RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was sent at the same time... No need to look in everybody e-mail... -Message d'origine- De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : Can anybody help with this ?
If they send you a test e-mail, what is the delay? Can it be that their mail server is sending Ident Request and that your FW is dropping it instead of Rejecting it? -Message d'origine- De : Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 18:20 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : RE: Can anybody help with this ? Ed truly is psychic. I received his response a good 10 minutes before the question was asked. Genius! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? Yes, looks like they're down. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can anybody help with this ? My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails do reach them but after a long delay. They claim that they haven't had any problems from other people and that the problem only comes from our end. Help would be appreciated ! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
All advice appreciated... We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000 environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in "cached exchange mode". In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart from normal mail services). Why would this have happened? Is it not related to the introduction of Outlook 2K3? Is it related? I have not yet run esutil, as there are other space issues this has now highlighted (and means until I free up some space elsewhere I can't run it, knowing I need approx 110% free space, and we now only have 1.79GB free on the drive the db's live on). I have searched the MS-KB and come up with nada. Ideas, suggestions all welcome... Thanks, themolk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
Ed truly is psychic. I received his response a good 10 minutes before the question was asked. Genius! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? Yes, looks like they're down. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can anybody help with this ? My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails do reach them but after a long delay. They claim that they haven't had any problems from other people and that the problem only comes from our end. Help would be appreciated ! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
Yes, looks like they're down. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can anybody help with this ? My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails do reach them but after a long delay. They claim that they haven't had any problems from other people and that the problem only comes from our end. Help would be appreciated ! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
RoadRunner is notorious for blocking blocks of IP address. Your NDR should include a URL referring you back to rr. All you can do is get your ISP to email them and hope that rr releases the block. We went through this 3 months ago and it took 2 months for rr to release it. Good luck -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can anybody help with this ? My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails do reach them but after a long delay. They claim that they haven't had any problems from other people and that the problem only comes from our end. Help would be appreciated ! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anybody help with this ?
My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails do reach them but after a long delay. They claim that they haven't had any problems from other people and that the problem only comes from our end. Help would be appreciated ! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
Yes, it does. But just synchronize once locally and it isn't a problem after that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich III Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 >From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Upgrade to Outlook >2003 and use cache mode. Something that I haven't figured out about cached mode yet, does it bring _all_ folders over? I have >31K items in deleted and >12K items in sent and I don't need them duplicated to the client. (Exchange Admin shows 1.6Gig in my mailbox) -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
But POP users send using SMTP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kevin C. Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110. Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. -K- -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
Notepad -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages Scott, What software package was chosen to do the encryption? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send SSN's and take patient care orders online. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
Christopher, What software package did you choose? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages We tried encrypting it for about a week. After so many complaints of "I can't understand this e-mail you sent" we decided it wasn't worth it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send SSN's and take patient care orders online. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
Scott, What software package was chosen to do the encryption? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send SSN's and take patient care orders online. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
You can search the tracking.log(s) for the domain is easy enough. You can also Alternately delivery mail to Manager's Account ( inbound only ). Let's give the person a little credit for some smarts. Portable media like USB drive is so much better for stuff like that (Like in The Recruit). Don't forget web mail accounts that permit file uploads. Do they have a CD-RW drive on the their PC? Beside all that, call your legal department, your out over thin ice. Maybe they have a relative at the other company you don't know about. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
You mean, other than by simply opening their mailbox and searching through the message bodies? Not in 5.5, unless you have been journaling. You can search by subject with ISSCAN or Exmerge. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
We tried encrypting it for about a week. After so many complaints of "I can't understand this e-mail you sent" we decided it wasn't worth it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send SSN's and take patient care orders online. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
OMG don't get me started on HIPAA. MY parent org is a healthcare member service org and the hoops they have us jump through to meet HIPAA compliancy sucks. We however did choose to encrypt the email because they often send SSN's and take patient care orders online. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
That's how I became a SQL specialist :) Before I only knew how to install SQL. After I could write some kick-butt queries and stored procedures. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed I have used Tumbleweed's SecureMail in a 100,000+ seat Exchange shop and I can certainly vouch for them. Solid product with top notch performance. It backends on SQL, which allows for some pretty nifty stuff that you can do as an admin (assuming you know SQL...always a good time to learn). Out of the box you really don't need to know SQL to use it, but if you wanted to "tweak" it you certain could with some well executed SQL queries. I have seen a single Tumbleweed box push out over 50,000 messages an hour in production and not break a sweat. The AV component is nice, but the content filters are really nice and really powerful in the right hands (it does take awhile to get the content filter just right...which is true of any content filter I think). Anyhow..I would highly recommend it if you can afford it. > Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? > > Thanks > > Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duplicate Meeting Events
I have a user who is a delegate to another. When she creates a meeting request and sends it to that user and then accepts it for him, the meeting request shows up twice in his calendar. Once Tentative and once Busy. When I send a meeting request to him she accepts and it works fine. She is using Outlook 2003 and he is on XP. Both on Exch2k SP3 server. Looks on KB and Google, but no luck. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
Thanks Martin. I will look and see if I can find it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages Mike, There was a massive thread on here about this subject yesterday. Check it out. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SP4 - release date?
