RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Did you re-install the backup agents after installing the hotfixes to all the servers? -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Have you got an upgraded key from Veritas? I had this same problem with a new Exchange installation a couple of weeks ago. Putting the existing key for Exchange gave me the mailboxes but didn't give me the Information stores option. A quick call to Veritas customer support got me a new key and the options were available. Simon. -- Simon Butler, MCP, MCSA Amset IT Solutions Ltd. e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: www.amset-it.com w: www.amset.info -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: 09 December 2003 23:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
-Original Message- From: Holt, Miles Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:49 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes. In the case of the 9.1 install (no hot fixes needed), I actually migrated the two mailboxes on the server back to the 5.5 server, uninstalled Exchange 2003 and formatted the box before trying again with a new server name. I then installed Exchange 2003 on it, created a test mailbox and sent it a few messages, and then installed BE 9.1 on the new server and rebooted. Even with a clean install on the server it cannot see the stores. The reinstall attempt with BE 9.1 on the exchange server its self was my project yesterday trying to debug it. It makes no sense to me. It the exchange agent can see the mailboxes and public folders for a bricks level backup (which appears to function) it should show the stores as well. Miles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you re-install the backup agents after installing the hotfixes to all the servers? -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
I have not tried that yet as I dread waiting on hold for an hour for a tech (if you are forced to pay for support in the first place should you get to speak with a tech without being on hold that long?). I guess that may be my next step but I have no idea why I would need a new key for it other than a weird bung on their end. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Butler Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Have you got an upgraded key from Veritas? I had this same problem with a new Exchange installation a couple of weeks ago. Putting the existing key for Exchange gave me the mailboxes but didn't give me the Information stores option. A quick call to Veritas customer support got me a new key and the options were available. Simon. -- Simon Butler, MCP, MCSA Amset IT Solutions Ltd. e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: www.amset-it.com w: www.amset.info -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: 09 December 2003 23:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
I didn't call Technical, I called sales to query my license, then they put me through to Customer Services. They read my license information from their computer and I was away. The reason they told me was that it was for a different version and I only could have it because I was under maintenance. I too thought it was odd that I required a different key, but that was what I was told. Simon. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: 10 December 2003 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? I have not tried that yet as I dread waiting on hold for an hour for a tech (if you are forced to pay for support in the first place should you get to speak with a tech without being on hold that long?). I guess that may be my next step but I have no idea why I would need a new key for it other than a weird bung on their end. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Butler Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Have you got an upgraded key from Veritas? I had this same problem with a new Exchange installation a couple of weeks ago. Putting the existing key for Exchange gave me the mailboxes but didn't give me the Information stores option. A quick call to Veritas customer support got me a new key and the options were available. Simon. -- Simon Butler, MCP, MCSA Amset IT Solutions Ltd. e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: www.amset-it.com w: www.amset.info -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: 09 December 2003 23:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Guys, good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now have regained my space back. thanks for the help Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
no prob -- From: pat karr Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Guys, good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now have regained my space back. thanks for the help Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
How much space? If it wasn't a lot, then keep an eye on it because it just might bounce back up. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pat karr Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Guys, good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now have regained my space back. thanks for the help Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Nate, Andy, and Ben, thanks for all of your help concerning this issue. I finally received a 1221 message from the server at 6 pm last night. It told me I have 6509 Megabytes of space free. Very cool. I will be doing another eseutil /d /priv over the weekend and another backup. Once again THANKS for all of your help. I'm learning eventhough I've been running this thing for 5 years or so. Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Hi all, I run an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server on Win NT 4.0. Over the weekend it reached it 16GB threshold and I had to defrag it using the ESEUTIL. Afterwards, I made a backup and began clearing out over 100 accounts that contained close to 8GB's worth of data (according to the privates stores resources area). After which, I went back and viewed the size of the PRIV.EDB and it remained the same size as it was before the purging. It was explained to me that I needed to run another backup and did so. Nothing has changed on the size of the PRIV.EDB database, shows 14.7 GB's. I even ran the ESEUTIL once afterwards and another backup. I am using Brightstor Enterprise Backup. Once again nothing changed. Does anyone know why this is happening and how I can recover all of the space that I cleared? best regards, Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
My first question is on the second ESEUTIL run di you run a defrag or did you run some other switch with it? If you did not run a second defrag after you cleaned out the accounts then that is your issue. MS Exchange does defrag automatically, but it does not compress automatically. In order to recoup the space you cleaned up you must run the ESEUTIL with the defrag switch. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: pat karr Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Hi all, I run an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server on Win NT 4.0. Over the weekend it reached it 16GB threshold and I had to defrag it using the ESEUTIL. Afterwards, I made a backup and began clearing out over 100 accounts that contained close to 8GB's worth of data (according to the privates stores resources area). After which, I went back and viewed the size of the PRIV.EDB and it remained the same size as it was before the purging. It was explained to me that I needed to run another backup and did so. Nothing has changed on the size of the PRIV.EDB database, shows 14.7 GB's. I even ran the ESEUTIL once afterwards and another backup. I am using Brightstor Enterprise Backup. Once again nothing changed. Does anyone know why this is happening and how I can recover all of the space that I cleared? best regards, Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Set the Deleted Item Retention time for messages to 0 and IS maintenance to always and let that puppy run for awhile. Also, check the 1221 events in the app log and see how much space has been freed up. The 1221's will give you the min amount you can reclaim after defragging with eseutil again. And of course, take another backup *after* you run eseutil :) -Original Message- From: pat karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Hi all, I run an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server on Win NT 4.0. Over the weekend it reached it 16GB threshold and I had to defrag it using the ESEUTIL. Afterwards, I made a backup and began clearing out over 100 accounts that contained close to 8GB's worth of data (according to the privates stores resources area). After which, I went back and viewed the size of the PRIV.EDB and it remained the same size as it was before the purging. It was explained to me that I needed to run another backup and did so. Nothing has changed on the size of the PRIV.EDB database, shows 14.7 GB's. I even ran the ESEUTIL once afterwards and another backup. I am using Brightstor Enterprise Backup. Once again nothing changed. Does anyone know why this is happening and how I can recover all of the space that I cleared? best regards, Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
I ran the util with the /d command switch. Was this correct? pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Yes, but only if you ran it AFTER online maintenance purged the deleted items. Eseutil only purges the whitespace, which only gets created by online maintenance. Do what Andy suggested, and set maintenance to run always, wait a while and check event 1221 to see how much whitespace you have. You can then run eseutil again to recover that whitespace. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: pat karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:00 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging I ran the util with the /d command switch. Was this correct? pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Andy, I went into the IS Maintenance and did what was requested. I also went and set the deleted file retention to 0 and removed the check box that relates to keeping the message until a backup is done. In the app log I see a bunch of 1003 and 1006 messages stating that messages and attachments are being cleaned by the background cleaning sessions. I have only seen 3 1221's and they deal with the MSExchangePublic. When should I see the one for MSExchangePriv? When will the private store size reflect the change? After the background cleaning session has done its job or after I run another eseutil /d /ispriv? thanks, Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
It will show the 1221 event for the Private IS once it is done. Once you see that message, then you can run eseutil again. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: pat karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:12 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging Andy, I went into the IS Maintenance and did what was requested. I also went and set the deleted file retention to 0 and removed the check box that relates to keeping the message until a backup is done. In the app log I see a bunch of 1003 and 1006 messages stating that messages and attachments are being cleaned by the background cleaning sessions. I have only seen 3 1221's and they deal with the MSExchangePublic. When should I see the one for MSExchangePriv? When will the private store size reflect the change? After the background cleaning session has done its job or after I run another eseutil /d /ispriv? thanks, Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Thanks Ben. So far the only 1221's that are showing up are the one's for the MSExchangePub but none for the MSExchange Private. Will it show some type of progress message? All I keep seeing are the messages relating deleting messages and attachments. what do you think? Pat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores
Corrupted mail store? -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 03:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores OK, I have an issue which I'm hoping someone can point in the right direction...even if it's only to ask some questions I haven't thought of yet. OK, first the setup: DC's and GC's running Win2k SP3. We are in a child domain. E2K SP3 running on Win2k SP2 member servers. There are 5 Admin groups though we're only concerned with one of them. The issue: Trying to move a mailbox fails. Basically the server has one storage group, and 4 stores. We're trying to move mailboxes from the original store (priv1) to one of the other 3 on the same server, and if fails with a mapi error indicating the IS/Exchange serevr is unavailable. The Event log shows 14 entries like this: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: Access Control Event ID: 1029 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:25:28 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=OrgName/OU=AdminGroup/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=S ervername /CN=MICROSOFT SYSTEM ATTENDANT. The folder ID is in the data section of this event. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 01 00 00 00 00 00 03 52 ...R Then followed by Antigen noticing the Store's gone off-line. And then: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 9169 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:05 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Failed to copy basic mailbox information. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1023 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to set a property on the message store on 'servername'. Result: Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. An unexpected, unknown error has occurred. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 80040115-0514-06ba For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1008 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to move mailbox 'User'. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: MAPI Session Event ID: 9175 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore' failed with the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server computer is down for maintenance. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0526- For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Now the odd thing is that this is the second server set up in this Admin group and is in the same AD site, subnet etc etc. The first one exhibits no problems. Moving a mailbox from the 1st server to the priv1 on the 2nd server works ok, but moving from the 1st server to any other store on the 2nd server fails. However, if you remove a mailbox, then create a new mailbox in the other stores, it works ok. It is thus only the move function which seems not to work. Whilst troubleshooting another issue over the weekend I stumbled across an article which mentioned the system attendant accounts. Unfortunately I can't remember how I got there to read it further but I think it said you could delete those accounts as they aren't needed, and I'm wondering if this has
RE: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores
I deleted and re-created them to rule that out but no joy -Original Message- From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2003 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores Corrupted mail store? -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 03:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't move Mailboxes between Stores OK, I have an issue which I'm hoping someone can point in the right direction...even if it's only to ask some questions I haven't thought of yet. OK, first the setup: DC's and GC's running Win2k SP3. We are in a child domain. E2K SP3 running on Win2k SP2 member servers. There are 5 Admin groups though we're only concerned with one of them. The issue: Trying to move a mailbox fails. Basically the server has one storage group, and 4 stores. We're trying to move mailboxes from the original store (priv1) to one of the other 3 on the same server, and if fails with a mapi error indicating the IS/Exchange serevr is unavailable. The Event log shows 14 entries like this: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: Access Control Event ID: 1029 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:25:28 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=OrgName/OU=AdminGroup/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=S ervername /CN=MICROSOFT SYSTEM ATTENDANT. The folder ID is in the data section of this event. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 01 00 00 00 00 00 03 52 ...R Then followed by Antigen noticing the Store's gone off-line. And then: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 9169 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:05 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Failed to copy basic mailbox information. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1023 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to set a property on the message store on 'servername'. Result: Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. An unexpected, unknown error has occurred. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 80040115-0514-06ba For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1008 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to move mailbox 'User'. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: MAPI Session Event ID: 9175 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore' failed with the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server computer is down for maintenance. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0526- For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Now the odd thing is that this is the second server set up in this Admin group and is in the same AD site, subnet etc etc. The first one exhibits no problems. Moving a mailbox from the 1st server to the priv1 on the 2nd server works ok, but moving from the 1st server to any other store on the 2nd server fails. However, if you remove a mailbox, then create a new mailbox in the other stores, it works ok. It is thus only the move function which seems not to work. Whilst troubleshooting another issue over the weekend I stumbled
Can't move Mailboxes between Stores
OK, I have an issue which I'm hoping someone can point in the right direction...even if it's only to ask some questions I haven't thought of yet. OK, first the setup: DC's and GC's running Win2k SP3. We are in a child domain. E2K SP3 running on Win2k SP2 member servers. There are 5 Admin groups though we're only concerned with one of them. The issue: Trying to move a mailbox fails. Basically the server has one storage group, and 4 stores. We're trying to move mailboxes from the original store (priv1) to one of the other 3 on the same server, and if fails with a mapi error indicating the IS/Exchange serevr is unavailable. The Event log shows 14 entries like this: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: Access Control Event ID: 1029 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:25:28 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=OrgName/OU=AdminGroup/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=Servername /CN=MICROSOFT SYSTEM ATTENDANT. The folder ID is in the data section of this event. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 01 00 00 00 00 00 03 52 ...R Then followed by Antigen noticing the Store's gone off-line. And then: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 9169 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:05 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Failed to copy basic mailbox information. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1023 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to set a property on the message store on 'servername'. Result: Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. An unexpected, unknown error has occurred. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 80040115-0514-06ba For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeAdmin Event Category: Move Mailbox Event ID: 1008 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Unable to move mailbox 'User'. Error: The action could not be completed because the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service is unavailable. Be sure the service is running and you have network connectivity to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: MAPI Session Event ID: 9175 Date: 25/03/2003 Time: 8:26:10 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore' failed with the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server computer is down for maintenance. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0526- For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Now the odd thing is that this is the second server set up in this Admin group and is in the same AD site, subnet etc etc. The first one exhibits no problems. Moving a mailbox from the 1st server to the priv1 on the 2nd server works ok, but moving from the 1st server to any other store on the 2nd server fails. However, if you remove a mailbox, then create a new mailbox in the other stores, it works ok. It is thus only the move function which seems not to work. Whilst troubleshooting another issue over the weekend I stumbled across an article which mentioned the system attendant accounts. Unfortunately I can't remember how I got there to read it further but I think it said you could delete those accounts as they aren't needed, and I'm wondering if this has a bearing? Anyone experienced something similar? Thanks Dave This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
In Exchange 5.5 you need at least one store on the server, even a connector server, so that NDR's and the like have a place to go. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deleting both Information Stores?
New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
I do follow your logic on if it ain't used, don't run it!. I subscribe to that myself. Sometimes great care has to be taken when determining which services are necessary and which are not. I have had a couple of interesting experiences disabling services on Exchange 2000. :-) Yep, the IMS puts all inbound mail in to the private information store, so it is required if the server is running an IMS. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:15 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
Thanks Ed - I found that out the fun way :-) Looks like the Event Service needs the Public IS as well? I may just remove the Event Service (as this is primarily a connector server) and then remove the Public IS totally. Am I right in thinking that the eventconfig public folder has to live on the relevent server, whereas setting the Public Folder Server value on the Private IS properties controls where new user-created public folders default to? regards Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
If you don't have an IS, you don't need the Event Service, since you won't have anything to generate events. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Thanks Ed - I found that out the fun way :-) Looks like the Event Service needs the Public IS as well? I may just remove the Event Service (as this is primarily a connector server) and then remove the Public IS totally. Am I right in thinking that the eventconfig public folder has to live on the relevent server, whereas setting the Public Folder Server value on the Private IS properties controls where new user-created public folders default to? regards Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
As to the philosophy of disabling services you don't need, feel free to stop and disable the Event Service if you don't have any event scripts installed. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Thanks Ed - I found that out the fun way :-) Looks like the Event Service needs the Public IS as well? I may just remove the Event Service (as this is primarily a connector server) and then remove the Public IS totally. Am I right in thinking that the eventconfig public folder has to live on the relevent server, whereas setting the Public Folder Server value on the Private IS properties controls where new user-created public folders default to? regards Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message You cannot remove the last information store from a server. Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stores
I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable. What's wrong? What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my data partition. How can I do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stores
Daniel It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise. Mark Fugatt -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stores I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable. What's wrong? What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my data partition. How can I do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stores
Correct
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stores
Daniel
It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise.
Mark Fugatt
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stores
I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me
to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable.
What's wrong?
What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage
group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my
data partition. How can I do this?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin 666 ATT00019.htm
M/%$3T-465!%($A434P@4%53$E#((M+R]7,T,O+T141!(5$U,(#,N,B\O
M14XB/@T*/$A434P^#0H\2$5!1#X-CQ-151!($A45% M15%5258](D-O;G1E
M;G0M5'EP92(@0T].5$5.5#TB=5X=]H=UL.R!C:%RV5T/5=I;F1O=W,M
M,3(U,B(^#0H\345402!.04U%/2)'96YEF%T;W(B($-/3E1%3E0](DU3($5X
M8VAA;F=E(%-EG9EB!V97)S:6]N(#8N,XV,C0Y+C$B/@T*/%1)5$Q%/E)%
M.B!3=]R97,\+U1)5$Q%/@T*/](14%$/@T*/$)/1%D^#0H\(2TM($-O;G9E
MG1E9!FF]M('1E'0OQA:6X@9F]R;6%T(TM/@T*#0H\4#X\1D].5!3
M25I%/3(^0V]RF5C=#PO1D].5#X-CPO4#X-@T*/% ^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR
M/BTM+2TM3W)I9VEN86P@365SV%G92TM+2TM/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/
M3E0@4TE:13TR/D9R;VTZ()O=6YC92UE-H86YG92TY-30P-D!LRYS=WEN
M:RYC;VT\+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^6SQ!($A2148](FUA
M:6QT;SIB;W5N8V4M97AC:%N9V4M.34T,#9 ;',NW=Y;FLN8V]M(CYM86EL
M=\Z8F]U;F-E+65X8VAA;F=E+3DU-# V0QS+G-W6YK+F-O;3PO03Y=3VX@
M0F5H86QF($]F($UAFL@1G5G871T/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:
M13TR/E-E;G0Z($UO;F1A2P@075G=7-T(#$Y+ R,# R(#0Z,C@04T\+T9/
M3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^5\Z($5X8VAA;F=E($1IV-UW-I
M;VYS/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/E-U8FIE8W0Z(%)%.B!3
M=]R97,\+T9/3E0^#0H\+U ^#0H\0E(^#0H-CQ0/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY$
M86YI96P\+T9/3E0^#0H\+U ^#0H-CQ0/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY)=!S;W5N
M9',@;EK92!Y;W4@87)E(')U;FYI;F@17AC:%N9V4@,C P,!3=%N9%R
M9!A;F0@;F]T($5N=5R')IV4N/]3TY4/@T*/]0/@T*#0H\4#X\1D].
M5!325I%/3(^36%R:R!=6=A='0\+T9/3E0^#0H\+U ^#0H-CQ0/CQ3TY4
M(%-)6D4],CXM+2TM+4]R:6=I;F%L($UEW-A9V4M+2TM+3PO1D].5#X-@T*
M/$)2/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CYF]M.B!$86YI96P@3X@36EL;5R(%L\02!(
M4D5/2)M86EL=\Z9UI;QED!A;69ERYC;VTB/FUA:6QT;SID;6EL;5R
M0%M9F5S+F-O;3PO03Y=/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/E-E
M;G0Z($UO;F1A2P@075G=7-T(#$Y+ R,# R(#,Z,C@@04T\+T9/3E0^#0H-
MCQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^5\Z($5X8VAA;F=E($1IV-UW-I;VYS/]
M3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/E-U8FIE8W0Z(%-T;W)ESPO1D].
M5#X-CPO4#X-CQ4CX-@T*/% ^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/DDG=F4@=')I960@
M8W)E871I;F@82!N97@W1OF%G92!GF]UXF;F)S#L@069T97(@8W)E
M871I;VXL(ET('=O;B=T(%L;]W(UE/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@
M4TE:13TR/G1O(%D9!A;GD@;6%I;!S=]R97,@+2!T:]U9V@@:70@V5E
M;7,@'5B;EC('-T;W)ER!AF4@86-C97!T86)L92X\+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ
M4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^5VAA==S('=R;VYG/SPO1D].5#X-CPO4#X-@T*
M/% ^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/E=H870@22!R96%L;'D@=V%N=!T;R!D;R!IR!-
M3U9%($@W1OF4OW1OF%G92!GF]UXF;F)S#L@37D@')I;6%R2!S
M=]R86=E/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/F=R;W5P(-UG)E
M;G1L2!R97-I95S(]N(UY('-YW1E;2!P87)T:71I;VX@86YD($D@=V%N
M=!T;R!S:EF=!I=!T;R!M3PO1D].5#X-@T*/$)2/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4]
M,CYD871A('!AG1I=EO;BXF;F)S#L@2]W(-A;B!)(1O('1H:7,_/]
M3TY4/@T*/]0/@T*/$)2/@T*#0H\4#X\1D].5!325I%/3(^7U]?7U]?7U]?
M7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?
M7U]?7U]?7U]?7U\\+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^3ES=!P
M;W-T:6YG($9!43HF;F)S#LF;F)S#LF;F)S#LF;F)S#LF;F)S#LF;F)S
M#L@/$$@2%)%1CTB:'1T#HO+W=W=RYS=VEN8RYC;VTOF5S;W5R8V4O97AC
M:%]F87$N:'1M(CYH='1P.B\O=W=W+G-W:6YC+F-O;2]R97-O=7)C92]E-H
M7V9A2YH=T\+T$^/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/D%R8VAI
M=F5S.B9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P
M.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R \
M02!(4D5/2)H='1P.B\O=W=W+G-W6YK+F-O;2]S:71EV5AF-H+W-E87)C
M:YAW B/FAT=' Z+R]W=WNW=Y;FLN8V]M+W-I=5S96%R8V@OV5AF-H
M+F%S#PO03X\+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^5\@=6YS=6)S
M8W)I8F4Z)FYBW [)FYBW [)FYBW [)FYBW [)FYBW [)FYBW [)FYB
MW [)FYBW [(#Q!($A2148](FUA:6QT;SIL96%V92UE-H86YG94!LRYS
M=WEN:RYC;VTB/FUA:6QT;SIL96%V92UE-H86YG94!LRYS=WEN:RYC;VT\
M+T$^/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/D5X8VAA;F=E($QIW0@
M861M:6XZ)FYBW [)FYBW [)FYBW [(QIW1A9UI;D!S=WEN:RYC;VT\
M+T9/3E0^#0H\+U ^#0H-CQ0/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?
M7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?7U]?
M7U]?7U]?7SPO1D].5#X-@T*/$)2/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY,:7-T('!OW1I
M;F@1D%1.B9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G-P.R9N8G
Fw: Stores
Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores. - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM Subject: RE: Stores Correct -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stores Daniel It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise. Mark Fugatt -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stores I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable. What's wrong? What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my data partition. How can I do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stores
Well, that answers question #1.
Is it possible to move/relocate the primary message store?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fw: Stores
Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel L. Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: Stores
Correct
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stores
Daniel
It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise.
Mark Fugatt
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stores
I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me
to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable.
What's wrong?
What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage
group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my
data partition. How can I do this?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin 666 ATT00076.htm
M/%$3T-465!%($A434P@4%53$E#((M+R]7,T,O+T141!(5$U,(#,N,B\O
M14XB/@T*/$A434P^#0H\2$5!1#X-CQ-151!($A45% M15%5258](D-O;G1E
M;G0M5'EP92(@0T].5$5.5#TB=5X=]H=UL.R!C:%RV5T/5=I;F1O=W,M
M,3(U,B(^#0H\345402!.04U%/2)'96YEF%T;W(B($-/3E1%3E0](DU3($5X
M8VAA;F=E(%-EG9EB!V97)S:6]N(#8N,XV,C0Y+C$B/@T*/%1)5$Q%/E)%
M.B!3=]R97,\+U1)5$Q%/@T*/](14%$/@T*/$)/1%D^#0H\(2TM($-O;G9E
MG1E9!FF]M('1E'0OQA:6X@9F]R;6%T(TM/@T*#0H\4#X\1D].5!3
M25I%/3(^5V5L;P@=AA=!A;G-W97)S('%U97-T:6]N(,Q+CPO1D].5#X-
MCPO4#X-@T*/% ^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/DES(ET('!OW-I8FQE('1O(UO
M=F4OF5L;V-A=4@=AE('!R:6UAGD@;65SV%G92!S=]R93\\+T9/3E0^
M#0H\+U ^#0H-CQ0/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CXM+2TM+4]R:6=I;F%L($UEW-A
M9V4M+2TM+3PO1D].5#X-@T*/$)2/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CYF]M.B!B;W5N
M8V4M97AC:%N9V4M.34T,#9 ;',NW=Y;FLN8V]M/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^
M/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/EL\02!(4D5/2)M86EL=\Z8F]U;F-E+65X8VAA;F=E
M+3DU-# V0QS+G-W6YK+F-O;2(^;6%I;'1O.F)O=6YC92UE-H86YG92TY
M-30P-D!LRYS=WEN:RYC;VT\+T$^74]N($)E:%L9B!/9B!-:7-S2!+;W-L
M;W-K3PO1D].5#X-@T*/$)2/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY396YT.B!-;VYD87DL
M($%U9W5S= Q.2P@,C P,B Q,#HR-2!!33PO1D].5#X-@T*/$)2/CQ3TY4
M(%-)6D4],CY4;SH@17AC:%N9V4@1ES8W5SVEO;G,\+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ
M4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^4W5B:F5C=#H@1GZ(%-T;W)ESPO1D].5#X-CPO
M4#X-CQ4CX-@T*/% ^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/E-T86YD87)D(1O97,@;F]T
M(%L;]W(9OB!M=6QT:7!L92!PFEV871E(EN9F]R;6%T:6]N('-T;W)E
MRX\+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^+2TM+2T@3W)I9VEN86P@
M365SV%G92 M+2TM+2 \+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^1G)O
M;3H@1%N:65L($PN($UI;QEB \+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%
M/3(^5\Z($5X8VAA;F=E($1IV-UW-I;VYS(#PO1D].5#X-@T*/$)2/CQ
M3TY4(%-)6D4],CY396YT.B!-;VYD87DL($%U9W5S= Q.2P@,C P,B Q,CHP
M.2!033PO1D].5#X-@T*/$)2/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY3=6)J96-T.B!213H@
M4W1OF5S/]3TY4/@T*/]0/@T*/$)2/@T*#0H\4#X\1D].5!325I%/3(^
M0V]RF5C=#PO1D].5#X-CPO4#X-@T*/% ^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/BTM+2TM
M3W)I9VEN86P@365SV%G92TM+2TM/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:
M13TR/D9R;VTZ()O=6YC92UE-H86YG92TY-30P-D!LRYS=WEN:RYC;VT\
M+T9/3E0^#0H-CQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^6SQ!($A2148](FUA:6QT;SIB
M;W5N8V4M97AC:%N9V4M.34T,#9 ;',NW=Y;FLN8V]M(CYM86EL=\Z8F]U
M;F-E+65X8VAA;F=E+3DU-# V0QS+G-W6YK+F-O;3PO03Y=3VX@0F5H86QF
M($]F($UAFL@1G5G871T/]3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/E-E
M;G0Z($UO;F1A2P@075G=7-T(#$Y+ R,# R(#0Z,C@04T\+T9/3E0^#0H-
MCQ4CX\1D].5!325I%/3(^5\Z($5X8VAA;F=E($1IV-UW-I;VYS/]
M3TY4/@T*#0H\0E(^/$9/3E0@4TE:13TR/E-U8FIE8W0Z(%)%.B!3=]R97,\
M+T9/3E0^#0H\+U ^#0H\0E(^#0H-CQ0/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY$86YI96P\
M+T9/3E0^#0H\+U ^#0H-CQ0/CQ3TY4(%-)6D4],CY)=!S;W5N9',@;EK
M92!Y;W4@87)E(')U;FYI;F@17AC:%N9V4@,C P,!3=%N9%R9!A;F0@
M;F]T($5N=5R')IV4N/]3TY4/@T*/]0/@T*#0H\4#X\1D].5!325I%
M/3
RE: Stores
Yep. Right-click the store in the Exch Manager... under one of the tabs is the option on where to keep the store. Just change that option, and the store will be taken offline while it's moved. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stores Well, that answers question #1. Is it possible to move/relocate the primary message store? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: Stores Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores. - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM Subject: RE: Stores Correct -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stores Daniel It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise. Mark Fugatt -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stores I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable. What's wrong? What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my data partition. How can I do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stores
Absolutely. - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:39 PM Subject: RE: Stores Well, that answers question #1. Is it possible to move/relocate the primary message store? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: Stores Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores. - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM Subject: RE: Stores Correct -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stores Daniel It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise. Mark Fugatt -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stores I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable. What's wrong? What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my data partition. How can I do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stores
Try this. Of course this is assuming you are using E2K next time you might want to include that information when you post a question. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q257184; chuck -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stores I've tried creating a new storage group. After creation, it won't allow me to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable. What's wrong? What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group. My primary storage group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my data partition. How can I do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default Mailbox Stores E2K Enterprise
What's the official recommendation for the default stores on the Enterprise version? I currently have 10 enterprise exchange in production - none of which use the default store. They (default stores) are pretty much all original size (minor mishaps with other admins inadvertently placing mbx'es in the wrong place), so I'm not concerned about the space I could gain back BUT - are the default stores removable? Safe to move the SA's mailbox to another store? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1.edb The Enterprise version of Exchange allows for multiple storage groups with multiple information stores. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1.edb William Any chance of you expanding on your third sentence? Regards -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2002 10:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: priv1.edb By having users delete content from their mailboxes and then running the eseutil utility to remove the whitespace generated by deleting. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q192185 You can also use the mailbox management features of exchange to force deletion of old items to create white space. If you have enterprise, you can move the contents to priv2.edb. ;o) William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: priv1.edb Hi, How can I drastically reduce the size of priv1.edb on my Exch 2K? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... sh ould client antivirus be installed as well?
Apologies, in case that whilst I've been un-sub'ed for vacation someone has posted this. But have you seen www.makeashorterlink.com? -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 July 2002 11:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? At most customer sites, we use Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition and Norton Antivirus for MS Exchange. They have a good doc that explains what to Exchange directories to exclude (link is wrapped): http://service4.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/552ba2f7636bedf088 256818006f78bf/bfaa6df92d548a2788256a220027256d?OpenDocumentprev=http:/ /search.symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.html?*col=kb %20us*st=1*nh=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/552ba2f7636bedf08825681 8006f78bf*qt=%2Bexchange%20%2Bexclude*miniver=nav_76_ce*sone=nav_76_ce_t asks.html*stg=*prod=Norton%20AntiVirus*ver=7.6%20Corporate%20Edition*bas e=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/nav/nav_76_ce/*ne xt=*boolean=andsone=nav_76_ce_tasks.htmlstg=prod=Norton%20AntiVirusv er=7.6%20Corporate%20Editionbase=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enter prise/products/nav/nav_76_ce/next=src=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= If link doesn't work, go to the knowledgebase for NAVCE 7.6 and search for exchange exclude . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well?
*MAY* wrap? LOL. Decapitation may be hazardous to your health, too. For future reference, you can always get a shorter link to Symantec's KB articles by clicking on the Printer-friendly version link at the top of the page. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 26, 2002 05:21 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? Subject: RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? At most customer sites, we use Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition and Norton Antivirus for MS Exchange. They have a good doc that explains what to Exchange directories to exclude (link is wrapped): http://service4.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/552ba2f7 636bedf088 256818006f78bf/bfaa6df92d548a2788256a220027256d?OpenDocumentp rev=http:/ /search.symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.ht ml?*col=kb %20us*st=1*nh=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/552ba2f7636be df08825681 8006f78bf*qt=%2Bexchange%20%2Bexclude*miniver=nav_76_ce*sone=n av_76_ce_t asks.html*stg=*prod=Norton%20AntiVirus*ver=7.6%20Corporate%20E dition*bas e=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/nav/nav _76_ce/*ne xt=*boolean=andsone=nav_76_ce_tasks.htmlstg=prod=Norton%20A ntiVirusv er=7.6%20Corporate%20Editionbase=http://www.symantec.com/tech supp/enter prise/products/nav/nav_76_ce/next=src=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= If link doesn't work, go to the knowledgebase for NAVCE 7.6 and search for exchange exclude . -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Brown Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 6:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? We currently have Trend Scanmail 6.0 installed on our Exchange 2000 server, but this software doesn't scan the drives. Is there really a need for client antirus software? I'm concerned about having 2 antivirus programs running together on the same box. Performance is a concern as well. Any suggestions? TIA! -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well?
We currently have Trend Scanmail 6.0 installed on our Exchange 2000 server, but this software doesn't scan the drives. Is there really a need for client antirus software? I'm concerned about having 2 antivirus programs running together on the same box. Performance is a concern as well. Any suggestions? TIA! -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well?
You won't have any conflict if you just ensure your client program doesn't touch the Exchange store, drive M, or anything else to do with Exchange. On the other hand, I usually don't run a client AV on my Exchange box. You can, however, if you wish. -Original Message- From: Jason Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? We currently have Trend Scanmail 6.0 installed on our Exchange 2000 server, but this software doesn't scan the drives. Is there really a need for client antirus software? I'm concerned about having 2 antivirus programs running together on the same box. Performance is a concern as well. Any suggestions? TIA! -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well?
No. Only install an Exchange-aware/compliant AV software. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Brown Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 18:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? We currently have Trend Scanmail 6.0 installed on our Exchange 2000 server, but this software doesn't scan the drives. Is there really a need for client antirus software? I'm concerned about having 2 antivirus programs running together on the same box. Performance is a concern as well. Any suggestions? TIA! -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector...sh ould client antivirus be installed as well?
Some would disagree. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 6:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? No. Only install an Exchange-aware/compliant AV software. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Brown Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 18:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? We currently have Trend Scanmail 6.0 installed on our Exchange 2000 server, but this software doesn't scan the drives. Is there really a need for client antirus software? I'm concerned about having 2 antivirus programs running together on the same box. Performance is a concern as well. Any suggestions? TIA! -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... sh ould client antivirus be installed as well?
If your Exchange server also serves as a file server, you'll want both types of AV. And you'll want to exclude everything Exchange on the file level scanner. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... sh ould client antivirus be installed as well? Some would disagree. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 6:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? No. Only install an Exchange-aware/compliant AV software. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Brown Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 18:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Have Exchange Antivirus that scans stores and connector... should client antivirus be installed as well? We currently have Trend Scanmail 6.0 installed on our Exchange 2000 server, but this software doesn't scan the drives. Is there really a need for client antirus software? I'm concerned about having 2 antivirus programs running together on the same box. Performance is a concern as well. Any suggestions? TIA! -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving exchange stores
Good morning, We have added a new storage box in our E2K cluster environment. We have relocated the Information Stores (priv, pub.edb/stm), transaction logs and system path... The one thing that we have not done is to move the MTA database. According to Q259896, it's pretty much straight forward. Has anyone done it before that runs E2K Cluster? Are there anything else that I need to move before I can extract the old storage box? Thanks in advance. ~justin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
If I recall, you take a 100MB hit for each SG you load and another 10MB hit for each IS within the SG. That's just to get the system started. Once the dynamic buffer caching starts growing the allocation to hold the active data, it's more. As Chris said, fragmentation of memory starts to become a problem. If you ever shut down one of the stores or SG's for any reason on a system that fully loaded, you may not be able to start it back up without a full restart. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows is a common thing. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG, however, practical limitations kick in with 4. All the Official MS documentation says that Exchange 2K Enterprise version is limited to 4 SG's and 5 MDB's per SG. You have to remember that each SG is a separate storage engine, requiring it's own memory space and a big slice of processor time. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Thank you very much John. You are AMAZING! --Felicity The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG, however, practical limitations kick in with 4. All the Official MS documentation says that Exchange 2K Enterprise version is limited to 4 SG's and 5 MDB's per SG. You have to remember that each SG is a separate storage engine, requiring it's own memory space and a big slice of processor time. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows is a common thing. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Thank you for this clarification Chris. -- Felicity The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows is a common thing. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores
Not really. I finished that class two weeks ago. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores Thank you very much John. You are AMAZING! --Felicity The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG, however, practical limitations kick in with 4. All the Official MS documentation says that Exchange 2K Enterprise version is limited to 4 SG's and 5 MDB's per SG. You have to remember that each SG is a separate storage engine, requiring it's own memory space and a big slice of processor time. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of stores I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange 2000 server. I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed. If I try to add another storage group I get a message from Exchange complaining - This server already contains the maximum number of storage groups allowed. Can someone explain this to me. TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move of E2K Stores to SAN
Is there any special provisions for moving the individual stores from the local system to a SAN? Planning on 16 stores for the company all sharing a large chuck of SAN storage. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move of E2K Stores to SAN
Nope the box looks at the SAN storage has if the LUNs are local to the box. The only problem I have had is with the SCISI time out setting on some SANs. What type of SAN are you moving to? Ryan, -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move of E2K Stores to SAN Is there any special provisions for moving the individual stores from the local system to a SAN? Planning on 16 stores for the company all sharing a large chuck of SAN storage. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Info stores
Exch2k SP2. Quick question. Probably a stupid one. My priv info store says it is 6.5 gig, but the users only add up to about 2 gig or so. My pub is 7 gig. Why is it so big? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Info stores
Bloated -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Info stores Exch2k SP2. Quick question. Probably a stupid one. My priv info store says it is 6.5 gig, but the users only add up to about 2 gig or so. My pub is 7 gig. Why is it so big? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Info stores
Check your event logs for 1221 information events. You have mucho white space - no biggie. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:46 PM Subject: Info stores Exch2k SP2. Quick question. Probably a stupid one. My priv info store says it is 6.5 gig, but the users only add up to about 2 gig or so. My pub is 7 gig. Why is it so big? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Stores
Hello, If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain that we create? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Stores
Have you looked at the ASP hosting documentation out at Microsoft.com? I believe there are a number of good white papers on hosting Exchange which cover this in good detail. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Stores Hello, If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain that we create? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Stores
If you really need true data separation, you need separate servers in separate Exchange organizations IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Stores Hello, If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain that we create? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
Thanks Wilson We did lose SI of all attachments, but that did not explain size. Size also changed some 2 weeks after Exchange 2000 set up, following serious degradation in performance especially noticeable in one Public Folder contact folder which eventually did not restore form the backup. (see response to /Peter). Agree with circular logging comment thanks. Regards Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files, our Exchaneg server was playing up. We moved the log files to another location and things went back to normal. The same thing repeated itself 1 week later. Moved the log files again and since then all the services start up without a problem, however the mail stores will not mount. Public mail store is abnormally large - 6GB - was 50MB under Exchange 5.5. Thanks for any assistance. Regards Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
Rob, You HAD a mail loop, 50 MB Priv. store? My server at home has a priv.edb biger than 1GB. BTW: walk away from the server, get a professional to fix it and get yourself a good exchange book. Read it, read it again and then maybe you are alowed back to the server. /Peter - Original Message - From: Rob Yeldon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 7:13 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files, our Exchaneg server was playing up. We moved the log files to another location and things went back to normal. The same thing repeated itself 1 week later. Moved the log files again and since then all the services start up without a problem, however the mail stores will not mount. Public mail store is abnormally large - 6GB - was 50MB under Exchange 5.5. Thanks for any assistance. Regards Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
You do have backups, right? /P - Original Message - From: Rob Yeldon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 7:13 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files, our Exchaneg server was playing up. We moved the log files to another location and things went back to normal. The same thing repeated itself 1 week later. Moved the log files again and since then all the services start up without a problem, however the mail stores will not mount. Public mail store is abnormally large - 6GB - was 50MB under Exchange 5.5. Thanks for any assistance. Regards Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
If you moved mailboxes from your 5.5 to 2000, then you probably lost your single instance of all the attachments.. that could be a reason for your increase in DB size. Also during mailbox moves, a lot of log files are created, I turned on circular logging during the mailbox move process so it wouldn't create so many log files. Then turned circular logging off after I was done. As for not being able to mount your store.. There can be 100 reasons, check all the event errors and see if any of them point you in the right direction. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rob Yeldon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files, our Exchaneg server was playing up. We moved the log files to another location and things went back to normal. The same thing repeated itself 1 week later. Moved the log files again and since then all the services start up without a problem, however the mail stores will not mount. Public mail store is abnormally large - 6GB - was 50MB under Exchange 5.5. Thanks for any assistance. Regards Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
Wilson, He would have the highest SIS in history. Greater than 1:100 G /P - Original Message - From: Varghese, Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:02 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores If you moved mailboxes from your 5.5 to 2000, then you probably lost your single instance of all the attachments.. that could be a reason for your increase in DB size. Also during mailbox moves, a lot of log files are created, I turned on circular logging during the mailbox move process so it wouldn't create so many log files. Then turned circular logging off after I was done. As for not being able to mount your store.. There can be 100 reasons, check all the event errors and see if any of them point you in the right direction. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rob Yeldon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files, our Exchaneg server was playing up. We moved the log files to another location and things went back to normal. The same thing repeated itself 1 week later. Moved the log files again and since then all the services start up without a problem, however the mail stores will not mount. Public mail store is abnormally large - 6GB - was 50MB under Exchange 5.5. Thanks for any assistance. Regards Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores
Thanks everyone for the input. Regards -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 7:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores We have specified multiple stores in storage groups for our 2000 deployment, but as yet, we haven't decided who will go where. If you put all the payroll users on one store, you may get quite a good single instance ratio, and can set policies for those users, etc, which is good. However, if you have a problem with that store, you have the whole of payroll to contend with. We are also looking at 'users created/migrated this week go on store 1, next week on store 2, the week after on store 3, then back to store 1, etc' Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores Mounting the first mailbox store in a storage group takes more resources that mounting additional stores in a single storage group. So, from a pure resources point of view, there may be some advantages to multiple stores in fewer storage groups. All other things being equal, I think I generally prefer it that way as well, although I personally don't have enough practical experience with disaster recovery under a multitude of scenarios with E2K (thank $deity), so there are some parts of the 'optimal' E2K design which are still a bit theoretical in my mind. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores Basically we want to move away from the large single IS database and have several smaller ones which are more managable (in event of disaster recovery, backup/restore, offline maintanence, applying different mailbox limits, etc). Also, assuming there is only a problem with one IS, we don't this problem affecting all other users. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores It's best to not let external hierarchies dictate how technological solutions are developed. What is the point of this exercise? What do you hope to gain? Is there a desired end result towards which you are working? What are the perceived business benefits? Answer those first. - Original Message - From: Duane Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:26 PM Subject: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores I want to split up my staff mailboxes into relevant units eg, payroll, managers, etc, on my E2k Enterprise server. Is it best to create mutiple Mailbox Stores under one Storage Group, OR, just have several Storage Groups with the single Mailbox Store. Is there any advantage going one way or the other? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores
We have specified multiple stores in storage groups for our 2000 deployment, but as yet, we haven't decided who will go where. If you put all the payroll users on one store, you may get quite a good single instance ratio, and can set policies for those users, etc, which is good. However, if you have a problem with that store, you have the whole of payroll to contend with. We are also looking at 'users created/migrated this week go on store 1, next week on store 2, the week after on store 3, then back to store 1, etc' Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores Mounting the first mailbox store in a storage group takes more resources that mounting additional stores in a single storage group. So, from a pure resources point of view, there may be some advantages to multiple stores in fewer storage groups. All other things being equal, I think I generally prefer it that way as well, although I personally don't have enough practical experience with disaster recovery under a multitude of scenarios with E2K (thank $deity), so there are some parts of the 'optimal' E2K design which are still a bit theoretical in my mind. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores Basically we want to move away from the large single IS database and have several smaller ones which are more managable (in event of disaster recovery, backup/restore, offline maintanence, applying different mailbox limits, etc). Also, assuming there is only a problem with one IS, we don't this problem affecting all other users. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores It's best to not let external hierarchies dictate how technological solutions are developed. What is the point of this exercise? What do you hope to gain? Is there a desired end result towards which you are working? What are the perceived business benefits? Answer those first. - Original Message - From: Duane Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:26 PM Subject: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores I want to split up my staff mailboxes into relevant units eg, payroll, managers, etc, on my E2k Enterprise server. Is it best to create mutiple Mailbox Stores under one Storage Group, OR, just have several Storage Groups with the single Mailbox Store. Is there any advantage going one way or the other? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores
I want to split up my staff mailboxes into relevant units eg, payroll, managers, etc, on my E2k Enterprise server. Is it best to create mutiple Mailbox Stores under one Storage Group, OR, just have several Storage Groups with the single Mailbox Store. Is there any advantage going one way or the other? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 Information Stores in Exchange 5.5
On two separate servers you can. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Casstevens Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2 Information Stores in Exchange 5.5 Quick question for the list: Is it possible to have 2 separate information stores when running Exchange 5.5 or is this only possible to do in Exchange 2000. Thanks for your help. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, California 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 information Stores
Only with E2K -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2 information Stores Quick question for the list: Is it possible to have 2 separate information stores when running Exchange 5.5 or is this only possible to do in Exchange 2000. Thanks for your help. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, California 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 Information Stores in Exchange 5.5
Quick question for the list: Is it possible to have 2 separate information stores when running Exchange 5.5 or is this only possible to do in Exchange 2000. Thanks for your help. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, California 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 information Stores
Not with 5.5 unless you install Exch on two servers then split the users -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Casstevens Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2 information Stores Quick question for the list: Is it possible to have 2 separate information stores when running Exchange 5.5 or is this only possible to do in Exchange 2000. Thanks for your help. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, California 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 Information Stores in Exchange 5.5
The answer is still E2K only. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2 Information Stores in Exchange 5.5 Quick question for the list: Is it possible to have 2 separate information stores when running Exchange 5.5 or is this only possible to do in Exchange 2000. Thanks for your help. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, California 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 information Stores
Ex5.5 already has two information stores; one for mailboxes, one for public folders. But that is all it has; you need Ex2K to get more. - Original Message - From: James Casstevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:42 AM Subject: 2 information Stores Quick question for the list: Is it possible to have 2 separate information stores when running Exchange 5.5 or is this only possible to do in Exchange 2000. Thanks for your help. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, California 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
