Returned I'm glad it's Friday Now we can play with answers Where is lala land? Bob -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GroupWise Migration Question
Doesn't GWcheck32 do that? Or is that just 5.5? Greg. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/17/2001 11:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: GroupWise Migration Question We've been migrating quite successfully from GropuWise 5.2 to Exchange for about 2 months so far. We've got about 7000 more to go and have hit one issue that is slowing us down a bit. We are trying to find a way to determine the size of the GroupWise users' mailboxes prior to the migration so we can determine how long it will take to migrate the data. Anyone ever heard of a tool that can do this? Thanks Steve * The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
Wait in line, bridge boy... And keep in mind I'm bigger than you are, so I'll rough you up a bit if you try to cut in line... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? I'll take a double scoop of Cherry Garcia please. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Yes. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem?
It is 100% correct. I do it on a fairly regular basis, in order to keep my near-diety status with my end users. Or to scare the bejeses out of my desktop staff, but that's another story. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Um, I'll have to try this, but I don't think that is correct. I believe messages are _always_ retained in the IS for the retention period (I don't care how you delete them). The DumsterAlwaysOn entry allows you to see the Recover Deleted Items tool in folders other that Deleted Items. That's why you only need the hack on any machines except the one you recover from. -Walden -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? Correct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? so if i am in my inbox folder, and hold down the shift key the item in the inbox never touches the deleted items folder, it is deleted right from the inbox folder, so to recover this you would have to turn dumpster always on registry edit ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? But if I want to recover other folders I have to go to each clients workstation and do the Dumpsteralways on reg config ?? No just the workstation you plan to use to recover things. But I thought anytime you delete an item it goes to the deleted item folder anyhow?? Not always...delete this message while holding the shiftkey. Delivering items to a PST would also be an instance were the message left the IS without being placed in the deleted items folder. So in which scenario would it be useful to edit this registry setting??? If you plan on recovering things that never resided in the deleted items folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Attachments Storage locations
That is not how it works for me. Missy - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 2:53 PM Subject: RE: Attachments Storage locations I was under the impression that when you open an attachment from within your mailbox, it does so in a TEMP folder. So any changes would be saved to the instance in the TEMP folder. And then if you say NO to Do you want to save when closing the email, you lose all the changes ANYWAY. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. --Jeremy S. Anderson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Winzenz Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachments Storage locations Your first statement regarding SIS is correct, however, I don't think the second one is. When attachments are sent via e-mail, they are always sent s Read-only (at least I was under the impression they were). So if someone opens it and makes a change, they HAVE to specify a location where they want to save it. Someone else correct me if I am wrong here. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Keith Boettcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachments Storage locations Windows NT 4.0, Sp 6 and MS Exchange 5.5, Sp 4 How do message attachments fit into the single instance storage feature. If 15 users on my server receive an identical message with an 8MB document attached, That 8 MB is only stored once, correct? Now someone opens the document and makes a change, then closes the document, he may save the changes without being prompted for a file name and location. Where is that (changed) copy of the file saved? If his files are in PRIV.EDB, is that where the altered copy is saved? That would mean that PRIV.EDB would grow by 8 MB after saving the second version of the document, right? Keith Boettcher San Joaquin Valley Library System _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
It has been awhile since I was roughed up... Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Wait in line, bridge boy... And keep in mind I'm bigger than you are, so I'll rough you up a bit if you try to cut in line... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? I'll take a double scoop of Cherry Garcia please. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Yes. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Exchange installed on BDC
Forget the paranoid admins who freak out over putting it on a BDC. It will work fine. The concern is over authentication traffic as well as security issues over having a SAM on the server, especially if it is accessible via the Internet. For your small environment go right ahead. -Original Message- From: Ghassan Hassan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange installed on BDC I know it is not a good practice to have Exchange 5.5 installed on a domain controller, but I only have 30 exchange users. I want to know if anyone has a bad experience or a horror story about this setup before I proceed. or any advice is appreciated. Thanks Ghassan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange installed on BDC
On a BDC Copy of SAM exists so Exchange is okay. (in other words, the bigges problem is when you don't have an alternate copy of the SAM. you do, so you could still recover if you lose the server.) Missy - Original Message - From: Ghassan Hassan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:46 AM Subject: Exchange installed on BDC I know it is not a good practice to have Exchange 5.5 installed on a domain controller, but I only have 30 exchange users. I want to know if anyone has a bad experience or a horror story about this setup before I proceed. or any advice is appreciated. Thanks Ghassan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Has Returned
