date:20020117

Oops, DO NOT quarantine

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virus scan

Personally, if it says it a virus, I don't take a chance. I also do
quarantine. If its important, the sender can fix the file and resend it. In
any case, I would delete this file and get a fresh copy.

-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: virus scan

I was told that this was not a virus and that it was a problem with the
detection message where no detection name is given, is an error message that
is given by the engine and misinterpreted by the GUI product, not a
detection by the DAT files. The files are now in quarantine, so can i send
out the file or is it infected with a virus?

I am running groupshield exchange.

This is the message we received in the event viewer:
"The file testing.doc is infected with '_'. Detected with scan engine 4.1.60
DAT version 4.1.4181 from user Exchange running groupshield 4.5.572.182 OAS"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: virus scan

Excellent tool.

-Original Message-
From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virus scan

Try scanning the file with another Antivirus product.  I would suggest
connecting to the trendmicro site (www.antivirus.com) and using their
housecall? product for a quick check if you don't have access to another
vendor's antivirus product.

cheers 

Wayne Hanks 
Systems Administrator 
Paterson Ord Minnett 
Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
"Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" 

-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 11:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: virus scan

I was told that this was not a virus and that it was a problem with the
detection message where no detection name is given, is an error message that
is given by the engine and misinterpreted by the GUI product, not a
detection by the DAT files. The files are now in quarantine, so can i send
out the file or is it infected with a virus?

I am running groupshield exchange.

This is the message we received in the event viewer:
"The file testing.doc is infected with '_'. Detected with scan engine 4.1.60
DAT version 4.1.4181 from user Exchange running groupshield 4.5.572.182 OAS"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: virus scan

Personally, if it says it a virus, I don't take a chance. I also do
quarantine. If its important, the sender can fix the file and resend it. In
any case, I would delete this file and get a fresh copy.

-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: virus scan

I was told that this was not a virus and that it was a problem with the
detection message where no detection name is given, is an error message that
is given by the engine and misinterpreted by the GUI product, not a
detection by the DAT files. The files are now in quarantine, so can i send
out the file or is it infected with a virus?

I am running groupshield exchange.

This is the message we received in the event viewer:
"The file testing.doc is infected with '_'. Detected with scan engine 4.1.60
DAT version 4.1.4181 from user Exchange running groupshield 4.5.572.182 OAS"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: virus scan

2002-01-17 Thread Wayne Hanks


Try scanning the file with another Antivirus product.  I would suggest
connecting to the trendmicro site (www.antivirus.com) and using their
housecall? product for a quick check if you don't have access to another
vendor's antivirus product.
 

cheers 

Wayne Hanks 
Systems Administrator 
Paterson Ord Minnett 
Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
"Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 11:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: virus scan


I was told that this was not a virus and that it was a problem with the
detection message where no detection name is given, is an
error message that is given by the engine and misinterpreted by the GUI
product, not a detection by the DAT files. The files are now in
quarantine, so can i send out the file or is it infected with a virus?

I am running groupshield exchange.

This is the message we received in the event viewer:
"The file testing.doc is infected with '_'. Detected with scan engine
4.1.60 DAT version 4.1.4181 from user Exchange running groupshield
4.5.572.182 OAS"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

virus scan

2002-01-17 Thread aci


I was told that this was not a virus and that it was a problem with the
detection message where no detection name is given, is an
error message that is given by the engine and misinterpreted by the GUI
product, not a detection by the DAT files. The files are now in
quarantine, so can i send out the file or is it infected with a virus?

I am running groupshield exchange.

This is the message we received in the event viewer:
"The file testing.doc is infected with '_'. Detected with scan engine
4.1.60 DAT version 4.1.4181 from user Exchange running groupshield
4.5.572.182 OAS"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved

Jason Dwyer, Super Sleuth.

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved

Hi all,
As many of you suggested, some sleuthing was required.  What I
discovered is that in the Winnt folder there were thousands of wfv*
folders.  A little further research found that backup exec from veritas was
the cause.

Backup exec has its own virus scanner which I run before backup, as a
secondary scanning method, apparently when it finds a *.cab file that it
doesn't like it copies it to a wfv folder 

voila... some time later, no space.

Thanks again for all your assistance

Regards,

Jason Dwyer

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

Thanks for all the great ideas, I will download treehack and do some
sleuthing and let you all know how it goes.

Regards,

Jason Dwyer

-Original Message-
From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 2:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

FTP hack was one of the things I thought of pretty quick, and none of us
should be offended to be reminded of security!

In my case it's a "learn as you go" deal.  Someone else set up the server,
I've taken basic Admin classes, but most things I'm just on my own to figure
out.  

Memory dumps is one I hadn't thought of.

-Original Message-
From: Niels Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

Memory dumps in \winnt?

Hidden directories from a hacker uploading files, using that ftp server you
forgot to disable and that anonymous account you forgot to remove?

(Sorry if I offend you by making these suggestions, but sometimes it takes a
slap in the face to see the forest...)

/\/iels

-Original Message-
From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

another thing to check is that your backup software is not writing log files
to c: drive.  My guess is the same as William, I suspect your page file is
using most of the space.  You may also need to look at your system variables
as temp/tmp may be pointing to c:\temp ?

Just suggestions, but I'm sure the install of Exchange still creates a
directory on C: drive, (c:\exchsvr) that contains a number of files.

When you say the folders only amount to ~1Gb, How did you work this out?
Have you looked at the properties for C: drive to see what the OS reports as
free space?  What format is your file system ( FAT, NTFS)?

cheers

Wayne Hanks
Systems Administrator
Paterson Ord Minnett
Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086
"Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy"

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 9:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

sorry I meant E drive is 27gb with lots of free space

Regards,

Jason Dwyer

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 12:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

You don't show an E:\ drive in your explanation.
Is it "Mapped" to "C:\something-or-other" by any chance??

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Urgent Running out of Drive space

Hi all,
I have  a little problem, my C drive on my exhchange server is down
to 9mb... I am starting to panic...

Setup is as follows

IBM Server NT 4 service pack 6a
Exchange 5.5 sp4
C Drive 4gb only 9mb free
D Drive 27Gb 24gb free
We use backup exec 8.6 with the exchange agent.

I have run the optimiser and according to that everything is on the e drive.
When I look at all the folders on the C drive they only amount to just over
1 gig...

Anyone got any ideas??

Regards,

Jason Dwyer

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/excha

RE: Ex 5.5 vs Ex 2000


S many variables.

Does the upgrade path fit your companies' needs?  Exchange2000 is a good
move, but there is a learning curve.  The end users do not really see any
difference aside from OWA.  AD deployment should not be underestimated
either.  

I do not know.  I like to keep plugging away at new technologies.  I say go
for it!

William 


-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ex 5.5 vs Ex 2000


Now I don't want to start any fights, but we are considering implementing
2000 across the office.

I have 50 staff currently running 98 on desktops and NT4 on servers
I will change all servers to 2K and implement AD, but the question is really
what do people think about Ex 2K?

Is it better? is migration ok? secure? stable?

5.5 has been great for me so far... and you know the saying "when you on a
good thing "

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Ex 5.5 vs Ex 2000

2002-01-17 Thread Jason Dwyer


Now I don't want to start any fights, but we are considering implementing
2000 across the office.

I have 50 staff currently running 98 on desktops and NT4 on servers
I will change all servers to 2K and implement AD, but the question is really
what do people think about Ex 2K?

Is it better? is migration ok? secure? stable?

5.5 has been great for me so far... and you know the saying "when you on a
good thing "

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved

2002-01-17 Thread Jason Dwyer


Hi all,
As many of you suggested, some sleuthing was required.  What I
discovered is that in the Winnt folder there were thousands of wfv*
folders.  A little further research found that backup exec from veritas was
the cause.

Backup exec has its own virus scanner which I run before backup, as a
secondary scanning method, apparently when it finds a *.cab file that it
doesn't like it copies it to a wfv folder 

voila... some time later, no space.

Thanks again for all your assistance

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space


Thanks for all the great ideas, I will download treehack and do some
sleuthing and let you all know how it goes.

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



-Original Message-
From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 2:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space


FTP hack was one of the things I thought of pretty quick, and none of us
should be offended to be reminded of security!

In my case it's a "learn as you go" deal.  Someone else set up the server,
I've taken basic Admin classes, but most things I'm just on my own to figure
out.  

Memory dumps is one I hadn't thought of.

-Original Message-
From: Niels Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space



Memory dumps in \winnt?

Hidden directories from a hacker uploading files, using that ftp server you
forgot to disable and that anonymous account you forgot to remove?

(Sorry if I offend you by making these suggestions, but sometimes it takes a
slap in the face to see the forest...)


/\/iels



-Original Message-
From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space


another thing to check is that your backup software is not writing log files
to c: drive.  My guess is the same as William, I suspect your page file is
using most of the space.  You may also need to look at your system variables
as temp/tmp may be pointing to c:\temp ?

Just suggestions, but I'm sure the install of Exchange still creates a
directory on C: drive, (c:\exchsvr) that contains a number of files.

When you say the folders only amount to ~1Gb, How did you work this out?
Have you looked at the properties for C: drive to see what the OS reports as
free space?  What format is your file system ( FAT, NTFS)?
 

cheers

Wayne Hanks
Systems Administrator
Paterson Ord Minnett
Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086
"Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy"

 



-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 9:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space


sorry I meant E drive is 27gb with lots of free space

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 12:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space


You don't show an E:\ drive in your explanation.
Is it "Mapped" to "C:\something-or-other" by any chance??

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Urgent Running out of Drive space


Hi all,
I have  a little problem, my C drive on my exhchange server is down
to 9mb... I am starting to panic...

Setup is as follows

IBM Server NT 4 service pack 6a
Exchange 5.5 sp4
C Drive 4gb only 9mb free
D Drive 27Gb 24gb free
We use backup exec 8.6 with the exchange agent.

I have run the optimiser and according to that everything is on the e drive.
When I look at all the folders on the C drive they only amount to just over
1 gig...

Anyone got any ideas??

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Okay, Thank you very much for the help.  Funny how you don't see things
until someone points it out :]

Thanks,

Danielle Roper
Technical Support
Transworld Systems Inc.
5880 Commerce Blvd.  Bldg. 1
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
T: 707-584-4225 Ext. 160
F: 707-584-5629
P: 707-973-2301
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Profit Recovery services are primarily performed by Transworld Systems Inc.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


No, it just means that if you were to attach to that mailbox with OL98
instead of 2K, you may have some issues with the rules. Don't worry about
that at all.

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


As I was finding out what the message said, I noticed that there was that
option...now my concern is that when I went to set this up it said that the
feature would not be compatible with Outlook 98.  Does that mean it would
affect the people using it or the people receiving it?



Thanks,

Danielle Roper
Technical Support
Transworld Systems Inc.
5880 Commerce Blvd.  Bldg. 1
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
T: 707-584-4225 Ext. 160
F: 707-584-5629
P: 707-973-2301
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Profit Recovery services are primarily performed by Transworld Systems Inc.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Well, there is the problem.
Now, tell me why you need a client only rule for an auto responder. The rule
should be simple, like this Check messages when they arrive and have the
server reply using this  message

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


This rule is a client-only rule, and will process only when Outlook is
running.

Thanks,

Danielle Roper

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Sounds to me like the rule is running as a client side one right now. What
does the rule say>?

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Hi All,

I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on
Exchange.  The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty.  She has
permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her own
email is open.  I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will happen
automatically (server-side) when a client emails Support even if the user
Support is not logged on since Support is not a real user.  The problem is
the auto-response only works when Support is logged in and the Support email
is open.

Any help with this would be and is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Danielle Roper

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

No, it just means that if you were to attach to that mailbox with OL98
instead of 2K, you may have some issues with the rules. Don't worry about
that at all.

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

As I was finding out what the message said, I noticed that there was that
option...now my concern is that when I went to set this up it said that the
feature would not be compatible with Outlook 98.  Does that mean it would
affect the people using it or the people receiving it?

Thanks,

Danielle Roper
Technical Support
Transworld Systems Inc.
5880 Commerce Blvd.  Bldg. 1
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
T: 707-584-4225 Ext. 160
F: 707-584-5629
P: 707-973-2301
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Profit Recovery services are primarily performed by Transworld Systems Inc.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Well, there is the problem.
Now, tell me why you need a client only rule for an auto responder. The rule
should be simple, like this Check messages when they arrive and have the
server reply using this  message

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

This rule is a client-only rule, and will process only when Outlook is
running.

Thanks,

Danielle Roper

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Sounds to me like the rule is running as a client side one right now. What
does the rule say>?

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Hi All,

I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on
Exchange.  The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty.  She has
permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her own
email is open.  I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will happen
automatically (server-side) when a client emails Support even if the user
Support is not logged on since Support is not a real user.  The problem is
the auto-response only works when Support is logged in and the Support email
is open.

Any help with this would be and is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Danielle Roper

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


You have waited too long already for SP4. One improvement in the SP is in
the AVAPI. There is no reason for you to wait any longer. You could do this
in a couple of hours.
Uninstall Scanmail, reboot
Install SP4, Reboot
Install Scanmail
Run Optimizer

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Once again, thanks for the upgrade.  Just found out that I can actually
upgrade to 3.52 for free, but the only other issue is that I HAVE to upgrade
to 5.5 sp4, which I was planning on doing, but know have to do it a little
soon than planned.  We are blocking most of those attachments, I guess only
from coming in, :), but can't do all of them.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Oh yes, and my famous file blocking list as well.

The Martin Blackstone Blocked Files List. Copyright 1999-2002 - Martin
Blackstone Basics vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB

Full List
EML;VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;HLP;HTA;INF;I
NS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;
SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I think 3.51 was a free upgrade. You should see if you can find that. Also,
use AVAPI, MAPI and Message Body scanning.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Well, the scan engine is a few versions back, current is 5.630 and I am at
5.600-1011.  If I remember correct tho, the version I am on cannot upgrade
beyond my version without purchasing the newer version, but I will look into
this more.  

Thanks again,

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine,
etc?

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying
us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves.
I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the
upgrade price.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...


might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Allowing POP3 Access

2002-01-17 Thread Fred Valdez


By default, pop3 is enabled when exchange is installed and IMC is alive ,
make an A record (i.e. mail.domain.com) pointing to your server.

Fred



-Original Message-
From: Jim Traino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Allowing POP3 Access


I have some users asking about POP3 access to the exchange server.  Is this
possible, will it work with outlook express?

Thanks.

Jim 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


As I was finding out what the message said, I noticed that there was that
option...now my concern is that when I went to set this up it said that the
feature would not be compatible with Outlook 98.  Does that mean it would
affect the people using it or the people receiving it?



Thanks,

Danielle Roper
Technical Support
Transworld Systems Inc.
5880 Commerce Blvd.  Bldg. 1
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
T: 707-584-4225 Ext. 160
F: 707-584-5629
P: 707-973-2301
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Profit Recovery services are primarily performed by Transworld Systems Inc.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Well, there is the problem.
Now, tell me why you need a client only rule for an auto responder.
The rule should be simple, like this
Check messages when they arrive and have the server reply using this 
message

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


This rule is a client-only rule, and will process only when Outlook is
running.

Thanks,

Danielle Roper

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Sounds to me like the rule is running as a client side one right now. What
does the rule say>?

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Hi All,

I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on
Exchange.  The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty.  She has
permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her own
email is open.  I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will happen
automatically (server-side) when a client emails Support even if the user
Support is not logged on since Support is not a real user.  The problem is
the auto-response only works when Support is logged in and the Support email
is open.

Any help with this would be and is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Danielle Roper

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Once again, thanks for the upgrade.  Just found out that I can actually
upgrade to 3.52 for free, but the only other issue is that I HAVE to upgrade
to 5.5 sp4, which I was planning on doing, but know have to do it a little
soon than planned.  We are blocking most of those attachments, I guess only
from coming in, :), but can't do all of them.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Oh yes, and my famous file blocking list as well.

The Martin Blackstone Blocked Files List. Copyright 1999-2002 - Martin
Blackstone
Basics
vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB

Full List
EML;VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;HLP;HTA;INF;I
NS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;
SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I think 3.51 was a free upgrade. You should see if you can find that. Also,
use AVAPI, MAPI and Message Body scanning.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Well, the scan engine is a few versions back, current is 5.630 and I am at
5.600-1011.  If I remember correct tho, the version I am on cannot upgrade
beyond my version without purchasing the newer version, but I will look into
this more.  

Thanks again,

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine,
etc?

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying
us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves.
I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the
upgrade price.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...


might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

2002-01-17 Thread Benjamin Zachary


Clarifying what Martin said, when you make the rule up there is an
option to have the server reply using a specific message or template.
That will make it a server side rule. 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Well, there is the problem.
Now, tell me why you need a client only rule for an auto responder.
The rule should be simple, like this
Check messages when they arrive and have the server reply using this 
message

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


This rule is a client-only rule, and will process only when Outlook is
running.

Thanks,

Danielle Roper

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Sounds to me like the rule is running as a client side one right now. What
does the rule say>?

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Hi All,

I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on
Exchange.  The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty.  She has
permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her own
email is open.  I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will happen
automatically (server-side) when a client emails Support even if the user
Support is not logged on since Support is not a real user.  The problem is
the auto-response only works when Support is logged in and the Support email
is open.

Any help with this would be and is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Danielle Roper

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


This rule is a client-only rule, and will process only when Outlook is
running.

Thanks,

Danielle Roper

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Sounds to me like the rule is running as a client side one right now.
What does the rule say>?

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Hi All,

I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on
Exchange.  The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty.  She has
permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her own
email is open.  I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will happen
automatically (server-side) when a client emails Support even if the user
Support is not logged on since Support is not a real user.  The problem is
the auto-response only works when Support is logged in and the Support email
is open.

Any help with this would be and is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Danielle Roper

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Sounds to me like the rule is running as a client side one right now.
What does the rule say>?

-Original Message-
From: Danielle Roper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2000 Auto Response

Hi All,

I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on
Exchange.  The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty.  She has
permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her own
email is open.  I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will happen
automatically (server-side) when a client emails Support even if the user
Support is not logged on since Support is not a real user.  The problem is
the auto-response only works when Support is logged in and the Support email
is open.

Any help with this would be and is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Danielle Roper

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Outlook 2000 Auto Response


Hi All,

I have created a user called Support and a mailbox for that user on
Exchange.  The person checking this inbox is a user named Marty.  She has
permissions to the Support inbox and can view Support's inbox while her
own email is open.  I want to set it up so the auto-response feature will
happen automatically (server-side) when a client emails Support even if
the user Support is not logged on since Support is not a real user.  The
problem is the auto-response only works when Support is logged in and the
Support email is open.

Any help with this would be and is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Danielle Roper

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Oh yes, and my famous file blocking list as well.

The Martin Blackstone Blocked Files List. Copyright 1999-2002 - Martin
Blackstone
Basics
vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB

Full List
EML;VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;HLP;HTA;INF;I
NS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;
SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH;

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I think 3.51 was a free upgrade. You should see if you can find that. Also,
use AVAPI, MAPI and Message Body scanning.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Well, the scan engine is a few versions back, current is 5.630 and I am at
5.600-1011.  If I remember correct tho, the version I am on cannot upgrade
beyond my version without purchasing the newer version, but I will look into
this more.  

Thanks again,

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine,
etc?

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying
us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves.
I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the
upgrade price.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...


might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

I think 3.51 was a free upgrade. You should see if you can find that.
Also, use AVAPI, MAPI and Message Body scanning.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

Well, the scan engine is a few versions back, current is 5.630 and I am at
5.600-1011.  If I remember correct tho, the version I am on cannot upgrade
beyond my version without purchasing the newer version, but I will look into
this more.  

Thanks again,

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine,
etc?

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying
us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves.
I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the
upgrade price.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...

might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Well, the scan engine is a few versions back, current is 5.630 and I am at
5.600-1011.  If I remember correct tho, the version I am on cannot upgrade
beyond my version without purchasing the newer version, but I will look into
this more.  

Thanks again,

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine,
etc?

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying
us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves.
I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the
upgrade price.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...


might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

OK, fair enough. You say you have the latest patterns. What about engine,
etc?

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying
us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves.
I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the
upgrade price.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...

might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: vpn with outlook

2002-01-17 Thread Cicerrella, Steve

Title: RE: vpn with outlook

That's
funny. I had to do the same thing with our vpn. I thought I
was bastardizing name resolution but it worked. I am glad to hear
someone else has the same problem, misery loves company I
guess.

-Original Message-From: Don Guyer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002
1:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: vpn with
outlook
Chris,
I pointed my W98
machine to our WINS server and added an LMHOSTS file, pointing to both
our PDC and Exchange server.
I know, I
know.
Don Guyer Information Systems
Citadel Federal Credit Union Ph:
800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org
-Original Message- From: Chris
Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: vpn with
outlook
I want to run outlook via vpn off 98 I can easially do
this easilly with win 2k pro, but for some reason then
98 will not see the exchange server It will see
everything else. Telnet, FTP, web and pcanywhere. Any
Idea. TIA Chris
__
Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails
in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


Yeah I know, but currently money is so tight that the company stopped buying
us office supplies and each department must purchase these items ourselves.
I have been trying to get this upgrade, but the boss won't spring for the
upgrade price.

MZ

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...


I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...


might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Scanmail problem...

I hate to sound like a broken record, but you 3.5 is an old version

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Scanmail problem...

might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange Scanmail problem...


might be OT, but I am trying to block attachments, both incoming and
outgoing but it appears that we can still send blocked attachments outbound.
Both the sender and the recipient receive a message saying the attachment
has been blocked, but for some reason the recipient still receives the
message.   Incoming messages with attachments ARE being blocked by scanmail.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this issue before, or if maybe this is
just a fluke with my system.  

Scanmail version 3.5 newest virus patterns

TIA,

> Mike Zatkalik
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: exporting gal

2002-01-17 Thread Lathrum Matt-P55173

Title: RE: exporting gal









I went to the charter for
this maillist to see if I could point this person to some archives. It mentions
archives but doesn’t say how to get to them.  Are they available? 

 

-- 

Matt Lathrum

General Dynamics
Decision Systems    


When cryptography is outlawed,


bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.

 

-Original
Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002
3:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exporting gal

 

Start ADMIN in RAW mode (-r) and look at
the Raw properties of the Email Address screen. The headers you need should
show up there. Just add that to the top(header row) of your source spreadsheet
.CSV file you're using to export the data with.

-Original Message- 
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: exporting gal 

 

I am trying to export the gal so that i
can add an additional internet email address for everyone. We are changing from
a .com to a .org. When i export the list i only get one smtp address listed. I
have 4 alias that i use. I don't want to get rid of the old .com just yet. How
can i get all of them to show? Is there an easier way to add a new address for
all of my users?

thanks in advance 

dave 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter
and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Problems with Distribution list

2002-01-17 Thread Crosby, Tim (Sarcom)


Good point.  Thanks for clearing that up for me.  I assumed it would only go
out as rich text if there was rich text in the message.  

Putting in the domain names and setting those to only send in plain text
seems to work for now.  Thanks for your help.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list


Just because she didn't use any Rich Text "features" doesn't mean that the
message wasn't in Rich Text.

I hope that works for you.  :-)

-Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl
Immigration site:  
The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while:

Tiggercam:  
-
Not only does the English Language borrow words from other languages, it
sometimes chases them down dark alleys, hits them over the head, and goes
through their pockets. -- Eddy Peters 
-


-Original Message-
From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list


I have now. :)

Seems to indicate that rich text was included with the original message.
But I looked at the item she sent, and there were no colors, bold, underline
etc. in the message so I'm not sure where that is coming from.

I have now gone into the IMS and put in entries for the domains having
trouble to always send in plain text.  I hope that will fix the problem.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list


Have you searched TechNet for ms-tnef?

-Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl
Immigration site:  
The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while:

Tiggercam:  
-
Things are going to get a lot worse before they get worse. -Lily Tomlin 
-


-Original Message-
From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list


Oh, and by the way, I just looked at one of the replies back from someone
who couldn't open the attachment.  This appears where the attachment would
normally be:

> >

> >
> >Part 1.2Type: application/ms-tnef
> >Encoding: base64
>
>   
> Name: Club Pub Services.doc
>Club Pub Services.docType: Winword File (application/msword)
> Encoding: base64

-Original Message-
From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Problems with Distribution list


Got a strange one that I'm hoping someone has the solution for.  One of our
users regularly sends out attachments to a bunch of external email address
that are not setup as custom recipients on our system.  She has a personal
distribution list that she uses which contains all the addresses.  Some of
the people that she sends to report that the attachment arrives at their end
with an attachment named "C.DTF" instead of the file she attached.

Q259065 says this can happen when sending Rich Text messages to a Lotus
Notes MTA.  But I checked the last time she sent a message and verified that
it was all in plain text.  She still says some people reported getting the
C.DTF file.  But it only seems to happen when sending to the group as a
whole.  When people send her replies saying they couldn't open the file, she
then replies directly to that person with the original attachment, and they
always receive that one fine.  From looking at the DL, it looks to have
about 65 addresses in it.  

Anyone seen this one before?  Should I try putting those names in our system
as custom recipients?  Or maybe creating a DL on the exchange server with
all those names in it?  

By the way, Exchange 5.5, SP4 running on W2K server, SP2.  Client is Outlook
2000.  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Ray Zorz

Yell - Hey ClusterBoy! and maybe he'll help.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange

My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do, and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Falkenberg


If you are using the Scan Mail eManager anti Spam filtering and you have
recently updated the rules update them again to verify you have the latest
version.  The previous version 217 was blocking hotmail.com, yahoo.com and
other list servers. The current version is 218 and appears to be working
properly.

Bob Falkenberg

-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail


My .02 worth.. once a month I down the entire network and reboot... I
avoid exactly these problems for that reason... as for technet web
interface, I have the CD subscription so I never use it.


Thanks!
Joe Irvine
http://www.tbopayroll.com/
609-597-1155

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

Hello folks,

We are at 30 days up time in my Exchange 5.5 environment. I am starting
to
get calls again from folks saying they are not receiving Internet
E-mail.
The inbound and outbound queues are empty and the CPU usage is not
pegged
through the roof.  The mail may appear hours/days later or not at all
until
the servers are rebooted.
It seems to effect 4 or 5 people at random and gets worse the closer to
40
days up time we get.  I can reboot the servers and it goes away until we
get
to 30+ days uptime again.

Exchange 5.5 sp4 site running on NT4.0 SP6a servers.  The user servers
are
running ScanMail 3.51 with eManger 3.1.  The IMC server is not running
any
anti virus.

Any ideas? And does anyone really like the new MS TechNet web interface?

Bob Falkenberg

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange SPAM Blocker Option

2002-01-17 Thread Rick Ward - HQ










Hi Gang,

I'm looking for a solid/good
Exchange Solution for SPAM blocking. Also any WEB sites you would use to find
such products would be good. If this body's opinion is that I should go
to a LINUX based solution, like SPAM assassin, I will.. but I'm trying to
stick with a single product solution.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Rick Ward, ext. 8225

Senior Systems Engineer

Email  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"It's not that I'm so smart , it's just that I stay with problems
longer . -Einstein"




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exch2k and SP2, is it safe?




There 
is a risk of increased stability and improved performance!  Oh and watch 
out for those nasty 'new email' alerts in OWA!
 
sp2 
has been good to me.
 
William
 
 
-Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:16 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exch2k and SP2, is 
it safe?

What is the consensus, is it safe to installed SP2 for 
Exch2k?
 
Thanks...
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exch2k and SP2, is it safe?

2002-01-17 Thread Michael Morisoli









What is the consensus, is it safe
to installed SP2 for Exch2k?

 

Thanks…




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Adams, Shawn

Title: RE: Clustering Exchange





I currenlty have 9 exchange clusters. I am using Ms Clustering.. It works.. not to bad.. When you failover you do have a little response time isue but its a few sec. You have to de side on what type of clustering you want..

Active / passive
Active / Active


I am using Active / Passive...  Active / Active does cost a lot but better repsonse time and reliablily. 


I have files/home dir and over 1000 printers on the cluster.. It took around 45 min to fail them over.
NOTE: I diddn't set these up.. Also my hardware is some what old. I have had some cluster corruption but as far as aexchange it been fine.. It mostly comes down to how much do they want to spend compared to how they feel reliablity.


Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Todd Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange



I have installed the NSI Double-Take solution for exchange.  It's a really slick package as long as you set it up properly.  We have failed over the exchange services twice with very successful results.  This was on an NT 4.0 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP3 environment.  The target server is the File and Print server.  You will lose a little response time while failed over but it's only temporary while you repair the original exchange server.

This product works with most applications.


Todd


>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/17/02 09:49AM >>>
If you have a lot of money there are several solutions.


http://www.directplus.compaq.com/dstore/default.asp?page=ctoBases&Produc 
tLineId=431&Family_Id=650


http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3670 


http://www.nsisoftware.com/main/pages/Products/DTspec.html 


No I'm not a sales person.


Darrin Carter
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA
Senior Systems Engineer
Elegrity, Inc.
415.821.0900 (main)
415.826.7758 (fax)
415.726.0413 (direct)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.elegrity.com 




-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange



My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do,
and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

owa and re

2002-01-17 Thread gordon chan


I have a question about OWA and Raiser's Edge Web.   If i have them both
on one server what are the issues if any for access them both behind a
firewall?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Kopec, David

We run www.marathontechnologies.com.   Better than clustered.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange

Didn't we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other
list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO NOT built
a cluster server period. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange

My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do,
and how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help
would be appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange 2000 SP2 support for OWA Spell Checker

2002-01-17 Thread David N Precht


FYI

To: "Announcement list for our OWA Spellchecker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 
 
 


The latest version of the OWA Spellchecker has support
for Exchange
Server 2000 Service Pack 2.  If you have purchased the
OWA 
Spellchecker,
please send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and once
we have verified
that you are a registered user, we will forward you
the latest version
with Service Pack 2 support.  Please include as much
information as
possible about the purchase (company name, invoice
number, anything 
that
is convenient) to expedite the verification.



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange


Using F5 load balancers

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange



An OWA web farm?


-Original Message-
From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange



I disagree. You can have fantastic clusters with up to thirty two machines
that will give you no trouble at all.

Of course, you have to be running OpenVMS, and so far, Exchange doesn't run
under that, but hey...

> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 January 2002 17:37
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
> 
> 
> Didn't we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other 
> list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO NOT 
> built a cluster server period.
> 
> Milton R Dogg
> Of The Dogg Foundation..
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Clustering Exchange
> 
> 
> My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get
> new Exchange
> Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never 
> clustered
> servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just 
> wanted to get
> everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard 
> is it to do,
> and how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help
> would be appreciated.
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Todd Wood


I have installed the NSI Double-Take solution for exchange.  It's a really slick 
package as long as you set it up properly.  We have failed over the exchange services 
twice with very successful results.  This was on an NT 4.0 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP3 
environment.  The target server is the File and Print server.  You will lose a little 
response time while failed over but it's only temporary while you repair the original 
exchange server.

This product works with most applications.

Todd

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/17/02 09:49AM >>>
If you have a lot of money there are several solutions.

http://www.directplus.compaq.com/dstore/default.asp?page=ctoBases&Produc 
tLineId=431&Family_Id=650

http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3670 

http://www.nsisoftware.com/main/pages/Products/DTspec.html 

No I'm not a sales person.

Darrin Carter
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA
Senior Systems Engineer
Elegrity, Inc.
415.821.0900 (main)
415.826.7758 (fax)
415.726.0413 (direct)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.elegrity.com 



-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange


My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do,
and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange



An OWA web farm?


-Original Message-
From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange



I disagree. You can have fantastic clusters with up to thirty two
machines that will give you no trouble at all.

Of course, you have to be running OpenVMS, and so far, Exchange doesn't
run under that, but hey...

> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 17 January 2002 17:37
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
> 
> 
> Didn't we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other
> list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO 
> NOT built
> a cluster server period. 
> 
> Milton R Dogg
> Of The Dogg Foundation..
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Clustering Exchange
> 
> 
> My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get 
> new Exchange
> Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never 
> clustered
> servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just 
> wanted to get
> everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard 
> is it to do,
> and how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help
> would be appreciated.
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Benjamin Winzenz

Title: RE: Clustering Exchange









However, the level of "cluster-aware"
is very dependant on the person that is setting it up.  I can think of
some that I would not want setting up any types of clusters.



Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002
12:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange

 

For 5.5 I
say NIYET - Is it doable but you gain no real advantages in doing it, as 5.5
isn't truly "cluster aware". 

For
XCHG2000 I say DAH - "IF" you have a solid cluster solution with
known HCL Server hardware. I recommend Compaq's cluster solutions as I have the
most/best experiences with it overall and the FIBRE channel connectivity is
SWEET.

XCHG2000
is cluster aware. 

Plan to
spend lotsomoney on your hardware however.. it ain't cheap. 

-Rick

-Original Message-

From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002
9:33 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Clustering Exchange


My
immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange

Servers that we should have them
clustered.  Now I have never clustered 
servers before and wouldn't know
how to start, but I just wanted to get 
everyone's opinions on the subject
to begin with.  How hard is it to do, and 
how is it to maintain.  What
are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be 
appreciated. 

List
Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Martin Reilly



I disagree. You can have fantastic clusters with up to thirty two
machines that will give you no trouble at all.

Of course, you have to be running OpenVMS, and so far, Exchange doesn't
run under that, but hey...

> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 17 January 2002 17:37
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
> 
> 
> Didn't we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other
> list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO 
> NOT built
> a cluster server period. 
> 
> Milton R Dogg
> Of The Dogg Foundation..
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Clustering Exchange
> 
> 
> My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get 
> new Exchange
> Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never 
> clustered
> servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just 
> wanted to get
> everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard 
> is it to do,
> and how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help
> would be appreciated.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Allowing POP3 Access

Yes, Exchange is an RFC compliant IMAP4 and POP3 server.  It will work with
any RFC compliant POP client from incredimail to outlook express to pine.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Traino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Allowing POP3 Access

I have some users asking about POP3 access to the exchange server.  Is this
possible, will it work with outlook express?

Thanks.

Jim 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Allowing POP3 Access

2002-01-17 Thread Jim Traino


I have some users asking about POP3 access to the exchange server.  Is this
possible, will it work with outlook express?

Thanks.

Jim 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Rick Ward - HQ

Title: RE: Clustering Exchange





For 5.5 I say NIYET - Is it doable but you gain no real advantages in doing it, as 5.5 isn't truly "cluster aware".


For XCHG2000 I say DAH - "IF" you have a solid cluster solution with known HCL Server hardware. I recommend Compaq's cluster solutions as I have the most/best experiences with it overall and the FIBRE channel connectivity is SWEET.

XCHG2000 is cluster aware.


Plan to spend lotsomoney on your hardware however.. it ain't cheap.


-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange


My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do, and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Darrin J. Carter


If you have a lot of money there are several solutions.

http://www.directplus.compaq.com/dstore/default.asp?page=ctoBases&Produc
tLineId=431&Family_Id=650

http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3670

http://www.nsisoftware.com/main/pages/Products/DTspec.html

No I'm not a sales person.

Darrin Carter
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA
Senior Systems Engineer
Elegrity, Inc.
415.821.0900 (main)
415.826.7758 (fax)
415.726.0413 (direct)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.elegrity.com



-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange


My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do,
and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Milton R Dogg


Didnt we just go over this, this morning?? Oh that was on the other
list. There is no good cluster other then the single node. DO NOT built
a cluster server period. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering Exchange


My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do,
and how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help
would be appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

exchange 2000 certificate and encryption

2002-01-17 Thread Jimmy Dejesus


HI, I'd like to know if I need a certificate on setting up exchange 2000
for email encryption and ssl.  Can I use the certificate services that is
included with windows 2000?  what is the best way of encrypting email and
also supporting secure socket layer?  Thanks for the input.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

2002-01-17 Thread Joe Irvine


My .02 worth.. once a month I down the entire network and reboot... I
avoid exactly these problems for that reason... as for technet web
interface, I have the CD subscription so I never use it.


Thanks!
Joe Irvine
http://www.tbopayroll.com/
609-597-1155

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

Hello folks,

We are at 30 days up time in my Exchange 5.5 environment. I am starting
to
get calls again from folks saying they are not receiving Internet
E-mail.
The inbound and outbound queues are empty and the CPU usage is not
pegged
through the roof.  The mail may appear hours/days later or not at all
until
the servers are rebooted.
It seems to effect 4 or 5 people at random and gets worse the closer to
40
days up time we get.  I can reboot the servers and it goes away until we
get
to 30+ days uptime again.

Exchange 5.5 sp4 site running on NT4.0 SP6a servers.  The user servers
are
running ScanMail 3.51 with eManger 3.1.  The IMC server is not running
any
anti virus.

Any ideas? And does anyone really like the new MS TechNet web interface?

Bob Falkenberg

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Callan, Chris


My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do, and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alias template has changed

2002-01-17 Thread Jim Busick


Thanks. It was set correct in my Admin, but my tech had her's set for FirstN
and she has always just changed the alias when she added.

> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> Tools / Options in the Admin program, but can't remember from then
> onwards (auto-naming or something??)
> 
> HelpI'm losing my 5.5 memory...!
> 
> Neil Hobson
> 
> Silversands
> http://www.silversands.co.uk
> Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
> For Enterprise Systems
> For Collaborative Solutions
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 17 January 2002 17:01
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Alias template has changed
> Subject: RE: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> Sorry, Ex5.5/sp4
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Alias template has changed
> > 
> > 
> > I don't remember what version you have.
> > 
> > (Site addressing?)
> > 
> > William
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Alias template has changed
> > 
> > 
> > Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from
> > FName to FirstN
> > and I don't remember how to change the template.
> > 
> > Jim Busick
> > Database Network Analyst, MCSE
> > Santee School District
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
> subsidiary companies.
> If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
> Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alias template has changed

2002-01-17 Thread Rochford, Paul

Title: RE: Alias template has changed





I think that's what it defaults to in a new exchange admin client install. 


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 17:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alias template has changed



You are exactly correct.  You shouldn't doubt yourself. ;)



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alias template has changed



Tools / Options in the Admin program, but can't remember from then
onwards (auto-naming or something??)


HelpI'm losing my 5.5 memory...!


Neil Hobson


Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions


-Original Message-
From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 17 January 2002 17:01
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Alias template has changed
Subject: RE: Alias template has changed



Sorry, Ex5.5/sp4


> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> I don't remember what version you have.
> 
> (Site addressing?)
> 
> William
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from
> FName to FirstN
> and I don't remember how to change the template.
> 
> Jim Busick
> Database Network Analyst, MCSE
> Santee School District
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please 
notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this E-mail 
from your system. Thank you.
It is possible for data transmitted by email to be deliberately or
accidentally corrupted or intercepted. For this reason, where the
communication is by email, the Bank of Ireland Group does not accept 
any responsibility for any breach of confidence which may arise 
through the use of this medium.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept 
 for the presence of known computer viruses.

  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alias template has changed


You are exactly correct.  You shouldn't doubt yourself. ;)


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alias template has changed


Tools / Options in the Admin program, but can't remember from then
onwards (auto-naming or something??)

HelpI'm losing my 5.5 memory...!

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 17 January 2002 17:01
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Alias template has changed
Subject: RE: Alias template has changed


Sorry, Ex5.5/sp4

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> I don't remember what version you have.
> 
> (Site addressing?)
> 
> William
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from
> FName to FirstN
> and I don't remember how to change the template.
> 
> Jim Busick
> Database Network Analyst, MCSE
> Santee School District
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alias template has changed

2002-01-17 Thread Neil Hobson


Tools / Options in the Admin program, but can't remember from then
onwards (auto-naming or something??)

HelpI'm losing my 5.5 memory...!

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 17 January 2002 17:01
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Alias template has changed
Subject: RE: Alias template has changed


Sorry, Ex5.5/sp4

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> I don't remember what version you have.
> 
> (Site addressing?)
> 
> William
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from
> FName to FirstN
> and I don't remember how to change the template.
> 
> Jim Busick
> Database Network Analyst, MCSE
> Santee School District
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alias template has changed

2002-01-17 Thread Jim Busick


Sorry, Ex5.5/sp4

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> I don't remember what version you have.
> 
> (Site addressing?)
> 
> William 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Alias template has changed
> 
> 
> Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from 
> FName to FirstN
> and I don't remember how to change the template.
> 
> Jim Busick
> Database Network Analyst, MCSE
> Santee School District
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Alias template has changed


I don't remember what version you have.

(Site addressing?)

William 


-Original Message-
From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Alias template has changed


Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from FName to FirstN
and I don't remember how to change the template.

Jim Busick
Database Network Analyst, MCSE
Santee School District

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Alias template has changed

2002-01-17 Thread Jim Busick


Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has changed from FName to FirstN
and I don't remember how to change the template.

Jim Busick
Database Network Analyst, MCSE
Santee School District


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: custom installation wizard

2002-01-17 Thread Brian Dewar

Title: RE: custom installation wizard





This might help you.


http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q234370


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: custom installation wizard



Hi,


just a quick question.


when using the custom installation wizard to deploy outlook 2000 can I specify the mailbox name as %username%?


Thanks


Stu


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Falkenberg

Multiple at random complaints.. beginning to wonder if the ScanMail is
the problem.

Bob F. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

Is it just one user complaining or are you getting multiple complaints?

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

Application logs show online maintenance occurring nightly for as far back
as I care to look.  There are no MTA or IS errors or warnings.  One of the
things I left out of the previous email is that the Tracking logs show the
delivery of the email to the users inbox at approximately the time he told
me it was sent.

Bob F. 

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

anything in the application event log?  online maintenance is happening each
night?

William 

-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

Hello folks, 

We are at 30 days up time in my Exchange 5.5 environment. I am starting to
get calls again from folks saying they are not receiving Internet E-mail.
The inbound and outbound queues are empty and the CPU usage is not pegged
through the roof.  The mail may appear hours/days later or not at all until
the servers are rebooted. It seems to effect 4 or 5 people at random and
gets worse the closer to 40 days up time we get.  I can reboot the servers
and it goes away until we get to 30+ days uptime again.

Exchange 5.5 sp4 site running on NT4.0 SP6a servers.  The user servers are
running ScanMail 3.51 with eManger 3.1.  The IMC server is not running any
anti virus.

Any ideas? And does anyone really like the new MS TechNet web interface?

Bob Falkenberg

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Finding Inactive Accounts

2002-01-17 Thread Wojasinski, Bob




Is there a way to find accounts that haven't been used for a specified
period of time??  I'd like to nuke accounts that haven't been used for six
months or more.   I haven't found this information.  Since Arcserve IT and
other processes log into the users accounts the last login time isn't
accurate.


Thanks!

Bob Wojasinski CNE, CCNA, MCP Exchange..blah, blah, blah.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000

2002-01-17 Thread Neil Hobson


Does the ALL-IN-1 source extractor provided on the E2k CD do the trick?

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Nadeem Rehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 17 January 2002 16:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000
Subject: Re: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000


To All:
 
 
Anyone know how to migrate users from DEC all-in-one directly to
Microsoft
Exchange 2000. 
 
Regards
Nadeem
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

2002-01-17 Thread Rick Ward - HQ

Title: RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!





Yep.. Bob hit it on the mark(or Bob).. that's your issue.


-Original Message-
From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!


James,


Update to SP6 (NT) on all the servers.  Then update to SP4 on your
Exchange 5.5 AND on the OWA/IIS box.


This should fix it.


This is a known issue with Exchange / NT and lower SPs.



Bob Fronk, MCSE 
BTR Technologies, Inc.


 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: James Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!


I am Using exchange 5.5 sp3 on one server and IIS4 with OWA 5.5 sp3 on
another server. OS is NT4.
OWA has just stopped, I rebooted both machines - still no joy.
I then restored a backup - still no joy.
The only error message that comes up if you leave it long enough is;
error 'ASP 0113'
Script timed out
/exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp
The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You can
change this limit by specifying a new value for the property
Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS administration
tools.
I have checked the timeouts and they are fine.
ANY IDEAS???


Regards,


James Palmer 


E-mail  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  





This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000




I know 
DEC-all about that.
 
-Original Message-From: Nadeem 
Rehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 
17, 2002 8:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000

To 
All:
 
 
Anyone know 
how to migrate users from DEC all-in-one directly to 
Microsoft
Exchange 2000. 

 
Regards
Nadeem
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000

2002-01-17 Thread Nadeem Rehman









To All:

 

 

Anyone know how to migrate users from DEC all-in-one
directly to Microsoft

Exchange 2000. 

 

Regards

Nadeem




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange Control Codes


A long shot but does anyone here have a list of
control codes that you can send to Exchange services using the
Control Service API call.

I used to have a list but can't find it any more.

Kevin

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange setup question

2002-01-17 Thread Benjamin Winzenz


Try just right-clicking on the message and choosing options.  Works in both
Outlook XP and 2000.  BTW - the CTRL-F3 doesn't work for me either.  You
sure you didn't set up a Macro or something Jeff?

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: Hanief Chowdhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange setup question

Nope that doesn't even work either..

-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange setup question


Ctrl-F3?  I have never seen that one before and I can't get it to popup on
Outlook XP.  I will have to try it on 2000 later.  

-Original Message-
From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange setup question


I like to use the Ctrl-F3 combination to
popup the header details in Outlook.  This
can be done from the Preview Pane as well
from the message.

--
Jeff Eggleston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

!retupmoc eht ni deppart m'I !pleH

==
"Lefkovics, William"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:220038@exchangelist...

Message headers are easily viewed from the
client.

Outlook2000 for example, from the message:
View-->Options

Outlook Express I think it's:
File-->Properties-->Details

If you have SMTP logging maxxed, you could
get the info there as well.

William



-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange setup question


Hello!

Way back in the day when our Exchange server
was installed, it was installed
with the vgreen.com domain.  We are now the
villagegreen.com domain.  Does
this really matter?  I think it does.  It
seems like when we send e-mail, it
says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is this true?
How can I check this?  When
an admin friend of mine replies to my mail,
he sees the following message in
his firewall logs:

vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa
216.216.191.226: can't verify reverse
address - hostname not found

Where is this reverse lookup looking?

Is there a way to change Exchange, without
reinstalling to reflect the
villagegreen.com domain?

p.s.  What is the best way to look at the
headers of e-mail messages?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list
_charter.htm





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


 
This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you
are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete
this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation. 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Internet mail question

2002-01-17 Thread Briggs, Bruce


I would expect this to work, too.
I wonder what is going on
Are there any messages in the firewall log to help.
Can you Ping or traceroute to your firewall external from someplace upstream
from the Provide A router?
Why does the DNS entry need to be changed? The IP addr of your SMTP server
does not seem to be changed from the info you have provided.

Bruce Briggs
System Administration
State University of NY

-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Internet mail question


I currently have to active connections to the 'net: one through provider A
(whom we've had for some time but are phasing out) and one through provider
B (whom we're phasing in).  Both have active connections tot he network
segment where the unprotected interface of my firewall lives.

E-mail comes and goes just fine through Provider A when I set its router as
the default gateway on my firewall.

When I set up provider B's router as my default gateway I can send e-mails
fine, but can't receive them.

I know that the required DNS changes showing my new addresses haven't
filtered through yet.  My question is, when I'm using my new provider as my
default route to the 'net and some one sends an e-mail to me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], shouldn't it still be able to come in via my old (and
still activeand connected) internet connection and be delivered to my
exchange server?

Configuration:

Exposed firewalla.b.c.180
/29 network
Old connection (A)  a.b.c.179  /29
network
New connection  (B) a.b.c.177 /29
network

I'm probably missing something totally obvious here, but hey, a chance to
learn is a chance to learn.

Thanks.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

e2k OWA password change issues

2002-01-17 Thread Preston Jeffares


Environment:

Exchange 2k
Front-end/Back-end topology
Front-end is in a DMZ with all the necessary ports
Front-end requires SSL
Everything is working fine EXCEPT:

When you go to options and click on "Change Password" a small window pops up and says 
"page not found"

Anyone else seen this?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

2002-01-17 Thread Kent, Larry SYNETICS

You may have a corrupt metabase.bin file.

-Original Message-
From: James Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

I am Using exchange 5.5 sp3 on one server and IIS4 with OWA 5.5 sp3 on
another server. OS is NT4.
OWA has just stopped, I rebooted both machines - still no joy.
I then restored a backup - still no joy.
The only error message that comes up if you leave it long enough is;
error 'ASP 0113'
Script timed out
/exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp
The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You can
change this limit by specifying a new value for the property
Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS administration
tools.
I have checked the timeouts and they are fine.
ANY IDEAS???

Regards,

James Palmer 

E-mail  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service
is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook Web Access

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Fronk \(BTR Technologies, Inc\)


http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;q259506


Bob Fronk, MCSE 
BTR Technologies, Inc.

 
 

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access

Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and
implementing Outlook Web Access?
We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message
that
says

Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related
fixes required for Outlook Web
Access.

The only thing that I could find in TechNet referred to NT 4.0 and said
the
cause of the problem is that
you don't have service pack 3 or later installed.  OWA must be thinking
that
the SP2 we are running
is applying to an NT 4.0 system, when in fact, it is applying to a
Windows
2000 system.  Has
anybody seen this before and been able to work around it?

Thanks!

Robert


*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***

This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail
message contain confidential information belonging to the originator,
and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information.
It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the
recipient(s).  If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the
taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically
mailed information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the
electronic mail message from your system.

*** The Dayton Power & Light Company. ***

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Fronk \(BTR Technologies, Inc\)


James,

Update to SP6 (NT) on all the servers.  Then update to SP4 on your
Exchange 5.5 AND on the OWA/IIS box.

This should fix it.

This is a known issue with Exchange / NT and lower SPs.


Bob Fronk, MCSE 
BTR Technologies, Inc.

 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: James Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

I am Using exchange 5.5 sp3 on one server and IIS4 with OWA 5.5 sp3 on
another server. OS is NT4.
OWA has just stopped, I rebooted both machines - still no joy.
I then restored a backup - still no joy.
The only error message that comes up if you leave it long enough is;
error 'ASP 0113'
Script timed out
/exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp
The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You can
change this limit by specifying a new value for the property
Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS administration
tools.
I have checked the timeouts and they are fine.
ANY IDEAS???

Regards,

James Palmer 

E-mail  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  




This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange setup question

2002-01-17 Thread Hanief Chowdhary

Nope that doesn't even work either..

-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange setup question

Ctrl-F3?  I have never seen that one before and I can't get it to popup on
Outlook XP.  I will have to try it on 2000 later.  

-Original Message-
From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange setup question

I like to use the Ctrl-F3 combination to
popup the header details in Outlook.  This
can be done from the Preview Pane as well
from the message.

--
Jeff Eggleston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

!retupmoc eht ni deppart m'I !pleH

==
"Lefkovics, William"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:220038@exchangelist...

Message headers are easily viewed from the
client.

Outlook2000 for example, from the message:
View-->Options

Outlook Express I think it's:
File-->Properties-->Details

If you have SMTP logging maxxed, you could
get the info there as well.

William

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange setup question

Hello!

Way back in the day when our Exchange server
was installed, it was installed
with the vgreen.com domain.  We are now the
villagegreen.com domain.  Does
this really matter?  I think it does.  It
seems like when we send e-mail, it
says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is this true?
How can I check this?  When
an admin friend of mine replies to my mail,
he sees the following message in
his firewall logs:

vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa
216.216.191.226: can't verify reverse
address - hostname not found

Where is this reverse lookup looking?

Is there a way to change Exchange, without
reinstalling to reflect the
villagegreen.com domain?

p.s.  What is the best way to look at the
headers of e-mail messages?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list
_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you
are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete
this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook XP Question/Oddity

2002-01-17 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry

Title: Message



Hmm, 
no, I haven't, have just downloaded the Office XP SP1 that includes all the 
Outlook updates.  Will install and see what happens.  

 
Thanks,
Sherry

  
  -Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 4:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Outlook XP Question/Oddity
  One 
  question, do you have the latest update for Outlook XP installed?  We did 
  install the updates and it improved performance as well as some other issues 
  with Outlook XP.
   
  Peter Dahl.
  

-Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:32 PMTo: 
'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: RE: Outlook XP 
Question/Oddity
I 
have never seen this happen with Outlook XP, we are running against Exchange 
2000 though.  Not sure if that makes the difference or if this is just 
a hit/miss "feature" of Outlook.
 
Peter Dahl.

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 4:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Outlook XP Question/Oddity
  I have 
  seen where it will not mark an emailed replied to after replying - I have 
  had to go into my sent items to make sure I didn't imagine sending the 
  reply.  
   
  Exact 
  same setup.
   
   
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
  IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio 
  Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
  Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  I put up my thumb... 
  and it blotted out the planet Earth. --Neil Armstrong 
  
  

-Original Message-From: Moody, 
Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook XP 
Question/Oddity
If you  have an e-mail that has happened to that would be OK 
to send to an anonymous person, then forward it to me.  Better yet, 
do a resend if possible.  I'll reply and see if it happens 
here.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook XP 
  Question/Oddity
  No, I can't replicate it, it really seems to be a random 
  occurrence.
  

-Original Message-From: Moody, 
Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook XP 
Question/Oddity
I am running the identical setup and have not had that 
problem.  Do you have any steps to try to replicate 
it?

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 1:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Outlook XP 
  Question/Oddity
  I have 
  a question about Outlook XP.  Sometimes when I reply to a 
  message in Outlook XP, it will bold the original message in my 
  inbox like it has not been read, but it does not do this all the 
  time, others on my team running Outlook XP have experienced the 
  same thing.  Has anyone seen this/know what causes 
  it?
   
  Server:  Exchange 5.5 sp4, NT 4.0 
  sp6
  Workstations:  Windows 2K sp2, Office/Outlook 
  XP
   
  It's 
  not causing any problems, just an oddity that I can't seem to find 
  a rhyme or reason to, but when Office/Outlook XP gets rolled out 
  to my user base I know it will become an issue.  I have done 
  a TechNet search, but apparently it's either not been reported to 
  MS, or I'm not using the right search phrase.
   
  Thanks 
  for any input,
   
  Sherry 
  Abercrombie
  Data Center 
  Administration Team
  Information 
  Technology
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-s

RE: Exchange setup question

2002-01-17 Thread Dahl, Peter

Ctrl-F3?  I have never seen that one before and I can't get it to popup on
Outlook XP.  I will have to try it on 2000 later.  

-Original Message-
From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange setup question

I like to use the Ctrl-F3 combination to
popup the header details in Outlook.  This
can be done from the Preview Pane as well
from the message.

--
Jeff Eggleston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

!retupmoc eht ni deppart m'I !pleH

==
"Lefkovics, William"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:220038@exchangelist...

Message headers are easily viewed from the
client.

Outlook2000 for example, from the message:
View-->Options

Outlook Express I think it's:
File-->Properties-->Details

If you have SMTP logging maxxed, you could
get the info there as well.

William

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange setup question

Hello!

Way back in the day when our Exchange server
was installed, it was installed
with the vgreen.com domain.  We are now the
villagegreen.com domain.  Does
this really matter?  I think it does.  It
seems like when we send e-mail, it
says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is this true?
How can I check this?  When
an admin friend of mine replies to my mail,
he sees the following message in
his firewall logs:

vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa
216.216.191.226: can't verify reverse
address - hostname not found

Where is this reverse lookup looking?

Is there a way to change Exchange, without
reinstalling to reflect the
villagegreen.com domain?

p.s.  What is the best way to look at the
headers of e-mail messages?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list
_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you
are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete
this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

custom installation wizard

2002-01-17 Thread Stuart Pittwood


Hi,

just a quick question.

when using the custom installation wizard to deploy outlook 2000 can I specify the 
mailbox name as %username%?

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange Backup

2002-01-17 Thread Brian Bauer


Anyone using HP Omniback for excahnge backup?  If so how do you like it?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Exchange setup question

2002-01-17 Thread Jeffegg


I like to use the Ctrl-F3 combination to
popup the header details in Outlook.  This
can be done from the Preview Pane as well
from the message.

--
Jeff Eggleston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

!retupmoc eht ni deppart m'I !pleH

==
"Lefkovics, William"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:220038@exchangelist...

Message headers are easily viewed from the
client.

Outlook2000 for example, from the message:
View-->Options

Outlook Express I think it's:
File-->Properties-->Details

If you have SMTP logging maxxed, you could
get the info there as well.

William



-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange setup question


Hello!

Way back in the day when our Exchange server
was installed, it was installed
with the vgreen.com domain.  We are now the
villagegreen.com domain.  Does
this really matter?  I think it does.  It
seems like when we send e-mail, it
says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is this true?
How can I check this?  When
an admin friend of mine replies to my mail,
he sees the following message in
his firewall logs:

vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa
216.216.191.226: can't verify reverse
address - hostname not found

Where is this reverse lookup looking?

Is there a way to change Exchange, without
reinstalling to reflect the
villagegreen.com domain?

p.s.  What is the best way to look at the
headers of e-mail messages?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list
_charter.htm





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!

2002-01-17 Thread James Palmer


I am Using exchange 5.5 sp3 on one server and IIS4 with OWA 5.5 sp3 on
another server. OS is NT4.
OWA has just stopped, I rebooted both machines - still no joy.
I then restored a backup - still no joy.
The only error message that comes up if you leave it long enough is;
error 'ASP 0113'
Script timed out
/exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp
The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You can
change this limit by specifying a new value for the property
Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS administration
tools.
I have checked the timeouts and they are fine.
ANY IDEAS???

Regards,

James Palmer 

E-mail  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  




This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered 
by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around 
the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public folder limits


That doesn't surpise me.

Have a great day, Kevin.

William 


-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


William,

You know me better than that! I already have!

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 08:27
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


Feel free to write something that accomplishes this.  ;)

William 


-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


Good! Hence, the format of the message being a question rather than a
statement! To me, it is an effective means of limiting a PF but to others it
may not.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 08:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


Actually it doesn't.  It is only used to set the warning.  An admin would
have to act on it.  As far as I recall, there is no effective means of
limiting public FOLDER size.

William 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


The Limits tab on the PF doesn't satisfy your requirement?

-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 02:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder limits


Hi all,

Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how
does it work ?.


Thanks in advance.

Jaspal

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public folder limits


William,

You know me better than that! I already have!

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 08:27
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


Feel free to write something that accomplishes this.  ;)

William 


-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


Good! Hence, the format of the message being a question rather than a
statement! To me, it is an effective means of limiting a PF but to others it
may not.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 08:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


Actually it doesn't.  It is only used to set the warning.  An admin would
have to act on it.  As far as I recall, there is no effective means of
limiting public FOLDER size.

William 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


The Limits tab on the PF doesn't satisfy your requirement?

-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 02:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder limits


Hi all,

Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how
does it work ?.


Thanks in advance.

Jaspal

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public folder limits

Feel free to write something that accomplishes this.  ;)

William 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits

Good! Hence, the format of the message being a question rather than a
statement! To me, it is an effective means of limiting a PF but to others it
may not.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 08:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits

Actually it doesn't.  It is only used to set the warning.  An admin would
have to act on it.  As far as I recall, there is no effective means of
limiting public FOLDER size.

William 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits

The Limits tab on the PF doesn't satisfy your requirement?

-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 02:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder limits

Hi all,

Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how
does it work ?.

Thanks in advance.

Jaspal

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public folder limits


Good! Hence, the format of the message being a question rather than a
statement! To me, it is an effective means of limiting a PF but to others it
may not.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 08:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


Actually it doesn't.  It is only used to set the warning.  An admin would
have to act on it.  As far as I recall, there is no effective means of
limiting public FOLDER size.

William 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


The Limits tab on the PF doesn't satisfy your requirement?

-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 02:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder limits


Hi all,

Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how
does it work ?.


Thanks in advance.

Jaspal

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public folder limits


Actually it doesn't.  It is only used to set the warning.  An admin would
have to act on it.  As far as I recall, there is no effective means of
limiting public FOLDER size.

William 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits


The Limits tab on the PF doesn't satisfy your requirement?

-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 02:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder limits


Hi all,

Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how
does it work ?.


Thanks in advance.

Jaspal

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public folder limits

The Limits tab on the PF doesn't satisfy your requirement?

-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 02:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder limits

Hi all,

Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how
does it work ?.

Thanks in advance.

Jaspal

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Directory Synchronization service