RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I cannot prove that an apple is red - well they're not if it's a granny smith nor that the sky is blue - quite often isn't in Blighty! Happy Holidays - Peace and Goodwill to all men eh! ;-) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
: Speaking of MOOT, can anyone tell me what top 10 classic rock single contains the word MOOT? Do you mean in the band name, song title or lyrics? Eg: Moot The Hoople - Ballad of Mott the Hoople (1973)? This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
The problem here is that Greg's opinion is that accepting gifts presents a real or perceived conflict of interest. The key point being the word perceived. The statement covers all eventualities. If the CoI is not real, it remains possible for it to be perceived - even by only one individual - therefore proving the statement correct, even when technically (not real) it is incorrect. Therefore we have a circular argument on which it seems people will not budge. I don't believe I have mis-characterised or mis-read any of the post and am addressing the basic premise. Now can we move on? -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 December 2003 00:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 People mis-characterize and read things into my posts that are not there. This one I have to do in-line. First of all, I've seen plenty of statements by people who accurately depict reasons that your opinion is bunk. You've either not read or not comprehended them. No one in 8 years has proven the statement flawed or illogical that when you work in an industry and accept gifts from vendors in that industry that it presents a real or perceived conflict of interest. This has been the point since day one, is the point today and will be the point tomorrow and the next day and the next. I've seen your comments repeatedly over the years, and continue to disagree with them. Its also painfully obvious to a casual observer that you're using incorrect statements in defense of your position. And ethics are not passed as laws. There is no law that a company's employees cannot accept gifts. The ethics that lawyers and doctors follow are also not laws. While this is technically accurate, in fact it is inaccurate. Both these professions require licenses to practice. Lawyers who decide to cross a relatively arbitrary line involving a conflict of interest can and have been disbarred - in other words, their license to practice law is revoked. Doctors, too, can have their medical license suspended or revoked. In either case, they are not allowed to practice their profession without that license. Ergo, those professions' codes of ethics *are*, if somewhat indirect, law. Yes, I understand and know all that, but that was not the point. Ethics go far, far beyond mere laws. Lawyers can be disbarred for ethics violations but not face any criminal prosecution. Yes, they can also be disbarred AND face criminal prosecution, but the point was made in response to an argument that indicated that ALL ethics must be legislated. Don't take things out of context. Your most asinine statements, however, are your explicit statements that being awarded a vendor sponsored honor automatically removes any and all objectivity for those on whom the honor is bestowed. The fact that you repeatedly use that argument shows me how weak your argument really is, especially since you can't show a single instance of where this actually has happened. I don't say this. I say that it is a real or perceived conflict of interest and hence a violation of basic ethics. I have stated repeatedly that MVP's may well NEVER cause anyone to ACT unethically. And guess what? It is irrelevant, it is still a real or perceived conflict of interest. What part of this are you missing? Because the MVP community is both under NDA's to Microsoft and also has private community newsgroups, you don't see that MVP's as a group are some of the most critical of Microsoft's products and policies. But none of that matters to you, because we're all just in Microsoft's pockets anyways. Its not like 12 of the 24 servers I've deployed this year run non-Microsoft OS's or anything.[1] Again, it does not matter if MVP is the greatest thing since sliced bread, results in world peace and gives every starving kid a home. None of that changes that it is a real or perceived conflict of interest. Again, it matters not one bit if MVP's act unethically or not, it is a conflict of interest plain and simple. I would be willing to bet that most if not all of the MVP's do NOT act unethically because of the title. Guess what? Doesn't matter. Still an violation of basic conflict of interest rules. So, I think its fair to say that you've not come even remotely close to proving to anyone where this alleged conflict of interest is, and how it negatively impacts our objectivity. I didn't say that it negatively impacts your objectivity, I said it has the *potential* to impact your objectivity. Why? Because it is a real or perceived conflict of interest. And, in the interest of full disclosure, two of the three accolades in my signature line are from Microsoft, obviously the last two. The first (MTS) was bestowed by my employer. Does that mean I'm instantly biased towards my employer? You obviously fail to understand what I am talking about. Roger
WAS RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 NOW my bad - sorry
Opps sorry my bad - only just read this one. -Original Message- From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 December 2003 01:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 The next person who wants to add something to this thread, please send your message directly to those who have demonstrated they care. It might be a little hard work the first time, but then all you have to do is hit reply to all. This list is not for you personal arguments. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Then tell people to quit bringing it up. Then quit beating this dead horse -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I have no interest in winning. Can this thread please go away...You're not going to win Greg... _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Oh for f**ks sake get over this. At the end of the day we are *only* IT Professionals providing a service. We're not that important in the bigger picture. Sure, some will abuse their position and that's a not too nice part of human nature - greed and nepotism. Full stop. It happens all the time in business and in ALL society. If you really have a problem with 'ethics' then direct it towards bigger fish like the fact the White House administration (amongst many other 'democratic' administrations) awards the billion dollar contracts to their buddies. Now that would make an interesting read. And don't get me started on your definition of money intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
player-of-the-season award Nice analogy This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ideal setup for exch 2003?
I've been asked to get a 'wish list' together for next years budget so I'm going all out for an upgrade from present setup: Small Business Server 2k (inc exch2k) to PDC running W2k3 on present box but will need a new box for Exch2k3 What would be a (relatively sensible) 'ideal' setup. I've read the recommended from MS but seem to recall that Exch 5.5 ran better on dual processors. Does this apply to Exch 2k3 or am I imagining things/ making it up? BTW, I'm not talking about partition info - hardware really such as processor speed/ dual/ memory thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TU UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?
Thanks Eric that's very useful -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 December 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Exchange 2000 and 2003 can make good use of dual processors. The configuration will vary based upon the load and number of users you are supporting, but here's an example of the system I just ordered for my company: Dell PowerEdge 4400 Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition Dual Pentium-4 Xeon 2.8 GHz Processors 2.0 GB of Dual channel DDR RAM (4 x 512 MB DDR) 4-channel PERC Raid card Disks: 2 x 18.2G 10k rpm drives [RAID-1] = C:\ (OS Drive) 2 x 18.2G 15k rpm drives [RAID-1] = D:\ (Directory Store + SMTP Queue + Swapfile) 4 x 73G 15x rpm drives [RAID-5] = E:\ (Information Store) 2 x 36G 15k rpm drives [RAID-0] = F:\ (Secondary Swapfile + free space for doing Information Store maintenance) Quantum VS160 Tape Drive (80/160GB) Note: For those of you who have been following my saga, I was finally able to get the executive board to approve $$$ for a new server NOW instead of 1/2004. I guess when you equate mail downtime to dollars and cents, they tend to listen more closely to the IT guy! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ideal setup for exch 2003? I've been asked to get a 'wish list' together for next years budget so I'm going all out for an upgrade from present setup: Small Business Server 2k (inc exch2k) to PDC running W2k3 on present box but will need a new box for Exch2k3 What would be a (relatively sensible) 'ideal' setup. I've read the recommended from MS but seem to recall that Exch 5.5 ran better on dual processors. Does this apply to Exch 2k3 or am I imagining things/ making it up? BTW, I'm not talking about partition info - hardware really such as processor speed/ dual/ memory thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TU UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: strange headers
Will read them and try and understand them! It wasn't from a spammer tho but from someone who wants us to sponsor them (we sell skateboards). -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 November 2003 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: strange headers Read and understand RFC 821 and 822, and their successors 2821 and 2822, and you'll understand a lot about how spammers ply their trade. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: strange headers Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't quite know why it appeared the way it did. Basically, someone sent an email from a Hotmail address yet the 'from' field did not display the hotmail address, but an address that looked as tho it was from our network. Now I know that it is possible to spoof addresses and so on but I didn't think this was possible thru hotmail tho having looked on their site, it appears you can do POP and the line below 'mail pickup service seems to indicate that. I don't use hotmail so I don't know whether POP could have been used. Would someone be able to look at the headers below and tell me what happened? I believe that someone did use a POP thru hotmail and spoofed the address but would like confirmation or correction I have also included the original mail but deleted some parts. (incidentally, what is the best practice for posting headers? should I block our sensitive stuff or is it easy enough to get hold of that it is not worth the bother?) Much obliged Rob Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from gateway.mydomain.xxx.net ([xxx.xxx.xx.x]) by servername.mydomain.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:55:11 + Received: from server.isp.net ([xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by gateway.mydomain.xxx.net (x.xx.x/x.xx.x) with ESMTP id hA1Gt79Q098836 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:55:07 GMT x-previous-hop: 64.4.18.193 Received: from hotmail.com (law12-oe58.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.18.193]) by server.isp.net (x.xx.x/x.xx.x) with ESMTP id hA1Gt84r029294 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:55:09 GMT Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 08:55:06 -0800 Received: from xx.xxx.xx.xxx by law12-oe58.law12.hotmail.com with DAV; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:55:06 + X-Originating-IP: [xx.xxx.xx.xxx] X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The one [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: getting sponsored Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:54:57 - MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2003 16:55:06.0977 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7226510:01C3A098] X-Virus-Checked: 61885 X-Skip-Virus-Check: yes X-Sender-IP: 212.50.178.147 X-INT-DeliveryDone: hA1Gt79Q098836 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900-- -Original Message- From: The one [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 November 2003 16:55 To: Mailbox Subject: send back on [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
strange headers
Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't quite know why it appeared the way it did. Basically, someone sent an email from a Hotmail address yet the 'from' field did not display the hotmail address, but an address that looked as tho it was from our network. Now I know that it is possible to spoof addresses and so on but I didn't think this was possible thru hotmail tho having looked on their site, it appears you can do POP and the line below 'mail pickup service seems to indicate that. I don't use hotmail so I don't know whether POP could have been used. Would someone be able to look at the headers below and tell me what happened? I believe that someone did use a POP thru hotmail and spoofed the address but would like confirmation or correction I have also included the original mail but deleted some parts. (incidentally, what is the best practice for posting headers? should I block our sensitive stuff or is it easy enough to get hold of that it is not worth the bother?) Much obliged Rob Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from gateway.mydomain.xxx.net ([xxx.xxx.xx.x]) by servername.mydomain.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:55:11 + Received: from server.isp.net ([xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by gateway.mydomain.xxx.net (x.xx.x/x.xx.x) with ESMTP id hA1Gt79Q098836 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:55:07 GMT x-previous-hop: 64.4.18.193 Received: from hotmail.com (law12-oe58.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.18.193]) by server.isp.net (x.xx.x/x.xx.x) with ESMTP id hA1Gt84r029294 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:55:09 GMT Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 08:55:06 -0800 Received: from xx.xxx.xx.xxx by law12-oe58.law12.hotmail.com with DAV; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:55:06 + X-Originating-IP: [xx.xxx.xx.xxx] X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The one [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: getting sponsored Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:54:57 - MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2003 16:55:06.0977 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7226510:01C3A098] X-Virus-Checked: 61885 X-Skip-Virus-Check: yes X-Sender-IP: 212.50.178.147 X-INT-DeliveryDone: hA1Gt79Q098836 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A098.E1BED900-- -Original Message- From: The one [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 November 2003 16:55 To: Mailbox Subject: send back on [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: options
