[expert] SO51 -- Backup on Save -- SOLVED!

1999-12-01 Thread Benjamin Sher

Dear Alan:

OK, subject closed. That's exactly what I get, too. Each .bak copy is
always one generation behind the .sdw file and I only need to use Save
to save. No need for Save As. When I delete the extra material (which I
added by stages, i.e. by "generations") from .sdw, the .bak will not
delete it (since it has added it cumulatively, one generation at a time)
until I modify .sdw again, even if only by typing a word and then
deleting it. That modification means "one generation" to SO, and .bak is
now identical to .sdw (i.e. both files end the way they began, with the
original material that I first typed on it when I first gave it a name).
But the process must, naturally, first begin with a name, and you don't
see the .bak file until AFTER the first modification, i.e. until the
second generation.

In WP8 as in MSWord, you see the backup with each generation, including
after the very first one. That's the difference that has driven me
batty.

At last, this madness is over.

Thanks a million, Alan for verifying this. And my thanks to Axalon and
everyone else who has been kind enough to respond.

Benjamin
-- 
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net



RE: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Derek Simkowiak

> And there are plenty of tools out there (ie: Majorcool) which will automate
> the process of adding/removing new lists, etc.

Yes, I've heard of (and experimented with) Majorcool, but what
other ones are there?

One != plenty.


--Derek



Re: [expert] Kernel modules not modular kernels?

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Steve Philp wrote:

> Jason Antonacci wrote:
> > 
> > Is there any linux os flavor (or any os period) that allows the loading of 
>multiple kernels?  I remember a professor during an SMP discussion stating that a 
>"low level SMP kernel" can be used to load "higher OS kernels" onto individual 
>processors.  This type system would allow os redundancy on a single peice of hardware 
>as well as serices.  Another plus would be testing and evaluation on an identical 
>platform.  Some of my associates have suggested Java, but I reject that outright 
>because it is not an OS.
> > 
> 
> The big one that comes to mind is VMWare.  It will allow you to run a
> wide variety of operating systems as user processes.
> 
> There is a user-space linux kernel floating around that will allow you
> to run more "linux machines" as processes of the real, physical machine.

If anyone knows a URL, it'd be much (s**t, i've forgotten howto spell,
must still be to early) appreciated (yay ispell) :-)
 
> Beyond that, you're treading into the territory of mainframe
> monsters...  I do remember reading that IBM has ported Linux as a
> "virtual machine" to their 390 series and is now working on porting it
> to act as the "main" operating system of the machine.
> 
> 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [expert] Kernel modules not modular kernels?

1999-12-01 Thread Jean-Louis Debert

Jason Antonacci wrote:
> Is there any linux os flavor (or any os period) that allows the loading of multiple 
>> kernels?  I remember a professor during an SMP discussion stating that a "low level 
>SMP > kernel" can be used to load "higher OS kernels" onto individual processors.  
>This type > system would allow os redundancy on a single peice of hardware as well as 
>serices.  Another > plus would be testing and evaluation on an identical platform.  
>Some of my associates have > suggested Java, but I reject that outright because it is 
>not an OS.

There are at least two different ways of doing this:
1. use VMware. This is commercial, but will definitely allow you to
run
as many kernels as you want (and other OS's such as Windows or
FreeBSD),
all at the same time (but better have enough memory for each !!!)

2. use a micro-kernel, such as e.g. the Mach kernel that was initially
tuned for the Linux kernel on PPC (IBM or Apple) machines. AFAIK you
can
find that beast at Carnegie-Mellon (.cmu.edu) but I don't know exactly
where.
You can definitely load several linux kernels on top of the
micro-kernel
(although with only one keyboard, communication may become awkward
...)
Although it is not much advertised, a version exists (and runs okay)
on Intel x86.
The resource requirements are much less than VMware, on the other hand
performance is not so good ...

-- 
Jean-Louis Debert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 Annemasse  France
old Linux fan



Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Patrick Putteman

I have to agree to this one:
Mailman is very easy to install, very configurable, has a web based
administration interface, archive possibilities, e-mail administration and
is FAST.

Patrick

- Original Message -
From: "Ronald J. Yacketta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] mailing list software?


> John Aldrich wrote:
> >
> > Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
> > perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake? My
> > boss gave me the job of coming up with a package to do
> > that.
> > Also keep in mind that it will probably be remotely
> > installed, configured and managed via ssh, so the easier
> > the better! :-)
> > John
> check out mailman it has a www interface and a built in archive (all www
> based)
>



Re: [expert] Web site (doubleblink)

1999-12-01 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message -
From: Alan Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Web site (doubleblink)


> Hoythow do I get on the MDB mailing list? :-)
>
> Alan
>
Sorry, that particular distro has a few, um, copyright violations, so it's
not for general distribution.

If there is any significant interest, I could clean it up. E-mail me
directly.

Hoyt



RE: [expert] Setting up linux box to connect to MS network

1999-12-01 Thread Stephen Carville

On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Vanco, Donald wrote:
-
-> And if the Exchange is anywhere near to being a standard
-> mail-server, than you should be able to use just about any 
-> mail-program
-> which supports POP3 and/or IMAP. I.e. just about any mail 
-> program at all.
-> 
-> To name few: pine, elm, kmail, Netscape, balsa...  
-   It has been my (sad) experience that none of these clients "play
-nice" with Exchange as the server.  There are different capabilities for POP
-and IMAP (purely from the Exchange side) that make integration a real pain.
-   If anyone has found a client that plays well with Exchange I'd love
-to hear your comments.  Netscape is about the best so far - other than the
-fact that I can't send anything... ;)

My employer recently crammed Exchange down my throat.  

I now use fetchmail to snarf the mail from the Exchange server
(using IMAP instead of POP) and Kmail to read it and sort it into
different mailboxes.  I run imapd so my system inbox and the Kmail
boxes are accessible from home using TkRat.

I send my mail using sendmail but setting up Kmail to use the Exchange
server as an SMTP server should work.  At least it did in my tests.

--
Stephen Carville

A well educated citizenry, being essential to the maintenance of a free
society, the right of the people, to keep and read books shall not be 
infringed.



RE: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Ian Douglas

> I would disagree about the "no maintenance".

Yes, granted, if you're constantly adding new lists or tweaking the
configuration then yes, there is work to do. But once it's all in place and
you have no more changes to make, Majordomo requires no maintenance to keep
running.

And there are plenty of tools out there (ie: Majorcool) which will automate
the process of adding/removing new lists, etc.

---
Ian Douglas, Wild Web Services
http://www.wildwebservices.com
ph: 613-253-3147
fx: 613-253-1029
pager: http://wildwebservices.com/pager.html




Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Johnthat is the fun of all this, learning new things! ;-)

Alan


John Aldrich wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> > Johnthat's not what I said, but you are correct.  There is no file
> > called rescue.img on my Mdk 6.0 CD or either of my Mdk 6.1 CD's.
> > However on the Mdk 6.0 CD there is a sub called /images/rescue and in it
> > are the three "Tom's root boot" files (they are not named rescue.img).
> >
> Well, I'll be darned..you're right. I coulda sworn that there was a
> rescue.img. :-) I just learned something new then. :-)
> FWIW, I've never had any problem with the RedHat rescue disk.. and
> I've used it several times. :-)
> One of the more recent times was to boot up a system I didn't know
> the root password on to add a user and change the root password...
> and I did it the RIGHT way... :-)
> logged in using the boot and rescue disks, mounted the hard drive,
> changed root to the hard drive and then ran "passwd root" and changed
> the root password. The first time I did that, I forgot to run "sync"
> afterwards and spent about 10 minutes pulling what little hair I have
> left out. ;-)
> After I figured it out, it was a cinch to reboot with the rescue
> disk, change the password again, THIS time, I ran "sync," unmounted
> the system and rebooted. ;-)
> Worked like a charm! :-)
> John



RE: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Derek Simkowiak

> > Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
> > perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake?
> 
> If you have root access on the remote system to set it up, I'd recommend
> Majordomo. Installation is pretty simple if you read the documentation and
> instructions and if you set it up to do so, there is almost no maintenance
> involved.

I would disagree about the "no maintenance".  Every time you add a
list, you need to add several aliases to the sendmail aliases file,
rebuild the db from that file, edit and create several files in
Majordomo's home directory (with the correct permissions), and finally
configure the mailing list with the 'new config' command.

But, it is very powerful, and fairly popular (making support easy
to find).

