RE: stationery disabling?

[Jennifer Baker]

ick.  I need a new cult.

-Original Message-
From: Heather Bellson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stationery disabling?


thanks oh great ones (ed and cthulhu).  

i figured there wasn't a one-stop solution!

heather

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: stationery disabling?

[Heather Bellson]

thanks oh great ones (ed and cthulhu).  

i figured there wasn't a one-stop solution!

heather

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 Background Sync

[Walden H. Leverich]

Karen,

I just had a very similar problem with Ex5.5 but the solution may be the
same. Are you running anti-virus software? If so, are you background
scanning? I was background scanning and all was fine, I turned off
background scanning and over the next several week syncs went to hell. I
turned it back on and waited an appropriate amount of time and all was good
again. The problem? Well, I have no direct proof, but empirical evidence
says that w/o background scanning enabled the scans of the messages when the
sync was requested were taking "too long" to complete and MAPI was timing
out. Turning on background scanning ensured that all messages were scanned
with the most current definitions so they didn't need to be scanned when
synching.

-Walden

-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Background Sync


We have a large sales force using Outlook 2000 that works offline most of
the time.  They fire up the client in offline mode, and synchronize
against the server periodically by hitting F9 (sync all folders) and
more often than not, get "Errors in background synchronization."
We have been troubleshooting this issue for a while now and cannot
establish a pattern because sometimes it will work, and sometimes it
will fail, without changing anything on the client or server end.

I didn't find much helpful in the KB and thought I'd ping you folks
for opinions on what to check.

TIA,
Karen


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: exchange server 5.5 n public folders

[Walden H. Leverich]

Evan,

PFs have e-mail addresses, just forward to that address as if it was a
normal recipient.

-Walden

-Original Message-
From: Evan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange server 5.5 n public folders


Dear Ed,
Mistaken, but not in that way. I had read to get around this to
use-forward to fublic folder- not move to folder. But I cannot find such a
command past forward to contact/ recipient.
Although it seems moving to a public folder used to work on the client
machine.  thanks
Evan Gyde

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Stephen Mynhier]

I will volunteer (short term) to be a CA apologist...
CA's sorry... Very very sorry

I resign now... That wore me out.

Stephen

-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


It's on, baby.

I heard rumors, too. Biker gangs swooping down on MEC to mete out "rough
justice", Exchange style, on unwitting victims. No violence, just CA site
licenses and installation of their products.

Say. How come CA never defends their quality? Are there any CA apologists?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Haaker
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC


Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to stop information store before backup?

[missy koslosky]

There's no need to stop the information stores to do a backup - in fact, it
is better to not do this, as an offline backup will not delete the
transaction log files and you'll not be able to replay those logs should you
need to restore.  Use NTBackup to backup Exchange databases or buy the
Exchange agent from Veritas for BackupExec.  Read
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q272/2/34.asp for a quick
overview of backup and recovery, and read the FAQ for this list (link in the
message footer) for more information.

If you absolutely don't want to do what I'm suggesting, then create a bat
file with the following:

net stop msexchangesa /y
net stop msexchangesa /y
net stop msexchangesa /y

And use that to stop all of the services.

Then start the services using a bat file with the following commands:

net start msexchangesa
net start msexchangeds
net start msexchageis
net start msexchangemta
net start msexchangeimc (ims?  it's been a while...)

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Labonte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:36 PM
Subject: How to stop information store before backup?


I am new to exchange and I am not sure how to do this.

I am running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Nt4 SP6

I want to stop the information store before I make a backup of the priv and
the pub files.  How can I do this?  Is there a script file I can run?

I am using backup exec to backup my server.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

If you have to ask, you'll never know.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is about these darn
fish taco's.  I would never eat anything like that but just to see what in
h*** is so special about them.  

 
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Fish:  The Forbidden Taco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad.
> 
> 
> Andy David 
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?
> 
> Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means 
> more beer and
> fish tacos for Andy.
> 
> Doug Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
> 
> 
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration 
> yesterday as
> he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. 
> They told him they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of 
> people have been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around 
> the world.
> Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
> tragedy.
> 
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national 
> leaders urged
> that the business and economic activities of this nation and 
> the global
> economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
> terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
> the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have 
> decided to
> move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
> through October 4th as scheduled.
> 
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation,
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the
> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions
> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are 
> working closely
> with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security
> measure is in place.
> 
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our
> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> 
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
> 
> 
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL P

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Doug Hampshire is not certified to administer the Tech Buddy program. Please
refer questions on the program directly to me.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


A tech buddy is not necessarily reciprocal, so the answer is yes.  Right,
fishbreath?

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Can I also take on a tech buddy even though I am the recipient of a tech
buddy?
Maybe I can become a tech buddy in training?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi
powers? :)

John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Would you be my tech buddy?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> I forgot who my tech buddy is
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
> websites
>
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP Exchange
> Exchange2000 List owner
> www.exchange-mail.org
> --
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> > What is MEC??
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: MEC
> >
> >
> > I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> > yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after
> recent events.
>
> > They told him
> they
> > would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of
> people have
> been
> > canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> > anything yet . . .
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> >
> >
> > Yes.  Still on.
> > Here is what I got from them:
> > September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the
> > world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been
> affected by this
> > terrible tragedy.
> >
> > As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders
> > urged that the business and economic activities of this
> nation and the
>
> > global economy must continue, even as we all work together
> to address
> > the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.
> The reopening
>
> > of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> > activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we
> have decided
> > to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September
> > 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
> >
> > Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> > strongly believe that national and international air
> transportation,
> > hotels and other support services will be fully operational
> before the
>
> > MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes,
> sessions, functions
>
> > and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working
> > closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible
> > security measure is in place.
> >
> > All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this
> tragedy in our
> > thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we
> carry on our
>
> > lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> >
> > Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > The MEC 2001 Team
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> > Network Specialist
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owne

Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

[missy koslosky]

Exmerge will kill his single instance storage, and his 40GB database will
end up at almost 50GB if he's got only a 1.2:1 ratio.  I'd try moving the
mailboxes in chunks of 50-100 at a time, and ensure that it's done from the
receiving server's Admin program for efficiency.

I'd guess that this can be done in 2-3 working days, without overtime.  Just
let the users know that their mailboxes may be "temporarily inaccessible"
and that their access should be resolved in 20-30 minutes (it should take
less per mailbox, but you always look good when things take less time than
you've said...).

Missy

- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate


Sander,

Any reason you think that exmerge will bring along corrupted messages ?
Since Exmerge is essentially copying the message from the mailbox store to
the .PST file, a corrupted message will cause Exmerge to hiccup.

We had major store corruption some time ago, approx 600 of the 1600
mailboxes wouldn't move via the Exchange Administration tool due to
corruption. Exmerge allowed those mailboxes to be successfully moved. Simply
looking at the exmerge log file, deleting the offending message(s) from the
mailbox allowed the migration to occur in most cases.

We have also used Exmerge doing only the first phase of the migration
(extracting to .PST file), in order to determine which mailboxes were
corrupt. Have done this a few days ahead of a migration to determine those
mailboxes which will have to be manually moved. This allowed us to expedite
those mailboxes with no detected corruption, and focus our efforts on those
mailboxes that were having problems.

Glenn

- Original Message -
From: "Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:00 PM
Subject: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate


> Hi All
>
> I know one should not generalise and each system is different. I
> acknowledge these two factors, but does anyone have any stats on the
> average transfer speed they obtained while doing a move mailbox. The
> servers in question are not in my site so I cannot quickly run a test. The
> servers are on a 100 MB switch.The total mail store is approx 40 GB. I
> would like to calculate an approx time needed to move mailboxes this way,
> exmerge is not an option as the original store has corruptions in it. I
> need to check after each mailbox if the new store is still consistent.
>
> Any info is appreciated.
>
> Regards
> Sander
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: moving mailboxes

[missy koslosky]

Automatically.  One way that MAPI rocks.

Leave the old server online for a month or so, and follow the steps in
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q152/9/59.asp.

Missy

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: moving mailboxes


I´m about to move some mailboxes from one exchangeserver to another in the
same site.. Do I have to specify the new exchange server on every client,
or is it taken care of automatically?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MP3 files

[missy koslosky]

You'll need a third party product (Sybari, TrendMicro, MimeSweeper) to do
this.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:43 AM
Subject: MP3 files


Dear All,

Can I block all MP3 files to and from from our Exchange server???

Carine



Improve your customers' satisfaction at a lower cost.
Click here for details :-
http://www.scs.com.my/scsNews.asp?article=30




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

He's all yours. Andy David will be your direct mentor and the secret cabal
of Tech Buddy mentors will take note of your progress.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Can I also take on a tech buddy even though I am the recipient of a tech
buddy?
Maybe I can become a tech buddy in training?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi
powers? :)

John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Would you be my tech buddy?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> I forgot who my tech buddy is
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
> websites
>
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP Exchange
> Exchange2000 List owner
> www.exchange-mail.org
> --
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> > What is MEC??
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: MEC
> >
> >
> > I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> > yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after
> recent events.
>
> > They told him
> they
> > would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of
> people have
> been
> > canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> > anything yet . . .
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> >
> >
> > Yes.  Still on.
> > Here is what I got from them:
> > September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the
> > world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been
> affected by this
> > terrible tragedy.
> >
> > As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders
> > urged that the business and economic activities of this
> nation and the
>
> > global economy must continue, even as we all work together
> to address
> > the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.
> The reopening
>
> > of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> > activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we
> have decided
> > to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September
> > 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
> >
> > Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> > strongly believe that national and international air
> transportation,
> > hotels and other support services will be fully operational
> before the
>
> > MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes,
> sessions, functions
>
> > and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working
> > closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible
> > security measure is in place.
> >
> > All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this
> tragedy in our
> > thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we
> carry on our
>
> > lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> >
> > Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > The MEC 2001 Team
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> > Network Specialist
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> > Office 270-685-6381
> > Fax 270-685-6212
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: MEC
> >
> >
> > Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

You can have multiple fans, but only one Tech Buddy.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Another fan!!  What am I going to do?  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Sorry Don..  But I realized over a month over when I first acquired this
list that when I grew up I wanted to be a lot like you.

And that was my first baby step. 

Mike Mitchell
eMAIL Systems Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC


The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
websites

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


> What is MEC??
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events.

> They told him
they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have
been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the
> world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this 
> terrible tragedy.
>
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders
> urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the

> global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address
> the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening

> of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided 
> to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 
> 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
>
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the

> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions

> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
>
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our

> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
>
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
>
>
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

MEC has been moved to Texarkana due to travel concerns.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?

Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means more beer and
fish tacos for Andy.

Doug Hampshire
Iron Chef Hanji

-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC


I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as
he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they
would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been
canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
anything yet . . .

- Original Message -
From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


Yes.  Still on.
Here is what I got from them:
September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world.
Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
tragedy.

As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged
that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global
economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided to
move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
through October 4th as scheduled.

Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
strongly believe that national and international air transportation,
hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the
MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions
and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working closely
with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security
measure is in place.

All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our
thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our
lives full of pride in our values and our country.

Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sincerely,
The MEC 2001 Team

Thank you,

Ron Crumbaker, MCP
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212





-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC


Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Force is what you do if it don't go in smooth.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Crumbaker, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


The force flows from within, you must concentrate on what surrounds you.
Be mindful of the future, but not at the cost of the present.


Thank you,

Ron Crumbaker, MCP
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Martin Blackstone]

New Features: Lose all body hair and grow wings
Major Curse : Degenerate into a pre-human creature
Doom: Lose your identity to The Deep Worms
Insanity: Absolute catatonia
Life Changes: Dress only in yellow silk and wear a mask
and
New Features: Acquire a bluish tinge to your skin color
Major Curse : Memorize the Book of Eibon
Major Curse : Feed the Dholes
Doom: Be a sacrifice on Walpurgisnacht
Insanity: Constant, incoherent babbling

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I bet he's got a warm fuzzy reading this. You sham. Go punish yourself
double. One for losing your tech buddy, two for deleting one of my
emails.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I forgot who my tech buddy is

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC


The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
websites

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


> What is MEC??
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration 
> yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events.

> They told him
they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have
been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard 
> anything yet . . .
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the 
> world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this 
> terrible tragedy.
>
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders 
> urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the

> global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address 
> the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening

> of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic 
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided 
> to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 
> 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
>
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the

> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions

> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
>
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our 
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our

> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
>
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
>
>
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resour

RE: MEC

[Martin Blackstone]

Ok, but who is my tech buddy. I want my original, no new one.
Heading to self punishment

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I bet he's got a warm fuzzy reading this. You sham. Go punish yourself
double. One for losing your tech buddy, two for deleting one of my
emails.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I forgot who my tech buddy is

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC


The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
websites

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


> What is MEC??
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration 
> yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events.

> They told him
they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have
been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard 
> anything yet . . .
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the 
> world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this 
> terrible tragedy.
>
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders 
> urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the

> global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address 
> the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening

> of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic 
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided 
> to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 
> 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
>
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the

> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions

> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
>
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our 
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our

> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
>
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
>
>
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/

RE: Sircam Virus

[Martin Blackstone]

And half the time you didn't even know you had one.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


All you had to do was yell at people to turn off macros...

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Athose were the days

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Remember the good ol' days of Office Macro viruses?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Magistrate is also still coming around pretty well.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses
are still SirCam.

Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup
to delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting
a ton of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being
deleted.  Just want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: test

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Later.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: test


Speaking of certs, when is the next update?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: test


Sure.

Your first test should be MOS1101: Elder Sign Essentials.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mehringer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: test



Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Avi can be your Tech Buddy. Mind you, he's a "Tech Buddy in Training",
subject to the oversight of the secret cabal of Tech Buddy mentors. Should
he give you any bad advice, said mentors will note it and see to it he gets
repeated contacts from the CA marketing department.

In such an event, Andy David will fill in as your "Tech Buddy" and Mike
Morrison will be his assisstant.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi
powers? :)

John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Would you be my tech buddy?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> I forgot who my tech buddy is
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
> websites
>
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP Exchange
> Exchange2000 List owner
> www.exchange-mail.org
> --
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> > What is MEC??
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: MEC
> >
> >
> > I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> > yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after
> recent events.
>
> > They told him
> they
> > would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of
> people have
> been
> > canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> > anything yet . . .
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> >
> >
> > Yes.  Still on.
> > Here is what I got from them:
> > September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the
> > world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been
> affected by this
> > terrible tragedy.
> >
> > As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders
> > urged that the business and economic activities of this
> nation and the
>
> > global economy must continue, even as we all work together
> to address
> > the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.
> The reopening
>
> > of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> > activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we
> have decided
> > to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September
> > 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
> >
> > Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> > strongly believe that national and international air
> transportation,
> > hotels and other support services will be fully operational
> before the
>
> > MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes,
> sessions, functions
>
> > and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working
> > closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible
> > security measure is in place.
> >
> > All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this
> tragedy in our
> > thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we
> carry on our
>
> > lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> >
> > Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > The MEC 2001 Team
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> > Network Specialist
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> > Office 270-685-6381
> > Fax 270-685-6212
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: MEC
> >
> >
> > Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> >
> >
> > _

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

He's right. Please back away from the Tech Buddy pairing, Mr. Tuip.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC


The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
websites

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


> What is MEC??
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration 
> yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events.

> They told him
they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have
been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard 
> anything yet . . .
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the 
> world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this 
> terrible tragedy.
>
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders 
> urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the

> global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address 
> the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening

> of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic 
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided 
> to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 
> 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
>
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the

> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions

> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
>
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our 
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our

> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
>
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
>
>
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swyn

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

I bet he's got a warm fuzzy reading this. You sham. Go punish yourself
double. One for losing your tech buddy, two for deleting one of my emails.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I forgot who my tech buddy is

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC


The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
websites

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


> What is MEC??
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events.

> They told him
they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have
been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the
> world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this
> terrible tragedy.
>
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders
> urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the

> global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address
> the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening

> of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided
> to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September
> 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
>
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation,
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the

> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions

> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible
> security measure is in place.
>
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our

> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
>
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
>
>
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/si

RE: MEC

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

It's on, baby.

I heard rumors, too. Biker gangs swooping down on MEC to mete out "rough
justice", Exchange style, on unwitting victims. No violence, just CA site
licenses and installation of their products.

Say. How come CA never defends their quality? Are there any CA apologists?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Haaker
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC


Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MEC

[missy koslosky]

You can still go - it's next week.

- Original Message - 
From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is about these darn
fish taco's.  I would never eat anything like that but just to see what in
h*** is so special about them.  

 
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Fish:  The Forbidden Taco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad.
> 
> 
> Andy David 
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?
> 
> Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means 
> more beer and
> fish tacos for Andy.
> 
> Doug Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
> 
> 
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration 
> yesterday as
> he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. 
> They told him they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of 
> people have been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around 
> the world.
> Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
> tragedy.
> 
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national 
> leaders urged
> that the business and economic activities of this nation and 
> the global
> economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
> terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
> the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have 
> decided to
> move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
> through October 4th as scheduled.
> 
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation,
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the
> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions
> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are 
> working closely
> with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security
> measure is in place.
> 
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our
> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> 
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
> 
> 
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.sw

Re: MEC

[missy koslosky]

You can have Hanji.

- Original Message -
From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


Can I also take on a tech buddy even though I am the recipient of a tech
buddy?
Maybe I can become a tech buddy in training?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi
powers? :)

John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Would you be my tech buddy?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> I forgot who my tech buddy is
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
> websites
>
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP Exchange
> Exchange2000 List owner
> www.exchange-mail.org
> --
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> > What is MEC??
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: MEC
> >
> >
> > I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> > yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after
> recent events.
>
> > They told him
> they
> > would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of
> people have
> been
> > canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> > anything yet . . .
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> >
> >
> > Yes.  Still on.
> > Here is what I got from them:
> > September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the
> > world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been
> affected by this
> > terrible tragedy.
> >
> > As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders
> > urged that the business and economic activities of this
> nation and the
>
> > global economy must continue, even as we all work together
> to address
> > the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.
> The reopening
>
> > of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> > activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we
> have decided
> > to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September
> > 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
> >
> > Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> > strongly believe that national and international air
> transportation,
> > hotels and other support services will be fully operational
> before the
>
> > MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes,
> sessions, functions
>
> > and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working
> > closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible
> > security measure is in place.
> >
> > All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this
> tragedy in our
> > thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we
> carry on our
>
> > lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> >
> > Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > The MEC 2001 Team
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> > Network Specialist
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> > Office 270-685-6381
> > Fax 270-685-6212
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: MEC
> >
> >
> > Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: MS Easybake Oven

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

If you set the list to "nomail", try really unsubscribing and resubscribing.

You can always subscribe again from a different address.

Or go back and make sure you typed in the right email address...

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phil Labonte
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven


Dumb question and sorry to bother you but I see you have several posts on
the mailing list.

I unsubscribe from the exchange list when I went on vacation.

I re subscribed a few days ago and I have been getting the messages but I
cannot post??  Is there something else I must do to post messages?

I emailed the moderator of the list and I have never received a response.

Any thoughts?

Phil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sircam Virus

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

All you had to do was yell at people to turn off macros...

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Athose were the days

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Remember the good ol' days of Office Macro viruses?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Magistrate is also still coming around pretty well.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses
are still SirCam.

Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup
to delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting
a ton of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being
deleted.  Just want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: test

[Martin Blackstone]

Speaking of certs, when is the next update?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: test


Sure.

Your first test should be MOS1101: Elder Sign Essentials.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mehringer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: test



Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Proxy Objects in Active Directory?

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Maybe you should spend money.

I'll just go to the MS Support site and...

Hey.

They moved everything around.

Dammit.

And they threw in a few "bonus steps" I didn't use to need... grrr...

Anyway, there's lots of KB articles. Some even on these error messages. The
PSS guy should be able to help you find them. If not, demand your money
back.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred W.
Macondray Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Proxy Objects in Active Directory?


Help!

I am getting repeated errors on my Exchange 2000 server:

1) Event id 8197
Error initializing session for virtual machine SERVER. The error number
is 0x80070005. Make sure Microsoft Exchange Store is running.

2) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "OAB Version 2"
in the Active Directory.

3) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "Test" in the
Active Directory.

4) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "OAB Version 2"
in the Active Directory.

5) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "Test" in the
Active Directory.

I get a few more of those.  I'm also getting errors in System Manager
where it errors out with an 80004005 error on Public Folders.

Please HELP!  I've been posing and searching for almost 3 weeks trying
to not spend money !!!

Thanks in Advance,
Fred Macondray
Systems Administrator
Virtual Purchase Card, Inc.
www.virtualpurchasecard.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Plain text in OWA

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Which version?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vinny Avallone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Plain text in OWA


I have a user who needs to be able to send mail from OWA in plain text
to someone else using a Unix based email systems that doesn't like html.
I thought there was a way to turn on plain text in OWA.
Am I mistaken?
 
 
--
Vinny Avallone
System Administrator
(410) 872-1535
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sircam Virus

[Martin Blackstone]

Athose were the days

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Remember the good ol' days of Office Macro viruses?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Magistrate is also still coming around pretty well.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses
are still SirCam.

Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup
to delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting
a ton of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being
deleted.  Just want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sircam Virus

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Remember the good ol' days of Office Macro viruses?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Magistrate is also still coming around pretty well.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses are
still SirCam.

Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup to
delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting a ton
of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being deleted.  Just
want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: stationery disabling?

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Yes. Fire anyone who dares incur your wrath by using stationery.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Heather Bellson
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: stationery disabling?


is there a way to disable stationery (not rich text format) from being
used internally?  i know how to force outgoing mail to be plain text, but
would like instead to force internal (to the exchange organization) mail
to leave their stationeries at the door.

there's been a few complaints about eye strain and general "that is SO
ugly!" coming my way about some users' particular choice in stationery. 
management wants me to stop it.

i really don't want to walk around to all the clients and force them to
use rtf or plain text, especially since they could simply undo my change. 
it would be wonderful if this could be restricted from the server, but i
couldn't find a way.

thanks in advance,
heather

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Store.exe is taking 100%

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Check for lots of server activity, like sending lots of email or recalling
lots of messages.