Or you could use some form of collaboration software such as Outlook Team Folders (similar to PF's but more versatility)- unsupported by MS at present but it looks good. If u can't find it I can send the pack over -it's only about 1.6mb for both files. Have a look at: http://www.slipstick.com/dev/teamfolders.htm -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 September 2003 23:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: options What happens when their hard drive fails, where is the backup. You have already decided that keeping the emails is important, therefore: 1) storing the emails in a public folder is the way to go 2) Permissions can be set to only allow them to add messages and not delete. (no different to file permissions 3) You could assign a SMTP address to the PF and get them to send on behalf of the PF to save them . 4) Archiving after project closure to PST is the way to go (OL 2003 removes the 2GB limit) cheers Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/09/2003 11:13:01 p.m. I fear that I will run out of disk space very fast on the server. They all have 20 GB free on their workstations, how about setting up a pst folder on their D-drives, then they can drag the mails into that one? Kim -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 19 september 2003 13:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: options Why not a publilc folder? You know the access on these can be limited so each pair has their own folder that no one else can see let alone read content from. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 September 2003 09:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: options Hi there, I have been asked to think about a way to implent a kind of policy for keeping emails. Our users work per two, i.e. a scientiific officer and an assistant. They get a lot of emails about certain projects, but after a while emails get lost, people don't know who replied etc... Now they want a system where the two people working together establish a sort of directory structure in which they can create a folder per project and keep all correspondance in there (not as a public folder). The lifespan of a project can be up to fice years so the volume of emails will be quite big. We have about 10 'couples' like that and what they want to dio is put eachother in CC for each response/received email, so that's already a duplication. Problem is that the diskspace on the E2K server has about 10 GB left so I'm worried about that fact, and I don't know whether using the archive function in Outlook (XP) is a good option. Does anyone want to share their opinion on this? Maybe some of you have faced a similar problem? Kim ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Re-assign/ Move mailbox
I did reply to this but am not sure if it came through. Thanks Tony that was a great help - forgot about the retention time - d'oh. I did have a bit of trouble doing this tho as when I deleted the user, there was no red cross against the mailbox so I could not re-attach. Ran clean-up agent and came up OK for future ref. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 September 2003 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox It's okay to delete the mailbox if you have retention set on the Store. PSS didn't give you exact directions. Check out http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enfamilyid= 9e52bafc-5c33-46b9-af14-04e4d989ef6b From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:05:41 +0100 Hi Nate, I have added the new AD account already and removed the 'SELF' rights from mailbox permissions however when I try and delete the 'corrupt'ad account, I cannot deselect the check box against 'mark this mailbox for deletion'. Perhaps this is a Small Business server restriction? Doesn't make much sense if it is. Thanks -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 September 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox It seems to me that all you need to do is add the new AD account to the original mailbox and then remove the old corrupt account from the permissions. Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From:Rob Hackney Reply To:Exchange Discussions Sent:Monday, September 15, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re-assign/ Move mailbox SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get 10MB of e-mail storage! Sign up for Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http
Re-assign/ Move mailbox
SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox
Hi Nate, I have added the new AD account already and removed the 'SELF' rights from mailbox permissions however when I try and delete the 'corrupt'ad account, I cannot deselect the check box against 'mark this mailbox for deletion'. Perhaps this is a Small Business server restriction? Doesn't make much sense if it is. Thanks -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 September 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox It seems to me that all you need to do is add the new AD account to the original mailbox and then remove the old corrupt account from the permissions. Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Rob Hackney Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re-assign/ Move mailbox SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes) I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass Mailings
Did look at Lsoft but it is too pricey for my lot! -Original Message- From: Wehner, Paul (wehnerpl) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 September 2003 19:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings I second the LSoft recomendation. Univ. of Cinci uses it and it's amazingly fast. Like 10K messages delivered in 60 minutes. We have webshield also installed on the box and god protect me, but it's all running fine-:) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings ListServ from LSOFT.COM is a good product. You set it up on it's own machine and subdomain (lists.Sanantonio.gov) and let it chug. One of the BETTER qualities of this product is that you can tune it so that a domain only gets one message for the number of people subscribed, rather than one message per recipient. (i.e. twenty users are listed at BELLSOUTH.NET.. Only one message gets sent to BELLSOUTH.NET) You can also chunk the traffic so that you don't flood out your ISP. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: Mass Mailings Hello All- We currently have a division that is requesting to be able to send mass mails through our server to opt-in recipients of a monthly newsletter, this would be upwards of 70,000 pieces per month and will increase as required. My question is has anyone received similar requests and how were they handled? The division head assures me that this list will be maintained and kept up to date and users who request to be removed from the list will be, they currently outsource this project and want to bring it in-house to save money. I believe in the long run this will cause more problems than the savings will add up to, any suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass Mailings
I've been tasked with running similar stuff over the pond here. I've tried a few if the cheaper versions you can get off download.com and they were pretty rubbish. If you're looking for a decent opt-out one then I'm testing Lyris List Manager which seems to test ok so far. And it's only $500. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 September 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings Your ISP isn't going to do anything; you're the city of San Antonio. But a sub-domain with its own originating IP does help in case that gets blacklisted by $random moron. You could get blacklisted no matter how careful you are just because there are idiots out there who will use any random blacklist that just happens to exist... and some of them are managed by.. well, as part of my kinder/gentler persona I'll stop there. The monthly San Antonio Parks Rec newsletter is highly unlikely to be seen as spam IMO. -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:12 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: RE: Mass Mailings I'am more concerned about being blacklisted also as Martin stated mass mail through my ISP (SBC). Should I consider setting up an additional domain/server to accomplish this in order to avoid being blacklisted or are there any other ways to get around this? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings [1]I've sent such things though Exchange before... no problems in terms of volume, but you may consider a majordomo or mailman (or similar) box and a sub-domain of @lists.sanantonio.gov to manage such mailings. [1] Hi Chris! -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:46 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: Mass Mailings Hello All- We currently have a division that is requesting to be able to send mass mails through our server to opt-in recipients of a monthly newsletter, this would be upwards of 70,000 pieces per month and will increase as required. My question is has anyone received similar requests and how were they handled? The division head assures me that this list will be maintained and kept up to date and users who request to be removed from the list will be, they currently outsource this project and want to bring it in-house to save money. I believe in the long run this will cause more problems than the savings will add up to, any suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting mailbox permissions
Hi, I have a site running ex2000 sp3 on an sbs2000 (windows2k sp3) box where all permissions on the mailboxes have been set to default =none. I have been asked to change calendar permissions to reviewer and rather than doing each mailbox individually, I am attempting to use the setperm tool. Is anyone familiar with this? It is available from http://www.mailsoftware.co.uk/downloads.html and is also listed on the slipstick site: http://www.slipstick.com/exs/permissions.htm I have not used this before and when I read the read me it mentioned some prerequisites: 1. Microsoft Outlook installed without Security Patch (Ensure CDO is installed - This is not the case with Outlook 2000) 2. ACL.DLL registered. Use regsvr32 acl.dll 3. Logged on as user with Permissions Admin or greater on relevant mailboxes. 3 I am fine on but 1 2 I am not sure - 1) does the security patch refer to oulook98? The version I will be running the app from will be Outlook2002 - I know that cdo is part of this but do I need to install it separately? 2)acl.dll is not on my system (XP) appears to be an uncompiled part of the platform sdk. Am i correct in this? What would be the way to proceed ot should I avoid this if I have not used cdo before and just manually configure the mailboxes? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting mailbox permissions
Thanks Chris - downloaded from the old part of cdolive and worked great. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 September 2003 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Setting mailbox permissions #1 refers to Outlook 2000 SR2 or later. If you just install Outlook (run all from my computer) from the Office 2000 CD you're good to go. #2 is indeed in the SDK, I believe it is compiled though. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney (old) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:57 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Setting mailbox permissions Subject: Setting mailbox permissions Hi, I have a site running ex2000 sp3 on an sbs2000 (windows2k sp3) box where all permissions on the mailboxes have been set to default =none. I have been asked to change calendar permissions to reviewer and rather than doing each mailbox individually, I am attempting to use the setperm tool. Is anyone familiar with this? It is available from http://www.mailsoftware.co.uk/downloads.html and is also listed on the slipstick site: http://www.slipstick.com/exs/permissions.htm I have not used this before and when I read the read me it mentioned some prerequisites: 1. Microsoft Outlook installed without Security Patch (Ensure CDO is installed - This is not the case with Outlook 2000) 2. ACL.DLL registered. Use regsvr32 acl.dll 3. Logged on as user with Permissions Admin or greater on relevant mailboxes. 3 I am fine on but 1 2 I am not sure - 1) does the security patch refer to oulook98? The version I will be running the app from will be Outlook2002 - I know that cdo is part of this but do I need to install it separately? 2)acl.dll is not on my system (XP) appears to be an uncompiled part of the platform sdk. Am i correct in this? What would be the way to proceed ot should I avoid this if I have not used cdo before and just manually configure the mailboxes? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick question...