--Derek



Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Geoff Croxson

At 12:45  2/12/99 +, you wrote:
>John Aldrich wrote:
>check out mailman it has a www interface and a built in archive (all www
>based)
we switched from majordomo to mailman here @ work becuae of the ease of use
for those not familiar with *NIX, or command sending through email, and
wanting to administer lists... apart from management spewing over no one
being told of the transfer there have been no complaints so far,


Regards

Geoff Croxson
---
Page me http://wwp.mirabilis.com/1120068   
Senior Micro-Computing Support Officer Ph: 9514 1218
Humanities and Social Sciences Fax:9514 1041
University of Technology, Sydney   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> Johnthat's not what I said, but you are correct.  There is no file
> called rescue.img on my Mdk 6.0 CD or either of my Mdk 6.1 CD's. 
> However on the Mdk 6.0 CD there is a sub called /images/rescue and in it
> are the three "Tom's root boot" files (they are not named rescue.img).
> 
Well, I'll be darned..you're right. I coulda sworn that there was a
rescue.img. :-) I just learned something new then. :-) 
FWIW, I've never had any problem with the RedHat rescue disk.. and
I've used it several times. :-)
One of the more recent times was to boot up a system I didn't know
the root password on to add a user and change the root password...
and I did it the RIGHT way... :-)
logged in using the boot and rescue disks, mounted the hard drive,
changed root to the hard drive and then ran "passwd root" and changed
the root password. The first time I did that, I forgot to run "sync"
afterwards and spent about 10 minutes pulling what little hair I have
left out. ;-)
After I figured it out, it was a cinch to reboot with the rescue
disk, change the password again, THIS time, I ran "sync," unmounted
the system and rebooted. ;-)
Worked like a charm! :-)
John



Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably perl-based)
> > mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake? My boss gave me the job of
> > coming up with a package to do that.
> 
> IMHO sympa is very robust configuratble and have good readable code
> (perl) more info on :
> 
> http://listes.cru.fr/sympa
> 
>   --Chmouel
>
Thanks...is that what this list is run on? ;-)
John



Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> 
> I've got ezmlm installed on the work server along with qmailadmin for a
> web-based administration of the whole system (pop accounts, forwarding,
> aliases, mailing lists, and auto-responders).  It's a pretty nice setup,
> I must say.  
> 
Thanks...otoh, since the server I may be installing (and supporting)
it on is about 30-miles away, I don't feel like setting up a whole
new mail server software. ;-)
Thanks...



Re: [expert] Kernel modules not modular kernels?

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> Is there any linux os flavor (or any os period) that allows the loading of multiple 
>kernels?  I remember a professor during an SMP discussion stating that a "low level 
>SMP kernel" can be used to load "higher OS kernels" onto individual processors.  This 
>type system would allow os redundancy on a single peice of hardware as well as 
>serices.  Another plus would be testing and evaluation on an identical platform.  
>Some of my associates have suggested Java, but I reject that outright because it is 
>not an OS.
> 
Yes, vmware -- you can run Linux under Win 95/98/NT or you can run
any of those operating systems under Linux. :-)

Now, next time, please set your mail client to post in plain text and
word-wrap at a decent length, about 60-70 characters. :-)
Thanks...



Re: [expert] Stoopid FTP Question

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> mget usually works pretty well for multiple files.
> 
> 
Sure does...but AFAIK, it doesn't do recursive gets of directories..
John



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> Nickrescue.img is not the name of the file.  On the Mdk 6.0 distro
> there is a sub called /images/rescue/ and in that sub are three files:
> 
>   tomsrtbt-1.7.134.dos.zip (create the floppy in a dos environment)
>   tomsrtbt-1.7.134.tar.gz  (create the floppy in a linux environment)
>   tomsrtbt.FAQ
> 
There *is* a file on the 6.0 cd called 'rescue.img.' At least on the
McMillan CD there is... The Tom's Root/Boot disk may also be there,
but I'm almost positive that the rescue image is there as
well.   
John



Re: [expert] Web site (doubleblink)

1999-12-01 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Hoythow do I get on the MDB mailing list? :-)

Alan


Hoyt wrote:
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Alan Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 11:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [expert] Web site (doubleblink)
> 
> > CivilemeI don't think it's too suprising that the poll came out like
> > that, after all, there have been two MacMillan distributions of
> > Linux-Mandrake that both say "RedHat with enhancements" right on the
> > box.  These boxed distributions can be found in many of the major
> > discount stores in the USA and they are likely one of the major
> > contributing factors for the phenominal growth of Linux-Mandrake over
> > the past 6 to 8 months.
> >
> 
> My LUG distributes Mandrake at local computer shows. We purchase the disks
> from www.linuxcentral.com and mark them up just enough to cover our
> distibution expenses,so they are very inexpensive. Yet we have trouble
> marketing them as "Mandrake". RedHat has so much market awareness that it is
> easier to say they are "RedHat on steroids" or "RedHat with improvements".
> But the fact remains that RedHat compatability helps sell the disks. I look
> at it this way: Elisha Grey and Alexander Graham Bell "invented" the
> telephone, but my Nokia cell phone is certainly much better than theirs. I
> see RedHat and Mandrake as being in a similar relationship: it's the same
> idea, but done better.
> 
> BTW, I make a distro based on Mandrake that I use and distribute to my
> friends. It is essentially Mandrake with 1)bugfixes/updates , 2)extra
> programs (many from cooker contribs), 3)mods to the /comps file 4)enhanced
> DOS and recovery utilities and 5)extra documantation. I immodestly call it
> MDB or "Mandrake Done Better"; there's always room for improvement.
> 
> Hoyt



RE: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Ian Douglas

> Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
> perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake?

If you have root access on the remote system to set it up, I'd recommend
Majordomo. Installation is pretty simple if you read the documentation and
instructions and if you set it up to do so, there is almost no maintenance
involved.

You can grab a copy from here: http://www.greatcircle.com/ and they have
their own mailing list about the software where lots of people (including
me) can help you out if you get stuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

---
Ian Douglas, Wild Web Services
http://www.wildwebservices.com
ph: 613-253-3147
fx: 613-253-1029
pager: http://wildwebservices.com/pager.html




[expert] SO51a backup -- works but only...

1999-12-01 Thread Benjamin Sher

Dear friends:

Again, my thanks to everyone who helped.

OK, here is the lowdown after an hour or so of playing around with SO's
backup feature.

First, I downloaded the 70 meg binary from Sun into my home directory,
then untarred it as a user and installed it as a user in my /home
partition (into  /home/sher/Office51). 

So51a will definitely do automatic backups of files (if "Always create
backup files" is checked in Options, General, Save.

HOWEVER, as I found out after successfully trying out Axalon's
suggestion, there is still a hitch and I wonder if any of you have this
problem:

Unlike WP8, where a backup is created automatically the first time you
save a file (and give it a name), this does not seem to be the case in
SO, at least not in my case. I first have to first save a file (giving
it a name), then I have to close it, come back and add a line or two,
then SAVE AS, not Save. Naturally, doing this once, when you first start
a file, is hardly worth mentioning. But you have to do it EVERY TIME.
That is, the only way I can get an automatic backup of a file is to SAVE
AS or else click on Close, then choose to save it (that is, overwrite
it). Apparently, unless SO sees the name it won't save the changes
created in the .bak file. I tried this with both the default path
directory for backup and my own.

I may be wrong about this, but I am certainly curious to know if your
experience has been any different.

Thank you all so much.

Benjamin


-- 
-- 
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net



Re: [expert] Kernel modules not modular kernels?

1999-12-01 Thread Steve Philp

Jason Antonacci wrote:
> 
> Is there any linux os flavor (or any os period) that allows the loading of multiple 
>kernels?  I remember a professor during an SMP discussion stating that a "low level 
>SMP kernel" can be used to load "higher OS kernels" onto individual processors.  This 
>type system would allow os redundancy on a single peice of hardware as well as 
>serices.  Another plus would be testing and evaluation on an identical platform.  
>Some of my associates have suggested Java, but I reject that outright because it is 
>not an OS.
> 

The big one that comes to mind is VMWare.  It will allow you to run a
wide variety of operating systems as user processes.

There is a user-space linux kernel floating around that will allow you
to run more "linux machines" as processes of the real, physical machine.

Beyond that, you're treading into the territory of mainframe
monsters...  I do remember reading that IBM has ported Linux as a
"virtual machine" to their 390 series and is now working on porting it
to act as the "main" operating system of the machine.

-- 
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Vincent Danen

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, John Aldrich wrote:

> Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
> perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake? My
> boss gave me the job of coming up with a package to do
> that.
> Also keep in mind that it will probably be remotely
> installed, configured and managed via ssh, so the easier
> the better! :-)

You can give Majordomo a try... although not very easy to setup
(traditionally) it's very powerful and is almost 100% perl-based.  If you
like, you can download the RPMS I made for myself at
http://tux.tzo.net/rpm.php3.  One of these days I'll tiddy them up and
submit them to contribs.

Vincent Danen, Freezer Burn web master: http://tux.tzo.net
ICQ: 54924721 . http://shx.tzo.net . telnet://shx.tzo.net
BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta . Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS

Check out the new Linux Information site at http://tux.tzo.net



Re: [expert] Pumping Up PPP

1999-12-01 Thread Tom Brinkman

   
> > The serial ports are character devices (unbuffered) under Linux.  I
> > don't know if there is any equivalent to the Windows setting or not.
> > 
> > I couldn't find anything about it in the setserial or pppd man
> > pages, so I'm guessing it does not apply.
> > 
> 
> That's a shame because it significantly improves performance. 
> I guess my "heavy" downloading will be done under MS Windows.

> Hoyt

That's the short answer, but I reckon the reason that a Windows
connection can be tweaked so much, is 'cause there's a hell'uva lot
more room for improvement to start with.

I've spent years tweaking Windows connections, even somewhat
successfully, and now I do my 'heavy' d/l'g with Linux  'cause
it's faster.

   You ought'a try d/l'g in Arkansas Hoyt, they're still tryin to
use tin cups and strings around here.

 --  take me back to Texas,
..  Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]  .




Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Derek Simkowiak

> Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
> perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake? My
> boss gave me the job of coming up with a package to do
> that.
> Also keep in mind that it will probably be remotely
> installed, configured and managed via ssh, so the easier
> the better! :-)

There is an O'Reilly book you'll want to buy, titled "Managing
Mailing Lists".  It's required reading, if you ask me.

Majordomo is perl based and very powerful.  It's also one of the
easier ones to configure.

When I first set up a mailing list, I thought it would be very
easy.  It turns out there are a lot of files you need to edit (and it's
all rather non-intuitive), because you need to configure Sendmail aliases
and config files and executables with appropriate permissions, yada yada.
At least that O'Reilly book will take you through it step by step.


--Derek




Re: [expert] NTP will not update!

1999-12-01 Thread William Ahern

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> Thanks to Ramon Gandia for his suggestions.
> 
> Reread the NTP FAQ and discovered that it can take up to 20 minutes to synch and 
>properly begin services.  I am stoopid :P.  Our network is all happily on proper time 
>now.  I am using NTP because our M$ NT 4.0 DHCP server supports the option. 
> Now all I have to do is find and deploy a win32 NTP client. 
if you have samba up on the NTP machine, try this on Windows:
`net time /set /yes \\[NTP machine]`

i have it run as a batch file in the startup folder.



Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Ronald J. Yacketta

John Aldrich wrote:
> 
> Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
> perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake? My
> boss gave me the job of coming up with a package to do
> that.
> Also keep in mind that it will probably be remotely
> installed, configured and managed via ssh, so the easier
> the better! :-)
> John
check out mailman it has a www interface and a built in archive (all www
based)



Re: [expert] question

1999-12-01 Thread Vincent Danen

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Lord And Master;) wrote:

> Is it possible to have windows 98 share drives using nfs instead of
> samba?

Yes, but you need a "pay" client in order to do it.  NFS servers exist for
WinNT, but Win98 only has NFS clients (well, I think there's *one* server
app for 98).  Best I've found is InterDrive by FTP Software.  Sorry, I
don't have a website for them but I'm sure you can find them doing a
search for NFS and Windows.

Vincent Danen, Freezer Burn web master: http://tux.tzo.net
ICQ: 54924721 . http://shx.tzo.net . telnet://shx.tzo.net
BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta . Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS

Check out the new Linux Information site at http://tux.tzo.net



[expert] FTP, chroot?

1999-12-01 Thread Ian Douglas

I've heard/read about using chroot to force an FTP user to only have access
to certain areas of the disk by making a subdirectory on the file system
their 'root' directory ('/').

However, I can't seem to find anywhere to do this. Can someone help me out?

Using Mandrake 6.0 and BeroFTPd 1.3.4.

---
Ian Douglas, Wild Web Services
http://www.wildwebservices.com
ph: 613-253-3147
fx: 613-253-1029
pager: http://wildwebservices.com/pager.html




Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Johnthat's not what I said, but you are correct.  There is no file
called rescue.img on my Mdk 6.0 CD or either of my Mdk 6.1 CD's. 
However on the Mdk 6.0 CD there is a sub called /images/rescue and in it
are the three "Tom's root boot" files (they are not named rescue.img).

Alan


John Aldrich wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> > Axhold it!  I don't think so!  You mean to tell me that both of my
> > 6.1 CD's are 'faulty'!  Two different CD's from two different sources!?
> > One is an official MandrakeSoft CD and the other is a LinuxMall CD and
> > neither one has an /images/rescue sub on it.  :-)
> >
> NEITHER of your disks has a /images directory with a file
> called "rescue.img"
> John



Re: [expert] NTP will not update!

1999-12-01 Thread Jason Antonacci

Thanks to Ramon Gandia for his suggestions.

Reread the NTP FAQ and discovered that it can take up to 20 minutes to synch and 
properly begin services.  I am stoopid :P.  Our network is all happily on proper time 
now.  I am using NTP because our M$ NT 4.0 DHCP server supports the option.  Now all I 
have to do is find and deploy a win32 NTP client. 

Jason S. Antonacci
Computer Support Specialist IV
Univ. of Georgia - Savannah River Ecology Lab

Office: 803.725.5984
Pager: 706.869.4043
Fax: 503.218.7129
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> "Jason Antonacci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29 Nov 99 17:17:57 >>>
I believe Network Time Protocol (NTP) only uses UDP port 123.  The utility ntptrace 
times out (ntp equivanet of traceroute).  SO, I open a tunnel from EXT to the NTP 
server for UDP 123, update the filters and it still times out.  What is the problem 
here?  The ntp.conf is the bare minimum directed to an open public server 
(tick.gatech.edu)

Jason S. Antonacci
Computer Support Specialist IV
Univ. of Georgia - Savannah River Ecology Lab

Office: 803.725.5984
Pager: 706.869.4043
Fax: 503.218.7129
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Re: [expert] Microsoft's "Vulnerability" ;-)

1999-12-01 Thread padlocke

AHHhhh Vaporware... I have many memories of my time with IBM and waiting for
all those promised OS/2 applications. (text book study in vaporware)

Many PS/1 machines had a pleathora of undocumented "features" Like for
instance... IBM Token Ring adapters won't work in your 486 PS/1. Much to the
surprise and merryment of many an administrator :)



On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999,  Sergio Korlowsky wrote:
> > Check this one... hehe
> > 
> > Microsoft has released a version upgrade that eliminates a vulnerability in
> > Microsoft(r) Internet Explorer 5. "A vulnerability in an optional component"
> > could allow a malicious user to gain additional privileges on a Windows NT
> > machine that allowed him or her to create or change files.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > How about that... a 'vulnerability is an "optional" component...
> > 
> > soon they are going to claim that a "Vulnerability" is an 'additional Feature'
> > 
> > in Winsucks products!  he he.. Sorry I couldn't resist!  ;-)
> 
> You guys should have been around in the late 70's and early
> 80's.  Those were the heyday of CP/M, Altairs and lots of
> S-100 computers14" drivesand 64K memory was a rich
> man's toy.
> 
> Back then, there were some pretty zany expressions out there.
> Lets take a Quiz:
> 
> 1. "That's not a bug, that's a FEATURE!"
> 
> 2. The dBASE-II ad with the rule bilge pump.  "Some
> databases...well...suck."
> 
> 3. "Vaporware" was coined.
> 
> 4. Jerry Pournelle was ranting about some new software
> or hardware product that was going to be released 
> "Real_Soon_Now! tm"  It WAS trademarked, and is now in
> the lexicon as RSNin the same context as Vaporware.
> 
> 5. The IBM PC at 4.77 mHz was soundly beat in computing
> speed by an Altair or any 2 mHz Z-80.  A good selling
> point is that it came with TWO 160K double sided floppy
> drives!  You could buy the XT with an incredible 5 MB
> hard drive, but nobody could figure out what you would
> need that vast amount of storage for!
> 
> 6. "The bill is $1,000.  $5 for the time it took to tap
> it with the screwdriver handleand $995 for knowing
> WHERE to tap it."  IBM circa 7040/7044 computers in 1960's.
> 
> Of course, when Microsoft came strong on the scene in
> 1992all rules were cast aside.  ANYTHING goes now.
> we have:  "Freedom to Innovate"  "Microsoft did not do
> anything wrong because it is the top selling and most
> wanted operating system...".  "I didn't say thatoh,
> this email? I don't remember it...".
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ramon Gandia = Sysadmin == Nook Net
> http://www.nook.net[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 285 West First Avenue tel. 907-443-7575
> P.O. Box 970  fax. 907-443-2487
> Nome, Alaska 99762-0970  Alaska Toll Free. 888-443-7525



RE: [expert] 2nd request: Vanishing Mouse Pointer in KDE

1999-12-01 Thread Jeff Groves

You may want to try using "synps2" as the mouse type.  This will make gpm 
use the Synaptics touchpad driver.

Run "gpm -t help" for a complete list of mouse types.  Also, the 
Laptop-HOWTO has information on how to configure your mouse.

I have a Compaq Prosignia 150 laptop with Mandrake 6.1 and the "synps2" 
setting works better than the standard "ps2".

I'm still having a little trouble getting the mouse acceleration set 
correctly, sometimes it jumps all over.

Jeff

At 11:11 AM 12/1/99 -0500, you wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Civileme [mailto:
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 4:16 PM
>
> > Just a note to let you know I saw your post.
> >
> > I am still trying to duplicate the behavior.  Anything else I
> > should know
> > about your install?  Did you format all partitions or just
> > some?  What sort of mouse?  What does the Pointer Device section of
> > /etc/X11/XF86Config say?
>Here's a bit more detail:
>Compaq Armada 1750 laptop (ATI Rage Pro LT graphics)
>BIOS set to support both internal (touchpad) and external PS/2 mice
>(simultaneously)
>Fresh install, 3 partitions (/boot, /, swap) all formatted during set-up
>running MACH64 Xserver
>XF86Config driver set to "PS/2" - device: have used /dev/mouse and
>/dev/psaux (but sym link is OK)
>Pointer vanishes regardless if I have the external mouse connected or not
>no difference between a session started via kdm or startx
>no log entries in /var/log pertaining to pointer issues
>no error output from X pertaining to pointer issues
>
>I recently installed a few of the RH 6.1 "PowerTools", but was experiencing
>the issue before that.  I've not really done much to the system after the
>initial 6.1 install other than a few updates (still on 2.2.13-7 kernel -
>will try to update today but have not been able to compile source)
>
>Thanx!
>Don



Re: [expert] Stoopid FTP Question

1999-12-01 Thread padlocke

mget usually works pretty well for multiple files.


