RE: disconnected mailbox not accessible by new account
That worked! Thank you jb From: Brandon Shanks [mailto:anudewal...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: disconnected mailbox not accessible by new account Jason, Try running Clean-MailboxDatabase a second time, now that their mailbox have been attached. I've seen this a few times in our environment with SP2 installed. Brandon On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.commailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com wrote: I disconnect a mailbox, ran clean-mailboxdatase so it showed up in the disconnected mailboxes. Connected the disconnect mailbox to a new AD account (that did not have a mailbox) But the user is getting errors when opening outlook, the outlook profile gets created and finds the mailbox but the user gets this error: Cannot open your default email folder. You must connect to exchange with current profile before you can synchronize your folders with your ost. I had him try OWA and it says his account is disabled ??!?? Jason Benway Data Center Architect JSJ Corporation 616-847-8474tel:616-847-8474 --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Forefront roadmap changes
It sounds like FOPE is just getting renamed? But will still be a service moving forward? We use it to front our onsite Exchange 2010. jb -Original Message- From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes You still have support (extended, anyway) for TMG until 2020, so I wouldn't let that sway your decision away from TMG. Joe Heaton ITB - Enterprise Server Support -Original Message- From: Jeff May [mailto:j...@bbandt.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:36 AM To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes Any ideas on the replacement, or maybe I am missing something, for the TMG??? We are currently looking at this for our OWA and Outlook Anywhere publishing and moving off our old ISA systems. Jeff A. May, MobileIron Certified SA and Security Specialist Client Server Engineer IV Client Server Engineering/IT Messaging Services Mail Code - 100-99-08-20 E-Mail - j...@bbandt.com -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forefront roadmap changes FYI. http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2012/09/12/important-changes-to-forefront-product-roadmaps.aspx Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Public Folders not receiving email
First time giving back to the group!!! Yeah, thank you all for the years of knowledge. Glad I could help. jb From: ExchList [mailto:exchl...@networkblade.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 12:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folders not receiving email Jason Benway provided the link below which worked great. Note, pay close attention to the Administrative Groups. I had a lingering group long forgotten from Exchange 2000 days. I missed it and the first time around it didn't work. Once I deleted the folder from that group email flow worked immediately. http://www.savagenomads.net/2012/07/18/mail_enabled_public_folders_getting_ndr/ Thanks for responding and helping me with this. Joseph Danielsen From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]mailto:[mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public Folders not receiving email We saw this the other day. Only one of the HT servers would NDR the mail. We fixed it by hard coding a DC that the other HT was using. Not ideal but no amount of restarting helped it. From: bounce-9540568-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:bounce-9540568-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9540568-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]mailto:[mailto:bounce-9540568-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of ExchList Sent: 13 August 2012 19:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public Folders not receiving email I just completed my Exch2003 to Exch2010 migration. It seems to have been working fine. A few weeks again I fully retired the Exchange 2003 box. Since then the public folders are now longer receiving emails. The error I get is #554 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver.Exception:ObjectNotFoundException; Failed to process message due to a permanent exception with message The Active Directory user wasn't found. ObjectNotFoundException: The Active Directory user wasn't found. ## Any help would be greatly appreciated. Joseph Danielsen --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SP2 RU3
Thanks everyone for the idea. I used Michael’s script and got the answer I
needed. But I will look into these other reporting options.
Thanks!
jb
From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 4:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SP2 RU3
I've not used Phil's script myself but heard good things! If you have a virtual
environment and use vCheck it's (according to one of my customers) a very
useful addition.
And given this is the second time in two weeks it's been mentioned i'd better
check it out myself :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Jun 2012, at 14:43, Randal, Phil
phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.ukmailto:phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.uk wrote:
There’s also my vCheck for Exchange plugins based on Alan Renouf’s vCheck, my
own scripts, Steve’s script and others.
http://www.virtu-al.net/2012/03/22/vcheck-exchange-updated/
I’d advise people to use version 2.1beta4 (not yet uploaded to Alan’s site):
http://www.rebee.clara.net/ExchangePlugins-2.1Beta4.zip
To make it easy to select plugins, use my Select-Plugins script for vCheck:
http://www.rebee.clara.net/blog/archives/2012/03/entry_197.html
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Infrastructure Engineer
Hoople Ltd | Thorn Office Centre | Hereford HR2 6JT
Tel: 01432 260415 | Email:
phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.ukmailto:phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.uk
From: Steve Goodman
[mailto:st...@stevieg.org]mailto:[mailto:st...@stevieg.org]
Sent: 22 June 2012 12:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SP2 RU3
If your looking for something a bit prettier you could check out my Exchange
Environment Report which will provide this and some additional info:
http://www.stevieg.org/2011/06/exchange-environment-report/
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Jun 2012, at 14:38, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I didn’t write this original script, I just modified it to handle some obvious
errors, but unfortunately I didn’t keep the original author’s byline handy.
The UR information is hidden pretty deeply. This script will get it out.
