[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
Despite a few liberal attitudes on some issues, i'm sure my posts have shown that I lean to the right and consider most problems in this country to be the result of personal irresponsibility and poor decisions as opposed to evil government or evil businessmen. This is generally the position that most conservatives take. Moreover, i've never been a fan of Hillary or Bill. Not so much because of their policies, but more so their character, or lack thereof. However, I will have to say that this emphasis on Hillary during this whole Benghazi situation is rather unnecessary. If a decision to not send in support to assist those who were killed, then that falls more on Obama's shoulders, IMO. If there was a cover-up trying to place blame on the anti-muslim film rather than something else, that was certainly more of a political maneuver trying to cover the WHOLE administration's ass, not just Hillary. Then we have alleged requests for more security that was never put into action. Well guess what, there are requests for security everywhere. Every base in Afghanistan needs more security, every embassy, every village stability site, and every post. But the US military and DOS is not an omnipresent force that can magically create an invincible fortress. I also think it's funny how Republicans are so blood-thirsty over 4 deaths when tens of thousands have died for other unnecessary reasons. Even the war in Afghanistan has shown signs that it is a waste of effort and lives. Hillary has, in my opinion, done just fine as Sec Of State. Probably average to well above average in comparison to any other in the past. Trust me, I don't like her at all, but I have to call it like I see it. (it's also funny that Democrats aren't angry at all, but would be if it were McCain or Romney who made this mistake). Another factor to consider here is that they were in a Muslim country. Politically correct or not, bottom line is that there are a multitude of individuals in these nations who have a very strong desire to kill Americans. So if you volunteer as a contractor, Dept of State employee, or Dept of Defense, then you either accept that risk, or you are simply blissfully ignorant of what you are getting yourself into. Just like George Carlin said about these contractors overseas If you don't want to get your head chopped off, stay the f**k in Oklahoma!. I do agree that the lack of action is a fault and should be corrected. It is more on Obama's shoulders than anyone. The worst thing I can think of accusing Hillary of is ignoring requests for additional security. The decision to not send in Close Air Support or a FAST team is primarily Obama, not Hillary. I do agree with what Hillary said in terms of 'what difference does it make, let's learn from this and prevent it in the future'. The US Government has made much worse calls in the past that have resulted in tens of thousands dying. seekliberation --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
Thanks, seekliberation, yours sounds like a balanced view of Hillary and the whole situation. It helps me understand. From: seekliberation seekliberat...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:19 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt! Despite a few liberal attitudes on some issues, i'm sure my posts have shown that I lean to the right and consider most problems in this country to be the result of personal irresponsibility and poor decisions as opposed to evil government or evil businessmen. This is generally the position that most conservatives take. Moreover, i've never been a fan of Hillary or Bill. Not so much because of their policies, but more so their character, or lack thereof. However, I will have to say that this emphasis on Hillary during this whole Benghazi situation is rather unnecessary. If a decision to not send in support to assist those who were killed, then that falls more on Obama's shoulders, IMO. If there was a cover-up trying to place blame on the anti-muslim film rather than something else, that was certainly more of a political maneuver trying to cover the WHOLE administration's ass, not just Hillary. Then we have alleged requests for more security that was never put into action. Well guess what, there are requests for security everywhere. Every base in Afghanistan needs more security, every embassy, every village stability site, and every post. But the US military and DOS is not an omnipresent force that can magically create an invincible fortress. I also think it's funny how Republicans are so blood-thirsty over 4 deaths when tens of thousands have died for other unnecessary reasons. Even the war in Afghanistan has shown signs that it is a waste of effort and lives. Hillary has, in my opinion, done just fine as Sec Of State. Probably average to well above average in comparison to any other in the past. Trust me, I don't like her at all, but I have to call it like I see it. (it's also funny that Democrats aren't angry at all, but would be if it were McCain or Romney who made this mistake). Another factor to consider here is that they were in a Muslim country. Politically correct or not, bottom line is that there are a multitude of individuals in these nations who have a very strong desire to kill Americans. So if you volunteer as a contractor, Dept of State employee, or Dept of Defense, then you either accept that risk, or you are simply blissfully ignorant of what