On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> Sorry for this boneheaded query, but I can't figure this out and this list should be 
>the quickest answer::
> 
> ftp, interactive mode.  How the heck can I retrieve a whole directory structure?
> 
> I've tried many permutations with "get" to no avail, and the man page didn't really 
>help.
> 
> Thanks!
> Chad



Re: [expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread Steve Philp

John Aldrich wrote:
> 
> Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
> perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake? My
> boss gave me the job of coming up with a package to do
> that.
> Also keep in mind that it will probably be remotely
> installed, configured and managed via ssh, so the easier
> the better! :-)
> John

I've got ezmlm installed on the work server along with qmailadmin for a
web-based administration of the whole system (pop accounts, forwarding,
aliases, mailing lists, and auto-responders).  It's a pretty nice setup,
I must say.  

-- 
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] 2nd request: Vanishing Mouse Pointer in KDE

1999-12-01 Thread Steve Philp

"Vanco, Donald" wrote:
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Civileme [mailto:
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 4:16 PM
> 
> > Just a note to let you know I saw your post.
> >
> > I am still trying to duplicate the behavior.  Anything else I
> > should know
> > about your install?  Did you format all partitions or just
> > some?  What sort of mouse?  What does the Pointer Device section of
> > /etc/X11/XF86Config say?
> Here's a bit more detail:
> Compaq Armada 1750 laptop (ATI Rage Pro LT graphics)
> BIOS set to support both internal (touchpad) and external PS/2 mice
> (simultaneously)
> Fresh install, 3 partitions (/boot, /, swap) all formatted during set-up
> running MACH64 Xserver
> XF86Config driver set to "PS/2" - device: have used /dev/mouse and
> /dev/psaux (but sym link is OK)
> Pointer vanishes regardless if I have the external mouse connected or not
> no difference between a session started via kdm or startx
> no log entries in /var/log pertaining to pointer issues
> no error output from X pertaining to pointer issues
> 
> I recently installed a few of the RH 6.1 "PowerTools", but was experiencing
> the issue before that.  I've not really done much to the system after the
> initial 6.1 install other than a few updates (still on 2.2.13-7 kernel -
> will try to update today but have not been able to compile source)
> 
> Thanx!
> Don
> 
> > "Vanco, Donald" wrote:
> >
> > > I posted last week about my mouse pointer vanishing in KDE
> > when my screen
> > > goes into "suspend" mode.  Anyone have any clues or
> > experience anything
> > > similar?  Past installs of 6.1 have not done hits - only
> > this time! (fresh
> > > install after nuking RH 6.1)
> > > Any help appreciated.
> > > Thanx
> > > Don
> >

I don't have the manpage for the Mach64 X server handy, but you might
look into adding the sw_cursor option.  It's possible that one of the
sleep modes is disturbing the hardware cursor.

It's worth a shot, anyway... :)

-- 
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message -
From: Alan Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Rescue.img


> Derekit's on the 6.0 disc but is not on the 6.1 disc.  It's called
> 'tomsrtbt' (Toms root boot) and is in /images/rescue.  There are two
> versions, one for creating the floppy under dos and one for creating it
> under linux as well as a FAQ file.  If you don't have the 6.0 disc then
> here's the URL to get it from the author.  It's a really neat and
> powerful little distribution.
>
> http://www.toms.net/rb
>
Tomsrtbr is great. I only wish that there would be an image file on the CD
that can easily be used with rawrite or dd to make a floppy instead of the
floppy ceation program. It would seem to be easier (and take less space) and
I don't see any prohibition in the tomsrtbt copyright.Hint. Hint.

Also, creating the boot image from Peanut Linux at
http://metalab.unc.edu/peanut/ can be useful since it implements the
Midnight Commander file manager.

As Axalon pointed out, the CD itself can be used for recovery.

Another floppy distro that is handy is Airmid at
http://airmid.netpedia.net/. He designed it to overcome the usual Lilo boot
dilemmas and it _will_ boot the botched install and allow you to fix it.
(Lilo error message here:
http://www.croftj.net/~fawcett/Bootdisk-HOWTO/Bootdisk-HOWTO-3.5-12.html )

I'm doing a "rescue demo" at my LUG next week and will post my notes in
article form to their web site's sponsor  at  http://linuxforum.com/
sometime after that.

Hoyt



[expert] Kernel modules not modular kernels?

1999-12-01 Thread Jason Antonacci

Is there any linux os flavor (or any os period) that allows the loading of multiple 
kernels?  I remember a professor during an SMP discussion stating that a "low level 
SMP kernel" can be used to load "higher OS kernels" onto individual processors.  This 
type system would allow os redundancy on a single peice of hardware as well as 
serices.  Another plus would be testing and evaluation on an identical platform.  Some 
of my associates have suggested Java, but I reject that outright because it is not an 
OS.

Jason S. Antonacci
Computer Support Specialist IV
Univ. of Georgia - Savannah River Ecology Lab

Office: 803.725.5984
Pager: 706.869.4043
Fax: 503.218.7129
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] Pumping Up PPP

1999-12-01 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message - 
From: Derek Simkowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Pumping Up PPP


> 
> The serial ports are character devices (unbuffered) under Linux.  I
> don't know if there is any equivalent to the Windows setting or not.
> 
> I couldn't find anything about it in the setserial or pppd man
> pages, so I'm guessing it does not apply.
> 

That's a shame because it significantly improves performance. 
I guess my "heavy" downloading will be done under MS Windows.

Thanks.
And thanks also, Civileme.

Hoyt



Re: [expert] Web site (doubleblink)

1999-12-01 Thread Hoyt


- Original Message -
From: Alan Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Web site (doubleblink)


> CivilemeI don't think it's too suprising that the poll came out like
> that, after all, there have been two MacMillan distributions of
> Linux-Mandrake that both say "RedHat with enhancements" right on the
> box.  These boxed distributions can be found in many of the major
> discount stores in the USA and they are likely one of the major
> contributing factors for the phenominal growth of Linux-Mandrake over
> the past 6 to 8 months.
>

My LUG distributes Mandrake at local computer shows. We purchase the disks
from www.linuxcentral.com and mark them up just enough to cover our
distibution expenses,so they are very inexpensive. Yet we have trouble
marketing them as "Mandrake". RedHat has so much market awareness that it is
easier to say they are "RedHat on steroids" or "RedHat with improvements".
But the fact remains that RedHat compatability helps sell the disks. I look
at it this way: Elisha Grey and Alexander Graham Bell "invented" the
telephone, but my Nokia cell phone is certainly much better than theirs. I
see RedHat and Mandrake as being in a similar relationship: it's the same
idea, but done better.

BTW, I make a distro based on Mandrake that I use and distribute to my
friends. It is essentially Mandrake with 1)bugfixes/updates , 2)extra
programs (many from cooker contribs), 3)mods to the /comps file 4)enhanced
DOS and recovery utilities and 5)extra documantation. I immodestly call it
MDB or "Mandrake Done Better"; there's always room for improvement.

Hoyt



[expert] SO51a new install -- backup succeeds!

1999-12-01 Thread Benjamin Sher

Do this,
File->New->Text document

type blah

Dear Axalon:

You did it!

In StarOffice, as you suggested, I did the following:

File->close
yes to save, file name is blah, Ok

Now,
File-># (it's 1 if you've fresh install)
type "blah blah", so now you have three blahs

File->Close
yes to save

Now look in backup/
 
And blah.bak is there!!!

Question: Do I then first have to save the file, then reopen it and save
it again? Is that the standard way of creating a backup?

Anyway, that's the way it seems to work. I just changed the paths from
the default to /home/sher/docs for both save and backup. Works
perfectly. Saved a few lines under a name. Reopened added a few words.
Saved again. Bingo: the file and .bak appear next to each other. Here is
the data. Look for yoke.sdw and yoke.bak below:

[sher@adsl-77-232-87 sher]$ cd docs
[sher@adsl-77-232-87 docs]$ ls 
anna  extra inferno  linuxplays shklov~1  wentzell
ascii faina inferno.bak  marshak  poetrysvezhowizard
benjamin  fiction   inv  natasha  reviews   tech 
yahoo-edu.doc commerce  freeware  ladycat old  rus  
temp  yale data  friends   let-in   others   russmark 
vaginov   yoke.bak dostovgeneral   let-out  pdf  scholar  
websher   yoke.sdw [sher@adsl-77-232-87 docs]$


I guess this does make sense, after all. StarOffice cannot create an
automatic backup until the file has already been given a name. In WP8,
though, you can create a BK! file the first time you save a file. 

Just curious if this is the way StarOffice creates a backup for others.
Let me know, please. 

My thanks to Axalon and everyone else for helping me solve this
mysterious problem so I can finally get back to work and enjoy using
StarOffice.

Benjamin








Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net



Re: [expert] Gnumeric not working

1999-12-01 Thread Derek Simkowiak

> Which version of Gnumeric are you using? I installed October GNOME
> (which comes with GNUMERIC 0.38) and I do have file
> /usr/share/fonts/fontmap; it was created, I believe, by a post-install
> script. 

$ gnumeric -V
Gnome gnumeric 0.31

...it's whatever came with Mandrake 6.1.  I supposed I could try
re-installing the RPM...


