RE: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899

[Steve Molkentin]

Larry = pst = bad.

themolk.

P.S. I wish he was the M:\ drive...

> -Original Message-
> From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, 17 October 2003 7:41 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: FW: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899
> 
> UNLOCK Digital Cable - FREE!
> 
> ***NEWEST VERSION - Released September 4,  2003***
> 
> * Sporting PPVs like Wrestling & Boxing
> * Adult Channels
> * Special Musical Concerts
> * Blockbuster New Release PPV Movies
> 
> Cheapest Price on the NET !! Only $39 !
> 
> 
> http://www.noveltynet2003.biz/promo.php?id=93758
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Take off list:
> http://www.noveltynet2003.biz/1/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899

[Larry]

UNLOCK Digital Cable - FREE!

***NEWEST VERSION - Released September 4,  2003***

* Sporting PPVs like Wrestling & Boxing
* Adult Channels 
* Special Musical Concerts 
* Blockbuster New Release PPV Movies

Cheapest Price on the NET !! Only $39 !


http://www.noveltynet2003.biz/promo.php?id=93758


 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Take off list:
http://www.noveltynet2003.biz/1/




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...

[Mike Anderson]

Hello everyone,

I am running Exchange 2000 on an internal server.  I am publishing the
SMTP Service on my ISA Box, and I am routing all my mail to Xwall (a
popular Spam package) which in turn routes mail to the Exchange Box.
Xwall runs on Port 25, and Exchange SMTP (incoming) runs on Port 24 (so
they can both coexist on the same box).

Since Xwall has no knowledge of the users on the system, it accepts ALL
stinking e-mail messages, and then forwards them to the Exchange box.
Since spammers use blind name lists, attempting to get lucky, and hit
all the possible [EMAIL PROTECTED], the Exchange Server wants to send NDR
reports to EACH and EVERY piece of Spam mail that comes into the system.

So as you can imagine, I have thousands of messages queued up - and it
takes FOREVER for a LEGIT message, initiated from a user on the system,
to actually make it out of the system and reach the remote mail server
for delivery - because it's competing with all these outgoing NDR (and
whatever else) messages.

What can I do???  Short of running Exchange Raw - so it can deny the
message on the spot (since it has direct knowledge of the users on the
system), I don't know what else to do.

Can anybody help?  Are there other suggestions I can try, in order to
reduce my mail congestion problem?

Thanks in advance,

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please check my setup

[Erick Thompson]

I'm doing a fairly massive reconfiguration of my email infrastructure, and I would 
really appreciate it if you could check my setup for problems. The system will behave 
in the following way. I have two servers, an external web server, and an internal 
Exchange 2000 server. I set up an SMTP Relay on the web server, with the outgoing 
connections set to use port 27. Also on the web server is the SpamCatcher service 
(which listens on all IP addresses), which is an SMTP server that I've set to listen 
on port 27. The SpamCatcher SMTP server then relays all email directly to the Exchange 
server (via port 25), which is on the internal network.

An assumption that I've made is that the web server Win2k SMTP should only handle 
incoming SMTP traffic, and so the setting of port 30 for outgoing connections 
shouldn't cause any problems, as the default SMTP virtual server on the Exchange 
server will handle all outgoing connections (no smart relay host configured). Is this 
correct?

In addition, I have another domain that is a subdomain of my primary domain (nbr.org). 
Email sent to this domain are in the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The vast majority of 
emails sent are delivered directly to lists.nbr.org, which is a Lyris SMTP server that 
is also on the web server. However, some SMTP servers are very ill behaved, and send 
email to lists.nbr.org to the MX server for nbr.org. This means that these emails end 
up in Exchange. On Exchange's default virtual SMTP server, I'm going to forward all 
mail with unresolved recipients to the Lyris IP on the web server. Is this the best 
way to handle this situation, or would a connector be a better solution?

Thanks,
Erick

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA and URLScan-Blocked Special Characters

[Martin, Jon]

OK, we all know that when you run Urlscan on an Exchange server that you will not be 
able to view certain notes in OWA, specifically those notes with special characters in 
the subject line. The special characters are below, along with the reason, according 
to MS documentation, that these should be blocked.

..  Allows directory traversals
./  Allows trailing dot on a directory name
\   Allows backslashes in URL
%   Allows escaping after normalization
&   Allows multiple CGI processes to run on a single request


My management wants these characters unblocked. To prevent this I need a better 
understanding of what potential problems are being prevented by the disabling of these 
characters. The above explanation in the MS documentation is probably not going to be 
sufficient. 

Does anyone have a more detailed explanation of the possible exploits being blocked by 
disabling these characters??

Thanks.


Jon Martin



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Missing Meetings in Outlook 2000

[Greg Evans]

I have a user that is unable to view meetings in her Outlook Calendar. 
The date that the meeting occurs is in bold, but when you look at the date
there are no meetings that appear for that day.  To make things more
interesting,  I had her log into our Outlook Web Access, and all of her
meetings were there.  To make sure it wasn't her computer I had her log
into a different XP box, same thing, no meetings.  Has anybody come across
this issue before??


List of Products: Exchange 2K SP3, Outlook 2K, Outlook Web Access, Windows
XP Pro SP 1a

Greg

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2003 Install Problems

[Peter Orlowski]

Who are you installing Exchange as?  Try installing it as the user you
specified as the Exchange Admin during the Forestprep/domainprep steps.  

