RE: Unsolicited Email
ta, thought as much. sometimes it's tricky to get whether someone's being sarcastic/ witty/ etc or not ;-) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Yes. Email headers are important. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN
Thanks Amy, I'll check that artical out today. -- From: ExchangeAdminList[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 13 August 2002 22:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Have a look at Q163576. We have run into similar problems with Outlook not responding although all network connectivity is present. As you said, we could ping the Exchange server, establish network connectivity to other servers, but could not get into Outlook. Many times reloading the TCP/IP protocol fixes the problem but since this is VPN, reloading will not help anything. When I ran into this issue with a VPN connection, I wound up changing the RPC binding order in the registry per the Q article and ensuring the rpcrt4.dll was registered correctly under the following key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\ClientProtocols. We also noticed that the rpcrt4.dll had become corrupt so after replacing this .dll with a good copy, we were able to access Outlook. This took a lot of trial and error to get the exact steps, but it was a relief when it fixed the problem. Amy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN See if he can telnet to 135 by both FQDN and ip address. Also, once Outlook hangs run a netstat on both the client and server to see if there are any active sessions between the two. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN So he can't ping by name then? Sounds like a netbios name resolution. I'm guessing he can resolve the server name if uses the IP address or the FQDN? If so, this would support that assumption. You could then verify this by adding an entry to his hosts file.. which would resolve but not fix the underlying name resolution issue. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Ok everyone, Thanks for your help with this and i spent loads of time on the phone yesterday trying all your advice out. The state of play is still the same, but this is what he can do: He can dial the VPN server over the xDSL link, establish the connection. He can browse My Network Places and Navigate to the servers shares and access them all. He can telnet into the Exchange server on Port 25, and send mail by hand. He can browse the Internet without any problems. It gotta be Outlook surely?? With Outlook i did the following: Ran Scanpst against his OST file. Turned off Offline access, to rule out Syncronisation. Deleted his OST file and had it recreate it later of an analogue line. Recreated his profile. However, i can not resolve the server name in the profile box. In other words he can do everything but open Outlook. So it leaves RPC config and maybe the ports that Outlook uses are being blocked?? Thanks again for all your help. David -- From: Baker, Jennifer[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12 August 2002 18:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Recreate his mail profile. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Hi everyone, I've been having this problem for some time and was wondering if anyone could help me with it. I have this NT4 server with PPTP installed plus some VPN connections. The staff can now dial into their local ISP and can open Outlook client and get their mail. They can also browse the shares, fine so far. However, recently the director went to NY and is sharing someones office over there which has DSL in place. He uses this link to make the VPN connection, which works no problem, until he tries to open Outlook, which freezes everytime! He can dial in to the server using a normal phone line which works fine. I guess its a routing problem, i have disabled the setting on his VPN connection use default gateway but this makes no difference. He is using Windows ME on a laptop. I myself have ADSL installed at home and it works for me no problem. The network he is connected/using seems a simple setup, just a hub that he plugs into and i guess a NAT box that gives him an ip address. Any thoughts guys? Thanks David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is
RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN
Hi Chris, He can ping by name. -- From: Chris Scharff[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 13 August 2002 21:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN So he can't ping by name then? Sounds like a netbios name resolution. I'm guessing he can resolve the server name if uses the IP address or the FQDN? If so, this would support that assumption. You could then verify this by adding an entry to his hosts file.. which would resolve but not fix the underlying name resolution issue. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Ok everyone, Thanks for your help with this and i spent loads of time on the phone yesterday trying all your advice out. The state of play is still the same, but this is what he can do: He can dial the VPN server over the xDSL link, establish the connection. He can browse My Network Places and Navigate to the servers shares and access them all. He can telnet into the Exchange server on Port 25, and send mail by hand. He can browse the Internet without any problems. It gotta be Outlook surely?? With Outlook i did the following: Ran Scanpst against his OST file. Turned off Offline access, to rule out Syncronisation. Deleted his OST file and had it recreate it later of an analogue line. Recreated his profile. However, i can not resolve the server name in the profile box. In other words he can do everything but open Outlook. So it leaves RPC config and maybe the ports that Outlook uses are being blocked?? Thanks again for all your help. David -- From: Baker, Jennifer[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12 August 2002 18:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Recreate his mail profile. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Hi everyone, I've been having this problem for some time and was wondering if anyone could help me with it. I have this NT4 server with PPTP installed plus some VPN connections. The staff can now dial into their local ISP and can open Outlook client and get their mail. They can also browse the shares, fine so far. However, recently the director went to NY and is sharing someones office over there which has DSL in place. He uses this link to make the VPN connection, which works no problem, until he tries to open Outlook, which freezes everytime! He can dial in to the server using a normal phone line which works fine. I guess its a routing problem, i have disabled the setting on his VPN connection use default gateway but this makes no difference. He is using Windows ME on a laptop. I myself have ADSL installed at home and it works for me no problem. The network he is connected/using seems a simple setup, just a hub that he plugs into and i guess a NAT box that gives him an ip address. Any thoughts guys? Thanks David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and
RE: Interesting spam filtering technology
This has been discussed before (all the different types of spam filtering) and I think one of the drawbacks from this type anti-spam was that other people decide for you what is spam. Cheers Sander -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 11:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting spam filtering technology That should be: http://www.cloudmark.com As opposed to could-mark... -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Interesting spam filtering technology While this is not meant to be an endorsement of any kind, I have found a kind of interesting web site I thought y'all might be interested in... www.couldmark.com On the positive side, it so far has not deleted anything that isn't spam. On the negative side, plenty of spam still gets through, and it doesn't play terribly well with Pocket PCs. It's kind of a neat concept though, where each user gets to be a node in a neural network deciding whether the messages they receive are spam. /Gordon ___NOTICE This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___NOTICE This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about accepted wisdom for external contacts within distribution lists.
E2K, OL2K Quick straw poll. What is the accepted wisdom for creating distibution lists which involve external contacts outside of your organisation? Ie. You want to roll out the following distirbution list to some, many or all of your users within your organisation: Somebody who works here Somebody else who also works here A third person who works here [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it better to devolve this to public folders/shared accounts, create internal distribution lists only within an AD structure and allow users to use these as a base and create their own distribution lists with external contacts? Or should you create a subsection of your AD devoted to external contacts and allow users to create external contacts here, so that distribution lists can have the objects to point to when created in AD? My gut feeling is that the latter is a bad option as your AD can quickly fill with out of date SMTP addresses and other assorted rubbish, but is my paranoia justified. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Swedish characters not displayed correctly in OWA??