Exchange is running Linux Monitoring Works Going Home Denis Denis A. Baldwin (A+/MCP/I-Net+/Net+/CCA) Network Administrator, CAE, Inc. 810-231-9373, ext. 229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Can someone explain to me what Haiku Friday is? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Tinki Winki knows I hear LaLa is his friend TeleTubbies rule! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Has Returned I'm glad it's Friday Now we can play with answers Where is lala land? Bob -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Haha...this is funny. I used the kid as an example but it is , in a way, to keep kids out of the net. Its in a youth area of our Church, and they want the Adults to be able to access the internet, but not the youth. And keep the lock down method simple for the Adults who are not that great on computers. That's it in a nutshell. The boot password would be good, but the youth need to use the apps on the Pc. I didn't think Zone alarm had passwords..but I might have missed it. (I will download it here at work and see). I like the script idea...But it would say GOD says no internet instead of Dad...hehe. I could change the DNS numbers, but I really don't want them going in and changing things like that when they need access. I got a tip that Norton Internet Security can do it, so I'm looking into that, and a current version of Zone alarm for passwords. Thanks for the OT help! Ron -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) No, removed from his will, the familial equivalent g -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) And if he does it again, does he get fired? LJ -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) I second that emotion. In this case a simple No should suffice. If it doesn't, a boot password on the machine should do the trick. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
disabled user accounts
We disabled a user account this morning and thus their mailbox was disabled as well. I enabled the user account about 20 minutes ago, but all mail sent to this user is giving me NDR's. Any way I can refresh the mailbox. I can't open their inbox either. Help!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled user accounts
Did you apply the regedit to make perms work before 2 hours pass? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled user accounts We disabled a user account this morning and thus their mailbox was disabled as well. I enabled the user account about 20 minutes ago, but all mail sent to this user is giving me NDR's. Any way I can refresh the mailbox. I can't open their inbox either. Help!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector setup
Don't use the Exchange Server link, scroll down the first page a bit and use the Site Search field in the left hand column. [it is a bit clunky not being able to search particular lists] -Original Message- From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector setup That is what I meant. I clicked on the search and it took me to http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp;, I selected Exchange Server and did the search. Got nothing? -Original Message- From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connector setup He meant search the mailing list archives at the url that is listed at the bottom of every message sent to the list. Phil I tried the search (Active Directory Connector - Question) on the Exchange Knowledge Base and it came up with a blank page. Could you explain exact where in the Search this info you mentioned is located. Thanks much. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange installed on BDC
We've got a JV I support. 30 users, Their Exchange box is PDC, file Print server plus it runs a SQL engine for their GL app. So far, it's been about as smooth as NT gets. Steve -Original Message- From: Ghassan Hassan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange installed on BDC I know it is not a good practice to have Exchange 5.5 installed on a domain controller, but I only have 30 exchange users. I want to know if anyone has a bad experience or a horror story about this setup before I proceed. or any advice is appreciated. Thanks Ghassan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC connector setup
Sorry - just tried that search mechanism and it is completely useless so apologies for wasting your time! Here's the complete thread so start from the bottom and work up to see if anything is relevant. === Thanks, that was the right tip: If I clear This is a Primary Connection Agreement for the connected Windows Domain they only get mail-enabled. Exactly what I want. By the way, another cool feature of the ADC concerning contact - replication: Exchange 5.5 Exchange Recipient - Container -- Contacts1 - Container Contacts1 - Container -- Contacts2 - Container Contacts22 - Container Now, if you map the ADC to Exchange Recipient - Container (MX 5.5) and on the other side to one OU in ADS, then the ADC will AUTOMATICALLY create the necessary OUs (Contacts1,Contacts11, and so on) for you. Cool .-) Greetings, Thomas -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question Using the ADC to mail-enable existing objects is not something I've done in practice since we used the ADC to actually create objects. However if you are confident that the matching rules will actually match up the right objects (by default, they are matched by GUID, legacyExchange DN, and primary Windows NT account), then you might want to consider initially setting up the Connection Agreement as secondary since this should prevent the creation of lots of duplicates if the matches don't work. See http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/60/exhelp/default.asp?URL= /exchange/en /60/exhelp/ADC_Htm/adc02P_SetaDefaultPolicytoCustObjectMatchingR ules.htm However you should still only need the one Connection Agreement since you are not trying to actually create objects in two disparate OUs; you are effectively just modifying existing objects with some extra mail-related attributes, therefore the one agreement will find the matching objects and be able to write changes to them as long as they are in the same domain. Mark -Original Message- From: Thomas Kofler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 May 2001 17:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: Active Directory Connector - Question postscript: The user accounts are already in the OU1 and OU2, they only need be mail-enabled through ADC. . Right, if I understand it right I can do the following: Exhange 5.5, 1 one Recipient database then map this database to ou1 and with a second connection agreement map the same exchange 5.5 database to the second ou (ou2). (The two ous are the summary of all users in the 5.5 database) So all users in the two OUs will get mail-enabled, am I right ? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Mark Harford Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Mai 2001 18:14 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question Fair enough, but you're getting complicated there since he only appears to have one 55 user container. To get the ADC to split the creation of new objects between sub-OUs he'd need to do some manual editing of the Connection Agreements search filters via LDP or ADSIEdit. I was referring to the fact that the one CA would be able to carry across modifications and/or deletions of a user to a destination other than the default target OU (as opposed to user account creations which would obviously be in the default OU1). rgrds mark -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 May 2001 15:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question ...unless you're going to keep adding users to the 5.5 side and expect them to show up in the correct OU. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question If they are initially replicated into OU1 and then manually moved into the sub-OUs, the same CA will find them as long as those sub-OUs are in the same domain, so no, you should NOT need additional CAs. Mark -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 May 2001 00:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question Thomas, you can indicate more than one source OU, but of course only one target container per CA. creating additional CAs is not difficult, though - and they are free with your paid subscription. so crunch all you want - you can make more. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Kofler Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connector - Question We are planning our adc - connector. We have one Exchange 5.5 - Recipients - Container which must be synchronized with two OUs in the
