RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
It always passed the relay tests that I threw at the though. This was a simple environment and no other relaying was allowed. I suspect that the systems you have worked on had some other reason for relaying besides that ones you mentioned. Aaron -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail Yes, you were lucky. I have seen this exact scenario happen a couple times now. Fydora or whoever apparently did not understand this scenario but it is a fairly common scenario in small office environments with people on the road connecting their laptops to hotel networks and the like. Yes, OWA is available, but there are lots of people in this world that are always going to hate something like OWA. OWA in 2003 is pretty sweet, I must say, but there will always be people that don't like. > It's been a while since I've supported POP3 clients on Exchange (5.5) > but, as I recall, I had no issues with anonymous relaying. I believe > that Exchange 5.5 allowed anonymous SMTP inbound connections (that is, > connections for mail to be delivered locally) and would allow relaying > by authenticated users only. > > Or maybe I was just luckily that the spammers different find this > server? > > Aaron > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail > > > While I am not sure that the "Greg" in this post was directed at me or > whether this is some new form of abuse and sarcasm, it is pretty much > irrelevant as I do have some things to say on this issue. > > The biggest problem that I have had with Exchange on the outside of > the SMTP mail chain is anti-spam in a small office environment. It is > not that anti-spam functionality does not exist in Exchange, but it is > in its native implementation. The issue actually revolves around POP3 > users. For your Exchange server to serve as the end-point for SMTP > connections from anywhere, you generally have to turn on Anonymous > Authentication. This allows any SMTP server to connect to yours to > send email. Now, let's say you have POP3 users that might be > connecting from anywhere they please on just about anyone's network. > To allow these people to send email, you have to generally turn go > into Relay Restrictions and turn on "Allow all computers which > successfully authenticate to relay..." The problem with this is that > Anonymous Authentication is also on, so guess what? Spammers can > anonymously authenticate and relay spam, because, apparently in the > Microsoft world Anonymous Authentication is just as good as any other > Authentication. Oh well. And yes, you can turn this checkbox off and > set up specific computers, but if they are POP3 clients connecting > from anywhere, you are hosed there and if you set up this by domain, > you have a whole other set of problems, not the least of which is that > this forces a reverse DNS lookup. > > What really needs to happen with this is that Microsoft needs to > simply add a checkbox that says something along the lines of > "Anonymous Authentication can only send inbound messages and not > relay." But, I guess since I am not an MVP the likelihood of this > happening is close to zero. > > In terms of speed, I do not have hard numbers, but if you buddy is > making rash statements like you indicate, he or she does not either. > Tell your buddy to show you the proof or jump off a pier. You may want > to be a little more PC. I have only seen an Exchange server's SMTP > mail engine under duress when a spammer was involved and we are > talking ungodly amounts of messages with lots of failures and retries. > > In terms of having Exchange exposed to the outside world, you can > secure it, put it in a DMZ and make it a front-end server. Again, the > main issue I have is with anti-spam in specific situations but if you > don't have to worry about POP3 users or have an extra box to point > POP3 users to, then you're good to go. > > Finally, I will point out that *technically* you do not even need > Exchange as the SMTP engine is built into Windows 2000/2003 and I have > played around with using this to serve as a host to forward SMTP mail > into my Exchange environment. It's been awhile since I really sat down > with it, but if memory serves it worked just fine. > > > > Greg, would you please help with this discussion on > > > SendMailYour input will be highly regardedThanks > > > > Tell him Postfix is more secure... :P > > > > > > Personally, I like to put another server at the edge for SMTP that > > > is NOT Exchange when I can... > > > > > > As far as who's faster at processing... Who cares, can Sendmail > > > do calendaring, public folders, etc? > > > > > > -Origi
RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
It's been a while since I've supported POP3 clients on Exchange (5.5) but, as I recall, I had no issues with anonymous relaying. I believe that Exchange 5.5 allowed anonymous SMTP inbound connections (that is, connections for mail to be delivered locally) and would allow relaying by authenticated users only. Or maybe I was just luckily that the spammers different find this server? Aaron -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail While I am not sure that the "Greg" in this post was directed at me or whether this is some new form of abuse and sarcasm, it is pretty much irrelevant as I do have some things to say on this issue. The biggest problem that I have had with Exchange on the outside of the SMTP mail chain is anti-spam in a small office environment. It is not that anti-spam functionality does not exist in Exchange, but it is in its native implementation. The issue actually revolves around POP3 users. For your Exchange server to serve as the end-point for SMTP connections from anywhere, you generally have to turn on Anonymous Authentication. This allows any SMTP server to connect to yours to send email. Now, let's say you have POP3 users that might be connecting from anywhere they please on just about anyone's network. To allow these people to send email, you have to generally turn go into Relay Restrictions and turn on "Allow all computers which successfully authenticate to relay..." The problem with this is that Anonymous Authentication is also on, so guess what? Spammers can anonymously authenticate and relay spam, because, apparently in the Microsoft world Anonymous Authentication is just as good as any other Authentication. Oh well. And yes, you can turn this checkbox off and set up specific computers, but if they are POP3 clients connecting from anywhere, you are hosed there and if you set up this by domain, you have a whole other set of problems, not the least of which is that this forces a reverse DNS lookup. What really needs to happen with this is that Microsoft needs to simply add a checkbox that says something along the lines of "Anonymous Authentication can only send inbound messages and not relay." But, I guess since I am not an MVP the likelihood of this happening is close to zero. In terms of speed, I do not have hard numbers, but if you buddy is making rash statements like you indicate, he or she does not either. Tell your buddy to show you the proof or jump off a pier. You may want to be a little more PC. I have only seen an Exchange server's SMTP mail engine under duress when a spammer was involved and we are talking ungodly amounts of messages with lots of failures and retries. In terms of having Exchange exposed to the outside world, you can secure it, put it in a DMZ and make it a front-end server. Again, the main issue I have is with anti-spam in specific situations but if you don't have to worry about POP3 users or have an extra box to point POP3 users to, then you're good to go. Finally, I will point out that *technically* you do not even need Exchange as the SMTP engine is built into Windows 2000/2003 and I have played around with using this to serve as a host to forward SMTP mail into my Exchange environment. It's been awhile since I really sat down with it, but if memory serves it worked just fine. > > Greg, would you please help with this discussion on SendMailYour > > input will be highly regardedThanks > > Tell him Postfix is more secure... :P > > > > Personally, I like to put another server at the edge for SMTP that > > is NOT Exchange when I can... > > > > As far as who's faster at processing... Who cares, can Sendmail do > > calendaring, public folders, etc? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:20 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail > > > > Good Morning All, > > > > I have a Unix/Linux admin that is just wearing me out with regards > > to Exchanging being 3rd rate. Given all of the variables including > > memory, processors, etc. How much mail traffic can Exchange process > > in an hour/day and what is the advantage if any of putting SendMail > > in front of Exchange? > > > > His last statement was that SendMail can process more mail in one > > minute than Exchagne can process in a day. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sean > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mo > > de=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting F
RE: Single Use E-Mail?
How about using something like http://www.spamhole.com/ Or http://jetable.org/ There are many of these... Aaron -Original Message- From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Single Use E-Mail? I'd like to allow my users to create a single use e-mail address to help reduce unwanted e-mail. - User mailbox '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' This user can create any new e-mail address by adding a suffix (with a special char '-' for example) such as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. All suffixes are by default allowed. There would need to be a method that would allow the user to blacklist a specific suffix. My idea would be to create an EventSink for Exch 2000/2003 that when a message is addressed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' it would parse the LHS of the @ and then do a lookup in a table to see if the blacklist existed. If it did, then it would return a '550 Mailbox does not exist' error code. If it does not exist, then the To: Field would be rewritten to strip out the '-suffix' and deliver the mail to the intended recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Questions: 1. Does something already exist today that does this? An event sink? 3rd Party App (MailMarshal, GFI MailEssentials)? Freeware on Linux, etc? 2. I've already coded the basic functionality for the database look and web interface to modify the blacklist but the Event Sink is causing me some issues. Anyone have experience in Event Sink programming willing to jump in an help with the development? 3. Is this a crazy idea and I should just abandon it? - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NetMeeting
You just need an LDAP server to keep track of each Netmeeting user. MS used to have a one called Internet Locator Service (or some such). Not sure if it's still available. Aaron -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NetMeeting Anybody out there using NetMeeting with Exchange 5.5? We've never used it before, and were looking for a way for several people to communicate without having to type in the "computer name". Perhaps a "user name" or "E-mail address"? Anybody know if that's possible? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain?
Errr... I think you mean SMTP. POP3 doesn't deliver email. -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain? Pop3 will let you send as whoever you'd like to be. (Depending on the server configuration of course) -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain? Other folks on this list can correct me on this. . .but isn't it rather slimey to "send as" somebody else's domain? Or are you perhaps talking about sending as a domain that you folks own, but don't normally use for email? Darcy -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 4:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to send on behalf for an "external" Domain? Hi, We have Exchange 2000 configured to send and receive mail for our Domain (e.a. microsoft.com) A user in our company wants to be able to send email using a different Domain name (e.a. msn.com) Is there a way to configure Outlook/Exchange 2000 to give only this user permission to send on behalf this "external" email address? Hope anybody can help me with this issue. Best Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bandwith question with MAPI and PPTP
10Kbps per user? The way my users use Outlook, I would estimate closer to 40K So it really depends on how everyone uses Outlook and what their expectations are. Aaron -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bandwith question with MAPI and PPTP The load of a PPTP connection depends on what you're sending through it. Rule of thumb for MAPI Outlook sessions is to plan for 3 to 4 KBps per light user, 5 to 7 KBps per moderate user, and 10 or more KBps per heavy user. Remember that this is from available bandwidth, something that is important to keep in mind when the pipes are shared among many applications. Implementing Outlook 2003 and cached mode can help make remote usage of MAPI appear to be much better because after the first access all data is cached in the local OST, so every time a user clicks on that 5MB message it doesn't have to bring it down from the server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bandwith question with MAPI and PPTP Do any of you smart exchange gurus know how much bandwidth does a MS PPTP connection and a MAPI connection to a exchange server be per user? I have a T1, and the remote office has SDSL 1.1 with a IP Sec tunnel to the T1. Just need a estimation of user to bandwidth ratio. Thanks, Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: priv1
Never have done one... I can only dream about my stores shrinking enough to make it worth the downtime. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1 How often do you guys do an offline defrag? Being offline for 8 hours is not really feasible here... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 3 oktober 2003 14:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1 Friggin Lyris DIR = Deleted Item Retention -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1 DIR Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 3 oktober 2003 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1 Here is the deal. If DIR is on and your users dump a bunch of mail, the mail is still stuck in DIR. Therefore no white space is freed up. The priv will not shrink during an offline defrag. You will need to turn DIR off, let the system run its daily online maint, and then defrag the priv. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1 I have checked the retention policy but is there no other way then an offline defrag, the defrag yesterday took about 8 hours Kind regards, Kim -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 3 oktober 2003 14:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1 Check deleted items retention policy and run an offline defrag. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 5:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: priv1 Yesterday I had to run eseutil over a network (not advised but...) Is there a way to syncronise the priv1.edb with the current state of affairs? I have had users clean out a total of about 6GB but my priv1.edb remains the same size as before (13.3 EDB AND 1.5 STR)? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
Sybari Anti-spam features are still pretty poor. But, the antivirus part is excellent. We've paired that up with Postini anti-spam service, and we have been 100% email virus free and 97% spam free since... -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Supposedly they are working on improving the filtering piece of it. They of course blame it on MS and vsapi. Appretly all that happens is that Ex passes the friendly name not the email address, blah blah blah. And their content filtering is not all that great either. Having said all that I have not played with their gateway solution so maybe that's a ton better. Just my 2cents -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations There is no additional "agent" for Exchange. If you buy Corp. Ed., it does not include the AV/Filtering for Exchange. And, IMHO, it sucks rocks. I like Corp. ed., but the Exchange server piece bites, and I have told them that plenty of times. The A/V scanning is fine, but the content filtering leaves a LOT to be desired. It is also not a gateway piece (though they have one available which was mentioned earlier). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: DL.Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:30 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Are you referring to an additional agent for Norton (Symantec) corporate antivirus, or the Norton (Symantec) antivirus filter? The avf we have is only able to filter by sender/subject line or set 'content types', in other words, quite limited... If you are talking about an additional agent, do you happen to have a link lying around for product information? TIA Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence ** (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:22 PM Posted To: ~Exchange Discussion~ Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations I must recommend the Exchange agent by Symantec, you buy Norton Corporate and get the Exchange agent separate, install this, you get a nice web GUI, and viruses should never land in your users mailboxes ever again. Very customizable, you can have it mail all people involved, it can set size limits, it can be told not to allow unscanable (encrypted) items, but that is a pain in the arse if its genuine! Its good. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 17:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Symantec's gateway will do *most* of that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not appear that this program will updated past its 4.5 version. The program has some nice features, but anything NAI blows, the support gets worse by the day, so I want to move on. The current setup I have is a single server that receives to WebSheild for AV scanning and keyword content filtering. Then it passes it on via port 26 to my MailFrontier for antispam scanning (both run on the same box) which then finally passes it on to the Exchange server boxen on port 25 just like usual. Here are the features I am looking for * Keyword Blocking * The ability to turn anti spam off and just use keyword blocking. * AV scanner * Ability to pass the mail on another port (such as when an AV gateway and an Antispam gateway are on the same box) * Recipient Exclusion * Sender exclusion (allow mail to pass directly from specified email addresses without scanning for content or virus's) * Originator Blocking (just dump any email that comes from specified persons) * A bonus would be that if it could do a lookup against my GAL and just dump any email for an address that does not exist * Must run on Wintel platform * Customizeable NDR's for content filtering, etc Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?
RE: Use of OST's over WAN
Configure Outlook to work-offline always or let them choose the mode when starting Outlook. When Outlook is off-line, it will always refer to the OST. Outlook 2003 with cached mode will improve this, but for now, this is a pretty good option. Aaron -Original Message- From: Gavin Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Use of OST's over WAN I am looking for some light reading/information to confirm the behaviour with using OST's over a WAN link. I have a remote office that connects to the main office over a 128k VPN connection. This pipe is shared between 5 other users, including all their internet traffic, so can get pretty slow at times. They currently retrieve their email from a 3rd party ISP, using POP3, but I want to pull them into the Exchange Org, to gain the benefits of the Exchange server. My issue is, I can't configure them to access the Exchange server directly over the 128k pipe, as Outlook/Exchange response is simply too slow. I don't want to go down the PST route, I am aware of the pitfalls there. That leaves the OST option. If I configure the Outlook client to use OSTs and synch in all folders, does Outlook always refer to the local OST first for information ie filed document/email/calender item etc, instead of going out to the Exchange server, over the slow wan link, even if the Exchange server is available? If so I think this is my answer as the WAN delay only comes into play when they are synchronisng with the server. I can't simply try it and see as I am not at the remote office and the guys there are not up to doing this themselves! I have read http://support.microsoft.com/?id=161889 which didn't shed much light! I have referred to the FAQ but that simply hightlights the dangers with PSTs. Can somebody point me to a document with the necessary info? Thanks Gavin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Discovering Mailboxes which are not uses
How about password expiration? -Original Message- From: Ryan Zalta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Discovering Mailboxes which are not uses I am trying to figure out a way to find out which mailboxes (users) don't use thier accounts. We are a school and allow our students to continue to use thier email accounts after they graduate. We are tying to figure out which users have not used OWA in more than say 6 months. I was hoping to use the last logon feature but unfortunatley the NT Authority/System logs into each mailbox everyday. Does anyone have any ideas of how to do this. Thanks, Ryan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent & Confidential
Duh!
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
There was an article a few months back in a local newspaper about some
people who reacted on a similar mail, they turn out to request headed paper,
bank account numbers, swift codes etc... In the end their savings account
was empty, and not the other way around... K/
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 18:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
Hundreds?
Wow! You could rolling in the cash if you just respond!*
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
*Note - I'm being factitious of course
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
We get hundreds of those every day. How did he get on this list? Did he
subscribe?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549 01 56
===
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 16:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
Onuigbo is my new buddy. Always wanted a lawyer friend called Onuigbo
From: "Bob Sadler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Urgent & Confidential
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:04:26 -0500
WOW! 25 Million Dollars! SIGN ME UP NOW!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Urgent & Confidential
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Mr. Onuigbo Baldwin Gozie, Bank Manager of Diamond Bank, Lagos Branch.
I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for you Mr. Barry
Kelly made a numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve calendar months,
valued at US$25,000,000.00 (Twenty-five Million
Dollars) in my branch. Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his
forwarding address but got no reply. After a month, we sent a reminder and
finally we discovered from his contract employers, Nigerian National
Petroleum Corporation that Mr. Barry Kelly died from an automobile accident.
On further investigation, I found out that he did not leave a WILL and all
attempts to trace his next of kin were fruitless. I therefore made further
investigation and discovered that Mr. Barry Kelly did not declare any next
of kin in all his official documents, including his Bank Deposit paperwork.
This sum of US$25,000,000.00 is still sitting in the Bank and the interest
is being rolled over with the principal sum at the end of each year. No one
will come forward to claim it. According to the Nigerian Law, at the
expiration of 6{Six} years, the money will revert to the ownership of the
Nigerian Government if nobody applies to claim the funds Consequently, my
proposal is that I will like you as a foreigner to stand in as the next of
kin to Mr. Barry Kelly so that the fruits of this old man's labor will not
get into the hands of some corrupt government officials. This is simple;
1) I will like you to provide me immediately with your full names and
address so that the attorney will prepare the necessary documents and
affidavits, which will put you in place as the next of kin.
2) We shall employ the services of two attorneys for drafting and
notarization of the WILL and obtain the necessary documents and letter of
probate/administration in your favor for the transfer.
3) A bank account in any part of the world, which you provide, will then
facilitate the transfer of this money to you as the beneficiary/next of kin
of Mr. Barry Kelly. The money will be paid into your account for us to share
in the ratio of 75% for me and 20% for you then 5% will be set aside for any
expenses that may occur during the transfer process. There is no risk at all
as all the paperwork for this transaction will be done by the attorney and
my position as the Branch Manager guarantees the successful execution of
this transaction. If you are interested, please reply immediately via the
private Tel/Fax numbers above. Upon your response, which will include your
personal Tel/Fax numbers I shall then provide you with more details and
relevant documents that will help you understand. Please observe utmost
confidentiality, and rest assured that this trans
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
95% would be a conservative estimate. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Thanks for the reply Aaron. Do you happen to know what percentage of spam Postini is catching at your company? > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. > > We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the > experience has been positive with no issues experienced. I > have not yet used technical support. Documentation is > complete and useable. It's is doing a very good job of > detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I > don't believe they offer an outbound solution. > > Aaron > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. > > > Hello all, > > I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the > above services > could take a moment and share them, good or bad? > > We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help > control spam and add > an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the > anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the > outbound mail has > been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our > gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been > poor as well. > > TIA for any comments. > > Steve > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
We are early in the process of using Postini. So far, the experience has been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet used technical support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very good job of detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't believe they offer an outbound solution. Aaron -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sobig.F alert
"Where's the KABOOM? There was supposed to be an earth shattering KABOOM!! -Marvin the Martian -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Nice... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert If only Arnold wasn't running for governor. We could send him back in time to stop Skynet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert As if we all didn't have enough to do? -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert T-minus 10 minutes . Its the end of the world run for your lives... -Original Message- From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Yes it is. Since we are not sure what the payload is, we patched for the new MDAC security patch. Hey, who knows? Better to be safe than sorry. T-minus 20 minutes. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Oh crap, I didn't think that anyone actually hooked Skynet up to the internet. T-Minus 30 minutes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1211&e=1&u=/nm/20030822 /tc_nm/tech_internet_virus_dc&sid=95573372 -Original Message- From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sobig.F alert FYI... http://www.f-secure.com/news/items/news_2003082200.shtml _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english
RE: Another Medium Risk Virus on the rise (Worm_Sobig.f)
We are seeing a lot of this virus this morning. Luckily, I block PIF and SCR extensions... Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another Medium Risk Virus on the rise (Worm_Sobig.f) Trend Pattern 618 is now available for this. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another Medium Risk Virus on the rise (Worm_Sobig.f) http://tinyurl.com/kgz2 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
I'll second that. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). I like Antigen Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange. Needless to say it's gone now. Is Scanmail still the defacto? I would like to get the best antivirus package out there. Thanks, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
This has almost always been the first place I learn about new viruses. I subscribe to numerous virus warning lists and this list has almost always been first to identify a virus that is a true threat. > Well, it wasn't hard, but it also wasn't _automatic_. If I hadn't read this ML > today, I might have missed it. > > Jim H _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters. Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reccomended Black Lists
Thanks everyone for your valued opinions and recommendations of black lists. I'm going to give black lists a try and use a tag-only option initially. If I get reports of false positives, I'll know that black lists will not work for me. Aaron -Original Message- From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reccomended Black Lists ...0%...I am using SpamAssassin along with Besian on a Linux box as well as Trend Emanager. Don't get me wrong, subscribing to a Black List alone could have a major impact on the outcome of SPAM blocks and actual valid mail. We have our messaging system learning the points, addresses, etc as well as the X-SPAM STATUS. I too agree to some extent of other re:'s, and had a few dealing's with them myself, but as the question was just about "Recommended Black Lists" and not how to make use of you topology to prevent SPAM. > Hmmm... And what percentage of those are valid business email? > > I concur with AB's assessment that they are mostly run by vigilantes. > There is a fairly famous exchange on this list about a year or two > ago, by Jim Schwartz, Paul Cumming, et al, concerning Dr, Cumming's > own RBL. I think its required reading for anyone considering RBL > usage. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:48 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Reccomended Black Lists > > > > > > I disagree with most of it, however, blacklist has been more > > valuable than > > not. Here's what I use: > > > > -SPAM blocked today- > > 1423 - relays.osirusoft.com > > 218 - dnsbl.njabl.org > >36 - relays.ordb.org > > Total Inbound Mail > >2599 > > > > > > > > > I find that most of them are run by vigilantes. There is no > > accountability > > > for these lists. They can do as they please and most often > > do. I'm not going > > > to trust my business email to someone like that. > > > > > > Since you have no control over what gets blocked, you could > > find yourself > > > missing valuable business email without knowing it. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:35 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Reccomended Black Lists > > > > > > Really? Do you find them to be inaccurate? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:32 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Reccomended Black Lists > > > > > > > > > None > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:33 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Reccomended Black Lists > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm planning to install spam blocking software soon and I > > was wonder what > > > mailhost black lists you all recommend. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Aaron > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Web Interface: > > > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode >
RE: Reccomended Black Lists
Really? Do you find them to be inaccurate? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reccomended Black Lists None -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reccomended Black Lists Hi all, I'm planning to install spam blocking software soon and I was wonder what mailhost black lists you all recommend. Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reccomended Black Lists
Hi all, I'm planning to install spam blocking software soon and I was wonder what mailhost black lists you all recommend. Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA permissions
Do they have 'Log on locally' permissions? -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA permissions Hi all, I just reinstalled Exchange and OWA. As regular Exchange user and a domain admin I have no trouble logging into OWA. Normal users aren't getting in though. I tried sharing out the webdata folder but that didn't make a dif so I put it back to normal. Any ideas? Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SQL
Maybe you could request a relatively small server and move SQL to it and then move Exchange to the old SQL box. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL The old Exchange box is a relic, it's going one way or the other and I wouldn't use it for solitare at this point. This whole discussion arouse when I put together a request for a new Exchange server. I don't think I am going to be able to win the argument to keep them separate. The SQL server was overkill to begin with now I'm going to have to live with SQL and Exchange on one box. I was looking for known software related issues that might help me with my argument but I couldn't find any. Thanks for the help, Scott. > Move Exchange to this box, move SQL to the old Exchange server? > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange and SQL > > We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3 > raid configurations with about 200 gb of hd space that's basically > being used to run a 2 gb database for about 20 users that will never > grow. My boss thinks we should move our exchange 5.5 server (about > 120 users) to this box (going to Exchange 2000 in a few months) > because it's not being utilized fully. Other than the "if we lose SQL > we lose Exchange" theory, why else is this a bad idea? Thanks in > advance, Scott. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > =&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fixing 1018 errors
You'll have to wait until tomorrow night. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Just do itwe are all waiting to hear the server explode. :) _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Yup, I'm scared. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors You can move everything to a new folder if you're scared. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Yes as Ed said. I thought maybe you were going to restore. From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:01:47 -0700 Yes. Delete everything. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors How about the logs for the private store... Do I have to delete them? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors If you are just going to move the mailboxes, delete the priv.edb and then move everything back, no you have to do that. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Thanks. Do I really have to move the IMS and public store? The 1018 errors were cause by a bad drive in the RAID set. The drive has been replaced. Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors You will want to go through this to move the server http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Yes, you can delete the priv when you are done. As for the 1018 errors, these are most often caused by hardware issues such as the RAID card or bad memory. You will need to diagnose and correct these issues before you put the server back in operation. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fixing 1018 errors My exchange database has been reporting 1018 errors. I couldn't restore from backup and repairing the database made matters worse. So, I've built a server and joined the existing site and have been moving mailboxes to the temporary server. Once all the mailboxes have been moved, can I simply delete the priv.edb file and the new empty database will be created upon starting the Exchange services? Is there anything else that needs to be moved to the temporary server before deleting the priv.edb? The server is running the Internet Mail Service for the site, has a public store, and is the "first" server in the site. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Enterprise, NT4 SP6a Thanks Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/
RE: Fixing 1018 errors
Yup, I'm scared. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors You can move everything to a new folder if you're scared. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Yes as Ed said. I thought maybe you were going to restore. From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:01:47 -0700 Yes. Delete everything. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors How about the logs for the private store... Do I have to delete them? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors If you are just going to move the mailboxes, delete the priv.edb and then move everything back, no you have to do that. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Thanks. Do I really have to move the IMS and public store? The 1018 errors were cause by a bad drive in the RAID set. The drive has been replaced. Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors You will want to go through this to move the server http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Yes, you can delete the priv when you are done. As for the 1018 errors, these are most often caused by hardware issues such as the RAID card or bad memory. You will need to diagnose and correct these issues before you put the server back in operation. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fixing 1018 errors My exchange database has been reporting 1018 errors. I couldn't restore from backup and repairing the database made matters worse. So, I've built a server and joined the existing site and have been moving mailboxes to the temporary server. Once all the mailboxes have been moved, can I simply delete the priv.edb file and the new empty database will be created upon starting the Exchange services? Is there anything else that needs to be moved to the temporary server before deleting the priv.edb? The server is running the Internet Mail Service for the site, has a public store, and is the "first" server in the site. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Enterprise, NT4 SP6a Thanks Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
RE: Fixing 1018 errors
How about the logs for the private store... Do I have to delete them? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors If you are just going to move the mailboxes, delete the priv.edb and then move everything back, no you have to do that. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors Thanks. Do I really have to move the IMS and public store? The 1018 errors were cause by a bad drive in the RAID set. The drive has been replaced. Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors You will want to go through this to move the server http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Yes, you can delete the priv when you are done. As for the 1018 errors, these are most often caused by hardware issues such as the RAID card or bad memory. You will need to diagnose and correct these issues before you put the server back in operation. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fixing 1018 errors My exchange database has been reporting 1018 errors. I couldn't restore from backup and repairing the database made matters worse. So, I've built a server and joined the existing site and have been moving mailboxes to the temporary server. Once all the mailboxes have been moved, can I simply delete the priv.edb file and the new empty database will be created upon starting the Exchange services? Is there anything else that needs to be moved to the temporary server before deleting the priv.edb? The server is running the Internet Mail Service for the site, has a public store, and is the "first" server in the site. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Enterprise, NT4 SP6a Thanks Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fixing 1018 errors
Thanks. Do I really have to move the IMS and public store? The 1018 errors were cause by a bad drive in the RAID set. The drive has been replaced. Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fixing 1018 errors You will want to go through this to move the server http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Yes, you can delete the priv when you are done. As for the 1018 errors, these are most often caused by hardware issues such as the RAID card or bad memory. You will need to diagnose and correct these issues before you put the server back in operation. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fixing 1018 errors My exchange database has been reporting 1018 errors. I couldn't restore from backup and repairing the database made matters worse. So, I've built a server and joined the existing site and have been moving mailboxes to the temporary server. Once all the mailboxes have been moved, can I simply delete the priv.edb file and the new empty database will be created upon starting the Exchange services? Is there anything else that needs to be moved to the temporary server before deleting the priv.edb? The server is running the Internet Mail Service for the site, has a public store, and is the "first" server in the site. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Enterprise, NT4 SP6a Thanks Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixing 1018 errors
My exchange database has been reporting 1018 errors. I couldn't restore from backup and repairing the database made matters worse. So, I've built a server and joined the existing site and have been moving mailboxes to the temporary server. Once all the mailboxes have been moved, can I simply delete the priv.edb file and the new empty database will be created upon starting the Exchange services? Is there anything else that needs to be moved to the temporary server before deleting the priv.edb? The server is running the Internet Mail Service for the site, has a public store, and is the "first" server in the site. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Enterprise, NT4 SP6a Thanks Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bandwidth Help
Your either an open relay, propagating a virus, or both. Aaron -Original Message- From: Jason E. Sommers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bandwidth Help Group, I am having some problem with my Exchange server using way too much bandwidth. I have been using Exchange 5.5 sp4 with my Windows 2000 server, I just recently upgraded to Exchange server 2000. Now my other computers on the network cannot download anything. They can still surf the web but all download go so long and the stop. I have a 512 connection to the internet via cable. I have tried several routers with the same problems. The cable company told me that my connection was fine and they could not support me any further since I am using a router. I have set the exchange server to only relay from the five computers on my LAN and they user would have to be authenticated by there server before they could relay to the SMTP VS. Any other thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jason P.S. Does anyone know what it means to get Outlook Express messages in all of their shared folders on the networkthanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and pop3
There are many options for re-configuring Outlook to MAPI depending on the version of Outlook. The more difficult task is getting all the email in those PST files back on the server. Aaron -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 Yeah thanks for your help.. Do you have any ideas or program recommendation on a quick, easy and low end user involvement for the mapi setup -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 Audit purposes? Such as security audit? I'd say that you've got bigger issues if your users are using POP3 and sending clear text passwords. My opinion is turn off account lockout and forgo the audit crap until you can convert these users to MAPI connections. I never found a solution that addressed the root of the problem. Aaron -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 Thank god.. Now I know im not crazy.. I have tried to disable the account lockouts but due to audit purposes I cannot .. Have you ran into any fixes or workarounds until I convert to mapi -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 I've seen this with Exchange 5.5 as well. Never could figure out why it was happening. Why not just disable account lockouts? -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and pop3 hello.. I have been dealing with this issue ever since we moved to exchange 2000. We are running windows xp with the pop3 connector. several of my users accounts are getting locked out as if they are entering and incorrect password. The users account information (password) is not being recognized my the exchange server. Need to reset password and recreate account on local machine.. Any ideas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and pop3
Audit purposes? Such as security audit? I'd say that you've got bigger issues if your users are using POP3 and sending clear text passwords. My opinion is turn off account lockout and forgo the audit crap until you can convert these users to MAPI connections. I never found a solution that addressed the root of the problem. Aaron -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 Thank god.. Now I know im not crazy.. I have tried to disable the account lockouts but due to audit purposes I cannot .. Have you ran into any fixes or workarounds until I convert to mapi -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 I've seen this with Exchange 5.5 as well. Never could figure out why it was happening. Why not just disable account lockouts? -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and pop3 hello.. I have been dealing with this issue ever since we moved to exchange 2000. We are running windows xp with the pop3 connector. several of my users accounts are getting locked out as if they are entering and incorrect password. The users account information (password) is not being recognized my the exchange server. Need to reset password and recreate account on local machine.. Any ideas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and pop3
I've seen this with Exchange 5.5 as well. Never could figure out why it was happening. Why not just disable account lockouts? -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and pop3 hello.. I have been dealing with this issue ever since we moved to exchange 2000. We are running windows xp with the pop3 connector. several of my users accounts are getting locked out as if they are entering and incorrect password. The users account information (password) is not being recognized my the exchange server. Need to reset password and recreate account on local machine.. Any ideas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pegasus migration utility?
http://www.slipstick.com/config/convmsg.htm -Original Message- From: Norris Carden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pegasus migration utility? Does anyone know of a decent utility that can migrate Pegasus mail files to .PST files? Thanks, Norris Carden www.rasquel.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Storage Limits
Wow. I'm a member because my wife was a member when we got married. She was a member because her father served in the Dental Corp and is a USAA member... And you can't get in because you've been out for 3 years! Geez! Aaron USAA since 1999. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits ironically enough on this subject..I tried to join usaa last week. they stated I was retired from the navy too long..2 years is the max, I have been 3. what a bummer. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits Getting raises since 1981. - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:28 PM Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits > If you're dependents then I think you need a raise! > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Happy 21st Century Auto Insurance customer since 2001! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:21 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits > > > Aye! > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits > > > And their dependents! > > Happy USAA customer since I can remember... > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:13 PM > Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits > > > > What's USAA? I thought it was a insurance company that caters to > > the > > military. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > hp Services > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris > > Scharff > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:55 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits > > > > > > At a StorageTek conference here in Austin a very nice lady from USAA > > drew my name out of a hat for the door prize (Palm m505). [1] > > > > obExchange: StorageTek makes archival solutions for Exchange which > > can > > > meet regulatory compliance for those who worry about the SEC or > > HIPPA > > and the like. > > > > [1] Like I didn't already like USAA enough. > > > > On 2/3/03 13:46, "Martin Blackstone" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > 1990 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:47 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits > > > > > > Since 1997 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:46 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits > > > > > > Er... 1986 > > > > On 2/3/03 13:33, "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Happy USAA customer since 1996 > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ:
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Thanks. I still planned to keep our main fax. We currently have two. One is dedicated to incoming and the other is for sending and overflow incoming. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a good fax machine. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Thanks Bill. Good info. Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm going to check out Panafax. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax. But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like 850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for... You better research this a bit more. Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable. First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2 channel cheapest is like 500.00 then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago). Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...) bill -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -----Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mail
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Thanks Bill. Good info. Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm going to check out Panafax. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax. But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like 850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for... You better research this a bit more. Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable. First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2 channel cheapest is like 500.00 then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago). Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...) bill -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -----Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
5.5 -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Are you running Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Checked into that one... Unfortunately it either forwards as a property format and a viewer needs to be installed, or it forwards as a self-viewing file (exe) which outlook and Antigen both choke on. I would like the faxes to be TIF or even better, PDF. Aaron -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think. Not sure if it automatically will forward it however. If not I am sure it wouldn't take much to write a program to do it for you. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NTbackup hardware compression ?
I used to back up a 17GB+ Priv on a DDS3 tape drive without spanning tapes. Something must be wrong with either the tape HW or the driver you are using. Aaron -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTbackup hardware compression ? I was wondering if hardware compression is generally effective when doing an Exchange-aware NTbackup backup, or if the databases are already compressed? I have a 12GB capacity DDS3 tape drive that I use to do on-line backups of my Exchange server. I have made sure that I am either using the command line switch /hc:on, or checking "hardware compression" in the NTbackup screeen. However, since my Priv.Edb creeped up to >12 Gig, the backup spans two tapes. Could there be something I'm doing incorrectly, or is it time to get a bigger tape drive, or an Exchange backup program that understands tape loaders, or just deal with the additional pain of tape flipping? Thanks for any info Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers ! (next year) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem sending email using CDONTS
Hi all,
I have a problem sending email using CDONTS. Digging around on TechNet
didn't help and Google indicated that this is a common problem but I found
no solutions.
Configuration is
NT 4.0 SP6a
IIS 4.0
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are trying to send email via CDONTS on the same server as Exchange.
Script works fine to send email outside the server. It also works fine to
send email to domains on the server that are re-routed to the primary domain
KleinschmidtUSA.com (via IMS routing). Trying to send email to the primary
domain results in an NDR.
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NERAC Request
Sent: 12/20/02 12:17:51 PM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/20/02 12:17 PM
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=kleinschmidt
ass;l=RAVEN0212201717ZDJ4GJ5Z
MSEXCH:IMS:Kleinschmidt Associates:PITTSFIELD:RAVEN 3902 (000B09AA) Host
Unknown
My first guess was a DNS issue, but I cannot find any faults with it.
Anyone have any ideas? Script is shown below
TIA,
Aaron
Dim objMail
Dim strEmail
Set objMail = Server.CreateObject("CDONTS.NewMail")
If Not isNull(Request("txtEmail")) Then
strEmail = Request("txtEmail")
Else
strEmail = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
End If
objMail.From = strEmail
objMail.Subject = "NERAC Request"
objMail.To = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
objMail.Body = "NERAC REQUEST FOLLOWS" & vbcrlf & vbcrlf&_
"Project Name: " & Request("txtProjectName") & vbcrlf & vbcrlf&_
"Job Number: " & Request("txtJobNumber") & vbcrlf & vbcrlf&_
"Information Needed: " & Request("txtDescription") & vbcrlf & vbcrlf&_
"Search Terms: " & Request("txtTerms") & vbcrlf & vbcrlf&_
"Date Needed By: " & Request("txtDate") & vbcrlf & vbcrlf&_
"Provide Search Results To: " & Request("txtResults")
objMail.Send
Response.Redirect("thanks.asp")
set objMail = nothing
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: a bit OT: My DSL modem+D-Link router+OWA - weird things
Reducing the MTU on the client might be a good start. Try something around 1400. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: a bit OT: My DSL modem+D-Link router+OWA - weird things Importance: High So I recently got DSL with BellSouth. I also got me a D-Link router. The DSL modem is also a router and a DHCP server. It gives out IP addresses in 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.100 range. D-Link grabs 192.168.1.1 from DSL modem. D-Link in turn is also a router and a DHCP server. It gives out IP addresses in 192.168.0.100-192.168.0.152 range. My PC is plugged into the D-Link and grabs 192.168.0.100 from the D-Link. So I have such a daisy chain. It works fine for browsing the Internet. I have no problem connecting to Exchange 2000 Outlook Web Access which is sitting on a public IP. I have no problem composing and sending short messages. But the weird stuff starts happening if I reply or forward a message - I put the recipients names in, I can even click on check names, I can use the address book search, but when I click on the Send button, the Send button and all other buttons in the toolbar turn grey and stay like that for a few minutes. Then they turn normal again but the message never gets sent. What's up with that? Any ideas? I have tried disabling DHCP service on the DSL modem and assigning a static IP to D-Link. Didn't help. P.S. I can make everything work by turning D-Link to use Dynamic PPPoE right through the DSL modem. It kind of overrides the modem's PPPoE (the modem becomes a mere medium, converter from phone jack to RJ45). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Working Offline
And no one has mentioned latency... Latency can have a huge impact on network performance. Bandwidth is only part of the equation. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline Because total bandwidth and available bandwidth are two entirely different animals. > -Original Message- > From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz@;inovis.com] > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > So if you, say, have 20 users in a remote office, using a high > estimate, they would need a total of 160K for outlook. In that > scenario, why bother with offline folders and forcing users to > synchronize? Even our remote dialup users still use outlook online > for the added functionality. > > James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ > Associate Systems Administrator > InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Working Offline > > > This issue has come up a few times regarding bandwidth needed for > Outlook. Seems most here agree 4K range per user. I have seen some say > as high as 8K though. > > - Original Message - > From: "James Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:51 AM > Subject: RE: Working Offline > > > > If they are connected using ADSL (how fast?) there is no reason why > > they can't continue to work online. My office currently does not > > have enough user to warrant an exchange server, so we connect > > remotely to our corp HQ. We are connecting over a 384K pipe, and we > > all work online. Even if the > DSL > > line is only a 768K line, there should be no issues with your users > working > > online if they want to. If you have enough users in the remote > > offices to be concerned about the bandwidth, then perhaps the idea > > of having a centralized exchange server should be rethought. We > > have about 20 users > in > > this office, though, and there are no significant performance issues > > with outlook and exchange. I recommend forgetting the PF idea with > > calendars > and > > let those users who need to open other users' calendars just work > > online. > I > > really don't think they will see a performance hit, and if so, it > > should > be > > minimal. > > > > James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ > > Associate Systems Administrator > > InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > > [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] > > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Working Offline > > > > > > Ok thanks, we have remote sites that used to have local exchange > > servers, and they worked online. We've now moved all mailboxes to > > our central > server, > > seperated from our remote offices via ADSL, and remote users now > > work offline, with automatic synchs every 10 mins. > > > > They basically open each others calenders, so I'm thinking we could > achieve > > the same by them using public folders instead > > > > -Original Message- > > From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz@;inovis.com] > > Sent: 01 November 2002 14:13 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Working Offline > > > > > > 1) yes, they have to mark that folder as being synchronized/made > > available offline. Even if you designate all folders to be made > > available offline, you will have to go in and modify that > > synchronization group whenever new folders or subfolders are > > created. > > 2) no, you will not have access to other users' folders when working > > offline, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect > > to other users' folders, they will have to work online. > > > > James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ > > Associate Systems Administrator > > InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > > [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] > > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:02 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Working Offline > > > > > > ...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' > > > > Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a > > workaround > > > > thanks > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange > > Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Working Offline > > > > > > Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline > > environment creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to > > be taught how to mark that folder to be synchronized? > > > > Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in > > synchronization > > > > Thanks > > > >
RE: Working Offline
We have a similar setup... 40% of my users work at other locations and use offline folders to improve Outlook performance. We also auto synch their folders. We have configured Outlook to ask the user whether they want to work offline or connect when Outlook starts, so if they are interested in using an Outlook feature that doesn't work in offline mode such as non-synched folders private and public folders, view free/busy info, opening other users' folders, or OOA, they simply restart Outlook in "Connected" mode. Aaron -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline Ok thanks, we have remote sites that used to have local exchange servers, and they worked online. We've now moved all mailboxes to our central server, seperated from our remote offices via ADSL, and remote users now work offline, with automatic synchs every 10 mins. They basically open each others calenders, so I'm thinking we could achieve the same by them using public folders instead -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz@;inovis.com] Sent: 01 November 2002 14:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline 1) yes, they have to mark that folder as being synchronized/made available offline. Even if you designate all folders to be made available offline, you will have to go in and modify that synchronization group whenever new folders or subfolders are created. 2) no, you will not have access to other users' folders when working offline, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to other users' folders, they will have to work online. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline ...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround thanks -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to mark that folder to be synchronized? Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in synchronization Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
Which server are you testing? Stainsafe appears to have 3 MX records stainsafe.com. 5h49m36s IN MX 10 mail.stainsafe.com. stainsafe.com. 5h49m36s IN MX 100 mail.uu.net. stainsafe.com. 5h49m36s IN MX 5 mail1.stainsafe.com. Mail1.stainsafe.com appears to be denying relays, but mail.stainsafe is open. Aaron -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE@;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying I have do not reroute incoming email selected. Nothing else. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:Aaron.Brasslett@;KleinschmidtUSA.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying I've tested your server and it is definitely wide-open. What do you have for routing restrictions? Aaron -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE@;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying This is my telnet session Helo stainsafe.com Mail from:<> Rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> No denial message. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Are you giving a local host or an external host name as your send from? -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE@;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Hello group. I am using Exchange 5.5 server with service pack 4. This server has the SMTP interface installed and it being used to route SMTP mail. For the life of me I can not figure out why this server is allowing SMTP mail to relay. I have the option "Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail" checked. I have restarted the IMS a few times. But when I telnet and send an email to a hotmail address, I do not get an error stating relaying is denied. It sends the message through. Is there anything that I am missing that is allowing mail to relay? *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please n
RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
I've tested your server and it is definitely wide-open. What do you have for routing restrictions? Aaron -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE@;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying This is my telnet session Helo stainsafe.com Mail from:<> Rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> No denial message. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Are you giving a local host or an external host name as your send from? -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE@;stainsafe.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying Hello group. I am using Exchange 5.5 server with service pack 4. This server has the SMTP interface installed and it being used to route SMTP mail. For the life of me I can not figure out why this server is allowing SMTP mail to relay. I have the option "Do not reroute incoming SMTP mail" checked. I have restarted the IMS a few times. But when I telnet and send an email to a hotmail address, I do not get an error stating relaying is denied. It sends the message through. Is there anything that I am missing that is allowing mail to relay? *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Stainsafe Inc. or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.* _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple SMTP ports
I don't think you'll get Exchange to listen on two ports for SMTP, but you may be able to accomplish this with your firewall. Aaron -Original Message- From: Bob Hollingsworth [mailto:bhollingsworth@;sympatico.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple SMTP ports Is it possible to make an Exchange 2000 server listen to multiple smtp ports(i.e. port 25 and 30)? One of our branch offices has there own mail server but the DSL isp block outbound 25 and I need to get around this to get mail to our server. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contact list problems
What is in the Display Name field? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Contact list problems I have some contacts that are in a public folder that were imported from a CSV file. When I got to look at the contacts the email shows up correctly in the right field. But when I got to add an address using them all that shows up is a ";" Does anyone know what's going on here? Why would the address show up correctly when I open up the contact yet be blank when I add it to a message? Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA service just quits...
I would recommend that you stop scanning files on your exchange server, or at the very least, exclude the exchange directories. This is considered by many as a necessity on your exchange server. Simply an update of your virus signature definition files could in fact cause problems that you have never encountered before. (Been there, done that) Hope this helps. Aaron -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA service just quits... I am running Norton Corp Edition. We have been running it for um 3 years (latest version about 1 1/2 years). No changes, and no issues before... Scanning both... -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: October 8, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA service just quits... Most of the time it is due to misconfigured AV software. What AV software are you running? Is it scanning the files, information store, or both? Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA service just quits...
