RE: Stop SMTP mail
Ok I did that and ran rebuild now in Recipient Update Services. But im_dom1.indianafcu.com can still send to the Internet??? -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Stop SMTP mail You could create an SMTP connector and put in the domain name, then point the smart host to 127.0.0.1. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stop SMTP mail I have an Exchange 2003 Standard sp2 server. I have some legacy smtp addresses laying around in ADUC of n...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com. I would like Exchange to not relay those emails to the Internet. Just keep them in house. Is there a way to not allow *...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to relay to the Internet addresses???
RE: Stop SMTP mail
That is the default smtp address for all users on this exchange server. We have in the past not wanted anyone with that address to be able to sent mail to the Internet. We had a second smtp address from an Internet based email provider that we are currently migrating into Exchange. Once all the pop accounts have been completely imported into Exchange we are going to switch the DNS to point to our firewall. Not everyone in the org has a second smtp address. So we want those individuals to stay within the org and not be able to send those not qualified emails to the internet and allow the second smtp address to send and receive at will. So I have a default connector currently that points to the Ironport * all smtp traffic from the exchange server. I set up the second connector and set it to point to [127.0.0.1] for all im_dom1.indianafcu.com traffic but I was able to send to my yahoo account from the im_dom1.indianafcu.com account base. _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail I don't think an SMTP connector should be necessary, and to be honest it sounds like a strange solution given the information I've seen so far. Can you tell us more about the desired result? Do the people with email addresses in that domain have accounts on your Exchange server? Is it your desire to have the Exchange server host mail for that domain? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:23 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Ok I did that and ran rebuild now in Recipient Update Services. But im_dom1.indianafcu.com can still send to the Internet??? -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Stop SMTP mail You could create an SMTP connector and put in the domain name, then point the smart host to 127.0.0.1. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stop SMTP mail I have an Exchange 2003 Standard sp2 server. I have some legacy smtp addresses laying around in ADUC of n...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com. I would like Exchange to not relay those emails to the Internet. Just keep them in house. Is there a way to not allow *...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to relay to the Internet addresses???
RE: Stop SMTP mail
I think so but also I don't want joetel...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to be able to send to the Internet I do however want joeteller to be able to send to janeteller but that should use the mapi client of exchange correct?? _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail So the issue is what shows up as the sender's address on outbound messages that originate on your Exchange server? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:36 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: That is the default smtp address for all users on this exchange server. We have in the past not wanted anyone with that address to be able to sent mail to the Internet. We had a second smtp address from an Internet based email provider that we are currently migrating into Exchange. Once all the pop accounts have been completely imported into Exchange we are going to switch the DNS to point to our firewall. Not everyone in the org has a second smtp address. So we want those individuals to stay within the org and not be able to send those not qualified emails to the internet and allow the second smtp address to send and receive at will. So I have a default connector currently that points to the Ironport * all smtp traffic from the exchange server. I set up the second connector and set it to point to [127.0.0.1] for all im_dom1.indianafcu.com traffic but I was able to send to my yahoo account from the im_dom1.indianafcu.com account base. _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail I don't think an SMTP connector should be necessary, and to be honest it sounds like a strange solution given the information I've seen so far. Can you tell us more about the desired result? Do the people with email addresses in that domain have accounts on your Exchange server? Is it your desire to have the Exchange server host mail for that domain? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:23 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Ok I did that and ran rebuild now in Recipient Update Services. But im_dom1.indianafcu.com can still send to the Internet??? -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Stop SMTP mail You could create an SMTP connector and put in the domain name, then point the smart host to 127.0.0.1. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stop SMTP mail I have an Exchange 2003 Standard sp2 server. I have some legacy smtp addresses laying around in ADUC of n...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com. I would like Exchange to not relay those emails to the Internet. Just keep them in house. Is there a way to not allow *...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to relay to the Internet addresses???
RE: Stop SMTP mail
Jane and Joe only get one, internal mail only. Bossman and Bosslady get two, internal and external. They have had them forever. Now we are taking control of both. Now in ADUC the accounts look like this: Jane smtp:j...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com set as primary Joe smtp:j...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com set as primary Bossman smtp:boss...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com, smtp:boss...@imcu.com set as primary Bosslady smtp:bossl...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com, smtp:bossl...@imcu.com set as primary Default SMTP connector is set to forward * smtp mail to the Ironport. The Ironport is getting all the IM_DOM1 traffic and cannot make a DNS connection to MX of IM_DOM1 and is rejecting all IM_DOM1 traffic. So I am just trying to keep the IM_DOM1 traffic local to exchange and not have it travel up to the Ironport in the first place?? Does this make any sense? _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail So Joe and Jane each have two e-mail addresses? Do you want them to have one account/inbox, or complete separation between the two? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:45 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I think so but also I don't want joetel...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to be able to send to the Internet I do however want joeteller to be able to send to janeteller but that should use the mapi client of exchange correct?? _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail So the issue is what shows up as the sender's address on outbound messages that originate on your Exchange server? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:36 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: That is the default smtp address for all users on this exchange server. We have in the past not wanted anyone with that address to be able to sent mail to the Internet. We had a second smtp address from an Internet based email provider that we are currently migrating into Exchange. Once all the pop accounts have been completely imported into Exchange we are going to switch the DNS to point to our firewall. Not everyone in the org has a second smtp address. So we want those individuals to stay within the org and not be able to send those not qualified emails to the internet and allow the second smtp address to send and receive at will. So I have a default connector currently that points to the Ironport * all smtp traffic from the exchange server. I set up the second connector and set it to point to [127.0.0.1] for all im_dom1.indianafcu.com traffic but I was able to send to my yahoo account from the im_dom1.indianafcu.com account base. _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail I don't think an SMTP connector should be necessary, and to be honest it sounds like a strange solution given the information I've seen so far. Can you tell us more about the desired result? Do the people with email addresses in that domain have accounts on your Exchange server? Is it your desire to have the Exchange server host mail for that domain? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:23 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Ok I did that and ran rebuild now in Recipient Update Services. But im_dom1.indianafcu.com can still send to the Internet??? -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Stop SMTP mail You could create an SMTP connector and put in the domain name, then point the smart host to 127.0.0.1. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stop SMTP mail I have an Exchange 2003 Standard sp2 server. I have some legacy smtp addresses laying around in ADUC of n...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com. I would like Exchange to not relay those emails to the Internet. Just keep them in house. Is there a way to not allow *...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to relay to the Internet addresses???
RE: Stop SMTP mail
Perfect. Now how to accomplish this. _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail Starting to make sense. Joe and Jane should be able to send mail to internal recipients only, and should never be able to send a message outside your Exchange organization? Bossfolk should be able to send anywhere, but always have imcu.com show as the sender? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:02 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Jane and Joe only get one, internal mail only. Bossman and Bosslady get two, internal and external. They have had them forever. Now we are taking control of both. Now in ADUC the accounts look like this: Jane smtp:j...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3aj...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com set as primary Joe smtp:j...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3a...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com set as primary Bossman smtp:boss...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3aboss...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com , smtp:boss...@imcu.com mailto:smtp%3aboss...@imcu.com set as primary Bosslady smtp:bossl...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3abossl...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com , smtp:bossl...@imcu.com mailto:smtp%3abossl...@imcu.com set as primary Default SMTP connector is set to forward * smtp mail to the Ironport. The Ironport is getting all the IM_DOM1 traffic and cannot make a DNS connection to MX of IM_DOM1 and is rejecting all IM_DOM1 traffic. So I am just trying to keep the IM_DOM1 traffic local to exchange and not have it travel up to the Ironport in the first place?? Does this make any sense? _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail So Joe and Jane each have two e-mail addresses? Do you want them to have one account/inbox, or complete separation between the two? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:45 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I think so but also I don't want joetel...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to be able to send to the Internet I do however want joeteller to be able to send to janeteller but that should use the mapi client of exchange correct?? _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail So the issue is what shows up as the sender's address on outbound messages that originate on your Exchange server? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:36 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: That is the default smtp address for all users on this exchange server. We have in the past not wanted anyone with that address to be able to sent mail to the Internet. We had a second smtp address from an Internet based email provider that we are currently migrating into Exchange. Once all the pop accounts have been completely imported into Exchange we are going to switch the DNS to point to our firewall. Not everyone in the org has a second smtp address. So we want those individuals to stay within the org and not be able to send those not qualified emails to the internet and allow the second smtp address to send and receive at will. So I have a default connector currently that points to the Ironport * all smtp traffic from the exchange server. I set up the second connector and set it to point to [127.0.0.1] for all im_dom1.indianafcu.com traffic but I was able to send to my yahoo account from the im_dom1.indianafcu.com account base. _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail I don't think an SMTP connector should be necessary, and to be honest it sounds like a strange solution given the information I've seen so far. Can you tell us more about the desired result? Do the people with email addresses in that domain have accounts on your Exchange server? Is it your desire to have the Exchange server host mail for that domain? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:23 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Ok I did that and ran rebuild now in Recipient Update Services. But im_dom1.indianafcu.com can still send to the Internet??? -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Stop SMTP mail You could create an SMTP connector and put in the domain name, then point the smart host to 127.0.0.1. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited
RE: Stop SMTP mail
Actually they can have it. That was how the original contractor set us up back in 97 and it was wrong then as well back they we were imfcu.com but since we weren't going to be sending to the internet it was an easy way to determine the internal and external mail. Now 13 years later we are combining and I think we will end up removing the im_dom1.indianafcu from the global address list and setting it at IMCU.com. Then using the doc you directed me to we will restrict email on groups policy instead of address range. _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail I actually don't think you have to worry about recipients receiving mail from the internet if they only have im_dom1.indianafcu.com addresses. im_dom1.indianafcu.com isn't valid because of the underscore, is it? (Unrelated - You might want to purchase indianafcu.com and let it sit - just for safety's sake.) On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote: Have a look at http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF009.html and http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF025.html and see where they take you. I haven't set up this configuration before, but it seems straightforward enough. Perhaps some of our esteemed MVPs have easier/better methods or links. On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:08 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Perfect. Now how to accomplish this. _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail Starting to make sense. Joe and Jane should be able to send mail to internal recipients only, and should never be able to send a message outside your Exchange organization? Bossfolk should be able to send anywhere, but always have imcu.com show as the sender? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:02 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Jane and Joe only get one, internal mail only. Bossman and Bosslady get two, internal and external. They have had them forever. Now we are taking control of both. Now in ADUC the accounts look like this: Jane smtp:j...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3aj...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com set as primary Joe smtp:j...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3a...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com set as primary Bossman smtp:boss...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3aboss...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com , smtp:boss...@imcu.com mailto:smtp%3aboss...@imcu.com set as primary Bosslady smtp:bossl...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com mailto:smtp%3abossl...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com , smtp:bossl...@imcu.com mailto:smtp%3abossl...@imcu.com set as primary Default SMTP connector is set to forward * smtp mail to the Ironport. The Ironport is getting all the IM_DOM1 traffic and cannot make a DNS connection to MX of IM_DOM1 and is rejecting all IM_DOM1 traffic. So I am just trying to keep the IM_DOM1 traffic local to exchange and not have it travel up to the Ironport in the first place?? Does this make any sense? _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail So Joe and Jane each have two e-mail addresses? Do you want them to have one account/inbox, or complete separation between the two? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:45 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I think so but also I don't want joetel...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to be able to send to the Internet I do however want joeteller to be able to send to janeteller but that should use the mapi client of exchange correct?? _ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stop SMTP mail So the issue is what shows up as the sender's address on outbound messages that originate on your Exchange server? On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:36 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: That is the default smtp address for all users on this exchange server. We have in the past not wanted anyone with that address to be able to sent mail to the Internet. We had a second smtp address from an Internet based email provider that we are currently migrating into Exchange. Once all the pop accounts have been completely imported into Exchange we are going to switch the DNS to point to our firewall. Not everyone in the org has a second smtp address. So we want those individuals to stay within the org and not be able to send those not qualified emails to the internet and allow the second smtp address to send and receive at will. So I have a default connector currently that points to the Ironport * all smtp traffic from the exchange server. I set up the second connector and set it to point to [127.0.0.1] for all im_dom1.indianafcu.com traffic but I was able to send to my yahoo account from the im_dom1.indianafcu.com account base
Storage Space on server
Microsoft Exchange Standard 2003 sp2 I am migrating a user from outlook express into outlook and she got this error message after I increased her mailbox size to 2 gb. The Junk E-mail Lists were not updated because the storage space on the server has been exceeded. I don't have any events in Application, System, or Security in regards to email space???
RE: Storage Space on server
Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 06/23/2010 Time: 7:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 44834 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. This means that this morning I had 44 GB of space correct?? -Original Message- From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server Wag- http://www.slipstick.com/rules/safesenders.htm [ot to list] I know I had problems sending before using my work email. I've since moved from e2003 to e2010; if this doesn't help and some people get garbled messages I'll go back to using the web to post... [/ot to list] -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Storage Space on server Microsoft Exchange Standard 2003 sp2 I am migrating a user from outlook express into outlook and she got this error message after I increased her mailbox size to 2 gb. The Junk E-mail Lists were not updated because the storage space on the server has been exceeded. I don't have any events in Application, System, or Security in regards to email space???
RE: Storage Space on server
Is the fix for that error an increase in the Junk Mail registry value? -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server That is an indication of how much WHITE SPACE is in the Exchange database. In most cases the white space should decrease over time, as it will be used before the Exchange database increases in physical size. However going back to your original message, this would be completely unrelated to that error. Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 24 June 2010 15:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 06/23/2010 Time: 7:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 44834 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. This means that this morning I had 44 GB of space correct?? -Original Message- From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server Wag- http://www.slipstick.com/rules/safesenders.htm [ot to list] I know I had problems sending before using my work email. I've since moved from e2003 to e2010; if this doesn't help and some people get garbled messages I'll go back to using the web to post... [/ot to list] -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Storage Space on server Microsoft Exchange Standard 2003 sp2 I am migrating a user from outlook express into outlook and she got this error message after I increased her mailbox size to 2 gb. The Junk E-mail Lists were not updated because the storage space on the server has been exceeded. I don't have any events in Application, System, or Security in regards to email space???
