RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07
Chris I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services attached to it. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 06:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Hi everyone, I just installed a single name SSL cert for my Ex07 server and I noticed that Outlook started complaining about an invalid certificate when it is opened. I discovered that I mistakenly added SMTP as one of the services on the new cert when I think I should have only enabled it on IMAP, POP, and IIS. This means that get-exchangecertificate results in two certificates being on SMTP. To remove all the services I tried enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint new_cert_thumbprint -services none. This resulted in no errors but still get-exchangecertificate shows the same results. Any ideas on this? Thanks, Chris Parker Aardvark Tactical IT Manager 1002 W Tenth St. Azusa, CA 91702 phone 800.997.3773 x131 direct 626.610.0131 fax 626.334.6860 cpar...@aardvarktactical.commailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com [http://www.swatgear.com/sig_logo_rsml.jpg]
OT: LTO4 Back Up Processes
Our LTO3 library just hit the skids so before I look at replacing it I am looking around to make sure this is still best practice. Other than those that do back up to disk and archive to tape processes, is LTO4 libraries best practice, and are they backward compatible to LTO3 and LTO2 tapes (I will double check this elsewhere also, just wanted to throw it out and get experienced feedback).
RE: LTO4 Back Up Processes
LTO4 is a good tape standard to use, We have a dell library for our exchange backups, the only information I was warned about is that the you need a good backbone as if there are any delays in data being written to the tapes then you can have it all corrupted. We were advised (after purchase) that we should backup to disk then back that up to tape after. LTO4 will read and write to LTO3 but not LTO2 (we have got 2x LTO4 and 2xLTO3 drives to overcome this issue. Info can be found at http://www.ultrium.com/default.php Cheers Philip Lock Network Systems Manager Moulsham Street CM2 0JQ 01245 293023 www.chelmsford-college.ac.uk -Original Message- From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 August 2009 13:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: LTO4 Back Up Processes Our LTO3 library just hit the skids so before I look at replacing it I am looking around to make sure this is still best practice. Other than those that do back up to disk and archive to tape processes, is LTO4 libraries best practice, and are they backward compatible to LTO3 and LTO2 tapes (I will double check this elsewhere also, just wanted to throw it out and get experienced feedback). This e-mail any files and attachments transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author/sender and are not necessarily shared or endorsed by Chelmsford College or any associated or related company. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of, or any action taken or omitted in reliance on this e-mail or any file or attachment transmitted with it is strictly prohibited may be unlawful. We may monitor all email communication through our networks. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify Chelmsford College by e-mailing:postmas...@chelmsford-college.ac.uk. If you contact us by email, we may store your details to facilitate communication. We take reasonable precautions to ensure our emails are virus free. However, we cannot accept responsibility for any virus transmitted by Chelmsford College and recommend that you subject any incoming email to your own virus checking procedures. -- Scanned by iCritical.
Exchange 2003 Server Swing
Anybody recommend a good step-by-step server swing doc for moving Exchange 2003 to a new box? I see a bunch out there, didn't know if one was considered to be the holy grail or not :) *** John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07
Outlook complaining would have nothing to do with smtp and more with IIS. Specifically autodiscover. You are correct the -services none parameter does not work and the documentation is misleading on Technet and is due to change shortly. If this is NOT the default cert (the one used for x-anonymous tls) and it is just a self-signed cert you created, why not just run remove-exchangecertificate? If it is a 3rd party CA cert and you only want to remove smtp as a service then go to c:\documents and settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys and remove Network Service from the ACL of the cert file in there. You can find which cert is yours by matching the timestamp on your cert when you run get-exchangecertificate |fl NotBefore and attempt to match that time with a date modified timestamp in the file system within that folder That will remove smtp as a service from the cert but based on what you write I don't think smtp is the issue here Thanks On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Sobey, Richard Ar.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Chris I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services attached to it. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 06:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Hi everyone, I just installed a single name SSL cert for my Ex07 server and I noticed that Outlook started complaining about an invalid certificate when it is opened. I discovered that I mistakenly added SMTP as one of the services on the new cert when I think I should have only enabled it on IMAP, POP, and IIS. This means that get-exchangecertificate results in two certificates being on SMTP. To remove all the services I tried enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint new_cert_thumbprint -services none. This resulted in no errors but still get-exchangecertificate shows the same results. Any ideas on this? Thanks, Chris Parker Aardvark Tactical IT Manager 1002 W Tenth St. Azusa, CA 91702 phone 800.997.3773 x131 direct 626.610.0131 fax 626.334.6860 cpar...@aardvarktactical.commailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com [http://www.swatgear.com/sig_logo_rsml.jpg]
Added a Second Back-End Server OWA not working
I have added a second back-end Exchange 2003 server. The server is in the same admin group. I moved a test mailbox enable user account to the new back-end server; the user can access email using Outlook. OWA was fine for user on the first Exchange 2003 server. But the test user account on the second back-end server cannot access OWA. When the test user connects to the Front-End Server, they receive the user name password pop-up box. When they enter their credentials nothing happens. The Login window keeps popping back (3 times) and finally they get an HTTP /1.1 401 Unauthorized error. No modification has been made on the front-end server. The firewall is configured to allow HTTP or HTTPs communication from the Front-end to the Back-end servers. Has anyone come across this issue, and how did you resolve it. Did not find any information on MS web site. Regards, Gary Babb
Re: Added a Second Back-End Server OWA not working
Is the website on your new BE configured properly to allow access from the FE IP address? Is IIS started? On 26/08/2009 15:25, Gary Babb gsb...@hotmail.com wrote: I have added a second back-end Exchange 2003 server. The server is in the same admin group. I moved a test mailbox enable user account to the new back-end server; the user can access email using Outlook. OWA was fine for user on the first Exchange 2003 server. But the test user account on the second back-end server cannot access OWA. When the test user connects to the Front-End Server, they receive the user name password pop-up box. When they enter their credentials nothing happens. The Login window keeps popping back (3 times) and finally they get an HTTP /1.1 401 Unauthorized error. No modification has been made on the front-end server. The firewall is configured to allow HTTP or HTTPs communication from the Front-end to the Back-end servers. Has anyone come across this issue, and how did you resolve it. Did not find any information on MS web site. Regards, Gary Babb
Re: LTO4 Back Up Processes
I actually never gave consideration to going to disk then tape. I am not sure we can do that here but it would speed up processes I would think. This is good advice and we will research it. On the tape compatibility, we did see that LTO2 was read only on LTO4 devices, which would be an issue for us. We will research it further. Thank you! On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Lock, Philiplo...@chelmsford-college.ac.uk wrote: LTO4 is a good tape standard to use, We have a dell library for our exchange backups, the only information I was warned about is that the you need a good backbone as if there are any delays in data being written to the tapes then you can have it all corrupted. We were advised (after purchase) that we should backup to disk then back that up to tape after. LTO4 will read and write to LTO3 but not LTO2 (we have got 2x LTO4 and 2xLTO3 drives to overcome this issue. Info can be found at http://www.ultrium.com/default.php Cheers Philip Lock Network Systems Manager Moulsham Street CM2 0JQ 01245 293023 www.chelmsford-college.ac.uk -Original Message- From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 August 2009 13:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: LTO4 Back Up Processes Our LTO3 library just hit the skids so before I look at replacing it I am looking around to make sure this is still best practice. Other than those that do back up to disk and archive to tape processes, is LTO4 libraries best practice, and are they backward compatible to LTO3 and LTO2 tapes (I will double check this elsewhere also, just wanted to throw it out and get experienced feedback). This e-mail any files and attachments transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author/sender and are not necessarily shared or endorsed by Chelmsford College or any associated or related company. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of, or any action taken or omitted in reliance on this e-mail or any file or attachment transmitted with it is strictly prohibited may be unlawful. We may monitor all email communication through our networks. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify Chelmsford College by e-mailing:postmas...@chelmsford-college.ac.uk. If you contact us by email, we may store your details to facilitate communication. We take reasonable precautions to ensure our emails are virus free. However, we cannot accept responsibility for any virus transmitted by Chelmsford College and recommend that you subject any incoming email to your own virus checking procedures. -- Scanned by iCritical.
Re: Added a Second Back-End Server OWA not working
IIS is started. I'm not too familiar with IIS, however from the Front-end server I can connect to be new back-end server with OWA https://new_back-end_server/exchange. When I enter the test user account credential OWA opens. Regards, Gary
Re: Exchange 2003 Server Swing
Anything by Ed Crowley is considered Holy Grail when referring to Exchange. The concepts are most likely are his originally. You could also go with write-ups by Daniel Petri. His documentation is very good. -- ME2 On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Kelsey, Johnjckel...@drmc.org wrote: Anybody recommend a good step-by-step server swing doc for moving Exchange 2003 to a new box? I see a bunch out there, didn't know if one was considered to be the holy grail or not :) *** John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Re: Exchange 2003 Server Swing
+1 for Crowley Petri On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: Anything by Ed Crowley is considered Holy Grail when referring to Exchange. The concepts are most likely are his originally. You could also go with write-ups by Daniel Petri. His documentation is very good. -- ME2 On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Kelsey, Johnjckel...@drmc.org wrote: Anybody recommend a good step-by-step server swing doc for moving Exchange 2003 to a new box? I see a bunch out there, didn't know if one was considered to be the holy grail or not :) *** John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
testing again...
Is anybody out there?
[OT] I'm back...
On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return!
RE: [OT] I'm back...
I wondered where you'd gotten off to. Figured you were just busy. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return! ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
RE: [OT] I'm back...
I figured you were just really busy.now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return! CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: [OT] I'm back...
Hah. So which ones are those? :-) From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... I figured you were just really busy…..now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return! CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: [OT] I'm back...
Everyone is instructed to repost their unanswered questions so Mikey can prove his omnipotence. As opposed to impotence which I'm sure Shookie or SC will allude to. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Hah. So which ones are those? :-) From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... I figured you were just really busy.now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return! CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: [OT] I'm back...
Pfft. I'm not omnipotent, not by far. In fact, I got major egg on my face on a powershell list on Monday. But I like how you are thinking. From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Everyone is instructed to repost their unanswered questions so Mikey can prove his omnipotence. As opposed to impotence which I’m sure Shookie or SC will allude to. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Hah. So which ones are those? :-) From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... I figured you were just really busy…..now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return! CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
RE: [OT] I'm back...
Who's running a powershell list? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Pfft. I'm not omnipotent, not by far. In fact, I got major egg on my face on a powershell list on Monday. But I like how you are thinking. From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Everyone is instructed to repost their unanswered questions so Mikey can prove his omnipotence. As opposed to impotence which I'm sure Shookie or SC will allude to. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Hah. So which ones are those? :-) From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... I figured you were just really busy.now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return! CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that
RE: [OT] I'm back...
Microsoft. The Scripting Guys forum. I use a piece of beta software that makes it work like a mailing list. From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Who’s running a powershell list? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Pfft. I'm not omnipotent, not by far. In fact, I got major egg on my face on a powershell list on Monday. But I like how you are thinking. From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Everyone is instructed to repost their unanswered questions so Mikey can prove his omnipotence. As opposed to impotence which I’m sure Shookie or SC will allude to. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Hah. So which ones are those? :-) From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... I figured you were just really busy…..now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return!
Re: Exchange 2003 Server Swing
+2 On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote: +1 for Crowley Petri On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: Anything by Ed Crowley is considered Holy Grail when referring to Exchange. The concepts are most likely are his originally. You could also go with write-ups by Daniel Petri. His documentation is very good. -- ME2 On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Kelsey, Johnjckel...@drmc.org wrote: Anybody recommend a good step-by-step server swing doc for moving Exchange 2003 to a new box? I see a bunch out there, didn't know if one was considered to be the holy grail or not :) *** John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
Re: [OT] I'm back...
Crap, that site fell of my list when I migrated systems. Thanks for the reminder. What software? That would be cool. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Michael B. Smithmich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: Microsoft. The Scripting Guys forum. I use a piece of beta software that makes it work like a mailing list. From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Who’s running a powershell list? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Pfft. I'm not omnipotent, not by far. In fact, I got major egg on my face on a powershell list on Monday. But I like how you are thinking. From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Everyone is instructed to repost their unanswered questions so Mikey can prove his omnipotence. As opposed to impotence which I’m sure Shookie or SC will allude to. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Hah. So which ones are those? :-) From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... I figured you were just really busy…..now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return!
RE: [OT] I'm back...
If I told you, I'd have to Anyway, it'll be from Microsoft and it'll be available when it's ready. Which it definitely isn't, right now. But it's better than nuttin'. From: Steven Peck [sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT] I'm back... Crap, that site fell of my list when I migrated systems. Thanks for the reminder. What software? That would be cool. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Michael B. Smithmich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: Microsoft. The Scripting Guys forum. I use a piece of beta software that makes it work like a mailing list. From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Who’s running a powershell list? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Pfft. I'm not omnipotent, not by far. In fact, I got major egg on my face on a powershell list on Monday. But I like how you are thinking. From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Everyone is instructed to repost their unanswered questions so Mikey can prove his omnipotence. As opposed to impotence which I’m sure Shookie or SC will allude to. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... Hah. So which ones are those? :-) From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] I'm back... I figured you were just really busy…..now please respond to the backlog of unanswered questions so we can get some work done! ;-) John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [OT] I'm back... On July 7th, I disappeared from this list and NTSysAdmin and ADAdmin... And no-one checked in on me! sniff Anyway, I've been reading messages and replying, and finally last week I noticed that no-one was replying to my responses! Lyris was dropping me on the floor... I contacted our friends at Sunbelt and apparently they pushed a button or turned a knob and now I'm back. Wheee! Let the games return!
RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07
What might that path be on server 2008? I'm not able to find it. All the paths I've taken beyond c:\users\default\appdata\ have been unfruitful. Thanks. From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 7:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Outlook complaining would have nothing to do with smtp and more with IIS. Specifically autodiscover. You are correct the -services none parameter does not work and the documentation is misleading on Technet and is due to change shortly. If this is NOT the default cert (the one used for x-anonymous tls) and it is just a self-signed cert you created, why not just run remove-exchangecertificate? If it is a 3rd party CA cert and you only want to remove smtp as a service then go to c:\documents and settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys and remove Network Service from the ACL of the cert file in there. You can find which cert is yours by matching the timestamp on your cert when you run get-exchangecertificate |fl NotBefore and attempt to match that time with a date modified timestamp in the file system within that folder That will remove smtp as a service from the cert but based on what you write I don't think smtp is the issue here Thanks On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Sobey, Richard Ar.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Chris I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services attached to it. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 06:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Hi everyone, I just installed a single name SSL cert for my Ex07 server and I noticed that Outlook started complaining about an invalid certificate when it is opened. I discovered that I mistakenly added SMTP as one of the services on the new cert when I think I should have only enabled it on IMAP, POP, and IIS. This means that get-exchangecertificate results in two certificates being on SMTP. To remove all the services I tried enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint new_cert_thumbprint -services none. This resulted in no errors but still get-exchangecertificate shows the same results. Any ideas on this? Thanks, Chris Parker Aardvark Tactical IT Manager 1002 W Tenth St. Azusa, CA 91702 phone 800.997.3773 x131 direct 626.610.0131 fax 626.334.6860 cpar...@aardvarktactical.commailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com [http://www.swatgear.com/sig_logo_rsml.jpg]
Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07
users\all users\microsoft\crypto\rsa\machine keys On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Chris W. Parkercpar...@aardvarktactical.com wrote: What might that path be on server 2008? I'm not able to find it. All the paths I've taken beyond c:\users\default\appdata\ have been unfruitful. Thanks. From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 7:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Outlook complaining would have nothing to do with smtp and more with IIS. Specifically autodiscover. You are correct the -services none parameter does not work and the documentation is misleading on Technet and is due to change shortly. If this is NOT the default cert (the one used for x-anonymous tls) and it is just a self-signed cert you created, why not just run remove-exchangecertificate? If it is a 3rd party CA cert and you only want to remove smtp as a service then go to c:\documents and settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys and remove Network Service from the ACL of the cert file in there. You can find which cert is yours by matching the timestamp on your cert when you run get-exchangecertificate |fl NotBefore and attempt to match that time with a date modified timestamp in the file system within that folder That will remove smtp as a service from the cert but based on what you write I don't think smtp is the issue here Thanks On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Sobey, Richard Ar.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Chris I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services attached to it. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 06:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Hi everyone, I just installed a single name SSL cert for my Ex07 server and I noticed that Outlook started complaining about an invalid certificate when it is opened. I discovered that I mistakenly added SMTP as one of the services on the new cert when I think I should have only enabled it on IMAP, POP, and IIS. This means that get-exchangecertificate results in two certificates being on SMTP. To remove all the services I tried enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint new_cert_thumbprint -services none. This resulted in no errors but still get-exchangecertificate shows the same results. Any ideas on this? Thanks, Chris Parker Aardvark Tactical IT Manager 1002 W Tenth St. Azusa, CA 91702 phone 800.997.3773 x131 direct 626.610.0131 fax 626.334.6860 cpar...@aardvarktactical.commailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com [http://www.swatgear.com/sig_logo_rsml.jpg]
RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07
Any idea why I don't have all users? From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 users\all users\microsoft\crypto\rsa\machine keys On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Chris W. Parkercpar...@aardvarktactical.com wrote: What might that path be on server 2008? I'm not able to find it. All the paths I've taken beyond c:\users\default\appdata\ have been unfruitful. Thanks. From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 7:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Outlook complaining would have nothing to do with smtp and more with IIS. Specifically autodiscover. You are correct the -services none parameter does not work and the documentation is misleading on Technet and is due to change shortly. If this is NOT the default cert (the one used for x-anonymous tls) and it is just a self-signed cert you created, why not just run remove-exchangecertificate? If it is a 3rd party CA cert and you only want to remove smtp as a service then go to c:\documents and settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys and remove Network Service from the ACL of the cert file in there. You can find which cert is yours by matching the timestamp on your cert when you run get-exchangecertificate |fl NotBefore and attempt to match that time with a date modified timestamp in the file system within that folder That will remove smtp as a service from the cert but based on what you write I don't think smtp is the issue here Thanks On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Sobey, Richard Ar.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Chris I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services attached to it. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 06:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Hi everyone, I just installed a single name SSL cert for my Ex07 server and I noticed that Outlook started complaining about an invalid certificate when it is opened. I discovered that I mistakenly added SMTP as one of the services on the new cert when I think I should have only enabled it on IMAP, POP, and IIS. This means that get-exchangecertificate results in two certificates being on SMTP. To remove all the services I tried enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint new_cert_thumbprint -services none. This resulted in no errors but still get-exchangecertificate shows the same results. Any ideas on this? Thanks, Chris Parker Aardvark Tactical IT Manager 1002 W Tenth St. Azusa, CA 91702 phone 800.997.3773 x131 direct 626.610.0131 fax 626.334.6860 cpar...@aardvarktactical.commailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com [http://www.swatgear.com/sig_logo_rsml.jpg]
RE: BES w/ Exchange 2010
Now that's an interesting idea...using 2007 as a proxy of sorts. If you don't mind, keep the list updated as you make progress. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BES w/ Exchange 2010 I got very close to getting 4.1.6 to work to work with BETA 1, with a failure at the account authentication stage. I suspect that was due to the CDO version. My next test will be whether it works with BESADMIN on an Exchange 2007 server, and the accounts on Exchange 2010, but I am just waiting for Exchange 2007 SP2 to be kicked out the door before I do that. Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] Sent: 24 August 2009 14:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BES w/ Exchange 2010 I know it took rim forever to support even 2007 but has anyone tried this out yet? Beta or RC of Exchange? 4.1.x or 5.0 BES? ~JasonG
RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07
Because you haven't unticked hide hidden folders? -Original Message- From: Chris W. Parker [mailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Any idea why I don't have all users? From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 users\all users\microsoft\crypto\rsa\machine keys On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Chris W. Parkercpar...@aardvarktactical.com wrote: What might that path be on server 2008? I'm not able to find it. All the paths I've taken beyond c:\users\default\appdata\ have been unfruitful. Thanks. From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 7:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Outlook complaining would have nothing to do with smtp and more with IIS. Specifically autodiscover. You are correct the -services none parameter does not work and the documentation is misleading on Technet and is due to change shortly. If this is NOT the default cert (the one used for x-anonymous tls) and it is just a self-signed cert you created, why not just run remove-exchangecertificate? If it is a 3rd party CA cert and you only want to remove smtp as a service then go to c:\documents and settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys and remove Network Service from the ACL of the cert file in there. You can find which cert is yours by matching the timestamp on your cert when you run get-exchangecertificate |fl NotBefore and attempt to match that time with a date modified timestamp in the file system within that folder That will remove smtp as a service from the cert but based on what you write I don't think smtp is the issue here Thanks On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Sobey, Richard Ar.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Chris I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services attached to it. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 06:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Hi everyone, I just installed a single name SSL cert for my Ex07 server and I noticed that Outlook started complaining about an invalid certificate when it is opened. I discovered that I mistakenly added SMTP as one of the services on the new cert when I think I should have only enabled it on IMAP, POP, and IIS. This means that get-exchangecertificate results in two certificates being on SMTP. To remove all the services I tried enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint new_cert_thumbprint -services none. This resulted in no errors but still get-exchangecertificate shows the same results. Any ideas on this? Thanks, Chris Parker Aardvark Tactical IT Manager 1002 W Tenth St. Azusa, CA 91702 phone 800.997.3773 x131 direct 626.610.0131 fax 626.334.6860 cpar...@aardvarktactical.commailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com [http://www.swatgear.com/sig_logo_rsml.jpg]
RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07
No, I'm able to see hidden folders. That's the first thing I did. I can see default which is a hidden folder but no all users. From: Steve Moffat [st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt) [exchangead...@optimum.bm] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Because you haven't unticked hide hidden folders? -Original Message- From: Chris W. Parker [mailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Any idea why I don't have all users? From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 users\all users\microsoft\crypto\rsa\machine keys On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Chris W. Parkercpar...@aardvarktactical.com wrote: What might that path be on server 2008? I'm not able to find it. All the paths I've taken beyond c:\users\default\appdata\ have been unfruitful. Thanks. From: Tom Kern [tpk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 7:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Outlook complaining would have nothing to do with smtp and more with IIS. Specifically autodiscover. You are correct the -services none parameter does not work and the documentation is misleading on Technet and is due to change shortly. If this is NOT the default cert (the one used for x-anonymous tls) and it is just a self-signed cert you created, why not just run remove-exchangecertificate? If it is a 3rd party CA cert and you only want to remove smtp as a service then go to c:\documents and settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys and remove Network Service from the ACL of the cert file in there. You can find which cert is yours by matching the timestamp on your cert when you run get-exchangecertificate |fl NotBefore and attempt to match that time with a date modified timestamp in the file system within that folder That will remove smtp as a service from the cert but based on what you write I don't think smtp is the issue here Thanks On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Sobey, Richard Ar.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Chris I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services attached to it. Regards Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 06:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can't set SSL cert services to none on Ex07 Hi everyone, I just installed a single name SSL cert for my Ex07 server and I noticed that Outlook started complaining about an invalid certificate when it is opened. I discovered that I mistakenly added SMTP as one of the services on the new cert when I think I should have only enabled it on IMAP, POP, and IIS. This means that get-exchangecertificate results in two certificates being on SMTP. To remove all the services I tried enable-exchangecertificate -thumbprint new_cert_thumbprint -services none. This resulted in no errors but still get-exchangecertificate shows the same results. Any ideas on this? Thanks, Chris Parker Aardvark Tactical IT Manager 1002 W Tenth St. Azusa, CA 91702 phone 800.997.3773 x131 direct 626.610.0131 fax 626.334.6860 cpar...@aardvarktactical.commailto:cpar...@aardvarktactical.com [http://www.swatgear.com/sig_logo_rsml.jpg]
Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
Let me rephrase. Could the problem with the named properties be causing us to have problems with connecting our iPhone to the Exchange server? From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
Note that RU8 and SP2 have different solutions. Also, SP2 offers a registry key to turn off the new behavior. From: Alex Fontana [afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
in a word: no. what problem are you having with your iPhones? does the same problem apply to other devices using exchange activesync? From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Let me rephrase. Could the problem with the named properties be causing us to have problems with connecting our iPhone to the Exchange server? From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
hmm...got a link to details around the reg key? That would definitely save us, but I haven't seen a word about that in release notes, or other links i've ready wrt sp2. -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: Note that RU8 and SP2 have different solutions. Also, SP2 offers a registry key to turn off the new behavior. -- *From:* Alex Fontana [afontana...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:30 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released
Just curious, has anyone seen a KB article for the list of bug fixes in SP2? I'm assuming it's more than just RU1-RU9 inc. and the new features for auditing etc. From: bounce-8639351-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8639351-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Simon Butler Sent: 25 August 2009 14:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released Release Notes are : http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/3/E/83E9DB24-0041-4F7E-A0DD-26043BBF7CAA/RelNotes.htm The what is new document is here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee221150.aspx This update requires Windows Installer 4.5. That means a reboot if you are on Windows 2003. Therefore I am suggesting to my clients that the installer is update is put in at the next available downtime window which requires a reboot. Then when you come to install the service pack no reboot is required. The installer update can be download from here: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=5A58B56F-60B6-4412-95B9-54D056D6F9F4displaylang=en Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/ From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 25 August 2009 14:02 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released Nice, the link for What's New in Exchange 2007 SP2 returns a page not found.. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Nothing official on this, I got the link from a different list I'm on: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=4c4bd2a3-5e50-42b0-8bbb-2cc9afe3216a Enjoy :) -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
1. Anyone mind explaining what this all means and how it relates to a message's x-headers? 2. How can this be monitored and is it something that I should be proactive about or just wait till it introduces itself? Using Exchange 2007 Update Rollup 9 here. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124151.aspx See HeaderPromotionModeSetting From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit hmm...got a link to details around the reg key? That would definitely save us, but I haven't seen a word about that in release notes, or other links i've ready wrt sp2. -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: Note that RU8 and SP2 have different solutions. Also, SP2 offers a registry key to turn off the new behavior. From: Alex Fontana [afontana...@gmail.commailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
I've posted this on the NTAdmin list because we're trying to run it through an ISA server. Can't get ActiveSync to work. From the Exchange Application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: Server ActiveSync Event Category: None Event ID: 3005 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:47:27 PM User: domain\username Computer: OTIS Description: Unexpected Exchange mailbox Server error: Server: [otis.scvl.com] User: [usern...@scvl.com] HTTP status code: [500]. Verify that the Exchange mailbox Server is working correctly. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit in a word: no. what problem are you having with your iPhones? does the same problem apply to other devices using exchange activesync? From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Let me rephrase. Could the problem with the named properties be causing us to have problems with connecting our iPhone to the Exchange server? From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
For (2) you can monitor Event id 9666 (iirc) for named properties being created, but you cannot query for how many named properties are already taken up until you deploy SP2 on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: bounce-8640819-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640819-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 21:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit 1. Anyone mind explaining what this all means and how it relates to a message's x-headers? 2. How can this be monitored and is it something that I should be proactive about or just wait till it introduces itself? Using Exchange 2007 Update Rollup 9 here. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
You mean AT ALL? Or just for iPhones? This particular error is a catch-all, and quite frankly, means almost nothing. It can happen even when everything is working fine, and a network connection got dropped. Gimme all the data: Exchange version, Exchange service pack, etc. etc. Then I'll ask some more questions... From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit I've posted this on the NTAdmin list because we're trying to run it through an ISA server. Can't get ActiveSync to work. From the Exchange Application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: Server ActiveSync Event Category: None Event ID: 3005 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:47:27 PM User: domain\username Computer: OTIS Description: Unexpected Exchange mailbox Server error: Server: [otis.scvl.com] User: [usern...@scvl.com] HTTP status code: [500]. Verify that the Exchange mailbox Server is working correctly. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit in a word: no. what problem are you having with your iPhones? does the same problem apply to other devices using exchange activesync? From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Let me rephrase. Could the problem with the named properties be causing us to have problems with connecting our iPhone to the Exchange server? From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released
I haven't seen it either. I've asked for it. If my request gets any traction, I'll let you know. From: Sobey, Richard A [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released Just curious, has anyone seen a KB article for the list of bug fixes in SP2? I’m assuming it’s more than just RU1-RU9 inc. and the new features for auditing etc. From: bounce-8639351-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8639351-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Simon Butler Sent: 25 August 2009 14:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released Release Notes are : http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/3/E/83E9DB24-0041-4F7E-A0DD-26043BBF7CAA/RelNotes.htm The what is new document is here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee221150.aspx This update requires Windows Installer 4.5. That means a reboot if you are on Windows 2003. Therefore I am suggesting to my clients that the installer is update is put in at the next available downtime window which requires a reboot. Then when you come to install the service pack no reboot is required. The installer update can be download from here: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=5A58B56F-60B6-4412-95B9-54D056D6F9F4displaylang=en Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/http://certificatesforexchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/http://domainsforexchange.net/ From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 25 August 2009 14:02 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released Nice, the link for What's New in Exchange 2007 SP2 returns a page not found.. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Nothing official on this, I got the link from a different list I’m on: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=4c4bd2a3-5e50-42b0-8bbb-2cc9afe3216a Enjoy :) -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
Thanks, I'll look into it. From: Sobey, Richard A [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit For (2) you can monitor Event id 9666 (iirc) for named properties being created, but you cannot query for how many named properties are already taken up until you deploy SP2 on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: bounce-8640819-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8640819-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Chris W. Parker Sent: 26 August 2009 21:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit 1. Anyone mind explaining what this all means and how it relates to a message's x-headers? 2. How can this be monitored and is it something that I should be proactive about or just wait till it introduces itself? Using Exchange 2007 Update Rollup 9 here. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul
RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
Originally posted on the the NTAdmin list because I thought it was ISA related. Exchange 2003 SP2 Enterprise running on Windows 2003 SP2. Running ISA 2006 on Windows 2003 R2. We've been trying to get this to work with the iPhone and, to troubleshoot it down, a Windows Mobile device. Bought a SSL cert from a reputable company and installed on Exchange server and ISA server. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit You mean AT ALL? Or just for iPhones? This particular error is a catch-all, and quite frankly, means almost nothing. It can happen even when everything is working fine, and a network connection got dropped. Gimme all the data: Exchange version, Exchange service pack, etc. etc. Then I'll ask some more questions... From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit I've posted this on the NTAdmin list because we're trying to run it through an ISA server. Can't get ActiveSync to work. From the Exchange Application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: Server ActiveSync Event Category: None Event ID: 3005 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:47:27 PM User: domain\username Computer: OTIS Description: Unexpected Exchange mailbox Server error: Server: [otis.scvl.com] User: [usern...@scvl.com] HTTP status code: [500]. Verify that the Exchange mailbox Server is working correctly. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit in a word: no. what problem are you having with your iPhones? does the same problem apply to other devices using exchange activesync? From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Let me rephrase. Could the problem with the named properties be causing us to have problems with connecting our iPhone to the Exchange server? From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't
Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit
Sweet, thanks. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Campbell, Rob rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124151.aspx See HeaderPromotionModeSetting -- *From:* Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:42 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit hmm...got a link to details around the reg key? That would definitely save us, but I haven't seen a word about that in release notes, or other links i've ready wrt sp2. -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: Note that RU8 and SP2 have different solutions. Also, SP2 offers a registry key to turn off the new behavior. -- *From:* Alex Fontana [afontana...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:30 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Probably not, most likely x-headers coming in from the internet, or if you are like us with many home grown apps that send mail those apps may be at fault. I know I'm going to have a lot of work to do before going RU8 or SP2 due to the amount of custom x-headers we have and how it will affect our IMAP users...sigh... -alex On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: So could this problem be causing the problem we're having trying to get our iPhone to connect to the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit This was a major area of effort in Exchange Server 2007 SP2. These fixes are not (and as far as I know, will not be) backported to Exchange Server 2003. Go ahead and bump it to 16K. Then keep track of it. If you hit 16K, you should seriously considering doing the move-mailbox. From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event 9667 - Named properties quota limit Getting the following in the Exchange 2003 server application log: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 9667 Date: 8/26/2009 Time: 1:31:25 PM User: N/A Computer: OTIS Description: Failed to create a new named property for database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (OTIS) because the number of named properties reached the quota limit (8192). User attempting to create the named property: BESAdmin Named property GUID: 00020386---c000-0046 Named property name/id: cd Googling finds that I can bump the limit up in the registry. That's all well and good, but it goes on to say that if I hit the 32K limit the information store won't work anymore. Okay, so if I bump the registry setting up to say... 16K, what are the odds that I'll hit that number any time soon? And from what I've read, if it hits the 32K mark, the information store doesn't work anymore. The fix for this appears to be creating another database and copying all the mailboxes over to it, but won't the quota just fill up again eventually? Paul ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. **
