Re: [Finale] FinaleScript Booklet

2006-04-26 Thread John Bell

On 26 Apr 2006, at 20:53, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
In the printers page setup, choose the appropriate landscape format  
(ie A3).

Open Finale script. If you have a duplex printer, type

print booklet



On 26 Apr 2006, at 20:52, dc wrote:


First of all, when using the Booklet script, you shouldn't set  
anything in the printer settings of Finale. You leave the printing  
dialogue alone, but you set up your printer to use the right size  
of paper and the right orientation. For instance, if my score is A4  
portrait, I set my printer to A3 landscape and run the script. If  
your printer can't duplex, you need to run the script in two parts,  
one for the recto, one for the verso, as explained in the script  
itself.


Thanks Johannes and Dennis. I've got the page size and orientation  
OK, but it still prints on one side only. I have tried with the  
printer layout set to duplex off, and to short-edged binding. Same  
result both ways.


John
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Converting Midi Files to Wav files to be burned on audio cds.

2006-04-26 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
If you are on Mac ... just go File>Save Special>Save as an Audio  
File. I save it to desktop then drag it into iTunes, from whence you  
can burn it directly to a CD.

I'm operating on Fin2006d.
Dean
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Arthur Craig wrote:

I learned of this group at a conference MusiCalifornia, last week.   
I am so excited to participate!


Is there a way to convert midi files to wav files and then burn  
them on an audio cd?  I have Finale 2000? Has anyone done this, and  
if so could you please send me a step by step procedure.  Many thanks.


Art

Celebrate Earth Day everyday! Discover 10 things you can do to help  
slow climate change. Yahoo! Earth Day

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] FinaleScript Booklet

2006-04-26 Thread Johannes Gebauer

On 26.04.2006 John Bell wrote:

FinMac 2006d

Having for years made booklets using the slightly long-winded method of adding 
pages to make multiples of 4 and specifying the page order etc, I decided to 
try the FinaleScript method.

I set the printer to 2-up, short-edge binding. I ran the Print Booklet script 
in the plug-ins menu. This produced single-sided, half-sized, 
portrait-orientated prints. What should I have done?


In the printers page setup, choose the appropriate landscape format (ie A3).
Open Finale script. If you have a duplex printer, type

print booklet

and return - off you go. If you don't have a duplex printer, first type
print booklet verso
then
print booklet recto

If your booklet has more than 16 pages you should specify ie

print booklet 24 [verso/recto]

Otherwise Finalescript will print your booklet in 16 page sub-booklets. 
(This would have to be bound especially)


Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] FinaleScript Booklet

2006-04-26 Thread John Bell

FinMac 2006d

Having for years made booklets using the slightly long-winded method  
of adding pages to make multiples of 4 and specifying the page order  
etc, I decided to try the FinaleScript method.


I set the printer to 2-up, short-edge binding. I ran the Print  
Booklet script in the plug-ins menu. This produced single-sided, half- 
sized, portrait-orientated prints. What should I have done?


John
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Converting Midi Files to Wav files to be burned on audio cds.

2006-04-26 Thread David W. Fenton
On 26 Apr 2006 at 10:07, Arthur Craig wrote:

> I learned of this group at a conference MusiCalifornia, last week.  I
> am so excited to participate!
> 
>   Is there a way to convert midi files to wav files and then burn them
>   on an audio cd?  I have Finale 2000? Has anyone done this, and if so
>   could you please send me a step by step procedure.  Many thanks.

Later versions of Finale can save to WAV file directly, but not 2K.

You don't say if you are Mac or Windows, but on Windows, I use an 
inexpensive program called Midi2Wav, which plays a MIDI file back 
through whatever onboard synthesizer you choose, and captures the 
output to a WAV file. Other programs can capture the audio output, 
but a program that coordinates the starting and ending of the MIDI 
file is helpful so you don't have to edit the resulting WAV file.

I've used Midi2Wav for years, originally on my Win95 PC. The latest 
version has one annoying feature, which is that if you don't put some 
silence at the end of your MIDI file, you get a bad pop right on the 
termination of the WAV file. This may actually be due to a problem 
with my system and the audio drivers, but the solution I've used is 
to put a MIDI event in an otherwise empty measure at the end of my 
MIDI files. It's kind of annoying, but an easy workaround. For a $20 
program, it's not too much of a problem.

There are probably better programs that others can recommend, but the 
process is basically the same -- you need something that can capture 
the audio output and write it to a WAV file.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 05:21 PM 4/26/06 +0200, you wrote:
>I'm still on 2K4, but was told that there were still font issues with 
>FinWin2K6. Could you try with the three different types of fonts (TT, PS 
>and OT) and let us know if they are all embedded correctly?