you are getting yourself into. Just like George Carlin said about these contractors overseas If you don't want to get your head chopped off, stay the f**k in Oklahoma!. I do agree that the lack of action is a fault and should be corrected. It is more on Obama's shoulders than anyone. The worst thing I can think of accusing Hillary of is ignoring requests for additional security. The decision to not send in Close Air Support or a FAST team is primarily Obama, not Hillary. I do agree with what Hillary said in terms of 'what difference does it make, let's learn from this and prevent it in the future'. The US Government has made much worse calls in the past that have resulted in tens of thousands dying. seekliberation --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead). http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
Unlike the billions awarded to Haliburton and its subsidiaries by their former CEO, Dick Cheney? Many people ignore the fact that the so-called rebuilding of Afghanistan and Iraq was a major reason to prosecute the war to begin with. Cheney and his buddies knew it would be a cash cow. From: wgm4u no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:42 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt! She should have been fired! Unfortunately liberalism is seen as the sacred cow, anything that may disparage it (not unlike the tmorg btw) is a threat! Today truth, is secondary to personal advantage, sad but a true description of an Obama admininsration. Look At all the millions that are being made by government contractors picked by Obama. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: You seem to ineptly forget Hillary Clinton herself was for the WAR in Iraq, you silly liberals have such a short memory. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seekliberation wrote: (snip) Hillary has, in my opinion, done just fine as Sec Of State. Probably average to well above average in comparison to any other in the past. Trust me, I don't like her at all, but I have to call it like I see it. (it's also funny that Democrats aren't angry at all, but would be if it were McCain or Romney who made this mistake). I seriously doubt you would have seen anything from the Democrats remotely like the frenzy of ridiculous accusations the Republicans indulged in. And if the Republicans had been halfway reasonable in this case, you might have seen more anger from Democrats. As it was, they had to go on defense. (snip) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? Hillary Clinton was 2012's Most Admired Woman in the World, according to Gallup, for the 17th time in 20 years.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Thanks, seekliberation, yours sounds like a balanced view of Hillary and the whole situation. It helps me understand.   Steve is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts. Let's sort through the weeds of misinformation: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#50568810 Hillary's Opening Remarks Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2013/01/203158.htm Hillary's Opening Remarks Before the House Foreign Affairs Committee http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2013/01/203192.htm ARB Report http://www.state.gov/arbreport/ ARB Report Summary http://www.cfr.org/libya/accountability-review-board-report-unclassified-benghazi-embassy-attack-december-2012/p29691 The ugly truth is that the same people who are accusing the administration of not providing sufficient security for the American consulate in Benghazi have voted to cut the State Department budget, which includes financing for diplomatic security. The most self-righteous critics don't seem to get the hypocrisy, or maybe they do and figure that if they hurl enough doubts and complaints at the administration, they will deflect attention from their own poor judgments on the State Department's needs. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/opinion/republicans-have-no-shame.html?_r=0 From: seekliberation To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:19 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!  Despite a few liberal attitudes on some issues, i'm sure my posts have shown that I lean to the right and consider most problems in this country to be the result of personal irresponsibility and poor decisions as opposed to evil government or evil businessmen. This is generally the position that most conservatives take. Moreover, i've never been a fan of Hillary or Bill. Not so much because of their policies, but more so their character, or lack thereof. However, I will have to say that this emphasis on Hillary during this whole Benghazi situation is rather unnecessary. If a decision to not send in support to assist those who were killed, then that falls more on Obama's shoulders, IMO. If there was a cover-up trying to place blame on the anti-muslim film rather than something else, that was certainly more of a political maneuver trying to cover the WHOLE administration's ass, not just Hillary. Then we have alleged requests for more security that was never put into action. Well guess what, there are requests for security everywhere. Every base in Afghanistan needs more security, every embassy, every village stability site, and every post. But the US military and DOS is not an omnipresent force that can magically create an invincible fortress. I also think it's funny how Republicans are so blood-thirsty over 4 deaths