MEC 2002 comments?
Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HelpDesk Software
You could try the Slipstick website http://www.slipstick.com/addins/mssampleapps.htm -Original Message- From: Benjamin, Bernie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 06:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HelpDesk Software A HelpDesk built as an Exchange server application. I have seen some client contact applications based on Exchange but have not seen a HelpDesk application. Regards, Bernie -Original Message- From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 October 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HelpDesk Software What do you mean available for exchange? What integration would u want? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Like it! Do you mind if I borrow that phrase?! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 22:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering I tout the virtues of single-node clusters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advice on infrastructure design
Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode' as opposed to POP3 retrieval? Our ADSL is capped at 256k upload from the central office, and in my experience, those who are configured to connect to the central server over ADSL (i.e. roaming laptop users) find it quite slow. At least in this config, users have local, faster access to their mail stores and public folders, and the slow mail transfer happens 'behind the scenes' I would prefer to work with one server, but would appreciate some advice before doing this as to possible performance issues Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design No. Move the mailboxes to your central site, and save the cost of 5 Exchange servers. I have had plenty of 20 person offices hitting Exchange across WAN links without issue. In fact, I have 2 offices going half way across Europe, with 30 users each, to the only office there that can support Exchange (from an admin standpoint). Personally, I think a server for less than about 40-50 users is insane. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Hi Very few to be honest, at our head office we have something like 30 users, then each site has around 10-15 Am I correct in assuming mailboxes need to be moved to our central server first, then the sites created, then the mailboxes moved back? Thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Good point -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Advice on infrastructure design I agree, but am curious as too how many users at each site? Do you really need one at each location. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 7:40 AM Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Switch to x.400 connectors. There is precious little difference, at the network level, between Site Connectors and intrasite communications - they both rely entirely on RPC connectivity, which frankly blows across unstable or tempermental WANs. Alternately (since you'd need to own Enterprise to use x.400 connectors), you could also use the IMS as your connector, but I find x.400 easier to use for connector purposes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Advice on infrastructure design Dear All, I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish question to ask, but I think we need to revise our setup, and are not in a position to hire a consultant. Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL links, using Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities. Our Exchange Setup is 1 site with 5 servers. We've had the odd problem in the past when the ADSL links have gone down, and messages have been lost. Not often, but once or twice It was suggested to me here that we should configure each server as residing in a different site, and configure site connectors I now have an issue where one server experiences massive delays when delivering messages to other servers (8 hours in some cases). On closer inspection, I see lots of MTA errors regarding RPC communication. When running RPC Ping, it says it failed to bind to the other servers on all protocols If we are to revise our configuration, will it be best for me to move mailboxes from 1 server to what I call our central server which will be remaining in the site its in, then delete the old server, re-install exchange into a new site in the existing organisation, and move the mailboxes back? Thanks for any advice Nik
RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Yes that is the theory, but there is a limit of 1900 users on an Active/Active cluster. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering No, according to the theory you can get more users on Active/Active because both cluster nodes are being used to do something useful. But if one fails, the other node better be able to take on the load. -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering Stay away from active/active. Go Active/passive instead. You can get more users on Active/Passive. Denny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Imran Iqbal Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move to Exchange 2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 node Active Active cluster and would be interested in hearing anyone views or real world experiences with similar setups. Each server would have about 800 active users and would probably be connected to a SAN for the shared storage. I have heard that there were memory issues with this setup pre SP3. I would like to know if there are any other problems and if it is worth doing Thanks in advance Imran _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
It was alright I guess. I got sick also? I think food poisoning was the culprit in my case. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Um, well, there is that one. Yeah. Gotta sell the bosses on it first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering Let me know if you change your mind! I enjoyed working with (for) you! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering I'm sure CJ and others would support me in saying that I don't need the services of Exchange consultants. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering Can you please be my customer? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering An intelligent one? If that makes me different, so be it. I'm also the first to send an arse clown out the door for recommending solutions that are way out of line. Like Exchange clusters. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering You must be a different type of a customer. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering As a customer, I appreciate when I'm shown that I was wrong when planning to spend 100% more than I have to. Makes me want to use that provider again. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering When a customer wants it AND wants to pay money for it... customer is always right. :) Customers hate when one proves them wrong. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering Perhaps it would be better if you educated that customer on better alternatives. Just as an aside, during Tony Redmond's session last week he asked how many in the audience were using clusters and I swear, a third of the people there raised their hands. I would have thought it a lot less. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering I prefer not to mess with Exchange clustering unless a customer insists on having a dedicated Exchange cluster. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering And when you deploy an Exchange cluster, that's exactly what you get! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering No I am just preparing for the worst-case scenario. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Advice on infrastructure design
