RE: RPC/HTTP Revisited
PEBKAC in the end – needed to enter a different entry in wild card cert for the msstd setting All working From: Duncan Turnbull [mailto:dun...@e-simple.co.nz] Sent: 21 April 2010 18:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited One issue I had with installing a wild card certificate was in iiis expecting a client certificate for the rpc directory Somehow that changed during the certificate installation, I took this requirement off the rpc dir in iis and things came back to life. I found it using the rpc tools for server 2003, otherwise there were no error messages Then for some reason the setting would revert every few hours. Eventually rebooting evrything caused it to stick Good luck Cheers Duncan Sent from my iPhone please excuse the typos On 22/04/2010, at 2:58 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Use 2010. Honestly, I’ve no idea. If 2010 works, then it’s probably part of the security package rework that happened in 2010. Certainly not going to be backported… Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
RPC/HTTP Revisited
The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
unticked http for fast networks and it went through, now to test external On 21 April 2010 15:49, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
yes, and from outside as well - I am actually disconnected from the LAN now as I got the thing working internally, but now externally it is still just prompting for the password, and it keeps prompting - I used the same user account to get the blank page when I tested connection rpc/rpcproxy.dll Thanks! On 21 April 2010 15:57, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: When you go to http://exchangeserver/rpc, do you get a login box? (From inside the network) *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:49 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
can't, 2003 is my clients standard desktop - I am running 2010 on my machine, was very happy when it worked only to be dropped back into the frustration thereafter (my 2010 is Beta still!) thanks On 21 April 2010 15:58, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Use 2010. Honestly, I’ve no idea. If 2010 works, then it’s probably part of the security package rework that happened in 2010. Certainly not going to be backported… Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:49 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment
Dear all, I hope someone can help with this one. Environment Exchange Front End Servers are Windows 2003 SP2, Exchange 2003 SP configured in a load balanced set up using Windows NLB, digital cert is a wild card, and the servers are sitting in the DMZ (no ISA Server) Exchange back end servers live on a three node cluster (again all 2003 sp2) where node 1 and 3 typically host the two live cluster resources, with node 2 as a failover node for both. OWA works without firing a cert error when connecting. I have installed the RPC/HTTP proxy components on both front end servers, and ticked all the relevant rpc/http radio buttons on the rpc tab for all of the servers (ESM only shows the 4 (two front end, and two back end hosts) If I do an RPCDUMP.exe /v on the first backend server I am testing it is not listening on ports 6001, 6002 and 6004, so I am guessing that this is something to do with it living on a cluster? I have the below information rgearding reg hacks: Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; sWindows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; server-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593;erver-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593; My question is do I need to add both of the virtual node names in for the back end system on all three back end registries? I am guessing I do, just wanted to run it past you all in case someone else has done this, as google is not being friendly on this one. Thanks in advance Clayton
RE: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment
Simon, agreed, poor design, (pre-me) Michael, we are talking about people who don't want us deploying 2008 member servers even though they know support runs out soon. (GR) RPC/HTTP was my idea as the firewall they have wants MD5 VPN, and well, Vista and 7. Found out after the fact that we have another client with a similar set up, so gonna have a browse through their exchange registries - you know, I am so looking forward to that ;-) Hopefully that will sort me out (he says) This three node backend cluster still has me worried, but I guess it depends on the reg entries? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 19 April 2010 18:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment Wildcards can be made to work. I did it years ago (but I'm shocked that anyone would be deploying a new feature on 2003 at this late date!), but can't find any notes I made about it. AFAICR, You'll need the external fqdn, the wildcard fqdn (*.example.com), the fqdn and shortnames of the fe, the be, and the proxy server. It'll be a long long validports entry. I'm pretty sure you'll also have to set this server is not a member of a managed front-end/back-end RPC/HTTP network for all servers. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment Two problems immediately sprint to mind. 1. Exchange in a DMZ - that is such a poor design. 2. RPC over HTTPS does not like wildcard certificates. With outlook it is looking for an exact match. With a wild card certificate *.example.com is NOT the same as mail.example.com You shouldn't be making registry changes if you are using fe/be - only the GUI is required. However I suspect things are not working because of the use of a DMZ and wildcard. Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 April 2010 16:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment Dear all, I hope someone can help with this one. Environment Exchange Front End Servers are Windows 2003 SP2, Exchange 2003 SP configured in a load balanced set up using Windows NLB, digital cert is a wild card, and the servers are sitting in the DMZ (no ISA Server) Exchange back end servers live on a three node cluster (again all 2003 sp2) where node 1 and 3 typically host the two live cluster resources, with node 2 as a failover node for both. OWA works without firing a cert error when connecting. I have installed the RPC/HTTP proxy components on both front end servers, and ticked all the relevant rpc/http radio buttons on the rpc tab for all of the servers (ESM only shows the 4 (two front end, and two back end hosts) If I do an RPCDUMP.exe /v on the first backend server I am testing it is not listening on ports 6001, 6002 and 6004, so I am guessing that this is something to do with it living on a cluster? I have the below information rgearding reg hacks: Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; sWindows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; server-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593;erver-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593; My question is do I need to add both of the virtual node names in for the back end system on all three back end registries? I am guessing I do, just wanted to run it past you all in case someone else has done this, as google is not being friendly on this one. Thanks in advance Clayton
RE: I lost the fight
Also, be prepared possible for complaints from iPhone users as AS in some versions of the iPhone OS are not full featured, I believe calendar sync is not fully functional in some revisions so probably worth looking at From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 February 2010 16:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: I lost the fight If you have WM phones working via AS, iPhones will work. From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 8:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: I lost the fight I have to allow a selected few to connect to Exchange 2003 with iPhones. I'm still arguing for the use of Good software but in the mean time I have to configure Exchange to connect. Is there a definitive article that you may have used on how to configure Exchange for iPhones? Google has returned various results. Thanks in advance! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 clip_image001 NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. image001.gif
Re: Exchange 2010 sizing guide
This might help? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335108.aspx 2010/1/13 Ellis, John P. johnel...@wirral.gov.uk Is there such thing as an Exchange 2010 sizing guide? Currently we are using Exchange 2003 and im trying to size the servers Currently we have about 4300 users and this will probably grow to 5500. Thanks John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
RE: A blast from the past...
Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html
RE: A blast from the past...
Well retrieved! From: Andrew Laya [mailto:andrew.l...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:45 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html
RE: A blast from the past...
Yeah it is a bit of a head twister - I started lurking in 98! Just wish I had more time to spend on list! From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... That's what I was guessing it was. I joined the list shortly after that, can't believe that it's been that long. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote: Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
RE: A blast from the past...
Looks aren't everything... From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 20:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... Lurker - you be scarey. ;) On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah it is a bit of a head twister - I started lurking in 98! Just wish I had more time to spend on list! From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... That's what I was guessing it was. I joined the list shortly after that, can't believe that it's been that long. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote: Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: A blast from the past...
Apparently both Baby Seals and Tiger Woods have now been clubbed by Scandinavians From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 20:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... ApparentlyMrs. Tiger Woods is finding that out it seems Yes, I just took this wyyy off topic. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: Looks aren't everything... From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 20:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... Lurker - you be scarey. ;) On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah it is a bit of a head twister - I started lurking in 98! Just wish I had more time to spend on list! From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... That's what I was guessing it was. I joined the list shortly after that, can't believe that it's been that long. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote: Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Friday Funny - Banned From Wal-Mart
the funniest thing I have ever read! http://www.vtwinmama.com/demonic_squirrel_riding_story.htm 2009/7/17 pramatow...@mediageneral.com the squirrel motorcycle story? *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2009 10:06 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* OT: Friday Funny - Banned From Wal-Mart Mr. Caesare, this is especially for you since you need a laugh or two to get you through the long day/night you have scheduled. Warning, some may find this politically, moraly or gender(ly) incorrect, but it's one of the funniest things I've read since the squirrel motorcycle story.(1, 3 12 are my personal favorites). snip -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Questions about masquerade domains
Morning all, hope someone can educamate me on this topic. I am looking at this setting on our Exchange 2003 SP2 environment, and note that there is something entered in there. When I look on our external SMTP proxy I see that there are outbound emails referencing the Masquerade domain. The emails referenced originate from either a Web based IT Service desk which connects to a mailbox on the Exchange server, or from an Exchange server which routes email from a remote site to the local Exchange server through a routing group connector. I am wondering why this is, and if anyone uses masquerade domains what is the practical use for them. Me no understand :-) Thanks in advance. Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Updating User's Properties in the GAL
Hi all, I was just asked a question if there is a way that users can view the properties of their own account in the GAL through Outlook and fill in the details on the general tab (address, phone number etc). I was wondering if any of you fine folks have anything like this in place and if s how you have achieved it. Many thanks Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Updating User's Properties in the GAL
Cool, thanks, will test that out. Clayton 2009/6/8 Vincent DeSouza vincent.deso...@nbkcapital.com Sorry. Should have been this one http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272198 Not Sure this will work with Exchange 2007 though Kind Regards, Vincent *From:* Vincent DeSouza [mailto:vincent.deso...@nbkcapital.com] *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2009 12:29 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Updating User's Properties in the GAL How to install and use the Global Address List Modify for Web tool See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/242223 Kind Regards, Vincent *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2009 12:10 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Updating User's Properties in the GAL Hi all, I was just asked a question if there is a way that users can view the properties of their own account in the GAL through Outlook and fill in the details on the general tab (address, phone number etc). I was wondering if any of you fine folks have anything like this in place and if s how you have achieved it. Many thanks Clayton [image: Global Finance declares NBK Capital 'The Best Investment Bank In Kuwait for 2009'] - www.nbkcapital.com -- *Attention* *This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. * *Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by NBK Capital, unless clearly indicated in the message and the authority of the author to so bind NBK Capital is duly verified. No warranty is given as to the legitimacy of e-Mail content transmitted over the Internet.* [image: Global Finance declares NBK Capital 'The Best Investment Bank In Kuwait for 2009'] - *www.nbkcapital.com* http://www.nbkcapital.com/ -- *Attention* *This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by NBK Capital, unless clearly indicated in the message and the authority of the author to so bind NBK Capital is duly verified. No warranty is given as to the legitimacy of e-Mail content transmitted over the Internet. * -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909802
Hi all, we seem to be experiencing the issues described in the above referenced kb article. Just wondering if anyone has installed it with no problems, and did you have to install it across your exchange org, or was it only required on the server on which the effected users had their mailboxes. Many thanks in advance. Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Blackberry :-( Issue
Hi all, first if this is a reallynewbie stupid question I will apologies up front, as thus far in my career I have been fortunate enough not to have had the displeasure of supporting these devices too much, which leaves me not knowing a helck of a lot lol. BES, latest version, 2 mailbox servers, E2K3 SP2 If a user is on exchange server A changes made onthe blackberry calendar sync to Outlook, however if you move them to server B the Blackberry changes no longer sync. I read that this can occur is mapi32.dll and cdo.dll on the exchange server does not match the version on the BES. I checked this all through and the same versions are present on all three machines. I checked the version of all of dll's in program files\exchsrvr (sad huh) on both mailbox servers and found only one discrepancy, exmime.dll (the non working server has an older version, but it is still a 6.5.76 version. Has anyone seen mismatches of exmime.dll cause the calendar issues decribed, and if so is it a simple matter of copying the dll from server a to server b and bouncing the server or is there a specific hot fix for this, google has not come upwith too much on this so far. TIA Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Blackberry :-( Issue
cool, will do, thanks :-) 2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk I’m not really sure what could cause this issue, but won’t hurt reading KB913643 and KB923537 (taken from the BES installation guide which is fresh in my memory). *From:* bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Clayton Doige *Sent:* 14 May 2009 16:23 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Blackberry :-( Issue Hi all, first if this is a reallynewbie stupid question I will apologies up front, as thus far in my career I have been fortunate enough not to have had the displeasure of supporting these devices too much, which leaves me not knowing a helck of a lot lol. BES, latest version, 2 mailbox servers, E2K3 SP2 If a user is on exchange server A changes made onthe blackberry calendar sync to Outlook, however if you move them to server B the Blackberry changes no longer sync. I read that this can occur is mapi32.dll and cdo.dll on the exchange server does not match the version on the BES. I checked this all through and the same versions are present on all three machines. I checked the version of all of dll's in program files\exchsrvr (sad huh) on both mailbox servers and found only one discrepancy, exmime.dll (the non working server has an older version, but it is still a 6.5.76 version. Has anyone seen mismatches of exmime.dll cause the calendar issues decribed, and if so is it a simple matter of copying the dll from server a to server b and bouncing the server or is there a specific hot fix for this, google has not come upwith too much on this so far. TIA Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Blackberry :-( Issue
I think I might have found the issue. In ADUC on the Exchange Advance tab besadmin has allow and deny ticked for full mailbox access. Does anyone know where this is inheritedfrom? I can't see it on the information store level. And I can't remove it as there is no tick box to sotp inheriting. Thanks:-) 2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk No worries. The text for it simply states “Unicode support for CalendarsTo support Exchange 2003, these need to be installed on the Messaging Server (913643) and BES server (923537)”. *From:* bounce-8529883-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: bounce-8529883-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Clayton Doige *Sent:* 14 May 2009 16:30 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Blackberry :-( Issue cool, will do, thanks :-) 2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk I’m not really sure what could cause this issue, but won’t hurt reading KB913643 and KB923537 (taken from the BES installation guide which is fresh in my memory). *From:* bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Clayton Doige *Sent:* 14 May 2009 16:23 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Blackberry :-( Issue Hi all, first if this is a reallynewbie stupid question I will apologies up front, as thus far in my career I have been fortunate enough not to have had the displeasure of supporting these devices too much, which leaves me not knowing a helck of a lot lol. BES, latest version, 2 mailbox servers, E2K3 SP2 If a user is on exchange server A changes made onthe blackberry calendar sync to Outlook, however if you move them to server B the Blackberry changes no longer sync. I read that this can occur is mapi32.dll and cdo.dll on the exchange server does not match the version on the BES. I checked this all through and the same versions are present on all three machines. I checked the version of all of dll's in program files\exchsrvr (sad huh) on both mailbox servers and found only one discrepancy, exmime.dll (the non working server has an older version, but it is still a 6.5.76 version. Has anyone seen mismatches of exmime.dll cause the calendar issues decribed, and if so is it a simple matter of copying the dll from server a to server b and bouncing the server or is there a specific hot fix for this, google has not come upwith too much on this so far. TIA Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
5.5 System Folder Question
Dear all, would I be correct in saying that the name format for a 5.5 OAB system folder would be EX:/ O= etc? Thanks Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: 5.5 System Folder Question
I have got a system folder created in 2002 that has only a version2 OAB folder. The default folder with the three versions was created in 2005. So I beleive what I am seeing is a legacy 5.5 folder that was replicated across during a 5.5 to 2003 upgrade. I just want to be sure that's what it is before I blow it away. We have 50 users in three sites who are getting the wrong OAB when they connect to exchange in cached mode. 2009/5/7 Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com Exchange 5.5 You're kidding right? On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.comwrote: Dear all, would I be correct in saying that the name format for a 5.5 OAB system folder would be EX:/ O= etc? Thanks Clayton -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
Cool, thanks :-) 2009/4/15 Bolser, Scott scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS’ lifecycle policy). -Scott *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: favorite phone
the touch pro rocks! 2009/3/6 James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com I've already made a few iPhone users jealous with my Touch Pro (same thing as a fuze). Keyboard too small? Smaller then the keyboard on an iPhone? Doesnt the fuze have the slide out keyboard? I like the slide out keyboard but I find the touch screen one to be the same as the one on the iPhone. Also the touch screen is the same as the iPhones. I used both but for work purposes I need Win Mobile. On 3/5/09, Gene Giannamore gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com wrote: User already has the htc fuze from att. Keyboard is too small, too many pop-ups while typing, touch screen is flakey (does not work consistently). Probably just give him one of the extra 1st gen iphones we have to play with for now, until I find something better. Gene Giannamore Abide International Inc. Technical Support 561 1st Street West Sonoma,Ca.95476 (707) 935-1577 Office (707) 935-9387 Fax (707) 766-4185 Cell gene.giannam...@abideinternational.commailto: gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: favorite phone As something to use instead of an iPhone go with the Fuze. Awesome phone with a touch-screen and slide out keyboard. Does everything the OP asks and much more. TVK From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: favorite phone BB 9000 (aka Bold) - on BES - BB browser slowly getting better but still not IE - yes to voice dialing though I don't use it. (this is for work of course) From: Gene Giannamore [mailto:gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: favorite phone We are looking at iphone alternatives. I was just wondering what your favorite phone is, especially for accessing exchange email, contacts, calendar, and browsing the web. Also does the phone have voice dialing? Gene Giannamore Abide International Inc. Technical Support 561 1st Street West Sonoma,Ca.95476 (707) 935-1577 Office (707) 935-9387 Fax (707) 766-4185 Cell gene.giannam...@abideinternational.commailto: gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ -- Sent from my mobile device ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
recover dead 5.5 mdb
Hi there, have restored an old 5.5 db, but it won't mount no matter what we try. Can anyone recommend a tool that we can use to extract PST's? We are trying to get Stellar Phoenix Mailbox Exchange Recovery, which needs a serial code, so looking for any freeware, cheap type alternative? tia Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd clay...@greenit.co.uk mailto:clay...@greenit.co.uk 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk http://www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb
All we have is a 6 gb 5.5 edb, and no back up of the previous server to restore from L From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb What errors do you get? Whats size is the EDB file? Have you tried running a edb check against the file? John From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@greenit.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:29 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: recover dead 5.5 mdb Hi there, have restored an old 5.5 db, but it won't mount no matter what we try. Can anyone recommend a tool that we can use to extract PST's? We are trying to get Stellar Phoenix Mailbox Exchange Recovery, which needs a serial code, so looking for any freeware, cheap type alternative? tia Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd clay...@greenit.co.uk 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb
Perfect, thanks!!! -Original Message- From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org Sent: 21 January 2009 18:03 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb Qntrack recovery tools. Or Quest recovery tools.. those are you options From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@greenit.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb All we have is a 6 gb 5.5 edb, and no back up of the previous server to restore from L From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb What errors do you get? Whats size is the EDB file? Have you tried running a edb check against the file? John From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@greenit.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:29 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: recover dead 5.5 mdb Hi there, have restored an old 5.5 db, but it wont mount no matter what we try. Can anyone recommend a tool that we can use to extract PSTs? We are trying to get Stellar Phoenix Mailbox Exchange Recovery, which needs a serial code, so looking for any freeware, cheap type alternative? tia Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd clay...@greenit.co.uk 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
Should be fine with one server Check the type of authentication you are using in IIS for the active sync area of the site, set it to integrated, and not forms based, see if that helps -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2008 16:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Hi Guys Day 3 I am still nowhere with IPhone. I have verified everything is setup how it needs to be but still not working. From the documentations that I found the only difference between our setup and the documentation is that we are not using a front end backend technology. Is it possible that my issue is that I don't have a front end server? Dr Something to do with front end and backend server as we only has one server. Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is there something I need to configure on the Active sync options with in the IIS manager? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is the cert trusted? In other words did you generate a cert request, send it off to your cert provider, etc etc etc. If you made the cert yourself the iPhone won't let you connect unless you install the cert up on the iPhone as well which I don't know how to do. HTH somewhat -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone I don't have a front end server I just have one exchange I do have an SSL for my OWA it's assigned by version. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
To be fair, set up an ISA in the DMZ, have FE and BE exchange servers and the right NAT on your external firewall and Windows Mobile does what it says on the tin, and it's secure. (secure is as secure does ma'am) Trying to get anything Apple talking to the world of PC has always been a mare IMHO. My biggest peeve as an ex BB user is having to turn off the wireless if I don't mail at 4:00 AM, at least that was what is was like 3 years ago, where as you don't have to enable push on Exchange, and most of our 'users' prefer that K, will shut up now lol -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2008 21:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Hmm, mentally contrasting this to adding a BB - or a dozen - or a whole new BES with users. And end up feeling good about having the ability of actually managing the remote devices and giving them free, secure intranet access without exposing Exchange or any other systems to the internet. [ok, smart-axx off] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Hi Guys Day 3 I am still nowhere with IPhone. I have verified everything is setup how it needs to be but still not working. From the documentations that I found the only difference between our setup and the documentation is that we are not using a front end backend technology. Is it possible that my issue is that I don't have a front end server? Dr Something to do with front end and backend server as we only has one server. Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is there something I need to configure on the Active sync options with in the IIS manager? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
that's a powerful point 2008/7/16 Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you guys excel yourselves! -- *From:* Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:38 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone In the System Center? On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only after you get your Groove on. - John Barsodi -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Word -Original Message- From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Yeah, they have a great Outlook on life. -Original Message- From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I really love these Exchanges in the group. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bet there is a nice Vista from that height. *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:32 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I noticed from your auto sig that you are on the 12^th floor of your building. Do the Windows open far enough to fit an iPhone through? *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com *From:* Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 15 July 2008 17:29 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I just received an IP phone from the IT director requesting that I setup email on it. Based on the documentation it looks like a simple job yah right I have been fumbling with the device for about 2 hours now. On my firewall I have port 443 open as we allow Outlook Web Access I also enabled IMAP not sure what else to do. I have a feeling it has something to do with SSL encryption. Any assistance would be great Dr ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
For sure, easy Access to information From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 11:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone It's always good to share points... From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone that's a powerful point 2008/7/16 Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you guys excel yourselves! From: Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone In the System Center? On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only after you get your Groove on. - John Barsodi -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Word -Original Message- From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Yeah, they have a great Outlook on life. -Original Message- From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I really love these Exchanges in the group. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bet there is a nice Vista from that height. *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:32 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I noticed from your auto sig that you are on the 12^th floor of your building. Do the Windows open far enough to fit an iPhone through? *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com/ http://www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com/ *From:* Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 15 July 2008 17:29 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I just received an IP phone from the IT director requesting that I setup email on it. Based on the documentation it looks like a simple job yah right I have been fumbling with the device for about 2 hours now. On my firewall I have port 443 open as we allow Outlook Web Access I also enabled IMAP not sure what else to do. I have a feeling it has something to do with SSL encryption. Any assistance would be great Dr ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 July 2008 17:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone That's a pretty good question...and WM5/6 devices have the same issue. There is actually an 'iPhone Configuration Utility' that you can use to locally provision settings/lock down an iPhone with for Enterprise use. One of the tabs lets you install your own certs, in case you use internal PKI for the OWA/EAS SSL. But if you use something from a large cert house (Thawte, Verisign, etc). you should be safe. --James On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder what type of SSL certs they accept. Each device has a different list of SSL CAs, right? -Original Message- From: James Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone A big part of the iPhone 2.0 is licensing of the Exchange Activesync software from Microsoft. It will allow password policies, remote wipe, etc. Email and Calendar should work flawlessly. I'll know for sure once we get some demos in this week (but from checking the HTTP-agents in our logs, I can see that a few people already have theirs and are working). Whether this is good or bad -- the Exchange copy will overwrite the local email and calendar on the device (only one profile, I guess). The only requirement from an Exchange perspective is to have OWA servers exposed to the internet for HTTPS. If everything else is set to default, Exchange Activesync will work just fine. The only rare exception would be a firewall that wants to block unusual looking HTTP verbs. --James On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think iPhones do Active Sync do they? I thought you had to do IMAP? 2008/7/14 Stefan Jafs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? __ Stefan Jafs This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
Sorry to ask what could be a dumb question, but your verisign cert, you have installed it back into your computer's personal certificate store etc etc? As it's verisign as long as the FQDN on the cert matches the FQDN on the iPhone's exchange server address you should be OK. 2008/7/16 Dennis Rogov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is the cert trusted? In other words did you generate a cert request, send it off to your cert provider, etc etc etc. If you made the cert yourself the iPhone won't let you connect unless you install the cert up on the iPhone as well which I don't know how to do. HTH somewhat -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone I don't have a front end server I just have one exchange I do have an SSL for my OWA it's assigned by version. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Do you have a front end server? Do you have an SSL cert installed? If so, who is the provider of it? -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 6:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Good Morning I am still struggling to activity the IPhone From the documentation it tells me that I need to have a certificate * On the Front-End Server, verify that a server certificate is installed and enable SSL for the Exchange ActiveSync virtual directory (require basic SSL authentication I am somewhat confused whats being asked on the above statement. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Do you need to have a cert dedicated
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
Hey, can't speak for Apache, but it seems to me that the cert needs to live on both the reverse proxy and the fe server. Certainly with the ISA set up you put the cert in both the ISA cert store and the website itself, else it does not work. PDA's also seem a lot more touchy with certs than a browser, as in a browser will connect when a pda won't. Can you telnet from the apache to IIS on 443? Also, on the ISA server set up's I have done I have had to make an entry for the FQDN of the cert in the hosts file on the ISA Server which points to the fe server. So if you can do this on the apache, and ping the fqdn and get a response from the fe server that might help? Dunno, just shotting out ideas really. HTH, will touch base with you later, but I am getting kicked out of the office now, so will check in from home :P C 2008/7/16 Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Grrr, I'm getting a little frustrated, well a lot frustrated. We've just recently gone the route of setting up OWA and now I'm working on ActiveSync. We have an Apache server that is setup with a reverse proxy to do OWA, and it works flawlessly. Attempting to do the same thing with ActiveSync, and it's not working. I go between getting an 0x85010014error code on the device to it prompting me to Please correct your Exchange Server password. on the device over and over again. It just depends on what settings I have in IIS, I've broken OWA a few times in this and fixed it, but I don't know what it is I'm missing. Exchange 2003 sp2, IIS6, and some windows device that my manager had laying around that we've put a sim card in. ISA is out of the loop since we're doing a reverse proxy from an Apache server, and we've had to install a root cert from our colo facility on the device. My apache guy says we don't need the cert on the exchange server because we're doing the reverse proxy. I've got the active sync virtual directory set to ignore client certs, it's also set for no anonymouse access, and Integrated Windows authentication. What else do I need to look at in IIS? What other settings on what other directories do I need to make? Yes, I've been googling and searching for answers since yesterday afternoon and not making any progress. Oh, I get the 10014 error code when I set the active sync virtual directory to have both integrated basic authentication, or to just basic authentication. Thanks all On 7/16/08, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry to ask what could be a dumb question, but your verisign cert, you have installed it back into your computer's personal certificate store etc etc? As it's verisign as long as the FQDN on the cert matches the FQDN on the iPhone's exchange server address you should be OK. 2008/7/16 Dennis Rogov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is the cert trusted? In other words did you generate a cert request, send it off to your cert provider, etc etc etc. If you made the cert yourself the iPhone won't let you connect unless you install the cert up on the iPhone as well which I don't know how to do. HTH somewhat -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone I don't have a front end server I just have one exchange I do have an SSL for my OWA it's assigned by version. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
I hear the kids are Hyper as it Virtually ready for release From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 20:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Nah... I'll just wait for the SQL... _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone You guys keep singing OneNote. Consider taking a different InfoPath. _ From: Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone For sure, easy Access to information From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 11:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone It's always good to share points... _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone that's a powerful point 2008/7/16 Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you guys excel yourselves! _ From: Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone In the System Center? On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only after you get your Groove on. - John Barsodi -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Word -Original Message- From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Yeah, they have a great Outlook on life. -Original Message- From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I really love these Exchanges in the group. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bet there is a nice Vista from that height. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Setting up blackberries to connect to Exchange
Why don't people ask IT FIRST? We got a call from a user in Amsterdam, 'I just bought a Blackberry'... 'Take it back and get a Smart Phone, we don't support it' was the response. Without a BES there is no point to getting Blackberries, even if they are a good Canadian company ;-) 2008/7/14 Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well done Bob, ditto On 7/14/08, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The best way is to install a Blackberry Enterprise Server. However, it sounds like you probably don't have the licenses for that. If you have your Exchange server setup for OWA, you can go to the BIS website of your cell provider and setup an account for each user and then add their email accounts. However, this will not work as well as BES. Calendars will not sync and the email does not sync as well in my experience. http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/internet/email.jsp#tab_tab_email_setup Really… you need BES to properly manage Blackberries in an enterprise environment. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] *From:* King's Kid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2008 10:32 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Setting up blackberries to connect to Exchange Hi all, My bosses in their infinite wisdom have decided to give our roaming supervisors Blackberry Curve 8330 phones. They have already received them. However, I wasn't notified until today that they are expecting to receive their e-mail using them. I've checked on Sprint's website (useless) and Microsoft's website and could find information about if there's a problem but not how to do an initial set-up. My question is, is there anything I need to do to our Exchange server to allow this? If so, could someone point me to a step by step to do it. Exchange 2k3, fully patched on an SBS 2k3 server sp2 TIA BJ No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
I don't think iPhones do Active Sync do they? I thought you had to do IMAP? 2008/7/14 Stefan Jafs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? *__* *Stefan Jafs* This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
well well well, might have to go get one lol thanks 2008/7/14 Stefan Jafs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I guess this may help. http://images.apple.com/iphone/enterprise/docs/iPhone_Enterprise.pdf *__* *Stefan Jafs* *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2008 10:51 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Ok it's starting BB to iPone I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? *__* *Stefan Jafs* This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OT Outlook POP Error 0X8004210A
All, sorry for the OT, I have a groups of four people who's pop email all stopped working about a week ago. When they send/receive the error in the subject comes up. Google reveals that this is due to Norton/McAffee blocking Outlook. In this case Norton is not installed, they are using AVG. I have had one of them turn off Windows Firewall and stop the AVG services and they still get the error. From a command window they can telnet to the mail server on port 110 and login, list, retrieve etc. If I had hair I would be pulling it out, and was wondering if anyone has any experience of this and can give me a few pointers. Thanks in advance Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
NDR's generated via spoofed from address
Hi all, have a user who is getting nailed with NDR's for email she is not sending. We have verified that there are no matching emails coming out of the E2k3 SP2 server which means that someone 'out there' is spoofing the from address and NDR's are going to that address. What's the best bet to combat this? Said user is getting bored of deleting the NDR's Thanks in advance for any advice J Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk http://www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: NDR's generated via spoofed from address
Deep joy, thanks for the advice J this blog was amusing to say the least: http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2007/12/19/drowning-in-the-backscatter From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 April 2008 14:05 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NDR's generated via spoofed from address Absolutely. Unfortunately you have no way of dealing with this other than setting up an Outlook rule or killing NDR's at your edge mail server if you have such a thing. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 April 2008 14:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: NDR's generated via spoofed from address Tell her that Outlook rules are her friend. On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, have a user who is getting nailed with NDR's for email she is not sending. We have verified that there are no matching emails coming out of the E2k3 SP2 server which means that someone 'out there' is spoofing the from address and NDR's are going to that address. What's the best bet to combat this? Said user is getting bored of deleting the NDR's Thanks in advance for any advice J Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Disclaimer: The Development Bank of Southern Africa exercises no control over information contained in any e-mail message originating from within the organisation. The Bank makes no representation relating to the completeness or accuracy and accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage or liability that is incurred by reliance on the content hereof by the recipient or any other party. Each page attached hereto must also be read in conjunction with any disclaimer, which forms part of it. Confidentiality: The e-mail is privileged and confidential and for use of the addressee only. Should you have received this e-mail in error, please return it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Dissemination, disclosure, copying or any similar actions of the content of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange fail-over
I have not tried 2007 SCR as yet, but have read a lot on it. SCR looks good, but do you really want to be doing stuff in command line when the boss is standing over you wondering when email is going to be back on line? The thing is, if you go to 2007 then you need to pitch your servers for 64 bit, and get the appropriate OS as well. If you are just wanting to get your existing data to an existing standby box, then Double Take is the way to go. The software will configure your target server so that all of the appropriate services are set to manual and stopped. When you failover it will update AD, and add the SPN for the source server to the target server, plus make any required changes in DNS. Users only have to restart Outlook if they were signed in at the time of the failover. And it can be controlled with one mouse click as opposed to having to type correctly when the poo hits the fan. On 18/03/2008, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DoubleTake (as someone else mentioned) and NeverFail are the typical recommended solutions. MessageOne is a typical 3rd party provider providing message continuity. However, I would recommend you upgrade to Exchange 2007 and use LCR or SCR; which are built into the product. If you really actually want to do active/passive Exchange clustering, search on technet.microsoft.com for SCC – Single Copy Clustering. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/ *From:* Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:00 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Exchange fail-over Hello all… I want to have a stand-by Exchange box that can act as a fail-over in the event I lose my active Exchange server. I understand that this can be accomplished by clustering. Google has a zillion links about Windows/Exchange clustering so I was hoping the experts here could recommend a link where it would be a good place to start learning how to do this. Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated. Environment is W2K3 Servers and Exchange 2003, clients are a mixture of O2K3 and O2K7…all fully patched. *Bill Lambert* *Windows System Administrator* *Concuity* *A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. * *Phone 847-941-9206* *Fax 847-465-9147* ** *NASDAQ: TTPA*** *The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. *** -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.gif
Re: Exchange fail-over
Very true, Double Take does however set itself to require a manual failover by default (you can disable this requirement, but why would you want to...) On 18/03/2008, Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding SCR, that's because it's a site resilience solution and not an HA solution. In my experience, most customers who want site resilience expect and understand that manual steps are required to get the system back up and running as they ultimately want to control when the failover occurs. The last thing they want is a DR site accidentally assuming control during a normal day when it shouldn't do. J *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 18 March 2008 14:31 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Exchange fail-over I have not tried 2007 SCR as yet, but have read a lot on it. SCR looks good, but do you really want to be doing stuff in command line when the boss is standing over you wondering when email is going to be back on line? The thing is, if you go to 2007 then you need to pitch your servers for 64 bit, and get the appropriate OS as well. If you are just wanting to get your existing data to an existing standby box, then Double Take is the way to go. The software will configure your target server so that all of the appropriate services are set to manual and stopped. When you failover it will update AD, and add the SPN for the source server to the target server, plus make any required changes in DNS. Users only have to restart Outlook if they were signed in at the time of the failover. And it can be controlled with one mouse click as opposed to having to type correctly when the poo hits the fan. On 18/03/2008, *Michael B. Smith* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DoubleTake (as someone else mentioned) and NeverFail are the typical recommended solutions. MessageOne is a typical 3rd party provider providing message continuity. However, I would recommend you upgrade to Exchange 2007 and use LCR or SCR; which are built into the product. If you really actually want to do active/passive Exchange clustering, search on technet.microsoft.com for SCC – Single Copy Clustering. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/ *From:* Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:00 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Exchange fail-over Hello all… I want to have a stand-by Exchange box that can act as a fail-over in the event I lose my active Exchange server. I understand that this can be accomplished by clustering. Google has a zillion links about Windows/Exchange clustering so I was hoping the experts here could recommend a link where it would be a good place to start learning how to do this. Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated. Environment is W2K3 Servers and Exchange 2003, clients are a mixture of O2K3 and O2K7…all fully patched. *Bill Lambert* *Windows System Administrator* *Concuity* *A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. * *Phone 847-941-9206* *Fax 847-465-9147* ** *NASDAQ: TTPA* *The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. * -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.gif
RE: Journaling to multiple archives
Monday morning, lol, figured this one out, and yes it is possible. Who would have thought the answer would be in the Exchange Help Files. Go figure! ;-) From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 February 2008 09:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Journaling to multiple archives Dear all, bit of a strange question perhaps. With a single archiving solution you typically turn on journaling on a store to a mailbox and then point the archive service to that mailbox. If I wanted to run two separate archive systems in parallel could I create a distribution list of two mailboxes, 1 per archiving mechanism, and then journal to that distribution list? Exchange 2003, SP2. Many thanks in advance Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Tracking disk space consumption
The backup job is taking care of the logs. We are in a very busy period, and I can see this volume of email being realistic. I am just trying to get a handle on individual mailbox growth so that if there is a training issue etc that needs addressing I can. Thanks On 30/01/2008, Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would use windirstat or treesize to find out where the greatest % of space is being used if you want to look simply at the file system as a whole. However, it sounds like you have other issues, are your logs truncating? Greg *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, 30 January 2008 7:54 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Tracking disk space consumption
Can you use ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag, but use a network drive to do the expansion etc? We have 5 stores that are all bigger than the amount of free space on the volume. On 30/01/2008, Fergal O Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We had a similar issue that we couldn't diagnose – out IS stores were increasing by the minute– ended up moving all users to a new IS and that fixed it – May have been related to messages in the temp tables Regards Fergal O'Connell ICT Support Cúram Software Phone : +353 1 4323212 Emailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 30 January 2008 08:54 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Tracking disk space consumption
That was the option I was hoping to avoid lol On 30/01/2008, Pierre Plamondon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, you can make a printscreen of the exchange manager system (mailbox by size) at the end of each day and compare. It is probably not the best way but you can find your space disk. Pierre -- *De :* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Envoyé :* 30 janvier 2008 03:54 *À :* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Objet :* Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!)
Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde of SMTP messages, at least according to the Message Tracking system, which indicates the emails originate from a specific email address. This is Exchange 2003 by the way: I have checked and the system is not a relay, and only authenticated users are allowed to send. I blocked access for this particular user account to the smtp connector, and changed the password on the user account. When looking in Message Tracking subsequent to making the changes above, the messages are noted, and the last action for each message is Submitted to Categorizer. According to the ISP mails are still coming out, and there is no record of an SMTP server on the packets. netstat outputs also seem like everything is normal, although the output is extensive. The box has been swept by it's local Trend SMEX, and Office Scan, plus two other online scanners. WireShark is not telling me anything exciting, and none of the processes running in task manager seem out of the norm. If this was another authenticated machine on the LAN I would have expected the password change to have put an end to that. Has anyone seen similar, and if so could you kindly point this already bald person in the right direction? Many thanks in advance -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!)
None of the processes, services, or registry entries that Hijack This outputs looks untowards on the server. Can the tool be used centrally to analyse numerous hosts, or does this need to be done on a host by host basis. Really what I want to do is see where these messages are originating as they are not in sent items for this users mailbox. Message Tracking has limited output, and I am having a devil of a time trying to track down the source for these messages. BTW, OOF etc are disabled on this server. Thanks On 21/01/2008, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have swept everything on the LAN, nothing revealed from that. I have downloaded HiJakc This and am just running the thing now, and looking at the results. thanks :-) On 21/01/2008, Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Clayton. I second the Hijack this recommendation. Are you saying you swept the server or the user's workstation? I would pull the workstation off the LAN first thing. On Jan 21, 2008 10:03 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde of SMTP messages, at least according to the Message Tracking system, which indicates the emails originate from a specific email address. This is Exchange 2003 by the way: I have checked and the system is not a relay, and only authenticated users are allowed to send. I blocked access for this particular user account to the smtp connector, and changed the password on the user account. When looking in Message Tracking subsequent to making the changes above, the messages are noted, and the last action for each message is Submitted to Categorizer. According to the ISP mails are still coming out, and there is no record of an SMTP server on the packets. netstat outputs also seem like everything is normal, although the output is extensive. The box has been swept by it's local Trend SMEX, and Office Scan, plus two other online scanners. WireShark is not telling me anything exciting, and none of the processes running in task manager seem out of the norm. If this was another authenticated machine on the LAN I would have expected the password change to have put an end to that. Has anyone seen similar, and if so could you kindly point this already bald person in the right direction? Many thanks in advance -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!)
It is the admin account, there goes my attempt at being discreet lol, Found out that Exchange 2003 SP2 is not on here, so trying that, and have disabled authenticated relaying as per your suggestions. Thanks On 21/01/2008, Simon Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first thing I would do is disable authenticated relaying. It may cause some problems for some users, but it needs to be done. Very unusual for a specific user account to be targeted, the usual target is the administrator account. Therefore what might be happening is that a user account is being abused but the authentication prompt is the administrator account. I would not expect the messages to show in the Sent Items, almost certainly the messages are coming from outside and are being pushed through SMTP. Take a look at my spam cleanup article: http://www.amset.info/exchange/spam-cleanup.asp Also remember that ESM is notorious for not showing the true extent of the queues, so while you may think you have cleaned the server up, the messages can continue to flow. Simon. -- *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 21 January 2008 15:36 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP) None of the processes, services, or registry entries that Hijack This outputs looks untowards on the server. Can the tool be used centrally to analyse numerous hosts, or does this need to be done on a host by host basis. Really what I want to do is see where these messages are originating as they are not in sent items for this users mailbox. Message Tracking has limited output, and I am having a devil of a time trying to track down the source for these messages. BTW, OOF etc are disabled on this server. Thanks On 21/01/2008, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have swept everything on the LAN, nothing revealed from that. I have downloaded HiJakc This and am just running the thing now, and looking at the results. thanks :-) On 21/01/2008, Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Clayton. I second the Hijack this recommendation. Are you saying you swept the server or the user's workstation? I would pull the workstation off the LAN first thing. On Jan 21, 2008 10:03 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde of SMTP messages, at least according to the Message Tracking system, which indicates the emails originate from a specific email address. This is Exchange 2003 by the way: I have checked and the system is not a relay, and only authenticated users are allowed to send. I blocked access for this particular user account to the smtp connector, and changed the password on the user account. When looking in Message Tracking subsequent to making the changes above, the messages are noted, and the last action for each message is Submitted to Categorizer. According to the ISP mails are still coming out, and there is no record of an SMTP server on the packets. netstat outputs also seem like everything is normal, although the output is extensive. The box has been swept by it's local Trend SMEX, and Office Scan, plus two other online scanners. WireShark is not telling me anything exciting, and none of the processes running in task manager seem out of the norm. If this was another authenticated machine on the LAN I would have expected the password change to have put an end to that. Has anyone seen similar, and if so could you kindly point this already bald person in the right direction? Many thanks in advance -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
E2K Forwarding
Hi, I posted this the other day, but shall try again... I wish to enable forwarding on my mail server so that messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on my server get forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a separate server which is not part of our org, and no connectors exist (and I don't want them to either) Both mail servers are behind the same firewall. In 5.5 this was fairly straight forward, routing tab, put in the domain and IP etc.. However in 2000, I can't get my head around it. On the general tab of the smtp connector, there are two options, use DNS or a smart host. I have put an MX record in my DNS for domain.b, but this does not work. Am I right in thinking that the only way to add their server as a smart host is to create a site connector or similar? I don't want to do that, and I only wish this to occur for one of our domain names. And before you come back and say Just use a rule, remember that I am inside the firewall, as are they, so no mail from my server can currently reach theirs. I hope this all makes sense, and I am sure that it is fairly simple to implement, but I can't get my head around it with E2K. I really hope you can help me with this. Thanks in advance Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E2K Forwarding
Cool, I did not see anything posted on my original post, and that took two days to hit the list, so, I am sorry for not catching your response the first time. Thanks again, and I will let you know how I get on. Cheers Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E2K Forwarding It's just as easy in E2K. (I thought I answered this? Maybe just in my head...) You configure forwarding to a smart host. I've done it on the SMTP virtual server, but I think it's preferred using an SMTP connector because of greater granular control over what passes through. The help file is clear on this, as well as: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q257/4/26.ASP Should be around: Protocols--SMTP--SMTP Virtual Server--Properties--Delivery--Advanced William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E2K Forwarding Hi, I posted this the other day, but shall try again... I wish to enable forwarding on my mail server so that messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on my server get forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a separate server which is not part of our org, and no connectors exist (and I don't want them to either) Both mail servers are behind the same firewall. In 5.5 this was fairly straight forward, routing tab, put in the domain and IP etc.. However in 2000, I can't get my head around it. On the general tab of the smtp connector, there are two options, use DNS or a smart host. I have put an MX record in my DNS for domain.b, but this does not work. Am I right in thinking that the only way to add their server as a smart host is to create a site connector or similar? I don't want to do that, and I only wish this to occur for one of our domain names. And before you come back and say Just use a rule, remember that I am inside the firewall, as are they, so no mail from my server can currently reach theirs. I hope this all makes sense, and I am sure that it is fairly simple to implement, but I can't get my head around it with E2K. I really hope you can help me with this. Thanks in advance Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
E2K Routing
Title: Message This may be long winded, so I will apologise off the bat. Here goes. Our mail is hosted by someone else at the moment, but we need to move that to our control in the next few days. All our existing mailboxes are on serverX, and have recreated these boxes on serverY which is sitting waiting for me to make the change (delayed for various reasons not important here). Until I can make the change our current users will use the existing serverX for email. But, we just registered a new domain name, and set the MX records to point to our server. Of course no one can access any emails here unless their Outlook is configured to do so, which it aint. In the mean time Marketing has told people to go ahead and give clients the new domain name for sending email. Cute. To further muddy the waters: if I try and send an email to serverX from serverY (both behind the firewall) it does not go through, which tells me I need to configure my mail server to forward mail for given domains to their mail server's internal IP. How do you do this. In 5.5, it was all in the IMC, but I can't seem to spot similar in the SMTP connector. Your wealth of knowledge in much appreciated (in advance!) J Clayton ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Simple Exchange 2000 question???
No it wasn't a question was it! I am guessing you want to know how to hide a recipient. There may be a quicker way, but try this go to the global address list properties page, and click preview double click the mailbox you want to hide go to the Exchange Advanced tab, and you will see it there as an option checkbox Hope that helps Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Exchange 2000 question??? That's not a question. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -- Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple Exchange 2000 question??? Hide users from the Global Address list, like Norton AV Account or Backup Exec Account, or an account I use for Junk Email delivered to former employees. TIA. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: not seeing Active Dir Exch Integrated info on all DC's??
When you install Exchange 2000 it is one of the options in Setup. Much like being able to install the 5.5 admin program on Workstation, you can have the Exchange Manager snap in loaded in an MMC on a professional desktop once you have installed admin.msi on the target workstation. Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: not seeing Active Dir Exch Integrated info on all DC's?? So, what exactly are the Exchange Systems Mgmt Tools that this article refers to? (I don't have an installation to play with right now) Thanks Pat Sure Pat try this article!! Took me a little while to find, but glad I could help!! ; ) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q244/2/87.ASP Thanks Pat Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:54:57 -0400 Author: Pat Smallwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello All, environment:(test) two win2k DC's SP2 (non production environment) one AD Connection Agreement to Exch 5.5 SP4 complete (in process of upgrading test domain to E2K) Is it normal that the only MMC Snap in for AD Users that shows Active Directory integrated Exchange info (ie email address etc) is the DC with the connector installed? The other DC AD Users Snap in does not show the new, additional information. Replication is working. Is there a component that I must install on each additional DC from which I want to manage ALL AD info (exchange for example)? Thanks Pat List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Simple Exchange 2000 question???
Well, in a big org I guess you are waiting for awhile, unless you know a faster way (which I bet you do ;-) Go on, share, it's such a lovely word... Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Exchange 2000 question??? That will do it. What if you maintain multiple address lists (yes, we do)? What if you have 2000 users and you are checking from your Win2000 Pro workstation? Could be awhile before you get a GAL preview. -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Exchange 2000 question??? No it wasn't a question was it! I am guessing you want to know how to hide a recipient. There may be a quicker way, but try this go to the global address list properties page, and click preview double click the mailbox you want to hide go to the Exchange Advanced tab, and you will see it there as an option checkbox Hope that helps Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Simple Exchange 2000 question??? That's not a question. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -- Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Simple Exchange 2000 question??? Hide users from the Global Address list, like Norton AV Account or Backup Exec Account, or an account I use for Junk Email delivered to former employees. TIA. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Organization Name
You should find it on your exchange disk, have a good read on it before you do anything though. It basically exports your account settings from the on server, and allows you to merge that info into an existing exchange box Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Millard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Organization Name Thanks for the reply. However, I've never heard of Exmerge. What exactly is it and where can I find information on it? Exmerge one server to the other is one route. Org names are not easily changed. William -Original Message- From: Paul Millard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Organization Name I have two exchange servers with different organization names that I need to somehow combine into one new organization name. This situation is a result of two companies coming together who each had their own Exchange server and of course different organization and site names. Both servers are running Exchange 5.5, SP 4. Can the organization name be changed in both organizations? Is there an easy way to export everything from one server to the other and then delete the original server? Thank you in advance for any and all assistance. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Accessing Exchange Server over Internet
Have them subscribe to the other list, they sound serious enough for it :-) Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I Gameday International N.V. Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Accessing Exchange Server over Internet Thanks Don, I thought of that, but then I would have to clean up the mess :-) It's very tempting though... I do tell Management ALL the time about the security issues, maybe someday they will get a clue. Diane -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Accessing Exchange Server over Internet One of us could hack it for ya and show the VP Why you don't put an Exchange server on the internet ;o) -Original Message- From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Accessing Exchange Server over Internet My Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 was setup to do this and ever since I had an email flood on one of my users mailboxes that took my server down and required a call to PSS which caused me to make changes to my Exchange Server, this can no longer be done without using VPN (yeah!). HOWEVER, the CEO and the Marketing VP think that is too much of an inconvenience so I have to put it back. Unfortunately I don't remember what permissions are needed for this. I have been dragging my feet to do this, but I have no choice. They don't care if isn't secure. I've been changing permissions slowly but does someone know exactly which permissions I have to dumb-down to get this working again? Maybe I'll just give those permissions to the CEO and Mkt VP. TIA, Diane -Original Message- From: David Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Accessing Exchange Server over Internet When I try to access our exchange 2000 server using outlook xp over the internet I keep getting the following message: snipOutlook could not log on. Check to make sure you are connected to the network and are using the proper server and mailbox name. I can ping the server by name and can access accounts using web browser, but no access from outlook xp client. Thanks David Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