when tens of thousands have died for other unnecessary reasons. Even the war in Afghanistan has shown signs that it is a waste of effort and lives. Hillary has, in my opinion, done just fine as Sec Of State. Probably average to well above average in comparison to any other in the past. Trust me, I don't like her at all, but I have to call it like I see it. (it's also funny that Democrats aren't angry at all, but would be if it were McCain or Romney who made this mistake). Another factor to consider here is that they were in a Muslim country. Politically correct or not, bottom line is that there are a multitude of individuals in these nations who have a very strong desire to kill Americans. So if you volunteer as a contractor, Dept of State employee, or Dept of Defense, then you either accept that risk, or you are simply blissfully ignorant of what you are getting yourself into. Just like George Carlin said about these contractors overseas If you don't want to get your head chopped off, stay the f**k in Oklahoma!. I do agree that the lack of action is a fault and should be corrected. It is more on Obama's shoulders than anyone. The worst thing I can think of accusing Hillary of is ignoring requests for additional security. The decision to not send in Close Air Support or a FAST team is primarily Obama, not Hillary. I do agree with what Hillary said in terms of 'what difference does it make, let's learn from this and prevent it in the future'. The US Government has made much worse calls in the past that have resulted in tens of thousands dying. seekliberation --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
Just for the record. The quote which Raunchy is referencing is not mine. It is attributable to seekliberation. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Thanks, seekliberation, yours sounds like a balanced view of Hillary and the whole situation. It helps me understand.   Steve is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts. Let's sort through the weeds of misinformation: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#50568810 Hillary's Opening Remarks Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2013/01/203158.htm Hillary's Opening Remarks Before the House Foreign Affairs Committee http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2013/01/203192.htm ARB Report http://www.state.gov/arbreport/ ARB Report Summary http://www.cfr.org/libya/accountability-review-board-report-unclassified\ -benghazi-embassy-attack-december-2012/p29691 The ugly truth is that the same people who are accusing the administration of not providing sufficient security for the American consulate in Benghazi have voted to cut the State Department budget, which includes financing for diplomatic security. The most self-righteous critics don't seem to get the hypocrisy, or maybe they do and figure that if they hurl enough doubts and complaints at the administration, they will deflect attention from their own poor judgments on the State Department's needs. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/opinion/republicans-have-no-shame.html\ ?_r=0 From: seekliberation To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:19 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!  Despite a few liberal attitudes on some issues, i'm sure my posts have shown that I lean to the right and consider most problems in this country to be the result of personal irresponsibility and poor decisions as opposed to evil government or evil businessmen. This is generally the position that most conservatives take. Moreover, i've never been a fan of Hillary or Bill. Not so much because of their policies, but more so their character, or lack thereof. However, I will have to say that this emphasis on Hillary during this whole Benghazi situation is rather unnecessary. If a decision to not send in support to assist those who were killed, then that falls more on Obama's shoulders, IMO. If there was a cover-up trying to place blame on the anti-muslim film rather than something else, that was certainly more of a political maneuver trying to cover the WHOLE administration's ass, not just Hillary. Then we have alleged requests for more security that was never put into action. Well guess what, there are requests for security everywhere. Every base in Afghanistan needs more security, every embassy, every village stability site, and every post. But the US military and DOS is not an omnipresent force that can magically create an invincible fortress. I also think it's funny how Republicans are so blood-thirsty over 4 deaths when tens of thousands have died for other unnecessary reasons. Even the war in Afghanistan has shown signs that it is a waste of effort and lives. Hillary has, in my opinion, done just fine as Sec Of State. Probably average to well above average in comparison to any other in the past. Trust me, I don't like her at all, but I have to call it like I see it. (it's also funny that Democrats aren't angry at all, but would be if it were McCain or Romney who made this mistake). Another factor to consider here is that they were in a Muslim country. Politically correct or not, bottom line is that there are a multitude of individuals in these nations who have a very strong desire to kill Americans. So if you volunteer as a contractor, Dept of State employee, or Dept of Defense, then you either accept that risk, or you are simply blissfully ignorant of what you are getting yourself into. Just