Get-ExchangeServer |% {
[bool]$known = $false
$name= $_.ToString()
$version = $_.AdminDisplayVersion.Major
if ($version -eq 14)
{
$key =
SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Installer\\UserData\\S-1-5-18\\Products\\AE1D439464EB1B8488741FFA028E291C\\Patches
$setup = SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\ExchangeServer\\v14\\Setup
$known = $true
}
elseif ($version -eq 8)
{
$key =
SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Installer\\UserData\\S-1-5-18\\Products\\461C2B4266EDEF444B864AD6D9E5B613\\Patches
$setup = SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Exchange\\Setup
$known = $true
}
if( $known )
{
$VALUE1 = DisplayName
$VALUE2 = Installed
$VALUE3 = MsiInstallPath
$reg =
[Microsoft.Win32.RegistryKey]::OpenRemoteBaseKey( 'LocalMachine', $name )
$regKey= $reg.OpenSubKey( $setup )
$installPath = ( $regkey.getvalue( $VALUE3 ) | foreach
{ $_ -replace (:, `$) } )
$binFile = Bin\ExSetup.exe
$exSetupVer = ( ( Get-Command
\\$name\$installPath$binFilefile:///\\$name\$installPath$binFile
).FileVersionInfo | ForEach { $_.FileVersion } )
$regKey= $reg.OpenSubKey( $key ).GetSubKeyNames() | ForEach {
$key\\$_ }
$dispName = [array] ( $regkey | % { $reg.OpenSubKey( $_
).getvalue( $VALUE1 ) } )
$instDate = [array] ( $regkey | % { $reg.OpenSubKey( $_
).getvalue( $VALUE2 ) } )
$countmembers = 0
if ($regkey -ne $null)
{
while ($countmembers -lt $dispName.Count)
{
$name + , + $dispName[
$countmembers ] + , + $instDate[ $countmembers ].substring( 0, 4 ) +
/ + $instDate[ $countmembers ].substring( 4, 2 ) + / +
$instDate[ $countmembers ].substring( 6, 2 ) + , + $exsetupver
$countmembers++
}
}
else
{
$name + ,No Rollup Updates are installed,, +
$exsetupver
}
}
else
{
$name + ,Unknown version,,
}
}
From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SP2 RU3
I install SP2 RU3
SP2 RU3
I install SP2 RU3 for exchange 2010 this weekend it seemed to finish successfully, but the version still shows 14.2 (build 247.5) Looks like I should see a build number of 14.2.309.2 for RU3 So what happened to the RU, did it not install correctly? jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Archiving (again)
With Exchange archive mailboxes aren't they accessed online so the clients being always connected put an extra resource strain on the exchange server. Isn't cache mode one of the ways Microsoft got the server requirements so low on 2010? If I setup everyone with an archive mailbox won't I be back to ~2003-2007 server requirements because of all the online mailboxes? jb -Original Message- From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Archiving (again) Hi Dave, I'd like to get it off the Exchange server so that I can free up resources and essentially keep my email server fast while people are searching archives. Again, since speed is my concern far more so than storage, I'm figuring throwing twice the hardware at a problem will help :) Thanks, Evan -Original Message- From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Archiving (again) Why do you want to get the data off the Exchange server? Exchange now has fairly minimal requirements for i/o so you no longer need high performance storage. Since SP1 whilst the archives MUST be on AN Exchange server it does not need to be the same server that the primary database is on. Even if it is on the same server you can have some slower storage for the archives. Sadly I did find that the OWA search only searches a single datastore so you need to select the archive to search, but at least its accessible from OWA by default without having to add extra's in. Dave Wade -Original Message- From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com] Sent: 13 March 2012 19:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Archiving (again) I think I may have asked this a year or two ago, but, here I am again. A while back I bought the Exchange Archiver from Sunbelt, and found out that they didn't recommend putting it on a DC. So, it went on the backburner for a little over a year, and a few weeks ago, I freed up a server and reinstalled it as a member server. I was now ready to install the archiver. Found out that the product was sold off to Metalogix. So, I talked to them and they told me a tech wouldn't be available to do the install (over the phone) for two weeks. I made the appointment and waited. As it turns out, Metalogix support is horrible. I've been put off four times now about doing the install... each time they say they can do it, then they either never call me, or email me and say they're too busy. So, I'd like to give up on this product, but I'd like to know what current products you guys are having good luck with? Essentially I've got an Exchange 2010 Enterprise Server with just a few (less than 25) mailboxes and a total store of 155 GB. My reason for archiving is to get the mail off the Exchange server and onto a separate server, and have it be indexed so that people can search large mailboxes very quickly. I don't think Exchange's native archiving would work for me because from what I've read it has to be done on the same server as the Exchange server, so I don't think that's going to speed up searches. Any other products I could look at? Thanks, as always, Evan --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** The Council has launched its Streets Ahead initiative to show how we can keep Stockport moving during the winter months. For all the latest news visit the new web pages at www.stockport.gov.uk/streetsahead This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act. If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport ICT, Corporate Support Services via email.qu...@stockport.gov.uk and then permanently remove it from your system. Thank you. http://www.stockport.gov.uk ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body:
RE: Archiving (again)
Didn't know there was a difference between RPC/HTTP vs. online mode I thought it was cache vs non-cache for performance.huh So using Exchanges built in archive mailboxes won't 2x the server CPU/Memory requirements if the clients are outlook 2010 using rpc/http ? Thank you jb -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Archiving (again) Cache mode has an impact, yes, but far less than the impact associated with RPC/HTTP vs. online mode. The primary reason for the reduction in I/O load is due to caching (i.e., loading indices into memory) and schema redesigns (i.e., changing the way the Exchange database is laid out on disk). -Original Message- From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Archiving (again) With Exchange archive mailboxes aren't they accessed online so the clients being always connected put an extra resource strain on the exchange server. Isn't cache mode one of the ways Microsoft got the server requirements so low on 2010? If I setup everyone with an archive mailbox won't I be back to ~2003-2007 server requirements because of all the online mailboxes? jb -Original Message- From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Archiving (again) Hi Dave, I'd like to get it off the Exchange server so that I can free up resources and essentially keep my email server fast while people are searching archives. Again, since speed is my concern far more so than storage, I'm figuring throwing twice the hardware at a problem will help :) Thanks, Evan -Original Message- From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Archiving (again) Why do you want to get the data off the Exchange server? Exchange now has fairly minimal requirements for i/o so you no longer need high performance storage. Since SP1 whilst the archives MUST be on AN Exchange server it does not need to be the same server that the primary database is on. Even if it is on the same server you can have some slower storage for the archives. Sadly I did find that the OWA search only searches a single datastore so you need to select the archive to search, but at least its accessible from OWA by default without having to add extra's in. Dave Wade -Original Message- From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com] Sent: 13 March 2012 19:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Archiving (again) I think I may have asked this a year or two ago, but, here I am again. A while back I bought the Exchange Archiver from Sunbelt, and found out that they didn't recommend putting it on a DC. So, it went on the backburner for a little over a year, and a few weeks ago, I freed up a server and reinstalled it as a member server. I was now ready to install the archiver. Found out that the product was sold off to Metalogix. So, I talked to them and they told me a tech wouldn't be available to do the install (over the phone) for two weeks. I made the appointment and waited. As it turns out, Metalogix support is horrible. I've been put off four times now about doing the install... each time they say they can do it, then they either never call me, or email me and say they're too busy. So, I'd like to give up on this product, but I'd like to know what current products you guys are having good luck with? Essentially I've got an Exchange 2010 Enterprise Server with just a few (less than 25) mailboxes and a total store of 155 GB. My reason for archiving is to get the mail off the Exchange server and onto a separate server, and have it be indexed so that people can search large mailboxes very quickly. I don't think Exchange's native archiving would work for me because from what I've read it has to be done on the same server as the Exchange server, so I don't think that's going to speed up searches. Any other products I could look at? Thanks, as always, Evan --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** The Council has launched its Streets Ahead initiative to show how we can keep Stockport moving during the winter months. For all the latest news visit the new web pages at www.stockport.gov.uk/streetsahead This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom
RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration
I think I found it I needed to click on VSS full. Now I wait another 3 hours to see if it clears the logs :) jb From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Shoot :( How do I use the default windows backup to get it to clear the exchange logs? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Yes. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]mailto:[mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange logs during mailbox migration I have a single exchange 2010 mailbox server with hub and transport on another box. Over the weekend a bunch of mailboxes were migrated that filled up the logs, I've freed up some space but I want to enable circular logging to finish the migrations. When I run Set-MailboxDatabase -CircularloggingEnabled:$true It says it won't take effect until the DB is unmounted and remounted. That doesn't help much. I've tried just running a full backup with commvault but its been running over 10 hours with little visible activity. Do I need to unmounts and remount for circular logging to start? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration
Nope that didn't do anything I did system status, the drives the DB and logs are on and set VSS to full. The backup completed but it didn't clear the log files. I'm back down to only a few GB. I'm about ready to just copy them elsewhere jb From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Shoot :( How do I use the default windows backup to get it to clear the exchange logs? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Yes. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]mailto:[mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange logs during mailbox migration I have a single exchange 2010 mailbox server with hub and transport on another box. Over the weekend a bunch of mailboxes were migrated that filled up the logs, I've freed up some space but I want to enable circular logging to finish the migrations. When I run Set-MailboxDatabase -CircularloggingEnabled:$true It says it won't take effect until the DB is unmounted and remounted. That doesn't help much. I've tried just running a full backup with commvault but its been running over 10 hours with little visible activity. Do I need to unmounts and remount for circular logging to start? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration
Huh, really? The builtin windows 2008 R2 backup don't backup the DB and clear the logs? jb From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 4:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Your not doing this correctly. You use the cli and vssadmin. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb530725%28v=vs.85%29.aspx From: Jason Benway [benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 1:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Nope that didn't do anything I did system status, the drives the DB and logs are on and set VSS to full. The backup completed but it didn't clear the log files. I'm back down to only a few GB. I'm about ready to just copy them elsewhere jb From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]mailto:[mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Shoot :( How do I use the default windows backup to get it to clear the exchange logs? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]mailto:[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange logs during mailbox migration Yes. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]mailto:[mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange logs during mailbox migration I have a single exchange 2010 mailbox server with hub and transport on another box. Over the weekend a bunch of mailboxes were migrated that filled up the logs, I've freed up some space but I want to enable circular logging to finish the migrations. When I run Set-MailboxDatabase -CircularloggingEnabled:$true It says it won't take effect until the DB is unmounted and remounted. That doesn't help much. I've tried just running a full backup with commvault but its been running over 10 hours with little visible activity. Do I need to unmounts and remount for circular logging to start? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs??
Are you running it in an exchange 2010 environment? Where do you have it installed CAS,Hub, or mailbox? Thanks,jb From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs?? We use Trend and I wouldn't change for anything. Just works. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Alice Goodman ali...@mckinstry.commailto:ali...@mckinstry.com wrote: Let me know how that goes for you as well... I am considering just sticking with my Trend Micro Scan Mail at the moment and not introduce any sticky challenges as I am still migrating from 2003 to 2010 and need to re-focus on that and finish. Alice From: Nicholas Turner [mailto:ntur...@caci.co.ukmailto:ntur...@caci.co.uk] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs?? I'd be quite interested to see what you find, I'm about to run a trial of Pure Message, although on exchange 2007. I'm a bit wary after installing CA R12's exchange modules and it corrupting 3 live transport databases :( which has prompted a rather swift change of vendors! Nick From: Alice Goodman [mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com]mailto:[mailto:ali...@mckinstry.com] Sent: 11 December 2011 19:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs?? Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs?? Our Workstation and Servers are being switched over to Sophos and apparently Pure Message is included in the licensing. I currently use Trend Micro's Scan Mail and am at the end of my licensing period but their messaging never told me so I have 1 day left. I am trying to get a 30 day extension and have time to evaluate Pure Message as I have heard that there are issues with it on Clusters, and that once installed, there is no easy way to uninstall it. Any users of Pure Message on here? Good? Bad? Ugly? Thanks, Alice Alice Goodman, MCSE, LEED(r) AP (BD+C) P 206.832.8295tel:206.832.8295 | C 206.427.7760tel:206.427.7760 | F 206.658.1797tel:206.658.1797 Sr. Exchange Administrator McKINSTRY FOR THE LIFE OF YOUR BUILDING Consulting | Construction | Energy | Facility Services www.mckinstry.comhttp://www.mckinstry.com/ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist This electronic message contains information from CACI International Inc or subsidiary companies, which may be confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this transmission or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately at postmas...@caci.co.ukmailto:postmas...@caci.co.uk Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. CACI Limited. Registered in England Wales. Registration No. 1649776. CACI House, Avonmore Road, London, W14 8TS. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- smsadm --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: process msexchangeadtopologyservice.exe topology discovery failed
yes From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: process msexchangeadtopologyservice.exe topology discovery failed Is the server a member of the Exchange Servers group? From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]mailto:[mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: process msexchangeadtopologyservice.exe topology discovery failed I've had this issue a few times on our new CAS server. The server has rights to the Manage Auditing and Security in the default domain controller GPO IPV6 is NOT disabled. This is for an Exchange 2010 CAS/HT server. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
direct booking and exchange 2010
I've seen the articles about changing the reg key in outlook 2010 to allow direct booking. My question is, if MS changed this in outlook 2010 what process should users use to function like direct booking? We have assistance that still want to just open the room calendar and book it for short notice bookings or outside user use. What are others doing, just enabling the reg key in outlook and setting the permissions on the calendar resource? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: migrating 2003 to 2010 and corrupt emails
Ok, should I just set the skip corrupt item really high and let it roll? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: migrating 2003 to 2010 and corrupt emails 9 times out of 10, these are very old calendar items. And, in general, they can't be recovered. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: migrating 2003 to 2010 and corrupt emails I'm moving mailboxes from 2003 to 2010, right now I'm just doing them one at a time to be careful. About half the mailboxes I've moved so far have had corrupt emails and I've had to restart the move skipping the corrupt emails. Is there a way to find the corrupt emails before I try to move them or should I just set the skip number to 10 and look at the logs after. Is there any way to recover the corrupt items? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
offline addressbook issues
Transitioning to exchange 2010. I have the HT/CAS and MBX setup, users and mailflow are all going through the HT/CAS I've moved the offline addressbook to the 2010. I have outlook 2003 and 2010 clients. I set the OAB to use publicfolders and web It looks like the OAB is not generating correctly because most clients are getting errors trying to download it. When I run Update-GlobalAddressList I'm getting a lot of yellow warnings with what looks like public folders and saying they are invalid. Lots on google to look though, looking for the groups knowledge of what to check first. Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: offline addressbook issues
Thanks, I'll search that site. This is transitioning from exchange 2003 to 2010. jb From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: offline addressbook issues Msexchangeteam.com has a bunch of one and two line commands you probably need to run. In terms of this issue, they are probably stored under Exchange 2007 though. This is a long-term data issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: offline addressbook issues Transitioning to exchange 2010. I have the HT/CAS and MBX setup, users and mailflow are all going through the HT/CAS I've moved the offline addressbook to the 2010. I have outlook 2003 and 2010 clients. I set the OAB to use publicfolders and web It looks like the OAB is not generating correctly because most clients are getting errors trying to download it. When I run Update-GlobalAddressList I'm getting a lot of yellow warnings with what looks like public folders and saying they are invalid. Lots on google to look though, looking for the groups knowledge of what to check first. Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: offline addressbook issues
I created another global address list and ran the powershell update command without errors. Should I Just delete the default one? If I do how do I get the offline address book to use the new GAL? I uploaded a few images of the GAL and OAB names http://i.imgur.com/3s5j9.png http://i.imgur.com/IWfHl.png From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: offline addressbook issues Msexchangeteam.com has a bunch of one and two line commands you probably need to run. In terms of this issue, they are probably stored under Exchange 2007 though. This is a long-term data issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: offline addressbook issues Transitioning to exchange 2010. I have the HT/CAS and MBX setup, users and mailflow are all going through the HT/CAS I've moved the offline addressbook to the 2010. I have outlook 2003 and 2010 clients. I set the OAB to use publicfolders and web It looks like the OAB is not generating correctly because most clients are getting errors trying to download it. When I run Update-GlobalAddressList I'm getting a lot of yellow warnings with what looks like public folders and saying they are invalid. Lots on google to look though, looking for the groups knowledge of what to check first. Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: offline addressbook issues
Don't know if anyone could shed some light on this 4247 Aug 22 11:43 Warning MSExchangeSA 2147492985 OALGen did not find any recipients in address list '\Global Address List'. This offline address lis t will not be generated. - \Default Offline Address List The strange thing is I don't have a list called global address list its called default global address list But this is the offline address list that was moved over from 2003... From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: offline addressbook issues Msexchangeteam.com has a bunch of one and two line commands you probably need to run. In terms of this issue, they are probably stored under Exchange 2007 though. This is a long-term data issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: offline addressbook issues Transitioning to exchange 2010. I have the HT/CAS and MBX setup, users and mailflow are all going through the HT/CAS I've moved the offline addressbook to the 2010. I have outlook 2003 and 2010 clients. I set the OAB to use publicfolders and web It looks like the OAB is not generating correctly because most clients are getting errors trying to download it. When I run Update-GlobalAddressList I'm getting a lot of yellow warnings with what looks like public folders and saying they are invalid. Lots on google to look though, looking for the groups knowledge of what to check first. Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: offline addressbook issues
I'm still getting the yellow warnings, but found out of I take a machine out of cache mode, then put it back in, I can download the OAB no problem..very strange. I haven't been able to test the mailboxes I moved to 2010 yet. All 4 users are gone today. jb From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: offline addressbook issues Msexchangeteam.com has a bunch of one and two line commands you probably need to run. In terms of this issue, they are probably stored under Exchange 2007 though. This is a long-term data issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: offline addressbook issues Transitioning to exchange 2010. I have the HT/CAS and MBX setup, users and mailflow are all going through the HT/CAS I've moved the offline addressbook to the 2010. I have outlook 2003 and 2010 clients. I set the OAB to use publicfolders and web It looks like the OAB is not generating correctly because most clients are getting errors trying to download it. When I run Update-GlobalAddressList I'm getting a lot of yellow warnings with what looks like public folders and saying they are invalid. Lots on google to look though, looking for the groups knowledge of what to check first. Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: exchange 2010 internal and external URL question
We already run a split DNS so that isn't an issue for us. Thanks for the quick feedback! jb From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange 2010 internal and external URL question The only downside is you would have to host all your External DNS internally, but only for your internal users. Not a big deal, but that is the only downside. We do it that way. So set up a zone for external.com on your dns server put in all the A records and away you go. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange 2010 internal and external URL question I didn't put the internal URL on the cert for the CAS server. So outlook clients are getting a popup when they are in the office. One way around this would be to make the internal and the external URLs the same. Any down side to doing this or should I just pay the extra cost to add the internal URL as another SAN to the cert? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: 2003 to 2010 transition
I'm in the EMS to change the security, but it's all greyed out. Our exchange 2003 is a cluster. I should be doing this on the 2003 BE server NOT the FE, correct? http://i.imgur.com/PSeLZ.png From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 2003 to 2010 transition Not if that is the only thing you change. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 2003 to 2010 transition I'm about to the point of switching the DNS so clients use the CAS not the 2003 server. I'd like to test it internally first by switching our internal records first. But to test ActiveSync I have to enable integrated windows auth on the virtual directory of 2003. If I enable this, will it affect the other ActiveSync users still connecting directly to the 2003 server? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: First CAS issue
The problem was the set default button wasn't active and both smtp addresses were bold. I ended up just deleting the contact and recreating it. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: First CAS issue So set a primary SMTP address. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: First CAS issue I moved our outgoing email though the CAS on Friday. Today We are getting the error RESOLVER.ADR.BadPrimary on a contact in one of our domains. The contact has two email addresses, one from our company and one from yahoo. I think how they use it is so he can receive email to a company address, but it gets forwarded to his yahoo account. It worked with exchange 2003 sending the email. All of our outgoing email is sent to a smart how which is our sonicwall anti-spam. The return message looks like its bouncing before it reaches the sonicwall. The whole error: CAS1001001.jsjcorp.com #5.2.0 smtp;550 5.2.0 RESOLVER.ADR.BadPrimary; recipient primary SMTP address is missing or invalid --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: First CAS issue
Time to get up on powershell for exchange. I've been using it with vmware. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 10:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: First CAS issue That's a workable way. You can also set it from PowerShell. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: First CAS issue The problem was the set default button wasn't active and both smtp addresses were bold. I ended up just deleting the contact and recreating it. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: First CAS issue So set a primary SMTP address. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 2:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: First CAS issue I moved our outgoing email though the CAS on Friday. Today We are getting the error RESOLVER.ADR.BadPrimary on a contact in one of our domains. The contact has two email addresses, one from our company and one from yahoo. I think how they use it is so he can receive email to a company address, but it gets forwarded to his yahoo account. It worked with exchange 2003 sending the email. All of our outgoing email is sent to a smart how which is our sonicwall anti-spam. The return message looks like its bouncing before it reaches the sonicwall. The whole error: CAS1001001.jsjcorp.com #5.2.0 smtp;550 5.2.0 RESOLVER.ADR.BadPrimary; recipient primary SMTP address is missing or invalid --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
First CAS issue
I moved our outgoing email though the CAS on Friday. Today We are getting the error RESOLVER.ADR.BadPrimary on a contact in one of our domains. The contact has two email addresses, one from our company and one from yahoo. I think how they use it is so he can receive email to a company address, but it gets forwarded to his yahoo account. It worked with exchange 2003 sending the email. All of our outgoing email is sent to a smart how which is our sonicwall anti-spam. The return message looks like its bouncing before it reaches the sonicwall. The whole error: CAS1001001.jsjcorp.com #5.2.0 smtp;550 5.2.0 RESOLVER.ADR.BadPrimary; recipient primary SMTP address is missing or invalid --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: forefront
How well has it worked keeping viruses and malware off the workstations? A lot of malware gets past Trend on the desktop jb -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: forefront I'm using Forefront Endpoint Protection, but not the Exchange product. I really like FEP, as it's managed through SCCM, and installing on a new machine is as simple as adding it to the right collection, and within minutes FEP is installed. Definition updates are pushed automatically, and it's really a hands-free operation. Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com 7/21/2011 10:27 AM Just wondering how many on the list were running Microsoft forefront for exchange and/or forefront for endpoints What have has been your experience, better or worse than other products? We currently run Trend on the desktops and soncwall email security for email viruses and spam. Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Connecting Outlook 2003 to Exchange 2010 SP1
Sorry to highjack your thread. Then does this mean, that users on the 2003 DB will start using the 2010 OWA interface once the CAS is installed? -Original Message- From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:robb.pickinpa...@anesthesiallc.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Connecting Outlook 2003 to Exchange 2010 SP1 Thanks for all the help! Turns out my downfall was believing the training class manuals. They kept saying make the CAS the connection point for all client connections. I interpreted all, and well... all. Rather I should have interpreted it as OWA, EAS, and OA. Silly me :) Once I set up and configured a MBX server, and moved the test user mailbox to it, MAPI repointed to the CAS. Lesson learned. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: AV on exchange 2010
I missed that feature of the edge server. I thought it was for external smtp features only. I thought the updated ISA server was to secure OWA/activesync ? -Original Message- From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 4:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: AV on exchange 2010 Edge Server role is not just for AV/spam. It's for providing a secure link for OWA/Activesync, also. Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com 7/6/2011 11:38 AM We are running scanmail from Trend on our exchange 2003 cluster. With Exchange 2010 it looks like scanmail gets installed on all roles Edge MX/HT/CAS I'm not planning on having an edge server because we have another antispam product that processes incoming and outgoing emails. Are most people installing email AV on the MX,HT, and CAS even if they are on different servers? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Too Many MAPI Connections
Are you using Cisco VPN for this? I remember something about an issue with Cisco VPN and outlook. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Too Many MAPI Connections I spent a few minutes hunting for a reference on this (a Microsoft reference I mean) and I can't locate it but I've seen this with both F5 and Cisco load balancers before. Generally, you increase the NAT or TCP session lifetime on your firewall or LB, not the TCP Keepalive on the Exchange servers themselves. I'm not 100% sure that your NW Engineer understands what TCP Keepalive is. J http://tldp.org/HOWTO/TCP-Keepalive-HOWTO/overview.html Too many MAPI connections instead generally means that a single account has too many active MAPI connections. This is generally because a prior connection (or multiple prior connections) were ignored and a new connection was created, or because of a program bug. NAT being torn down too quickly would lead directly to this issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Too Many MAPI Connections Good morning everyone, Our office in Bangalore connects via VPN tunnel back to our Exchange 2003 environment. Recently a number of users have been having difficulty connecting to their mailboxes (Outlook 2007 client). Upon investigation, we are seeing too many MAPI connections - so it appears that MAPI connections are not being closed correctly. We have checked for the presence of desktop search programs, having seen that cause similar issues in the past. We have disabled all of the desktop search engines, yet the issue continues. We have also recreated their MAPI profiles with no success. Our Exchange 2010 upgrade is entering UAT, so we are inching closer to migrating away from 2003, but I can't rush it. :) One of my network engineers is suggesting that we change the TCP KeepAlive timeout on the Exchange servers based on some research he has done online. Recommended value is 300,000 (5 minutes), and the default time for Exchange is 7,200,000 (2 hours). Looking for some thoughts - will changing this timeout cause any additional issues within Exchange? We could also increase the max number of MAPI connections, but I'm hesitant to do either change - I would rather find the root cause, but the issue is getting fairly hot and I need to get some relief even if only temporary. Jim Jim Holmgren Senior Manager, Infrastructure Services XLHealth Corporation The Warehouse at Camden Yards 351 West Camden Street, Suite 100 Baltimore, MD 21201 410.625.2200 (main) 443.524.8573 (direct) 443-506.2400 (cell) www.xlhealth.com http://www.xlhealth.com --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?
Do you have the Cisco Call Center IPCC (UCCX) ? Just wondering how exchange 2010 plays with it. jb From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM? We actually did a POC of Exchange 2010 to Unity. Currently we have Unity setup in a standalone forest so it is completely separate from our Exchange side. Management is wanting to integrate VM into the users mailbox so we have Unified Messaging. Me as the AD/Exchange guy I did not like the idea of installing Unity in our primary domain because it requires a lot of elevated rights that would then be available to our telecom guys, via the Unity management console. So I opened my mouth and suggested looking at Exchange 2010. We currently have Exchange 2007, but that lacks the MWI (message waiting indicator) interface unless you use a 3rd party. So we setup a lab with Unity and Exchange 2010 and I configured the same options that we are using on Unity. The only thing I could not get on the Exchange side was a voice mail box that had no greeting, Exchange requires some kind of recording. We did the side by side comparison with management and they like the idea of going to Exch 2010. The integration into Outlook, accessing contacts and calendar items, and the VM preview we key things they liked. Going with Exch 2010 also allowed me to keep the telecom team from having elevated rights in the domain. We will UM enable a user in the same process as creating the user. So now I am starting a project to upgrade our Exchange environment to 2010 from 2007. Still in the design phase. From: Barsodi.John [mailto:john.bars...@igt.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM? Curious if anyone has dropped Unity like a bad habit in favor of Exchange 2007/2010 UM? If so what was your experience like? Happier now or wish you would have stuck with Unity? Thanks, JB
running exchange 2010 on windows 2008 vs. windows 2008 r2
It looks like ESX 3.5 and vcenter 2.5 don't fully support windows 2008 r2 ( don't see us upgrading our ESX and Vcenter until mid 2010). We are looking to rollout exchange 2010, I'll be updating our forest and domain to AD 2003 mode this week. My question is, is there any advantage of running exchange 2010 on a windows 2008 R2 server vs. just windows 2008 ? Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: Symprex support
We are using the same software. I didn't know they had phone support. I always just emailed support. It takes awhile because they are in the UK. jb From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Symprex support HI team Does anyone have a contact number for decent Symprex Signature Manager support ? I've been trying for days with the guys in the UK with no luck as there number just rings and then goes to voice mail. It's really starting to get frustrating. Thanks Peter
RE: recipient policy help
I'm not sure what I was trying to say either! I think I was trying to say how to I use the GUI with the checkboxes to get the same results as the LDAP query. I have around 7 of these to setup. I would prefer to use the GUI and the checkboxes. jb From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recipient policy help You can go into advanced view to edit the LDAP query directly. I don't understand remote the query for any contact and any PF,DL, or DDL to be able to answer it. From: Jason Benway [benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recipient policy help anyone? From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recipient policy help I'm using the GUI in exchange 2003 to create these policies. Not sure how to edit the ldap directly though the GUI, or which boxes to check to remote the query for any contact and any PF,DL, or DDL thanks,jb From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: recipient policy help Your LDAP logic is a wee-bit off.. If I am reading this correctly, it says any mailenabled object that's: * any mailbox not on any server * any mailbox on IZZYEmail * any contact * any PF, DL or DDL ( ( ( (mailnickname=*) (| ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=user) (!(homeMDB=*)) (!(msExchHomeServerName=*)) ) ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=user) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL) ) ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=contact) ) (objectCategory=group) (objectCategory=publicFolder) (objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) I think you want something more like: - Any mail enabled object, on IZZYEMAIL that is a mailbox, contact, group, PF or DDL. ((mailnickname=*) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user) ) ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact)) (objectCategory=group) (objectCategory=publicFolder) (objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) ) ) To shorten that a bit more, since you're hitting all mail enabled objects on the server: ((mailnickname=*) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL)) will do approx. the same thing. On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com wrote: I created new recipient policies to replace the legacy one's from our 55 days. During that process I had to add another domain for our of our business units. So I did an apply to all. We have 5 different exchange servers and I have 11 recipient policies. The users are being stamped and created correctly, but the DLs are only being stamped with the #1 policy. Here's the ldap from that policy. ((( (mailnickname=*) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(!(homeMDB=*))(!(msExchHomeSe rverName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(msExchHomeServe rName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=IZZYEMAIL))((obj ectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact))(objectCategory=group)(objectCa tegory=publicFolder)(objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) I believe this should stamp all objects, but only on the izzyemail server, correct? but it seems to be stamping DLs on all emails servers!! thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: re-attaching mailbox freezes ESM
Thanks, it took a few hours for each but they worked. jb From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: re-attaching mailbox freezes ESM The operation can take some time to complete. I've seen it hang for almost a minute sometimes. My advice would be to reconnect it, then go for a crafty pint down the pub. If it's still hung when you get back, you have a problem J Richard From: bounce-8573384-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8573384-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Jason Benway Sent: 20 June 2009 16:28 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re-attaching mailbox freezes ESM We having a fully patches exchange 2003 server that we just migrated a bunch of mailboxes from a different Exchange Org this weekend. A few of the mailboxes need to be attached to different accounts. I've dis-associated the old user and the mailbox. The clean process ran so the mailbox shows unattached. When I try to reconnect the mailbox to a different account it locks up the ESM. I've tried from a different exchange server (same org) and get the same results. Any ideas? thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
exchange 2003 db cleanup
Normally isn't there a scheduled task/event that runs within exchange to cleanup the db and free up whitespace. Before we moved over a bunch of mailboxes from another org we archived all mailboxes so they where smaller than 100megs. But now that we moved them over a bunch of them are larger than 100 megs, but viewing through outlook they should be below 100. I'm thinking the db cleanup process should run and correct this. I've ran a full backup, which didn't reclaim any of the space. I know about eseutil, but I thought the cleanup processes ran by themselves. Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: exchange 2003 db cleanup
I'm with you on the process, I'm just trying to figure out why outlook is telling me one mailbox size and exchange is telling me another. I found this: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/891789 The reg keys on in the exchange server. jb From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: exchange 2003 db cleanup The clean up processes do run automatically on an Exchange server. However, I believe that your perception of what they will do is in error. Look for an event id 1221 in the application log on your Exchange server, you should have multiples of this event daily depending on how many information store databases you have. This event informs you that the online defragmentation has completed on a specific store and how much free space (white space) is available. You will not recover that free space in any way shape form or fashion unless you run eseutil. This is not a recommended process to run unless directed to by Microsoft PSS. Your Exchange server will run much more effeciently with available white space in its databases. It will not have to grow a database to accomodate the need for more space if that white space is already available to it. Most Exchange admins allow their Exchange servers to run in this fashion. Eseutil is to be avoided unless you want to screw up your Exchange server. It can be used if there are serious issues with an information store that need to be resolved and really should only be done at the direction of PSS. On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com wrote: Normally isn't there a scheduled task/event that runs within exchange to cleanup the db and free up whitespace. Before we moved over a bunch of mailboxes from another org we archived all mailboxes so they where smaller than 100megs. But now that we moved them over a bunch of them are larger than 100 megs, but viewing through outlook they should be below 100. I'm thinking the db cleanup process should run and correct this. I've ran a full backup, which didn't reclaim any of the space. I know about eseutil, but I thought the cleanup processes ran by themselves. Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: exchange 2003 db cleanup
So a quota won't be freed up until the retention time is over? From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: exchange 2003 db cleanup Depends on your deleted items retention. The Exchange MB will contain deleted items held until the retention period passes. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud From: Jason Benway To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Mon Jun 22 09:42:45 2009 Subject: RE: exchange 2003 db cleanup I'm with you on the process, I'm just trying to figure out why outlook is telling me one mailbox size and exchange is telling me another. I found this: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/891789 The reg keys on in the exchange server. jb From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: exchange 2003 db cleanup The clean up processes do run automatically on an Exchange server. However, I believe that your perception of what they will do is in error. Look for an event id 1221 in the application log on your Exchange server, you should have multiples of this event daily depending on how many information store databases you have. This event informs you that the online defragmentation has completed on a specific store and how much free space (white space) is available. You will not recover that free space in any way shape form or fashion unless you run eseutil. This is not a recommended process to run unless directed to by Microsoft PSS. Your Exchange server will run much more effeciently with available white space in its databases. It will not have to grow a database to accomodate the need for more space if that white space is already available to it. Most Exchange admins allow their Exchange servers to run in this fashion. Eseutil is to be avoided unless you want to screw up your Exchange server. It can be used if there are serious issues with an information store that need to be resolved and really should only be done at the direction of PSS. On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com wrote: Normally isn't there a scheduled task/event that runs within exchange to cleanup the db and free up whitespace. Before we moved over a bunch of mailboxes from another org we archived all mailboxes so they where smaller than 100megs. But now that we moved them over a bunch of them are larger than 100 megs, but viewing through outlook they should be below 100. I'm thinking the db cleanup process should run and correct this. I've ran a full backup, which didn't reclaim any of the space. I know about eseutil, but I thought the cleanup processes ran by themselves. Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure
re-attaching mailbox freezes ESM
We having a fully patches exchange 2003 server that we just migrated a bunch of mailboxes from a different Exchange Org this weekend. A few of the mailboxes need to be attached to different accounts. I've dis-associated the old user and the mailbox. The clean process ran so the mailbox shows unattached. When I try to reconnect the mailbox to a different account it locks up the ESM. I've tried from a different exchange server (same org) and get the same results. Any ideas? thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: recipient policy help
anyone? From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recipient policy help I'm using the GUI in exchange 2003 to create these policies. Not sure how to edit the ldap directly though the GUI, or which boxes to check to remote the query for any contact and any PF,DL, or DDL thanks,jb From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: recipient policy help Your LDAP logic is a wee-bit off.. If I am reading this correctly, it says any mailenabled object that's: * any mailbox not on any server * any mailbox on IZZYEmail * any contact * any PF, DL or DDL ( ( ( (mailnickname=*) (| ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=user) (!(homeMDB=*)) (!(msExchHomeServerName=*)) ) ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=user) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL) ) ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=contact) ) (objectCategory=group) (objectCategory=publicFolder) (objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) I think you want something more like: - Any mail enabled object, on IZZYEMAIL that is a mailbox, contact, group, PF or DDL. ((mailnickname=*) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user) ) ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact)) (objectCategory=group) (objectCategory=publicFolder) (objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) ) ) To shorten that a bit more, since you're hitting all mail enabled objects on the server: ((mailnickname=*) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL)) will do approx. the same thing. On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com wrote: I created new recipient policies to replace the legacy one's from our 55 days. During that process I had to add another domain for our of our business units. So I did an apply to all. We have 5 different exchange servers and I have 11 recipient policies. The users are being stamped and created correctly, but the DLs are only being stamped with the #1 policy. Here's the ldap from that policy. ((( (mailnickname=*) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(!(homeMDB=*))(!(msExchHomeSe rverName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(msExchHomeServe rName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=IZZYEMAIL))((obj ectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact))(objectCategory=group)(objectCa tegory=publicFolder)(objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) I believe this should stamp all objects, but only on the izzyemail server, correct? but it seems to be stamping DLs on all emails servers!! thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
recipient policy help
I created new recipient policies to replace the legacy one's from our 55 days. During that process I had to add another domain for our of our business units. So I did an apply to all. We have 5 different exchange servers and I have 11 recipient policies. The users are being stamped and created correctly, but the DLs are only being stamped with the #1 policy. Here's the ldap from that policy. ((( (mailnickname=*) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(!(homeMDB=*))(!(msExchHomeSe rverName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(msExchHomeServe rName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=IZZYEMAIL))((obj ectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact))(objectCategory=group)(objectCa tegory=publicFolder)(objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) I believe this should stamp all objects, but only on the izzyemail server, correct? but it seems to be stamping DLs on all emails servers!! thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: recipient policy help
I'm using the GUI in exchange 2003 to create these policies. Not sure how to edit the ldap directly though the GUI, or which boxes to check to remote the query for any contact and any PF,DL, or DDL thanks,jb From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: recipient policy help Your LDAP logic is a wee-bit off.. If I am reading this correctly, it says any mailenabled object that's: * any mailbox not on any server * any mailbox on IZZYEmail * any contact * any PF, DL or DDL ( ( ( (mailnickname=*) (| ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=user) (!(homeMDB=*)) (!(msExchHomeServerName=*)) ) ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=user) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL) ) ( (objectCategory=person) (objectClass=contact) ) (objectCategory=group) (objectCategory=publicFolder) (objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) I think you want something more like: - Any mail enabled object, on IZZYEMAIL that is a mailbox, contact, group, PF or DDL. ((mailnickname=*) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user) ) ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact)) (objectCategory=group) (objectCategory=publicFolder) (objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) ) ) To shorten that a bit more, since you're hitting all mail enabled objects on the server: ((mailnickname=*) (msExchHomeServerName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=I ZZYEMAIL)) will do approx. the same thing. On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com wrote: I created new recipient policies to replace the legacy one's from our 55 days. During that process I had to add another domain for our of our business units. So I did an apply to all. We have 5 different exchange servers and I have 11 recipient policies. The users are being stamped and created correctly, but the DLs are only being stamped with the #1 policy. Here's the ldap from that policy. ((( (mailnickname=*) (| ((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(!(homeMDB=*))(!(msExchHomeSe rverName=*)))((objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(msExchHomeServe rName=/O=ghsp/OU=Belton/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=IZZYEMAIL))((obj ectCategory=person)(objectClass=contact))(objectCategory=group)(objectCa tegory=publicFolder)(objectCategory=msExchDynamicDistributionList) I believe this should stamp all objects, but only on the izzyemail server, correct? but it seems to be stamping DLs on all emails servers!! thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
New Recipient policies don't apply
I created a new recipient policy for our Exchange 2003 org Its the second policy the first is pointing to a different exchange server than the one I'm working on. I setup the ldap query for only this server. the policy is to add an additional smtp address and set it as the default, still leaving all existing smtp addresses. This exchange server is in a subdomain of the forest and using a different DNS name space. I've read through many MS KB and a few blog post related to this. IT doesn't work for new users or for existing users. I ran the exchange BPA and nothing of interested came back. I'm going to increase logging levels, just not sure which domain or exchange server to do it on. Thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: New Recipient policies don't apply
The 1 priority has a ldap query to apply to a total different exchange server. But I've been fighting this all day so I'll try anything :-) I'll bump it upto PR 1 Just to add more detail Current PR 1 lets call it policy widget A is applying to exchange server A The current PR 2 call it policy widget B is applying to exchange server B = is the one I'm trying to get to apply for all users on server B These servers are in the same exchange org, same AD forest just different AD domains. jb From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: New Recipient policies don't apply AFAIK, the recipient policies are not cumulative, so if one is applied it will not continue to the next. Have you tried increasing the priority, perhaps that's not desired, but it could be that the recipients are hitting the highest priority policy (priority 1) and not continuing on to the new policy. -alex On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jason Benway benw...@jsjcorp.com wrote: I created a new recipient policy for our Exchange 2003 org Its the second policy the first is pointing to a different exchange server than the one I'm working on. I setup the ldap query for only this server. the policy is to add an additional smtp address and set it as the default, still leaving all existing smtp addresses. This exchange server is in a subdomain of the forest and using a different DNS name space. I've read through many MS KB and a few blog post related to this. IT doesn't work for new users or for existing users. I ran the exchange BPA and nothing of interested came back. I'm going to increase logging levels, just not sure which domain or exchange server to do it on. Thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
RE: recipient policy and X400 question
We've consolidated a bunch of exchange servers since the 5.5 days, I'm trying to tell what I need to put in for the X400 for the new recipient policies I'm going to create. None of the current ones make sense. jb From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recipient policy and X400 question I'm fond of using adfind with LDAP queries. In Exchange 2003, you do need those addresses. The need finally disappears in a pure Exchange 2007 and up organization. From: Jason Benway [benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: recipient policy and X400 question Is there a way to document/export recipient in exchange 2003 and in a pure exchange 2003 org, do I need X400 addresses on new recipient polices? thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
recipient policy and X400 question
Is there a way to document/export recipient in exchange 2003 and in a pure exchange 2003 org, do I need X400 addresses on new recipient polices? thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~JSJ_Email_Bruce.jpg
KB 957208
Anyone deploy the hotfix from KB 957208? The title of the fix is Reminders for meeting requests reappear in Outlook after users synchronize meeting requests by using a mobile device and Exchange ActiveSync in Exchange Server 2003 We are experiencing this issue and I'm thinking of installing the hotfix, but I'm looking for experiences from people that have tried this hotfix. Thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~attc0401.jpg
RE: Single exe windows ftp server
http://usb.smithtech.us/apps/servu.php Serv-U FTP Server Portable From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Single exe windows ftp server Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a single exe FTP Server for Windows? I saw one once that had a good GUI, basic user setups and folder permnissions etc and was just one file. It doesn't have to run as a service, just something we can add to the toolkit to help getting files from/to windows boxes (mostly to/from linux servers). There's the nifty FTPDMIN (http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/ftpdmin/) but that doesn't have any user support of any kind, with each connection being anonymous which isn't great, even for single use access. Any others ? Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.com http://www.g2support.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
outlook search question
Do any of the free outlook search tools search only the cache files when in cache mode so It doesn't impact the exchange server? I'm thinking MS desktop search or xobni?? We are running windows XP, outlook 2003 in cache mode, and exchange 2003. thanks,jb Jason Benway System/Storage Engineer 616-847-8474 telephone 616-850-1208 fax www.jsjcorp.com http://www.jsjcorp.com/ JSJ Corporation 700 Robbins Road Grand Haven, MI 49417 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~attdf6d.jpg
RE: Exch2007 in ESX
Here's a link from vmware with some information from a Dell tech about running a huge exchange environment on vmware. But these are all in controlled installs not production. http://www.savagenomads.net/2008/03/05/16000_exchange_mailboxes_1_server _-_vmware_vroom/ jb From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX E2K7 on a DC is not recommended but is supported http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX Soif you virtualize Exchange 2007...what other systems would you run on the same ESX hosts, does it matter? My understanding Exchange 2K7 is recommended to sit on a GC designated domain controller (so it has quick access to the global catalog), but would it sit on the same box as say, an SMS, WSUS, or SQL server? Anything you WOULDN'T have it share a host with? Dave Lum - Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025 When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 6:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exch2007 in ESX Yes, currently four mailbox servers and six CAS/HT servers, working towards a few thousand mailboxes to be migrated in the next few weeks. All running on ESX 3.5. You should get new Dell server guys if they can't quantify that statement. A properly configured VM running on a properly configured ESX server (can't speak for Hyper-V) and properly sized should see no noticeable performance hit. Just as in the physical world you gotta make sure you understand your current environment and size accordingly, with emphasize on storage and memory. There are at least a couple of whitepapers on Exchange 2007 performance on ESX; HP and maybe Dell. I would say take a look at those, test in your environment with your type of workload and use that data to make your decision. -alex On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Dennis Melahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone virtualized Exchange 2007? I'm getting mixed opinions. My Dell server guys are saying performance would suffer too much. I also have a local integrator who is a VMware and MS Gold Partner and says they virtualize everything and that because my information store is only about 25GB for approx 150 boxes I wouldn't have performance problems. Thoughts? Thanks, Dennis ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: xobni invites
please send one of those invite my way jb From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: xobni invites Just installed and have 6 to give. dave This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Centrally manage outlook signatures
Is anyone using a product to centrally manage outlook signatures in an exchange 2003 environment? Thanks,jb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Centrally manage outlook signatures
I'm looking for a way to manage about 1000 users across multiple exchange servers, in the same forest and exchange org, but different AD domains. I need to create a default signature that is customize with each users contact info. But maintains the same look and logo. I'd also like it to work with OWA and windows mobile phones. I know I'm not asking for much :-) jb -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Centrally manage outlook signatures Interested as well... how many users are you talking about? My users have so many that I have to actually back them up. I have some users with like 40 of them. And yes, they use templates too! -Sam -Original Message- From: Jason Benway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Centrally manage outlook signatures Is anyone using a product to centrally manage outlook signatures in an exchange 2003 environment? Thanks,jb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
free/busy server impact
I've been search for information about how much increasing the free busy information published out to 12 months. Most of the sites I've found only talk about the process not server impact, if any. our exchange servers have less then 500 user each. Other than some increase in the public folder store, will I see much impact on the exchange performance? thanks,jb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RPC-Http Access
We got RPC-Https working and were running up instructions on how-to configure outlook 2003. Then we starting thinking that people could use the directions to setup their own PC or other non-company asset to pull a copy of all their emails. Is there anyway to stop people from using non-company assets to access RPC-Http? thanks,jb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
outlook resource schedule
WE just went live using exchanges resources instead of public folders. We have Exchange 2003 with outlook 2003, so far its been so/so So far we noticed issues with trying to let the exchange server pick a single resource when multiple are selected. In outlook the auto pick is set to all receipts and one resource, but its not picking the resources correct. We get the confirmation pop-up. But once it didn't seem to reserve any conf rooms the other time it resourced all the conference rooms. Any know issues with exchange 2003 SP2 and conference room resources? Thanks,jb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