I just tried this under WinXP. The fonts all embed and distill, but the
font properties in the PDF report them all as Type 1 fonts.

Dennis

(PS: The paper size problem still exists under XP)



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Re: Multimeasure rest symbols in 4/2

2006-04-26 Thread Ken Moore

John Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


But as to wanting to revert to the stacks of rests (which go back in 
time to the inventor of rests with specific values, Franco of 
Cologne, in the 13th century), I was never so happy as when modern 
publications dropped that old-fashioned business in orchestral music 
and adopted the simple multimeasure rest convention.  In either case, 
I'll end up counting measures, so just tell me how many measures to 
count!


I recall being very grateful for breve and long rests when reading the 
bass part of the Saint-Saens Organ Symphony in a poor light.  They were 
much more distinguishable than "3" and "5" in the font the publisher had 
used.


--
Ken Moore
Musician and engineer

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Converting Midi Files to Wav files to be burned on audio cds.

2006-04-26 Thread Arthur Craig
I learned of this group at a conference MusiCalifornia, last week.  I am so excited to participate!     Is there a way to convert midi files to wav files and then burn them on an audio cd?  I have Finale 2000? Has anyone done this, and if so could you please send me a step by step procedure.  Many thanks.     Art
	
		Celebrate Earth Day everyday!  Discover 10 things you can do to help slow climate change. Yahoo! Earth Day___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Johannes Gebauer

On 26.04.2006 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:

My apologies too for bring up an issue that may have been discussed earlier. I 
tend to focus on a narrow band of issues that are a roadblock at the time, and 
I tend not to pay a lot of attention if it's not something I am working on at 
that time. I just finally settled most of the other troubles Finale has given 
me, when I had this trouble with the PDF. So the list's patience is greatly 
appreciated.


Not at all. These issues need to be discussed. And if you want to get it 
fixed you should bombard MakeMusic with "problem reports".


Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
I used Finale 2005a with Acrobat 6.0 on XP Box.
Johannes, your PDF looked fine. There weren't any issues.
The quality of it also made me wonder that I was doing something wrong.
 
My apologies too for bring up an issue that may have been discussed earlier. I tend to focus on a narrow band of issues that are a roadblock at the time, and I tend not to pay a lot of attention if it's not something I am working on at that time. I just finally settled most of the other troubles Finale has given me, when I had this trouble with the PDF. So the list's patience is greatly appreciated.

 
Thanks Kim 
On 4/26/06, Johannes Gebauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26.04.2006 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:> Here's a sample of my PDF @ 
http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample.pdf I used the highest setting possible (Printer's quality) and I upped the DPI to 2400. Still not as good as this Molter sample, or the Sibelius. My beams seem very ragged, no matter how much you zoom in. And I noticed that Finale's staff lines seem too thick. And some of the articulations and words have a splotchy look.
Which platform. Which Distiller. Which Finale version.How do the PDFs I sent you recently compare?I am pretty sure this is the known FinWin only problem. There has been alot of discussion about this in the past. I don't know the details, but
I was under the impression that Fin2k6 corrected this.The problem has never been reported for Mac PDFs created from Finale, soI would be surprised if the same was true for the PDFs I sent you, but Iam interested to hear your opinion.
Johannes--http://www.musikmanufaktur.comhttp://www.camerata-berolinensis.de___
Finale mailing listFinale@shsu.eduhttp://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
-- Kim Patrick Clow"There's really only two types of music: good and bad." ~ Rossini 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 05:21 PM 4/26/06 +0200, you wrote:
>I'm still on 2K4, but was told that there were still font issues with 
>FinWin2K6. Could you try with the three different types of fonts (TT, PS 
>and OT) and let us know if they are all embedded correctly?

It finished compiling, but OpenType fonts crash the Distilling process. I'm
using Distiller 5, but I tried it in Ghostscript and direct print to Adobe
PDF generator, and it can't do it either. Error is thrown on the font name.

(Keep in mind I'm using Win98SE with Adobe Type Manager -- but OpenType
works on other programs such as MSWord when printing to PDF.)

Dennis





___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Barbara Touburg
Dennis, you take the words right out of my mouth! I was ready to cheer, 
but no, alas..

I'll try the graphics tool.

Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
However, there is a problem anyway. Even with the printer set up to the

custom paper size, it won't compile to it. I use a very nice 9.25x12.25
template -- but the Compile Postscript Listing dialog box does not respect
sizes entered into its page size box. Whatever is selected from the
droplist is used, even though the dialog box maintains the sizes for the
next score. There is no "custom" entry in the droplist.