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
so does we-blocker (www.we-blocker.com). Freeware and very configurable. Worth a look, for the price. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:42 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Hmm...that's interesting. Although it wont block all sites, I can spend some time blocking most offensive ones, and it does have passwords. Thanks! -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Can you use the Content Advisor that comes with IE? Jessica Williams Network Messaging Administrator Woman's Hospital (225) 924-8611 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns
Hi Peter, Thanks for the suggestion. Do you know if it is possible to specify the complete smtp address in the IMS's Address Space (I was under the impression that it only handled domains)? If it can't be set up for specific smtp addresses (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), then this presents a problem, as our security legal depts want the disclaimer to appear on all emails which do not have the specific requirement of leaving it off, and other emails to a specific domain or even the same address within the domain are supposed to have the disclaimer message turned on. Then again, even if it can be config'd for specific smtp addresses, legal/security may only want them to avoid the disclaimer on the specific emails with the requirement. So I'm in need of a solution which can be manually turned off at will by the sender, on a email by email basis; and then there is the possibility that security/legal may ask for it to only be capable of being overridden for specific sender's mailboxes. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Joe You could create another Exchange server with an IMS that is dedicated to those domains and addresses that have issues with the disclaimer and not run the disclaimer on those machines. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 13:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns In the FAQ. (we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this) -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio ns Good morning to some and good afternoon to the others ... I'm assuming of course that you do go to sleep some time. 8-) We recently implemented the IMSEXT.DLL, in order to throw in the disclaimers which our security and legal departments were looking for. However, this is now causing issues on emails which MUST have only specific text in the body as they tend to ignore it or choke on it when they see disclaimer text as well. How are other people handling issues such as sending an unsubscribe message to a list when the unsubscribe message is only supposed to have a specific subject line and absolutely nothing in the message body? Does anyone know of any alternative products or settings I can use on IMSEXT.DLL or Exchange; which would let the clients override the dislaimer text on an email by email basis, or with the ability to override the auto-disclaimer for specific mailboxes? This requirement also extends to emails relayed off of our IMS (from behind our firewall of course). TIA ... Joe This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and If you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, transfert ou autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdite. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated.
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
A simple solution: unplug the modem. Plug it in when you want to surf. When your kids have figured out how to see all the pictures YOU have downloaded, then you can leave it plugged in and just let them surf away. Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) so does we-blocker (www.we-blocker.com). Freeware and very configurable. Worth a look, for the price. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:42 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Hmm...that's interesting. Although it wont block all sites, I can spend some time blocking most offensive ones, and it does have passwords. Thanks! -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Can you use the Content Advisor that comes with IE? Jessica Williams Network Messaging Administrator Woman's Hospital (225) 924-8611 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled user accounts
does anyone else happen to know what mail would bounce to a previously disabled and now reenabled user?? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts I've never heard of that, I'm fairly new to E2k. Where do I find out more info.? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts Did you apply the regedit to make perms work before 2 hours pass? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled user accounts We disabled a user account this morning and thus their mailbox was disabled as well. I enabled the user account about 20 minutes ago, but all mail sent to this user is giving me NDR's. Any way I can refresh the mailbox. I can't open their inbox either. Help!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled user accounts
1. Hasn't replicated to all the GC servers 2. E2K DSAccess cache hasn't expired the lookup === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts does anyone else happen to know what mail would bounce to a previously disabled and now reenabled user?? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts I've never heard of that, I'm fairly new to E2k. Where do I find out more info.? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts Did you apply the regedit to make perms work before 2 hours pass? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled user accounts We disabled a user account this morning and thus their mailbox was disabled as well. I enabled the user account about 20 minutes ago, but all mail sent to this user is giving me NDR's. Any way I can refresh the mailbox. I can't open their inbox either. Help!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5