--Derek

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Alexander Kirillov wrote:

> 
> Sasha
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 02:58:17PM -0800, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> >  When I try to run Gnumeric on Mandrake 6.1, I get:
> > 
> > 
> > [dereks@localhost 0409]$ gnumeric 
> > Cannot read file /home/dereks/.gnome/fonts/fontmap :
> > gzopen failed: No such file or directory
> > Cannot read file /usr/share/fonts/fontmap :
> > gzopen failed: No such file or directory
> > 
> > ** WARNING **: gnome_font_new_closest: font family Helvetica not found
> > 
> > Gnumeric failed to find a suitable default font.
> > 
> > Please verify your gnome-print installation and that your fontmap file
> > (typically located in /usr/local/share/fonts/fontmap) is not empty or
> > near empty.
> > 
> > If you still have no luck, please file a proper bug report (see
> > http://bugs.gnome.org) including the following extra items:
> > 
> > 1. Values of LC_ALL and LANG environment variables.
> > 2. Your fontmap file, see above.
> > 
> > Thanks -- the Gnumeric Team
> > 
> > 
> > Does anyone know how to fix this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Derek
> > 
> > 
> 



[expert] mailing list software?

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

Can someone recommend a good, easy to use (preferably
perl-based) mailing list package for RedHat/Mandrake? My
boss gave me the job of coming up with a package to do
that.
Also keep in mind that it will probably be remotely
installed, configured and managed via ssh, so the easier
the better! :-)
John



[expert] Vanishing Mouse Pointer resolved (but not fixed..)

1999-12-01 Thread Vanco, Donald

It appears that my vanishing mouse pointer is a bug in the MACH64 Xserver
(3.3.5) and the ATI RAGE LT Pro chipset.  After exchanging a few notes with
Civileme it dawned on me that past installs on this laptop have been
configured with the SVGA server - this time I used the MACH64.  Sure enough
- I went back to SVGA (using the C&T 6 chipset) and the mouse pointer is
here to stay.  
FWIW - the generic SVGA looks better than the MACH64 anyway!  
Did not look at top to see how the overhead has changed tho
(thanx Civileme!)

Cheers -
Don



Re: [expert] Cohabitation: RH 5.2 & M 6.1

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> Arrg!
> 
> Under RH 5.2 I tried that manually, with:
> 
> # mkfs /dev/sda7
> 
> and it put an ext2fs file system on the partition. I then tried:
> 
>  # mkfs -t swap /dev/sda7
> mkfs.swap: No such file or directory
> 
> So I don't think it will will work when I reboot to L-M.
> 
Try 'mkswap /dev/sda7' and see if that works... :-)
John



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Charles Curley

On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 01:43:05PM +, Nick Kay wrote:
-> 
-> >Well son of a, ok not my fault. I just double checked the iso on my ftp
-> >and your right. I have no clue how that happened. I don't have a 6.1 boxed
-> >set to check the other disks, I do know it was tight on space and they
-> >stuck a bunch of stuff elsewhere, I was pretty sure it was on the 6.1 beta
-> >but i can't seem to find that cd anywhere =( sorry ladies (and guys, yes
-> >ladies always first)
-> > 
-> 
-> Just for information, I looked all over my 6.1 boxed set. There
-> is no file called "rescue.img"  :(

I did not find it on my 6.1 CD. However, if you make an emergency boot
disk at installation time, supposedly you can use that as a rescue disk. I
say, "supposedly", because if you do, it asks for another floppy disk --
which is not made at the same time. Oops.

-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley



[expert] remove

1999-12-01 Thread Aaron Prayther

remove



RE: [expert] 2nd request: Vanishing Mouse Pointer in KDE

1999-12-01 Thread Vanco, Donald

> -Original Message-
> From: Civileme [mailto:   
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 4:16 PM

> Just a note to let you know I saw your post.
> 
> I am still trying to duplicate the behavior.  Anything else I 
> should know
> about your install?  Did you format all partitions or just 
> some?  What sort of mouse?  What does the Pointer Device section of 
> /etc/X11/XF86Config say?
Here's a bit more detail:
Compaq Armada 1750 laptop (ATI Rage Pro LT graphics)
BIOS set to support both internal (touchpad) and external PS/2 mice
(simultaneously)
Fresh install, 3 partitions (/boot, /, swap) all formatted during set-up
running MACH64 Xserver
XF86Config driver set to "PS/2" - device: have used /dev/mouse and
/dev/psaux (but sym link is OK)
Pointer vanishes regardless if I have the external mouse connected or not
no difference between a session started via kdm or startx
no log entries in /var/log pertaining to pointer issues
no error output from X pertaining to pointer issues

I recently installed a few of the RH 6.1 "PowerTools", but was experiencing
the issue before that.  I've not really done much to the system after the
initial 6.1 install other than a few updates (still on 2.2.13-7 kernel -
will try to update today but have not been able to compile source)

Thanx!
Don


> "Vanco, Donald" wrote:
> 
> > I posted last week about my mouse pointer vanishing in KDE 
> when my screen
> > goes into "suspend" mode.  Anyone have any clues or 
> experience anything
> > similar?  Past installs of 6.1 have not done hits - only 
> this time! (fresh
> > install after nuking RH 6.1)
> > Any help appreciated.
> > Thanx
> > Don
> 



Re: [expert] Cohabitation: RH 5.2 & M 6.1

1999-12-01 Thread Civileme

Charles Curley wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 07:51:52PM -0700, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> -> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Charles Curley wrote:
> ->
> -> > I have been running Red Hat 5.2 for over a year now. I have just put
> -> > Mandrake 6.1 on the same system. However, RH 6.0 was a disaster, so this
> -> > time I took things carefully: I installed M 6.1 in its own boot and root
> -> > partions. BUT I have them both sharing the same swap space. That may have
> -> > been an error. I get this error message from dmesg, and no swap partition.
> ->
> -> Um, you've forgotten to send the error?
>
> Oops, mea culpa!
>
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> Unable to find swap-space signature
> Unable to find swap-space signature
> sysctl: ip forwarding off
>
> ->
> -> > 1) Is there any way to allow the two installations to share the same swap
> -> > space?
> -> >
> -> > 2) Failing that, is there anything short of re-installing with a new swap
> -> > partition I can do? Such as: back up the Mandrake root and boot
> -> > partitions, twiddle the partitions, restore the partitions, re-run LILO?
> -> >
> -> > Thank you.
> ->
> ->
> ->  Worst comes to worst you can fiddle with the rc.sysinit and have it
> -> reformat the swap on each boot, but i wasn't aware the format changed.
>
> Arrg!
>
> Under RH 5.2 I tried that manually, with:
>
> # mkfs /dev/sda7
>
> and it put an ext2fs file system on the partition. I then tried:
>
>  # mkfs -t swap /dev/sda7
> mkfs.swap: No such file or directory
>
> So I don't think it will will work when I reboot to L-M.
>
> --
>
> -- C^2
>
> No windows were crashed in the making of this email.
>
> Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
> http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley

Try

mkswap /dev/sda7

Civileme




Re: [expert] Stoopid FTP Question

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 02:47:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -> Sorry for this boneheaded query, but I can't figure this out and this list should 
>be the quickest answer::
> -> 
> -> ftp, interactive mode.  How the heck can I retrieve a whole directory structure?
> -> 
> -> I've tried many permutations with "get" to no avail, and the man page didn't 
>really help.
> -> 
> -> Thanks!
> -> Chad
> 
> There is no way to get an entire directory structure with recursive
> descent with standard FTP.
> 
> In standard FTP, "mget"  gets a directory at a time. You may
> want to turn prompting off with "prompt".
> 
> Better, use ncftp, and don't worry about "prompt".
> 
> You might look at sitecopy, which will do what you want, although it isn't
> intended for it. :-)
> 
Or rsync which IS intended for that purpose. :-) Rsync
comes pre-installed in RH 6.0. I'm assuming it's installed
in Mandrake as well.
John



Re: [expert] Mandrake, Corel and co..

1999-12-01 Thread David van Balen


it would be interesting if Red Hat bought Corel as is rumored...


DvB



On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Denis Havlik wrote:

> Hi, everybody.
> 
> I thought this might interest You - i have just posted this story on
> LinuxPR and Slashdot (no idea if they are going to accept it. Sorry for
> the html:
> ++
> 
> http://www.linux-mandrake.com">Mandrake, a distribution
> rather similar to http://www.redhat.com">Red Hat, but
> explicitely targeted at home-users has been a subject of many Press
> releases, including those talking about "best selling distribution" during
> the last six months. 
> However, as usuall in the Linux universe, it is
> allmost impossible to find out what is a real impact of the Mandrake
> compared to other distributions. 
> 
> One of the rare places which tries to follow the world-wide development
> of the linux-use is the http://www.linuxcounter.org">Linux
> counter, a non-profit organisation dedicated to counting the linux
> users, and gathering of the general Linux-related statistics. While this
> info certainly lacks accuracy (registering is voluntaryly and less than 1%
> of users actually register), it is the best freely
> available statistics on linux usage. 
> Among other things, Linux-counter offers the info on  href="http://www.linuxcounter.org/reports/machines.html">spread of the
> Linux-distributions. Abouth a month ago, I started to follow the
> growth of the "Mandrake" distribution - at that time, ca. 1.7% of the
> registred machines were running the Mandrake. This is obviously not really
> impressive, but still this has made the Mandrake into sixt-strongest
> distribution following the Slackware (historical reasons), RedHat, Debian,
> Suse and DIY. No other distribution exceedes 1% of the registred base.
> In the meantime, however, Mandrake had the second-fastest absolute growth
> (approximately 1/2 of the Red-hats growth), and by far the largest
> "relative growth" of all the distributions. 
> 
> In only one month, the number of registred "Mandrake" machines grew by 27%
> - for comparison, number of Red-Hat machines grew by only 3%! Obviously,
> Mandrake-s model of "simple to use" Linux has been very successfull and
> has a very strongly growing userbase. If Mandrake succeedes in sustaining
> the current growth rates for the next six months, it will become a very
> powerfull "player" among the Linux distributions. 
> 
> 
> Because of the Corel-hypo, I just took a look at Corels userbase - it is
> currently non-existing, but i suppose it is growing rather fast, too. 
> 
> I am not sure if their growth is sustaineable, though - from what I hear
> the distribution is rather crappy and they still do not understand the
> Open-Source developement model. In particular they have completely
> pissed-off the KDE-developers and debian-people aren't really happy
> either.
> 
> In case someone is interested in numbers, here it is, for all the
> distributions with more than 0.1% of the registred machines:
> 
> 66876 values
> 
>   535 0.80% distribution:Caldera
>  1514 2.27% distribution:DIY
>   115 0.17% distribution:DLD 
> 
> # OK, this is all debian, so kill me.
> 12884 19.32% distribution:Debian
>  2340 3.51% distribution:Debian ==DEBIAN-VERSION==
>   111 0.17% distribution:Debian potato
> 
>   162 0.24% distribution:LinuxPPC
>  1287 1.93% distribution:Mandrake
>   595 0.89% distribution:Other  (registrands choice)
> 19417 29.12% distribution:Red Hat
>  4249 6.37% distribution:S.u.S.E
>   415 0.62% distribution:SLS 
> 20605 30.90% distribution:Slackware
>68 0.10% distribution:Yggrdrasil
>  2579   3.87% distribution:Others (sum of smaller distros with less than 
>   0.1% users)  
> 
> cu
>   Denis
> 
> 