By the way, how do you get a California University of Pennsylvania?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Store.exe is taking 100%


The store on one box is taking 100% of one CPU.   We had a student this
morning that sent a message to all the students on campus about 8000
mailboxes.  The message contain voting buttons, delivery receipt, and
read receipt.   I recalled the message but the server continues at 100%
on one of the processors of the server.   The other one goes between
70%-100%.   Does anyone have any ideas on what to check for.


Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: test

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Sure.

Your first test should be MOS1101: Elder Sign Essentials.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mehringer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: test



Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Customizing OWA 2000

[Tony Hlabse]

I agree but I could only find the help ASP files. Seems the other ones are
buried somewhere.  I looked all over. I have a feeling it has to do with
possibly XML editing. If happen to find out which/where these files live I
would appreciate it.

- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: Customizing OWA 2000


> OWA is really just a collection of HTML files. Edit them as you would any
> other HTML file. Only difference is ASP is not used in the 2K version.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:41 PM
> Subject: Customizing OWA 2000
>
>
> > In old Exchange 5.5 OWA you could edit the ASP files to customize the
look
> > of OWA to change the look to meet your Companies needs. ie company logo
> > etc. Does anybody know where/how that is done in Exchange 2000.
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP application

[Kevin Miller]

Could you turn off the security or the level that it is running at?? Is
there not a security tab thingie like in IE???

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP application


I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model:
http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568 

*
  Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
  Simpler-Webb, Inc.  Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook XP application
> 
> 
> I have a user who has built an application that accesses the
> address book in
> Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a 
> message every time
> the application tries to run about it being allowed to access 
> the address
> book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does 
> anyone know how to
> turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
> particular user that is not a concern.
> 
> Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is
> something that I
> would like to avoid btw).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2

[Kevin Miller]

There is a switch on eseutil to upgrade you Priv to sp4 if that is the
case. Check for a Q on doing this. I have done it a few times with a
good success rate.

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Linton Smith
(WBTQ)
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2


... as long as your were at W2K SP1 and Ex5.5 SP4 in April.  If not,
then you will have to re-install to the exact versions you were at in
April.

Linton


-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2


Just completed what you would like to do, you do not need to reinstall
exchange.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Test 2


Hello All,

Note:
Exchange Server 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP1 
Recovery Server and Production Exchange server have identical Exchange
server, Windows 2k server and service packs.

I have just successfully completed a DR test using the last full backup
tape (Friday's tape).  My manager would like me to do another test but
this time using a full backup tape from April 2001.  He said that back
in July they lost some public folder data and could not recover it and
was wondering if I could do another DR test using an older tape.  My
question is this.  Should I reinstall Exchange and do all the steps over
again?  Can I just restore the IS and DS from April and would it
overwrite the current one?  What is the best way to go about performing
the next DR test?

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Kevin Miller]

Oh good.. : > cuz I am the first member, not only a member the
president? What did not sound like hair club..

C look it works.. Must be those typing skills...

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


No, I definitely won't forget you.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I am the first official member of the fan club.. Don't forget that
one

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Another fan!!  What am I going to do?  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Sorry Don..  But I realized over a month over when I first acquired this
list that when I grew up I wanted to be a lot like you.

And that was my first baby step. 

Mike Mitchell
eMAIL Systems Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC


The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
websites

--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


> What is MEC??
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration 
> yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events.

> They told him
they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have
been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard 
> anything yet . . .
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the 
> world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this 
> terrible tragedy.
>
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders 
> urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the

> global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address 
> the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening

> of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic 
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided 
> to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 
> 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
>
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the

> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions

> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
>
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our 
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our

> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
>
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sincerely,
>

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

[Kevin Miller]

I forgot to add the word WIN in there.. : >

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


>Ok good.. Back to getting my Arse kicked at Nintendo by my 5 year old..

>Wish he would let me once and a while..

You want to kick your own Arse???

...Joel Osborn

PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Reader
Is Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or Will
Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State.



-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


Ok good.. Back to getting my Arse kicked at Nintendo by my 5 year old..
Wish he would let me once and a while..

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


He doesn't scan those folders.  Drink another Espresso...  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


You NEVER want to use a file based scanner on the Exchange folders in
the server.. That is a very bad idea. You just don't do that period. If
you want more protection then use extension blocking. File scanner your
exchange server will cause nothing but problems and now help at all..
Why do you think there is a separate product for exchange?  Never mind..
Don will finish this one better then I can.. 

You should have left it you being wrong.

Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


Don,

Hi!

What I don't want is to make this as argument.  I am just saying that I
would run File Based A/V product to increase the protection of Exchange
server.  You can't really say your server is bullet proof.  Maybe it is
at the time, but what if/when there's a new threat for security holes.
A/V may not be able to protect it, but it certainly may decrease the
chance of getting infected (IMO).  You think that file based A/V
products corrupt Exchange database?  Well, Not if people install it
properly and run it properly.  Exchange Virus product companies support
File Based A/V products.  Microsoft does not say you can not install
File Based A/V products on Exchange server, do they?  If they do, please
let me know.

If you are happy with not running file based A/V products on your
Exchange server, that's okay with me.  I am just happy running file
based A/V product along email virus product on my Exchange server.  And
this is supported by my A/V vendor. 

Brian

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Rules Wizard

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

Yes. Make everyone use the Exchange 5.0 email client.

Of course, they can still delete them without reading them.

There are seldom good technical solutions for personnel issues. If they
don't read something marked high priority and urgent and mandatory in ALL
CAPS, they deserve anything they got coming.

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Khin Thuzar Nu
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard



Hi to all,

Is there a way to stop users from using Rules Wizard to dump company
newsbreaks to their Personal Folders or Inbox folders??

The goal is to have them read the announcements instead of dumping them
somewhere to be deleted.

Any help would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance..

Thuzar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA

[Great Cthulhu Jones]

This is a vile problem. You would be well advised to get someone, say PSS,
to work closely with you on the issue. Of course, you already did put a call
in to Microsoft. Time to up the ante.

If you have a TAM, start screaming at the guy that you don't want to waste
hours on the phone with PSS when you can get the same benefits from playing
Freecell. Holler. Scream. Demand a resolution. Tell him your boss is
threatening to cut the Premier account and you're doing what you can to save
Microsoft on the enterprise.

Or, you could hire a consultant to swing by and check things out for you. I
know a guy or two who might be able to help...

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dumke, Jane
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA


The one that works has the ADC on it.

Jane Dumke
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point

phone:(715)346-2463  fax:(715)346-4577



-Original Message-
From: Dumke, Jane
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA


We're still not out of the woods as I can replicate the folders to a 3rd
server (supposed to be identical to the first 2), remove the replica off
the "bad" server, and the 3rd server has the exact same folder
permissions issues as the original first server.  The 2nd server remains
good for accessing PFs.

Jane Dumke
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point

phone:(715)346-2463  fax:(715)346-4577



-Original Message-
From: Dumke, Jane
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Zuge, Peter
Subject: RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA


We use BackupExec and Trend Micro's Scanmail for Exchange.

It's not worked from Day One so I doubt the security patches caused
issues.

Interesting through, if I connect through the one PF server directly, I
have problems.  If I connect through the 2nd PF server, it's peachy.
This is a huge break through.   I could just cry! ;)

Signed,

Maybe not so Desperate in Stevens Point

Jane Dumke
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point

phone:(715)346-2463  fax:(715)346-4577



-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA


You got anything backing up or scanning the M: Drive?

Apply any recent security patches?

Can you connect directly to the back-end server and have things work?

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dumke, Jane
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Zuge, Peter
Subject: RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA


Through experience we've learned that M: drive permissions are a no-no,
but that was after this was already occurring and is still occurring on
folders that we've never looked at through the M: drive.

We are using OWA as a front-end server.

I tried the http://servername/exchange rendition with no change in the
permissions issues.

Thanks for the ideas.


Jane Dumke
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point

phone:(715)346-2463  fax:(715)346-4577



-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA


If you touched M: Drive permissions in ANY way, you are among the hosed.
If
you did any hardening of your IIS on that machine, check to see what the
hardening did.

Does this work if you use a front-end server for it?

Does this work if you use http://servername/exchange to start the OWA
session? Not http://servername.domain.com/exchange, just the host name.
If
that works, search the archives for "Coyote Jones" about in-depth
discussion
of that sort of boondoggle.

Yes, I now find myself in agreement with other Mr. Jones. Strange times
we
live in...

(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dumke, Jane
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Zuge, Peter
Subject: RE: Public Folders Access Issues through OWA


Although we hadn't been using the full domain\logon when we logged on, I
just verified that that does not make a difference.

Jane Dumke
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point

RE: imap public folder

[Ed Crowley]

Did you create replicas of the folders on the new server and wait for them
to replicate?  Did you change the home public folder server setting on the
user's mailbox server?

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mikel fernandez
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: imap public folder


How can I move the root of an Imap public folder.
The real problem is that we moved public folders to a new server but
after stopping all exchange services in the root server , the clients can
not access to any Public Folder because we can use only one root.


The root was created in one server that we will desinstall
¿¿will it be changed after the desinstallation??

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: stationery disabling?

[Ed Crowley]

You could have the files purged from people's workstations.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Heather Bellson
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: stationery disabling?


is there a way to disable stationery (not rich text format) from being
used internally?  i know how to force outgoing mail to be plain text, but
would like instead to force internal (to the exchange organization) mail
to leave their stationeries at the door.

there's been a few complaints about eye strain and general "that is SO
ugly!" coming my way about some users' particular choice in stationery. 
management wants me to stop it.

i really don't want to walk around to all the clients and force them to
use rtf or plain text, especially since they could simply undo my change. 
it would be wonderful if this could be restricted from the server, but i
couldn't find a way.

thanks in advance,
heather

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Editing Inbox Contents

[Ed Crowley]

The "modified" date is changed in that case.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Editing Inbox Contents



hi ed,

i don't see a problem with editing inbox contents, in fact i find it to be a
useful feature. however, one of our site managers expressed the opinion that
someone could falsify the contents of a recieved message (say from a
customer) in order to get away with something.

> What does "skive" mean?

sorry, english slang here. Skiving (sky-ving) means not doing any work, or
not even turning up for work

'Where's the admin gone, is he skiving off somewhere?'
'I'm so tired after last night, I might skive off work today'.

dan.