Thanks guys. Another question tho - if mail is in the queue directory, why would it not show in the queue under exchange system manager default smtp server queues? Thanks -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2003 17:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick question... Indeed. I knocked up a script to remind me weekly of the size of Badmail, and I've put it up here: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/dealing_with_ba.html It wouldn't be too difficult to make it automatically delete the contents, too. Neil -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06 August 2003 17:32 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Quick question... Subject: RE: Quick question... You might not want to delete the ones in the queue folder. Besides you probably can't anyway since they are in use. Are they of large size and maybe taking a little while to be sent? The badmail you can safely delete. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick question... Hi, Exch 2000 I have items in my badmail directory - most recent from 28/07/03 and I also have items in my mailroot\vsi1\queue folder. Can I delete these items? Nothing is showing up in my queue thru system manager Thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quick question...
Hi, Exch 2000 I have items in my badmail directory - most recent from 28/07/03 and I also have items in my mailroot\vsi1\queue folder. Can I delete these items? Nothing is showing up in my queue thru system manager Thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
Are you bored? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: There is no M: drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook team folders
Has anyone used the Outlook Team folders that is now discontinued? I'm trying to get the outlook team folders wizard to work on my system (sbs2000/ exch 2000 sp3) however I am getting the following error: Error: occurred during HTTP publishing of Web files. Select OK to try another destination to publish your files to or Cancel to exit the wizard. According to Q250861 I need to install it on NT4 then upgrade - not an option. However, on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/teamfolders.htm it states I need to install the web publishing wizard which I have done however I am still getting the error. Does this require a reboot to get it to work? Or any other ideas? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: OWA and the M:
Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
Thanks - just needed re-assuring! -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 11:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Mine've always been like that... And all the other servers I ever looked at. Andy -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
That's what I've got on the exadmin folder What I would really like to know tho is why I cannot publish a team calendar to my server -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: you can replace that M:\blah-blah-blah with \\.\BackOfficeStorage\ -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Thanks - just needed re-assuring! -Original Message- From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 11:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Mine've always been like that... And all the other servers I ever looked at. Andy -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help on Q327378
Hi, I've been reading q327378 about changing mailbox size limits in a reasonable time and have added the value for the exchangeIS. Should I be concerned that there is not the value for Dsaccess\Instance0\CacheTTLUser in my registry or one for Mailbox cache limit? If not concerned I can just go ahead and add it, right? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Outlook prob removing old account
Hi, Exch 2k sp3 outlook 2k As per Ed's 'never restore' method, I have set up mailbox retention on my departing users. I gave permission to the admin account to access a users mailbox who has departed in order to check any emails. I have since deleted the mailbox and account within AD however I still have the mailbox showing under folder list for the admin account. I have removed it from the admin account properties advanced tab under outlook so I am not sure why it would still be there. Has anyone got any ideas a) why it still may be there b) how to remove it from there? I'm thinking either stop/ start IS or recreate account/ mailbox. Google/ Technet didn't throw up anything I could find but then that may be my search criteria. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Priv1.edb and stm
Hi, Exch 2k on sbs2k - all SP'd up I had a little scare earlier on with a simultaneous virus alert on one user and a disk space warning from my server which turned out to be totally unconnected however while I was trouble shooting a noticed a couple of odd things: 1) disk space on the server was decreasing rapidly from 8gb 7.5 6.5 gb in the space of about 5 mins - anyone experienced this before? 2) my priv1.edb is @ 7.2 gb while the stm file was at 2.9gb. I looked at my users mailboxes and the total size of their mailboxes was under 6gb. Why would the the two priv files be more than my users mailboxes if the edb + stm = information store? I'm probably missing something here as I'm still pretty new to exch2k? TIA Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quick question re backup
Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000: If I am backing up the microsoft information store but not microsoft exchange mailboxes or the M: drive then there is no point in backing up program files\exchsrvr is there? Or should I still backup the program files\exchsrvr directory but deselect the mdb data directory? I thought I had set up the backup procedure so that I wasn't doing BLB's but I had to examine the procedure closely as I am having trouble getting all our data onto a 40/80gb dltIV tape with hardware compression enabled (otherwise software). I've had a look at the faq and had a good search around the archives etc but cannot find a definitive answer on this. Thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick question re backup
Thanks Ed - that answers my question -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick question re backup Do not back up M: as it can corrupt the store. Do not back up exchsrvr\*data directories as all the data those directories is transient or the files are open. The only exception is exchsrvr\kmsdata (if you use it), which you can only back up successfully if you shut down the Key Management Server service first. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick question re backup Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000: If I am backing up the microsoft information store but not microsoft exchange mailboxes or the M: drive then there is no point in backing up program files\exchsrvr is there? Or should I still backup the program files\exchsrvr directory but deselect the mdb data directory? I thought I had set up the backup procedure so that I wasn't doing BLB's but I had to examine the procedure closely as I am having trouble getting all our data onto a 40/80gb dltIV tape with hardware compression enabled (otherwise software). I've had a look at the faq and had a good search around the archives etc but cannot find a definitive answer on this. Thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serbian premier assassinated
Er yes geology being the study of the history of the earth and its life especially as recorded in rocks whereas geography deals with the description, distribution, and interaction of the diverse physical, biological, and cultural features of the earth's surface Or did I miss the joke ;-) -Original Message- From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 March 2003 20:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated Get it right man, it's GEOLOGY! Sheesh sum peeple air so stoopid... -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated Didn't anyone here take Geometry ??? -Original Message- From: Bernadette Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated or George Bush with the rest of what lies south of Canada, either -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated Besides the fact that this is way off topic, please don't confuse George Bush with North America. Thanks -Warren (in Canada) -Original Message- From: Aamir Hanif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 6:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated the only difference being that this time north america wants to attack everyone and europe does not. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Serbian premier assassinated This is how the first world war started... From BBC newswire Serbian premier assassinated The Serbian Prime Minister, Zoran Djindjic, has been assassinated in the capital, Belgrade... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Wow, 116 ish posts on this crock of sh1t. Anyway, Mr Muir deserves some compensation for having to work in Luton [1] [1] UK joke... Rob MCSE + a, b, c thru to I MVPE A+ CNNE BA (hons) A-levels GCSE's This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange attachment problem
Hi all, have searched archives/ technet and done a google but no joy... I have a user who is using Outlook98 on our exch 2k server She has been complaining that a recipient never receives attachments from her. I have tested her logged into another pc - still on outlook 98 and recipient got the attachment. Sending the mail from another users mailbox also resolves this (using w98/outlook 98 and also XP/outlook2002). I have since set her up on the pc that seemed to send from her account ok and the recipient still is not receiving attachment but I sent it to my home account and got that ok. Is it a problem at our end or could it be the recipients problem? I'm a bit puzzled... Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange attachment problem
Thanks but perhaps I wasn't clear. The recipient will get the attachment if *sent* from another mailbox - tested from a w98/outlook98 pc and a xp/outlook2002 pc and from users mailbox when configured on another pc (w98 or xp) on another pc. When I send from the users w98/outlook98 pc, the recipient doesn't get attachment. I've checked all the mailbox restrictions and they are all set as default. Rob -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2003 14:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange attachment problem Outlook 2k will block some types of attachments. -Kevin This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you? -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2002 13:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Turns out BTOpenworld have decided to block port 25 for all home plug and go setups which mine is (I use it mainly for testing purposes). Time to find a new ISP. As such I am now faced with a new problem. I would still like to use the GAL of my Exchange 2000 machine (ie all my AD contacts) but with my POP3 account instead. I can add an Exchange and POP3 profile OK (which will display the contacts) but when I go to send messages (via BTOpenworld's SMTP server, which will only allow my BTOpenworld account to send mail) they seem to just disappear into the ether. No bounce back message, no delivery. Any ideas? From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] | This is Spam | Add to Address Book . To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:08:56 -0600 The server isn't answering on port 25. C:\telnet mail.simonbond.com 25 Connecting To mail.simonbond.com... Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed C:\telnet 217.39.149.150 25 Connecting To 217.39.149.150... Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed C:\tracert 217.39.149.150 Tracing route to host217-39-149-150.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.39.149.150] over a maximum of 30 hops: 110 ms 10 ms10 ms 10.32.32.1 2 10 ms10 ms10 ms srp4-0.austtxa-rtr1.austin.rr.com [66.68.2.254] 310 ms10 ms10 ms srp0-0.austtxrdc-rtr2.austin.rr.com [66.68.1.253 ] 410 ms10 ms10 ms srp4-0.austtxrdc-rtr4.texas.rr.com [24.93.33.132 ] 510 ms20 ms20 ms pop2-hou-P6-1.atdn.net [66.185.146.33] 610 ms20 ms10 ms bb1-hou-P0-1.atdn.net [66.185.146.112] 750 ms40 ms30 ms bb1-atm-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.184] 840 ms50 ms40 ms bb1-cha-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.183] 940 ms40 ms40 ms bb2-cha-P1-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.135] 1050 ms50 ms60 ms bb2-ash-P13-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.50] 1151 ms50 ms60 ms bb1-ash-P2-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.40] 1270 ms60 ms60 ms bb1-new-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.49] 13 130 ms 120 ms 130 ms bb2-loh-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.141] 14 130 ms 120 ms 130 ms pop4-loh-P1-0.atdn.net [66.185.146.67] 15 130 ms 120 ms 120 ms linx1-g10-0.ukcore.bt.net [195.66.224.10] 16 130 ms 130 ms 120 ms core1-pos14-0.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [194.74.65.11 8] 17 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms core1-pos13-3.bletchley.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.196. 217] 18 120 ms 130 ms 120 ms interconnect1-pos4-0.bletchley.fixed.bt.net [194 .72.31.34] 19 130 ms 130 ms 130 ms ftip002637389.interconnect1.bletchley.fixed-nte. bt.net [213.120.62.182] 20 120 ms 130 ms 130 ms 213.120.62.77 21 130 ms 161 ms 130 ms bthg307.imsnet2.btopenworld.com [62.7.251.136] 22 *** Request timed out. 23 * -Original Message- From: Simon Bond To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/26/2002 8:26 AM Subject: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Exchange 2000, SP3, W2K SP3. I'm afraid I can't provide a great deal of informatiuon here since there just isn't any! Basically, one day I have a perfectly working mail system then suddenly it stops receiving incoming mail. Outgoing is absolutely fine. There is nothing in the event viewer to suggest a problem and all DNS records appear to be OK. I have three domain names housed on the same box, bondyweb.com, simonbond.com and sacredlondon.co.uk. Bondyweb.com is the main one that is used and I have temporarily forwarded this to another address. However, the other addresses have the same problem and I have left these pointing to my exchange box for testing purposes. Any slightest hint of a suggestion is more than welcome. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC
RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Certainly do I think - I'll pmail you and take this off list.. -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Erm...yes. Do I know you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: 29 November 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you? -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2002 13:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Turns out BTOpenworld have decided to block port 25 for all home plug and go setups which mine is (I use it mainly for testing purposes). Time to find a new ISP. As such I am now faced with a new problem. I would still like to use the GAL of my Exchange 2000 machine (ie all my AD contacts) but with my POP3 account instead. I can add an Exchange and POP3 profile OK (which will display the contacts) but when I go to send messages (via BTOpenworld's SMTP server, which will only allow my BTOpenworld account to send mail) they seem to just disappear into the ether. No bounce back message, no delivery. Any ideas? From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] | This is Spam | Add to Address Book . To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:08:56 -0600 The server isn't answering on port 25. C:\telnet mail.simonbond.com 25 Connecting To mail.simonbond.com... Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed C:\telnet 217.39.149.150 25 Connecting To 217.39.149.150... Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed C:\tracert 217.39.149.150 Tracing route to host217-39-149-150.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.39.149.150] over a maximum of 30 hops: 110 ms 10 ms10 ms 10.32.32.1 2 10 ms10 ms10 ms srp4-0.austtxa-rtr1.austin.rr.com [66.68.2.254] 310 ms10 ms10 ms srp0-0.austtxrdc-rtr2.austin.rr.com [66.68.1.253 ] 410 ms10 ms10 ms srp4-0.austtxrdc-rtr4.texas.rr.com [24.93.33.132 ] 510 ms20 ms20 ms pop2-hou-P6-1.atdn.net [66.185.146.33] 610 ms20 ms10 ms bb1-hou-P0-1.atdn.net [66.185.146.112] 750 ms40 ms30 ms bb1-atm-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.184] 840 ms50 ms40 ms bb1-cha-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.183] 940 ms40 ms40 ms bb2-cha-P1-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.135] 1050 ms50 ms60 ms bb2-ash-P13-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.50] 1151 ms50 ms60 ms bb1-ash-P2-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.40] 1270 ms60 ms60 ms bb1-new-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.49] 13 130 ms 120 ms 130 ms bb2-loh-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.141] 14 130 ms 120 ms 130 ms pop4-loh-P1-0.atdn.net [66.185.146.67] 15 130 ms 120 ms 120 ms linx1-g10-0.ukcore.bt.net [195.66.224.10] 16 130 ms 130 ms 120 ms core1-pos14-0.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [194.74.65.11 8] 17 120 ms 130 ms 140 ms core1-pos13-3.bletchley.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.196. 217] 18 120 ms 130 ms 120 ms interconnect1-pos4-0.bletchley.fixed.bt.net [194 .72.31.34] 19 130 ms 130 ms 130 ms ftip002637389.interconnect1.bletchley.fixed-nte. bt.net [213.120.62.182] 20 120 ms 130 ms 130 ms 213.120.62.77 21 130 ms 161 ms 130 ms bthg307.imsnet2.btopenworld.com [62.7.251.136] 22 *** Request timed out. 23 * -Original Message- From: Simon Bond To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/26/2002 8:26 AM Subject: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Exchange 2000, SP3, W2K SP3. I'm afraid I can't provide a great deal of informatiuon here since there just isn't any! Basically, one day I have a perfectly working mail system then suddenly it stops receiving incoming mail. Outgoing is absolutely fine. There is nothing in the event viewer to suggest a problem and all DNS records appear to be OK. I have three domain names housed on the same box, bondyweb.com, simonbond.com and sacredlondon.co.uk. Bondyweb.com is the main one that is used and I have temporarily forwarded this to another address. However, the other addresses have the same problem and I have left these pointing to my exchange box for testing purposes. Any slightest hint of a suggestion is more than welcome. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: attachments
What version of exchange/ outlook are you using? If youre using exh2k and outlook 2002 then most attachments are blocked by default - I'm not sure about earlier versions of outlook. The blocked attachments are referred as level one. Have a look at Q290497 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 November 2002 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachments Hi, Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachments
Easy tiger, never said anything about relying on it and apologies if that's what came across - just where there is a list of blocked attachments. From that one could deduce which ones to block... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 November 2002 16:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments BUT, the problem with letting OL block the files is two fold. A) They are still in the IS. B) They can be accessed with OWA. Relying on OL to do your content blocking is a poor method. It should be the last step, certainly NEVER the first. And since virtually any Exchange based AV will do this for you, why not take advantage of such a great feature? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments What version of exchange/ outlook are you using? If youre using exh2k and outlook 2002 then most attachments are blocked by default - I'm not sure about earlier versions of outlook. The blocked attachments are referred as level one. Have a look at Q290497 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 November 2002 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachments Hi, Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachments+virus
That's a file that doesn't have a clue about how the system operates but wants to open everything and just gets larger and larger over time without any discernible output while taking up a huge amount of resources. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 November 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments+virus What the heck is a .CEO file anyhow? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments+virus EXE is on Martins list of Danger Mpeg is often your/company call (I block it) with regard to the new virus, after looking at the description.. since one of the files is a PIF (which is on martins list or other good things to block) IF the PIF gets blocked..what effect would the .CEO or the .HTM have since the .CEO has no way to register itself with out the PIF being there to run? just curisious bill -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments So you do not block mpeg and exe? K/ Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 17:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments Don't forget to add .ceo also. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachments Hi, Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending email from different companies.
It depends on what you want to achieve... If these people are to *always* send from company B (new company)then just add the new (smtp) mail address in their mailbox properties and set that as primary/ reply address. Alternatively, if they only need to send occassionally, then set up another mailbox for these users, set the mail address as above, assign it to the relevant users and create a new profile for outlook on their pc's. They can then chose to go into either account (by setting up the 'prompt for user' in outlook). You could also go further and set delegate permissions etc. Rob -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 November 2002 11:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending email from different companies. We have set up another company within our own company. Whilst the majority of the time my users will still be sending email from the original (default company) I have two Users who occasionally will need to send email as if it came from the new company with no mention of the original default parent company. We are using Exchange 5.5 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and Outlook XP clients. I have setup Exchange to accept email for the new company I just need to know the best way for them to be set up so as they can quickly and easily send email as if it came from the new company. What is the best way to achieve this scenario. Many thanks for any help offered. Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material immediately. Whilst this email has been swept for viruses, you should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Oxford Natural Products plc accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception or interruption of this email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Exch2k to a new server
What type of server is the advanced server (ie pdc/ member)? SBS is a pdc so if you've set up the new server as that also, I don't think it's possible. You could put the 2 servers on different network segments and exmerge - or exmerge and copy to backup tape. You can use the csvde or ldifde to create the users/ mailboxes - plenty of articles on technet about this Upgrading to backoffice when you already have an advanced server there is a bit of a waste of money (unless you are going to use it but the way I read you it is going away) I recently had to merge 2 domains - one on existing sbs2k and the other on sbs4.5 Used exmerge, data to tape and import onto sbs2k - worked a treat. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 November 2002 17:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Exch2k to a new server I am not an SBS expert but I don't believe you can use my method to upgrade an SBS server. As I understand it, you must upgrade the SBS server to BackOffice and then you can use my method. If I'm wrong, an SBS expert can correct me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Winfrey Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move Exch2k to a new server I am moving exchange 2k to a new server and am using the procedures found at http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm and I guessed based on Ed Crowley's instructions for moving exch 5.5. Anyway, I'm on step 7 which says Create new mailbox stores and public folder stores on the new server to match the old server (This is not a requirement per se, you might instead choose a different configuration to take advantage of new and improved hardware). However, I look in the Exchange Manager and do not find my new server. I only see the old server which is still in production. Any explanation why I don't see my new server? This new server has AD installed and is in the same tree as the old server. In the interest of full disclosure, the old server is Small Business Server 2000 and my attempt is to install the new server as Win2k Adv Server and Exch2k. Eventually, the old SBS will go away. Thank you, Mike Winfrey _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Over here in the uk working for a small co (salaried), got it written into my contract that I get overtime for 'special circumstance'. Eg if a server goes down or an upgrade goes wrong and I'm here till 3 in the morning then I'd get time and a half but if I stay till 7pm instead of 5.30 pm then I wouldn't get anything. No arrangement for time in lieu tho. This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange White PAper???