You will probably need to delegate control to your user account as that
superuser to be able to install Exchange 2003.

This is what I had to do to install it into my 5.5 environment.  

- Peter

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 Install Problems

I am installing the first 2003 server in a 5.5 site.

I have done all the forest and domain prep work as well as the rest using
the excellent "guide" they now have when installing Exchange 2003.
BUT .  .  . when installing the server itself I get this error when trying
to select the Messaging and Collaboration components for install:

The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Servicfes"
cannot be assigned the action "install" because:
- You either do not have permissions to complete this operation or Active
Directory has not replicated all the necessary permissions for the deleted
items container. Please check that you have the necessary permissions to
modify Exchange components and that replication is complete before running
setup.

The account I am logged in with has domain admin rights in the parent domain
and child domain (exchange getting installed in the child domain),
enterprise domain and schema rights in the parent domain and Org and Site
rights in the 5.5 Exchange site.

I found KB article kb817378 which talks about having not run /domainprep in
the parent domain, which I hadnt. Just /forestprep.
So I went back and ran /domainprep as well. It then said I also had to
configure RUS in the parent domain OR have a GC in the child domain. I have
1 GC in the parent domain and 2 GC's in the child domain. I tried to install
RUS in the parent domain but on the second step of the wizard where you
select the computer Exchange is running on is greyed out and I can do
nothing but cancel. I am assuming this is as I dont have Exchange installed
anywhere? Why would this be the fix then for not being able to complete an
Exchange install?

any ideas?

tia

chris



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2003 Install Problems

[Chris H]

I am installing the first 2003 server in a 5.5 site.

I have done all the forest and domain prep work as well as the rest using
the excellent "guide" they now have when installing Exchange 2003.
BUT .  .  . when installing the server itself I get this error when trying
to select the Messaging and Collaboration components for install:

The component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Servicfes"
cannot be assigned the action "install" because:
- You either do not have permissions to complete this operation or Active
Directory has not replicated all the necessary permissions for the deleted
items container. Please check that you have the necessary permissions to
modify Exchange components and that replication is complete before running
setup.

The account I am logged in with has domain admin rights in the parent domain
and child domain (exchange getting installed in the child domain),
enterprise domain and schema rights in the parent domain and Org and Site
rights in the 5.5 Exchange site.

I found KB article kb817378 which talks about having not run /domainprep in
the parent domain, which I hadnt. Just /forestprep.
So I went back and ran /domainprep as well. It then said I also had to
configure RUS in the parent domain OR have a GC in the child domain. I have
1 GC in the parent domain and 2 GC's in the child domain. I tried to install
RUS in the parent domain but on the second step of the wizard where you
select the computer Exchange is running on is greyed out and I can do
nothing but cancel. I am assuming this is as I dont have Exchange installed
anywhere? Why would this be the fix then for not being able to complete an
Exchange install?

any ideas?

tia

chris



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SMTP relay to a nonstandard port

[Erick Thompson]

Is there any way to use the Windows 2000 SMTP relay to route email for a particular 
domain to a non-standard port on another server? When I set the host for the relay, 
along with the port, I get an error that "the domain name is not valid". If I don't 
specify the port, I don't get the error.

Thanks,
Erick

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can't recover some deleted public folders

[MS Exchange List]

Hello,

I've had this happen in our environment, and so far the only thing I can
trace it to is PFs created pre-Exchang2K and the upgrade.

There are various Q articles that'll recommend ISINTEG, and some other
things.  You should obviously give those a shot, but they never solved
the problem for us.

One thing we're able to do is to KILL the recovery process before it
hits that corrupt message (or whatever it is).  That recovers the folder
and all of its messages up to the point you kill it off.  It takes some
timing and practice to maximize the number of messages you get.

Of course you can also DR the PF from the last backup, etc...

On Google I remember reading a post from someone that said they just
kept trying and trying and it finally recovered.  We did quite a bit of
that without success.

I haven't searched the KB since May for this issue, maybe PSS has gotten
around to posting a workound by now.

Good luck, if you find success please post it,

Brent


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:15 PM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Conversation: Can't recover some deleted public folders
Subject: Can't recover some deleted public folders


Hi all.

We are having a hard time trying to recover some public folders that
have been deleted (using Tools->Recover Deleted Items)

With Outlook 2000, we get an immediate error message saying that we
don't have permissions to do this. (We do have all the permissions
needed)

With Outlook 2003, the recovery process starts and goes to ~75% and then
the error message pops up telling us that we don't have permissions.
Funny that while the recovery process is running, we can see the
subfolder that is being recovered, and even grab some messages out of it
using another instance of Outlook.

But once the error message pops up - poof, the subfolder that was being
recovered disappears.

We know that in some cases antivirus programs could cause something like
this, so we made sure to turn them off.

What else could be throwing it off?

Thanks!



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can't recover some deleted public folders

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Weird thing, we just explained to the user who actually deleted the PF
how to use DumpsterAlwaysOn, and she was able to recover the PF.



-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Can't recover some deleted public folders

Hi There,

  This is happerning because the folder is 'tombstoned' in your
direcyry.
This means if its recovered, the GUIDbound to it is picked up by the
system attendant again and is deleted.

