date:20020426


Folks,

I keep getting the message MS Exchange Server Not available when I try to
connect to an exchange server account with a laptop using dialup networking.
Can't find any helpful fix in any of MS's knowledgebases. Any ideas,
suggestions are welcome.

Thanks

Frank 


___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be 
legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its 
attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by telephoning on 
+44 (0)207 459-3600.  

When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for 
their use only and are  subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing 
Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a member of the London Stock 
Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered 
by MessageLabs.
__

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

2002-04-26 Thread Papageorgakis Nikos


TCP / IP properties


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

2002-04-26 Thread Walt Brannon


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is 
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
 http://www.star.net.uk 
 The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual 
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.  
 
 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice 
 contained in this email are for their use only and are  
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.
 
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star 
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is 
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
 http://www.star.net.uk 
 The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual 
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.  
 
 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice 
 contained in this email are for their use only and are  
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.
 
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star 
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
http://www.star.net.uk 
The service is powered by MessageLabs.



___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be 
legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its 
attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by telephoning on 
+44 (0)207 459-3600.  

When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for 
their use only and are  subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing 
Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a member of the London Stock 
Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered 
by MessageLabs.
__

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

2002-04-26 Thread Carol Fee


Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is 
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
 http://www.star.net.uk 
 The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual 
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.  
 
 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice 
 contained in this email are for their use only and are  
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.
 
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star 
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
http://www.star.net.uk 
The service is powered by MessageLabs.



___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is private,
confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the
intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its
attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us by telephoning on 
+44 (0)207 459-3600.  

When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
are for their use only and are  subject to the terms and conditions
expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is
a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service
is powered by MessageLabs.
__

List Charter and FAQ at:

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

No, I can't Carol. That is pointing toward DNS isn't it?

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?

Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is 
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?

 Frank

 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

 TCP / IP properties

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
 http://www.star.net.uk 
 The service is powered by MessageLabs.

 __
 __

 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual 
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.  

 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice 
 contained in this email are for their use only and are  
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.

 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star 
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
http://www.star.net.uk 
The service is powered by MessageLabs.

___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is private,
confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the
intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its
attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us by telephoning on 
+44 (0)207 459-3600.  

When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email
are for their use only and are  subject to the terms and conditions
expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is
a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.

This

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

2002-04-26 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT


Sounds like DNS or WINS.  Worse case, put an entry in HOSTS or LMHOSTS.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


No, I can't Carol. That is pointing toward DNS isn't it?

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: 
 http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.
 
 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
 contained in this email are for their use only and are  
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.
 
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
http://www.star.net.uk 
The service is powered by MessageLabs.



___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is private,
confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the
intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this

RE: OWA


Uh, no.  TS in W2k server comes bundled with it.  Provided the TS clients
are W2K pro or XP pro, to TS CAL is needed...


Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com




-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA


However, if more than two users connect via TS at one time, you need to buy
an expensive TS license.

-- 
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
 When cryptography is outlawed,
 bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.

 -Original Message-
From:   Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Re: OWA

Terminal Services  Outlook, faster, fully functional...

 Hello All,
 
 I have a couple of questions about OWA.
 
 1) When will spell check be available?

 2) Is there a way to create a rule on the server side to block certain 
 people from sending mail to my users.  ie.  spam and other mail to be 
 blocked.
 
 3) How does one create a signature in owa?
 
 4) In present our present use of Outlook, if you type the name of the 
 person you are sending email to, their email address pops up in the To 
 box.  Possible in web version?
 
 TIA, any information is greatly appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA

2002-04-26 Thread Lynn Karen

Title: RE: OWA

But isn't the bundled TS on the server only for 2 (or 3?) concurrent connections for administrative purposes? If you need more than that number of concurrent TS sessions you need to buy the full TS licence.

Karen

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA

Uh, no. TS in W2k server comes bundled with it. Provided
the TS clients
are W2K pro or XP pro, to TS CAL is needed...

Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com

-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA

However, if more than two users connect via TS at one time,
you need to buy
an expensive TS license.

--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA

Terminal Services Outlook, faster, fully functional...

Hello All,

I have a couple of questions about OWA.

1) When will spell check be available?

2) Is there a way to create a rule on the server side to
block certain
people from sending mail to my users. ie. spam and other
mail to be
blocked.

3) How does one create a signature in owa?

4) In present our present use of Outlook, if you type the
name of the
person you are sending email to, their email address pops
up in the To
box. Possible in web version?

TIA, any information is greatly appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA

2002-04-26 Thread Jeremiah Watson

Title: RE: OWA

Not if
the Clients are Win2K, You just need to setup a Terminal Services License
Server before 90 days are up( or it quits working, been there done
that).

-Original Message-From: Lynn Karen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:15
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
OWA
But isn't the bundled TS on the server only for 2 (or 3?)
concurrent connections for administrative purposes? If you need more
than that number of concurrent TS sessions you need to buy the full TS
licence.
Karen
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
OWAUh, no. TS in W2k server comes bundled with it.
Provided the TS clients are W2K pro or XP pro, to TS CAL is needed...
Don
Ely Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 -
Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWAHowever, if more than two users
connect via TS at one time, you need to
buy an expensive TS license. -- Matt
Lathrum General Dynamics Decision
Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA Terminal Services Outlook,
faster, fully functional...Hello All, I have a couple of questions about OWA. 1) When will spell check be
available?

2) Is there a way to create a rule on the server side to block certain people from
sending mail to my users. ie. spam and other mail to be blocked.
3) How does one
create a signature in owa? 4) In present our present use of Outlook, if you type the
name of the
person you are sending email to, their email address pops up in the To box. Possible
in web version?
TIA, any information is greatly appreciated.
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Distribution List Monitoring

2002-04-26 Thread McCready, Robert


Exchange 5.5, SP4.  NT 4.0, SP6a.

Is it possible to see who removed a user from a distribution list?  I
believe I have monitoring turned on, but
I'm not sure what Category or Event to look for in EVENTVWR that would tell
me who is modifying the
group.

Thanks!

Robert 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA

Title: Message



No, 
there is no TS Server license anymore. It comes with W2K server. 
Provided the clients accessing it are 2k pro or better, no CAL's are 
needed. 


Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  
  -Original Message-From: Lynn Karen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:15 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  OWA
  But isn't the bundled TS on the server only for 2 (or 3?) 
  concurrent connections for administrative purposes? If you need more 
  than that number of concurrent TS sessions you need to buy the full TS 
  licence.
  Karen 
   -Original Message-  
  From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: 26 April 2002 12:53  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: 
  OWAUh, no. TS in W2k server comes bundled with it. 
  Provided  the TS clients  are W2K pro or XP pro, to TS CAL is needed...   
    Don 
  Ely  Network Engineer  
  Tripath Imaging, Inc.  (336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct  (336) 516-4519 - Mobile  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email  http://www.tripathimaging.com  
  -Original Message- 
   From: Lathrum Matt-P55173  
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:39 PM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: OWAHowever, if more than two users 
  connect via TS at one time,  you need to 
  buy  an expensive TS license.   --  Matt 
  Lathrum  General Dynamics Decision 
  Systems  
  When cryptography is outlawed,  
  bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.   -Original Message-  
  From:  Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:35 PM  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: Re: OWA   Terminal Services  Outlook, 
  faster, fully functional...Hello All, I have a couple of questions about OWA. 1) When will spell check be 
  available?  

   2) Is there a way to create a rule on the server side to  block certain   people from 
  sending mail to my users. ie. spam and other  mail to be   blocked. 
  3) How does one 
  create a signature in owa? 4) In present our present use of Outlook, if you type the 
   name of the   
  person you are sending email to, their email address pops  up in the To   box. Possible 
  in web version?
   TIA, any information is greatly appreciated.  
   List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

2002-04-26 Thread Carol Fee


I believe Exchange only uses Netbios (WINS) name resolution.  You can try
adding an entry for the Exchange server in your lmhosts file, however I have
never had any luck using that over a RAS/VPN connection.  Remember the
lmhosts file only loads at boot up, so reboot before you try again.  Are you
using Windows 2000 for your RAS server.  If so, on the RAS server do you
have Enable IP Routing selected on the IP tab of the Properties for the
server in Win2K Routing and Remote Access.  This is required in order for
RAS/VPN clients to get WINS and DNS servers from the DHCP server on the
network.
Also, try this after making the DUN connection and authenticating to the
domain.  From a command prompt:
\\net use \\%ExchangeServerNetbiosName%\ipc$ user:domain name\username

Then try to open Outlook.


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


No, I can't Carol. That is pointing toward DNS isn't it?

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is 
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
 http://www.star.net.uk 
 The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual 
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.  
 
 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice 
 contained in this email are for their use only and are  
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.
 
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star 
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

2002-04-26 Thread Rochford, Paul

Title: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN





can't ping it by netbios name is pointing towards some WINS problem. As mentioned stick an entry in your lmhosts file and do an nbtstat -R to reload it.



-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN



Sounds like DNS or WINS. Worse case, put an entry in HOSTS or LMHOSTS.


mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN



No, I can't Carol. That is pointing toward DNS isn't it?


-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN



Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?



Carol Fee MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN



Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.


Frank


-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN



The question is lacking in details. How are you authenticating? Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange? Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.


Walt


 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: 
 http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.
 
 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
 contained in this email are for their use only and are 
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.
 
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
http://www.star.net.uk 
The service is powered by MessageLabs.

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


First of all, that is only for Exchange 5.5.  Second, obviously you don't
have to reboot your computer after adding host file entries.  NBBTSTAT is a
wonderful too.  Third of all, I've rarely if ever had RAS problems like
either Frank or yourself, so maybe y'all should check out your network
functionality (e.g. WINS) and wonder what's wrong with it.

Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com




-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


I believe Exchange only uses Netbios (WINS) name resolution.  You can try
adding an entry for the Exchange server in your lmhosts file, however I have
never had any luck using that over a RAS/VPN connection.  Remember the
lmhosts file only loads at boot up, so reboot before you try again.  Are you
using Windows 2000 for your RAS server.  If so, on the RAS server do you
have Enable IP Routing selected on the IP tab of the Properties for the
server in Win2K Routing and Remote Access.  This is required in order for
RAS/VPN clients to get WINS and DNS servers from the DHCP server on the
network. Also, try this after making the DUN connection and authenticating
to the domain.  From a command prompt: \\net use
\\%ExchangeServerNetbiosName%\ipc$ user:domain name\username

Then try to open Outlook.


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


No, I can't Carol. That is pointing toward DNS isn't it?

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: 
 http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on

Multiple addresses

2002-04-26 Thread Dahl, Peter

Title: Multiple addresses





The question yesterday about multiple SMTP addresses prompted a familiar answer from the list, but I have never seen it work as stated.

The reply was and always seems to be, select the from field and type the address as you would like it to be sent out. With every Exchange server I have worked with, once you type any secondary address in, that address is resolved to the name from the GAL and reset to use the primary SMTP address as associated with that account. 

Is there something I am missing here?


Peter Dahl.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Multiple addresses

Title: Message



Nope, 
you're not missing it at all. It resolves back to the GAL and uses the 
primary SMTP addy.


Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  
  -Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
  9:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Multiple 
  addresses
  The question yesterday about multiple SMTP 
  addresses prompted a familiar answer from the list, but I have never seen it 
  work as stated.
  The reply was and always seems to be, select the 
  from field and type the address as you would like it to be sent out. 
  With every Exchange server I have worked with, once you type any secondary 
  address in, that address is resolved to the name from the GAL and reset to use 
  the primary SMTP address as associated with that account. 
  Is there something I am missing here? 
  Peter Dahl. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Brick Level Backups on Exchange.

2002-04-26 Thread Majetic, John RAME


Someone was just asking for more info on this. I put this when I would know
where it was, so of course couldn't find it, but then stumbled across it
today. Covers the topic's pluses and minus's pretty good.
 
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm 
 
John Majetic


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Multiple addresses

2002-04-26 Thread Dahl, Peter

Title: Message

Thanks
Don!

-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:39
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Multiple
addresses
Nope, you're not missing it at all. It resolves back to the GAL
and uses the primary SMTP addy.

Don
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 -
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

-Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002
9:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Multiple
addresses
The question yesterday about multiple SMTP
addresses prompted a familiar answer from the list, but I have never seen it
work as stated.
The reply was and always seems to be, select the
from field and type the address as you would like it to be sent out.
With every Exchange server I have worked with, once you type any secondary
address in, that address is resolved to the name from the GAL and reset to
use the primary SMTP address as associated with that account.
Is there something I am missing here?
Peter Dahl. List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList
Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.

Holidays not showing up (OL98)

2002-04-26 Thread McCready, Robert


I have a test account.  I deleted the mailbox and recreated another one to
start fresh.
I added the United States Holidays.  However, when I added them, I received
an error
message stating that the holidays are already installed.  I selected YES
to
reinstall them (which I assume could have caused duplicates), but the
holidays
still are not visible.  If I highlight the Calendar, and then select VIEW -
CURRENT
VIEW - EVENTS, there is nothing in the LOCATION column.  I believe this
column should say UNITED STATES.  Has anybody else ran into a 
similar situation?

Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6.

Thanks.

Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Thanks Carol, and all. I realised, thanks to your suggestions that there was
no entry for the Exchange Server on our DNS and so I added it and all was
fine. Can now connect to Exchange mailbox fine.

Many thanks

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 13:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


First of all, that is only for Exchange 5.5.  Second, obviously you don't
have to reboot your computer after adding host file entries.  NBBTSTAT is a
wonderful too.  Third of all, I've rarely if ever had RAS problems like
either Frank or yourself, so maybe y'all should check out your network
functionality (e.g. WINS) and wonder what's wrong with it.

Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com




-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


I believe Exchange only uses Netbios (WINS) name resolution.  You can try
adding an entry for the Exchange server in your lmhosts file, however I have
never had any luck using that over a RAS/VPN connection.  Remember the
lmhosts file only loads at boot up, so reboot before you try again.  Are you
using Windows 2000 for your RAS server.  If so, on the RAS server do you
have Enable IP Routing selected on the IP tab of the Properties for the
server in Win2K Routing and Remote Access.  This is required in order for
RAS/VPN clients to get WINS and DNS servers from the DHCP server on the
network. Also, try this after making the DUN connection and authenticating
to the domain.  From a command prompt: \\net use
\\%ExchangeServerNetbiosName%\ipc$ user:domain name\username

Then try to open Outlook.


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


No, I can't Carol. That is pointing toward DNS isn't it?

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: 
 http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private,

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

2002-04-26 Thread Leone, Michael

Title: RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup





 Online backup using Microsoft documented APIs. Restore of individual
 mailboxes are not done... 
 you reload the Information Store(s), prefereably to a recovery server, 


Presuming you have the hardware, and an extra licensed copy of the OS and Exchange to use ...


 then EXMERGE or connect via a MAPI client and export
 just the info needed. Also, reduced backup window, flushing 
 of transaction logs (no need to use circular logging, which means that in 
 the event of a DR situation, you can replay the logs up to the point of 
 failure, if the logs are available).


So I would EXMERGE out the CEO's mailbox; and then what? Import it into my real, production server? 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Date format change

2002-04-26 Thread Mitchell Mike


Good morning;

Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5 SP4

Does anyone know how to change the date format over the daily schedule using
the day/week/month
format on Outlook?  The lady is reporting she has 4/26/2002 and she wants
Friday, April 26.

I looked everywhere but could find how that can be changed.

Have a great weekend.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Excahnge 2000 Outlook web Access Inbox does not load (Q315515)

2002-04-26 Thread Raghu KASTURY


When I try to login to OWA, the right pane of the inbox shows loading...
but does not show messages. Other folders seem to be working fine. The
microsoft knowledge base Q315515 suggets to add atleast one language in IE
options general language. These settings are already there.

The inbox shows up correctly when we access OWA using the ISP other than
the one who is providing us the web address and redirecting the MX pointer
to our server.

Can any one help us what could be the reason. Is this a problem with the
ISP's settings?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Could somebody give some insight to why RoutingRestrictions for R ELAYING in Exchange 5.5 isn't working correctly

2002-04-26 Thread Barr, Christopher

Title: Message



Here's the 
senario:
 2 
servers, 1 NT4.0 SP5 Exchange 5.5 sp3, and 1 Win2k SP2 running Contact Mgmt 
software (GoldMine). 
Now we've been 
knowingly relaying email, which I am trying to bring to an 
end.
From what I can 
gather the quickest way to do this would be to go into the IMS properties under 
Routing, then to
Routing 
Restrictions. From there I enter all the valid IP's .2 - .254 (even the Goldmine 
Server) and check the box 
Hosts and Clients 
with these IP addressesthenStop and Restart 
Exchange.
Nowany 
GoldMine users that try to use Goldmine Email to send mail get the error message 
that they cannot due
to the fact that the 
server will not allow relaying. This confuses me, I'm not sure wether I've done 
something wrong 
or this is something 
that SP4 will resolve. I cant seem to find anything in the list of SP4 bug fixes 
regarding this 
specific issue. 

Only other 
optionsare to stop using GoldMine Email all together, untill I can get 
another mail server up to 
specifically use for 
GoldMine.
Any comments or 
suggestion would be appreciated.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

2002-04-26 Thread Salvador Manzo

Title: RE: "Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup



Either 
import into the production server or load the PST file directly into Outlook and 
only restore what is needed.

As for 
the hardware and software, it's only really necessary if you are going with a 
dedicated recovery server. We've used as a recovery server a 
workstation class machine with a SCSI card to attach to the backup 
device. We decomm the thing immediately after use, and you MIGHT be 
able to use an NFR license, since the recovery server wouldn't need to be a 
production machine.

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
  07:42To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  "Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec 
  backup
   Online backup using Microsoft documented APIs. 
  Restore of individual  mailboxes are not 
  done...  you reload the Information 
  Store(s), prefereably to a recovery server, 
  Presuming you have the hardware, and an extra licensed copy of 
  the OS and Exchange to use ... 
   then EXMERGE or connect via a MAPI client and 
  export  just the info needed. Also, reduced 
  backup window, flushing  of transaction logs (no 
  need to use circular logging, which means that in  
  the event of a DR situation, you can replay the logs up to the point of 
   failure, if the logs are available). 
  So I would EXMERGE out the CEO's mailbox; and then what? 
  Import it into my real, production server? List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Jon Farr


I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.  We
have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough
(we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like to
have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95% of the
users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems
large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. 
Ever.

thanks,

Jon Farr

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Cross, Tom

We use 40mb (warning) 50mb (deny send).  Of course there are a few
exceptions, but we really enforce it for the most part.

Tom

-Original Message-
From:   Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, April 26, 2002 1:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Mailbox size limits

I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.  We
have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough
(we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like to
have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95% of the
users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems
large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. 
Ever.

thanks,

Jon Farr

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

Title: Message



"Presuming you have the hardware, and an 
extra licensed copy of the OS and Exchange to use 
..."

Huh?


Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  
  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
  10:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  "Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec 
  backup
   Online backup using Microsoft documented APIs. 
  Restore of individual  mailboxes are not 
  done...  you reload the Information 
  Store(s), prefereably to a recovery server, 
  Presuming you have the hardware, and an extra licensed copy of 
  the OS and Exchange to use ... 
   then EXMERGE or connect via a MAPI client and 
  export  just the info needed. Also, reduced 
  backup window, flushing  of transaction logs (no 
  need to use circular logging, which means that in  
  the event of a DR situation, you can replay the logs up to the point of 
   failure, if the logs are available). 
  So I would EXMERGE out the CEO's mailbox; and then what? 
  Import it into my real, production server? List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

Title: Message



I 
always have a couple of extra licenses just lying around  especially of 
Exchange ;)

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, 
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and 
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, 
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:41 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: "Reminders" not 
  found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup
  "Presuming 
  you have the hardware, and an extra licensed copy of the OS and Exchange to 
  use ..."
  
  Huh?
  
  
  Don 
  ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
  

-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
10:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
"Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec 
backup
 Online backup using Microsoft documented APIs. 
Restore of individual  mailboxes are not 
done...  you reload the Information 
Store(s), prefereably to a recovery server, 
Presuming you have the hardware, and an extra licensed copy 
of the OS and Exchange to use ... 
 then EXMERGE or connect via a MAPI client and 
export  just the info needed. Also, 
reduced backup window, flushing  of transaction 
logs (no need to use circular logging, which means that in  the event of a DR situation, you can replay the logs up to the 
point of  failure, if the logs are 
available). 
So I would EXMERGE out the CEO's mailbox; and then what? 
Import it into my real, production server? List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

Title: RE: Mailbox size limits





Last place with Exchange 175/200/225
Currently for client on Notes 50
Highest that I have seen 300


BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to get this, 1 gig !


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.



-Original Message-
From: Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox size limits



I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits. We
have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough
(we've already made exceptions to get her to that point). I'd like to
have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous. For 95% of the
users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems
large to me. Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. 
Ever.


thanks,


Jon Farr


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Could somebody give some insight to why RoutingRestrictions f or R ELAYING in Exchange 5.5 isn't working correctly

Title: Message




Never 
used GoldMine, but I have never heard any good things about it. Just bad 
ones
Why 
not run a solid backup and then SP6 the NT and SP4 the Exchange ? 


  -Original Message-From: Barr, Christopher 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:39 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Could somebody give 
  some insight to why RoutingRestrictions for R ELAYING in Exchange 5.5 isn't 
  working correctly
  Here's the 
  senario:
   
  2 servers, 1 NT4.0 SP5 Exchange 5.5 sp3, and 1 Win2k SP2 running Contact Mgmt 
  software (GoldMine). 
  Now we've been 
  knowingly relaying email, which I am trying to bring to an 
  end.
  From what I can 
  gather the quickest way to do this would be to go into the IMS properties 
  under Routing, then to
  Routing 
  Restrictions. From there I enter all the valid IP's .2 - .254 (even the 
  Goldmine Server) and check the box 
  Hosts and Clients 
  with these IP addressesthenStop and Restart 
  Exchange.
  Nowany 
  GoldMine users that try to use Goldmine Email to send mail get the error 
  message that they cannot due
  to the fact that 
  the server will not allow relaying. This confuses me, I'm not sure wether I've 
  done something wrong 
  or this is 
  something that SP4 will resolve. I cant seem to find anything in the list of 
  SP4 bug fixes regarding this 
  specific issue. 
  
  Only other 
  optionsare to stop using GoldMine Email all together, untill I can get 
  another mail server up to 
  specifically use 
  for GoldMine.
  Any comments or 
  suggestion would be appreciated.
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Schwartz, Jim


1 Gig? Jeez.

Talk to you legal department or your lawyer about document retention and how
they need to audit this person for compliance. If you've got a limit and
they need to go over it, start charging them for it. You'd be amazed at how
fast they start getting rid of those 20MB movies of Uncle Sal at the beach.

 -Original Message-
 From: Precht, David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:00 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: Mailbox size limits
 
 Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 
 Currently for client on Notes 50 
 Highest that I have seen 300 
 
 BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to get this, 1
 gig ! 
 
 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
 for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
 and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
 distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
 message.
 
 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: Jon Farr [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 Subject: Mailbox size limits 
 
 
 I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.  We 
 have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough 
 (we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like to 
 have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95% of the
 
 users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems 
 large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. 
 Ever. 
 
 thanks, 
 
 Jon Farr 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Annette K. Raymond


We have a warning set at 75 meg and the limit at 80 meg.  We just lately put
the limits on after getting 400 messages, each with 10 jpgs attached!
Brought Exchange to it's knees, of course.  I just picked a limit that was
just above the biggest existing mailbox and set the limit there.  No one has
complained yet.

Annette

-Original Message-
From: Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox size limits


I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.  We
have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough
(we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like to
have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95% of the
users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems
large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email.
Ever.

thanks,

Jon Farr

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Reto Inversini

Title: RE: Mailbox size limits

... well, I don't use any quotas ... discspace is
cheap and I don't like whining users ... but beware ... if you give them one
finger they are going to take the whole hand :-) ... most users a reasonable and
using between 5meg and say, 120meg ... but there are always a few, urmm, special
cases ... until now the highscoreis 400meg - and then they start
complaining that outlook is sooo slow ...

/Reto

- Original Message -

From:
Precht, David
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:59
PM
Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits

Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 Currently for client on Notes 50 Highest that I
have seen 300
BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to
get this, 1 gig !
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of
the original message.
-Original Message- From: Jon
Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox
size limits
I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size
limits. We have a user at one client who keeps
insisting that 90Mb isn't enough (we've already made
exceptions to get her to that point). I'd like to have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous. For
95% of the users, we use the defaults from Exchange
(45/60/80), which still seems large to me. Then
there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. Ever.
thanks,
Jon Farr
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Toni, Randy

charging resource costs back to departments -- that would solve so many
issues (ridiculously large mailboxes, off-hour support call-outs for idiotic
issues, etc.).  There are times (usually middle of the night and the pager
is screming) when I wish they would do that here...

 -Original Message-
 From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:29 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: Mailbox size limits

 1 Gig? Jeez.

 Talk to you legal department or your lawyer about document retention and
 how
 they need to audit this person for compliance. If you've got a limit and
 they need to go over it, start charging them for it. You'd be amazed at
 how
 fast they start getting rid of those 20MB movies of Uncle Sal at the
 beach.

  -Original Message-
  From:   Precht, David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:   Friday, April 26, 2002 2:00 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject:RE: Mailbox size limits

  Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 
  Currently for client on Notes 50 
  Highest that I have seen 300 

  BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to get this, 1
  gig ! 

  Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
 is
  for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
 confidential
  and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
  distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
 please
  contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
 original
  message.

  -Original Message- 
  From: Jon Farr [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: Mailbox size limits 

  I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.  We

  have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough 
  (we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like to 
  have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95% of
 the

  users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems 
  large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email.

  Ever. 

  thanks, 

  Jon Farr 

  List Charter and FAQ at: 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry

Title: Message



I 
don't use quotas either.not by my choice but because mgmt. won't let 
me. I do however, use Mailbox Manager which runs every weekend and deletes 
anything older than 45 days. Right now the largest mailbox I have is just 
over 200MB, at one time however, I had several that were getting close to the 
1GB mark. My CTO gently prodded them into cleaning them up. Now 
those users aren't even in the top ten..

At one 
time the age in date was 60 days for MBM, but when we told mgmt that we would 
either have to reduce the size of our IS on Exchange, or upgrade to Enterprise 
edition, which was no longer available, because we were getting too close to the 
16 GB limit on Exchange 5.5 standard, they changed it to 45 days and the memo 
came from the CEO. No whining was heard:) One of the few times 
that ever happened

  
  -Original Message-From: Reto Inversini 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:39 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Mailbox size 
  limits
  ... well, I don't use any quotas ... discspace is 
  cheap and I don't like whining users ... but beware ... if you give them one 
  finger they are going to take the whole hand :-) ... most users a reasonable 
  and using between 5meg and say, 120meg ... but there are always a few, urmm, 
  special cases ... until now the highscoreis 400meg - and then they start 
  complaining that outlook is sooo slow ... 
  
  /Reto
  
  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
Precht, David 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:59 
PM
Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits

Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 Currently for client on Notes 50 Highest that 
I have seen 300 
BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to 
get this, 1 gig ! 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any 
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, 
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies 
of the original message.
-Original Message- From: Jon 
Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox 
size limits 
I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size 
limits. We have a user at one client who keeps 
insisting that 90Mb isn't enough (we've already made 
exceptions to get her to that point). I'd like to have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous. For 
95% of the users, we use the defaults from Exchange 
(45/60/80), which still seems large to me. 
Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. Ever. 
thanks, 
Jon Farr 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Toni, Randy


I tried giving them one finger too but I made the unfortunate choice of
which finger to use :-)

Seriously, we open a mailbox with a standard (default) 10 meg warning, 15
meg send limit.  Anyone who needs more can just request it.  Managers have
much larger size limits, as requested.  A few power users (finance, etc.)
also have more.  You'd think this would be a ton or extra work for me since
everyone would probably be whining and calling us up to give them more
space, but the vast majority of users don't ever call.  A few do - and they
get a bump - no problem if they need it.  

Once upon a time we had a space issue with Exchange 5.0 and it's IS size
limit - lots of junk put us near the edge.  It took a lot of effort to clean
up a system gone wild.  We don't have that constraint now with 5.5 but in
our environment most users really don't need any more than this small limit
(medical people who just use email for departmental issues and schedules,
etc.) so we kept in intact as a default.  Most of the users are not power
users, so this actually works quite well here.  But I can see how it would
be suicidal to suggest these tiny limits in other types of shops.

 -Original Message-
 From: Reto Inversini [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:39 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  Re: Mailbox size limits
 
 ... well, I don't use any quotas ... discspace is cheap and I don't like
 whining users ... but beware ... if you give them one finger they are
 going to take the whole hand :-) ... most users a reasonable and using
 between 5meg and say, 120meg ... but there are always a few, urmm, special
 cases ... until now the highscore is 400meg - and then they start
 complaining that outlook is sooo slow ... 
  
 /Reto
  
 - Original Message - 
 
   From: Precht, David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:59 PM
   Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits
 
 
   Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 
   Currently for client on Notes 50 
   Highest that I have seen 300 
 
   BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to get
 this, 1 gig ! 
 
   Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
 attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
 contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
 use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
 recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
 copies of the original message.
 
 
 
   -Original Message- 
   From: Jon Farr [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
   Subject: Mailbox size limits 
 
 
   I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.
 We 
   have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough
 
   (we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like
 to 
   have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95%
 of the 
   users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still
 seems 
   large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an
 email. 
   Ever. 
 
   thanks, 
 
   Jon Farr 
 
   List Charter and FAQ at: 
   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
   List Charter and FAQ at:
   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
   
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

2002-04-26 Thread Leone, Michael

Title: RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup





-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]


Presuming you have the hardware, and an extra licensed copy of the OS and Exchange to use ...


Huh?


Exactly as it says ... the recommendation was to restore the IS to a temporary server. In order to (legally) do this, you need to have another copy of Exchange to restore to. Of course, we'd all probably just install one of our existing Exchange CDs, and uninstall after we're done, but technically, that's illegal. Not to mention, highly time-consuming.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Public Folder Permissions

2002-04-26 Thread Bob Falkenberg

Title: RE: "Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup



We are 
slowly starting to use Public Folders here. I want to avoid someone 
granting rights on a Publicfolder to the Anonymous user? How should 
I set the permissions to prevent this?

Bob F. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

Title: Message



You 
don't have an MSDN version? 

Otherwise, most of us have a recovery server sitting in a corner with 
everything installed ready to go in the event of an emergency. It's not in 
production nor it is even on, it just sits in a corner waiting for its 
day. 
Don 
ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com

  
  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
  3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  "Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec 
  backup
  -Original Message- From: Ely, 
  Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  
  "Presuming you have the hardware, and an extra 
  licensed copy of the OS and Exchange to use ..." 
  Huh? 
  Exactly as it says ... the recommendation was to restore the 
  IS to a temporary server. In order to (legally) do this, you need to 
  have another copy of Exchange to restore to. Of course, we'd all probably just 
  install one of our existing Exchange CDs, and uninstall after we're done, but 
  technically, that's illegal. Not to mention, highly 
  time-consuming.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Garland Mac Neill

We don't use size limits here unfortunately. Too many Sales people would
scream. Most people there's under 200 Mb which I can live with. The one I
had to reign was 1.6 GB. Then complained that Archving took a solid 24
hours. 

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits

1 Gig? Jeez.

Talk to you legal department or your lawyer about document retention and how
they need to audit this person for compliance. If you've got a limit and
they need to go over it, start charging them for it. You'd be amazed at how
fast they start getting rid of those 20MB movies of Uncle Sal at the beach.

 -Original Message-
 From: Precht, David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:00 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: Mailbox size limits

 Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 
 Currently for client on Notes 50 
 Highest that I have seen 300 

 BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to get this, 1
 gig ! 

 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
 for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
 and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
 distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
 message.

 -Original Message- 
 From: Jon Farr [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 Subject: Mailbox size limits 

 I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.  We 
 have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough 
 (we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like to 
 have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95% of the

 users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems 
 large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. 
 Ever. 

 thanks, 

 Jon Farr 

 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public Folder Permissions

2002-04-26 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry

Title: Message



Restrict who has the ability to create Public Folders. Anonymous 
permissions should be "None" on all Public Folders. Default permission 
should be set to "Reviewer" for all public folders. You can grant specific 
users access to specific Public Folders if they need access to make changes, add 
things etc. Public Folders are a great way for say a Purchasing Dept. to 
share their contacts within their dept. and the rest of the organization never 
even sees that folder. You set the Default permissions to "None" on 
something like that and grant the dept. the appropriate 
rights.

  
  -Original Message-From: Bob Falkenberg 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
  2:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Public 
  Folder Permissions
  We 
  are slowly starting to use Public Folders here. I want to avoid someone 
  granting rights on a Publicfolder to the Anonymous user? How 
  should I set the permissions to prevent this?
  
  Bob 
  F. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

problem with 0ut of 0ffice

2002-04-26 Thread Allan Muchmore

Title: Message



I have a user who's 0ut of 0ffice wizard is not 
working. Just doesn't respond, 
though if I add an extra rule to it, that other rule fires. Anyone have 
any idea why? More info:

I set up extensive logging and received the 
following event ID warning. Scoured the net without finding a 
reference:

"Event ID: 1033Source: MS ExchangeIS 
Private

The rule (1-D7CD) with sequence number 50 is being 
ignored because it is disabled. The distinguised name of the owning 
mailbox is John Smith."

Running, Exchange 5.5 sp4, on NT 4 SP6a and Outlook 2002. Other users can use 
OOO, so I'm guessing it is not a systemwide setting.


Allan
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Erickson, David


we have warn at 12MB, deny send at 15MB

anything that takes up more than a few K is an attachment and should be
stored on the file server / or public folder.

David Erickson
IT -- BWBR Architects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
From: Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox size limits


I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size limits.  We
have a user at one client who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough
(we've already made exceptions to get her to that point).  I'd like to
have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous.  For 95% of the
users, we use the defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems
large to me.  Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. 
Ever.

thanks,

Jon Farr

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.350 / Virus Database: 196 - Release Date: 4/17/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.350 / Virus Database: 196 - Release Date: 4/17/2002
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

2002-04-26 Thread Leone, Michael

Title: RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup





-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]


You don't have an MSDN version? 


Nope; we're a small shop. Not everyone has a subscription like that, you know.


Otherwise, most of us have a recovery server sitting in a corner with everything installed ready to go in the event of an 

emergency. It's not in production nor it is even on, it just sits in a corner waiting for its day. 


Then most of you are luckier than those of us in smaller companies.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Message Size

2002-04-26 Thread Erickson, David


2MB send and 3MB receive -- files bigger than that should be sent ftp
(that's what it's for).  I admin at an Architecture firm and we move around
large cad and graphic files to consultants and so on, use the right tool for
the right job. And use zip, I can't believe you don't get corrupted files
when emailing big ones.

David Erickson
IT -- BWBR Architects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
From: Van Otterloo, Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Message Size


I have some users that are trying to email files that are over 36MB in size.
That is above the Maximum Message Size that is set at this time.  They are
the type that will run to the higher ups in the company and cry to them to
get it changed.  

We only have a 256K connection to the Internet.

What do you have your message size set to and could you give some of the
reasoning behind the decision for that size?

Thanks.

Brad Van Otterloo, EE, MCSE on Win NT 4.0, MCP+Internet
Network Administrator/Controls Engineer
Diversified Plastics Corporation

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.350 / Virus Database: 196 - Release Date: 4/17/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.350 / Virus Database: 196 - Release Date: 4/17/2002
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

16 GB Limit?

2002-04-26 Thread Majetic, John RAME


Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the
docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and
5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the
16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. 

Am I right?
If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5?


John Majetic

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

2002-04-26 Thread Keith Nelson


You are correct.

Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County High School of the Arts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(714) 560-0900 ex5910 

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 16 GB Limit?


Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the
docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and
5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the
16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. 

Am I right?
If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5?


John Majetic

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

2002-04-26 Thread Kevin Miller


You are correct.. Have a cookie and take the rest of the day off. That
is where I am headed.

--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 16 GB Limit?


Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all
the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between
5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar
5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. 

Am I right?
If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5?


John Majetic

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

2002-04-26 Thread Baker, Marc

Standard is 16 gig

Enterprise is unlimited

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 16 GB Limit?

Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the
docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and
5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the
16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. 

Am I right?
If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5?

John Majetic

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Reminders not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup

2002-04-26 Thread Salvador Manzo

Title: RE: "Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec backup



WorldWide Fulfillment package. Full Exchange server media with NFR 
license for about $30. Roughly the same for OS media.

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
  13:02To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  "Reminders" not found on 1 mailbox during BackupExec 
  backup
  -Original Message- From: Ely, 
  Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  
  You don't have an MSDN version? 
  Nope; we're a small shop. Not everyone has a 
  subscription like that, you know. 
  Otherwise, most of us have a recovery server sitting in a 
  corner with everything installed ready to go in the event of an 
  emergency. It's not in production nor it is even on, 
  it just sits in a corner waiting for its day. 
  Then most of you are luckier than those of us in smaller 
  companies. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

2002-04-26 Thread Abercrombie, Sherry

Title: RE: 16 GB Limit?





Actually, I'm going to eat the last Krispy Kreme donut  hit the road.


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?



You are correct.. Have a cookie and take the rest of the day off. That is where I am headed.


--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!



-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 16 GB Limit?



Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. 

Am I right?
If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5?



John Majetic


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public Folder Permissions

2002-04-26 Thread Bob Falkenberg

Title: Message



Thanks 
Sherry, 

Would 
you make some say Owner? I have already restricted who can create 
folders.

bob f. 


  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:43 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Public Folder 
  Permissions
  Restrict who has the ability to create Public Folders. Anonymous 
  permissions should be "None" on all Public Folders. Default permission 
  should be set to "Reviewer" for all public folders. You can grant 
  specific users access to specific Public Folders if they need access to make 
  changes, add things etc. Public Folders are a great way for say a 
  Purchasing Dept. to share their contacts within their dept. and the rest of 
  the organization never even sees that folder. You set the Default 
  permissions to "None" on something like that and grant the dept. the 
  appropriate rights.
  

-Original Message-From: Bob Falkenberg 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
2:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Public 
Folder Permissions
We 
are slowly starting to use Public Folders here. I want to avoid 
someone granting rights on a Publicfolder to the Anonymous user? 
How should I set the permissions to prevent this?

Bob F. List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

2002-04-26 Thread Joe Irvine

Title: RE: Mailbox size limits



I set 
my warning at 200MB and limit send at 250MB this works for all but one (who 
seems to hover around 400) and since she's the offivce manager, I have to make 
some allowances most are below 60 MB

Thanks! 
Joe Irvine 
Director of Information 
Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 
597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com 

  -Original Message-From: Reto Inversini 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:39 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Mailbox size 
  limits
  ... well, I don't use any quotas ... discspace is 
  cheap and I don't like whining users ... but beware ... if you give them one 
  finger they are going to take the whole hand :-) ... most users a reasonable 
  and using between 5meg and say, 120meg ... but there are always a few, urmm, 
  special cases ... until now the highscoreis 400meg - and then they start 
  complaining that outlook is sooo slow ... 
  
  /Reto
  
  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
Precht, David 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:59 
PM
Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits

Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 Currently for client on Notes 50 Highest that 
I have seen 300 
BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up, to 
get this, 1 gig ! 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any 
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, 
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies 
of the original message.
-Original Message- From: Jon 
Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox 
size limits 
I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox size 
limits. We have a user at one client who keeps 
insisting that 90Mb isn't enough (we've already made 
exceptions to get her to that point). I'd like to have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is ridiculous. For 
95% of the users, we use the defaults from Exchange 
(45/60/80), which still seems large to me. 
Then there are the few packrats who won't delete an email. Ever. 
thanks, 
Jon Farr 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox size limits

Title: RE: Mailbox size limits

I only
wish my users were that organized

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of
the original message.

-Original Message-From: Joe Irvine
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 16:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mailbox size
limits
I
set my warning at 200MB and limit send at 250MB this works for all but one
(who seems to hover around 400) and since she's the offivce manager, I have to
make some allowances most are below 60 MB

Thanks!
Joe Irvine
Director of Information
Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609)
597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com

-Original Message-From: Reto Inversini
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:39
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Mailbox
size limits
... well, I don't use any quotas ... discspace
is cheap and I don't like whining users ... but beware ... if you give them
one finger they are going to take the whole hand :-) ... most users a
reasonable and using between 5meg and say, 120meg ... but there are always a
few, urmm, special cases ... until now the highscoreis 400meg - and
then they start complaining that outlook is sooo slow ...

/Reto

- Original Message -

From:
Precht, David
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:59
PM
Subject: RE: Mailbox size
limits

Last place with Exchange 175/200/225 Currently for client on Notes 50 Highest
that I have seen 300
BUT someone has always b*tched and got theirs booted up,
to get this, 1 gig !
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
-Original Message- From:
Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 13:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:
Mailbox size limits
I'm curious what other businesses are using for mailbox
size limits. We have a user at one client
who keeps insisting that 90Mb isn't enough (we've
already made exceptions to get her to that point). I'd like
to have some comparisons to show her that 90Mb is
ridiculous. For 95% of the users, we use the
defaults from Exchange (45/60/80), which still seems large to me. Then there are the few packrats who won't delete
an email. Ever.
thanks,
Jon Farr
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList
Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList
Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?