I couldn't find either an .ini file or registry entry that determines the
sizes in the droplist. :(

(However, using the graphics tool for exporting EPS respects the page size.
But one it's one page at a time. Can EPS files be combined into a PS file?)

Dennis


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 05:21 PM 4/26/06 +0200, you wrote:
>I'm still on 2K4, but was told that there were still font issues with 
>FinWin2K6. Could you try with the three different types of fonts (TT, PS 
>and OT) and let us know if they are all embedded correctly?

I will soon. The file I just distilled has both TrueType and Type 1 fonts
in it, and so far all characters appear correctly. I only have a few OT
fonts, but will put give this a shot. Back in a few minutes

However, there is a problem anyway. Even with the printer set up to the
custom paper size, it won't compile to it. I use a very nice 9.25x12.25
template -- but the Compile Postscript Listing dialog box does not respect
sizes entered into its page size box. Whatever is selected from the
droplist is used, even though the dialog box maintains the sizes for the
next score. There is no "custom" entry in the droplist.

I couldn't find either an .ini file or registry entry that determines the
sizes in the droplist. :(

(However, using the graphics tool for exporting EPS respects the page size.
But one it's one page at a time. Can EPS files be combined into a PS file?)

Dennis




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] That magical SPEED LOSS folder

2006-04-26 Thread Liudas
Can someone please remind me where that magical Finale temp speed loss
folder is, and what to empty from it to get Finale to work quickly again?

Liudas

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
Finale : $600.00
Acrobat:$200.00
Finale's Mailing List : Priceless ;) 
On 4/26/06, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 04:44 PM 4/26/06 +0200, Johannes Gebauer wrote:>I am pretty sure this is the known FinWin only problem. There has been a
>lot of discussion about this in the past. I don't know the details, but>I was under the impression that Fin2k6 corrected this.AAHHH! I had *so* given up on this that I never tried
"Compile Postscript Listing" on FinWin2K6 until you said this. It works![Insert long string of positive expletives here]Thanks for mentioning this fix. Oo oo oo oo ooo. Best
news of the week. The month, even. And the display is very nice, not allblotchy and uneven. And the files are small, too.Future beers are on me,Dennis--Please participate in my latest project:
http://maltedmedia.com/waam/___Finale mailing listFinale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale-- Kim Patrick Clow"There's really only two types of music: good and bad." ~ Rossini 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
At 04:44 PM 4/26/06 +0200, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>I am pretty sure this is the known FinWin only problem. There has been a 
>lot of discussion about this in the past. I don't know the details, but 
>I was under the impression that Fin2k6 corrected this.

AAHHH! I had *so* given up on this that I never tried
"Compile Postscript Listing" on FinWin2K6 until you said this. It works!
[Insert long string of positive expletives here]

Thanks for mentioning this fix. Oo oo oo oo ooo. Best
news of the week. The month, even. And the display is very nice, not all
blotchy and uneven. And the files are small, too.

Future beers are on me,
Dennis





-- 

Please participate in my latest project:
http://maltedmedia.com/waam/



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Johannes Gebauer

On 26.04.2006 Kim Patrick Clow wrote:

Here's a sample of my PDF @ http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample.pdf I 
used the highest setting possible (Printer's quality) and I upped the DPI to 
2400. Still not as good as this Molter sample, or the Sibelius. My beams seem 
very ragged, no matter how much you zoom in. And I noticed that Finale's staff 
lines seem too thick. And some of the articulations and words have a splotchy 
look.


Which platform. Which Distiller. Which Finale version.

How do the PDFs I sent you recently compare?

I am pretty sure this is the known FinWin only problem. There has been a 
lot of discussion about this in the past. I don't know the details, but 
I was under the impression that Fin2k6 corrected this.


The problem has never been reported for Mac PDFs created from Finale, so 
I would be surprised if the same was true for the PDFs I sent you, but I 
am interested to hear your opinion.


Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Christopher Smith


On Apr 26, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:

I know someone who uses Sibelius and they sent me a PDF of a file. 
Instantly the minute the PDF opened on my screen, the quality 
was noticeably better than any PDF I have created with Finale.

 
Are there some settings that I don't know about to make the absolutely 
sharpest, clearest PDF possible. Or is something that Finale doesn't 
handle well?  For example online there is this:
 http://www.utorpheus.com/misc/pagine_musica/tib011.pdf and I've 
posted a screenshot of my friend's Sibelius PDF at 
http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample-sib.bmp


Here's a sample of my PDF @ 
http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample.pdf I used the highest 
setting possible (Printer's quality) and I upped the DPI to 2400. 
Still not as good as this Molter sample, or the Sibelius. My beams 
seem very ragged, no matter how much you zoom in. And I noticed that 
Finale's staff lines seem too thick. And some of the articulations and 
words have a splotchy look.