  The way to get arround thsi to so:

1.  Restore the folder in a non production environement
2.  sweep the contents to a PST
3.  Re-create a new folder (will create new GUIDS so it can be the same
name).
4.  Copy the contents of teh PST into your production environement.

  I had the same thing happen to me, but I have my public server and
each
tree nested in 5 servers worldwide. That was a real mess as I had to
restore 5 servers in the lab and do this process 5 times to fully
recover!

  Hope this helps.

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PF wierdness

[Hatley, Ken]

Hey guys, I am using MicroEye's script director to document forms in our Ex5.5 
environment.  The tool is hanging on a folder and I am currently having them custom 
code something for me.  I am trying to go ahead and fix the problem for myself to save 
time and money but I can't avoid the hang.

In order to try to circumvent that particular folder I have removed all of my 
permissions and set default to none and not visible.  There are only two ACLS in the 
folder now...one is a dl that I am not a member of and one is the owner of the folder. 
 My issue is that it still hangs on that folder even though I should not even be able 
to see it.

When I open Outlook from the computer that script director uses I can't see the 
folder, but when I open Outlook from my laptop that is sitting right next to it I can 
see and manage the folder in question.  Script director uses CDO and Mapi, so my 
question is why can it see the folder from it and why can I see it from my laptop.  
This is driving me crazy.  I have tried every combination imaginable including not 
having my account as none and listing it with none and not visible but I can still 
access it.  Any ideas would be so greatly appreciated.  Replication is happening 
because I can look at the client permissions and the changes are taking place but I 
still have access.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can't recover some deleted public folders

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Doesn't sound like fun. Our PF store is 100GB. It takes a day and then
some to restore it from tape.




-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Can't recover some deleted public folders

Hi There,

  This is happerning because the folder is 'tombstoned' in your
direcyry.
This means if its recovered, the GUIDbound to it is picked up by the
system attendant again and is deleted.

  The way to get arround thsi to so:

1.  Restore the folder in a non production environement
2.  sweep the contents to a PST
3.  Re-create a new folder (will create new GUIDS so it can be the same
name).
4.  Copy the contents of teh PST into your production environement.

  I had the same thing happen to me, but I have my public server and
each
tree nested in 5 servers worldwide. That was a real mess as I had to
restore 5 servers in the lab and do this process 5 times to fully
recover!

  Hope this helps.

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

[MS Exchange Discussions]

It appears that MS03-046 (829436) is a duplicate of September Post SP3
Rollup.  I have checked several files to have the same date, size and
version.  SPMSG.DLL and SPUNINST.EXE is missing from the \Bin directory
however.  Should I reinstall it nonetheless?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 5:13 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions
Conversation: Hot off the Fixes
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes


Thank you very much for all your information!

Russell 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

The newsfeed is http://www.thundermain.com/rss/ I use NewsGator which
integrates with Outlook 

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

Hi Martin

Can you tell me how you did this?  I just downloaded a RSS newsreader
and I don't know how to get it to work with MS..

Thanks

Russell 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

I have an RSS newsfeed that tells me anytime MS makes a new download
available 

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

How did you hear about this (MS046)?  I'm subscribed to MS's security
bulletin service but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this
patch.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes


 
MS03-046 is listed as "critical" and involves somebody sending bogus
data to your smtp port.  In our case, the smtp port of our exchange
server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP
interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus
gateway and then to the exchange machine.  In this scenario, the bogus
smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server.  If
your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a
hurry to load that patch.

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hot off the Fixes

Anyone applied these yet?

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp

Ali

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ: 

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Ben Winzenz]

And I am saying you have to check with MS Licensing to get a straight
answer.  I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL included a license for
Outlook 2003.  Personally, I would not think that an Exchange 2000 CAL
covers Outlook 2003, but hey, I'm don't work for Microsoft.  They have
an 800 number you can call with licensing questions  1-800-642-7676. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:10 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Outlook 2003.
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.


I don't think I was totally clear. I was wondering if the Exchange CAL
allowed me to use Outlook 2003 only (not all of Office). I wouldn't
assume that it would allow me to use all of office. We're on Office 2k,
and will stick with that for a little bit longer, but I would like to
move to Outlook 2003.

Thanks,
Erick

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details.  I was told that 
> each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not

> all of Office.  I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's 
> do to this, though.  Again, to be sure, check with MS.  They are the 
> only ones authorized to quote official licensing.
> 
> 
> Ben Winzenz
> Network Engineer
> Gardner & White
> (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, 
> October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> Conversation: Outlook 2003.
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions?
> That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000.
> Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs?
> 
> Thanks,
> Erick
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> > 
> > 
> > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading
> from 2000
> > straight to 2003. What a difference!
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Outlook 2003.
> > 
> > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
> > Exchange
> > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running
> Outlook 2002
> 
> > on our client systems.
> >  
> > My question is...
> >  
> > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
> > Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues
> running it
> > against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions
> aside from
> > the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003
> will not be
> 
> > available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
> >  
> > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I
> have figured
> > out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
> > others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
> >  
> > Thanks
> >  
> > 
> > Ken Powell
> > Systems Administrator
> > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
> > Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> > Fax: (360) 759-6001
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Erick Thompson]

I don't think I was totally clear. I was wondering if the Exchange CAL allowed me to 
use Outlook 2003 only (not all of Office). I wouldn't assume that it would allow me to 
use all of office. We're on Office 2k, and will stick with that for a little bit 
longer, but I would like to move to Outlook 2003.