I don't know if its any help, but the default install of Windows 2000 Server SP2 (International English) with a default install of Exchange 2000 Server SP2 (International English) results in OWA correctly displaying Danish, Swedish and Norwegian special characters. You do not need the language packs. Works OK with clients running all the OS I've tried : Mac OS 9, X, Windows 9x through XP. Netscape 6 and up, IE 5 and up, maybe earlier versions. English or European localised versions (Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, German etc.). You say some clients. What is different about the configuration of the machines which display the characters incorrectly? What Exchange/Windows version is running on the server and clients? What language? Are you using Internet Explorer on the clients? What version? What does the browser do about other web pages with Scandinavian characters? I would guess that the clients have some kind of language weirdo going on. Localisations you might want to do : In Exchange System Manager go to... \root\administrative groups\administrative group xyz\servername Right click servername - properties - Locales Make sure Swedish is there. Shouldn't affect the font display in OWA though. All the best, Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12. august 2002 23:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Swedish characters not displayed correctly in OWA?? Hi, when sending mail to some clients via OWA, swedish characters are not displayed correctly!! The swedish characters ÅÖÄ are replaced with ¤! and so on!! Anybody who can help?? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC early registration
Wha't are you go'ing o'n about'? -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Naah, the spelling doesn't look like Kevin's work. The apostrophe abuse[1] does look like yours though. [1] Omitting them is just as cruel to the poor things as squeezing them in where they don't belong -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 17:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Kevin hijacked my mail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Attract? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Ill be the one selling Fish Tacos in front of the Hilton, while Andy does his thong dance to attract customers. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC early registration Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ __ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. __ __ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk __ __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Queues on Front-End Servers
Running Front-End / Back-End servers setup E2k Sp2. Noticed that in my smtp queues that it appears that messages that are awaiting local delivery are actually messages for users that have mail forwarded offsite. Anyone run into this before and how to correct. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
What about the aditional overhead (cost) of Windows 2000 server as he
will need an AD. I would say rather stick with NT4.0 and Exchange 5.5
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 05:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
Since you won't have to worry about the Exchange 5.5/2K coexistence
phase, then by all means implement Exchange 2K. It's a much better
product. It's more scaleable, more logical, has much better web
interface, etc. Yes, there is a learning curve to learn the new
administrative interfaces, but without an installed base of Exchange
5.5, the implementation of Exchange 2K is very straightforward.
Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA
Senior Network Engineer
PowerTV, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 8/12/2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future.
Then no Exchange2000.
Looks like you'll be happy with 5.5 for awhile.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric
Fors, II
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
I've recently come into the need to implement Exchange server
for my new
employer. I have been blissfully ignorant of all things related
to
Exchange for nearly a year and a half now, but alas that is at
an end.
I've had substantial experience with Exchange with my previous
employer,
but when I was hired on here they already had some other e-mail
product
and were not interested in switching to Exchange. Now they are
and I am
needing to catch up. My experience with Exchange goes back to
the RC
for Exchange 4.0 and runs up to EX55 SP3. EX2K was only just
starting
to be implemented widely by the more adventurous members of this
list at
the time I changed jobs.
With that lengthy pre-amble, here's my question: I have
seen
some of the recent posts with scary stories about what to expect
when
upgrading EX55 to EX2K and read some other things about AD
implementations gone awry.
These cause me to wonder if it is worth it to install EX2K? We
already
own EX55 and our Windows networking is run strictly on a
domains
model, (no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future.)
Our
implementation will be rather small, one site, one server, about
50
users, and a handful of remote users. What if any advantages
would
there be to me to implement EX2K over EX55?
Thanx,
Eric Fors, II
BTW - I'm glad to see that the Ed's and Missy K. are still on
the list.
Your posts in the archives have pulled my proverbial bacon out
of the
fire more than a few times.
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.rí½¶à³zrmyzruvi
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
Can't move mailbox
We have a mixed E2k/E5.5 org with several Exchange 5.5 sites in this org and one mixed site. All E5.5 servers in 1 NT4 domain and all E2k servers in a W2k domain. Two way trusts and all permissions exist as they should. We have set up two way CA's from each Exchange site to AD. When we try to move a users mailbox from an exchange 5.5 server in the pure Exchange 5.5 site using ad users and computers the target server and storage group drop down boxes are greyed out!? When moving mailboxes from the mixed site (the one we joined when adding the first exchange 2000 server) the move mailbox option does not experience this problem. Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Restore Public Folders to an alternate server
Hi all. I have restored an Exchange 2000 PF store to an alternate server. No problems with the restoration process itself - the store mounted fine. However the alternate server is in a different active directory. That active directory does not have these public folders in the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container. Is there a way to populate the AD based on the contents of the PF store? (like DS/IS Consistency Adjuster used to do back in Exchange 5.5) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAPI anonymous connection to E2K
CDO/MAPI anonymous logon to Exchange server works for Exchange 5.5 but not for Exchange 2000 (E2K), see below: strProfileInfo = /o=Organisation/ou=Site/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=ServerName vbLf vbLf anon cdoSession.Logon , , False, True, , True, strProfileInfo Where the profile info is obtained from the Raw Property of the Exchange server. My question is does E2K support anonymous connection via MAPI? If it does, what would be the equivalent to the above? Any help would be greatly appreciated! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
I heard Exchange could not efficiently take advantage of more than 4GB of RAM. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Win2k Server is fine. As long as you're happy with 4 or less CPUs and 4 or less GB of system RAM. The only reason to go to Advanced is to increase to 8cpus, 8GB RAM, clustering. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/serverfamily/default.asp -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 05:21 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Subject: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Exchange 2000 Net require Win2K Server Advanced, or will Win2k Server standard do? (Microsoft man said yes but didn't see same in system document doc.) TIA Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
Also if you want to do clustering or load balancing, you need to have Win2K Advanced
Server
-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
Unless you use Windows 2000 Advanced Server with the /3GB switch, the store process
will not able to allocate more than 1 GB of RAM. And since there is no upgrade
between Windows 2000 Server to Windows 2000 Advanced Server without a complete
re-install, if you intend to ever benefit from more than 1.5GB of physical RAM in your
Exchange server, you should start with Windows 2000 Advanced Server.