> There are seldom good technological solutions to
> behavioral problems.  I don't really see how it's any
> different than if they compose their e-mail in
> Notepad, then cut and pasted it later.  What is the
> real worry?  Please provide a scenario.
>
> What does "skive" mean?
>
> Ed Crowley
> Compaq Computer
>
> --- "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > hi all,
> >
> > we've just moved a load of users onto outlook 2001
> > (mac) from OE5. They're
> > not too happy because of missing features and no
> > easy migration tools, but
> > hey ho.
> >
> > The admin at one site has raised the point that in
> > outlook, as with the pc
> > version, you can edit and save messages in the
> > inbox. He's worried people
> > will abuse this feature to forge dishonest email to
> > help them skive off and
> > generally get away with stuff at work.
> >
> > I'm sure there's no way to restrict this, but how
> > would you handle this one
> > with the powers-that-be, should they be concerned?
> >
> > cheers
> > dan.
> >
> >
> _
> > List posting FAQ:
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:
> > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with
> Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Rules Wizard

[Ed Crowley]

At a previous employer, at an outpost office, while using the urinal, right
at eye level was a paper taped to the wall showing proper lifting
techniques.  Written in the bottom margin was, "Safety in your face."

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard


Tape them to the back of the stall doors in the bathroom. And over the
urinals in the men's room.

...Joel Osborn

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard


Every once in a while, buy a bunch of Krispy Kreme donuts and hide a
reference to the fact that the first five people to come ask for them
will get half a dozen.  The first three people to respond to this email
get every Feb 30th off for the rest of the century, paid double salary.
Give 'em a quiz.  Gather them into a room and read it aloud to them.
Print it out and tape it to their monitors.  Make them write "I will
read my daily memos" 100 times on the conference room chalkboard.

I am quite capable of ignoring stuff in my inbox without moving it to
another folder.  I bet your users are, too.  The only way you're going
to make them read it, is to make your managers, well, manage.

-Original Message-
From: Khin Thuzar Nu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:28 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Rules Wizard
Subject: Rules Wizard



Hi to all,

Is there a way to stop users from using Rules Wizard to dump company
newsbreaks to their Personal Folders or Inbox folders??

The goal is to have them read the announcements instead of dumping them
somewhere to be deleted.

Any help would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance..

Thuzar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Rules Wizard

[Ed Crowley]

Puhleeeze! [1]

[1] Hi, Ben!

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard


I think Ed's still on the can

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard


[1] Hi Ed!

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Khin Thuzar Nu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Rules Wizard
> 
> 
> 
> Hi to all,
> 
> Is there a way to stop users from using Rules Wizard to dump
> company newsbreaks to their Personal Folders or Inbox folders??
> 
> The goal is to have them read the announcements instead of
> dumping them somewhere to be deleted.
> 
> Any help would be highly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks in advance..
> 
> Thuzar
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

stationery disabling?

[Heather Bellson]

is there a way to disable stationery (not rich text format) from being
used internally?  i know how to force outgoing mail to be plain text, but
would like instead to force internal (to the exchange organization) mail
to leave their stationeries at the door.

there's been a few complaints about eye strain and general "that is SO
ugly!" coming my way about some users' particular choice in stationery. 
management wants me to stop it.

i really don't want to walk around to all the clients and force them to
use rtf or plain text, especially since they could simply undo my change. 
it would be wonderful if this could be restricted from the server, but i
couldn't find a way.

thanks in advance,
heather

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2

[Ed Crowley]

This is a prime reason you should keep a server maintenance log!

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Linton Smith
(WBTQ)
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2


... as long as your were at W2K SP1 and Ex5.5 SP4 in April.  If not, then
you will have to re-install to the exact versions you were at in April.

Linton


-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2


Just completed what you would like to do, you do not need to reinstall
exchange.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Test 2


Hello All,

Note:
Exchange Server 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP1
Recovery Server and Production Exchange server have identical Exchange
server, Windows 2k server and service packs.

I have just successfully completed a DR test using the last full backup tape
(Friday's tape).  My manager would like me to do another test but this time
using a full backup tape from April 2001.  He said that back in July they
lost some public folder data and could not recover it and was wondering if I
could do another DR test using an older tape.  My question is this.  Should
I reinstall Exchange and do all the steps over again?  Can I just restore
the IS and DS from April and would it overwrite the current one?  What is
the best way to go about performing the next DR test?

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: How to stop information store before backup?

[Ed Crowley]

I agree with the other two who say you don't need to do this.  Instead
obtain the Exchange Agent and back up the Information Store and Directory
objects, and exclude the C:\EXCHSRVR\*DATA directories from any file backup
you do.

But if for some weird reason you still think you need or want to do what you
asked, enter on the command line "NET STOP MSEXCHANGEIS /Y" to stop the
service, and the corresponding "NET START" command to restart it after the
backup.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phil Labonte
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to stop information store before backup?


I am new to exchange and I am not sure how to do this.

I am running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Nt4 SP6

I want to stop the information store before I make a backup of the priv and
the pub files.  How can I do this?  Is there a script file I can run?

I am using backup exec to backup my server.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: moving mailboxes

[Ed Crowley]

Right.  Leave the old server up and running for a while.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: moving mailboxes


IF the original server is up, then MAPI clients will automatically modify
the profile to reflect the new server.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/25/01 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: moving mailboxes

Hi there

I'm am in the process of doing this now.  Outlook automatically finds
the
server if the information is wrong.

Thanks

Russell

-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: moving mailboxes


if both exchange servers are in the same site it should resolve the new
server location for you. At least that has been my experience.

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: moving mailboxes


> I´m about to move some mailboxes from one exchangeserver to another in
the
> same site.. Do I have to specify the new exchange server on every
client,
> or is it taken care of automatically?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Customizing OWA 2000

[Daniel Chenault]

OWA is really just a collection of HTML files. Edit them as you would any
other HTML file. Only difference is ASP is not used in the 2K version.

- Original Message -
From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Customizing OWA 2000


> In old Exchange 5.5 OWA you could edit the ASP files to customize the look
> of OWA to change the look to meet your Companies needs. ie company logo
> etc. Does anybody know where/how that is done in Exchange 2000.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Ed Crowley]

A tech buddy is not necessarily reciprocal, so the answer is yes.  Right,
fishbreath?

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Can I also take on a tech buddy even though I am the recipient of a tech
buddy?
Maybe I can become a tech buddy in training?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi
powers? :)

John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Would you be my tech buddy?

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> I forgot who my tech buddy is
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> Hey!  Get off my Tech Buddy!  Only I am allowed to harass him.  ;o)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
>
>
> The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
> websites
>
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP Exchange
> Exchange2000 List owner
> www.exchange-mail.org
> --
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
>
>
> > What is MEC??
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: MEC
> >
> >
> > I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> > yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after
> recent events.
>
> > They told him
> they
> > would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of
> people have
> been
> > canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> > anything yet . . .
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> >
> >
> > Yes.  Still on.
> > Here is what I got from them:
> > September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the
> > world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been
> affected by this
> > terrible tragedy.
> >
> > As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders
> > urged that the business and economic activities of this
> nation and the
>
> > global economy must continue, even as we all work together
> to address
> > the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.
> The reopening
>
> > of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> > activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we
> have decided
> > to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September
> > 30th through October 4th as scheduled.
> >
> > Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> > strongly believe that national and international air
> transportation,
> > hotels and other support services will be fully operational
> before the
>
> > MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes,
> sessions, functions
>
> > and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working
> > closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible
> > security measure is in place.
> >
> > All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this
> tragedy in our
> > thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we
> carry on our
>
> > lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> >
> > Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > The MEC 2001 Team
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> > Network Specialist
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> > Office 270-685-6381
> > Fax 270-685-6212
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: MEC
> >
> >
> > Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://w

RE: Help with Public Folder

[Ed Crowley]

What do you mean public folder?  Do you mean mailbox folders?  Try deleting
and recreating the profile.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mehringer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help with Public Folder


I have a user who's Public Folder is showing up as "Mailbox - Lattinville,
Bob".  This user does have Delegate rights to that users folder, but it
shows up twice.  One of the two is actually the Public Folders.  I have
never run into this before and can't seem to find an answer for this on
Knowledge Base.  The folder cannot be renamed.  Deleting and recreating the
.ost does not fix it either.  I've tried removing the one users mailbox, but
the Public Folder is still named incorrectly.  Ever seen this before?  Any
thoughts, ideas?  I know it's not high level stuff, but it's annoying... :-)

Thanks,

Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

[Ed Crowley]

Of course, that recommendation sells more licenses!

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


Most of the Antivirus companies will support having a file base antivirus
product running on the Exchange server as long and you follow the
recommended deployment guide-line.  For example, some product may recommend
Exchange administrator to exclude the Exchange directory or the Antivirus
for Exchange directory.  Other product when install will automatically
recognize these directory and exclude them from being scan.

The recent virus threat show us that almost every systems are vulnerable to
virus attacks at some point, so if you have a good file base antivirus
scanner that is compliance with Windows then why not install it.  You have
nothing to loose, unless the product does not function will under this
condition.

Richard Ku
Product Manager
Trend Micro

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


You still are missing the distinction between a file-based scanner and
scanning the database using an Exchange-aware antivirus solution using
the AVAPI technology.  They are NOT the same.  Sort of like hitting your
NTFS volumes with Norton Antivirus for DOS.

> -Original Message-
> From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 02:49 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> I don't suggest anyone install an AV product physically on the server.
> 
> I don't understand why to install on the same box, when they can scan
> from a separate system.
> Microsoft are not against using file based scanners.  Clearly 
> Microsoft
> have no aversion to scanning Exchange 2000 servers.
> 
> I think previous comments have been misleading about this point.  By
> combining installing on the same box and AV scanners.
> 
> What does Ed have to say anyway?  This issue seems right up his alley.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Scharff, Chris
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> Because there's a difference between an Exchange aware AV 
> product using
> the AVAPI and a file based AV scanner running on a server 
> which happens
> to also be running Exchange. 
> 
> *
>   Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
> 
>   "Cheshire-Puss," she began, "would you tell me, please, 
>   which way I ought to go from here?"
>   "That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," 
>   said the Cat.
>   "I don't care much where--" said Alice.
>   "Then it doesn't matter which way you go," said the Cat.
> * 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:30 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=22416
> > 
> > Why have they invested in the new api then??
> > 
> > Nathan
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen 
> > Mynhier
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:34 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > 
> > 
> > Third parties might support it... that's fine.   But MS 
> doesn't really
> > support running file-based AV on an Exchange server.  It is 
> one of the
> 
> > first things that they have you remove if you call in with 
> a problem, 
> > it is one of the first things that they have you remove.
> > 
> > Never confuse "can" and "should"
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Ko
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Sent: 9/25/01 1:34 PM
> > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > 
> > Kevin,
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I don't know why you think why I am wrong.  Why don't you
> > call Antivirus
> > companies and tell them they are wrong for supporting file based A/V
> > products on Exchange servers.
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Kevin Miller
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:25 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > > 
> > > 
> > > You NEVER want to use a file based scanner on the 
> 

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

[Ed Crowley]

True.  I should have added "IIS" to my list of reasons to consider it.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


You would be if several of your Exchange servers were infected by our NIMDA
friend last week.

Doug Hampshire
Iron Chef Hanji

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


What's he risking by not having file-based A/V on his Exchange server?
There shouldn't be anything other than Exchange on the server, so Antigen
should protect his server quite nicely.