Thanks,
Erick

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details.  I was told that
> each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not
> all of Office.  I don't believe that you can use Exchange 
> 2000 CAL's do
> to this, though.  Again, to be sure, check with MS.  They are the only
> ones authorized to quote official licensing. 
> 
> 
> Ben Winzenz
> Network Engineer
> Gardner & White
> (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM
> Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> Conversation: Outlook 2003.
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions?
> That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000.
> Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs?
> 
> Thanks,
> Erick
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> > 
> > 
> > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading 
> from 2000 
> > straight to 2003. What a difference!
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Outlook 2003.
> > 
> > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
> > Exchange
> > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running 
> Outlook 2002
> 
> > on our client systems.
> >  
> > My question is...
> >  
> > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
> > Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues 
> running it 
> > against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions 
> aside from 
> > the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 
> will not be
> 
> > available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
> >  
> > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I 
> have figured 
> > out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
> > others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
> >  
> > Thanks
> >  
> > 
> > Ken Powell
> > Systems Administrator
> > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
> > Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> > Fax: (360) 759-6001
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Can't recover some deleted public folders

[Timothy Schilbach]

Hi There,

  This is happerning because the folder is 'tombstoned' in your direcyry.
This means if its recovered, the GUIDbound to it is picked up by the
system attendant again and is deleted.

  The way to get arround thsi to so:

1.  Restore the folder in a non production environement
2.  sweep the contents to a PST
3.  Re-create a new folder (will create new GUIDS so it can be the same
name).
4.  Copy the contents of teh PST into your production environement.

  I had the same thing happen to me, but I have my public server and each
tree nested in 5 servers worldwide. That was a real mess as I had to
restore 5 servers in the lab and do this process 5 times to fully recover!

  Hope this helps.

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question

[Timothy Schilbach]

Hi There,


  Thank for the reply. Yes it is, but I think I found the answer and the
solution. Its documented here:

http://www.winnetmag.com/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook/Article/ArticleID/25332/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook_25332.html


  This did the trick nicely by allowing me to increase the DS auery
intervals. I am also using NetIQ now to look at hung threads in the
Netlogon service.

  Technically the server wasnt 'down' but in software failure. I am going
to set NetIq to have a threshhold of so many dead threads and then restart
the Netlogon service.

  This can also be accomplished with MOM as well. Thanx all for the
support and have a wonderful day

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question

[Jason Clishe]

Is your other server (the one that didn't fail) also a GC? You'll have
all sorts of problems if you don't have a live GC anywhere on your
network.

JC 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy
Schilbach
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question

HI Everyone,

  We are running Ad in our environment with Exchange 2000. We have 2 AD
servers in the same site and only 1 server has all FSMO roles (we havent
gotten a chance to move them yet).

  For some reason when one of our DC's failed (the one with all the FSMO
roles), our other DC did not accept incomming authentication request,
directory lookups, or outlook clients logging into Exchange.

  I am trying to understand why this issue occurs when we have 2
dircetory servers and exchange is setup to use either of them. DNS is
all setup correctly as well and resolves to both servers. I even checked
the "_"
directories under the main DNS and manually verified that all SRV
records are in place.

  Can anyone render an explanation for this? Is it because one server
has all the FSMO roles? If so, which roles should I transfer to the
other servers?

-Timothy


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't recover some deleted public folders

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Hi all.

We are having a hard time trying to recover some public folders that
have been deleted (using Tools->Recover Deleted Items)

With Outlook 2000, we get an immediate error message saying that we
don't have permissions to do this. (We do have all the permissions
needed)

With Outlook 2003, the recovery process starts and goes to ~75% and then
the error message pops up telling us that we don't have permissions.
Funny that while the recovery process is running, we can see the
subfolder that is being recovered, and even grab some messages out of it
using another instance of Outlook.

But once the error message pops up - poof, the subfolder that was being
recovered disappears.

We know that in some cases antivirus programs could cause something like
this, so we made sure to turn them off.

What else could be throwing it off?

Thanks!



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR Question

[Gagrani, Kishore]

Thanks Bob.

Kishore

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME 
From exceeds maximum threshold - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum 
threshold

Make a distribution list that goes nowhere and put those email addresses
that you are getting spammed with there.  Acts as a blackhole, eating up
junk and never gives an NDR :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68


-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME
>From exceeds maximum threshold


I'm sorry , I meant blocking SMTP sender's NDR . Essentially trying to
block SPAMMERS a response for those mails which bounce back to them
because of a wrong e-mail address spelling or mail bound for someone who
no more exists with my company. As I wrote we'll manually monitor those
mails (as we already do now) in a separate exchange mailbox.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From
exceeds maximum threshold

Why would you do that?
NDR's are a very necessary tool. How is someone that is trying to email
the CEO know that his important message did not get delivered?

-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR Question

Hi everyone,

I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still
have copies of NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization
? I looked all KB but couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running
Exchange 2k-SP3.

Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly appreciated,

Thanks
Kishore

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=?
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=?
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=?=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Ken . Powell]

So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told
that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is
service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for
skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003.

At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go
straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they
say there.