RE: Storage Space on server
Did that and life is good again. Thanks -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server Have you looked at this user's junk senders list? If not, I would start there. And empty it. I can pretty much guarantee that removing the content of the junk email senders list will have zero effect on the amount of spam that the user receives. The list is designed for a regular sender (such as a group) which doesn't process an unsubscribe or other stop message correctly, not for a random spam message (which will be spoofed anyway). Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 24 June 2010 20:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server Is the fix for that error an increase in the Junk Mail registry value? -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server That is an indication of how much WHITE SPACE is in the Exchange database. In most cases the white space should decrease over time, as it will be used before the Exchange database increases in physical size. However going back to your original message, this would be completely unrelated to that error. Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 24 June 2010 15:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 06/23/2010 Time: 7:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 44834 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. This means that this morning I had 44 GB of space correct?? -Original Message- From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage Space on server Wag- http://www.slipstick.com/rules/safesenders.htm [ot to list] I know I had problems sending before using my work email. I've since moved from e2003 to e2010; if this doesn't help and some people get garbled messages I'll go back to using the web to post... [/ot to list] -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Storage Space on server Microsoft Exchange Standard 2003 sp2 I am migrating a user from outlook express into outlook and she got this error message after I increased her mailbox size to 2 gb. The Junk E-mail Lists were not updated because the storage space on the server has been exceeded. I don't have any events in Application, System, or Security in regards to email space???
Stop SMTP mail
I have an Exchange 2003 Standard sp2 server. I have some legacy smtp addresses laying around in ADUC of n...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com. I would like Exchange to not relay those emails to the Internet. Just keep them in house. Is there a way to not allow *...@im_dom1.indianafcu.com to relay to the Internet addresses???
RE: Create a report of NDR's
Sorry, This is on a Exchange 2003 Standard server. -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Create a report of NDR's Is there a way to create a text report of all the NDR's for yesterday?
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Thanks. I know the thread has been long but it has paid many dividends more than the Cert from GoDaddy ever will. The ability to learn from this group and to see differing points of view outside of mine is what I am investing in. Whether or not the VP's from branch operations ever get their Iphones working I could really care less. In 2 days they won't Even remember me trolling over this setup and buying the cert for them to function but I will have that knowledge of how this Whole process works and be able to explain it to the Auditors when they come complaining about the holes in the Firewall. I do agree a lot of people have spent a lot of time holding my hand and smaking the back of my head to get me to understand it. I truly appreciate all of you more than I can express. Thanks I'll get the cert and see if I even have everything setup and running properly. :-) _ From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange If you are using a self-signed certificate, then that is to be expected. Was that the case when you enabled the option to ignore certificate trust? It could also be that your self-signed certificate is corrupt. I see that happen a lot. A corrupt certificate will mean the secure channel does not establish correctly. I will be blunt - I don't know how much your time is worth, but going by the length of time that this thread has been active, you would be better off getting a commercial signed SSL certificate three hours ago. The certificate will work for OWA, OMA, RPC over HTTPS as well as ActiveSync. It is more professional, and when the certificate expires, you simply change the certificate on the server. With a self-signed certificate you have to touch every device, get the users to import it. That doesn't always work correctly. The free self-signed certificate is rarely worth the cost saving. When the only option was Verisign and their $500+ certificates, then it was worth it, but to save $30? Simon. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 20:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Fails on the cert. _ From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange In my experience the iPhone reacts very badly to a self-signed certificate. It also means you may have trust issues. When you can get a signed certificate the iPhone likes for US$30/year, it doesn't make any sense to try and get self-signed certificates to work. Therefore my recommendations to you would be a. Get a signed SSL certificate. b. Setup a test account on your domain c. Test said test account with the Microsoft test site at https://testexchangeconnectivity.com That will confirm whether ActiveSync and the certificate trust is setup correctly. If it passes the tests on the Microsoft site, then you can go back to the iPhone and setup again. Or you could just buy a Blackberry which works straight out of the box, with very little hassle on the user's end. ;-) Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 19:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange It is self signed. Not covered _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange No. Install the cert in your browser, if you haven't already, export it to a file, send the file as an attachment to an email to an address the iPhone can reach. (As I recall OWA didn't work, I had to send it to my gmail account.) Tap the file, and you should be prompted to install it on your phone. And this presumes you're using a self-signed cert. I tried going back through the thread, and I didn't see any details on your environment... On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote: yes CFee From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I accept the cert? Is that the same as install? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
I must not have the ActiveSync set up properly. _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange The Active Sync protocol is very clear. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Remember too, that Microsoft and Apple have been in a spitting contest forever. My experience with getting help securely integrating iPhones in our Exchange environment was met by less than enthusiastic responses from both sides. All the people that originally pressed to bring these into our environment have moved back to Blackberrys except one. The iPhones have been passed around to countless others, who eventually became disenchanted with them as well and moved back to Blackberrys. They are currently being used by a individuals who basically do not need to forward attachments through email. Until the Titans can come to maturity and learn with play nice with each other, I'm disgusted with both of them in regard to this matter. From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:joe.poched...@fivesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Remember that the iPhone is, first and foremost, a consumer device. Corporate manageability is an afterthought to Apple. (At least they've made some effort...) Furthermore, Apple has fought very hard against the idea that the iPhone is a mini computer. Hence you don't have direct access to the file system, can't install apps without it iTunes store, etc (without jailbreaking at least). So far, this strategy has worked very well for Apple, so I wouldn't expect a change of heart any time soon. JP From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange You are correct. You can't do that and there is no Explorer equivalent. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Ellis, John P. johnel...@wirral.gov.uk wrote: After some fiddling, I got the Iphone to download emails - Thanks for those who offered advice. Am I right in saying that I cant just plug the Iphone in via USB and browse the phone as I can do with a Windows Mobile device? And is there such thing as Windows Explorer on an Iphone? Thanks John -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:joe.poched...@fivesgroup.com] Sent: 10 June 2010 22:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange The iPhone is /has an ActiveSync client. ActiveSync on the iPhone isn't as full featured as on Windows Mobile, but it seems to get a bit closer with every release... Feature wise it's close enough for most folks... (Security wise, it's close enough for most too... But don't overlook the iPhone's known hackability for anyone who gets physical access to the device if you're concerned about that.) When you say that you need certs installed on the device, is it because you're forcing certificate based device authentication or are you simply using self-signed certs for OWA? Joe P -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Iphone connectivity with Exchange Ok, don't over think this Iphone thing. Do you have OWA set up via SSL? If yes point the Iphone email app at that URL and provide the user credentials when asked. I will bet a box of Ho Ho's that you will be good to go at that point. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Iphone connectivity with Exchange I've been asked to setup an Iphone with access to Exchange Email. I've done this a many a time on Window Mobile devices using ActiveSync. Is there an equivalent of ActiveSync for the Iphone, if so it built in, or do I need a 3rd party app? Also, I have an SSL certificate to install to the device, is this as simple as running the cert to install it to the device? Cheers John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- smsadm
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Nope we only have the Iphones. -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have you got this working on a windows mobile phone by any chance? Regards Peter Johnson I.T Architect United Kingdom:+44 1285 658542 South Africa: +27 11 252 1100 Swaziland: +268 442 7000 Fax:+27 11 974 7130 Mobile: +2783 306 0019 peter.john...@peterstow.com This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company. Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or otherwise. The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send this e-mail. -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
The setting on the phone? -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have you tried not requiring SSL? Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Nope we only have the Iphones. -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have you got this working on a windows mobile phone by any chance? Regards Peter Johnson I.T Architect United Kingdom:+44 1285 658542 South Africa: +27 11 252 1100 Swaziland: +268 442 7000 Fax:+27 11 974 7130 Mobile: +2783 306 0019 peter.john...@peterstow.com This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company. Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or otherwise. The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send this e-mail. -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Didn't help. -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Yes. Sometimes I've found from my experience that even if your server requires SSL, if you tell the phone to not require it it works. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange The setting on the phone? -Original Message- From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have you tried not requiring SSL? Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Nope we only have the Iphones. -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have you got this working on a windows mobile phone by any chance? Regards Peter Johnson I.T Architect United Kingdom:+44 1285 658542 South Africa: +27 11 252 1100 Swaziland: +268 442 7000 Fax:+27 11 974 7130 Mobile: +2783 306 0019 peter.john...@peterstow.com This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company. Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or otherwise. The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send this e-mail. -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com **
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com **
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
This where I am confused. This kb says 990, 999, 5721, 5678, 5679, and 26675. Another one I was looking at this morning was 143 and 993. And yet another one was only 443??? How much of this firewall do I need to expose to get this stupid phone to work? -Original Message- From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Silly question and I apologize if this was brought up before, but are the ports for A/S being blocked by a firewall or other device? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/259369 Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Direct: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com **
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Ok. I will delete after every failed attempt. -Original Message- From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Try deleting the account and recreating. CFee -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com **
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com http://mobile-email.yourco.com/ ? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com http://www.clearswift.com/ **
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com http://mobile-email.yourco.com/ ? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com http://www.clearswift.com/ **
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Completely did this. Can connect to oma but I am still get this in the logs: Internally connecting: 2010-06-15 17:01:40 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange-oma/DavidM/Inbox/RE:+ACH+TOTALS-4.EML/1_multipart/image001.gif Security=2 443 IM_DOM1\davidm 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+WOW64;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2 ;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+P C+6.0;+InfoPath.1;+MS-RTC+LM+8;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E;+OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; +OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322) 200 0 0 IPhone Sync fails 2010-06-15 17:05:11 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 OPTIONS /exchange-oma/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync - 443 im_dom1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Apple-iPhone/705.18 200 0 0 2010-06-15 17:05:11 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 OPTIONS /exchange-oma/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync - 443 im_dom1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Apple-iPhone/705.18 200 0 0 2010-06-15 17:05:42 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 OPTIONS /exchange-oma/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync - 443 im_dom1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Apple-iPhone/705.18 200 0 0 2010-06-15 17:05:42 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 OPTIONS /exchange-oma/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync - 443 im_dom1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Apple-iPhone/705.18 200 0 0 2010-06-15 17:05:44 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 OPTIONS /exchange-oma/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync - 443 im_dom1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Apple-iPhone/705.18 200 0 0 2010-06-15 17:05:44 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 OPTIONS /exchange-oma/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync - 443 im_dom1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Apple-iPhone/705.18 200 0 0 From Safari on the IPhone 2010-06-15 17:09:12 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange-oma - 443 - 166.137.140.27 Mozilla/5.0+(iPhone;+U;+CPU+iPhone+OS+3_1_3+like+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)+AppleWebKi t/528.18+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/4.0+Mobile/7E18+Safari/528.16 401 2 2148074254 2010-06-15 17:09:48 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange-oma - 443 - 166.137.140.27 Mozilla/5.0+(iPhone;+U;+CPU+iPhone+OS+3_1_3+like+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)+AppleWebKi t/528.18+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/4.0+Mobile/7E18+Safari/528.16 401 1 0 2010-06-15 17:09:48 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange-oma - 443 IM_DOM1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Mozilla/5.0+(iPhone;+U;+CPU+iPhone+OS+3_1_3+like+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)+AppleWebKi t/528.18+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/4.0+Mobile/7E18+Safari/528.16 302 0 0 2010-06-15 17:09:49 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange-oma/ - 443 IM_DOM1\davidm 166.137.140.27 Mozilla/5.0+(iPhone;+U;+CPU+iPhone+OS+3_1_3+like+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)+AppleWebKi t/528.18+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/4.0+Mobile/7E18+Safari/528.16 200 0 0 2010-06-15 17:09:50 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange-oma/DavidM/Inbox/ Cmd=contents 443 - 166.137.140.27 Mozilla/5.0+(iPhone;+U;+CPU+iPhone+OS+3_1_3+like+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)+AppleWebKi t/528.18+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/4.0+Mobile/7E18+Safari/528.16 401 2 2148074254 2010-06-15 17:09:50 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange-oma/DavidM/ Cmd=navbar 443 - 166.137.140.27 Mozilla/5.0+(iPhone;+U;+CPU+iPhone+OS+3_1_3+like+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)+AppleWebKi t/528.18+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/4.0+Mobile/7E18+Safari/528.16 401 2 2148074254 _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=global http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%2 0817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 query=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse OMA Activesync. This link came from Bing, Google was down for me. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Nope. Exchange relays to Ironport, Ironport relays to Cisco ASA. _ From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Are you accessing through ISA? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=global http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%2 0817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 query=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse OMA Activesync. This link came from Bing, Google was down for me. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com http://mobile-email.yourco.com/ ? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com http://www.clearswift.com/ ** -- smsadm
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
I accept the cert? Is that the same as install? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Did you install the cert on the iPhone? I'm not sure exactly what fixed my problem, I know I had installed the cert on my phone, previously, based on information I'd read earlier. The last thing I did do was make sure that oma worked. I may have had a few Exchange updates outstanding that I took care of, too. It was a side project and only benefited me at the time, so I wasn't carefully monitoring my actions. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Nope. Exchange relays to Ironport, Ironport relays to Cisco ASA. _ From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Are you accessing through ISA? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=global http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%2 0817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 query=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse OMA Activesync. This link came from Bing, Google was down for me. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com http://mobile-email.yourco.com/ ? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com http://www.clearswift.com
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Ok. I am doing that too. _ From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange yes CFee From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I accept the cert? Is that the same as install? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Did you install the cert on the iPhone? I'm not sure exactly what fixed my problem, I know I had installed the cert on my phone, previously, based on information I'd read earlier. The last thing I did do was make sure that oma worked. I may have had a few Exchange updates outstanding that I took care of, too. It was a side project and only benefited me at the time, so I wasn't carefully monitoring my actions. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Nope. Exchange relays to Ironport, Ironport relays to Cisco ASA. _ From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Are you accessing through ISA? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=global http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%2 0817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 query=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse OMA Activesync. This link came from Bing, Google was down for me. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com http://mobile-email.yourco.com/ ? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head on desk I can get to my exchange (2003 standard) box via OWA with ssl over the internet using safari on the IPhone. I go the settings, mail, add exchange, put in my smtp mail account, user name, password, domain, Internet IP address for exchange, accept cert when it comes up. Go to mail and try and get mail from the app and get a Cannot Get Mail the connection to the server failed message continue banging head ** This email and any files transmitted
RE: Change name?
Ok. Feeling kind of dumb right now because I have been explaining away the pop and smtp servers we currently use and pop=pull (From the Internet.) and smtp=send (To the Internet.) Du da dumb dumb _ From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Change name? easy enough to add additional SMTP alias to a mailbox, and to specify which alias is the PRIMARY ( which one shows when sending ) On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Ok, we are about to go live with Exchange 2003 as our internet email server. The question came up today if a user gets married/divorced and changes their name how will they get their email. Since brenda.sm...@host.com will get changed to brenda.jo...@host.com the customer that sends brenda.sm...@host.com will get an NDR?? Correct??
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
It is self signed. Not covered _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange No. Install the cert in your browser, if you haven't already, export it to a file, send the file as an attachment to an email to an address the iPhone can reach. (As I recall OWA didn't work, I had to send it to my gmail account.) Tap the file, and you should be prompted to install it on your phone. And this presumes you're using a self-signed cert. I tried going back through the thread, and I didn't see any details on your environment... On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote: yes CFee From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I accept the cert? Is that the same as install? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Did you install the cert on the iPhone? I'm not sure exactly what fixed my problem, I know I had installed the cert on my phone, previously, based on information I'd read earlier. The last thing I did do was make sure that oma worked. I may have had a few Exchange updates outstanding that I took care of, too. It was a side project and only benefited me at the time, so I wasn't carefully monitoring my actions. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Nope. Exchange relays to Ironport, Ironport relays to Cisco ASA. _ From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Are you accessing through ISA? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=global http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%2 0817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 query=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse OMA Activesync. This link came from Bing, Google was down for me. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Have your tried dropping out the domain bit? Or changing the IP address to a domain name I.e mobile-email.yourco.com http://mobile-email.yourco.com/ ? So it matches the name on the cert John -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange banging head
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Actually just a member server 2003. Exchange Standard 2003. Current on patches. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Then that's a hint. This an SBS2003 box? Mine was, too. Although, I can't remember if I took specific action related to the nature of SBS. Are your Exchange patches current? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:44 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: It is self signed. Not covered _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange No. Install the cert in your browser, if you haven't already, export it to a file, send the file as an attachment to an email to an address the iPhone can reach. (As I recall OWA didn't work, I had to send it to my gmail account.) Tap the file, and you should be prompted to install it on your phone. And this presumes you're using a self-signed cert. I tried going back through the thread, and I didn't see any details on your environment... On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote: yes CFee From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I accept the cert? Is that the same as install? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Did you install the cert on the iPhone? I'm not sure exactly what fixed my problem, I know I had installed the cert on my phone, previously, based on information I'd read earlier. The last thing I did do was make sure that oma worked. I may have had a few Exchange updates outstanding that I took care of, too. It was a side project and only benefited me at the time, so I wasn't carefully monitoring my actions. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Nope. Exchange relays to Ironport, Ironport relays to Cisco ASA. _ From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Are you accessing through ISA? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=global http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%2 0817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 query=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse OMA Activesync. This link came from Bing, Google was down for me. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma, but I don't recall what I did to fix that problem. have you verified that you can get to /oma? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Can you browse to https://exchangeserver/oma? If not you may not have everything setup correctly. I had an issue, don't recall how I resolved it though. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I can browse. I can even connect to owa with safari. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Can you browse the web on the phone? Ive seen odd errors that have been due to the device not having a data connection john -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 16:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange During account setup I am getting account verification failed. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John
RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange
Fails on the cert. _ From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange In my experience the iPhone reacts very badly to a self-signed certificate. It also means you may have trust issues. When you can get a signed certificate the iPhone likes for US$30/year, it doesn't make any sense to try and get self-signed certificates to work. Therefore my recommendations to you would be a. Get a signed SSL certificate. b. Setup a test account on your domain c. Test said test account with the Microsoft test site at https://testexchangeconnectivity.com That will confirm whether ActiveSync and the certificate trust is setup correctly. If it passes the tests on the Microsoft site, then you can go back to the iPhone and setup again. Or you could just buy a Blackberry which works straight out of the box, with very little hassle on the user's end. ;-) Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: 15 June 2010 19:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange It is self signed. Not covered _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange No. Install the cert in your browser, if you haven't already, export it to a file, send the file as an attachment to an email to an address the iPhone can reach. (As I recall OWA didn't work, I had to send it to my gmail account.) Tap the file, and you should be prompted to install it on your phone. And this presumes you're using a self-signed cert. I tried going back through the thread, and I didn't see any details on your environment... On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote: yes CFee From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I accept the cert? Is that the same as install? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Did you install the cert on the iPhone? I'm not sure exactly what fixed my problem, I know I had installed the cert on my phone, previously, based on information I'd read earlier. The last thing I did do was make sure that oma worked. I may have had a few Exchange updates outstanding that I took care of, too. It was a side project and only benefited me at the time, so I wasn't carefully monitoring my actions. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Nope. Exchange relays to Ironport, Ironport relays to Cisco ASA. _ From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Are you accessing through ISA? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=global http://support.microsoft.com/smarterror/default.aspx?spid=globalquery=kb%2 0817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 query=kb%20817379errurl=%2fdefault.aspx%2fkb%2f817379%29 You may have better luck with Google Technical Support with unable to browse OMA Activesync. This link came from Bing, Google was down for me. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Enabled for all users currently so I must have something else messed up. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange Or disabled for the user... but I bet that's why you're having trouble. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Came up asking for authentication creds. Then failed with a system error. OMA might be jacked? _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IPhone connectivity with Exchange I may have been unclear. I had the same behavior as you when attempting to get my iPhone talking to our Exchange server. I do remember being unable to browse to https://exchangeserver/oma
RE: Beginning to Migrate from pop/smtp hosted to Exchange 2003 in house.
Haven't gotten there yet. Still migrating and testing the setup of the user account. _ From: Eric [mailto:seag...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Beginning to Migrate from pop/smtp hosted to Exchange 2003 in house. DNS can take time to propagate, so your new MX record may take some time to be known. I use a few DNS sites as well as query my ISP DNS servers. http://www.iptools.com/ http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx Hope this helps. Eric On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:15 AM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Yeah Me! Okay so you all have given me great direction. I am doing my testing right now. I have a 5 step process. 1. Route all smtp mail through my firewall then my Ironport then my Exchange Server. 2. Add smtp address to my user account in Exchange. 3. Migrate Outllook Express data to Outlook using the wizards. 4. Add Internet addresses for domain such as MX, A, and SPF records. 5. Cancel Email hosting service. So I have a ticket open with Ironport support to verify my changes there are cool. I am testing my email and from one of 4 hosted email accounts (All of which will be brought in house) and I don't ever see it leave or enter the smtp queue on Exchange or Ironport. So I am at a loss for why I am not seeing it. Is it because in step 2 I am giving the external pop/smtp addresses?? Please consider the environment before printing this email. image001.gif
RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)
Does Windows 2003 IIS even need urlscan?? _ From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA 2003 Loading...(Somewhat fixed.) Found that URLScan.ini was the culprit and can now get logged into OWA2003 and have a page display. Can send email, can open previous emails, CANNOT open new mail though. Getting an HTTP 404 error?? Please consider the environment before printing this email.
RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.)
It was the : and . in the subject line. Commented them out of URLScan and life is good, I guess. _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.) need is a funny word. It's not a requirement. You can use the IIS W3SVC logs and the urlscan logs to see what verbs are being denied and if truly files are not being found. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA 2003 Loading.(Somewhat fixed.) Does Windows 2003 IIS even need urlscan?? _ From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA 2003 Loading...(Somewhat fixed.) Found that URLScan.ini was the culprit and can now get logged into OWA2003 and have a page display. Can send email, can open previous emails, CANNOT open new mail though. Getting an HTTP 404 error?? Please consider the environment before printing this email.
RE: [ot] Friday Funny
What do you call cheese that doesn't belong to you? Na cho Cheese. _ From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: [ot] Friday Funny My daughter (4 years old) loves this joke... What od you call a cow that cuts the grass? A lawnMOOer. On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What do you get if you divide the circumference of a pumpkin by its diameter? Pumpkin pi. From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: [ot] Friday Funny What do you call a fly without wings? A 'walk'. Shook
RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters
3 weeks ago I tripped up to 900 a day per mailbox. Starting Monday this week I was under or right at 100 a day per mailbox. So I am either entirely infested with bots now or some bad guy got snuffed in the wild and we can breath a little easier. Actually wait. Was it after Tuesday's patches??? -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters BTW, has anyone notice a huge drop in the number of sp*m for the last week? Murray -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters I loaded it, but had to remove it. Although it comes highly recommended, it caused me all kinds of grief with Outlook. I have Outlook 2007 running on Windows XP and Exchange 2007 on SBS 2008. \\Steve// -Original Message- From: Robert Smith [mailto:exch...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Outlook Anti-Phishing Filters Has anyone had any experience with OutlookSpy, someone suggested that this utility would give the exact portion of an email that has been flagged. Thanks On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Robert Smith exch...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any way to determine which links in an email triggered the anti phishing filters in Outlook? We have had several emails coming in from consultants that have been flagged as suspicious therefore disabling all links. Being that there are multiple links in these emails, it would be nice to know which link(s) are triggering the filter. Thanks, Bob
RE: Opening another users mailbox when hidden from gal
Unhide them. Attach to them. Hide them. _ From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening another users mailbox when hidden from gal What's the trick to allowing a user the ability to `Open other Users Folder` when that user is hidden from the GAL? Thanks! jlc
RE: Benefits of consolidating emails
Thanks all. This helped me got off the ground. _ From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 7:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Benefits of consolidating emails In addition. 1.)Security. You won't have your e-mail sitting on a 3rd party organisation's servers that you don't have any access to. 2.)Single instance storage. All of your e-mail will, post a migration post, be sitting in a store, or multiple stores, on your exchange servers rather than being scattered over users desktops and laptops. 3.)Easier management of e-mail and archives for functions such as electronic discovery during litigation etc. Regards Peter Johnson I.T Architect United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542 South Africa: +27 11 252 1100 Swaziland: +268 442 7000 Fax:+27 11 974 7130 Mobile: +2783 306 0019 peter.john...@peterstow.com This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company. Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or otherwise. The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send this e-mail. From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 April 2010 09:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Benefits of consolidating emails Off the top, I could think of: * Lower cost of ownership as you will no longer be purchasing your hosted email access and Outlook CALs for all your users. * Take control of your MX record, so that it can be used for additional services. * Consistency in email communication. Conversations containing internal and external recipients can be done from a single email client, not 2. * Easier management of your AV solutions. Currently you HAVE to make sure end-users are always up to date on their AV signatures. * Active-Sync/ Blackberry devices. want email on that iPhone/Android(?) * Meeting invites extend to external recipients. If your recipients also use Exchange or other rich client, you can send meeting invites from Outlook and they can actively respond and maintain it in their own calendars. * Fewer viruses written for Outlook than OE (no statistical info on hand, but OE is often a target with open AB) On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:28 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I am looking to write a justification letter for merging my two email clients into one. I currently have a hosted email for external mail using outlook express. I currently have Exchange email for internal mail using outlook 2003. I want to migrate all of the outlook express and internal outlook into one client. I want to do all of this so we have only one client to manage nightly backups won't have to add smtp to all workstations a user moves to won't have a separate password for external mail we become the owner of the mail and we can troubleshoot the problems ourselves. (Once I get OWA working the users will be able to get the mail on their smartphones?) Anything else? I need more power. Let me have as much foder as you can give me. Please consider the environment before printing this email. image001.jpgimage002.jpgimage003.gif
RE: Removing a dead server
That is the right article. For me anyways the ADSIedit tool cleared up my System Manager of 2003 anyways. Now back to the events. Thanks Again -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Removing a dead server Well, the long and the short of it is that you have to whack it from AD. There should be a KB article titled something like Manually removing an Exchange 2003 Server that has the information you need. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Philip Cobb [mailto:philip.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Removing a dead server Hi, My old exchange 2003 server died last week. It had no real function, I'd moved the public folders, mailboxes and address books over to exchange 2007, but I hadn't got as far as uninstalling exchange to remove the server from AD and from the Exchange Org. Get the odd user who gets Outlook 2007 bring up a username and password box, asking to connect to the exchange2003 server. This is all really odd, as all user mailboxes are on the 2007 server. How can I remove the 2003 box when it is offline? Cheers, Phil.
RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard
It the website properties it shows an incomplete unc path instead of c:\progra..etc. I am screwed, aren't I? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard They should be the same place you found exchweb. If they aren't there, you have larger problems. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard ExchWEb isAdmin Full authenicated user read only. Still trying to find the Exchange site directories? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard What are the permissions on the dierctories? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard Never gives the authentication window though That's why I am confused. _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard 401.2 is authentication failed and 404.0 is file not found. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA exchange 2003 Standard I was getting an error so I began with adding a new Cert. I am still getting the below errors?? 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange/davidm/ - 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 401 2 2148074254 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchweb/bin/auth/owalogon.asp url=https://10.0.50.4/exchange/davidm/reason=0 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 404 0 2
RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard
Thanks. Is there a good KB for removing an additional exchange server from the First Storage Group? I had two servers, One production, the other backup. The backup died and now I can not get it to go away? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard There used to be (and probably still is) a KB article on removing and re-installing IIS and then reinstalling Exchange. You need to do that. Certain things need to be done in a specific order, so you should locate the KB before you begin the process. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 9:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard It the website properties it shows an incomplete unc path instead of c:\progra..etc. I am screwed, aren't I? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard They should be the same place you found exchweb. If they aren't there, you have larger problems. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard ExchWEb isAdmin Full authenicated user read only. Still trying to find the Exchange site directories? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard What are the permissions on the dierctories? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard Never gives the authentication window though That's why I am confused. _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard 401.2 is authentication failed and 404.0 is file not found. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA exchange 2003 Standard I was getting an error so I began with adding a new Cert. I am still getting the below errors?? 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange/davidm/ - 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 401 2 2148074254 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchweb/bin/auth/owalogon.asp url=https://10.0.50.4/exchange/davidm/reason=0 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 404 0 2
RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard
Never gives the authentication window though That's why I am confused. _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard 401.2 is authentication failed and 404.0 is file not found. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA exchange 2003 Standard I was getting an error so I began with adding a new Cert. I am still getting the below errors?? 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange/davidm/ - 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 401 2 2148074254 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchweb/bin/auth/owalogon.asp url=https://10.0.50.4/exchange/davidm/reason=0 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 404 0 2
RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard
ExchWEb isAdmin Full authenicated user read only. Still trying to find the Exchange site directories? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard What are the permissions on the dierctories? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard Never gives the authentication window though That's why I am confused. _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA exchange 2003 Standard 401.2 is authentication failed and 404.0 is file not found. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA exchange 2003 Standard I was getting an error so I began with adding a new Cert. I am still getting the below errors?? 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchange/davidm/ - 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 401 2 2148074254 2010-04-05 14:37:57 W3SVC1 10.0.50.4 GET /exchweb/bin/auth/owalogon.asp url=https://10.0.50.4/exchange/davidm/reason=0 443 - 10.0.50.81 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+ CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+Media+Center+PC+6.0;+ OfficeLiveConnector.1.4;+OfficeLivePatch.1.3;+InfoPath.1;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E ) 404 0 2
RE: Exchange 2003 - Recommended # of Mailboxes per Server
Any ideas on where the idiot wanted to go with this info? What agenda or problem where they pushing or did they just want you to waste your time for 3 days justifing the good solution you already have? _ From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 11:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 - Recommended # of Mailboxes per Server Unfortunately, my assumptions were correct. My VP took the evidence that disproved the comments and showed it to our CIO. He was convinced we knew what we were doing and said the other manager should have never opened his mouth. The unfortunate part is that is pretty much it. I may still push him for the article he got his information from, but I'm not going to get the satisfaction of him being called out publicly. Oh well, still a win for IT! - Sean On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Gotcha. We've been an EMC shop for several years. I've worked with CX200, CX300 and we've currently got two CX700s and one CX4-960 I just implemented. From a performance perspective, I've been really happy with the Clariions. When we introduced the CX4-960, it just made sense because we already had an EMC environment and established fiber channel fabric. I don't have any experience with the Recoverpoint software. With that said, we're currently working on a Virtualization proof of concept, starting with Dell server hardware and Equalogic storage. The more I get to play with the EQL unit and realize it's capabilities, the more I think this is the future of our storage needs. The scalability of the EQL is probably the most appealing, but I also like the fact that they bundle other capabilities such as replication, automatic storage tiering, etc. without nickle and diming you like other storage vendors do for those same capabilities. I highly recommend you give it a close look if you're looking at a new product. I keep hearing that iSCSI is the storage protocol of the future and the fiber channel, though it will be around for many many years, is slowly dying. If you don't already have an established fiber channel environment, and you're used to iSCSI, you may find it to be a lot more appealing and easier on the wallet. - Sean On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:37 AM, sms adm sms...@gmail.com wrote: I/we hate them. Or I should say the horrible Replication Manager backup software. Moving to a new architecture soon. Clrion, fibrechannel with flash drives (which won't help us when we move from 2003 probably in a year or two, but that is another story) Using EMC's Recoverpoint (http://www.emc.com/products/detail/software/recoverpoint.htm) Anyone aware of it? On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: I have to admit, I shuddered a little bit when I read you're using the Celerra. We have a couple of NS502G as iSCSI gateways to our Clariions. I've never really liked them, but I guess my complaints have more to do with the cludgy interface than anything else. We only use them to serve up iSCSI luns to a few Microsoft Virtual Server hosts for test/dev and to provide non-critical CIFS. Good to hear you're seeing positive results. Thanks for sharing. - Sean On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:08 AM, sms adm sms...@gmail.com wrote: We have 9000+ mailboxes on 2 backend servers, fronted by 2 FE servers. Storage is EMC Celerra, iSCSI (soon to be fiberchannel). No performance problems whatsoever! On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: If/when I need additional hardware to boost performance, I'll have no problem getting it. This statement came from a manager of a non-technical department who believes he can do a better job than all of our existing Analysts. I'm sure it sounds like I'm taking it a bit personally, and I may be, but this is just a case where I know our current environment is over-sized, and I've got the performance metrics to prove it. This is an Exchange 2003 Enterprise SP2 environment, 2003 AD. Each server is a PowerEdge M710, 6GB RAM (limited via boot.ini due to 32-bit), 4 local 15k sas drives (RAID 1 OS, RAID 1 page file/temp directories). QLogic 2572 HBAs connected to Brocade 5300 Fiber switches (4gbps) to an EMC CX700. Logs are stored on a 4 disk (15k FC) RAID 10, Stores are on a 14 disk (15k FC) RAID 10, SMTP, message tracking, mta directories are on a RAID 1 (15k FC). A third front-end server provides ActiveSync. Disk I/O has always been our biggest battle and based on our user I/O, the above configuration has yielded very good results. Although we do have about 2000 mailboxes, only 1200-1300 of those are ever accessed concurrently, so with that we're barey above this 500 mailbox limitation he came up with. I guess a lot of this stems from this particular manager having a reputation of trying make others look bad in these high-profile meetings. My boss(es) are taking this more personally than I
Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003
Ben, Wondering what an 'MX' SPF directive might be?? -Add a spf record to the 206.18.123.215. Yup. There are other ways (like the mx SPF directive), but during a transition like this it's best to be explict. -- From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I have been given the green light to research bringing all mail in house onto the Exchange 2003 server. And there was much rejoicing! I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain. I have an ASA firewall and an Ironport for email. IronPort is a mail filtering appliance, right? What does it do currently? What *can* it do? If it has the features and the load capacity, I would recommend having all your incoming *and* outgoing mail go through the IronPort. That helps you control and monitor mail you send as well as receive. -Globally change the smtp addresses for all users that already have external accounts in Exchange to match. If you're not already using your Exchange server for other mail, I would suggest modifying the recipient policy such that it automatically generates an appropriate SMTP address as the Primary address. It generally doesn't hurt anything to have multiple systems configured to generate mail with your From address. -Add an mx record to point to an outward facing address such as 206.18.123.215 -Add a dns record for mail.imcu.com or pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com? Close but not quite. MX records take domain names (like mail.example.com) on their RHS (Right Hand Side), not IP addresses. So generally, you could create DNS records along these lines: imcu.com. MX mail.imcu.com. mail.imcu.com. A 206.18.123.215 -Add a route through the firewall to the ironport and a relay to the exchange box. (incoming) Pretty much. In more detail, to receive mail *from* other systems: You want the firewall to allow traffic with destination port TCP/25 to the IronPort. If your inside network NAT'ed? If so, you also need the firewall configured to do port-forwarding/NAT/PAT/one-to-one-static-NAT/whatever-your-vendor-calls-it between the public address and the IronPort. The IronPort should be configured to accept mail addressed *to* your domain(s), and to forward that mail to your Exchange server. You generally cannot rely on DNS to tell your IronPort this, because DNS will be telling your IronPort to deliver your mail to itself. You want your Exchange server configured to accept mail addressed *to* your domain(s). That's done with recipient policies, mentioned above. -Add a smtp route from exchange to the ironport and relay to the internet. (outgoing) Again, that's the gist of it. In detail, to send mail *to* other systems: You want the firewall configured to allow traffic with destination port TCP/25 to any outside host, from either the IronPort or the Exchange server. (I recommend both even if you decide to have Exchange relay outgoing mail through the IronPort. If the IronPort ever has trouble, you can reconfigure Exchange to bypass and send direct.) You want the IronPort configured to relay mail from the Exchange server to any outside system. If you have other hosts which send mail, add them, too. You want the Exchange server configured to relay all outgoing mail through the IronPort. This can be done just by designating the IronPort as the SMTP smart host. You don't *need* an SMTP connector for this. If you create an SMTP connector (it won't hurt), then configure it with a mail route to the IronPort, as you say. Eventually, you want most computers on your LAN to be denied if they attempt to relay mail directly through the IronPort. That would indicate they are bypassing Exchange, which most of the time will be a rogue system set-up without IT department knowledge, or a computer compromised by malware to be a spam zombie. -Import all Outlook Express mail into Exchange and the delete all mail from the outlook express clients and remove the mailboxes from there. You may want to do the migration in stages. First, get the Exchange server configured to *send* mail. You can test that yourself by creating test accounts, logging in to other users' PCs, etc. Exchange won't know about any of the other mail going on, but you can make sure it can send. Once you're sure that's working, migrate people from Outlook Express/Win Mail/etc. to Outlook proper, but still configured to POP mail from your current mail host. That changes the client software, and the mail storage and sending, but keeps mail coming in the old way. The advantage here is that you can back out an individual client, or put the whole project on hold, without really disrupting anything. Since this is the big change in user experience, that's
Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003
I know you have been MVP of Exchange for a long while. Have you written anything, white papers, magazine articles?? From: Michael B. Smith Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 Well, you basically need to configure exchange 2003 as per any good exchange 2003 book.it does seem as if you've hit the high points tho. If owa isn't working, you should be receiving some event log messages. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: ms exchange Subject: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 I am cross posting to the Exchange list as well. I have and Exchange server (2003) that is basically underused. (Internal mail only and some calendaring.) I have a third party hosting my external mail (MailAnyone.net). I have been given the green light to research bringing all mail in house onto the Exchange 2003 server. I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain. I have an ASA firewall and an Ironport for email. I think to host I would need to do several of these things but I am not sure and I am not sure of the order. -Globally change the smtp addresses for all users that already have external accounts in Exchange to match. -Add an mx record to point to an outward facing address such as 206.18.123.215 -Add a dns record for mail.imcu.com or pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com? -Add a route through the firewall to the ironport and a relay to the exchange box. (incoming) -Add a smtp route from exchange to the ironport and relay to the internet. (outgoing) -Import all Outlook Express mail into Exchange and the delete all mail from the outlook express clients and remove the mailboxes from there. -Add a spf record to the 206.18.123.215. I know I am missing a lot and I need to verify that the mail that was going to the mailanyone and still be retrieved until we are sure all the mailboxes and distribution lists are working??? Sidenote my OWA stopped working a while back. Nobody used it but me but if we go to this I will need to have it up and running. Where do I look to find out why it has stopped.
Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003
I thought it was the same person. Thanks From: Webster Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 MBS has written books, blog articles, newsletter articles, magazine articles and a lot of other stuff. He has the featured article in the upcoming May issue of Windows IT Pro. MBS has also spoken at many tech conferences. Webster From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Subject: Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 I know you have been MVP of Exchange for a long while. Have you written anything, white papers, magazine articles?? From: Michael B. Smith Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 Well, you basically need to configure exchange 2003 as per any good exchange 2003 book.it does seem as if you've hit the high points tho. If owa isn't working, you should be receiving some event log messages. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com
RE: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003
Ok. I'll have to see that one in print to understand it a little better. So I have these people with Iphones that want to send and receive emails as well. If I spf the mx and ip they are still going to get refused or at the very least Be addressed as spammers because their ip will be that of the closest 3G tower?? Right? -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 I believe that if you use the mx option in your SPF record, it means to include the IPs from your MX records as valid senders. -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 Ben, Wondering what an 'MX' SPF directive might be?? -Add a spf record to the 206.18.123.215. Yup. There are other ways (like the mx SPF directive), but during a transition like this it's best to be explict. -- From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: I have been given the green light to research bringing all mail in house onto the Exchange 2003 server. And there was much rejoicing! I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain. I have an ASA firewall and an Ironport for email. IronPort is a mail filtering appliance, right? What does it do currently? What *can* it do? If it has the features and the load capacity, I would recommend having all your incoming *and* outgoing mail go through the IronPort. That helps you control and monitor mail you send as well as receive. -Globally change the smtp addresses for all users that already have external accounts in Exchange to match. If you're not already using your Exchange server for other mail, I would suggest modifying the recipient policy such that it automatically generates an appropriate SMTP address as the Primary address. It generally doesn't hurt anything to have multiple systems configured to generate mail with your From address. -Add an mx record to point to an outward facing address such as 206.18.123.215 -Add a dns record for mail.imcu.com or pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com? Close but not quite. MX records take domain names (like mail.example.com) on their RHS (Right Hand Side), not IP addresses. So generally, you could create DNS records along these lines: imcu.com. MX mail.imcu.com. mail.imcu.com. A 206.18.123.215 -Add a route through the firewall to the ironport and a relay to the exchange box. (incoming) Pretty much. In more detail, to receive mail *from* other systems: You want the firewall to allow traffic with destination port TCP/25 to the IronPort. If your inside network NAT'ed? If so, you also need the firewall configured to do port-forwarding/NAT/PAT/one-to-one-static-NAT/whatever-your-vendor-cal ls-it between the public address and the IronPort. The IronPort should be configured to accept mail addressed *to* your domain(s), and to forward that mail to your Exchange server. You generally cannot rely on DNS to tell your IronPort this, because DNS will be telling your IronPort to deliver your mail to itself. You want your Exchange server configured to accept mail addressed *to* your domain(s). That's done with recipient policies, mentioned above. -Add a smtp route from exchange to the ironport and relay to the internet. (outgoing) Again, that's the gist of it. In detail, to send mail *to* other systems: You want the firewall configured to allow traffic with destination port TCP/25 to any outside host, from either the IronPort or the Exchange server. (I recommend both even if you decide to have Exchange relay outgoing mail through the IronPort. If the IronPort ever has trouble, you can reconfigure Exchange to bypass and send direct.) You want the IronPort configured to relay mail from the Exchange server to any outside system. If you have other hosts which send mail, add them, too. You want the Exchange server configured to relay all outgoing mail through the IronPort. This can be done just by designating the IronPort as the SMTP smart host. You don't *need* an SMTP connector for this. If you create an SMTP connector (it won't hurt), then configure it with a mail route to the IronPort, as you say. Eventually, you want most computers on your LAN to be denied if they attempt to relay mail directly through the IronPort. That would indicate they are bypassing Exchange, which most of the time will be a rogue system set-up without IT department knowledge, or a computer compromised
RE: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003
Thanks for the openspf mention. I think you have guided me there before. The Iphone I think I am going to make them log in OMA/OWA and get there mail that way I know the routing in from behind my firewall. I just need to get it up and running But not until I have the rest of yesterday's list up and running correctly. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:17 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Wondering what an 'MX' SPF directive might be?? All the A records for all the MX records for domain are tested in order of MX priority. If the client IP is found among them, this mechanism matches. (from http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax) So rather than specifying your mail exchanger's name or IP address in the SPF record, you can just specify mx. Reason it's a good idea to be explict during your migration is that your MX records will be in flux. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:28 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: So I have these people with Iphones that want to send and receive emails as well. If I spf the mx and ip they are still going to get refused ... It's not a question of the iPhone, but how mail is routed. Can the iPhone be configured to relay mail through your systems? If so, do that, problem solved. If not, you're SOL. -- Ben
Migrating SMTP email to Exchange 2003
I am cross posting to the Exchange list as well. I have and Exchange server (2003) that is basically underused. (Internal mail only and some calendaring.) I have a third party hosting my external mail (MailAnyone.net). I have been given the green light to research bringing all mail in house onto the Exchange 2003 server. I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain. I have an ASA firewall and an Ironport for email. I think to host I would need to do several of these things but I am not sure and I am not sure of the order. -Globally change the smtp addresses for all users that already have external accounts in Exchange to match. -Add an mx record to point to an outward facing address such as 206.18.123.215 -Add a dns record for mail.imcu.com or pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com? -Add a route through the firewall to the ironport and a relay to the exchange box. (incoming) -Add a smtp route from exchange to the ironport and relay to the internet. (outgoing) -Import all Outlook Express mail into Exchange and the delete all mail from the outlook express clients and remove the mailboxes from there. -Add a spf record to the 206.18.123.215. I know I am missing a lot and I need to verify that the mail that was going to the mailanyone and still be retrieved until we are sure all the mailboxes and distribution lists are working??? Sidenote my OWA stopped working a while back. Nobody used it but me but if we go to this I will need to have it up and running. Where do I look to find out why it has stopped.
Going from 2003 to 2010??
No training on 2003 Standard. Wanting to go to 2010 Standard??? What classes are recommended for this Exchange??? What pitfalls do I need to know about.
Re: How many Exchange Admins do you have???
I am supporting about 500 mailboxes and many more public folders on 2003. From: Steve Ens Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: How many Exchange Admins do you have??? I have about 150 users as well, but me and my tech support them across five time zones and ten cities/nine provinces. On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:33 PM, paul chinnery pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote: Gee, and I thought I would have the smallest number. I got you beat by 25, David. And, like you, it's just me. -- Subject: RE: How many Exchange Admins do you have??? Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:06:59 -0500 From: david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com ~150 here. Just me. -- From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: How many Exchange Admins do you have??? Anybody have any articles that suggest how many mailboxes ONE Exchange Admin should support? I’m sure it varies greatly from company to company, but I’m just trying to get a general baseline. How many do you guys support? Thanks! -- Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.
Outlook 2003 emails for administrator account
Apparently someone unhid the administrator in the GAL and the domain administrator account has been receiving emails. It has some 24000 emails in it now. I have hid from GAL set on it now but I need to purge all the unwanted emails?? On a MS Exchange 2003 standard server using a MS Outlook 2003 client how do I get rid of those emails??
Re: Ironport users
That's definetely in there. Add footer or add disclaimer has a not on response but only original area. From: Kevin Lundy Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ironport users Well the underlying OS has a very simple solution not available in the GUI. Page 236 of the latest manual as an example for Signed Rule. Message filter vs content filter Guess it goes to show there is value in RTFM every now and then. Now if I could get it to give me a disclaimer only on new messages, not replies ... On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote: Not sure then... Might be worth a call to support, they are excellent... On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Lundy klu...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, did that. Also did it another way - setup a filter for SSN scanning, and used the notify feature. I then sent a signed message, with a fake SSN. It quarantined and notified based on the SSN. I then looked at the notify message (which includes the evaluated headers). (that was easier than using Outlooks poor interface to read headers) On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, that would imply it's working... Have you looked in the message tracking to see what values are seen in the header to verify you're filtering the right one? On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Lundy klu...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure what you mean (only had the device about 18 hours). But, I can modify the filter to filter something else (e.g. a key word rather than a header), and the filter works. So I assume that means it is attached? On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote: Did you attach the filter to the SMTP listener? On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Kevin Lundy klu...@gmail.com wrote: Just got a couple of Ironports. I'm trying to write an outgoing content filter to identify digitally signed messages. I've tried Other Header with header name of Content-Type and value contains multipart/signed, or value contains x-pkcs7-signature. Can't seem to make it work. Anyone got an idea? Thanks Kevin
Weird problem
I have Exchange 2003. We use it for internal email only. We connect to it using Outlook 2003. I have a mail provider, mailanyone.net. We use it for external email only. We connect to it using Outlook Express, pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com. I have an ironport that sits on the edge of my network. Currently if I set up an smtp address in Outlook 2003 I can get my email sent out the ironport device from exchange. I can not get any mail into exchange through the ironport. I have a requirement to keep the two clients but send all the smtp and receive all the pop mail through the ironport. If that means relaying off of the exchange that is fine or not even using it is also fine. Does anyone know of away to do this?
Re: Weird problem
Would I set my internal dns to have pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com point to the smtp relay of the ironport? That way when the outlook express accounts resolved their addresses they would be forced to come through the ironport? I can set up the ASA to funnel all port 25 and port 110 traffic to go through the ironport? Current: - --- -- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Outlook Express\ - - Proposed: - ---- --- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Ironport\---/Outlook Express\ - - -- From: Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Weird problem Usually, anti-spam devices that sit on the network edge talk SMTP, not POP, for inbound mail delivery. Check your Ironport spec sheet to be sure, or look in the configuration menus for setting up POP mail retrieval, and if you don't find that capability, you can't get there from here. Carl -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Weird problem I have Exchange 2003. We use it for internal email only. We connect to it using Outlook 2003. I have a mail provider, mailanyone.net. We use it for external email only. We connect to it using Outlook Express, pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com. I have an ironport that sits on the edge of my network. Currently if I set up an smtp address in Outlook 2003 I can get my email sent out the ironport device from exchange. I can not get any mail into exchange through the ironport. I have a requirement to keep the two clients but send all the smtp and receive all the pop mail through the ironport. If that means relaying off of the exchange that is fine or not even using it is also fine. Does anyone know of away to do this?
Re: Weird problem
Thanks Jason. I would love to get rid of OL Express but it is a Legacy thing. I have promoted this beast because of my fears of viruses in the past. Now I have been so convincing that nobody will allow me to change their stance on internal mail and external mail. -- From: Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Weird problem If you already have an email server (Exchange) and all the other necessary items why not simplify and just (get rid of Outlook Express): Public IP Private IP Internet--ASA--Ironport--Exchange--Outlook ^^ || Mail Gateway -+| (DNS MX record)| | Mail Relay + Am I missing something? the ASA will do PAT of port 25 to/from the Ironport (so public MX record actually points to ASA public IP). Best practice would be to have the ASA block port 25 to and from anything other than the Ironport (clients should not ever send directly to the Internet); Exchange box will use Ironport as the smarthost. Configure the Ironport to LDAP lookups against a domain controller to avoid delivery to non-existent users. If you really want to retain OL Express, enable POP/IMAP and point your OL Express at the Exchange box. At any rate, the Ironport is an smtp relay only; you cannot enable a client access protocol such as POP or IMAP on it. Your Co. is paying a lot of money for the Ironport; utilize the support resources to help you get the configuration done right. There are many small details involved, but thankfully most only have to be dealt with once, when it's first set up. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 14:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: David McSpadden Subject: Re: Weird problem Would I set my internal dns to have pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com point to the smtp relay of the ironport? That way when the outlook express accounts resolved their addresses they would be forced to come through the ironport? I can set up the ASA to funnel all port 25 and port 110 traffic to go through the ironport? Current: - --- -- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Outlook Express\ - --- -- Proposed: - --- -- --- --- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Ironport\---/Outlook Express\ - --- - - -- From: Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Weird problem Usually, anti-spam devices that sit on the network edge talk SMTP, not POP, for inbound mail delivery. Check your Ironport spec sheet to be sure, or look in the configuration menus for setting up POP mail retrieval, and if you don't find that capability, you can't get there from here. Carl -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Weird problem I have Exchange 2003. We use it for internal email only. We connect to it using Outlook 2003. I have a mail provider, mailanyone.net. We use it for external email only. We connect to it using Outlook Express, pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com. I have an ironport that sits on the edge of my network. Currently if I set up an smtp address in Outlook 2003 I can get my email sent out the ironport device from exchange. I can not get any mail into exchange through the ironport. I have a requirement to keep the two clients but send all the smtp and receive all the pop mail through the ironport. If that means relaying off of the exchange that is fine or not even using it is also fine. Does anyone know of away to do this?
Re: Weird problem
But right now they are breaking the law and have the email segregated. Internal only in Outlook and external only in OE. They are happy that way. From: Eric Woodford Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Weird problem :) Do viruses spread slower because they are attached to an email in a POP mailbox vs passing through an Exchange server? I agree with Jason, you paid for the IronPort to scan your incoming mail, get rid of the OE client and simplify. When no new mail shows up in their OE mailbox, but appears in Outlok, they'll be pleasantly pleased. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:21 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Thanks Jason. I would love to get rid of OL Express but it is a Legacy thing. I have promoted this beast because of my fears of viruses in the past. Now I have been so convincing that nobody will allow me to change their stance on internal mail and external mail. -- From: Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Weird problem If you already have an email server (Exchange) and all the other necessary items why not simplify and just (get rid of Outlook Express): Public IP Private IP Internet--ASA--Ironport--Exchange--Outlook ^^ || Mail Gateway -+| (DNS MX record)| | Mail Relay + Am I missing something? the ASA will do PAT of port 25 to/from the Ironport (so public MX record actually points to ASA public IP). Best practice would be to have the ASA block port 25 to and from anything other than the Ironport (clients should not ever send directly to the Internet); Exchange box will use Ironport as the smarthost. Configure the Ironport to LDAP lookups against a domain controller to avoid delivery to non-existent users. If you really want to retain OL Express, enable POP/IMAP and point your OL Express at the Exchange box. At any rate, the Ironport is an smtp relay only; you cannot enable a client access protocol such as POP or IMAP on it. Your Co. is paying a lot of money for the Ironport; utilize the support resources to help you get the configuration done right. There are many small details involved, but thankfully most only have to be dealt with once, when it's first set up. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 14:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: David McSpadden Subject: Re: Weird problem Would I set my internal dns to have pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com point to the smtp relay of the ironport? That way when the outlook express accounts resolved their addresses they would be forced to come through the ironport? I can set up the ASA to funnel all port 25 and port 110 traffic to go through the ironport? Current: - --- -- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Outlook Express\ - --- -- Proposed: - --- -- --- --- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Ironport\---/Outlook Express\ - --- - - -- From: Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Weird problem Usually, anti-spam devices that sit on the network edge talk SMTP, not POP, for inbound mail delivery. Check your Ironport spec sheet to be sure, or look in the configuration menus for setting up POP mail retrieval, and if you don't find that capability, you can't get there from here. Carl -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Weird problem I have Exchange 2003. We use it for internal email only. We connect to it using Outlook 2003. I have a mail provider, mailanyone.net. We use it for external
Re: Weird problem
I want to so bad. From: Tom Cass Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Weird problem Ditto! From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Weird problem :) Do viruses spread slower because they are attached to an email in a POP mailbox vs passing through an Exchange server? I agree with Jason, you paid for the IronPort to scan your incoming mail, get rid of the OE client and simplify. When no new mail shows up in their OE mailbox, but appears in Outlok, they'll be pleasantly pleased. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:21 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote: Thanks Jason. I would love to get rid of OL Express but it is a Legacy thing. I have promoted this beast because of my fears of viruses in the past. Now I have been so convincing that nobody will allow me to change their stance on internal mail and external mail. -- From: Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Weird problem If you already have an email server (Exchange) and all the other necessary items why not simplify and just (get rid of Outlook Express): Public IP Private IP Internet--ASA--Ironport--Exchange--Outlook ^^ || Mail Gateway -+| (DNS MX record)| | Mail Relay + Am I missing something? the ASA will do PAT of port 25 to/from the Ironport (so public MX record actually points to ASA public IP). Best practice would be to have the ASA block port 25 to and from anything other than the Ironport (clients should not ever send directly to the Internet); Exchange box will use Ironport as the smarthost. Configure the Ironport to LDAP lookups against a domain controller to avoid delivery to non-existent users. If you really want to retain OL Express, enable POP/IMAP and point your OL Express at the Exchange box. At any rate, the Ironport is an smtp relay only; you cannot enable a client access protocol such as POP or IMAP on it. Your Co. is paying a lot of money for the Ironport; utilize the support resources to help you get the configuration done right. There are many small details involved, but thankfully most only have to be dealt with once, when it's first set up. ~JasonG -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 14:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: David McSpadden Subject: Re: Weird problem Would I set my internal dns to have pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com point to the smtp relay of the ironport? That way when the outlook express accounts resolved their addresses they would be forced to come through the ironport? I can set up the ASA to funnel all port 25 and port 110 traffic to go through the ironport? Current: - --- -- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Outlook Express\ - --- -- Proposed: - --- -- --- --- / Internet E-Mail\-/ASA FireWall\---/Ironport\---/Outlook Express\ - --- - - -- From: Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Weird problem Usually, anti-spam devices that sit on the network edge talk SMTP, not POP, for inbound mail delivery. Check your Ironport spec sheet to be sure, or look in the configuration menus for setting up POP mail retrieval, and if you don't find that capability, you can't get there from here. Carl -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Weird problem I have Exchange 2003. We use it for internal email only. We connect to it using Outlook 2003. I have a mail provider, mailanyone.net. We use it for external email only. We connect to it using Outlook Express, pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com. I have an ironport that sits on the edge of my network. Currently if I set up an smtp address in Outlook 2003 I can get my email sent out the ironport device from exchange. I can not get any mail into exchange through the ironport. I have a requirement
Is this a good SMTP transaction?
Protocol SMTP interface Data1 (IP 10.0.10.15) on incoming connection (ICID 215625) from sender IP 10.0.50.4. Reverse DNS host 03030611n4m055.imcu.local verified 1. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) (ICID 215625) RELAY sender group RELAYLIST match 10.0.50.4 SBRS rfc1918 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Start message 212050 on incoming connection (ICID 215625). 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 enqueued on incoming connection (ICID 215625) from err...@imcu.com. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 on incoming connection (ICID 215625) added recipient (3177141...@txt.att.net). 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) SMTP delivery connection (DCID 157984) opened from IronPort interface 10.0.10.15 to IP address 66.102.165.114 on port 25. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 contains message ID header '03030611n4m055iizih1...@03030611n4m055.imcu.local'. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 (825 bytes) from err...@imcu.com ready. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 matched per-recipient policy DEFAULT for outbound mail policies. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 scanned by Anti-Virus engine Sophos. Interim verdict: CLEAN 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 scanned by Anti-Virus engine. Final verdict: Negative 15 Sep 2009 07:16:52 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 queued for delivery. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:53 (GMT -0400) (DCID 157984) Delivery started for message 212050 to 3177141...@txt.att.net. 15 Sep 2009 07:16:53 (GMT -0400) (DCID 157984) Delivery details: Message 212050 sent to 3177141...@txt.att.net 15 Sep 2009 07:16:53 (GMT -0400) Message 212050 to 3177141...@txt.att.net received remote SMTP response 'Message received: 20090915111653.udfi13119.atledge02.cingularme@ironport.imcu.local'.
Re: Anybody Out There?
Just shows what killing millions of brain cells can produce It is genius and frightening all at the same time. - Original Message - From: Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Anybody Out There? Anybody here ever done the Dark Side of Oz experiment? It's a trip. -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 4:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anybody Out There? On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, David Mazzaccarodavid.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com wrote: Technically... Comfortably Numb's second line is Is there anybody IN there. Yah, yah, I know. But we wouldn't have a 10 message off-topic thread if I let things like that worry me, neh? ;-) ...Ahhh the memories. I regret that I never got the chance to see the real Pink Floyd. I did catch The Australian Pink Floyd Show http://www.aussiefloyd.com/ when it came around here, though, and it was quite impressive. People I was with who *had* seen the original said it was pretty darn close, except that the Aussie version lacked certain... scents in the air during the show. ;-) -- Ben
Re: Anybody Out There?
I think they were highly intelligent to start and had the idea but I honestly feel that the killing of the brain cells allowed for the creative process to be completed in the manner that produced the coincidence. - Original Message - From: Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:28 AM Subject: RE: Anybody Out There? So did you think it was intentional or coincidence? -sc -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anybody Out There? Just shows what killing millions of brain cells can produce It is genius and frightening all at the same time. - Original Message - From: Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangel...@lyris.sunbelt- software.com Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Anybody Out There? Anybody here ever done the Dark Side of Oz experiment? It's a trip. -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 4:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anybody Out There? On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, David Mazzaccarodavid.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com wrote: Technically... Comfortably Numb's second line is Is there anybody IN there. Yah, yah, I know. But we wouldn't have a 10 message off-topic thread if I let things like that worry me, neh? ;-) ...Ahhh the memories. I regret that I never got the chance to see the real Pink Floyd. I did catch The Australian Pink Floyd Show http://www.aussiefloyd.com/ when it came around here, though, and it was quite impressive. People I was with who *had* seen the original said it was pretty darn close, except that the Aussie version lacked certain... scents in the air during the show. ;-) -- Ben
Re: monitoring tips?
Just add Blat to your ntbackup script and you have notification... :-) - Original Message - From: Sherry Abercrombie To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:15 PM Subject: Re: monitoring tips? You can schedule email notifications upon completion of the BackupExec job. Not sure if NTBackup has that ability, but I know BackupExec does. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jeff Brown 2jbr...@gmail.com wrote: using NT Backup on the Ex boxes to disk, then BackupExec puts them to tape. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote: What backup software are you using? On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Jeff Brown 2jbr...@gmail.com wrote: That probably IS what I'm looking for, but Nagios is linux only tool, is it not? I'm not currently running any linux boxes. :( On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Andrew Greene agre...@cityofanderson.com wrote: I use Nagios for this (in a roundabout way) – logs are on a separate drive from system and the information stores, so what I do is using NSClient, run checks to make sure that I’m not using more than 2% of the drive. If I’m using more than that on a drive, it means that the backup hasn’t run and the logs haven’t been removed. Do that for each of your servers. Not sure if this is will help or is what you’re looking for, but it’s what I use. Andrew Greene IS Technician / Webmaster City of Anderson From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: monitoring tips? Anyone have something they are proud of that confirms backup/log file removal for multiple exchange servers? FE/BE setup with 3 mailbox servers, all running E2k3, W2K3 servers. All standard versions. (probably has to be free for me to be able to use it). Thanks for any help/suggestions. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Azle, TX, United States
Re: Anybody Out There?
Come on, now. - Original Message - From: Peter van Houten peter...@gmail.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:47 PM Subject: Re: Anybody Out There? ...is there anyone home? -- Peter van Houten On the 03/08/2009 21:25, Ben Scott wrote the following: Just nod if you can hear me. -- Ben
Re: Making sure all can read... (was RE: 2k3 message tracking-Resolved)
With a bag of cheesy poofs and the evangelist of the day pumping through the TV wondering why Shookie won't call you back. :-) - Original Message - From: Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Making sure all can read... (was RE: 2k3 message tracking-Resolved) the pain comes later when I'm home alone. -- ME2 On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Andy Shookandy.sh...@peak10.com wrote: ME2 and I both do it, it's painless and works H…. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Making sure all can read... (was RE: 2k3 message tracking-Resolved) Why not use gmail for reading mailing lists. ME2 and I both do it, it's painless and works. On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com wrote: All: Because Listserv seems to subtly break mime headers, posting to the list in anything other than a plain-text 8-bit charset will likely result in some people being unable to read your message. Also, sending mail in UTF will cause those who use Eudora to Kvetch endlessly until you fix your posting style (but don't EVER suggest they switch to something that's supported!) ;) I sure am glad I don't use my gmail for reading mailing lists! ~JasonG -Original Message- From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 09:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: 2k3 message tracking-Resolved You have to be joking! Jason G. help him... -- Peter van Houten On the 22/07/2009 15:48, pramatow...@mediageneral.com wrote the following: +ADw-html xmlns:v+AD0AIg-urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml+ACI- xmlns:o+AD0AIg-urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office+ACI- xmlns:w+AD0AIg-urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word+ACI- xmlns:m+AD0AIg-http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml+ACI- xmlns+AD0AIg-http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40+ACIAPg- +ADw-head+AD4- +ADw-meta http-equiv+AD0-Content-Type content+AD0AIg-text/html+ADs- charset+AD0-utf-7+ACIAPg- +ADw-meta name+AD0-Generator content+AD0AIg-Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)+ACIAPg- +ADwAIQ---+AFs-if +ACE-mso+AF0APg- +ADw-style+AD4- v+AFw-:+ACo- +AHs-behavior:url(+ACM-default+ACM-VML)+ADsAfQ- o+AFw-:+ACo- +AHs-behavior:url(+ACM-default+ACM-VML)+ADsAfQ- w+AFw-:+ACo- +AHs-behavior:url(+ACM-default+ACM-VML)+ADsAfQ- .shape +AHs-behavior:url(+ACM-default+ACM-VML)+ADsAfQ- +ADw-/style+AD4- +ADwAIQBb-endif+AF0---+AD4- +ADw-style+AD4- +ADwAIQ--- /+ACo- Font Definitions +ACo-/ +AEA-font-face +AHs-font-family:Calibri+ADs- panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4+ADsAfQ- +AEA-font-face +AHs-font-family:Tahoma+ADs- panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4+ADsAfQ- /+ACo- Style Definitions +ACo-/ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal +AHs-margin:0in+ADs- margin-bottom:.0001pt+ADs- font-size:11.0pt+ADs- font-family:+ACI-Calibri+ACI-,+ACI-sans-serif+ACIAOwB9- a:link, span.MsoHyperlink +AHs-mso-style-priority:99+ADs- color:blue+ADs- text-decoration:underline+ADsAfQ- a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed +AHs-mso-style-priority:99+ADs- color:purple+ADs- text-decoration:underline+ADsAfQ- p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText +AHs-mso-style-priority:99+ADs- mso-style-link:+ACI-Plain Text Char+ACIAOw- margin:0in+ADs- margin-bottom:.0001pt+ADs- font-size:10.0pt+ADs- font-family:+ACI-Arial+ACI-,+ACI-sans-serif+ACIAOwB9- p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate +AHs-mso-style-priority:99+ADs- mso-style-link:+ACI-Balloon Text Char+ACIAOw- margin:0in+ADs- margin-bottom:.0001pt+ADs- font-size:8.0pt+ADs- font-family:+ACI-Tahoma+ACI-,+ACI-sans-serif+ACIAOwB9- span.PlainTextChar +AHs-mso-style-name:+ACI-Plain Text Char+ACIAOw- mso-style-priority:99+ADs- mso-style-link:+ACI-Plain Text+ACIAOw- font-family:+ACI-Arial+ACI-,+ACI-sans-serif+ACIAOwB9- span.BalloonTextChar +AHs-mso-style-name:+ACI-Balloon Text Char+ACIAOw- mso-style-priority:99+ADs- mso-style-link:+ACI-Balloon Text+ACIAOw- font-family:+ACI-Tahoma+ACI-,+ACI-sans-serif+ACIAOwB9- .MsoChpDefault +AHs-mso-style-type:export-only+ADsAfQ- +AEA-page Section1 +AHs-size:8.5in 11.0in+ADs- margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in+ADsAfQ- div.Section1 +AHs-page:Section1+ADsAfQ- --+AD4- +ADw-/style+AD4- +ADwAIQ---+AFs-if gte mso 9+AF0APgA8-xml+AD4- +ADw-o:shapedefaults v:ext+AD0AIg-edit+ACI- spidmax+AD0AIg-2050+ACI- /+AD4- +ADw-/xml+AD4APAAhAFs-endif+AF0---+AD4APAAh---+AFs-if gte mso 9+AF0APgA8-xml+AD4- +ADw-o:shapelayout v:ext+AD0AIg-edit+ACIAPg- +ADw-o:idmap v:ext+AD0AIg-edit+ACI- data+AD0AIg-1+ACI- /+AD4- +ADw-/o:shapelayout+AD4APA-/xml+AD4APAAhAFs-endif+AF0---+AD4- +ADw-/head+AD4- +ADw-body lang+AD0-EN-US link+AD0-blue vlink+AD0-purple+AD4- +ADw-div class+AD0-Section1+AD4- +ADw-p class+AD0-MsoPlainText+AD4-If they used the mailbox (Outlook or OWA) you'd see something in sent items.
Re: Is Exchange Doomed?
Not sure if it is really reasonable yet. Still needs to be used for a little while yet. - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:13 PM Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed? I used it once. From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is Exchange Doomed? Around 1.75 million businesses are using Google Apps? 1.75 million USERS I would believe, not businesses. Exchange in your local shop may be doomed, MS wants you to buy it as a cloud service too. It was only a matter of time before somebody came up with reasonable competition. Carl From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is Exchange Doomed? http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10260879-2.html Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Replacing Win2k3 DC
In Exchange 2003 how do I verify it is pointing to the new DC. - Original Message - From: Sherry Abercrombie To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:48 PM Subject: Re: Replacing Win2k3 DC Yeah, I think that's all you need to do. It just makes it and Exchange aware of one another. We had to rebuild a DC recently, the other two dc's we have hadn't had the domainprep run on them, and Exchange quit working (even though the other two were global catalog servers), ran the domainprep and all was happy again. As others have said but just to sum it all up: 1. build up your new dc 2. move FSMO roles 3. dcpromo old dc to demote it 4. and wait, we typically give it at least 24 hours if not more.. At this point, you are in no hurry, you've replaced it with the new dc, just let it sit for a day or two before removing it from the domain and scrapping it. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.org wrote: Just that one will grab the new DC name and insert it into all the tables on Exchange? - Original Message - From: Sherry Abercrombie To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:26 PM Subject: Re: Replacing Win2k3 DC DomainPrep from the Exchange 2003 cd on the new DC. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Stefan Jafs sj...@amico.com wrote: Yes I should have mentioned the DC replication times….. Wait …. Wait.. check for replications … Done. ___ Stefan Jafs From: Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC [mailto:rick.foga...@us.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Replacing Win2k3 DC The only thing that I’d add is some time in between each of those steps for replication etc.. (this could be depending upon how big the OP’s environment is) wasn’t stated in your message, although could be that it was implied… From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Replacing Win2k3 DC If the aging server is still up, add the new server DC promo move the appropriate roles, DC promo (demote) the old one. Exchange is smart enough to now of the change. Am I missing something? ___ Stefan Jafs From: Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC [mailto:rick.foga...@us.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Replacing Win2k3 DC Perhaps this might help in determining what is where: http://www.petri.co.il/determining_fsmo_role_holders.htm Rick From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Replacing Win2k3 DC I have 3 DC's in my Domain. I am at the life's end of one of them. I am building a server to replace it. I need to know how to determine what roles this server has so I can be sure to get them on the new server. What is the best practice to replace a DC and to migrate the roles??? This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Haslet, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Haslet, TX, United States ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Replacing Win2k3 DC
I was just there. My new DC is in the mix there as Config and DC along with a third Server that is there as DC and GC. I think I am ok. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:10 AM Subject: RE: Replacing Win2k3 DC Check the Directory Access tab of the server in the management console Administrative Groups | group name | Servers | server name | Properties | Directory Access -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 8:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Replacing Win2k3 DC In Exchange 2003 how do I verify it is pointing to the new DC. - Original Message - From: Sherry Abercrombie To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:48 PM Subject: Re: Replacing Win2k3 DC Yeah, I think that's all you need to do. It just makes it and Exchange aware of one another. We had to rebuild a DC recently, the other two dc's we have hadn't had the domainprep run on them, and Exchange quit working (even though the other two were global catalog servers), ran the domainprep and all was happy again. As others have said but just to sum it all up: 1. build up your new dc 2. move FSMO roles 3. dcpromo old dc to demote it 4. and wait, we typically give it at least 24 hours if not more.. At this point, you are in no hurry, you've replaced it with the new dc, just let it sit for a day or two before removing it from the domain and scrapping it. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.org wrote: Just that one will grab the new DC name and insert it into all the tables on Exchange? - Original Message - From: Sherry Abercrombie To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:26 PM Subject: Re: Replacing Win2k3 DC DomainPrep from the Exchange 2003 cd on the new DC. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Stefan Jafs sj...@amico.com wrote: Yes I should have mentioned the DC replication times... Wait .. Wait.. check for replications . Done. ___ Stefan Jafs From: Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC [mailto:rick.foga...@us.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Replacing Win2k3 DC The only thing that I'd add is some time in between each of those steps for replication etc.. (this could be depending upon how big the OP's environment is) wasn't stated in your message, although could be that it was implied. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Replacing Win2k3 DC If the aging server is still up, add the new server DC promo move the appropriate roles, DC promo (demote) the old one. Exchange is smart enough to now of the change. Am I missing something? ___ Stefan Jafs From: Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC [mailto:rick.foga...@us.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Replacing Win2k3 DC Perhaps this might help in determining what is where: http://www.petri.co.il/determining_fsmo_role_holders.htm Rick From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Replacing Win2k3 DC I have 3 DC's in my Domain. I am at the life's end of one of them. I am building a server to replace it. I need to know how to determine what roles this server has so I can be sure to get them on the new server. What is the best practice to replace a DC and to migrate the roles??? This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
Re: (Crosspost) Email directly to File folder
3 Mb for 30 days. But I have a lot of others that we are emails a group of people that we have to have for the auditors that end up being saved by a user anyways. So it could be 10 - 15 Mb a day for 30 days. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:18 PM Subject: RE: (Crosspost) Email directly to File folder Oh, and how long do you need to keep them? From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 5:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: (Crosspost) Email directly to File folder How big are these reports and what is the frequency? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 5:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: (Crosspost) Email directly to File folder Is there a way to use Exchange to send emailed reports to a file folder instead of an email account?? Or could I set up a rule to save to a file folder?? Mostly I don't want some of these reports bloating my Exchange server. Exchange is 2k3 and we use Outlook 2k3 on a Windows2k3 Active Directory. Thanks David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
(Crosspost) Email directly to File folder
Is there a way to use Exchange to send emailed reports to a file folder instead of an email account?? Or could I set up a rule to save to a file folder?? Mostly I don't want some of these reports bloating my Exchange server. Exchange is 2k3 and we use Outlook 2k3 on a Windows2k3 Active Directory. Thanks David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
I will check the deleted item size this morning. I think I do have everything. Thanks all. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:57 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? So.did you get everything you needed? Peter told you how to get the delete item size in the ESM. Here is a script that will display it too: http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/a-script-for-getting-mailbox-sizes-using-wmi-in-powershell.aspx From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I got something to work. Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved. Exchange Organization Name: Indiana Members Credit Union Default SMTP address for organization: IM_DOM1.IndianaFCU.com All Exchange Servers in forest DC=IMCU,DC=local Server Name: 03030611N4M055 Server name: 03030611N4M055 Storage group: First Storage Group Store: Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) EDB file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.edb Size: 693 megabytes STM file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.stm Size: 200 megabytes Store Size Total: 893 megabytes Store: Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) EDB file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.edb Size: 63,070 megabytes STM file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.stm Size: 10,736 megabytes Store Size Total: 73,806 megabytes Storage Group total: 74,699 megabytes Server total: 74,699 megabytes Organization total: 74,699 megabytes - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:23 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I'll send you a complete archive from home tonight (and make it available on the blog). From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I created a C:\Scripts folder I created a C:\Scripts\Lib folder I copied the WSF file into the Scripts folder I created the 5 vbs files in the Lib folder. I make the correction from the below aspx page. When I run all I get is Expected Statement. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
Michael, I am looking at this blog and the script is bleeding off to the right... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:57 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? So.did you get everything you needed? Peter told you how to get the delete item size in the ESM. Here is a script that will display it too: http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/a-script-for-getting-mailbox-sizes-using-wmi-in-powershell.aspx From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I got something to work. Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved. Exchange Organization Name: Indiana Members Credit Union Default SMTP address for organization: IM_DOM1.IndianaFCU.com All Exchange Servers in forest DC=IMCU,DC=local Server Name: 03030611N4M055 Server name: 03030611N4M055 Storage group: First Storage Group Store: Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) EDB file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.edb Size: 693 megabytes STM file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.stm Size: 200 megabytes Store Size Total: 893 megabytes Store: Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) EDB file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.edb Size: 63,070 megabytes STM file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.stm Size: 10,736 megabytes Store Size Total: 73,806 megabytes Storage Group total: 74,699 megabytes Server total: 74,699 megabytes Organization total: 74,699 megabytes - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:23 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I'll send you a complete archive from home tonight (and make it available on the blog). From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I created a C:\Scripts folder I created a C:\Scripts\Lib folder I copied the WSF file into the Scripts folder I created the 5 vbs files in the Lib folder. I make the correction from the below aspx page. When I run all I get is Expected Statement. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055
Exchange 2003 store sizes?
I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big and the mailboxes so small? I am getting this error when the NTBackup runs at night?? The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-' ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
Thanks Don. I expected some heat but I really don't know. - Original Message - From: Don Ely To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:20 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Why is the sky blue? On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:18 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.org wrote: I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big and the mailboxes so small? I am getting this error when the NTBackup runs at night?? The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-' ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well, that generally means you need to find the FIRST ntbackup that failed and look at its logfile and the event log it generated when it failed. The error you mention is caused by a backup not cleaning up after itself. You can clear it by restarting the Information Store service. Every night you should have a ESE online maintenance task that runs and generates a 1221 event that tells you how much white space is in your databases. What did that say? Is this Enterprise or Standard Edition? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big and the mailboxes so small? I am getting this error when the NTBackup runs at night?? The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-' ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well, that generally means you need to find the FIRST ntbackup that failed and look at its logfile and the event log it generated when it failed. The error you mention is caused by a backup not cleaning up after itself. You can clear it by restarting the Information Store service. Every night you should have a ESE online maintenance task that runs and generates a 1221 event that tells you how much white space is in your databases. What did that say? Is this Enterprise or Standard Edition? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big and the mailboxes so small? I am getting this error when the NTBackup runs at night?? The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-' ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well, that generally means you need to find the FIRST ntbackup that failed and look at its logfile and the event log it generated when it failed. The error you mention is caused by a backup not cleaning up after itself. You can clear it by restarting the Information Store service. Every night you should have a ESE online maintenance task that runs and generates a 1221 event that tells you how much white space is in your databases. What did that say? Is this Enterprise or Standard Edition? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big and the mailboxes so small? I am getting this error when the NTBackup runs at night?? The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-' ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well, that generally means you need to find the FIRST ntbackup that failed and look at its logfile and the event log it generated when it failed. The error you mention is caused by a backup not cleaning up after itself. You can clear it by restarting the Information Store service. Every night you should have a ESE online maintenance task that runs and generates a 1221 event that tells you how much white space is in your databases. What did that say? Is this Enterprise or Standard Edition? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big and the mailboxes so small? I am getting this error when the NTBackup runs at night?? The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-' ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
I will read it. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well, that generally means you need to find the FIRST ntbackup that failed and look at its logfile and the event log it generated when it failed. The error you mention is caused by a backup not cleaning up after itself. You can clear it by restarting the Information Store service. Every night you should have a ESE online maintenance task that runs and generates a 1221 event that tells you how much white space is in your databases. What did that say? Is this Enterprise or Standard Edition? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
shouldn't have but we have CISCO VOIP interfacing with Exchange so it might added a snapin or plugin to Exchange. I will the VOIP tech and see if he has been messing with my Exchange box again. - Original Message - From: Ralph Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I had a situation where the edb size was about double the size of all the mailboxes together. It turns out that an email archiving solution that had been recently implemented was creating a lot of Restricted Views, which take up space in the database but don't show up in the mailbox sizes. Anything like that recently implemented? -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I am looking in System Manager at Mailbox sizes and then I am looking at the priv1.edb that is 64 GB's. I don't see the correlation between the two? What gives? Why is the priv1 so big and the mailboxes so small? I am getting this error when the NTBackup runs at night?? The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Error returned from an ESE function call (d). ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupRead()' additional data '-' Confidentiality Notice: ** This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
I created a C:\Scripts folder I created a C:\Scripts\Lib folder I copied the WSF file into the Scripts folder I created the 5 vbs files in the Lib folder. I make the correction from the below aspx page. When I run all I get is Expected Statement. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well, that generally means you need to find the FIRST ntbackup that failed and look at its logfile and the event log it generated when it failed. The error you mention is caused by a backup not cleaning up after itself. You can clear it by restarting the Information Store service. Every night you should have a ESE online maintenance task that runs and generates a 1221 event that tells you how much white space is in your databases. What did that say? Is this Enterprise or Standard Edition? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 store sizes
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
Thanks. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:23 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I'll send you a complete archive from home tonight (and make it available on the blog). From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I created a C:\Scripts folder I created a C:\Scripts\Lib folder I copied the WSF file into the Scripts folder I created the 5 vbs files in the Lib folder. I make the correction from the below aspx page. When I run all I get is Expected Statement. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well, that generally means you need to find the FIRST ntbackup
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
I got something to work. Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved. Exchange Organization Name: Indiana Members Credit Union Default SMTP address for organization: IM_DOM1.IndianaFCU.com All Exchange Servers in forest DC=IMCU,DC=local Server Name: 03030611N4M055 Server name: 03030611N4M055 Storage group: First Storage Group Store: Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) EDB file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.edb Size: 693 megabytes STM file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.stm Size: 200 megabytes Store Size Total: 893 megabytes Store: Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) EDB file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.edb Size: 63,070 megabytes STM file: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.stm Size: 10,736 megabytes Store Size Total: 73,806 megabytes Storage Group total: 74,699 megabytes Server total: 74,699 megabytes Organization total: 74,699 megabytes - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:23 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I'll send you a complete archive from home tonight (and make it available on the blog). From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I created a C:\Scripts folder I created a C:\Scripts\Lib folder I copied the WSF file into the Scripts folder I created the 5 vbs files in the Lib folder. I make the correction from the below aspx page. When I run all I get is Expected Statement. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
I think I have yours running. It shows just shy of 75GB. I have another one that is showing just the mailbox counts from: 'AllMailBoxes.vbs 'Alan Kaplan, for VA VISN 6, alan dot kaplan at va dot gov It generates a xls and I totaled the mailbox space for just over 12GB. Why is there almost 60 GB difference?? - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:23 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I'll send you a complete archive from home tonight (and make it available on the blog). From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I created a C:\Scripts folder I created a C:\Scripts\Lib folder I copied the WSF file into the Scripts folder I created the 5 vbs files in the Lib folder. I make the correction from the below aspx page. When I run all I get is Expected Statement. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Looks like my DB is full? Exchange 2003 Standard SP2
Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes?
David McSpadden Issue Warning 233.38 2,938 FALSE Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) First Storage Group Gina Lewis Issue Warning 272.91 3,663 FALSE Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) First Storage Group Trent Qualkinbush Issue Warning 426.76 7,034 FALSE Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) First Storage Group Stacy Bradfield Issue Warning 452.89 8,645 FALSE Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) First Storage Group Donna Hasty Issue Warning 583.51 6,149 FALSE Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) First Storage Group 12,045.27MB 410,305 - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:23 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I'll send you a complete archive from home tonight (and make it available on the blog). From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? I created a C:\Scripts folder I created a C:\Scripts\Lib folder I copied the WSF file into the Scripts folder I created the 5 vbs files in the Lib folder. I make the correction from the below aspx page. When I run all I get is Expected Statement. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/08/07/exchange-disk-space-version-2-1.aspx this includes a report of deleted space used per mailbox. You may need to turn down DIR. But to get the backup working again, regardless, you'll need to bounce the information store service. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 90 days. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Then like Peter said - what's your deleted item retention and deleted mailbox retention set to? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? 1 store. I will get the path for you. But it is the mailboxes under the admin group, servers, first storage group, mailbox store... - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:14 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Well that one tells you pretty clearly that SOME mailbox(es) is(are) consuming lots of space in the store. Where are you looking in ESM? You only have a single private store, right? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 6:00:00 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (03030611N4M055) has 18 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 store sizes? That's for the public store. What's the same event for the private store? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 store sizes? Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: General Event ID: 1221 Date: 3/3/2009 Time: 3:22:40 AM User: N/A Computer: 03030611N4M055 Description: The database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (03030611N4M055) has 1 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated. For more information, click http
Relaying through my firewall
I have 1 mailbox set up for testing purposes for imcu.org. I have the imcu.org MX pointed to Messagelabs and they are in turn pointed to an address. That address is allowed pop and smtp through common ports to my Exchange 2003 server. My Exchange 2003 server is set to allow relay from the internal address of the firewall. When Messagelabs attempts to test the connectivity they are getting denied. Here is their string: Connected to tower 95 server 2... Connected to xxx.xxx.123.215 [220] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:16:04 -0400 EHLO server-2.tower-95.messagelabs.com [250] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Hello [216.82.247.83] [250] TURN [250] SIZE [250] ETRN [250] PIPELINING [250] DSN [250] ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [250] 8bitmime [250] BINARYMIME [250] CHUNKING [250] VRFY [250] X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] X-EXPS=LOGIN [250] AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] AUTH=LOGIN [250] X-LINK2STATE [250] XEXCH50 [250] OK MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [250] 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [550] 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEST FAILED What am I missing??? Data Security is everyone's responsibility. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Relaying through my firewall
Yes. This testing is outside the context of their production as well. We are looking to begin hosting our own email on our Exchange server instead of paying for it. I am stumbling through all the doc I can find but I am aimlessly just pushing buttons right now. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:55 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Is that address in the valid recipients list for that domain at Message Labs? -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Relaying through my firewall I have 1 mailbox set up for testing purposes for imcu.org. I have the imcu.org MX pointed to Messagelabs and they are in turn pointed to an address. That address is allowed pop and smtp through common ports to my Exchange 2003 server. My Exchange 2003 server is set to allow relay from the internal address of the firewall. When Messagelabs attempts to test the connectivity they are getting denied. Here is their string: Connected to tower 95 server 2... Connected to xxx.xxx.123.215 [220] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:16:04 -0400 EHLO server-2.tower-95.messagelabs.com [250] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Hello [216.82.247.83] [250] TURN [250] SIZE [250] ETRN [250] PIPELINING [250] DSN [250] ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [250] 8bitmime [250] BINARYMIME [250] CHUNKING [250] VRFY [250] X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] X-EXPS=LOGIN [250] AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] AUTH=LOGIN [250] X-LINK2STATE [250] XEXCH50 [250] OK MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [250] 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [550] 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEST FAILED What am I missing??? Data Security is everyone's responsibility. ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Relaying through my firewall
I do not know. My internal domain is im_dom1.indanafcu.com. I thought I coudl just blindly relay off of the exchange box - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Is your Exchange server authoritative for that domain? -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Relaying through my firewall Yes. This testing is outside the context of their production as well. We are looking to begin hosting our own email on our Exchange server instead of paying for it. I am stumbling through all the doc I can find but I am aimlessly just pushing buttons right now. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:55 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Is that address in the valid recipients list for that domain at Message Labs? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Relaying through my firewall I have 1 mailbox set up for testing purposes for imcu.org. I have the imcu.org MX pointed to Messagelabs and they are in turn pointed to an address. That address is allowed pop and smtp through common ports to my Exchange 2003 server. My Exchange 2003 server is set to allow relay from the internal address of the firewall. When Messagelabs attempts to test the connectivity they are getting denied. Here is their string: Connected to tower 95 server 2... Connected to xxx.xxx.123.215 [220] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:16:04 -0400 EHLO server-2.tower-95.messagelabs.com [250] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Hello [216.82.247.83] [250] TURN [250] SIZE [250] ETRN [250] PIPELINING [250] DSN [250] ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [250] 8bitmime [250] BINARYMIME [250] CHUNKING [250] VRFY [250] X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] X-EXPS=LOGIN [250] AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] AUTH=LOGIN [250] X-LINK2STATE [250] XEXCH50 [250] OK MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [250] 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [550] 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEST FAILED What am I missing??? Data Security is everyone's responsibility. **Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
Re: Relaying through my firewall
Exchange server has my mailbox. I want the mail to come to me. via smtp. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:15 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Are you trying to receive that email into a mailbox on your Exchange server, or have the Exchange server accept it and then relay it to somewhere else? -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Relaying through my firewall I do not know. My internal domain is im_dom1.indanafcu.com. I thought I coudl just blindly relay off of the exchange box - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Is your Exchange server authoritative for that domain? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Relaying through my firewall Yes. This testing is outside the context of their production as well. We are looking to begin hosting our own email on our Exchange server instead of paying for it. I am stumbling through all the doc I can find but I am aimlessly just pushing buttons right now. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:55 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Is that address in the valid recipients list for that domain at Message Labs? -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Relaying through my firewall I have 1 mailbox set up for testing purposes for imcu.org. I have the imcu.org MX pointed to Messagelabs and they are in turn pointed to an address. That address is allowed pop and smtp through common ports to my Exchange 2003 server. My Exchange 2003 server is set to allow relay from the internal address of the firewall. When Messagelabs attempts to test the connectivity they are getting denied. Here is their string: Connected to tower 95 server 2... Connected to xxx.xxx.123.215 [220] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:16:04 -0400 EHLO server-2.tower-95.messagelabs.com [250] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Hello [216.82.247.83] [250] TURN [250] SIZE [250] ETRN [250] PIPELINING [250] DSN [250] ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [250] 8bitmime [250] BINARYMIME [250] CHUNKING [250] VRFY [250] X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] X-EXPS=LOGIN [250] AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] AUTH=LOGIN [250] X-LINK2STATE [250] XEXCH50 [250] OK MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [250] 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [550] 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEST FAILED What am I missing??? Data Security is everyone's responsibility. **Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message
Re: Relaying through my firewall
I have done that. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall You need to set up a recipient policy for that domain, and tell the Exchange server it's responsible for delivering email for that domain. -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Relaying through my firewall Exchange server has my mailbox. I want the mail to come to me. via smtp. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:15 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Are you trying to receive that email into a mailbox on your Exchange server, or have the Exchange server accept it and then relay it to somewhere else? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Relaying through my firewall I do not know. My internal domain is im_dom1.indanafcu.com. I thought I coudl just blindly relay off of the exchange box - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Is your Exchange server authoritative for that domain? -- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Relaying through my firewall Yes. This testing is outside the context of their production as well. We are looking to begin hosting our own email on our Exchange server instead of paying for it. I am stumbling through all the doc I can find but I am aimlessly just pushing buttons right now. - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:55 PM Subject: RE: Relaying through my firewall Is that address in the valid recipients list for that domain at Message Labs? From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Relaying through my firewall I have 1 mailbox set up for testing purposes for imcu.org. I have the imcu.org MX pointed to Messagelabs and they are in turn pointed to an address. That address is allowed pop and smtp through common ports to my Exchange 2003 server. My Exchange 2003 server is set to allow relay from the internal address of the firewall. When Messagelabs attempts to test the connectivity they are getting denied. Here is their string: Connected to tower 95 server 2... Connected to xxx.xxx.123.215 [220] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:16:04 -0400 EHLO server-2.tower-95.messagelabs.com [250] 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local Hello [216.82.247.83] [250] TURN [250] SIZE [250] ETRN [250] PIPELINING [250] DSN [250] ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [250] 8bitmime [250] BINARYMIME [250] CHUNKING [250] VRFY [250] X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] X-EXPS=LOGIN [250] AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN [250] AUTH=LOGIN [250] X-LINK2STATE [250] XEXCH50 [250] OK MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [250] 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [550] 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEST FAILED What am I missing??? Data Security is everyone's responsibility. **Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
Re: You do not know me..
She would have to update her skillset every 6 to 9 months to keep her communication level with him or he would become overwhelmed with outdated rfc's and protocal convertors. - Original Message - From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:29 AM Subject: Re: You do not know me.. Not without a whitepaper or TechNet article... On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Campbell, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just as well. The poor girl is lonesome already. She obviously doesn't realize marrying an Exchange administrator isn't going to help much. -Original Message- From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: You do not know me.. Results: The following members were successfully deleted: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warm regards, Stu -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 3:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: You do not know me.. HAHAHAHAHAHA On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Matthew Talley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find your email on dating site and I wished to write to you. You do not know me... and I do not know you... But I trust in destiny and I hope that destiny give me a chance I want to find a kind, honest and clever man. My name - Natalya. My age-26 years.It is difficult to tell about myself. If this is of any interest to you, write to me I hope, I can see your letter soon. In the following letter I to tell about myself and send my photos. Write on my personal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] now I write with the work and my chief does not know about it. Sincerely, Natalya. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stu - request to remove user?
I have seen it in some Credit Unions and some hospitals. Depends on the Admin and how well versed they are with it. If you 'get it' you can set it up automagically with no admin interference. I on the other hand don't 'get' a lot of things so I don't use it. Wish I could because with Messagelabs and SpamAssasin I still get 10 to 15 spams a day. - Original Message - From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:18 PM Subject: Re: Stu - request to remove user? Stats, no - just personal experience. Where I work I get a email cross-sampling of tech, legal, and public relations. On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have stats on that? I've worked in several industries and not seen it in wide spread use. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stu - request to remove user? Its a lot more common than you think. It depends on the industry you are in. On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting. I saw others complaining about it yesterday, but I think I was deleting it with the OOF's coming in and missed. I just got one, 15 minutes after I sent an email to the list. I can't believe someone is actually using a challenge/response spam filtering solution. Lol. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stu - request to remove user? Every time I post to this list, I am getting an email back from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you unsubscribe her? Or ask her to use a different address? It is rather annoying. -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: NDR's generated via spoofed from address
Re: NDR's generated via spoofed from addressok. thanks. - Original Message - From: Kennedy, Jim To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:39 PM Subject: RE: NDR's generated via spoofed from address When you say all smtp/pop traffic is forwarded to one IP on the firewall do you mean all of your internal servers are forwarded to that one IP.or are your users using outside servers? SPF is tied to the sending servers IP address per domain. So you figure out what public IP addresses the servers that send for 'imcu.com' and publish those in an SPF record. If that is all NAT'd out on one public IP address on your firewall then you have an easy task.. But that said your message below came from 208.70.128.104 which is mailanyone.net. An outside email provider? If they handle all of your domain's email sending then you need to check with them to get the list of sending IP addresses and those go into your domain's SPF record. And it won't 'solve' the NDR problem but it could make it better. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: NDR's generated via spoofed from address All of my users are behind a firewall and all smtp/pop traffic is forwarded to one IP on the firewall. If I SPFed my ip from the Firewall would that kill me NDR's? Or maybe I should just sit back down in the corner with my propeller hat on and lick my oversized lollipop. - Original Message - From: Kennedy, Jim To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:05 PM Subject: RE: NDR's generated via spoofed from address I hear ya, ours is probably similar. edu networks can be exciting. But even if you can narrow it down to a class B that is an improvement..casting a wide address space in your SPF would at least eliminate a great part of the rest of the internet.. From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: NDR's generated via spoofed from address Some of us have very weird network setups that make SPF records non-starters... (sigh) On 4/23/08 10:27 AM, Kennedy, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You certainly should publish an SPF, it can help and causes no harm as you point out. But I would respectfully suggest that someone sending that much backscatter is already so clueless that they probably don't check SPF either. Firewall them. From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NDR's generated via spoofed from address Publishing an SPF record may help some depending on the domain(s) the NDR's are coming from. From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: NDR's generated via spoofed from address Hi all, have a user who is getting nailed with NDR's for email she is not sending. We have verified that there are no matching emails coming out of the E2k3 SP2 server which means that someone 'out there' is spoofing the from address and NDR's are going to that address. What's the best bet to combat this? Said user is getting bored of deleting the NDR's Thanks in advance for any advice J Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk http://www.greenit.co.uk --- Salvador Manzo __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you
Exchange 2003 setup
How do I determine an Exchange setup? I am setting up a backup exchange server and I know my current Exchange server has files on C: E: and L:. I have those drives on my backup server but I am unsure of when or how to point the different parts of exchange to make it match the production exchange server. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: What is this and why am I getting it?
I am now. I think it is a loop between Cisco Unity and Exchange. The user at the 1800 number got the fax but I have received that NDR 7800 times since 3:00 pm yesterday. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:34 PM Subject: RE: What is this and why am I getting it? Are you postmaster? Someone tried to send a fax to 918007758875 and that attempt failed. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: What is this and why am I getting it? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Fax send error - could not render attachment [FAXPHONE=918007758875][FAX:NDR] Sent: 1/28/2008 3:23 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'System Administrator' on 1/28/2008 3:23 PM The message could not be delivered because the recipient's destination email system is unknown or invalid. Please check the address and try again, or contact your system administrator to verify connectivity to the email system of the recipient. 03030611n4m055.IMCU.local #5.1.2 __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
View Postmaster
I had an admin that was supposed to be monitoring the postmaster email account. They have left the job and I took the account over and found 38000 emails. I can not view them though. I keep getting time issues. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