If you start as Windows 2000 Server, you will be limited to the number of concurrent
connections you will reasonably want to handle. Where the cut-off should be is
difficult to say because it would be based upon how long you intend to keep that
server in production, the load created by your users, and your potential upgrade path.
I suppose if you were reasonably certain that the server would never grow larger than
100 users and you anticipated a 3 year life expectancy, you'd be safe using Windows
2000 Server. So it's a viable alternative for small sites.
Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA
Senior Network Engineer
PowerTV, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 8/13/2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
Standard will do it, but if you have a lot of RAM in the box, Advanced
Server plays more nicely with E2K (both standard enterprise).
- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: FW: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
Oops, I meant Exchange 2000 Enterprise version.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
Exchange 2000 Net require Win2K Server Advanced, or will Win2k Server
standard do? (Microsoft man said yes but didn't see same in system document
doc.)
TIA
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r(ື \b=!6 0 à§zÇ1r,:.Ë
mé[hy\z[,)rÉZZvh'+-iÙ¢2 G(
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
The MS Exchange 2000 Internals: Quick Tuning Guide (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtech nol/exchange/exchange2000/maintain/optimize/exchtune.asp) says to use the /3GB switch on servers with 1GB of RAM (or more). Pierre Bijaoui says the same thing in his Scaling MS Exchange 2000 book. Seems that the conclusion from that is to run Advanced Server on any Exchange box with RAM = 1GB. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? I'm not gonna disagree with you either, but I'm out of the loop on that topic. Have you got references, or are you hearing internal company whisperings? I've seen a lot of misunderstanding of the (poorly written) documentation of this switch. Are you talking about a Win2k Advanced Server machine with 2gb, or regular W2k server? My lab servers are old Compaq 1600s that would die of shock if they ever found out a machine could have 2gb RAM, so I can't test it... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:37 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Not to disagree with you Tom (not I!), but there's been a lot of talk lately about the /3GB switch helping performance, even on systems with 2GB of RAM. So A/S might be good, but, as you said, probably isn't necessary. M - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:32 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Win2k Server is fine. As long as you're happy with 4 or less CPUs and 4 or less GB of system RAM. The only reason to go to Advanced is to increase to 8cpus, 8GB RAM, clustering. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/serverfamily/default.asp -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 05:21 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Subject: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Exchange 2000 Net require Win2K Server Advanced, or will Win2k Server standard do? (Microsoft man said yes but didn't see same in system document doc.) TIA Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue
Anonymous messages? RFC821 www.faqs.org Might be an open relay? Test it. http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article; sid=156 (link wrap) -Original Message- From: Karon Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/13/2002 11:50 AM Subject: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue I've tried several things to prevent messages getting stuck in the Outbound queue of the IMS it's like someone is relaying SPAM off of us. I've installed Trend Micro's InterScan 5 Messaging Security Suite and tried to block anonymous messages that way. Are they NDR's or messages to user's that are no longer here? Normally I just delete them everyday but I'm concerned that we're being a relay of somekind. Is this normal for Exchange 5.5 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Listserve Recommendations
So it seems I'm soliciting opinions on list serve software.. Gimme the good bad. My sole criterion in this request is that you have some experience with the software you mention. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC issues
Hi there This brings up a question I have along the same topic I see a few hundred of these on a daily basis. I can't tell you the topics because we're in mixed company. I always go in and delete them, thinking that these will take up resources trying to send out mail that will never be sent. Am I doing the wrong thing, or should I just let them time out?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues Ignore them. They'll eventually time out and disappear from the queues - they're NDR messages. If you cannot cannot cannot make yourself ignore them, whack 'em. Missy - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: IMC issues We are all of a sudden getting hundreds (and I mean hundreds, as I go in there about twice a day and clean out about 300 at a time) of the following in the IMC Queues window: Originator If you go in to read what the error message says, it says Host unreachable even though I can ping it and go to the site on the Internet. Also, a lot of messages in the queue have this error code: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [xxx x.x.x Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve] The above looks like it could be a reverse lookup problem, but I am not sure. Anyone been there, done these, hated it? TIA Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC early registration
Gosh, I et me a fish taco last night. (didn't get her name, though..) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Ill be the one selling Fish Tacos in front of the Hilton, while Andy does his thong dance to attract customers. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC early registration Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
This is where I heard it: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KSP2_Cluster.asp Memory Limitations Exchange 2000 Server works well with the /3GB switch. Note Exchange 2000 Server requires that the /3GB switch be used in conjunction with Windows 2000 Advanced Server and Windows 2000 Datacenter Server on hardware with more that 1 GB of physical RAM installed. For more information, see the /3GB and the Additional Resources sections of this document. Exchange 2000 Server does not support instancing (the ability to run multiple instances of an application as separate processes on the same computer) or Physical Address Extension (PAE), which limits Exchange 2000 Server to about 3 GB of usable memory. Installing more than 3 GB of physical memory on a computer running only Exchange 2000 Server is not recommended because the additional memory does not result in a measurable improvement of server performance. However, if you are running other memory intensive applications in conjunction with Exchange 2000, such as Microsoft SQL Server, then increasing the physical memory size beyond 3 GB can provide greater server performance -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? I heard Exchange could not efficiently take advantage of more than 4GB of RAM. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Win2k Server is fine. As long as you're happy with 4 or less CPUs and 4 or less GB of system RAM. The only reason to go to Advanced is to increase to 8cpus, 8GB RAM, clustering. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/serverfamily/default.asp -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 05:21 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Subject: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced? Exchange 2000 Net require Win2K Server Advanced, or will Win2k Server standard do? (Microsoft man said yes but didn't see same in system document doc.) TIA Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server
If all you want to do is make sure the public folders live SOMEWHERE, then you can import the recovered folders to PST and then import them into your production AD. If you want them to go to their original homes, well, you may have to wrestle with the Exchange 2000 version of Pfadmin. If that's the case, good luck. I'll pay you dearly for whatever info gets it to work. ;) -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server Importance: High Hi all. I have restored an Exchange 2000 PF store to an alternate server. No problems with the restoration process itself - the store mounted fine. However the alternate server is in a different active directory. That active directory does not have these public folders in the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container. Is there a way to populate the AD based on the contents of the PF store? (like DS/IS Consistency Adjuster used to do back in Exchange 5.5) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC early registration
there are those things best left to inner monologue. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Gosh, I et me a fish taco last night. (didn't get her name, though..) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Ill be the one selling Fish Tacos in front of the Hilton, while Andy does his thong dance to attract customers. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC early registration Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exmerge or not?
Hi all, I am planning a migration from 5.5 to an existing 2k/AD server because of an office relocation. 2 different sites which are not connected but same domain (kind of... Under NT the domain is called mydomain and under SBS2k it is mydomain.co.uk). I've read up on the WP and also related KB, plus the Ed Cowley move server method - I tried to read to read appendix k in the faq but it will not enlarge. Any reason why? They don't quite seem to address what I have to do tho. Anyway, I would like your opinions on the best way to migrate the data - Would the best way to do it just connect the 2 sites once they are physically together and use the migration wizard? Or should I use exmerge or can I use the alternate method of copying the edb files? If i copy the edb, how to I get the data in that into the exch2k edb files? Would I also be correct in assuming that if I use the migration wizard, then the user accounts will also be created? Has anyone ran a similar migration before? This will be tested 1st of course. TIA Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting spam filtering technology
Not to mention that it is a *CLIENT* add-on. Who wants to enroll a client anti-SPAM product if I have a corporate messaging infrastructure in place which is supposed to handle this long before it is supposed to actually drop into the users mailbox. You mean because it is free? Well, just monitor the cumulative traffic a client-side SPAM protection generates and you pretty quickly consider a server-side solution. Believe me. And since it is currently Outlook 2000/2002 only it's useless for those using POP3/IMAP4 clients or Exchange Outlook Web Access. Just my $.02 US. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting spam filtering technology This has been discussed before (all the different types of spam filtering) and I think one of the drawbacks from this type anti-spam was that other people decide for you what is spam. Cheers Sander -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 11:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Interesting spam filtering technology That should be: http://www.cloudmark.com As opposed to could-mark... -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Interesting spam filtering technology While this is not meant to be an endorsement of any kind, I have found a kind of interesting web site I thought y'all might be interested in... www.couldmark.com On the positive side, it so far has not deleted anything that isn't spam. On the negative side, plenty of spam still gets through, and it doesn't play terribly well with Pocket PCs. It's kind of a neat concept though, where each user gets to be a node in a neural network deciding whether the messages they receive are spam. /Gordon ___NOTICE This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___NOTICE This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server
This was my original plan (similar to single mailbox restore): 1. Restore PF store from tape to alternate server 2. Mount the restored store 3. Connect with Outlook to the alternate server and export the PFs to PST 4. Import PST into the production server However the alternate Exchange server has its own active directory that does not have the same Microsoft Exchange System Objects container as the producion system. The PFs live in that container. So the alternative AD does not have these PFs listed and they do not show up in Outlook. -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server If all you want to do is make sure the public folders live SOMEWHERE, then you can import the recovered folders to PST and then import them into your production AD. If you want them to go to their original homes, well, you may have to wrestle with the Exchange 2000 version of Pfadmin. If that's the case, good luck. I'll pay you dearly for whatever info gets it to work. ;) -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server Importance: High Hi all. I have restored an Exchange 2000 PF store to an alternate server. No problems with the restoration process itself - the store mounted fine. However the alternate server is in a different active directory. That active directory does not have these public folders in the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container. Is there a way to populate the AD based on the contents of the PF store? (like DS/IS Consistency Adjuster used to do back in Exchange 5.5) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unsolicited Email
TKCSales? Aren't you the kite people based in Bath? Advertising for a general techie bod a while back? I thought of applying, but you weren't paying enough! Cheers GWG -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2002 09:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email ta, thought as much. sometimes it's tricky to get whether someone's being sarcastic/ witty/ etc or not ;-) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Yes. Email headers are important. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Somewhere a box needs kicking...
What's the deal? -Original Message- From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Somewhere a box needs kicking... Anyone else having trouble with this list? Over the last 24 hours, I'm seeing sporadic message delivery. My messages stopped around 10:30p last nigt CST, started coming in again for a few hours around mid day (just the messages for that period - nothing for the down period). Now I've seen nothing since 2pm today. Yet I can log on via web page and see the stuff I haven't received. No problem with mail from other lists or other traffic. Trent Hancock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC issues
Hi Missy Thanks for your insight and advice! Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues There's no problem letting them simply time out. Depends on how you want to spend your time. g M - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: IMC issues Hi there This brings up a question I have along the same topic I see a few hundred of these on a daily basis. I can't tell you the topics because we're in mixed company. I always go in and delete them, thinking that these will take up resources trying to send out mail that will never be sent. Am I doing the wrong thing, or should I just let them time out?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues Ignore them. They'll eventually time out and disappear from the queues - they're NDR messages. If you cannot cannot cannot make yourself ignore them, whack 'em. Missy - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: IMC issues We are all of a sudden getting hundreds (and I mean hundreds, as I go in there about twice a day and clean out about 300 at a time) of the following in the IMC Queues window: Originator If you go in to read what the error message says, it says Host unreachable even though I can ping it and go to the site on the Internet. Also, a lot of messages in the queue have this error code: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [xxx x.x.x Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve] The above looks like it could be a reverse lookup problem, but I am not sure. Anyone been there, done these, hated it? TIA Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Somewhere a box needs kicking...
What's your Exchange admin say? -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Somewhere a box needs kicking... I know, having similar problems myself. Not sure why, thought it might be me but I don't think so. -Original Message- From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Somewhere a box needs kicking... Anyone else having trouble with this list? Over the last 24 hours, I'm seeing sporadic message delivery. My messages stopped around 10:30p last nigt CST, started coming in again for a few hours around mid day (just the messages for that period - nothing for the down period). Now I've seen nothing since 2pm today. Yet I can log on via web page and see the stuff I haven't received. No problem with mail from other lists or other traffic. Trent Hancock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER! The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please contact the sender at (312) 782-5432 and delete this e-mail message. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC issues
My philosophy is whack 'em, but don't go to the bother of getting someone else to whack 'em while you're on vacation. -Peter -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC issues Hi Missy Thanks for your insight and advice! Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues There's no problem letting them simply time out. Depends on how you want to spend your time. g M - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: IMC issues Hi there This brings up a question I have along the same topic I see a few hundred of these on a daily basis. I can't tell you the topics because we're in mixed company. I always go in and delete them, thinking that these will take up resources trying to send out mail that will never be sent. Am I doing the wrong thing, or should I just let them time out?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues Ignore them. They'll eventually time out and disappear from the queues - they're NDR messages. If you cannot cannot cannot make yourself ignore them, whack 'em. Missy - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: IMC issues We are all of a sudden getting hundreds (and I mean hundreds, as I go in there about twice a day and clean out about 300 at a time) of the following in the IMC Queues window: Originator If you go in to read what the error message says, it says Host unreachable even though I can ping it and go to the site on the Internet. Also, a lot of messages in the queue have this error code: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [xxx x.x.x Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve] The above looks like it could be a reverse lookup problem, but I am not sure. Anyone been there, done these, hated it? TIA Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forwarding MAil
Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 A small part of our organization is moving to their own mail server. They don't like the way we restrict our Exchange/Outlook system. What they want is to have all of the mail that is coming in for these twenty users to be forwarded to the new domain. I think we can do this with the alternate recipient but currently our Exchange server does not allow the transfer of eMAIL to the Outside world. I cannot find where this is turn on. Please help me. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding MAil
Based on what you have said here I believe your solution is to go into your IMS and look at the Internet Mail tab and click on Advanced. Nate -- From: Mitchell Mike Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding MAil Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 A small part of our organization is moving to their own mail server. They don't like the way we restrict our Exchange/Outlook system. What they want is to have all of the mail that is coming in for these twenty users to be forwarded to the new domain. I think we can do this with the alternate recipient but currently our Exchange server does not allow the transfer of eMAIL to the Outside world. I cannot find where this is turn on. Please help me. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding MAil
If I turn off the automatic replies to the Internet, will this allow the forwarding of eMAILs to the Outside world? -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 14 August, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil Based on what you have said here I believe your solution is to go into your IMS and look at the Internet Mail tab and click on Advanced. Nate -- From: Mitchell Mike Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding MAil Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 A small part of our organization is moving to their own mail server. They don't like the way we restrict our Exchange/Outlook system. What they want is to have all of the mail that is coming in for these twenty users to be forwarded to the new domain. I think we can do this with the alternate recipient but currently our Exchange server does not allow the transfer of eMAIL to the Outside world. I cannot find where this is turn on. Please help me. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC issues
I saw this at a company I was consulting for once and it turned out that they were allowing open relay and the messages were SPAM messages being relayed through the server. You may want to double-check some of the messages -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: IMC issues My philosophy is whack 'em, but don't go to the bother of getting someone else to whack 'em while you're on vacation. -Peter -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC issues Hi Missy Thanks for your insight and advice! Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues There's no problem letting them simply time out. Depends on how you want to spend your time. g M - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: IMC issues Hi there This brings up a question I have along the same topic I see a few hundred of these on a daily basis. I can't tell you the topics because we're in mixed company. I always go in and delete them, thinking that these will take up resources trying to send out mail that will never be sent. Am I doing the wrong thing, or should I just let them time out?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues Ignore them. They'll eventually time out and disappear from the queues - they're NDR messages. If you cannot cannot cannot make yourself ignore them, whack 'em. Missy - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: IMC issues We are all of a sudden getting hundreds (and I mean hundreds, as I go in there about twice a day and clean out about 300 at a time) of the following in the IMC Queues window: Originator If you go in to read what the error message says, it says Host unreachable even though I can ping it and go to the site on the Internet. Also, a lot of messages in the queue have this error code: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [xxx x.x.x Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve] The above looks like it could be a reverse lookup problem, but I am not sure. Anyone been there, done these, hated it? TIA Geoff... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Unsolicited Email
and the prize goes to you! yup, that's us and I took the job - I'm just a cheap tart! -Original Message- From: Gary Wilson-Garner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email TKCSales? Aren't you the kite people based in Bath? Advertising for a general techie bod a while back? I thought of applying, but you weren't paying enough! Cheers GWG -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2002 09:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email ta, thought as much. sometimes it's tricky to get whether someone's being sarcastic/ witty/ etc or not ;-) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Yes. Email headers are important. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding MAil
You want to make sure the Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet is NOT selected. This will allow mail forwarded by rules or Alternate Recipient addressing to occur. -- From: Mitchell Mike Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil If I turn off the automatic replies to the Internet, will this allow the forwarding of eMAILs to the Outside world? -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 14 August, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil Based on what you have said here I believe your solution is to go into your IMS and look at the Internet Mail tab and click on Advanced. Nate -- From: Mitchell Mike Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Forwarding MAil Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 A small part of our organization is moving to their own mail server. They don't like the way we restrict our Exchange/Outlook system. What they want is to have all of the mail that is coming in for these twenty users to be forwarded to the new domain. I think we can do this with the alternate recipient but currently our Exchange server does not allow the transfer of eMAIL to the Outside world. I cannot find where this is turn on. Please help me. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Proxy E2K OWA traffic?
Has anyone on the list tried to use Apache or MS ISA server to proxy http (and https) from a DMZ back into an E2K front end server? If so how did it work out? Inquiring minds want to know! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC early registration
Looks like maybe not as many people registered yet as they had hoped? Anyone one of the first 1000 to get a DVD? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:55 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC early registration Subject: MEC early registration Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password Authentication (Maybe OT)
We are running 2 domains (NT 4.0 domain and a Windows 2000 Active Directory). We have duplicate accounts for each person on each domain (I know we are working on fixing this). Our Domain Controller was also the Exchange 2000 Server. Users were able to log on to the Exchange server without having to type their username and password as long as the password was the same. Recently we created another domain controller and moved active directory to that server. Ever since, users now have to type their username, password, and domain to logon. Does anybody know why this could have happened? I checked all over and couldn't find anything. Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC early registration
I am.. It will be interesting to see what is on it.. . Mark -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC early registration Looks like maybe not as many people registered yet as they had hoped? Anyone one of the first 1000 to get a DVD? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:55 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC early registration Subject: MEC early registration Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ex2k Journaling Incoming only
Hi My customr has journaling enable. And all email a redirected to a Public Folder For now only incoming eMail are achived.. No outgoing mails to internal or external eMail are archived... Does anyone have experienced that ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding MAil
Thanks for all of your help. I have connected as required. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 14 August, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil You want to make sure the Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet is NOT selected. This will allow mail forwarded by rules or Alternate Recipient addressing to occur. -- From: Mitchell Mike Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil If I turn off the automatic replies to the Internet, will this allow the forwarding of eMAILs to the Outside world? -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 14 August, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil Based on what you have said here I believe your solution is to go into your IMS and look at the Internet Mail tab and click on Advanced. Nate -- From: Mitchell Mike Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Forwarding MAil Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 A small part of our organization is moving to their own mail server. They don't like the way we restrict our Exchange/Outlook system. What they want is to have all of the mail that is coming in for these twenty users to be forwarded to the new domain. I think we can do this with the alternate recipient but currently our Exchange server does not allow the transfer of eMAIL to the Outside world. I cannot find where this is turn on. Please help me. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC early registration
If you're a Technet subscriber, the latest box of cds that arrived contains a promotional code to type in at the registration website, which will get you the free DVD also. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: MEC early registration Subject: RE: MEC early registration Looks like maybe not as many people registered yet as they had hoped? Anyone one of the first 1000 to get a DVD? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:55 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC early registration Subject: MEC early registration Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server
Ok, I have figured it out if anyone is interested. There are two ways of making it work. After you restore PUB1.EDB and PUB1.STM to an alternate server and mount the PF store, al the public folders will show up in Exchange System Manager. But you won't see them in Outlook yet. To make the visible in Outlook, do: A. Create a new public top-level public folder on the alternate Exchange server. Then move one of the restored public folders into the new folder. Then right-click on the new folder and select All Tasks/Propagate Settings/Folder Rights. After it rips through, move the restored public folder back into the original location. OR B. Create a new public top-level public folder on the alternate Exchange server. Then COPY one of the restored public folders into the new folder. Delete the original restored public folder and move its copy from the new top level folder back to the original location. Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST http://www.innerhost.com -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server If all you want to do is make sure the public folders live SOMEWHERE, then you can import the recovered folders to PST and then import them into your production AD. If you want them to go to their original homes, well, you may have to wrestle with the Exchange 2000 version of Pfadmin. If that's the case, good luck. I'll pay you dearly for whatever info gets it to work. ;) -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore Public Folders to an alternate server Importance: High Hi all. I have restored an Exchange 2000 PF store to an alternate server. No problems with the restoration process itself - the store mounted fine. However the alternate server is in a different active directory. That active directory does not have these public folders in the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container. Is there a way to populate the AD based on the contents of the PF store? (like DS/IS Consistency Adjuster used to do back in Exchange 5.5) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First installation, first problem
Hi, Exchange 2000 SP3, Windows 2000 SP3 Situation: Today I started my first Exchange 2000 installation. Problem: Only the account I used to install Exk2 have a mailbox. Question from a beginner: Where are the mailboxes for the others 400 users? I don't want to send message only to myself Thanks in advance for your answers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: First installation, first problem
Manuel, I assume you installed Exchange using the default administrator account, in which case that address by default receives a mailbox. To give the other users within Active Directory mailboxes you can 'mailbox enable them' by running the Users and Computers MMC (available from the Administrator tools in the start menu) and right click the user accounts you want to give a mailbox to (you can select multiple accounts at once), and select exchange tasks, and create mailboxes. Some things to be aware of when doing that 1. All mailboxes will be created within the default storage group/database - realistically you may want to create multiple storage groups or database and split the users out, purely for easier management and faster backup/restore times. 2. Do you really want to create brand new mailboxes for these users? Should you not be migrating them from an earlier version of exchange? I really suggest you read some of the excellent white papers (and getting started guides) from Microsoft and play with the product in a lab environment first before you start administering this system, in a live environment mainly due to the fact that if your struggling at this stage then you will struggle later down the line :-) HTH Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Manuel Cabezas Sent: 14 August 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: First installation, first problem Hi, Exchange 2000 SP3, Windows 2000 SP3 Situation: Today I started my first Exchange 2000 installation. Problem: Only the account I used to install Exk2 have a mailbox. Question from a beginner: Where are the mailboxes for the others 400 users? I don't want to send message only to myself Thanks in advance for your answers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: First installation, first problem
Thanks for your answer , Jason -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Jason Kane Enviado el: miercoles, 14 de agosto de 2002 20:22 Para: Exchange Discussions Asunto: RE: First installation, first problem Manuel, I assume you installed Exchange using the default administrator account, in which case that address by default receives a mailbox. To give the other users within Active Directory mailboxes you can 'mailbox enable them' by running the Users and Computers MMC (available from the Administrator tools in the start menu) and right click the user accounts you want to give a mailbox to (you can select multiple accounts at once), and select exchange tasks, and create mailboxes. Some things to be aware of when doing that 1. All mailboxes will be created within the default storage group/database - realistically you may want to create multiple storage groups or database and split the users out, purely for easier management and faster backup/restore times. 2. Do you really want to create brand new mailboxes for these users? Should you not be migrating them from an earlier version of exchange? I really suggest you read some of the excellent white papers (and getting started guides) from Microsoft and play with the product in a lab environment first before you start administering this system, in a live environment mainly due to the fact that if your struggling at this stage then you will struggle later down the line :-) HTH Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Manuel Cabezas Sent: 14 August 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: First installation, first problem Hi, Exchange 2000 SP3, Windows 2000 SP3 Situation: Today I started my first Exchange 2000 installation. Problem: Only the account I used to install Exk2 have a mailbox. Question from a beginner: Where are the mailboxes for the others 400 users? I don't want to send message only to myself Thanks in advance for your answers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN
I have the exact same problem. I have tried connecting using 3 different computers but all have the same issue with Outlook hanging. I am also using a high speed DSL connection at home. I have enquired about other users, some even using AOL to connect via VPN , and they have no problems whatsoever getting their Outlook to work. So I'm assuming it is something to do with my ISP blocking some kind of traffic. What's even wierd is that it used to work earlier and then one fine day it just stopped working. Any ideas ? I'm going to try making those registry tweaks mentioned here to see if it fixed my problem. But if not, what should I find out from my ISP ? Thanks. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 4:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Hi Chris, He can ping by name. -- From: Chris Scharff[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 13 August 2002 21:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN So he can't ping by name then? Sounds like a netbios name resolution. I'm guessing he can resolve the server name if uses the IP address or the FQDN? If so, this would support that assumption. You could then verify this by adding an entry to his hosts file.. which would resolve but not fix the underlying name resolution issue. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Ok everyone, Thanks for your help with this and i spent loads of time on the phone yesterday trying all your advice out. The state of play is still the same, but this is what he can do: He can dial the VPN server over the xDSL link, establish the connection. He can browse My Network Places and Navigate to the servers shares and access them all. He can telnet into the Exchange server on Port 25, and send mail by hand. He can browse the Internet without any problems. It gotta be Outlook surely?? With Outlook i did the following: Ran Scanpst against his OST file. Turned off Offline access, to rule out Syncronisation. Deleted his OST file and had it recreate it later of an analogue line. Recreated his profile. However, i can not resolve the server name in the profile box. In other words he can do everything but open Outlook. So it leaves RPC config and maybe the ports that Outlook uses are being blocked?? Thanks again for all your help. David -- From: Baker, Jennifer[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12 August 2002 18:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Recreate his mail profile. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and PPTP + VPN Hi everyone, I've been having this problem for some time and was wondering if anyone could help me with it. I have this NT4 server with PPTP installed plus some VPN connections. The staff can now dial into their local ISP and can open Outlook client and get their mail. They can also browse the shares, fine so far. However, recently the director went to NY and is sharing someones office over there which has DSL in place. He uses this link to make the VPN connection, which works no problem, until he tries to open Outlook, which freezes everytime! He can dial in to the server using a normal phone line which works fine. I guess its a routing problem, i have disabled the setting on his VPN connection use default gateway but this makes no difference. He is using Windows ME on a laptop. I myself have ADSL installed at home and it works for me no problem. The network he is connected/using seems a simple setup, just a hub that he plugs into and i guess a NAT box that gives him an ip address. Any thoughts guys? Thanks David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook profiles
I'm trying to find a profile generation tool that would add additional mailboxes. I came across a tool called createprf.exe which would allow me to add additional mailboxes but it seems like it will only allow me to add ONE additional mailbox. Is that correct or am I missing something ? I'm using ScriptLogic to centralize mail profile generation on log on. However, SL does not support adding additional mailboxes. Any ideas how I can get this to work ? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 SP3
I wouldn't recommend installing this currently if you have plans to. There is a serious bug that is causing none of the mail to be picked up from your outlook clients until you restart the IS. This happens every few hours now when it was just twice a day last week. We are all scratching our heads on this since there are no bad event errors even with logging set. We have had this issue open with MS since last week and they first blamed it on the virus scanner but that's not the case. The Tech at MS did confirm that a few other customers were having the same problem so it's not isolated to just us. But as always YMMV, so good luck if you install it.. Just a heads up.. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: First installation, first problem
One question more: Now, when I tried to connect to Exchange Server from Outlook I receive the next message: Is not possible to open the electronic mail folders, you don't have permissions to start the session. (It happens with all the accounts except the administrator). Before start the installation, I played with the product in lab enviroment and all was ok. I never had problems. And now Any suggestion? Thanks, again. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Jason Kane Enviado el: miercoles, 14 de agosto de 2002 20:22 Para: Exchange Discussions Asunto: RE: First installation, first problem Manuel, I assume you installed Exchange using the default administrator account, in which case that address by default receives a mailbox. To give the other users within Active Directory mailboxes you can 'mailbox enable them' by running the Users and Computers MMC (available from the Administrator tools in the start menu) and right click the user accounts you want to give a mailbox to (you can select multiple accounts at once), and select exchange tasks, and create mailboxes. Some things to be aware of when doing that 1. All mailboxes will be created within the default storage group/database - realistically you may want to create multiple storage groups or database and split the users out, purely for easier management and faster backup/restore times. 2. Do you really want to create brand new mailboxes for these users? Should you not be migrating them from an earlier version of exchange? I really suggest you read some of the excellent white papers (and getting started guides) from Microsoft and play with the product in a lab environment first before you start administering this system, in a live environment mainly due to the fact that if your struggling at this stage then you will struggle later down the line :-) HTH Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Manuel Cabezas Sent: 14 August 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: First installation, first problem Hi, Exchange 2000 SP3, Windows 2000 SP3 Situation: Today I started my first Exchange 2000 installation. Problem: Only the account I used to install Exk2 have a mailbox. Question from a beginner: Where are the mailboxes for the others 400 users? I don't want to send message only to myself Thanks in advance for your answers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SP3
How exactly does the Exchange server pick up mail from Outlook clients? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SP3 I wouldn't recommend installing this currently if you have plans to. There is a serious bug that is causing none of the mail to be picked up from your outlook clients until you restart the IS. This happens every few hours now when it was just twice a day last week. We are all scratching our heads on this since there are no bad event errors even with logging set. We have had this issue open with MS since last week and they first blamed it on the virus scanner but that's not the case. The Tech at MS did confirm that a few other customers were having the same problem so it's not isolated to just us. But as always YMMV, so good luck if you install it.. Just a heads up.. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Groupwise - exchange
Have a very small installation wanting to migrate their novell/groupwise 6.0 data to exchange 2000. I'm looking through the materials on MS's site now but was wondering if there are any big show stoppers that folks here have run into. Any advise from experience doing this migration? Thx for any pointers- byron PS - Sorry if this is a repost. I can't seem to get the original through. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Groupwise - exchange
We went through a GW5 to E2K migration a little over a year ago for about 100 mailboxes. In general, things went very smoothly and our users have been very happy. Some things we encountered: 1. Reminder Notes do not come across at all. 2. Messages that had been forwarded many times got truncated. 3. Appointments and Tasks come across as an attachment to a message and must be imported. We did this, rather than asking the users, since we were also converting the desktops to W2K at the same time. 4. Repeating Appointments come across as a series of individual appointments. 5. Message status information did not come across. 6. Users of message retraction and status tracking had some adjustments to make. Good luck ... Chris From: Byron Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Groupwise - exchange Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:02:01 -0700 Have a very small installation wanting to migrate their novell/groupwise 6.0 data to exchange 2000. I'm looking through the materials on MS's site now but was wondering if there are any big show stoppers that folks here have run into. Any advise from experience doing this migration? Thx for any pointers- byron PS - Sorry if this is a repost. I can't seem to get the original through. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
same forest different domain 2nd exchange server
Greetings 1 forest 2 domains (just 1 DC in each W2K-AD domain) W2k+SP3+native mode 1 exchange2000 in 1st domain + SP3 + native mode We are trying to install MSx2000 in the 2nd domain, we did not run setup /forestprep in this second domain beacuse we already did it in the 1st domain, we got an error when trying setup /domainprep both DCs are able to see each other via FQDN. (netdiag + dcdiag passed ok on both DCs..except I got Trust Relation Test : skipped) setup is unable to access the windows 2000 active directory failed to contact the schema master server for this active directory forest the account I am using is a local and domain admin of the 2nd domain, in MSX2000 in the first domain this account has been delegateed full exchange permissions * we got the same error if we try to run setup /forestprep in the second domain too. Please any suggestions? -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange, Global Catalog, and AD Help!!
Hi All, Can somebody explain to me how the three interact. I have been reading up on some postings and would like some clarification as to how they are interrelated. We have 2 Domain Controllers(DCs), A and B and Exchange as a member server. A is setup as the Global Catalog. We added a third DC, C, to replace A. We promoted C as a global catalog and remove Global Catalog function from A. We forced replication between the two DNS servers, A and C. We then shutdown A. That's when we noticed that users complained that Outlook failed. Can somebody explain to me why this happen? We had to bring back server B to get this fixed. From what I have read, this is how I assume it works. Please correct if I am mistaken. When a Outlook MAPI client connects to exchange, it queries the Exchange server for the preferred Global Catalog. Exchange replies with the closest GC it knows of and the Outlook client caches the information. This can be seen on your local computer's registry. If for some reason, the GC were to go down, then it would not work. Exchange only knows about the Global Catalog that it boots up with. Any new GC added afterwards requires a reboot or the System Attendant to restart. The list of GCs avaiable for Exchange to refer Outlook clients reflect the state of the network when Exchange was booted and is not dynamically updated. From our scenario, could it be that because Exchange didn't know about our new GC, Outlook failed? I just want to decommissioned the A server from our network. I am trying to understand the interdependecies between Exchange and Windows 2000 AD. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't move mailbox
If I understand you correctly, you're trying to move mailboxes from 5.5 sites to an exchange 2000 server in a different site...If so, you can't do that. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't move mailbox We have a mixed E2k/E5.5 org with several Exchange 5.5 sites in this org and one mixed site. All E5.5 servers in 1 NT4 domain and all E2k servers in a W2k domain. Two way trusts and all permissions exist as they should. We have set up two way CA's from each Exchange site to AD. When we try to move a users mailbox from an exchange 5.5 server in the pure Exchange 5.5 site using ad users and computers the target server and storage group drop down boxes are greyed out!? When moving mailboxes from the mixed site (the one we joined when adding the first exchange 2000 server) the move mailbox option does not experience this problem. Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange, Global Catalog, and AD Help!!
When an Outlook profile is created it connects to a DC that is a GC. Once you removed the original DC, which was a GC, the profile stops responding. Recreate the users profile and you should be ok. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange, Global Catalog, and AD Help!! Hi All, Can somebody explain to me how the three interact. I have been reading up on some postings and would like some clarification as to how they are interrelated. We have 2 Domain Controllers(DCs), A and B and Exchange as a member server. A is setup as the Global Catalog. We added a third DC, C, to replace A. We promoted C as a global catalog and remove Global Catalog function from A. We forced replication between the two DNS servers, A and C. We then shutdown A. That's when we noticed that users complained that Outlook failed. Can somebody explain to me why this happen? We had to bring back server B to get this fixed. From what I have read, this is how I assume it works. Please correct if I am mistaken. When a Outlook MAPI client connects to exchange, it queries the Exchange server for the preferred Global Catalog. Exchange replies with the closest GC it knows of and the Outlook client caches the information. This can be seen on your local computer's registry. If for some reason, the GC were to go down, then it would not work. Exchange only knows about the Global Catalog that it boots up with. Any new GC added afterwards requires a reboot or the System Attendant to restart. The list of GCs avaiable for Exchange to refer Outlook clients reflect the state of the network when Exchange was booted and is not dynamically updated. From our scenario, could it be that because Exchange didn't know about our new GC, Outlook failed? I just want to decommissioned the A server from our network. I am trying to understand the interdependecies between Exchange and Windows 2000 AD. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Split Exchange 5.5 org
Subject: Split 1 5.5 Org into 2 E2K Orgs I am planning a project to split an existing Exchange 5.5 Organization into 2 Exchange 2000 Organizations. Today the Exchange 5.5 Org crosses 2 AD forests, with 1 site in each forest. This is a loose relationship between forests. Exchange 2000 will make me split into 2 Exchange Organizations so that each forest can manage its own Exchange Servers. 1 site (the more powerful forest) will be upgraded in place to Exchange 2000. The other site will deal with the implications. I am working on a theory that I may be able to use the Exchange 5.5 Organization to create both Exchange 2000 Organizations. Since there are two separate forests, could I install ADC for each forest using the Exchange 5.5 site for each respective forest, then run /ForestPrep to create 2 separate Exchange 2000 Organizations that I can then upgrade in place for both? Thanks for your time... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange, Global Catalog, and AD Help!!
Have you also moved the FSMO roles to the new server as well ? Otherwise your system will not know the full topology of the AD. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange, Global Catalog, and AD Help!! Hi All, Can somebody explain to me how the three interact. I have been reading up on some postings and would like some clarification as to how they are interrelated. We have 2 Domain Controllers(DCs), A and B and Exchange as a member server. A is setup as the Global Catalog. We added a third DC, C, to replace A. We promoted C as a global catalog and remove Global Catalog function from A. We forced replication between the two DNS servers, A and C. We then shutdown A. That's when we noticed that users complained that Outlook failed. Can somebody explain to me why this happen? We had to bring back server B to get this fixed. From what I have read, this is how I assume it works. Please correct if I am mistaken. When a Outlook MAPI client connects to exchange, it queries the Exchange server for the preferred Global Catalog. Exchange replies with the closest GC it knows of and the Outlook client caches the information. This can be seen on your local computer's registry. If for some reason, the GC were to go down, then it would not work. Exchange only knows about the Global Catalog that it boots up with. Any new GC added afterwards requires a reboot or the System Attendant to restart. The list of GCs avaiable for Exchange to refer Outlook clients reflect the state of the network when Exchange was booted and is not dynamically updated. From our scenario, could it be that because Exchange didn't know about our new GC, Outlook failed? I just want to decommissioned the A server from our network. I am trying to understand the interdependecies between Exchange and Windows 2000 AD. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