It came out this month.. it is called Exchange 2003. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SP4 - release date? Has anyone heard when Exchange 2000 SP4 will be released? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 SP4 - release date?
Has anyone heard when Exchange 2000 SP4 will be released? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tumbleweed
I have used Tumbleweed's SecureMail in a 100,000+ seat Exchange shop and I can certainly vouch for them. Solid product with top notch performance. It backends on SQL, which allows for some pretty nifty stuff that you can do as an admin (assuming you know SQL...always a good time to learn). Out of the box you really don't need to know SQL to use it, but if you wanted to "tweak" it you certain could with some well executed SQL queries. I have seen a single Tumbleweed box push out over 50,000 messages an hour in production and not break a sweat. The AV component is nice, but the content filters are really nice and really powerful in the right hands (it does take awhile to get the content filter just right...which is true of any content filter I think). Anyhow..I would highly recommend it if you can afford it. > Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? > > Thanks > > Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
You're right on that, Christopher. It's not a requirement. However, if an org does not encrypt, they do need to document that fact and why they didn't implement it. We've looked into it to a small degree but haven't started doing it (and, hopefully, won't). Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption packages You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
As an SMTP engine, Tumbleweed is quite powerful. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed I was just looking for an SMTP relay that has other abilities (i.e. anti-spam) and we checking out Tumbleweed's appliance. Does anyone have an opinion on this one or others I could investigate? (like there's any shortage of opinions around here!) I just signed on to the list so I may have missed any recent discussions on the matter. Translation - please don't hammer me for asking what may seem to be a redundant question. I don't mind doing my homework but don't know what products are out there and worth looking into. Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We had 60Mph winds last night. They FLY! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Hit up the web interface for the list. Lots of chatter lately about tumbleweed, etc. I've heard very good things about tumbleweed from various people. -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed I was just looking for an SMTP relay that has other abilities (i.e. anti-spam) and we checking out Tumbleweed's appliance. Does anyone have an opinion on this one or others I could investigate? (like there's any shortage of opinions around here!) I just signed on to the list so I may have missed any recent discussions on the matter. Translation - please don't hammer me for asking what may seem to be a redundant question. I don't mind doing my homework but don't know what products are out there and worth looking into. Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
I was just looking for an SMTP relay that has other abilities (i.e. anti-spam) and we checking out Tumbleweed's appliance. Does anyone have an opinion on this one or others I could investigate? (like there's any shortage of opinions around here!) I just signed on to the list so I may have missed any recent discussions on the matter. Translation - please don't hammer me for asking what may seem to be a redundant question. I don't mind doing my homework but don't know what products are out there and worth looking into. Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We had 60Mph winds last night. They FLY! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Yeah, it made a mess. It also caused a pretty big blackout over in Moscow last night. Go cougs ;) -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Dude!! You're at WSU in Pullman? I'm in the SE WA State in the Tri-Cities!! Weren't those winds terrible? Wind like that really plays havoc with our microwave towers. -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We had 60Mph winds last night. They FLY! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
You might want to read the HIPAA requirements again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption packages
Mike, There was a massive thread on here about this subject yesterday. Check it out. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption packages Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Encryption packages
Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000. We are a healthcare organization. We wre looking to implement an encryption package that is as easy as possible for the sender and the receiver. With HIPAA looming, all Patient Health Information (PHI) that is sent outside our organization must be encrypted. Does anyone have experience with encryption and PHI data? We are looking into the future where other groups of people will also use this product to encrypt information that they send outside the organization. Any guidance on these products would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 "Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't!" - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Dude!! You're at WSU in Pullman? I'm in the SE WA State in the Tri-Cities!! Weren't those winds terrible? Wind like that really plays havoc with our microwave towers. -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We had 60Mph winds last night. They FLY! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
We had 60Mph winds last night. They FLY! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110. Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. -K- -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