Steve, Unless you get an error along the lines of the service cannot be controller in its current state the server is still doing what it is supposed to do. What you are doing is the equivalent of hitting your friend in the face with a brick while he is having a conversation with the boss. Not generally a good practice. Tom. -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 We see that if we need to do a mid day re boot and lots of users are connected. The services applet hangs while attempting to stop the services (usually the info store) and we usually need to give it the fickle finger of fate (i.e., tap the power button) to get it to cycle. Steve -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 I'm just curious. Are you saying that you were shutting down the services, you didn't get any error messages while the services were stopping; you just didn't want to wait any longer, so you powered the box off? Tom. -Original Message- From: Sabi Kassim-Momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 Hi everyone. This is a follow-up to my earlier message, at some point after my email, outlook failed to connect to the server for everyone in the site. The only way I could quickly restore the service was to reboot the server, as stopping the services one after the other was taking too long. This problem occurred in the past and the only way to resolve it was a reboot. Please your advise is required to resolve the problem as rebooting server is not a permanent solution. I have checked the event viewer there were no error messages, which other log can I check. Thanks With best regards Sabi Kassim-Momodu User\Network Support Analyst This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you receive this message in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
Can I watch? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Wait in line, bridge boy... And keep in mind I'm bigger than you are, so I'll rough you up a bit if you try to cut in line... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? I'll take a double scoop of Cherry Garcia please. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Yes. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Haiku Has Returned
Servers are humming Management vacationing Now I go golfing -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Ben said pagan word In truth? First I thought absurd pagan word I heard g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/17/2001 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned In short - it is a paganistic ritual (Oh sorry, thinking of the wrong thing). Seriously though, it is just a ritual that the list had been doing for a long time on Fridays. Haiku is a form of writing where there are 3 lines, each having a certain number of syllables. Specifically, 5, 7, 5. If you want to read more about it, check in the archives. I'm pathetic at these types of writing so I won't even attempt to do it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Can someone explain to me what Haiku Friday is? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Tinki Winki knows I hear LaLa is his friend TeleTubbies rule! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Has Returned I'm glad it's Friday Now we can play with answers Where is lala land? Bob -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5
interesting. alternatively, you could clearly explain to them what the issue is, encourage them to read a book and grow from the mistake. why did they use poor judgment and make a dumb mistake? Good question. who put them in that environment? Sounds like a great opportunity for a best practices manual as required reading before being given admin access to the host. Simply another, perhaps positive/proactive way of thinking about it. Byron -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 You are very generous in giving one warning. My reaction would be a disabled account, a box, and a finger pointing towards the door. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 So, lemme get this straight: You have an application running that is actively servicing X number of users and makes heavy use of memory cache. You order it to shut down and it doesn't move fast enough to your liking so you just hit the power button thus wiping all the transactions still held in memory possibly leading to data loss or even database corruption. If someone working for me did this he would get one warning. - Original Message - From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:12 AM Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 We see that if we need to do a mid day re boot and lots of users are connected. The services applet hangs while attempting to stop the services (usually the info store) and we usually need to give it the fickle finger of fate (i.e., tap the power button) to get it to cycle. Steve -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 I'm just curious. Are you saying that you were shutting down the services, you didn't get any error messages while the services were stopping; you just didn't want to wait any longer, so you powered the box off? Tom. -Original Message- From: Sabi Kassim-Momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 Hi everyone. This is a follow-up to my earlier message, at some point after my email, outlook failed to connect to the server for everyone in the site. The only way I could quickly restore the service was to reboot the server, as stopping the services one after the other was taking too long. This problem occurred in the past and the only way to resolve it was a reboot. Please your advise is required to resolve the problem as rebooting server is not a permanent solution. I have checked the event viewer there were no error messages, which other log can I check. Thanks With best regards Sabi Kassim-Momodu User\Network Support Analyst This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you receive this message in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Has Returned
As it is Friday I will make my first attempt to help Haiku live -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Servers are humming Management vacationing Now I go golfing -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Ben said pagan word In truth? First I thought absurd pagan word I heard g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/17/2001 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned In short - it is a paganistic ritual (Oh sorry, thinking of the wrong thing). Seriously though, it is just a ritual that the list had been doing for a long time on Fridays. Haiku is a form of writing where there are 3 lines, each having a certain number of syllables. Specifically, 5, 7, 5. If you want to read more about it, check in the archives. I'm pathetic at these types of writing so I won't even attempt to do it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Can someone explain to me what Haiku Friday is? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Tinki Winki knows I hear LaLa is his friend TeleTubbies rule! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Has Returned I'm glad it's Friday Now we can play with answers Where is lala land? Bob -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5