 
This is very frustrating for me. Any advice would be greatly 
appreciated.




There are a few inconsistencies here.

In your sample.pdf I saw no words or articulations at all, so I 
couldn't comment. But everything else, including lines, beams, slurs, 
and bar numbers, stayed nice and smooth right up to the highest zoom, 
as it should. PDFs are supposed to NOT use bitmaps, which get jaggy at 
high zoom; they are supposed to use little equations to draw lines and 
so do not lose resolution no matter how they are resized. I did notice 
that the stems on flagged eighths seem to have alignment issues with 
the flag, and you have not corrected Finale's mistreatment of slanted 
beams so there are little white wedges with staff lines (Patterson 
Beams plugin corrects this last one) but everything else is fine. Are 
you sure this is a PDF issue, and not a screen viewing issue on your 
computer? Compare printouts of your PDF files with printouts of the 
original Finale file to be sure you are comparing apples to apples. 
Antialiasing can put little grey borders around curved objects on 
screen which could account for the splotchy look you mention, but that 
doesn't print out usually.


(One thing that doesn't concern you, but Apple's Preview app shows 
lines and beams in your file as grey instead of black onscreen. They 
show up correctly in Adobe Reader 7, so it is obviously a Preview 
issue. I see this all the time with Finale PDFs viewed in Preview that 
come from PC computers.)


Your friend's sample-sib.bmp IS a bitmap, and so automatically gets 
jaggy when zoomed. Just on screen, I saw some bad stem-notehead 
connections and the right-most barline appears badly aligned, though 
that could be cropping. I would have to see the original PDF to make a 
proper comparison.


The tib011.pdf looks fine - no flag end issues and hardly any slanted 
beams so I couldn't comment on the wedges. He seems to have set his 
barlines to be about twice as thick as his stems and staff lines, which 
doesn't seem to be consistent with publication practice. I don't know 
as much about this, but I think the usual idea is to have stems thinner 
than barlines, which are in turn thinner than staff lines by a small 
amount, though I see a lot of different opinions on this.


If you don't like your line thicknesses, they are easy to set in 
Document Options>Lines. I notice your stems, staff lines and barlines 
all seem to be set the same, which I think is the Finale default, but 
they are easy to change. I find good-looking line thickness depends on 
the size of staff you are using, so I hesitate to offer any exact 
suggestions since you are almost certainly using different staff 
heights than I am.


Christopher



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Jón Kristinn Cortez
I made this PDF a few minutes ago http://www.isalog.info/notur/sumar.pdf , how does that compare?CortezI know someone who uses Sibelius and they sent me a PDF of a file. Instantly the minute the PDF opened on my screen, the quality was noticeably better than any PDF I have created with Finale.   Are there some settings that I don't know about to make the absolutely sharpest, clearest PDF possible. Or is something that Finale doesn't handle well?  For example online there is this: http://www.utorpheus.com/misc/pagine_musica/tib011.pdf and I've posted a screenshot of my friend's Sibelius PDF at http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample-sib.bmp Here's a sample of my PDF @ http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample.pdf I used the highest setting possible (Printer's quality) and I upped the DPI to 2400. Still not as good as this Molter sample, or the Sibelius. My beams seem very ragged, no matter how much you zoom in. And I noticed that Finale's staff lines seem too thick. And some of the articulations and words have a splotchy look.    This is very frustrating for me. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.   Thank you   Kim Patrick Clow    ___Finale mailing listFinale@shsu.eduhttp://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Finale: Sharp and crisp PDFs.

2006-04-26 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
I know someone who uses Sibelius and they sent me a PDF of a file. Instantly the minute the PDF opened on my screen, the quality was noticeably better than any PDF I have created with Finale.
 
Are there some settings that I don't know about to make the absolutely sharpest, clearest PDF possible. Or is something that Finale doesn't handle well?  For example online there is this:
http://www.utorpheus.com/misc/pagine_musica/tib011.pdf and I've posted a screenshot of my friend's Sibelius PDF at http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample-sib.bmp
Here's a sample of my PDF @ http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/sample.pdf I used the highest setting possible (Printer's quality) and I upped the DPI to 2400. Still not as good as this Molter sample, or the Sibelius. My beams seem very ragged, no matter how much you zoom in. And I noticed that Finale's staff lines seem too thick. And some of the articulations and words have a splotchy look. 

 
This is very frustrating for me. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
 
Thank you
 
Kim Patrick Clow
 
 
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale