Help
Hey all... Having a little problem with a userA having access to userB's calendar. I went to userB's outlook and removed all permissions that userA had. UserA started to receive meeting request for userB. I killed userA's email account and now everyone else that sends userB a meeting request is getting Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Updated: Review 2002 Budget Sent: 1/16/02 8:29 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: *userA* on 1/16/02 8:29 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=XX;l=XXX0-020116162846Z-25335 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:MyDomain:My Exchange I check userB's account again, I do not see any rules or anything else of that nature. NT4sp6a Exch5.5sp3 Outlook2000 Thanks for the help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help rev2 (still not able to post correctly)
Hey all... Having a little problem with a userA having access to userB's calendar. I went to userB's outlook and removed all permissions that userA had. UserA started to receive meeting request for userB. I killed userA's email account and now everyone else that sends userB a meeting request is getting Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Updated: Review 2002 Budget Sent: 1/16/02 8:29 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: *userA* on 1/16/02 8:29 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=XX;l=XXX0-020116162846Z-25335 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:MyDomain:My Exchange I check userB's account again, I do not see any rules or anything else of that nature. NT4sp6a Exch5.5sp3 Outlook2000 Thanks for the help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help rev2 (still not able to post correctly)
That was my head hitting the desk in shame. This is a fine example that you shouldn't trust your Jr. Admins notes until you check it yourself. Sorry for abusing your time in such a manner. Maybe next time I'll have an intelligent question to ask this group. > I got lazy, but I've done the work for you now. Tools, Options,Delegates, > uncheck the meeting thingy there. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:18 a.m. > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Help rev2 (still not able to post correctly) > > > Hey all... > > Having a little problem with a userA having access to userB's calendar. I > went to userB's outlook and removed all permissions that userA had. UserA > started to receive meeting request for userB. I killed userA's email account > and now everyone else that sends userB a meeting request is getting > > Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. > > Subject: Updated: Review 2002 Budget > Sent: 1/16/02 8:29 AM > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > *userA* on 1/16/02 8:29 AM > The recipient name is not recognized > The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= > ;p=XX;l=XXX0-020116162846Z-25335 > MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:MyDomain:My Exchange > > > I check userB's account again, I do not see any rules or anything else of > that nature. > > NT4sp6a Exch5.5sp3 Outlook2000 > > Thanks for the help... > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It > may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of > legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the > sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information > contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this > e-mail. > > For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page > http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administration, Anti-Virus, Content Filtering, etc. *I need control!*
To the group...
We are going to rebuild our exchange environment (current one sucks and I haven't a
clue why it still works) and we wish to attach some administrative tools to the
project. As shown in the subject I've been reviewing tools that my department can use
to streamline anything and everything with our new/current exchange server.
Now I'm looking for real world experience, policies, ideas, pros and cons etc. This
is what I have in my plan so far for exchange Config...
Gateway -Win2000
Firewall -PIX 515
Bridge
Dir. services -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4
Bridge
Information store -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4
3rd party -This is where I'm looking for suggestions
1. Mail Essentials
-Content filter
-AV with VSAPI (mapi=bad in my world {I hate bricks but have no choice *really, not
kidding*})
-Spam filter
-Disclaimer
-Installed on the gateway
2. Bind View BV-Control
-Query base administrator
-Policy enforcement
-Jr. Admin permission control
-Security scan and enforcement
-Performance tuning
Is there a better set of tools out there? What pro/con you all had with these tools?
This is where you all pull out your big sticks and tell me to read the archive or the
FAQ (Not done with it but reading) use send mail, blah blah blah.
David Gibbons
Sr. Network Engineer
Caliber Collision Center
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000
List, I'm still reading the archives but I have another question that I can't seem to find the answer to... I currently have Exchange 5.5sp3 enterprise on NT 4sp6a enterprise. We are moving to Windows 2000 (member server, no AD in place yet) with Exchange 5.5sp4 enterprise (16gig limit sucks!). The question, Does the enterprise version of Exchange require Windows 2000 Adv.? Thanks. David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000
Thanks... That's all I needed to know. > No > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 5.5sp4 and Windows 2000 > > > List, > > I'm still reading the archives but I have another question that I can't seem > to find the answer to... > > I currently have Exchange 5.5sp3 enterprise on NT 4sp6a enterprise. We are > moving to Windows 2000 (member server, no AD in place yet) with Exchange > 5.5sp4 enterprise (16gig limit sucks!). > > The question, > > Does the enterprise version of Exchange require Windows 2000 Adv.? > > Thanks. > > David > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
Hello,
Exchange 5.5sp3 NT 4.0sp6a.
When starting the IMS I process a few emails then I recieve this error:
4116:
An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail
Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is
possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be
returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered.
The message will be moved to the "BAD" folder, if possible, and the error
is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is
restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of
your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to
the "BAD" folder.
I get it a 2nd time then I get
4102:
A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange
Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down.
I try to restart the service and I get
Could not start Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service service on
\\{Server}
Error 2140: An internal Windows NT error occurred
I have tried
Q186739
Q163243
Q169223 (all messages moved out)
Q169686 (150 total)
I looking good on memory and CPU but completely lost as to what to do...
Please help, thanks..
David
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
To add to the issue, I've set the IMS to outbound only and still cannot start the service. I only have one server in my site again I'm lost on what to do... David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
It just keeps getting better and better New event: 4131 An unexpected error occurred in the Internet Mail Service. Information about this error is stored in the data portion of this event. Data: : e0 07 14 00 70 00 03 80 à...p..? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
Hehehe Microsoft site sucks... Is there anyway that you can post to the board? David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
Not recieveing the other errors listed in this artical. I also do not have this value in my registry. Should I add it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
I had hoped that I would not have to stop the information store to do
this. *Sigh* I going to piss a lot of people in management off. I was
able to start the IMS as inbound only if that helps any...