I like to have some idea before unleashing any sales pitches these days. Over the last year I have inquired on about 5 different products (spam, backup, file management - different things) and every one of them is way beyond our reach bit I cant get the damn salespeople to stop calling me! I really dont have time for it. If its gonna be 10grand plus, I know we wont buy it so Id rather have some idea upfront before unleashing the dogs of Sales... Jeff -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed IIRC they've changed their pricing structure from per seat to per proc. Huge difference. Why don't you call them and find out. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed So in todays-money, I can excpect 3 Ferrari's and maybe a Mercedes rag-top or two? I think I have them laying around Physical Plant. Maybe I can keep 1 of the Mercs if I scrub the support... Jeff -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Back in 1998 when we implemented it for 20,000 users at Credit Suisse, Tumbleweed with the SEC-compliant Message Archival cost roughly a couple of Ferraris (including support) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
You are going to be introducing a lot of changes by doing this. Let me give you a piece of advise. Put the Xwall on a separate box. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Yep. They changed to that about a year ago. Not sure if that applies to appliances however. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed IIRC they've changed their pricing structure from per seat to per proc. Huge difference. Why don't you call them and find out. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed So in todays-money, I can excpect 3 Ferrari's and maybe a Mercedes rag-top or two? I think I have them laying around Physical Plant. Maybe I can keep 1 of the Mercs if I scrub the support... Jeff -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Back in 1998 when we implemented it for 20,000 users at Credit Suisse, Tumbleweed with the SEC-compliant Message Archival cost roughly a couple of Ferraris (including support) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
IIRC they've changed their pricing structure from per seat to per proc. Huge difference. Why don't you call them and find out. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed So in todays-money, I can excpect 3 Ferrari's and maybe a Mercedes rag-top or two? I think I have them laying around Physical Plant. Maybe I can keep 1 of the Mercs if I scrub the support... Jeff -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Back in 1998 when we implemented it for 20,000 users at Credit Suisse, Tumbleweed with the SEC-compliant Message Archival cost roughly a couple of Ferraris (including support) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
So in todays-money, I can excpect 3 Ferrari's and maybe a Mercedes rag-top or two? I think I have them laying around Physical Plant. Maybe I can keep 1 of the Mercs if I scrub the support... Jeff -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Back in 1998 when we implemented it for 20,000 users at Credit Suisse, Tumbleweed with the SEC-compliant Message Archival cost roughly a couple of Ferraris (including support) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Back in 1998 when we implemented it for 20,000 users at Credit Suisse, Tumbleweed with the SEC-compliant Message Archival cost roughly a couple of Ferraris (including support) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Wow, this sounds pretty good. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail We currrently use the Certified Mail with the Mail Marshal package. It accepts site certificates from other servers so if you send to a domain that the 2 of us have shared certificates and they have a secure mail server... then all mails sent to and from those servers will be encrypted. Anyone else will receive an unencrypted email with a link to https://server.name.here/getmymail and asks for them to create a login and password for mail retrieval. We have it setup to encrypt mail when the subject contains the word SECRET. Otherwise all mail going through this server is unencrypted. Just set it up as your smarthost if your using exchange. - Scott Weston - -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Now you will have to rely on scripts or LDIFDE.exe to assign the appropriate e-mail addresses to your users. Which is fine if you are comfortable with scripts or LDIFDE. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address i disabled the update for all users. regards Uso - Original Message - From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:08 PM Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address Users have a little checkbox that makes them listen to the recipient policies. Turn it off - and the user will never be updated. Or you could create a number of different recipient policies that would only match certain users. Then only those users will be affected by the specific recipient policies. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address OK, I got the recipient update service to run, but that didn't turn out to be a good idea at all. Our email addresses are mostly custom addresses they don't have any fixed format. I ended up with additonal SMTP addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] The same are also set in the mail field (E-mail field on the General Tab). I scripted to add the [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and set it as the primary addresses. I scripted also to reset the mail field to to the same (E-mail field on the General Tab) however the default policy keeps setting it back. What can I do so the default policy doesn't mess up my email names? thanks Uso - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address > It seems as if your Recipient Update Service isn't running. Search TechNet > for that phrase and start checking out the potential causes. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uso > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address > > I have set the desired smtp address as primary in my default policy. And > applied it (Recipient Update Service) but that hasn't changed anything for > me. I still have smtp address with the old name set as primary. What am I > doin wrong? > > I tried LDIFDE. My only problem is that I don't have to write a multivalued > field and the ProxyAddresses is multivalued. > > regards > Uso > - Original Message - > From: "mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:27 AM > Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address > > > > > > use the recipient policy in system manager ... > > > > Uso wrote: > > > Exchange 2000. > > > regards > > > Uso > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:30 PM > > > Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address > > > > > > > > > > > >>Which version of Exchange? > > >> > > >> > > >>From: "Uso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address > > >>Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:24:37 +0400 > > >> > > >>Hi, > > >>we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two > > >>different domain names. > > >>I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these > > > > > > domain > > > > > >>names. > > >>Is there an easy way to do that? > > >> > > >>regards > > >>Uso > > >> > > >> > > >>_ > > >>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > >>Web Interface: > > >> > > > > > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang > > > =english > > > > > >>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >>_ > > >>Get McAfee virus scanning and cleaning of incoming attachments. Get > > > > > > Hotmail > > > > > >>Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es > > >> > > >> > > >>_ > > >>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > >>Web Interface: > > > > > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-
RE: Tumbleweed
No idea. http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/appliance_edition.html But, they are pricey for sure. Securemail will run you about 10k. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Anyone know offhand what a Tumbleweed appliance would cost (roughly) for 1500 mailboxes? Jeff Hague Network Manager MCSE Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tumbleweed Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: "internet.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Didn't that one girl call you "Spanky"? ;0) -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed "Mighty Hercules" will suffice. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Should we call you Dave or David? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed I just got rolled with about nine OOFS. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Tumbleweed
"Mighty Hercules" will suffice. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Should we call you Dave or David? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed I just got rolled with about nine OOFS. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto
RE: Tumbleweed
Should we call you Dave or David? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed I just got rolled with about nine OOFS. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interf
RE: Tumbleweed
I just got rolled with about nine OOFS. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Really? I thought it rolled. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Tumbleweed Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Tumbleweed rocks. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Instant Messaging
Download the Migration Guide. I wrote about LCS documents here: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/10/live_communicat.html Neil -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 October 2003 17:35 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: MS Instant Messaging Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging Were you using IM on EX2000? Is there a migration tool? - Matt -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is working great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003 migration. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000. It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions
Log on Locally is no longer required for OWA. This change came with E2k. As for your problem, see this: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327843 Neil -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 24 October 2003 23:47 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: OWA versus NTFS permissions Subject: RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions yes logon locally in place in the w2k member server were owa resides. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:26 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange List Server Conversation: OWA versus NTFS permissions Subject: RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions Permission granted for users to log on locally? See the archives for extensive discussion... David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA versus NTFS permissions Hi all W2K-AD nativemode (1 forest, 1 tree, 1 domain) MSX2000+SP3 (mixedmode) running in a W2K+SP4 member server. The only account able to use OWa is the exchangeadmin account, all other users got "Error: Access is Denied" after 3 tries. I have followed the Microst Article Q317471 and still does not work. Any suggestions? thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
GWART! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 October 2003 20:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exch 5.5 Routing Question Subject: Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which was elliminated in 2000. From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Exch 5.5 Routing Question Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:08:19 -0800 Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP4 boxes. 1 ORG, 3 Sites (A, B, C) in three different cities across N.A. I have 2 x400 connectors setup in each location. Each site is setup the same in that they all have two x400 connectors, each going to one of the other sites. If the VPN link between Site A and Site C goes down and site C is trying to send mail to Site A, will Site C route it's mail through Site B to get to Site A? If not, how can I make this so? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Want to check if your PC is virus-infected? Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