Set up all the remote users in MAPI (ie Exchange) mode, and set them to work offline, and to syncronize every 10-15 minutes. That will manage your connect time very well. I'd also spring for a real circuit at the central location, but that's just me - it might not fit the budget. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode' as opposed to POP3 retrieval? Our ADSL is capped at 256k upload from the central office, and in my experience, those who are configured to connect to the central server over ADSL (i.e. roaming laptop users) find it quite slow. At least in this config, users have local, faster access to their mail stores and public folders, and the slow mail transfer happens 'behind the scenes' I would prefer to work with one server, but would appreciate some advice before doing this as to possible performance issues Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design No. Move the mailboxes to your central site, and save the cost of 5 Exchange servers. I have had plenty of 20 person offices hitting Exchange across WAN links without issue. In fact, I have 2 offices going half way across Europe, with 30 users each, to the only office there that can support Exchange (from an admin standpoint). Personally, I think a server for less than about 40-50 users is insane. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Hi Very few to be honest, at our head office we have something like 30 users, then each site has around 10-15 Am I correct in assuming mailboxes need to be moved to our central server first, then the sites created, then the mailboxes moved back? Thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Good point -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Advice on infrastructure design I agree, but am curious as too how many users at each site? Do you really need one at each location. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 7:40 AM Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Switch to x.400 connectors. There is precious little difference, at the network level, between Site Connectors and intrasite communications - they both rely entirely on RPC connectivity, which frankly blows across unstable or tempermental WANs. Alternately (since you'd need to own Enterprise to use x.400 connectors), you could also use the IMS as your connector, but I find x.400 easier to use for connector purposes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Advice on infrastructure design Dear All, I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish question to ask, but I think we need to revise our setup, and are not in a position to hire a consultant. Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL links, using Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities. Our Exchange Setup is 1 site with 5 servers. We've had the odd problem in the past when the ADSL links have gone down, and messages have been lost. Not often, but once or twice It was suggested to me here that we should configure each server as residing
RE: stopping the SPAM
6) everyone is at MEC Lighten up! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stopping the SPAM James, You have posted this 3 times. No one has replied. This can only mean one of five things: 1) those that can help are busy on other things 2) those that can help are busy trying to think up a helpful solution 3) those that can help are sick of you posting this message, and are refusing to help 4) you have posted this message to the wrong list... 3 TIMES! 5) there is no 5th thing Weigh up your options... themolk -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 5:37 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: stopping the SPAM Lately, our School District has been getting more and more SMAM e-mails. We are currently using Scan Mail for Exchange 5.5 and the e-manager part to filter out SMAM which leaves a lot to be desired because when a user gets a SMAM e-mail, it is deleted (about 50%) of the time, however the user, in addition, gets a message that states The original message content contained a virus or was blocked due to blocking rules and has been removed. We have discussed the problem with Trend, and they seem to have no way to prevent the user from receiving this additional message. So what is the difference in a user getting SPAM or a user getting a message saying that your SPAM has been deleted? Isn't the whole idea to limit the number of e-mail messages to those that which have some meaning to the user. My question to the group is: is there anyone using a product out there that they are pleased with and that is preventing SPAM from getting to the end user, that does not send additional mails to the user telling them that their SPAM has been deleted? Any advise and or guidance on this topic would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, CA 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Well guys I enjoyed this conversation and thank you a lot for bringing me up to speed in the cluster part of Exchange. -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering Yes that is the theory, but there is a limit of 1900 users on an Active/Active cluster. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering No, according to the theory you can get more users on Active/Active because both cluster nodes are being used to do something useful. But if one fails, the other node better be able to take on the load. -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering Stay away from active/active. Go Active/passive instead. You can get more users on Active/Passive. Denny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Imran Iqbal Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move to Exchange 2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 node Active Active cluster and would be interested in hearing anyone views or real world experiences with similar setups. Each server would have about 800 active users and would probably be connected to a SAN for the shared storage. I have heard that there were memory issues with this setup pre SP3. I would like to know if there are any other problems and if it is worth doing Thanks in advance Imran _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Exchange user survey
Does anyone have a standard survey that could be applied to sizing a new Exchange amil user site. 1. How many users? 2. Store mail on user PC or exchange server? 3. How many messages each week per user? 4. Does user delete after reading or retain?? 5. How long an outage can user tolerate? One day, two days, one week? Etc... If you have something or have suggestions please email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange user survey
Outage tolerance? Some can't wait even a minute. Even if it only happens once a year. -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange user survey Does anyone have a standard survey that could be applied to sizing a new Exchange amil user site. 1. How many users? 2. Store mail on user PC or exchange server? 3. How many messages each week per user? 4. Does user delete after reading or retain?? 5. How long an outage can user tolerate? One day, two days, one week? Etc... If you have something or have suggestions please email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: a wish
Well I tried to fudge Default message format and make it *.*, but it did not help. I also tried to fudge the SMTP Connector's address space - using ADSI Edit I was able to change it from * to *.*, but that did not help either. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: a wish Importance: High I wish the address space would take characters like a dot, then I could create a *.* address space. This way I would not have to see messages to someone@aol or someone@hotmail or someone@yahoocom etc sitting in my queues. On the other hand, shouldn't the server immediately bounce the message if the destination domain name cannot be resolved in DNS? This particular server is a relay for our Imail servers. I have an idea though. I am currently testing it in the lab. Exchange 2000 has a setting under Global Settings/Internet Message Formats. By default there is a just one settings there called default and it is set as * There is no way to change * using ESM, but I can change it using ADSI. I am going to change it to *.* and see if it helps (or screws everything up:) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com Complex Hosting in a Global Environment _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange user survey
Compaq has some Exchange sizer tools http://www.compaq.com/partners/microsoft/utilities/storagesystem.html -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange user survey Does anyone have a standard survey that could be applied to sizing a new Exchange amil user site. 1. How many users? 2. Store mail on user PC or exchange server? 3. How many messages each week per user? 4. Does user delete after reading or retain?? 5. How long an outage can user tolerate? One day, two days, one week? Etc... If you have something or have suggestions please email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange user survey
Ahh but is that tolerance = Has an impact on their business process
or
tolerance = Whines to helpdesk cos the daily dilbert ain't arrived yet.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 15/10/2002 13:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: New Exchange user survey
Outage tolerance? Some can't wait even a minute. Even if it only happens once
a year.
-Original Message-
From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Exchange user survey
Does anyone have a standard survey that could be applied to sizing a new
Exchange amil user site.
1. How many users?
2. Store mail on user PC or exchange server?
3. How many messages each week per user?
4. Does user delete after reading or retain??
5. How long an outage can user tolerate? One day, two days, one week?
Etc...