1. Buy a book or look on m$security/ win2000/ permissions/ company policies and procedures 2. event viewer... -Original Message- From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 08:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange White PAper??? Importance: High PLEASE GUYS I NEED SOME INFO ON THE BELOW URGENTLY I need access to information regarding the specific, detailed mechanisms and controls that will ensure that the confidentiality of all emails within the organziation's Exchange network can be protected at all times, while at the same time, in the event of the organization requiring to read any individual emails for legal reasons, this can be done within a properly controlled and visible context. Furthermore, how can the Exchange environment be monitored so as to identify where unauthorized breaches of privacy and confidentiality have occurred? Regards, Carlos Magalhaes - This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed, whose privacy should be respected. Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Trencor Group, or any of its representatives, unless specifically stated. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, error free or without virus contamination. The sender therefore accepts no liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, nor for any virus infection that might result from opening this message. Trencor is not responsible in the event of any third party interception of this email. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Trencor, visit www.trencor.net http://www.trencor.net intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SP3
Before you get shot down in flames by someone else ;-), sp3 is cumulative I believe so no need to install the others. Rob -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus;intas.be] Sent: 24 October 2002 10:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SP3 Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
I had a similar setup at my old place. We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from exch server to itself over night. However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot was a mirror of the exch server. that way, when (and it did) the exch server went down, I simply took out the exch server and booted the backup (used netdom to remove and add the servers to the network)into its secondary config. Ran isinteg patches etc and voila was online in about an hour or so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server on its own network separate from the production network, then if the production server fails, you simply move the DR server to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too. Brian -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it fred_bloggs for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
sounds like he already has -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 17:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private I think those graphics would look like an ASCII representation of a binary file. Some days CJ's graphic beard monogram is more apropos than others. CJ, since you're so good at this stuff, you should teach some classes on technology and history someplace. I'm sure the kids would become heroes if they too could lean to manipulate poorly encrypted, delimited data files using both raster and vector graphics tools. Maybe they could grow up to become NASA analysts working on interpreting Martian meteorological data for hidden faces and other virtual artifacts. You could develop a whole new field of pseudo-science, leading to a cult following that memorializes your work in a religion based on visionetics. It could even have a sub-cult that is the science fantasy literature branch, complete with its own web sites and self published stories. You could be onto something here . . . -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private You can also get thumbnail views of all graphics attachments. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private I find drawing a big red circle around each really important item is a big time saver when I come to search that file again in 6 months time. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 12:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private You can also open PST files with photoshop, but you have to rename them with a .PSD extension. Once you do that, you can manipulate the files with the graphics tools in that program. I just love applying a mosaic filter to my Sent Items folder... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Uh... Outlook. You don't have to import it, just open it. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless
RE: Exchange server migration
oops sorry misread question. apologies -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server migration If your in Native mode you could move the server in Site B to Site A. If your in mixed you can not. Mixed mode requires then rehoming PF and moving mailboxes using MS tools. - Original Message - From: Albert Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:27 AM Subject: Exchange server migration Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data from site B to site A. After migration, I want to turn off site B's server. Data currently on site B's exchange server is mailboxes and public folder (very large folders). Currently, both sites aren't in the same organisations. My questions are: - What are considerations I might thing about? - What tools do you recommand me to use? - Is there a procedure on how to do the migration? Maybe another question on this. What kind of hardware (CPU speed, memory, Hard drive space, etc) my server must be? I have about 20 users connecting through a mapi client (Outlook 2000). Our corporate databases are stored in public folders and users use them a lot. Albert Charron Trisotech Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server migration
I had a similar migration going from sbs4.5 (site1) to sbs2k (site2) Used exmerge and it went like a dream but I din't have public folders and as far as i recall, public folders cannot be done. There are some articles on technet (see sbs2000 upgrade migration white papers) which tell you how to go about this. You'll need a decent amount of disk space as exmerge copies users mailboxes to individual *.pst files which are then imported. (make sure you check the attributes of the pst files - sometimes can put a readonly which must be taken off) Make sure your users clear out as much cr*p out of their mailboxes. I've got some notes if you'd like me to pmail them to you? Rob -Original Message- From: Albert Charron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server migration Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data from site B to site A. After migration, I want to turn off site B's server. Data currently on site B's exchange server is mailboxes and public folder (very large folders). Currently, both sites aren't in the same organisations. My questions are: - What are considerations I might thing about? - What tools do you recommand me to use? - Is there a procedure on how to do the migration? Maybe another question on this. What kind of hardware (CPU speed, memory, Hard drive space, etc) my server must be? I have about 20 users connecting through a mapi client (Outlook 2000). Our corporate databases are stored in public folders and users use them a lot. Albert Charron Trisotech Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR From Field
sorry, i think you are misunderstanding me. I'm bemoaning the fact that it appears that i could see who it was from / to on an exch5.5 system but now after an upgrade migration to exch2k I cannot see who it was from - can see who it is To ok after I click the 'send again'. Rob -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 October 2002 18:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR From Field The NDR should look something like: --- The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:26:43 GMT from localhost [127.0.0.1] with id g9BEQhG06871 - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown) - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to smtp-gw-4.msn.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown --- And will contain one or more attachments, which are the original message. Open that and you'll see who it was addressed to and from. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR From Field I can see to whom it was sent so can fwd if necessary . If the rfc states that it should be dropped then I can't see it - right? In that case, how can I see it on an exch5.5 box with basic mail client (ie not outlook?) bit annoying that really -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 October 2002 14:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR From Field Nope. By the rules (RFC 2821), all non delivery messages are to have null from addresses - , in order to indicate to the mailer daemon that if it can't be delivered, it should be dropped. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR From Field I have seen that and I assumed it was a bcc. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR From Field The NDR should contain the original message to tell you to whom it was sent. NDRs are required to have null sender addresses. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR From Field Hi, I'm sure this has been covered before but I can't seem to find anything on technet/google/archives: I'm receiving all the ndr's (mostly for old email addresses) for our organisation but the from field is being stripped so I cannot tell who it is from. i'm sure that I could a month or so ago but now cannot - could be wrong tho. I managedto have this setup using the mail client and exch 5.5 but not now. ANy ideas anyone? thanks Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: OT - Web Mail hosting
For your company users or to resell? If the former, OWA - no, not company users - already have OWA thanks so would be 'reselling' How many users do you want to have on the system, and what it is the purpose of said system. well, I've been asked to think about 10,000 users/ subscribers but whether we get that amount is another matter! It's basically to offer our customers on the retail side of the business an alternative to hotmail etc - so they can have a 'lifestyle' email address. The retail side of our business has mail/internet order and also 15 shops nationwide and we sell skateboards/ inline blades/ bmx's and clothing/ accessories. Thanks to the other suggestions - I'll look into them. Rob -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Web Mail hosting Hi all, i'm looking into the feasiblity of setting up a hotmail style web based email hosting service - does anyone know of any good companies that offer this service? Preferably UK based. I have searched and I know there are plenty about but a personal recommendation would be nice thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
thanks all - this thread can now close. done the updates and all went smoothly -Original Message- From: KC Lemson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 September 2002 18:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' Yes, they are cumulative. One important note however - if you received a special hotfix on top of a certain service pack (say SP2) close to the time before the next SP was released (SP3), that hotfix isn't guaranteed to be in the next SP (SP3 in this case). You should check with the PSS engineer who gave you the hotfix to verify this. Neigh. :-) - KC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Do you have a fireproof safe at all? I would have thought you would even if you are a small business. To get a little (boltdown)safe that is fireproof for an hour or so (hopefully long enough for the fire service to get there plus maybe put it somewhere sensible) isn't too expensive and you can put all your system media in there as well. Plus take one offsite at end of every week. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2002 23:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Another thing -does your boss know what raid means? -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 September 2002 09:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware This has got to be a joke. Taking a spare drive from a RAID 5 is not a valid backup scheme... It doesn't protect you at all. The spare drive is a mirror of one of the drives that's actually part of the RAID. Since there's no way to guarantee that the data on the drive it was mirroring wasn't changed during the night (unless the machine it's attached to is shut down prior to the removal of the drive in which case the probability of a drive failure is 0 anyway) then the spare is useless and the RAID is just as broken. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Ok any other reason I can throw in there besides the Vibration/Temperature RAID box dying? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Now taking tapes home is normal. Depending on your backup schedule most companies do this on a weekly bases. Bye the way taking one drive home does no good at all. Think of it this way. Lets say the RAID box catches fire/blows up. Do you really think one drive will allow a full rebuild. I don't think so. Tell your Boss that his friend is an idiot. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sp3 revisited
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying to run the install (cos I can't) does anyone know if I can copy the files across and which ones I need? And what do you mean about moving the mapi32.dll? cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United
RE: urgent backup problem
hmmm - think I might just stick with what I've done - more trouble than it's worth. Server is being decommissioned in approx 3 weeks anyway. thanks for the info the info tho - filed it away! cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, Usually you are running Outlook on the same PC, this has a different Mapi32.dll and is a version that the exch admin prog does not like. So when installing rename the Outlook one, install then make sure that the exch admin dll is copied to the bin directory it is installed to and then rename the Outlook one back. I don't know off hand where you are going to get a installable copy of the admin or what all the files it requires (there is a few as I have tried to help a friend in your position, told him in the end to get hold of a old MS select CD and install from there and patch it). Cheers Paul -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying to run the install (cos I can't) does anyone know if I can copy the files across and which ones I need? And what do you mean about moving the mapi32.dll? cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
urgent backup problem
hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
checking version/ service packs
Not being too familiar with my way round exch2k, how can I check what the version is and which service pack I am using? I've had a look at the registry: HKLM\software\micorsoft\exchange but nowt there and I've also run hfnetchk but that only came up with windows 2000 service pack 2 missing. thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: checking version/ service packs
d'oh...should've tried that! thanks -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 10:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs Open Exchange System Manager, right click on the server, select properties Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 09:15 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: checking version/ service packs Not being too familiar with my way round exch2k, how can I check what the version is and which service pack I am using? I've had a look at the registry: HKLM\software\micorsoft\exchange but nowt there and I've also run hfnetchk but that only came up with windows 2000 service pack 2 missing. thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: checking version/ service packs
yup, fairly new to the org and I am the admin... there was no documentation when I got here so I'm working on that while trying to get up to speed on w2k server and exch 2k...oh the joys of reading thick books ;-) -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs You could also ask the email administrator. Good ones keep notes on this sort of thing. (Subtle hint to begin documenting everything in sight. If you're new, it'll make you look incredibly busy with a minimum of effort.) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 4:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs d'oh...should've tried that! thanks -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 10:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs Open Exchange System Manager, right click on the server, select properties Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 09:15 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: checking version/ service packs Not being too familiar with my way round exch2k, how can I check what the version is and which service pack I am using? I've had a look at the registry: HKLM\software\micorsoft\exchange but nowt there and I've also run hfnetchk but that only came up with windows 2000 service pack 2 missing. thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: checking version/ service packs
Who he? according to google he could be the creator of: http://www.fatlaneonline.com/ or he could be the musician who arranged the harmony vocals on The Byrds 'Hey Mr Tambourine Man' or could he be anything to do with www.simpler-webb.com I dunno... -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 15:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs Make sure you go to MEC this year and wear a nametag that says you're Dean Webb. You'll make lots of friends and get in with a good, helpful crowd. Alternatively, wear anything with tentacles and you'll attract the same good, helpful crowd. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs yup, fairly new to the org and I am the admin... there was no documentation when I got here so I'm working on that while trying to get up to speed on w2k server and exch 2k...oh the joys of reading thick books ;-) -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs You could also ask the email administrator. Good ones keep notes on this sort of thing. (Subtle hint to begin documenting everything in sight. If you're new, it'll make you look incredibly busy with a minimum of effort.) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 4:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs d'oh...should've tried that! thanks -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 10:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs Open Exchange System Manager, right click on the server, select properties Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 September 2002 09:15 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: checking version/ service packs Not being too familiar with my way round exch2k, how can I check what the version is and which service pack I am using? I've had a look at the registry: HKLM\software\micorsoft\exchange but nowt there and I've also run hfnetchk but that only came up with windows 2000 service pack 2 missing. thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ
sbs 4.5 migration to sbs2k
It seems that we're all at it... There's been a few threads to this so apologies if this has been covered but I don't think *this* bit has: I've searched web and done reading of technet/ white papers etc and found the following: SBS: How to Upgrade SBS 4.x to SBS 2000 (Part 1 of 2): http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q278439GSSNB=1 SBS: How to Upgrade SBS 4.x to SBS 2000 (Part 2 of 2): http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q290603GSSNB=1 Alternate Method for Migrating Exchange Data in SBS 2K Migration: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q294430 Microsoft Small Business Server - Migration Upgrade: http://www.microsoft.com/sbserver/techinfo/deployment/2000/MigrationUp_ wp.asp and also Q281584 / Q174197 I've also read Ed Crowley move server but don't belive it applies to what I will be doing. My question is are there any other articles I should have read? thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: sbs 4.5 migration to sbs2k
It seems that we're all at it... There's been a few threads to this so apologies if this has been covered but I don't think *this* bit has: I've searched web and done reading of technet/ white papers etc and found the following: SBS: How to Upgrade SBS 4.x to SBS 2000 (Part 1 of 2): http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q278439GSSNB =1 SBS: How to Upgrade SBS 4.x to SBS 2000 (Part 2 of 2): http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q290603GSSNB =1 Alternate Method for Migrating Exchange Data in SBS 2K Migration: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q294430 Microsoft Small Business Server - Migration Upgrade: http://www.microsoft.com/sbserver/techinfo/deployment/2000/MigrationU p_wp.asp and also Q281584 / Q174197 I've also read Ed Crowley move server but don't belive it applies to what I will be doing. My question is are there any other articles I should have read? thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
viewing ndr
Hi, exch2k and outlook2000 enviroment: A user has had an ndr sent to him but when he tried to open it, it failed to open (using outlook 2000) and just hung. Is there anyway of viewing this mail within the administrator program? I have had a look in the badmail directory but it is not in there as it has been delivered to his mailbox. You'll have to forgive me as I'm still getting my head round exch2k. I have had this before for a previous client who was running exch5.5 and all I did for this was logon to his mailbox (using the basic mail program) and check the relevant ndr but i can't do this this time as the server has outlook2k on it and has the same problem. tia Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewing ndr
ahhh permissions. This is another area I'm still getting my head round. Do you mean permissions through outlook or through AD? I';ve tried the former but no joy as the client on the server is outlook2000 and has the same problems. I'll give OWA a go. Not usre if it is set up tho. thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 August 2002 11:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewing ndr You could still log into his mailbox using your client - just give yourself rights to the mailbox. Alternatively, you could try getting the user to open the message with OWA. Neil -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 27 August 2002 11:10 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: viewing ndr Subject: viewing ndr Hi, exch2k and outlook2000 enviroment: A user has had an ndr sent to him but when he tried to open it, it failed to open (using outlook 2000) and just hung. Is there anyway of viewing this mail within the administrator program? I have had a look in the badmail directory but it is not in there as it has been delivered to his mailbox. You'll have to forgive me as I'm still getting my head round exch2k. I have had this before for a previous client who was running exch5.5 and all I did for this was logon to his mailbox (using the basic mail program) and check the relevant ndr but i can't do this this time as the server has outlook2k on it and has the same problem. tia Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewing ndr
OWA was set up so managed to look thru that. but is there still a way of accessing the mailbox using AD or the system manager? I was looking around and managed to open the administrators mailbox thru either AD or sys manager but I can't remember now how I did it. ANy tips? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 August 2002 11:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewing ndr You could still log into his mailbox using your client - just give yourself rights to the mailbox. Alternatively, you could try getting the user to open the message with OWA. Neil -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 27 August 2002 11:10 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: viewing ndr Subject: viewing ndr Hi, exch2k and outlook2000 enviroment: A user has had an ndr sent to him but when he tried to open it, it failed to open (using outlook 2000) and just hung. Is there anyway of viewing this mail within the administrator program? I have had a look in the badmail directory but it is not in there as it has been delivered to his mailbox. You'll have to forgive me as I'm still getting my head round exch2k. I have had this before for a previous client who was running exch5.5 and all I did for this was logon to his mailbox (using the basic mail program) and check the relevant ndr but i can't do this this time as the server has outlook2k on it and has the same problem. tia Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, ISA and ISDN
isn't this an autodial setting? -Original Message- From: Stuart Errington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 August 2002 14:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000, ISA and ISDN Hi, Are there any how-to's out there that tell you how to make a SBS2000 server bring up the ISDN line so that the Exchange box can send and receive automatically ?? Thanks, Stuart. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
odd profiles
Hi all, can anyone shed some light onto the following... On my exch 5.5 sp4 server, if I look at the profiles on the inbox mail client I have the following listed: ExchangeAdmin servername 0x04c63a ExchangeAdmin servername 0x04da3f ExchangeAdmin servername 0x04f24b ExchangeAdmin servername 0x3b9d4a ExchangeAdmin servername 0x3c514f38 plus a few other similar. I don't believe they are that important but are they? and can they be removed safely? tia Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resource Scheduling
I had a similar environment in my old job which was on an exch5.5 server. If i needed to check how had sent the meeting requests, I think the way I did was just to log on to that mailbox using the mail client on the server and checking the inbox. I'm afraid I can't remember exactly how I did it but it was similar. There are probably better ways of doing it tho. -Original Message- From: Crump, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2002 14:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resource Scheduling while logged on with the conf room profile, go to Tools, Options, Calendar Options. Click the Resource Scheduling button, tick the first two items here that have check boxes (automatically accept and automatically decline conflicts). Make sure to set up permissions correctly. Then take a look at the Free/Busy button - default is fine, but you might want to publish more than 2 months of free/busy for these conf room profiles. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey G. Witt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resource Scheduling I am wondering what people are doing for resource scheduling. I have set up our conference rooms as users in E2K SP2. I set the resource scheduling options to auto accept meeting requests, Deny conflicts and deny reoccuring meetings. The problem I am having is how do I make the information about who has the room booked? I would also like to send back a link to veiw this conference room schedule when a meeting gets declined. I have looked at some of the auto accept scripts but they are only for Exchange 5.5. Thanks Jeffrey Witt System Administrator Huf North America Work: (262) 257-2146 Mobile: (414) 828-5386 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unsolicited Email
ta, thought as much. sometimes it's tricky to get whether someone's being sarcastic/ witty/ etc or not ;-) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Yes. Email headers are important. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exmerge or not?
Hi all, I am planning a migration from 5.5 to an existing 2k/AD server because of an office relocation. 2 different sites which are not connected but same domain (kind of... Under NT the domain is called mydomain and under SBS2k it is mydomain.co.uk). I've read up on the WP and also related KB, plus the Ed Cowley move server method - I tried to read to read appendix k in the faq but it will not enlarge. Any reason why? They don't quite seem to address what I have to do tho. Anyway, I would like your opinions on the best way to migrate the data - Would the best way to do it just connect the 2 sites once they are physically together and use the migration wizard? Or should I use exmerge or can I use the alternate method of copying the edb files? If i copy the edb, how to I get the data in that into the exch2k edb files? Would I also be correct in assuming that if I use the migration wizard, then the user accounts will also be created? Has anyone ran a similar migration before? This will be tested 1st of course. TIA Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unsolicited Email
and the prize goes to you! yup, that's us and I took the job - I'm just a cheap tart! -Original Message- From: Gary Wilson-Garner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email TKCSales? Aren't you the kite people based in Bath? Advertising for a general techie bod a while back? I thought of applying, but you weren't paying enough! Cheers GWG -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2002 09:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email ta, thought as much. sometimes it's tricky to get whether someone's being sarcastic/ witty/ etc or not ;-) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Yes. Email headers are important. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unsolicited Email
? -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 19:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email a... Deckler's back. It's been a long time... - Original Message - From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:49 AM Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. /snip Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers? When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could see where it was routed thru. And if it is legit mail, you can also see whether you or your isp has a problem with out bound comms, can you not? -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Hey, we're not all PHBs, Erik! Some of us have to do the technical stuff ourselves g,dr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 August 2002 19:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail or Yahoo! or brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the headers are going to tell you is that the email message came from an account on www.brain.com.pk which is pretty useless since you already know that. They should at least be able to disable the account for you and may have some information related to what computer was used to access that account. If the user had instead used the common SMTP hack to forge a From address, then the RFC's and headers would come into play. But depending on how they did the hack, you still would probably not be able to determine much if they did anything to help cover their tracks. As you have discovered, in the world of SMTP and free email services, it is extremely easy to forge the From address of an email and it is difficult, if not impossible to track this down if the person doing it has any amount of a brain what-so-ever. Tell your executives to deal because it is the nature of SMTP and the Internet. Dear List, Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with = the name of one of our senior executive. His name was used on free web = based email service (www.brain.com.pk). My question is how can I trace = the culprit. Help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Unsolicited Email
it was a joke. anyway, I'm still unclear as to look or not look at smtp headers. Perhaps someone could help me understand this. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Eng! Wrong Answer...especially if you are using McAfee. See link below. McAfee anti-virus software fails to block Klez virus sometimes... http://www.silicon.com/public/door?6004REQEVENT=REQINT1=54540REQSTR1=s ilic on.com (may wrap) -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email sure but then the av software will pick this up ;-)) I understand the reasons why it's not great because of the ease of spoofing but is there any greater reason? As I've said, I find they can be useful to find out if my server or my isp server has a problem. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 14:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Also remember that this is how the Klez family of viruses works (ie it spoofs addresses in an infected machine's address book). Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Rob Hackney Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 07:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. /snip Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers? When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could see where it was routed thru. And if it is legit mail, you can also see whether you or your isp has a problem with out bound comms, can you not? -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Hey, we're not all PHBs, Erik! Some of us have to do the technical stuff ourselves g,dr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 August 2002 19:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail or Yahoo! or brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the headers are going to tell you is that the email message came from an account on www.brain.com.pk which is pretty useless since you already know that. They should at least be able to disable the account for you and may have some information related to what computer was used to access that account. If the user had instead used the common SMTP hack to forge a From address, then the RFC's and headers would come into play. But depending on how they did the hack, you still would probably not be able to determine much if they did anything to help cover their tracks. As you have discovered, in the world of SMTP and free email services, it is extremely easy to forge the From address of an email and it is difficult, if not impossible to track this down if the person doing it has any amount of a brain what-so-ever. Tell your executives to deal because it is the nature of SMTP and the Internet. Dear List, Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with = the name of one of our senior executive. His name was used on free web = based email service (www.brain.com.pk). My question is how can I trace = the culprit. Help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments
RE: Mass email software
Thanks for all your replies - most helpful. And don't worry, it is legit mass mailing - all recipients have signed up to a mailing list. You think I'd post a question like that to THIS list if it was dodgy ;-) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 07:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass email software The mailer should be called 'Infecta'. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass email software You need to watch for those who will shortly be trying to get your ISP to kill your SPAM operations. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mass email software The marketing dept of my company has just told me they were asked to buy some mass email software called infacta (www.infacta.com) by a director. Apart from the obvious issues like bandwidth (they're on a 128 dialup isdn!) what other issues should I be looking out for? thanks Rob intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD connector
have you looked at Q199831? -Original Message- From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 10:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD connector All, I am installing Exchange 2000 and active directory connector. The exchange installation did not complete because of a problem with name resolution. I now want to remove the ADC but I cannot as the Exchange installation has created a connection agreement which cannot be deleted. How can I delete this connection agreement? Also what is the best method for checking that name resolution is working properly prior to Exchange 2000 installation? TIA Mark Condron -- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. -- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically stated. -- Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk www.volunteering-wales.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Service account logons - hacker?
I would imagine that it is system related. What level logging have you set it to? Maybe increase to max to get more info? -Original Message- From: Dandy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2002 17:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Service account logons - hacker? Under what circumstances would a logon occur on the Exchange service account? I was looking through my event log and found that the service account logs on occasionally. Often it is between 2:00 AM and 3:30 AM but it doesn't occur every day and it doesn't appear to be closely associated with any particular event such as a system backup or reboot. I'm wondering if I have a hacker might be logging on using the service account? I changed the service account password yesterday and still got a logon last night at 3:11 AM. There were no failed logons. Thanks for your comments. Curt Finley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unsolicited Email
snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. /snip Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers? When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could see where it was routed thru. And if it is legit mail, you can also see whether you or your isp has a problem with out bound comms, can you not? -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Hey, we're not all PHBs, Erik! Some of us have to do the technical stuff ourselves g,dr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 August 2002 19:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail or Yahoo! or brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the headers are going to tell you is that the email message came from an account on www.brain.com.pk which is pretty useless since you already know that. They should at least be able to disable the account for you and may have some information related to what computer was used to access that account. If the user had instead used the common SMTP hack to forge a From address, then the RFC's and headers would come into play. But depending on how they did the hack, you still would probably not be able to determine much if they did anything to help cover their tracks. As you have discovered, in the world of SMTP and free email services, it is extremely easy to forge the From address of an email and it is difficult, if not impossible to track this down if the person doing it has any amount of a brain what-so-ever. Tell your executives to deal because it is the nature of SMTP and the Internet. Dear List, Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with = the name of one of our senior executive. His name was used on free web = based email service (www.brain.com.pk). My question is how can I trace = the culprit. Help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Unsolicited Email
sure but then the av software will pick this up ;-)) I understand the reasons why it's not great because of the ease of spoofing but is there any greater reason? As I've said, I find they can be useful to find out if my server or my isp server has a problem. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 14:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Also remember that this is how the Klez family of viruses works (ie it spoofs addresses in an infected machine's address book). Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Rob Hackney Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 07:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. /snip Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers? When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could see where it was routed thru. And if it is legit mail, you can also see whether you or your isp has a problem with out bound comms, can you not? -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Hey, we're not all PHBs, Erik! Some of us have to do the technical stuff ourselves g,dr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 August 2002 19:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail or Yahoo! or brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the headers are going to tell you is that the email message came from an account on www.brain.com.pk which is pretty useless since you already know that. They should at least be able to disable the account for you and may have some information related to what computer was used to access that account. If the user had instead used the common SMTP hack to forge a From address, then the RFC's and headers would come into play. But depending on how they did the hack, you still would probably not be able to determine much if they did anything to help cover their tracks. As you have discovered, in the world of SMTP and free email services, it is extremely easy to forge the From address of an email and it is difficult, if not impossible to track this down if the person doing it has any amount of a brain what-so-ever. Tell your executives to deal because it is the nature of SMTP and the Internet. Dear List, Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with = the name of one of our senior executive. His name was used on free web = based email service (www.brain.com.pk). My question is how can I trace = the culprit. Help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet
RE: Unsolicited Email
looks like it -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 15:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email I think you missed Erik's sarcasm tags. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. /snip Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers? When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could see where it was routed thru. And if it is legit mail, you can also see whether you or your isp has a problem with out bound comms, can you not? -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 August 2002 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Hey, we're not all PHBs, Erik! Some of us have to do the technical stuff ourselves g,dr -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 August 2002 19:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail or Yahoo! or brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the headers are going to tell you is that the email message came from an account on www.brain.com.pk which is pretty useless since you already know that. They should at least be able to disable the account for you and may have some information related to what computer was used to access that account. If the user had instead used the common SMTP hack to forge a From address, then the RFC's and headers would come into play. But depending on how they did the hack, you still would probably not be able to determine much if they did anything to help cover their tracks. As you have discovered, in the world of SMTP and free email services, it is extremely easy to forge the From address of an email and it is difficult, if not impossible to track this down if the person doing it has any amount of a brain what-so-ever. Tell your executives to deal because it is the nature of SMTP and the Internet. Dear List, Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with = the name of one of our senior executive. His name was used on free web = based email service (www.brain.com.pk). My question is how can I trace = the culprit. Help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
Mass email software
The marketing dept of my company has just told me they were asked to buy some mass email software called infacta (www.infacta.com) by a director. Apart from the obvious issues like bandwidth (they're on a 128 dialup isdn!) what other issues should I be looking out for? thanks Rob intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unsolicited Email
Look at the headers of the email -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 August 2002 11:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unsolicited Email Dear List, Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with the name of one of our senior executive. His name was used on free web based email service (www.brain.com.pk). My question is how can I trace the culprit. Help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any new hotfixes for Exchange 5.5
don't worry about the ram - I'm running a exch55 sp4 sbs4.5 sp6a server on a PII 350 with 256Mb ram and disk space of 2gb and 10gb (only approx 30 users tho)! tell him not to worry! btw - this server is being made redundant in 3 weeks ! no trouble with it yet -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 August 2002 23:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any new hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 There should always be hotfixes you don't have. You don't want all of them. Especially not to fix a non-existent problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tiresias Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any new hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 Karon It's simple. Your manager is convinced that there are hotfixes that you haven't found yet. Okay, just (for the sake of the argument), assume he's right - always a good career move to give the boss the benefit of the doubt. If/when you find the info about the hotfix that you don't have, where are you going to get it from? Microsoft PSS, that's where. So I assume your boss is happy to crash the $199 or whatever a PSS call costs these days - and if he's right, and it's a hotfix, they'll refund your card. So just short circuit the search, and ring PSS anyway - tell 'em the symptoms, and ask 'em for the hotfix. If they've got one, you get it and your fee back, and your boss off your back. If not, PSS (not you) prove him wrong, and the $199 he gambled is gone. Either way, so is the problem. When you ask him to gamble his $199, he might suddenly not be so sure about a hotfix you don't have. Let us know the outcome. Ken T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: 07 August 2002 21:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any new hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 I don't know. Everything is running fine on that server. We occassionally have problems backing it up and occassionally it's slow and we have to reboot it but I blame all of that on Backup Exec. This server has a 1gb of ram and the store.exe uses 75% or more of that and according to this new Sys Mgr who has every certification they make, that's NOT normal. I've been asked to totall re-vamp this server because he's alarmed upper management that it's going to die in 60 days if we don't do something. He said that there are new patches or hotfixes which I've been searching for but haven't found anything yet. Is that the problem you're having? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any new hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 I know that Exchange is designed to take up ALL THE RESOURCES it wants and then NOT release them until another application specifically requests it. But, if it's supposed to release resources to other apps and it's not that could be a problem right? There might be. Check their websites to be sure before you tell him that there aren't. Those products have had memory leaks in the past, and you don't want to overlook them. Regardless, store.exe will use up just about all available RAM hotfixed or not; it's by design. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any new hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 Forgive for being ignorant but what is PSS? I've tried to explain this to him I've showed him several emails from this forum and others but his remarks are, I don't believe that. Exchange 5.5 has been out 6 years and I know they've fixed this by now. He doesn't believe me at all. Nice huh, when you're management don't take you seriously. So, he has me searching all sites and forums for hotfixes that he swears he saw. They're might be some for Backup Exec and for Groupshield but not for Exchange 5.5 SP4. There are always new hotfixes. However, except for security hotfixes, you are not supposed to install them without guidance from PSS. The behavior you describe is normal. Forward this to your systems manager. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
RE: SBS
very funny! shaken baby syndrome mailing lists society for biomolecular screening... social and behavioural society not quite the sbs I think he was looking for. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 August 2002 21:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SBS http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=sbs+mailing+listhc=0hs=0 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SBS Is there a mailing list like this for Small Business Server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
search engine... www.google.com www.google.co.uk -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 July 2002 14:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Can someone give me the URL for Google? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related What is this Google thing you use? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=sensorsoft -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 04:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: None Exchange related Subject: RE: None Exchange related Tony, Do you have their web page or a phone number? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related We use a product by a company called SensorSoft. It's just a thermometer that attaches to a serial port. The software monitors the temperature and alerts us via pager and/or e-mail if it reaches a temperature that we define. It works great. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: None Exchange related
meow -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 July 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Can you open my milk, mommy? -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related http://www.google.com/ Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant and Webmaster Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.1 Tel:+44 (0) 1344 444349 Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312 Fax:+44 (0) 207 681 1238 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/ -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 July 2002 14:43 pm To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related Can someone give me the URL for Google? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related What is this Google thing you use? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=sensorsoft -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 04:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: None Exchange related Subject: RE: None Exchange related Tony, Do you have their web page or a phone number? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: None Exchange related We use a product by a company called SensorSoft. It's just a thermometer that attaches to a serial port. The software monitors the temperature and alerts us via pager and/or e-mail if it reaches a temperature that we define. It works great. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net -- -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
FW: Forwarding Problem . . .