like George Carlin said about these contractors overseas If you don't want to get your head chopped off, stay the f**k in Oklahoma!. I do agree that the lack of action is a fault and should be corrected. It is more on Obama's shoulders than anyone. The worst thing I can think of accusing Hillary of is ignoring requests for additional security. The decision to not send in Close Air Support or a FAST team is primarily Obama, not Hillary. I do agree with what Hillary said in terms of 'what difference does it make, let's learn from this and prevent it in the future'. The US Government has made much worse calls in the past that have resulted in tens of thousands dying. seekliberation --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Just for the record. The quote which Raunchy is referencing is not mine. It is attributable to seekliberation. Oops. Sorry. I get you guys confused. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Thanks, seekliberation, yours sounds like a balanced view of Hillary and the whole situation. It helps me understand.   Steve is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts. Let's sort through the weeds of misinformation: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#50568810 Hillary's Opening Remarks Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2013/01/203158.htm Hillary's Opening Remarks Before the House Foreign Affairs Committee http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2013/01/203192.htm ARB Report http://www.state.gov/arbreport/ ARB Report Summary http://www.cfr.org/libya/accountability-review-board-report-unclassified\ -benghazi-embassy-attack-december-2012/p29691 The ugly truth is that the same people who are accusing the administration of not providing sufficient security for the American consulate in Benghazi have voted to cut the State Department budget, which includes financing for diplomatic security. The most self-righteous critics don't seem to get the hypocrisy, or maybe they do and figure that if they hurl enough doubts and complaints at the administration, they will deflect attention from their own poor judgments on the State Department's needs. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/opinion/republicans-have-no-shame.html\ ?_r=0 From: seekliberation To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:19 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!  Despite a few liberal attitudes on some issues, i'm sure my posts have shown that I lean to the right and consider most problems in this country to be the result of personal irresponsibility and poor decisions as opposed to evil government or evil businessmen. This is generally the position that most conservatives take. Moreover, i've never been a fan of Hillary or Bill. Not so much because of their policies, but more so their character, or lack thereof. However, I will have to say that this emphasis on Hillary during this whole Benghazi situation is rather unnecessary. If a decision to not send in support to assist those who were killed, then that falls more on Obama's shoulders, IMO. If there was a cover-up trying to place blame on the anti-muslim film rather than something else, that was certainly more of a political maneuver trying to cover the WHOLE administration's ass, not just Hillary. Then we have alleged requests for more security that was never put into action. Well guess what, there are requests for security everywhere. Every base in Afghanistan needs more security, every embassy, every village stability site, and every post. But the US military and DOS is not an omnipresent force that can magically create an invincible fortress. I also think it's funny how Republicans are so blood-thirsty over 4 deaths when tens of thousands have died for other unnecessary reasons. Even the war in Afghanistan has shown signs that it is a waste of effort and lives. Hillary has, in my opinion, done just fine as Sec Of State. Probably average to well above average in comparison to any other in the past. Trust me, I don't like her at all, but I have to call it like I see it. (it's also funny that Democrats aren't angry at all, but would be if it were McCain or Romney who made this mistake). Another factor to consider here is that they were in a Muslim country. Politically correct or not, bottom line is that there are a multitude of individuals in these nations who have a very strong desire to kill Americans. So if you volunteer as a contractor, Dept of State employee, or Dept of Defense, then you either accept that risk, or you are simply blissfully ignorant of what you are getting yourself into. Just like George Carlin said about these contractors overseas If you don't want to get your head chopped off, stay the f**k in Oklahoma!. I do agree that the lack of action is a fault and should be corrected. It is more on Obama's shoulders than anyone. The worst thing I can think of accusing Hillary of is ignoring requests for additional security. The decision to not send in Close Air Support or a FAST team is primarily Obama, not Hillary. I do agree with what Hillary said in terms of 'what difference does it make, let's learn from this and prevent it in the future'. The US Government has made much worse calls in the past that have resulted in tens of thousands dying. seekliberation --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
or maybe you just feel better focussing on one blemish on an otherwise sterling record as SOS. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
You seem to ineptly forget Hillary Clinton herself was for the WAR in Iraq, you silly liberals have such a short memory. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
Bill, if you feel that this makes her complicit to the same extent as those who rigorously pushed that agenda, then be my guest. I admit it is difficult to buck a trend and vote against a measure which may then make you appear to be unpatriotic or as a pacifist, and so you therefore decide to vote with the majority. But, if you see no difference between voting for the measure and orchestrating it, then there's not much I can say. But I would say that you are being intellecually dishonest. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: You seem to ineptly forget Hillary Clinton herself was for the WAR in Iraq, you silly liberals have such a short memory. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
She should have been fired! Unfortunately liberalism is seen as the sacred cow, anything that may disparage it (not unlike the tmorg btw) is a threat! Today truth, is secondary to personal advantage, sad but a true description of an Obama admininsration. Look At all the millions that are being made by government contractors picked by Obama. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: You seem to ineptly forget Hillary Clinton herself was for the WAR in Iraq, you silly liberals have such a short memory. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
I admit I was FOR the war in Iraq much like MOST of the country at the time. Yeah We were ALL complicit,as you put it, wake up! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Bill, if you feel that this makes her complicit to the same extent as those who rigorously pushed that agenda, then be my guest. I admit it is difficult to buck a trend and vote against a measure which may then make you appear to be unpatriotic or as a pacifist, and so you therefore decide to vote with the majority. But, if you see no difference between voting for the measure and orchestrating it, then there's not much I can say. But I would say that you are being intellecually dishonest. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: You seem to ineptly forget Hillary Clinton herself was for the WAR in Iraq, you silly liberals have such a short memory. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
You know Bill, I'm just gonna have to let you carry on. I don't see much opportunity for a dialog. You seem pretty frustrated, and I can understand that. But you appear so one sided, that I think you should work it out as best you can. I hope you can come to some resolution in your mind. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: She should have been fired! Unfortunately liberalism is seen as the sacred cow, anything that may disparage it (not unlike the tmorg btw) is a threat! Today truth, is secondary to personal advantage, sad but a true description of an Obama admininsration. Look At all the millions that are being made by government contractors picked by Obama. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: You seem to ineptly forget Hillary Clinton herself was for the WAR in Iraq, you silly liberals have such a short memory. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary Clinton, a pathetic end to an empty skirt!
I think we should have expected more from our leaders than to push that agenda as they did. To have so much military might, there is always a temptation to use it. But if our leaders had been more responsible, had not spun all the facts and been so intent on starting a war, we would have been in far better shape. That's what our leaders are supposed to do, right? Make decisions that benefit the country, not harm it right? That's what they are elected to do. But sometimes you get bad leaders who make bad decisions. On that basis alone - extracting us from two wars, I can like this president. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: I admit I was FOR the war in Iraq much like MOST of the country at the time. Yeah We were ALL complicit,as you put it, wake up! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Bill, if you feel that this makes her complicit to the same extent as those who rigorously pushed that agenda, then be my guest. I admit it is difficult to buck a trend and vote against a measure which may then make you appear to be unpatriotic or as a pacifist, and so you therefore decide to vote with the majority. But, if you see no difference between voting for the measure and orchestrating it, then there's not much I can say. But I would say that you are being intellecually dishonest. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: You seem to ineptly forget Hillary Clinton herself was for the WAR in Iraq, you silly liberals have such a short memory. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 wrote: Wowzer. I can only imagine your outrage at GWB for that war in Iraq. Where is that on your outrage scale in terms of what we paid for in lives and treasure and what we got? Diplomats have some idea of what they might be getting into, and likely can refuse an assignment. What were the troops, who had no choice, fighting for? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wrote: So Hillary, did you enjoy your short lived glory? I hope you enjoyed your trips abroad, because thar's all thet were, travel opportunities. Enjoy your tax paid retirement, bitch! (4 dead).