I can see your point. However, I can't really agree that something like this falls into the poor judgment\dumb mistake realm. This is along the lines of deleting log files because you don't know what they are, and they take up a lot of space. If you don't know, you shouldn't be touching the box. Tom. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 interesting. alternatively, you could clearly explain to them what the issue is, encourage them to read a book and grow from the mistake. why did they use poor judgment and make a dumb mistake? Good question. who put them in that environment? Sounds like a great opportunity for a best practices manual as required reading before being given admin access to the host. Simply another, perhaps positive/proactive way of thinking about it. Byron -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 You are very generous in giving one warning. My reaction would be a disabled account, a box, and a finger pointing towards the door. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 So, lemme get this straight: You have an application running that is actively servicing X number of users and makes heavy use of memory cache. You order it to shut down and it doesn't move fast enough to your liking so you just hit the power button thus wiping all the transactions still held in memory possibly leading to data loss or even database corruption. If someone working for me did this he would get one warning. - Original Message - From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:12 AM Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 We see that if we need to do a mid day re boot and lots of users are connected. The services applet hangs while attempting to stop the services (usually the info store) and we usually need to give it the fickle finger of fate (i.e., tap the power button) to get it to cycle. Steve -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 I'm just curious. Are you saying that you were shutting down the services, you didn't get any error messages while the services were stopping; you just didn't want to wait any longer, so you powered the box off? Tom. -Original Message- From: Sabi Kassim-Momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection failure to exchange server 5.5 Hi everyone. This is a follow-up to my earlier message, at some point after my email, outlook failed to connect to the server for everyone in the site. The only way I could quickly restore the service was to reboot the server, as stopping the services one after the other was taking too long. This problem occurred in the past and the only way to resolve it was a reboot. Please your advise is required to resolve the problem as rebooting server is not a permanent solution. I have checked the event viewer there were no error messages, which other log can I check. Thanks With best regards Sabi Kassim-Momodu User\Network Support Analyst This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you receive this message in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns
I was refering to a snap in module for NEMX. There is also the infamous friggin package that shows upMore references in the FAQ, as well.. -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Larry, Thanks for your help. I was just wondering though, when you mentioned NEMX, is the product you're refering to Nemx TBAV for MS Exchange Server or is there a smaller snap-in for MSX designed specifically for the auto-disclaimers/legalese stuff? What I'm hoping to find (I'm not asking for much am I - ;-)) is a simple elegant non-redundant solution which we can snap into our MSX5.5/TrendAV environment, keeping in mind that we're trying to avoid interferring with: o Emails which need to be signed/encrypted. o Emails which for whatever reason, may need to override inclusion of the auto-disclaimer. o Security/Legal's requirement that this be on All emails (I'm not sure under what circumstances they'll permit exceptions - e.g. only for specific mailboxes or maybe they'll let everyone have the capability of manually overriding the auto-disclm. on a msg. by msg. basis). ... Joe -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns It looks as if you need something with a little more horsepower, such as NEMX, that provides the ability to fine tune the use of filters.. -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Peter, Thanks for the suggestion. Do you know if it is possible to specify the complete smtp address in the IMS's Address Space (I was under the impression that it only handled domains)? If it can't be set up for specific smtp addresses (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), then this presents a problem, as our security legal depts want the disclaimer to appear on all emails which do not have the specific requirement of leaving it off, and other emails to a specific domain or even the same address within the domain are supposed to have the disclaimer message turned on. Then again, even if it can be config'd for specific smtp addresses, legal/security may only want them to avoid the disclaimer on the specific emails with the requirement. So I'm in need of a solution which can be manually turned off at will by the sender, on a email by email basis; and then there is the possibility that security/legal may ask for it to only be capable of being overridden for specific sender's mailboxes. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Joe You could create another Exchange server with an IMS that is dedicated to those domains and addresses that have issues with the disclaimer and not run the disclaimer on those machines. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 13:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns In the FAQ. (we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this) -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio ns Good morning to some and good afternoon to the others ... I'm assuming of course that you do go to sleep some time. 8-) We recently implemented the IMSEXT.DLL, in order to throw in the disclaimers which our security and legal departments were looking for. However, this is now causing issues on emails which MUST have only specific text in the body as they tend to ignore it or choke on it when they see disclaimer text as well. How are other people handling issues such as sending an unsubscribe message to a list when the unsubscribe message is only supposed to have a specific subject line and absolutely nothing in the message body? Does anyone know of any alternative products or settings I can use on IMSEXT.DLL or Exchange; which would let the clients override the dislaimer text on an email by email basis, or with the ability to override the auto-disclaimer for specific mailboxes? This requirement also extends to emails relayed off of our IMS (from behind our firewall of course). TIA ... Joe This email communication is intended as a
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Throw in a wav file of the old Station 51 tones and you got yourself a good alert. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. - Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail list Archives??