We currrently use the Certified Mail with the Mail Marshal package. It accepts site certificates from other servers so if you send to a domain that the 2 of us have shared certificates and they have a secure mail server... then all mails sent to and from those servers will be encrypted. Anyone else will receive an unencrypted email with a link to https://server.name.here/getmymail and asks for them to create a login and password for mail retrieval. We have it setup to encrypt mail when the subject contains the word SECRET. Otherwise all mail going through this server is unencrypted. Just set it up as your smarthost if your using exchange. - Scott Weston - -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connection
You can ignore the DNS errors, chances are there is no PTR record for those IP's. What I am concerned with is the amount of time it takes for a reply from 212.154.128.18 and the next hop appears to have timed out completey, unless they are denying ICMP replies. 820ms alone is very high, maybe too high. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2003 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection If I do a trceroute via samspade then I get the following: 3130.152.180.21 6.672 ms isi-1-lngw2-atm.ln.net [AS226] Los Nettos origin AS 4198.172.117.161 8.894 ms ge-9-3.a01.lsanca02.us.ra.verio.net [AS2914] Verio 5129.250.29.136 9.931 ms xe-1-0-0-4.r21.lsanca01.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio 6129.250.2.11 9.440 ms p16-7-0-0.r00.lsanca01.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio 7208.173.57.2112.043 ms bpr1-so-6-0-0.LosAngeles.cw.net 8208.172.47.136.939 ms dcr2-ae1-0.LosAngeles.cw.net 9166.63.194.61166.812 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net 10166.63.194.1 166.855 ms car1.Frankfurt.cw.net 11166.63.197.26265.337 ms ojsc-kazakhtelecom.Frankfurt.cw.net 12212.19.148.105 283.913 ms DNS error [AS9198] Kazakhtelecom Data Network Administration 13212.154.128.18 820.239 ms DNS error [AS9198] Kazakhtelecom Data Network Administration 14 * -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 29 oktober 2003 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection Id say your getting minor packet loss at a guess, meaning the connection is not being held up long enough for the mail to be delivered? I would say there are a lot of aspects to consider when diagnosing such a problem. BTW, is Kazakhstan a real place then? I thought it was a place used in Jest by Ali-G! -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2003 10:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection I'm having trouble receiving emails from one of our offices in Kazakhstan, and I don't have a clue where the problem lies, Can anyone give a hint? Thanks, Kim This is the error message they receive when sending mail to us, and below that is a tracert from Kazakhstan to our server: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: failure notice > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at academset.kz. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 33718 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 05:37:34 > - > Received: from unknown (HELO MAGESTIC) (192.168.10.13) > by 0 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 05:37:30 - > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kamila Magzieva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Manfred Spiesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Joelle Lepot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Aoife Leydon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Catherine Verschoore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Fw: failure notice > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:38:45 +0700 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="koi8-r" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > C:\>tracert mail.intas.be Tracing route to mail.intas.be [213.177.134.28] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms MAGESTIC [192.168.0.1] 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 10.10.1.1 310 ms20 ms20 ms 212.154.128.17 430 ms30 ms40 ms 212.19.148.106 5 120 ms 300 ms 180 ms car1-serial6-0-0.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.197.25] 6 210 ms 211 ms 210 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.194.61] 7 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms zcr2
RE: connection
If I do a trceroute via samspade then I get the following: 3130.152.180.21 6.672 ms isi-1-lngw2-atm.ln.net [AS226] Los Nettos origin AS 4198.172.117.161 8.894 ms ge-9-3.a01.lsanca02.us.ra.verio.net [AS2914] Verio 5129.250.29.136 9.931 ms xe-1-0-0-4.r21.lsanca01.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio 6129.250.2.11 9.440 ms p16-7-0-0.r00.lsanca01.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio 7208.173.57.2112.043 ms bpr1-so-6-0-0.LosAngeles.cw.net 8208.172.47.136.939 ms dcr2-ae1-0.LosAngeles.cw.net 9166.63.194.61166.812 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net 10166.63.194.1 166.855 ms car1.Frankfurt.cw.net 11166.63.197.26265.337 ms ojsc-kazakhtelecom.Frankfurt.cw.net 12212.19.148.105 283.913 ms DNS error [AS9198] Kazakhtelecom Data Network Administration 13212.154.128.18 820.239 ms DNS error [AS9198] Kazakhtelecom Data Network Administration 14 * -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 29 oktober 2003 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection Id say your getting minor packet loss at a guess, meaning the connection is not being held up long enough for the mail to be delivered? I would say there are a lot of aspects to consider when diagnosing such a problem. BTW, is Kazakhstan a real place then? I thought it was a place used in Jest by Ali-G! -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2003 10:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection I'm having trouble receiving emails from one of our offices in Kazakhstan, and I don't have a clue where the problem lies, Can anyone give a hint? Thanks, Kim This is the error message they receive when sending mail to us, and below that is a tracert from Kazakhstan to our server: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: failure notice > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at academset.kz. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 33718 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 05:37:34 > - > Received: from unknown (HELO MAGESTIC) (192.168.10.13) > by 0 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 05:37:30 - > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kamila Magzieva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Manfred Spiesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Joelle Lepot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Aoife Leydon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Catherine Verschoore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Fw: failure notice > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:38:45 +0700 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="koi8-r" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > C:\>tracert mail.intas.be Tracing route to mail.intas.be [213.177.134.28] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms MAGESTIC [192.168.0.1] 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 10.10.1.1 310 ms20 ms20 ms 212.154.128.17 430 ms30 ms40 ms 212.19.148.106 5 120 ms 300 ms 180 ms car1-serial6-0-0.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.197.25] 6 210 ms 211 ms 210 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.194.61] 7 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms zcr2-so-1-0-0.Frankfurtfri.cw.net [166.63.195.190] 8 190 ms 130 ms 130 ms zpr1-ge-1-3-0.Frankfurtfix.cw.net [166.63.204.86] 9 341 ms 340 ms 481 ms so-2-2-1.fra30.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.64.41] 10 451 ms 341 ms 350 ms so-1-0-0.anr10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.105] 11 351 ms 340 ms 341 ms tiscali-be-2.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.69.22] 12 361 ms 721 ms 601 ms ge-11-1.sw-01.bru.net.tiscali.be [62.235.3.209] 13 521 ms
RE: connection
Mail for academset.kz is handled by mail.academset.kz (10) 193.254.251.62 sri.academset.kz (20) 193.254.251.229 samek.academset.kz (30) 193.254.251.205 test.academset.kz (40) -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 29 oktober 2003 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection Id say your getting minor packet loss at a guess, meaning the connection is not being held up long enough for the mail to be delivered? I would say there are a lot of aspects to consider when diagnosing such a problem. BTW, is Kazakhstan a real place then? I thought it was a place used in Jest by Ali-G! -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2003 10:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection I'm having trouble receiving emails from one of our offices in Kazakhstan, and I don't have a clue where the problem lies, Can anyone give a hint? Thanks, Kim This is the error message they receive when sending mail to us, and below that is a tracert from Kazakhstan to our server: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: failure notice > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at academset.kz. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 33718 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 05:37:34 > - > Received: from unknown (HELO MAGESTIC) (192.168.10.13) > by 0 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 05:37:30 - > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kamila Magzieva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Manfred Spiesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Joelle Lepot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Aoife Leydon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Catherine Verschoore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Fw: failure notice > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:38:45 +0700 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="koi8-r" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > C:\>tracert mail.intas.be Tracing route to mail.intas.be [213.177.134.28] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms MAGESTIC [192.168.0.1] 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 10.10.1.1 310 ms20 ms20 ms 212.154.128.17 430 ms30 ms40 ms 212.19.148.106 5 120 ms 300 ms 180 ms car1-serial6-0-0.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.197.25] 6 210 ms 211 ms 210 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.194.61] 7 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms zcr2-so-1-0-0.Frankfurtfri.cw.net [166.63.195.190] 8 190 ms 130 ms 130 ms zpr1-ge-1-3-0.Frankfurtfix.cw.net [166.63.204.86] 9 341 ms 340 ms 481 ms so-2-2-1.fra30.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.64.41] 10 451 ms 341 ms 350 ms so-1-0-0.anr10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.105] 11 351 ms 340 ms 341 ms tiscali-be-2.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.69.22] 12 361 ms 721 ms 601 ms ge-11-1.sw-01.bru.net.tiscali.be [62.235.3.209] 13 521 ms 481 ms 360 ms ge-9-0-0-bfr.bru-ix.be.wanadoo.com [195.74.202.5] 14 *** Request timed out. 15 360 ms 661 ms 631 ms adsl-134-28.wanadoo.be [213.177.134.28] Trace complete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
RE: connection
What should I check first? -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 29 oktober 2003 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: connection Id say your getting minor packet loss at a guess, meaning the connection is not being held up long enough for the mail to be delivered? I would say there are a lot of aspects to consider when diagnosing such a problem. BTW, is Kazakhstan a real place then? I thought it was a place used in Jest by Ali-G! -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2003 10:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection I'm having trouble receiving emails from one of our offices in Kazakhstan, and I don't have a clue where the problem lies, Can anyone give a hint? Thanks, Kim This is the error message they receive when sending mail to us, and below that is a tracert from Kazakhstan to our server: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: failure notice > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at academset.kz. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 33718 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 05:37:34 > - > Received: from unknown (HELO MAGESTIC) (192.168.10.13) > by 0 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 05:37:30 - > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kamila Magzieva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Manfred Spiesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Joelle Lepot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Aoife Leydon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Catherine Verschoore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Fw: failure notice > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:38:45 +0700 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="koi8-r" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > C:\>tracert mail.intas.be Tracing route to mail.intas.be [213.177.134.28] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms MAGESTIC [192.168.0.1] 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 10.10.1.1 310 ms20 ms20 ms 212.154.128.17 430 ms30 ms40 ms 212.19.148.106 5 120 ms 300 ms 180 ms car1-serial6-0-0.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.197.25] 6 210 ms 211 ms 210 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.194.61] 7 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms zcr2-so-1-0-0.Frankfurtfri.cw.net [166.63.195.190] 8 190 ms 130 ms 130 ms zpr1-ge-1-3-0.Frankfurtfix.cw.net [166.63.204.86] 9 341 ms 340 ms 481 ms so-2-2-1.fra30.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.64.41] 10 451 ms 341 ms 350 ms so-1-0-0.anr10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.105] 11 351 ms 340 ms 341 ms tiscali-be-2.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.69.22] 12 361 ms 721 ms 601 ms ge-11-1.sw-01.bru.net.tiscali.be [62.235.3.209] 13 521 ms 481 ms 360 ms ge-9-0-0-bfr.bru-ix.be.wanadoo.com [195.74.202.5] 14 *** Request timed out. 15 360 ms 661 ms 631 ms adsl-134-28.wanadoo.be [213.177.134.28] Trace complete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connection
Id say your getting minor packet loss at a guess, meaning the connection is not being held up long enough for the mail to be delivered? I would say there are a lot of aspects to consider when diagnosing such a problem. BTW, is Kazakhstan a real place then? I thought it was a place used in Jest by Ali-G! -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2003 10:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connection I'm having trouble receiving emails from one of our offices in Kazakhstan, and I don't have a clue where the problem lies, Can anyone give a hint? Thanks, Kim This is the error message they receive when sending mail to us, and below that is a tracert from Kazakhstan to our server: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: failure notice > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at academset.kz. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 33718 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 05:37:34 > - > Received: from unknown (HELO MAGESTIC) (192.168.10.13) > by 0 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 05:37:30 - > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kamila Magzieva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Manfred Spiesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Joelle Lepot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Aoife Leydon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Catherine Verschoore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Fw: failure notice > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:38:45 +0700 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="koi8-r" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > C:\>tracert mail.intas.be Tracing route to mail.intas.be [213.177.134.28] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms MAGESTIC [192.168.0.1] 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 10.10.1.1 310 ms20 ms20 ms 212.154.128.17 430 ms30 ms40 ms 212.19.148.106 5 120 ms 300 ms 180 ms car1-serial6-0-0.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.197.25] 6 210 ms 211 ms 210 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.194.61] 7 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms zcr2-so-1-0-0.Frankfurtfri.cw.net [166.63.195.190] 8 190 ms 130 ms 130 ms zpr1-ge-1-3-0.Frankfurtfix.cw.net [166.63.204.86] 9 341 ms 340 ms 481 ms so-2-2-1.fra30.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.64.41] 10 451 ms 341 ms 350 ms so-1-0-0.anr10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.105] 11 351 ms 340 ms 341 ms tiscali-be-2.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.69.22] 12 361 ms 721 ms 601 ms ge-11-1.sw-01.bru.net.tiscali.be [62.235.3.209] 13 521 ms 481 ms 360 ms ge-9-0-0-bfr.bru-ix.be.wanadoo.com [195.74.202.5] 14 *** Request timed out. 15 360 ms 661 ms 631 ms adsl-134-28.wanadoo.be [213.177.134.28] Trace complete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
connection