If you have something or have suggestions please email me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance
/s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: webpopup
If port 139 is open on their firewall, they have bigger issues than Spam! -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup I believe this will clear it up for you. http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3374542,00.html Stephen Grant IT/IM Officer Federal Superannuates National Association 1052 St. Laurent Blvd. Ottawa, ON K1K 3B4 tel: (613)745-2559 fax: (613)745-5457 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webpopup Apologies if this is totally off topic. All my exchange servers (could be conicidence) have shown webpopup messages, these are messages sent to the machine by ip address from who knows where, selling rubbish. How are they doing it? Using msg from command line requires terminal services which I am not running on these machines. Any ideas? Many thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: webpopup
It isn't open!! Which is a concern... Thanks Vanessa -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 14:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup If port 139 is open on their firewall, they have bigger issues than Spam! -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup I believe this will clear it up for you. http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3374542,00.html Stephen Grant IT/IM Officer Federal Superannuates National Association 1052 St. Laurent Blvd. Ottawa, ON K1K 3B4 tel: (613)745-2559 fax: (613)745-5457 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webpopup Apologies if this is totally off topic. All my exchange servers (could be conicidence) have shown webpopup messages, these are messages sent to the machine by ip address from who knows where, selling rubbish. How are they doing it? Using msg from command line requires terminal services which I am not running on these machines. Any ideas? Many thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Daniel, How come then you could shutdown a server quicker by specifying the shutdown order of the services in a batch file (as requested here) then shutting down SA? if that was the case then the batch file would make no difference. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 14:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 That was not the cause of the shutdown; the dependencies make sure of the correct order. It had to do with the IS and how it was flushing buffers which was addressed, finally, in SP3. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Services Failing to Start at Boot
OK I have found this event message at another site now. It seems that this problem appears after Exchange SP2 has been applied to the server and then restarted. The message below is an actual event (except for the computer name) from the server in question. This only happe4ns when the server is restarted. The services start when they are manually started after logon. Is there a way I can make these services wait until the SA starts before they attempt to, or is there a known fix for this that I so far have not been able to locate? Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 13/10/2002 Time: 19:52:07 User: N/A Computer: SERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Services Failing to Start at Boot
OK I have found this event message at another site now. It seems that this problem appears after Exchange SP2 has been applied to the server and then restarted. The message below is an actual event (except for the computer name) from the server in question. This only happe4ns when the server is restarted. The services start when they are manually started after logon. Is there a way I can make these services wait until the SA starts before they attempt to, or is there a known fix for this that I so far have not been able to locate? Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 13/10/2002 Time: 19:52:07 User: N/A Computer: SERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
You're comparing _ANY_ MEC to Boston..??? Chriminey, I could've hosted MEC in my garage and it'd been better than Boston. Dallas was the second worst venue, imo. Search the archives for a rehash of reasons; I've instigated enough already. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID 8213
I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 10/15/2002 Time: 8:31:31 AM User: N/A Computer: MSA Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care of the error. I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly. Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange user survey
I bet on the second one ;-)) peter -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange user survey Ahh but is that tolerance = Has an impact on their business process or tolerance = Whines to helpdesk cos the daily dilbert ain't arrived yet. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 15/10/2002 13:52 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: New Exchange user survey Outage tolerance? Some can't wait even a minute. Even if it only happens once a year. -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange user survey Does anyone have a standard survey that could be applied to sizing a new Exchange amil user site. 1. How many users? 2. Store mail on user PC or exchange server? 3. How many messages each week per user? 4. Does user delete after reading or retain?? 5. How long an outage can user tolerate? One day, two days, one week? Etc... If you have something or have suggestions please email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)ꪯr(꺷 \檆b桽!椶 0 䧑zǚ꯱r⪬:.˛ m隊[hy꒪\z[,꒪)rZ Zvh뗧+-i٢2⪞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Shut them down in any order you would like. The order in which they are shutdown really only depends on if you are doing a manual shutdown from the command line. Otherwise, stop the DS first, which will take down a couple of others services and then do the rest of manually. It is best to shutdown the services FIRST when you are rebooting the Exchange machine. Takes less time then allowing NT to do it. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 That was not the cause of the shutdown; the dependencies make sure of the correct order. It had to do with the IS and how it was flushing buffers which was addressed, finally, in SP3. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
viewer of PST
Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: webpopup
Yes, strange behaviour if it isn't showing as open. I had a Messenger popup occur at home twice now even though a port scan shows 139 closed. I don't know how they are getting through. Steve -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup It isn't open!! Which is a concern... Thanks Vanessa -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 14:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup If port 139 is open on their firewall, they have bigger issues than Spam! -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup I believe this will clear it up for you. http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3 374542,00.html Stephen Grant IT/IM Officer Federal Superannuates National Association 1052 St. Laurent Blvd. Ottawa, ON K1K 3B4 tel: (613)745-2559 fax: (613)745-5457 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webpopup Apologies if this is totally off topic. All my exchange servers (could be conicidence) have shown webpopup messages, these are messages sent to the machine by ip address from who knows where, selling rubbish. How are they doing it? Using msg from command line requires terminal services which I am not running on these machines. Any ideas? Many thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: webpopup
Umm Ill throw in 2 cents What do you mean exactly by Webpopup the fore a mentioned NET SEND by others..I personally would not consider a Webpopup, just a NET SEND message. I would consider a Webpopup like an annoying popup you get when surfing the web and you get the credit card thing'y. Are you opening IE? on the server? more detail might help bill -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webpopup Apologies if this is totally off topic. All my exchange servers (could be conicidence) have shown webpopup messages, these are messages sent to the machine by ip address from who knows where, selling rubbish. How are they doing it? Using msg from command line requires terminal services which I am not running on these machines. Any ideas? Many thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange server migration
Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data from site B to site A. After migration, I want to turn off site B's server. Data currently on site B's exchange server is mailboxes and public folder (very large folders). Currently, both sites aren't in the same organisations. My questions are: - What are considerations I might thing about? - What tools do you recommand me to use? - Is there a procedure on how to do the migration? Maybe another question on this. What kind of hardware (CPU speed, memory, Hard drive space, etc) my server must be? I have about 20 users connecting through a mapi client (Outlook 2000). Our corporate databases are stored in public folders and users use them a lot. Albert Charron Trisotech Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID 8213
I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 10/15/2002 Time: 8:31:31 AM User: N/A Computer: MSA Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care of the error. I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly. Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Did you guys get sick from the MEC Party at CA? I had food poisoning on Friday morning as well, and thought that maybe I was the only one. Personally, I thought two things sucked about that party. 1.) I paid $100 for a ticket to that party, so that my wife could go...then she couldn't go on the trip at all and I was stuck with it. 2) A ticket to Disneyland for the ENTIRE DAY would only have been $45. And here I was stuck with a ticket to an event that had like six rides open, lousy food and lots of beer for 4 hours. How stupid is that? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? It was alright I guess. I got sick also? I think food poisoning was the culprit in my case. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MEC 2002 comments?
I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
I was thoroughly impressed, although this was my first and obviously last MEC. I will be in Dalls in June, however. Was my first trip to S. CA and was not impressed with it. Disney was disappointing for the fact that they had half the park closed off. Food was good and the free beer even better. Had a good time, did have trouble finding anyone from this list however. Maybe we should set up a off-site get together for the people that post here. Would have loved to have meet some of the genius behind all the helpful posters. See ya in Dallas. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? You're comparing _ANY_ MEC to Boston..??? Chriminey, I could've hosted MEC in my garage and it'd been better than Boston. Dallas was the second worst venue, imo. Search the archives for a rehash of reasons; I've instigated enough already. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 8213
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8213source= Q296151 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 8213 I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 10/15/2002 Time: 8:31:31 AM User: N/A Computer: MSA Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care of the error. I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly. Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 8213
Oops.. Didn't mean to send that... You found the same article I did. My bad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 8213 I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 10/15/2002 Time: 8:31:31 AM User: N/A Computer: MSA Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care of the error. I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly. Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
Outlook, Exchange client -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
File, Open, Outlook Data File? -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HelpDesk Software
Take a look at http://www.workflow.com.ar/welcome.htm, found the reference at http://www.helpdesks.com -Jorge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Benjamin, Bernie Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HelpDesk Software We are looking at options for implementing HelpDesk software. Could anyone advise me if there is any HelpDesk software availabel for Exchange 5.5 and Oullook 98. Bernie Benjamin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VB.NET Examples
Can anyone point me to the correct site where I can get vb.net examples on EXCHANGE 5.5 examples on how to create a mailbox from a client machine. I have checked the MS site everything is in VB6 and when trying to convert it , it gives lots of hassles ! Thank you. Regards, Carlos Magalhaes - This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed, whose privacy should be respected. Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Trencor Group, or any of its representatives, unless specifically stated. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, error free or without virus contamination. The sender therefore accepts no liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, nor for any virus infection that might result from opening this message. Trencor is not responsible in the event of any third party interception of this email. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Trencor, visit www.trencor.net http://www.trencor.net Can anyone point me to the correct site where I can get vb.net examples on EXCHANGE 5.5 examples on how to create a mailbox from a client machine. I have checked the MS site everything is in VB6 and when trying to convert it , it gives lots of hassles ! Thank you. Regards, Carlos Magalhaes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Orphaned Delegates?
DS/IS Consistency Adjuster Cheers -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2002 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? Been there, done that, got that T-shirt more times than I care to think about. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? Good idea... I'll give it a go! Thx for your help! Run the resource kit utility Cleansweep and delete all rules - there will be one that doesn't have a name associated with it, and that's the delegate rule. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Orphaned Delegates? Exch 5.5 w/sp4 on NT4.0 OL2000 UserA assigns UserB delegate permissions with meeting request notification, UserB decides to seek greener pastures and leaves the company, UserB's exchange account gets deleted. Now... anyone sending a meeting request to UserA gets an NDR re: cannot deliver to UserB as the recipient name is not recognized. Even though UserB is no longer a listed delegate for UserA. Seems as though Exch is orphaning delegates and perhaps I will have to actually remove Delegate rights prior to removing exch accounts. Has anyone seen this or found a nice happy way to deal with this? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: webpopup
It uses port 445, see discussion from other mailing list below: These links discuss port 445. It's apparently used by SMB over TCP/IP, and is a new feature in Windows 2000/Active Directory (the first link is an official Microsoft doc, the second is a pretty good plain English discussion): http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q204279; http://ntsecurity.nu/papers/port445/ -Eric -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup Yes, strange behaviour if it isn't showing as open. I had a Messenger popup occur at home twice now even though a port scan shows 139 closed. I don't know how they are getting through. Steve -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup It isn't open!! Which is a concern... Thanks Vanessa -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 14:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup If port 139 is open on their firewall, they have bigger issues than Spam! -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup I believe this will clear it up for you. http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3 374542,00.html Stephen Grant IT/IM Officer Federal Superannuates National Association 1052 St. Laurent Blvd. Ottawa, ON K1K 3B4 tel: (613)745-2559 fax: (613)745-5457 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webpopup Apologies if this is totally off topic. All my exchange servers (could be conicidence) have shown webpopup messages, these are messages sent to the machine by ip address from who knows where, selling rubbish. How are they doing it? Using msg from command line requires terminal services which I am not running on these machines. Any ideas? Many thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
File - open ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khoi Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
You don't have to import it, just use file/open in outlook -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Services Failing to Start at Boot
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7001source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Brunt Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Services Failing to Start at Boot OK I have found this event message at another site now. It seems that this problem appears after Exchange SP2 has been applied to the server and then restarted. The message below is an actual event (except for the computer name) from the server in question. This only happe4ns when the server is restarted. The services start when they are manually started after logon. Is there a way I can make these services wait until the SA starts before they attempt to, or is there a known fix for this that I so far have not been able to locate? Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 13/10/2002 Time: 19:52:07 User: N/A Computer: SERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
Hmm.I believe this can be done in Outlook. Instead of using the Import option from the file menu, use the Open, then Personal Folder File. It should open it in another folder in Outlook, but not import the messages into your Inbox. John J. Steniger -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
Outlook works just fine -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khoi Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Yeah, Friday morning. I was so sick. Damn Disney! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? Did you guys get sick from the MEC Party at CA? I had food poisoning on Friday morning as well, and thought that maybe I was the only one. Personally, I thought two things sucked about that party. 1.) I paid $100 for a ticket to that party, so that my wife could go...then she couldn't go on the trip at all and I was stuck with it. 2) A ticket to Disneyland for the ENTIRE DAY would only have been $45. And here I was stuck with a ticket to an event that had like six rides open, lousy food and lots of beer for 4 hours. How stupid is that? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? It was alright I guess. I got sick also? I think food poisoning was the culprit in my case. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
Outlook. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/15/2002 9:25 AM Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham Scrambles. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: a wish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the address I think. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:55 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: a wish Subject: RE: a wish Well I tried to fudge Default message format and make it *.*, but it did not help. I also tried to fudge the SMTP Connector's address space - using ADSI Edit I was able to change it from * to *.*, but that did not help either. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: a wish Importance: High I wish the address space would take characters like a dot, then I could create a *.* address space. This way I would not have to see messages to someone@aol or someone@hotmail or someone@yahoocom etc sitting in my queues. On the other hand, shouldn't the server immediately bounce the message if the destination domain name cannot be resolved in DNS? This particular server is a relay for our Imail servers. I have an idea though. I am currently testing it in the lab. Exchange 2000 has a setting under Global Settings/Internet Message Formats. By default there is a just one settings there called default and it is set as * There is no way to change * using ESM, but I can change it using ADSI. I am going to change it to *.* and see if it helps (or screws everything up:) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com Complex Hosting in a Global Environment _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange server migration
If your in Native mode you could move the server in Site B to Site A. If your in mixed you can not. Mixed mode requires then rehoming PF and moving mailboxes using MS tools. - Original Message - From: Albert Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:27 AM Subject: Exchange server migration Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data from site B to site A. After migration, I want to turn off site B's server. Data currently on site B's exchange server is mailboxes and public folder (very large folders). Currently, both sites aren't in the same organisations. My questions are: - What are considerations I might thing about? - What tools do you recommand me to use? - Is there a procedure on how to do the migration? Maybe another question on this. What kind of hardware (CPU speed, memory, Hard drive space, etc) my server must be? I have about 20 users connecting through a mapi client (Outlook 2000). Our corporate databases are stored in public folders and users use them a lot. Albert Charron Trisotech Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've always preferred OWA myself. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eventid.net $$$
I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Wait a second If this is a test question, let us know next time. If you pulled this off a Microsoft test, you're in violation of the non disclosure you signed. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
Hex editor? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Outlook, Exchange client -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
http://www.wickett.net/ have a nice solution for this. Look up WN Mailkeeper. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private File, Open, Outlook Data File? -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server migration
I had a similar migration going from sbs4.5 (site1) to sbs2k (site2) Used exmerge and it went like a dream but I din't have public folders and as far as i recall, public folders cannot be done. There are some articles on technet (see sbs2000 upgrade migration white papers) which tell you how to go about this. You'll need a decent amount of disk space as exmerge copies users mailboxes to individual *.pst files which are then imported. (make sure you check the attributes of the pst files - sometimes can put a readonly which must be taken off) Make sure your users clear out as much cr*p out of their mailboxes. I've got some notes if you'd like me to pmail them to you? Rob -Original Message- From: Albert Charron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server migration Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data from site B to site A. After migration, I want to turn off site B's server. Data currently on site B's exchange server is mailboxes and public folder (very large folders). Currently, both sites aren't in the same organisations. My questions are: - What are considerations I might thing about? - What tools do you recommand me to use? - Is there a procedure on how to do the migration? Maybe another question on this. What kind of hardware (CPU speed, memory, Hard drive space, etc) my server must be? I have about 20 users connecting through a mapi client (Outlook 2000). Our corporate databases are stored in public folders and users use them a lot. Albert Charron Trisotech Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Orphaned Delegates?
That's an awefully big stick to be swinging at such a small problem. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Phil Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? DS/IS Consistency Adjuster Cheers -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2002 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Orphaned Delegates? Been there, done that, got that T-shirt more times than I care to think about. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? Good idea... I'll give it a go! Thx for your help! Run the resource kit utility Cleansweep and delete all rules - there will be one that doesn't have a name associated with it, and that's the delegate rule. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Orphaned Delegates? Exch 5.5 w/sp4 on NT4.0 OL2000 UserA assigns UserB delegate permissions with meeting request notification, UserB decides to seek greener pastures and leaves the company, UserB's exchange account gets deleted. Now... anyone sending a meeting request to UserA gets an NDR re: cannot deliver to UserB as the recipient name is not recognized. Even though UserB is no longer a listed delegate for UserA. Seems as though Exch is orphaning delegates and perhaps I will have to actually remove Delegate rights prior to removing exch accounts. Has anyone seen this or found a nice happy way to deal with this? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: a wish
A null from field is compliant with the RFC's for a number of good reasons. Also, I don't think you would want to pound on your (or anybody else's) DNS servers to do something not related to packet delivery. Besides, it wouldn't buy you much. Just because you have a positive DNS resolution, it implies neither that host exists (it can be proxied to another host where someone has invested in the name) nor that it that even if it does exist that a mailer daemon is running on it. That would require requesting a port connection, ostensibly for the purpose of passing SMTP packets. That much being said, this is but one of the many things that could be added to network functionality if DEN/CIM or DEN2 were universally adopted. A wise man once advised that one should be careful of what one asks for, because you might get it. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: a wish Well I tried to fudge Default message format and make it *.*, but it did not help. I also tried to fudge the SMTP Connector's address space - using ADSI Edit I was able to change it from * to *.*, but that did not help either. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: a wish Importance: High I wish the address space would take characters like a dot, then I could create a *.* address space. This way I would not have to see messages to someone@aol or someone@hotmail or someone@yahoocom etc sitting in my queues. On the other hand, shouldn't the server immediately bounce the message if the destination domain name cannot be resolved in DNS? This particular server is a relay for our Imail servers. I have an idea though. I am currently testing it in the lab. Exchange 2000 has a setting under Global Settings/Internet Message Formats. By default there is a just one settings there called default and it is set as * There is no way to change * using ESM, but I can change it using ADSI. I am going to change it to *.* and see if it helps (or screws everything up:) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com Complex Hosting in a Global Environment _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ???
Thanks for all the help! I got the users created with CSVDE. They start life with no passwords and password must be changed at next logon checked. I found an easy way to set all the passwords the same. I downloaded a 30 day eval of Hyena which let me select all the test accounts and uncheck the next logon box in one operation. It also let me set all the passwords at once (all to the same password). Thanks again for all the help. Tom -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? Not true. To set passwords all you need is account administrator rights (or better). === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? To set the passwords, you would need to use impersonation. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? I think the tough point he brought up is he wanted to also set the passwords for each account. My understanding it is not straight forward using scripts for AD. Hence the need for some 3rd party App. - Original Message - From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:05 PM Subject: RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? You can't do it with a csv unless you also write the script that reads the csv. I know I have a script around here somewhere that does it. There's one on our web site that will create a single mailbox. easy to modify for lots. I'll see if I can dig up the one that does lots and post that too. (http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm) All my scripts use perl instead of VB. There are VB samples around too on MSDN and the Comp^h^h^h^hHP ActiveAnswers web site (actually a good little set of scripts is available there). === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:48 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? Subject: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ??? I have a test server that I am trying to create a bunch of mailboxes (user1, user2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to do some benchmarking on the server. All I want to do is create mailboxes with unique email addresses (which requires an accompanying AD user account I believe) and I would like to also give them some default password if possible. I have been experimenting with CSVDE but so far I have only created disabled accounts which have no exchange mailbox. Does anyone know what the minimum amount of info I can put in the CSV file to accomplish this? Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List
Hello Friends; I am having a heck of a time with the Address Lists in E2K. I have setup a few address lists for different domains that we are hosting on our system. On one domain in particular they want a distribution group setup to send to everyone in the domain. So far so good. I setup a Distribution Group called [EMAIL PROTECTED] The address works great and the email gets to everyone just fine. Here is the problem. In their Address List, using the filter builder, I can get the users listed just fine or I can the Distribution Group listed just fine, but not both. My filters look a lot like: User - Email Address - Does - End With - *thedomain.com User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - Administrator* User - Alias - Does NOT - Start With - IUSR* At this point, it brings up all of the recipients with no problem. If I add: Group - Alias - Does - Start With - staff* I get No results found. If I just run the Group line by itself, I get the group but no users. Can anyone offer some advice on this? I appreciate it. Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
Also, if it is burned to a CD, you will have read only access to the .pst file. You will need to copy it to your hard drive or wherever, in order to do anything more than read. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've always preferred OWA myself. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eventid.net $$$
You might want to invest in the new Hotmail grammar checker first. ;* -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eventid.net $$$
Been doing it for months -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eventid.net $$$
I recommend the Precht Enterprise Subscription Service. Unlimited access to all events. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Hi there OOppsss... Where did I error? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K
Exchange 2k, SP3 Win2k, SP3. I was running an Exchange2k server which needed to be rebuilt (server A). I moved all mailboxes across to another E2K server (server B) and rebuilt the original server which became the new main E2K server (server C). I then moved the mailboxes and public folders across from Server B to Server C. All well and good. However I now have three E2K servers in my organisation and I can't seem to delete Server A. I know what I did wrong (ie I didn't decommission it properly) but how do I get rid of this machine from my current E2K organisation? All traces of the original machine appear to have gone in AD, it is only System Manager that displays it (though there are one or two minor authentication issues). Please help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Viewer of PST - Thanks
Hi Exchangers, First of all, thank you so much for your advice on this question. I have tried your suggestion, and it worked perfectly. This is what I really wanted. Thanks again for your help. -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Well, one pendantic point and one possibly not so much... If you don't back up all of the databases within the same /storage group/ in a backup job, the logs won't be purged. And, disabling circular logging, while a nice option in general doesn't solve the original problem as stated... In fact if it were really enabled it would only exacerbate the problem. Disabling might be appropriate after the root problem were resolved. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi there OOppsss... Where did I error? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Embassy Suites had great breakfasts as well...eggs cooked to order, french toast and pancakes, doughnuts...and it was free. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham Scrambles. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Share address book with another company.
I am looking into sharing our Exchange address book with a company we work closely with. We both use Exchange 2000 and contact each other frequesntly. Is there an easy way to keep an updated list between 2 companies without joining Active Directory? Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eventid.net $$$
Am I missing something? What does eventid.net provide that TechNet and Deja don't 10x over? I used it once or twice just out of curiosity (but didn't inhale), and found it to be less than useful. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Eventid.net $$$ Just like a drug pusher. They get you hooked on their product for free. Then when you're hooked they start charging you up the nose (pardon the pun). -- From: Tony Hlabse Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Share address book with another company.
There are surprisingly few products that fall along these lines. As such, I will make a shameless plug for my own company's product, Furnace. http://www.infonition.com/furnace.shtml This product synchronizes two Exchange organizations' directory and free/busy information. We are also looking to add public folder synchronization to this product as well. I am looking into sharing our Exchange address book with a company we work closely with. We both use Exchange 2000 and contact each other frequesntly. Is there an easy way to keep an updated list between 2 companies without joining Active Directory? Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K
I would suggest using ADSIEdit. 1. Start | Run | mmc | OK 2. Console | Add/Remove Snap-in 3. Add button | ADSI Edit | Add | Close 4. OK 5. Right click on ADSI Edit and choose Connect to... 6. Under Naming Context select Configuration Container | OK 7. Expand Configuration Container | expand CN=Configuration,DC=domain 8. Expand CN=Services | CN=Microsoft Exchange | CN=organization name 9. Expand CN=Administrative Groups, CN=administrative group | CN=Servers You should now see a listing of your Exchange servers. Blast Server A. This will remove Server A from AD entirely which will remove it from the Exchange System Manager. Let me know if you have any questions or issues. Exchange 2k, SP3 Win2k, SP3. I was running an Exchange2k server which needed to be rebuilt (server = A). I moved all mailboxes across to another E2K server (server B) and rebuilt = the original server which became the new main E2K server (server C). I then = moved the mailboxes and public folders across from Server B to Server C. All well and good. However I now have three E2K servers in my organisation and I can't seem = to delete Server A. I know what I did wrong (ie I didn't decommission it properly) but how do I get rid of this machine from my current E2K organisation? All traces of the original machine appear to have gone in = AD, it is only System Manager that displays it (though there are one or two = minor authentication issues). Please help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eventid.net $$$
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, at 2:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I missing something? What does eventid.net provide that TechNet and Deja don't 10x over? Easier and more precise search capability, and a database tailored to the particular problem domain. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Share address book with another company.
Simplesync, LDSU from Compaq and MMS from Microsoft will all do it, IIRC. In addition, you could just use LDAP queries. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Share address book with another company. I am looking into sharing our Exchange address book with a company we work closely with. We both use Exchange 2000 and contact each other frequesntly. Is there an easy way to keep an updated list between 2 companies without joining Active Directory? Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Hi Chris Thanks for the answer. I appreciate it :) Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Well, one pendantic point and one possibly not so much... If you don't back up all of the databases within the same /storage group/ in a backup job, the logs won't be purged. And, disabling circular logging, while a nice option in general doesn't solve the original problem as stated... In fact if it were really enabled it would only exacerbate the problem. Disabling might be appropriate after the root problem were resolved. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi there OOppsss... Where did I error? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K question
It is a sample question! Man what a mistake it was to post this. Give this list something to dwell on, they will. - John Q - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:05 AM Subject: RE: E2K question Wait a second If this is a test question, let us know next time. If you pulled this off a Microsoft test, you're in violation of the non disclosure you signed. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K
I don't see ADSI Edit as an option. Where do I find/install it? Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K I would suggest using ADSIEdit. 1. Start | Run | mmc | OK 2. Console | Add/Remove Snap-in 3. Add button | ADSI Edit | Add | Close 4. OK 5. Right click on ADSI Edit and choose Connect to... 6. Under Naming Context select Configuration Container | OK 7. Expand Configuration Container | expand CN=Configuration,DC=domain 8. Expand CN=Services | CN=Microsoft Exchange | CN=organization name 9. Expand CN=Administrative Groups, CN=administrative group | CN=Servers You should now see a listing of your Exchange servers. Blast Server A. This will remove Server A from AD entirely which will remove it from the Exchange System Manager. Let me know if you have any questions or issues. Exchange 2k, SP3 Win2k, SP3. I was running an Exchange2k server which needed to be rebuilt (server = A). I moved all mailboxes across to another E2K server (server B) and rebuilt = the original server which became the new main E2K server (server C). I then = moved the mailboxes and public folders across from Server B to Server C. All well and good. However I now have three E2K servers in my organisation and I can't seem = to delete Server A. I know what I did wrong (ie I didn't decommission it properly) but how do I get rid of this machine from my current E2K organisation? All traces of the original machine appear to have gone in = AD, it is only System Manager that displays it (though there are one or two = minor authentication issues). Please help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Let me say also that I probably enjoyed the List party most of all. I got to meet all of my heroes/heroines at one time. Thanks folks for accepting me as one of your own. People I now count as friends: Andy David, Andy Webb (BTW...thanks again for the hat), Darcy Adams, Martin Blackstone, Gary Slinger, Ed Crowley, Ed Woodrich, Victor Fisher, Kevin Miller, Erik Sojka, Martin Tuip, Matt Cross, Tom Meunier, Chris Scharff, Doug Hampshire, Seigfried Weber, et al. Every single one of these people (regardless of their sometimes cynical comments online) ;o), is truly a very sociable and fun person to be around. I enjoyed meeting you all. Thanks again and I'll see you next year or at TechEd. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? It was alright I guess. I got sick also? I think food poisoning was the culprit in my case. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: re-join a site MSX55 server
Original scenario 1MSX55 organization 1 site 2 servers (A+B) MSX55+SP4 then DL were rehomed from Server B to serverA, we forgot about the public folders. we removed server B from exchange site server B is still complete...how can we rejoin server B to the site or put back the public folders so users in server A can see the contents? currently users is server A see the Public Folder structure but are not able to see the contents...because all the data is in serverB will be sufficent to copy from server B to server A \exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb ? thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: re-join a site MSX55 server
Sounds like a disaster recovery project. - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:23 PM Subject: RE: re-join a site MSX55 server Original scenario 1MSX55 organization 1 site 2 servers (A+B) MSX55+SP4 then DL were rehomed from Server B to serverA, we forgot about the public folders. we removed server B from exchange site server B is still complete...how can we rejoin server B to the site or put back the public folders so users in server A can see the contents? currently users is server A see the Public Folder structure but are not able to see the contents...because all the data is in serverB will be sufficent to copy from server B to server A \exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb ? thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K
Then it may be too dangerous for you :) -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K I don't see ADSI Edit as an option. Where do I find/install it? Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K I would suggest using ADSIEdit. 1. Start | Run | mmc | OK 2. Console | Add/Remove Snap-in 3. Add button | ADSI Edit | Add | Close 4. OK 5. Right click on ADSI Edit and choose Connect to... 6. Under Naming Context select Configuration Container | OK 7. Expand Configuration Container | expand CN=Configuration,DC=domain 8. Expand CN=Services | CN=Microsoft Exchange | CN=organization name 9. Expand CN=Administrative Groups, CN=administrative group | CN=Servers You should now see a listing of your Exchange servers. Blast Server A. This will remove Server A from AD entirely which will remove it from the Exchange System Manager. Let me know if you have any questions or issues. Exchange 2k, SP3 Win2k, SP3. I was running an Exchange2k server which needed to be rebuilt (server = A). I moved all mailboxes across to another E2K server (server B) and rebuilt = the original server which became the new main E2K server (server C). I then = moved the mailboxes and public folders across from Server B to Server C. All well and good. However I now have three E2K servers in my organisation and I can't seem = to delete Server A. I know what I did wrong (ie I didn't decommission it properly) but how do I get rid of this machine from my current E2K organisation? All traces of the original machine appear to have gone in = AD, it is only System Manager that displays it (though there are one or two = minor authentication issues). Please help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Orphaned Delegates?
Hi Roger, Bigger the better :-) I'll have a look at Cleansweep, does it clean the Public Folder permissions too? Cheers -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 16 October 2002 2:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? That's an awefully big stick to be swinging at such a small problem. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Phil Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? DS/IS Consistency Adjuster Cheers -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2002 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? Been there, done that, got that T-shirt more times than I care to think about. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? Good idea... I'll give it a go! Thx for your help! Run the resource kit utility Cleansweep and delete all rules - there will be one that doesn't have a name associated with it, and that's the delegate rule. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Orphaned Delegates? Exch 5.5 w/sp4 on NT4.0 OL2000 UserA assigns UserB delegate permissions with meeting request notification, UserB decides to seek greener pastures and leaves the company, UserB's exchange account gets deleted. Now... anyone sending a meeting request to UserA gets an NDR re: cannot deliver to UserB as the recipient name is not recognized. Even though UserB is no longer a listed delegate for UserA. Seems as though Exch is orphaning delegates and perhaps I will have to actually remove Delegate rights prior to removing exch accounts. Has anyone seen this or found a nice happy way to deal with this? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MEC 2002 comments?
I thought it were the mints that Tom gave us or the scrambled toasts ? ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham Scrambles. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
What were those mints called again? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I thought it were the mints that Tom gave us or the scrambled toasts ? ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham Scrambles. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Great Party! Thanks again Andy and Kim! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? Let me say also that I probably enjoyed the List party most of all. I got to meet all of my heroes/heroines at one time. Thanks folks for accepting me as one of your own. People I now count as friends: Andy David, Andy Webb (BTW...thanks again for the hat), Darcy Adams, Martin Blackstone, Gary Slinger, Ed Crowley, Ed Woodrich, Victor Fisher, Kevin Miller, Erik Sojka, Martin Tuip, Matt Cross, Tom Meunier, Chris Scharff, Doug Hampshire, Seigfried Weber, et al. Every single one of these people (regardless of their sometimes cynical comments online) ;o), is truly a very sociable and fun person to be around. I enjoyed meeting you all. Thanks again and I'll see you next year or at TechEd. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? It was alright I guess. I got sick also? I think food poisoning was the culprit in my case. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MEC 2002 comments?
I'm 'so' not going to send that out .. most contentfilters would bounce my message ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:15 AM Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? What were those mints called again? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I thought it were the mints that Tom gave us or the scrambled toasts ? ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham Scrambles. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Re: Share address book with another company.
www.cps-systems.com offers Simple Sync. I've heard good comments from it as well and a lot cheaper then MMS. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:06 PM Subject: RE: Share address book with another company. Simplesync, LDSU from Compaq and MMS from Microsoft will all do it, IIRC. In addition, you could just use LDAP queries. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Share address book with another company. I am looking into sharing our Exchange address book with a company we work closely with. We both use Exchange 2000 and contact each other frequesntly. Is there an easy way to keep an updated list between 2 companies without joining Active Directory? Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
That is wrong. http://www.wickett.net/ (yes, Mark, you already posted this but I wanted all to have the correct facts) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 13:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Also, if it is burned to a CD, you will have read only access to the .pst file. You will need to copy it to your hard drive or wherever, in order to do anything more than read. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've always preferred OWA myself. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
That is wrong in what sense? I agree that Dale is wrong, but does Mailkeeper have to do with whether or not a PST file can be opened from a CD? As long as you're correcting facts, by all means do correct them; don't leave us hanging. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/15/2002 7:15 PM Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private That is wrong. http://www.wickett.net/ (yes, Mark, you already posted this but I wanted all to have the correct facts) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 13:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Also, if it is burned to a CD, you will have read only access to the .pst file. You will need to copy it to your hard drive or wherever, in order to do anything more than read. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've always preferred OWA myself. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: automated replies
The enemy of my OOF reply is a friend of mine. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies Oh come on, Oh Great One. We know you're evil, demented, and disgusting, but you still wouldn't help _spammers_. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies I just gather up all their email addresses and sell them in bulk to spammers. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies Set up their subscriptions to a public folder OR Set up to another, non-generating OOO email address OR Set their status to NOMAIL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 03:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies So what do you tell them then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies Just every one you get Reply back with something like this ... Can you stop OOOs and autoreplies from hitting the discussion list ? Thanks. Half the time I get a response and most of the time, the people are like, how do I do that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies What do you think you're the only one or something? Hey everyone get off the freeway cause B. van Ouwerkerk is coming and he demands special treatment. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B. van Ouwerkerk Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: automated replies Hi, Could you fine ppl please prevent your mailclient from sending out of the office replies when the message comes from a list The original subject of this messages was out of the office replies.. but that got rejected.. TIA, B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Fine. I'll work for intelligent people. When said customer's got molten slag for a server and is begging me to return and fix things, I'll do so, provided it's on my terms. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Some customers will say: you are just trying to cut corners and give me a cheap solution or you don't know crap about clusters, I have been to such-and-such conference where Bill Gates himself pull the power cable -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question After disabling circular logging and firing the moron who turned it on in the first place. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question e. perform full online nightly backups of entire storage group. :o) William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K question
Logs are only overwritten after they've been committed. On a sufficiently crappy box, the log files could definitely pile up. Of course, on a sufficiently crappy box, log files pile up for all kinds of reasons... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Actually, there wouldn't necessarily be only one log; in fact there'd likely be more than one. but I don't see how circular logging would result in more logs than one would typically find in an environment where circular logging were disabled. A seems to be the least likely of any of the possible answers. B can likely be discounted because Microsoft thinks everything can be solved through software, leaving one to choose between the almost equally bad answers of C D. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K question Because if you had circular logging enabaled it would prevent the purging of the logs. And more importantly there would only be one log. So it was misleading, and confusing. What I should have asked was, do you need to backup the entire Storage group to purge the logs? I know that there is only a transaction log per storage group, but I did not see any reference to any items describing when logs are purged or not. Even in the Microsoft Disaster Recovery Plan Exchange 2000 paper, but I'm still reading. - John Q - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: E2K question Why would you think A, 'disabling circular logging' would be the correct answer? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
I think I liked Boston the best. It's nice to have a MEC in a *real* city. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? You're comparing _ANY_ MEC to Boston..??? Chriminey, I could've hosted MEC in my garage and it'd been better than Boston. Dallas was the second worst venue, imo. Search the archives for a rehash of reasons; I've instigated enough already. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Share address book with another company.
Also you might consider the InterOrg utility, ADC with an interorganizational CA, or Microsoft Mail DirSync (unsupported but can be made to work). Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Share address book with another company. Simplesync, LDSU from Compaq and MMS from Microsoft will all do it, IIRC. In addition, you could just use LDAP queries. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Share address book with another company. I am looking into sharing our Exchange address book with a company we work closely with. We both use Exchange 2000 and contact each other frequesntly. Is there an easy way to keep an updated list between 2 companies without joining Active Directory? Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K
Install the Windows 2000 System Tools. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel L. Miller Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K I don't see ADSI Edit as an option. Where do I find/install it? Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K I would suggest using ADSIEdit. 1. Start | Run | mmc | OK 2. Console | Add/Remove Snap-in 3. Add button | ADSI Edit | Add | Close 4. OK 5. Right click on ADSI Edit and choose Connect to... 6. Under Naming Context select Configuration Container | OK 7. Expand Configuration Container | expand CN=Configuration,DC=domain 8. Expand CN=Services | CN=Microsoft Exchange | CN=organization name 9. Expand CN=Administrative Groups, CN=administrative group | CN=Servers You should now see a listing of your Exchange servers. Blast Server A. This will remove Server A from AD entirely which will remove it from the Exchange System Manager. Let me know if you have any questions or issues. Exchange 2k, SP3 Win2k, SP3. I was running an Exchange2k server which needed to be rebuilt (server = A). I moved all mailboxes across to another E2K server (server B) and rebuilt = the original server which became the new main E2K server (server C). I then = moved the mailboxes and public folders across from Server B to Server C. All well and good. However I now have three E2K servers in my organisation and I can't seem = to delete Server A. I know what I did wrong (ie I didn't decommission it properly) but how do I get rid of this machine from my current E2K organisation? All traces of the original machine appear to have gone in = AD, it is only System Manager that displays it (though there are one or two = minor authentication issues). Please help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loadsim for exchange 5.5 - STG_E_FILENOTFOUND
I'm having some problems with loadsim for exchange 5.5 I am able to create the topology (creating the mailboxes on the exchange 5.5 server) but when I try to initialize the test (which populates the mailboxes with bogus e-mails and folders based on criteria I have specified) it returns the error OLE: STGOPENSTORAGE (Ups1k.msg): Error: STG_E_FILENOTFOUND . I found the Microsoft article that says to save the .sim file in the same directory as the .msg files. I tried that but I still have the same problem. Any suggestions? Thanks - Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