> Does this article give you anything new? Q197792
>
> RE: my last post...you may still have a memory problem, if you have still
> have a bad message that's filling up drive space due to looping, which may
> affect virtual memory?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Exchange 5.5sp3 NT 4.0sp6a.
> When starting the IMS I process a few emails then I recieve this error:
> 4116:
> An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail
> Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is
> possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be
> returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered.
> The message will be moved to the "BAD" folder, if possible, and the error
> is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is
> restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of
> your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to
> the "BAD" folder.
>
> I get it a 2nd time then I get
> 4102:
> A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange
> Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down.
>
> I try to restart the service and I get
> Could not start Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service service on
> \\{Server}
> Error 2140: An internal Windows NT error occurred
>
> I have tried
> Q186739
> Q163243
> Q169223 (all messages moved out)
> Q169686 (150 total)
>
>
> I looking good on memory and CPU but completely lost as to what to do...
> Please help, thanks..
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
Tried, my management said try other things first. > > Why not just call PSS? > > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > Hehehe Microsoft site sucks... Is there anyway that you can post to > the board? > > David > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential >information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is >addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is >strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately >notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or >email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
I've moved "Everything" out of the IMS. Didn't help. > I've had this happen twice and the event log always told me which = > message > file was bad. In capital letters even. Delete it (or move it, = > whatever), > restart the service and you should be good to go. > > I really hate that line "put on the latest service pack". That didn't = > help > me a bit. > > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > Here's your answer to this one... > > XFOR: Internet Mail Service Stops with Event Log Error 4116 (Q193639) > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > It just keeps getting better and better New event: > 4131 > An unexpected error occurred in the Internet Mail Service. Information > about this error is stored in the data portion of this event. > > Data: > : e0 07 14 00 70 00 03 80 =E0...p..? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
HeHe... Don't be, I can't apply the service pack right now anyways.. If anything I have to wait tell 7pm if they (management) let me. > I'm hurt. > > > > -Original Message- > =46rom: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > I've had this happen twice and the event log always told me which message > =66ile was bad. In capital letters even. Delete it (or move it, whatever), > restart the service and you should be good to go. > > I really hate that line "put on the latest service pack". That didn't help > me a bit. > > -Original Message- > =46rom: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > Here's your answer to this one... > > XFOR: Internet Mail Service Stops with Event Log Error 4116 (Q193639) > > -Original Message- > =46rom: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > It just keeps getting better and better New event: > 4131 > An unexpected error occurred in the Internet Mail Service. Information > about this error is stored in the data portion of this event. > > Data: > : e0 07 14 00 70 00 03 80 =E0...p..? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---= > --- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and = > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or = > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the = > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, = > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have = > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler = > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email = > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
True, but I'm payroll and calling PSS is an expence. To top it all off all of my management isn't feeling this one right now. They're all at a leadership conf in Las Vegas, so of course I can't call PSS, it's not affecting them. > At some point, the amount of money this outage is costing will be more than the > $225 to call. After all, you're not free... > > -- Drew > > Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! > "The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the > support of a cause we believe to be just." Abraham Lincoln > > -Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Gibbons > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > Tried, my management said try other things first. > > > > Why not just call PSS? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:58 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > > > > Hehehe Microsoft site sucks... Is there anyway that you can post to > > the board? > > > > David > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential > information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is > addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please > immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. > Thank you. > > > > == > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
*sheeply* Yes... But that was install BEFORE I was hired on. Current project load on my desk (1 week old) _Rebuild Exchange Enviorment_. In this project that I'm building I'm getting rid of Groupshield and using Trend. But I have about 1 more month to deal with this exchange server so things like this pop up and turn my world upside down. BWT, I'm going to use Ed's server move method. Thanks for the FAQ Ed. David > Let me guess.Groupshield? > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > GAWD DAMNED ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE!!! G Disabled AV and everything > comes up fine. Sorry for bugging you all... > > HeHe... Don't be, I can't apply the service pack right now anyways.. If > > anything I have to wait tell 7pm if they (management) let me. > > > I'm hurt. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > =46rom: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:59 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > > > > > > > I've had this happen twice and the event log always told me which > > > message =66ile was bad. In capital letters even. Delete it (or > > > move it, whatever), restart the service and you should be good to > > > go. > > > > > > I really hate that line "put on the latest service pack". That > > > didn't help me a bit. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > =46rom: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:52 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > > > > > > > Here's your answer to this one... > > > > > > XFOR: Internet Mail Service Stops with Event Log Error 4116 > > > (Q193639) > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > =46rom: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:43 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > > > > > > > It just keeps getting better and better New event: > > > 4131 > > > An unexpected error occurred in the Internet Mail Service. > > > Information about this error is stored in the data portion of this > > > event. > > > > > > Data: > > > : e0 07 14 00 70 00 03 80 =E0...p..? > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > ---= > > > --- > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and = > > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > = > > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the = > > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, = > > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have = > > > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler = > > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email = > > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the
RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116
Tell me about it. If it hurts management I get what I need. If it doesn't, well. I have to brake it to the point that I do get what I need. The trials of working for a company that counts every penny and tries to cut any costs that they can. David > You have a very peculiar IT support structure. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > True, but I'm payroll and calling PSS is an expence. > To top it all off all of my management isn't feeling this one right now. > They're all at a leadership conf in Las Vegas, so of course I can't call > PSS, it's not affecting them. > > > At some point, the amount of money this outage is costing will be more > > than the $225 to call. After all, you're not free... > > > > -- Drew > > > > Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! > > "The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter > > us from the support of a cause we believe to be just." Abraham > > Lincoln > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Gibbons > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > > > > Tried, my management said try other things first. > > > > > > Why not just call PSS? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:58 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: IMS Will start and then stop with event ID 4116 > > > > > > > > > Hehehe Microsoft site sucks... Is there anyway that you can > > > post to the board? > > > > > > David > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential > > information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > > whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or > > email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > == > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Mr. Scharff, I understand that youre currently a bit jaded with this topic (or you could be enjoying yourself not sure... The email intonation module on my pc is broken *grin*). But, would you mind taking a moment to explain or send links to previous explanations as to why RBL is not a good idea? With the research that I have conducted I cannot find any serious issues with it. Of course I'm missing quite a lot of first hand knowledge with this technology since I have yet to incorporate within my test environment. I fear that I might be apart of that 32% your talking about and wish to... um... well... *shrug* not be. Thanks for the input! David > Perhaps you should read your e-mails before you send them. Just cause > you wrote something down and it sounds one way in your head doesn't > meant that it will sound the same way on the other end. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning. > I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only rude to a subset of the > 32% of admins who actually could spell RBL and thus understood the barb. > As a journalism major, with an English minor I am quite concerned about > any grammatical errors I might have made in the comment you are > referring to. Would you please be so kind as to point out my grammar > errors so that I might endeavor to eliminate them from my future > postings? > > Now, as to your point that my statement that of the 32% of mail > administrators who can spell RBL many are unable to comprehend the > implications of it: I've made more than 8,000 replies in various public > forums in the last 12 months. I've read over 50,000 threads during that > same period. It's been a relatively slow year for me, but even if we > take those low water numbers back 4 years it's still a fairly > substantial number of administrators and posts that I've encountered. > Based on that vast experience with and exposure to mail administrators > around the world, I find it highly likely that 16% or more of mail > administrators don't understand fully the implications of the RBL > technology they are using and or advocating. > > It has nothing to do with being smart or dumb. It has to do with being > knowledgeable about a particular issue or technology. My comments were > not directed at any particular individual user on this list and were > more accurately a diatribe against the technology than those who choose > to implement it. I'm sorry you chose to misinterpret my comments. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Walsh, Ric [mailto:Walshr@;national-citymortgage.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:52 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Ok your "spelling" remark was rude to all of us. > > > > You following remark despite it's poor grammar seems to say that the > > rest of us are dumber that you. I'd have to say that it was ALL rude. > > > > Ric Walsh > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Walsh, Ric > > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:32 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. > > > Have > > you > > > though of taking an anger management class? > > > > > > Ric Walsh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject:RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL. > > > > > The majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the > > > > implications of > > > the > > > > functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it > > > > > actually works or not. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to > > > > > comprehend its functionality? > > > > > > > > > > William > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris > > > > > Scharff > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd > > > > > parties to provide the functionality, ot
RE: RBL's
To reply.. 1. *Grin* Not yet... 2. Another good example that I will include in my report 3. I respect your thoughts and guidance. I also enjoy your, hum..., colorful(?) insight in regards to, um getting your point a crossed to those that think they know what they are doing yet lack the brain matter to process the opinions of others that have been doing this for far longer. Please keep up the good work. If I remember correctly the "pillow-muncher" comment had me rolling in laughter for ten minutes! If not I give kudos to the person that did make that comment. David Gibbons > Couple of other thoughts... > > 1. There's no shame in being one of the 32% (unless perhaps you've already > implemented an RBL solution) and your inquisitiveness is to be commended. > 2. Simpler-Webb, Inc., who certainly isn't now and likely never has been an > open relay is listed by one RBL... an overly zealous one to be sure, but > still listed. > 3. My opinions are mine alone, you you're free to ascribe whatever weight to > them you choose. > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:David.Gibbons@;Calibercollision.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:52 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Mr. Scharff, > > > > I understand that you're currently a bit jaded with this topic (or you > > could be enjoying yourself not sure... The email intonation module on my > > pc is broken *grin*). But, would you mind taking a moment to explain or > > send links to previous explanations as to why RBL is not a good idea? > > With the research that I have conducted I cannot find any serious issues > > with it. Of course I'm missing quite a lot of first hand knowledge with > > this technology since I have yet to incorporate within my test > > environment. > > > > I fear that I might be apart of that 32% your talking about and wish to... > > um... well... *shrug* not be. > > > > > > Thanks for the input! > > David > > > > > Perhaps you should read your e-mails before you send them. Just cause > > > you wrote something down and it sounds one way in your head doesn't > > > meant that it will sound the same way on the other end. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning. > > > I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only rude to a subset of the > > > 32% of admins who actually could spell RBL and thus understood the barb. > > > As a journalism major, with an English minor I am quite concerned about > > > any grammatical errors I might have made in the comment you are > > > referring to. Would you please be so kind as to point out my grammar > > > errors so that I might endeavor to eliminate them from my future > > > postings? > > > > > > Now, as to your point that my statement that of the 32% of mail > > > administrators who can spell RBL many are unable to comprehend the > > > implications of it: I've made more than 8,000 replies in various public > > > forums in the last 12 months. I've read over 50,000 threads during that > > > same period. It's been a relatively slow year for me, but even if we > > > take those low water numbers back 4 years it's still a fairly > > > substantial number of administrators and posts that I've encountered. > > > Based on that vast experience with and exposure to mail administrators > > > around the world, I find it highly likely that 16% or more of mail > > > administrators don't understand fully the implications of the RBL > > > technology they are using and or advocating. > > > > > > It has nothing to do with being smart or dumb. It has to do with being > > > knowledgeable about a particular issue or technology. My comments were > > > not directed at any particular individual user on this list and were > > > more accurately a diatribe against the technology than those who choose > > > to implement it. I'm sorry you chose to misinterpret my comments. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Walsh, Ric [mailto:Walshr@;national-citymortgage.com] > > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:52 PM > > > >