I'm having trouble receiving emails from one of our offices in Kazakhstan, and I don't have a clue where the problem lies, Can anyone give a hint? Thanks, Kim This is the error message they receive when sending mail to us, and below that is a tracert from Kazakhstan to our server: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: failure notice > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at academset.kz. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 213.177.134.28 but connection died. (#4.4.2) > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too > long. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 33718 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 05:37:34 > - > Received: from unknown (HELO MAGESTIC) (192.168.10.13) > by 0 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 05:37:30 - > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kamila Magzieva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Manfred Spiesberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Joelle Lepot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Aoife Leydon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Catherine Verschoore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Fw: failure notice > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:38:45 +0700 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_003D_01C396FE.B83CFC90 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="koi8-r" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > C:\>tracert mail.intas.be Tracing route to mail.intas.be [213.177.134.28] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms MAGESTIC [192.168.0.1] 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 10.10.1.1 310 ms20 ms20 ms 212.154.128.17 430 ms30 ms40 ms 212.19.148.106 5 120 ms 300 ms 180 ms car1-serial6-0-0.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.197.25] 6 210 ms 211 ms 210 ms bcr1.Frankfurt.cw.net [166.63.194.61] 7 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms zcr2-so-1-0-0.Frankfurtfri.cw.net [166.63.195.190] 8 190 ms 130 ms 130 ms zpr1-ge-1-3-0.Frankfurtfix.cw.net [166.63.204.86] 9 341 ms 340 ms 481 ms so-2-2-1.fra30.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.64.41] 10 451 ms 341 ms 350 ms so-1-0-0.anr10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.105] 11 351 ms 340 ms 341 ms tiscali-be-2.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.69.22] 12 361 ms 721 ms 601 ms ge-11-1.sw-01.bru.net.tiscali.be [62.235.3.209] 13 521 ms 481 ms 360 ms ge-9-0-0-bfr.bru-ix.be.wanadoo.com [195.74.202.5] 14 *** Request timed out. 15 360 ms 661 ms 631 ms adsl-134-28.wanadoo.be [213.177.134.28] Trace complete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed
Glad to here that you got it to work, but I have a bought Cert (Verisign) and on the same client (my home PC) I have no trouble with connecting at HTTTPS://domain... and use the OWA with formbased logon with the same username/password that I am trying to connect Outlook/ over RPC-HTTP I cant get into outlook - because it prompt me for the username/password when I use the profile that should use RPC over HTTP - so I can´t try the trick with CRTL + outlook icon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing
Hi, A question into your answer. How to do a ALL-domain route instead of per-domain route? Thanks -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing If your BT connection has an address space of *, and you enter a per-domain route of, say, hotmail.com, then any messages to hotmail.com will go via the new route since the address space is a more explicit match than just *. Neil -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 10 July 2002 15:41 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Routing Subject: RE: Routing Will this stop it going out over the BT connection ??? > -Original Message- > From: Neil Hobson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 July 2002 11:38 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Routing > > > On the IMS, go to the Connections tab and look in the "specify by > email domain" area. You can set up per-domain routing, e.g. add in > your other domain and configure message delivery to the IP address of > the POP3 system. > > Neil > > -Original Message- > From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: 10 July 2002 08:05 > Posted To: Swynk Exchange List > Conversation: Routing > Subject: Routing > > > Lets see if anyone can answer this one today ... I'll try and put as > much info as possible this time > > Site 1 : Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT4 SP6a > Site 2 : POP3 Mail system > > Scenario : Site 2 now owns Site 1 and we have set up various custom > recipients to forward mail around. However all the mail leaving Site 1 > currently goes out over our BT ISDN connection. How do I make all mail > destined for Site 2 use the fixed line we have in place between the 2 > sites and not go over the ISDN connection. Looking around in Exchange > admin I have routing tab on the IMS set for all messages sent to > Site1.com route to inbound. Is it just a case of adding a routing > entry here for Site2.com routing to Site2. If so how do i address > site2 (DNS,IP etc ) Pls help as I need this sorted ASAP. > > Regards > > Darren > > > > > Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd > London Road Henley Road > Teynham Paddock Wood > Kent Kent > ME9 9PR TN12 6DN > > Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 > Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 > > All business is conducted in accordance with the company's > terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on > request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated > by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of > this company. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > * > This email and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and intended solely for the use of > the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view > or opinions presented are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent those of > Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. > > If you have received this email in error, please > contact our Support Desk immediately on > 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Route Mail
Hi al, For route mail, specified domain or host server need to be specify in the SMTP Connector. One of my Oracle's Application (B2B) has to be configure to send email out to external users(e.g. Yahoo,Hotmail) hence this application needs to relay email to Exchange 5.5. What is the standard way to implements this? With Exchange 5.5, I need to specify route @yahoo.com.sg email relay to "yahoo.com.sg". I doubt this is a way, specify so many of the host servers. Thanks Rgds Fioon ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
