[Finale] Capo Problems
Hello - I was wondering if any of you have solved these problems. I am doing a song in Eb major with chords - wanting to set it up for capo on the 3rd fret for guitar. I am running into 2 problems. (FinWin2k4) 1. It looks like I need to go through each chord and double-click on it to get the Chord definition dialogue box and enter capo 3rd fret. Is there no way to change the whole piece at once? 2. When I change the C minor chord to 3rd fret, it then reads B double-flat minor, instead of A minor. When I tried changing the original chord to B# minor, then with 3rd fret it read G double-sharp minor. How can I get it to display A minor? Thanks in advance for your help. --- James James M. Cooper -- [composer, songwriter, classical guitarist] www.ModeZ.com ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib
The Oxford Companion to Music confirms David's comments re- ad libitum and obbligato, giving examples of the 'confusion' and stating - rather smugly, I thought- "a clear case of Lucus a non lucendo". Translation please? FWIW my solution to what to put in parts and score would be "optional" and "play" Cheers Keith in OZ - Original Message - From: David H. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Aaron Sherber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 9:44 AM Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib > I always thought that was what obbligato meant (obligated to be played.) > A quick glance in my New Harvard Dictionary confirms it -- Obbligato is > the opposite of ad libitum. > > > > Aaron Sherber wrote: > > Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... > > > > In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which > > the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So > > those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the > > oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? > > > > I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section > > with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as > > well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron. > > > > ___ > > Finale mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > > > . > > > > -- > David H. Bailey > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > Finale mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib
>From a practical standpoint, I would suggest that the "ad lib" bars be followed simply by a marking of "PLAY" or "(play)" or "(always play)." Raymond Horton Bass Trombonist Louisville Orchestra - Original Message - From: "Aaron Sherber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:36 PM Subject: [Finale] OT: ad lib > Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... > > In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which the > oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So those > bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the oboe > must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? > > I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section > with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as well? > Is the answer simply 'Play'? > > Thanks, > Aaron. > > ___ > Finale mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
On Jan 20, 2004, at 4:37 PM, Richard Huggins wrote: Below would be my choice as well. As for the objection that it can't be used if correct spacing were an issue, I ask why. Spacing is adjustable to make room for this, using the beat chart for one thing. For another, I should think it wouldn't be too hard to set up the barline as either a note expression or an articulation in such a way that Finale's spacing algorithm treats it properly (with the appropriate feature checked under Music Spacing Options). mdl ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] OT: ad lib
At 01:50 AM 1/21/04 +0100, Jörg Peltzer wrote: >Why not simply define a custom line starting with ad lib. Followed by - - - >- - and a down hook -| and draw that around the measures you need to be >marked. When I've needed extra barlines, I've used one of these: 1. Use them as expressions. The barline is a font character, and can be attached & spaced as needed. 2. For many staggered barlines, I create lyrics that consist exclusively of the barlines, and then raise the baselines. Until Finale actually supports fully independent barlines, all these workarounds will continue. How many years? :) Dennis ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] Booklet printing
For all Windows users: Try Fineprint (www.fineprint.com)- it's the best printing apprentice around Wonderful bookletprinting option with preview. Amazing options also in conjunction with pdfFactory (same company) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of d. collins Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 10:34 PM To: Finale list Subject: Re: [Finale] Booklet printing Johannes Gebauer écrit: >Well, I haven't got my update yet. I didn't realize there was a >ready-made script. Does it work? It doesn't work "out of the box", unfortunately. It only prints one page. And I see nothing in the instructions that might make it print the whole booklet. But I'm pretty sure it could be done with a script. Unless I'm missing something. The documentation on FinaleScript leaves quite a bit do be desired, in my opinion. Let's see if anyone else has got it working. I use Clickbook for my booklets, which does a very good job and is very flexible. Dennis ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] OT: ad lib