[expert] Advanced Extranet Server

1999-12-01 Thread Timothy Litwiller

I noticed that the files haven't changed for a little while. Is now a
good time to redownload and set this up?



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread John Aldrich

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> Axhold it!  I don't think so!  You mean to tell me that both of my
> 6.1 CD's are 'faulty'!  Two different CD's from two different sources!? 
> One is an official MandrakeSoft CD and the other is a LinuxMall CD and
> neither one has an /images/rescue sub on it.  :-)
> 
NEITHER of your disks has a /images directory with a file
called "rescue.img"
John



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Nickrescue.img is not the name of the file.  On the Mdk 6.0 distro
there is a sub called /images/rescue/ and in that sub are three files:

tomsrtbt-1.7.134.dos.zip (create the floppy in a dos environment)
tomsrtbt-1.7.134.tar.gz  (create the floppy in a linux environment)
tomsrtbt.FAQ

If you don't have the Mdk 6.0 disc you can get tomsrtbt here:

http://www.toms.net/rb

Alan


Nick Kay wrote:
> 
> >Well son of a, ok not my fault. I just double checked the iso on my ftp
> >and your right. I have no clue how that happened. I don't have a 6.1 boxed
> >set to check the other disks, I do know it was tight on space and they
> >stuck a bunch of stuff elsewhere, I was pretty sure it was on the 6.1 beta
> >but i can't seem to find that cd anywhere =( sorry ladies (and guys, yes
> >ladies always first)
> >
> 
> Just for information, I looked all over my 6.1 boxed set. There
> is no file called ""  :(
> 
> cheers all
> nick@nexnix



Re: [expert] System Temporarily Freezing

1999-12-01 Thread William Ahern

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Civileme wrote:
> 
> > William Ahern wrote:
> > 
> > > We have a box serving as a router/ipmasq, smb/cifs server, webserver,
> > > sql server, and email and dns host. this box has two nic's, one w/
> > > a private address, the other with a public. every once in awhile
> > > nothing can be accessed via the private address and/or the public address.
> > > when this happens, i can't telnet to the private address (it just hangs), but
> > > i can to the public. ipmasq continues to work (all the pc's have private
> > > addresses and can access the internet fine), but nobody can send or receive
> > > email internally (externally 'netstat' shows incoming connections fine, when
> > > netstat doesn't freeze). Also, when this occurs i usually cannot get netstat or
> > > ipchains to list anything; they usually both hang.
> 
> Also make sure your useing the "-n" parm on both of those
yep. netstat -n. i do an nslookup from outside our network and everythiing
resolves fine, too.



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Tomexactly!  So does my LinuxMall Mdk 6.0, but not either of my MDk
6.1 CD's (Official Mandrake & Linux Mall).  I don't think that they're
"faulty", I think that the /images/rescue sub was left off of the 6.1
distro (maybe by oversight).

Alan



Tom Brinkman wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> > Axhold it!  I don't think so!  You mean to tell me that both of my
> > 6.1 CD's are 'faulty'!  Two different CD's from two different sources!?
> > One is an official MandrakeSoft CD and the other is a LinuxMall CD and
> > neither one has an /images/rescue sub on it.  :-)
> >
> > Alan
> 
> I've got a CheapBytes Mdk 6.0 CD and it has /images/rescue. The
> 'little distribution' in /rescue is 'tomsrbdt' aka, "The most Linux
> on one floppy disk"
> --
> ..  Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]  .
> 
> 
> >
> > Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > >
> > > > > On the Mandrake 6.x CD there is a little distribuition that can stay
> > > > > on a single floppy. Usually I use that little floppy.
> > > >
> > > >   What are you referring to here?  I do not see any such
> > > > distribution (with the exception of boot.img, bootnet.img, and pcmcia.img
> > > > in the CDROM/images directory).
> > > >
> > > > --Derek
> > >
> > > if you don't have a images/rescue/, you have a faulty disk.
> > >
> > > --
> > > MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
> > > --Axalon
>



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Nick Kay wrote:
> 
> >Well son of a, ok not my fault. I just double checked the iso on my ftp
> >and your right. I have no clue how that happened. I don't have a 6.1 boxed
> >set to check the other disks, I do know it was tight on space and they
> >stuck a bunch of stuff elsewhere, I was pretty sure it was on the 6.1 beta
> >but i can't seem to find that cd anywhere =( sorry ladies (and guys, yes
> >ladies always first)
> > 
> 
> Just for information, I looked all over my 6.1 boxed set. There
> is no file called "rescue.img"  :(
> 
> cheers all
> nick@nexnix

And we're right back where the thread began 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



RE: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone


Yep definatly completed a full circle on this one :)

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, webmedic wrote:
> Another good boot disk is the one inluded with peanut linux. It includes
> midnight commander.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote:
> > 
> > > A friend of mine has RH 6.1, it does not have rescue.img on it either. And
> > > since Mandrake is derived from RH perhaps this is why.
> > 
> > No that is not why, it was simply moved and forgotten. redhats rescue.img
> > sucks big time, tomsrtbt has easy double the apps
> 
> 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [expert] Cohabitation: RH 5.2 & M 6.1

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Charles Curley wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 07:51:52PM -0700, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> -> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Charles Curley wrote:
> -> 
> -> > I have been running Red Hat 5.2 for over a year now. I have just put
> -> > Mandrake 6.1 on the same system. However, RH 6.0 was a disaster, so this
> -> > time I took things carefully: I installed M 6.1 in its own boot and root
> -> > partions. BUT I have them both sharing the same swap space. That may have
> -> > been an error. I get this error message from dmesg, and no swap partition.
> -> 
> -> Um, you've forgotten to send the error?
> 
> Oops, mea culpa!
> 
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> Unable to find swap-space signature
> Unable to find swap-space signature
> sysctl: ip forwarding off
> 
> 
> 
> ->  
> -> > 1) Is there any way to allow the two installations to share the same swap
> -> > space?
> -> > 
> -> > 2) Failing that, is there anything short of re-installing with a new swap
> -> > partition I can do? Such as: back up the Mandrake root and boot
> -> > partitions, twiddle the partitions, restore the partitions, re-run LILO?
> -> > 
> -> > Thank you.
> -> 
> ->  
> ->  Worst comes to worst you can fiddle with the rc.sysinit and have it
> -> reformat the swap on each boot, but i wasn't aware the format changed.
> 
> Arrg!
> 
> Under RH 5.2 I tried that manually, with:
> 
> # mkfs /dev/sda7
> 
> and it put an ext2fs file system on the partition. I then tried:
> 
>  # mkfs -t swap /dev/sda7
> mkfs.swap: No such file or directory
> 
> So I don't think it will will work when I reboot to L-M.
 
 Should be 
mkswap /dev/sda7 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [expert] Gnumeric not working

1999-12-01 Thread Alexander Kirillov

Which version of Gnumeric are you using? I installed October GNOME
(which comes with GNUMERIC 0.38) and I do have file
/usr/share/fonts/fontmap; it was created, I believe, by a post-install
script. 

Sasha



On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 02:58:17PM -0800, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
>  When I try to run Gnumeric on Mandrake 6.1, I get:
> 
> 
> [dereks@localhost 0409]$ gnumeric 
> Cannot read file /home/dereks/.gnome/fonts/fontmap :
> gzopen failed: No such file or directory
> Cannot read file /usr/share/fonts/fontmap :
> gzopen failed: No such file or directory
> 
> ** WARNING **: gnome_font_new_closest: font family Helvetica not found
> 
> Gnumeric failed to find a suitable default font.
> 
> Please verify your gnome-print installation and that your fontmap file
> (typically located in /usr/local/share/fonts/fontmap) is not empty or
> near empty.
> 
> If you still have no luck, please file a proper bug report (see
> http://bugs.gnome.org) including the following extra items:
> 
> 1. Values of LC_ALL and LANG environment variables.
> 2. Your fontmap file, see above.
> 
> Thanks -- the Gnumeric Team
> 
> 
>   Does anyone know how to fix this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Derek
> 
> 



RE: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread webmedic

Another good boot disk is the one inluded with peanut linux. It includes
midnight commander.