I'm not a proponent of file-based scanners on servers that aren't file
servers.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


You are risking a lot by not putting Antivirus software on your server.
We've been running ScanMail and ServerProtect on our Exchange server for
a while w/o any problem.  We did exclude ScanMail and Exchange folders
from scanning.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Steven Plender
> Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
>
>
> We are currently using Antigen Anti-virus software on all of
> our Exchange servers. We have not used any other anti-virus
> software to protect the server or operating system itself.
> Three years ago when the Exchange systems were being
> installed it was known that file scanning anti-virus software
> could or would corrupt information store files and perhaps
> log files as well. The architect recommended that no
> anti-virus software be installed at that time. Desktops and
> other servers are protected with file scanning anti-virus
> software which is updated nightly. We have been asked /
> directed to install server file scanning software (NAI) on
> our Exchange servers. This weekend I have been running it in
> the lab on an Exchange server and have excluded the partition
> with the information store and the partition with the log
> files. Can you tell me what the consensus is on this issue
> and do you run server anti-virus software along with Exchange
> aware anti-virus software. Thanks.
>
> Steve Plender
> RBC DS
>
> __
> Sent with PAWSoft MiniMail
> Download MiniMail for FREE now!
> http://www.pawsoft.co.uk
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sircam Virus

[Brian Steele]

SirCam remains the most popular virus to be received in my Internet E-mail
Inbox. I receive several copies of the damned thing every day.  Frankly,
it's amazing how many doofii are still out there using PCs that are infected
by such a well-known virus.

In the case of my corporate mail, the infected messages are deleted by the
virus scanning software on the gateway server, so I never get to see them.

Sending a message back to the originator informing them that their PC was
infected seemed to work most of the time...until I started receiving
messages from an @Home user that had no return address information!
Notifying [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to have sorted out that problem.

Brian


- Original Message -
From: "Sethi, Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:50 PM
Subject: Sircam Virus


> Hello,
>
> Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
> W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup to
> delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting a ton
> of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being deleted.
Just
> want to know if others are getting a lot too.
>
> Thanks,



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email m odule

[Ed Crowley]

Please explain.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Markette
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
m odule


Hello,
Does anyone know how to enable encoding on the server side? Or if
this is possible?

Paul Markette
NT Systems Administrator
Epicentric, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
415-995-7228

Hello IT.

Could any of you tell me how exchange uses the encoding option.  Autodesk
doesn't get the option when sending email, to format encoding, which they
must do in order to make their japanese characters display correctly.  I
realize this isn't REALLY our problem, but they don't know how.

Can someone help me with this?

I hope so ~ Thanks!
Barbara

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Motley
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:50 PM
To: Barbara Barrows
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


yeah, thats right, the name itself would only be encoded.  Without decoding,
it appears as random ascii chars not japanese.  So, a mix in the body should
be fine, Exchange  detected the part that is endoded with our test I
believe.



-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Thomas Motley
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


sure, but I mean a mix in the body.  I believe the only Japanese part of
this is the name.

Dear {japanese person},

Thanks you for registering...bla bla in english

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Motley
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Barbara Barrows
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


QA tell me its impossible to have the name (addressee) in Japanese chars.
Email addresses have to be alpha numeric.  Its is the body that can have
encoding, and this is what happens with autodesk, they want to plant the
japanese chars in the body.

-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:17 PM
To: Thomas Motley
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


you know what I just thought of though?  would this email be fully utf8 or
just the name?  I mean is it supposed to work this way... having the name in
Japanese and the body in English?

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Motley
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Barbara Barrows
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


I belive the encoding option is greyed out if there is no encoded text
detected in the body of the message, you might want to run this past IT
first however.



-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Engineering Escalation
Subject: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


Francois/ Tom.

Hi guys.  Remember this one?  Could you just give this guy some ideas about
how to receive with the encoding, mine was greyed out too.

{email in from customer}
I see the format->encoding option greyed out when I am reading
the registration email with Japanese characters. This menu item
appear to be enabled only when I am sending a new email.
How can be enable the format->encoding option to test this?

Thank you,
Michael

-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters


===
For any future correspondence regarding this support request, please enter
UPDATE 1-1216377 in the subject line of your message.  Make sure that there
are no extraneous characters listed before UPDATE (e.g. Re:) or your message
will not be entered into our database.
If you would like to determine the status of your Service Request, please
enter the following into the subject line of your message: STATUS 1-1216377
.
===

Hello Michael,

Well we have successfully tested email with Japanese.  You need to configure
your email message to receive these characters.  Actually we went to the
format>encoding option on the email itself and this transformed the
characters to be displayed correctly.

This issue would have to be solved at your email client level.  Whichever
email server you choose should have options you can adjust for display.  I
am using exchange and the format> encoding works for me (on the tool bar).

As a side note, regarding your database...  It appears that in order to view
unicode in Oracle you must have a special tool provided by Oracle.  Linda is
aware of this I believe.  The fact that you are viewing the question marks
may not be an issue.

Good Luck!  Let me know if you have questions regarding this issue.

Have a good weekend,
Barbara Barr

Customizing OWA 2000

[Tony]

In old Exchange 5.5 OWA you could edit the ASP files to customize the look
of OWA to change the look to meet your Companies needs. ie company logo
etc. Does anybody know where/how that is done in Exchange 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Messages with attachments are slow to display

[Tony Hlabse]

What does the utilization look like. If you think it  is the NAV antivirus
try shutting it off and test before and after. I used to see the NAV
sometimes cause 95 % utilization of the processes. Good Luck

- Original Message -
From: "Phil Labonte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Messages with attachments are slow to display


> NT4.0, SP6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NAV for Exchange
>
> When my users access messages with attachments the
> server responds very slowly.  It does not appear that
> the size of the attachments matters only that there is
> one.  If I try and open a message with an attachment
> it will take 2 to 5 seconds longer to open. When I
> read messages without attachments that are very long,
> they open in a split second.
>
> Is my virus scanner causing the problem you think?
>
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email m odule

[Paul Markette]

Hello,
Does anyone know how to enable encoding on the server side? Or if
this is possible?

Paul Markette
NT Systems Administrator
Epicentric, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
415-995-7228

Hello IT.

Could any of you tell me how exchange uses the encoding option.  Autodesk
doesn't get the option when sending email, to format encoding, which they
must do in order to make their japanese characters display correctly.  I
realize this isn't REALLY our problem, but they don't know how.

Can someone help me with this?

I hope so ~ Thanks!
Barbara

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Motley 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:50 PM
To: Barbara Barrows
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


yeah, thats right, the name itself would only be encoded.  Without decoding,
it appears as random ascii chars not japanese.  So, a mix in the body should
be fine, Exchange  detected the part that is endoded with our test I
believe.



-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Thomas Motley
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


sure, but I mean a mix in the body.  I believe the only Japanese part of
this is the name.

Dear {japanese person},

Thanks you for registering...bla bla in english

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Motley 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Barbara Barrows
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


QA tell me its impossible to have the name (addressee) in Japanese chars.
Email addresses have to be alpha numeric.  Its is the body that can have
encoding, and this is what happens with autodesk, they want to plant the
japanese chars in the body.

-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:17 PM
To: Thomas Motley
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


you know what I just thought of though?  would this email be fully utf8 or
just the name?  I mean is it supposed to work this way... having the name in
Japanese and the body in English?

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Motley 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Barbara Barrows
Subject: RE: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


I belive the encoding option is greyed out if there is no encoded text
detected in the body of the message, you might want to run this past IT
first however.



-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Engineering Escalation
Subject: Autodesk: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters/ email
module


Francois/ Tom.

Hi guys.  Remember this one?  Could you just give this guy some ideas about
how to receive with the encoding, mine was greyed out too.

{email in from customer}
I see the format->encoding option greyed out when I am reading
the registration email with Japanese characters. This menu item
appear to be enabled only when I am sending a new email.
How can be enable the format->encoding option to test this?

Thank you,
Michael

-Original Message-
From: Barbara Barrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: 1-1216377 : Support for Unicode characters


===
For any future correspondence regarding this support request, please enter
UPDATE 1-1216377 in the subject line of your message.  Make sure that there
are no extraneous characters listed before UPDATE (e.g. Re:) or your message
will not be entered into our database.  
If you would like to determine the status of your Service Request, please
enter the following into the subject line of your message: STATUS 1-1216377
.
===

Hello Michael, 

Well we have successfully tested email with Japanese.  You need to configure
your email message to receive these characters.  Actually we went to the
format>encoding option on the email itself and this transformed the
characters to be displayed correctly.

This issue would have to be solved at your email client level.  Whichever
email server you choose should have options you can adjust for display.  I
am using exchange and the format> encoding works for me (on the tool bar).

As a side note, regarding your database...  It appears that in order to view
unicode in Oracle you must have a special tool provided by Oracle.  Linda is
aware of this I believe.  The fact that you are viewing the question marks
may not be an issue. 

Good Luck!  Let me know if you have questions regarding this issue.

Have a good weekend,
Barbara Barrows
Escalations Manager

===
Service Request Number: 1-1216377

Date Opened :   8/17/01 6:19:10 PM
Severity :  2-Severe Impact
Product :   
Abstract :  Support for Unicode characters
Description :   --
Con

RE: Outlook XP application

[Presley, Steven]

Thanks Jeff, but the problem is not with attachments, but rather an outside
application accessing the address book (this is coded in to Outlook XP to
prevent mass mailers).  I have one user who has written a program that needs
access to Outlook's address book, but can't get access to it because of the
limitation\security on XP.

Best Regards,

Steve



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP application


Check here... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm 

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook XP application

I have a user who has built an application that accesses the address book in
Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a message every time
the application tries to run about it being allowed to access the address
book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does anyone know how to
turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
particular user that is not a concern.

Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is something that I
would like to avoid btw).

Thanks,

Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP application

[jvfantin]

Check here... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm 

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook XP application

I have a user who has built an application that accesses the address book in
Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a message every time
the application tries to run about it being allowed to access the address
book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does anyone know how to
turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
particular user that is not a concern.

Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is something that I
would like to avoid btw).