I reckon the footers being attached. Bit like 'do not include original when replying in outlook options (except you can't do the same with fwd) -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 July 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding Problem . . . Whats your issue ? The forwarding or the footers? Explain with more details, please. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roni Schuetz Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding Problem . . . Hi everyone, search about a solution or a way to come to one. If I have a mailing list like this one, and I want delete all footers in the mails how can I do it. please advice, Roni Schuetz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping Spam
Messagelabs have just bought out a new hosted product which could be useful -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 July 2002 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam I believe we will go with Brightmail. We want the user to receive all mail with suspected spam marked as such. We don't want IS taking on the cop role because some legitimate business mail may get blocked. The user can have the emails marked suspect spam automatically deleted if they choose. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html -Original Message- From: Massey, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Stopping Spam We use MailMarshal (www.marshalsoftware.com) and so far have been very pleased. I admit I spent about a weeks worth of time adjusting and adding my own filters but now it's running like a champ. It's stopping a large percentage of the junk mail that comes this way. I looked at Praetor, Mimesweeper, Mail Essentials, Mail-Gear, and a few others by other AV vendors. For our environment and use, MailMarshal came out on top. Offering the most features and flexibility over the other packages. Good Luck, David- -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam Thanks Chris. I did download the eval version to test before I purchase. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam Purchasing anything without first extensive testing in the lab would, IMHO be a bad idea. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam Thanks Jeremy... I was reading up on CMS's Praetor and it seems perfect for the job. Has anyone had any bad experiences with it before I go ahead and purchase ? -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam I use and like CMS's Praetor. There is some administration to it, but it is worth it if your CEO doesn't get animal porn emails anymore. Check it out at http://www.cmsconnect.com. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam Yes I am looking for server based. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam Sunbelt makes one. But I think like most of them they are client based. If your looking for server based I don't have any options for you. http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam My question: Is there a 3rd party tool anyone recommends to block spam ? I'm looking for something for the Microsoft Windows platform. I found plenty for UNIX and LINUX... In answer to your question: The TURF Directory has to be created and does not exist by default. The default entry is C:\Turfdir but you can change the path by altering a registry entry. Look on the MS KBase for this registry entry..don't remember it. Don't forget to restart the IMS as well as the IS after you do change the message filtering options and after you create the folder. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping Spam it's pretty difficult to stop spam as such - precisely for the reason you have discovered: domains keep changing... you really need a dedicated 3rd party solution for this as ex is not good enough as is. q2 - have a look at http://spam.abuse.net/ as for q3 - don't know and can't remember as not using ex5.5 Rob be lucky... -Original Message- From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 July 2002 15:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stopping Spam I have 3 questions. I know I can block Spam from a particular sender, or block all the senders from a certain domain, using Message Filting in Exchange 5.5. I got a list of individual address from the Junk senders list and Adult senders list but the domains all seem to be different. 1. Do I have to put them individually or can I import them some how? 2. Also
RE: Stopping Spam
it's pretty difficult to stop spam as such - precisely for the reason you have discovered: domains keep changing... you really need a dedicated 3rd party solution for this as ex is not good enough as is. q2 - have a look at http://spam.abuse.net/ as for q3 - don't know and can't remember as not using ex5.5 Rob be lucky... -Original Message- From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 July 2002 15:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stopping Spam I have 3 questions. I know I can block Spam from a particular sender, or block all the senders from a certain domain, using Message Filting in Exchange 5.5. I got a list of individual address from the Junk senders list and Adult senders list but the domains all seem to be different. 1. Do I have to put them individually or can I import them some how? 2. Also does anyone have a list of Spam domains that I can put in, in addition to the address I already have? 3. Where is the folder called Turf suppose to be in MS Exchange 5.5, where all of the filtered e-mails are suppose to go. I did a search for it and it didn't find it. ANY help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5 relay/spamming
Thanks for the help. Have ended up just turning off routing/ relaying as it wasn't needed. Couldn't do anything else to prevent the out queue being clogged apart from install a firewall and have mail routed thru the ISP smtp mail server which is up-to-date. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 July 2002 16:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5 relay/spamming Exchange 5.0 has two options when it comes to relaying. Allow it, or don't. If you need more granular control, you'll need to upgrade. -Original Message- From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5 relay/spamming I've already read the faq an plenty of Q articles, and in my opinion, that article (and most others) only relates to exchange 5.5. I do not have routing restiction button under the routing tab. Q169683 refers to putting a # sign infront of any routed domains - do I do this when adding the routed domain - ie #domain.com inbound ? My problem is the software they are running is old - SBS 4 and exchange 5 sp2. I cannot get the upgrade (to SBS 4.5 which includes exch 5.5) in the UK as it is discontinued and you cannot technically upgrade to SBS 2k - it is a fresh install. I've turned routing off for now as I found that it was not necessary and also switched the IMS off over the weekend but when the IMS is on, the administrators mailbox is filled with ndr's as the relay is no longer open and the queue gets clogged ensuring no legit mail gets sent out. Not only that but I am still open to reverseUCE apparently. Can anyone help me with this - I need some hands on advice. Thanks Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: exchange 5 relay/spamming
Your point being? I have read almost all I could find on this problem (inc the faq) - this mail list was my last port of call We are running SBS4/exchange 5 sp2 NOT exchange 5.5 The article in the faq and q169683 relate to exch 5.5. I cannot see any routing restrictions tab in the version of each I am running. The article q169683 may help - do I put the # sign in front of the domain I want to re-route (ie under sent to it would look like #mydomain.com inbound? For the time being, I have turned off rerouting but I am still getting ndr in the administrators mailbox, plus all the messages in the queue which is putting a strain on resources and preventing legit mail going out. It would be nice if the problem was read properly rather than just being dismissively told to read the faq. Please don't say upgrade to exch 5.5 because it apparently isn't possible if you are running sbs4. Thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 July 2002 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5 relay/spamming FAQ 3.73 Look below to find the link. Read it all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 3:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 5 relay/spamming I've just started at a new company and their systems are in a bit of a mess. On one site (different domain), they are running NT SBS 4 with exchange 5 sp1. Their mail server is being used as a spam relay. The free upgrade to NT sbs 4.5 (and thus exchange 5.5) has been discontinued in the UK so cannot do that. Installing SBS2K will take too long. I've checked technet and the only article I could find relevant to exchange 5 was q199656 however it doen't make much sense to me. DO i need to install exhc on another server - what if I don't have one? Any ideas anyone? thankns Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange 5 relay/spamming
Your point being? I have read almost all I could find on this problem (inc the faq) - this mail list was my last port of call We are running SBS4/exchange 5 sp2 NOT exchange 5.5 The article in the faq and q169683 relate to exch 5.5. I cannot see any routing restrictions tab in the version of each I am running. The article q169683 may help - do I put the # sign in front of the domain I want to re-route (ie under sent to it would look like #mydomain.com inbound? For the time being, I have turned off rerouting but I am still getting ndr in the administrators mailbox, plus all the messages in the queue which is putting a strain on resources and preventing legit mail going out. It would be nice if the problem was read properly rather than just being dismissively told to read the faq. Please don't say upgrade to exch 5.5 because it apparently isn't possible if you are running sbs4. Thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 July 2002 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5 relay/spamming FAQ 3.73 Look below to find the link. Read it all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 3:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 5 relay/spamming I've just started at a new company and their systems are in a bit of a mess. On one site (different domain), they are running NT SBS 4 with exchange 5 sp1. Their mail server is being used as a spam relay. The free upgrade to NT sbs 4.5 (and thus exchange 5.5) has been discontinued in the UK so cannot do that. Installing SBS2K will take too long. I've checked technet and the only article I could find relevant to exchange 5 was q199656 however it doen't make much sense to me. DO i need to install exhc on another server - what if I don't have one? Any ideas anyone? thankns Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