Thanks again.


Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details.  I was told that each
Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of
Office.  I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this,
though.  Again, to be sure, check with MS.  They are the only ones
authorized to quote official licensing. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October
16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Outlook 2003.
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.


Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions?
That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000.
Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs?

Thanks,
Erick

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 
> straight to 2003. What a difference!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook 2003.
> 
> We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
> Exchange
> 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002

> on our client systems.
>  
> My question is...
>  
> Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
> Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it 
> against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from 
> the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be

> available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
>  
> I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured 
> out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
> others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> 
> Ken Powell
> Systems Administrator
> Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
> Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> Fax: (360) 759-6001
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Erik Sojka]

http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/howtobuy/LicensingFAQ.asp  This may answer
some of your questions.  I know it's confusing.  

Check with your licensing rep to be sure (and for your own legal protection).


You must have the latest version of an Exchange CAL in order to use the
latest version of the Outlook client.  The Outlook usage rights are separate
from Office (An Exchange CAL only grants the right to use Outlook, not the
entire Office suite).  

Ex2k3 CAL = right to install and use Outlook 2003 or earlier versions
Ex2k CAL  = right to install and use Outlook XP or earlier versions

In your situation (Exchange 2000 server, Full Office 2000 licenses) you
should be able to use those purchased copies of Outlook 2000 to connect to
the Exchange 2000 server.  You didn't mention CALs.  Assuming you also have
Exchange 2000 CALs, you should be fine to use Outlook 2000.  

In order to use Outlook 2003 to connect to your Exchange 2000 server, you
would need to do one of the following (I'm purposely excluding SA and other
similar programs):
1) purchase Outlook 2003
2) purchase Office 2003
3) purchase Exchange 2003 CALs (or comparable CAL)



> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other 
> versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and 
> licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on 
> workstations using the Exchange CALs?
> 
> Thanks,
> Erick
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> > 
> > 
> > Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000
> > straight to 2003. What a difference!
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Outlook 2003.
> > 
> > We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at 
> > moving to Exchange
> > 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running 
> > Outlook 2002 on
> > our client systems.
> >  
> > My question is...
> >  
> > Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops 
> > to Outlook
> > 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running 
> it against
> > Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from 
> > the fact that
> > features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be 
> > available to those
> > clients that still have Outlook 2002?
> >  
> > I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have 
> > figured out
> > where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
> > others so that
> > we can have a more gradual rollout.
> >  
> > Thanks
> >  
> > 
> > Ken Powell
> > Systems Administrator
> > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
> > Vancouver, Washington
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> > Fax: (360) 759-6001 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query

[Timothy Schilbach]

Hi All,

  How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now
its about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it
to fail over. Thans about 14 minutes too long for our executive staff.

  Any suggestions?

Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Chinnery, Paul]

I agree with checking with MS licensing rep however, I've never assumed that a license 
to use Outlook was a license to use Office but quite the opposite.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.


Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details.  I was told that
each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not
all of Office.  I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do
to this, though.  Again, to be sure, check with MS.  They are the only
ones authorized to quote official licensing. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Outlook 2003.
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.


Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions?
That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000.
Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs?

Thanks,
Erick

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 
> straight to 2003. What a difference!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook 2003.
> 
> We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
> Exchange
> 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002

> on our client systems.
>  
> My question is...
>  
> Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
> Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it 
> against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from 
> the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be

> available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
>  
> I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured 
> out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
> others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> 
> Ken Powell
> Systems Administrator
> Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
> Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> Fax: (360) 759-6001
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Ben Winzenz]

Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details.  I was told that
each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not
all of Office.  I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do
to this, though.  Again, to be sure, check with MS.  They are the only
ones authorized to quote official licensing. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Outlook 2003.
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.


Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions?
That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000.
Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs?

Thanks,
Erick

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 
> straight to 2003. What a difference!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook 2003.
> 
> We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
> Exchange
> 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002

> on our client systems.
>  
> My question is...
>  
> Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
> Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it 
> against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from 
> the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be

> available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
>  
> I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured 
> out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
> others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> 
> Ken Powell
> Systems Administrator
> Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
> Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> Fax: (360) 759-6001
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Erick Thompson]

Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have 
an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on 
workstations using the Exchange CALs?

Thanks,
Erick

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
> 
> 
> Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000
> straight to 2003. What a difference!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook 2003.
> 
> We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at 
> moving to Exchange
> 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running 
> Outlook 2002 on
> our client systems.
>  
> My question is...
>  
> Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops 
> to Outlook
> 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
> Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from 
> the fact that
> features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be 
> available to those
> clients that still have Outlook 2002?
>  
> I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have 
> figured out
> where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
> others so that
> we can have a more gradual rollout.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> 
> Ken Powell
> Systems Administrator
> Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
> Vancouver, Washington
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> Fax: (360) 759-6001 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question

[Timothy Schilbach]

HI Everyone,

  We are running Ad in our environment with Exchange 2000. We have 2 AD
servers
in the same site and only 1 server has all FSMO roles (we havent gotten a
chance to move them yet).

  For some reason when one of our DC's failed (the one with all the FSMO
roles), our other DC did not accept incomming authentication request,
directory lookups, or outlook clients logging into Exchange.

  I am trying to understand why this issue occurs when we have 2 dircetory
servers and exchange is setup to use either of them. DNS is all setup
correctly as well and resolves to both servers. I even checked the "_"
directories under the main DNS and manually verified that all SRV records
are in place.

  Can anyone render an explanation for this? Is it because one server has
all the FSMO roles? If so, which roles should I transfer to the other
servers?

-Timothy


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2000 Web Public Folder Setup Issue

[Timothy Schilbach]

Hi All,

  I am experiencing a wierd issue when making a new Web Store in Public
folders to develop in. I start by doing the following:

1.  Create a new Public Folder Tree
2.  Create a New Public store and bind it to new tree
3.  Create an HTTP entry in the HTTP protocals for the new tree and add
script permissions so I can develop in it.
4.  I add Frontpage Extension so I can develop via front page in it.
5.  I create a new folder in the ESM called Test1
6.  I create a virutual directory to the folder on the 'M' drive and
frontpage enable it.

Now all that goes fine. I am logging into the frontpage folder as the
'system administrator' and I can create my application without issue!

The problem I have is when I go an edit anything. Yes, Edit! I can create
and delete without issue. I cannot edit or modify anything as I dont have
permissions?

So I go to the ESM and look in that store and I look for the permissions
and
I grant my 'System Administrator' account full access under 'Client
Permissions'.

Now I go back and again, I can create and delete, but not modify. Where am
I
going wrong with this one?

Timothy H. Schilbach
Sr. Messaging Administrator
CenturyTel


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum threshold

[Bob Sadler]

Make a distribution list that goes nowhere and put those email addresses
that you are getting spammed with there.  Acts as a blackhole, eating up
junk and never gives an NDR :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME
>From exceeds maximum threshold


I'm sorry , I meant blocking SMTP sender's NDR . Essentially trying to
block SPAMMERS a response for those mails which bounce back to them
because of a wrong e-mail address spelling or mail bound for someone who
no more exists with my company. As I wrote we'll manually monitor those
mails (as we already do now) in a separate exchange mailbox. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From
exceeds maximum threshold

Why would you do that?
NDR's are a very necessary tool. How is someone that is trying to email
the CEO know that his important message did not get delivered?

-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR Question

Hi everyone,

I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still
have copies of NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization
? I looked all KB but couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running
Exchange 2k-SP3.

Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly appreciated,

Thanks
Kishore

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=?
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=?
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum threshold

[Gagrani, Kishore]

I'm sorry , I meant blocking SMTP sender's NDR . Essentially trying to block SPAMMERS 
a response for those mails which bounce back to them because of a wrong e-mail address 
spelling or mail bound for someone who no more exists with my company. As I wrote 
we'll manually monitor those mails (as we already do now) in a separate exchange 
mailbox. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds 
maximum threshold

Why would you do that?
NDR's are a very necessary tool. How is someone that is trying to email the
CEO know that his important message did not get delivered?

-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR Question

Hi everyone,

I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still have
copies of NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization ? I
looked all KB but couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running Exchange
2k-SP3.

Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly appreciated,

Thanks
Kishore

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=?
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=?=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Why would you do that?
NDR's are a very necessary tool. How is someone that is trying to email the
CEO know that his important message did not get delivered? 

-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR Question

Hi everyone,

I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still have
copies of NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization ? I
looked all KB but couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running Exchange
2k-SP3.

Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly appreciated, 

Thanks 
Kishore

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NDR Question

[Gagrani, Kishore]

Hi everyone,

I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still have copies of 
NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization ? I looked all KB but 
couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running Exchange 2k-SP3.

Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly appreciated, 

Thanks 
Kishore

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

Martin,

Here is the one for OL2003 causing issues with the Ex5.5 store.

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=829418
829418 - XADM: Information Store Intermittently Stops Responding and an
Access Violation Occurs in EcDSDNFromSz

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.


OL 2003 works great with Exchange 5.5
If you use OWA, there is hotfix you will want to install to ensure
compatability with OL2003 and E55 OWA users. There is also one for OL2003
rules that can cause issues with Exchange 5.5. If I could remember the KB
numbers I would post them. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver,
Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Arlo Clizer]

Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000
straight to 2003. What a difference!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Martin Blackstone]

OL 2003 works great with Exchange 5.5
If you use OWA, there is hotfix you will want to install to ensure
compatability with OL2003 and E55 OWA users. There is also one for OL2003
rules that can cause issues with Exchange 5.5. If I could remember the KB
numbers I would post them. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2003.

[Anthony Sollars]

There has been an issue raised with the store.exe service crashing with
outlook 2003 clients being used in some cases. MS has released a store.exe
patch that fixes it. One exch 5.5 server out 36 we have had this issue, and
the patch fixed it.

Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(  425.254.4845
)   425.681.4190
2   425.793.6000
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook 2003.

[Ken . Powell]

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FIXED RE: [Exchange2000] Problems with E2K SP3 bridgehead

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Sounds like that feature was an afterthought... I think it actually was.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions
Subject: FIXED RE: [Exchange2000] Problems with E2K SP3 bridgehead

Well it looks like a call to PSS has identified and shot down my
problem.

It seems there is a big difference in the way DNS queries are handled by
the SMTP VIRTUAL SERVER over DNS queries made through the Network
Properties function.  If a mail admin plugs DNS server IP addresses into
the SMTP VIRTUAL SERVER Delivery -> Advanced ->External DNS page,
Exchange will query these DNS servers rather than use the DNS servers
supplied via the Network Properties page.

That, by itself is not so bad, however, DNS queries made through the
SMTP VIRTUAL SERVER are SINGLE THREAD only. One message queue is
processed at a time and the DNS queries have to resolve or fail before
the next queue is processed. When it can take 20 seconds or more for a
DNS query to fail, that can be a significant amount of time to process a
long line of queues before starting over again.

Now this condition only comes into play when you have DNS entries in the
EXTERNAL DNS page, and use DNS to do the delivery of mail messages (no
smart host entries in either an SMTP connector or the virtual SMTP
Server).

The workaround is to A. remove the External DNS server entries and let
DNS servers be designated via Network Properties, OR B. supply a
SMARTHOST for mail forwarding to the Internet or other dynamic DNS
environment.

PSS will be forwarding me other information today.

I hope you can use this information.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: John Matteson 
Posted At: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:13 PM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Discussion list
Conversation: Problems with E2K SP3 bridgehead
Subject: [Exchange2000] Problems with E2K SP3 bridgehead


Hey Guys and Gals:

Got a persistent problem that I'm trying to troubleshoot.

I have a bridgehead server with two routing group connectors and
three Internet mail connectors loaded on it, one SMTP virtual server.

The hardware is a DELL 1650, single 1.4 Gbyte processor, 512
Mbytes of RAM, 100Mbyte NIC, OS is Win2K  sp 4, E2k SP3 and September
Roll up package.

What happens is that the queue builds up on the bridgehead
server, then delivers mail to local routing group servers, across the
RGC connectors to other machines and out to the Internet (we deliver
directly via DNS rather than use a single outbound gateway machine).
This happens about every 8 to 10 minutes. If I bounce the Routing
Engine, then some of the items get delivered then, but not all.

Winroute tells me that Link State is UP on all machines in all
RG's  (All machines are in one admin group, but split into three routing
groups) even as the queue is building.

Perfmon shows little if any network traffic outbound from the
bridgehead server except when the Routing Engine is bounced, or when the
queue dumps on it's own every ten minutes.

Where do I go to help this machine deliver mail a bit more
smoothly?  Currently there are no limits on connections or the number of
messages per connection. But I rarely see more than 5 connections on the
server 4 inbound and one outbound.

Anyone have suggestions?

TIA

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US &
Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/eJp0lB/TM
-~->

  Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Exchange 2000 FAQ: 
  http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Public Folder Traffic from SMTP sever routing to New Server In Site

[Dumke, Jane]

We recently added 3 new servers to our Ex2K, SP3 site (W2K, SP4).  We
noticed that all traffic coming through our front-end servers addressed
to public folders is being routed through one of the new servers.  The
new server has a public folder store, but none of the PFs that the
messages are addressed to have replicas on that server.  We found one
Google Groups message on this from 2002 and the guy said that Microsoft
said there was no rhyme or reason to where the messages for PFs were
routed when coming from the front-end servers.  We only have one routing
group.  The new servers are not listed in the MX records.  Anyone see
this or have an explanation for it?

Also, email sent through the front-end servers addressed to mailboxes,
is delivered directly to the home server of the recipient.

Jane Dumke 
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point 
 
phone:(715)346-2463  fax:(715)346-4577 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ...

[Dumke, Jane]

Catching up and wanted to put some extra "documentation" on this issue
and we found zero-help on this through Google Groups and this list when
we experienced it.

Jane Dumke 
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point 
 
phone:(715)346-2463  fax:(715)346-4577 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MS Exchange
List
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 6:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a
backfill ...



Hello,

You're catching up on List posts. :-)

I ended up dragging a message into every "un-synced" folder on the
Source server.  With a list of every "bad" PF, it was probably only a
couple seconds per folder to drag and drop.  "Backfill" then fired off
within an hour or so and everything was fine.

If we were at 9,000 PFs we might have accidentally suffered and
unrecoverable disaster on the PF store.  Especially if it was a sunny
day outside. :-)

Thank you,
Brent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dumke, Jane
Posted At: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:31 PM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Conversation: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a
backfill ...
Subject: RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a
backfill ...


I found that the only way I could get this done on our site was to dump
a listing of the PFs and the # of items in each one for each server,
pull them up side by side in Excel and figure out which server had the
more complete copy.  Then I removed the replica off the incomplete
server, and then rereplicated.  Horrendous job with 9000+ PFs, but it
worked to get them back in sync.

Jane Dumke 
Messaging Manager
University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point 
 
phone:(715)346-2463  fax:(715)346-4577 



-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill
...



Hello,

E2K (Source & Target): SP3+September'03 Rollup, Scanmail 6.1, native
OS: w2K, SP3 + all critical fixes , native

I'm doing the Ed Crowley Server move.  I've got 400 of 1500 Public
Folders that haven't replicated completely.  It has been over 2 weeks.
One thing that seems to force a backfill on a PF is to put a new
message/post into the PF.  It then seems to figure out it's not up to
date and a backfill is kicked off that evening.

Most of these PFs do not have an Email address, and are not visible to
the Address Book.  Any tips on how to send a message to a large number
of such folders, or how to force a backfill on them?

Notes:

-Turning off virus scanning on the Public Folders a week or so ago
improved things greatly. -PFs not in sync vary between no messages to
just a couple messages off. -No size restrictions on PFs or SMTP.
-Active PFs (like this list at 40,000+ messages) sync up just fine.
-Source and Target Servers are in the same Server room, plugged into the
same Switch. -Hierarchy came across just fine.  Just message content has
problems.

I've done:

-ISINTEG and Defrag for Source PF store.
-Checked that both Public Folder Stores have "proxy addresses" set
(Q286356) -On the top level folders set "propagate settings" of
Replicas, Replication message priority, and Replication Schedule.
Replication Interval is: "always run", and Replication message priority
is: "urgent".

With logging turned up I get a lot of these:

=
Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS Public Store
Event Category: Replication Errors 
Event ID:   3093
Date:   9/2/2003
Time:   7:41:51 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   EXCHANGE
Description:
Error -2147221233 reading property 0x674b0014 on object type
tbtMsgFolder from database "First Storage Group\Public Information Store
(EXCHANGE)". 
==

Thanks,
Brent


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

Warnings after installing patch for MS03-046

[Freddie Soerensen]

Hi list

We just installed this patch on our E2k SP3 running on win2k SP4 and
immediately after that we started to get these warnings - several every
minute :

EVENTLOG : Application
EVENT TYPE : WARNING (2)
SOURCE : MSExchangeTransport
CATEGORY : Exchange Store Driver
EVENT ID : 350
TIME :  10/16/2003 2:29:07 PM
MESSAGE :  HrGetBinary( ... IMMPID_EMP_ORIGINAL_P1_RECIPIENT_LIST ...)
800300fd  

The description for Event ID ( 350 ) in Source ( MSExchangeTransport )
cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry
information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer.
The following information is part of the event: HrGetBinary( ...
IMMPID_EMP_ORIGINAL_P1_RECIPIENT_LIST ...); 800300fd; .

Anybody seen this ? Anybody have any idea what it means and how to fix it ?

Google Groups, EventID.net and MS technet don't seem to have very much
information on this event - please help

Thanks
Freddie


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Warnings after installing patch for MS03-046

[Freddie Soerensen]

Hi list

We just installed this patch on our E2k SP3 running on win2k SP4 and
immediately after that we started to get these warnings - several every
minute :

EVENTLOG : Application 
EVENT TYPE : WARNING (2) 
SOURCE : MSExchangeTransport 
CATEGORY : Exchange Store Driver  
EVENT ID : 350 
TIME :  10/16/2003 2:29:07 PM 
MESSAGE :  HrGetBinary( ... IMMPID_EMP_ORIGINAL_P1_RECIPIENT_LIST ...)
800300fd  

The description for Event ID ( 350 ) in Source ( MSExchangeTransport )
cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry
information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote
computer. The following information is part of the event: HrGetBinary(
... IMMPID_EMP_ORIGINAL_P1_RECIPIENT_LIST ...); 800300fd; .

Anybody seen this ? Anybody have any idea what it means and how to fix
it ?

Google Groups, EventID.net and MS technet don't seem to have very much
information on this event - please help

Thanks
Freddie

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

[Etts, Russell]

Thank you very much for all your information!

Russell 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

The newsfeed is http://www.thundermain.com/rss/ I use NewsGator which
integrates with Outlook 

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

Hi Martin

Can you tell me how you did this?  I just downloaded a RSS newsreader
and I don't know how to get it to work with MS..

Thanks

Russell 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

I have an RSS newsfeed that tells me anytime MS makes a new download
available 

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes

How did you hear about this (MS046)?  I'm subscribed to MS's security
bulletin service but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this
patch.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes


 
MS03-046 is listed as "critical" and involves somebody sending bogus
data to your smtp port.  In our case, the smtp port of our exchange
server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP
interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus
gateway and then to the exchange machine.  In this scenario, the bogus
smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server.  If
your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a
hurry to load that patch.

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hot off the Fixes

Anyone applied these yet?

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp

Ali

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

language issue

[Kim Schotanus]

My NDR's are suddenly in another language. How can I revert them back to
English and how is this possible? 
Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SV: RPC over HTTP - username/password are refused

[Troels Majlandt]

 
Hi there !
 
Yes I have used "Basic Authentication" under Exchange - Proxy setting up the client.
 
Under security pane, (hope this is correct translated - Iám using a Danish client)
I have NOT selected - Crypter data beetween client and exchange
I have NOT selected - Ask alwyas after username/password
And in nwtwork sercurity I have selected - Kerberos/NTLM
 
TroelsM


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af David Lemson
Sendt: 15. oktober 2003 17:45
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: RPC over HTTP - username/password are refused

Did you select Basic Authentication on the client? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RPC over HTTP - username/password are refused

Hi there !

I have tried to set up RPC over HTTP

Server1 = Win2K3 and Exchange 2003
Server2 = Win2K3 (GC)
Client = WinXP and Outlook 2003 (from my home location)

I looks like everything work - but when i make a profile and try to connect to the 
exchange server the username/password are refused.

I have SSL on the Exchange server.
I have configured the RPC over HTTP try guidelines in Exchange 2003 Deployment Guide, 
ie. the webserver - configurations in regedit on both the exchange server and global 
catalog server.

AnyOne have any idea on where to look for the error - that my username/password are 
refused from the client.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]