RE: RBL's
Mr. Scharff, I do monitor the postmaster email box and have tried and tried to ease up on the content filter but HR is HR and we provide a service to our company no matter how flawed I feel their thinking my be on issues that they do not fully understand. I thank you for this information and will pass it along in my report to management who, by the by, think RBL is the best thing since sliced bread. In short, there is too much room from human error and ego for RBL to be an effective tool to block Spam as well as lack of standardization to remove one's domain for such a list after testing and the like. Too bad, RBL seems like a really good idea for Spam control. Again, I thank you for your input David Gibbons > Hopefully this e-mail message will get through. I fear that the most > technically useful portions of this thread may have been blocked by your > company's overzealous content filter. If you administer the postmaster > mailbox, I'm sure you've seen my comments on your server's filter settings. > > Actually, your company's content filters provide a useful analogy to the RBL > situation. In the case of your content filters, no matter how crappy they > are, you've decided to implement them in the manner you currently find them. > You can further refine the criteria you use for filtering messages as you > choose. > > When you choose to use an RBL, you are subject to the criteria that some > random entity has decided is appropriate to filter messages bound for your > domain. There's no guarantee that the RBL you are using isn't run by some > zealot who cares more about making statements than blocking spam. And when > his interests and those of your business collide, it is likely your business > will be the one to suffer. I am aware of too many examples of legitimate > mail being blocked by numerous RBLs. Look at your typical Domain Hosting > Provider, they put 200 domains on the same server and spread them over 10 > IPs. 10 domains per IP... 1 loser spammer on the IP you share with 9 other > folks and suddenly you are unable to send mails to the vendor you'd like to > spend $10 million with. Wonder if any other vendors want your money. > > As to links... the SPEWS FAQ http://www.spews.org/faq.html is a great place > to start. > > Q41: How does one contact SPEWS? > A41: One does not. SPEWS does not receive email - it's just an automated > system and website, general blocklist related issues can be discussed in the > public forums mentioned above. The newsgroup news.admin.net-abuse.email > (NANAE) is a good choice, and Google makes it quite easy to post messages > there via the Web as M@ilGate does via email. First time newsgroup posters > should read the NANAE FAQ. Note that posting messages in these newsgroups & > lists will not have any effect on SPEWS listings, only the discontinuation > of spam and/or spam support will. Be aware that posting ones email address > to any publicly viewable forum or website makes it instantly available to > spammers. If you're concerned about getting spammed, change or "mung" the > email address you use to post with. > Q42: My IP address/range is being listed by SPEWS but I'm not a spammer and > I just signed up for this/these address(s). What can I do to be removed from > the list? > A42: SPEWS is just an automated system, if spam or spam involvement (hosting > spammers, selling spamware) from your IP address/range ceases, it will drop > out of the list in time. Normally the listing involves spam related problems > with your host and the first step you need to take is to complain to them > about the listing, in almost all cases, they are the only people who can get > an address/range out of the SPEWS list. If there is a spam related problem > with your host, their IP address/range will not be removed until it is > resolved. If your host or network is certain a listing mistake has been > made, ask them to read this FAQ then post a message in a public forum > mentioned above with the SPEWS record number (eg. S123) and/or the IP > address/range information in it. Placing the text "SPEWS:" in the subject > can help a SPEWS editor or developer see the message and they may double > check the listing - note that, although others may, no SPEWS editor or > developer will ever reply to the posting. Will this get your IP > address/range removed from a SPEWS listing? Again, not if there are > currently spam related problems with your host. Be aware that posting ones > email address to any publicly viewable forum or website makes it instantly > available to spammers. If you're concerned about getting spammed, change or > "mung" the email address you use to post with. > > > &
HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
Hey, I just finished making my new exchange server (5.5sp4 on W2K) the first server in the site and I shutdown the other server. Now all of my clients are very slow to repond and check name takes like 5mins to complete. Opening the client takes a very long time as well. Please any help.. Please!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
I finished moving all of the accounts last week. I turned the services off on Sat. I turn off the server 3 hours ago. Check name working it just takes a lng time. > Leave the old server up until everyone has been moved over. > Make sure the workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new server. > > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > Hey, > > I just finished making my new exchange server (5.5sp4 on W2K) the first > server in the site and I shutdown the other server. Now all of my clients > are very slow to repond and check name takes like 5mins to complete. > Opening the client takes a very long time as well. Please any help.. > Please!! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential >information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is >addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is >strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately >notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or >email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
I used Bindview and gave all the users an x500 connector cause I had to move them to a diffrent container schema. I updated all the profiles with progen.exe from microsoft. everyone was move over and working fine untill I turned that old server off. > Right, but make sure you leave the old server up until everyone's mapi > profile has been updated. > > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > I finished moving all of the accounts last week. I turned the services > off on Sat. I turn off the server 3 hours ago. Check name working it > just takes a lng time. > > > Leave the old server up until everyone has been moved over. > > Make sure the workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new server. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:17 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > Hey, > > > > I just finished making my new exchange server (5.5sp4 on W2K) the first > > server in the site and I shutdown the other server. Now all of my clients > > are very slow to repond and check name takes like 5mins to complete. > > Opening the client takes a very long time as well. Please any help.. > > Please!! > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > == > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential >information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is >addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is >strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately >notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or >email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