Is it still possible to search the Exchange mail list archives? I went to the Archive address in the email - and it says to use the search in the left navigation, which takes me to a list of knowledge bases. I pick Exchange and enter 'public folder' as the search string - and only get 4 hits (which are NOT from the mail list archives). I go to swynk.com - and can't find it anywhere. Can someone direct me, or provide a URL directly to it? Thx Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
I suggest you look at your Connection Agreements... It looks like your Exchange 5.5 system is not connected to Active Directory correctly. HTH Maxim - Original Message - From: Brad Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:28 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Hi Ron. what do you mean by do a replace from within there replace what?? thanks Crumbaker, Ron wrote: Go into AD Services and Sites and Under one of your domain controllers, Click on the NTDS Settings. Then you should see the automatically generated for each of the Domain Controllers. Now Right Click on each of them and do a Replicate Now. Go into Exchange Manager and then do a Replace from within there. It should work. I just did this process this weekend. Good Luck. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mike Hagerty Prairie iNet www.prairieinet.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Check out CyberSitter, It will allow you to restrict his access based on content(auto updates), automatically block all internet access based on timeframe, and of course a pswd for disabling it for adult access. It has some cool remote reporting and access log emailing as well. Not only did my 10yr old find his way to some not so great websites, but also sneaked mom's credit card when so prompted :( His PC is now another lab machine :) -Jared -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) That's what duct-tape and TheStick were invented for. Just remember the rule of thumb - the stick can't be thicker than your thumb. Tom. -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) And if he does it again, does he get fired? LJ -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) I second that emotion. In this case a simple No should suffice. If it doesn't, a boot password on the machine should do the trick. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Check out CyberSitter, It will allow you to restrict his access based on content(auto updates), automatically block all internet access based on timeframe (no internet during bedtime), and of course a pswd for disabling it for adult access. It has some cool remote reporting and access log report emailing as well. Not only did my 10yr old find his way to some not so great websites, but also sneaked mom's credit card when so prompted :( His PC is now another lab machine :) -Jared -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Can you use the Content Advisor that comes with IE? Jessica Williams Network Messaging Administrator Woman's Hospital (225) 924-8611 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
http://www.worldvillage.com/family/parental.html Above site has 20 or so programs and even some hardware solutions for internet/PC control. Some parents are hesitant to use the sTicK(tm) (or Foot for that matter) and I have gone as far as installing W2K Pro with profiles for children so that Word apps are the only thing available, No Run/No Control Panel/No Install etc etc. Good luck! -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) No, just Fired Up -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) And if he does it again, does he get fired? LJ -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) I second that emotion. In this case a simple No should suffice. If it doesn't, a boot password on the machine should do the trick. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Haiku Has Returned
Servers are humming Management vacationing Now I go golfing Management return unexpectantly servers are down you golfing long time _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
deleting public folders
How do you delete public folders in exchange 5.5? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled user accounts
by right-clicking on the user in ad users and computers, and clicking disable... the mailbox is now back on-line, is their any way to speed up that process because that was absolutely ridiculous -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts Let me ask the silliest of questions... What did you do to Disable the account? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. - Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled user accounts We disabled a user account this morning and thus their mailbox was disabled as well. I enabled the user account about 20 minutes ago, but all mail sent to this user is giving me NDR's. Any way I can refresh the mailbox. I can't open their inbox either. Help!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: deleting public folders
Can you easily permanently delete the public folder icon and not allow anyone to create them? Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders Press Delete. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aristotle Zoulas Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: deleting public folders How do you delete public folders in exchange 5.5? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: deleting public folders
because our company purchased a Cadillac and now want to disable the functionality... What a waste. Mike Mitchell eMAIL System Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders Um.., why would you want to? You can certainly assign permissions at the root to disable the creation of folders. Again though, why would you want to? They are a rather useful feature for collaboration... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders Can you easily permanently delete the public folder icon and not allow anyone to create them? Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders Press Delete. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aristotle Zoulas Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: deleting public folders How do you delete public folders in exchange 5.5? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: deleting public folders
Well, go to the top level folder, set up your group as the owner of all folders, mark the replicate check box and click on apply. Once it's all finished, go to the Public Information Store object in the Site configuration object, click on the Top Level Folder tab and give no one the right to create top level folders. Start/Restart your outlook client, and remove all the folders starting from the bottom-most one and work your way up. Or have a manager/VP who approved this silly idea to do it himself. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. - Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders because our company purchased a Cadillac and now want to disable the functionality... What a waste. Mike Mitchell eMAIL System Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders Um.., why would you want to? You can certainly assign permissions at the root to disable the creation of folders. Again though, why would you want to? They are a rather useful feature for collaboration... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders Can you easily permanently delete the public folder icon and not allow anyone to create them? Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting public folders Press Delete. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aristotle Zoulas Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: deleting public folders How do you delete public folders in exchange 5.5? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Has Returned
Our Unix admin is making me nuts today thank God its Friday -Original Message- From: Andre Toussaint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Instead of golfing, I will skip the first eighteen, and hit the nineteenth -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Servers are humming Management vacationing Now I go golfing -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Ben said pagan word In truth? First I thought absurd pagan word I heard g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/17/2001 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned In short - it is a paganistic ritual (Oh sorry, thinking of the wrong thing). Seriously though, it is just a ritual that the list had been doing for a long time on Fridays. Haiku is a form of writing where there are 3 lines, each having a certain number of syllables. Specifically, 5, 7, 5. If you want to read more about it, check in the archives. I'm pathetic at these types of writing so I won't even attempt to do it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Can someone explain to me what Haiku Friday is? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Tinki Winki knows I hear LaLa is his friend TeleTubbies rule! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Has Returned I'm glad it's Friday Now we can play with answers Where is lala land? Bob -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Problems installing E2K SP1