On Wed, 01 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote:
> 
> > A friend of mine has RH 6.1, it does not have rescue.img on it either. And
> > since Mandrake is derived from RH perhaps this is why.
> 
> No that is not why, it was simply moved and forgotten. redhats rescue.img
> sucks big time, tomsrtbt has easy double the apps

-- 
He must increase but I must decrease---

Holliness unto the Lord
Name:   Brook Humphrey
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webmaster:  thelinuxstop.com
webmester:  webmedic.net
Owner:  Mobile PC Medic



Re: [expert] Cohabitation: RH 5.2 & M 6.1

1999-12-01 Thread Charles Curley

On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 07:51:52PM -0700, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
-> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Charles Curley wrote:
-> 
-> > I have been running Red Hat 5.2 for over a year now. I have just put
-> > Mandrake 6.1 on the same system. However, RH 6.0 was a disaster, so this
-> > time I took things carefully: I installed M 6.1 in its own boot and root
-> > partions. BUT I have them both sharing the same swap space. That may have
-> > been an error. I get this error message from dmesg, and no swap partition.
-> 
-> Um, you've forgotten to send the error?

Oops, mea culpa!

VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
Unable to find swap-space signature
Unable to find swap-space signature
sysctl: ip forwarding off



->  
-> > 1) Is there any way to allow the two installations to share the same swap
-> > space?
-> > 
-> > 2) Failing that, is there anything short of re-installing with a new swap
-> > partition I can do? Such as: back up the Mandrake root and boot
-> > partitions, twiddle the partitions, restore the partitions, re-run LILO?
-> > 
-> > Thank you.
-> 
->  
->  Worst comes to worst you can fiddle with the rc.sysinit and have it
-> reformat the swap on each boot, but i wasn't aware the format changed.

Arrg!

Under RH 5.2 I tried that manually, with:

# mkfs /dev/sda7

and it put an ext2fs file system on the partition. I then tried:

 # mkfs -t swap /dev/sda7
mkfs.swap: No such file or directory

So I don't think it will will work when I reboot to L-M.


-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley



Re: [expert] question

1999-12-01 Thread Charles Curley

On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 09:07:36PM +, Civileme wrote:
-> "Lord And Master;)" wrote:
-> 
-> > Is it possible to have windows 98 share drives using nfs instead of
-> > samba?
-> 
-> Short Answer:  NO
-> 
-> Longer Answer :NO!
-> 
-> Reasoned Answer:  Samba was created mostly by Andrew Tridgell from some
-> work he did to make DOS use some unix files, sometime in ancient
-> history.  Of course, the contributors list is much longer now! It's
-> stated purpose is not only to make UNIX and Windows play nice but also
-> to SHARE.  Without this protocol translator known as Samba, they don't
-> share.  Note that the approach taken is that as Windows does its 800 lb
-> gorilla act, Samba reverse engineers to stay compatible.
-> 
-> It should actually be possible to write a program for 98 to use nfs.  If
-> you can get me the Windows source code, I'll be happy to undertake the
-> task :-).Or Microsoft could write some extension to Win9x and WinNT
-> to do so, but they don't.

I'm not convinced. :-)

There are NFS clients and servers for NT, although I have never used
any. Since W98 is even less secure than NT, it should be possible to write
one.

As with NT, the major problem would be in the status bit
translation. Windows and Unix status bits simply do not map easily to each
other.

If such a beastie does exist, I would still advise you to use Samba anyway.

-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Nick Kay


>Well son of a, ok not my fault. I just double checked the iso on my ftp
>and your right. I have no clue how that happened. I don't have a 6.1 boxed
>set to check the other disks, I do know it was tight on space and they
>stuck a bunch of stuff elsewhere, I was pretty sure it was on the 6.1 beta
>but i can't seem to find that cd anywhere =( sorry ladies (and guys, yes
>ladies always first)
> 

Just for information, I looked all over my 6.1 boxed set. There
is no file called "rescue.img"  :(

cheers all
nick@nexnix



RE: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote:

> A friend of mine has RH 6.1, it does not have rescue.img on it either. And
> since Mandrake is derived from RH perhaps this is why.

No that is not why, it was simply moved and forgotten. redhats rescue.img
sucks big time, tomsrtbt has easy double the apps
 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ramon Gandia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 2:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] Rescue.img
> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999,  Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> > 
> > if you don't have a images/rescue/, you have a faulty disk. 
> 
> Well, I don't have it on mine either.  Its the Mandrake
> PowerPack.  My guess is, you intended for it to be on
> 6.1 but it didn't make it to the CD pressing.
> 
> 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



RE: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS

A friend of mine has RH 6.1, it does not have rescue.img on it either. And
since Mandrake is derived from RH perhaps this is why.

-Original Message-
From: Ramon Gandia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 2:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Rescue.img


On Tue, 30 Nov 1999,  Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> 
> if you don't have a images/rescue/, you have a faulty disk. 

Well, I don't have it on mine either.  Its the Mandrake
PowerPack.  My guess is, you intended for it to be on
6.1 but it didn't make it to the CD pressing.

-- 
Ramon Gandia = Sysadmin == Nook Net
http://www.nook.net[EMAIL PROTECTED]
285 West First Avenue tel. 907-443-7575
P.O. Box 970  fax. 907-443-2487
Nome, Alaska 99762-0970  Alaska Toll Free. 888-443-7525



RE: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS

These are the only images on my Mandrake 6.0-2 CD as well. boot, bootnet,
and pcmcia. img's



> On the Mandrake 6.x CD there is a little distribuition that can stay
> on a single floppy. Usually I use that little floppy.

What are you referring to here?  I do not see any such
distribution (with the exception of boot.img, bootnet.img, and pcmcia.img
in the CDROM/images directory).

--Derek



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> Axhold it!  I don't think so!  You mean to tell me that both of my
> 6.1 CD's are 'faulty'!  Two different CD's from two different sources!? 
> One is an official MandrakeSoft CD and the other is a LinuxMall CD and
> neither one has an /images/rescue sub on it.  :-)
> 
> Alan


I've got a CheapBytes Mdk 6.0 CD and it has /images/rescue. The
'little distribution' in /rescue is 'tomsrbdt' aka, "The most Linux 
on one floppy disk" 
-- 
..  Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]  .


> 
> Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > 
> > > > On the Mandrake 6.x CD there is a little distribuition that can stay
> > > > on a single floppy. Usually I use that little floppy.
> > >
> > >   What are you referring to here?  I do not see any such
> > > distribution (with the exception of boot.img, bootnet.img, and pcmcia.img
> > > in the CDROM/images directory).
> > >
> > > --Derek
> > 
> > if you don't have a images/rescue/, you have a faulty disk.
> > 
> > --
> > MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
> > --Axalon




[expert] Mandrake, Corel and co..

1999-12-01 Thread Denis Havlik

Hi, everybody.

I thought this might interest You - i have just posted this story on
LinuxPR and Slashdot (no idea if they are going to accept it. Sorry for
the html:
++

http://www.linux-mandrake.com">Mandrake, a distribution
rather similar to http://www.redhat.com">Red Hat, but
explicitely targeted at home-users has been a subject of many Press
releases, including those talking about "best selling distribution" during
the last six months. 
However, as usuall in the Linux universe, it is
allmost impossible to find out what is a real impact of the Mandrake
compared to other distributions. 

One of the rare places which tries to follow the world-wide development
of the linux-use is the http://www.linuxcounter.org">Linux
counter, a non-profit organisation dedicated to counting the linux
users, and gathering of the general Linux-related statistics. While this
info certainly lacks accuracy (registering is voluntaryly and less than 1%
of users actually register), it is the best freely
available statistics on linux usage. 
Among other things, Linux-counter offers the info on http://www.linuxcounter.org/reports/machines.html">spread of the
Linux-distributions. Abouth a month ago, I started to follow the
growth of the "Mandrake" distribution - at that time, ca. 1.7% of the
registred machines were running the Mandrake. This is obviously not really
impressive, but still this has made the Mandrake into sixt-strongest
distribution following the Slackware (historical reasons), RedHat, Debian,
Suse and DIY. No other distribution exceedes 1% of the registred base.
In the meantime, however, Mandrake had the second-fastest absolute growth
(approximately 1/2 of the Red-hats growth), and by far the largest
"relative growth" of all the distributions. 

In only one month, the number of registred "Mandrake" machines grew by 27%
- for comparison, number of Red-Hat machines grew by only 3%! Obviously,
Mandrake-s model of "simple to use" Linux has been very successfull and
has a very strongly growing userbase. If Mandrake succeedes in sustaining
the current growth rates for the next six months, it will become a very
powerfull "player" among the Linux distributions. 


Because of the Corel-hypo, I just took a look at Corels userbase - it is
currently non-existing, but i suppose it is growing rather fast, too. 

I am not sure if their growth is sustaineable, though - from what I hear
the distribution is rather crappy and they still do not understand the
Open-Source developement model. In particular they have completely
pissed-off the KDE-developers and debian-people aren't really happy
either.