I brough the server back up. Everything works fine. I looked at the profile that I was using to archive mail on user accounts over 2 gigs and the profile points to my new server. Again outlook works, it's just really slow unless the other server is online. Heck, everything was fine with all the exchange services turned off as long as that server was turned on. When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and they all where re-created and pointed to the new server. I guess I can unplug the old server from the network and recreate the outlook profile and see if it works. Any other ideas? *sigh* 5 weeks of planning... *hangs head* > Well then, bring it back up! > I see manual profile re-creation in your future... > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > I used Bindview and gave all the users an x500 connector cause I had to > move them to a diffrent container schema. I updated all the profiles with > progen.exe from microsoft. everyone was move over and working fine untill > I turned that old server off. > > > > Right, but make sure you leave the old server up until everyone's mapi > > profile has been updated. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:25 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > I finished moving all of the accounts last week. I turned the services > > off on Sat. I turn off the server 3 hours ago. Check name working it > > just takes a lng time. > > > > > Leave the old server up until everyone has been moved over. > > > Make sure the workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new > server. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:17 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > I just finished making my new exchange server (5.5sp4 on W2K) the first > > > server in the site and I shutdown the other server. Now all of my > clients > > > are very slow to repond and check name takes like 5mins to complete. > > > Opening the client takes a very long time as well. Please any help.. > > > Please!! > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > == > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If yo
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
Unpluged old exchange from network, recreated profile within outlook... same issue. After a hang time of 5 to 10 mins everything works fine. Logoff outlook and log back in. Repeat of issue 5 to 10 min hang time and everything works fine. > I brough the server back up. Everything works fine. I looked at the > profile that I was using to archive mail on user accounts over 2 gigs and > the profile points to my new server. Again outlook works, it's just > really slow unless the other server is online. Heck, everything was fine > with all the exchange services turned off as long as that server was > turned on. > > When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and they > all where re-created and pointed to the new server. > > I guess I can unplug the old server from the network and recreate the > outlook profile and see if it works. > > Any other ideas? > > *sigh* 5 weeks of planning... *hangs head* > > > Well then, bring it back up! > > I see manual profile re-creation in your future... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:32 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > I used Bindview and gave all the users an x500 connector cause I had to > > move them to a diffrent container schema. I updated all the profiles with > > progen.exe from microsoft. everyone was move over and working fine untill > > I turned that old server off. > > > > > > > Right, but make sure you leave the old server up until everyone's mapi > > > profile has been updated. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:25 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > I finished moving all of the accounts last week. I turned the services > > > off on Sat. I turn off the server 3 hours ago. Check name working it > > > just takes a lng time. > > > > > > > Leave the old server up until everyone has been moved over. > > > > Make sure the workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new > > server. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:17 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > I just finished making my new exchange server (5.5sp4 on W2K) the first > > > > server in the site and I shutdown the other server. Now all of my > > clients > > > > are very slow to repond and check name takes like 5mins to complete. > > > > Opening the client takes a very long time as well. Please any help.. > > > > Please!! > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > > > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > == > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ:
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
WINS as well as DNS. I checked them both. That was my thought as well. I can point WINS to the new server if ya think that will help. I'm personaly leaning to the x500 addresses on all of the accounts for the old mailbox location. > What are you using for name resolution? > > > -Original Message----- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:01 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > I brough the server back up. Everything works fine. I looked at the > profile that I was using to archive mail on user accounts over 2 gigs and > the profile points to my new server. Again outlook works, it's just > really slow unless the other server is online. Heck, everything was fine > with all the exchange services turned off as long as that server was > turned on. > > When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and they > all where re-created and pointed to the new server. > > I guess I can unplug the old server from the network and recreate the > outlook profile and see if it works. > > Any other ideas? > > *sigh* 5 weeks of planning... *hangs head* > > > Well then, bring it back up! > > I see manual profile re-creation in your future... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:32 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > I used Bindview and gave all the users an x500 connector cause I had to > > move them to a diffrent container schema. I updated all the profiles with > > progen.exe from microsoft. everyone was move over and working fine untill > > I turned that old server off. > > > > > > > Right, but make sure you leave the old server up until everyone's mapi > > > profile has been updated. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:25 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > I finished moving all of the accounts last week. I turned the services > > > off on Sat. I turn off the server 3 hours ago. Check name working it > > > just takes a lng time. > > > > > > > Leave the old server up until everyone has been moved over. > > > > Make sure the workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new > > server. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:17 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > I just finished making my new exchange server (5.5sp4 on W2K) the > first > > > > server in the site and I shutdown the other server. Now all of my > > clients > > > > are very slow to repond and check name takes like 5mins to complete. > > > > Opening the client takes a very long time as well. Please any help.. > > > > Please!! > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the > > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have > > > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete th
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
Yep... I even added a host file to my laptop. Log's in hangs for a few and then everything works fine. This is so odd. I even removed the x500 address from this account and it still didn't work.. Hum > But, it works fine if the all of Exchange Server services are shut down on > the orig server yes? > The workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new mail server? > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > WINS as well as DNS. I checked them both. That was my thought as well. > I can point WINS to the new server if ya think that will help. I'm > personaly leaning to the x500 addresses on all of the accounts for the old > mailbox location. > > > > What are you using for name resolution? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:01 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > I brough the server back up. Everything works fine. I looked at the > > profile that I was using to archive mail on user accounts over 2 gigs and > > the profile points to my new server. Again outlook works, it's just > > really slow unless the other server is online. Heck, everything was fine > > with all the exchange services turned off as long as that server was > > turned on. > > > > When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and they > > all where re-created and pointed to the new server. > > > > I guess I can unplug the old server from the network and recreate the > > outlook profile and see if it works. > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > *sigh* 5 weeks of planning... *hangs head* > > > > > Well then, bring it back up! > > > I see manual profile re-creation in your future... > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:32 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > I used Bindview and gave all the users an x500 connector cause I had to > > > move them to a diffrent container schema. I updated all the profiles > with > > > progen.exe from microsoft. everyone was move over and working fine > untill > > > I turned that old server off. > > > > > > > > > > Right, but make sure you leave the old server up until everyone's mapi > > > > profile has been updated. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:25 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > > > > I finished moving all of the accounts last week. I turned the > services > > > > off on Sat. I turn off the server 3 hours ago. Check name working it > > > > just takes a lng time. > > > > > > > > > Leave the old server up until everyone has been moved over. > > > > > Make sure the workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new > > > server. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:17 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > I just finished making my new exchange server (5.5sp4 on W2K) the > > first > > > > > server in the site and I shutdown the other server. Now all of my > > > clients > > > > > are very slow to repond and check name takes like 5mins to complete. > > > > > Opening the client takes a very long time as well. Please any > help.. > > > > > Please!! > > > > > > > > > > _
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
You've got to be bleedin' kidding me XCLN: Automatic Name Checking Stops Working on Some Outlook Clients (Q246795) Killed the address book and it worked. I can't belive this!! I rebuilt 1238 profiles already. Now I have to do it again!!! Gawd! > IIRC, by creating an x500 address for the orig mailbox's DN, it allows the > MTA to re-route mail destined for the old mailbox to the new mailbox. > So, manually re-creating the mapi profile doenst work, name resolution is > accurate... > and this is happening to all the workstations? > > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > Yep... I even added a host file to my laptop. Log's in hangs for a few > and then everything works fine. > > This is so odd. I even removed the x500 address from this account and > it still didn't work.. Hum > > > > But, it works fine if the all of Exchange Server services are shut down on > > the orig server yes? > > The workstations have the correct DNS entry for the new mail server? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:16 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > WINS as well as DNS. I checked them both. That was my thought as well. > > I can point WINS to the new server if ya think that will help. I'm > > personaly leaning to the x500 addresses on all of the accounts for the old > > mailbox location. > > > > > > > What are you using for name resolution? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:01 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > I brough the server back up. Everything works fine. I looked at the > > > profile that I was using to archive mail on user accounts over 2 gigs > and > > > the profile points to my new server. Again outlook works, it's just > > > really slow unless the other server is online. Heck, everything was > fine > > > with all the exchange services turned off as long as that server was > > > turned on. > > > > > > When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and > they > > > all where re-created and pointed to the new server. > > > > > > I guess I can unplug the old server from the network and recreate the > > > outlook profile and see if it works. > > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > > > *sigh* 5 weeks of planning... *hangs head* > > > > > > > Well then, bring it back up! > > > > I see manual profile re-creation in your future... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:32 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > > > > I used Bindview and gave all the users an x500 connector cause I had > to > > > > move them to a diffrent container schema. I updated all the profiles > > with > > > > progen.exe from microsoft. everyone was move over and working fine > > untill > > > > I turned that old server off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right, but make sure you leave the old server up until everyone's > mapi > > > > > profile has been updated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:25 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I finished moving all of the accounts last week. I turned the > > services > > > > > off on Sat. I turn off the server 3 hours ago. Check name work
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
Bingo! Thanks Ben I can't find a Q on this error but XCLN: Automatic Name Checking Stops Working on Some Outlook Clients (Q246795) this fixed it. > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, at 8:01pm, David Gibbons wrote: > > When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and they > > all where re-created and pointed to the new server. > > Just to confirm, you have tried removing and recreating the MAPI profile > on the workstation? > > We had symptoms like what you describe at one of our customers. It turned > out to be that the "Outlook Address Book" MAPI service still had a reference > to the old server. By removing and then re-adding OAB, the problem went > away. > > -- > Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | > | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | > | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
Ben, Question... Based on this new information could I leave the old server up and recreate the profiles (again) and then bring the server down without a issue. This is the _exact_ steps that I took to move that accounts in the first place.. Shut remote center down move all accounts login into center recreate profile (some just a check name and remove add OAB some progem.exe) log onto server with remote client repeat 1200-ist times Now with this info add.. turn off server repeat again? or Leave server online rebuild profile again turn server off. > Bingo! Thanks Ben I can't find a Q on this error but XCLN: Automatic > Name Checking Stops Working on Some Outlook Clients (Q246795) > this fixed it. > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, at 8:01pm, David Gibbons wrote: > > > When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and they > > > all where re-created and pointed to the new server. > > > > Just to confirm, you have tried removing and recreating the MAPI profile > > on the workstation? > > > > We had symptoms like what you describe at one of our customers. It turned > > out to be that the "Outlook Address Book" MAPI service still had a reference > > to the old server. By removing and then re-adding OAB, the problem went > > away. > > > > -- > > Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | > > | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | > > | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues!
Jim, Thanks for the info but I have made the new server the first server in site and I have yet to delete the old server. I just powered it off. I have tested out some of the computers here and did find that if one of my techs just did a check name when I move their account and did not re-create the Outlook address book then they have problems with the hang. If my tech did what I told them to do or if they got the script and it completely recreated the profile everything works just fine. So in short, I'm going to power this server down and delete it and handle the 100 or so calls for outlook not working. Thanks for everyones input into my issue. David. > Dave, > > Here's your problem...I had the same problem, when removing the first server > in our site. Change this over, and you won't have to change a single > profile: > > XADM: Reassigning Site Roles after Removing the First Server in an Exchange > Site (Q152960) > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q152960 (may wrap) > > Changing the Site Folder Server > If the Site Folder Server is removed from the site, Exchange will > automatically discover the problem and select another server, but this may > take several hours or longer. > > The site folder server has responsibility for verifying the validity and > existence of the Offline Address Book (OAB) and the Schedule+ Free Busy > (F/B) folders. > > Jim Blunt > > Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this communication are those of the > individual sender only and are never to be construed as the formal opinion > of The Bechtel Group or Bechtel Hanford, Inc. This opinion shall also not > be considered as a formal endorsement by the aforementioned companies of any > software products recommended by this individual. > > -Original Message- > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: HELP. Using Ed's server move method. Client issues! > > > Ben, > > Question... Based on this new information could I leave the old server up > and recreate the profiles (again) and then bring the server down without a > issue. > > This is the _exact_ steps that I took to move that accounts in the first > place.. > > Shut remote center down > move all accounts > login into center > recreate profile (some just a check name and remove add OAB some > progem.exe) > log onto server with remote client > repeat 1200-ist times > > Now with this info add.. > turn off server > repeat again? > > or > > Leave server online > rebuild profile again > turn server off. > > > Bingo! Thanks Ben I can't find a Q on this error but XCLN: Automatic > > Name Checking Stops Working on Some Outlook Clients (Q246795) > > this fixed it. > > > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, at 8:01pm, David Gibbons wrote: > > > > When I moved the accounts to the new server I did check profiles and > they > > > > all where re-created and pointed to the new server. > > > > > > Just to confirm, you have tried removing and recreating the MAPI > profile > > > on the workstation? > > > > > > We had symptoms like what you describe at one of our customers. It > turned > > > out to be that the "Outlook Address Book" MAPI service still had a > reference > > > to the old server. By removing and then re-adding OAB, the problem went > > > away. > > > > > > -- > > > Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do > not | > > > | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity > or | > > > | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any > kind. | > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: one user can't login to OWA
Is the users Alias the same as his user name? I'm not running a 2000ad but that's a commen problem with NT4 and 5.5exch > can you go to http://mailboxserver.domain.com/exchange and get in that = > way? > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:40 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: one user can't login to OWA > > > Here's my setup: > > A Win2000 AD domain. I have one internal Exchange server, 5.5 SP3, with = > the > stores and all. We have OWA installed on our webserver (Win2k). > > I have a user who can't login to OWA. The browser comes up with the = > "OWA > was unable to get to your inbox" error. > Outlook 2000 is no problem for him. He has all the right permissions = > (in a > desparate attempt, I elevated his priveleges to almost God didn't = > work). > > The recipient's properties all look ok... I checked them against a user = > for > whom OWA works fine. > > The webserver Security log shows a Successful Network Logon for that = > user. > The Exchange server doesn't report anything to the logs. > > Any steering in the right direction would be a great help > > > > > Chris Levis > Applied Geographics, Inc. > Boston, MA > > Don't go where the path leads you. > Instead go where there is no path and leave trails. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Odd Client Behavior
To the group, (Server-W2K sp3 E5.5sp4 Workstations-W2K OK2000sp3) I'm having this same issue with one of my client email accounts. It doesn't matter what PC I create the profile on. When trying to read a message there is about a 7 sec delay for the client to mark the message as read. During this time Outlook in lock up with and hour glass. This can be recreated by right clicking on the message and changing the status of the message for read to unread. Messages will also take about 7 sec to be sent. The message will sit in the outbox. This is very odd. I have run clean sweep for views, forms and rule reply templates. Still no joy.. Any other ideas? BTW: New Mail Notification works, no error logs in exchange and this seems to be the only mailbox in the company having an issue. My email response time (from the same PC) is just fine. I've hunted the archives and TechNet and can't seem to find this issue. All KB's point to UDP/New Mail Notification but I can't find an issue with network connectivity. Thanks David Gibbons > Look at the default view on the folder > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnny Martinez > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Odd Client Behavior > > > Hi Ed, > It's not workstation specific. I tried setting him up on another system > and it did the same thing. Even something as simple as selecting a read > email in his Inbox and marking it as unread lags a few seconds. > > He did mention that it might have started happening at the same time I > reinstalled OWA and SP4 but I don't see why it would effect only his > mailbox. > > Johnny > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Odd Client Behavior > > > Does it happen with other workstations' Outlook installations, or is it > isloated to this lone Outlook instance? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnny Martinez > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Odd Client Behavior > > > 1)Remove all services but MS Exchange server service? I think I am > misunderstanding you. Did you mean to say that? > > This is only happening with this one mailbox whether he is logged in or > out. > > Johnny > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Odd Client Behavior > > > One thing I would check is this: > > 1) Remove all services but the MS Exchange server service. > 2) Have the customer exit and log off from Outlook > 3) Resend your test message. > 4) See what kind of performance you have then. > > Nate Couch > EDS Messaging > > -Original Message- > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Odd Client Behavior > > > 10/100 Switched network > Server: > Windows NT4 server SP6a > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > Client: > Windows NT4 workstation SP6a > Outlook 2000 SP3 > 210 MB free space on disk c: > > Hi all, > I have one client that is lagging big time when he tries to open or > close any emails. Just moving the highlight bar lags...Other systems can > open/close emails with no lag. I've noticed that when I send the user an > email it sits in my Outbox for about five seconds instead of just going > immediately like when I send to anyone else. I've tried sending when his > Outlook client is closed and it doesn't make a difference. > > This is a pretty vanilla client except I have two shared resources > added. DHCP is running fine. All updates are in. > > Anyone have any ideas why the mailbox would lag like this? It doesn't > seem to be the workstation that is the problem. He has 85MB out of 450MB > allowed. No filters setup...his mailbox is generic too. Thanks for any > help! > > Johnny > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/sear
Event ID 1025 MSExchangeIS Public
(Exch5.5sp4 W2Ksp3) An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: FEqEntryId Error: 0x80040107 Anyone have any ideas on what this error is? All I can really find is a MAPI error MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID on Google. This looks like it might be related (VB HEX error code matches) but the site is not in english and there's no "translate page" in google. If I search on Microsoft I find Q190993 - XADM: Events Service Fails to Start with MAPI 0x80040107 but, I'm not having and Event Service issue. Ideas? Please? Thanks David Gibbons _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
To All: Current environment Test Lab Server 1 Compaq r3000 2 PII 333 1.5gig Ram 1x 4.1gig OS mirror 1x 9.1gig Log mirror 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5 Windows NT 4sp6 Exchange 5.5sp4 Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container Scheme Container for each location e.g. -Center Location 1 --User --User --ETC -Center Location 2 --User --User --Etc Test Lab Server 2 Compaq ML530 2 PIII Xoen 1gig 2gig Ram 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5 Windows 2000sp2 Exchange 5.5sp4 We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current hardware that our exchange server is sitting. We also wish to move all user out of there current containers and set them in the root of the exchange server and use address book views for our GAL(ie the right way) Within Ed's server move method I can use the server to server move and not lose single instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on the new server. As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the new server. Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of their containers and into the root without having to use a .pst and losing single instance storage? David Gibbons Sr. Network Engineer Caliber Collision Centers 949-283-7593 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
Chris and Martin, Thanks for the information. *sigh* My manager's going to hate me. But that's what a test lab is for right? As for E2K, I've yet to really look at it as a possabiliy so my first question is... Can I run E2K is it own domain with a DC blah blah blah... Leaving my current NT 4 domain intact and setup a trust between the 2 domains, add the E2K server to my current site and move all the users to it? We're not quite ready to move to 2000 yet so I need to work between the lines. > Upgrade to E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage. > > > > > > To All: > > > > Current environment > > > > Test Lab Server 1 > > Compaq r3000 > > 2 PII 333 > > 1.5gig Ram > > 1x 4.1gig OS mirror > > 1x 9.1gig Log mirror > > 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5 > > Windows NT 4sp6 > > Exchange 5.5sp4 > > Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig > > uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container > > Scheme Container for each location e.g. -Center Location 1 > > --User --User --ETC -Center Location 2 --User --User --Etc > > > > Test Lab Server 2 > > Compaq ML530 > > 2 PIII Xoen 1gig > > 2gig Ram > > 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror > > 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror > > 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5 > > Windows 2000sp2 > > Exchange 5.5sp4 > > > > We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current > > hardware that our exchange server is sitting. We also wish > > to move all user out of there current containers and set them > > in the root of the exchange server and use address book views > > for our GAL(ie the right way) Within Ed's server move method > > I can use the server to server move and not lose single > > instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with > > all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on > > the new server. As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get > > all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I > > lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the > > new server. Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of > > their containers and into the root without having to use a > > .pst and losing single instance storage? > > > > > > David Gibbons > > Sr. Network Engineer > > Caliber Collision Centers > > 949-283-7593 > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
Chris, Currently all of our _wonderful_ users depend on the containers to help them figure out who's at a center or to send email to everyone at that center and we do not use address book views at this time. We have a high transfer rate here and every time some moves from one center to another I have to move that mailbox. Also we're 62 centers strong and are looking at adding 30 more centers before the end of this year. The container's are a pain right now and will become a nightmare by the end of the year. Also, my boss doesn't like it and I have to give him what he wants I just wish his previous staff set it up correctly. Now, if we drill everyone down to the root anytime I have a new user hire or a transfer I just need to change the information in their profile and can manage all the mailbox resources via an address book view instead of hard moves and complicated scripting. > Question: Why do you need to move the users to a single container? > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:52 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage. > > > > > > Chris and Martin, > > > > Thanks for the information. *sigh* My manager's going to hate > > me. But that's what a test lab is for right? > > > > As for E2K, > > > > I've yet to really look at it as a possabiliy so my first > > question is... > > > > Can I run E2K is it own domain with a DC blah blah blah... > > Leaving my current NT 4 domain intact and setup a trust > > between the 2 domains, add the E2K server to my current site > > and move all the users to it? > > > > We're not quite ready to move to 2000 yet so I need to work > > between the lines. > > > > > Upgrade to E2K. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage. > > > > > > > > > > > > To All: > > > > > > > > Current environment > > > > > > > > Test Lab Server 1 > > > > Compaq r3000 > > > > 2 PII 333 > > > > 1.5gig Ram > > > > 1x 4.1gig OS mirror > > > > 1x 9.1gig Log mirror > > > > 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5 > > > > Windows NT 4sp6 > > > > Exchange 5.5sp4 > > > > Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig > > > > uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container > > > > Scheme Container for each location e.g. -Center Location 1 > > > > --User --User --ETC -Center Location 2 --User --User --Etc > > > > > > > > Test Lab Server 2 > > > > Compaq ML530 > > > > 2 PIII Xoen 1gig > > > > 2gig Ram > > > > 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror > > > > 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror > > > > 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5 > > > > Windows 2000sp2 > > > > Exchange 5.5sp4 > > > > > > > > We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current > > > > hardware that our exchange server is sitting. We also wish > > > > to move all user out of there current containers and set them > > > > in the root of the exchange server and use address book views > > > > for our GAL(ie the right way) Within Ed's server move method > > > > I can use the server to server move and not lose single > > > > instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with > > > > all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on > > > > the new server. As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get > > > > all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I > > > > lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the > > > > new server. Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of > > > > their containers and into the root without having to use a > > > > .pst and losing single instance storage? > > > > > > > > > > > > David Gibbons > > > > Sr. Network Engineer > > > > Caliber Collision Centers > > > > 949-283-7593 > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Profile Maker How to?
Hey all I'm maving quite a few problems with my exchange server move (yes I tested it and none of this stuff happened in test so I'm stuck with it). I'm moving from one server to another and into another container. I was using a 3rd party tool that failed me completly in the live enviroment (BindView). So here I am, I need to update all the profiles in my company with a login scrip and wish to use Modprof from Microsoft. I need it to append the new server name to the exchange profile, problem... I can't figure out how to use the darn thing. Does anyone have a sample *.prf that is not the Outlook.prf that you can download from Microsoft? It has everything in it and I just need the exchange server and can't fiugure out how to pull all the unneeded text from it so I can test it. Thanks David (Really tired with a caffee IV) Gibbons. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Profile Maker How to?
> Hey all > > I'm maving quite a few problems with my exchange server move (yes I tested > it and none of this stuff happened in test so I'm stuck with it). I'm > moving from one server to another and into another container. I was using > a 3rd party tool that failed me completly in the live enviroment > (BindView). So here I am, I need to update all the profiles in my company > with a login scrip and wish to use Modprof from Microsoft. I need it to > append the new server name to the exchange profile, problem... I can't > figure out how to use the darn thing. Does anyone have a sample *.prf > that is not the Outlook.prf that you can download from Microsoft? It has > everything in it and I just need the exchange server and can't fiugure out > how to pull all the unneeded text from it so I can test it. > > Thanks > David (Really tired with a caffee IV) Gibbons. Sorry, Windows 2000 Exchange 5.5sp4 win9x clients with outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Relay with IIS
Well, Here's yet another issue that I'm having that I hope someone can help me out with. Exchange 5.5sp4 on w2k IIS5 SMTP on w2k I am tring to forward all email from my exchange server through the SMTP server. I can recieve email just fine and although I have setup the relay server to allow relay to the ip and dns name of my exchange server I still get Reporting-MTA: dns;mail2.calibercollision.com Received-From-MTA: dns;a-exch-pri.calibercollision.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 19:00:50 -0700 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 Relaying is prohibited Any ideas? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