Why not simply define a custom line starting with ad lib. Followed by - - - - - and a down hook -| and draw that around the measures you need to be marked. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Owain Sutton Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib I've seen plenty of 'ad lib' passages where the intended result was basically a cadenza. A dictionary is unlikely to keep up with the interpretation of such instructions. David H. Bailey wrote: > While ad.lib. often means the performer is in control of tempo/in, > strictly speaking it means the section can be taken or not, at the > pleasure of the performer. At least that's how it is defined in the New > Harvard Dictionary of Music. > > > > Michael Withers wrote: > >> Thinking about it ... is 'ad lib' the right term for a few bars that >> can be >> missed out? I'm more used to seeing 'ad lib' in the context of >> cadenzas or >> sections where the 'soloist' is in control of the tempo/interpretation. >> >> Maybe the bars in question should be indicated with brackets and >> marked as >> 'optional'. >> >> Michael Withers >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Behalf Of Owain Sutton >> Sent: 20 January 2004 22:57 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib >> >> >> >> >> Aaron Sherber wrote: >> >>> Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain >>> short-circuit... >>> >>> In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars >>> which the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's >>> discretion. So those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following >>> are bars which the oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad >>> lib? >>> >>> I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib >>> section with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I >>> can use as well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Aaron. >>> >> >> >> >> I guess the translation of Ab Lib. as 'at pleasure' means there's >> probably no negative. Unless you want to instruct the players to >> perform 'without pleasure'. Perhaps a textual (english) description, >> or even "cancel ad lib.", would be better? >> >> ___ >> Finale mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> >> ___ >> Finale mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> >> . >> > ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
Below would be my choice as well. As for the objection that it can't be used if correct spacing were an issue, I ask why. Spacing is adjustable to make room for this, using the beat chart for one thing. Not even the shape designer would be absolutely needed. Select the line tool from the smart shapes pallette, start at the top of the stave, hold the shift key down and draw two lines downward. The handle on either line can be used to space it relative to the other line and both handles can be used to move them in tandem left or right as desired. --Richard > From: Noel Stoutenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > However, if measure numbers matter, and I don't need the target, I have > also used the shape designer to create a shape expression which looks > just like a double bar line, and use that, instead. ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib
I've seen plenty of 'ad lib' passages where the intended result was basically a cadenza. A dictionary is unlikely to keep up with the interpretation of such instructions. David H. Bailey wrote: While ad.lib. often means the performer is in control of tempo/in, strictly speaking it means the section can be taken or not, at the pleasure of the performer. At least that's how it is defined in the New Harvard Dictionary of Music. Michael Withers wrote: Thinking about it ... is 'ad lib' the right term for a few bars that can be missed out? I'm more used to seeing 'ad lib' in the context of cadenzas or sections where the 'soloist' is in control of the tempo/interpretation. Maybe the bars in question should be indicated with brackets and marked as 'optional'. Michael Withers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Owain Sutton Sent: 20 January 2004 22:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib Aaron Sherber wrote: Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? Thanks, Aaron. I guess the translation of Ab Lib. as 'at pleasure' means there's probably no negative. Unless you want to instruct the players to perform 'without pleasure'. Perhaps a textual (english) description, or even "cancel ad lib.", would be better? ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale . ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib
While ad.lib. often means the performer is in control of tempo/in, strictly speaking it means the section can be taken or not, at the pleasure of the performer. At least that's how it is defined in the New Harvard Dictionary of Music. Michael Withers wrote: Thinking about it ... is 'ad lib' the right term for a few bars that can be missed out? I'm more used to seeing 'ad lib' in the context of cadenzas or sections where the 'soloist' is in control of the tempo/interpretation. Maybe the bars in question should be indicated with brackets and marked as 'optional'. Michael Withers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Owain Sutton Sent: 20 January 2004 22:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib Aaron Sherber wrote: Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? Thanks, Aaron. I guess the translation of Ab Lib. as 'at pleasure' means there's probably no negative. Unless you want to instruct the players to perform 'without pleasure'. Perhaps a textual (english) description, or even "cancel ad lib.", would be better? ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale . -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
On 20.01.2004 23:37 Uhr, Noel Stoutenburg wrote > However, if measure numbers matter, and I don't need the target, I have > also used the shape designer to create a shape expression which looks > just like a double bar line, and use that, instead. But if you are concerned about correct spacing this is not really an option. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] OT: ad lib
Thinking about it ... is 'ad lib' the right term for a few bars that can be missed out? I'm more used to seeing 'ad lib' in the context of cadenzas or sections where the 'soloist' is in control of the tempo/interpretation. Maybe the bars in question should be indicated with brackets and marked as 'optional'. Michael Withers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Owain Sutton Sent: 20 January 2004 22:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib Aaron Sherber wrote: > Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... > > In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which > the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So > those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the > oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? > > I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section > with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as > well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? > > Thanks, > Aaron. > I guess the translation of Ab Lib. as 'at pleasure' means there's probably no negative. Unless you want to instruct the players to perform 'without pleasure'. Perhaps a textual (english) description, or even "cancel ad lib.", would be better? ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib
Aaron Sherber wrote: Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? Thanks, Aaron. I guess the translation of Ab Lib. as 'at pleasure' means there's probably no negative. Unless you want to instruct the players to perform 'without pleasure'. Perhaps a textual (english) description, or even "cancel ad lib.", would be better? ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
On Jan 20, 2004, at 12:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there some command in Finale Mac 3k that will allow me to do this, or do I have to create two separate measures out of the one in 4/4 time and then hide the time signature in the second measure of 1/4? That's how I do it -- assuming that by "hiding" the 1/4 you mean setting the measure to "display as" 4/4. Also, don't forget to adjust your measure numbers accordingly. I suppose someone might put together a plug-in (or script??) to do bundle these tasks together. mdl ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] OT: ad lib
I always thought that was what obbligato meant (obligated to be played.) A quick glance in my New Harvard Dictionary confirms it -- Obbligato is the opposite of ad libitum. Aaron Sherber wrote: Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? Thanks, Aaron. ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale . -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
Martin wrote: I'm editing an early 19th Century concerted choral work, and about midway thru the piece there is a change of tempo on the 4th beat of a measure (quarter note on beat one, quarter rest on beat two, quarter rest of beat three with a fermata, followed by a thin double bar, then a quarter note on the fourth beat which initiates the new allegro tempo and a fugue). Is there some command in Finale Mac 3k that will allow me to do this, or do I have to create two separate measures out of the one in 4/4 time and then hide the time signature in the second measure of 1/4? You don't need to hide any time signatures, if you specify for the two measures that you want the time signature to be 3/4 display as 4/4 and 1/4 display as 4/4, which is the way I sometimes do this, particularly if measure number values don't matter, and I need the 1/4 measure as the target for a repeat. However, if measure numbers matter, and I don't need the target, I have also used the shape designer to create a shape expression which looks just like a double bar line, and use that, instead. ns ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] OT: ad lib
Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit... In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the oboe must play. What indication cancels the ad lib? I know that one way of making this clear is to print the ad lib section with reduced noteheads, but isn't there some term which I can use as well? Is the answer simply 'Play'? Thanks, Aaron. ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
The best way is to make the two measures, making a 3/4 measure and a 1/4 measure and hiding both time signatures. You'll have to adjust your measure numbers, if you're using them. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm editing an early 19th Century concerted choral work, and about midway thru the piece there is a change of tempo on the 4th beat of a measure (quarter note on beat one, quarter rest on beat two, quarter rest of beat three with a fermata, followed by a thin double bar, then a quarter note on the fourth beat which initiates the new allegro tempo and a fugue). Is there some command in Finale Mac 3k that will allow me to do this, or do I have to create two separate measures out of the one in 4/4 time and then hide the time signature in the second measure of 1/4? Thanks, Martin Martin Banner Monticello, NY ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale . -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
On 20.01.2004 21:59 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > Is there some command in Finale Mac 3k that will allow me to do this, or > do I have to create two separate measures out of the one in 4/4 time and > then hide the time signature in the second measure of 1/4? This is the way to do it in Finale. First measure should be 3/4, second 1/4, and you will have to adjust the measure numbers as well. I wished there was a plugin, which could do the work automatically. Ie, you enter the measure as though there wasn't a double bar, select it, call the plugin, tell it "divide measure after 3rd beat" and then it would split the measure and adjust the measure number regions (ie split the region). This would be good for mid-measure repeats as well. Oh, and while we are on about plugins: is Jari still around? I am wondering whether you are planning on bringing some of your plugins to OS X? Some of them have become redundant, I guess, but I'd love to get the Time Sig plugin (and if you do it, there is a bug in there). Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Creating mid-measure double bar line
I'm editing an early 19th Century concerted choral work, and about midway thru the piece there is a change of tempo on the 4th beat of a measure (quarter note on beat one, quarter rest on beat two, quarter rest of beat three with a fermata, followed by a thin double bar, then a quarter note on the fourth beat which initiates the new allegro tempo and a fugue). Is there some command in Finale Mac 3k that will allow me to do this, or do I have to create two separate measures out of the one in 4/4 time and then hide the time signature in the second measure of 1/4? Thanks, Martin Martin Banner Monticello, NY ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Henle Font?
On 20 Jan 2004 at 11:26, Andrew Stiller wrote: > > David W. Fenton wrote > > > > >> It's rounded in the *wrong* direction -- it's concave, when it > >> should be convex. > >> > >> At least, that's my opinion in regard to replicating the shape of > >> the wedge that I see in late 18th- and early 19th-century editions > >> (which > > > is what I want to do). > > I have seen the concave version (base of the triangle curved inward > toward the tip, making a shape like a cocklebur) in publications from > as early as 1830, and it is the standard shape from the late 19th c. > on (in scores by Stravinsky, e.g.). It has always surprised and vexed > me that Finale has not included this form in any of its fonts. The > older, convex form (dart-shaped) is available in Maestro, where it can > be found at ' and opt-sh-'. Both versions are in the WinFin2003 version of Maestro, and the default articulation libraries use it. -- David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Henle Font?
David W. Fenton wrote > It's rounded in the *wrong* direction -- it's concave, when it should be convex. At least, that's my opinion in regard to replicating the shape of the wedge that I see in late 18th- and early 19th-century editions (which > is what I want to do). I have seen the concave version (base of the triangle curved inward toward the tip, making a shape like a cocklebur) in publications from as early as 1830, and it is the standard shape from the late 19th c. on (in scores by Stravinsky, e.g.). It has always surprised and vexed me that Finale has not included this form in any of its fonts. The older, convex form (dart-shaped) is available in Maestro, where it can be found at ' and opt-sh-'. For the cocklebur, I use the old Crescendo font, wh. I understand is no longer available. I'm sure the symbol must be found somewhere though--life isn't *that* absurd! -- Andrew Stiller Kallisti Music Press http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/ ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Beaming 16th Notes
Giovanni Andreani wrote: If I understand your directions correctly, you can do the following: Simple entry; Deselect "check for extra notes"; Put the notes in the bar as required, and add an extra 16th note beside the one you need the beaming on; Beam those two notes with Speedy entry (and choose "ignore the extra notes" in the dialog box); Change the unneeded notehead to a 'non-character' to hide it; Use the beam stem adjust tool to move the extra stem on top of the one still with the notehead, to hide it. ___ Sorry, I didn't completeley explain my problem. No, I don't need to beam two notes across a bar, because the is in the the last bar of a system; it's a single-standing 16 note, and I would like to have it beamed like if it had to be beamed to another 16th note Thank you Giovanni In that case, what I've written should work - remove the notehead from the 'extra' 16th note after the one you want beamed in this way, and do as I describe. ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Beaming 16th Notes
> If I understand your directions correctly, you can do the following: > > Simple entry; > > Deselect "check for extra notes"; > > Put the notes in the bar as required, and add an extra 16th note beside > the one you need the beaming on; > > Beam those two notes with Speedy entry (and choose "ignore the extra > notes" in the dialog box); > > Change the unneeded notehead to a 'non-character' to hide it; > > Use the beam stem adjust tool to move the extra stem on top of the one > still with the notehead, to hide it. > > ___ Sorry, I didn't completeley explain my problem. No, I don't need to beam two notes across a bar, because the is in the the last bar of a system; it's a single-standing 16 note, and I would like to have it beamed like if it had to be beamed to another 16th note Thank you Giovanni ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Beaming 16th Notes
Giovanni Andreani wrote: Hello, I'm trying to beam a note as single 16th note with a beam as it would be if extended over a rest, but it's the last note in 3/8 time with other rests before it, and I don't want it beamed within the previous group. In the Finale options (2003), I can just find the "Extend Beams Over Rest" checkbox. Am I missing something? Tank you all If I understand your directions correctly, you can do the following: Simple entry; Deselect "check for extra notes"; Put the notes in the bar as required, and add an extra 16th note beside the one you need the beaming on; Beam those two notes with Speedy entry (and choose "ignore the extra notes" in the dialog box); Change the unneeded notehead to a 'non-character' to hide it; Use the beam stem adjust tool to move the extra stem on top of the one still with the notehead, to hide it. ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Beaming 16th Notes
You want it beamed over the barline into the next measure? Liudas - Original Message - From: "Giovanni Andreani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Finale Groups" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:29 PM Subject: [Finale] Beaming 16th Notes > Hello, > I'm trying to beam a note as single 16th note with a beam as it would be if > extended over a rest, but it's the last note in 3/8 time with other rests > before it, and I don't want it beamed within the previous group. In the > Finale options (2003), I can just find the "Extend Beams Over Rest" > checkbox. > Am I missing something? > Tank you all > > ___ > Finale mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Beaming 16th Notes
Hello, I'm trying to beam a note as single 16th note with a beam as it would be if extended over a rest, but it's the last note in 3/8 time with other rests before it, and I don't want it beamed within the previous group. In the Finale options (2003), I can just find the "Extend Beams Over Rest" checkbox. Am I missing something? Tank you all ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
