Antigen question...

[Eric Brouwer]

Hello!

Ok, from what I can gather from you talented folks is that Antigen is the
best.  Period.  I think I have convinced management that I need this
software.  I just have a few questions.

We have two Exchange 5.5 servers in the same site.  Would I have to install
Antigen on both servers or just the first?  Is there Antigen for Exchange
5.5 and 2000?

Based on answers to these questions, I'll probably have more?

Also, is Trend Micro's NeatSuite a decent alternative to Antigen if I can't
swing the price?

Eric


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen question...

[Eric Brouwer]

I'm not sure if I understand the question.  Both servers connect to a hub
that makes up our DMZ.  They both go out through the same interface on our
firewall.  The way I understood it is all mail comes through the first
server we installed, and if it is destined for a mailbox on the other
server, it is "forwarded".  Is that not how multiple servers work?

If I install the demo, do I need to uninstall it after 30 days even if we
decide to go with them, or can I just put in a serial number somewhere to
validate it?

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen question...


Are both servers connected to the internet separately?  You need to protect
the one that is the internet gateway.

There is an Antigen for Exchange2000 as well as 5.5.  You can download and
run the demo.  It uninstalls clean if you choose not to run with it.


-Original Message-----
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Antigen question...


Hello!

Ok, from what I can gather from you talented folks is that Antigen is the
best.  Period.  I think I have convinced management that I need this
software.  I just have a few questions.

We have two Exchange 5.5 servers in the same site.  Would I have to install
Antigen on both servers or just the first?  Is there Antigen for Exchange
5.5 and 2000?

Based on answers to these questions, I'll probably have more?

Also, is Trend Micro's NeatSuite a decent alternative to Antigen if I can't
swing the price?

Eric


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

? re: Antigen's free trial

[Eric Brouwer]

I'm not TOTALLY hijacking this thread, as my question is relative to it, but
I did change the name!

I am 99% sure I am going with Antigen ASAP.  I have approval for the funds,
but I want to install the demo before I commit to something I have no
touched myself.  We currently use GroupSucks.  Suffice it to say, I don't
care for it.  My question to you wise folks is this.  How should I conduct
my test?  Can I install Antigen with GS still installed, and then just stop
all GS services to test?  Or should I completely remove GS before I proceed?

I humbly await your guidance,

Eric

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-virus software for Exchange


I use Antigen, but I have heard that ScanMail is also a very good
product.  You will not go wrong purchasing either one.  I would try both
and see which one you like the best.
 
I know that Antigen has a free trial download that will uninstall from
the Exchange server very clean, so give it a try.  Not sure about Trend.
 
Mark

-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-virus software for Exchange



I just read all the posts in this thread and noticed that no one
mentioned Trend Micro ScanMail.  When I posted the question of what
anti-virus software to use with Exchange, most everyone said ScanMail.
It is even in the Swynk FAQ last I read it.  Now everyone says Antigen?
Should I be switching after my year is up with ScanMail or what?

 -Original Message- 
From:   Ellery July [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ] 
Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 8:22 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject:RE: Anti-virus software for Exchange 

antigen is great - when set up properly (which is very easy to do) you
are 
at least 99.%
protected. 

While others are being hit by varies virus you will be protected. Whiles

others are waiting for updates you will be protected. Your exchange
server 
will be up and on while others have taken theirs off line. 

ellery 

-Original Message- 
From: Tony Flannery [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 7:42 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Anti-virus software for Exchange 


Hi, 

Has anybody got any opinions/recommendations on anti-virus software for 
Exchange 5.5 ?  I've come across MailMarshal, Antigen, and GFI 
MailEssentials, but they all seem quite expensive. 

Thanks for any input. 

Tony. 

List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

GroupShield removal ?

[Eric Brouwer]

Hello!

Does anyone out there happen to have access to the removal instructions
(automatic and manual) for GroupShield 4.0.4.039?  I want to get rid of it,
and can not access their knowledgebase.  I have NO idea where to find my
grant number and can't answer all the questions they ask to have it sent to
me.

Eric


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: GroupShield removal ?

[Eric Brouwer]

Thanks, I'll check that out.

I made the decision LONG ago, but finally got the approval for funding a
switch.  The homepage virus got through because Groupshield just decided to
stop, and didn't throw any errors, notices, etc.  I just thought it was
doing it's thing.  And then, even though I was patched on Exchange against
NIMDA, it still got in via a bad web site as best as I can tell.  Yes, I
know I could have prevented that by properly patching all my systems, but I
still like the peace of mind NeatSuite will give me.  What did you switch
to?

As great as Anitgen seems to be, I think I'm going with Trend's NeatSuite.
I like the idea of putting protection at the gateway, e-mail server, and
clients with the same product suite.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GroupShield removal ?


I think you run the standard uninstall.
But then you may have some issue after. You will want to look at this
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm and go to section 3.70 for
the info.

This was how I did it.

Let me guess you decided to change to another product cause of this virus. I
did the same thing when ILOVEYOU or Melissa came out (cant remember which)

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: GroupShield removal ?


Hello!

Does anyone out there happen to have access to the removal instructions
(automatic and manual) for GroupShield 4.0.4.039?  I want to get rid of it,
and can not access their knowledgebase.  I have NO idea where to find my
grant number and can't answer all the questions they ask to have it sent to
me.

Eric


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

[Eric Brouwer]

I have nothing good to say about Groupsuck.  How they can sell that product
is beyond me.  I am also getting away from it ASAP.

Just to warn you, the uninstall is not clean.

-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


I am so PISSED OFF!!
Our POS GroupShield after an update to 4172 DATs simply lost "SCR" from the
list of blocked extensions!!!
WTF?!?! And of course some dumb-ass user got an email infected with
W32/Goner and opened it!
I got it under control now by adding SCR back in and initiating full IS
scan.. So far only one infected message that was succesfully cleaned..
But still, WTF is up with GroupShield?! I am moving to Antigen, that's for
sure.

Sorry for this rant


-Original Message-
From: Briggs, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Just in case you are not aware yet, there is a new virus out there.
Lots of incoming infected mail here, right now.
We got an automatic update this morning for Antigen which is protecting us.
Hope the same for you.

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bruce Briggs
System Administration
State University of NY

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

[Eric Brouwer]

Groupsuck REALLY sucks...

Even though I already had the latest dat installed, and all my services are
running, two instances of this virus made it through.  Thankfully I don't
trust GS, and I sent out a warning and my users actually read it, and acted
on it.

Any idea why GS might not be catching them?  Everything looks like it's set
up properly.  I caught all the Badtrans viruses last week.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Download and save the file sarcx86.exe, and then execute it on the system to
be updated.

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm



Which file do you grab from there 

-Original Message- 
From: Philip Youngworth [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:37 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


You can get the sarc update from their ftp server. 

ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_definitions/norto
  
n_antivirus/specdef 

You should be able to grab the sarc there for it. 

-Original Message- 
From: Cicerrella, Steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Seeing this one already.I have not found a patch for "Norton for 
Exchange" yet.Already sent a broadcast to the users pleading with them 
to use some common sense and explicitly telling them NOT to open that one. 
I wonder how many of them will open it anyway..   ;) 

Steve 



-Original Message- 
From: Briggs, Bruce [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:41 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Just in case you are not aware yet, there is a new virus out there. Lots of
incoming infected mail here, right now. We got an automatic update this
morning for Antigen which is protecting us. Hope the same for you.

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Bruce Briggs 
System Administration 
State University of NY 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  


*** 
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s)
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material.  Any review, 

retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in
error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any
computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

[Eric Brouwer]

I should probably know that, huh?

How can I tell if I am?  What is the alternative?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Using AVAPI??

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Groupsuck REALLY sucks...

Even though I already had the latest dat installed, and all my services are
running, two instances of this virus made it through.  Thankfully I don't
trust GS, and I sent out a warning and my users actually read it, and acted
on it.

Any idea why GS might not be catching them?  Everything looks like it's set
up properly.  I caught all the Badtrans viruses last week.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Download and save the file sarcx86.exe, and then execute it on the system to
be updated.

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm



Which file do you grab from there 

-Original Message- 
From: Philip Youngworth [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:37 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


You can get the sarc update from their ftp server. 

ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_definitions/norto
<ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_definitions/nort
o>  
n_antivirus/specdef 

You should be able to grab the sarc there for it. 

-Original Message- 
From: Cicerrella, Steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Seeing this one already.I have not found a patch for "Norton for 
Exchange" yet.Already sent a broadcast to the users pleading with them 
to use some common sense and explicitly telling them NOT to open that one. 
I wonder how many of them will open it anyway..   ;) 

Steve 



-Original Message- 
From: Briggs, Bruce [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:41 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Just in case you are not aware yet, there is a new virus out there. Lots of
incoming infected mail here, right now. We got an automatic update this
morning for Antigen which is protecting us. Hope the same for you.

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  

Bruce Briggs 
System Administration 
State University of NY 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  


*** 
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s)
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material.  Any review, 

retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in
error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any
computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

[Eric Brouwer]

That figures...  Their dumb site says 4173 will catch it.

-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


You need to get the 4174 DATs to catch it and of course McAfee FTP servers
are hammered!
Use ftp:/ftpeur.nai.com and manually download the sdat-4174.zip. You will
then have to manually apply it to your Exchange server, witch is major PITA
by itself.
See in  FAQs on www.mcafeeb2b.com for "Why are all attachments being
blocked?" question on instructions how to do it.
Feel free to email me with any questions.

Dimitri


-Original Message-----
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Groupsuck REALLY sucks...

Even though I already had the latest dat installed, and all my services are
running, two instances of this virus made it through.  Thankfully I don't
trust GS, and I sent out a warning and my users actually read it, and acted
on it.

Any idea why GS might not be catching them?  Everything looks like it's set
up properly.  I caught all the Badtrans viruses last week.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Download and save the file sarcx86.exe, and then execute it on the system to
be updated.

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm



Which file do you grab from there 

-Original Message- 
From: Philip Youngworth [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:37 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


You can get the sarc update from their ftp server. 

ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_definitions/norto
<ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_definitions/nort
o>  
n_antivirus/specdef 

You should be able to grab the sarc there for it. 

-Original Message- 
From: Cicerrella, Steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Seeing this one already.I have not found a patch for "Norton for 
Exchange" yet.Already sent a broadcast to the users pleading with them 
to use some common sense and explicitly telling them NOT to open that one. 
I wonder how many of them will open it anyway..   ;) 

Steve 



-Original Message- 
From: Briggs, Bruce [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:41 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Just in case you are not aware yet, there is a new virus out there. Lots of
incoming infected mail here, right now. We got an automatic update this
morning for Antigen which is protecting us. Hope the same for you.

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  

Bruce Briggs 
System Administration 
State University of NY 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  


*** 
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s)
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material.  Any review, 

retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in
error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any
computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

[Eric Brouwer]

All I know is that a friend on mine called me at 10:00 AM EST that he got
hit by the virus, I immediately went to my Exchange server, and did the live
update.  it said there were no new def's.  I thought that was odd, so I went
to their web site.  Sure enough, on the home page, there was a huge warning
about the virus.  At that time, the virus def said 4173.

This finally gave me the excuse I needed to rip that junk off my server, and
install ScanMail.  So far, I am loving the new program.

-Original Message-
From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Odd ... when I looked before I went home last night (about 3 hours before
your message) it quite clearly said 4174 was needed: different information
in different parts of the site??

Karen

> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 December 2001 20:59
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> That figures...  Their dumb site says 4173 will catch it.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:48 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> You need to get the 4174 DATs to catch it and of course 
> McAfee FTP servers
> are hammered!
> Use ftp:/ftpeur.nai.com and manually download the 
> sdat-4174.zip. You will
> then have to manually apply it to your Exchange server, witch 
> is major PITA
> by itself.
> See in  FAQs on www.mcafeeb2b.com for "Why are all attachments being
> blocked?" question on instructions how to do it.
> Feel free to email me with any questions.
> 
> Dimitri
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:33 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> Groupsuck REALLY sucks...
> 
> Even though I already had the latest dat installed, and all 
> my services are
> running, two instances of this virus made it through.  
> Thankfully I don't
> trust GS, and I sent out a warning and my users actually read 
> it, and acted
> on it.
> 
> Any idea why GS might not be catching them?  Everything looks 
> like it's set
> up properly.  I caught all the Badtrans viruses last week.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:27 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> Download and save the file sarcx86.exe, and then execute it 
> on the system to
> be updated.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:50 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> 
> Which file do you grab from there 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Philip Youngworth [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:37 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 
> 
> 
> You can get the sarc update from their ftp server. 
> 
> ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_def
> initions/norto
> <ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_de
> finitions/nort
> o>  
> n_antivirus/specdef 
> 
> You should be able to grab the sarc there for it. 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Cicerrella, Steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:24 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 
> 
> 
> Seeing this one already.I have not found a patch for "Norton for 
> Exchange" yet.Already sent a broadcast to the users 
> pleading with them 
> to use some common sense and explicitly telling them NOT to 
> open that one. 
> I wonder how many of them will open it anyway..   ;) 
> 
> Steve 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Briggs, Bruce [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:41 AM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 
> 
> 
> Just in case you are not aware yet, there is a new virus out 
> there. Lots of
> incoming infected mail here,

Mailbox move problem

[Eric Brouwer]

Hello!
 
I have 
two Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers on NT 4.0 SP6 in the same org, same site, 
etc.  I want to condense them down to the first server in the site.  
First thing I am trying to do is move the mailboxes to the original.  The 
first few went fine.  Now I am getting errors while moving.  I didn't 
catch the error that popped up on the screen (but I could recreate it if that 
would help), but this is what the event viewer:
 
Event 
ID: 1008
Source: MSEchangeAdmin
Category: Move Mailbox
 
Unable 
to move mailbox "mailbox name".
 
From 
what I have gathered is that the mailbox might hold some corruption.  Does 
this sound accurate?  If so, how do I proceed?  Should I export to a 
PST file, and run the Inbox Repair Tool?  If I export to a PST, will it 
keep the structure of any subfolders that were created?
 
Any 
other ideas?
 
Eric
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox move problem

[Eric Brouwer]

Never 
mind...  The one piece of advice I ignored.  "Turn off size limit 
restrictions" on the target server...
 
Woo 
Hoo!

  -Original Message-From: Eric Brouwer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 
  2001 1:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mailbox 
  move problem
  Hello!
   
  I 
  have two Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers on NT 4.0 SP6 in the same org, same site, 
  etc.  I want to condense them down to the first server in the site.  
  First thing I am trying to do is move the mailboxes to the original.  The 
  first few went fine.  Now I am getting errors while moving.  I 
  didn't catch the error that popped up on the screen (but I could recreate it 
  if that would help), but this is what the event viewer:
   
  Event ID: 1008
  Source: MSEchangeAdmin
  Category: Move Mailbox
   
  Unable to move mailbox "mailbox 
  name".
   
  From 
  what I have gathered is that the mailbox might hold some corruption.  
  Does this sound accurate?  If so, how do I proceed?  Should I export 
  to a PST file, and run the Inbox Repair Tool?  If I export to a PST, will 
  it keep the structure of any subfolders that were created?
   
  Any 
  other ideas?
   
  EricList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

[Eric Brouwer]

Title: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?



That 
thread was pretty lengthy...
 
Did 
anyone summarize the consensus "best beers" by region?

  -Original Message-From: Clayton 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 
  4:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Aren't 
  there supposed to be gurus in here?
   
  Not only that, but I know now what beer to order regardless of where I 
  am in the world. Now how many stuffy IT lists can you say that about 
  huh?
  
-Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: December 5, 2001 
4:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Aren't 
there supposed to be gurus in here?
I actually feel BAD asking a question- I usually get a lot 
more FROM the list than I give TO the list.  Not that I don't want to 
contribute more- I just don't have the intensive Exchange knowledge others 
have.  When I see something I can give input on, I try to jump on 
it.
-Original Message- From: 
Kelsey, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here? 
I'm a big fan of anything thats free, especially good 
advice.  I also rather enjoy the side chat, 
beer, CA bashing, The TINA incident, etc.  I laugh my cuss off at least once a day because of some of the posts here.  
Its a nice little break in the day I think. 

John K. 
-Original Message- From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here? 
You hit the nail on the head. I'm just thankful that there's 
a place like this where one can ask a question for 
free and even HOPE for a reply. When those in the 
know take the time from their busy schedules and reply, that's 
icing on the cake. Many go above and beyond by helping 
off-list and offering to walk you through this or 
that. 
Heck, this list just makes me warm and fuzzy all over 
:) 
 -Original Message- From:   STACKHOUSE, TODD -CONT(DYN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:56 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues Subject:    RE: Aren't there 
supposed to be gurus in here? 
What I don't understand is how anyone can have anything 
negative to say about this list or any other "free" 
list where many times answers that are given would 
normally cost $.  I just consider the OT stuff the price of all 
the valuable info I have gleaned from this indispensible 
resource.  Thanks to all. 
-Original Message- From: Don 
Ely - Verizon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:43 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here? 

Really???  I just typed it, apparently, you fell for 
it.  :P 
Touchy???  Hmmm...  No!  This is probably the 
third time in two weeks that someone has complained 
about their question not being answered.  
"Waaa  No one will answer my question, you guys 
are sooo mean. Wahhh" 
Maybe, we're busy today and we don't have time to answer the 
question. Maybe, we don't know the answer (did I say 
that).  Maybe, we just don't feel like 
answering questions today. 
There's a whole lot that goes into why a question might or 
might not be answered.  Right now, I'm busy 
spec'n new hardware and don't feel like answering 
questions.  When I'm done in a couple of hours, I'll see what 
I can do to help. 
D 
"We don't know who we are until we see what we can do." 
-Martha Grimes 
-Original Message- From: 
Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:33 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here? 

There is nothing there and aren't we being a little 
touchy? 
-Original Message- From: Don 
Ely - Verizon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:24 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here? 

The care bear list is down the road.  http://www.carebear.com/exchange Might I suggest the both of you go there... 
As for the other whiner's problem, some of us are actually 
busy who know the answer.  We'll reply when we 
have time since we're not paid to be here. 

D 
"When all else fails, read the manual." 
-Original Message- From: Joe 
Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:25 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE

RE: no outgoing mail

[Eric Brouwer]

The other day when I was looking for anti-spam help (thank you all that
responded.  Cleaning everything out did the trick!), this was EXACTLY how I
discovered we were exploited.  Interoffice mail was fine.  We received from
the internet fine.  We just couldn't send.  Our outbound queue had a limit
of 25,000 messages (is that an Exchange limit or something we set up?) and
the spam hit the ceiling.  After cleaning both the outbound queues, and
closing the relay, we were fine.

Eric 

-Original Message-
From: John John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: no outgoing mail


I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 machine that has suddenly stopped sending 
outgoing mail. Outside mail is being routed internally, and internal mail is

routed fineit's just mail destined for outside.

The exchange box uses a different dns server than it did previously, but 
this was done weeks ago. Messages stopped going out after a reboot 
yesterday. I've tried switching back to the old dns server, to no avail.

The Exchange box is behind a proxy 2.0.

Any ideas would be helpful. I can't find anything on TechNet.

John.

_
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's

[Eric Brouwer]

Thanks!  This is great news (hopefully!) for my mac users.

-Original Message-
From: Bonner, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's


Just an FYI, but Sunbelt hosts a Mac-NT list that specifically is about
running Macs in an NT/2000 environment:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/mac-nt-list_charter.htm

Maybe someone there has dealt with these issues and could be of some help.
Just an idea...

Jon Bonner

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's

[Eric Brouwer]

Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's



I too 
am responsible for a handful of Macs in an NT world...
 
Things 
worked great with Exchange and the macs for years.  One day, nada.  I 
swear I changed NOTHING.  And I'm the only one who would have.  I 
added the host entries.  No help.  Worked with MS PSS.  
Nothing.  The refunded the calls even.  For s&g, I built another 
test server on a PC.  Guess what.  Worked FINE!!!  I've checked, 
and rechecked everything.  There is NO difference between these 
boxes.  They connect to one, but not the other.  I just learned to 
live with it...

  -Original Message-From: Dawn R. Ashford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:35 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
  troubles with Mac's
  A 
  Macintosh on an NT network isn't a happy thing.. but for the most part it 
  does work.  We have a few diehards that will NOT swtich to PC, so they 
  suffer a bit. If anyone's ever been able to get the Mac's to dial in and 
  retrieve mail I'd love to know how.
   
  I 
  can make it dial in and it seems to connect and stay connected to the server, 
  but that's the extent of it. I can't connect to the exchange 
  server.
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:23 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
5.5 troubles with Mac's
Get rid of the macs 
-Original Message- From: 
Chris Thelen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:17 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 troubles with Mac's 
I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server that works fine with the 
win2k machines on my network, but is just starting to have problems with 
some macs.  I setup 5 macs on my network to use the server and it was 
working fine for a day and a half, but now when they go to open outlook 8.2 
on their Mac, it asks for the login info, but then errors out saying they 
have network issues and to talk to your administrator.  I am at a lost, 
as I am not a Mac expert.  The macs are able to access network 
resources as well as the internet.  Any ideas?
Chris 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange setup question

[Eric Brouwer]

Hello!

Way back in the day when our Exchange server was installed, it was installed
with the vgreen.com domain.  We are now the villagegreen.com domain.  Does
this really matter?  I think it does.  It seems like when we send e-mail, it
says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is this true?  How can I check this?  When
an admin friend of mine replies to my mail, he sees the following message in
his firewall logs:

vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa 216.216.191.226: can't verify reverse
address - hostname not found

Where is this reverse lookup looking?

Is there a way to change Exchange, without reinstalling to reflect the
villagegreen.com domain?

p.s.  What is the best way to look at the headers of e-mail messages?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange setup question

[Eric Brouwer]

Grr  Why can't I remember to include ALL relevant info???

It is 5.5.

I do have villagegreen.com set as my reply address even though both domain
addresses still work for me.  If I look at the headers for my e-mail though,
it still says they were received by mailhost.vgreen.com.  Is it maybe not an
Exchange issue?  Could it be related to how the server is named or my DNS?

What determines that part of the header info?

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange setup question


Hi Eric.

What version of exchange have thou?

You can have many SMTP domains in Exchange, but with MAPI clients, only one
'reply address'.  If you want to change users to the new domain for replying
and still retain inbound for the old one in Exchange5.5 you can do one of
two things:

1) manually open the properties page for each user for which this change is
required.  Select the email addresses tab and add a new internet address
with the full villagegreen.com domain.  Select the new domain in the window
and click 'set as reply address'

2) for larger groups of users, a directory export to csv is more practical.
You can add the new column (which Kevin or someone will provide...
'secondary-proxy-address' I think) and reimport.  There is a KB article on
bulk import/export at the source.  

You could also play around with Site Addressing.

William


-----Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange setup question


Hello!

Way back in the day when our Exchange server was installed, it was installed
with the vgreen.com domain.  We are now the villagegreen.com domain.  Does
this really matter?  I think it does.  It seems like when we send e-mail, it
says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is this true?  How can I check this?  When
an admin friend of mine replies to my mail, he sees the following message in
his firewall logs:

vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa 216.216.191.226: can't verify reverse
address - hostname not found

Where is this reverse lookup looking?

Is there a way to change Exchange, without reinstalling to reflect the
villagegreen.com domain?

p.s.  What is the best way to look at the headers of e-mail messages?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange setup question

[Eric Brouwer]

yes!  That is EXACTLY it...  Can I safely change the domain on the server
from vgreen.com to villagegreen.com?

It is an NT 4.0 SP6a box running Exchange 5.5 SP4

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange setup question


Looks like your DNS settings (on your Exchange server) are set such that
your Exchange server's hostname is mailhost, and the domain name is
vgreen.com.

That's how your Exchange box answers on port 25, anyway.  A reverse
lookup shows vgreen.com as well.

Neil

-Original Message-----
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 16 January 2002 17:18
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange setup question
Subject: RE: Exchange setup question


Grr  Why can't I remember to include ALL relevant info???

It is 5.5.

I do have villagegreen.com set as my reply address even though both
domain addresses still work for me.  If I look at the headers for my
e-mail though, it still says they were received by mailhost.vgreen.com.
Is it maybe not an Exchange issue?  Could it be related to how the
server is named or my DNS?

What determines that part of the header info?

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange setup question


Hi Eric.

What version of exchange have thou?

You can have many SMTP domains in Exchange, but with MAPI clients, only
one 'reply address'.  If you want to change users to the new domain for
replying and still retain inbound for the old one in Exchange5.5 you can
do one of two things:

1) manually open the properties page for each user for which this change
is required.  Select the email addresses tab and add a new internet
address with the full villagegreen.com domain.  Select the new domain in
the window and click 'set as reply address'

2) for larger groups of users, a directory export to csv is more
practical. You can add the new column (which Kevin or someone will
provide... 'secondary-proxy-address' I think) and reimport.  There is a
KB article on bulk import/export at the source.  

You could also play around with Site Addressing.

William


-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange setup question


Hello!

Way back in the day when our Exchange server was installed, it was
installed with the vgreen.com domain.  We are now the villagegreen.com
domain.  Does this really matter?  I think it does.  It seems like when
we send e-mail, it says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is this true?  How
can I check this?  When an admin friend of mine replies to my mail, he
sees the following message in his firewall logs:

vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa 216.216.191.226: can't verify
reverse address - hostname not found

Where is this reverse lookup looking?

Is there a way to change Exchange, without reinstalling to reflect the
villagegreen.com domain?

p.s.  What is the best way to look at the headers of e-mail messages?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange setup question

[Eric Brouwer]

Title: RE: Exchange setup question



I 
don't think I'm talking NT domains either.  Where do I look at info 
regarding the SMTP domain?

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 2:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange setup question
  Are 
  we talking NT domains or SMTP domains?  I assumed 
  SMTP.
   
  William 
  
  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:54 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  setup question
  Sure... as long as the Exchange server isn't a BDC, or PDC. 
  Exchange(5.x) doesn't really care about domains so 
  long as the server isn't a participant in that role(i.e. PDC, BDC). Make sure 
  you get all your service accounts changed over to the new domain, as all 
  replication and MTA transfers will break. OR you give those service accounts 
  permission(trust) in the new domain.. or you create names exactly the same 
  with the same password in the new domain (NT 4.0 undocumented 
  "feature").
  WIN/XCHG 2000, however, is a whole new ballgame.. 
  -----Original Message- From: Eric 
  Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:43 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: Exchange setup question 
  yes!  That is EXACTLY it...  Can I safely change the 
  domain on the server from vgreen.com to 
  villagegreen.com? 
  It is an NT 4.0 SP6a box running Exchange 5.5 SP4 
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Exchange setup question 
  Looks like your DNS settings (on your Exchange server) are set 
  such that your Exchange server's hostname is mailhost, 
  and the domain name is vgreen.com. 
  That's how your Exchange box answers on port 25, anyway.  
  A reverse lookup shows vgreen.com as well. 
  Neil 
  -----Original Message- From: Eric 
  Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 16 January 2002 17:18 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  Exchange setup question Subject: RE: Exchange setup 
  question 
  Grr  Why can't I remember to include ALL relevant 
  info??? 
  It is 5.5. 
  I do have villagegreen.com set as my reply address even though 
  both domain addresses still work for me.  If I 
  look at the headers for my e-mail though, it still 
  says they were received by mailhost.vgreen.com. Is it 
  maybe not an Exchange issue?  Could it be related to how the 
  server is named or my DNS? 
  What determines that part of the header info? 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Exchange setup question 
  Hi Eric. 
  What version of exchange have thou? 
  You can have many SMTP domains in Exchange, but with MAPI 
  clients, only one 'reply address'.  If you want 
  to change users to the new domain for replying and 
  still retain inbound for the old one in Exchange5.5 you can do one of two things: 
  1) manually open the properties page for each user for which 
  this change is required.  Select the email 
  addresses tab and add a new internet address with the 
  full villagegreen.com domain.  Select the new domain in the window and click 'set as reply address' 
  2) for larger groups of users, a directory export to csv is 
  more practical. You can add the new column (which 
  Kevin or someone will provide... 
  'secondary-proxy-address' I think) and reimport.  There is a 
  KB article on bulk import/export at the source.  
  
  You could also play around with Site Addressing. 
  William 
  -Original Message- From: Eric 
  Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 
  setup question 
  Hello! 
  Way back in the day when our Exchange server was installed, it 
  was installed with the vgreen.com domain.  We are 
  now the villagegreen.com domain.  Does this 
  really matter?  I think it does.  It seems like when 
  we send e-mail, it says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is 
  this true?  How can I check this?  When an 
  admin friend of mine replies to my mail, he sees the 
  following message in his firewall logs: 
  vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa 216.216.191.226: can't 
  verify reverse address - hostname not found 

  Where is this reverse lookup looking? 
  Is there a way to change Exchange, without reinstalling to 
  reflect the villagegreen.com domain? 
  p.s.  What is the best way to look at the headers of 
  e-mail messages? 
  Eric 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-sof

RE: Exchange setup question

[Eric Brouwer]

Title: RE: Exchange setup question



Let me 
back up a step...  The server IS a member of the villagegreen.com 
domain.  Logs on with the admin account from villagegreen.com as 
well.  The only place I see a ref to vgreen.com is when I look at the 
TCP/IP properties.  THAT'S where it's listed as the vgreen.com 
domain.
 
Eric

  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:54 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  setup question
  Sure... as long as the Exchange server isn't a BDC, or PDC. 
  Exchange(5.x) doesn't really care about domains so 
  long as the server isn't a participant in that role(i.e. PDC, BDC). Make sure 
  you get all your service accounts changed over to the new domain, as all 
  replication and MTA transfers will break. OR you give those service accounts 
  permission(trust) in the new domain.. or you create names exactly the same 
  with the same password in the new domain (NT 4.0 undocumented 
  "feature").
  WIN/XCHG 2000, however, is a whole new ballgame.. 
  -----Original Message- From: Eric 
  Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:43 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: Exchange setup question 
  yes!  That is EXACTLY it...  Can I safely change the 
  domain on the server from vgreen.com to 
  villagegreen.com? 
  It is an NT 4.0 SP6a box running Exchange 5.5 SP4 
  -Original Message- From: Neil 
  Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Exchange setup question 
  Looks like your DNS settings (on your Exchange server) are set 
  such that your Exchange server's hostname is mailhost, 
  and the domain name is vgreen.com. 
  That's how your Exchange box answers on port 25, anyway.  
  A reverse lookup shows vgreen.com as well. 
  Neil 
  -----Original Message- From: Eric 
  Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 16 January 2002 17:18 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: 
  Exchange setup question Subject: RE: Exchange setup 
  question 
  Grr  Why can't I remember to include ALL relevant 
  info??? 
  It is 5.5. 
  I do have villagegreen.com set as my reply address even though 
  both domain addresses still work for me.  If I 
  look at the headers for my e-mail though, it still 
  says they were received by mailhost.vgreen.com. Is it 
  maybe not an Exchange issue?  Could it be related to how the 
  server is named or my DNS? 
  What determines that part of the header info? 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Exchange setup question 
  Hi Eric. 
  What version of exchange have thou? 
  You can have many SMTP domains in Exchange, but with MAPI 
  clients, only one 'reply address'.  If you want 
  to change users to the new domain for replying and 
  still retain inbound for the old one in Exchange5.5 you can do one of two things: 
  1) manually open the properties page for each user for which 
  this change is required.  Select the email 
  addresses tab and add a new internet address with the 
  full villagegreen.com domain.  Select the new domain in the window and click 'set as reply address' 
  2) for larger groups of users, a directory export to csv is 
  more practical. You can add the new column (which 
  Kevin or someone will provide... 
  'secondary-proxy-address' I think) and reimport.  There is a 
  KB article on bulk import/export at the source.  
  
  You could also play around with Site Addressing. 
  William 
  -Original Message- From: Eric 
  Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 
  setup question 
  Hello! 
  Way back in the day when our Exchange server was installed, it 
  was installed with the vgreen.com domain.  We are 
  now the villagegreen.com domain.  Does this 
  really matter?  I think it does.  It seems like when 
  we send e-mail, it says it comes from vgreen.com.  Is 
  this true?  How can I check this?  When an 
  admin friend of mine replies to my mail, he sees the 
  following message in his firewall logs: 
  vgreen.com.191.216.216.in-addr.arpa 216.216.191.226: can't 
  verify reverse address - hostname not found 

  Where is this reverse lookup looking? 
  Is there a way to change Exchange, without reinstalling to 
  reflect the villagegreen.com domain? 
  p.s.  What is the best way to look at the headers of 
  e-mail messages? 
  Eric 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  

RE: Exchange setup question

[Eric Brouwer]

Title: RE: Exchange setup question



That's 
what brought this whole thing up.  Since I got hit with a SPAM relay, we've 
been failing a lot of reverse lookups.  Or is that more a symptom of being 
blacklisted?

  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 
  3:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  setup question
  
  So it is listed under 
  the DNS suffix as vgreen.com?  I don't see why you shouldn't be able to 
  change the DNS suffix on the computer.  You will, however, have to change 
  your MX records.  When I perform a DIG on your domain, this is what I 
  get.  I am using the nameserver of gateway.vgreen.com:  You can see 
  where I underlined the record that is coming back.  If you are going to 
  change the DNS suffix on the server, you need to make sure that it is changed 
  on the MX record as well, otherwise, you run the risk of reverse-DNS lookups 
  failing.
   
  villagegreen.com A 
  (Address) 216.216.191.227
    
  villagegreen.com NS (Nameserver) gateway.vgreen.com
    
  villagegreen.com NS (Nameserver) ns1.home.net
    
  villagegreen.com SOA (Zone of Authority)
      
  Primary NS: gateway.vgreen.com
      
  Responsible person: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      
  serial:33
      
  refresh:3600s (60 minutes)
      
  retry:600s (10 minutes)
      
  expire:86400s (24 hours)
      
  minimum-ttl:3600s (60 minutes)
    
  villagegreen.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mailhost.vgreen.com
    villagegreen.com 
  MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 20 mx1.home.com
    
  villagegreen.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 30 
  mx2.home.com
  
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE 
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator 
  Peregrine 
  Systems 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Eric 
  Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:05 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  setup question
   
  
  Let me back up a 
  step...  The server IS a member of the villagegreen.com domain.  
  Logs on with the admin account from villagegreen.com as well.  The only 
  place I see a ref to vgreen.com is when I look at the TCP/IP properties.  
  THAT'S where it's listed as the vgreen.com domain.
  
   
  
  Eric
  
-Original 
Message-From: Rick 
Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:54 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange setup question
Sure... 
as long as the Exchange server isn't a BDC, or PDC. Exchange(5.x) doesn't really care about 
domains so long as the server isn't a participant in that role(i.e. PDC, 
BDC). Make sure you get all your service accounts changed over to the new 
domain, as all replication and MTA transfers will break. OR you give those 
service accounts permission(trust) in the new domain.. or you create names 
exactly the same with the same password in the new domain (NT 4.0 
undocumented "feature").
WIN/XCHG 2000, however, is a whole new ballgame.. 

-Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange setup 
question 
yes!  That is EXACTLY it...  Can I safely 
change the domain on the server from vgreen.com to villagegreen.com? 

It is 
an NT 4.0 SP6a box running Exchange 5.5 SP4 
-Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange setup 
question 
 
Looks 
like your DNS settings (on your Exchange server) are set such 
that your 
Exchange server's hostname is mailhost, and the domain name is 
vgreen.com. 

That's 
how your Exchange box answers on port 25, anyway.  A 
reverse lookup 
shows vgreen.com as well. 
Neil 
-Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 16 
January 2002 17:18 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List 
Conversation: Exchange setup 
question Subject: RE: Exchange setup question 

 
Grr  Why can't I remember to include 
ALL relevant info??? 
It is 
5.5. 
I do 
have villagegreen.com set as my reply address even though both 
domain addresses still work 
for me.  If I look at the headers for my e-mail though, it still says they were 
received by mailhost.vgreen.com. Is it maybe not an Exchange issue?  Could it be 
related to how the server is named or my DNS? 
What 
determines that part of the header info? 
-Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange setup 
  

Outbound queue question...

[Eric Brouwer]

Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT 4.0 SP 6a
 
Where 
are the files stored that appear in the "Outbound Messages Awaiting Conversion" 
queue?  How are they different from the "Outbound Messages Awaiting 
Delivery"?  What do cause the former queue to build up and not delete 
itself?
Eric
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Outbound queue question...

[Eric Brouwer]

Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT 4.0 SP 6a
 
Where 
are the files stored that appear in the "Outbound Messages Awaiting Conversion" 
queue?  How are they different from the "Outbound Messages Awaiting 
Delivery"?  What do cause the former queue to build up and not delete 
itself?
Eric
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Unable to move a mailbox

[Eric Brouwer]

Hello!

I am having trouble moving a mailbox from one Exchange 5.5 server to another
in the same site.  If I start the move from the target server, I get a
client operation failed message at about 70% complete.  In event viewer, I
get an event id:1151 message with a type:warning and category:rules.  This
mailbox will not move.  I looked at the users settings, and they don't have
any rules defined.

Any of you wise folks out there have any ideas?

Eric
who is wearing red, white, and blue today.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Unable to move a mailbox

[Eric Brouwer]

Shoot!  I'll be amazed when I actually post a message that has ALL the info
that might help people...

No, they are both SP 3 for Exchange and NT 4.0 SP 6a.

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to move a mailbox


Are you running SP4?

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to move a mailbox


Hello!

I am having trouble moving a mailbox from one Exchange 5.5 server to another
in the same site.  If I start the move from the target server, I get a
client operation failed message at about 70% complete.  In event viewer, I
get an event id:1151 message with a type:warning and category:rules.  This
mailbox will not move.  I looked at the users settings, and they don't have
any rules defined.

Any of you wise folks out there have any ideas?

Eric
who is wearing red, white, and blue today.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: GAL question

[Eric Brouwer]

Doh!  Yes, they are.  I'll try resynching the Offline Address books...
Can't believe I missed that

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GAL question


Are your clients using offline address books?

-Original Message-----
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: GAL question


Hello!

I am running Exchange 5.5 SP 3 on an NT 4.0 SP 6 server.  My clients run
Exchange 2000.  We had several people leave the company, so I deleted their
mailboxes.  Even though they are gone, they still show up in the GAL for the
clients.  Is there something special I'm missing to update the GAl for the
users?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Apple connection to Exchange

[Eric Brouwer]

Title: Message



Jim, 
are you still out there?  Did this resolve your issue?
 
I am 
having an eerily similar experience

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, December 15, 
  2001 12:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Apple connection to Exchange
  Possible fix found -
   
  According to PSS and some tests we ran, my Exchange server is not 
  listening on canc_ip_tcp which is required for MAC connectivity.  He has 
  provided my a hot fix to solve it Q297534 unfortunately he provided me a bum 
  link to download the fix.  So till Monday we wait.  No big deal, 
  luckily the MAC users are off this weekend.  
   
  If 
  anyone wants more details let me know.
  
-Original Message-From: Kevin Loney 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
1:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Apple 
connection to Exchange
My 
experience was the same as Jons. I have one Mac G4 that gets configured via 
DHCP, all I added was the Exchange Server name, the mailbox name and the 
user info. I have had fewer problems with the Mac than my Wintel 
machines.
 
Kevin Loney

  -Original Message-From: Bonner, Jon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
  1:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Apple connection to Exchange
  I regularly 
  connect to the campus Exchange server from home using my personal iMac. It 
  is running OS X and Outlook 2001 (running in Classic mode). When I set 
  this up for the very first time, I just installed Outlook 2001 and told it 
  my mailbox name. It simply worked like it was supposed to work. I've also 
  used Outlook 2001 on the iMac here in the office that is running Mac OS 9. 
  It too connected just like you'd expect it to - on the first 
  try.
  Jon Bonner 
  
-Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
1:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
Apple connection to Exchange
That was cold... yet on target... But words 
hurt sometimes ;)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Doug Eubank 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
  12:24 
  Subject: RE: Apple connection to 
  Exchange
  
  MAC = Overpriced Etch-A-Sketch.
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 
14, 2001 12:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Apple connection to 
Exchange
Keith -
 
Thanks - sorry if I sounded frustrated - two very vocal users 
and I guess ignorance breeds contempt as far as MACs go for 
me.  
 
Using Outlook 2001 - when I resolve the name I start with IP 
and Alias and resolve to Computer Name and User 
name.
 
Static IP address even on the same subnet plugged into the 
same switch as the exchange server.
 
Not sure about the domain in the Additional Search Domains 
will check that first thing in the morning.  Already have the 
ticket open with PSS - boss didn't care - we will just get in the 
queue in the morning if this doesn't resolve it.
 
Thanks for the advice!
 
 
 
 

  -Original Message-From: 
  Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Apple connection to 
  Exchange
  Jim,
  Did you get your problem resolved?
  If not are you using Outlook 2001 or Outlook 
  8.x.
  If your using the old version try Outlook 2001 from http://www.microsoft.com/mac/
  Also are you resolving the names using DNS. If so how are 
  the macs getting their IP address, DHCP or 
  static?
  On the Mac in the TCP/IP control panel do you have your 
  domain name in the Additional Search domains. If not it might help 
  having it there.
   
  I hope this info helps. I started off as a mac person and 
  still consider them real computers. However I don't think they are 
  real network clients just like win9x isn't a real network 
  client.
   
  Keith 
  NelsonNetwork AdministratorOrange County High School of 
  the Arts[EMAIL PROTECTED](714) 

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4

[Eric Brouwer]

Title: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4



LOL
 
Thanks 
William!  I really needed a good laugh.  That was 
great!
 
We 
jettisoned Groupsuck a few months ago.  ScanMail has been fabulous since 
then.  And I sleep better, too!

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:52 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: McAfee 
  GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4
  There are 2 types of Groupshield 
  Admins:
  - 
  ones that have had problems.
  - 
  ones that will have problems.
   
  Those problems are just as likely to manifest 
  themselves in the business side as well as the technical side.  
  
   
  Of 
  course, some people have to have some success with them.  I understand 
  there might even be a CA install that works.
   
  
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:35 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: McAfee 
GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4
Another opinion 
1.  Do not purchase or install Antigen 2.  Install Groupshield 3.  
Exchange admins go home early??? 
I run Groupshield on Exch 5.5, sp4, and have had no problems 
with it.  
-Original Message- From: 
Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:29 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4 

1. Do not install GroupShield 2. 
Purchase Antigen 3. Go home early 
Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, 
LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com   301-610-9584 
voice   240-465-0323 
Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is 
deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged 
information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others 
without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, 
LLC.
-Original Message- From: 
Richardson, Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:27 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4 
Any gotchas anyone one had with running McAfee GroupShield 
5.0 on Exchange 5.5 SP4?  Management has backed me into the corner and 
I am forced to finally install some type of anti-virus on the Email 
server.  Any tips, tricks, hints, or allegations would be 
appreciated.
Roy Richardson Webmaster/System 
Administrator Email:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange 5.5 SP 4 restore questions....

[Eric Brouwer]

How can I verify my site and org names?  Can I rely on the display names?

Outside of running Exchange Optimizer, how can I determine the paths to my
various db's?

How can I determine what hotfixes are installed on my productions server
outside of SP 4?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Address Book Views

[Eric Brouwer]

Hello!

Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on NT 4.0 SP 6a

When I create Address Book Views, are they stored like recipient containers?
In other words, where would I find them in Exchange Admin once I create
them?

Also, my clients use Outlook 2000.  Would the ADV just show up in their pick
list of address books?  Would I have to do anything to publish it other than
create the view?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: RE : It's Friday!!

[Eric Brouwer]

Dude.  You scare me just a little bit...

I really don't enjoy this "humor" from people I don't know.

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!!


one wife (and one ex)
combined family
 
I carry two loaded 9mm with 13 round clips to work everyday.everyone
will know why when I snap
 
 
ticktick...tick.
 
Jeff
 
(yes I am kidding about the gunsthey have 10 round clips...lol)

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!!



Dear gods how did this get started again. 

Hey Jeff are you that guy from Dateline that has 8 wives in Utah? 

-Original Message- 
From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:48 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!! 

35 with 11 children (i have a pic to prove it) 

now lets move on. 



-Original Message- 
From: Adams, Shawn [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:38 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: RE : It's Friday!! 


32 and 2 children (7yr old born on 4th of July and a 2yr old). I am a twin. 


-Original Message- 
From: Gérard Dumazet [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:36 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE : It's Friday!! 


63 and 6 children ! 

-Message d'origine- 
De : Bart Southworth [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2002 04:50 
À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Objet : Re: It's Friday!! 

40. 

7, 5, 2.5 

Get over it.  ;-) 


- Original Message - 
From: "Wayne Hanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 8:50 PM 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 


> 38 with 2 boys, 3 and 8months  (try surviving for 3 years with very 
limited 
> sleep, It makes you realise why people can go postal over the dummest 
> things:-)  ) 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Dennis Atherton [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2002 5:32 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> I am 53, and have 2 boys 23 and 20, and a 19 year old daughter. 
> 
> The 23 year old got his Netware Admin Cert in HS. 
> 
> But I sure feel older than 53.. 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Stephen J. Norton [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:07 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> 48 
> and I'll see your 4 + 6 year old and raise you two daughters 15 + 18 
and 
an 
> 11 year old son. 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Stefan Jafs [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:57 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> How about 50 with a 4 and 6 year old boy. 
> 
> 
> Stefan Jafs 
> Amico Corporation 
> Tel: 1-877-GO-AMICO 
>  < http://www.amico.com/> www.amico.com 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 16:49 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> Thank God, somebody on here is older than me! 
> 
> 44  (with a 16 and a 2 yr old boy) 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Ray Zorz [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:37 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> Byte me! 
> 
> 46 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Preston Jeffares [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:33 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> I am so freaking old I'm thinking about arguing for early acceptance 
for 
> Kroger's Seniors discount... 
> 
> 26 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Matthew Carpenter [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:49 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone noticed that most of the responses are from the 20 
somethings? 
> lol 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:47 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> 
> Ripe age of 22 :-) 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Precht, David [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:41 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> 
> 
> i just turned 24 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Paul Green [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 14:26 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
> 
> i just turned 22 haha ;) 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Matthew Carpenter [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:21

Delegating administration?

[Eric Brouwer]

Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on NT 4.0 SP 6a

Is there a way to delegate administrative rights?  For example, I want a
lower level tech to be able to add mailboxes, and maybe even be able to
delete them, but I don't want them to be able to accidentally delete a whole
container or the site!  Remotely possible???  Thanks!

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange 5.5 recovery/restore questions...

[Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)]

Happy Friday!

We are running Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on NT 4.0 SP 6a in production.  I am
testing our DR abilities.  We use Backup Exec 8.5 to perform online backups
with the Exchange agent.  We have 3 mail servers: mail1 (first in site),
mail2, and macmail.

I built a little test network.  I built a BDC in our production environment,
and then moved it to it's own network, promoting it to the PDC.  I then
built mail1 just like it exists live.  I restored the IS, DS, DSADATA and
MDBDATA directories.  Everything went smoothly.

I wanted to then test the ability to test mail2.  I renamed mail1 to mail2,
and restored the appropriate files.  I get the following error when
attempting to start the IS: "The Microsoft Exchange Information Store
service returned service specific error 4015."  When I look in event viewer,
I see these two:

Event ID: 1121
Source: MSExchangeIS
Error 0xfaf connecting to the Microsoft Exchange Server Directory Service.

Event ID:5000
Source: MSExchangeIS
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service.
Error 0xfaf.

Any ideas???  The DS starts no problem.  Is it related to the first server
in the site not being present?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 recovery/restore questions...

[Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)]

I did that, and I get a -1181 JET_errFileNotFound error.

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 recovery/restore questions...


Event 5000:
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. Error
Database is in inconsistent state. 

The problem occurs when the Information Store stops abnormally and the
Eseutil.exe hard repair option (/P) is run against the Priv.edb file to
return it to a state in which it can be started. In addition, the previous
transaction log files were deleted, as recommended in the Eseutil dialog
box, but hard repair was not run against the Pub.edb file.  

Q185577 , Q231299  

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 14:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 recovery/restore questions...


Happy Friday!

We are running Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on NT 4.0 SP 6a in production.  I am
testing our DR abilities.  We use Backup Exec 8.5 to perform online backups
with the Exchange agent.  We have 3 mail servers: mail1 (first in site),
mail2, and macmail.

I built a little test network.  I built a BDC in our production environment,
and then moved it to it's own network, promoting it to the PDC.  I then
built mail1 just like it exists live.  I restored the IS, DS, DSADATA and
MDBDATA directories.  Everything went smoothly.

I wanted to then test the ability to test mail2.  I renamed mail1 to mail2,
and restored the appropriate files.  I get the following error when
attempting to start the IS: "The Microsoft Exchange Information Store
service returned service specific error 4015."  When I look in event viewer,
I see these two:

Event ID: 1121
Source: MSExchangeIS
Error 0xfaf connecting to the Microsoft Exchange Server Directory Service.

Event ID:5000
Source: MSExchangeIS
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. Error
0xfaf.

Any ideas???  The DS starts no problem.  Is it related to the first server
in the site not being present?

Eric

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Help with SPAM!

[Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)]

Title: Message



I 
thought I had buttoned up my Exchange server, but it appears I am wrong.  
Exchange 5.5, Sp 4 on NT 4.0 Sp 6a.  I don't know if you will be able to 
see the header for the message I attached or not, but if you can look at it, I'd 
appreciate some insight!
 
Someone is sending SPAM to me, that looks like it is coming from 
me.  Is that a relay?  How can I test if it is possible, and more 
importantly, how can I fix it???
 
Your 
help will be most appreciated!  And if it is bad form forwarding a SPAM, I 
sincerely apologize!
 
Eric

-Original Message-From: Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET) 
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:32 AMTo: Eric Brouwer 
(Corporate DET)Subject: Lowest Mortgage Rates 
Around


  
  
 
  We can help 
  find the perfect mortgage for you. Just click on the option below that 
  best meets your needs: 
  
  



  

  Refinance your existing 
mortgage lower your payments
  

  

  Consolidate your 
debt simplify your life

  

  Home Equity 
financing get extra cash

  

  Purchase a 
home there's never been a better 
time

  
  
  Here's how it 
  works... After completing a short form, we will automatically sort 
  through our database of over 2700 lenders to find the ones most qualified 
  to meet your needs. Up to three lenders will then contact you and compete 
  for your business. The search is free and there's no obligation 
  to continue. It's that easy, so click here to get 
  started now! 





  
  

  This 
  email was sent to you via Saf-E Mail Systems.  Your email address was 
  automatically inserted into the To and From addresses to eliminate 
  undeliverables which waste bandwidth and cause internet congestion. Your 
  email or webserver IS NOT being used for the sending of this mail. 
  No-one else is receiving emails from your address. You may utilize the 
  removal link below if you do not wish to receive this mailing. 
    
  Please Remove 
  Me   Saf-E Mail Systems, PO Box 116-3015 San Rafael 
  de Heredia, 
CR
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Help with SPAM!

[Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)]

Title: Message



It 
doesn't look like the original header info was included.  Is there a way to 
extract that info and send just that?  I am using Outlook XP for my 
client.
Eric

  
  -Original Message-From: Eric Brouwer 
  (Corporate DET) Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 4:18 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Help with 
  SPAM!
  I 
  thought I had buttoned up my Exchange server, but it appears I am wrong.  
  Exchange 5.5, Sp 4 on NT 4.0 Sp 6a.  I don't know if you will be able to 
  see the header for the message I attached or not, but if you can look at it, 
  I'd appreciate some insight!
   
  Someone is sending SPAM to me, that looks like it is coming from 
  me.  Is that a relay?  How can I test if it is possible, and more 
  importantly, how can I fix it???
   
  Your 
  help will be most appreciated!  And if it is bad form forwarding a SPAM, 
  I sincerely apologize!
   
  Eric
  
  -Original Message-From: Eric Brouwer 
  (Corporate DET) Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:32 AMTo: 
  Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)Subject: Lowest Mortgage Rates 
  Around
  
  


   
We can help 
find the perfect mortgage for you. Just click on the option below that 
best meets your needs: 


  
  
  

  
Refinance your existing 
  mortgage lower your payments

  

  
Consolidate your 
  debt simplify your life
  

  
Home Equity 
  financing get extra cash
  

  
Purchase a 
  home there's never been a better 
time
  


Here's how it 
works... After completing a short form, we will automatically sort 
through our database of over 2700 lenders to find the ones most 
qualified to meet your needs. Up to three lenders will then contact you 
and compete for your business. The search is free and there's 
no obligation to continue. It's that easy, so click here to get 
started now! 
  
  
  
  
  


  
This email was sent to you via Saf-E Mail Systems.  
Your email address was automatically inserted into the To and From 
addresses to eliminate undeliverables which waste bandwidth and cause 
internet congestion. Your email or webserver IS NOT being used 
for the sending of this mail. No-one else is receiving emails from your 
address. You may utilize the removal link below if you do not wish to 
receive this mailing.   Please Remove Me 
  
Saf-E 
Mail Systems, PO Box 116-3015 San Rafael de Heredia, 
CRList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Help with SPAM!

[Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)]

Title: Message



As 
long as it's just coming to me and my company I can live with it.  Can it 
be sent to others outside my server and look like it's coming from 
me???

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 
  4:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Help 
  with SPAM!
  heh
   
  You can not stop SPAM..
   
  This is a very common spoof, no biggee. The only 
  way to help curb SPAM is a 3rd party app, like Mail Marshall, Mail Essentials, 
  or Praetor.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET) 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:17 
PM
Subject: Help with SPAM!

I 
thought I had buttoned up my Exchange server, but it appears I am 
wrong.  Exchange 5.5, Sp 4 on NT 4.0 Sp 6a.  I don't know if you 
will be able to see the header for the message I attached or not, but if you 
can look at it, I'd appreciate some insight!
 
Someone is sending SPAM to me, that looks like it is coming from 
me.  Is that a relay?  How can I test if it is possible, and more 
importantly, how can I fix it???
 
Your help will be most appreciated!  And if it is bad form 
forwarding a SPAM, I sincerely apologize!
 
Eric

-Original Message-----From: Eric Brouwer 
(Corporate DET) Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:32 
    AMTo: Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)Subject: Lowest 
Mortgage Rates Around


  
  
 
  We can help 
  find the perfect mortgage for you. Just click on the option below that 
  best meets your needs: 
  
  



  

  Refinance your 
existing mortgage lower your payments
  

  

  Consolidate your 
debt simplify your life

  

  Home Equity 
financing get extra cash

  

  Purchase a 
home there's never been a better 
  time

  
  
  Here's how it 
  works... After completing a short form, we will automatically sort 
  through our database of over 2700 lenders to find the ones most 
  qualified to meet your needs. Up to three lenders will then contact 
  you and compete for your business. The search is free and 
  there's no obligation to continue. It's that easy, so click here to get 
  started now! 





  
  

  This email was sent to you via Saf-E Mail Systems.  
  Your email address was automatically inserted into the To and From 
  addresses to eliminate undeliverables which waste bandwidth and cause 
  internet congestion. Your email or webserver IS NOT being used 
  for the sending of this mail. No-one else is receiving emails from 
  your address. You may utilize the removal link below if you do not 
  wish to receive this mailing.   Please 
  Remove Me 
    Saf-E Mail Systems, PO Box 116-3015 San 
  Rafael de Heredia, 
  CRList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Help with SPAM!

[Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)]

Title: Message



I can 
accept that, but with my limited header knowledge, this looks bad.  I 
managed to get a copy of it:
 
Received: from TESTMAIL.BERCOQC.COM (ftp.bercoqc.com [206.162.177.235]) by 
mailhost.vgreen.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 
5.5.2653.13) id PH40J5HA; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:49:15 -0400Received: 
from onemails5018.com([202.110.213.141]) by TESTMAIL.BERCOQC.COM (IBM OS/400 
SMTP V05R01M00) with TCP; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:46:49 -0500From: "ebrouwer" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],     
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
    [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],     
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],     [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
    [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Sun, 28 
Jul 2002 17:51:50 -0700Subject: Retire Early -- Earn Easy Online 
IncomeMIME-Version: 1.0X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 
6.00.2600.X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2600.X-Precedence-Ref: 
l234056789zxcvbnmlkjhgfqwrtContent-Type: text/html; 
charset=us-asciiContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I know 
this message went out to the CC list, as I got an OOO notice from one of the 
addressees.  Is there anyhting I can do about this???
 
Eric

  
  -Original Message-From: Purviance, Chad 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 
  4:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Help 
  with SPAM!
  
  Yes, It can be sent to anyone as if it is coming from you on the 
  FROM: line, and no you can't prevent it because SMTP doesn't require proof of 
  sender. BUT, if they look at the headers they will see it never touches your 
  server so you can at least prove it wasn't you. This unfortunately is a very 
  common method to get the nasty responses sent to someone 
  else.
   
  Chad 
  P.
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
  29, 2002 
  3:25 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Help with 
  SPAM!
   
  
  As long 
  as it's just coming to me and my company I can live with it.  Can it be 
  sent to others outside my server and look like it's coming from 
  me???
  -Original 
  Message- http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  +++The information transmitted is intended only for 
  the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
  use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons 
  or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received 
  this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this 
  document.+++
  The information transmitted is intended only for 
  the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
  use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons 
  or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received 
  this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this 
  document.

RE: Help with SPAM!

[Eric Brouwer (Corporate DET)]

Title: Message



Thank 
you very much!

  
  -Original Message-From: Purviance, Chad 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 
  5:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Help 
  with SPAM!
  
  Unfortunately 
  no. As I mentioned 
  earlier, this is the method for someone else to get the 
  complaint.
  Now as for 
  bad??
  
The reply address 
is  [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is probably a 
collector of good addresses IE they hit reply to complain and the real 
sender validate it as a good address. 
The first server appears to be 
from a host at 202.110.213.141 bounced off an open relay at 206.162.177.235. 
I am not taking the time to research, but you can at www.samspade.org if you 
like. 
   
  With the reply being 
  a .RU I is another fine piece of Asia SPAM ... not the canned 
  variety.
   
  Unfortunately, your 
  best bet may be to prepare a canned response stating the e-mail didn't 
  originate from you and the real information can be found in the header. The 
  chances of getting off their list is minimal, this is how they make their 
  money.
   
  CJP
   
   
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
  29, 2002 
  3:38 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Help with 
  SPAM!
   
  
  I can 
  accept that, but with my limited header knowledge, this looks bad.  I 
  managed to get a copy of it:
  
   
  
  Received: from 
  TESTMAIL.BERCOQC.COM (ftp.bercoqc.com 
  [206.162.177.235]) by mailhost.vgreen.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange 
  Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id PH40J5HA; 
  Sun, 28 Jul 
  2002 
  19:49:15 -0400Received: 
  from onemails5018.com([202.110.213.141]) by TESTMAIL.BERCOQC.COM (IBM OS/400 
  SMTP V05R01M00) with TCP; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:46:49 -0500From: "ebrouwer" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
      [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
      [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
      [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],     [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
      [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Sun, 
  28 Jul 2002 17:51:50 -0700Subject: Retire Early -- Earn Easy Online 
  IncomeMIME-Version: 1.0X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 
  6.00.2600.X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
  V6.00.2600.X-Precedence-Ref: 
  l234056789zxcvbnmlkjhgfqwrtContent-Type: text/html; 
  charset=us-asciiContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  
  I know 
  this message went out to the CC list, as I got an OOO notice from one of the 
  addressees.  Is there anyhting I can do about this???
  
   
  
  Eric
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Purviance, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 4:29 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Help 
with SPAM!
Yes, 
It can be sent to anyone as if it is coming from you on the FROM: line, and 
no you can't prevent it because SMTP doesn't require proof of sender. BUT, 
if they look at the headers they will see it never touches your server so 
you can at least prove it wasn't you. This unfortunately is a very common 
method to get the nasty responses sent to someone 
else.
 
Chad 
P.
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 
29, 2002 
3:25 
PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Help with 
SPAM!
 

As 
long as it's just coming to me and my company I can live with it.  Can 
it be sent to others outside my server and look like it's coming from 
me???
-Original 
Message- http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
+++The information transmitted 
is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may 
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, 
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
destroy any copies of this document.+++
The information transmitted is 
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may 
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, 
this information by persons