Thanks,

Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Easybake Oven

[Roger Seielstad]

Its hardly patently stupid when that's what you've got to play with, and it
will support a *test* environment of two adults and 2 children under the age
of 5.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Slow is an understatement!
> 
> And sufficient for what?
> 
> My point is not that it can't be done, but that it is
> patently stupid to do so.  And there's always some
> manager who'll say "but Microsoft says this is all it needs".
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Phil
> 
> -
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 24 September 2001 19:10
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > 
> > 
> > I have.  Can be slow at times, but it still works.  Check 
> > this out...I've
> > got a PC with a P2-266 and 64mb ram running W2K Server and it 
> > is a DC.  Used
> > to be a GC Server as well.  It is a bit slow, but it hasn't 
> > keeled over and
> > died yet.  I've also run W2K Pro on P133's and P166's also 
> > with 64mb ram.
> > It works.  Not extremely well, but sufficient.
> > 
> > Ben Winzenz, MCSE
> > Network/Systems Administrator
> > Peregrine Systems, Inc.
> > 
> >  -Original Message-
> > From:   Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent:   Monday, September 24, 2001 5:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > 
> > Have you tried running Win2K on a PC which is Microsoft's 
> > minimum spec?
> > 
> > -
> > Phil Randal
> > Network Engineer
> > Herefordshire Council
> > Hereford, UK 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 23 September 2001 17:48
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ludicrous how?  My lab machines here at home don't come close 
> > > to meeting the
> > > minimum requirements and they run stuff fine.
> > > 
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> > > All your base are belong to us.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Randal, Phil
> > > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:54 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Microsoft's minimum specs are ludicrous to start with.
> > > 
> > > I just double what they say to get an almost realistic estimate.
> > > 
> > > Phil
> > > 
> > > -
> > > Phil Randal
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Herefordshire Council
> > > Hereford, UK
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 21 September 2001 13:42
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is
> > > > essentially the same
> > > > as 2K with a new gui?
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> > > Great Cthulhu
> > > > Jones
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements
> > > > for anything
> > > > named "XP".
> > > >
> > > > (:=
> > > > Great Cthulhu Jones
> > > > CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
> > > > http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
> > > > http://www.bad-managers.com
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> > Ed Crowley
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware. 
> > >  Seen the
> > > > minimum requirements for anything named "2000"?
> > > >
> > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > > > Tech Consultant
> > > > Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> > > > All your base are belong to us.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > > Bauer, Mr. Rick
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:03 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Must be a COMPAQ server guy--always solve problems with
> > > > bigger hardware.
> > > >
> > > > Rick Bauer
> > > > The Hill School
> > > >
> > 

RE: MS Easybake Oven

[Roger Seielstad]

It is nice being able to play the two of them off each other like kids do to
their parents

"But Dad, Mom said I could!"

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Um, no. That would be his other manager. He gets to enjoy 
> having 2 managers.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Are you the manager that Roger referred to earlier?
> 
> Andy David
> Iron Chef Thong
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Belay that order lieutenant.
> 
> Doug (Ben's boss) Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: George Halstead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> This is what you call pushing it over the line.  Do yourself 
> a favor and get
> more out of your  server and bump your ram up to the max for 
> your system
> board.  I don't think it's going to get any cheaper (RAM) 
> that is.  go here
> http://www.crucial.com
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Benjamin Winzenz
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> I have.  Can be slow at times, but it still works.  Check 
> this out...I've
> got a PC with a P2-266 and 64mb ram running W2K Server and it 
> is a DC.  Used
> to be a GC Server as well.  It is a bit slow, but it hasn't 
> keeled over and
> died yet.  I've also run W2K Pro on P133's and P166's also 
> with 64mb ram.
> It works.  Not extremely well, but sufficient.
> 
> Ben Winzenz, MCSE
> Network/Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems, Inc.
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:12 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> Have you tried running Win2K on a PC which is Microsoft's 
> minimum spec?
> 
> -
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 23 September 2001 17:48
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> >
> >
> > Ludicrous how?  My lab machines here at home don't come close
> > to meeting the
> > minimum requirements and they run stuff fine.
> >
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > Tech Consultant
> > Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> > All your base are belong to us.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:54 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> >
> >
> > Microsoft's minimum specs are ludicrous to start with.
> >
> > I just double what they say to get an almost realistic estimate.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > -
> > Phil Randal
> > Network Engineer
> > Herefordshire Council
> > Hereford, UK
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 21 September 2001 13:42
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > >
> > >
> > > I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is
> > > essentially the same
> > > as 2K with a new gui?
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Great Cthulhu
> > > Jones
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements
> > > for anything
> > > named "XP".
> > >
> > > (:=
> > > Great Cthulhu Jones
> > > CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
> > > http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
> > > http://www.bad-managers.com
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Ed Crowley
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware.
> >  Seen the
> > > minimum requirements for anything named "2000"?
> > >
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP

RE: Mailbox size advice

[Roger Seielstad]

No comment.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Mailbox size advice
> 
> 
> Are you referring to any manager in particular?
> 
> Ed Crowley
> Compaq Computer
> 
> --- Roger Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > PResent the facts differently. Like in a graph.
> > Managers are genetically
> > predisposed to prefer information in graphical form.
> > 
> > Seriously, if the message isn't getting across, try
> > presenting it
> > differently. Once you understand how a boss wants
> > information, it becomes
> > much easier to get the ideas through.
> > 
> > Roger
> >
> --
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
> > Senior Systems Administrator
> > Peregrine Systems
> > Atlanta, GA
> > http://www.peregrine.com
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:31 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Mailbox size advice
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Larry:
> > > 
> > > You bring up such good information and strike a
> > very deep topic:
> > > 
> > > "management have to make that decision, based upon
> > you 
> > > presenting the facts
> > > to them."
> > > 
> > > I just wish management had a clue even when they
> > are told the facts -
> > > repeatidly.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > 
> > > Erik L. Vesneski
> > > Internal Network Manager
> > > Epicentric, Inc.
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Josefowski, Larry
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:21 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Mailbox size advice
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Welcome Luis,
> > > 
> > >   Your answer will depend heavily upon how you plan
> > on 
> > > using it.  No,
> > > we don't recommend putting mail on the
> > workstation, but 
> > > keeping it on the
> > > server.  We also can't answer if it is enough for
> > us: You 
> > > users and your
> > > management have to make that decision, based upon
> > you 
> > > presenting the facts
> > > to them.
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Luis Pérez Lazo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:02 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Mailbox size advice
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello 
> > > 
> > > I'd like to know your opinions on whether to let
> > user's mail 
> > > items on the
> > > server or in the wks and the size limit u
> > recommend.
> > > 
> > > We have less than 500 users connecting to Exchange
> > 5.5 through Outlook
> > > 2000/97 in a LAN. Mail is left on the server and
> > the size 
> > > limit is set to
> > > 30MB but they want more.
> > > We are considering to move to Exchange 2000 where
> > the server 
> > > version allows
> > > only 15GB storage. Is this enough for us?
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance;
> > > 
> > > Luis
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> >
> _
> > > List posting FAQ:  
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:  
> > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > >
> >
> _
> > > List posting FAQ:  
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:  
> > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > >
> >
> _
> > > List posting FAQ:  
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:  
> > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> >
> _
> > List posting FAQ:  
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:  
> > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with 
> Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

[Andy David]

Just answer my question.

Andy


-Original Message-
From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


It's the complicated sense of humor that gets me every time.

(The above comment is sarcastic)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


Uh... I guess Andy's joke flew right over your head, then.  

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html

Loosen up.  Hang loose.  I just mean this as a joke, so it must not be
an insult.  
[Insert disguised obscenities here] 


> -Original Message-
> From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:58 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> Thanks for the plug.  Unfortunately we don't specialize in humour 
> training.  Although if you got the joke you might be half way there.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:30 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> 
> ReWordT
> A New Language Improvement Program for Adults 
> Developed by neuroscientists in consultation with leading clinicians,
> ReWord is a computer-based training program that improves language and
> organizational skills for adults. 
> 
> http://www.scilearn.com/prod/index.php3?main=reword/home&cartid=
> 
> 
> Andy David
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 04:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> Oh I see, looking through all the c##p that has been written, we have 
> sides.  Looks like I'm on yours then.
> 
> I have not f#d anyone off this week.  Looks like this
> comment might
> get everyone.  
> 
> You LOOOSERS.  (with reference to URGENT comments last week).
> 
> Nathan
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Andy David]

Are you on the right list? ;)

Andy


-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Fish: It's what's for dinner

Candee


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Fish:  The Forbidden Taco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad.
> 
> 
> Andy David
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?
> 
> Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means
> more beer and
> fish tacos for Andy.
> 
> Doug Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
> 
> 
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> yesterday as
> he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. 
> They told him they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of 
> people have been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around
> the world.
> Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
> tragedy.
> 
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national
> leaders urged
> that the business and economic activities of this nation and 
> the global
> economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
> terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
> the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have 
> decided to
> move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
> through October 4th as scheduled.
> 
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the 
> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions 
> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
> 
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our 
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our 
> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> 
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
> 
> 
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://

RE: test

[Scharff, Chris]

In my environment I generally won't even look at a message delay issue to an
internet source until it's been delayed at least 4 hours unless there's
free beer involved.

> -Original Message-
> From: Mehringer, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: test
> 
> 
> 
> Douglass W. Mehringer
> Network Administrator
> Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
> 100 South Fourth Street
> St. Louis, MO 63102
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (314) 393-1404 (cell)
> (314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Help with Public Folder

[Scharff, Chris]

IBID

> -Original Message-
> From: Mehringer, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Help with Public Folder
> 
> 
> I have a user who's Public Folder is showing up as "Mailbox - 
> Lattinville,
> Bob".  This user does have Delegate rights to that users 
> folder, but it
> shows up twice.  One of the two is actually the Public 
> Folders.  I have
> never run into this before and can't seem to find an answer 
> for this on
> Knowledge Base.  The folder cannot be renamed.  Deleting and 
> recreating the
> .ost does not fix it either.  I've tried removing the one 
> users mailbox, but
> the Public Folder is still named incorrectly.  Ever seen this 
> before?  Any
> thoughts, ideas?  I know it's not high level stuff, but it's 
> annoying... :-)
>  
> Thanks,
> 
> Douglass W. Mehringer
> Network Administrator
> Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
> 100 South Fourth Street
> St. Louis, MO 63102
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (314) 393-1404 (cell)
> (314) 259-4541(office)
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder named wrong

[Scharff, Chris]

Create a new profile named "New profile"

> -Original Message-
> From: Mehringer, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Public Folder named wrong
> 
> 
> I have a user who's Public Folder in outlook 98 is showing up 
> as "Mailbox,
> Username".  It is actually the Public Folders, but I can't 
> find a way to
> rename it.  Anyone ever seen this or know how to fix it.  Can't find
> anything on Knowledge Base.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Douglass W. Mehringer
> Network Administrator
> Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
> 100 South Fourth Street
> St. Louis, MO 63102
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> (314) 393-1404 (cell)
> (314) 259-4541(office)
>  
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Help with Public Folder

[Scharff, Chris]

IBID

> -Original Message-
> From: Mehringer, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Help with Public Folder
> 
> 
> I have a user who's Public Folder is showing up as "Mailbox - 
> Lattinville,
> Bob".  This user does have Delegate rights to that users 
> folder, but it
> shows up twice.  One of the two is actually the Public 
> Folders.  I have
> never run into this before and can't seem to find an answer 
> for this on
> Knowledge Base.  The folder cannot be renamed.  Deleting and 
> recreating the
> .ost does not fix it either.  I've tried removing the one 
> users mailbox, but
> the Public Folder is still named incorrectly.  Ever seen this 
> before?  Any
> thoughts, ideas?  I know it's not high level stuff, but it's 
> annoying... :-)
>  
> Thanks,
> 
> Douglass W. Mehringer
> Network Administrator
> Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
> 100 South Fourth Street
> St. Louis, MO 63102
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (314) 393-1404 (cell)
> (314) 259-4541(office)
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP application

[Scharff, Chris]

Dmitry's product isn't free, but it is such a great value add for developers
that one might argue it pays for itself quite easily... Especially given
that the price is for a /distributable version/.

Not free, but certainly not expensive And it allows the standard
"security enhancements" in Outlook to remain, protecting your environment
from lusers.

*
  Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
  Simpler-Webb, Inc.  Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook XP application
> 
> 
> Thanks Chris...guess the answer is that there is no "free" 
> way to do it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook XP application
> 
> 
> I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model:
> http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568 
> 
> *
>   Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
>   Simpler-Webb, Inc.  Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
> * 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Outlook XP application
> > 
> > 
> > I have a user who has built an application that accesses the
> > address book in
> > Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a 
> > message every time
> > the application tries to run about it being allowed to access 
> > the address
> > book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does 
> > anyone know how to
> > turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
> > particular user that is not a concern.
> > 
> > Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is
> > something that I
> > would like to avoid btw).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: test

[Steve Molkentin]

You really don't know what you are starting with this Doug - test at your
peril...

themolk.

> -Original Message-
> From: Mehringer, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:42 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: test
> 
> 
> 
> Douglass W. Mehringer
> Network Administrator
> Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
> 100 South Fourth Street
> St. Louis, MO 63102
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (314) 393-1404 (cell)
> (314) 259-4541(office)
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Messages with attachments are slow to display

[Phil Labonte]

NT4.0, SP6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NAV for Exchange

When my users access messages with attachments the
server responds very slowly.  It does not appear that
the size of the attachments matters only that there is
one.  If I try and open a message with an attachment
it will take 2 to 5 seconds longer to open. When I
read messages without attachments that are very long,
they open in a split second.

Is my virus scanner causing the problem you think?



Any suggestions?


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. 
http://im.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Easybake Oven

[Phil Labonte]

Dumb question and sorry to bother you but I see you have several posts on
the mailing list.

I unsubscribe from the exchange list when I went on vacation.

I re subscribed a few days ago and I have been getting the messages but I
cannot post??  Is there something else I must do to post messages?

I emailed the moderator of the list and I have never received a response.

Any thoughts?

Phil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

test

[Mehringer, Doug]

Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Candee Vaglica]

Fish: It's what's for dinner

Candee


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Fish:  The Forbidden Taco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad.
> 
> 
> Andy David
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?
> 
> Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means
> more beer and
> fish tacos for Andy.
> 
> Doug Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
> 
> 
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> yesterday as
> he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. 
> They told him they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of 
> people have been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around
> the world.
> Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
> tragedy.
> 
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national
> leaders urged
> that the business and economic activities of this nation and 
> the global
> economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
> terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
> the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have 
> decided to
> move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
> through October 4th as scheduled.
> 
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the 
> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions 
> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
> 
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our 
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our 
> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> 
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
> 
> 
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help with Public Folder

[Mehringer, Doug]

I have a user who's Public Folder is showing up as "Mailbox - Lattinville,
Bob".  This user does have Delegate rights to that users folder, but it
shows up twice.  One of the two is actually the Public Folders.  I have
never run into this before and can't seem to find an answer for this on
Knowledge Base.  The folder cannot be renamed.  Deleting and recreating the
.ost does not fix it either.  I've tried removing the one users mailbox, but
the Public Folder is still named incorrectly.  Ever seen this before?  Any
thoughts, ideas?  I know it's not high level stuff, but it's annoying... :-)
 
Thanks,

Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help with Public Folder

[Mehringer, Doug]

I have a user who's Public Folder is showing up as "Mailbox - Lattinville,
Bob".  This user does have Delegate rights to that users folder, but it
shows up twice.  One of the two is actually the Public Folders.  I have
never run into this before and can't seem to find an answer for this on
Knowledge Base.  The folder cannot be renamed.  Deleting and recreating the
.ost does not fix it either.  I've tried removing the one users mailbox, but
the Public Folder is still named incorrectly.  Ever seen this before?  Any
thoughts, ideas?  I know it's not high level stuff, but it's annoying... :-)
 
Thanks,

Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Proxy Objects in Active Directory?

[Fred W. Macondray Jr.]

Help!

I am getting repeated errors on my Exchange 2000 server:

1) Event id 8197
Error initializing session for virtual machine SERVER. The error number
is 0x80070005. Make sure Microsoft Exchange Store is running. 

2) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "OAB Version 2"
in the Active Directory. 

3) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "Test" in the
Active Directory. 

4) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "OAB Version 2"
in the Active Directory. 

5) Event ID 9543
Unable to create Public Folder proxy object for folder "Test" in the
Active Directory. 

I get a few more of those.  I'm also getting errors in System Manager
where it errors out with an 80004005 error on Public Folders.

Please HELP!  I've been posing and searching for almost 3 weeks trying
to not spend money !!!

Thanks in Advance,
Fred Macondray
Systems Administrator
Virtual Purchase Card, Inc.
www.virtualpurchasecard.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Public Folder named wrong

[Mehringer, Doug]

I have a user who's Public Folder in outlook 98 is showing up as "Mailbox,
Username".  It is actually the Public Folders, but I can't find a way to
rename it.  Anyone ever seen this or know how to fix it.  Can't find
anything on Knowledge Base.

Thanks,

Douglass W. Mehringer
Network Administrator
Stinson Mag & Fizzell, P.C.
100 South Fourth Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
(314) 393-1404 (cell)
(314) 259-4541(office)
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP application

[Presley, Steven]

Thanks Chris...guess the answer is that there is no "free" way to do it.





-Original Message-
From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP application


I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model:
http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568 

*
  Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
  Simpler-Webb, Inc.  Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook XP application
> 
> 
> I have a user who has built an application that accesses the
> address book in
> Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a 
> message every time
> the application tries to run about it being allowed to access 
> the address
> book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does 
> anyone know how to
> turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
> particular user that is not a concern.
> 
> Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is
> something that I
> would like to avoid btw).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?

[David N. Precht]

Come to find out...the guys working on the DNS & DHCP servers... well, they
did pretty nasty stuff to the boxes and many reboots later, all is well.
Thanks for the feedback.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desjardins,
Raymond
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 15:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?


I just got to it.  Not sure why you couldn't.

Ray Desjardins, MCSE
Manager of Systems Services
Technical Services
Bridgewater State College
Bridgewater, MA 02779
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?


I can not seem to access that page ..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desjardins,
Raymond
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?


There is also Profile Maker, which we use here at the college.
www.autoprof.com

Ray Desjardins, MCSE
Manager of Systems Services
Technical Services
Bridgewater State College
Bridgewater, MA 02779
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?


I think I may have got it working ... I'm still testing... If it isn't, I
will post it. Thanks for the help.


Dustin Krysak

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 19, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?


Post the batch file.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dustin Krysak
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?


I tried that, and had issues. I believe the issues were in my batch file
Do you have an example?


Dustin Krysak


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 19, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?


One way, without buying anything, is to customize the outlook.prf file to
set:

MailboxName=%UserName%

Create a batch file to run "newprof.exe" to create a batch file using the
.prf file you make and set it to run in the user's logon profile.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dustin Krysak
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Auto config Outlook profiles with exchange?



W2K with exchange 5.5 - latest patches.

Is there a current way to auto config outlook for an exchange user when they
logon based on their network logon? I have searched the MS site, and have
only found a "how-to" based on Outlook 97/98. We are currently in an Outlook
2000 and soon to go to XP environment.

Thanks for any direction.

Dustin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting F

RE: Trend ScanMail for Exchange

[Wells, Brent]

strange stuff - if I create a text document .txt and rename it to a .com I
can send it no problemo... if I create a Word document .doc and rename it to
a .com - won't go through - huH?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend ScanMail for Exchange


Just for the halibut, try putting a ; in front of com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wells, Brent
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend ScanMail for Exchange


Hi all,

We just purchased Trend ScanMail for E2k and I'm installing /
configuring now for the first time.  I'd like to block all attachments
with .exe, .com, and a few others and I'm having a problem setting this
up properly.  I've enabled attachment blocking and selected "specified
attachments".  I've
added:
com;exe;bat;dll;vbs;wsh;scr;cmd;
All .exe's are being blocked, but I have no problem sending a .com.  Any
ideas??

TIA,
Brent
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

[Glenn Corbett]

Sander,

Any reason you think that exmerge will bring along corrupted messages ?
Since Exmerge is essentially copying the message from the mailbox store to
the .PST file, a corrupted message will cause Exmerge to hiccup.

We had major store corruption some time ago, approx 600 of the 1600
mailboxes wouldn't move via the Exchange Administration tool due to
corruption. Exmerge allowed those mailboxes to be successfully moved. Simply
looking at the exmerge log file, deleting the offending message(s) from the
mailbox allowed the migration to occur in most cases.

We have also used Exmerge doing only the first phase of the migration
(extracting to .PST file), in order to determine which mailboxes were
corrupt. Have done this a few days ahead of a migration to determine those
mailboxes which will have to be manually moved. This allowed us to expedite
those mailboxes with no detected corruption, and focus our efforts on those
mailboxes that were having problems.

Glenn

- Original Message -
From: "Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:00 PM
Subject: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate


> Hi All
>
> I know one should not generalise and each system is different. I
> acknowledge these two factors, but does anyone have any stats on the
> average transfer speed they obtained while doing a move mailbox. The
> servers in question are not in my site so I cannot quickly run a test. The
> servers are on a 100 MB switch.The total mail store is approx 40 GB. I
> would like to calculate an approx time needed to move mailboxes this way,
> exmerge is not an option as the original store has corruptions in it. I
> need to check after each mailbox if the new store is still consistent.
>
> Any info is appreciated.
>
> Regards
> Sander
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP application

[Scharff, Chris]

I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model:
http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568 

*
  Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
  Simpler-Webb, Inc.  Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
* 

> -Original Message-
> From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook XP application
> 
> 
> I have a user who has built an application that accesses the 
> address book in
> Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a 
> message every time
> the application tries to run about it being allowed to access 
> the address
> book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does 
> anyone know how to
> turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
> particular user that is not a concern.
> 
> Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is 
> something that I
> would like to avoid btw).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

[Richard_Ku]

Most of the Antivirus companies will support having a file base antivirus
product running on the Exchange server as long and you follow the
recommended deployment guide-line.  For example, some product may recommend
Exchange administrator to exclude the Exchange directory or the Antivirus
for Exchange directory.  Other product when install will automatically
recognize these directory and exclude them from being scan.

The recent virus threat show us that almost every systems are vulnerable to
virus attacks at some point, so if you have a good file base antivirus
scanner that is compliance with Windows then why not install it.  You have
nothing to loose, unless the product does not function will under this
condition.

Richard Ku
Product Manager
Trend Micro

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


You still are missing the distinction between a file-based scanner and
scanning the database using an Exchange-aware antivirus solution using
the AVAPI technology.  They are NOT the same.  Sort of like hitting your
NTFS volumes with Norton Antivirus for DOS.