In case someone is interested in numbers, here it is, for all the
distributions with more than 0.1% of the registred machines:

66876 values

  535 0.80% distribution:Caldera
 1514 2.27% distribution:DIY
  115 0.17% distribution:DLD 

# OK, this is all debian, so kill me.
12884 19.32% distribution:Debian
 2340 3.51% distribution:Debian ==DEBIAN-VERSION==
  111 0.17% distribution:Debian potato

  162 0.24% distribution:LinuxPPC
 1287 1.93% distribution:Mandrake
  595 0.89% distribution:Other  (registrands choice)
19417 29.12% distribution:Red Hat
 4249 6.37% distribution:S.u.S.E
  415 0.62% distribution:SLS 
20605 30.90% distribution:Slackware
   68 0.10% distribution:Yggrdrasil
 2579   3.87% distribution:Others (sum of smaller distros with less than 
0.1% users)  

cu
Denis



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, ibi wrote:

> I guess it's a good thing then that I picked Mandrake 6.0 tonight for if
> I hadn't made the rescue disk I would never have been able to access it.
> :-)  
> 
> Pj
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nah, the cdrom it's self makes a pretty handy rescue disk (howto in one of
the archives, i'm sure) 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [expert] SO51a new install -- backup still fails!

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Benjamin Sher wrote:

> Dear friends:
> 
> Realizing, after what Axalon said, that perhaps I had messed up my
> permissions in StarOffice for good, I decided to download a completely
> new copy of SO51a from Sun. Before doing anything, I first deinstalled
> SO through SOSetup, then deleted every trace of my old SO, including
> Office51, the old binary and the .sversionrc file in my /home/sher
> directory.
> 
> I then downloaded the new SO51a into my /home partition, specifically,
> into /home/sher, then moved it into /home/sher/SO:
> I then untarred so51a as USER in this same directory:
> 
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 sher]$ cd SO
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 SO]$ ls
> so51a_lnx_01.tar  so51inst
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 SO]$ ls -la
> total 69020
> drwxr-xr-x3 sher sher 1024 Nov 30 22:36 .
> drwxr-x---   29 sher sher 2048 Nov 30 22:51 ..
> -rw-rw-r--1 sher sher 70393856 Nov 30 22:28 so51a_lnx_01.tar
> drwxrwxr-x4 sher sher 1024 Aug 24 07:07 so51inst
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 SO]$   
> 
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 SO]$ cd so51inst
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 so51inst]$ ls
> documentation  office51
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 so51inst]$ ls -la
> total 11
> drwxrwxr-x4 sher sher 1024 Aug 24 07:07 .
> drwxr-xr-x3 sher sher 1024 Nov 30 22:36 ..
> drwxrwxr-x2 sher sher 1024 May 11  1999 documentation
> drwxrwxr-x2 sher sher 8192 Aug 24 06:44 office51
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 so51inst]$ cd office51
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 office51]$   
> 
> Below are the last files from office51 that relate to the setup. All of
> the files in office51 have the same permissions.
> 
> -rw-rw-r--1 sher sher  681 Aug 24 05:44 f_98_1
> -rw-rw-r--1 sher sher81867 Aug 20 03:25 f_99_1
> -rw-rw-r--1 sher sher  1279166 Aug 23 06:52 f_9_1
> -rwxrwxr-x1 sher sher86960 Aug 11 06:49 setup
> -rw-rw-r--1 sher sher   275547 Aug 24 06:40 setup.ins
> -rw-rw-r--1 sher sher  7040582 Aug 24 06:44 setup.zip
> [sher@adsl-77-232-144 office51]$ 
> 
> 
> I then installed Office51 into my /home/sher/Office51 directory as
> prompted by SO.
> 
> I then opened StarOffice and checked "Always create backup file" in
> Options, General, Save. 
> 
> No problem saving whatsoever. No error messages. But no backup either.
> Not by using SO's default directory for backups or my own
> /home/sher/docs. I can save into either directory but cannot create an
> automatic backup.
> 
> Anyone have any idea what's holding things up? Why can I save but not
> backup?


Do this,
File->New->Text document

type blah

File->close
yes to save, file name is blah, Ok

Now,
File-># (it's 1 if you've fresh install)
type "blah blah", so now you have three blahs

File->Close
yes to save

Now look in backup/
 
> Thanks so very much to everyone.
> 
> Benjamin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Alan Shoemaker wrote:

> Axhold it!  I don't think so!  You mean to tell me that both of my
> 6.1 CD's are 'faulty'!  Two different CD's from two different sources!? 
> One is an official MandrakeSoft CD and the other is a LinuxMall CD and
> neither one has an /images/rescue sub on it.  :-)
> 
> Alan

Well son of a, ok not my fault. I just double checked the iso on my ftp
and your right. I have no clue how that happened. I don't have a 6.1 boxed
set to check the other disks, I do know it was tight on space and they
stuck a bunch of stuff elsewhere, I was pretty sure it was on the 6.1 beta
but i can't seem to find that cd anywhere =( sorry ladies (and guys, yes
ladies always first)
 
> Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > 
> > > > On the Mandrake 6.x CD there is a little distribuition that can stay
> > > > on a single floppy. Usually I use that little floppy.
> > >
> > >   What are you referring to here?  I do not see any such
> > > distribution (with the exception of boot.img, bootnet.img, and pcmcia.img
> > > in the CDROM/images directory).
> > >
> > > --Derek
> > 
> > if you don't have a images/rescue/, you have a faulty disk.

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [expert] Stoopid FTP Question

1999-12-01 Thread Denis Havlik

:>In standard FTP, "mget"  gets a directory at a time. You may
:>want to turn prompting off with "prompt".
:>
:>Better, use ncftp, and don't worry about "prompt".
:>
:>You might look at sitecopy, which will do what you want, although it isn't
:>intended for it. :-)

Or "wget" which is intended for it.

cu
Denis



[expert] answer and a new question

1999-12-01 Thread Denis Havlik

:>> Is it possible to have windows 98 share drives using nfs instead of
:>> samba?
:>
:>Short Answer:  NO
:>
:>Longer Answer :NO!
:>

Both answers are wrong AFAIK. Right answer is YES and NO. 
However, I am not sure if I am really going to recomend it. 

- Vanilla windows cannot do it.

- However, (AFAIR) Reflection comes with a tool for mounting NFS
directories, and using "lpd" printers. I am not sure if there
are any other tools and how much would it cost.

I am also not sure how does the NFS-mounting on windows machine reflect
the user-ID structure in UNIX machine. It is probably not particulary
sensible to allow windoze machines to use NFS-mounts at all, unless you
really have a FULL controle over them. 

With all the due respect towards NFS (i use it all the time), it is
inherently extremely insecure - anyone with a root password (or DOS
machine) who is allowed to access the shares can access anyones data -
all he needs is to install a user with appropriate user ID, su to this
user and voila! The damn bloated SMB-protocol at least wants to have a
user-password for every share...

Saying this, I have some questions myself 

- anyone knows how to allow users to use "smbmount?". Last time I tried,
only root could use it. 
- Can automounter (amd or autofs) be tweaked on mounting smb-shares on
request?
- Is there some way to let "smbmount" mount some dirs on boot, whithouth
having to write the unencripted (smb) password in "rc.local"?

cu
Denis

---
Denis Havlik  |||   http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
 (@ @)  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-oOO--(_)--OOo-



Re: [expert] Rescue.img

1999-12-01 Thread ibi

I guess it's a good thing then that I picked Mandrake 6.0 tonight for if
I hadn't made the rescue disk I would never have been able to access it.
:-)  

Pj
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [expert] SO51a Save/backup -- Solved! (mostly)

1999-12-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Steve Philp wrote:

> Bug Hunter wrote:
[..]
> >   DOS and Wind*ws and Mac applications and OS tends to hold peoples hands,
> > making it more difficult (not impossible) to screw up an installation to
> > the point a single user can't use it.  Mind you I'm not talking about
> > security.
> 
> You must not be talking about a user that installs applications into
> those environments either.  Seriously, Windows won't let a user screw it
> up?  Ha ha.  And that sentiment goes for security issues as well.  

You own the worlds must customizable (prove me wrong or stfu.) operating
system and your gonna complain about this? In less than a day (i'm being
generous) you can lock down a mandrake(virtualy any linux, for that
matter) system, so as the only way damage can be caused (without a hammer)
is unpluging it. Look at the cobalt cubes, or any of the other similar
systems. Now compare any of those to our friend (Not!) the dreamcast, that
bloody thing locks up more often than my K6 when i turn on it's
non-exsistant external cache in the bios, and it only has a gamepad for an
interface and no (persay) storage space. 

[...]
> >   However, only 5 to 10 percent of the world can handle a computer with
> > any reasonable certainty of success.  The other 90 to 95 percent need an
> > appliance, but think they want a computer.  To get linux into their hands,
> > it needs to be more like an appliance.  And that includes application
> > installs.
> 
> No, it just means that the personal computer is the wrong solution. 
> Take WebTV, as an example.  Need to send email and do occasional web
> surfing?  Why bother with the maintenance and cost of a PC when you can
> have a bulletproof box for $200 and never have to worry about it.

Double that and get that snazzy Phillips digital recorder that they are
spewing in the late night infomercials ;) (no really i don't like gadgets,
and somebody owes me one of these boxes for endorcing them)
 
> Keep in mind, however, that appliances like WebTV don't exclude Linux. 
> They simply hide the complexity for the given task.

The linux equivilant isn't very far off

> >   As much as I hate to admit it, Corel might be on the right path.  They
> > don't have it right yet, but they are heading the right direction.
> 
> For a specific market, yes.  Whether it's a significant market will
> remain to be seen.
 
*sigh* Still haven't seen it, you guys have all the fun


--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon