RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF
Yes, identical version of McAfee GroupShield. Only difference seems to be loading - dev server has very little traffic - production is busy. Thanks Dave Does the dev server have McAfee installed on it as well? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF I have applied recent MS Patch KB829418 to one of my production servers (after testing ok on dev server). However, after approx 4 hours I get STORE.EXE GPF. The patch has updated STORE.EXE to 5.5.2657.74 (fixes a problem with Outlook 2003 rules processing). Exchange 5.5 SP4. NT4 SP6a plus security patches. Server running Exchange only but has Internet Mail Service and NNTP news service connectors. Also running McAfee GroupShield 5.0 SP2 Patch 1. Have contacted PSS but they require a crash dump which so far I have not been able to obtain. Backed off patch and server runs fine. Problem - repeatable. Anyone experienced any problems with KB829418 on Exchange 5.5? Thanks Dave Parker Rutherford Lab UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
That is the nature of it. I don't belief that NAV checks the mime time so an option would be to rename them i.e. .ex_ .ba_ etc. The other option is to password protect the Zip files and then they will not be scanned. -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use of DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
In setting up a lab environment to test upgrading from 5.5 to 2000, I came across some issues with the IS that I did not expect to see. Over the last few years we have removed users from both the NT Sam and the Exchange DS. When a Recipient was removed from the DS, it removed the mailbox from the IS but it appears that any permissions that referenced that recipient (e.g. /O=CREATIVE COMPUTING, INC./OU=CREATCOMP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RLB) in both the Public Folders and/or other users folders become orphaned. As case in point, the above recipient was given explicit access to a number of folders in my Inbox and now that he has been removed, I now have these orphaned permissions. I have used the DS/IS Adjuster when using a recovery server to restore an individual mailbox to create the DS entries. In this case however I do not wish to create any missing entries but hope that I can use it to Remove unknown user accounts from mailbox permissions and Remove unknown user accounts from public folder permissions I have researched MS knowledge base and reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's Exch 5.5 books and don't really see any prertinent information that indicates whether this is an appropriate use for it. Robichaux does indicate that this is a dangerous feature so thought I would seek the opinion of others. I could manually go through all of my folders and remove the permissions but I would have to also have everyone else in the organization perform this as well and thought this may be an automated way to remove these orphaned permissions. It seems that this would be a good step before trying to migrate. As a side question, is there a particular reason that the deletion of a recipient does not remove all references to them in the IS and not just their mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Use of DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
Thanks that answered the question exactly -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Use of DS/IS Consistency Adjuster You're on the right track for clearing out the orphans (or zombies). http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886, specifically the section Prepare Exchange Server 5.5 for Migration Hunter -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Use of DS/IS Consistency Adjuster In setting up a lab environment to test upgrading from 5.5 to 2000, I came across some issues with the IS that I did not expect to see. Over the last few years we have removed users from both the NT Sam and the Exchange DS. When a Recipient was removed from the DS, it removed the mailbox from the IS but it appears that any permissions that referenced that recipient (e.g. /O=CREATIVE COMPUTING, INC./OU=CREATCOMP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RLB) in both the Public Folders and/or other users folders become orphaned. As case in point, the above recipient was given explicit access to a number of folders in my Inbox and now that he has been removed, I now have these orphaned permissions. I have used the DS/IS Adjuster when using a recovery server to restore an individual mailbox to create the DS entries. In this case however I do not wish to create any missing entries but hope that I can use it to Remove unknown user accounts from mailbox permissions and Remove unknown user accounts from public folder permissions I have researched MS knowledge base and reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's Exch 5.5 books and don't really see any prertinent information that indicates whether this is an appropriate use for it. Robichaux does indicate that this is a dangerous feature so thought I would seek the opinion of others. I could manually go through all of my folders and remove the permissions but I would have to also have everyone else in the organization perform this as well and thought this may be an automated way to remove these orphaned permissions. It seems that this would be a good step before trying to migrate. As a side question, is there a particular reason that the deletion of a recipient does not remove all references to them in the IS and not just their mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2K and MS CRM Router issue
Our company is testing Microsoft's CRM application, the problem we seem to be having deals with the CRM router service. We can send email through the CRM and recieve via Outlook but the message never makes it back to CRM. We currently have an escalated case with Microsoft and they have yet to figure out why it is not funcioning correctly. Has anyone else experienced this? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISP/Exchange Question
Here is the memo from DHS: Department of Homeland Security (UPDATED) ADVISORY Potential For Significant Impact On Internet Operations Due To Vulnerability In Microsoft Operating Systems July 30, 2003 SYSTEMS AFFECTED: Computers using the following operating systems: Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Services Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 OVERVIEW THIS IS AN UPDATE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) JULY 24, 2003 ADVISORY ON MICROSOFT OPERATING SYSTEMS. The DHS/ Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP) National Cyber Security Division (NCSD) is issuing this advisory in consultation with the Microsoft Corporation to heighten awareness of potential Internet disruptions resulting from the possible spread of malicious software exploiting a vulnerability in popular Microsoft Windows operating systems. DHS expects that exploits are being developed for malicious use. (UPDATE: SEVERAL WORKING EXPLOITS ARE NOW IN WIDESPREAD DISTRIBUTION ON THE INTERNET. THESE EXPLOITS PROVIDE FULL REMOTE SYSTEM LEVEL ACCESS TO VULNERABLE COMPUTERS.) Two additional factors are causing heightened interest in this situation: the affected operating systems are in wide spread use, and exploitation of the vulnerability could permit the execution of arbitrary code. DHS and Microsoft are concerned that a properly written exploit could rapidly spread on the Internet as a worm or virus in a fashion similar to Code Red or Slammer. (UPDATE: NO WORM CODE HAS BEEN REPORTED; HOWEVER, AN INTERNET-WIDE INCREASE IN SCANNING FOR VULNERABLE COMPUTERS OVER THE PAST SEVERAL DAYS REINFORCES THE URGENCY FOR UPDATING AFFECTED SYSTEMS.) IMPACT The recently announced Remote Procedure Call (RPC) vulnerability in computers running Microsoft Windows operating systems listed above could be exploited to allow the execution of arbitrary code or could cause a denial of service state in an unprotected computer. Because of the significant percentage of Internet-connected computers running Windows operating systems and using high speed connections (DSL or cable for example), the potential exists for a worm or virus to propagate rapidly across the Internet carrying payloads that might exploit other known vulnerabilities in switching devices, routers, or servers. DETAILS There is a vulnerability in the part of RPC that deals with message exchange over TCP/IP. The vulnerability results from the handling of malformed messages. This particular vulnerability affects a Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) interface with RPC, which listens on RPC enabled ports. This interface handles DCOM object activation requests that are sent by client machines (such as Universal Naming Convention (UNC) paths) to the server. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability would be able to run code with local system privileges on an affected system. The attacker would be able to take any action on the system, including installing programs, viewing changing or deleting data, or creating new accounts with full privileges. RECOMMENDATION Due to the seriousness of the RPC vulnerability, DHS and Microsoft encourage system administrators and computer owners to take this opportunity to update vulnerable versions of Microsoft Windows operating systems as soon as possible. Microsoft updates, workarounds, and additional information are available at http://microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/ bulletin/MS03-026.asp DHS and Microsoft further suggest that Internet Service Providers and network administrators consider blocking TCP and UDP ports 135, 139, and 445 for inbound connections unless absolutely needed for business or operational purposes. Advisories recommend the immediate implementation of protective actions, including best practices when available. DHS encourages recipients of this advisory to report information concerning suspicious or criminal activity to law enforcement or a DHS watch office. The DHS Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection watch offices may be contacted at: For private citizens and companies - Phone: (202) 323-3205, 1-888-585-9078, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Online: http://www.nipc.gov/incident/cirr.htm For telecommunications industry - Phone: (703) 607-4950 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For Federal agencies/departments - Phone: (888) 282-0870 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Online: https://incidentreport.fedcirc.gov Recipients located in Northern Virginia/Washington, DC may report information concerning suspicious or criminal activity directly to me. DHS intends to update this alert should it receive additional relevant information, including information provided to it by the user community. Based on this notification, no change to the Homeland Security Advisory System (HSAS) is anticipated; the current HSAS level is YELLOW. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
I received this earlier today and being the administrator I knew that I had not sent myself this message. The message included a WinZip attachment which was rather interesting to take apart. It turned out to be an html document that directed the browser to go to a website and run a file foveae -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
I am not sure if this was simply bad typing but the file name was an executable called foo (foo.exe) -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus I received this earlier today and being the administrator I knew that I had not sent myself this message. The message included a WinZip attachment which was rather interesting to take apart. It turned out to be an html document that directed the browser to go to a website and run a file foveae -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?
MAPS is one but there are actually several. I ran into an issue with some of our consultant using there Verizon DSL accounts being block for this very reason (they appear as a dialup pool) while I was testing Antigen Spam filter. The link below shows a number of the different RBL lists and descriptions of what they block. http://www.email-policy.com/Spam-black-lists.htm -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? One of the RBL's (MAPS, I think) maintains a blackhole list that includes all known IP dial up pools. Kinda an interesting concept, really. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? This is going over my head, I'm afraid. How can the accepting host know that the sending server has a dynamic IP address? Surely it's not changing in the middle of a mail send? Is the recipient doing a reverse DNS lookup or something? Trying to learn something in Pittsburgh Jim Helfer Greg Sachs wrote: I've had problems from a dynamic dns site on a cable modem sending to aol for a long time. ISP's smtp server is the only way to go - smarthost is one way, you can also set up an smtp connector to send mail to specific domains to your isp's smtp server such as aol.com. Your choice if you trust your isp's mail server more, or your ability to keep the list on your connector current for domains that won't except your outgoing email directly -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? Use your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost for all outgoing mail. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules? I have architected for Fortune 10s... but this time I have a small server on a home network. I use DynDNS.ORG to update the A and MX records. AOL has just instituted a new policy rejecting any email server coming from a dynamic IP address. I have emailed them asking about this but I know they will respond with something like We are attempting to reduce SPAM... even though I reject SPAM on my server's SMTP connector based on IP because SPAMmers typically use the same ISPs and static IP addresses... and there are only a handful of ISPs that allow spammers knowingly. Anyone else had problems with this lately... or more importantly found a way around it (other than getting/paying for a static IP address)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode = lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
Re: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet?
One clarification, to get the behavior in Exchange 2003 of only sending an OOF if the user is on the To: or CC: field you have to set the following reg key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIS\Parameters System\SuppressOOFsToDistributionLists The value should be a DWORD and be set to a value of 1. Also, if you set this reg key then it will disable OOFs to all distribution lists, even internal Exchange distribution lists that are explicitly OOF enabled. One other thing worth noting is that if there are no addresses at all on the To: or CC: line, the OOF will still fire. - Dave - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:31 AM Subject: Re: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet? My employer allows OOFs , but I never set it because I dont think its anyone's business outside of the company where I am, and I dont need to help out any spammers by verifiing my address. (Note that you can specify allowed OOFs by domain) FWIW, Exchange 2003 will *not* send OOFs if the user is not specified in the TO: or CC: field. (Re: your mailing list storm). .Auto-replies to the Internet are bad for that reason and for the potential mail-loops they can cause. - Original Message - From: ml.exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet? Looks like it is that time of the year again, strong pressure from the top has arrived trying to mandate the use of the Out of Office and auto response to the Internet. Even though we have helped cause mailing list storms in the past when it was forced on for a sales convention (thus leading to it's current banishment) once again users want it enabled. Any thoughts on the subject to help enlighten the PHB's would be again most welcome. Thanks in advance all. Miles --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 Licensing
I believe that starting with Exchange 2003 you can buy CALs on a per-mailbox or per-device basis; but as always, ask your MS rep to be sure. In the case of the company I work for it's actually cheaper to license on a per-user since lots of users access their mailboxes from multiple machines. - Dave - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing This certainly could have changed, since Microsoft is famouse for altering their licensing arrangements. At the time I bought CALs, we had to purchase them one per user. If MS really has made this change, then this is definitely a good thing. Matt -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Licensing that is what I was told as well by my rep. It is now a CAL per device that connects. So if a person at one computer opens 5 mailboxes in Outlook it is only 1 CAL. - Original Message - From: Chinnery, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:31 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing Some time ago (I believe it was last year), I listened to a webcast put on by Microsoft. During the Q A, one person asked the Microsoft rep what the licensing requirement would be for the following scenario: 5 Mailboxes all being accessed from 1 computer His answer: 1 license because only 1 machine was used. Which just goes to show, as had been said mb people much more experienced with Exchange than me, that it all depends on who you talk to and that you should always direct licensing questions to your Microsoft representative. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing You need to have as many CALs (client access licenses) as you do users who will connect. As far as I know each user must have their own CAL. Terminal Services works the way you're suggesting, but not this. You might not be able to buy a 5.5 CAL anymore... You may have to buy Exchange 2000 CALs (isn't there a Exchange 2003 coming out? In that case buy THOSE CALs), since a CAL is backwardly compatible. Matt -Original Message- From: Stew Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Licensing Can anyone explain how Exchange 5.5 licensing works. If we need to have 250 users mailboxes do we need 250 licenses? Is is based on concurrent users--for example if a company has 1000 mailboxes but at any point only 50 people are connected to the exchange server do you only need 50 licenses? Its a bit confusing, I am sure many of you will agree. We definitely want to make sure we do this the right way. Many thanks. Stew __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Re: Not Open Relay, but...
Your mail system is accepting a mail for an invalid address (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), and since it couldn't deliver it it's trying to send a message back to the sender telling them it couldn't deliver the message. But in this case, the spammer forged the sender address, so your mail server is sending you NDRs because it can't send the original NDR back to the spoofed address. Make sense? There's not much you can do with Exchange 5.5 to avoid this situation unless the spammer is using a single IP address that you can block from being able to send mail into your system. - Dave - Original Message - From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:26 PM Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... Thanks. I've also cut down the Notifications to just 'Host not Found'. One of the NDR's looks like this A mail message could not be sent because the following host is unknown: smdv231.entertainmentmail.net The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Subject: Undeliverable: Sales manager or Marketing dept - Is this is a Relay, shouldn't I not be accepting it in the first place? Thanks for all the insight so far... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... They're just using dfg.com. Don't bother your MX record. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... Thanks, Jim. Just so I'm clear, it's not uncommon to have over 10,000 messages sitting in the IMS queue after 8hrs? I have another site where the IMS has hardly any messages sitting in there so this is why I am concerned. What if I changed the MX record's IP address, would that help slow it down a little or are they just using dfg.com? Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... Tony, Open up the properties page of your IMS Connection, go to the Internet Mail tab and click on the Notifications... button. My guess would be that you have the Always send notifications when non-delivery reports are generated radio button clicked. If that is the case, select the second choice and uncheck the options that you don't want. I receive anywhere from 3,000 to 10,000 ndrs a day, from spammers trying to brute force their spam through the system. I track the NDRs to create a spreadsheet for management, showing them the exponential growth of spam and the load it is placing on the servers, in order to justify new servers. Jim -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... I've tested via telnet and from home using Outlook Express and it always replies with 550 so I think I'm good there. Just the amount of mail is insane. I came in this morning at there's over 10,000 in the IMS Queue. I guess eventually it will slow down... Thanks to all. Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Dave Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Not Open Relay, but... For #3, what you are seeing is spammer trying to find valid addresses @dfg.com by simply guessing addresses and trying them, your best bet would be to turn off the notification on your IMS for E-mail address could not be found. For #2, yes they will sit in the queue until they are delivered or just time out. For #1, are you sure you're not an open relay? See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Preventing_Third_Party_Relaying_In_MS_Ex change_Server_55.html. - Dave - Original Message - From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... Hi John, Is this in response to my question #3? If so, does everyone receive over 2000 messages every hour in the 'Admin' mailbox with a subject line of 'Notification: Inbound Mail Failure? I understand getting some but over 2000 an hour? Each of these messages is addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whatever. It's just random letters in front of the domain name @dfg.com and there's just a ton of them. Thanks for any ideas, all. Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... NDR's (non-delivery reports) from spammer's probably
RE: how to cut down on spam
Can you elaborate flakey? They are hit or miss on filtering or the crash Outlook -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If you have individuals who are really getting hammered and need immediate relief, one or the other may help. -Peter -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Not Open Relay, but...
For #3, what you are seeing is spammer trying to find valid addresses @dfg.com by simply guessing addresses and trying them, your best bet would be to turn off the notification on your IMS for E-mail address could not be found. For #2, yes they will sit in the queue until they are delivered or just time out. For #1, are you sure you're not an open relay? See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Preventing_Third_Party_Relaying_In_MS_Exchange_Server_55.html. - Dave - Original Message - From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... Hi John, Is this in response to my question #3? If so, does everyone receive over 2000 messages every hour in the 'Admin' mailbox with a subject line of 'Notification: Inbound Mail Failure? I understand getting some but over 2000 an hour? Each of these messages is addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whatever. It's just random letters in front of the domain name @dfg.com and there's just a ton of them. Thanks for any ideas, all. Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... NDR's (non-delivery reports) from spammer's probably. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Not Open Relay, but... Hello, NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com I've just taken over a site's Exchange server and have noticed something strange. It's been sometime since I had to play with Exchange this deep but the Queues on my IMS keep filling up with 1000's of emails. We're not an Open Relay that I can tell (I've tested) but there's just a ton of 'Outbound Message Awaiting Delivery' with originator and Destination Host of different .com's. There is a ton of Inbound Mail Failures in the 'Admin' mailbox for delivery failures as well. My three questions are: 1) Are these messages that are trying to relay but failing? 2) If so, are they just going to sit in the Queue for the default time? 3) For the Inbound Mail Failures, a lot of them are going to bogus addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are these all coming from? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot create mail box
I had this same problem, and it turned out to be permission on the user object. Click on view - advanced - click on the security tab on the user, click on advanced, make sure there are 4 entries for Exchange Server, or compare the permissions from a working account to set them up correctly. If I remember right there are r/w public; r/w personal; list permissions; and one other one I can't recall. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cannot create mail box 1 W2K SP3, 1 E2K SP3 I have one user that I cannot create a mail box for. I click on exchange task, create mailbox. It adds the exchange attributes to her account but does not add an email address nor does it create a mail box. Tried manually pushing the magic RUS button. No luck there. Have waited a few days, have rebooted. I get no error message. Any thoughts? Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR's
You can configure NDR' from the IMS Properties.. Look on the Internet Mail tab Notifications -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR's Is there a way in exchange 5.5 to kill ndr's from being sent out? I seem to be getting pounded with dictionary attacks from spammers and my outbound queue is enormous...over 24k waiting to be sent. I'm assuming that they are NDR's cuz the originator is . I am not an open relay as I have tested it many times to make sure. b -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Lawyers are like economists - any consensus they reach automatically becomes the truth because all the people who matter act as though it's true. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 June 2003 17:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers I asked my wife about this, since she is an attorney strapping on flame-retardent underwear and her opinion was that it is used for its insurance value. If you sent the formula for Coke to the wrong person by accident it is accepted by the courts that it is common sense that this person does not have the right to freely distribute this and that they should know they recieved it by accident. Adding the legal disclaimer at the bottom just gives the attorneys extra ammunition in case it goes to trial. Hey, not only should common sense tell you that you cannot redistrbute this but WE did too. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: replication issue
No the 2nd server joined the site flawlessly. There are no problems with name resolution (as MS suggested) and just to be sure of this I did add each machine to the HOSTS file. This error doesn't occur until replication of the server's user objects start. Permissions, connectors and all others are successful. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
replication issue
Situation: Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced. Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site. Site will not replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are: Event ID: 1059 Source: MSExchangeDS Description: Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error 22. Event ID: 1083 Source: MSExchangeDS Description: Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on directory 'FIRST-SERVER'. Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that DRA error 22 is a JET error. I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed. outcome = identical issues. Thoughts? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change FQDN in Ex55
I recently reconfigured our internal network from .com to .loc in advance of our planned migration/upgrade to AD. We are running Ex 5.5 Sp4 on W2K Sp3. I have found and issue with the SMTP header that now sent out as seen here: Received: from challenger.creatcomp.loc (unknown[216.237.98.130]. I have reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's books on Exch 5.5 looking for a way to change this so it appears to come from an external FQDN but was unable to find any reference for this. I have also looked at just about every attribute within the Ex5.5 objects especially the IMS but nothing seems to be applicable. Is there any way to change this? Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
It is not the email address that I want change. Our current addressing is [EMAIL PROTECTED]. What I am looking to change is the SMTP header that Exchange is writing. It is now writing this based upon the internal DNS information on the Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on outgoing mail. Sander -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change FQDN in Ex55 I recently reconfigured our internal network from .com to .loc in advance of our planned migration/upgrade to AD. We are running Ex 5.5 Sp4 on W2K Sp3. I have found and issue with the SMTP header that now sent out as seen here: Received: from challenger.creatcomp.loc (unknown[216.237.98.130]. I have reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's books on Exch 5.5 looking for a way to change this so it appears to come from an external FQDN but was unable to find any reference for this. I have also looked at just about every attribute within the Ex5.5 objects especially the IMS but nothing seems to be applicable. Is there any way to change this? Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Relay Help
No -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Relay Help I unchecked Hosts and clients connecting to these internal addresses and restarted the IMS. Still relaying? Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, and Goulding -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussion Subject: RE: Open Relay Help I think the Hosts and clients connecting to these internal addresses is your problem - you don't need it ticked (or I should say it isn't ticked here and doesn't affect inbound email). regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 May 2003 15:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Relay Help On the Routing tab Reroute incoming SMTP mail (required for POP3/IMAP4 support)is checked. In the field below Sent to: has our domain of jjg.com and Route to: is inbound The Routing Restrictions are as follows: Hosts and clients that successfully authenticate is not checked. Host and clients with these IP addresses is checked and populated with 3 internal addresses for Canon Image Runner copiers that can send email. Hosts and clients connecting to these internal addresses is checked with the Internal IP address of our exchange server. Specify the hosts and clients that can NEVER route mail is empty. Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, and Goulding -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussion Subject: RE: Open Relay Help Still open... What's that tab say now exactly? -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:23 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Open Relay Help Subject: RE: Open Relay Help I'm sure I did but restarted once more to make sure. Can you try again? Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, and Goulding -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussion Subject: RE: Open Relay Help You're still an open relay. Did you restart the IMS after making the changes described in the article? Describe your settings on this tab as well in detail: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Files/04/7696/Screen_04.gif -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:06 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Open Relay Help Subject: Open Relay Help Apparently my mail server has been listed as an Open Relay at http://njabl.org/. I've followed the instructions listed in the following FAQ, and still get listed as an open relay. 3.73 Q: How can I configure my Exchange server so it can't be used as an open relay? A: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 My server is as follows: Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Trend Micro's ScanMail and EManager are installed and current on version and pattern files. I have been unsuccessful in finding and searching the archives. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, and Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Small warning: Antigen 7.5
As was pointed out this is not strictly a Sybari issue. I received an notification from Sybari that included the following information. Microsoft Knowledge Base Article number 814891 describes an error (Error -613) that can occur when performing an online backup of Exchange 2000. Microsoft has identified a situation that causes this problem to occur. Sybari has received a few reports from some of its customers that online backups of Exchange 2000 are reporting this error after they have enabled Antigen's disclaimer feature. Antigen utilizes Microsoft APIs when updating an email message with disclaimer text. As a result of working with those customers that reported the error as well as with Microsoft, those customers have now received a fix from Microsoft Product Support Services and are now beginning testing of the fix. We are making you aware of this potential issue so that you can contact Microsoft Product Support Services if after reading the QFE you believe that you should also deploy Microsoft's fix. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];814891s -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Small warning: Antigen 7.5 My customer was advised by Sybari to run 7.5 because 7.0 caused high INETINFO CPU usage, and the SMTP queues to block. Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Grafton Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks, Neil. Sybari have already come back to me with a solution for the affected server, and its running OK again, but with Antigen 7.0. They're trying to recreate the problem in their lab so they can make a more permanent solution, but haven't managed yet. Andy No, I don't know I'm afraid. We really only deal with Trend products on a regular basis. I'm aware of Antigen 7.0 (SR1 I think) having this problem from either this list or another. Neil -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 27 May 2003 11:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Small warning: Antigen 7.5 Subject: RE: Small warning: Antigen 7.5 Antigen isn't the only 3rd party product causing -613s in the STM. Other products are doing it (eXclaimer springs to mind). From what I've read, it may not be entirely the fault of the 3rd party product developers. Neil do you have more info about that? Like which Exchange Update could be starting this behaviour?! Sybari's EU support got back to me already requesting more details and said that they hadn't seen the issue before with 7.5. All the best, Andy -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 27 May 2003 10:24 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Small warning: Antigen 7.5 Subject: Small warning: Antigen 7.5 Note this isn't maligning Sybari or needing help - its just a heads up for information. In summary : watch out for Antigen V7.5 We'd been running Antigen 7.0 on one of our servers for about 3 weeks. No problems at all. Fantastic. Much better than PantyShield 5.2 (Thanks Chris S). Last Weds we downloaded V7.5 from their wesite and upgraded to it - plan being to try out the anti-spam stuff. The only change we made to the Antigen config was to activate the default spam list for incoming SMTP. After reboot we saw the error at the end (ignore the time this comes after much testing) when attempting to back up. Fixing it is simple: move mailboxes to another server and recreate the private store, but... We deleted/recreated the private store and the corruption recurred when we moved any mailbox back onto the server. We uninstalled Antigen V7.5 and recreated the stores. No problems with corruption no matter how many test mailboxes we moved back onto it. We reinstalled Antigen V7.5 and after a reboot the corruption recurred. i.e. we're pretty sure that Antigen is causing the problem. I've sent a *long* note to Sybari support and we'll see what they make of it. Some info below. Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 217 Date: 26-05-2003 Time: 23:33:48 User: N/A Computer: CPH-2KEX01 Description: Information Store (2108) 1cd6d2b9-6a5f-4114-b983-9a7f1591efe2: Error (-613) during backup of a database (file E:\Exchange Information Store\Private Store\priv1.stm). The database will be unable to restore. The server it is installed on is a Dell PowerEdge 2400 with stock (on-motherboard) RAID running Windows 2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 Standard, SP3. It is not running anything else [no file-system AV, no fancy components etc.]. It has no history of problems. BackupExec 8.6
RE: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings
I too run interscan, but pass all the tests...not sure exactly why you don't, but wanted to let you know that it is possible for all tests to pass. not much help I know. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings I have two Trend Micro Interscan SMTP servers as my incoming gateways for mail. When I run them through http://www.rbl.jp/svcheck.php I pass all tests but the second and third from the last where they try passing an address of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mydomain.com. I am trying to configure Interscan so that I pass all tests. Has anyone had experience with these 2 exploits and will they even work? If you want to see an example to see what I mean my smtp servers are: mail.jergens.com and mail4.jergens.com. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings
we are running IMSS, Version 5.1, Build 3147. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings what version are you running? I am using 3.53 build 1493 thanks! - Original Message - From: Stevens, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings I too run interscan, but pass all the tests...not sure exactly why you don't, but wanted to let you know that it is possible for all tests to pass. not much help I know. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings I have two Trend Micro Interscan SMTP servers as my incoming gateways for mail. When I run them through http://www.rbl.jp/svcheck.php I pass all tests but the second and third from the last where they try passing an address of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mydomain.com. I am trying to configure Interscan so that I pass all tests. Has anyone had experience with these 2 exploits and will they even work? If you want to see an example to see what I mean my smtp servers are: mail.jergens.com and mail4.jergens.com. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messenger in exchange
How does an IMS kick users off? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messenger in exchange Hello all .. I am having a major problem.. This week the IMS it going crazy.. It is kicking everyone off in a sporadically time.. It man be 5 min or 10 but it disconnects everyone.. Does anyone have any ides on what is causing this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Impromptu Poll
7 mail servers (2 are gateways, 1 is DR)...45 default size with the piggies to 100mb.. I second what the chief says...go Navy! ETC(SW) MD Stevens (RET.) USS Fletcher DD-992 Operation Desert Fox -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 7:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll Well I have 10 servers and they range from 30gb to 0gb. Petty Officer Biesecker, wish all you guys out there, fair winds and following sea's. Chief John M. Strongosky,DPC,USN (RET.) -Original Message- From: Biesecker, Noel E. IT1(SW) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll My Information Store, with about 350 users, is about 4GB. However, my normal users are limited to 20MB email box sizes. Then I have certain users allowed up to 75MB and still others allowed 120MB. Only me and a few select others are unlimited. IT1(SW) Biesecker, USN USS DEYO (DD-989) Strike Destroyer System Administrator/Network Analyst Serving with Pride -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Impromptu Poll What is the Size of your Information Store? And If it gets very large, is there a chance it can becoming corrupted? I am Very Interested in Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Main: (864) 272-1145 Mobile: (864) 449-9912 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores
I deleted and re-created them to rule that out but no joy -Original Message- From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2003 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores Corrupted mail store? -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 03:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores OK, I have an issue which I'm hoping someone can point in the right direction...even if it's only to ask some questions I haven't thought of yet. OK, first the setup: DC's and GC's running Win2k SP3. We are in a child domain. E2K SP3 running on Win2k SP2 member servers. There are 5 Admin groups though we're only concerned with one of them. The issue: Trying to move a mailbox fails. Basically the server has one storage group, and 4 stores. We're trying to move mailboxes from the original store (priv1) to one of the other 3 on the same server, and if fails with a mapi error indicating the IS/Exchange serevr is unavailable. The Event log shows 14 entries like this: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: Access Control Event ID: 1029 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:25:28 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=OrgName/OU=AdminGroup/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=S ervername /CN=MICROSOFT SYSTEM ATTENDANT. The folder ID is in the data section of this event. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 01 00 00 00 00 00 03 52 ...R Then followed by Antigen noticing the Store's gone off-line. And then: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 9169 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:05 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Failed to copy basic mailbox information. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1023 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to set a property on the message store on 'servername'. Result: Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. An unexpected, unknown error has occurred. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 80040115-0514-06ba For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1008 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to move mailbox 'User'. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: MAPI Session Event ID: 9175 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore' failed with the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server computer is down for maintenance. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0526- For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Now the odd thing is that this is the second server set up in this Admin group and is in the same AD site, subnet etc etc. The first one exhibits no problems. Moving a mailbox from the 1st server to the priv1 on the 2nd server works ok, but moving from the 1st server to any other store on the 2nd server fails. However, if you remove a mailbox, then create a new mailbox in the other stores, it works ok. It is thus only the move function which seems not to work. Whilst troubleshooting another issue over the weekend I stumbled
Can't move Mailboxes between Stores
OK, I have an issue which I'm hoping someone can point in the right direction...even if it's only to ask some questions I haven't thought of yet. OK, first the setup: DC's and GC's running Win2k SP3. We are in a child domain. E2K SP3 running on Win2k SP2 member servers. There are 5 Admin groups though we're only concerned with one of them. The issue: Trying to move a mailbox fails. Basically the server has one storage group, and 4 stores. We're trying to move mailboxes from the original store (priv1) to one of the other 3 on the same server, and if fails with a mapi error indicating the IS/Exchange serevr is unavailable. The Event log shows 14 entries like this: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: Access Control Event ID: 1029 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:25:28 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=OrgName/OU=AdminGroup/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=Servername /CN=MICROSOFT SYSTEM ATTENDANT. The folder ID is in the data section of this event. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 01 00 00 00 00 00 03 52 ...R Then followed by Antigen noticing the Store's gone off-line. And then: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 9169 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:05 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Failed to copy basic mailbox information. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1023 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to set a property on the message store on 'servername'. Result: Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. An unexpected, unknown error has occurred. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 80040115-0514-06ba For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1008 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to move mailbox 'User'. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: MAPI Session Event ID: 9175 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore' failed with the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server computer is down for maintenance. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0526- For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Now the odd thing is that this is the second server set up in this Admin group and is in the same AD site, subnet etc etc. The first one exhibits no problems. Moving a mailbox from the 1st server to the priv1 on the 2nd server works ok, but moving from the 1st server to any other store on the 2nd server fails. However, if you remove a mailbox, then create a new mailbox in the other stores, it works ok. It is thus only the move function which seems not to work. Whilst troubleshooting another issue over the weekend I stumbled across an article which mentioned the system attendant accounts. Unfortunately I can't remember how I got there to read it further but I think it said you could delete those accounts as they aren't needed, and I'm wondering if this has a bearing? Anyone experienced something similar? Thanks Dave This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient
RE: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth.
Although this will eliminate the emails being stored, I do not think this will address his bandwidth issue but I could be wrong. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 10:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth. 1. Create a Distribution List with no members. 2. Add the SMTP addresses of the people who are no longer there to this Distribution List. 3. Hide the Distribution List. No NDRS, Emails disapear. And be careful out there. -- Original Message -- From: IT1(SW) Biesecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 05:03:27 -0800 Hi everyone. I'm new to this group so here's a quick introduction. I'm a network Administrator in the US NAVY, currently on board the USS DEYO. My organization contains about 350 people so it is actually a fairly small network. While we are underway (as we are now), my Internet connection bandwidth is approximately 14 Kbps. I manage everything on my network fairly well, but there are certain things with Exchange 5.5 that I just can't seem to figure out. That's why I've joined this list. Today, my question deals with emails that arrive on my server bound for mailboxes that no longer exist. My clients and I are Sailors who tend to spend a lot of time away from home and many times, have no news available to us. That's why so many of my clients sign up for email distribution lists for things such as news, jokes, etc., I'm sure you all know exactly what I'm talking about. Well, when people transfer away from my command, I remove their accounts and delete their mailboxes. Recently, I decided to check the Exchange Administrator's mailbox, something that I have never done in the past. Holy cow! Look at all those Inbound Mail Failures and NDR's! It seems that the exchange server still downloads the whole email, even if the mailbox it's being sent to is no longer there. Then, as if that's not enough, when it doesn't find the mailbox, it sends an NDR back to the originator, further wasting my bandwidth. I've found that this is really taking up a lot of my precious bandwidth. I'm talking over 350 NDR's for deleted mailboxes in one day! I've checked eveything I can think of in the Internet Mail Connector to try to prevent the NDR's from being sent back to the Internet, but they continue to go out. Can someone help me stop these NDR's for Unknown mailboxes from going out? And what would be better than that would be to tell my server not to download the message if it is destined for a deleted mailbox. Is there a way to do this? If anyone can help me out, I would sure appreciate it. IT1(SW) Biesecker, USN USS DEYO (DD-989) Strike Destroyer Serving with Pride _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth.
Exactly! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth. Short of unsubscribing all the users from all those lists... - Original Message - From: Dave Vantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:56 AM Subject: RE: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth. Although this will eliminate the emails being stored, I do not think this will address his bandwidth issue but I could be wrong. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 10:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth. 1. Create a Distribution List with no members. 2. Add the SMTP addresses of the people who are no longer there to this Distribution List. 3. Hide the Distribution List. No NDRS, Emails disapear. And be careful out there. -- Original Message -- From: IT1(SW) Biesecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 05:03:27 -0800 Hi everyone. I'm new to this group so here's a quick introduction. I'm a network Administrator in the US NAVY, currently on board the USS DEYO. My organization contains about 350 people so it is actually a fairly small network. While we are underway (as we are now), my Internet connection bandwidth is approximately 14 Kbps. I manage everything on my network fairly well, but there are certain things with Exchange 5.5 that I just can't seem to figure out. That's why I've joined this list. Today, my question deals with emails that arrive on my server bound for mailboxes that no longer exist. My clients and I are Sailors who tend to spend a lot of time away from home and many times, have no news available to us. That's why so many of my clients sign up for email distribution lists for things such as news, jokes, etc., I'm sure you all know exactly what I'm talking about. Well, when people transfer away from my command, I remove their accounts and delete their mailboxes. Recently, I decided to check the Exchange Administrator's mailbox, something that I have never done in the past. Holy cow! Look at all those Inbound Mail Failures and NDR's! It seems that the exchange server still downloads the whole email, even if the mailbox it's being sent to is no longer there. Then, as if that's not enough, when it doesn't find the mailbox, it sends an NDR back to the originator, further wasting my bandwidth. I've found that this is really taking up a lot of my precious bandwidth. I'm talking over 350 NDR's for deleted mailboxes in one day! I've checked eveything I can think of in the Internet Mail Connector to try to prevent the NDR's from being sent back to the Internet, but they continue to go out. Can someone help me stop these NDR's for Unknown mailboxes from going out? And what would be better than that would be to tell my server not to download the message if it is destined for a deleted mailbox. Is there a way to do this? If anyone can help me out, I would sure appreciate it. IT1(SW) Biesecker, USN USS DEYO (DD-989) Strike Destroyer Serving with Pride _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTPEventSink Adding a Disclaimer to outgoing emails
Hello, I am trying to add a disclaimer to all outgoing SMTP mail from my exchange server. I have followed Q articles 317327 and 288756. However, when I go to register the sink on the interface as described in 317327 I get an error. The smtpreg.vbs comes back with Active X object can't be created. I have tried this several times, rebuilt the dll in VB several times but still no luck. Any ideas? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time and help Dave Kuehling Genoa Savings and Loan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTPEventSink Adding a Disclaimer to outgoing mail
Hello, I am trying to add a disclaimer to all outgoing SMTP mail from my exchange server. I have followed Q articles 317327 and 288756. However, when I go to register the sink on the interface as described in 317327 I get an error. The smtpreg.vbs comes back with Active X object can't be created. I have tried this several times, rebuilt the dll in VB several times but still no luck. Any ideas? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time and help Dave Kuehling Genoa Savings and Loan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rule fails to complete
I am trying to set up an mailbox that sends out an email with information automatically and am at wits end trying to get it to work. Running Ex5.5 SP4 on W2k server in an NT Domain. I set up an NT account autoreply and a mailbox for this user. I then used this account and logged into the domain from a Win2k Pro desktop running Office XP and configured a profile for the account. Once in Outlook I followed the instructions in Q291958 - How to create a server side rule to auto-reply with a specific message. The problem is the message is never sent. I know the rule is firing because I also had another part of the rule to forward the received email to another mail account and this seems to happen ok. I then removed the forward to make sure that it was not the cause of the message not being sent. Finally I ran the rule manually against and email sitting in the inbox. When you click on the button to run the rule now, it just sits there and never completes. There are no errors either on the Exch Server event log. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rule fails to complete
Nothing I should also add that I have made sure that the IMS is set to allow OOO and auto replies. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rule fails to complete What shows up in the client event logs? -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rule fails to complete I am trying to set up an mailbox that sends out an email with information automatically and am at wits end trying to get it to work. Running Ex5.5 SP4 on W2k server in an NT Domain. I set up an NT account autoreply and a mailbox for this user. I then used this account and logged into the domain from a Win2k Pro desktop running Office XP and configured a profile for the account. Once in Outlook I followed the instructions in Q291958 - How to create a server side rule to auto-reply with a specific message. The problem is the message is never sent. I know the rule is firing because I also had another part of the rule to forward the received email to another mail account and this seems to happen ok. I then removed the forward to make sure that it was not the cause of the message not being sent. Finally I ran the rule manually against and email sitting in the inbox. When you click on the button to run the rule now, it just sits there and never completes. There are no errors either on the Exch Server event log. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
we use promodag. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails per day This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Problems
Thanks. I have now resolved it. I got the Schedule+ public folder in Europe to replicate to our server (same admin group). This seems to have resolved the issue :) Cheers Dave -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 1 March 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Problems something is screwed up about the Free/Busy system folder... When you are moving the users to Exchange 2000, are they staying in the same Admin group? or are they going to a new Admin group that you may have created? If they are going to the new Admin group, their Legacy Exchange DN is still referring to the old Admin group (5.5 Site) and that's where their Outlook tries to go in order to get the Free/Busy info - Outlook tries to find the old free/busy system folder. Similar stuff happened to me when I moved all users from one E2K server to another E2K server, and the servers were in different Admin groups. I then whacked the old server and started getting the same Free/Busy complaints/error that you are getting. In my case, there was a floating orphan of the old server's free/busy system folder, so I homed it on the new server and it seemed to have helped. You may want to see if you could replicate your old free/busy system folder to the new server. -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Problems Hi All, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction... We have begun migrating mailboxes from Ex5.5 to E2K using NetIQ. The organisations are different and mutilple admin groups exist in E2K. We have now moved 10 mailboxes and find that the free/busy is unavailable for all but one (my own as it happens). Ie, if anyone creates a meeting and looks at the schedule, the schedule is unavailable for every included mailbox, except their own and mine. The aim with the admin groups was to have one per region plus a backbone. Looking at Exchange Advanced tab of users I found that my account is in Oceania admin group but almost everyone else is in backbone. It appears the ADC has put most accounts in the Backbone Admin group - not sure why mine was different. All migrated mailboxes are placed on the same server in the Oceanic group so I would have expected them all to be in Oceania group. I've checked the legacyExchangeDN attribute (article 286783) and there's no problem regarding uppercase CN's etc, but the Admin group are generally listed as Backbone. I tried editing this but that broke access to the mailbox. Also, I found another account which IS in the Oceania admin group and that cannot be seen in free/busy either. On the client side, the users get 'cannot update free/busy schedule' when exiting outlook which really explains why there is no data available I guess. The OC Admin group has a Schedule+ public folder on our server, but the backbone Schedule+ is on a server overseas. Don't know if this makes any difference however. What would be nice at least is a method of finding out exactly WHAT Outlook is attempting to write too when it gives that error - ie, what server, which folder or whatever. At least then I could see what is different in my account compared to the others and then search a way to make them the same. BTW we're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2 - both Native mode. Client is WinXP SP1 and OL2002 (10.4219.4219 - SP2. We migrated from Ex 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP5 with clients of NT4 SP5 and OL98. Any help, suggestions etc. Oh, incidentally, created a fresh user and mailbox (ie not migrated) gives the same issue which I'm assuming rules out NetIQ and points to either a server issue (but I can't think what else to check) or client side (but I have someone use my machine to eliminate that). Cheers - Dave Lloyd Assistant IT Systems Team Manager IT Technical Services Rabobank Group Phone: +61 2 9234 4388 Fax: +61 2 9234 4874 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.rabobank.com.au This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments.We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided
Forged headers using my domain
Several weeks ago I posted a problem I was having with NDR's bouncing back to bogus random email accounts in my domain (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) These are coming from a variety of advertisers and I have been grouping them as they arrive and there are currently 12 different organizations. Because they are all different I believe that some bulk email company is handling the mail for these companies. Today one our consultants forwarded me this email. I am not sending out email to this address... I have got a couple of these just yesterday. Could someone be sending stuff using my account as a starting point? Me -Original Message- From: Mail Administrator To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2/26/2003 9:18 PM Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: The following destination addresses were unknown (please check the addresses and re-mail the message): SMTP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel this message to be in error. ATT11670.TXT (ADV)time share Someone now seems to be doing bulk emailing but now using a legitimate address from our domain. This is getting to the point of being ridiculous. Any spammer, it would seem, can take any legitimate address and begin an email campaign and let that domain worry about any of the bounces as well as disgruntled users receiving the email and thinking it was from us. If we decide to change our email domain to something else can both old and new email addresses be resolved to a single individual/mailbox for some period of time then drop the one being used by bulk mailers. I am also in the midst of upgrading to AD in order to move to E2k so am unclear of all the impact this may have. Also is there anything that can be done to try to mitigate this issue in the future. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Move a DHCP database
I am trying moving a NT4 dhcp database to a 2k Server to be able to utilize the dynamic update/removal from DNS. Following the instructions in KB 130642, it does say that you may get the following error. Jet Conversion Process The Conversion was not successful! The conversion could not locate the file called EDB500.DLL which is required for conversion . The KB states this is normal and to extract the file from the W2K CD. In reviewing the error logs, one of the event id's states: Event Type: Information Event Source: JetConv Event Category: None Event ID: 1008 Date: 2/27/2003 Time: 12:22:14 PM User: N/A Computer: MachineName Description: The Jet Conversion utility failed to convert the database for DHCPServer due to error f88d. Please run ESEUTIL.exe to convert the database. I am guessing it has to due with that it is also a jet database. Although I have extracted this file, before I rerun this I am wondering if anyone has done this conversion before. The properties of the DLL indicate that it the file version is 5.5.1960.3 and the Description is MS Exchange Database Storage Engine. This server is also acting as my Exch 5.5 server and do not need to do something stupid. There are no words of caution in the KB article Will this cause me any problems if I attempt to run it like some how going against my exchange store rather than the dhcp.mdp file and trashing the datastore. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move a DHCP database
Martin Thank you that worked. I tried using it from the Resource Kit CD Supplement but I could find no help with the tool. I was not until I read the documentation that came with the download that I realized that it had to be installed on the source and the destination servers to work correctly. -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move a DHCP database Check this out http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/tools/new/dhcpexim-o.as p -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am trying moving a NT4 dhcp database to a 2k Server to be able to utilize the dynamic update/removal from DNS. Following the instructions in KB 130642, it does say that you may get the following error. Jet Conversion Process The Conversion was not successful! The conversion could not locate the file called EDB500.DLL which is required for conversion . The KB states this is normal and to extract the file from the W2K CD. In reviewing the error logs, one of the event id's states: Event Type: Information Event Source: JetConv Event Category: None Event ID: 1008 Date: 2/27/2003 Time: 12:22:14 PM User: N/A Computer: MachineName Description: The Jet Conversion utility failed to convert the database for DHCPServer due to error f88d. Please run ESEUTIL.exe to convert the database. I am guessing it has to due with that it is also a jet database. Although I have extracted this file, before I rerun this I am wondering if anyone has done this conversion before. The properties of the DLL indicate that it the file version is 5.5.1960.3 and the Description is MS Exchange Database Storage Engine. This server is also acting as my Exch 5.5 server and do not need to do something stupid. There are no words of caution in the KB article Will this cause me any problems if I attempt to run it like some how going against my exchange store rather than the dhcp.mdp file and trashing the datastore. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/Busy Problems
Hi All, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction... We have begun migrating mailboxes from Ex5.5 to E2K using NetIQ. The organisations are different and mutilple admin groups exist in E2K. We have now moved 10 mailboxes and find that the free/busy is unavailable for all but one (my own as it happens). Ie, if anyone creates a meeting and looks at the schedule, the schedule is unavailable for every included mailbox, except their own and mine. The aim with the admin groups was to have one per region plus a backbone. Looking at Exchange Advanced tab of users I found that my account is in Oceania admin group but almost everyone else is in backbone. It appears the ADC has put most accounts in the Backbone Admin group - not sure why mine was different. All migrated mailboxes are placed on the same server in the Oceanic group so I would have expected them all to be in Oceania group. I've checked the legacyExchangeDN attribute (article 286783) and there's no problem regarding uppercase CN's etc, but the Admin group are generally listed as Backbone. I tried editing this but that broke access to the mailbox. Also, I found another account which IS in the Oceania admin group and that cannot be seen in free/busy either. On the client side, the users get 'cannot update free/busy schedule' when exiting outlook which really explains why there is no data available I guess. The OC Admin group has a Schedule+ public folder on our server, but the backbone Schedule+ is on a server overseas. Don't know if this makes any difference however. What would be nice at least is a method of finding out exactly WHAT Outlook is attempting to write too when it gives that error - ie, what server, which folder or whatever. At least then I could see what is different in my account compared to the others and then search a way to make them the same. BTW we're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2 - both Native mode. Client is WinXP SP1 and OL2002 (10.4219.4219 - SP2. We migrated from Ex 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP5 with clients of NT4 SP5 and OL98. Any help, suggestions etc. Oh, incidentally, created a fresh user and mailbox (ie not migrated) gives the same issue which I'm assuming rules out NetIQ and points to either a server issue (but I can't think what else to check) or client side (but I have someone use my machine to eliminate that). Cheers - Dave Lloyd Assistant IT Systems Team Manager IT Technical Services Rabobank Group Phone: +61 2 9234 4388 Fax: +61 2 9234 4874 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.rabobank.com.au This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments.We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URL Problem
tools, internet options, advanced.. reuse windows for launching shortcuts maybe that will work. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URL Problem User Group Outlook 2000 SR1 Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Internet Explorer 5.5 SP1 If you have Internet Explorer open and you are at lets say www.support.com and you also have Outlook open and the mail has a URL in it say www.google.com and you click on the url in outlook it does not open a new window but uses the existing window that is already open. Is there a reg fix or any other settings to overcome this problem so that it opens a new window. So there is two explorer windows open. Any constructive comments would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption
Tumbleweed product does this...it is something that our headquarters wants us to look into...I haven't personally evaluated yet. dave Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Files zipped when sent out
I just took a look at this and it looks pretty good. It would seem like it could save considerable space in the message store and create a very good way to organize attachments via is search capabilities. Anyone using it and have any pro's/con's Thanks -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Files zipped when sent out ZipOut http://www.microeye.com On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everyone, May I know which 3rd party software (that works well with Exchange) which will automatically zip files when sent out.! Thank you Cheers! Carine Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at http://www.scs.com.my/proService9.asp or contact us at 03 - 79565800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Could you let me know about what Trend states about the AVAPI and ESE scanner? we still run the avapi and have not really seen the requirement to upgrade to ese...however, it would be nice to get more detailed info when viruses are found...and I also understand that the ese does not reset the mailbox accessed each time it performs a manual scan. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I guess that equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server? I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just struck me as the sort of thing that might crop up further down the line... I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs. Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues with ESE scanners? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?
I would agree with Mike that it is probably and issue with that one client. I would look carefully at the name resolution. Can the user ping the exchange server via name resolution across the tunnel? We ran into some recent problems when using the MUVPN from Watchguard, especially on XP machines. Occasionally some of the MUVPN's do not setup the Virtual Adapter and it connects using SafeNet's default mode which uses the Shim (there are 3 options for this disabled, preferred, and required) which leaves you without any name resolution that may have been supplied via the virtual adapter. The only way around the problem with those that will only connect with the Shim was to use an ALMOST file on there machine. Watchguard is aware of this issue and is working with SafeNet -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix? Ronni, Given that your other VPN clients work OK except this one I think I'd be looking at the specifics of this guys VPN and network setup and start with the simple stuff like the Watchguard traffic monitor and logs to see if anything's getting blocked and with the name resolution and dialup performance at the client end, rather than diving in with a bunch of hotfixes. We have a very similar setup here, and these tools fix pretty much all these issues here. Just my approach, Mike -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 February 2003 22:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix? We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process of moving us to a new server. New hardware, new name, following Ed's Move Server Method which I have already done once without issue on NT4 to NT4. This time we moved to Windows 2000 for the new server's OS. New server is therefore Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2k SP2 + security fixes and old server was/is Exch 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP 6a + security fixes. I moved mailboxes over the course of a few days and everyone was fine, running happily without issues, except for one guy (the n-sigma where n is a big number guy of course) whose home machine couldn't connect fully to the new mail server over VPN as it had when it was on the NT4 box. It does make connections to the Exchange Server. I can see that with netstat -a on either side but it does not appear to transfer data. He uses a software vpn client to connect to our network. So at first I was ready to blame the MTU issue and make the modifications necessary to correct that. However, when I researched it, it seemed as though I should be having the same problem with all the clients that use vpn. Now some of my vpn clients have an appliance (Watchguard SOHO at user's home connects to our Watchguard Firebox) and some have the software client. Those with the appliance might not see the issue but my box at home uses the software client (SafeNet created for Watchguard) and it works fine as do all the SOHOs. The only pertinent difference I can see between my n-sigma user's connection and mine is that he uses dial-up and I use a dsl line. I have also verified that this is dial-up related in that a second user also has the issue with dial-up access. I have googled. I have technetted. I have searched archives. I have found/done the following: I have read Q301337 PMTU Detection May Not Work After You Install Windows 2000 SP2 and while it appears to be the most pertinent, I am leery of adding a fix that until recently was not available except through PSS just to fix 2 people's e-mail access from home. Certainly it is true that our software vpn assigns an address on the same subnet to the client pc. But that is true for my machine as well, so I am also not 100% convinced that this will solve my issue. Has anyone here installed the Q301337 hotfix Q301337_W2k_SP3_x86_en.exe on a Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange Server and found that it caused problems? If not I am willing to try it. But I find myself a bit nervous about that Uninstall is not available note at the bottom of the download page. I do not have a server I can test with at the moment. If I get no positive feedback on this fix I may decide to build one first. Positive feedback about this fix would be appreciated as I am not sure where I can find a box to build a temporary test Exchange Server out of. Following Q159211 Diagnoses and Treatment of Black Hole Routers I did find a breakdown at an MTU of about 1200 for the n-sigma user's machine over dial-up and at 1450 for the other user's machine so I am reasonably certain MTU is a factor. I reviewed Q259783 PPPoE with ICS Requires MTU Setting Below 1492 on the ICS Client however, neither user is running ICS, nor is either one running PPPoE. Q120642 TCP/IP NBT Configuration Parameters for Windows seems to indicate that I could add
RE: Book Question
here is one on mom's house... Mom's House, Dad's House: Making Two Homes for Your Child http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0684830787/qid=1045085473/sr=8 -3/ref=sr_8_3/104-2038329-1854319?v=glances=booksn=507846 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Book Question I looked on MS's site and Amazon. Could not find a book on MOM. Does anybody know of one? _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Domain used by Spammers
I spent a considerable amount of time trying to trace the offenders. What is strange is that although the bulk of it is coming from http://digitaletics.tv (supposedly in Brazil). There are others coming from what I believe to be Korea and Russia. Each of them appears to be using a randomly generated user name against our legitimate domain. I guess I am wondering if these companies have contracted with some 3rd party to do bulk mailing which to some degree is not their fault. The digitaletics website only offers a email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to contact them and it does appear to be valid as there is a mail server at the site as well. The others don't even supply any type of contact information. I had considered forwarding all the bounced mail to that address but would rather resolve it in a more agreeable fashion. I also have started receiving some nasty emails within these NDR's about our spamming practices and am possibly anticipating some how getting blacklisted. I sent an email with a copy of the emails to what I believe is the ISP of record in Brazil but have not heard any response. I had considered calling the ISP's phone number but I am wondering the chances of someone speaking English. -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Domain used by Spammers Been there, done that. Most ISP's don't bother. However, check to see a domainname and find out who is hosting it. I had some success closing down the offenders website.. --B. At 09:10 07-02-2003 -0800, you wrote: trace the header ip's to track down the originator and get in contact with the isp? -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Domain used by Spammers For the last few weeks I have been plagued by what I had originally considered to be spam attacks. These were showing up as NDR's which I have forwarded to my own mailbox for review. They were always some nonexistent random alphanumeric user i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . This morning I had over one hundred of them so decided to investigate further and see if there was way to screen them out. As it turns out, these are not emails being sent to me, but rather someone is spamming using these random alphanumeric in the From field and the NDR's are coming back to me from whoever is in the To field. I re-tested my own exchange server to ensure that they were not relaying of the Exchange server. I then telneted to my personal attbi.com mail server and sent and email as a nonexistent user in my domain to a bogus mail address. The attbi.com server promptly sent back and NDR to my domain. I concerned about any implications of getting on any RBL lists. I guess I would equate this to identity theft but have no how to address this serious issue. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Domain used by Spammers
For the last few weeks I have been plagued by what I had originally considered to be spam attacks. These were showing up as NDR's which I have forwarded to my own mailbox for review. They were always some nonexistent random alphanumeric user i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . This morning I had over one hundred of them so decided to investigate further and see if there was way to screen them out. As it turns out, these are not emails being sent to me, but rather someone is spamming using these random alphanumeric in the From field and the NDR's are coming back to me from whoever is in the To field. I re-tested my own exchange server to ensure that they were not relaying of the Exchange server. I then telneted to my personal attbi.com mail server and sent and email as a nonexistent user in my domain to a bogus mail address. The attbi.com server promptly sent back and NDR to my domain. I concerned about any implications of getting on any RBL lists. I guess I would equate this to identity theft but have no how to address this serious issue. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router
Now I'm getting confused...is this failing resolving the server name or the mailbox name? you mentioned on a different email that you can resolve a different mailbox name? If resolving the mailbox name, try the alias name and maybe even the fully qualified name (email address). Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router The workstation has internet can log into OWA no problem. Used Ip address resolves to Exchange server name not to mail box name. I can ping to the world. Lets up the anty..I got a (if you need) new in box never opened linksys cable DSL wireless router with 4 ports built in FREE to the Guru who can lead my confused mind down the right path. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help try the ip #. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help OK here goes. I am emailing this help request from my laptop using outlook 2002. Server is an exchange 2k sp3 enterprise and 2k advance server sp3 both items. My laptop is on my desk next to my workstation. It is logged into exchange and using this mail box no problems. Both laptop and Workstation are running XP pro SP1 and outlook 2002. My workstation cannot connect to the exchange Server. I keep getting name cannot be resolved. I have removed office and reinstalled no help. Does anyone have any idea's?? Help if you can I'm out of Idea's!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Directory Export - SMTP address
I usually import the csv into excel and manipulate from there. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Directory Export - SMTP address How do you export the SMTP address without the entire DN using admin.exe to export to a .csv file? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router
Try a new outlook profile...use a completely different name. I have seen newly created profiles with the same 'old' name behave strangely. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router Identical.. This workstation use to log into an 5.5 server now retired -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router Are the TCP/IP properties the same on both boxes? Subnet, Gateway, DNS, WINS, etc. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router Yes on same servers. From this workstation I can only see one domain or address list. From another pc I can log into this box with outlook 2000 2002 etc. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router The workstation will let me resolve to another mailbox on system. Is the mailbox you cannot resolve and the mailbox you can resolve on the same servers? If they are on different servers, you could still have a DNS issue. - Matt Bailey -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help FREE linksys wireless router Keep your router and reinstall the TCP/IP stack. Then if it still doesn't work, use RPCPing to test. On 2/6/03 10:16, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The workstation has internet can log into OWA no problem. Used Ip address resolves to Exchange server name not to mail box name. I can ping to the world. Lets up the anty..I got a (if you need) new in box never opened linksys cable DSL wireless router with 4 ports built in FREE to the Guru who can lead my confused mind down the right path. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help try the ip #. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help OK here goes. I am emailing this help request from my laptop using outlook 2002. Server is an exchange 2k sp3 enterprise and 2k advance server sp3 both items. My laptop is on my desk next to my workstation. It is logged into exchange and using this mail box no problems. Both laptop and Workstation are running XP pro SP1 and outlook 2002. My workstation cannot connect to the exchange Server. I keep getting name cannot be resolved. I have removed office and reinstalled no help. Does anyone have any idea's?? Help if you can I'm out of Idea's!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Public Folder Storage Limits
ironically enough on this subject..I tried to join usaa last week. they stated I was retired from the navy too long..2 years is the max, I have been 3. what a bummer. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits Getting raises since 1981. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:28 PM Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits If you're dependents then I think you need a raise! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Happy 21st Century Auto Insurance customer since 2001! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits Aye! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits And their dependents! Happy USAA customer since I can remember... - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:13 PM Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits What's USAA? I thought it was a insurance company that caters to the military. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits At a StorageTek conference here in Austin a very nice lady from USAA drew my name out of a hat for the door prize (Palm m505). [1] obExchange: StorageTek makes archival solutions for Exchange which can meet regulatory compliance for those who worry about the SEC or HIPPA and the like. [1] Like I didn't already like USAA enough. On 2/3/03 13:46, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1990 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits Since 1997 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Storage Limits Er... 1986 On 2/3/03 13:33, Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Happy USAA customer since 1996 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
did you try the RPC ping? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange box from these workstations. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions, 3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a weird profile problem. If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions to, they get this error: The name could not be resolved. Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if this condition persists. They click OK and get: The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed. Understand that this is not happening with all users. Most can create profiles just fine, but about a dozen can't. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking users from Internet mail
what about removing the smtp address? -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking users from Internet mail I have customer that is requesting that a few users not be able to send or receive Internet mail. Has anyone done this and know the best way to go about doing it? I was thinking I could add a restriction to the IMC that specifies that accounts that are not allowed to send mail through it, but that would only take care of the sending restriction, right? I still need to prevent them from receiving Internet mail. Platform is Exhange 2000. J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
Our store(s) are 28 GB spread (900 users) across 4 Dell 4400's...we split them up for faster distaster recovery options (Exchange 5.5)..Our managers demanded 4 hour restore time. We use Arcserve on everything EXCEPT our mail systemdo not want that software getting close to our vital system. we stick with good ol' W2K NT Backup. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? 70 gig or so and I hate Arcserve so I am using Backup Exec on an ADIC Scalar 100 LTO. Thank you. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? 1TB. Holding all the spam from my Hotmail account. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? 250 TB ( 1 User). Using Arcserve with the Open File Agent. Colorado Backup. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:59 PM Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? About 25gbs(200 users), Using Benchmark DLT1 backup device with native Microsoft Windows 2000 backup module (NTBackup). Raj -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Pete, We have about ~55 gb or so (Exchange 2k w/3 storage groups) Using Backup Exec and a Compaq TL890 Storage Library. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Moving from 1 server to another
have you checked the white space? Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving from 1 server to another I have moved my old server to a new server and I noticed that the Private store on the old machine is still a huge file.. Is it suppose to purge or something? I need some space on the box but I have not shutdown exchange yet because of replication with the public folders yet P.S. this is a 5.5 sp4 setup Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: the spam product question
We bought IMSS from Trend a few months agoI am very happy with it with the only exception being some of the log manipulation. Some of the searches and query's are not very detailed. Great product, we quarantine and block about a thousand a day.it will cost you too. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: the spam product question I know I know I know, this questions has been asked a million times. My question has a small but important twist. We don't content filter our email here. Now they want to, even though we are less then 6 months away from a Exchange 2000 and/or Exchange .Net migration, but they want to do it anyway. I'm looking for the best spam filter that will run on 5.5 but then will also run on 2000. I dug through the archives a bit but didn't see this addressed. On a side note... They should really add the what anti-spam product should I use? question to the faq. Chow bellas e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus activity
so much bigger or sobig! -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus activity Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in the last week or so? Our gateway scanner has been catching an increasing number of viruses over the last week. I am also seeing a few that we haven't seen in quite a while. I am not concerned, just curious if others have noticed this also. -Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
Found the problem now! Turns out that the E2K CD's admin program was to fault - possibly being SP3? Logged onto the E5.5 box itself (SP4) and ran import and it works. Would have thought the E2K stuff would include the latest tools but guess not... Thanks all Dave -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2003 1:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help Change the SMTP address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 1/13/03 22:27, Lloyd, D (Dave) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because they still need to be used for public folder access until migration is complete :( -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 14 January 2003 3:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help Why not change the mode to delete and delete the DLs on your server? On 1/13/03 21:49, Lloyd, D (Dave) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all SMTP addresses in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO with the entry ~DELSMTP: but all it gives me is errors on import. A google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages. The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle of migrating to E2K. The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already. Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K ones back as custom recipients. I think we need to remove the SMTP address in order to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here. (And yes, this is in a lab first.) Thanks Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present
RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
Even better. Can't install SP4 on the Admin program (running winxp) as it claims to have a higher SP already installed!. -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2003 8:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help Found the problem now! Turns out that the E2K CD's admin program was to fault - possibly being SP3? Logged onto the E5.5 box itself (SP4) and ran import and it works. Would have thought the E2K stuff would include the latest tools but guess not... Thanks all Dave -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2003 1:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help Change the SMTP address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 1/13/03 22:27, Lloyd, D (Dave) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because they still need to be used for public folder access until migration is complete :( -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 14 January 2003 3:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help Why not change the mode to delete and delete the DLs on your server? On 1/13/03 21:49, Lloyd, D (Dave) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all SMTP addresses in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO with the entry ~DELSMTP: but all it gives me is errors on import. A google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages. The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle of migrating to E2K. The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already. Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K ones back as custom recipients. I think we need to remove the SMTP address in order to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here. (And yes, this is in a lab first.) Thanks Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email
Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
Hi all, With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all SMTP addresses in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO with the entry ~DELSMTP: but all it gives me is errors on import. A google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages. The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle of migrating to E2K. The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already. Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K ones back as custom recipients. I think we need to remove the SMTP address in order to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here. (And yes, this is in a lab first.) Thanks Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
Because they still need to be used for public folder access until migration is complete :( -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 14 January 2003 3:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help Why not change the mode to delete and delete the DLs on your server? On 1/13/03 21:49, Lloyd, D (Dave) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all SMTP addresses in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO with the entry ~DELSMTP: but all it gives me is errors on import. A google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages. The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle of migrating to E2K. The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already. Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K ones back as custom recipients. I think we need to remove the SMTP address in order to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here. (And yes, this is in a lab first.) Thanks Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RTF converted to HTML overnight!
I'm running Exchange 2000 service pack 3. We send all internal messages in Rich Text format but since upgrading from service pack 2 to service pack 3 the Rich Text Format e-mails are being converted to HTML format overnight! Has anyone seen this before of know why it may be happening? Regards Dave Hornby _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
from their website: PROMODAG Reports is designed for simple, convenient, and effective user interaction. Supports all versions of Exchange Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Are they offering the same product for Exchange 2000. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Mailbox monitoring I agree. We use Promodag. It's excellent. Not too expensive, either. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the report format that management wanted. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Delegations
Hi All, We're in the midst of moving to Exchange 2000 from Exchange 5.5 and I'm wondering if there is a way to export/migrate the delegations and permissions from 5.5 and import them to 2000? We have quite a number of mailboxes using delegation and the only way I know of setting those permissions (the reviewer, editor etc) is via the Outlook client. The thought of logging in to every mailbox and checking those permissions, migrating the mailbox and them logging into the 2000 mailbox and replicating the delegation permissions is a little distressing! Can anyone point me to some tools? (BTW, we're playing with NetIQ at present but it appears to lose the actual permission settings - sets them all to 'none'. We got a rep from them coming in tomorrow I wonder if there's alternatives) Thanks - Dave Lloyd Assistant IT Systems Team Manager IT Technical Services Rabobank Group Phone: +61 2 9234 4388 Fax: +61 2 9234 4874 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.rabobank.com.au == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Delegations
Because that would make too much sense wouldn't it? We're stuck now because our overseas HO decided they'd prefer to setup a fresh organisation. No easy mailbox moves for us!! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 7 January 2003 3:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Delegations I was going to suggest NetIQ because I thought it preserved these. Why aren't you joining your Exchange 2000 server to your Exchange 5.5 organization? That preserves virtually everything. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lloyd, D (Dave) Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Delegations Hi All, We're in the midst of moving to Exchange 2000 from Exchange 5.5 and I'm wondering if there is a way to export/migrate the delegations and permissions from 5.5 and import them to 2000? We have quite a number of mailboxes using delegation and the only way I know of setting those permissions (the reviewer, editor etc) is via the Outlook client. The thought of logging in to every mailbox and checking those permissions, migrating the mailbox and them logging into the 2000 mailbox and replicating the delegation permissions is a little distressing! Can anyone point me to some tools? (BTW, we're playing with NetIQ at present but it appears to lose the actual permission settings - sets them all to 'none'. We got a rep from them coming in tomorrow I wonder if there's alternatives) Thanks - Dave Lloyd Assistant IT Systems Team Manager IT Technical Services Rabobank Group Phone: +61 2 9234 4388 Fax: +61 2 9234 4874 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.rabobank.com.au == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Auto Deleted old messages from Exhcanage5.5
There is a tool called the Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Manager. Might be on the resource kit. David Morrow Network Administrator Autodata Solutions Company Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has originated from Autodata Solutions. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 2, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto Deleted old messages from Exhcanage5.5 Exmerge will do just that. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Auto Deleted old messages from Exhcanage5.5 Instead of the Exmerge, I thought there is a tool that would aloud you to run it against the IS. I wanted to delete just the old messages (like specific date) automatically for certain mailbox on the server. --- Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exmerge for old messages and not sure what you want deleted. User or User's mailbox? - Original Message - From: NetStar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 4:02 PM Subject: Auto Deleted old messages from Exhcanage5.5 I'm looking a way to deleted old messages from Exchange5.5 server for specific. Is there a tool that would aloud me to delete specific user from the Exchange5.5 server? Thank you inadvance. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSL and OWA
The best I have come across is about $100 which is why I have generated my own certs for my 3 exposed servers. Who provides them at $25? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I did. That's a dirt cheap price. -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I was going to do but a cert from quality ssl is trusted by 99% of all browsers for $25.00 a year. I figured why not. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: SSL and OWA Don't buy a SSL Cert. Just windows 2000 cert services to create your own. The only difference is that the user's browser will nag them about the cert, but they just have to answer yes and it works fine. -Kevin -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: SSL and OWA Subject: SSL and OWA Hello, I'm in the process of buying a certificate to secure an Outlook web access page and part of the process is entering a site name. This site has no dns site name, it's accessed via a link on our company web page that's hosted by our ISP. Should I assign a dns name for this server or should I put in the netbios name of the server? I'm just looking for some suggestions as this is the first server I'm securing with SSL. Thanks again, Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VBS_SLUG.B
And Symantec only has http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/dyn/33762.html David Morrow Network Administrator Autodata Solutions Company Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part. This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 3, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VBS_SLUG.B Goood Morning All, I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10 users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are in the same folder and same file. This is one of the messages that i recieved, Virus Alert!! VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain. Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22 Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed) I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match on this virus. I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap. I told them that I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server. So how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their program (office scan). Has anyone seen this virus before. I also scanned all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no notifications of them being infected. RGDS RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing
I did some research on the same subject here at our work...even though we have not implemented to date, the product from Captaris seemed the bestit is pretty expensive though...check it out... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0. Once upon a time, we had Faxing software integrated with our Exchange server. However, it gave us fits, and we eventually canned it. Now there is a drive to obtain some new software. Does anybody have a faxing product they are using which they highly recommend? Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSL for Exchange IMAP and OWA
Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] kindly wrote: Do you have the iisadmpwd virtual directory in your IIS configured? IIS5.0 does not install this virtual by default. I did not, and added it in per Q301428. Still no joy, but I must be closer now. Thank you. Dave Moore == [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSL for Exchange IMAP and OWA
Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] kindly wrote: When you connect via MS Explorer and use OWA access via the proper URL. I am using MS IE, and am using the URL that allows me access to my Inbox. Only the Change Password option does not work. Are you sure you are being directed to the secure area. HTTPS? Does the lock show up at the bottom. Are you behind a firewall and have port 443 open? Ah, now. I was not doing HTTPS, was not being directed to the secure area, and did not have the lock displayed. I fixed that using the management console. Still no joy. Also, notice that none of these fixes is relevant to IMAP clients, which are also not being able to change the password. I appreciate your help though, this too gets me a little closer to the fix. Dave Moore == [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSL for Exchange IMAP and OWA
My users need to be able to change passwords via the Web and IMAP clients, such as Eudora. I obtained IMAP and WWW certificates from FreeSSL.com, and installed them using the Key Manager, which reports that they are complete and usable. Nevertheless, when I try to change password via Eudora, I receive Could not connect to 'myserver.edu' Cause: connection refused(10061) Clicking the change password button on the OWA page just 404s. What have I missed? I'm running IIS 4.0, Exchange 5.5 SP3, and NT 4.0, SP6. According to my log, I installed IIS before Exchange, per 175439. Thanks in advance, Dave Moore == [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail Relaying Originator
I recently setup my MS Exchange server such that only people connecting from a specific set of IP addresses (my company's IP range) and connections to an internal IP address are allowed to relay mail. After doing so, I am still noticing mail in the IMC queue that has an originator of David Morrow Network Administrator Autodata Solutions Company Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part. This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company. The attached material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
I think it is the other way..lmhosts is for netbios names..hosts are in fully qualified domain names. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: VPN breaks Outlook LMHOSTS files are for your connected on a public network (internet) and HOSTS for when connected on a private. - Original Message - From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR From Field
I have seen that and I assumed it was a bcc. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR From Field The NDR should contain the original message to tell you to whom it was sent. NDRs are required to have null sender addresses. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR From Field Hi, I'm sure this has been covered before but I can't seem to find anything on technet/google/archives: I'm receiving all the ndr's (mostly for old email addresses) for our organisation but the from field is being stripped so I cannot tell who it is from. i'm sure that I could a month or so ago but now cannot - could be wrong tho. I managedto have this setup using the mail client and exch 5.5 but not now. ANy ideas anyone? thanks Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My IMS is having issues!
We have had some intermittent issues with our internet mail server; the service is stopping itself. Below are some of the id's...technet suggests that the max threads could be too low (id 4094). I have checked the registry key and it is set to 06xe. Is that setting too low and could be causing this problem? Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 running on W2K. Has anyone come across this problem? Thank you, Dave Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4094 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: The error 0x8004011d occurred while trying to refresh network connections to the Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4116 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4102 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:25 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My IMS is having issues!
thanks for the quick reply. This server is our primary smtp server for all outbound messages. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My IMS is having issues! You're getting corrupted messages that it can't recover from. Is this public facing (ie does it receive messages from the outside world) or does it pass all mail off to a relay box? You might consider turning up the IMS logging options (probably protocol logging) and looking at what's happening in the SMTP sessions. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My IMS is having issues! We have had some intermittent issues with our internet mail server; the service is stopping itself. Below are some of the id's...technet suggests that the max threads could be too low (id 4094). I have checked the registry key and it is set to 06xe. Is that setting too low and could be causing this problem? Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 running on W2K. Has anyone come across this problem? Thank you, Dave Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4094 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: The error 0x8004011d occurred while trying to refresh network connections to the Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4116 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4102 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:25 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My IMS is having issues!
We are running Trend ScanMail 3.52 The MKBA Q317653 does state that antivirus software could be causing this problem, but we haven't had any problems in the past. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My IMS is having issues! What AV are you running? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My IMS is having issues! We have had some intermittent issues with our internet mail server; the service is stopping itself. Below are some of the id's...technet suggests that the max threads could be too low (id 4094). I have checked the registry key and it is set to 06xe. Is that setting too low and could be causing this problem? Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 running on W2K. Has anyone come across this problem? Thank you, Dave Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4094 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: The error 0x8004011d occurred while trying to refresh network connections to the Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4116 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4102 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:25 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My IMS is having issues!
Not running any file based AVjust the ScanMail.. I am leaning that the problem was a 'bad' incoming message that caused the store to fail. After restarting, I am guessing that the message was discarded. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My IMS is having issues! What file level AV are you running on the machine? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My IMS is having issues! We are running Trend ScanMail 3.52 The MKBA Q317653 does state that antivirus software could be causing this problem, but we haven't had any problems in the past. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My IMS is having issues! What AV are you running? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My IMS is having issues! We have had some intermittent issues with our internet mail server; the service is stopping itself. Below are some of the id's...technet suggests that the max threads could be too low (id 4094). I have checked the registry key and it is set to 06xe. Is that setting too low and could be causing this problem? Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 running on W2K. Has anyone come across this problem? Thank you, Dave Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4094 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: The error 0x8004011d occurred while trying to refresh network connections to the Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4116 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4102 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:25 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Yes, probably Veritas Backup Exec v8.6 -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:09 AM Posted To: SWYNK - Exchange Conversation: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only backing up the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to stop those services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not using the Open File Agent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2k downgrade !!
Is it possible to downgrade 2000 Enterprise Edition back to Standard Edition?? Thanks Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advanced SMTP outbound management
Hi, Does anyone know of an add for Exchange 2000 that will intelligent route via an SMTP connector to the internet if the other SMTP connector is down. The intention is to have Dual Mailsweeper boxes running and to route via MailSweeper box 1 unless it fails then route via Mailsweeper box 2. MailSweeper can't act as a smart host. Any info greatly appreciated. Dave Turner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advanced SMTP mgmt
Has anybody found an add on for Exchange that will act as a smarthost that is configurable for route redundancy. ie. I wanted to use 2 Mailsweeper boxes and would like to route via a main Mailsweeper box unless it fails, then I would like to route via the secondary. Any help greatly appreciated. Dave Turner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scanmail price increase
I heard the same thing..we just got done renewing our's for two yearsplus made the plunge on Interscan Security Suite. dave Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scanmail price increase Anyone else getting notified of a huge increase in maintanence cost for Trend's Scanmail? Our cost is going from $4,000 to more than $7,000. If anyone is looking to buy new licenses you better do it before Oct. 1 when the new pricing goes into effect. Looks like it's time to start looking at other vendors. Jeff Petschow College of DuPage _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: malformed address
The actual address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: malformed address The email address is SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: malformed address We received the following NDR, noting an error 553, malformed address...I checked google, but most of the links pertained to non-ascii characters, which this is not the case. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? The email address is correct (as listed in exchange administrator)... exchange 5.5/sp4. dave From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent RCPT TO:SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 553 malformed address: SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
malformed address
We received the following NDR, noting an error 553, malformed address...I checked google, but most of the links pertained to non-ascii characters, which this is not the case. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? The email address is correct (as listed in exchange administrator)... exchange 5.5/sp4. dave From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent RCPT TO:SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 553 malformed address: SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spell check in OWA
third party...here is one.. http://www.spellchecker.com/corporate/default.asp?page=OWA_Corp.htm Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spell check in OWA Is there a way to do a spell check in OWA? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Recovery
In the past I have I have used server to restore a single mailbox by installing Exchange as a new site using the original ORG/SITE then restoring the IS and running consistency checker. Since my last test of this procedure I have upgraded my production server to W2k and my restore server is an older NT4 sp6a. Both machines are running 5.5 SP4. The IS will not start after the restore. Perhaps I made some error while following the DR white paper and I am getting ready to uninstall Exchange and start over. Should this procedure be able to work or will it only work if the O/S, Exch Ver and SP are the same Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the report format that management wanted. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
have you upgraded your Promodag to the newest version, 5? It is much faster spitting out reports than the previous. Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring I agree. We use Promodag. It's excellent. Not too expensive, either. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the report format that management wanted. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
I had copied my scheduled reports off the server and then onto a new server... the .pro extensions...worked like a champ. Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring yes we have upgraded and it is much better with a bunch of more options for reports. However, it removed all of my scheduled reports which was a huge hassle to recreate. But it's done now, and before I do another upgrade, I'll ask first what and how I need to back this stuff up. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the report format that management wanted. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox
I've seen corrupted profiles causing this error. After rebuilding the profile, it worked fine. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent emails hang in Outbox Has anybody come across the following problem: A user sends an email, sometimes it can be 500k in size or can be a couple of megs in size. He hits the send button and the message automatically goes to the Outbox and stays there. He opens the mail and click send again and the message goes immediately. No other users appears to have this problem. This happens once in a blue moon. The message can be destined for users on the same exchange server and also other exchangeservers through an X400 connector. The event viewer indicates that everything is fine. I am not sure if this message is getting stuck in the IS or in the MTA queue, and hence showing up in the Outbox. Has anybody else come across this. This is not a problem for the user. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox
one thing to mention is to completely rename the profile...don't use the same old name.. dave -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox Dave, Thanks, I will give that a go. Didy -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox I've seen corrupted profiles causing this error. After rebuilding the profile, it worked fine. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent emails hang in Outbox Has anybody come across the following problem: A user sends an email, sometimes it can be 500k in size or can be a couple of megs in size. He hits the send button and the message automatically goes to the Outbox and stays there. He opens the mail and click send again and the message goes immediately. No other users appears to have this problem. This happens once in a blue moon. The message can be destined for users on the same exchange server and also other exchangeservers through an X400 connector. The event viewer indicates that everything is fine. I am not sure if this message is getting stuck in the IS or in the MTA queue, and hence showing up in the Outbox. Has anybody else come across this. This is not a problem for the user. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Password expiration
Q262902 -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Password expiration Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the users are getting the password will expire in 0 days message. I've searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this message? Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Loops in Exchange 5.5
Disable forwarding in the IMS will cure the problem! -Original Message- From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Loops in Exchange 5.5 Does anyone know a way to stop loops in Exchange 5.5? We have big problems with users setting auto-forward to an external mailbox and now and then we get loops and our Exchangeservers running the IMC break down. Any tricks out there, any third-party products? /Olle _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
restore question
I am trying a restore on our disaster recovery server. When I try to restore the priv.edb the restore process does not begin without the network cable attached. In the past (with NT4 backup), from what I recall, did not have to have the lan cable attached which is reassuring that I will not effect our production servers. However with the new W2K backup, the restore will not work without communicating to the network. Does anyone know why this is occuring? The disaster recovery server is not a BDC...All servers are W2K with Exchange 5.5/SP4. We are only restoring the store, not Directory services, which from what I understand, can only be restored to the original exchange server. thanks, Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Identifying old mailboxes
The reason that does not work for me either is due to a manual anti-virus scan every Sunday...I perform a mapi/avapi scan for message body viruses that would not be detected in the real time scan. This screws up the last logged in/access time/date. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Identifying old mailboxes You can use Mailbox Resources, which will show what account logged on and the time/date of logon and logoff (if this is the information you are looking for). I use it monthly for my 13 Exchange Servers to do a nice little spreadsheet that my Manager and the Regional Analysts absolutely love. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Identifying old mailboxes In preparation for Exchange 2000, we must find a way to identify old mailboxes. Is there a way to automate a process to identify the last time the primary NT account accessed a mailbox? I know you can see last accessed in a general sense, but scanmail and other nightly processes skew this information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smtp command
Isn't there a way, when telneting to a mail server (port 25), to determine the MAX allowed message size?... thank you. Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The infamous Invalid data in message
I checked that already..thanks. -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The infamous Invalid data in message TIFs can be large files. Perhaps it is the size of the attachment that is the problem. At 04:37 PM 7/24/2002 -0400, Stevens, Dave wrote: for the most part, these are scanned tif images and it is occurring with different destinations and senders. Maybe they don't like the tif format. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The infamous Invalid data in message I didn't think it was the length of the Subject line just the content probably confused the heck out of the recieving machine so it rejected it. :o) -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The infamous Invalid data in message Is that a setting in Outlook? I have never had to mess with the mime settings..I was wondering about the Subject lineit is awfully longwould that effect the header of the message? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The infamous Invalid data in message They need to disable 8 bit mime is my guess. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The infamous Invalid data in message This subject has reared it's ugly head once again. There is very little documentation that I have found to help remedy this problem. Does anyone know how I can go about to troubleshoot this error? Thank you. Dave Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Invocation of Informal Dispute on the Missed Milestone for Ground water Operable Unit Record of Decision 1 (C-720) Signature McCracken Coun ty, Kentucky KY8-890-008-982_v1.TIF Sent: 7/22/2002 10:52 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/22/2002 10:53 AM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=DOE;l=ORO-FOB-MX2N-020722155226Z-57677 MSEXCH:IMS:DOE:ORO:ORO-MAIL 3554 (000B09AA) 554 Invalid data in message I thought we had this fixed but it doesn't appear that it is. Give me a call. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla Speak your mind, even if your voice shakes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