> -Original Message-
> From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 02:49 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> I don't suggest anyone install an AV product physically on the server.
> 
> I don't understand why to install on the same box, when they can scan
> from a separate system.
> Microsoft are not against using file based scanners.  Clearly 
> Microsoft
> have no aversion to scanning Exchange 2000 servers.
> 
> I think previous comments have been misleading about this point.  By
> combining installing on the same box and AV scanners.
> 
> What does Ed have to say anyway?  This issue seems right up his alley.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Scharff, Chris
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> Because there's a difference between an Exchange aware AV 
> product using
> the AVAPI and a file based AV scanner running on a server 
> which happens
> to also be running Exchange. 
> 
> *
>   Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
> 
>   "Cheshire-Puss," she began, "would you tell me, please, 
>   which way I ought to go from here?"
>   "That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," 
>   said the Cat.
>   "I don't care much where--" said Alice.
>   "Then it doesn't matter which way you go," said the Cat.
> * 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:30 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=22416
> > 
> > Why have they invested in the new api then??
> > 
> > Nathan
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen 
> > Mynhier
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:34 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > 
> > 
> > Third parties might support it... that's fine.   But MS 
> doesn't really
> > support running file-based AV on an Exchange server.  It is 
> one of the
> 
> > first things that they have you remove if you call in with 
> a problem, 
> > it is one of the first things that they have you remove.
> > 
> > Never confuse "can" and "should"
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Ko
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Sent: 9/25/01 1:34 PM
> > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > 
> > Kevin,
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I don't know why you think why I am wrong.  Why don't you
> > call Antivirus
> > companies and tell them they are wrong for supporting file based A/V
> > products on Exchange servers.
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Kevin Miller
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:25 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> > > 
> > > 
> > > You NEVER want to use a file based scanner on the 
> Exchange folders 
> > > in the server.. That is a very bad idea. You just don't do that 
> > > period. If you want more protection then use extension blocking. 
> > > File scanner your exchange server will cause nothing but problems 
> > > and now help at all.. Why do you think there is a 
> separate product 
> > >

RE: MEC

[Seitz, Peter]

Absolutely!

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Cabo Wabo, Yeah baby! [1]

[1] Don't forget the lime for the Corona.

-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


It's a state of mind. A philosophy. It's being in Cabo with a cold Corona
and fish tacos.

Peter Seitz
Operating Systems Analyst
Cubic Corporation
San Diego, Ca. 92021
(858) 505-2724


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is about these darn
fish taco's.  I would never eat anything like that but just to see what in
h*** is so special about them.  

 
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Fish:  The Forbidden Taco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad.
> 
> 
> Andy David 
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?
> 
> Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means 
> more beer and
> fish tacos for Andy.
> 
> Doug Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
> 
> 
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration 
> yesterday as
> he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. 
> They told him they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of 
> people have been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around 
> the world.
> Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
> tragedy.
> 
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national 
> leaders urged
> that the business and economic activities of this nation and 
> the global
> economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
> terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
> the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have 
> decided to
> move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
> through October 4th as scheduled.
> 
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation,
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the
> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions
> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are 
> working closely
> with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security
> measure is in place.
> 
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our
> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> 
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
> 
> 
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/si

RE: Trend ScanMail for Exchange

[Martin Blackstone]

Just for the halibut, try putting a ; in front of com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wells, Brent
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend ScanMail for Exchange


Hi all,

We just purchased Trend ScanMail for E2k and I'm installing /
configuring now for the first time.  I'd like to block all attachments
with .exe, .com, and a few others and I'm having a problem setting this
up properly.  I've enabled attachment blocking and selected "specified
attachments".  I've
added:
com;exe;bat;dll;vbs;wsh;scr;cmd;
All .exe's are being blocked, but I have no problem sending a .com.  Any
ideas??

TIA,
Brent
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook XP application

[Presley, Steven]

I have a user who has built an application that accesses the address book in
Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a message every time
the application tries to run about it being allowed to access the address
book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does anyone know how to
turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
particular user that is not a concern.

Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is something that I
would like to avoid btw).

Thanks,

Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Trend ScanMail for Exchange

[Wells, Brent]

Hi all,

We just purchased Trend ScanMail for E2k and I'm installing / configuring
now for the first time.  I'd like to block all attachments with .exe, .com,
and a few others and I'm having a problem setting this up properly.  I've
enabled attachment blocking and selected "specified attachments".  I've
added:
com;exe;bat;dll;vbs;wsh;scr;cmd;
All .exe's are being blocked, but I have no problem sending a .com.  Any
ideas??

TIA,
Brent
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sircam Virus

[Horst Hinz]

SirCam is the #2 virus around here, Magistr is the #1.

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup to
delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting a ton
of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being deleted.  Just
want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

[tech]

It's the complicated sense of humor that gets me every time.

(The above comment is sarcastic)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


Uh... I guess Andy's joke flew right over your head, then.  

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html

Loosen up.  Hang loose.  I just mean this as a joke, so it must not be
an insult.  
[Insert disguised obscenities here] 


> -Original Message-
> From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:58 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> Thanks for the plug.  Unfortunately we don't specialize in humour 
> training.  Although if you got the joke you might be half way there.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:30 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> 
> ReWordT
> A New Language Improvement Program for Adults 
> Developed by neuroscientists in consultation with leading clinicians,
> ReWord is a computer-based training program that improves language and
> organizational skills for adults. 
> 
> http://www.scilearn.com/prod/index.php3?main=reword/home&cartid=
> 
> 
> Andy David
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 04:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
> 
> 
> Oh I see, looking through all the c##p that has been written, we have 
> sides.  Looks like I'm on yours then.
> 
> I have not f#d anyone off this week.  Looks like this
> comment might
> get everyone.  
> 
> You LOOOSERS.  (with reference to URGENT comments last week).
> 
> Nathan
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sircam Virus

[John Martinez]

I get that stupid [EMAIL PROTECTED] virus all the time, that's the spoofed
originator anyway. Has anyone been to http://sexyfun.net ? Someone actually
purchased that domain to inform others, pretty nice of them.

John

-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Magistrate is also still coming around pretty well.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses are
still SirCam.

Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup to
delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting a ton
of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being deleted.  Just
want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sircam Virus

[Barry Patterson]

Magistrate is also still coming around pretty well.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sircam Virus


Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses are
still SirCam.

Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup to
delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting a ton
of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being deleted.  Just
want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Erik Sojka]

Coors?  The analogy of making love in a canoe comes to mind...

> -Original Message-
> From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Corona is not a beer [1].  Micros are beers.  Being from 
> Portland, we have
> the highest number of microbrews per capita than anywhere in 
> the world.
> 
> [1]  Also not beers:  Bud, Michelob, Coors, Schlitz, Hamms, 
> or anything else
> that comes in a can [2].
> 
> [2] Zima does not count.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Cabo Wabo, Yeah baby! [1]
> 
> [1] Don't forget the lime for the Corona.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:18 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> It's a state of mind. A philosophy. It's being in Cabo with a 
> cold Corona
> and fish tacos.
> 
> Peter Seitz
> Operating Systems Analyst
> Cubic Corporation
> San Diego, Ca. 92021
> (858) 505-2724
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is 
> about these darn
> fish taco's.  I would never eat anything like that but just 
> to see what in
> h*** is so special about them.  
> 
>  
> John Bowles
> Exchange Administrator
> NT Server & Workstation Team
> Celera Genomics
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Fish:  The Forbidden Taco.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> > 
> > 
> > Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad.
> > 
> > 
> > Andy David
> > J Muller International
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> > 
> > 
> > Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?
> > 
> > Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means
> > more beer and
> > fish tacos for Andy.
> > 
> > Doug Hampshire
> > Iron Chef Hanji
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: MEC
> > 
> > 
> > I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> > yesterday as
> > he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. 
> > They told him they
> > would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of 
> > people have been
> > canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> > anything yet . . .
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: MEC
> > 
> > 
> > Yes.  Still on.
> > Here is what I got from them:
> > September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around
> > the world.
> > Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by 
> this terrible
> > tragedy.
> > 
> > As you know, President Bush and other global and national
> > leaders urged
> > that the business and economic activities of this nation and 
> > the global
> > economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
> > terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The 
> reopening of
> > the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> > activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have 
> > decided to
> > move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on 
> September 30th
> > through October 4th as scheduled.
> > 
> > Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> > strongly believe that national and international air 
> transportation, 
> > hotels and other support services will be fully operational 
> before the 
> > MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, 
> sessions, functions 
> > and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> > closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> > security measure is in place.
> > 
> > All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this 
> tragedy in our 
> > thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we 
> carry on our 
> > lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> > 
> > Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Sincerely,
> > The MEC 2001 Team
> > 
> > Thank you,
> >

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

[Drewski]

Aboslutely not.  No sense of humor there.  He can't even joke about Fish
Tacos.

Drew

If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)

KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net

The best vitamin for making friends: B1.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os


Andy does not have a sense of humor.

> -Original Message-
> From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
>
>
> Thanks for the plug.  Unfortunately we don't specialize in humour
> training.  Although if you got the joke you might be half way there.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:30 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
>
>
>
> ReWordT
> A New Language Improvement Program for Adults
> Developed by neuroscientists in consultation with leading clinicians,
> ReWord is a computer-based training program that improves language and
> organizational skills for adults.
>
> http://www.scilearn.com/prod/index.php3?main=reword/home&cartid=
>
>
> Andy David
> J Muller International
> [maartined]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

[Bueffel, Scott M - CNF]

Corona is not a beer [1].  Micros are beers.  Being from Portland, we have
the highest number of microbrews per capita than anywhere in the world.

[1]  Also not beers:  Bud, Michelob, Coors, Schlitz, Hamms, or anything else
that comes in a can [2].

[2] Zima does not count.

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Cabo Wabo, Yeah baby! [1]

[1] Don't forget the lime for the Corona.

-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


It's a state of mind. A philosophy. It's being in Cabo with a cold Corona
and fish tacos.

Peter Seitz
Operating Systems Analyst
Cubic Corporation
San Diego, Ca. 92021
(858) 505-2724


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is about these darn
fish taco's.  I would never eat anything like that but just to see what in
h*** is so special about them.  

 
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server & Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Fish:  The Forbidden Taco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad.
> 
> 
> Andy David
> J Muller International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone?
> 
> Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means
> more beer and
> fish tacos for Andy.
> 
> Doug Hampshire
> Iron Chef Hanji
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC
> 
> 
> I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration
> yesterday as
> he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. 
> They told him they
> would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of 
> people have been
> canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
> anything yet . . .
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
> Subject: RE: MEC
> 
> 
> Yes.  Still on.
> Here is what I got from them:
> September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around
> the world.
> Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
> tragedy.
> 
> As you know, President Bush and other global and national
> leaders urged
> that the business and economic activities of this nation and 
> the global
> economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
> terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
> the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
> activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have 
> decided to
> move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
> through October 4th as scheduled.
> 
> Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we 
> strongly believe that national and international air transportation, 
> hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the 
> MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions 
> and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working 
> closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible 
> security measure is in place.
> 
> All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our 
> thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our 
> lives full of pride in our values and our country.
> 
> Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sincerely,
> The MEC 2001 Team
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ron Crumbaker, MCP
> Network Specialist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
> Office 270-685-6381
> Fax 270-685-6212
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MEC
> 
> 
> Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:   

RE: Sircam Virus

[Osborn, Joel]

Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses are
still SirCam.

Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sircam Virus


Hello,

Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup to
delete any attachments that may have this virus in them.  Im getting a ton
of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being deleted.  Just
want to know if others are getting a lot too.

Thanks,

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]