Joel, Yes, they are, at least the ones I'm dealing with. There are three data centres, Bergen, Manchester and Frankfurt. The route domain was established in Bergen and GC servers exist in the other centres. Three child domains exist - NO, UK and DE. Manchester has its own site, Frankfurt is part of the main site but there is network link between Manchester and Frankfurt but there should be no need for one. There are no OM functions in Frankfurt? I'm working with the Manchester site, which has the only Exchange 2000 servers in the organisation. Do you recommend rejoining the main site? That is something I haven't considered (yet). regards, Richard Dann -Original Message- From: Stidley, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 16:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems installing E2K SP1 Is each subnet setup at a site in AD? Joel Stidley Senior Systems Engineer divine inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Richard Dann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems installing E2K SP1 Folks, I can't get E2K SP1 to run in the following configuration: Windows 2000 Advanced Server with SP2 with clustering in a child domain. Route domain exists on a different subnet with a root GC server on thee local subnet. Only domain controllers on the local subnet have full access to the DCs on the remote subnet. The Schema master function has been transferred to the local route GC server. There are three full exchange administrators - the root administrator, the child administrator and the cluster admin. Whichever account is used the update will not run claiming insufficient permissions or lack of access to AD. Do I need direct access to any Operation Master functions (other than Schema Master which is already assigned to a local server)? Is there anything else I might have overlooked? regards, Richard Dann Nextra is the trading name of CIX (Compulink Information Exchange), Norsk Data and XTML, all of whom are part of the Nextra Group. Nextra, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For information on products and services click on www.nextra.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nextra is the trading name of CIX (Compulink Information Exchange), Norsk Data and XTML, all of whom are part of the Nextra Group. Nextra, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For information on products and services click on www.nextra.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
..a wandering along the leaves so green! John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. - Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? Here we go Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? FAQ. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? I find it really amusing that the reason people tend to answer FAQ RTFM questions, like the one I (guiltily) posted last evening, with remarks like some of those below is to discourage erroneous messages from cluttering up a very valuable resource (this list)..and yet those same folks continuously babble on about it . Thus cluttering up the list even more. Enough said. That's the last you'll hear on the topic from me...and for all you others out theremy apologies for contributing to the clutter at this point. Enjoy -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 16, 2001 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? Now *that* could be construed as a sarcastic answer! Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? Methinks I've heard this question once or twice before in the last few weeks. It's been fery Frequently Asked. If there was a list of something that had answers to these FONT SIZE=1000F/FONTFONT SIZE=1requently /FONTFONT SIZE=1000A/FONTFONT SIZE=1sked/FONT FONT SIZE=1000Q/FONTFONT SIZE=1uestions /FONT somewhere, that might help... -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Assigned Signature? Can an Exchange server be configured such that an admin-assigned signature (similar to that at the bottom of this message) gets appended to all outgoing email through the Internet Mail Service? David A. Morrow, MCSE Network Architect Autodata Solutions Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 83940023 Phone:(519)451-2323 x6067 Fax:(519)451-6615 http://www.autodata.net/ This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. _ This message has been checked
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Replicate is what I meant to say. Sorry. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: mike hagerty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi Ron. what do you mean by do a replace from within there replace what?? thanks Crumbaker, Ron wrote: Go into AD Services and Sites and Under one of your domain controllers, Click on the NTDS Settings. Then you should see the automatically generated for each of the Domain Controllers. Now Right Click on each of them and do a Replicate Now. Go into Exchange Manager and then do a Replace from within there. It should work. I just did this process this weekend. Good Luck. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mike Hagerty Prairie iNet www.prairieinet.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
Actually, I find the Exchange2000 help to be excellent. Granted, it's not a manual per sé. I've copied the exadmin.chm to my workstation and read parts almost as a manual. I'm impressed with it. SQL2000 BOL is also quite good. William -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? RTFM? RTFM!! WHO gets manuals anymore? We gots to go out and buy 3rd party books any more to get decent (read ANY) documentation. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. - Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? I find it really amusing that the reason people tend to answer FAQ RTFM questions, like the one I (guiltily) posted last evening, with remarks like some of those below is to discourage erroneous messages from cluttering up a very valuable resource (this list)..and yet those same folks continuously babble on about it . Thus cluttering up the list even more. Enough said. That's the last you'll hear on the topic from me...and for all you others out theremy apologies for contributing to the clutter at this point. Enjoy -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 16, 2001 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? Now *that* could be construed as a sarcastic answer! Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature? Methinks I've heard this question once or twice before in the last few weeks. It's been fery Frequently Asked. If there was a list of something that had answers to these FONT SIZE=1000F/FONTFONT SIZE=1requently /FONTFONT SIZE=1000A/FONTFONT SIZE=1sked/FONT FONT SIZE=1000Q/FONTFONT SIZE=1uestions /FONT somewhere, that might help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled user accounts
You never once said You were running E2K Read Andy's response -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts I've never heard of that, I'm fairly new to E2k. Where do I find out more info.? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled user accounts Did you apply the regedit to make perms work before 2 hours pass? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled user accounts We disabled a user account this morning and thus their mailbox was disabled as well. I enabled the user account about 20 minutes ago, but all mail sent to this user is giving me NDR's. Any way I can refresh the mailbox. I can't open their inbox either. Help!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange installed on BDC
Hmmm... PDC Exchange... SQL Masochist? -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/17/01 11:29 AM Subject: RE: Exchange installed on BDC We've got a JV I support. 30 users, Their Exchange box is PDC, file Print server plus it runs a SQL engine for their GL app. So far, it's been about as smooth as NT gets. Steve -Original Message- From: Ghassan Hassan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange installed on BDC I know it is not a good practice to have Exchange 5.5 installed on a domain controller, but I only have 30 exchange users. I want to know if anyone has a bad experience or a horror story about this setup before I proceed. or any advice is appreciated. Thanks Ghassan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wrong distribution lists
Yeah, change the name of the list to This list junks up the mailbox of everyone in our entire organization including people that you don't know and never met! -Original Message- From: missy koslosky To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/16/01 12:44 PM Subject: Re: Wrong distribution lists No. Can you change the DL names to be more clear? Missy - Original Message - From: steph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:20 AM Subject: Wrong distribution lists Hi,We have both firm and office distribution lists, on occassions people send messages to the firm wide list rather than the local office one. On sending a message is there any way I can set a 'Are you sure' messgae box when the frim wide DL has been choosen? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scan Mail 3.52 and IMC Registry entry ReRoute thru store.