Most of the time it is due to misconfigured AV software. What AV software are you running? Is it scanning the files, information store, or both? Aaron -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA service just quits... What would cause the MTA service to just quit? Every so often it dies, then I restart it, and it dies a few days later... Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
So far, I've only have seen one Bugbear-A compared to the dozen or more Klez that I get each day. Aaron -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? > I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd > place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. > > -Peter > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcut for Public Folders
After re-reading you post, you may be looking for the url style of linking a public folders. It would take the format of outlook://Public%20Folders/All%20Public%20Folders/myfoldername Aaron -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders EX 55/SP4 Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not the full path. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcut for Public Folders
This may be client dependant.. But this works for OL 2000 and 2002. >From the folder list drag and drop the folder into an email body and it will create a file with the extension xnk. Aaron -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders EX 55/SP4 Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not the full path. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCC problems in Public Folders
I bet those message are not from his "sent items" folder. I've seen users BCC themselves so it would be in their inbox. If he moved that email he _received_ it would not have any BCC info. Aaron -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders He's using outlook 2002/Exchange 2000. I also tried it for myself, it worked for me to. He's a "troubled" user so I really have no idea what he did. Hell he could be using an etech-a-sketch and trying to check his e-mail -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders Hmmm... This works for me. I moved an email from my sent items that had a bcc address in it to a public folder and I still can see who I bcc'ed. What version out Outlook/Exchange? I am using 2002/5.5SP4 Aaron -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has some BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there anyway to see the info in the BCC field? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCC problems in Public Folders
Hmmm... This works for me. I moved an email from my sent items that had a bcc address in it to a public folder and I still can see who I bcc'ed. What version out Outlook/Exchange? I am using 2002/5.5SP4 Aaron -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has some BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there anyway to see the info in the BCC field? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
That is a perfect scenario for using a VPN. Since you already have the Internet access, you are half way towards a VPN. Aaron -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc. while offline (in meetings, on an airplane, etc.) and synchronize with the home office when they're back in the hotel room. It's MUCH cheaper for them to use the Internet connection in the hotel room rather than dial up from Finland back to Texas. Not to mention MUCH faster. I'm would like to get the TS/Outlook2K to create an ost on their local drive that can be accessed by their local Outlook2K while offline. Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a "workaround" to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/searc
RE: To "Great Cthulhu Jones"
Oh, that is pronounced: 'jOnz That one stumps me on occasion as well. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To "Great Cthulhu Jones" Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To "Great Cthulhu Jones" You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: To "Great Cthulhu Jones" A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Pickup directory
Okay, now we may be getting somewhere... The archive directory was already there, so I deleted it to test to see if restarting the IMS would recreate it. It did not. Nothing logged in the event logs besides the IMS stop and start events. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, final shot, then maybe others have some ideas. :) Was the archive directory created underneath the pickup dir when you restarted the IMS? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yah, did that too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, dumb question: Did you check the permissions on the message, i.e. the file itself? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory. I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings according to Q319890. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Does the Exch SA account have the necessary permissions to access that file? What troubleshooting have you already done? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Pickup directory Hi all, I am placing a RFC822 compliant message in my Exch 5.5 SP4 (NT4.0 SP6a) IMC pickup directory, but the message never gets delivered and the file just stays in that directory. I've reviewed a number of Q articles to try and troubleshoot why the pickup directory doesn't work but nothing has helped. Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To u
RE: IMC Pickup directory
Yah, did that too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, dumb question: Did you check the permissions on the message, i.e. the file itself? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory. I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings according to Q319890. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Does the Exch SA account have the necessary permissions to access that file? What troubleshooting have you already done? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Pickup directory Hi all, I am placing a RFC822 compliant message in my Exch 5.5 SP4 (NT4.0 SP6a) IMC pickup directory, but the message never gets delivered and the file just stays in that directory. I've reviewed a number of Q articles to try and troubleshoot why the pickup directory doesn't work but nothing has helped. Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
Easy way would be to buy a Temperature and Humidity monitor for your APC Smart-UPS and let Powerchute alert you. Or, if your cheap, look at http://www.admins-web.de/digitemp/ then use something like ServersAlive to page you. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: None Exchange related Hi ALL I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I have been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down? Can some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to know if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me. THANK EVERYONE Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
Easy way would be to buy a Temperature and Humidity monitor for your APC Smart-UPS and let Powerchute alert you. Or, if your cheap, look at http://www.admins-web.de/digitemp/ then use something like ServersAlive to page you. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: None Exchange related Hi ALL I would like to know how other company cool room is setup. I have been ask the question about what happen when the AC stop working in the computer room and do you have any way of being notify if the AC is down? Can some of you share your setup like hardware, software, etc I like to know if is possible to setup a modem and have it page me. THANK EVERYONE Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST as an archive?
Other list... Unsubscribe. PST=BAD Aaron -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST as an archive? On another list I am on it is suggested that outlook mail be archived to .pst files and burned to cd's Is there any good reason to do this? My understanding is that this is not a wise idea and that there are better ways to archive mail stores. It seems that at least once a week someone on this list is trying to deal with a corrupt pst file. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Notifications
Your question would be best answered by the Servers Alive! Mailing list http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/mailinglist.asp SMS is your best option. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Notifications Hi all, This is way off topic, but may have be solved with something from Exchange ... We have just purchased a copy of 'Servers Alive' to monitor our network servers (PDC, BDC, IIS, SQL, Exchange etc). Is there a preferred method of using a modem to send a text message or email to a mobile phone/pager ? The options we have is to purchase a 'special' agreement from Vodafone which uses their SMS server, or use their free service and send an email to a 'host' which relays it to the phone. Unfortunately, this isn't very efficient and I don't think we can trust it. Does Exchange provide a 'standard' method of sending a message to a mobile phone or is there something I can download from one of the Exchange sites ? Any ideas would be greatly received. Thanks, Tim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
Now what starts with the letter C? Cookie starts with C Let's think of other things That starts with C Oh, who cares about the other things? C is for cookie, that's good enough for me C is for cookie, that's good enough for me C is for cookie, that's good enough for me Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie starts with C C is for cookie, that's good enough for me C is for cookie, that's good enough for me C is for cookie, that's good enough for me Oh, cookie, cookie, cookie starts with C -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D and rhymes with Hell. I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error messages in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the disk drive. So I called the D company and every support engineer told me it was something different. Eventually after I complained enough they started sending me replacement drives through a vendor. I plugged these in same message, they said oops, we sent you another bad drive, so their vendor sent me another. Oops, it was the same one I originally sent out. So the D company eventually sent me a drive from their real warehouse, and - we still got the error. Then they started saying that our application had caused the hard drive error message, and we were to rebuild the drive array from a backup. I asked them how is it that an application is causing hard drive error's. They didn't have an answer. We eventually migrated to a different server and we were able to sweet talk them into getting a replacement. I hated working on the innards of these servers as well. I mean have you seen how they are laid out. The memory array card's have to be the most bizzare thing I have ever seen. I broke a nail taking one of these out. Give me the C word any day. --Felicity > Maybe it's time to go with D or I! > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM > Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions > Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they = > were > not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a > competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like > servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I = > think > Ed is also from the C side, right? > > -Original Message- > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed > Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. =20 > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server > > > I apologise for the OT question... > > Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? > (hardware RAID) > > I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the = > array it > is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error = > right? > > When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical > disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually = > corrupts) > the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents = > backups > from completing. > > hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't = > handle > the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in = > the > process of rebuilding itself... > > The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from = > scratch > and restoring from backup > > Any thoughts? > > sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday = > afternoon > Haiku for good measure: > > Friday afternoon > gotta get going home=20 > server is cactus > > Thanks, > MP > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___
RE: VPN issue...
Possibly a problem with the ADSL router... some routers don't pass PPTP packets properly. Upgrade it to the latest firmware. Also, your ADSL ISP may be blocking PPTP protocol... wouldn't be the first time I've seem ADSL providers blocking VPN ports. Aaron -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... Yeah Aaron but the problem you see... for some reason... it is not working on the ADSL... and that too only from Sharjah... but I have myself tested it out in CYprus with a local ISP and ADSL here and had a win 2K server with 3 clients behind it.. and the Win 2K server as a RRAS .. and all the clients could get on to the VPN.. do u think it is an issye with the Lucent router.. -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... But PPTP can. Who said anything about IPSec? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com
RE: VPN issue...
But PPTP can. Who said anything about IPSec? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Check it out
Worked for me! Make sure you type the ? Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Check it out MAn I tried it too but it didnt work Check this website out most of the things work on it www.eeggs.com -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Check it out Nope. No Workee. U bad Tener. ANDY! Aren't U his Tech Buddy. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Check it out Exchange 5.5 IMAP4 Easter Egg Rating: 5.3 of 10 (18 votes cast) From: ajo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Requires: telnet access to port 143 Easter Egg: 1. telnet to a 5.5 server's imap4 port (port 143 by default) 2. enter the following commands: ? IMAP4 [hit enter] ? ATE [hit enter] ? MY [hit enter] ? BALLS [hit enter] You should see the following: * OK Microsoft Exchange IMAP4rev1 server version 5.5.2650.23 (yourdomainnamehere.com) ready ? BAD Protocol Error ? BAD Protocol Error ? BAD Protocol Error * Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 Server is brought to you by: * * Development: * Larry Osterman Mark Pustilnik * * Kok Wai Chan Patrick Ng Mathru Janakiraman * Jaya Matthew Anand Naidu Soner Terek * * Shailesh Vaishnavi Andrzej Turski Kean Riekenbrauck * Isaac Chan Jean Wu * * Testing: * Steven Goddard Son Duong Danial Aalberg * Scott Overholser Jason Urban Marc Allen * Sean O'Brien *Darren Smith *Jon Beck * *Marielle Sanna * * Program Management: * Mike Gahrns * * Team Mascot: Delilah the Spastic Spaniel ? OK Microsoft Exchange Server - the most feared and loathed group @ Microsoft! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BLB's
I think that the lack of mention of BLB in the DR papers says it all doesn't it? DR >< BLB. Aaron -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BLB's Anyone got any good Q articles or pages explaining the drawbacks of doing Brick Level Backups? My memory is slightly rusty and i am looking to persuade my new site to stop doing them. The site is currently using Veritas Exchange backup. Searched TechNet with no fruitful findings. DR papers dont have much about it. Many thanks Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving out of a Domain
Don't -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving out of a Domain So what would be a recommendation to put an exchange box in DMZ. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving out of a Domain I am Exchange. Hear me roar. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Moving out of a Domain Exchange cannot stand alone; Ex55 requires a domain, Ex2K requires AD. Period. - Original Message - From: "Vincent Avallone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:19 PM Subject: Moving out of a Domain We are in the process of redesigning our network and may need to take our Exchange 2000 server out of our domain. Since Exchange will out of the AD domain, it will not be able to get any user info etc. Basically how should I move an Exchange box out of domain to be a standalone email server? I think I may have to Exmerge to .pst and reload Exchange, then Exmerge back. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Hmmm... I must have the magic touch too 120 users 17Gb priv, 6Gb pub single PIII 550, 256MB, mirrored sys drive, mirrored log drive, RAID 5+1 database drive and the server sits idle most of the day... Aaron PS It also runs IIS for OWA and AV software... -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization How many, and what speed is your processor on your Exchange Box? I am running 1gMhz, with 1g Ram, for about 200 users, and I still get "Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server" Share your secret on how you do that? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redundant OWA
Good idea. You could use the demo version of Servers Alive! to do that quite easily. Aaron -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Redundant OWA You could write a script that would pole the current exchange server and when it does not receive a response have it Stop IIS rewrite the reg entry and then restart IIS PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phillip Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Redundant OWA Exchange 5.5 OWA This is a dedicated OWA server that has only OWA component installed. It is set up to connect to a Exchange server. The name of the server can be found at the MSExchangeWEB registry key at: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\Parameter s\Server Is it possible to add one more Exchange server names there to let it be kind of redundant? In the event of failure of the primary Exchange server that the OWA is connecting to, the OWA server can pick up the secondary Exchange server. Let me know. Thank you. Phillip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another CA Problem
Okay. Have you tried stop the services via the InoculateIT Service Manager? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem It has been awhile since I tried to do it. I don't remember the errors. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem And those errors are... -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Tried to set it up and use it, but it wouldn't work. Kept running into errors. -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Next question is why are you manually installing the updates? I run the same version and you the auto download thingy and it automatically stops and restarts all the necessary bits for me. I have very little problems with that arrangement. Have you tried using it? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped. I am running version 4.53. As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be 100% better. Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies. What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another CA Problem Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT. After I apply one of their Signature updates. I do all required steps to install the patch. I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services. Well after a few hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu. Am I doing something wrong. Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually doing something. I have check my event log and there have been no Virus stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use. I am running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange L
RE: Another CA Problem
And those errors are... -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Tried to set it up and use it, but it wouldn't work. Kept running into errors. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Next question is why are you manually installing the updates? I run the same version and you the auto download thingy and it automatically stops and restarts all the necessary bits for me. I have very little problems with that arrangement. Have you tried using it? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped. I am running version 4.53. As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be 100% better. Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine. -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies. What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another CA Problem Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT. After I apply one of their Signature updates. I do all required steps to install the patch. I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services. Well after a few hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu. Am I doing something wrong. Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually doing something. I have check my event log and there have been no Virus stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use. I am running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another CA Problem
Next question is why are you manually installing the updates? I run the same version and you the auto download thingy and it automatically stops and restarts all the necessary bits for me. I have very little problems with that arrangement. Have you tried using it? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped. I am running version 4.53. As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be 100% better. Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine. -Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another CA Problem First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies. What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another CA Problem Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT. After I apply one of their Signature updates. I do all required steps to install the patch. I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services. Well after a few hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu. Am I doing something wrong. Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually doing something. I have check my event log and there have been no Virus stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use. I am running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another CA Problem
First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies. What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use? Aaron -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another CA Problem Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT. After I apply one of their Signature updates. I do all required steps to install the patch. I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services. Well after a few hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu. Am I doing something wrong. Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually doing something. I have check my event log and there have been no Virus stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use. I am running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Then you have a RAID 5 array with a hot spare. The drive with no light on is the hot spare. A -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know smart array 431 controller, slot 3 array A with spare 34719 mb raid 5, logical drive 1 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: anyone know >>> >>> >>>I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the >>>4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol >>>ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. >>>Thanks >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
I think you store some kind of make-up in it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: anyone know >>> >>> >>>I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the >>>4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol >>>ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. >>>Thanks >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
In other words, you don't know the config. How much total space does the RAID 5 volume report. I bet if it reports 36.4 then you have a RAID 5 plus hot spare. If it reports 54.6GB you have a RAID5 with a failed parity drive. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know this is a year old server and the 4 drives are part of a raid 5 array -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare light doesn't come on. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare light doesn't come on. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: off topic - Account lockout
I agree with Joe. Go get ERD Commander now and it will save you gobs of time in the future... it is priced quite reasonable. Aaron -Original Message- From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: off topic - Account lockout ERD Commander is a great tool for this and other general Nt admin items www.sysinternals.com I dont know if the demo version will allow you to change a password. The tool is invaluable however IMHO. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: off topic - Account lockout Does anyone have some sort of hack tool that will allow you to change the local admin password on a workstation and get into the OS? We took a machine off the domain but didn't realize that the local admin password was not set to the company default password. Also is there is way to just load the windows 2k cd in and restart the pc and have it so that it only does a reinstall and does not format the drive? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 'Contacts' - Searching for activities
This works okay for me
Is the activity folder a journal folder? If not, try creating a journal
public folder and see if you can specify it as the activity folder.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tim John - Domainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 'Contacts' - Searching for activities
Hi gang,
I hope this isn't too far off topic, but ...
I have created a contacts list in Public Folders and have also created a
folder where I can 'cc' an email sent to the contact ('Send message to
Contact'). When I try and view the activities for the contact, it doesn't
return the information from the new email folder.
I have configured the 'activities' location in the 'Properties' section of
the contact folder, but it only seems to work on the contents of a mailbox
and not a public folder.
Is this a default setting or am I overlooking something in my configuration
?
Thanks in advance.
Tim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Ah ha! Somebody else has this problem! We have the same problem although we are using InoculateIT and I figured it was to blame, but it appears that Scanmail does the same. Even though the message's attachment has been deleted, when the message is read via OWA, you immediately start getting the dreaded ASP 0115 errors. Only a reboot of the machine will fix the problem... bouncing the service doesn't help. I have yet to find a solution except to inform the users not to open these messages via OWA... and we all now how good that works! So far I have had to reboot the server twice as a result of this virus's message. Let me know if you find a solution! Aaron -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I had a user that received a message that was infected with the "WORM_BADTRANS.B" virus (attachment "HAMSTER.DOC.pif"). ScanMail caught the virus and deleted the attachment. Now if the user gets into OWA and tries to open the message...it kills IIS everytime. I put the message in my mailbox and I also duplicated the problem. Back to Microsoft for a fix!!! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PST=BAD
I thought I would never have to actually post a PST question as I know PST=BAD. But I have been asked to help a subcontractor of ours with his Outlook woes. He has been storing his emails in a PST. Apparently, they don't have an exchange server so PST was their only option. He is complaining that he is losing emails and Outlook is very slow. Turns out the guy has a 1.9GB PST file! I quickly pointed out to him that a PST of over 1.0GB is considered unstable and prone to corruption and that Outlook will no longer work once his PST reaches 2.0GB. Long term solution (2 months?) would be to provide him access to our Exchange resources with a VPN tunnel and store his emails there. So for a short term solution (until I can get the tunnel setup) I could break up his PST into multiple smaller PST files (around 500MB each). Do you believe that multiple smaller PST files (all opened in Outlook at the same time) would be more stable than one 1.9GB PST? Is this a good short term solution? I am open to other suggestions. OWA access is currently not feasible for various reasons. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello
What do expect from a cheapo Internet connection? There is a simple rule when it comes to picking your Internet provider. There are three basic qualities... Lots of Bandwidth/Low latency Great Technical Support and Reliability Inexpensive pick any two of those qualities. Aaron -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello Yeah.. I'm back after 3.5 days of downtime thanks to AT&T and Excite communications. I HAD 3 static IP'sgone now and probably won't get any for another 3-4 weeks. I have been reduced to using DHCP assigned addresses. Had to reconfigure my firewall and my DNS. Could not get a call back from anyone all weekend and had to wait on hold for 1.5 hours Monday just to find out I was SOL. Just wanted to post my gratitude publicly. BEM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standard to Enterprise
I'm seeing mixed opinions in the archives about the best way to upgrade Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise. FAQ states: 1. Do a backup. (yadda yadda online, offline, ERD) 2. Run setup from the Enterprise CD 3. Select Reinstall option to upgrade the server Archives hint at re-applying NT SPs and/or Exchange SPs... this true? Any need to run optimizer? TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA error
In my experience, this is usually related to a permissions issue with IIS. TechNet has gobs of info on ASP 0115 errors. Here is a test. Give everyone that has access to OWA administrative privileges on the server. If that solves your problem, then you know it is a permissions issue this is the fastest and easiest way, but it has some obvious security issues. Usually it has boiled down to a permissions problem in the WINNT and WINNT\SYSTEM32 directories. Good luck... finding the cause of ASP 0115 errors is loads of fun. Aaron -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA error I keep getting the error listed below for OWA. I perform a weekly automated reboot on it. That seemed to clear up the issue for a while, however, it is becoming more frequent. OWA is on a standalone NT 4/SP6a server without the regular exchange services present on the box. The CDO is Exchange SP4. The OWA server connects to a seperate exchange server SP6a/ Exchange SP4. Looking at knowledgebase only gave clues for Exchange 55 RTM or SP1. error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/logon.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. Thank You! Michael Semiglia IBM Global Services Groupware Exchange E-mail Engineering *207 575-1094 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Forwarder
For the record, I would agree this is a bad idea, but... You could allow him to use you as a relay as long as he has authenticated. Give him a mailbox, username, and password, configuring each appropriately. Make sure he uses a client that allows SMTP authentication (Outlook, Outlook Express, ?) and hope he doesn't decide to use your server for sending his Spam. Aaron -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Forwarder So anyway, I see this isn't a fond idea to you all. But how do I do it, regardless of the down side of it? I need to present some solution to my superior. I do appreciate your feed back. Thank you. Ed -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Forwarder He is asking you to be a relay. Not nice and could lead to horrible long term problems. Why doesn't his ISP let him send mail? Tris - Deputy Systems & Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 November 2001 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Forwarder I am not sure how to achieve this, so I was wondering if someone may point me in the right direction. I have a colleague that wishes to send out mail. His ISP however, is restricting him from sending mail out. He wants to know if he can send mail out from our email server, I guess sort of be a forwarder for him. Is this at all possible? If it is how can I actually do that? Or do I have to create an account for him and have him use pop3 settings etc.? Thank you all in advance for you much appreciated knowledge and feed back. BTW I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 server on NT 4.0 sp6a. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
abacus -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Beat that! -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K TS-1000 (2k RAM, membrane keyboard, RF converter for BW TV) Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Well My first was a small computer called Lazar (I am not sure whether it is a major brand At that time) something which had a 64 KB of memory and GWBasic in its ROM. I Was damn Illiterate those days I did not knew how to find the configuration Of that "Toy" Then not to mention the Commodore ant ARC computer with 256 memory And no hard disk - 51/2 floppies. And that first floppy diskette of mine.. What trouble I went through to own that.. Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: Utegaard, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 22:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Yes, but I have all my enterprise data stored on cassettes via TRS-80. We have a storage warehouse just for them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Litton 4k drum memory all program loaded via paper tape. Don't drop the roll. - Original Message - From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:46 PM Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > HP 2100 > > 4K words of *core* memory, and a model 33 teletype w/ paper tape for program > storage. > > Have you ever loaded an OS at 110 baud? > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > PDP-11. > > Ed Crowley > Compaq Computer > > --- "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Man I remember the first computer I wrote my first > > Pascal program on. It > > was an 8086 PC with no hard disk and 256K of RAM. > > The code had different > > procedures for about 10 sorting algorithms and it > > was intended to be a tool > > for comparing how different algorithms performed > > with certain data sets. It > > had overwhelmed the CPU when I tried to compile it > > in Turbo pascal. Aah, > > the good old days... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Shields, Anthony > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:21 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > > > As sarcastic as it is. It is interesting, if one > > presumes, that the > > very machines we're mentioning were in fact our > > first 'computers'. For > > me, reading your emails is like walking down memory lane...TRS-80's > > , TI-99a? Or 994a?, TRS-80's with 384K of RAM, etc... > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:41 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > Ooh! Ooh! > > Can I get Colour Display for my TRS-80s? I've got a > > killer ap that I > > wrote in basic that draws these neato boxes on the > > screen and I have > > been aching to see it in full 8 bit colour! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Soysal, Serdar > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: 10/1/01 8:46 AM > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > You've got COLOR DISPLAY When did THAT come > > out? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rocky Stefano > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:31 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > > > You all lose. I've clustered 25 Atari 2600's and can > > now play Mission > > Impossible in 8bit color > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier > > Sent: October 1, 2001 8:29 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K > > > > > > > > Man, you're way too cutting-edge for me. I just use > > my VIC-20 and post > > to the local BBSs. And I can just copy my new > > software onto tapes... > > far more convenient than disks or CDs. > > > > Stephen > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Soysal, Serdar > > To:
RE: Market Share
A recent survey indicated that 76% of all surveys are inaccurate. Aaron -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Market Share http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/compare/Ferris.asp >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 6:14 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Market Share >>> >>> >>>What's your logon and PW? >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, >>>William >>>Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:09 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: Market Share >>> >>> >>>This looks a little high for Exchange, no? >>> >>>MARKET SHARE (Seats Deployed) >>> >>>Exchange 58% >>>Notes/Domino 27% >>>HP OpenMail 5% >>>GroupWise 2% >>>Other 8% >>> >>>Source: >>>http://www.ferris.com/rep/200103/default.asp >>> >>>William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ASP 0115 Errors on OWA
Yuck 0115 errors suck. Most of my random ASP 0115 errors went away with some permission changes. Why permission changes fix RANDOM errors I will never know, but it did help us. The following blurb is from this article: http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q194190 Permission and authentication issues with files and registry keys Errors may occur if the authenticated user does not have sufficient permissions on other files such as custom components, system dynamic- link libraries (DLLs), and even registry keys. ASP scripts are typically executed in the security context of the IUSR_ account. If you believe you are dealing with a permissions problem in the registry, you can use Regedt32.exe to examine permissions on the various registry keys. In particular, you may want to look at ODBC, Jet, ADO, and other keys that might be relevant to the problem. If you have a computer that is working properly, try comparing key permissions between the two computers. The first step is to determine if you really are seeing a permissions problem. A good test is to temporarily add the anonymous logon account (IUSR_) to the administrators group using User Manager. This gives the IUSR_ account administrative privileges on the computer. If this causes ASP to function properly, you are almost certainly dealing with a permissions issue. NOTE : When you have finished debugging, be sure to remove the IUSR_ account from the Administrators group to minimize the security risk on your server. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ASP 0115 Errors on OWA Good morning to you all: After closing all watertight doors and hatches and weathering the latest virus storms, we started having problems with our OWA server. The problem crops up intermittently with OWA users both from the Internet, from our VPN and inside the corporate network. The server is NT 4.0 with the Option Pack IIS 4 installed. All Service Packs, necessary hotfixes and patches for Nimda and CodeRed were installed (not confirmed if the rollup security patch was installed). However, my problem is this, users are getting ASP 0115 errors when attempting to reach the OWA server. This happens sometimes, before getting the certificate popup, and sometimes after typing in their userid at the basic login page. Usually hitting REFRESH will be enough to let the user in, but sometimes they will have to wait a while, then try again. I've searched Tech net, but most of the KB's point to coding errors. All of this is stock coding directly from Microsoft, no locally developed code at all. Any suggestions as to where I should start looking to fix this, or do I need to nuke the server and start again? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Very small servers (was: A good space for the Exchange ...)
Why use circular logging if they are backing up every night? I would turn that off. Otherwise, if it works, you have pointed out the risks, and they find this acceptable, then go with it... Aaron -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Very small servers (was: A good space for the Exchange ...) On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Daniel Chenault wrote: >> I thought that if you lost the logs, there was a procedure to at least >> restore the data in the Stores? Yeah, you lose anything that wasn't >> committed, of course, but can't you recover something? > > Yes, there is. In my world of support, though, lost data == > unacceptable. Everything is relative. The company I work for supports very small businesses (no more than 50 people, usually less than 20) and SOHO enviornments. One of our most common "new customer" scenarios is when the office has finally grown to the point where they need to buy their first dedicated network server. In that sort of situation, you cannot justify stand-by servers for restores and recovery. Hell, we usually have to argue just to get them to buy a tape drive. Now, consider this configuration: NT 4.0, Exchange 5.5, with patches kept current. Single server for everything -- file, print, mail, backups, etc. Either a single non-redundent disk, or two disks as a single mirrored volume. All files, databases, database logs, etc., on the same disk. Circular logging turned on. It gets backed up every night to tape -- often a full backup every night. Multiple tapes are used in rotation (father/son, etc.). The customer is fully aware that hardware failure will likely result in permenently losing the changes made since last night's backup. It is considered an acceptable risk. My belief has been that this scenario should work. While performance is far from the theoretial ideal, there is nothing that would cause data corruption or system failure. If a catestrophic failure occurs (e.g., dead disk), once the failure is corrected, we should be able to recover to the point of the previous night's backup. Is my belief correct, or are there additional factors that I am not aware of? -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox capacity
I have two comments: 1) Never talk to that tech again... he/she has no clue. 2) Do not move stuff to personal folders... if it is worth keeping, keep it on the Exchange server. Performance will not suffer. I have a user with a 1.5GB mailbox with no performance problems. Aaron -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox capacity Two questions, please. We have some users growing pretty hefty mailboxes, one over 300 MB. A tech told me mailboxes over 50 MB and certainly 100 MB can cause performance problems. Agree? (I haven't seen performance degredation yet.) The tech reccommends we have users create personal folders and move files there. While experimenting with this, we noticed restrictions when dragging a folder from the mailbox to personal folders. Looks like you can't move a folder with subfolders. Please comment. Regards, Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