We are in the process of doing the ever continuing process of upgrading (is a mother's work ever done?)from Exchange Sp3 to SP4 and ScanMail 3.0 to 3.52 and in doing my research I came across a readme in the Scanmail 3.52 manual and emailed tech support at TrendMicro(in which they where very helpfulI know that someone from TrendMicro monitors this listthat sound you just heard was the sound of the suckup bird;-). My question is (if I understand the way exchange routes internet email),that the reg entry as is (with the 1 in it) would reroute mail back thru the store before it was delivered, but with a 0 its turning it off.? Problem/Question: Issue with outgoing attachments passing thru the IMC and Scanmail for Exchange 3.52. Explanation: Regarding this issue that is stated in our README file: We recommend installing ScanMail on a server that does not have the IMC (Internet Mail Connector) installed. During testing we found some issues with outgoing Internet mail messages containing attachments, which are routed to Exchange for delivery, being lost due to the Exchange Anti-Virus Scan API. Microsoft is aware of the issue and is working to provide a patch. The lost mail problem is caused by HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Parameters\RerouteviaSt ore set to 1. All you need to do is change the value to 0 and restart IMC Service and you won't have to worry about the Lost mail. ScanMail for Exchange designed to be installed on a Mail Server and not on a bridgehead server that only routes mail. It is ok to install it on a Bridgehead Server but any mails that passes only thru the connector and be routed to other server will not be scanned. Only mails going to the local Information Store/ mailboxes located on the said Exchange Server will be scanned. \\\___/// \\ - - // (--@-@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
I'll be the one wearing pants. Andy -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Sure... Just be in Orlando the first week of October.. Bridgeboy, Ice Cream boy and myself will probably be seen together more than once. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Can I watch? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Wait in line, bridge boy... And keep in mind I'm bigger than you are, so I'll rough you up a bit if you try to cut in line... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? I'll take a double scoop of Cherry Garcia please. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Yes. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
Actually, LMHOSTS is the quickest IF you use the #PRE parameter as part of an entry. It tells Windows to preload that entry permanently into cache in RAM which is checked first for name resolution. Practically instant resolution... There are several Technet articles about setting this up... HTH At 07:40 PM 8/17/2001 -0400, you wrote: I do not believe that Administrating Exchange with a Buzz is an approved course. Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? From my perspective, I'm likely to see more than one of BridgeBoy and PergrineBoy! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Sure... Just be in Orlando the first week of October.. Bridgeboy, Ice Cream boy and myself will probably be seen together more than once. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Can I watch? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Wait in line, bridge boy... And keep in mind I'm bigger than you are, so I'll rough you up a bit if you try to cut in line... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? I'll take a double scoop of Cherry Garcia please. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Yes. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem?
Thanks for your time walden, well explained thank you -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 6:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? Ooops, make that That's why you DON'T need the hack on any machines except the one you recovery from. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theyd eletethem? Um, I'll have to try this, but I don't think that is correct. I believe messages are _always_ retained in the IS for the retention period (I don't care how you delete them). The DumsterAlwaysOn entry allows you to see the Recover Deleted Items tool in folders other that Deleted Items. That's why you only need the hack on any machines except the one you recover from. -Walden -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? Correct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? so if i am in my inbox folder, and hold down the shift key the item in the inbox never touches the deleted items folder, it is deleted right from the inbox folder, so to recover this you would have to turn dumpster always on registry edit ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after theydeletethem? But if I want to recover other folders I have to go to each clients workstation and do the Dumpsteralways on reg config ?? No just the workstation you plan to use to recover things. But I thought anytime you delete an item it goes to the deleted item folder anyhow?? Not always...delete this message while holding the shiftkey. Delivering items to a PST would also be an instance were the message left the IS without being placed in the deleted items folder. So in which scenario would it be useful to edit this registry setting??? If you plan on recovering things that never resided in the deleted items folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
